WEBVTT - US Consumer Confidence Slumps , Paramount Earnings, Tech Preview

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Card playing Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 2>With consumer confidence number in ninety seven, the expectations coming

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 2>in sixty six point four, you got to wonder what's

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>behind that?

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that and that expectation sixty six point four is

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 3>down from last month's revised up seventy four, So a

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 3>big drop there.

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, luckily we have Dana Peterson here, she's chief economists

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 2>over at the Conference Board. They do this data, so

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 2>it's great that we get her for that instant reaction.

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 2>So just to recap that Consumer Conference consumer confidence number

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>coming at ninety seven, Dana, what happened? What's behind that?

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 4>Sure, this is the third month that the index has

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 4>fallen off, and certainly in the month consumers were less

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 4>optimistic about current employment conditions, and certainly looking forward they

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 4>were less optimistic about employment, business and also income. But

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 4>I would say that if you look out of the

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 4>last two years, the headline measure has been moving back

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 4>and forth in a pretty narrow range, but still in

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 4>all three months down we really wonder what's going to

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 4>happen in that fourth month.

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 3>So how long does a trend here? I mean, it

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 3>feels like a trend to me, and I'm looking at

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 3>some of the revisions downward here, what is this data

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 3>really telling us?

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Here?

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Is there a problem for this US economy?

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 5>Here?

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would split it out, so the headline, well,

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 4>the headline is made up of present conditions and also expectations.

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 4>So the present conditions index has actually stayed pretty much afloat,

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 4>even though it's moving back and forth a lot. But

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 4>expectations really came off about a year or so ago,

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 4>and they've just been flirting with that eighty threshold, and

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 4>below eighty usually signals or recession. So it suggests consumers

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 4>are a little worried about something. They're concerned about inflation still,

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 4>and they're getting a little bit worried about the labor market.

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 2>So to that point, this kind of goes to the

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>whole idea that people feel really bad even though the

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 2>overall data, like you could look at the employment cost

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 2>in next coming and higher than estimated, you know, GDP

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 2>I realized was a little cool, but still the data

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 2>actually comes in pretty pretty strong. How do we understand that?

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 6>So?

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 4>I think the key thing is, on the one hand,

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 4>consumers are working and so they feel good about that

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 4>and they have income coming in, but then that income

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 4>is eroded by inflation. Prices are still elevated. Even though

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 4>prices aren't rising as quickly as they were, the level

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 4>is high. People are saying eggs are eight bucks. I'm

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 4>not used to that.

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't really like that, all right, Dana, thanks so

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 3>much for joining us. Dana Peterson, she's a chief economist

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 3>at the Conference Board. Kind of break down some of

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 3>these consumer confidence data coming in today, and again the

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>headline is Alex just reported Consumer Conference Board consumer confidence

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 3>came in and reading you have ninety seven.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 7>Consensus was one zero four, one oh four. So a

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 7>pretty big miss there.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Straight up inflation, Like you're right, if you're gonna go

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 2>pay eight bucks for eggs, Like that's how you feel,

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 2>no matter what your paycheck necessarily is.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android auto.

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>With the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.559
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Thirty and Alex steelongside Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio,

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 2>recover all the top news with our amazing analysts worldwide.

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 2>They covered about two thousand companies and one hundred and

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 2>thirty industries. We also want to give you the perspective

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 2>of bigger market strategists, right, like, how do you look

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 2>at it if you're looking at the longer term perspective

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to quity is and how the short

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 2>term is dictating how you're going to see the outcome.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Chris Watling is CEO and chief market strategist over at

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Longview Economics. He joined us now from Toronto, Canada. So

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking Chris at an SMP charter one month and

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 2>clearly we had a decline last week. Right, we've retraced

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 2>that we're up about three percent from the lows, but

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>we're still down by about two two and a half

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>percent from the peak that we saw back in early April.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 2>What do we make of the market?

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 5>What do you make of the market? What a great

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 5>question and morning Alex and Paul. Great to be on. Yeah,

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean it's it's I think it's it's time for

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 5>a bit of give back, and we think about it.

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 5>It's been extremely good run all the way from the

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 5>sort of loads in October last year through to where

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 5>we were at the beginning of April when we when

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 5>we sort of hit the highs on the S and P,

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 5>and and since then, I think we've had just a

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 5>bit of give back, a bit of a pause, what

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 5>I would call a healthy correction. And you know, part

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 5>of the reasons for that is I think the market's

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 5>time to think about the liquidity environment over the summer.

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 8>You know, the RRP.

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 5>This draining of the r RP has been a wheel

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 5>driver for stock markets, for riskats. It's over the last

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 5>seven eight months, as that's been drained and liquidity has

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 5>come into equities, that's been a will positive. And also

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 5>I think there's some issues about yields back up. This

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 5>is a bit of a sort of biting on the

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 5>valuation side of the equity market. And then on top

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 5>of that, personally, I think grow it's going to surprise

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 5>a little bit to the downside in the States this year.

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 5>So grappling with all of those, I would say and

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 5>as you said, the market bounced last week, it's sold

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 5>off the prior week. You know, markets don't go down

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 5>in straight lines, they don't go up in straight lines.

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 5>So I think we've begun early eight for a bit

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 5>of a gift back, a healthy correction, as I say,

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 5>And I think it's it's good for the market, so

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 5>it's important, and it often happens at the time when

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 5>you begin some rotation in sector leadership.

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 8>So that's kind of interesting as well.

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Chris, were about halfway through earning season here. Anything jumping

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 3>out at you so far? I mean, I guess revenue

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 3>is surprising, maybe one or two percent on the upside,

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>earnings maybe eight or nine percent on the upside.

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 7>Anything surprising you, well, I.

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 5>Think, I mean the interesting thing I mean is somewhat surprising,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 5>but some sensible. I suppose you've got that following when

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 5>when earnings have been a bit better. So, as you say,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 5>the earnings are surprising to the upside, they aren't deliver

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 5>in growth. I think this de collective surprise is about

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 5>eight percent at the moment, and normally it's three or

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 5>four percent positive surprise, so that's coming in. I think

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 5>it's quite interesting how some of the big stocks have

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 5>been very mixed. We've seen over the last seven or

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 5>so days, you know, some of the big cap tech

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 5>having very different outcomes of very different performance as a result.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 5>So there's a lot of volatility on the back of

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 5>that in some of those stocks, you know, ten percent

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 5>moves on the day on earnings announcements. So I'd say

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 5>those are probably so far the key features, lots to

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 5>go for, lots to come.

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>So Cameron christ writes a daily newsletter. He also contributes

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>to m Live and he had one of the best

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 2>sentences I've heard in a while on his daily article today.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 2>Chris He said, one of the basic principles of successfully

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 2>navigating financial markets is that you should only date, not

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>marry your positions. Thanks the question what positions should you

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.119
<v Speaker 2>date and what should you marry? Right now?

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 8>Well, I like to think not only rather than I.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Kind of like the dating marriage. But okay, I see

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>your point, n versus owning.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's all the same. What what should you date?

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 5>What? I think you should you should be dating. If

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 5>you're very short term trader, you should be short this

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 5>equity market for for for a bunch of weeks, a

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 5>couple of months. Uh, and you should be thinking about

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 5>marrying at the at the bottom in a in a

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 5>month or two time, because you know, the soft landing

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 5>that I think is going to come in the US,

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 5>coupled with some eventual rate cuts certainly in the out

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 5>of the fair but also of course out of the

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.239
<v Speaker 5>European Central Bank and out of the UK, that's all coming.

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 8>That's all very positive.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 5>So you know, you know, you want to you want

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 5>to date in the short term and rent in the

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 5>medium term. Gold we like, uh and gold gold you

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 5>could almost marry, you know, I mean girl, I mean

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.679
<v Speaker 5>gold gold is gold is It's a terrific acid class

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 5>at the moment. It's had a great run already this year.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Of course it's given a bit of that back recently,

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 5>but it's got a lot going for it.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 8>The Chinese are buying.

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 5>There's some stories, I think on the Bloomberg termal today

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 5>about Chinese buying, central bank buying. That's been a themal year.

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 5>And it's not just the central bank in China, it's

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 5>also the retailer. Is in China is time to buy,

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 5>and there's of course an awful lot of them and

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 5>a lot of liquidity around there. So we like gold,

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 5>and it'll be helped when the FED eventually starts cutting rights.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 5>So I you know, as I say, could almost marry that.

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 5>I actually think European banks you should own and rent

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 5>and buy and everything.

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 8>And I think I.

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 5>Actually our left of field recommendation moments by Spanish mid caps,

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 5>which is really out there but Spanish. Yeah, I know,

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 5>I know it sounds a bit nuts, but actually has

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 5>a lot to be said for them. It's an economy

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 5>that's been neglected no one's really talked about for ten

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 5>to fifteen years since the euro crisis. Are because the

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 5>pigs crisis as it was known with with d sbing Spain,

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 5>and you know, the economy has really sorted itself out

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 5>over these last fifteen years. Healed a lot of structural imbalances.

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 5>It's well set and it's going to get rate cuts

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 5>when the ECB starts cutting, and it's going to benefit

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 5>from those. And I think we're going to see strong

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 5>growth out of Spain. And of course mid caps is

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 5>a great way to play a domestic economy. So that

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 5>is an own and a marry basically, not a rent

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 5>or whatever the other one was.

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 8>Dates.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So yeah, so that there's there's so much going on,

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 5>there's so many opportunities out there.

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, you've got to distinguish between trading and investing.

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 7>Which let's go, let's go hyper local.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 3>How's the economy in Clapham, which is a neighborhood south

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 3>of London.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 8>Clapham, how's it?

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 5>That's a great question. I do actually live very close

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 5>to Clapham. I'm obviously in Canada at the moment, but Plapham,

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 5>Clapham in South London is buzzing because it's full of

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 5>twenty and thirty year olds basically who who love to

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 5>get out and the sunshine started to come out and

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 5>it's that time of year.

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 8>So but but the British.

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 5>Economy is not good now, which is perhaps more to

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 5>your question. The British economy is flat. It's had no

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 5>growth in two years. It's flat as a parent caake

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 5>and it desperately needs weight cuts and we're going to

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 5>be getting those pretty soon.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So is that the expectation of the Bank Bank

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 3>of England is not waiting on the Fed that the

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Bank of England is confident to cut rage sooner?

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely.

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 5>I think that the Bank of England is just like

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 5>the UCB and you would have seen Christine Lagarde a

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 5>couple of weeks ago say, you know that the UCB

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 5>is not is data dependent, not Fed dependent, trying to

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 5>make that distinguish distinction between the FED and the European

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 5>central banks. So same in the UK, different inflation dynamics,

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 5>different growth dynamics, and therefore and need to get on

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 5>with cuts.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what the currencies are going to say about

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 2>that and the very differentials. But okay, let's play it

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 2>out a little bit. How strong does a dollar actually get.

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it is definitely breaking things.

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 5>It is breaking things, and you're quite right, and it's

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 5>probably got I think it's got one more flurry in

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 5>it in this sort of risk of phase that we're

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 5>thinking about in the near term, and of course the

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 5>dollars are classic recipient of liquidity when.

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 8>It's a risk off.

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 5>But beyond that, I think we're going to get into

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 5>a dollar bear market. You know, we've had a dollar

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 5>bull market now for a long time, sort of ten

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 5>plus years depending on your starting point, but a long

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 5>old dollar bull market, and I think we're due a

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 5>change in that sort of secular status of the currency.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, I've given a few more weeks of strength

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 5>in the dollars, we've complete this risk of phase, then

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 5>as we get closer to fedweight cuts, because I mean,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 5>I think really in this risk of phase that you

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 5>know the market wants to bully the FED for cuts.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 8>You know, we're still doing QT.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, this is an extraordinary thing, you know, And

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 5>I think this will be tough for the stock market

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 5>to to with with with QT ongoing. So yeah, so

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 5>I think got one more, one more, one more florry

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 5>in the dollar.

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 3>One more floy and real quick, Chris, I mean, are

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 3>we going to get a rate cut in the US

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 3>here this year?

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 8>I think so? Yeah?

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I mean I know the data is so mixed,

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 5>isn't it. I mean, e CI not so good today.

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 5>Consumer confidence is bad. It's it's a two speed economy,

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 5>and I think that's why the data is so confusing.

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 5>But I do think the reality is money is much

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 5>tight and it has been. Fiscal stimulus is not as

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 5>good as it was last year, in fact, quite the reverse,

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 5>And so I think inflation will dissipate and you'll get

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 5>a cut and maybe two, but certainly one.

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Chris really appreciated Chris Watling joining US from Longview Economics.

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Just so I know Paul Chris knows this, but you

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know. He is my mom's favorite.

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>He is.

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 3>He is nice.

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 7>That's just for he.

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't know what to say to that. I just feel

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 2>like he used to be on with me in the

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 2>morning show. He used to jam for like an hour

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 2>or two. And okay, she's Carol Steel's favorite out there.

0:12:58.520 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 7>It's a big deal.

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a big deal means And speaking of the FED,

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio has full coverage for you starting at one

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 2>thirty eastern tomorrow, very much. All looking forward to.

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 7>That, Tom Lisa and John Farrell. How good is that?

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 6>So good?

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Can't get any better?

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 7>Talking about the FED?

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 3>And then and Michael McKee, we're sending him on the

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 3>sella train this say afternoon. He'll be down there ready

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 3>to go and ask his question or two of the

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 3>FED chairman during the press conference tomorrow afternoon, which starts

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 3>at two thirty pm Wall Street time.

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on AFO, car Playing and

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>broyd Outo with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 7>Paramount.

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Paramount is the old CBS television networking stations. It's the Viacom,

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 3>which is MTV and all that kind of good stuff,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 3>the Powermount movie and TV studio, all that's wrapped up

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:58.479
<v Speaker 3>into this company renamed Paramount.

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 7>A lot going on there, let's put it.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean they got reported earnings last night mixed, They

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 3>replaced their CEO. That's not good with an office of CEO.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 3>And oh yeah, they're actually in discussions to be sold

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 3>to one or more parties.

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 7>I'm not sure what's going on. There are a lot

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 7>of moving pieces.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Luckily we have Getha Rong Anathon joining us. She's a

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 3>media analyst, the media analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 7>She's based in Princeton, New Jersey.

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 3>So, Githa, let's start with the potential ownership change here.

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 3>There's lots of parties looking at Paramount. I guess the

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 3>sky Dance, which is the media company owned by mister Ellison,

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 3>the son of Larry Ellison.

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 7>Of what is that? Where is he from?

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, Oracle, thank you? So where are we with

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 3>those negotiations, Githa.

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, good morning, Paul and Alex so we're in the

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 6>take of those negotiations. There there is an exclusive negotiating

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 6>window that Paramount agreed to with sky Dance that one

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 6>actually expires this Friday. So obviously the ouster of Bob

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 6>Bakish as CEO, who was vehemently opposed to the deal,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 6>seems to suggest to us that they really have something

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 6>lined up and something's kind of going to go through

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 6>pretty quickly.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 2>What do we make of the actual earnings? I mean,

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 2>I was on air breaking the numbers yesterday, and like,

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 2>we didn't even talk about the numbers. We just talked

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 2>about the CEO replacement and the weird three CEO thing

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 2>they got going on. What did we learn within the numbers?

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 6>So the actual earnings by itself, Alex was not bad

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 6>at all. I mean, there were definitely some encouraging elements.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 6>We saw advertising hold up really well, but again one

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 6>could argue that core advertising is still challenged. The reason

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 6>that they reported the seventeen percent increase in advertising revenue

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 6>in the first quarter was really all driven by the

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 6>Super Bowl telecast that said, I mean, you know, if

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 6>you kind of looked at their streaming business, we did

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 6>see a pretty good momentum there in terms of subscriber numbers.

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 6>You know, we did see some progress on a profitability,

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 6>which is not not to say that it's actually profitable,

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 6>just that the losses were a little bit better than

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 6>what we were expecting. But overall, I mean, this is

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 6>right now, as Paul kind of pointed out, this is

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 6>peak uncertainty at paramount. Right now. We don't know what's

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 6>going on with ownership. We don't know what's going on

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 6>with leadership, we don't know what's going on with strategic direction.

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 6>So it's all up in the air.

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 3>So, Gita, I guess one of the big big questions

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 3>on any change of ownership is what are they going

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 3>to pay for share of the buyer? And are they

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 3>going to pay the same price for Sherry Redstone's controlling shares,

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the super voting shares. Are they going to pay the

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 3>same for those shares as they will for the plain

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 3>old shareholders shares?

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 7>So how's that work?

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they're not, Paul, And that's kind of been the

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 6>whole bone of contention. Right, So, the whole sky Dance

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 6>proposal is kind of this very convoluted offer. It's this

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 6>two step proposal where they basically pay out Sherry her

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 6>interest in Paramount is worth something like about eight hundred,

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 6>eight hundred and fifty million. They're going to pay her

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 6>upwards of about two billion dollars, so she's getting a

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 6>nice pocket of change there, but it's basically diluting everybody else,

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 6>and that's why you have all of this shareholder consternation.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 6>Of course, Guy Dance is kind of addressing that. Now

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 6>you know, they have sweetened the bid a little bit.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 6>They've thrown in about a three billion dollar cash infusion

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 6>to pay down debt to buy back stock, but I'm

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 6>not sure if that's going to be enough.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel like this is the best and final

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 2>offer from Skydance as we get to that Friday deadline?

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 6>That's what they have said.

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Yes, did we learn anything from the numbers yesterday that

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 2>shows what a buyer should be paying for shares?

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 6>So we do have another concrete offer on the table,

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 6>one that Sherry Redstone rejected. This was the offer from Apollo,

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 6>which basically offered, you know, twelve billion dollars for the

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 6>equity of the company versus what it's currently trading at,

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 6>which is about eight billion, so you know, roughly about

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 6>ninety to twenty dollars a share. So that's kind of

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 6>where you know, the the Apollo deal stand. Of course,

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 6>now there have been rumors that's they're partnering with Sony

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 6>to again take that bid up a little bit. But

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, when we kind of did some of the

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 6>parts analysis, you know, we think that this company is

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 6>easily worth you know, upwards of twenty dollars a share.

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 7>Yep, I've seen folks.

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 3>If you want to check out that research analysis, you

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 3>can go to Bigo in the terminal and search for

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Geetha's work. They did a lot of evaluation work on paramount.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 3>A lot of investors are looking at that work as well.

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 3>So getha Friday is I guess one kind of date

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 3>to keep in mind. But it just seems like with

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 3>this dual class of stock and maybe different prices being

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 3>paid for different classes of stock, this thing's gonna end

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 3>up in court. It just feels like, what are most

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 3>people thinking about this?

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 6>I think it definitely that there is a very very

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 6>high property of litigation. I mean it's not probably, it's

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 6>almost a certainty. At this point. Everybody has said all

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 6>all the big shareholders, including Mario Gabelli, has said that

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 6>they will definitely litigate if Sherry Redstone actually goes through

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 6>with this deal, a deal which does not treat all

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 6>shareholders equally. And this isn't something new, Paul with paramount.

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we've seen this litigation stuff happen over and

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 6>over again. But it definitely is a huge risk and

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be interesting to see what Sony and

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 6>Apollo kind of come up with. In the meantime, before I.

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Let you go, Warner Brothers Discovery is down like eight percent.

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 6>Why Why because no NBA. So their NBA rights are

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 6>actually being negotiated right now. They're currently paying about one

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 6>point two billion. Rumor is that NBC, which is owned

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 6>by Comcast, is kind of swooping in ready to pay

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 6>about two and a half billion dollars to the NBA

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 6>and snatching away the rights from from TNT. That's where

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, Warner Brothers owns TNT. That's where they show

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 6>the NBA games. And remember NBA, TNT is kind of

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 6>the anchor to the Warner Brothers TV portfolio, and the

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 6>NBA is the anchor to the TN to the TNT network.

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 6>So not having that is really going to hurt them.

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 6>It's hurting them as you can see in the stock price.

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Today, turnover, speak of turnover and CEOs. How about David

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Zaslov the yea of Warner Brothers Discovery here? I mean

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 3>the stocks down thirty four percent this year, down almost

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent over the last year. Holy can John alone

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 3>cannot be happy with what's going on here? What's the

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 3>thinking about Warner Brothers Discovery here?

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 6>Hard to say, Paul. I mean, the whole story here

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 6>was supposed to be synergies, which I think they've done

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 6>a pretty good job on. But what's really kind of

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 6>been out of their control has been the TV ad market,

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 6>which has really you know, it's it's of course secularly challenged,

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 6>and I think what made it even far, far worse

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 6>was the Hollywood strikes, which just kind of resulted in

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 6>no good content right now, and so they're kind of

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 6>trying to work through all that. But you know, we've

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 6>chatted before about this. The Ibadah number that they kind

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 6>of showed everybody was fourteen billion. This year, they're going

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 6>to go below ten billion. Add to that, you know,

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 6>about forty billion dollars in debt, and it's really just

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 6>a train wreck right now.

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 2>I Mean, I feel like that is well said you know,

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 2>I said hot mess yesterday about Paramount, train wreck about

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 2>Warner Brothers Discovery. It fit of sums it up.

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I think the life of a media analyso and media

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 3>investor these days.

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's so crazy to be. It is a place

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 2>to be. And you know, you make we can make

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 2>hey about Paramount what I think it's seventy one million subscribers,

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 2>but then compare that to Netflix, right, forget it. Githa,

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>thanks a lot. We appreciate you. You are the best.

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Keithan wrongana than she joins us. She is head of

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>US media coverage for Bloomberg Intelligence. What's interesting too, I think, Paul,

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 2>is that when you get to these companies, like the

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 2>numbers in some ways then matter less. It's more about

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 2>what the strategy is going to wind up being and

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 2>who's going to be able to turn it around. Same

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 2>thing for Warner Brothers Discovery and same thing for Paramount.

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, And it's been a very big challenge for the

0:21:54.920 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 3>industry overall, you know, navigating that transition from the traditional

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 3>distribution through cable to all.

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 7>This streaming stuff.

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 3>So I wan have to see how that plays out

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 3>for both of these companies.

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa, Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Smack dab in the middle of earnings and right now

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 3>we're getting through the tech earnings and is a big

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 3>week here next couple of days. Today after the close,

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Amazon sets report, and then Thursday, after the close, we'll

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 3>hear from our good friends at Apple walk us through

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 3>what are some of the key issues that we need

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 3>to focus on that the market needs to focus on?

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 7>Is Gene Monster.

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Gen Munster is the managing partner co founder of deep

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Water Asset Manager. He's been covering Silicon Valley for decades.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 3>He is absolutely a go to voice and we appreciate

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 3>getting a few minutes of his time. Hey, Geene, let's

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 3>start with Amazon. I guess it's all about the cloud,

0:22:58.880 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 3>isn't it.

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 9>Indeed, Paul, the cloud AWS is expected to continue to accelerate,

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 9>So just taking a couple steps back, AWS growth over

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 9>the past year and a half has been declining from

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 9>high twenty percent and then at bottomed at twelve percent

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 9>in the September quarter, bumped up to thirteen percent year

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 9>of year growth in December, and expectations in print are

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 9>for fifteen percent year ofver year growth in March. I

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 9>mentioned and emphasize the word print there because the whisper

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 9>numbers have been stoked after Amazon, after Azure and Google

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 9>Cloud reported last week, and of course they had upside

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 9>to their cloud numbers. I suspect that the whisper number

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 9>is sixteen percent plus. In other words, if they print

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 9>to sixteen percent growth up from thirteen in December, that

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 9>may be viewed as a slight disappointment. A couple other

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 9>just quick, really important parts related to the whole AWS conation.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 9>As a reminder, this is seventeen percent of Amazon's revenue

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 9>and about sixty seven percent this is for calendar twenty

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 9>three of their earnings. So it punches above its weight

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 9>when it comes to profitability, and that's why investors are

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 9>so hyper focused. And when you put all this together, Paul,

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 9>what you have is a picture where AWS with leading

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 9>market share continues to lose market share. I mentioned that

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 9>sixteen percent whisper number if they deliver on that they're

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 9>growing at half the rate that Azure and Google Cloud

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 9>are growing. So this dynamic is it will post an

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 9>improvement undoubtedly in AWS growth, but still the broader picture

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 9>around the future of AWS, not the future, but the

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 9>future market share is still in question as Google and

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 9>Microsoft are really benefiting from how much they've been invested

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 9>in AI and that has been powering their cloud business

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 9>faster than Amazon.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 7>Folks, I've seen this time and time again. Gene Mounster speaks.

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 7>People take notes.

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Alex Steel has been writing furiously over here listening to Gene.

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 2>It's so true. I'm like, oh, I got to break

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Amazon after the bell, So let me really pay attention here.

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 2>So if you go back to the AWS growth, why

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 2>why did we see that decline in growth and how

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 2>do we expect them at some point to get back

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 2>up to twenty and then grow from there or is

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>it now going to be in some kind of range.

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 9>So during that period of call it high twenties to

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 9>that twelve percent, Azure showed some also deceleration from mid

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 9>thirties down to high twenties, Google Cloud from around thirty

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 9>down to low twenties, and so it was just a

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 9>kind of a broader corporate pullback in cloud spending I

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 9>think had part of it, but I think the other

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 9>part was this piece around what's going on on the

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 9>model front, and specifically of course with Azure they've got

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 9>the integration with open AI models, with Google their own

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 9>deep Mind and what they've done with Gemini and building

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 9>those models into their cloud offerings. And when it comes

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 9>to Amazon, they do have an offering. It is related

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 9>to anthropic. They also host a lot of the kind

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 9>of open source models like Lama, But I think that

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 9>that has played into it. So Alex, to put it

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 9>in a perspective, I think that half of the decline

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 9>has been that we saw earlier was because of the

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 9>broader market corporate spending, and I think half is because

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 9>I think that there are AI strategy well, it is

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 9>forward thinking, still lacks some of the punch that Azure

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 9>and Google Cloud is integrating.

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 3>So ging this company has certainly evolved over the years

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 3>that at least you and I have covered it. How

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 3>do investors view this company right now? Like how do

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 3>they think about the retail business? And they just kind

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 3>of put us a relatively low multiple on it and

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of really just focus.

0:26:57.520 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 8>On the cloud.

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 9>Tonight, it is all about the cloud. I think that

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.679
<v Speaker 9>is that the central takeaway. I think that beyond this,

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 9>we are seeing an improvement in some of the metrics

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 9>around the retail business. And this, of course is the

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 9>vast majority of their sales and the profitability is starting

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 9>to move in the right direction, and part of that

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 9>is because of how they've improved the logistics. Some of

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 9>those have been more recently related to AI in terms

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 9>of the planning. Some of it's just been good old

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 9>fashioned algorithms that make their delivery more efficient. But the

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 9>retail opportunity I see as kind of a changing of

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 9>the guard and the Amazon story. Over the next couple

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 9>of years, I think investors will progressively focus more on

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 9>that business. I mentioned today almost seventy percent of Amazon's

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 9>earnings come from AWS, and I think that number is

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 9>going to continue to decline going forward because I think

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 9>the retail business is going to improve, and the substance

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 9>of the improvement is better efficiency at logistics. Of course,

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 9>is a real this is real AI, it's not hype,

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 9>it's real. And second is related to robotics. It's something

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 9>that they've done this Kiva acquisition a long time ago.

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 9>That's the start to it. But they have a profound

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 9>opportunity in terms of integrating robotics over the next decade

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 9>into logistics, which would have a positive impact on earning.

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 9>So I do think that we will see the baton

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 9>switch over the next couple of years in terms of

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 9>the pressure point. We will be talking about AWS, but

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 9>it won't be the center focus all right, So I.

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Feel like I'm relatively prepped now to break those earnings.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 2>So can you prep us for Apple on Thursday? For sure?

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 9>I think Apple is going to be much more exciting

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 9>in terms of kind of what the investor reaction is

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 9>going to be because the setup we have is pretty

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 9>well known that the businesses has been slow. The expectations.

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 9>Their guidance was for revenue to be down five percent

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 9>year every year, and that's generally where analysts are at

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 9>the iPhone segment. Analysts are expecting it to be down

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 9>ten percent, and if you take a step back over

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 9>the last few years, it's continued to be flat to

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 9>downsh the iPhone and regular China is a weakness. I

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 9>just want to call out that's one of the key

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 9>metrics that investors are going to be focusing on. In September.

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 9>The China business was down three percent, in December down

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 9>ten percent, and I believe that it's going to be

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 9>down caught around thirteen to fifteen percent in the March quarter.

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 9>So continued softness in China that's about twenty percent of

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 9>Apple's overall redness. That's going to be one of the themes.

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 9>The second theme, of course, is going to be related

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 9>to when the bottom of the cycle happens, and I

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 9>think they will give softish guidance for the June quarter,

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 9>but the stock may actually react positive to that because

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 9>once they've got that negative guidance in then investors can

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 9>start to look to the back half of the year. Of course,

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 9>the new iPhone cycle comes, that will probably have some

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 9>AI branding around it, and that we should start to

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 9>see some reacceleration. So the irony of this print is

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 9>the weak March quarter, punky guidance for June might actually

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 9>kind of mark the bottom. One last piece, of course,

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 9>I buried the lead related to AI. This we're going

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 9>to hear a lot more in the beginning June at

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 9>their developer conference, and I think that there is a

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 9>piece around this on Capex, of course, that was a

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 9>hot topic last week. Apple has yet to talk about CAPEX,

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 9>any big uptake in Capex. They stand alone amongst big tech,

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 9>and I think this is going to be a quarter

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 9>where investors get some medicine when it comes to Apple

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 9>and how they are going to be spending in CAPEX.

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 9>If in fact, Apple wants to participate in AI, which

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 9>sounds like they want to, it's going to require a

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 9>significant uptake in Capex, and that potentially could be at

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 9>the cost of margins, a couple percent in margins. So

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 9>that's the piece I'm bracing for is what their commentary

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 9>on CAPEX is related to jenit of ai.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Are you surprised, Gene that we haven't seen a more

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 3>aggressive move on AI from Apple?

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, I mean it's I mean there's silence today, it's

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 9>more recently it's they've said more, but has been definiting

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 9>at least in twenty twenty three. And I think that

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 9>they've got a golden opportunity here. They have a brand

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 9>around privacy. The current stage of AI that we're operating

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 9>in is jenn of ai, where we prompt a model,

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 9>it gets back, we can have a conversation. The next

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 9>phase and this is it won't be products today with Apple,

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 9>but I think ultimately where they're going to go is

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 9>what's referred to as a gentic or agent or personalized day.

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.959
<v Speaker 9>You'll hear those terms interchanged, but this is the idea

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 9>of AI actually completing a task for you instead of

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 9>just responding in part to a conversation. And again, because

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 9>I think what Apple does around privacy, I think they're

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 9>going to have an invitation for consumers really to build

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 9>some unique products around agentic AI down the road.

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 7>All right, Gene, thanks so much for your time. Really appreciated.

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Gene, Monster, managing partner, co founder of Deepwater Asset Management.

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Give us a preview here for Amazon tonight after close

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 3>and Apple reporting the results Thursday.

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 7>After the close.

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon. Alexa'm our flagship New York station.

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 2>To Alex Steele, I hear alongside Paul Sweeney. We are

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 2>live Interactive Brokers Studio right here in Midtown Manhattan. This

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. We cover all the news for you,

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 2>all the top news for you with our amazing analysts worldwide.

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 2>They cover about two thousand companies and one hundred and

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty industries. So let's get to one of them right now.

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Look at mcdonald' stock doing a whole lot of nothing.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 2>It was down earlier today it has slight miss on

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 2>earnings per share and their comp sales, particularly international missed estimates.

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 2>But the big news everyone seems so excited about is

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 2>his biggest burger thing. We're going to test it to

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 2>try and spark some traffic growth right here, let's bring it,

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, okay, just by two of them. Anyway, let's

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 2>get more details on this with Michael Halen. He is

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg Intelligence senior restaurant and food service analyst, and

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 2>he joins us. Now, okay, let's just kiss off the

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 2>earnings before we get to this big burger thing. What

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 2>was your biggest takeaway?

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 10>I'd say the biggest takeaway was, you know the fact

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 10>that April's flat so far in the United States, that's

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 10>trailing the industry level. You know the industry data that

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 10>we get so and also you know, restaurant brands reported

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 10>this morning, and Burger King showed an acceleration in the

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 10>US and their US numbers.

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 11>So I would say that was the biggest surprise.

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 10>McDonald's still on a five year trend, is vastly outperforming

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 10>Burger King almost the other quick service names, but there seems.

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 11>To be some slowing.

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:34.719
<v Speaker 10>If I was to guess, some of that bad press

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 10>around the eighteen dollars big mac meal in some markets,

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 10>you know, could be hurting because we are seeing US

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 10>consumers really push back against price increases right now, and

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 10>they're they're being more picky about where they spend their money.

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 7>Mike, I see. Just in the Bloomberg reporting here.

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Executives have also said that low income consumers in the US,

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 3>which is an important part of the company's customer base,

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 3>are pulling back. Is that Does that mean we're going

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 3>to see more promotions which might be put freshl on

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 3>the margins.

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, we see. Yeah.

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 10>McDonald's has come out and said they're going to focus

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 10>more on their value menu. They're going to continue to

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 10>offer promotions, a lot of them.

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 11>Through the apps. So it looks like a full on

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 11>value war is here.

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 10>I mean, Burger King said they're going to be a

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 10>little bit more careful than they've been in the past

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 10>with their price increases because you know, they've had some

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 10>increases over.

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 11>The last five years or so.

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 10>I'm sorry, so Burger things to be a little bit

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:36.399
<v Speaker 10>more careful with their discounting because in the last five

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 10>years or so they've gotten too aggressive and hurt franchising margins.

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 11>So they kind of hoopooed that a little bit.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 10>But we think a full blown value war is here

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 10>and it's on the table for twenty twenty four.

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 2>So does the value war take into account a Bigger Burger?

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Is that the deal?

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 11>Well? Value?

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 10>You know, it's measured in a couple of ways. It's

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 10>not just the price, but it's what you get for

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 10>the price, right, And so you know, I'm sure McDonald's

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 10>has done their legwork and they have some customer feedback

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 10>that says that they want some Bigger Burgers on their menu,

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 10>and so that's going to be interesting. They said they're

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 10>going to start testing it in the second half of

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 10>this year, so it may not hit the United States

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:19.399
<v Speaker 10>for quite some time.

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 11>But yeah, there's a couple of ways to measure value.

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Mike, what are the McDonald's of the world, and

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, the other restaurant companies you talked to, what

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 3>are they saying about these GLP one drugs? Are they

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 3>really going to impact their business?

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 10>You know, I don't think there's too much worry about

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 10>that anymore. I know that was a big thing last

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 10>summer and into the fall, and it really impacted the

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 10>prices of some of these quick service restaurant chain stocks,

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 10>especially McDonald's. But you know, I've seen a lot of

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 10>different reports out there, and you know, the amount of

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 10>people on these drugs ranges from you know, seven to

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 10>twelve or maybe fifteen percent bit best case if once

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 10>they get to like maybe a pill form instead of

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 10>a shot, you know, and we don't know about long

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 10>term side effects from some of these drugs, so I

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 10>think initially there was some concern, but over time, McDonald's

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 10>and these other chains, they're going to figure out how

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 10>to make a seven to twelve percent smaller cheeseburger. Right

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 10>They're getting smaller anyway, because beef prices are going they're

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 10>going up, and you know, there's a historical situation in

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 10>the cattle market right now, and so beef prices are

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 10>going to continue to stay elevated in here for a

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 10>couple of years, and so chains are already starting to

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 10>try to, you know, solve for some of these problems,

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 10>you know, ahead of broader adoption.

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean you have to think that translation is

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 2>going to hit in many different ways. But before we

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 2>let you go, we have about a minute left. So

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 2>who wins the value war right now? Based on what

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 2>you've seen.

0:36:55.960 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's interesting because you know McDonald's historically has and

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 10>so that's what's most interesting about them underperforming in April.

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 10>Burger King is is an interesting one because you know,

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 10>they have easier comps. They struggled coming out of the

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 10>pandemic for a few years, right, and so they have

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 10>easier comparisons to lap lower average unit volumes at the

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 10>store level, and so there's room for some upside there.

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:26.760
<v Speaker 10>Chipotle absolutely continues to knock the cover off the ball,

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 10>and you know McDonald's has scale, right, and so when

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 10>they really start pushing on value, everyone else is going

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.399
<v Speaker 10>to feel it. So so you know, I'm confident that

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 10>that McDonald's can kind of can kind of turn the

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:43.760
<v Speaker 10>tide here a little bit because they can just offer

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 10>burgers and other items at prices their computers just can't match.

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 7>All right, Michael, great stuff has always Mike Calin.

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 3>He's a senior restaurant and food service analyst Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 3>McDonald's putting out some numbers a little bit disappointing. The

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 3>stock kind of flat here today, maybe you know, talking

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 3>about is kind of where the demand is, where some

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 3>of their customers are facing some pressure. So how promotional

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 3>do you need to be and how innovative do you

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:08.760
<v Speaker 3>be in products?

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 7>You know you.

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Just already said, right, I mean, he likes you.

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 3>I get the same thing today that I got when

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 3>I was like fifteen, which is a number two with

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 3>a coke.

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 7>It's like a quarter pound or something with cheese.

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And can you offer the price for that, Like

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't even know now, but I'm sure the price

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:28.320
<v Speaker 3>is going to do it dramatically, so but we have

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 3>to see.

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 7>But it still works. But I think do it once

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 7>or twice a year, so who cares.

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>each weekday, ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>com The iHeart Radio app tune In, and the Bloomberg

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Business App. You can also watch us live every weekday

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal