WEBVTT - Ep. 474: Future Wild - A Case for Wildness with David Quammen

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't particularly enjoy reading the news these days. It's

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>always something sensational, always something bad. But what saves me

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>when I get the good sense to put down my

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>phone and take a step outside is wildness. Henry David

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Thurrow wrote that in wildness is the preservation of the world,

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's right. But what exactly is wildness.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a tricky thing to pin down. What I can

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you is that I've seen it in the eyes

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of a mountain lion, lying on a branch twenty feet

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>above my head, its tail swishing back and forth, its

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 1>iron gray eyes locked right on mine. And I felt it,

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, as a kid every morning during summer break,

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>when I would set off into the neighborhood woods on

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the full day with nothing to do but look for

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>snakes and turtles and frogs, and coming back at dark covered.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>In slime mud scratches.

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And I've heard it on nights laying on a tent

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>on the top of a cold, dark mountain, when I've

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>been woken up by the screaming of a bowl elk

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>echoing from peak to peak. This, as far as I

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>can tell, is wildness, but it comes in so many

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>other forms.

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 2>And each is essential.

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>By some accounts, today wildness is disappearing. Just take a

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the news.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 2>As I mentioned.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>In other ways, though, you might say that wildness is

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>on the rise. Take that mountain line I saw, for example,

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and the many other two the carnivores that are starting

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 1>to return to landscapes that they haven't commonly been seen

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in since the early twentieth century.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 2>The question is.

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Does any of this matter in a twenty first century

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>world that's seemingly defined by social media and AI and power,

0:01:55.760 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>fame and fortune. Is wildness still relevant? I believe it is.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think it's more important than ever in

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the face of so much today that's artificial. We need

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>something real, and there's nothing that can shake you back

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:19.839
<v Speaker 1>to reality more urgently than the wild. Thankfully, I'm far

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>from the only one who's asking questions today about wildness,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and one of those thinkers who has spent more time

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>than most defining and making a case for wildness today

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is David Kwaman. David is an outdoor enthusiast, a world

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>renowned science writer, and the New York Times best selling

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>author of numerous books, including several of my all time

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>favorites on the topics of wildness and wildlife, such as

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the Song of the Dodo, Monster of God, and most recently,

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>The Heartbeat of the Wild. I've invited David to join

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>me here today to help us understand how wildness might

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>be defined in our present day matters and what the

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>future might hold for wildness on this planet. Thanks for

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>being here, David Kwalman. Thank you so much for joining me.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 3>You're very welcome. Mark glad to be with you me too.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, have really appreciated your work, and in

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>reading and listening to your books over the years, I've

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>come away from them with a lot of new thoughts,

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but also questions, and I'm hoping to dive into some

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of those here today. A lot of witches is wondering

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>how your thoughts on many of these topics that you've

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>written about over the last thirty or so years have

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>possibly evolved over the subsequent decades. But I want to

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>start with your most recent work, your most recently published book,

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>The Heartbeal of wild You opened with this extended discussion

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of wildness and what that is, and I'm curious if

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you could help us understand what you mean by that.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>How would you define wildness. And then secondly, why why

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is wildness worth contemplating and possibly preserving?

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Right? Happy to do that, let me start with the

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 3>second of those two questions. Why Why did I try

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 3>to define wildness at the beginning of this book and

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 3>the introduction of this book? And that's because I wanted

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 3>to think about it more systematically than I ever had before.

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Because I knew I was going to be publishing this

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 3>book of essays, reports narratives drawn from work that I

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 3>did over twenty years for National Geographic and I knew

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 3>I was going to title it the Heartbeat of the Wild.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>So I wanted to think, what is the heartbeat of

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 3>the wild? What is the wild itself? And what is

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 3>the very core, the very essence of it? So I

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 3>started thinking about that systematically than I had before, and

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 3>and what I came to was the simple statement that

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 3>what we mean when we use the word wildness, what

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 3>do you mean? And what I mean as opposed to

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 3>what somebody means about you know times square on New

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Year's Eve, is we're talking about and thinking about nature,

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 3>living nature, living nature on planet Earth at its most dynamic,

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 3>its most diverse, its most unfettered and robust, Right Okay,

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of adjectives that I apply to this. And

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 3>then I said to myself, well, so when you add

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 3>those things together, what is it that What is it

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:58.559
<v Speaker 3>that's necessary to constitute a place, an ecosystem, a patch

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 3>of landscape, a collection of animals and plants such that

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 3>that wildness is throbbing with vitality, is is permanent, is capacious,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 3>is substantial enough? What is it that differs wildness as

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 3>we think about it, from say, a tiger in a

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 3>cage in a zoo, or a or a piranha in

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>an aquarium, or a single great baobab tree in Africa,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 3>as I've seen great baobab trees in Africa that has

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 3>become the centerpiece of a roundabout in a village, surrounded

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 3>by dirt roads, surrounded by shops, surrounded by cars and motorcycles,

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 3>a baobab. We don't think of those as wildness. So

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 3>what is it that that comes together to constitute wildness?

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 3>And what I came up with is four characteristics and

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 3>I enumerate them in the introduction, and those are scale, connectivity, diversity,

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 3>and ecological processes. You put those together and I'll define

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>each of those briefly put those together and you have

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 3>real wildness. As I think of it, so scale. It's

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 3>got to be big. It's got to be big enough,

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 3>big enough piece of landscape, big enough protected area, national park, whatever,

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 3>big enough forest. It's got to be sufficiently big so

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 3>that it will contain all of the creatures that were

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 3>there originally. If you have a small piece of really

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 3>beautiful forest but it's too small to support a population

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 3>of the top predator, then everything is going to change

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 3>and you're not going to have wildness in the same stent,

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.239
<v Speaker 3>because if you lose the top predator, then the middle

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>sized predators will explode in population and they'll eat up

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 3>all the ground nesting birds and you'll start losing diversity

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 3>in sort of a chain reaction. So you've got to

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 3>have scale. It's got to be big, and the bigness

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 3>has got to have connectivity. It can't be just a

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 3>cumulative gathering of small patches that are separated from one

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 3>another by roads and by parking lots and by fences.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 3>It's got to be well scale with connectivity. And that

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 3>realizing that went back to work I've done thirty years

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 3>ago on island biogeography in the song of the Dodo.

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 3>So scale connectivity diversity, Well, that's both the both the

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.239
<v Speaker 3>necessity and a result of this kind of wildness disassemblage

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 3>of factors. You need full biological diversity. You need that

0:08:55.200 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 3>top predator. You need that population of lions, or that

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 3>population of grizzly bears, or that population of tigers to

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 3>play their role, that population of saltwater crocodile to play

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 3>their role in the ecosystem. And you need the things

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 3>all the way through at the bottom, including the little

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 3>things that run the world. Is the great ed Wilson

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Edward O. Wilson put it. You need the ants, Yes,

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 3>you really need the ants. Ants are really important on

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 3>this planet. You need all of the insects. You need

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 3>the beetles, which are less obviously important but are incredibly biodiverse,

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 3>so you need them. You need the bacteria. You need

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 3>the archaeans, the microbes that are not bacteria but look

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 3>like bacteria. I wrote a whole book about the discovery

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 3>of the tangle tree. You need all of that. You

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 3>need the diversity, and finally, if you have those three things,

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 3>you probably will have the ecological processes. But if you don't,

0:09:55.600 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 3>you need to know the reason why ecological processes dation,

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 3>herbivy competition, photosynthesis, decomposition, parasitism, seed dispersal, pollination. What am

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 3>I missing? Mark you that I thought, Okay, you need

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 3>those things. You need those things to be happening. And

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 3>when you have those things, then scale connectivity, diversity, and

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 3>the ecological processes. Then you've got this thing where the

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 3>heart of wildness is beating within it, the way it

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 3>beats in the Congo forest, the way it beats in

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 3>the best intact portions of the of the Amazon forest,

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 3>the way it beats in the northern boreal forest, the

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 3>way the way it beats at the heart of you know,

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 3>the Bob Marshall wilderness. Then you have that wildness.

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So so you and I and likely many many of

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the people listening to this were so fortunate that we

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>have a direct connection to places and animals and examples

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that you described there that exude that wildness. But there's

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>so many people likely across the world who would hear

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>what you just described and would think to themselves, that

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a lot. That doesn't sound all that necessary.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 1>When I look at the forest, I just see board

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>feet of timber that could help fill my bank account,

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>or they might say, you know, I really just want

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to see as many different birds as possible to fill

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>out my list, and that's all that really matters to me.

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>The rest of that seems like above and beyond, where

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 1>there might be some people that say, well, I just

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>want to catch as many fish as I can, or

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I just want to be able to sell this piece

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of real estate for as much as possible. There's all

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>these different ways that people look at a landscape or

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the animals that are on that landscape that might be

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>different than what you just described. And my question for

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you is what would you say to that person as

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to why your description of wildness is important? Why should

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that be preserved or fought for?

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, Mark, there's no question that I've thought more

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 3>about and more often about over the last forty years

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 3>than that, how do you convey this to other people?

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Because I feel it almost as as a religious belief.

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm not a conventionally religious person. I wouldn't

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 3>even claim to be a spiritual person. I'm a black

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 3>hole Darwinian materialist who happened to go through twelve years

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 3>of Catholic education. But I feel this connection. What ed

0:12:55.200 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Wilson called biophilia an inherent love for life in all

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 3>its forms. I feel that almost as a pre rational conviction,

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 3>but not everybody does. And I want people to agree

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 3>with the importance of preserving wildness. So it's incumbent on me,

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 3>and it's incumbent on you. This is what you guys do.

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 3>That's what I do all day, every day as we work,

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 3>is try and figure out ways to make the case

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 3>that this stuff is important for people who maybe didn't

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 3>at the age of six encounter a snake for the

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 3>first time and think, this is the most wonderful thing

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 3>I've ever seen. What is this? Yeah, let me grab it.

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Let me take it home and put it in a

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 3>box in my bedroom so I can look at it.

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Not everybody is built that way or has that luck

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 3>that experience. I do, Jane Goodall did, Ed Wilson did.

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Not everybody so incumbent to explain it make the case

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 3>for it. I think there are two ways. There are

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 3>two channels, two categories of explanation of argument for that.

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 3>One is the pragmatic, sort of anthropocentric answer, and one

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 3>is a little bit more is less pragmatic and it's

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 3>more esthetic. Maybe is the way to put it. The

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 3>pragmatic answer is if you want to catch trout. I

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 3>was a fishing guide for a number of years. When

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 3>I was a starving young writer. I came to Montana

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 3>with a fly rod, an electric typewriter, and Volkswagen bus

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 3>filled with books in September of seventy three because I

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 3>wanted two things. I wanted to be a writer and

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to fly fish.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah there's the dream right there.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, And I don't fish anymore, but I know

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 3>what it feels, so I know how incredibly thrilling it

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 3>is to catch a trout on a fly. See a

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 3>rainbow trout, you know, come flying out of the water,

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 3>and a big jump when you come up snug with it,

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 3>and you've laid out, you know, a number eighteen atoms

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 3>in front of him, and you tied that number eighteen

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 3>atoms yourself perfect. I know what that feels like. I

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 3>know how thrilling that is. But if you want that feeling,

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 3>then you need aquatic insects. You need mayflies, stone flies, catisflies,

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 3>and let's see what's the fourth one.

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Of the may fly, stone flies, cats flies, terrestrials of

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>different types would help.

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, anyway, clean water, and you need clean water and

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 3>nutrients in that water, but not too many nutrients, not

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 3>too much nutrients. And you you need a temperature regiment.

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 3>You need for that water not to get too hot.

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 3>You need dissolved oxygen in that way. You need all

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 3>those things. And if you don't have them, if you

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 3>don't have a real wild stream, wildness in your stream,

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 3>wildness in your Madison River, wildness in your Odell Spring

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 3>creek or whatever, then eventually those those trout are not

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 3>going to be there. So that's pragmatic. If you're you know,

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 3>if you're in the timber business, if you're like buddies

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 3>of mine who have made their living in the timber

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 3>fell in trees, then you're probably wise enough to realize

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 3>that even for those trees to grow, you need a

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 3>healthy ecosystem. You need to control climate change. You need

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 3>for things to be happening so that your forest is

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 3>not streaked through with rusty red needles because of a

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 3>huge beetlekill that has swept through the forest and killed off,

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, twenty percent of the trees. Why did that

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 3>beetle kill happen, Well, it happened because of things that

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 3>people do happen probably because of climate change. Happened because

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 3>our weeks of sub zero weather in the winter have

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 3>decreased so that our beetle populations have exploded. Those things

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 3>are connected. Even if you're in the timber business. But

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 3>also if you're in the timber business, you're probably somebody

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 3>who likes to be outdoors in the forest, like the

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 3>buddies that I talked about, you know, with their johnsreads

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 3>who were out there, you know, cutting logs, and then

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 3>when they're done cutting logs, they go fly fishing, and

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 3>when they're done fly fishing, they'd work on their novel

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, not all loggers are working on novels and

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 3>fly fishing, but there are people who like to be

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 3>out there, sure, and so maybe maybe you find it

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 3>more satisfying if you're going out into the timber to

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 3>know that the grizzly is out there too, at pine

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 3>marks are out there too, that maybe maybe there's this

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 3>sparse population of wolverines or links out there you're cutting.

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, you're cutting logs in the winter. Maybe you

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 3>want you want to see, you enjoy probably seeing some

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 3>some cougar prints or some linx prints moving around occasionally

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 3>occasionally seeing uh a uh a Martin or or whatever. Anyway.

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Uh So those that's all the pragmatic Well that's also

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 3>somewhat aesthetic. But but for timber, you need healthy forests

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 3>and and for it for there to be a sustainable

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 3>timber industry, you need proportion h you need good timber science,

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 3>good ecosystem science. You need cooperation with your fellow citizens.

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 3>You need to to appreciate that over the long term.

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 3>If you want to make a living from timber, you

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 3>need to compromise with people about about limits and sustainability.

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 3>You need you need spotted owls. You might need not

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 3>need spotted owls for from your for yourself, but you're

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 3>there are gonna be people who are going to be

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 3>against you if you don't figure out a way to

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 3>make it possible for there to be northern spotted owls too.

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Uh And then there's the aesthetic argument that I make

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 3>in preference actually to that argument, that category of argument there.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 3>It's not all one or the other. But I think

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 3>the the more esthetic and maybe you could call it

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 3>spiritual argument is is the bottom line, if we don't

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 3>have these things, if we don't have scale in our wildness,

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 3>if we don't have connectivity, if we break everything up,

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 3>we cut everything down, if we dig everything up, if

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 3>we if we you know, if we if we hunt

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 3>species to extinction rather than hunting them sustainably the way

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 3>good hunters do. Uh, And then we're going to be

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 3>living on a planet, and we're going to be passing

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 3>along a planet to our children and our grandchildren. If

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 3>we have children that is more boring, more lonely, and

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 3>more ugly than the planet that we were born on.

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't have any children, but if I had children

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 3>and grandchildren, and by now, you know, at least one

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 3>of my high school buddies has a great grandchild. That's

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 3>how old I am. If I had children and grandchildren,

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 3>I would not want to look at them and realize

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 3>that they're going to live on a planet where there

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 3>is no polar bear, or at least no polar bear

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 3>in the wild. They're going to live on a planet

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 3>where there is no lowland gorilla. They're going to live

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>on a planet where there is no tiger swallowtail. A

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 3>planet that's more lonely, boring, and ugly than the amazing,

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 3>green and blue, throbbing with life planet that we inherit

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 3>and that we still live on right now. Yeah. You know,

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 3>there's a famous statement attributed to Benjamin Franklin. He comes

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 3>out of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia seventeen eighty nine,

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 3>and a woman says to him, mister Franklin, what sort

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 3>of a government have you designed for us, you guys

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 3>in there in the Constitutional Convention? And Franklin supposedly said,

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 3>a republic, madam, if you can keep it. So. What

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking about is we have wildness on this planet,

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 3>amazing wildness, boys and girls. If you can keep it?

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>That haunts me. A question haunts me that I imagine

0:21:58.680 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>for my kids.

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I do have chill. I have a six year old

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and an eight year old boy.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And what keeps me up at night more often than

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I cared to admit, is twenty years from now, thirty

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>years from now, forty years from now, them living in

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>that alternate world, and them asking me, why didn't you

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>do anything, Why didn't you change this? Why didn't you

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>keep that wild here for us? Why am I hearing

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>these stories about how great it was when you were

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty or thirty and not able to actually experience it myself.

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>That that's the scariest thing to imagine for me. So yes,

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I can relate to that. And so that brings to

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>mind the next question, which is if wildness is worth

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>preserving as we both believe, and wildness is illuminated or

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is manifested by these four different these four different I

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>guess qualifiers, that being scale, connectivity, diverse, and those ecological processes.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Standing here now in twenty twenty six, I'm curious, would

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you say that those four elements are gaining ground or

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>losing ground? What's what's the trend for wildness currently?

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 3>Well, the overall trend is losing ground. The overall trend

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 3>is tragic, it is losing ground. We have eight point

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 3>three billion humans on this planet. And when you when

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 3>you multiply the human population times average human consumption, you

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 3>get our footprint, or not just our carbon footprint, b

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 3>our ecological footprint, our consumptive footprint. So you can say, well,

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 3>it's human population, but it's not just human population, because

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 3>if you say it's just human population, then the next step,

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 3>the next conclusion that some people leap to is well,

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 3>it's those those families in Africa that have six kids,

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 3>or seven kids, or eight kids. They're the problem. And

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 3>you know we have two kids or three kids. I

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 3>don't have kids, but my parents have three kids. I

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 3>have two sisters. But no, those those six or eight

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 3>kids in that family in that village in Africa are

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 3>not the problem because they're consuming less. We who live

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 3>in affluent countries and belong to africa aff fluent socioeconomic

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 3>groups categories, we account for more consumption than those six

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 3>or eight kids in that average African village. So we

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 3>need to think about our consumption. And this is not

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, if this is not to point fingers except

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 3>into the mirror. If you're going to point figures fingers

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 3>about what's happening, the first direction you point the finger

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 3>is into the mirror. I do that. I know you

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 3>do that. You just mentioned that we all need to

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 3>do that. And then we point figure fingers also at

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 3>our elected representatives. You know, there are two ways in

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 3>which we ultimately deal with this. We deal with this

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 3>as citizens of communities, voters, people who can march, who

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 3>can write letters, who can who can donate to organizations,

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 3>And we deal with it as individuals. What am I

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:40.959
<v Speaker 3>doing that is causing a lot of footprint that maybe

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 3>I could reduce and the thing we talked about children,

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 3>the number of children that you have, that's an important

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>part of your footprint. The number of miles that you travel,

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 3>particularly by airplane, the amount of meat you eat. And

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 3>we're on meat eater, so it's important that I can

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 3>immediately say what I'm really talking about is the amount

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 3>of meat you buy. Yes, the amount of meat you

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 3>buy especially, it's different, especially the amount of meat you

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:19.959
<v Speaker 3>buy from a supermarket chain. Yeah. Now, if you're you know,

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 3>if you're a hunter who harvests his own meat or

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 3>her own meat in a sustainable way, in a responsible way,

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:34.959
<v Speaker 3>then great. But the number of children you haven't, what

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 3>they consume as well as you consume into the future,

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the amount of meat that you eat that's bought from

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 3>industrial animal husbandry operations and through supermarkets, and the amount

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 3>of carbon you burn in traveling around. And you know,

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 3>I travel a lot. I burn a lot of airplane fuel.

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 3>So when I look in the mirror and point the finger,

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 3>that's one of the things I point at. Okay, you're

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 3>invited to go such and such a place, or you

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 3>want to go such and such a place. Is that

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 3>worth it? Or should that be a zoom conversation and

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 3>more and more. For me, it's zoom conversations. I mean

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 3>not the last book that I published, the Heartbeat of

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 3>the Wild, I did a lot of travel. All those

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 3>travels came for National Geographic Magazine over that twenty year period,

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 3>and then National Geographic Magazine actually wanted me to assemble

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 3>them into a book.

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But to your point, we are all complicit in our

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>own ways, in our own very many different variations of

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 1>examples like that, we all make an impact. There's no

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>changing that. And some people use that though as an

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>excuse to say, well, either pointing a finger at somebody

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>like you and saying, well, you're telling us we should

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>care about these things and that we should do something

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.719
<v Speaker 1>about it. But you're a hypocrite because you're burning all

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this carbon and you don't really care about climate change,

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>or you don't really care about these things because you

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>you're making you know, you're making an impact to or

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, folks will say, geez, I recognize

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that I'm doing these things. I recognize I'm complicit. So

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>who am I to try to do something about or

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.479
<v Speaker 1>who am I to tell people that we should care

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>about these things? Because then I am a hypocrite. So

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>there's there's these two different sides of that same coin.

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>This sometimes will keep folks from trying to engage. It

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>will keep folks from trying to even reckon with this,

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's hard to reckon with UH. There's a lot

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of cognitive dissonance when you have to look in the

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>mirror and realize that all these things that I care about, UH,

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I am in some ways a part of their atrophy

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>or decline. So I want I want to dive into

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit further through two examples that you reference.

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>There two parts of wildness that I think are quite

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>interconnected and in many ways seem to lead to the

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>possibility of those second two being diversity and those processes

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so scale and connectivity. You've done a lot of great work,

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to say maybe your most famous

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>work or your foundational work, but the Song of the

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Dough Dough, this book, which is a heck of a doorstop.

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a big, intimidating book. It took me a while

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to finally get the nerve to dive into it, but

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>when I did, I was very glad to do so.

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>After it's sitting on the bookshelf for several years. I

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>need to do that eventually. I need to read that eventually. Well,

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I finally did five years ago or whatever it was.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 3>I have books like that. I have big, intimidating books

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 3>that have sat on my bookshelf for twenty years, and

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 3>I finally say it's time to do that. It's time anyway,

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 3>but I appreciate that.

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And.

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So all that said, I want to spend some time

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>exploring some of those topics. In another piece of yours,

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you wrote about Thomas Lovejoy, who you end up talking

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>about in the Song of the Dodo you write about,

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>but in an article you wrote about Lovejoy, you talked

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>about this idea that he helped advance, and a quote

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of his that you mentioned there was that nature to

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>be diverse and functional and steady must be large, must

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>be large. And you reference that as well in your

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>book and your explanation right there. We need scale, We

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>need this size. Why is that?

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 2>And what is.

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Happening across the world related to that? Do we have

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this scale we need? You mentioned in general wildness is

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in decline, but can you speak to the importance of scale,

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the importance of nature being large and where that is

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>headed currently right now, and maybe we can explore this

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to the example of where you live in the Greater

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Yellowstone ecosystem in that region scale and connectivity. I'd love

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to just kind of peel back the layers of the

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>onion a little bit there for people who haven't read

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the book, who aren't familiar with this.

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Why yeah, okay, let's start with Tom Lovejoy. Tom Lovejoy

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 3>was a great man. He died about through two and

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 3>a half years ago, and he became an important a

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 3>great friend of mine, an important influence on me. He

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 3>as I described in the Song of the Dodo. He

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 3>was at one point he was vice president for Conversation

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 3>for Conservation of the World Wildlife on then he worked

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 3>for the Smithsonian Institution. He worked all of his life

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 3>for the preservation of biological diversity. He got his PhD

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 3>studying birds in the Amazon, and he went back to

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 3>the Amazon years later and created a project that at

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 3>first was called the the Minimum Critical Size of Ecosystems Project.

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 3>There was a law that had been passed in Brazil

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 3>that said if you own or have a least rights

0:31:55.680 --> 0:32:00.719
<v Speaker 3>on a big area of Amazon forest, then you're allowed

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 3>to log half of your holdings and you have to

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 3>leave the other half standing as forests. So this was

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a fact that was going to happen. Large stretches of

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Amazon forests were going to be cut down in some

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 3>way that left half of each holding. And Tom by

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:25.719
<v Speaker 3>that time was well versed in politics and business as

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 3>well as ecology of Brazil. He was fluent in Portuguese,

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 3>and he went down there and he started persuading people

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 3>to do their cutting in a way that would leave

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 3>islands of forest surrounded by a sea of clearcut islands

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 3>of standardized size one hundred hectors hector is two point

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 3>four acres, the metric unit of landscape area one hundred

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 3>hectors one thousand hectors ten thousand. So he was creating

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 3>an experiment to see what happens if a forest loses

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 3>connectivity and loses scale and you have these little ecological

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 3>islands of Amazon rainforest surrounded by just clearcut sun baked latterite,

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 3>clay and slash. And he wrote about that, and that

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 3>inspired me to write the Song of the Dodo. Song

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 3>of the Dodo just had its thirtieth anniversary was published

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen ninety six. But I was reading about his

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 3>ideas and reading about there was a book called The

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Fragmented Forest. This was the mid late eighties, and people

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 3>were starting to realize that habitat loss was not the

0:33:53.760 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 3>only way you lost biological diversity. Habitat fragmentation also resulted

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 3>in a loss of biological diversity, the cutting of your

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 3>ecosystem into little pieces. And it was actually Ed Wilson,

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Edward O. Wilson and a colleague friend of his, Robert MacArthur,

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 3>who had first systematized that insight in ecological terms with

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 3>a little book called The Theory of Island Biogeography, published

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen sixty seven, And I discovered that book in

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 3>about nineteen eighty five, about the same time I discovered

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Tom Lovejoy's experiment to explore the implications of that book.

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 3>And so what all this adds up to is that

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 3>if you have a mainland ecosystem and it has a

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 3>full complement, the full food chain of biological diversities, got

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 3>big predators and meso predators and smaller predators, and birds

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 3>of all sorts and insects of all sorts, microbes, sords,

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 3>and you create an island of just a part of that,

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 3>either with rising water or with clear cut land, so

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 3>that suddenly there's only a limited area. You will start

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 3>to lose biological diversity immediately. And Tom Lovejoy's phrase for that,

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I think he coined this phrase was ecosystem decay. Biological

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 3>diversity would start to be lost, would decay from that

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 3>island bit of ecosystem in a way parallel to radioactive decay. Now,

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 3>an element loses loses protons, loses electrons, and it decays

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 3>into another element. So that's ecosystem decay. Tom created this

0:35:56.440 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 3>experiment to test it. There were also some natural experiments detested.

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 3>There was an island in what became the Panama Canal.

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 3>When the Panama Canal was built in Panama, they created

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 3>dams to back up water. They created a great reservoir

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 3>called Lake Gatun to feed the canal to make sure

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 3>there would always be enough water in the canal. And

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 3>when they built those dams, they created this reservoir, Lake Gatun,

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 3>and there was a there was a mountain that called Barrow, Colorado,

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 3>that instead of being a mountain, became an island. As

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 3>the water rose, it became a small island of intact,

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 3>primary nearly pristine Panama rainforest. And so they studied that

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 3>island after the reservoir had filled and insularized it, and

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 3>they saw this, they saw ecosystem decay. What happened first, Well,

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 3>there population of puma mountain lion cougar which they had

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 3>in Panama disappeared. Why the island wasn't big enough to

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:12.919
<v Speaker 3>support a viable population, an inter breeding population of puma.

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 3>So the puma disappears, and they have an explosion of

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 3>miso predators. I forget what they were, things like raccoons,

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Quadamundi's small predatory cats smaller than the puma, and those

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 3>creatures no longer were being preyed on by the top predator.

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 3>So their populations exploded, and suddenly they lost all their

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 3>ground nesting birds because these birds are laying eggs on

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 3>the ground and now they're you know, Koda Mundy's running around,

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 3>and they were gone. So the ecosystem started losing, diversity

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 3>started collapsing. Same thing was happening on Tom Lovejoy's islands

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 3>in the Amazon forests, surrounded by a sea of clearcut.

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 3>That's the lesson of scale and connectivity. So you bring

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:12.760
<v Speaker 3>that back to where we live Montana, Gallatin County. Boseman,

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 3>the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. The Greater Yellowstone ecosystem is one

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 3>of the greatest exemplars of this that you could have.

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Yellowstone National Park is what two point two million acres

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, including six national forests, two Indian reservations,

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 3>some wildlife refuges, all contiguous with Yellowstone Park. Also Grand

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Teton National Park, of course, all contiguous Greater Yellowstone ecosystem.

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 3>It's more like twenty million acres with two million acres

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 3>if you put an ocean around it, or if you

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 3>put clearcut around it, pretty soon you're not going to

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.359
<v Speaker 3>have a grizzly bear population because it's not big enough,

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 3>not even two million acres. But if you've got the

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, then you've got elk migrating in and

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 3>out with the seasons. You know, elk leave Yellowstone Park

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:15.399
<v Speaker 3>in the autumn and migrate down across the Shoshone River

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 3>onto winter range, including a lot of private ranches in

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 3>the Shoshone Basin over there by Cody and and the

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 3>grizzlies hibernate, and in the spring elk migrate back in

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 3>and so uh and likewise the bison so grizzlies have

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 3>enough to eat, and they have enough individuals to support

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 3>a viable, genetically robust, reproducing population.

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 2>So paint me a picture, David.

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:53.880
<v Speaker 1>If the current trends continue, and if the island of

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem becomes, if the seas around the

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>island of the Greater yellow Stone Ecosystem continue to rise,

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>We'll follow that analogy, and let's say that more and

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>more of the valleys around Madison Valley and Paradise Valley

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and the areas around Cody and you know, stretching up

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>out of Jackson and Teton Valley in Idaho, if they

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to be bought up and developed, more and more

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>housing developments, more and more energy development in certain regions,

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 1>more and more of the forested lands broken up, because

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>let's say the roadless rule goes away, and now we

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>open up more of this national forest system to roads.

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So we're getting more and more fragmentation, more roads, more development,

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>more loss of habitat. All of this one big island

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:41.760
<v Speaker 1>becomes instead two hundred and sixteen smaller islands. To steal

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:43.919
<v Speaker 1>from your incredible analogy at the beginning of the Song

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of a Dodo, If that great big rug is cut

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 1>into two hundred and sixteen pieces. Is it still a great,

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.240
<v Speaker 1>big rug or is it actually something very different?

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 3>It's a pile. It's a pile of washcloths.

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So if we end up with a greater Yellowstone

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem that is still twenty million acres, but it's twenty

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>million acres of washcloths.

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean for the wildlife there?

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Because you just mentioned that having this great big thing

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>allows us to have a genetically viable grizzly bear population.

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 1>It allows us to have those elk migrations, but in

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem to decay. When in describing that and examples of that,

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you also write about extinction vortices and how there' seem

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to be all these different feedback loops that occur once

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we start snipping things apart. Paint a picture for us

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem twenty years from now if

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it does get snipped away as we're describing here, What

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>does that look like?

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 2>How does it happen?

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:56.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Well, you start with thinking about the grizzly bear,

0:41:56.480 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 3>because that grizzly bear is the top press, the predator

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 3>that needs the most wildness, and there's also the wolf.

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 3>The wolf is very important. We're blessed to have the

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.919
<v Speaker 3>wolf back. The wolf is playing an important ecological role.

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:16.959
<v Speaker 3>But but wolves are they reproduce much more quickly and

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 3>spread much more quickly, and are much more cagey in

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 3>their relations with humans than grizzly bears are. They're resilient,

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 3>that's right. Yeah, so so the most On the other hand,

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 3>we hunt wolves. People hunt wolves, and that's you know,

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 3>that's an issue, that's a question, especially along the boundary,

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 3>along the northern boundary of Yellowstone. That's a different can

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 3>of worms we can or cannot maybe talk about, but

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 3>do so think about the grizzly bear. So when when

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:59.399
<v Speaker 3>the grizzly bear was listed as an endangered species back

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 3>in I think nineteen seventy three, it was right after

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 3>the dumps have been closed. This is the ancient history

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 3>of Yellowstone. Grizzly bears in Yellowstone used to be carnival

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 3>clowns that performed for the tourists, or they were they

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 3>were They were treated like carnival clowns and they would

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 3>get a lot of their nutrition from big dumps of

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:31.920
<v Speaker 3>food waste outside the hotels in Yellowstone Park. This is

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 3>during the nineteen sixties, there were stands. There were you know,

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:43.919
<v Speaker 3>like what am I thinking of stadiums. Stadium stands, Yeah,

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 3>that were set up so that people could go out

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 3>after the dinner at Lake Lodge or Mammoth or whatever

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 3>and sit and watch, you know, ten or twenty or

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty five bears come in and route through grapefruit rines

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 3>and leftover you know, steak bones in that garbage of

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 3>all sorts. And they could say, well, yeah, we saw

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 3>grizzly bears. Yeah, they apparently love to eat garbage. And

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 3>we saw twenty of them. And then we talked briefly

0:44:16.080 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 3>you and I before we started about Aldo Leopold. It

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:25.799
<v Speaker 3>was one of Aldo Leopold's sons, which one Starker, Yeah,

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 3>who helped help the Secretary of the Interior with the

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 3>report about a better way to think about Yellowstone Park

0:44:35.600 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 3>and our national parks in general, natural regulation, natural management,

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 3>and that they said, well, let's get rid of the dumps.

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 3>We got to get rid of the dumps. Okay, but

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 3>if we get rid of the dumps, what are the

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 3>bears going to eat? Well, the bears will figure it out.

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Is there going to be a lot more bear human conflict.

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Well maybe, but we can push through that. So this

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:59.879
<v Speaker 3>is all started happening in sixty seven or sixty eight

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 3>and was happening straight through to seventy three. There was

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 3>a lot more bear human contact. Bears were dying, population

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 3>of grizzlies, and Yellowstone was estimated to be down around

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 3>viracall correctly. One's seventy five. Don't hold me to that.

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:20.439
<v Speaker 3>It's just memory and I sounds haven't refreshed my memory.

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:26.240
<v Speaker 3>So one seventy five. So that's that's better than nothing,

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 3>But that's not that's that's not a very sizable population

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 3>if you consider that it includes juvenile males and post

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 3>reproductive females and depends whether we're counting cubs of the

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:47.920
<v Speaker 3>year or not. The scientists who study island biogeography and

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 3>the scientific branch of population biology and viable population theory

0:45:56.719 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 3>have told us that seventy five in a population is

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 3>not enough probably to retain genetic robustness and resistance to

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 3>various kinds of disaster over the long term, and if

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 3>you want a viable population, you need more than that.

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 3>Neverre scientists writing PhD dissertations on this subject. It's a

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 3>fellow named Matt Mark Schaeffer, who became an important conservationist.

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 3>But he did his dissertation out of the University of

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Michigan School of Natural Resources. If I call correctly on

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the case history of what is a viable population of

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:45.880
<v Speaker 3>grizzly bears in Yellowstone? And he concluded that, well, you

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 3>can't say X or y is the exact viable population,

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 3>but you can say that at a certain level there

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 3>will be a greater chance of extinction. And if you

0:46:55.520 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 3>want a ninety nine percent likelihood that you grizzly population

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.520
<v Speaker 3>is going to persist for a thousand years, then you

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 3>need this many maybe five hundred. Again, I'm I'm vaguely

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 3>recollecting in this number. If you only have one hundred

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 3>and seventy five, then the chance of your population persisting,

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 3>surviving in their isolated state over one thousand years, that

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 3>might be down to fifty percent. Chance. Is society satisfied

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 3>with a fifty percent chance that grizzlies will persist in Yellowstone?

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 3>One thousand years is a long time. It's hard to imagine.

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 3>But you could also say, okay, what's the likelihood of

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 3>going extinct in one hundred years? Well, at one hundred

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 3>and seventy five individuals, The likelihood might be might be

0:47:47.160 --> 0:47:50.359
<v Speaker 3>up to a fifty percent chance that the population would

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 3>go extinct in one hundred years. Is society satisfied with

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 3>that there's a fifty to fifty chance that the grizzly

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 3>bear will go extinct in Yellowstone National Park in one

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:02.840
<v Speaker 3>hundred years. We don't do anything about this population size.

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people would say, no, that's not good enough,

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 3>that's not good enough. So this whole debate went on. Now,

0:48:10.840 --> 0:48:14.920
<v Speaker 3>if you've got a population that's smallish like that and

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 3>it has a danger of going extinct. You mentioned that

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 3>I wrote about the vortices of extinction. Michael Souley and

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Mike Gilpin were these two brilliant population biologists who worked

0:48:26.520 --> 0:48:30.840
<v Speaker 3>out the theory of how species go extinct, and I

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 3>wrote about the implications and how it was happening in

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:38.280
<v Speaker 3>the Song of the Dodo. Once your population gets small,

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 3>you're going to start to have inbreeding. You're going to

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:45.360
<v Speaker 3>have you know, mothers breeding with their own sons, or

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 3>you're going to have brothers breeding with sisters because there

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:54.320
<v Speaker 3>aren't enough options around. You're going to have a problem

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 3>that Well, one year there there was a nice crop

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 3>of cubs. There were there were eighteen cubs that survived

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 3>in Yellowstone Park, but unfortunately, fourteen of those were male

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 3>cubs and only four were female cubs. So we've got

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 3>a dangerous shortage of females now. Plus things have happened

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 3>to the food supply. We've got climate change that is

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:26.839
<v Speaker 3>killing off the white bark pines in Yellowstone and white

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 3>bark pine nuts are one of the four staple food

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 3>sources for the Yellowstone grizzly. We're losing them. We've had

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:39.879
<v Speaker 3>lake trout introduced to Yellowstone Lake and they're killing off

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 3>the cutthroat trout. And cutthroat trout spawn in the feeder

0:49:44.040 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 3>streams where grizzlies can eat them. Lake trout spawn at

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.120
<v Speaker 3>the bottom of the lake where grizzlies cannot eat them.

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:52.880
<v Speaker 3>So if you lose your cutthroat trout spawning, that's another

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 3>loss of a food source for grizzlies. Your population is

0:49:56.120 --> 0:49:58.759
<v Speaker 3>going to shrink down a little bit more. And then

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:00.879
<v Speaker 3>you have a fire of the sort that we had

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen eighty eight. And maybe it's caused by climate change,

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's not. Maybe it's human cost maybe it's caused

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:11.880
<v Speaker 3>by lightning. Still, things happen, as the saying goes, shit happens.

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:16.280
<v Speaker 3>That's an important principle in ecology as well as life generally.

0:50:18.200 --> 0:50:20.400
<v Speaker 3>And so you have a fire, and you lose a

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of your habitat, You lose a lot of your

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:32.480
<v Speaker 3>white bark pines. Perhaps you might lose habitat for at

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 3>least for a year. So you might lose habitat for

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 3>your big ungulates. You might have fewer elk, you might

0:50:38.000 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 3>have fewer bison. If you have fewer elk and fewer bison,

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:43.400
<v Speaker 3>you lose another of the major food sources for grizzlies,

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 3>which is which is ungulate meat, particularly of the young

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 3>of winter killed and young. So all of these are

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:54.320
<v Speaker 3>happening there. These are cyclists that interact with one another

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 3>what Gilpin and Soulet called the vortices of extinction. The

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:03.799
<v Speaker 3>inbreeding vortice can hurt your population, and then you've got

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:09.279
<v Speaker 3>the democratic demographic vortex. You know, too many males born

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:12.760
<v Speaker 3>and not enough females just by chance. And then maybe

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 3>you've got a disease that comes in and kills off some,

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 3>and then you've got loss of habitat or loss of

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:23.080
<v Speaker 3>food all of these things interacting, and the lower your

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 3>population goes, the worse the inbreeding problem is going to be,

0:51:29.239 --> 0:51:32.920
<v Speaker 3>and the greater the chance that just some sort of

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 3>an accident, a really bad fire, or you know, a

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:44.239
<v Speaker 3>winter where there is not enough snow so there's not

0:51:44.360 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 3>enough winter kill of big ungulates and the grizzlies come out.

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:51.879
<v Speaker 3>What are they going to eat? There are no winter

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:55.839
<v Speaker 3>kill bison carcasses, no winter kill elk carcasses. There, all

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 3>of these things, And eventually you get to a point

0:51:57.480 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 3>where you've got six grizzly bears left, and two of

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 3>them are females and four are males, and one of

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:12.800
<v Speaker 3>the females is post reproductive, and then the other female

0:52:12.800 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 3>gets hit by a car boom. Grizzly bear is extinct

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:20.319
<v Speaker 3>in Yellowstone Park if it's an island.

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>And because that increasing water level all around it, increasing fragmentation,

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:32.279
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to supplement that island population with new immigrants

0:52:32.560 --> 0:52:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is not there, right, So right that fragregation keeps us

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:38.480
<v Speaker 1>from ever being able to bring it.

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Bring it you turn it around.

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Right, And so that's the scenario that gloomy scenario I

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:46.719
<v Speaker 3>and I describe a scenario just parallel to that in

0:52:46.800 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 3>the Song of the Dodo, and it's about the possible

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 3>scenario of extinction of the of the Dodo itself, this

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 3>bird that lived on the island of Mauritius in the

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Indian Ocean. The scenario I just described, that's the scenario

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 3>with Yellowstone Park as an island. No greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Instead,

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 3>you've got an ecosystem of parking lots and hotels and

0:53:11.480 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 3>suburbs and golf courses and interstate highways. So that's why

0:53:17.160 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 3>we need the greater Yellowstone ecosystem, and we need it

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:24.800
<v Speaker 3>to be not just there but connected. And that means

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:30.840
<v Speaker 3>how many roads, how many suburbs, how many big private

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:36.239
<v Speaker 3>ranches over in the Shoshonee Valley south of Kody, how

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 3>many of those big private ranches get sold for subdivision.

0:53:41.719 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 3>All of those things are factors that can turn Yellowstone

0:53:46.120 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Park into an island.

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and something very similar might be happening for mountain

0:53:53.239 --> 0:53:56.760
<v Speaker 1>lions in the Everglades, And something similar could be happening

0:53:56.800 --> 0:54:01.759
<v Speaker 1>with mountain goats in the Bridgers, or bears in the Smokies,

0:54:01.880 --> 0:54:05.400
<v Speaker 1>or you know, pick your species and pick some other island.

0:54:05.920 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Metaphorical island. You know, this is happening all over the country.

0:54:09.360 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 1>There are all sorts of different examples where we're surrounding

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:16.919
<v Speaker 1>these last fragments of wildlife habitat with development of one

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:19.839
<v Speaker 1>kind or another. And then these different animals are all

0:54:19.880 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 1>experiencing some unique version of that spiraling extinction vortex that

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:28.319
<v Speaker 1>you just described for grizzlies, but so many other species. Right,

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is this is happening at different rates, to

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:35.800
<v Speaker 1>different degrees all over the place. That is a discouraging

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 1>reality to consider. And you you kind of paint the

0:54:43.000 --> 0:54:46.880
<v Speaker 1>picture of the problem within the Song of the Dodo

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:52.239
<v Speaker 1>in your latest book, Heartbeat of the Wild, you illustrate

0:54:52.480 --> 0:54:58.080
<v Speaker 1>some encouraging examples of various kinds, some little rays of hope.

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm curious if you can and speed us up

0:55:02.520 --> 0:55:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to now in twenty twenty six, when you look at

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:09.759
<v Speaker 1>the the islandification of our nation in many ways, and

0:55:10.080 --> 0:55:12.239
<v Speaker 1>of course it is happening across the world, but let's

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:15.800
<v Speaker 1>focus on America. When you see what's happening in America

0:55:16.360 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and all those discouraging trends we just described, can you

0:55:19.840 --> 0:55:25.320
<v Speaker 1>share with me some examples of solutions or positive trends

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:29.120
<v Speaker 1>or tools that encourage you on this front.

0:55:30.160 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, there are some. There is some good news,

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:40.000
<v Speaker 3>There are some encouraging things. There are cases where where

0:55:40.040 --> 0:55:44.640
<v Speaker 3>species have been brought back from the brink that manage

0:55:45.160 --> 0:55:52.879
<v Speaker 3>to transcend the problem of insularization. For not many, but

0:55:53.120 --> 0:55:55.800
<v Speaker 3>the one that comes to mind immediately is the California condor.

0:55:56.520 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Here's a great scavenging bird, a magnetic animal. It was

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:06.840
<v Speaker 3>down to about I don't know, fifteen to twenty individuals,

0:56:06.920 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 3>maybe less than that at its peak of endangerment thirty

0:56:12.480 --> 0:56:16.480
<v Speaker 3>or thirty five years ago. When I started, I wrote

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:18.719
<v Speaker 3>about it. I think at least once, when I was

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 3>doing the Natural Science column I did for Outside magazine

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 3>California case of the California conder, and at the last

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 3>minute they said, all right, let's bring those last Maybe

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:32.399
<v Speaker 3>they were down to six, six or eight. Let's let's

0:56:32.400 --> 0:56:39.120
<v Speaker 3>bring them into captivity. They're being killed, They're dying for

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:45.080
<v Speaker 3>reasons that we can deal with. They were actually be dying.

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:48.360
<v Speaker 3>If I recall correctly, there was some concern about DDT

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 3>DDT in the environment, which makes eggshells thinner and makes

0:56:53.360 --> 0:56:56.160
<v Speaker 3>reproductive success less for birds. That's what happened to the

0:56:56.160 --> 0:56:58.759
<v Speaker 3>peregrine falcon in the US. That's what happened to the

0:56:58.800 --> 0:57:02.400
<v Speaker 3>bald eagle. But with the with the California conduct there

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:07.480
<v Speaker 3>was also the issue of lead ammunition. And they were

0:57:07.520 --> 0:57:14.880
<v Speaker 3>scavenging carcasses of animals that had been killed by hunters

0:57:15.160 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 3>and presumably by legitimate hunters, but using lead ammunition, and

0:57:18.600 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 3>they adjusted enough lead that they were starting to die

0:57:22.040 --> 0:57:26.800
<v Speaker 3>of lead poisoning. Now that was I never I never

0:57:26.800 --> 0:57:28.400
<v Speaker 3>wrote a book about that, so I don't know the

0:57:28.440 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 3>details as well as I know the details about some things.

0:57:32.240 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they discovered that, well, the lead ammunition was a

0:57:35.920 --> 0:57:39.480
<v Speaker 3>marginal problem, and you know, there were other problems more severe,

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:43.040
<v Speaker 3>but that was one of the things that was discussed. Anyway,

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 3>they brought him into captivity, they brought him carefully in captivity,

0:57:45.600 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 3>and then they started releasing him to the wild. And

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:50.120
<v Speaker 3>they can soar over the Grand Canyon, They can soar

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:53.080
<v Speaker 3>out of California. They can soar from one piece of

0:57:53.080 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 3>good habitat to another. They can soar over downtown Los

0:57:56.800 --> 0:58:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Angeles if they need to. So they are not insularized

0:58:01.080 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 3>in the way that most creatures, including grizzly bears, are insularized.

0:58:06.440 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 3>You also hear about corridors. Corridors are important if you're

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:13.040
<v Speaker 3>going to design a nature reserve, or if you have

0:58:13.080 --> 0:58:19.560
<v Speaker 3>a chance to protect two pieces of wild landscape and

0:58:19.600 --> 0:58:23.600
<v Speaker 3>there's a chance of having a corridor between the two pieces,

0:58:23.840 --> 0:58:28.280
<v Speaker 3>a corridor that's big enough that some dispersing individuals of

0:58:28.360 --> 0:58:32.800
<v Speaker 3>different species will use it, then you have mitigated the

0:58:32.840 --> 0:58:38.680
<v Speaker 3>problem of insularization. And that's being done in different parts

0:58:38.720 --> 0:58:40.960
<v Speaker 3>of the world. There's a lot of work that's been

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:45.800
<v Speaker 3>done on the Cougar in California that has involved corridor work.

0:58:46.520 --> 0:58:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Probably in the East to some extent too, but I'm

0:58:49.760 --> 0:58:53.440
<v Speaker 3>not a knowledgeable that. Definitely in Florida with the Florida

0:58:53.440 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 3>panther yea, yeah, yeah, because a lot of those animals

0:58:58.120 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 3>were being killed by if I recall correctly, right, yes, right,

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:08.120
<v Speaker 3>So corridors can protect and allow animals, some kinds of

0:59:08.160 --> 0:59:13.480
<v Speaker 3>animals to migrate from, you know, from one patch of landscape,

0:59:13.480 --> 0:59:16.560
<v Speaker 3>one island of landscape to another. If there's a corridor,

0:59:16.600 --> 0:59:20.000
<v Speaker 3>then it's not an island, it's it's it's a peninsula,

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:23.080
<v Speaker 3>and it potentially can migrate. And then the other thing

0:59:23.120 --> 0:59:25.360
<v Speaker 3>that we haven't mentioned yet was if you're going to

0:59:25.400 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 3>protect landscape, really wild landscape. Well, most wild landscape on

0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 3>this planet has some human presence. There are some people.

0:59:34.720 --> 0:59:37.920
<v Speaker 3>This is in the Amazon, in the Congo. The wild

0:59:37.960 --> 0:59:41.880
<v Speaker 3>is most of the wildest places I've ever gone, there

0:59:41.920 --> 0:59:49.080
<v Speaker 3>is still some dimension, some wisp of human presence. I've

0:59:49.080 --> 0:59:52.720
<v Speaker 3>been to some places in the Congo where there's there's

0:59:53.040 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 3>no evidence of humans having been there for you know,

0:59:56.080 --> 0:59:58.760
<v Speaker 3>for fifty or sixty years to any degree. But most

0:59:58.800 --> 1:00:01.560
<v Speaker 3>places there's a human presence. There are people that are

1:00:01.600 --> 1:00:04.480
<v Speaker 3>living either in the in the forest or adjacent to

1:00:04.560 --> 1:00:06.880
<v Speaker 3>the forest. And usually if it's if it's in Africa

1:00:06.960 --> 1:00:10.720
<v Speaker 3>or South America or in Borneo, those people are are

1:00:10.760 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 3>disempowered people. They're they're uh, they're rural people. There are

1:00:14.280 --> 1:00:21.920
<v Speaker 3>people living in villages, living by subsistence agriculture or by hunting.

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:27.080
<v Speaker 3>So what is their impact, what are their rights? And

1:00:27.160 --> 1:00:30.800
<v Speaker 3>how do we deal with their rights even as we

1:00:30.840 --> 1:00:34.320
<v Speaker 3>try and protect biological diversity. And I write about I

1:00:34.320 --> 1:00:36.360
<v Speaker 3>write about that in the Heartbeat of the Wild. A

1:00:36.440 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 3>couple of different cases, but the one that's I think

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:45.480
<v Speaker 3>most inspiring is gore and Gosa National Park in Mozambique,

1:00:46.000 --> 1:00:50.960
<v Speaker 3>which is a big, beautiful national park that's filled with

1:00:51.560 --> 1:00:55.440
<v Speaker 3>wildlife and is being brought back to life after a

1:00:55.520 --> 1:01:00.960
<v Speaker 3>long civil war in Mozambique that resulted in and the

1:01:00.960 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>slaughter of a lot of their wildlife, for instance, slaughter

1:01:03.840 --> 1:01:08.760
<v Speaker 3>of their elephant population for ivory to buy ammunition. The

1:01:08.800 --> 1:01:14.800
<v Speaker 3>rebel faction in that civil war made Gordon Gosa National

1:01:14.800 --> 1:01:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Park their headquarters, and they and the government bombed them

1:01:20.080 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 3>and bombed the park infrastructure, and the rebels killed animals

1:01:26.600 --> 1:01:29.880
<v Speaker 3>to eat and also killed elephants for ivory to buy ammunition.

1:01:30.240 --> 1:01:32.960
<v Speaker 3>So this place was devastated and then beginning about the

1:01:33.000 --> 1:01:36.080
<v Speaker 3>year two thousand and two thousand and one, it was

1:01:36.200 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 3>brought back to life by a combination of parties, including

1:01:41.000 --> 1:01:47.600
<v Speaker 3>a very progressive president of Mozambique, an American multi multi

1:01:47.600 --> 1:01:51.560
<v Speaker 3>millionaire named Greg Carr from Idaho, who said the president

1:01:51.720 --> 1:01:53.640
<v Speaker 3>happened to meet him and said, how can I help

1:01:53.680 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 3>to restore your national park. I got a bunch of

1:01:56.280 --> 1:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>money and I want to do something good with it.

1:02:00.840 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 3>So they created a partnership. Nelson Mandela was involved across

1:02:04.800 --> 1:02:07.960
<v Speaker 3>the border in South Africa in this brainstorming and they

1:02:07.960 --> 1:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>have created a park project that includes revived, rewilded Gordon

1:02:16.240 --> 1:02:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Gosa National Park surrounded by a buffer zone that is

1:02:22.160 --> 1:02:26.680
<v Speaker 3>filled with people and villages one hundred thousand people maybe

1:02:26.720 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember the exact number. And those people in

1:02:30.560 --> 1:02:34.120
<v Speaker 3>those villages are not locked out of the park. They

1:02:34.200 --> 1:02:40.440
<v Speaker 3>are considered, they are considered one of the purposes for

1:02:40.520 --> 1:02:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the park to exist. The park, under the guidance of

1:02:44.800 --> 1:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>the Mozambican leaders and Greg Carr, wanted this park project

1:02:49.320 --> 1:02:52.320
<v Speaker 3>to be the best thing that ever happened to the

1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:57.200
<v Speaker 3>people in the buffer zone immediately surrounding ghosta national park.

1:02:57.440 --> 1:03:00.720
<v Speaker 3>So there are agronomy projects, there are education projects, they're

1:03:00.760 --> 1:03:05.920
<v Speaker 3>public health projects. Are girls clubs, clubs for young girls

1:03:05.960 --> 1:03:09.080
<v Speaker 3>to get them educated and get them engaged in school

1:03:09.120 --> 1:03:11.160
<v Speaker 3>so they don't get married off at the age of twelve.

1:03:12.200 --> 1:03:18.600
<v Speaker 3>All of these things great social benefits and financial benefits

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:22.800
<v Speaker 3>and health benefits to the people in the areas surrounding

1:03:23.280 --> 1:03:28.280
<v Speaker 3>because the leaders in Mozambique and their partner Greg Carr,

1:03:28.520 --> 1:03:35.080
<v Speaker 3>realized that for the long term, you have to consider

1:03:36.320 --> 1:03:40.720
<v Speaker 3>the needs and rights of the people on the on

1:03:41.040 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 3>or at the fringes of the wild landscape, the people

1:03:44.600 --> 1:03:49.960
<v Speaker 3>on the rural landscape. Because a lot of a lot

1:03:50.000 --> 1:03:54.160
<v Speaker 3>of nature, a lot of populations of big animals exist

1:03:54.240 --> 1:03:57.280
<v Speaker 3>outside of protected areas, so you have to deal with

1:03:57.560 --> 1:03:59.919
<v Speaker 3>the human needs as well. And Gore and Gosa National

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Park is a great example of how that can succeed.

1:04:03.600 --> 1:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, it's funny that you know that applies just

1:04:07.480 --> 1:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>as much to our Yellowstone example too, Right. I think

1:04:11.840 --> 1:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>tolerance or intolerance of animals can be just as much

1:04:15.840 --> 1:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of a habitat fragmentator as a road.

1:04:19.080 --> 1:04:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:04:19.320 --> 1:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>If you have a stretch of human occupied landscape where

1:04:22.360 --> 1:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they are intolerant of the presence of grizzly bears or elk,

1:04:27.160 --> 1:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that can bifurcate a migration route or stop connectivity of

1:04:31.600 --> 1:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>habitat just as much as anything else.

1:04:33.360 --> 1:04:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:04:33.760 --> 1:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So to your point, if we can find ways to

1:04:36.520 --> 1:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>increase tolerance for wildlife, we therefore then also increase the

1:04:41.040 --> 1:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>potential for our islands to.

1:04:43.160 --> 1:04:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Be larger or there to be those corridors.

1:04:46.800 --> 1:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and you talked about I think this is on

1:04:49.680 --> 1:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>another interview you did with somebody else. You talked about

1:04:52.640 --> 1:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>for there to be conservation of habitat or whileft to

1:04:56.200 --> 1:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>actually be lasting, you need to make for solution for

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the people just as much as the animals.

1:05:02.760 --> 1:05:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and that reminds me of and I know we're

1:05:05.680 --> 1:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>probably running out of time, but there is an elk biologist,

1:05:10.240 --> 1:05:12.160
<v Speaker 3>a wonderful guy named Arthur Middleton.

1:05:12.600 --> 1:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>You know Arthur Middleton, not personally, but I'm very well

1:05:15.200 --> 1:05:15.959
<v Speaker 1>aware of his work.

1:05:16.320 --> 1:05:18.680
<v Speaker 3>You should get him on this show, because there is

1:05:18.720 --> 1:05:22.440
<v Speaker 3>nobody who's better than Arthur at both understanding the needs

1:05:22.480 --> 1:05:27.080
<v Speaker 3>of elk, the importance of elk to the whole Yellowstone ecosystem,

1:05:27.200 --> 1:05:33.600
<v Speaker 3>and the perspective of the private ranchers over in the

1:05:33.600 --> 1:05:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Shoshonee Valley south of Cody, who have these big plots

1:05:38.080 --> 1:05:43.480
<v Speaker 3>of winter range where hundreds and hundreds thousands of elk

1:05:43.520 --> 1:05:48.680
<v Speaker 3>come and eat their grass and then migrate back into

1:05:48.760 --> 1:05:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Yellowstone in the summer. And Arthur Middleton works with those people,

1:05:54.320 --> 1:06:02.240
<v Speaker 3>those ranchers for mutual understanding, cooperation, appreciation of what their

1:06:02.320 --> 1:06:06.240
<v Speaker 3>needs and their perspectives are, and the service that they

1:06:06.280 --> 1:06:11.520
<v Speaker 3>provide by way of the elk and grass to the

1:06:11.560 --> 1:06:17.680
<v Speaker 3>grizzly bear and to the American people. It's an interesting, yeah,

1:06:17.880 --> 1:06:20.400
<v Speaker 3>political biological ecosystem.

1:06:21.280 --> 1:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>So many of our ecological challenges are just as tied

1:06:25.880 --> 1:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to social science as they are to actual conservation biology

1:06:30.720 --> 1:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>or ecosystem science.

1:06:31.960 --> 1:06:33.280
<v Speaker 2>That's certain.

1:06:34.040 --> 1:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>So, as you mentioned, we are coming up on time.

1:06:37.120 --> 1:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I was maybe being overly optimistic that I could somehow

1:06:39.760 --> 1:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>manage a discussion with you in less than sixty minutes

1:06:43.120 --> 1:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>because there's so much talk about. But I have two

1:06:47.040 --> 1:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>final things i'd love to pick your brain about, selfishly,

1:06:50.720 --> 1:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>very selfishly. One is related to an overarching theme that

1:06:57.360 --> 1:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I have always personally thought will be mission critical to

1:07:03.000 --> 1:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>ever actually solving these problems. We've been talking about this,

1:07:07.360 --> 1:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to protect wildness and wildlife and wild places. And

1:07:11.280 --> 1:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I read an essay of yours in which you had

1:07:14.960 --> 1:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a friend who shared with you the same perspective that

1:07:18.600 --> 1:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I have, and I'm curious about your thoughts on it now.

1:07:20.440 --> 1:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So you wrote this essay in which you went on

1:07:22.400 --> 1:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a mountain lion hunt with a friend of yours, Don Thomas,

1:07:26.080 --> 1:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and you were kind of antagonistic towards the idea of

1:07:29.640 --> 1:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>mountain lion and hunting until you went on that trip

1:07:32.920 --> 1:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>with him and learned about how he does it and

1:07:34.720 --> 1:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>why he does it and all those things. But in

1:07:37.240 --> 1:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>this piece that you wrote, you shared a perspective that

1:07:41.080 --> 1:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Don shared and what he said to you. I'm paraphrasing

1:07:44.120 --> 1:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this quote a little bit, But he said one of

1:07:46.720 --> 1:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the biggest impending tragedies and the struggle waged by conservation

1:07:50.760 --> 1:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>organizations is the polarization between the hunting and non hunting

1:07:55.440 --> 1:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>factions of those groups. This polarization divides resource, is it

1:08:00.680 --> 1:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>divides people. It wastes time and money. Until hunting and

1:08:05.160 --> 1:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>non hunting conservationists can find the pragmatic wisdom to accommodate

1:08:09.360 --> 1:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>each other within the larger fold, the developers and miners

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and the loggers are going to be laughing all the

1:08:15.920 --> 1:08:19.439
<v Speaker 1>way to the bank. So my question to you is,

1:08:19.520 --> 1:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>number one, do you agree with Don? And number two,

1:08:23.960 --> 1:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>if you do, do you have any sense of what

1:08:27.160 --> 1:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that pragmatic wisdom is that might help us accommodate each

1:08:32.120 --> 1:08:36.479
<v Speaker 1>other and work together to solve these pressing conservation issues.

1:08:38.080 --> 1:08:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, I absolutely agree with Don. I

1:08:40.720 --> 1:08:42.280
<v Speaker 3>learned a lot from Don. He's a great guy. You

1:08:42.320 --> 1:08:46.080
<v Speaker 3>should have him on the show. E Donald Thomas, Okay, Yes,

1:08:46.240 --> 1:08:50.479
<v Speaker 3>he's a he's a writer. He's published a number of

1:08:50.479 --> 1:08:55.520
<v Speaker 3>books about hunting and outdoor adventures of various different sorts.

1:08:55.040 --> 1:09:01.599
<v Speaker 3>He's a great sportsman. He's also a medical doctor. And

1:09:01.800 --> 1:09:07.639
<v Speaker 3>I wrote a piece long ago about about mountain lions,

1:09:07.680 --> 1:09:10.919
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that you know, I've lived in Montana

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:13.320
<v Speaker 3>for fifty years and I've never seen one in the wild.

1:09:13.760 --> 1:09:16.519
<v Speaker 3>I've seen one in Chile in the wild, but I've

1:09:16.560 --> 1:09:18.720
<v Speaker 3>never seen one in Montana in the wild. And I

1:09:18.760 --> 1:09:21.320
<v Speaker 3>thought they must be pretty rare, and maybe we shouldn't

1:09:21.400 --> 1:09:25.559
<v Speaker 3>hunt them if they're that rare. And I published that

1:09:25.600 --> 1:09:29.439
<v Speaker 3>piece and came to Don's attention, and he we joke

1:09:29.479 --> 1:09:31.880
<v Speaker 3>about this. Now he emailed me essentially, I think email,

1:09:31.920 --> 1:09:33.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe he sent me a letter, maybe it was before email,

1:09:34.439 --> 1:09:40.160
<v Speaker 3>and he said, hey, you ignorant Bozeman yuppie, if you

1:09:40.240 --> 1:09:42.320
<v Speaker 3>think mountain lions are rare, you should come up and

1:09:42.479 --> 1:09:45.920
<v Speaker 3>go mountain lion hunting with me and my dogs, and

1:09:46.000 --> 1:09:48.639
<v Speaker 3>I'll show you what a mountain lion looks like. And

1:09:48.960 --> 1:09:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I wrote back and said when when can I come?

1:09:52.960 --> 1:09:55.880
<v Speaker 3>So I went up there. Oh, And I also said,

1:09:57.080 --> 1:10:00.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe we shouldn't hunt them because you don't

1:10:00.360 --> 1:10:04.559
<v Speaker 3>eat them. And I have no problem with hunting for food,

1:10:05.040 --> 1:10:08.280
<v Speaker 3>but hunting for trophies falls in a different category. And

1:10:08.320 --> 1:10:10.639
<v Speaker 3>he said, well, I eat my mountain lions, and I'll

1:10:10.640 --> 1:10:13.040
<v Speaker 3>feed you a mountain lion dinner if you come up

1:10:13.120 --> 1:10:14.840
<v Speaker 3>and he did that. I went out with him in

1:10:14.880 --> 1:10:17.320
<v Speaker 3>the snow with his dogs. We did not see a

1:10:17.320 --> 1:10:19.400
<v Speaker 3>mountain lion. We did not strike a trail that day.

1:10:19.880 --> 1:10:25.559
<v Speaker 3>And then he fed me mountain lion and that was

1:10:25.600 --> 1:10:31.400
<v Speaker 3>interesting and we became friends highly with a high degree

1:10:31.400 --> 1:10:34.240
<v Speaker 3>of mutual respect. And that statement of his I absolutely

1:10:34.280 --> 1:10:38.880
<v Speaker 3>agree with. How how do we do that? People have

1:10:38.960 --> 1:10:40.920
<v Speaker 3>to keep talking to each other, They have to keep listening,

1:10:41.760 --> 1:10:52.880
<v Speaker 3>have to realize that there are heartfelt values beyond their

1:10:52.920 --> 1:10:58.440
<v Speaker 3>own heartfelt values. They have to use their imagination. Imagine

1:10:59.160 --> 1:11:02.840
<v Speaker 3>the things that matter to the other person. Imagine the

1:11:02.840 --> 1:11:07.240
<v Speaker 3>things that make the other person feel threatened, Imagine the

1:11:07.320 --> 1:11:11.880
<v Speaker 3>things that make the other person feel disrespected or demeaned.

1:11:12.400 --> 1:11:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Use your imagic pause, pause, and use your imagination about

1:11:16.240 --> 1:11:19.880
<v Speaker 3>the other person. You know, I'm I, You know I was.

1:11:20.040 --> 1:11:23.519
<v Speaker 3>I described my fishing background. My father was a fisherman,

1:11:23.560 --> 1:11:25.200
<v Speaker 3>taught me to fish. I started fishing when I was

1:11:25.200 --> 1:11:27.439
<v Speaker 3>a kid. My father didn't happen to be a hunter.

1:11:27.640 --> 1:11:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I never hunted, but I eat meat, so I have

1:11:33.160 --> 1:11:41.839
<v Speaker 3>no ethical grounds or inclination to disrespect you know, hunting

1:11:41.920 --> 1:11:47.559
<v Speaker 3>for food. Trophy hunting is a different discussion. Don taught

1:11:47.600 --> 1:11:51.040
<v Speaker 3>me that even that is a complicated discussion. And I

1:11:51.160 --> 1:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>learned these things because I was barely smart enough in

1:11:55.800 --> 1:11:59.920
<v Speaker 3>response to that hey, you ignorant Bozeman yuppie letter to say,

1:12:01.320 --> 1:12:03.519
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to go out in the snow with you

1:12:03.680 --> 1:12:06.960
<v Speaker 3>when you hunt mountain lions and see and learn something.

1:12:07.920 --> 1:12:14.080
<v Speaker 3>And that created the opportunity for a friendship that exists

1:12:14.800 --> 1:12:16.479
<v Speaker 3>to this day. We don't see each other as often

1:12:16.520 --> 1:12:22.280
<v Speaker 3>as we wish, but we have a strong bond of

1:12:23.360 --> 1:12:27.800
<v Speaker 3>respect and mutual appreciation. And there are other people that

1:12:27.840 --> 1:12:30.320
<v Speaker 3>I've had that kind of thing with, not as often

1:12:30.360 --> 1:12:36.639
<v Speaker 3>as I wish, but it starts with saying, pause and

1:12:36.760 --> 1:12:40.960
<v Speaker 3>try and imagine what it looks like, you know, walk

1:12:41.000 --> 1:12:43.080
<v Speaker 3>a mile in the other guy's moccasins.

1:12:43.520 --> 1:12:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:12:44.240 --> 1:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, It's amazing how such a simple act can be

1:12:49.000 --> 1:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>so transformative. And if we can do that, to Don's point,

1:12:54.880 --> 1:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think.

1:12:55.240 --> 1:12:57.280
<v Speaker 2>That we would have a.

1:12:57.439 --> 1:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Larger, stronger, were diverse and capable army of people to

1:13:06.479 --> 1:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>stand up for and speak up for these wild places

1:13:10.040 --> 1:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and wild creatures that we all care about, sometimes in

1:13:12.840 --> 1:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>different ways, and we have different ways of engaging with wildness,

1:13:17.640 --> 1:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's no less.

1:13:18.960 --> 1:13:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Valuable, that's for certain. So amen, one last question.

1:13:26.320 --> 1:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>That I have selfishly wanted to talk to you about

1:13:30.000 --> 1:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>when I very when I reached out to you several

1:13:31.840 --> 1:13:32.519
<v Speaker 1>years ago.

1:13:34.160 --> 1:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>For the first time, it was it was with this

1:13:35.840 --> 1:13:37.559
<v Speaker 2>question of mind. And I've reached out.

1:13:37.360 --> 1:13:41.479
<v Speaker 1>To a number of other people who have who are

1:13:41.520 --> 1:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>friends of yours, and other writers and other thinkers on this,

1:13:45.640 --> 1:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and it comes back to we started a conversation off

1:13:49.320 --> 1:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>air with Leopold, right, and this is this is a

1:13:52.920 --> 1:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>famous line of Leopold's. He said something along the lines

1:13:55.920 --> 1:13:58.599
<v Speaker 1>of in his book is Stan County Almanac. He said

1:13:58.600 --> 1:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that the curse of an ecologic education is that you

1:14:01.920 --> 1:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>discover that you live in a world full of wounds. Right,

1:14:06.080 --> 1:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we've been talking about here today, is

1:14:08.439 --> 1:14:11.599
<v Speaker 1>how this amazing wild world that we live in and

1:14:11.640 --> 1:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that we love, and that we have our own unique

1:14:14.000 --> 1:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>ways of participating, whether it's hunting or fishing, or wildlife

1:14:18.120 --> 1:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>watching or biking or hiking, whatever it is. When you

1:14:22.080 --> 1:14:26.559
<v Speaker 1>start paying attention to our present day, you recognize that

1:14:26.600 --> 1:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>there are many ways that it's in decline, that it

1:14:29.080 --> 1:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is threatened, and that the future is in the air.

1:14:33.120 --> 1:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>It's up in the air in many ways that can

1:14:36.280 --> 1:14:43.519
<v Speaker 1>be depressing, that can be discouraging, that can it's a

1:14:43.560 --> 1:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of negativity if you allow yourself to wallow

1:14:46.000 --> 1:14:51.639
<v Speaker 1>in it. So quite simply, how do you find hope?

1:14:51.920 --> 1:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>What gives you hope for the future given all of

1:14:55.160 --> 1:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>this reality that we just discussed.

1:15:01.640 --> 1:15:04.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a very interesting question. It's an important question. It's

1:15:04.080 --> 1:15:06.599
<v Speaker 3>a question I think about a lot. And it's all

1:15:06.640 --> 1:15:11.880
<v Speaker 3>the more so now because my current book project is

1:15:12.040 --> 1:15:16.759
<v Speaker 3>to do a short, essaistic biography of Jane Goodall. Yeah,

1:15:17.240 --> 1:15:24.519
<v Speaker 3>I saw, and that's a question that she answered a

1:15:24.600 --> 1:15:29.560
<v Speaker 3>lot of times. She always talked about hope, and I,

1:15:30.000 --> 1:15:32.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, Jane Goodall and Ed Wilson are two of

1:15:32.720 --> 1:15:36.080
<v Speaker 3>the biggest heroes of mine that I had the privilege

1:15:36.080 --> 1:15:43.360
<v Speaker 3>of meeting and becoming, you know, friends with during their lifetimes.

1:15:44.760 --> 1:15:49.080
<v Speaker 3>And Jane, so I asked her that question. I was

1:15:49.120 --> 1:15:51.439
<v Speaker 3>one of the many, many people who asked her that question.

1:15:52.080 --> 1:15:59.439
<v Speaker 3>And because she her hope just seemed inextinguishable. She traveled

1:15:59.439 --> 1:16:02.599
<v Speaker 3>three hundred a year, speaking to people, speaking to big

1:16:02.640 --> 1:16:05.960
<v Speaker 3>audiences of adults, speaking at university, speaking to school kids,

1:16:06.000 --> 1:16:11.599
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, et cetera. And so for me, the answer

1:16:11.640 --> 1:16:20.800
<v Speaker 3>has always been this, hope is not a mood. It's

1:16:20.840 --> 1:16:29.679
<v Speaker 3>a duty because these things that we're talking about are

1:16:29.720 --> 1:16:36.120
<v Speaker 3>so precious that even though the trends are mostly grim,

1:16:36.680 --> 1:16:42.599
<v Speaker 3>there's nothing more important than to continue to fight, to

1:16:42.640 --> 1:16:46.760
<v Speaker 3>continue to fight for the for the preservation of biological diversity,

1:16:47.360 --> 1:16:51.320
<v Speaker 3>as much of it as we can preserve. There's just

1:16:51.360 --> 1:16:55.839
<v Speaker 3>nothing more important. So even if the odds are against

1:16:55.960 --> 1:17:01.600
<v Speaker 3>us and the trends are grim, you keep fighting. And

1:17:03.439 --> 1:17:11.520
<v Speaker 3>that's because hope versus despair is different from optimism and pessimism.

1:17:12.000 --> 1:17:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Optimism and pessimism tend to imply predictions of the future.

1:17:18.640 --> 1:17:21.840
<v Speaker 3>A pessimist thinks that things will go badly, and an

1:17:21.840 --> 1:17:25.759
<v Speaker 3>optimist expects that things will go well. But hope versus

1:17:25.800 --> 1:17:29.719
<v Speaker 3>despair I view as more an act of the will,

1:17:30.120 --> 1:17:36.280
<v Speaker 3>a duty. Despair is an indulgence that we can't afford,

1:17:36.720 --> 1:17:40.679
<v Speaker 3>and hope is a duty that we've got to embrace

1:17:40.720 --> 1:17:43.720
<v Speaker 3>because it empowers us. And Jane said the same thing.

1:17:43.800 --> 1:17:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Her answer is a little bit more elaborate. She gives

1:17:50.280 --> 1:17:52.519
<v Speaker 3>four reasons for hope. She's written a number of books

1:17:52.520 --> 1:17:54.880
<v Speaker 3>that have hope. In the title, she talks about the

1:17:54.920 --> 1:18:01.320
<v Speaker 3>resilience of nature and the inventiveness of humans and the

1:18:01.680 --> 1:18:07.040
<v Speaker 3>energy of young people as reasons for hope, and she's

1:18:07.080 --> 1:18:10.840
<v Speaker 3>got one more that I can't remember right now because

1:18:10.880 --> 1:18:14.760
<v Speaker 3>we're doing this live and this is real. Yes, but

1:18:15.240 --> 1:18:19.680
<v Speaker 3>so so. One of the reasons I have hope is

1:18:19.720 --> 1:18:23.639
<v Speaker 3>that Jane Goodall taught us you don't have a right

1:18:24.280 --> 1:18:27.040
<v Speaker 3>to despair. You got to keep fighting. But also there

1:18:27.080 --> 1:18:30.920
<v Speaker 3>are reasons, there are reasons to be optimistic. The resilience

1:18:30.920 --> 1:18:37.840
<v Speaker 3>of nature and the energy and and idealism of young

1:18:37.840 --> 1:18:39.120
<v Speaker 3>people are high on the list.

1:18:39.680 --> 1:18:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:18:40.400 --> 1:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, the passion of people like yourself who are willing

1:18:46.520 --> 1:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to give themselves to that cause is certainly another one

1:18:51.840 --> 1:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that gives me hope, because there are a lot of

1:18:54.280 --> 1:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>people in one way or another that have dedicated themselves

1:18:57.439 --> 1:19:00.160
<v Speaker 1>their lives, their work, their time, or maybe just their

1:19:00.200 --> 1:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>weekends or their evenings, whatever it is they have to

1:19:03.760 --> 1:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>spare to try to make sure we can continue enjoying

1:19:07.200 --> 1:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>wildness and wild places. Those all of those individual examples

1:19:13.000 --> 1:19:16.519
<v Speaker 1>are are certainly encouraging as well. And I appreciate everything

1:19:16.520 --> 1:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>that you have done in that in that line, David,

1:19:19.479 --> 1:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's been thank you, Mark, appreciate it very much,

1:19:21.920 --> 1:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and I appreciate our chat here today too.

1:19:24.360 --> 1:19:26.920
<v Speaker 3>I enjoyed it very much. Thanks for having me on.

1:19:27.600 --> 1:19:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you