WEBVTT - Trump Calls Cohen `Weak’ After Mueller Deal

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>day we bring you insight and analysis into the most

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>important legal news of the day. You can find more

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. Today, one of

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the most significant developments in the Muller Russia investigation, President

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's former lawyer, Michael Cohen, pleaded guilty to a

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>new federal charge, admitting that he lied to Congress about

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump's pans to build a Trump Tower in Russia in

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>order to be consistent with the countet. Trump's representative. Trump

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>dismissed the importance of Cohen's plea to reporters, He's lying

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>about a project that everybody knew about it. I mean,

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>we were very open with it. We were thinking about

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>building a building. I guess we had an inform. It

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>was an option. I don't know what you'd call it.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>We decided I decided ultimately not to do it. There

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>would have been nothing wrong if I did do it.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Joining me to discuss the plea is Bradley Moss apartment

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Mark said, so, Brad, how significant is the latest Cone

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>plea and cooperation deal. Well, this is absolutely huge. You know,

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>there's not a good day for President of Trump, or

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>his legal team or his family. This is the president's

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>former personal lawyer, one of his most inner circle allies

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and associates, pleading guilty and admitting that he knowingly lied

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to Congress about the nature of the president's financial investment

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>or interest in Russia during the campaign, when there was

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>a Russian disinformation campaign going on that was supporting the president,

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>when there were when there was concerns about whether or

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>not the president's financial exposures was a national security risk,

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>when there was all these issues tied to meetings with

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Russians and Trump Tower and everything else. All this, all

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>this time, we've been told nothing happened with this deal,

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>nothing would happen with this deal. And now Michael Cohen

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>has come out and admitted, under penalty of perjury before

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the judge in a signed document that he lied to

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Congress about it, that this deal was going on into

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the summer of and that the president was being repeatedly

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>briefed and the president's family was being repeatedly briefed on

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the details of the negotiations. Let's discuss the timing not

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>only Cohen's upcoming sentencing, not only the blow up of

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the Mantafort deal on Monday, but perhaps more important, the

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>submission of President Trump's written answers to the Special Council. Yeah,

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this is this is not a coincidence that this is

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>all happening. Now, so what did we have? We had?

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>The President finally submitted those written responses to a number

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of questions provided by the Special Council, the addressing like

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>what he knew about the Trump Power meeting, what he

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>knew about the platform change at the Republican Convention, and

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>what he knew about interactions with people such as Felix

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Sader and Michael Cohen about a possible deal in Russia

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for a Trump Tower. Now we know the president's answers

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to the questions about the Trump Tower meeting. He says

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>he has no recollection of being informed. He says he

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>has no recollection of knowing anything about with you that

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't it know what his answer was on this

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>issue with the Trump Tower stuff. We only have his

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>public statements so far. But if the President lied in

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>his responses, if he committed perjury and knowingly provided false

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>information to the Special Council. He is facing serious potential

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>legal or political problems. This is why the Special Council

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted to sit down, because they wanted to understand what

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the President knew and to what extent he was concealing

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>information from the government. On that respect, we now know

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that Jerome Corsi has been giving information. We know that

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Roger Stone's in the Special Council's crosshairs. All these things.

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>The news is tightening around Donald Trump, and his commentary

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is only going to get more angry and unhinged as

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it gets worse. I'm curious about one thing, Brad, what

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>do you make of Muller initially pushing Cohen off to

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Southern District prosecutors so seemingly not interested in now making

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a plea deal with him, which the Southern District didn't Well.

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that was partially um D o J bureaucratic move.

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe my understanding of when this all initially came

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>about that they were looking at Cohen, that the Deputy

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General, Rob Rosenstein, who was overseeing the probe, decided

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>that this particular area into the issue of campaign finance

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>violations and money longer. I was sorry wire fraud wasn't

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>really within the scope of Special Council's mandate, and so

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>they gave it over to the Southern District. But when

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen initially played guilty on those felonies, he agreed

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to cooperate with the US government in general, and that

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>included the Special Council, who was allowed to have these

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>numerous sessions with him. I think it's seventy hours of

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>discussions with him in which they've gotten extensive amount of

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>testimony from him. They've got his text messages and emails,

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>his documents, everything he had on his phones, all of

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this data, and they're using it to build cases in

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>different suments against potentially different individual rules where there was

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>false material statements or where there was other felonies potentially committed.

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Brad Now. Trump said an impromptu press conference after the

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Cohen deal that he had a right to do a

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>business deal with Russia, and he kept repeating that what

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is he not saying about that deal? Well, that's that's

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>all fifty four thousand dollar question. Yes, so long as

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the president was a private citizen before he became the

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>president of United States, he had a right to make

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>any business deals he wanted that were consistent with the law.

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But here were the problems. He repeatedly stated the public

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>during presidential debates and the primaries and the summer and

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>press conferences that he had no deals in Russia. He

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>kept calling it fake news that he had any deals

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in Russia, where we now know that was completely false,

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that there was this ongoing negotiation that Cohen was briefing

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>him on. Cohen's ongoing discussions with the Putin's senior officials

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>with Felix Sader, who was a uh Kremlin linked business

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>associate of the Trump circle, was trying to make this deal,

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to make a big meeting between Putin and Trump

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>happen in the summer or the early fall of All

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>these things are going on, And this is the problem

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of how to what extent the president has been misleading

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the public in the context of the presidential election, and

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>more particularly to this investigation, to what extent he provided

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>false information at a special council and his responses. All right,

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just about a minute here, But what kind of time

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is Coin facing with this particular police So long as

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>he continues to provide the co operation, it's zero to

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>six months. It's basically just being packed on as you know,

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>icing on the cake to his already existing felony plea deal.

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>He's looking at several years, but it's more as he cooperates,

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be more leniency. All right, Thanks so much, brad.

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>That's Bradley Moss, a partner at Mark's ad and UM.

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Just a reminder, under federal law, it's a crime to

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>knowingly and willfully make material false statements to Congress or

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to any branch of the federal government in connection with

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>matters your investigation. That's what completed to President Trump has

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>been complaining about the Ninth Circuit since the California federal

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.559
<v Speaker 1>judge blocked the Trump administration from shutting down the doccer

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>program in January. He ramped up those complaints after another

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>California judge blocked Trump's attempt to ban asylum at the

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>border for those crossing illegally last week. The order today

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>is not we can get around that very easily. What

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I do say Ninth Circuit is it's very unfair. When

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody files their case in the Ninth Circuit, they file

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it for a reason. The President's complaints are nothing new

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for the circuit. It's been stereotyped as too liberal by

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>conservatives for years, Just how liberal is the Ninth Circuit.

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Here to answer that question is Steve Sanders, a professor

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>at Indiana University's Mare School of Law. Steve Trump is

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>complaining about the Ninth Circuit, a federal appeals court, but

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>most of his real complaints have been about individual district

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>judges in that circuit. Explain the distinction, sure, well, District

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>judges in the federal system are are trial judges trial

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>court judges. There the first level of the federal judiciary.

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh and in most states have at least one so

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>called federal district. Many states, like California and larger states

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have two or three different districts. The Ninth Circuit is

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a court of appeals which sits over a group of states. Actually,

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Ninth Circuits a pretty large group of states California, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Hawaii, Alaska,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and Montana. Uh and the Ninth Circuit takes appeals from

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>litigants who are dissatisfied with the results they've gotten in

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the district courts in those states, and occasionally the Supreme

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Court takes appeals from those courts of appeals. The Ninth

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Circuit is one of twelve such courts of appeals spread

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 1>around the country. Each one, um, well most of them,

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>eleven of them oversee groups of states, and then there's

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>another court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, so Steve.

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>For years, the Ninth Circuit has been stereotyped as the

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>most liberal circuit, so much so that conservative groups mounted

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>an effort to split it up in just how liberal

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is the Ninth Circuit compared to other appellate courts? Um,

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know that I've seen. There has

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>been no recent data, at least reliable scholarly empirical data

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that measures the liberal or conservative sort of temperature of

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>each federal circuit. You know, for one thing, it's it's

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to do that kind of work. How do you

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.599
<v Speaker 1>know many decisions that courts issue are really difficult to

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>characterize as quote liberal or conservative. So I have a

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>basic problem of what kind of data are you starting with?

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to what are your inputs going

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to be to try to decide that kind of thing.

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a recent study that try to base its judgment

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on the political donations that were made by law clerks

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>to judges in those circuits, which seems like a really

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>tenuous and and and end of unreliable way of measuring

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 1>a circuit um. The most systematic study of the liberal

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>versus conservative nature of the Federal circuits um was done

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>back in UH, well in early two thousands. The data

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>ended at two thousand and at that point, the Ninth

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Circuit was pretty liberal. It was more liberal than most

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Federal circuits in its decisions. But again that

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>data is now almost twenty years out of date. UM.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Other Republican presidents like Trump and George W. Bush had

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>had appointments to those courts. I think a lot of

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the Ninth circuits liberal reputation stems from, you know, a

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>small number of very high profile liberal judges that that

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>court his heads in some cases dating back to appointments

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that were made by Jimmy Carter in the late nineteen seventies.

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Reinhardt, who just passed away within the last year,

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>was a sort of liberal lion of the Federal judiciary. UM.

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 1>There's another UH judge named marsh Marsha Burzon who still

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>sits on that court. But the Ninth Circuit also has

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>conservative judges. I think some of this comes from the

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>stereotyping of California. The Ninth Circuit headquarters is in San Francisco,

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot of its cases come out of California. And

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's a mixture of factors. I would

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>say that, you know, what President Trump is saying is

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>based on probably things that his Federalist Society advisors and

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>friends have been telling him, which he's in turn vastly

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>oversimplifying and turning into sort of cartoon character versions of

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a commentary on the on federal judges. And and indeed,

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>but those even those perceptions that he's being hold about

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>are probably about ten years out of date. There are

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>studies showing that the Circuit is becoming more centrist. Now.

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has also said that the Ninth Circuit is

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the federal appeals court reversed most by the Supreme Court.

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>What do the stats tell you about that claim? Yeah,

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that is flatly not correct. And and here I'm relying

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>on some data that was gathered by a scholar at

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>the University of Texas named Stephen Flattock, who I believe

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>has occasionally been a guest on Bloomberg Law. And the

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>data that he found indicates that over the last five years.

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Over the last five Supreme Court terms, three federal courts

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.959
<v Speaker 1>of appeals have actually been reversed by the Supreme Court

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>in a higher percentage of cases than the Ninth Circuit.

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Of the Third Circuit, which is on the east coast,

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the Sixth Circuit, which is sort of in the middle

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of the country, and the Eleventh Circuit, which is in

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the south, all had higher reversal rates than the Ninth

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Circuit um the Ninth because the Ninth Circuit is so large,

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it covers a geographically very large area, it has lots

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of judges, and so therefore it has a very large

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>caseload in absolute numbers. Um the Ninth Circuit may look

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>like it's getting more reversals, but as a percentage of

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>all the cases decided, it's actually down there near the middle.

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 1>There three circuits that in the last five years that

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>higher reversal rates at the Supreme Court. And Steve just

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>how much does whether a circuit court is liberal or

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:36.559
<v Speaker 1>conservative have to do with the reversal rate? Not very much.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>You know. Some of these courts that have been more

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>frequently reversed, like the Eleventh Circuit, is actually considered a

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>relatively conservative Court based on the appointments who appointed the

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>judges who are sitting on that court, and so I

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a correlation there at all. The Supreme

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Court in the last year or two and a couple

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of very high profile cases, one civil rights discrimination case,

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>another immigration case upheld the Ninth Circuit in in in

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in opinions that had come to quote unquote liberal outcomes,

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 1>if you want to put it that way. So I

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's very much of a very much of

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a correlation there. It's also important to remember that the

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Supreme in something like seventy of the cases it takes,

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court reverses the lower court. In Supreme Court

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes takes cases and affirms the judgment of the lower court.

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>But usually if the Supreme Court is going to get

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>involved in a case, it's because it's troubled by something

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that happened below. And so it is the norm for

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>circuits when cases get to the Supreme Court for circuits

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to be reversed. More often, something like seventy of the

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>cases the court takes are reversals of lower courts. The

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>one final thing it's important to note that the Supreme

0:14:53.800 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Court here's a tiny fraction. They because there's so much

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to say about this, but thank you that. Steve Sanders,

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>It's professor at Indiana University's Mara School of Law. Thanks

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can subscribe

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and listen to the show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>on bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. This

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg