1 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most 3 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,399 Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more 4 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 5 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. Today, one of 6 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:26,320 Speaker 1: the most significant developments in the Muller Russia investigation, President 7 00:00:26,360 --> 00:00:29,520 Speaker 1: Donald Trump's former lawyer, Michael Cohen, pleaded guilty to a 8 00:00:29,520 --> 00:00:32,600 Speaker 1: new federal charge, admitting that he lied to Congress about 9 00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:35,680 Speaker 1: Trump's pans to build a Trump Tower in Russia in 10 00:00:35,760 --> 00:00:39,440 Speaker 1: order to be consistent with the countet. Trump's representative. Trump 11 00:00:39,440 --> 00:00:43,600 Speaker 1: dismissed the importance of Cohen's plea to reporters, He's lying 12 00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:46,479 Speaker 1: about a project that everybody knew about it. I mean, 13 00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:48,920 Speaker 1: we were very open with it. We were thinking about 14 00:00:48,920 --> 00:00:51,080 Speaker 1: building a building. I guess we had an inform. It 15 00:00:51,159 --> 00:00:52,920 Speaker 1: was an option. I don't know what you'd call it. 16 00:00:53,720 --> 00:00:57,320 Speaker 1: We decided I decided ultimately not to do it. There 17 00:00:57,320 --> 00:00:59,320 Speaker 1: would have been nothing wrong if I did do it. 18 00:01:00,120 --> 00:01:02,639 Speaker 1: Joining me to discuss the plea is Bradley Moss apartment 19 00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:06,559 Speaker 1: Mark said, so, Brad, how significant is the latest Cone 20 00:01:06,560 --> 00:01:10,880 Speaker 1: plea and cooperation deal. Well, this is absolutely huge. You know, 21 00:01:10,920 --> 00:01:13,080 Speaker 1: there's not a good day for President of Trump, or 22 00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:15,920 Speaker 1: his legal team or his family. This is the president's 23 00:01:15,959 --> 00:01:20,160 Speaker 1: former personal lawyer, one of his most inner circle allies 24 00:01:20,160 --> 00:01:23,880 Speaker 1: and associates, pleading guilty and admitting that he knowingly lied 25 00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:28,360 Speaker 1: to Congress about the nature of the president's financial investment 26 00:01:28,440 --> 00:01:32,080 Speaker 1: or interest in Russia during the campaign, when there was 27 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:36,399 Speaker 1: a Russian disinformation campaign going on that was supporting the president, 28 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:39,080 Speaker 1: when there were when there was concerns about whether or 29 00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:43,280 Speaker 1: not the president's financial exposures was a national security risk, 30 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:46,760 Speaker 1: when there was all these issues tied to meetings with 31 00:01:46,840 --> 00:01:50,040 Speaker 1: Russians and Trump Tower and everything else. All this, all 32 00:01:50,040 --> 00:01:52,080 Speaker 1: this time, we've been told nothing happened with this deal, 33 00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:54,800 Speaker 1: nothing would happen with this deal. And now Michael Cohen 34 00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:57,480 Speaker 1: has come out and admitted, under penalty of perjury before 35 00:01:57,480 --> 00:02:00,560 Speaker 1: the judge in a signed document that he lied to 36 00:02:00,600 --> 00:02:03,080 Speaker 1: Congress about it, that this deal was going on into 37 00:02:03,080 --> 00:02:06,680 Speaker 1: the summer of and that the president was being repeatedly 38 00:02:06,720 --> 00:02:09,800 Speaker 1: briefed and the president's family was being repeatedly briefed on 39 00:02:09,880 --> 00:02:13,320 Speaker 1: the details of the negotiations. Let's discuss the timing not 40 00:02:13,480 --> 00:02:17,080 Speaker 1: only Cohen's upcoming sentencing, not only the blow up of 41 00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:20,680 Speaker 1: the Mantafort deal on Monday, but perhaps more important, the 42 00:02:20,760 --> 00:02:26,080 Speaker 1: submission of President Trump's written answers to the Special Council. Yeah, 43 00:02:26,120 --> 00:02:28,200 Speaker 1: this is this is not a coincidence that this is 44 00:02:28,240 --> 00:02:30,520 Speaker 1: all happening. Now, so what did we have? We had? 45 00:02:30,880 --> 00:02:33,720 Speaker 1: The President finally submitted those written responses to a number 46 00:02:33,760 --> 00:02:37,600 Speaker 1: of questions provided by the Special Council, the addressing like 47 00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:39,760 Speaker 1: what he knew about the Trump Power meeting, what he 48 00:02:39,800 --> 00:02:42,800 Speaker 1: knew about the platform change at the Republican Convention, and 49 00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:46,240 Speaker 1: what he knew about interactions with people such as Felix 50 00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:49,800 Speaker 1: Sader and Michael Cohen about a possible deal in Russia 51 00:02:49,840 --> 00:02:52,120 Speaker 1: for a Trump Tower. Now we know the president's answers 52 00:02:52,120 --> 00:02:54,480 Speaker 1: to the questions about the Trump Tower meeting. He says 53 00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:56,880 Speaker 1: he has no recollection of being informed. He says he 54 00:02:56,919 --> 00:02:59,400 Speaker 1: has no recollection of knowing anything about with you that 55 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:02,160 Speaker 1: we don't it know what his answer was on this 56 00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:05,000 Speaker 1: issue with the Trump Tower stuff. We only have his 57 00:03:05,040 --> 00:03:07,959 Speaker 1: public statements so far. But if the President lied in 58 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:12,240 Speaker 1: his responses, if he committed perjury and knowingly provided false 59 00:03:12,280 --> 00:03:16,800 Speaker 1: information to the Special Council. He is facing serious potential 60 00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:21,120 Speaker 1: legal or political problems. This is why the Special Council 61 00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:24,360 Speaker 1: wanted to sit down, because they wanted to understand what 62 00:03:24,480 --> 00:03:28,400 Speaker 1: the President knew and to what extent he was concealing 63 00:03:28,440 --> 00:03:31,840 Speaker 1: information from the government. On that respect, we now know 64 00:03:31,960 --> 00:03:35,320 Speaker 1: that Jerome Corsi has been giving information. We know that 65 00:03:35,440 --> 00:03:39,200 Speaker 1: Roger Stone's in the Special Council's crosshairs. All these things. 66 00:03:39,240 --> 00:03:42,920 Speaker 1: The news is tightening around Donald Trump, and his commentary 67 00:03:43,080 --> 00:03:48,000 Speaker 1: is only going to get more angry and unhinged as 68 00:03:48,040 --> 00:03:51,360 Speaker 1: it gets worse. I'm curious about one thing, Brad, what 69 00:03:51,400 --> 00:03:54,680 Speaker 1: do you make of Muller initially pushing Cohen off to 70 00:03:54,760 --> 00:03:58,880 Speaker 1: Southern District prosecutors so seemingly not interested in now making 71 00:03:58,920 --> 00:04:03,240 Speaker 1: a plea deal with him, which the Southern District didn't Well. 72 00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:06,960 Speaker 1: I think that was partially um D o J bureaucratic move. 73 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:09,720 Speaker 1: I believe my understanding of when this all initially came 74 00:04:09,760 --> 00:04:12,480 Speaker 1: about that they were looking at Cohen, that the Deputy 75 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:16,160 Speaker 1: Attorney General, Rob Rosenstein, who was overseeing the probe, decided 76 00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:20,039 Speaker 1: that this particular area into the issue of campaign finance 77 00:04:20,120 --> 00:04:23,960 Speaker 1: violations and money longer. I was sorry wire fraud wasn't 78 00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:27,880 Speaker 1: really within the scope of Special Council's mandate, and so 79 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:30,719 Speaker 1: they gave it over to the Southern District. But when 80 00:04:30,839 --> 00:04:34,960 Speaker 1: Michael Cohen initially played guilty on those felonies, he agreed 81 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:37,080 Speaker 1: to cooperate with the US government in general, and that 82 00:04:37,160 --> 00:04:40,160 Speaker 1: included the Special Council, who was allowed to have these 83 00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:43,320 Speaker 1: numerous sessions with him. I think it's seventy hours of 84 00:04:43,360 --> 00:04:46,760 Speaker 1: discussions with him in which they've gotten extensive amount of 85 00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:50,600 Speaker 1: testimony from him. They've got his text messages and emails, 86 00:04:50,600 --> 00:04:54,159 Speaker 1: his documents, everything he had on his phones, all of 87 00:04:54,200 --> 00:04:57,640 Speaker 1: this data, and they're using it to build cases in 88 00:04:57,680 --> 00:05:00,960 Speaker 1: different suments against potentially different individual rules where there was 89 00:05:01,080 --> 00:05:04,760 Speaker 1: false material statements or where there was other felonies potentially committed. 90 00:05:05,600 --> 00:05:10,520 Speaker 1: Brad Now. Trump said an impromptu press conference after the 91 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:12,719 Speaker 1: Cohen deal that he had a right to do a 92 00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:15,599 Speaker 1: business deal with Russia, and he kept repeating that what 93 00:05:15,760 --> 00:05:20,040 Speaker 1: is he not saying about that deal? Well, that's that's 94 00:05:20,040 --> 00:05:22,839 Speaker 1: all fifty four thousand dollar question. Yes, so long as 95 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:25,359 Speaker 1: the president was a private citizen before he became the 96 00:05:25,360 --> 00:05:27,320 Speaker 1: president of United States, he had a right to make 97 00:05:27,320 --> 00:05:29,839 Speaker 1: any business deals he wanted that were consistent with the law. 98 00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:33,040 Speaker 1: But here were the problems. He repeatedly stated the public 99 00:05:33,080 --> 00:05:36,160 Speaker 1: during presidential debates and the primaries and the summer and 100 00:05:36,240 --> 00:05:39,040 Speaker 1: press conferences that he had no deals in Russia. He 101 00:05:39,120 --> 00:05:41,520 Speaker 1: kept calling it fake news that he had any deals 102 00:05:41,520 --> 00:05:45,200 Speaker 1: in Russia, where we now know that was completely false, 103 00:05:45,400 --> 00:05:48,600 Speaker 1: that there was this ongoing negotiation that Cohen was briefing 104 00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:53,240 Speaker 1: him on. Cohen's ongoing discussions with the Putin's senior officials 105 00:05:53,560 --> 00:05:57,320 Speaker 1: with Felix Sader, who was a uh Kremlin linked business 106 00:05:57,400 --> 00:06:00,719 Speaker 1: associate of the Trump circle, was trying to make this deal, 107 00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:02,960 Speaker 1: trying to make a big meeting between Putin and Trump 108 00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:07,080 Speaker 1: happen in the summer or the early fall of All 109 00:06:07,120 --> 00:06:09,120 Speaker 1: these things are going on, And this is the problem 110 00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:12,320 Speaker 1: of how to what extent the president has been misleading 111 00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:15,640 Speaker 1: the public in the context of the presidential election, and 112 00:06:15,839 --> 00:06:19,120 Speaker 1: more particularly to this investigation, to what extent he provided 113 00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:22,080 Speaker 1: false information at a special council and his responses. All right, 114 00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:25,080 Speaker 1: just about a minute here, But what kind of time 115 00:06:25,279 --> 00:06:29,880 Speaker 1: is Coin facing with this particular police So long as 116 00:06:29,920 --> 00:06:33,200 Speaker 1: he continues to provide the co operation, it's zero to 117 00:06:33,279 --> 00:06:36,159 Speaker 1: six months. It's basically just being packed on as you know, 118 00:06:36,640 --> 00:06:39,680 Speaker 1: icing on the cake to his already existing felony plea deal. 119 00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:42,479 Speaker 1: He's looking at several years, but it's more as he cooperates, 120 00:06:42,480 --> 00:06:45,640 Speaker 1: it's gonna be more leniency. All right, Thanks so much, brad. 121 00:06:46,080 --> 00:06:50,200 Speaker 1: That's Bradley Moss, a partner at Mark's ad and UM. 122 00:06:50,240 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 1: Just a reminder, under federal law, it's a crime to 123 00:06:52,680 --> 00:06:57,000 Speaker 1: knowingly and willfully make material false statements to Congress or 124 00:06:57,000 --> 00:06:59,440 Speaker 1: to any branch of the federal government in connection with 125 00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:09,160 Speaker 1: matters your investigation. That's what completed to President Trump has 126 00:07:09,200 --> 00:07:12,480 Speaker 1: been complaining about the Ninth Circuit since the California federal 127 00:07:12,560 --> 00:07:15,559 Speaker 1: judge blocked the Trump administration from shutting down the doccer 128 00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:19,800 Speaker 1: program in January. He ramped up those complaints after another 129 00:07:19,880 --> 00:07:23,360 Speaker 1: California judge blocked Trump's attempt to ban asylum at the 130 00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:28,640 Speaker 1: border for those crossing illegally last week. The order today 131 00:07:28,960 --> 00:07:32,080 Speaker 1: is not we can get around that very easily. What 132 00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:36,160 Speaker 1: I do say Ninth Circuit is it's very unfair. When 133 00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 1: everybody files their case in the Ninth Circuit, they file 134 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:42,320 Speaker 1: it for a reason. The President's complaints are nothing new 135 00:07:42,400 --> 00:07:45,480 Speaker 1: for the circuit. It's been stereotyped as too liberal by 136 00:07:45,520 --> 00:07:49,400 Speaker 1: conservatives for years, Just how liberal is the Ninth Circuit. 137 00:07:49,440 --> 00:07:51,920 Speaker 1: Here to answer that question is Steve Sanders, a professor 138 00:07:51,960 --> 00:07:56,000 Speaker 1: at Indiana University's Mare School of Law. Steve Trump is 139 00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:59,280 Speaker 1: complaining about the Ninth Circuit, a federal appeals court, but 140 00:07:59,400 --> 00:08:03,400 Speaker 1: most of his real complaints have been about individual district 141 00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:09,120 Speaker 1: judges in that circuit. Explain the distinction, sure, well, District 142 00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:12,720 Speaker 1: judges in the federal system are are trial judges trial 143 00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:16,040 Speaker 1: court judges. There the first level of the federal judiciary. 144 00:08:16,720 --> 00:08:19,920 Speaker 1: Uh and in most states have at least one so 145 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:24,440 Speaker 1: called federal district. Many states, like California and larger states 146 00:08:24,440 --> 00:08:27,520 Speaker 1: have two or three different districts. The Ninth Circuit is 147 00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:31,280 Speaker 1: a court of appeals which sits over a group of states. Actually, 148 00:08:31,280 --> 00:08:39,480 Speaker 1: in the Ninth Circuits a pretty large group of states California, Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, Hawaii, Alaska, 149 00:08:39,480 --> 00:08:42,960 Speaker 1: and Montana. Uh and the Ninth Circuit takes appeals from 150 00:08:43,040 --> 00:08:46,080 Speaker 1: litigants who are dissatisfied with the results they've gotten in 151 00:08:46,160 --> 00:08:51,320 Speaker 1: the district courts in those states, and occasionally the Supreme 152 00:08:51,360 --> 00:08:55,120 Speaker 1: Court takes appeals from those courts of appeals. The Ninth 153 00:08:55,120 --> 00:08:59,320 Speaker 1: Circuit is one of twelve such courts of appeals spread 154 00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:03,079 Speaker 1: around the country. Each one, um, well most of them, 155 00:09:03,080 --> 00:09:06,320 Speaker 1: eleven of them oversee groups of states, and then there's 156 00:09:06,320 --> 00:09:10,120 Speaker 1: another court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, so Steve. 157 00:09:10,679 --> 00:09:13,640 Speaker 1: For years, the Ninth Circuit has been stereotyped as the 158 00:09:13,679 --> 00:09:17,320 Speaker 1: most liberal circuit, so much so that conservative groups mounted 159 00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:20,880 Speaker 1: an effort to split it up in just how liberal 160 00:09:20,960 --> 00:09:24,920 Speaker 1: is the Ninth Circuit compared to other appellate courts? Um, 161 00:09:25,080 --> 00:09:27,600 Speaker 1: You know, I don't know that I've seen. There has 162 00:09:27,640 --> 00:09:32,640 Speaker 1: been no recent data, at least reliable scholarly empirical data 163 00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:38,040 Speaker 1: that measures the liberal or conservative sort of temperature of 164 00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:41,160 Speaker 1: each federal circuit. You know, for one thing, it's it's 165 00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:43,400 Speaker 1: hard to do that kind of work. How do you 166 00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:47,599 Speaker 1: know many decisions that courts issue are really difficult to 167 00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:51,120 Speaker 1: characterize as quote liberal or conservative. So I have a 168 00:09:51,200 --> 00:09:54,240 Speaker 1: basic problem of what kind of data are you starting with? 169 00:09:54,320 --> 00:09:56,840 Speaker 1: How are you going to what are your inputs going 170 00:09:56,880 --> 00:09:58,520 Speaker 1: to be to try to decide that kind of thing. 171 00:09:58,559 --> 00:10:02,480 Speaker 1: There's a recent study that try to base its judgment 172 00:10:02,679 --> 00:10:06,800 Speaker 1: on the political donations that were made by law clerks 173 00:10:06,840 --> 00:10:10,199 Speaker 1: to judges in those circuits, which seems like a really 174 00:10:10,360 --> 00:10:14,640 Speaker 1: tenuous and and and end of unreliable way of measuring 175 00:10:14,640 --> 00:10:19,079 Speaker 1: a circuit um. The most systematic study of the liberal 176 00:10:19,200 --> 00:10:23,120 Speaker 1: versus conservative nature of the Federal circuits um was done 177 00:10:23,920 --> 00:10:27,360 Speaker 1: back in UH, well in early two thousands. The data 178 00:10:27,559 --> 00:10:31,600 Speaker 1: ended at two thousand and at that point, the Ninth 179 00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:36,480 Speaker 1: Circuit was pretty liberal. It was more liberal than most 180 00:10:36,559 --> 00:10:39,520 Speaker 1: of the Federal circuits in its decisions. But again that 181 00:10:39,640 --> 00:10:42,800 Speaker 1: data is now almost twenty years out of date. UM. 182 00:10:42,840 --> 00:10:47,559 Speaker 1: Other Republican presidents like Trump and George W. Bush had 183 00:10:47,600 --> 00:10:49,840 Speaker 1: had appointments to those courts. I think a lot of 184 00:10:49,840 --> 00:10:55,040 Speaker 1: the Ninth circuits liberal reputation stems from, you know, a 185 00:10:55,120 --> 00:10:59,560 Speaker 1: small number of very high profile liberal judges that that 186 00:10:59,640 --> 00:11:02,920 Speaker 1: court his heads in some cases dating back to appointments 187 00:11:02,920 --> 00:11:05,880 Speaker 1: that were made by Jimmy Carter in the late nineteen seventies. 188 00:11:06,280 --> 00:11:09,480 Speaker 1: Stephen Reinhardt, who just passed away within the last year, 189 00:11:09,600 --> 00:11:13,760 Speaker 1: was a sort of liberal lion of the Federal judiciary. UM. 190 00:11:13,800 --> 00:11:18,319 Speaker 1: There's another UH judge named marsh Marsha Burzon who still 191 00:11:18,320 --> 00:11:20,960 Speaker 1: sits on that court. But the Ninth Circuit also has 192 00:11:21,080 --> 00:11:25,160 Speaker 1: conservative judges. I think some of this comes from the 193 00:11:25,240 --> 00:11:30,360 Speaker 1: stereotyping of California. The Ninth Circuit headquarters is in San Francisco, 194 00:11:30,440 --> 00:11:33,079 Speaker 1: a lot of its cases come out of California. And 195 00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:36,720 Speaker 1: so I think there's a mixture of factors. I would 196 00:11:36,760 --> 00:11:40,080 Speaker 1: say that, you know, what President Trump is saying is 197 00:11:40,160 --> 00:11:44,400 Speaker 1: based on probably things that his Federalist Society advisors and 198 00:11:44,480 --> 00:11:48,320 Speaker 1: friends have been telling him, which he's in turn vastly 199 00:11:48,400 --> 00:11:52,960 Speaker 1: oversimplifying and turning into sort of cartoon character versions of 200 00:11:54,320 --> 00:11:57,440 Speaker 1: a commentary on the on federal judges. And and indeed, 201 00:11:57,440 --> 00:12:00,680 Speaker 1: but those even those perceptions that he's being hold about 202 00:12:01,040 --> 00:12:04,360 Speaker 1: are probably about ten years out of date. There are 203 00:12:04,400 --> 00:12:08,560 Speaker 1: studies showing that the Circuit is becoming more centrist. Now. 204 00:12:08,679 --> 00:12:11,640 Speaker 1: President Trump has also said that the Ninth Circuit is 205 00:12:11,679 --> 00:12:15,920 Speaker 1: the federal appeals court reversed most by the Supreme Court. 206 00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:19,640 Speaker 1: What do the stats tell you about that claim? Yeah, 207 00:12:19,679 --> 00:12:23,120 Speaker 1: that is flatly not correct. And and here I'm relying 208 00:12:23,160 --> 00:12:26,200 Speaker 1: on some data that was gathered by a scholar at 209 00:12:26,200 --> 00:12:29,079 Speaker 1: the University of Texas named Stephen Flattock, who I believe 210 00:12:29,080 --> 00:12:32,240 Speaker 1: has occasionally been a guest on Bloomberg Law. And the 211 00:12:32,360 --> 00:12:36,360 Speaker 1: data that he found indicates that over the last five years. 212 00:12:36,360 --> 00:12:40,000 Speaker 1: Over the last five Supreme Court terms, three federal courts 213 00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:42,959 Speaker 1: of appeals have actually been reversed by the Supreme Court 214 00:12:43,280 --> 00:12:46,439 Speaker 1: in a higher percentage of cases than the Ninth Circuit. 215 00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:49,240 Speaker 1: Of the Third Circuit, which is on the east coast, 216 00:12:49,320 --> 00:12:51,240 Speaker 1: the Sixth Circuit, which is sort of in the middle 217 00:12:51,280 --> 00:12:53,880 Speaker 1: of the country, and the Eleventh Circuit, which is in 218 00:12:53,920 --> 00:12:57,600 Speaker 1: the south, all had higher reversal rates than the Ninth 219 00:12:57,679 --> 00:13:01,360 Speaker 1: Circuit um the Ninth because the Ninth Circuit is so large, 220 00:13:01,440 --> 00:13:04,760 Speaker 1: it covers a geographically very large area, it has lots 221 00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: of judges, and so therefore it has a very large 222 00:13:07,880 --> 00:13:12,720 Speaker 1: caseload in absolute numbers. Um the Ninth Circuit may look 223 00:13:12,760 --> 00:13:16,320 Speaker 1: like it's getting more reversals, but as a percentage of 224 00:13:16,320 --> 00:13:20,240 Speaker 1: all the cases decided, it's actually down there near the middle. 225 00:13:20,280 --> 00:13:23,319 Speaker 1: There three circuits that in the last five years that 226 00:13:23,480 --> 00:13:27,320 Speaker 1: higher reversal rates at the Supreme Court. And Steve just 227 00:13:27,440 --> 00:13:30,840 Speaker 1: how much does whether a circuit court is liberal or 228 00:13:30,920 --> 00:13:36,559 Speaker 1: conservative have to do with the reversal rate? Not very much. 229 00:13:37,120 --> 00:13:39,440 Speaker 1: You know. Some of these courts that have been more 230 00:13:39,520 --> 00:13:43,240 Speaker 1: frequently reversed, like the Eleventh Circuit, is actually considered a 231 00:13:43,280 --> 00:13:48,480 Speaker 1: relatively conservative Court based on the appointments who appointed the 232 00:13:48,559 --> 00:13:51,480 Speaker 1: judges who are sitting on that court, and so I 233 00:13:51,800 --> 00:13:55,320 Speaker 1: don't think there's a correlation there at all. The Supreme 234 00:13:55,360 --> 00:13:57,720 Speaker 1: Court in the last year or two and a couple 235 00:13:57,800 --> 00:14:02,240 Speaker 1: of very high profile cases, one civil rights discrimination case, 236 00:14:02,280 --> 00:14:06,920 Speaker 1: another immigration case upheld the Ninth Circuit in in in 237 00:14:06,920 --> 00:14:10,960 Speaker 1: in opinions that had come to quote unquote liberal outcomes, 238 00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:12,839 Speaker 1: if you want to put it that way. So I 239 00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:15,079 Speaker 1: don't think there's very much of a very much of 240 00:14:15,120 --> 00:14:18,400 Speaker 1: a correlation there. It's also important to remember that the 241 00:14:18,440 --> 00:14:22,280 Speaker 1: Supreme in something like seventy of the cases it takes, 242 00:14:22,680 --> 00:14:26,440 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court reverses the lower court. In Supreme Court 243 00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:30,280 Speaker 1: sometimes takes cases and affirms the judgment of the lower court. 244 00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:33,240 Speaker 1: But usually if the Supreme Court is going to get 245 00:14:33,280 --> 00:14:37,080 Speaker 1: involved in a case, it's because it's troubled by something 246 00:14:37,080 --> 00:14:40,280 Speaker 1: that happened below. And so it is the norm for 247 00:14:40,400 --> 00:14:43,360 Speaker 1: circuits when cases get to the Supreme Court for circuits 248 00:14:43,400 --> 00:14:47,240 Speaker 1: to be reversed. More often, something like seventy of the 249 00:14:47,240 --> 00:14:51,200 Speaker 1: cases the court takes are reversals of lower courts. The 250 00:14:51,240 --> 00:14:53,720 Speaker 1: one final thing it's important to note that the Supreme 251 00:14:53,800 --> 00:15:00,400 Speaker 1: Court here's a tiny fraction. They because there's so much 252 00:15:00,400 --> 00:15:02,400 Speaker 1: to say about this, but thank you that. Steve Sanders, 253 00:15:02,400 --> 00:15:06,560 Speaker 1: It's professor at Indiana University's Mara School of Law. Thanks 254 00:15:06,560 --> 00:15:09,800 Speaker 1: for listening to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can subscribe 255 00:15:09,880 --> 00:15:13,120 Speaker 1: and listen to the show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and 256 00:15:13,160 --> 00:15:17,640 Speaker 1: on bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. This 257 00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:18,720 Speaker 1: is Bloomberg