WEBVTT -  Lululemon’s Disappointing Outlook Adds Urgency to CEO Search 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Lululemons, that's up three point two percent today. That's a

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>good news. The bad news it's down twenty percent year

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 2>to date. It's down fifty percent over the trailing twelve months.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 2>I understand they don't have a CEO either, so I'm

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 2>not sure what's going on there. Big fan of Lululemon,

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>don't get me wrong, but I think there's a little

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:41.319
<v Speaker 2>bit of them.

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 3>What was the last Lululemon item you bought?

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>Not one, but I'm a big admirer.

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yep?

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Put them.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Goyle, Senior US e Commerce and Retail Story Intelligence joins

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 2>us from Princeton.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 4>Put them.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>I note Lululemon reported some results here. A what did

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>you see in the results? And B what's the latest

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>on their CEO search?

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely on their CEO searches that it's still undergoing and

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 4>we don't know where they are as far as the

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 4>results are. Concerned. They posted respectable for Q numbers last night.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 4>A one percent increase in revenue was better than the

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 4>one percent roughly declined that we expected, so a little better.

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 4>The concern was really the guidance the outlook for the

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 4>next quarter, which is one queue and the full year

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 4>was still very light. Now, I don't know if it's

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 4>that they're being conservative because clearly the turnaround hasn't begun

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 4>to take hold, or that things are still soft as

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 4>they continue to mark down product to get rid of

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 4>some of that inventory and bring in new product. So

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 4>I'd say mixed results overall, Still cautious on the turnaround.

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 4>We're not confident that it's beginning to take hold just yet,

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 4>but we can somewhat say that, you know, maybe we've

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 4>hit the bottom.

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I have a seventy five dollars credit at Lululemon

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 3>every quarter because I have an American Express Platinum card.

0:01:57.840 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Of course you do, and this is one of the

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 3>benefit of it. But I struggle to use it because

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 3>I haven't found anything that I want to spend it on.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.559
<v Speaker 3>And I go and Reddit and a lot of people

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 3>feel this way. They do, or they did talk about

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 3>having a new designer and some new product, but that

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 3>has not made its way into stores just yet. What

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 3>is the latest in terms of just innovation, new design,

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 3>freshing up their lineup?

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, Yeah, so you're starting to see some of

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.959
<v Speaker 4>that trickle through. We were just at stores last week

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 4>and we did see some new styles come through. I'd

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 4>say the bulk of it, though, we'll be in the

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 4>spring and summer, so that is when you will start

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 4>to see some of the new product flow through and

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 4>hopefully more exciting lineups that you will feel excited to

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 4>spend your seventy five dollars credit on. I'd say on

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 4>the women's side, that's where most of the work is needed.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 4>For men's though they've done really really well. Their men's

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 4>lineup is pretty solid. They're doing really well internationally. I

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 4>do agree that in women's in North America specifically, they

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 4>need to show more and deliver more, and we expect

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.519
<v Speaker 4>to see some of that in spring summer and we'll

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 4>know more if they'll resonate to see if the turnaround

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 4>can actually take hold.

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 3>So the other thing that Lula Lemon has to contend

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 3>with is Chick Wilson, the founder. As far as I know,

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't actually have an operating role in the company.

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 3>He's not on the board, but he is kind of

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 3>in the peanut gallery agitating for changes overhauls. What kind

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 3>of influence does this have on the existing board and

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 3>on investors' expectations.

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's been advocating for change for quite some time now.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 4>We did see some change come through just recently where

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 4>they did appoint a new board of director and one

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 4>of the current board of directors will not be renewing,

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 4>so you're starting to see some shake up. I think

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 4>he's still calling for more rightfully. So you know, lul

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Lemon has definitely lost its mojo over the last three

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 4>years and it's given up a lot of the upside

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 4>to competition. So I think change is coming, especially as

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 4>we wait for the new incoming CEO to see who

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 4>that will be. I think that'll be the key inflection

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 4>point to say, you know, can this new person bring

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 4>Lulu Lemon back on board kind of reignite the double

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 4>digit gains that we're used to because quite frankly, a

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 4>low single legit increase is not what you expect to

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 4>see at a Lula Lemon.

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 2>So I'm looking at the an R function on the

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg terminal for Lululemon. I got three buys, one cell

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and thirty holds. What are those thirty analysts waiting for putam.

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 4>And new ceo, new direction? Do we want to see

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 4>the new product?

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean I can go out there and go to

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>LinkedIn and find them somebody.

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, Paul, you're applying, you know it has to be

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 4>the right person, right, you have to get the right person.

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 4>We need to make sure that we get a person

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 4>who understands the DNA of Little Lemon, who understands the

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 4>athletic work space, and really is a product led a

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 4>person like for me, it's important to see that someone

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 4>comes through who understands that retail one on one is

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 4>about the product first and everything else after.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, But Calvin McDonald, the CEO who has just left

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 3>and who's come under pressure because things started to kind

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>of slide at the end of his tenure, he was

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 3>that person initially because when he first joined sales took

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 3>off and he came over from Sephora. So he clearly

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 3>has a merchandising background.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 4>He does, but it's in beauty if you remember. As

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 4>soon as he came on, I think the first big

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 4>pressures he had was let's launch a skincare line, you know,

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 4>the deodorant and some of the lotions, etc. That didn't

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 4>go too well. It was a nice idea very high

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 4>gross margins eighty percent, so in theory sounded great, but

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 4>it didn't really resonate and get a Little Lemon anywhere.

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 4>I think what we need is someone who understands the

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 4>apparel and the at leisure space. Someone who knows that

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 4>you need style with performance, because that is what this

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 4>brand demands. And constant newness, like a Little Lemon, has

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 4>to outshine the broader competition, and that's become harder with

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 4>just technologies being almost available to everyone.

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Right now, stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 3>up after this.

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 3>All right, it is still earning season, believe it or not,

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 3>and the retailers are reporting results. We heard about Lulu

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Lemon earlier. Let's talk about Macy's. The stock is up

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 3>about five percent. In this morning's trade. Mary Ross Gilbert

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 3>is our senior equity analyst covering retail and she joins us. Now, Mary,

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 3>what do we learn from Macy's.

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 5>What we learned from Macy's is that Macy's has inflected

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 5>to positive comp sales. They were looking to achieve sustainable growth.

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 5>We think they're there, and for this year they're providing

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 5>i think, very tepid guidance. They want to kind of

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 5>budget where you know, do higher gas prices have an impact,

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 5>But overall, the consumer is very resilient and they're attracting

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 5>more of the middle income to higher income consumer, you know,

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 5>across their brands, primarily you know, the Macy's name plate.

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 5>So they're expecting comp sales though they're guiding to be

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 5>down half a percent to up half a percent, but

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 5>we think they'll easily beat that. And of course for

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 5>the first quarter they're already seeing strong traction and at

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 5>the high end they're guiding for comp sales to rise

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 5>one and a half percent. So what we're seeing is

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 5>that the name plate looks like it has inflected to

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 5>positive comps, and we certainly see the changes when we

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 5>go in the store.

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 2>What do you see when you go in the store,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Mary that that that's different or maybe positive in general.

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So what we're seeing is the stores are constantly evolving.

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean every time I go in there, I'm seeing

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 5>something new. So I'm seeing new brands, and what the

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 5>company reported on the calls, they've added sixty brands. So

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 5>when I go in there and I'm you know, obviously

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 5>focused on women's wear, but I did kind of take

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 5>a look and I saw Roden Gun in our local store,

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 5>so that was kind of a nice addition. And the

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 5>stores are just the merchandising is so strong, and the

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 5>sales people. This has been the best encounter that I've

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 5>had with sales associates. When I went in the store

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 5>just yesterday, I encountered at least three associates. They were

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 5>well appointed, absolutely charming and engaging. And because they have

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 5>some of these new labels, I actually tried something on.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm really a Bloomingdale's person. I really love the premium brands,

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 5>but I did see some really good brands in there.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 5>My favorite is a Vec lo Fee and I tried

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 5>on some of those genes and they're oh, they were amazing,

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 5>absolutely amazing. So I really think that Macy's has come back.

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 5>They're bringing in all the brands that consumers care about,

0:08:55.720 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 5>They're attracting younger consumers. So I really see very good

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 5>execution here with the company.

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 3>What about execution at Bloomingdale's, And I bring this up

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 3>particularly with Sax's issues. SAX of course in bankruptcy protection

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 3>right now and trying to find a way to get

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 3>through all of its step problems.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 5>That's all been a benefit for bloomingdale. So Bloomingdale's has

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 5>been executing, you know, for the last few years, and

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 5>it's an ongoing process. So just in our local store

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 5>just opened was the Christian Lubaton shoe boutique. And of

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 5>course these are licensed businesses, but it doesn't matter. You know,

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 5>they're not reporting comp sales on all these different basis.

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 5>It's just comp sales. So it does include the benefit

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 5>of licensed brands. But so they now have a Chanelle boutique,

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 5>and they now have the Christian Lubaton. But they're always

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 5>if you go to Ready to wear, you're seeing constantly,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, new labels coming in. So it's very exciting.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 5>I love Bloomingdale's and that explains why their comp sales

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 5>were up ten percent. Essentially in the fourth quarter. I

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 5>think that is some of the gains coming from Sachs

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 5>and Neiman Marcus customers given the bankruptcy lack of product

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 5>during that time. So they're they're the beneficiary, and that's

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 5>why they really emphasized how they're focused on expanding the

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 5>chain this year and the company, one of the executives

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 5>did indicate probably a month ago that they would look

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 5>at some of the stores that might be closing if

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 5>it's relevant. So they're they're looking to see what opportunities

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 5>are out there because they're only in fourteen markets, so

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 5>there's a there's a great uh, I think expansion opportunity

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 5>to with Bloomingdale's right.

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, Scarlett Mary, she shops in only the best locations.

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Westfield Century City, that's where she goes to. The race

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 2>is there, and that you think the short Holds mall

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 2>is nice, The Westfield Century City Mall is spectact there

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, Lolover's offices are right there. Oh,

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 2>so that's how it works. It's good on lunch to

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>them all and that's that work. We love it. What's

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 2>makes you say about their store count in general? Here,

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 2>because there was a decade or more of the department

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 2>store industry really reducing store count.

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so they're they're closing fourteen stores that's probably mostly

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 5>closed at this point, and then going forward, there's about

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 5>sixty five more to gore to go and those will

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 5>close through twenty twenty eight. They're not in a hurry

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 5>to close them. They want to make sure they maximize

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 5>the real estate value. And it's okay because those stores

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 5>are profitable. But the go forward store base continues to

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 5>be the three hundred and fifty stores, and so they

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 5>will get there. Like I said, by twenty twenty eight,

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 5>they'll have gotten rid of the last of the sixty

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 5>five stores they plan to close. So I think, you

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 5>know what, once we move past that, you know, the

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 5>overall top line should look good.

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay, and Android Auto

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 2>Let's get back to the market. Talk about an individual

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 2>name here, Unilever. What we've seen in the package goods

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 2>sector is a lot of companies trying to figure out

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>a way to jump start growth as inflation has eroded

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 2>some of their pricing power and cause some challenges for

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 2>the stocks. One of them is Unilever. We want to

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 2>get the latest on what they may be thinking about

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>in terms of maybe changing up the company and strategies.

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 2>We're joined by Diana Gomes, Bloomberg Intelligence senior equity analysts. Diana,

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 2>what can you tell us about Unilever? I mean, we

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of know the brands, there's a million brands underneath

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 2>a Unilever umbrella, but what are they doing to think

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 2>about juicing growth at that company?

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 6>Yes, thank you for having me so. Nil Ever is

0:12:54.960 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 6>really coming through a few years of transformation where they

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 6>split the Magnum ice cream for instance, to really focus

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 6>more in their core business, which is personal care and

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 6>beauty as central stage. That's where the company has been

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 6>really refocusing their premium and innovation and really getting the

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.719
<v Speaker 6>marketing machine behind that segment in order to get to

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 6>that four to six percent organic sales growth target in

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 6>the medium term. However, we see some challenges, especially in

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 6>the near term to get there, and the guidance for

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 6>two twenty six was already quite cautious, partly because the

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 6>food business has been seen quite weak demand, particularly in Europe,

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 6>even though they have very strong brands, so Almans and

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 6>no are the leading stars in that unit. But obviously

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 6>with the geopolitics uncertainty that that's some level of additional risk.

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Right And when it comes to its food business, Unilever

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 3>has been consistently reducing its exposure. It's sold off its

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 3>spreads business, the part of the business that contains I

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 3>can't believe it's not butter. Last year it sparat off

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 3>its ice cream division into Magnum ice Cream. It still

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 3>holds a twenty percent stare, it is steadily selling that down.

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Is the goal here to shrink foods into something that's

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 3>not meaningful because the CEO is at the end of

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the day, really a beauty and wellness guy rather than

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 3>a food sky.

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 6>That's an interesting question when when asked about it, ever,

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 6>keeps defending that they are very behind the main brands

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 6>of the foods business. But obviously they are in the

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 6>middle of that program to divest about one and a

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 6>half billion euros in what they call non core brands

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 6>food brands, and this would include some European local brands,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 6>where probably the effort to to really pull up that

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 6>growth is seen as too much for the return and

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 6>it can be distracting for for management as well. But

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 6>this food business is still quite margin creative for the

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 6>whole UNI level group now without Magnum ice cream also

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 6>cash a creative, so it still makes sense to to

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 6>have it in the portfolio to some extent. But I

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 6>do see why, especially in this background, why there could

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 6>be some vision to try and accelerate the that split

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 6>and considering different options as as they have been saying

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 6>that they are, but just a reiteration of that in

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 6>the last in the last day or so.

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 2>So I look at the A n R function Diana

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 2>for a Unilever and I see eleven buys, eleven holes

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 2>and four cells. It shows to me the street has

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 2>no idea what to do with this dock. What do

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 2>you think the bulls want out of Unilever today?

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 6>So it is about where people would be, I guess

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 6>in terms of not wanting to put words into their mouths.

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 6>But the way I look at it, it depends where

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 6>we see their journey to get to accelerate that growth further.

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 6>The main goal is really to drive volume growth, and

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 6>Unilever already showed that they can get to the two

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 6>percent at least two percent mark in the fourth Q

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 6>results in the back of some of the fixes they

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 6>had been doing also in emerging markets. So it is about,

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 6>I would say, where people's confidence is in terms of

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 6>where it goes from here versus where it's already and

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 6>the very the drive really is on the premium innovation

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 6>and that focus. And we saw already a lot of

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 6>the transformation bringing in benefits already in last year in

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty five, So can they do better in the

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 6>new term?

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am. EA is done on Apple, Cocklay

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>General Mills Cheerios right, yes, that's how I start my

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 2>day with the bullet cheeriers. What happened with General Mills?

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 2>What did they report?

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 7>So basically it was mixed. Results were mixed compared to consensus.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 7>They they seem to be doing better obviously, there were

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 7>some puts and takes, some tatwinds, but they seem to

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 7>be a little bit more quarter dense rather than something

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 7>that we can extrapolate into next quarter. So yeah, I mean,

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 7>obviously I think the stock is down and it's because

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, while volume underneath underlying volume is improving, it's

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 7>still it's still weak and to get volume growth it's

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 7>still very expensive.

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Just looking at the PGeo function that breaks down kind

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 2>of where they get their revenue whore they break it

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 2>down pretty finally baking mixes and ingredients, dough, super premium

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 2>ice cream, cereal, convenient meal, snacks, yogurt, pet other way

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 2>they break it down. So what are there certain segments

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.199
<v Speaker 2>that are doing better than others? Are Are they one

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 2>of these consumer product companies that are saying, if something's

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 2>not working, we'll sell it and will try to invest

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 2>in the areas that are growing.

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 7>That is, you know, all of these companies have done

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 7>some portfolio reshaping. You know, yogurt has been a headwind

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 7>because they spin it off, so that is obviously one

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 7>of the things the latest you know spin offs that

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 7>they have done. But yeah, they are very sharp in

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 7>terms of their portfolio. You know, reshaping, but it seems

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 7>that now they're investing more on making the brands that

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:29.239
<v Speaker 7>they have grow, and some of them are growing and

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 7>some of them are not.

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Stock is year to date down about seventeen percent, hit

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 2>a fifty two week low today. Here, how are the

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 2>General Mills of the world, the Proctor and the gammeles,

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 2>How are they dealing with the consumer facing particularly the

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>bottom end of the K shaped economy, facing economic pressures

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 2>now it's more money to fill up your car with gas.

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 2>How are they dealing with that?

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 7>Yes, so this company, in particular General Mills, they actually

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 7>reduced guidance during Cagney last month, and it was basically

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 7>because volume growth is just not there and they're trying

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 7>to increase marketing. They're not necessarily trying to rely on

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 7>price cuts, but it seems that that is going to

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 7>have to start happening. More competition they're seeing, for example,

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 7>for snacking, they seem to be a little bit more

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 7>competitive then the category used to be dog seems to

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 7>be still a little bit of a headwind for them.

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 7>So we're seeing, you know, there seems to be a

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 7>little bit more of cautionary tail for the consumer and

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:41.479
<v Speaker 7>definitely with prices spiking for gas, it's not necessarily helping.

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't know if it's just me, but

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 2>I mean when I go to a supermarket now, I

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 2>see many more store brands in more categories, and they're

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 2>also getting better placement in the shows, which it's important

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 2>for you guys. Yes, talks about just the competitive landscape

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 2>of brands, name brands versus kind of the store brands.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 7>Yes, So basically retailers have been investing on their private

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 7>label portfolio. Uh, it's about a quarter of of their

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 7>revenue at this point. They're trying to obviously navigate. They

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 7>don't necessarily want to anger the national brands, but they

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 7>tend to fill out certain white spaces that are not

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 7>necessarily cater by by these national brands. And at some point,

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, sometimes they're competitive more competitive. They have tiers

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 7>of of you know, pricing for for this private label,

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 7>and you know some people actually go to these stores

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 7>to buy their private label.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 2>What's the we're now, I guess, you know, roughly a

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 2>year into these teriffs, what are the consumer project companies are?

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 2>What are they saying these days about tariffs and passing

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 2>it along versus taking into their margin. Where are we

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 2>knowing at.

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 7>Yes, so some of a lot of it has gone

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 7>through the P and L. They they're very hesitant about

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 7>increasing prices again, they're thinking it's more on the price competition.

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 7>They're going to be more price competitive going forward. So

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing headwinds on the on the margins rather than

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 7>you know, just passing through.

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at this company, General Mills, and they have

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 2>a six point three percent dividend yield.

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 6>That's pretty good.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, How safe is that? How do they committed? What's

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 2>their policy on all that?

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 7>Well, they usually try to grow it at the same

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 7>rate of earnings, so we don't necessarily see them as

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 7>as you know, being a little bit you know, increasing

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 7>share repurchases are probably like spiking the dividend. We're probably

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 7>going to see a lot of the same, you know,

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 7>just dividend growing at the same pace of earnings.

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>weekday nam toewon Eastern, on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal