WEBVTT - Michael Fisch on Private Equity Funds

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry rid Holds on

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 2>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Michael Fish is co founder and CEO of American Securities.

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 2>They're one of the older private equity firms around, been

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>in business since nineteen ninety four. They run over twenty

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 2>seven billion dollars in assets. If you're at all interested

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 2>in what it's like to run a private equity firm

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't just buy up companies and parcel them out,

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 2>but rather partners with management, keeps the teams in place

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 2>on the companies they buy, and just facilitates the improvement

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>of the company, how it operates, how they're able to

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>bring expertise both in along with capital and whatever necessary

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 2>debt is, as well as a network of experts. Then

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I think you're going to find this to be a

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 2>fascinating conversation. There aren't a lot of companies and there

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 2>aren't a lot of people that have the historical perspective

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.559
<v Speaker 2>on the rise of private equity like Michael Fish does.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I found this conversation to really be intriguing, and I

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>think you will also with no further ado. My discussion

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 2>with American Security CEO, Michael Fish.

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Berry. It's a pleasure to be here.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a pleasure to have you.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about your background BA

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>in economics from Dartmouth. You get a Stanford NBA. What

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>was the original career plan? Were you always thinking about

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 2>going into finance?

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>The original career plan was to be employed to provide

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a safety net for my mother and my two sisters. Right.

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>But if I had a plan as to how to

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>do that when I went to college, it was learn

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>as much as I could, as fast as I could,

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and get a BA and then become an accountant and

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer, because then I figured I could always be

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>deployed either managing the numbers or doing law and get

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>those two degrees.

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 2>That that's not the direction you ended up going though.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>What was it that made you say, Hey, this finance

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 2>thing looks like it's fun and interesting.

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's, you know, like life, it's a serendipitous series

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of things. I met a terrific man at Dartmouth named

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>John Hennessy Junior. He was the ex deean of the

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Tuck School, the business school at Dartmouth College, and I

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>took a freshman seminar with him because I needed a course,

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and he became a mentor. And he once asked me,

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>when you just asked me? And I explained him, get

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the CPA, get the law degree, I'd always be employable.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>And he kind of said, hmm, I'm higher. Have you

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>thought about an MBA?

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Really? That's very interesting, though, says the person at Tuck

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Business School.

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Right exactly. And he ultimately encouraged me to apply to

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the three to two program. They had a dormant program

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>left over from the Korean War. You know, business schools,

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of course have favored people with experience.

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 2>So five years gives you undergraduate and graduate is that the.

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Time you basically do three years as an undergrad. You

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>apply to the Tuck school. If you get in and

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it hadn't taken anyone in over a decade, then you

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>do your senior year effectively as the first year MBA

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>do the second year, and you get both degrees in

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>five years.

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And he encouraged me to apply. He wrote a recommendation

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>for me, and I guess, surprising, not surprisingly after that.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I did get in, But you went to Stanford, not Tuck.

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So I trotted down the street to call to his

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>assistant made an appointment, all sweaty and nervous, and went

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to thank him for his gracious recommendation. And he said,

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in the way of good mentors, well do you want

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to go? And I'm thinking he's the x dan of

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the business school, like, this is a trick question. And

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I gave him the deer in the headlights look, and

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>he said, well, let me let's let me imagine we

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>got three letters here. We got a letter to get

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>into Tuck, a letter to get into Harvard, and a

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>letter to get into Stanford. And I said well, and

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought to myself, well, I know he went to Harvard, right,

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And he said, Dean Attuck is a trick question. And

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I said something like, well, I guess Harvard or Stanford.

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And he said, well, then we're done. And I said,

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not into Harvard and Stanford. He said, well

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>you will be.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>That's very funny. So in between Dartmouth and Stanford you

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 2>work for Goldman Sachs doing M and A early eighties.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 3>How is that?

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>How did that help prepare your path to private equity?

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, that same man the next year I trotted down

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's said, well, okay, we're applying to Harvard and Stanford,

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't you? And when do I write my letter of recommendation?

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So he did, and I was fortunate to be accepted

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>to both and that was very important because when this

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>was the dawning of what is now a big analyst

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>program across the country in all banks and investment banks.

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>But back then, in nineteen eighty three, the entire analyst

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>program of Goldman Sachs was twenty five people, and that

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>was a big expansion from the prior year before, and

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>it had only been in existence for two years, so

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street was so much smaller. Barry, you remember, back

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty three, Goldman Sacks had about thirty thousand

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>total employees, fifteen hundreds.

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 3>They were a private partnership. They weren't even public.

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>YEP.

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:21.559
<v Speaker 3>Very different world.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And the entire merger department of Goldman Sachs in nineteen

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>eighty three was thirty two people. That's amazing, and I

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like to say none were lowered to the ground than me,

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a first year analyst, which meant I was below ground.

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 2>And how did you end up at Bain and Company

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 2>in Paris?

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>What was that like? Well, in the time that I

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>was working at Goldman Sachs. In mergers, there were a

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of big public companies who were on We were

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>on M and a retainer they call it. So the

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>public companies looking to buy lots of acquisitions, and they

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>would have us running the numbers with their people for them,

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>as they would have Bain and Company in two of

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>these situations doing the strategic work alongside their management team.

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>So I got to know the work and we would

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>jointly make presentations to the senior management team or their

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>board if a deal went far. And I got to

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>see firsthand what Bain was doing in strategic consulting and

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>understand their view of business separate from the numbers. And

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.679
<v Speaker 1>so when I did go out to Stanford, I wanted

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to spend my summer learning that better and in Paris,

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and Bain was kind enough to offer me a job

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to facilitate.

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 2>I have to imagine that Paris in the mid eighties

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 2>was just delightful.

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>It was not tough duty. I was very lucky to

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>be there and grateful all summer.

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>So you come out of Stanford, you enter the LBO world,

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 2>what we now call essentially private credit and private equity.

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 2>What was it like in the late nineteen eighties, how

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.799
<v Speaker 2>to be the wild West. It really wasn't a mature

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 2>industry the way it is today.

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Well buryer again like Wall Street. It was all so

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>much smaller. In nineteen eighty three, by my reckoning, the

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>entire global institutional private equity business was less than a

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of committed capital.

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 3>That's unbelievable, large nothing.

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>The largest fund then was KKR with one hundred and

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy five million dollars. The second largest fund was forcement

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Little with one hundred and fifty I.

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Mean these are transaction levels. Today those entire funds are

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 2>like partial transaction.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>They'd be less than I'm sure ten or twenty percent

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of what KKR would put into many private equity deals.

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 2>So you're doing LBO, you're doing M and A. How

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 2>did those experiences lead to a career in private equity?

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>So there was almost no M and A activity. There

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>was no M and A departments in any investment bank

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>really until the very late seventies. Because the today where

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we talk about return on equity, your margins with your

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>stock price. Back then, if you were in business in

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the real world, they said how many people

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>work for you? And if you started your career on

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a line became a line manager or foreman, became a

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>plant manager maybe, or a division manager, so on up

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the line. If people ask you how many people work

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for you, and you said, well, I sold a business,

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had a thousand, but now I'm at

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, eight hundred. When you barry, you're not a

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.239
<v Speaker 1>good manager. I thought you were a manager. So literally

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>nobody sold in and the only things that got sold

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>were bankruptcies. The odd company that went bankrupt would need

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to get sold. But there wasn't an active M and

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>A business. There wasn't a leverage finance business, all the

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>things we know now. So when I was at Goldman

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Sachs doing M and A from eighty three to eighty five,

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>there came to be some people looking at the M

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and A business was started to boom, be a fraction

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of what it is now. But there came to be

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in certain situations buyers that were bootstrap buyers, that were

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we would call them today. They then leveraged buyout financiers,

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and now we call it the private equity industry. And

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 1>so I came to see some of these entities at

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the very early stages KKR would be one, but there

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>were others and a lot of entrepreneurs trying to do

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, because wealthy families were often these bootstrap buyers.

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, it was almost like a religious war between

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>two views of the world. EPs earnings per share that

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>all public companies would look at to evaluate mergers and

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>cash flow ebit DA, which didn't exist as a term,

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not back then, but ibadiya cash flow

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was how these these bootstrap buyers would look at it.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>And this seemed kind of interesting and new and different,

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and I became interested in how they did what they

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>did and how they valued it and the differences between

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>that and ebit DA. So sorry then, EPs.

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 2>So in nineteen ninety four, you and your co found

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Chuck Klein launch what is the present version of American Securities?

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 2>What was the catalyst for launching the firm?

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Then?

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 2>What kind of business were you hoping to build?

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was more than just Chuck and I. So

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>we had the great gift of the Rosenwaldt family. So

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I had worked for two private equity firms when I

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>got out of Stanford, so I'd really gotten a little

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of experience. I was still young, Hope. I still

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>am young today, but I'd gotten a little bit of experience,

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and I met Chuck, and Chuck was then the senior

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>financial advisor to the William ROSENWALDT family and the William

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Rosenwald family. Julius was the genius behind Sears Roebuck and

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>so they had largesse from the Rosenwald fortune.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 2>So, in other words, this after building, helping to build

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Seers and run Seers for a number of years, this

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 2>was we would call that today a family office of.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It absolutely was. It was called w R. S. William

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Rosenwald family Associates. Julius Rosenwald, who was the eminence grease

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>behind the growth of Sears the way Ray crock was

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 1>with McDonald genius for the Catalog and Downtown department stores.

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Sears Alton got taken public. He passed away in the

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties. Bill was his youngest son. Bill separated his

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>money from that of his siblings and came to New

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>York and right after World War Two set up his

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>family office modeled along the lines of the Rockefeller family,

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's founded the name. He registered the name American

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Securities Corporation, the first corporate owned broker dealer. All the

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>other ones had been private partnerships, but he had capital

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and didn't want to have it at risk, and that

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>family office had done were then called bootstraps, all sorts

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of investments, not just the stocks and bonds common of

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>wealthy families of the day, but actually buying businesses, some

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>very very successful businesses that were still private, that were

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>private when I bought them. Now one of them is

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>public and as a equity market cap of thirty five

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. But Chuck was their senior financial advisor, so

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>he's buying selling stocks. And Chuck and I hit it

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>off on our first breakfast on the Upper East Side

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>here in New York, and he kindly asked me if

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>I would come join him, saying that he would if

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>he wanted me to come join him. He was fifty five,

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to retire when he's sixty. Families take a

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>while to get used to somebody, so he wanted me

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to work with him and then he'd retire. And I

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>said to Chuck, I really like you, but that's not

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>really what I want to do. But I got a

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>different idea. You be my partner. We'll set up a

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>private equity firm, and the Rosewold family will be our

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>lead investor, and that's what I want to do.

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>And everybody signed on and said, let's go. That's the

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 2>launch of the modern version of American securities.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It's more complicatan that because Chuck was a very cautious investors.

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So what Chuck actually said was, Okay, well, come work

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>with me for a year and assuming that works out, well,

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>then we'll go raise this private equity firm.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So I joined the Rosenwald family in the spring of

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety three, and we we did some investing together

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>for the first year, and we raised our private equity

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>fund the next year.

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 2>I almost feel compelled to point out to younger listeners

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 2>who may not be familiar with what Sears was back

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 2>in the day. But I'm not exaggerating when I say

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Sears was the Amazon of its time. It was America's

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 2>largest retailer. Every major city, every major town had a Sears.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 2>They were dominant, weren't they.

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Absolutely. I like to say I hadn't thought about

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>think about Amazon. I like to say they created the

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>walton esque fortune, ok the first half of the nineteen

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>hundreds because they were Walmart at least and maybe Amazon two.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>They had a one third market share of certain product

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>sales in the entire country. And they were also an

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>amazing they picked. Julius successfully leveraged two really great trends.

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>One was the urbanization of America and the downtown department store,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>which was so prevalent then and then almost on a

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>different axis to the catalog which was mailed. The Sears

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Catalog was mail to homes across the country and it

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>allowed anyone in any community of any background to buy

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly what the city slickers were buying, or vice versa.

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And that was and they were. Interestingly, I think it's

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>true to say the first non utility, non railroad that

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>was thought stable enough to be allowed to be a

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>public company. Huh. Only utilities and railroads at the beginning

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of the stock market were thought stable enough.

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 2>So last question about that. That's really fascinating, and there's

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 2>a whole long history of things that Sears spun out.

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the Discover card came from Sears and All

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 2>State Insurance and a couple of banks. I mean, it

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 2>was just one different entity after another.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>That's absolutely true. And the family separately is responsible. The

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Rosenwald family for Blue Cross and Blue Shield. Oh really,

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago. Uh huh.

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Julius Rosenwald was an important trustee of Tuskegee University and

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>friend of I think it's Booker t. Washington. I mean,

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the family's philanthropic legacy is staggering.

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 2>That's really fascinating. You know, it's funny. I'm very aware

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 2>of the audience age, and it's arranged from people listening

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 2>who might be in college or grad school and people

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 2>who have are retired, and I sort of feel like,

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 2>all right, some of you youngsters may not know. This

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 2>was literally the biggest retailer of its day, whether you

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 2>want to compare it to Walmart for the stores or

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Amazon the catalog not all that different from online shopping.

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 2>They were just massive and failed to pivot when the

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 2>time came. So hey, everything is temporary, right, last question

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>about the launch of the firm, So ninety four, it's

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 2>still early days for private equity. Not a lot of transactions,

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 2>not a lot of money under management. When you're out

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 2>pitching this to institutional investors in the middle of a

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>giant bull market, let me add inequities. What was what

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 2>was the response, did people understand that this was a

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 2>different type of investing and potentially a diversifier, or did

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 2>they look at you kind of funny?

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Well berry to paint where we were in the arc

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of private equity. So as we were talking before it did,

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it didn't exist until the very late seventies at best,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and then was you know, from five firms to ten firms,

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>two hundred firms in the nineteen eighties, and so it

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>was growing. And when we went to raise our first

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>fund again we had the great benefit of the support

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of the William Rosenwald family. They were a committed lead investor.

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But I had been involved in some transactions and had

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and those transactions had happily gone well. Chuck Klin and

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the family had been involved in a bunch of transactions.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>So we had some form of a track record that

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we could talk to people about and a very specific

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>investment objective about what we were planning to do. And

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>so there were certainly there weren't that many, and we

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 1>did talk to a lot of people, but we were

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>grateful to have a college endowment, a publicly traded insurance company,

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a publicly traded company, corporation's pension fund, and some wealthy

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.120
<v Speaker 1>individuals join our first fund, which was a mighty seven

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>one point four million dollars at the final closing.

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, so you mentioned you had some specific objectives back

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen ninety four.

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 3>What were those objectives?

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, building on the the investment legacy of the Rosenwald

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>family and some of the things that I had been

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>doing and thinking about, we agreed that we were only

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>going to buy the market leading company, the number one

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>market share company in its niche. I mean, obviously these

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>would be modest sized companies given the size of our fund,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>but the number one market share company, we would look

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to only buy that company an industry which was GDP

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>growth or better, we would look to only support the

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>existing CEO. We wanted to support them, Meaning you're.

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Not coming in cleaning house and installing your own guys.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 3>You're looking for a management team you want to work with.

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>We had then and we have still today, a relationship focus.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, changing and it's practical, changing executives is risky.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>We believe that if we're coming in and feel aligned

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>and simpatico with the management team and particularly the CEO

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>running the business that delivered the earnings that we're valuing

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the business on if we could just help them be

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the same or better, we'd have only good outcomes for investors.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And why take the risk of changing management. We'd rather

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>just look for a new situation. And we wanted to

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>have relatively modest leverage. We tended at the beginning to

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>capitalize our companies with less debt than other investors.

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Huh, really really intriguing.

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about twenty seven billion dollars,

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and eighty full time professionals. What is the

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 2>secret to successfully growing a private equity firm? For you?

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on your thirtieth year?

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Great people, you know, I like to say money is

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate commodity. So our product, if you will, is money.

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what we invest and so if we're going to

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>outperform for our investors, it's going to be the people

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that we've attracted, our investment philosophy, and maybe some processes

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that we've employed.

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 2>So you've done plenty of deals over that thirty year period.

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 2>What stands out anything really memorable? Any transactions that stick

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 2>with you?

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>You know when I think about that, we've certainly had

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the great pleasure to be involved with some great businesses,

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's really the people that stick out the most. It's,

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, life is people, and we are in the

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>people business managers, investors, lenders, bankers, the whole ecosystem. And

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the special relationships which we're proud to have created.

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And some of the CEOs from our very first fund,

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>our very first deals, you know, twenty eight years ago,

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>are still close friends of mine. I'll be going to

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Florida to spend a weekend with one of our first

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>CEOs and his wife staying with them next month. Huh.

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 2>That's really interesting. So let's stay focused on that concept

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>of people and partnering with management rather than just taking

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 2>over a company and cleaning house. Is this relatively uncommon

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 2>in the industry. I have to imagine other companies see

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the value of this, Or when you first started doing this,

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 2>was it kind of a one off?

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.239
<v Speaker 1>We weren't really sure when anyone else was doing At

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, You're just kind of doing it and hoping

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it works out. As it turns out, You're absolutely right.

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>There is a consulting firm which did a study a

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>few years ago that twenty five percent of the CEOs

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are gone at closing in most partly the average private

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>equity transaction, fifty percent are gone by two years and

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>only twenty five percent are there after four years. In

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>contrast to that, now, for our thirty year existence, are

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>what I call CEO win rate is over eighty percent,

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>meaning eighty percent of the men and women who were

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>running the business before we showed up, we're running it

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>at exit or are running it today if we still

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>own it.

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 2>So this is really very different if if the typical firm,

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 2>they're in half the situations, they're gone either closing or

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 2>two years later.

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>We are walking the talk in terms of management partnership,

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and we really believe in it.

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 2>So when you're evaluating a company, this is more than

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 2>EBADA or earnings per share or something like that. You're

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 2>really doing your due diligence on the management team and

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 2>how effective they are, and hey, are these people we

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 2>want to get into bed with and do business with?

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>All those things we have, we add a very important

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>management dimension to the basic you know, product services, customers,

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>raw material suppliers and so on.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 3>How do you evaluate that?

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Because that's Listen, when you look at EBAD, it's numbers

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 2>on an Excel spreadsheet or Google sheets or whatever you're

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 2>using when you're evaluating people, it's much squishier and qualitative.

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 2>How do you make that how do you institutionalize that process?

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, it's very it's very bespoke. Every person

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is different. Different of our colleagues are different, even though

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we all share this same belief in CEO partnership and

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 1>management team partnership. And it's really just deciding you want

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to work together. We're not perfect, our management teams aren't perfect.

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>But can we make I like to say my favorite

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>equation is one plus one equals three. Can we work

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>with a management team and together be great partners and

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>do something different together? And we bring certain resources that

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>some other firms don't have. The largest group of our

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and eighty people that you cited are so

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>called resources group. These are full time operating professionals. They're

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>not virtual, they're not consultants, they're not ten ninety nine,

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>and they are W two colleagues. And so we have

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of resources we can bring to our companies

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in purchasing, procurement, strategy, it hr you name it. And

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>some executives are excited by that. They want the help,

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>they want fresh set of eyes on certain problems, or

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>extra extra arms and legs on problems. And some people say,

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we got that, we know what we do,

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and you just put up the money, and we're better

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>partners for the former than the latter.

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 2>So you describe a lot of your investments as platform investments,

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 2>and you've made seventy eight of these platform investments over the.

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Last thirty years.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 2>Tell us a little bit bit about that phrase, and

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 2>then we'll get into the subsequent three hundred and five

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 2>add on investments that followed.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, a platform investment for us is really the first

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.239
<v Speaker 1>big investment. It's we're investing in a company with the

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>management team. We're typically the control investor, so we'll own

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>more than fifty one percent, sometimes almost one hundred percent

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>of the company, but the management will always be an

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>investor with us. And that is and that first unique

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>investment is a so called platform. Some investments will never

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>have add on acquisitions. They can grow organically or other ways.

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But many acquisitions do find smaller competitors or sometimes mergers

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>of equals, and we then build them with add on

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>what are called add on acquisitions, into the existing platform.

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>And so that three hundred would be a lot of

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>add ons, and sometimes they're very small, sometimes they're material.

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>It just depends on the company.

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 2>So when you're putting money into a company, is this

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 2>you're obviously buying shares from somebody. Are you also providing

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 2>a level of operating capital? How much in a typical structure,

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 2>what is previous owners selling and what is money that

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 2>goes for future deployment.

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It greatly depends. The interesting thing about us is we

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>are very attractive to founder CEOs. Almost half of the

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>investments in our most recent fund, half of the companies

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>we've purchased, we purchased from founder CEOs who continue to

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>be the CEO and in many cases rolled over an

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of money into this company that we now control,

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>where they're still being the CEO. So I like to

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>think of those as very choosy investors. They really care

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>about their company because they founded it, They really care

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>about their company because they're running it, And they really

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>care about their company because they're going to maintain a

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>very big personal investment. And in a lot of those situations,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>they are happy and excited to partner with us as

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>we are them, And I think they're attracted by the

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>resources we bring other than money to the second part

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of your question on what is the capital structure and

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the money? Typically the capital structure the money that

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we put up and oftentimes lenders's if it's a debt

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>free business goes to selling shareholders. But as part of that,

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, you want to capitalize a company with undrawn

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>lines of credit so called revolvers or delay draw term loans,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 1>other terms like that. There's liquidity to run the business

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>on a day to day basis, survive a rainy day,

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>and also grow the business as makes sense, if it

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>is by out on acquisition or new customer acquisitions or

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>new plants we're building, whatever.

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 2>So I want to separate the platform initial investments with

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the add ons. What are you looking for when you're

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 2>making a platform investment. What is it that gets you

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 2>excited about a particular company or not so excited and saying, hey,

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 2>this isn't exactly for us.

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So going back to what we started thirty years ago,

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for the number one market share player or.

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 2>So that's persistent. In other words, the original ideas are

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 2>still driving your investment strategies.

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>We work really hard to get better tactically and execution

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>wise and with our scale advantages now, but the fundamental

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>investment philosophy hasn't changed. We're looking for that market share

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>leader which has a sustainable competitive advantage. We hope that

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>we can invest behind and see stability so that there

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 1>won't be a loss of capital.

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 3>And above average GDP growth.

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>And we're looking for that company to exist, as you said,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>in an industry that is growing at GDP or better.

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Now we use terms like is there a tailwind?

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Huh, So we'll talk a little bit about sectors in

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 2>a few moments.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Berry, and I have to add. And we're

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>looking to back the existing management team.

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 3>They're going to stick around.

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>We want the CEO to want to be our partner.

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we obviously know a lot of managers, but

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we really get excited if the CEO is going to

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>be our partner going forward.

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 2>So competitive edge, better than average growth, a management team,

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 2>you like, that doesn't sound like the worst sort of

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 2>investment that those sound like pretty attractive things. How many

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 2>companies are out there that check all your boxes? You?

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean quite? I mean it's a lot are a

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>little depending on how big your screen is, but we

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the year but we will typically see

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and fifty to four hundred and fifty companies

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that look like they might be suitable. This number is

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a rough guess, but we probably do very detailed work,

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes without side consulting firms and other advisors on maybe

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>forty of those, and we will make you know, final

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>contract offers on probably around ten. That's rough guess, and

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it changes every year. And we're only buying i should say,

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>US headquartered businesses. That's all we've ever aspired to do,

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's something overseas all here. Many of our companies

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>have international operations. Some are truly global companies, some are not.

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But the key thing for us is that they're US

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>headquartered because this is where we know people, we know

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the laws, we know the language. We should have a

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>competitive advantage and we can be close and still try

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a family life. If we're travel all over

0:29:57.520 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the world, there should be someone who has our advantages

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and say Beijing, Berlin, Buenos Aires and Bombay, that should

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>be not us, Whereas we have those advantages here as

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>American securities.

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 2>And so when you look hence the name, and so

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 2>when you look at doing any of those three hundred

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 2>and five add ons. At that point, you're familiar with

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 2>much more familiar with the company. You've already put prior

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 2>capital into it. What are you looking to accomplish with

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.719
<v Speaker 2>those add ons? Is it just a matter of getting

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 2>liquidity the insiders who want some and you and larger position,

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 2>or is it hey, they could use a little more

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 2>capital and we're happy to participate.

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So the add ons are all about building the existing

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>business or the platform initial investment to use the phrase

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you were using, and so there, it's not about a

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>capital it's not about getting liquidity for anyone who's an

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>existing investor. Sometimes there will be a smaller competitor that

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the company wants to sell to us. Sometimes there will

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>be size business in an adjacent industry where there's synergies

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that we can save money on purchasing, let's say, by

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>having a bigger scale platform. It really depends on the company.

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 2>So you guys have been doing this sort of platform

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 2>investment and add on investment pretty much from the beginning.

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Have you seen other companies other private equity firms seemingly

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 2>imitate or at least has this said differently? Has this

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 2>strategy become more popular over the years.

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I think absolutely, Barry. I think almost everybody in

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>private equity generally, when they make their first investment, they

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>are looking at what might be able to acquire. In addition,

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>investment bankers always market this now in their materials. When

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at company, this company can grow by buying

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>all these companies. This is real or imagined, but it

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>gets marketed, and really it's something I think everyone in

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the private equity industry is pretty much thinking about every

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>time they make initial investment. Is their growth through acquisition

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>as well as organic really intriguing.

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about the modern world and what you're

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 2>dealing with. I have a quote of yours that I

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 2>really liked. Five hundred basis points of rate increases changes

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot. Can you explain to us, yes, five hundred

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 2>BIPs it does change a lot. What does it mean

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 2>for your work?

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, eighteen months ago, just to put this in perspective,

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months ago, private equity firms generally could borrow senior

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>debt for their companies at around six six and a

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>quarter percent all in. So if you borrowed one hundred

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars of debt, you paid six dollars and twenty five

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>cents let's say of interest every year on that debt that.

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Was whatever, I forget the name of what replaced Libor

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 2>plus three percent or so something like that two and

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 2>a half percent.

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Software has replaced Libor and then basically it was libor

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>softra at about four fifty. Depends on the perceived credit

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>quality of the company and syndication markets at that time,

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>so it was basically the initial base rate was almost

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>zero's you're at a fifty basis points with software plus

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that four fifty, let's say, and fees amortized in and

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you get to let's say six six and a quarter,

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and today and eighteen months later that your people like

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>us are paying more like ten and a quarter.

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 3>That's a big number.

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's the five percent more or five hundred basis

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>points you were talking about. So instead of paying six

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars and twenty five cents, you're now paying ten dollars

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and twenty five cents in interest. And you know, it's

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>either a lot or a little, depending on whether you

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>have the money or not. If one didn't capitalize the

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>capital structure planning to have a cushion that was that big,

0:33:56.480 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that higher interest rate can be a barrier to continuing

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to pay interest or amortize, you know, pay back that

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>debt over time. And there are other problems like inflation

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 1>where and supply chain issues, both of which caused many companies,

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 1>even healthy, growing companies, to need more cash for working capital.

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you were selling something where the raw

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 1>material cost used to be a dollar, and because of inflation,

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:24.959
<v Speaker 1>after a couple of years, it's now a dollar twenty five,

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that's twenty five percent more money in working capital for

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the same number of units. And if you were your

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>supply chains might have come from Asia and it takes

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>longer because they're not quite sufficient, harder to get containers,

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so you actually need more units. This can add up

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. So between interest and working capital, even companies

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that are flat or growing can have cash flow problems

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if they didn't plan to have enough liquidity.

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 2>So when we look at the public markets, most of

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 2>the major public corporations that were carrying any sort of

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 2>debt all refine financed before this we're up and rates,

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 2>so what they're carrying is fairly low interest rates. What

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 2>did you see in the private sector where people taking

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:14.760
<v Speaker 2>advantage of low rates to to you know, recapitalize whatever

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 2>their obligations were at the lowest possible carrying costs.

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Well public or private Barry the companies are always refinancing.

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>You have a first issue is are you refinancing with

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 1>floating rate debt or fixed rate debt? So if I

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>had a five year senior debt credit facility of let's

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>say liboard then software now plus four fifty, that whether

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I refinanced it now or then that that's five and

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a half six sorry, six and a quarter percent debt

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that's now ten and a quarter. But if I issued

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:50.240
<v Speaker 1>bonds or fixed rate debt, then I would be insulated

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>from their rate increase. So it's it's firstly, did you

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>issue fixed rate debt or floating And if it was floating,

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>some people still bought hedges. The hedge market's pretty efficient

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 1>for two three years. Hard to hedge farther than that, right,

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>And so when those hedges run out, even if you

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>were conservative, and so you really have been boring at

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>six and a quarter for the last eighteen months as

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>rates have come up. When your hedge runs out, it's

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be ten and a quarter if rates stay the

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>same as they are today.

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean most companies are not Apple. I remember Apple

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 2>floated a bond deal at like two to and a

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 2>quarter some crazy number for thirty years. Yep, right, sold

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 2>a ton of it. I'm gonna imagine private companies don't

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 2>have that sort of ability to float debt, but they

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 2>certainly can issue some sort of fixed rate. Did you see,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Like what was the fixed rate world like on the

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 2>private side when things were dirt cheap.

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Typically on the private side eighteen months ago, you wouldn't

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have borrowed, but few people borrowed first lean. In the

0:36:56.400 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>private markets, they would sometimes issue bonds. And so in

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>one company we know, well, that company managed to issue

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>six percent bonds. So that was fixed rate.

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Six percent sounds attractive eighteen months ago. Now it looks

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 2>like a bargain for them.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it was attractive eighteen months ago because it was

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>fixed rate. If you were a conservative, you had no risk.

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And now now that same company, if it came to market,

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 1>would be issuing those bonds for at least twelve percent.

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:29.760
<v Speaker 2>So we've seen a lot of again in the public markets,

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:35.320
<v Speaker 2>multiple compression stocks were pretty pricey in the low rate era.

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 3>Rates have gone up.

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:40.879
<v Speaker 2>We're stone, it's see multiple compression. How are the higher

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 2>rates affecting valuations amongst private companies.

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So there's two issues that are affecting valuations. One is

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the amount, just what's called the quantum, the amount of

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 1>debt you can borrow, expressed as a multiple of your

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:58.719
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow or your ebit DA. Until eighteen months ago,

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>a reasonably solid, stable business could borrow between six and

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>six and a half times it's trailing EBITDA, and sometimes

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>pro form projected this year it would be a little higher.

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>You could borrow that same number off what you hope

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to achieve in the year you're in. Now that six

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half is more like five for a good company,

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and it could be four and a half if the

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>company is perceived to have a little bit of a blemish,

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and the adjustments that might move it higher are harder

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.399
<v Speaker 1>for lenders to support. So one thing that constrains value

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 1>is you fundamentally, all things being equal, if you bought

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>a company with six times leverage three or four years ago,

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and now a private equity firm is trying to sell it,

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>it probably cannot sell it with that much leverage. The

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>buyer is going to be having five times, and that

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 1>means more equity. And if you have the same equity.

0:38:56.920 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>If you have a bigger equity check that will be

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>in a lower rate turn in the X. That can

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 1>impact price. And as we've talked a lot about, the

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rate is also a big impact because instead

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of paying in the one hundred dollars of debt at

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 1>six fifty, let's say six fifty of interest a year,

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>now it's ten to fifty because rates are higher. So

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>those two things constrain value where earnings hasn't even if

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>earning's grown, and it may make it hard to get

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the money out where in a sale today

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>if earnings are flat or only up a little bit.

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 2>So let's look at valuation in a historical perspective, and

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 2>again most of my frame of reference are the public markets.

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Pre financial crisis, stocks were at least reasonably priced, and

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 2>certainly before the mid nineties reasonably priced. And then since

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the financial crisis, everything seems to have gotten everything priced

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 2>in dollars and credit seems to have gotten more expensive,

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 2>including stocks. Did you see anything take place similarly in

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 2>private markets when we're looking at the nineties, the two

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 2>thousands to twenty tens.

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, there's so many forces going on very I mean,

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:10.359
<v Speaker 1>now and just think about the big impact of the

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>five or six largest tech companies as a percent of

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the growth in stock markets, and the average company, particularly

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>smaller public companies, are down, not up, even though the

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>stock market's up. So at any one time, I like

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to say, no one should ever invest in us because

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they think we're good macroeconomists, because macroeconomists are often wrong,

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>especially at inflection points when we need them to be right.

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>That particular company at a moment in time, with its

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>forces and its management team, and that's what we spend

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 1>all of our time trying to analyze. We try to

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>be macro aware, but really micro focus.

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 2>That makes a lot of sense. And look at the

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 2>financial crisis middle of two thousand and eight. Most economists

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 2>didn't see a recession coming, even though we were right

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the worst one in a long time.

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 2>So macro aware, micro focused I like that description. So

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 2>let let's talk about some of the challenges of the

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:17.399
<v Speaker 2>current environment. Bankruptcies just hit a thirteen year high. What

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 2>sort of risks does this create for your portfolio companies?

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Or is this really companies that aren't doing as well

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 2>that eventually succumb to the more challenging environment.

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's all facts and circumstances. Certainly, you're absolutely right

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that bankruptcies are up, and most people think they're going

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to keep rising, and I think they're right. And that's

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing more than we've just talked about the cash needs

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of the average business for more money and inventory, for

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates, and in some many businesses constrain growth

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and at some point that can that can reach a

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:04.359
<v Speaker 1>breaking point, and so those forces will have bankruptcies rise,

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>just as lower interest rates will have that debate in

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the natural cycle of business.

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 2>And my assumption is, since you're looking at companies and

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 2>management teams, you're probably not all that interested in these

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 2>bankrupt companies or distressed assets. Doesn't seem to really fit

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the way I think of your model.

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>There are many private equi firms that focus on so

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:34.359
<v Speaker 1>called bankruptcy, distressed and whatnot, and private credit providers. We

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>are trying to avoid those and trying to buy good business.

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>On the journey from good to great or great to greater,

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>once in a while we will look at what i'll

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 1>call good company, bad balance sheet. The fundamental company is

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a good company and has been. It has all the

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 1>characters who like market leadership, margins, stability, some tailwinds, and

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 1>great management team, but it just had too much debt.

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So we may try to provide an investment to a

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:04.359
<v Speaker 1>company like that where when it comes out of bankruptcy

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 1>or its debt problem, it's a great company with the

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 1>right capital structure. But most of our most of our

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>things are not that.

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 3>That's really interesting.

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about the private equity industry.

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 2>We saw a lot of investors kind of rush in

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty two when public markets stocks, am bonds

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 2>we're doing poorly. And since then there's been lots of

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 2>talk about how we price private holdings. What do you

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 2>think about this chatter about extending pretend or quarterly marks

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 2>not being very accurate or precise. And I'm not referring

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 2>to any of your companies, I'm talking generally.

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 3>This has been.

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Chatter that's been in a lot of news.

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So private equity, as you were talking about before, has

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>been growing now now for thirty five years. So as

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem keeps growing, there are more companies owned by

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>private equity, There are more good things, and there are

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes more bad things. So it's just it's just growing

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>so I think the trend to more people investing in

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>private equity has grown dramatically and it's it's continuing to grow.

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And the institutional investors often are thinking, if you're a

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 1>big state pension fund, I want ten percent, twenty percent,

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're some college endowments, forty percent in private equity.

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>But whatever is that percentage, they're targeting that and they've

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>allocated their assets to have that percentage invested in private equity.

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So two big forces that affect all of these institutions

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is one, what's the value of those private equity investments.

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:53.319
<v Speaker 1>So if you targeted if you had a dollar to

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 1>invest and you targeted ten percent in private equity, and

0:44:56.440 --> 0:45:01.800
<v Speaker 1>those investment doubled, now you have twenty cents in private

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>equity instead of ten on your dollar, so your quote

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 1>over allocated. That's really good in a sense because your

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>private equity portfolios are up, but it's still a problem

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>because you're overallocated, so you stop making new commitments. The

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>same thing happens in a different way with your dollar

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:23.839
<v Speaker 1>if that dollar is based on the value of all

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of your holdings and the stock market say drops by

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 1>ten percent, now you only got ninety cents. If your

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>private equity is at ten cents, you're over allocated, and

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 1>if it's at twenty, you've got a real problem. And

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 1>it's really both those factors. They're called the numerator and

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the denominator effect. That has caused some institutions to slow

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 1>down their commitments to private equity to get those back

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in balance, because, as you know, the stock market was

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:52.880
<v Speaker 1>down not this year, but last year, and private equity

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 1>values continue to be up. So that's one set of forces.

0:45:56.800 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 1>The second thing you raised is you know, how is

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>private equity valued. The stock market gets valued every day,

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>every stock you can see when it trades, every tick

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the way private equity gets valued. And all private equity

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>firms in the United States with more than one hundred

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million dollars of capital under management are registered

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>with the SEC. And one of the requirements is that

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>all private equity firms value their holdings every quarter and

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that at least annually. Those valuations are typically subjected to audit.

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 1>As part of the audit process, the audits look at

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 1>those valuations. Now they're private companies, so you got what

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a timing lag, if you will, So every quarter, so

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:42.240
<v Speaker 1>let's say on March thirty first, the quarter ends. Private

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:44.760
<v Speaker 1>equity firms takes time to get numbers from your companies,

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and so there's typically forty five days where you try

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what the value was on March thirty first,

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and then you send those values to your investors. So

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:57.439
<v Speaker 1>if you're invested in private equity March thirty one, by

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>May fifteenth, you will get to know what the private

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:04.760
<v Speaker 1>equity firm valued those investments on. So that's a lag.

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>So people talk about the lag, and that's one inherent issue.

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.239
<v Speaker 1>And the second is since it's not if we know

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.359
<v Speaker 1>what's trading in the public market, so you know that

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 1>that was the trade yesterday. Whether someone paid too much

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 1>or too little, you know that was the trade. And

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>as we say, for every buyer who thinks they're getting

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a deal, there's a seller who is happy with the price.

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's a market the valuations being done by each

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:31.360
<v Speaker 1>private equity firm. You don't really have that market test

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 1>except when it's sold. And so some people talk about

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is the value real my personal belief In general, it's

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>very real. The sec comes in, looks at it, the

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>auditors bless it, and investors are sophisticated in general, so

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty real, although people can cast dispersions, but often

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>that's the lag happening. You know, if you're if at

0:47:56.800 --> 0:47:59.799
<v Speaker 1>April thirtieth, after this notional March thirty one, the market

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:03.359
<v Speaker 1>ten percent, you say, my private equity stuff's down ten percent. Well,

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the valuation you get May fifteenth is as of March

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, it's not going to be shown down because

0:48:08.800 --> 0:48:09.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not supposed to be.

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:11.359
<v Speaker 3>You won't get that till the next quarter.

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So the third thing, just I mean, just say last thing.

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>While the institutions have backed up new commitments in private equity,

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>which actually seems to be thawing as we're speaking, individuals,

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>individual investors are dramatically underinvested in private equity versus institutions,

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is an even bigger pool of capital, if

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you will, on the sidelines or now trying to invest

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in private equity. And so that's another wave of flow.

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So most people expect private equity to keep growing.

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned transactions are obviously the easiest way to

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:48.800
<v Speaker 2>measure valuation. What are you seeing in terms of deal making?

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 2>Are private equity firms still making as many investments as

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 2>they were in recent years, and what are you seeing

0:48:57.120 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 2>on the other side, what about exits.

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had a detailed conversation a few moments

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>ago about interest rates and their impact, and you were

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about some companies declaring bankruptcy more often, and I

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>think that trend continues. And in terms of volume, deal

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>volume is about half of what it was two years ago.

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Meaning new investments into existing companies.

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And sales both because they're two sides at the same coin. Often,

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are you can take companies public to exit,

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and you can sell to public companies, but the private

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>buyer to private buyer is an active, active market, and

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it's roughly down fifty percent. So new investments are down

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and realizations are down, but the ones that are happening

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are actually happening at prices close to, if not entirely,

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 1>as much as they were eighteen twenty four months ago.

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:56.840
<v Speaker 2>So prices are holding up, just total volumes.

0:49:56.520 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So far, prices are holding up now.

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Obviously there's an implication there that the best companies are

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:07.800
<v Speaker 2>getting a price. And if you have a little a

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:10.960
<v Speaker 2>little hair on the deal or a blemish not so much.

0:50:11.040 --> 0:50:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Barry, you show yourself to be an astute observer or

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>keen understanding of how the world works. That's exactly what happens.

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:22.960
<v Speaker 1>The average we see, which let's say is down maybe

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 1>half a multiple point, maybe three quarters of multipoint is

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:30.480
<v Speaker 1>this year compared to two years ago, is only the

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 1>ones that's sold which are going to be the better companies.

0:50:34.040 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So the multiple drop is a little more than shown

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in the numbers quality adjusted.

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:39.279
<v Speaker 3>You're exactly right.

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I look at the world through the lens that everything

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 2>is survivorship biased, so that you're seeing the winners, you're

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 2>not seeing the ones that didn't close. And that is

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 2>that's something that's that's never far from my thoughts. So

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 2>let's focus on some of the sectors that American Securities

0:50:57.040 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 2>really likes. You're big in services, You're you're being in

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:06.920
<v Speaker 2>consumer and healthcare, but you're especially formidable in industrials. Tell

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 2>us about those sectors and what's been the appeal.

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're absolutely right. For the thirty year history of

0:51:13.520 --> 0:51:16.839
<v Speaker 1>the firm, roughly sixty percent of our investments have been

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in so called industrials and the rest have been consumer

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 1>services and healthcare. With respect to industrials, I'm not sure

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:32.399
<v Speaker 1>why it is the case, but lots of people don't

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>find it sexy.

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you think about what a big industrial manufacturer does.

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:43.880
<v Speaker 2>It's hard, it's dirty, it's complicated. As opposed to some

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:47.799
<v Speaker 2>new software app that all the kids love. There's a

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 2>very different set of audiences for those businesses there is.

0:51:53.320 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we need our industrial base, and interestingly

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in this country it actually grows faster than the overall

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:04.320
<v Speaker 1>GDP by a point or two for the last twenty years.

0:52:05.360 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 3>It's amazing.

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:10.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a vibrant source of transactions and it's been very

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:13.720
<v Speaker 1>successful for us. And we have to some extent built

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:16.239
<v Speaker 1>our resources group and some of our internal functions to

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 1>help those management teams and those companies be better. That

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:22.720
<v Speaker 1>are industrial companies. And the thing that we like about

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it is because we're very focused on creating the best

0:52:26.719 --> 0:52:30.920
<v Speaker 1>risk adjusted returns we can. So we like stable businesses

0:52:32.440 --> 0:52:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and we when we do our due diligence with an

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:38.360
<v Speaker 1>established business industrial business, if you will, you can understand

0:52:38.400 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 1>its manufacturing process and how that compares to its competitors.

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:45.799
<v Speaker 1>You can understand its suppliers and how it purchases raw

0:52:45.840 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>materials and how that compares favorably or not to competitors.

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And you can understand the customers, and particularly if you're

0:52:51.440 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>buying the number one market share player, you can really

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:57.839
<v Speaker 1>see the industry and know what customers are thinking. So

0:52:57.920 --> 0:53:02.959
<v Speaker 1>we see stability in that and in a relatively large

0:53:03.000 --> 0:53:06.680
<v Speaker 1>number of situations, we're able to see the indicitia of

0:53:06.719 --> 0:53:10.279
<v Speaker 1>a successful investment equity investment, we hope because of that

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:13.399
<v Speaker 1>stability and the ability to do due diligence, where other

0:53:13.440 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>people in the venture world, for example, are just looking

0:53:15.640 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 1>at how big is the runway and if we build it,

0:53:18.000 --> 0:53:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they will come, and God bless them they many of

0:53:19.960 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 1>those folks have done terrific investing for their investors. But

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not what we do. We're looking at what is

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and what can continue to be the case, and how

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:30.800
<v Speaker 1>might we be able to help management make it better.

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:35.720
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned industrials have been growing faster than GDP

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 2>over the past twenty years, an era, as we previously discussed,

0:53:40.040 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 2>a very low interest rates. What does that mean for

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the next ten or twenty years for industrials. How do

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:50.160
<v Speaker 2>you think about the sector today in a higher inflation,

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:51.800
<v Speaker 2>higher interest rate environment.

0:53:52.080 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, all businesses are dealing in an active market, right,

0:53:56.560 --> 0:53:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they have active competitors their customers are thinking how to

0:53:59.880 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>do the best for themselves. Suppliers likewise, and so the

0:54:03.480 --> 0:54:07.800
<v Speaker 1>forces that will have made a company survive and perhaps

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:10.719
<v Speaker 1>thrive over the last twenty years are likely to be

0:54:10.760 --> 0:54:13.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty consistent and the product of market based forces, and

0:54:13.760 --> 0:54:18.240
<v Speaker 1>so the really good companies will should keep doing well

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 1>irrespective of the environment. Sometimes it's easier, sometimes it's harder,

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but again it's more the microeconomic forces that are going

0:54:25.640 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to matter for that company than a general macroeconomic something.

0:54:29.920 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 2>So let me let me tack in a slightly different direction.

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:37.200
<v Speaker 2>A lot of your site talks about citizenship being a

0:54:37.239 --> 0:54:42.879
<v Speaker 2>good corporate steward, and you have discussions of deverstitating, inclusion, philanthropy, esg.

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 2>How do you work that sort of focus into.

0:54:47.480 --> 0:54:49.640
<v Speaker 3>What you do on the private equity side.

0:54:51.800 --> 0:54:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, some of it's some of it's related, and some

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of it enables the other stuff. So we grew out

0:54:58.920 --> 0:55:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Rosenwaldt family. Rosemol family had a terrific philanthropic legacy,

0:55:03.440 --> 0:55:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and we're terrific citizens and cared about communities and we

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:11.280
<v Speaker 1>try to do the same. So we we have lots

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of programs that are philanthropic that are enabled by the

0:55:14.400 --> 0:55:17.280
<v Speaker 1>success of our businesses. We give us a fixed percent

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of our annual profits to charities every year as an example.

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:24.239
<v Speaker 1>But there are other things that we're trying to do

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>every day with our businesses. You know, so called ESG. Environmental,

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:32.760
<v Speaker 1>social and governance factors we think are not only good

0:55:32.840 --> 0:55:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for the planet, but they enable ebitt the a growth.

0:55:35.440 --> 0:55:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And so being a good steward is about being efficient.

0:55:38.680 --> 0:55:40.319
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to waste energy, and you want to

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:42.879
<v Speaker 1>reduce it if you can. You want to. You don't

0:55:42.960 --> 0:55:45.239
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't want your employees to get hurt on the job.

0:55:45.600 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So every monthly book from every one of our companies

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for years and years and years, starts with safety. It's

0:55:51.040 --> 0:55:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing. We want employees that are showing

0:55:53.080 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>up to know that they and their loved ones now

0:55:55.080 --> 0:55:57.520
<v Speaker 1>we're in a safe environment. I mean, and this seems

0:55:57.560 --> 0:55:59.839
<v Speaker 1>like how everyone should be acting. But and I hope

0:55:59.840 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 1>they We certainly are too.

0:56:01.960 --> 0:56:04.120
<v Speaker 2>There's been a lot of studies on governance and it

0:56:04.200 --> 0:56:07.360
<v Speaker 2>turns out that companies and there's a little bit of

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:11.359
<v Speaker 2>a chicken and egg question here issue here, but companies

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:16.480
<v Speaker 2>that have broad governance with a variety of people in

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:22.359
<v Speaker 2>board positions and senior management positions tend to outperform, at

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:25.600
<v Speaker 2>least in the public markets, companies that, for example, have

0:56:25.719 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 2>no women on their boards of directors. Do you ever

0:56:29.120 --> 0:56:32.759
<v Speaker 2>think about this when you're considering an investment or Is

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 2>that the sort of thing that gets facilitated post investment?

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, we think about we think about being a good

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:44.400
<v Speaker 1>steward and a good corporate citizen and investing in businesses

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that enable us to do that. Going in period full

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:50.880
<v Speaker 1>stop the boards. Every one of our companies has an

0:56:50.920 --> 0:56:54.680
<v Speaker 1>independent board, so the CEOs on the board. Typically we're

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the controlling shaffers who are on the board, but we

0:56:56.560 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 1>actually create a unique board for every company and try

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to model the best of diversity in all its forms

0:57:03.760 --> 0:57:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and diverse members on those boards.

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 2>So this isn't just the sort of thing that is

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:13.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, green dressing or whatever. Greenwashing is the phrase

0:57:13.880 --> 0:57:18.120
<v Speaker 2>of the day. There's an actual corporate advantage to having

0:57:18.200 --> 0:57:21.080
<v Speaker 2>a diverse board. Is that a fair way to look

0:57:21.120 --> 0:57:21.400
<v Speaker 2>at it?

0:57:21.600 --> 0:57:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think the studies use sites show that

0:57:25.040 --> 0:57:31.240
<v Speaker 1>diversity is profitable. Okay, diversity is profitable for investors. And

0:57:31.480 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the great thing about being a private company is there's

0:57:33.640 --> 0:57:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a whole reduced liability structure for outside directors. So we

0:57:38.160 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>often find, and I think this is broadly true for

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the private equity industry. There is a lot of people

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:46.640
<v Speaker 1>who are great people and very experienced and can add

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 1>value to boards, that are actively interested in joining the

0:57:49.680 --> 0:57:53.040
<v Speaker 1>boards of private companies, maybe even more so than public companies.

0:57:53.240 --> 0:57:56.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, so let me shift gears again. You were

0:57:56.680 --> 0:57:59.840
<v Speaker 2>a lecturer. You began at Stanford in two thousand and six,

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:00.760
<v Speaker 2>still doing that.

0:58:01.080 --> 0:58:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's really one day a year.

0:58:03.520 --> 0:58:06.040
<v Speaker 3>There was a test lecture a terrific.

0:58:06.400 --> 0:58:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Man professor when I was there. I became his research

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:12.200
<v Speaker 1>assistant and he asked me to come one day and

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:15.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about private equity. So I go to Stanford one

0:58:15.040 --> 0:58:16.919
<v Speaker 1>day a year since two thousand and six.

0:58:17.520 --> 0:58:22.720
<v Speaker 2>And you're involved in a number of other philanthropies, the

0:58:22.760 --> 0:58:29.080
<v Speaker 2>eleven sixty two Foundation, the Atlantic Council, just a run

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:34.400
<v Speaker 2>of this, Northwell Health, Board of Trustees of Princeton Theological Seminary.

0:58:34.720 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Tell us a little bit about what you do on

0:58:36.280 --> 0:58:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the philanthropic side.

0:58:39.880 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, being a good corporate citizen isn't just

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:44.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about it. You got to walk to talk. And

0:58:44.640 --> 0:58:48.400
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's important to give of one's time

0:58:48.440 --> 0:58:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and one's treasure to these institutions, and I'm proud to

0:58:53.040 --> 0:58:53.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to do it.

0:58:54.200 --> 0:58:56.640
<v Speaker 3>So I only have you for a few more minutes.

0:58:57.040 --> 0:59:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's jump to our speed round and just ask you

0:59:01.200 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 2>some of the same questions we ask all of our guests,

0:59:03.800 --> 0:59:06.760
<v Speaker 2>starting with what what have you been streaming these days?

0:59:06.800 --> 0:59:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Tell us what's kept you entertained?

0:59:11.040 --> 0:59:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, very I watch so little personal media of any form.

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:19.120
<v Speaker 1>What I what I do watch is typically with my kids,

0:59:19.800 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Witcher is a big fan favorite for them,

0:59:24.040 --> 0:59:27.000
<v Speaker 1>as are whatever Star Wars spin off at the moment.

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about mentors. You mentioned one of your early

0:59:30.280 --> 0:59:33.080
<v Speaker 2>mentors who helped shape your career.

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I've been blessed with so many. I'd feel bad

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:41.000
<v Speaker 1>naming some, but I mentioned a couple of PhD professors.

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:44.760
<v Speaker 1>There's people I've worked with. Uh, there's you know, Chuck Klin,

0:59:44.880 --> 0:59:47.919
<v Speaker 1>with whom I founded American Securities, who's a dear, dear

0:59:48.440 --> 0:59:50.520
<v Speaker 1>mentor and important figure in my life. But there's I'm

0:59:50.520 --> 0:59:52.040
<v Speaker 1>really blessed with a lot of people who've tried to

0:59:52.040 --> 0:59:52.320
<v Speaker 1>help me.

0:59:52.560 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about books.

0:59:53.680 --> 0:59:55.360
<v Speaker 2>What are some of your favorites and what are you

0:59:55.440 --> 0:59:56.440
<v Speaker 2>reading right now?

0:59:57.000 --> 1:00:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You know pleasure. Reading is a sad asualty of my

1:00:00.880 --> 1:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>day job, but occasionally I do get to steal sometime.

1:00:05.200 --> 1:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a terrific book that's so elegant and peaceful called

1:00:09.160 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>A Gentleman in Moscow, about a man held in a

1:00:12.880 --> 1:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>hotel for decades. That is a really a read I

1:00:17.440 --> 1:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>would recommend to other people, who's given me by a

1:00:19.360 --> 1:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>colleague of mine. And I'm currently reading Outlive by Peter Attiyah,

1:00:26.480 --> 1:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>which is about you know, living longer and living healthfully.

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Our final two questions, what sort of advice would you

1:00:35.280 --> 1:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>give a recent college graduate interested in a career in

1:00:39.480 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>private equity or investing.

1:00:41.400 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the two most important things for a career

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in anything is do you like the work? And do

1:00:46.920 --> 1:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you like the people? And I tell my kids that,

1:00:49.600 --> 1:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and I tell everyone I meet. You know, don't whatever

1:00:52.080 --> 1:00:56.919
<v Speaker 1>it is, tech, private equity, something else. Don't get caught

1:00:56.960 --> 1:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>up in the hype. Do you like the work, go

1:00:59.680 --> 1:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>try it. Understand what your friends or more people more senior,

1:01:03.920 --> 1:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>are doing. And do you like the work. It's you

1:01:07.080 --> 1:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>can't like private equity if you don't like modeling in numbers.

1:01:10.880 --> 1:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So do you like the work, and make sure you

1:01:12.800 --> 1:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>work with people you like, because life is people and

1:01:15.240 --> 1:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if you love the people you work with, you'll be

1:01:17.600 --> 1:01:19.919
<v Speaker 1>learning and growing and happy every day. And if you don't,

1:01:20.000 --> 1:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter what you're doing, you're not going to

1:01:22.200 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>be happy.

1:01:23.080 --> 1:01:25.760
<v Speaker 2>And our final question, what do you know about the

1:01:25.800 --> 1:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>world of private equity today? You wish you knew back

1:01:29.920 --> 1:01:33.080
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen ninety four when you were first launching your firm.

1:01:33.880 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it would. It is amazing to me and

1:01:39.000 --> 1:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>probably to most of the other people who started in

1:01:41.840 --> 1:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>private equity in nineteen eighties, that this has become a

1:01:45.080 --> 1:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>massive industry. Honestly, I thought, and I think most of

1:01:48.840 --> 1:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the other people doing it thought, we were just we

1:01:51.200 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>just saw the world a little bit different and there

1:01:52.720 --> 1:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>were a bunch of companies which had cash flow characteristics

1:01:55.320 --> 1:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>different than their EPs characteristics, and so we could buy

1:01:59.240 --> 1:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>some of these companies and have fun working with the

1:02:02.080 --> 1:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>management teams. And that this, you know, little side niche

1:02:06.080 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>has become so huge is really shocking to me.

1:02:11.720 --> 1:02:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Huh, really really fascinating. Michael, thank you for being so

1:02:14.640 --> 1:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>generous with your time. We have been speaking with Michael Fish.

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:22.120
<v Speaker 2>He is the CEO of American Securities, a twenty seven

1:02:22.280 --> 1:02:27.080
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar private equity firm. If you enjoy this conversation, well,

1:02:27.200 --> 1:02:29.800
<v Speaker 2>feel free to check out any of our previous five

1:02:29.880 --> 1:02:33.600
<v Speaker 2>hundred discussions we've had over the past nine years. You

1:02:33.640 --> 1:02:38.560
<v Speaker 2>can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, wherever you get

1:02:38.640 --> 1:02:42.479
<v Speaker 2>your favorite podcast. Sign up for our daily reading list

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:46.080
<v Speaker 2>at ridhlts dot com. Follow me on Twitter at Ritoltz.

1:02:46.520 --> 1:02:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Follow all of the Bloomberg family of podcasts on Twitter

1:02:50.440 --> 1:02:53.480
<v Speaker 2>at Podcasts. I would be remiss if I did not

1:02:53.600 --> 1:02:56.880
<v Speaker 2>thank the crack team who helps me put these conversations

1:02:56.920 --> 1:03:00.880
<v Speaker 2>together each week. Meredith Brank is my audio engineer at

1:03:00.960 --> 1:03:04.400
<v Speaker 2>tik of Albron is my project manager. Anna Luke is

1:03:04.440 --> 1:03:08.040
<v Speaker 2>my producer. Sean Russo is my researcher.

1:03:08.320 --> 1:03:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm Barry Hilts.

1:03:09.920 --> 1:03:13.720
<v Speaker 2>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.