WEBVTT - Surveillance: War in Ukraine with Kimmitt

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz. Daily we bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, sun Cloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. What we will

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>do is speak of this war. We do this with

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.599
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman early in his career at that time when

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Russia again blew up in the early nineties, Mark Kimmitt

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>was with the eighth Infantry and then answer other tours

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of duty with the Army and General Kimmitt Division Artillery

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Commander the first Armored Division in Germany. He has hands

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>on experiences Ben Hodges did the other day for US

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. General Kimmitt, thank you for joining us UH

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Mark Kimmitt, What will the tank warfare look

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>like in Carcave? What will the warfare look like in Kiev? Well,

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>first of all time, it won't be tank warfare. All

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>those advantages that the Russians have with those mechanized vehicles,

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>UH in too great extent, is completely neutralized when you

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>go inside the city. These are small streets, even the

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>large ones can't fit a lot of tanks through them,

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>And it goes down to a completely different kind of

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>warfare that we're seeing right now on the roads. If

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a different warfare, do you suggest we'll see

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it in any moment's notice and with that we will

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>see Ukraine do better than the last twenty four hours. Well,

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see clearly the Ukrainians have done very very well

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>up to this point, but it's the first ending in

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a nine ending ball game. When you go into the cities,

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>everything that they've been doing up to this point changes. Uh.

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>They certainly have the advantage as the defender in the

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>city ease and a lot of the advantages that the

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Russians had are just completely neutralized. But it is still tough,

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>brutal combat in a way that we haven't seen yet.

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Urban combat is for any military historian certainly understood. It's

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the toughest, grittiest, bloodiest kind of warfare there is. We've

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>had a many times, General that it has to favor

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the attack. The ratio in combat in urban wol fat.

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Can you run me through the kind of ratio you're

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking about, General, Because we hear things like six to one.

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>What an attack it needs to overwhelm the defender in

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Uban wol fat, What kind of ratio is needed? Oh,

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it could be far more than that. You took a

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>look at what happened in Mosle. A hundred thousand troops

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>were necessary to go against ISIS and Mosle about six

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand inside there. Uh. And unfortunately there's a huge toll

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on the civilian population inside those cities as well. But

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for an attack her to win in a city fight

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is our marines did in Felluja. It takes extraordinary numbers

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and it also takes extraordinary valor. And that last point

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is the important point, General, And can we sit on

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that for a moment. How unique is this when we

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>see these videos of the individuals coming from the Russian

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>army into Ukraine, which seemingly very little appetite to attack,

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Ukrainian people just pushing those tanks back. General,

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 1>what have you made of that? You've seen those videos

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>through social media reporting on news networks around the world. Yeah,

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I have seen the ones that are shown in social

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>media where the Russians aren't coming across the Well, what

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing is those early insertions done by the

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Russian paratroopers into some of those air fields. Uh. Those

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>are professional paratroopers, they are not conscripts, and they're much

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>better trained. But when you're talking about the conscripts that

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing on the road that are basically giving up

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>or dying, I think that the Ukrainians have acquitted themselves

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>spectacularly up to this point. General, do you think that

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we are underestimating the morale issue, both the boosted morale

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Ukrainian side and the opposite on the Russian side. No,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I think we got it about right. I think that

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody is surprised at how poorly the Russians have done

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>up to this point. Much can be explained number one

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that these are conscripts that never knew

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they were going to be thrown into the war. Uh.

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And number two, the intense, intense leadership shown by President Zelensky,

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>which is toughened uh, the backbone of every one of

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>those civilians and the military and the militias that they're

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>fighting them. General, can you see an endgame at this point,

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that it seems like Vladimir Putin is

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>not giving in in any way, and the Western allies

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>are simply trying to remain with the sanctions and clamping

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>down harder on that front. Yeah. So that's a good

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>question because, as I said earlier, this is the first

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in a nine ending ball game, and the Russians will

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>just continue to hammer and hammer and hammer away at

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you in places such as cities. They don't worry about casualties.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>They weren't, don't worry about collateral damage, they don't worry

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>about infrastructure. So I would expect that his endgame will

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>be to go into those cities and destroy them. It's

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that simple. Destroy the buildings, destroy the people, destroy the civilians.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>They don't care. They will continue to flow troops and

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>equipment in there and fire artillery missiles and bomb them

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>until they are destroyed. That's how they see the end game.

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>In many ways, people would say that's the only endgame

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that you can accomplish inside this type of warfare. And general,

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I want you to speak to the public that does

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not warn the uniform that you have warned there's a

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>massive primal screen. Just do something. And I want to

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>talk about the American initiative or even initiatives plural here

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to fly into western Ukraine and deposit a massive force

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Ukrainians can use or to come in through

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the Black Sea, alistra Vitas and the others. What's the

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>initiative America can do now to assist militarily, President Zelinski? Well,

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the main thing is to do what we've

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>been doing, not only as Americans but as our NATO

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>colleagues and our NATO allies, which is flow as much

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>precision weapons into UH Ukraine as possible, whether it's sting

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>or missiles to bring down their helicopters, javelins, to knock

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>out there UH tanks in their artillery, drones to UH

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>conductoral warfare against selected targets. But we want to contain

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.679
<v Speaker 1>this inside Ukraine. We can't be put in Americans into Ukraine,

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>otherwise this will spill over into NATO and it would

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>be a much much bigger war. What would you do

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>as a mandate as a general in combat which you've done,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>What would you do with a convoy forty miles long?

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that the job of modern technology and drones? Well,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the problem with that, of course time is that we

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have air superiority. You remember in the First Gulf War,

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>so we need to fly zone the common of the moment, Generals,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>we need to know fly zone. Well, the no fly

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>zone won't help the Ukrainian Air Force get into the air.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>It's personally non existent at this point. Um and again,

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the no fly zone would completely change the dimension of

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>this conflict from a war inside of Ukraine to a

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>war that can spill over in Europe. What we need

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to do more than anything else is see if we

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>can get those Ukrainian helicopters in the air, because, as

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we say in the military, forty miles of vehicles is

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a target rich environment. We've seen them destroyed as we

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>did in the first Gulf War where were destroyed about

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>ten miles and vehicles, and it would be pretty easy.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But the Russians have air superiority, and we've got to

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>take that air superior already away from them through anti

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>aircraft devices such as stingers. But I don't think that

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>will happen in time. General, as things stands. To wrap

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>things up, we'd love your assessment of the base case

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>about how this turns out, you write. A group was

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.679
<v Speaker 1>on with us earlier this week. They said we continue

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to see the most likely outcome of the invasion as

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a combination of regime change and Russian political control of

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the entirety of the country. What's your conclusion, your base

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>case at the moment, General, Well, I think that's probably

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>where it will end up. At these peace negotiations. Of

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>these peace talks on the Belarusian border don't accomplish anything. Remember,

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>wars don't end when the last person dies. Wars end

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>at the diplomacy table, at the negotiating table, and candidly,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the sooner we can negotiate Russia out of Ukraine, the better, mark, General,

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering a lot of people are talking about the

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that Russia is a nuclear power, and NATO came

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>out this morning and said that there's no need to

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>change the nuclear weapons alert, even though Russia has come

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>out and taken steps on that front. How concerned should

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we be? Can we shrug this off? Well, I don't

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>think we can struggle just shrug it off. But I

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't tell you that while Vladimir Putin maybe stupid, he's

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>not suicidal. And I think even he recognizes that a

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 1>nuclear exchange any kind would be not only the end

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of his regime, but in many ways could could completely

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>sink the Russian Federation. General we have to leave it there.

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate your time, and sir, please stay close. We'd

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>love to catch up with you again soon. Lucky to

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>catch up with General Mark Kimmitt this morning, let us

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>go to an informed guest. She is absolutely brilliant in mathematics.

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Her graduate studies are just bulletproof. She holds court if

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>b n Y Melon Wealth Management Alicia Levine on this

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>historic Tuesday. Alicia, how is your view of the markets

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>changed given war? Look, the geopolitical situation over in Europe

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 1>with a hot war really just adds another layer to

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>an already kind of very difficult environment for equities here,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>because you have that specter of the nineteen late nineteen seventies,

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen eighties, of that stag flash, stagflationary fear of

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of ever ratcheting down growth and ever ratcheting up inflation,

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>as you've just spoken about. And what this conflict does

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is it plays into the inflationary piece, because I don't

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>think the oil and gas piece, you know, the markets

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>assuming that flows are going to say the way they

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>are and then Iran will come on and it will

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>be fine. And I think we have to ask ourselves,

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>what if that doesn't happen. You know what if we

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>do see a disruption, and I think you could see

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>energy higher. And let's not forget that Ukraine is the

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>bread basket of the former Soviet. You Union of the

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>world's week comes from Ukraine, and so therefore commodity price

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>inflation is going to stay higher. So it just really

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>adds to those concerns and difficult and difficult environment for

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>equities as a result. At least s are you surprised

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>by how much we're fighting FED action this year, a

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>CP action potentially later this year, and getting comfortable with

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the FED will pull back a bit.

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not surprised that the expectations for the ECB

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>have pulled back, because after all, in a sense, the

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>European economy is going to be most directly hit by

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>this conflict and by the sanctions and by some turmoil

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in their local banks. So so that's not entirely surprising.

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it is more surprising for the FED simply

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:49.479
<v Speaker 1>because the inflation here is broad based and becoming sticky,

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and that is something the FED is going to have

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to deal with first and foremost. And I think the

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>war is about growth. Are going to be secondary. They

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with the inflation piece, and ever increasing

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>oil here is not going to help. It's just lasting longer.

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And what we've seen is that the length of time,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the duration that these kind of factors filter into expectations

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just make it worse. And so even if we think

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it's transitory for a year, it's already gotten into the

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>psyche of consumers and business leaders. Alicia, what happens if

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we continue to get this move where rates actually come

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>down because people think that the FED is not going

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.719
<v Speaker 1>to move, and yet we see stock markets continue to

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>decline because people are starting to price in stagflation. What

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>happens in a regime where people basically are saying the

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>FED has lost control over inflation. Right, Look, that that's

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the key question, because it's it's not a great environment

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>for equities. But we actually think we're here in a

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>range somewhere between hundred range, which is where we've been

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>bouncing around until we settle what the main issue is,

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>whether can inflation start moving lower in the spring, and

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>can can be fed do it in a way that

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't inhibit growth. I'll say this, the data on the

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>real economy is coming in pretty nicely in February, and

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>so that really does support better than you know, pretty

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>decent growth. I am happily surprised about that, but that's

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the range is where we are until it gets settled

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>one way or another. So there's risks in both directions here.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to start to see a bit

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>in some of those large cap text socks also simply

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>because that is that is really the safety play, earnings,

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>cash flow dependability of a business that's really divorced from

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>from the economic cycle. We're a little bit more cautious

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>on the consumer cyclicals here, simply because in a rate

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>hiking environment and an increasing inflation environment, that's those are

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>really the areas to get hit first. What are you

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>doing with energy companies right now? So we still like

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>energy here. I think that much of the move is

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>probably behind us. But given the situation here, I think

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>energy is really still the play. The really interesting question here,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and you've been bringing this up all morning of CEO

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>from Devon Energy. You know, why isn't the US changing

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's energy policy in the way that Germany has.

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think of German policy changed radically. You know

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>what what it was for the last several decades as

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a response to this, and I think that's really something

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>on a policy basis would not be a bad thing

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for the administration to address here, simply because it turns

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>out that complicts and places with very small percentages of

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>global GDP really do affect us. Alicia, wonderful to hear

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>from you, and so always Alicia living of BM y Man,

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm with some really important questions. Let us move on

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to our interview of the damn for in exchange with

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Comac Travetti of Golden Sax were thrilled that you could join.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh this morning, come act you very simple, where is

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the true valuation of ruble? Good morning? Thank you for

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>having me. I mean, this is the kind of situation where, uh,

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, fundamental valuations are very hard to do. I mean,

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you can think about things like Russia's oil and gas exports,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>its current accounts surplus, it's reserves. None of these things

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>matter at a time when a large quantity of the

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>reserves are sanctioned. Essentially, the sanctions are making Russian assets

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>uninvestable for most you know, Western investors, and they're making

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, valuations and fundamental valuation calculations pretty much impossible

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. Can you use adjacent ratios to come up

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>with some form of guestimate of dollar ruble right now?

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Moving out from my eyes are failing me here from

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a one oh one, one oh two right now, can

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we dare say one fifteen or one twenty? Look, it

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>all depends on how things evolve. You know. If you

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>look back to the period fifteen when you had the

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>annexation of crimea, hostilities in the don bus and of

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>halving in the oil price, you saw, you know, a

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>huge sell off in the ruble, you know, nearly you

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>know or so, and that came along with a drain

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of central bank reserves of something like a hundred billion dollars. Uh.

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>That kind of drain or that kind of decumulation in

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>order to support the ruble is just not possible today.

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>So again I think that you know, one can come

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>up with you know, maximum undervaluation numbers or things like that. Uh,

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, and we are well through those points at

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>at you know, hundred and fifteen or whatever it is.

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>But I just think at this point it's it's not

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you need to see some crystallization of the risks. You

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>need to see some sense of the end point here

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>before you can put a firm value that this is

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of as far as it goes, and and no

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>further in the meantime comm act share we're seeing is

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>nodes of liquidity amid the sea of illiquidity that is

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the Russian market for all assets, where are you seeing

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the most traumatic ramifications, the most traumatic moves simply because

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>it is the only place that people are using to

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>offset some of their other bets. That potentially could be

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>an overshoot if things do come to some resolution in

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the near term. That's the That's a very interesting question.

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that is really one that investors should be

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>asking themselves as well, right, I mean, you know, Russian assets,

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>as I said to the sanctions are making them very

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>hard to to to touch. But there are the whole

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>host of other assets that may be affected by what

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is going on in Russia and Ukraine. Uh and there

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 1>at some point there may be a more interesting opportunity.

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the most significant risk premium is being put

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in the assets that are closest to the theater of

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>conflict parts of Central Eastern Europe, Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>The equities, the currencies in those regions, and those are

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>places where if you saw some stabilization, some secession of

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>some cease fire, I think would probably see some of

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the biggest recoveries and the fastest moves. Uh. And I

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>think then there are assets that are pretty far away

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>from that. You know, if you think about oil producing

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>countries like Colombia and the Colombian Paso or the Middle

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>East and oil producers the credits preds on those, I

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>think some of those things could be You know, I

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>have already been pretty resilient, but could see more out

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>performance in the world where the hostility sees but oil

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>prices are still meaningfully higher. You are an economist at

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England. You understand the interplay of oil

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>prices and growth and how the combat for inflation can transpire.

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that markets have gotten ahead of themselves

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in pricing out possible rate highs from either the Bank

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 1>of England or the ECB, or even the better reserve

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on the hills of this conflict? I should say I

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>was about economist the Bank of England many many years ago.

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Now obviously it's attist at Goldman facts, but um, look,

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the markets are trying to price a very

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>uncertain situation, and I think what is really happening is

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 1>that markets are, you know, implicitly making the assumption that

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the tightening in financial conditions that is needed to bring

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>inflation down. Some of that tightening is already being delivered

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>by the move higher and commodity prices and oil prices.

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that is sort of what the market is pricing,

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's why you're seeing the interest rates

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the yields moved down. I think that, you know, my

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>our view is that you will still need to see

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>considerable tightening, especially in places where as I said, the

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>growth impact from this conflict may be relatively limited, but

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the negative shock from oil prices to inflation might actually

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>be quite meaningful. So I it's it's understandable why markets

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>are doing what they're doing, but I think it may

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>be a bit too fast, and I think you're probably

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>still going to see major central banks, at least in

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 1>the near future, continue to be on a tightening trajectory.

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Can act right to catch up. We're gonna get your

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>perspectives and really impotent thoughts on what's gonna happen with

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>his current state. COTTI of Gellman Sacks thank you said

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, what we're gonna do is link a Russia

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by what is at fourteen nations to in America

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by two with great commonalities with Canada and Mexico.

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>One company that has done that over the decades in

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>North America is Target. Let's get your attention. Target is

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>beat Walmart by over six hundred basis points per year

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>in the last ten years in the name of Global

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. That is success. Their chief financial officer, Michael

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Fidelki joins us this morning. Mike, I'm gonna cut to

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the chase. The President will speak tonight on a hundred

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and four hundred five dollar Brent crude. You spoke today

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>with twenty four dollars per hour on your wage. How

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>are you going to do this at twenty four dollars

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>an hour blended forty eight thousand dollars a year for

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>line employees. I'll tell you the investments that we make

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in our team from my seat for the best investments

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that we make, and that's been a path of investment

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>over years now. We laid a path to get to

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen dollar starting wage back in accomplished that a

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago. We've invested in additional benefits. We've

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>invested in tuition free education, assistant assistance, and we see

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>those investments paying off. You can see it and the

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>results that team delivered in our quarter with growth of

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>nine percent because of time. I don't mean to cut

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you off, but I think this is so important, Michael,

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>because you lead on this and you and I'm gonna say, Amazon,

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Jesse and the rest are in the cross. Here's on

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this are we have an arms race right now for

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>line employees. It's definitely a tight labor market, but our

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 1>story might look different than what you'd hear elsewhere, and

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that we track our ability to attract and retain those

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.239
<v Speaker 1>metrics really closely. Those metrics are stronger for us right

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>now than they were pre pandemic. So we see the

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>results of that investment over time really paying off with

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a team that wants to come to work at Target

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and that best team in retails delivering. Michael, this is

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>one side of the equation that you have a bird's

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>eye view on the employment aspect. The other side is

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>consumers willingness to keep spending at the same pace even

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>as they see their price of gasoline rise to the

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>highest level since two thousand and fourteen, even as wheat

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>futures arise to the highest since two thousand and eight.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>How do you game this out when you talk about pricing,

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about passing it on to the consumers

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and your ability to do so. Is time running out

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep passing it all on directly? Now, we certainly

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>see the inflationary costs pressure in the environment, but we

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>tackle that really through the lens of our guests. Were fortunate.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>We have a lot of levers to pull within our

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>business to make sure that we're protecting value for our guests,

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and price is the lever we pull last, not first,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 1>and that investment in value is working. If you look

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>at our fourth quarter results that nine growth, it came

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>almost entirely from traffic. That means guests picking target more often,

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>whether with their footsteps or clicks to our website, and

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>so those investments in protecting value or paying off. Michael,

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking because you sort of are at this cross

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>section of what we talked about every day. We're talking

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>about what's going on with Russia invading Ukraine, the possible

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>disruption of supply chains, the possible ramifications on growth of

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>oil prices, and I'm wondering how you factor these things

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and have you been scouring through your supply chains and

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>looking for possible disruptions either from this or other perspective conflicts.

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:37.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how does this factor in to your day

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to day decision making now? As you might expect, it's

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a situation we monitor really closely, and I'll start by

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>just saying our hearts go out to everyone impacted by

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>the situation in Ukraine. I know it weighs heavily on

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.479
<v Speaker 1>my mind, our target team, and our guests. We're fortunate

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we've got the benefit of a really sophisticated supply chain

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that's navigated a lot of challenges over the last two

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>years incredibly well, feel really it about our inventory position

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>today upt to last year. That's a testament to us

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>working through some of those supply chain challenges, so we

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>should be well positioned to start the year. Have you

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>found that you've actually gotten a lot of market share

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>from smaller businesses simply because you have that ability to

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>really rejigger supply chains and streamline certain costs so that

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you can pass it along. We look at our market

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>share games over the last couple of years, we see

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>them coming from a variety of places, and some of

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that goes to, you know, the market share story by category.

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>As you know, we've got strength across so many categories,

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>from a really strong apparel business to a strong food

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and beverage business, and each of those categories grew double

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>digits in the last year. And so the market stare

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>share store is a little different by category, but it's

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a wide set of sources. Michael, big move in

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a pre market today by almost eleven months to move

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in fact from New York. Thank you, Michael. Michael Fowk

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>there of target. The target move quite sizeable in early trading,

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>yet today down about writing much of that and the

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Eddie pot of today's session. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays from seven to

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>each day from six to nine am for insight from

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. And

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and of course on the terminal. I'm Tom

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Keene and this is Bloomberg