WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: The Macintosh Story Part 3

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>tech are you? It is time for another classic episode,

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and for the last two Fridays we have been publishing

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>reruns from twenty seventeen of The McIntosh Story. It's a

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>three part series.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 2>So this is the conclusion as of twenty seventeen of

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the Macintosh Story. So if you missed parts one and two,

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 2>you can look back at the last two fridays and

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 2>catch up. The original publication date for this episode was

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 2>June ninth, twenty seventeen. So let's listen to The Macintosh

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Story Part three.

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't remember, Part one of this series

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>covered the people responsible for launching the first macin Tosh,

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>which came out in nineteen eighty four. The second part

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>largely focused on the Mac from about nineteen eighty five

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>up through the point where Steve Jobs returned to Apple.

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So between nineteen eighty five and nineteen ninety seven, Steve

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Jobs was effectively forced out of the company he had

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>co founded, and then in nineteen ninety seven he returned

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to Apple. So this third part we're going to pick

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>back up right around that time, which requires me to

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>do a little backtracking just so that we're all on

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>the same page.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.279
<v Speaker 3>So it's nineteen ninety seven.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>The Apple CEO at the time at the beginning of

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety seven was Gil Emilio, and he was in

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>charge during the time where Apple started looking at developing

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the next generation of operating systems. It had been developing

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>operating systems in house, tried to develop a brand new

0:01:54.480 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>operating system for the power PC microchip as a partner ship.

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 3>With Motorola and IBM.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>It became known as the Aim Projects because it was Apple, IBM,

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and Motorola and it was meant to be a competitor

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to Intel and the Windows operating system.

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 3>And how well that partnership was working, they.

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Were looking at acquiring a company in order to get

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a new operating system on board, and they were looking

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>at two different companies that were each founded by a

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>different former member of the Apple team.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 3>One of those two companies was called Next.

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Next was a company that Steve Jobs founded after he

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>had left Apple. He was trying to create a new

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>computer standard, a new type of computer for the educational industry,

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and Next was the computer system he developed. It was

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>not really a super success. It was modest in its successes.

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>It was a very expensive machine. Again, like many of

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the stories I've told about the Macintosh, not only was

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it expensive, but it was hard to get developers to

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>make software for it.

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 3>So it was not a bad idea.

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>It just didn't have a lot of support and it

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>was really expensive, so it didn't get a huge number

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of purchases out there.

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple acquired Next, and as a result they also kind

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 1>of acquired Steve Jobs.

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 3>He came along with the company.

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Jobs would then convince the Board of directors that Emilio

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>needed to go. I mean, he had led the charge

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>about acquiring Next, but he had also made some decisions

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that Steve Jobs viewed as being incredibly negative for the

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>health of Apple as a company. Apple stocks were at

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a twelve year low when gill Emilio was CEO. The

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>board agreed with Steve Jobs and removed gill Emilio from

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the position of CEO, and then Steve Jobs essentially became

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Apple, although originally he was just called

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the interim CEO. He would later become the permanent CEO,

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but in the meantime he was the interim CEO, which

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>would mean that he was just keeping the seat warm

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for somebody else. It just turned out he was keeping

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the seat warm for himself. He didn't turn the company

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>around instantly, but he did get to work right away.

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>The day after he was named interim CEO of Apple,

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>he launched a new project that would really pay off

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety eight, and that was the iMac. He

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>started that the day after September sixteenth, nineteen ninety seven.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>He started that iMac project, So he didn't waste any

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.119
<v Speaker 1>time once he stepped into that role. Now, nineteen ninety

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>seven was also the year that Apple decided to rename

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the operating system for the Macintosh. If you remember in

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>our last episode, they had started calling the operating system

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a pretty simple name. The name was System. So the

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>first mac operating system was just System one point zero.

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>The last version of System using this naming style was

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>System seven point five point five or seven dot five

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>dot five if you prefer. Starting with version seven dot six,

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they decided to rename it and they went with macOS eight. Now,

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>what's more, this version of the opering system wasn't compatible

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Mac Plus. It was the first of the

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>operating systems that Apple had designed that would not work

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>on the old Mac Plus computer. If you remember, Macplus

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was the longest lived Macintosh on the market. It had

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>been developed by Apple and manufactured for four years. That's

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a long time in the computer business to keep making

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the same model of computer. But they had stopped making

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>mac Pluss for a long time. They just continued to

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>support it by developing operating systems that could still run

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>on a Macplus. Just would update your Macplus to the

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>latest operating system and you're good to go.

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 3>Well, Mac OS eight was the first.

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>Operating system that would not run on a Macplus. So

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this was sort of the mark of Macplus marching into

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the sunset. It was over. It was an obsolete form

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 1>at that point. You could run old stuff on it,

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>but you couldn't run anything new on it.

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Now you might wonder why.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.679
<v Speaker 1>They changed the name of the operating system from system

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>to macOS, and I'll explain that in just a minute.

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>But another thing that Apple discontinued continued at this point

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>was its licensing program, or at least it really changed

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that licensing program that had been rather disastrous for Apple

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years. So what had happened

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>was Apple had, before Steed Jobs came back on board,

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple had started to license out its technology to other

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>computer manufacturers, which meant that other companies could make computers

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>that were Mac compatible. Essentially, they were called Mac clones,

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and there were several companies that were doing this, and

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>they were making cheaper versions of Macintosh hardware. It was

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>in a totally different form factor. It didn't look the

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>way a Macintosh looked, but it ran Macintosh operating systems

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and programs. So you could go out and buy a

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>clone from one of these companies that was fully licensed.

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>They were not breaking the law or anything, and you

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>could run that Mac operating system and software on your

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Mac clone for much less money than it would cost

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for you to buy an official Macintosh, which meant that

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>ultimately Apple was undercutting its own sales. Why would you

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>go out and buy an official Apple Mac if you

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>could get a comparable system for much less money somewhere else.

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs didn't really care for this. He thought it

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>was a terrible idea, and so he wanted to renegotiate

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>all those licensing agreements. So once the term was coming up,

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to renegotiate where the royalty fees would be

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>much higher, so that every sale of a Mac clone

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>would guarantee Apple a certain percentage of the revenue. Now,

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, that doesn't make the manufacturing companies all that

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>eager to sign a new agreement. It means cutting into

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>their profit margin, and it would mean that they would

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>have to start raising the prices of their computers to

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>regain that lost profit margin. But that would mean that

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the higher priced computers would be in direct competition with

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the Apple computers.

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 3>It would just mean a lot.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Of tough decisions on the part of these licensed companies.

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So there was a lot of resistance on that, and

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that's when Steve Jobs decided to really make a move.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>You see, the agreement that they Apple had with these

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>clone companies was that they could continue to make clones

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of Mac computers as long as they were in the

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>System seven range. If they were in that System seven range,

0:08:55.679 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>then you could continue to make Mac clones. But once

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>they renamed the operating system from System to macOS, that

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the agreement no longer was valid because it

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>was a different operating system at least in name, and

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what the agreement had said, that as long as

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it was system, they could continue to make them. It

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>meant that all the macclone companies could not make the

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>most up to date version of the Macintosh, they couldn't

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>include the latest version of the operating system without paying

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>another hefty license fee, and as a result, one by

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>one these licensed companies began to get out of the

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>macclone business, until by the middle of nineteen ninety eight none.

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Of them were doing it anymore.

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>So within about a year, Steve Jobs stopped this cloning

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>program that was going on from its predecessor. Now that

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>in full was a pretty good decision, at least from

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a sales perspective for Apple. Back in nineteen ninety five,

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple had sold four and a half million Max, so

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>at four and a half million Max nineteen ninety five,

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>but then it started this clone program where it began

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to license the technology to competitors, and in nineteen ninety

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>six sales of Max dropped to four million units, so

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>five hundred thousand units fewer than the year before. Now,

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you never want to see the number go down when

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you are in a company, you always want that graph

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to go up into the right, not down into the right.

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a bad graph if you're in a sales department.

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.599
<v Speaker 1>It was worse the following year, in ninety seven, the

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>writing was on the wall because sales had dropped to

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>two point eight million units. So two point eight million

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>from four point five is awful.

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, there were other mitigating factors that were

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>also affecting this. For example, Microsoft launched Windows ninety five,

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and that really affected sales at the end of ninety

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and throughout ninety six and ninety seven. It was a

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>very powerful operating system. It was much friendlier than previous

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>versions of Windows. People said, oh, this is more like

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>what I expect from Apple, and so people began to

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>become more happy with Microsoft's approach to a graphic user

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>interface or guey operating system. So there were other factors

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>besides the fact that there were cheaper clones on the

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>market than Apple computers. But all of this together meant

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that getting rid of that clone program just made sense.

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what Steve Jobs was able to do

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>through this renegotiation process and then by changing the operating

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>system name.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm going to keep talking about Steve.

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Jobs because his history and mac history are so closely

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>tied together. Remember, the Macintosh started not as one of

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs's projects. It was an Apple project, but it

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>wasn't headed by Steve Jobs. It wasn't until Steve Jobs

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>was removed from a Lisa project, and then he decided

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to get involved with the McIntosh project. But from that

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>point forward, the Macintosh was really affected by Steve Jobs.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Even when he was away from the company, a lot

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of his decisions would end up finding their way into

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh generation after generation. He made some more big

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>changes to Apple.

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 3>In nineteen ninety eight.

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, Steve Jobs shut down the Newton project.

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>The Newton was a personal digital assistant that had become

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the butt of a lot of jokes thanks to ah inconsistent,

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say, imperfect design and implementation. It had a handwriting

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>recognition feature that frequently did not work very well and

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>was made fun of on The Simpsons. Among other things.

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs also decided to streamline the product lines in

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the computer and printer divisions. He started to eliminate some

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of the types of computers they were selling. He thought

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that they needed to refocus and start selling a more

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>narrow band of computers and make sure that they got

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that right, as opposed to selling a wide variety of

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>computers that are of varying degrees of quality. Now, one

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of the lines of computers that survived this process was

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the Mac. He decided that the Mac had some value

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to it. It did not need to be completely done

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>away with or replaced with some other name. He wanted

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to reinvigorate it, but not to completely scrap it and

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>start over. So the biggest jump for Apple was the

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>introduction of the iMac. This was a new attempt for

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple to push into the consumer market in a really

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>big way, and the basic iMac was a pretty decent

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>machine for its era. It had a two hundred and

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 1>thirty three megahertz G three CPU, had thirty two megabytes

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of RAM, a four gigabyte hard drive, a CD ROM drive,

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and an Ati Rage two CS graphics card with two

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>whole megabytes of video memory. Now, Apple originally stated that

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the iMac could support up to one hundred and twenty

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>eight megabytes of RAM, which users could upgrade. So this

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>was one of the times where you could actually boost

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the performance of your machine by adding in extra memory

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to the device yourself, something that Apple would eventually get

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>away from to the point where if you wanted anything upgraded,

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you're really stuck. Often you don't have an option at

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>all unless you just go out and buy a new computer.

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Which I mean, if you're selling computers, if that's the

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>business you're in, if you could convince your users to

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>just buy a new computer every time they needed something

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a little more powerful, that's lucrative.

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 3>If there's enough people who will actually do it.

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, the iMac you could upgrade, and again, Apple originally

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>said that you could upgrade up to one hundred and

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight megabytes of RAM, but people found out that

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you could actually upgrade it beyond that, depending upon on

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the RAM you bought, because not all RAM chips were compatible,

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>but some were, and in fact, some users found out

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that depending upon the chip they bought, they could get

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>up to five hundred and twelve megabyte modules working on

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>an iMac, which meant that you could get a maximum

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of RAM of around a gigabyte. Now, that was

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive by nineteen ninety eight standards. The computer and

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>display of the iMac were paired together, so the computer

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and display were one big unit that you would plug

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a keyboard and mouse into and it looked a lot

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>like a television set. The display was a fifteen inch display.

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>It did not have the basic one anyway, did not

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>have a floppy disk drive. In fact, this marked a

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>trend for Apple where it began to get away from

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>including floppy drives in their computers, and eventually other computer

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers began to follow suit and stopped including floppy drives

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in their machines. So this was the beginning of the

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>end for the floppy disk drive as a storage media.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It began to go into obsolescence. But the display on

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the iMac was a cathode ray tube display a CRT.

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I talked a lot about CRTs in the History of

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>TV podcasts, So if you want to know how a

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>cathode ray tube works, listen to my History of Television

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>podcasts because I talk about in detail there. But the

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>thing to remember is that these machines are take up

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of space. So these are those big, clunky

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>TVs from yesterday that you might have seen, not like

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>flat screens. Those are you know, either LCD or LED

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>or plasma displays. But the original IMAX for CRTs, so

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they were a little hefty. As a result, they could

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>support a resolution originally anyway of oneenty twenty four by

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>seven sixty eight or ten twenty four by seven sixty

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>eight if you prefer now. Later in nineteen ninety eight,

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple introduced an updated version of the iMac that had

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>better graphics card with more video memory, and the most

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>recent version of the Mac operating system, which was at

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that point macversion Mac OS version eight point five.

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 3>And on top of the iMac.

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple also introduced new power books in their laptop lineup,

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>which included a curvy laptop that was called the Wall

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Street power Book. And I this every now and then

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple would come out with a product that I just

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>don't get the esthetics. If you don't know what a

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street PowerBook looks like, do an image search on

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple Wall Street power Book. Because this thing just does

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>not appeal to me. It was kind of funky. It

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>also suffered from a design flaw. In the early models,

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the hinges were a little weak, which meant that once

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>they wore out, the laptop screen wouldn't stay in place anymore.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>It would start to fall over, which is pretty inconvenient

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for a laptop. So it wasn't the best product to

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>ever come out of Apple. The Wall Street line also

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>had a few other issues. For one thing, it was

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>noticeably slower than the desktop powermas that were coming out

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at the time. And you'd expect that to a point.

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But when you're selling these laptops at a premium price

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>and you're saying this is the field version of the

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>desktops that you can get for your basic home setup,

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not great when it works significantly slower than the

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>desktop version. All Right, So we've come up to our

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>first little break here. Now after the break, we're going

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk more about some interesting developments from Apple, including

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>some changes in port systems, as well as some interesting

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>esthetic choices to really set Apple apart from the herd.

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But before we get into that, let's take a quick

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsor.

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 3>All right. So around this time.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple introduced a new protocol that really took a large

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>part in the Macintosh from that point forward, and that

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>was FireWire.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, originally you had to.

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Get FireWire expansion cards so that you could get a

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>FireWire port in your mac but over time, FireWire would

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>become a standard port in the Macintosh lines for several years. Now,

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>if you don't know what FireWire is because it's largely

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>been replaced at this stage. It is a protocol, a

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>technology for moving data from one device to another, and

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's meant to move a large amount of data in

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a small amount of time. So it's really essentially similar

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to other types of ports that you would find on computers,

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>like Scuzzy ports back in the day, or us B

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>ports or USBC today used to be three point zero

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>style ports.

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>At the time, FireWire was a big advance from Scuzzy,

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>at least your basic Scuzzy. Unless you were using top

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:19.479
<v Speaker 1>of the line Scuzzy ports with the best cables that

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>money could buy, you weren't maxing out your speeds that high.

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Scuzzy Ultra had about a ten megabytes per

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>second top speed for data transfers, which is not bad

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>except if you're trying to transfer very large files let's

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>say video files are very high quality audio files.

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 3>That was a little slow.

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And remember that the macline of computers was frequently being

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>used by video producers audio producers for a lot of

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>creative applications like that, as opposed to your productivity software,

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>which was typically viewed as a Windows machine duty Max

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>were taking on all these really high end and very

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>demanding applications when it comes to audio and video production,

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>so they needed something that would allow you to transfer

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>data at faster speeds.

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Now, firewires initial.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Capabilities stretched up to the four hundred megabits per second range.

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Now megabits versus megabytes very different.

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 1>A bit is one single unit of information, it's either

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a zero or a one.

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 3>A byte is.

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Eight of those collectively, So four hundred megabits is equivalent

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to around fifty megabytes per second, but that's like five

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:43.199
<v Speaker 1>times faster than Scuzy Ultra was. So Apple was looking

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>at reinventing data transfers from device to device using the

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>FireWire as their primary protocol, and also over time they

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>had the plan and they implemented this to increase the

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>capability of FireWire to move at greater and greater speeds,

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>so over the generations of the technology, it could move

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>more information in a shorter amount of time, so it

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>would become a standard port on max from about two

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one to two thousand and eight and God's

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>development in the late nineties, but really got wide rollout

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>by about two thousand and one and over the next

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 1>seven years, it was standard on almost every Mac that

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>came out from Apple. Also, in nineteen ninety eight, Apple

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>discontinued quite a few machines from their lineup. They officially

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>stopped supporting all of the Motorola processor MAX that preceded

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the switch to the power PC microchip. Now, remember Motorola

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>still had involvement in developing the power PC chips, but

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the chips that were in Macintosh computers prior to power

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>PC chips were all Motorola chips. So at that point

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple said, well, we're not going to support those anymore.

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Everything is going to now depend upon this power PC

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>microchip because that's what we're putting in our MAX from

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this point forward. They also discontinued support for the Apple

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>two line, which is pretty incredible that they had supported

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple two all the way up to.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Nineteen ninety eight.

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Now, they had discontinued manufacturing the Apple two long before that,

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 1>but they continued to support it all the way until

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety eight when they officially ended support. That really

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>tells you how long that Apple two's life was, because

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>remember that was introduced. Apple two came out like in

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the late seventies, early eighties. So the fact that it

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>lasted all the way to nineteen ninety eight and at

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>least some capacity in Apple support was amazing. So it

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>was really the last hurrah for the Apple two. I

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>still love the Apple two, and I wouldn't mind finding

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>one just to mess around with one, but I doubt

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that I could easily find one in good working order

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>at this stage. I wish I could, because I loved

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the Apple two. Now, the following year, nineteen ninety nine,

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple released some new Imax. Like the previous episodes, I'm

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to cover every single model Apple released, which

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>would just make this episode incredibly dull. But one thing

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to mention is nineteen ninety nine because the

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Imax came out in a selection of new colors. It

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just this beige computer that had been kind of

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple's trademark ever since the old Apple two days. You

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>could get a selection of different colors which included blue, purple, orange, green,

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>or red, but Apple called them different names.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 3>You could get an iMac.

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And blueberry, grape, tangerine, lime, and strawberry.

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 3>And I gotta be honest with.

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>You guys, even though I'm the dude from tech stuff

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>who from the beginning has been accused of having an

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>anti Mac bias. And even though these machines are woefully

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>outdated by today's standards, I really still big the designs

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of these early Imax, these nineteen ninety nine Imax and

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 1>these bright colors.

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 3>They're really appealing to me. I would love to have

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 3>one in grape or lime.

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 1>So I guess this episode is ultimately a Jonathan wish

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>list of old computers that are obsolete, that are no

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>longer supported, that don't run any useful operating system or

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>software at this point, but I still kind of want

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>so the Apple two and a nineteen ninety nine iMac

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are on that list. There's just something really appealing about

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>those vibrant color schemes. So look up nineteen ninety nine

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>imas to get a look at what these these brightly

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>colored machines look like back in the day, and maybe

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll agree that they're They've got a certain appeal to them.

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>They are big, clunky machines because these are not flat

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>panel displays. These are still CRT.

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 3>Machines, but I don't know, they just seem kind of

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 3>friendly to me. Now.

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple also introduced a desktop tower style computer called the

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Yosemite PowerMac G three.

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 3>Some people refer to this one.

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>As the Smurf, and the reason they do that is

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the case was blue, it also had white accents, and

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it had sort of a transparent cover over the white aspects.

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>The design included a drawbridge like door that could fold

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>down to the right of the computer that would allow

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>you to add expansions to the actual motherboard, and you

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>could even open the computer while it was working, like

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you could have the computer on and open it up

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and it would still run because all the modules were

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>still connected to that hinged door. It's kind of neat,

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>not really any point of doing that, but it's neat

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 1>that you could do it. Apple offered a three hundred

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>megahertz version initially in this Yosemite computer, but by June

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety nine, so within a few months of introducing it,

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 1>they discontinued the three hundred megahertz version and instead relied

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on a more powerful four hundred and fifty megahertz model.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>They also used a similar design for their Power Machine

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>like this was for their high end users who were

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>hoping to use it for like video production and that

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. This was Apple's PowerMac G four, and

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the US government initially called this computer this desktop personal computer,

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>high end personal computer, but still a personal computer. They

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>called it a supercomputer. Now why did they call a

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>personal computer a supercomputer. Well, this was the first Mac

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that could perform one billion floating operations per second, or

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>otherwise known as a gigaflop, and at the time, gigaflop

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>was considered a capability that was in the supercomputer range.

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So the US government said, technically, this PowerMac is a supercomputer.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>The case was essentially identical to the Yosemite tower I

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>just described, only this one was white, graphite gray and

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 1>had silver accents. And I guess this was meant to

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>make it look more professional and business like and less

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of sleek and fun.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I suppose it still.

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Was a very nice design. The top level Max in

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>this model line introduced a new type of motherboard called

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the saw tooth, which allowed for a more powerful machine overall.

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>You could fit more memory, you could fit a faster processor,

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you could fit a better graphics card to it, so

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a more powerful machine overall. But there were

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>various lines in this G four model, so the entry

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>level did not have this saw tooth motherboard. It was

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>only the higher end models that did. The entry level

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>had a motherboard that was modeled after the Yosemite design,

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>so it had a slightly less powerful approach. Now, this

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>was a particularly potent machine. If you've got the top

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of the line G four power Mac, then you had

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a machine that was comparable or actually faster than a

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>pen Tum three processor computer from the IBM compatible lines,

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and PENDM three's were known to be screaming back in

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the day. Today they're slow as a snail, but back

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in the day that was cutting edge if you were

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>going the Intel Slash Windows route. So the Apple computers

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>were no slouch. They could go head to head with

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the fastest machines coming out from Intel's side. But Apple

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>did do something that was kinda lousy to their customers

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>when they introduced this PowerMac G four, and it was

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>all because of a supply chain issue. We're going to

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break, but we will be back with

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>more about the Macintosh story in just a moment.

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 3>So one of the.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Things that computer manufacturers in general have run into are

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>these supply chain problems where one element or maybe more

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>than one element in some cases, is being held.

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Up up by the.

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Suppliers of the specific components that are going into the computer.

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>In this case, it was the microprocessors. Apple was finding

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that Motorola could not supply five hundred megahertz processors at

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the rate that Apple needed them, which was unfortunate because

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple had a bunch of orders for five hundred megahertz

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>PowerMac G four computers. So Apple did something that a

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people found a bit questionable. The company scaled

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>back all their models by fifty megaherts, so instead of

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>selling a five hundred megahertz machine as their top machine,

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>they went with a four hundred and fifty megahertz machine

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as their top machine. This refers to the processor speed,

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>so how fast is the CPU inside the powermax four

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty mega hurts? Obviously fifty mega hurts slower

0:30:56.400 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>than a five hundred megahertz machine. And then four hundred

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and fifty mega hurtz machines were scaled back to four

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred megahurts, so on and so forth, so everything took

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>like a half step back from where it was supposed

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to be. But Apple did not change the prices of

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>their models, so the top model was still the same

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>price even though it had a less powerful processor than

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>what was originally planned. And Apple customers got a tiny

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>bit peeved about this, understandably so that they were paying

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a premium price for something that was less powerful than

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>what they were promised. So this was a pretty nasty

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.239
<v Speaker 1>little situation for Apple. Fortunately the company was able to

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>rectify things in like a week, but it still was

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a rough week over at Apple Computers due to this

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>little kerfuffle. And yeah, so people who talk about Apple

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>being a company that sets a premium price, it's stuff

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like this particular incident that reinforces that idea. Now, the

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street power Book ended up taking a bow. In

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety nine, they discontinued the Wall Street and decided

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to launch a new model of power Book that was

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>code named Lombard. And this was the first power book

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Mac to have a USB port on it, so it

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>was revolutionary at the time, and it was the fastest

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>laptop line at the time of its debut, not fastest

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for Apple. The PowerBook Mac that was code named Lombard

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>was the fastest laptop on the market period when it

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>came out. It also had a bronze translucent keyboard which

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I think actually looks more brown than bronze and was

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, really unattractive. That's my own personal perspective

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>on it. Maybe that's that anti Mac bias kicking in again.

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But the specs were really impressive, even though I found

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the esthetic to be not terribly attractive. Taking a page

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>from their success with the iMac, Apple also introduced a

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>laptop for the education market called the iBook. This was

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit chunkier and more rugged than their PowerBook line.

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>It was less powerful, didn't need to be as powerful

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>as the power Book, but it still had a lot

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of curved lines in the design. I kind of dig

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the eyebook. It does look a little unwieldy, especially compared

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to the laptops that Apple produces today, but it has

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>again a kind of a friendly look to it.

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I think. Now.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>One thing that really helped Apple out at this time,

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>something that was completely outside of Apple's.

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Control, was a little thing called the Y two K scare.

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And you may, oh, my drugs not remember what this

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was about things changing so scory and people like to forget,

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>But the Y two K bug or the y two

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>K scare was all about how some lazy computer programmers

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and computer scientists had really made a terrible design decision

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that frightened the pants off a whole bunch of people

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the late nineties.

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 3>So here's that's what it was all about.

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give you a quick summary because I

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>could do a full episode.

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I have done a full episode about Y

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 3>two K.

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>The problem was that programmers were a little lazy back

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in the day, and when some programmers were designing various architectures,

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they took a shortcut when it came to designating years,

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:24.959
<v Speaker 1>and they used a two digit method of designating the year.

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you put eight nine as the two digits,

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>then the computer knew you meant nineteen eighty nine. But

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you're probably already spotting the problem, which is that once

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you got to nineteen ninety nine, you're going.

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 3>To roll over to two thousand.

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>But computers only had two digits to tell what the

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>year was going to be, so ninety nine to zero

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>zero could be interpreted as nineteen hundred instead of two thousand,

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of different computer processes could screw up.

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>As a result, you had things that were pretty easy

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to imagine going haywire, like a financial software that is

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>calculating stuff like interest, Well, if it rolls back one

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, that's really going.

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 3>To mess things up.

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>But people were worried about all sorts of stuff, like

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.399
<v Speaker 1>computers just stop maybe they could stop working, and not

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 1>just computers, but other devices too that were working on

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>microchips that had this kind of architecture. So people were

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>worried about getting stuck in elevators or what would happen

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>on a plane.

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, Apple didn't have.

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 1>To worry about this because their programmers didn't use that

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>convention when they were designating years, so they didn't have

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to worry about running out of time with two digits.

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So with time continuing to pass as it does and

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>two thousand coming along, people began to think, well, maybe

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>we should get Apple computers because they don't suffer the

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>same weakness as other computers that have this two digit problem. So, yeah,

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't do you any good if your computer thinks

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 1>it's nineteen hundred and suddenly decides to put on an

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Edwardian suit and start talking about the latest George Bernard

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Shaw play. That doesn't help you out if you want

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to do some modern computing. And the macOS didn't have

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that issue. So people started to look at Macintosh computers

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and sales increased for Apple. Now, whether or not that

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>had anything to do with the y two K bug

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is hard to say because there's so many other variables

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>that play here, but it's probably something that factored into

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at least a few people's decision to switch over to

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>the Macintosh platform because.

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.439
<v Speaker 3>It was y two K proof. In fact, power PC.

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Max, not the old Motorola ones, but the power Pc

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Max actually allow computers to keep good time up to

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the year twenty nine and forty, so we're good for now.

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Even if you're using an obsolete Mac you don't have

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to worry about the operating system suddenly thinking it's nineteen hundred,

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's going to keep on chugging along until the

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>hardware breaks. Because I guarantee you that hardware will break

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.760
<v Speaker 1>before the year twenty nine and forty, and if it doesn't,

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing you won't be around. That's not a you know,

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not a slam against you. It's just I'm recording

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>this in twenty seventeen, and I don't think people in

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the year twenty thousand are still.

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Listening to tech stuff. If you are, thanks for listening.

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:16.760
<v Speaker 3>You're awesome.

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, In case you were curious, the world did not

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:24.280
<v Speaker 1>end in two thousand spoiler alert. But Apple did introduce

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 1>some new stuff that year, like the Cube. This was

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a desktop computer that was shaped like a cube. It

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>was five hundred and eighty one cubic inches and it

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>was a really powerful machine for its time. This was

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>also the year that Apple previewed the macOS ten using

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the Roman numeral for ten, which is an X. Now

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>that led me, the ignorant person that I was at

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the time, to call it MACOSX, which got lots of

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 1>people laughing at me for calling it mac OSX. But

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna be using a bunch of letters in

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the name of your product, don't use a Roman numeral

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to design its operating system number.

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 3>So it's macOS ten.

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes I still say MACOSX because sometimes I just

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like to have a little fun at my own expense. Now,

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>moving ahead to two thousand and one, Apple again boosted

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the power.

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 3>Of its various computers. Nothing new there.

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much every year Apple would update its line of

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>existing computers and increase their abilities by putting in more

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:28.959
<v Speaker 1>powerful processors, putting in more memory, giving it a few

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>different ports, so again I'm not going to cover all

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of those changes, so I'm just going to cover the big,

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>big differences. They also introduced some new color schemes in

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>their iMac line, so you could buy the Blue Dalmatian

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or flower Power. These actually had designs, not just a

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.919
<v Speaker 1>solid color. They actually had you know, designs on them

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that I find almost but not quite completely unappealing.

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 3>So I don't want either of those.

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>If anyone's listening and they want to get me the

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>wish list of items I've talked about, like Apple Two's

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and the iMac you know, lime or the iMac Grape,

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that's cool, but don't get me a blue Dalmati or

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:05.760
<v Speaker 1>flower Power.

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't need them. They're just not for me.

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>The company also released a lighter, more powerful iBook sometimes

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>called the Ice Book, and Apple created the quicksilver version

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of its PowerMac G four line, And they also opened

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>up their first two Apple stores in two thousand and one.

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Now there's hundreds of the things, but back in two

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:28.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one they were brand new.

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 3>It was the first time.

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple had opened up a retail space of its own,

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and of course that ends up being a popular destination

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>for people all around the world. There are Apple stores

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that get crowds of tourists because they are particularly interesting

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in their design and layout. Oh. That's also the year

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple launched the next product to help define the company

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>as its new identity.

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 3>That would be the iPod.

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 1>But we talked about the iPod in our History of

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>MP three P podcast, so I'm not going to.

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Cover it here, but just to say that two thousand.

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And one marked a real turning point in Apple's history,

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>because that was the moment when Apple began to really

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 1>expand beyond personal computers and printers and workstations. They began

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>to get into personal electronics in a serious way. The

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Newton was kind of a failure, but the iPod was

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>totally the opposite. iPod was a runaway success, particularly once

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 1>you got a couple of generations in and really took

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>off once iTunes became a real player in the data

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>management or music management space. Now, two thousand and two

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>was more of the same, with tweaked computer designs, some

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>boosted performance, and not much else. Apple did create a

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>new line of macs for educational institutions. They called it

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the eMac E for Education. It was housed in an

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>iMac like CRT style case, the stream was flat, it

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't curved, but it still was a cathode ray tube

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that was providing the actual image that you saw in there,

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>so big bulky case, in fact, really big and bulky.

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>The basic model weighed fifty pounds, but it cost a

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 1>little less than one thousand bucks, So Apple was really

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to price these computers in a way where education

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>systems would be able to shell out the bucks to

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>buy them, because again Max were pretty expensive and a

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of education systems just didn't have the budget to

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>buy Macintosh computers. So this was Apple's attempt to kind

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of get into that market with a slightly less powerful computer.

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and three, Apple began introducing Max that

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>were no longer backwards compatible with the old classic Mac

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>operating system, and this began the March of Obsolescens for

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>those old OS builds. The company continued its trend of

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>updating machines, but again there were no major revolutions that happened.

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and three, Apple did introduce the PowerMac

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>G five with the IBM power Pc nine seventy CPU

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that gave the Mac a processor speed of between one

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>point six to two point zero gigahertz, depending upon the

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>model that you bought. This computer generated so much heat

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that it required nine cooling fans to manage it. Nine

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>fans inside of this computer so that it would not overheat.

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 1>The case was also made out of aluminum, which is

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a very effective conductor of heat. Which is good because

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of heat gets generated inside the machine, it

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 1>transfers out to the case, and the case transfers it

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>out to the air around it. But yeah, these machines

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 1>got pretty toasty. Well, we've got one last section to

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 1>go through to talk about the history of the Macintosh

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 1>and get up to present day. But before I jump

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>into that, let's take another quick break to thank our sponsor.

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 3>Jumping out into two thousand.

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And four, the big news that year for Apple was

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a redesign of the iMac Now. The older CRT versions

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>were replaced that year with a new flat panel display version.

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 1>The computer was in the same housing as the display,

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>with an optical drive to the right of the screen

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and all the ports helpfully on the back of the

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 1>darn thing. I hated that design decision, by the way,

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to have all the ports on this computer on the back.

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I understand it was necessary for the layout for the motherboard,

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>but man, it was so irritating to have to plug

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>everything into the back of the machine in order to

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>use it, including stuff like your mouse and your keyboard,

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. But this looked like a flat

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 1>panel television on a stand. The entire computer was housed

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>inside of this thing. Big dramatic change from those big,

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 1>bulky CRT sets of the iMac before, and a totally

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>new design, brand new aesthetic move for Apple, and it

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of started Apple down the pathway of that smooth

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 1>white two thousand and one ish aesthetic that they became

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>known for. A lot of Apple's products would end up

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 1>following that same sort of design philosophy, but this was

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 1>one of the earliest ones. And I actually had an

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:22.760
<v Speaker 1>iMac in this style, although it wasn't a two thousand

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:24.839
<v Speaker 1>and four iMac it was a bit later. It might

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 1>have been as ley as two thousand and six, but

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I definitely had one of these max. It was the

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>only Mac I've ever owned. I liked it just fine.

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I just never bought another one.

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:38.760
<v Speaker 3>So kind of cool.

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>This two thousand and one ish approach very different from

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the lollipop colorful approach of the crt Imax from just

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a few years earlier. And in two thousand and five

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we got the Mac Mini. Now by we, I mean

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the general Wei. I never owned Mac Minie, but this

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was a really cool idea too. This was a desktop

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:01.760
<v Speaker 1>computer in miniature, and it didn't have a built in display.

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 1>There was no display that came along with it. But

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you would get this tiny little computer, and I mean

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it was tiny. It was six and a half inches

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:13.319
<v Speaker 1>per side and two inches tall and that was the

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 1>whole desktop and you would just connect that to an

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>existing display using whichever port you needed. And it was

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:23.800
<v Speaker 1>bargain priced, at least as far as Apple is concerned.

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:26.480
<v Speaker 1>It was on sale for four hundred and ninety nine dollars.

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:30.400
<v Speaker 1>That's dirt cheap with Apple. So it gave people the

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:33.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to own a Mac as long as they already

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>had a display, or they didn't mind buying a display

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and a keyboard and all that other stuff, or a

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 1>bargain price compared to the other Macs that were on

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the market at that same time. One drawback to this

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>design was that you couldn't expand it. You couldn't add

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:52.320
<v Speaker 1>more memory or change it in any meaningful way, because

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it was so small and everything was packed so tightly

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>together that there was no room to expand it at all,

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:00.800
<v Speaker 1>so if you bought one, you were pretty much stuck

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>with the initial specs that it came out with. That

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 1>same year, Steve Jobs made a big announcement, so this

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is again two thousand and five. He said that future

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Max would move away from power Pc chips that had

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>provided Mac processing power for the last decade or so,

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and instead Apple would make a move to Intel. Intel

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>would supply the future CPUs to all Macintosh computers that

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>would be released after that point. Those first Mac Intel's

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>would not go on sale until the following year, and

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it worried a lot of Mac users because not all

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>software is compatible with various microprocessor architecture. So if you

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:48.279
<v Speaker 1>have operating system and software that was designed to work

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>on the power Pc platform, it might not work on

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the Intel platform. And if those programs are important to

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your business or whatever you're using your Mac for,

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>then upgrade to a new Macintosh could be harmful to you.

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So for example, here at how Stuff Works, we use

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>very specific editing suites.

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 3>For our video and audio stuff like this podcast and

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:13.240
<v Speaker 3>video series.

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:16.719
<v Speaker 1>We use very specific types of software for that on

0:47:16.800 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh computers. If we were to upgrade to a new

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:24.359
<v Speaker 1>processor that could not run those old programs, we would

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 1>be kind of stuck. Now, Apple's solution for this was

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>to release a power PC emulator. It's called Rosetta, named

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>after the Rosetta stone, which of course was used to

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:39.240
<v Speaker 1>help translate hiro glyphics back in the day. So Rosetta

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was an emulator, which means it's a program that simulates

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:47.320
<v Speaker 1>another type of technology, in this case another type of microprocessor,

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the power PC style microprocessor, and this would allow you

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:55.919
<v Speaker 1>to continue to use some of that legacy software even

0:47:55.960 --> 0:47:59.879
<v Speaker 1>on these Intel powered machines. Also in two thousand and five,

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple introduced.

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 3>The Mighty Mouse. You can't see this audio listeners, but.

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:11.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm making a very unimpressed face into the webcam I'm

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 1>using for the Twitch stream of this episode. Remember you

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 1>can always go to twitch dot tv slash tech stuff

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch an episode live as I

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 1>record it. Well, the Mighty Mouse was a mouse that

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>had more than just one button capability. The Macintosh was

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 1>famous for shipping with a mouse that only had one button,

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and if you wanted other types of functionality, You had

0:48:33.480 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to hold down a key on the keyboard while pressing

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 1>down on the button. The Mighty Mouse actually had ability

0:48:40.160 --> 0:48:42.799
<v Speaker 1>to use the left side of the mouse or the

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:45.799
<v Speaker 1>right side of the mouse, or you could squeeze both

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:50.479
<v Speaker 1>sides and create three different types of controls with this mouse,

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 1>or three different types of commands with one mouse.

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 3>So it still felt like one button, but.

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>You could press the left side of the button down,

0:48:58.400 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>or press the right side of the button down, or

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:02.840
<v Speaker 1>squeeze it, and that would allow you to execute different

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>commands in various programs. Why not just make a mouse

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 1>with extra buttons, with each button dedicated to a specific function.

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Because Johnny Ive.

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Who's a chief designer over at Apple, and Steve Jobs

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:20.799
<v Speaker 1>hate buttons, I guess they just don't like them. They

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:25.240
<v Speaker 1>like the aesthetic of a smooth, buttonless type of device,

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 1>even if it means that they are stressing form over functionality. Now,

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe again that's my anti Mac bias, but I like

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 1>functionality over form. I want something to work first and

0:49:38.680 --> 0:49:41.280
<v Speaker 1>then look nice. I don't want it to look nice

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and then just work. Okay, but that just shows the

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 1>difference of approach I take to technology than Apple takes.

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, Apple would.

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Argue that they value both equal, that something needs to

0:49:55.480 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>look amazing and work perfectly. I would argue the Mighty

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Mouse does not white achieve that. That's my own personal

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>opinion as someone who had a Mighty Mouse and an

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>iMac and I despise that mouse a lot, but again

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>antimac bias, so don't pay too much attention to me.

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 1>The company also began to ship dual core Power Max

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>at this time, using dual core processors. This is part

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:26.759
<v Speaker 1>of a new era in computing at this point where

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:29.359
<v Speaker 1>we started to see these multicore processors find their way

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:32.760
<v Speaker 1>into consumer computers. Now, I'll likely do a full episode

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:36.240
<v Speaker 1>about what multicore core processors are and how they work

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and why it's important at a later date. I've covered

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:41.719
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit in previous Tech Stuff podcasts, but

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just know that it would take a full episode to

0:50:44.239 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>really explain this. But it was a big advance for

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Macintosh computers at the time.

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Now, in two.

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Thousand and six, the first Intel Max started to hit

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>store shelves, and the biggest drawback for Mac users was

0:50:55.719 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that these machines wouldn't support any classic macOS applications. So

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:02.719
<v Speaker 1>if you had those legacy apps you depended on, you

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 1>couldn't run them on those machines. You had to keep

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:08.000
<v Speaker 1>an older Mac around, or you had to create an

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:11.360
<v Speaker 1>emulator to run them. And that's the problem in general

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 1>with legacy systems. As the hardware gets faster, sometimes you

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:17.800
<v Speaker 1>lose support for older software, and that's still a problem

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>if you really depend on that older software to do something.

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I said before, with audio and video production here

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works, that could be an issue. Anyone

0:51:26.920 --> 0:51:31.200
<v Speaker 1>who used garage Band with Macintosh computers knows that the

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>various evolutions of the garage Band software and the changes

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Mac operating system in Mac processors meant that

0:51:38.760 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you would end up losing features that you thought

0:51:41.640 --> 0:51:45.240
<v Speaker 1>were absolutely important for you, and you had to stick

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:49.640
<v Speaker 1>with older, obsolete machines just to get stuff done. The

0:51:49.680 --> 0:51:53.720
<v Speaker 1>company also introduced a new line in laptops. They called

0:51:53.719 --> 0:51:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this new line the MacBook Pro, which of course you

0:51:56.719 --> 0:52:01.000
<v Speaker 1>can still find today. These are higher end Mac laptops,

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:03.920
<v Speaker 1>so these are meant for power users. They're more expensive,

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 1>they have more features, they're they've got faster processors. It's

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially you know your sports vehicle version of the Macintosh laptops.

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:17.359
<v Speaker 1>People really hated this name when it first came out.

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:22.239
<v Speaker 1>The MacBook Pro was replacing the old PowerBook line, and

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>people really liked PowerBook and they hated the name MacBook.

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But today MacBook is standard, and I think most people

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:31.839
<v Speaker 1>probably don't even remember the old power Books, and they

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 1>probably don't remember that they put up a fuss when

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it went from PowerBook to MacBook. The moral of that

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:44.960
<v Speaker 1>story is people hate change, whether it's good, bad, or indifferent. Now,

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing of real significance happened in the Macintosh history in

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven, other than Apple making flat screen

0:52:51.680 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Imax and brushed aluminum instead of white plastic.

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:57.680
<v Speaker 3>So let's skip ahead to two thousand and eight.

0:52:57.800 --> 0:52:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to spend time on a year where

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>not really anything happened. Now, this was the year that

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs introduced the MacBook Air, which was a big

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:10.719
<v Speaker 1>deal in a small package. It was the thinnest MacBook

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:12.800
<v Speaker 1>at that point, and at.

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:13.520
<v Speaker 3>It was amazing.

0:53:13.520 --> 0:53:15.799
<v Speaker 1>It was three quarters of an inch thick, which is

0:53:15.880 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 1>incredibly thin for a laptop, especially one as powerful as

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the MacBook Air, and it weighed in at three pounds.

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 1>It had no optical drive, so you couldn't insert any

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:28.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of CD or DVD into it. But it did

0:53:28.480 --> 0:53:31.800
<v Speaker 1>have a sweet aluminum body, and it had one port

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:34.800
<v Speaker 1>on it, which was a single USB two point zero

0:53:34.800 --> 0:53:37.799
<v Speaker 1>connector port, and that was behind a little door. You

0:53:37.840 --> 0:53:40.760
<v Speaker 1>had to open the little door to access this port

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:46.000
<v Speaker 1>because ports, I guess, spoiled the computer's lines otherwise. Also,

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to add more ports, it would have

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 1>meant having to create a thicker version of the MacBook Air,

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:54.879
<v Speaker 1>which was not what Steve Jobs had in mind when

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he actually, you know, when he launched this project to

0:53:58.280 --> 0:54:03.439
<v Speaker 1>create a super thin MacBook, so it ended up having

0:54:03.600 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 1>just one port. From that point forward, Max and their

0:54:06.680 --> 0:54:10.279
<v Speaker 1>various lines received regular updates and a refresh to their appearances,

0:54:10.880 --> 0:54:16.319
<v Speaker 1>but that was mostly it. Right, the future MacBooks would

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:20.080
<v Speaker 1>largely follow simple trends in that you'd get.

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Faster processors, better graphics. Ports would change.

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Eventually you would get better resolution on your displays as well.

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:34.760
<v Speaker 1>They'd get more expensive, they'd get thinner, and they'd get lighter.

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But that's pretty much the trend. There wasn't anything really

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>revolutionary after this point, nothing that jumped completely out of

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the line of what you would come to expect from Apple.

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:50.319
<v Speaker 1>There were a couple of exceptions, a couple standouts. The

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:52.920
<v Speaker 1>MacBook Pro in twenty twelve came in a model with

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:56.279
<v Speaker 1>a retina display that was the first MacBook Pro to

0:54:56.600 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>actually have a retina display that's similar to the display

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you find in iPhones of that time, is a very

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 1>high definition, high resolution display. And in twenty thirteen, Apple

0:55:08.600 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>introduced a cylindrical case for a new Mac Pro, so

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you suddenly had a tower that was a cylinder instead

0:55:16.120 --> 0:55:20.319
<v Speaker 1>of a rectangle style, which was what was common at

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the time. And the cylinder was gorgeous. It looks like

0:55:23.760 --> 0:55:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it belongs in some sort of science fiction film. It's

0:55:27.040 --> 0:55:31.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of a high tech supercomputer sort of look to it.

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And this Mac Pro was really meant to work as

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 1>a server or a workstation. It wasn't necessarily meant to

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:41.960
<v Speaker 1>be your own personal computer. They were pretty darn expensive

0:55:42.000 --> 0:55:45.320
<v Speaker 1>when they came out, and it was a really unique

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 1>esthetic something that stood out. However, I can tell you

0:55:48.560 --> 0:55:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that some of the video team here at how Stuff

0:55:50.320 --> 0:55:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Works have a few strong opinions about the performance of

0:55:53.960 --> 0:55:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this specific model of the MacPro, and they are not

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:02.520
<v Speaker 1>entirely positive. May just be our own experiences with them,

0:56:02.960 --> 0:56:08.120
<v Speaker 1>but something that they found somewhat frustrating is a good

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:11.760
<v Speaker 1>word searching for a word that wouldn't be too harsh.

0:56:11.840 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Frustrating is a good one.

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:16.360
<v Speaker 1>But this was another example of Apple taking a dramatic

0:56:16.400 --> 0:56:19.400
<v Speaker 1>departure from the general esthetics that were prevalent in personal

0:56:19.400 --> 0:56:21.719
<v Speaker 1>computers at the time and trying to make it their own.

0:56:22.880 --> 0:56:26.440
<v Speaker 1>One thing else I need to mention before we conclude, really,

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:33.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously a moment that really changed the direction of Apple

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:38.440
<v Speaker 1>overall and the Mac in particular, was the death of

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs.

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:41.320
<v Speaker 3>He passed away in twenty eleven.

0:56:41.400 --> 0:56:44.399
<v Speaker 1>We did an episode called One More Thing all about

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs where we talked about this, and this obviously

0:56:47.920 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 1>had a monumental impact on the company as a whole.

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:56.240
<v Speaker 1>He had already stepped down as CEO earlier before his passing,

0:56:56.880 --> 0:57:00.680
<v Speaker 1>but he was still very much a president set Apple

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:04.520
<v Speaker 1>up until a couple of months before his death, and

0:57:04.560 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 1>he had handed the reins over to Tim Cook to

0:57:06.680 --> 0:57:10.240
<v Speaker 1>become the new CEO. But it had been Jobs, along

0:57:10.280 --> 0:57:14.399
<v Speaker 1>with a top tier level of designers like Johnny Ive,

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:18.680
<v Speaker 1>who had really set the direction of Apple and the

0:57:19.200 --> 0:57:23.200
<v Speaker 1>esthetic direction for products like the Macintosh computer line and

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the MAX that followed. It would be another couple of

0:57:27.560 --> 0:57:31.160
<v Speaker 1>years before Jobs's direct influence would no longer be a

0:57:31.200 --> 0:57:34.680
<v Speaker 1>major factor in MAX. And this is largely because the

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 1>products that launch on any given year have been in

0:57:37.160 --> 0:57:40.919
<v Speaker 1>development for a while behind the scenes. So while Steve

0:57:40.960 --> 0:57:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Jobs passed away in twenty eleven, it would be another

0:57:43.520 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>year or two before his direct influence was no longer

0:57:48.320 --> 0:57:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a living component of the MAX that followed. But this

0:57:53.440 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 1>did mean that Apple started having to produce computers without

0:57:57.640 --> 0:58:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that guidance from Steve Jobs himself, and that some people

0:58:02.640 --> 0:58:06.520
<v Speaker 1>ended up pointing out as being an issue. Some people

0:58:06.600 --> 0:58:10.520
<v Speaker 1>say that the changes to the macline post Steve Jobs

0:58:10.520 --> 0:58:16.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't been terribly inspirational or innovative. Others have said that

0:58:16.280 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 1>been more frustrating as Apple has continued to change things up.

0:58:21.040 --> 0:58:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Remember in two thousand and eight they stopped making FireWire

0:58:24.280 --> 0:58:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a standard on all Macintosh computers.

0:58:28.400 --> 0:58:30.320
<v Speaker 3>By a couple of years.

0:58:30.200 --> 0:58:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Later, they started moving toward well, actually really this year

0:58:34.000 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they started moving in last year they started moving toward

0:58:36.800 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 1>USB s ports and abandoning things like the thunderbolt connectors.

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So there have been changes, a lot of them have

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:50.960
<v Speaker 1>been changes that some Apple users have been very upset

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:55.240
<v Speaker 1>about because they feel like Apple is ignoring consumer needs

0:58:56.080 --> 0:58:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and is instead demanding that consumers follow in the footsteps

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that they are forging, which is mixing metaphors.

0:59:03.440 --> 0:59:04.120
<v Speaker 3>But never mind it.

0:59:04.160 --> 0:59:06.840
<v Speaker 1>But I would say that that's been Apple's history all along.

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple has made very strong decisions to go in certain

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 1>directions that require users to follow suit or they get

0:59:18.400 --> 0:59:22.919
<v Speaker 1>left behind. That's the history of Apple. It might be frustrating,

0:59:23.520 --> 0:59:26.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's not out of character. It is something that

0:59:26.440 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 1>has been part of the company culture from the earliest days,

0:59:30.320 --> 0:59:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I would argue.

0:59:32.400 --> 0:59:36.200
<v Speaker 2>And that concludes the three part Macintosh story as of

0:59:36.680 --> 0:59:40.840
<v Speaker 2>June ninth, twenty seventeen. I'll have to check and see

0:59:40.920 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 2>if I've done updates since then, because clearly a lot

0:59:44.040 --> 0:59:47.040
<v Speaker 2>can happen in six years seven years, so we will

0:59:47.400 --> 0:59:49.400
<v Speaker 2>look and see what kind of updates we can do.

0:59:49.520 --> 0:59:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it could be a shorter episode, because a lot

0:59:52.960 --> 0:59:57.440
<v Speaker 2>of the really traumatic stuff happened all the way through

0:59:57.480 --> 1:00:00.280
<v Speaker 2>its early years, right with the formation of of the

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Macintosh in the first place, and a lot of the

1:00:02.880 --> 1:00:06.400
<v Speaker 2>things that have happened since then have been largely iterative.

1:00:06.680 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Although you could argue that Apple developing its own processors

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:13.480
<v Speaker 2>is a huge part that we should touch on, So

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe I will do an update in the near future.

1:00:16.000 --> 1:00:18.280
<v Speaker 2>In the meantime, I hope you're all well and I'll

1:00:18.320 --> 1:00:27.480
<v Speaker 2>talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an

1:00:27.480 --> 1:00:33.000
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

1:00:33.160 --> 1:00:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.