WEBVTT - Weekend Morning Run: A Trans Champ, the N-Word, and Messy Breakups

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Morning Run with Amy and TJ and iHeartRadio Podcast.

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 2>Hey theo folks, it is Saturday, June seventh. Thank you

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 2>so much for continuing to run with us. We'll taken

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 2>a weekend morning run right now. Rose. During the week,

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of stories on our morning run

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 2>that get us going, get us worked up, even get

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 2>us arguing, and we don't get to get into it.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 2>So this is where we've been doing that.

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So we are bringing the stories to you this

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>weekend from the week that kept us talking or got

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>us going. And we'll begin with the news. California, the

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>state of California, was trying to find a compromise. President

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump signed an executive order saying, hey, We're going to

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>cut all federal funding from any sort of athletic organization

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that allows transgender athletes to compete in girls' sporting events.

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>California had a major high school championship track and field,

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and they had a transgender athlete competing and guess what,

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the transgender athlete one and one big first place in

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>two events, second place in the third event. And so

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in order to compromise and to not have federal funds restricted,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they decided to add a girl to the podium, so

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>someone who would have won that the transgender athlete took

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>their place of got to meddle too. It's a very

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>confusing compromise that actually pissed off a lot of folks.

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 2>You made it crystal clear, though in your explanation it

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>is confusing. As I'll get out. I'll give it to

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>your bottom line as a trans girl who won, who

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 2>is a state champion in two categories out there in California. Yeah,

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump warned against this, he would take money. We'll see

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>what happens. The problem rose, we got back and forth.

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 2>That was so unsettling. So unsettling about the story is

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 2>it feels like nobody won with this rule change. It

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 2>felt almost humiliating to all sides to do it this way.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 2>So you're essentially just saying, yes, the trans girl got first,

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 2>so the person she beat who got second gets to

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 2>move up to first. Person, the guy third gets to

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 2>move up to second. Person who got fourth gets to

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 2>move up the third. But who's the actual champion? Who

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 2>does that help that? Who? The trans girl is standing

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>there with another girl at the top of the podium

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>who won, I beat you, but you get to come

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 2>up here with me, and.

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>The records reflect that it wasn't the trans girl, it

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>was the other girl. And so yeah, no one gets

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to feel good about the metal they got because it

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of feels like, did I earn this? Did I

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>not earn this? Who is the best? And what's the

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>right way to go? And I think for most people,

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't ever want to discriminate against or discourage people

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>from participating in athletic competitions. It's part of what makes

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>being a kid and growing up exciting and fun. Just

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>feels awful and icky, because yes, if you're one of

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the girls, or you're a parent one of the girls,

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you might be frustrated at the unfairness of the competition

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>because of the what most people would point to the

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>biological advantages that the trans girl has over a girl

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>who was born a girl. And so that is a

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 1>very controversial and difficult conversation to have. And is there

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a good answer? Is there a right way forward? How

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>else can trans athletes compete? There's so few of them,

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>as we know in our population, they couldn't actually have

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>their own competition because that would be great, except for

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>who would they be competing against.

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 2>It's tough we haven't figured it out yet. We have

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to figure it out, but this just felt like a

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 2>mess of a way to try to deal with it.

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 2>And sure enough she qualified and went out there and

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 2>won two state championships. She came in third place in

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 2>one event.

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>The law thought it was the second place. She came

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in second place, game and second.

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 2>So one cisgender girl beat her out, but beat her

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 2>out by just a little bit. They were approaching state

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 2>records that Marion Jones broke when she was in high school.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>So what I'm saying is this transathlete, yes, got second,

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 2>but still did so well that almost competing with one

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 2>of the greatest track athletes we've ever known in this country.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So I started thinking when you told me that tidbit

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>that what if a trans girl beats an Olympic athlete

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>or someone who is a storied female competitor like Marion Jones?

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Will Will that be okay to have a trans girl

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>beat someone like Marion Jones record? Is that fair to compare?

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that fair for then that trans girl to have

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that record over a biological female or a female who

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>was born I don't even know how to say it

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.119
<v Speaker 1>not to offend anyone, but this is a tough cist gender.

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 2>I think this is what we're supposed to go with. Now,

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 2>what is it cis to person? That's what you're born

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 2>sis gender girls, this gender girl and born.

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think that is another huge issue. And then

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you start taking Okay, we're doing it state by state,

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but in international competitions, the Olympics, et cetera. You say,

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a system in place where you have to

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>take some sort of a blood test and if you

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>have enough estrogen or enough hormones of a female, you

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>can be considered a female.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 2>You have to show how long you've gone through this process.

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 2>You have to show some say you have to have

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 2>gone through for a year or two years. But the

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 2>rules aren't uniform all over the world, so we just

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>haven't figured out.

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is this, would you not say that

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>most people would agree and it would be hard to

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>argue against that a trans girl who was not born

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a female has a physical advantage in almost every case.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly there are exceptions to the rule, but

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, there's a reason why men don't compete against

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>women because women do not have a physical advantage. Period.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 2>It is happening incount for you where that governor has

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 2>come out recently and said that he believes it's unfair.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 2>He's breaking with some in his own party and some

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>progressives in his own party by saying that. But he

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 2>said it is unfair for trans girls to be competing

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 2>in girls' sports.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's okay to say this because I

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>know you know. Look, I'm a parent of girls, you're

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>a parent of girls. We have friends who we love

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and know who have trans children. So this isn't something

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that is foreign or unusual to us in any way,

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, even in an intimate way. But I

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>think that you can be supportive of trans rights and

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>supportive of some of the and and at and angered

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>about some of the rights that are being taken away

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>from them, and still believe that there is a physical

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>advantage and it is unfair to other girls to have

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>them competing against people who were born with a physical advantage.

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that you can have both thoughts and still

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>be supportive of trans rights. It's just a sticky, tough

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>situation because no one wants to alienate anyone or make

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 1>anyone feel left out. Everyone wants to belong, and yet

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you still have to have a system in place for fairness.

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Right. Another story that got us going this week and

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 2>really got us going. The military has renamed a ship.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Shouldn't be a big deal, I suppose, But it was

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>what name they took off the ship and when they

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 2>did it that was a big deal. It was the

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 2>us NS the US naval ship Harvey Milk, named after

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the civil rights gay rights leader. They took the name

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 2>off the ship. Robes, that's one thing they said. It

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 2>was part of kind of a let's whole dei anti

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 2>dei afying of the military since Trump got back into office.

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 2>This is a part of that. But Robe, it was

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the timing of when they did it, and then it

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 2>was coming back and saying we did that on purpose. Yeah.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Defense official absolutely said this timing was intentional. When Defense

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Pete Hegzeff announced that they were removing Harvey Milk's

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>name from that ship right at the beginning of Pride month.

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>June is Pride month, and it was just an extra

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>gut punch, I think to folks who have been fighting

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so hard for inclusiveness. It was mean. It was mean spirited.

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>It was almost like ha ha ha ha ha, and

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this you know, Harvey milk. If you're not familiar, he

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most yes and if you ever

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Sean Penn portrayed him in the movie. This is a

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>man who was of service, was in the Navy. His

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>parents served in the Navy, but he was threatened with

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the court martial because of his sexual orientation. He had

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to leave the military because he was gay. And once

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>he finally got elected, one of the first openly gay

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>men to be elected to office, he was serving on

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, he was assassinated a

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>year later. So this is somebody who gave his life

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for who he was, and not willingly, but is someone

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>who has been honored and revered and studied and we

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>don't ever want to go back to those times and

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>repeat that. And yet this just to take his name

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and to remove it from nable Ship is just unnecessary

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and cruel. And with everything that's going on in the world,

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>do we really just want to continue to divide one

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>another here and say us versus them?

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 2>And I hate that cast. Let's say they wanted to

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 2>do it and they did it in August, people would

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 2>take issue with it. They shouldn't have done it, fine,

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 2>but to do it, and you're telling an entire community that,

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 2>in this month that is so important to you, we're

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 2>actually going to insult you. We're actually going to punch you,

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 2>We actually are trying to inflict harm on a move

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 2>we already know you're not gonna like we are now

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 2>intend that is unbelievable.

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>You likened it too, and asked because they have also said, hey,

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>there are some other ship names that are want up

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to be removed as well, including Thurgood Marshal, the first

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>black Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Can you stay with third Good Marshal Force second February one,

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 2>tell us you're going to rename stuff like that.

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>The beginning of Black History Month. Go ahead and say

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start removing names of black civil rights

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>leaders and pioneers.

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 2>So try this on February one. There's a USNS John Lewis, Okay,

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 2>February one, make that announcement. Why why would you do

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 2>that unless you're trying to give a big f you

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 2>to the black community. I would take it as such.

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't like it if you took it off in

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 2>September or December. But if you do know February one,

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 2>what are you trying to say to a group collectly?

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 2>This blows my mind. There are a lot of things,

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 2>but this to be that that obviously and embracing how

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 2>mean we are trying?

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg same thing. Let's do

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it at the beginning of Women's History Month. I mean,

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just you could get think about that and think

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>about how that would make you feel with whatever community

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you identify with. It is an extra like it's like

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>they're spitting in your face and it's just unkind and

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>unfair and unnecessary.

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 2>That one really got us talking. You know that, it

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 2>got us worked up. If you can't tell Love Island

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 2>and the inward, you might know the story by now.

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, Rose, the show too much much anticipation, finally

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 2>launched this week and on episode two, one of the

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 2>hotties in the villa was already gone and there wasn't

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 2>much fanfair and we didn't know why if you were

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 2>just watching the show.

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>When you said not much fanfair, that was almost an

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>understatement because there's a cheeky narrator with a British accent, who, look,

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we watched Love Island. I think if anyone listens to

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. You know, we're kind of obsessed with reality.

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 2>For the record, she forces me to watch.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's really hard. Yeah, I should be charged with coercion. Yes, no,

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you are, you are okay, you're right. Sorry, I shouldn't

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>go there. You are a willing participant. In fact, I

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>believe it was last night that we were catching up

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>on Love Island. But in the second episode, at the beginning,

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the cheeky narrator says this and only this, Ulyssa has

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>left the villa, and then moves on there is no

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>other commentary, and we've been watching. We actually went back

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>watched the first episode heading into the second one now

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and look, this is a very diverse group. I'm curious

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>what they even think because this all blindsided them. Were

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>there was chatter before she got on, because people found

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>these podcasts that this particular contestant was on. How long

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>ago were these podcasts, you know, I don't have the years,

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but fairly recently. She goes on podcasts

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and very casually and very comfortably starts dropping the N

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>word when she is being recorded with the microphone for

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a podcast that she knows is going to be broadcast

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>or at least disseminated and seem to have zero concern

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that Ulyssa herself could say this and knowing she is

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>not black, She's Hispanic, but she is not black.

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 2>But she is very comfortable using the in words incredibly comfortable. Something.

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>Is that shocking to you.

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I have known folks before who have been around a

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of black people and maybe hear black folks talk

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 2>to each other in this way and sometimes get comfortable

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 2>enough in that environment where they get permission to use

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 2>it from.

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Me, ken, can a black person say it sounds like

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>she was dating a black man for a long time.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>She had like an eight year relationship I believe she

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about and when you hear what she said, it

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>was seemingly referring back to him. Can a black man

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>give permission to a white girl, a Hispanic girl, anyway,

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's non black, to use the word no.

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 2>The answer is no. Now, permission in a clothes setting

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 2>is just the two of us, the three of us

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 2>a certain group is one thing. You shouldn't do that either,

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 2>because if word gets out that you're permitting this, you

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 2>might be in trouble with your community. But what I'm

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>saying is there's nobody who can give any person outside

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 2>of the black community permission to use the word publicly.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Nobody gets that permission. You can't. You're gonna have to

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 2>ask every black person in America if it's okay, and

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>we're not gonna give that permission. So this is it

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 2>was so casual in how she said it. She didn't

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 2>miss a beat or think she said anything wrong, and

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>knew this was public.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>She just it's remarkable to me that someone that young

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>would feel so free to do it, because aren't those

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>young folks also woke and they know what to say

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and what not to say. And you can't say this,

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and you can't say that. Things that we could say

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>as kids, you can't say anymore referring to other certain

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>time types of the population, whether whether you're whether you're gay,

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>or whether you have you know, cognitive issues. There were

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>things that we said as kids that you absolutely cannot say.

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And we know that.

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 2>But you've commented now. I believe that also these kids

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 2>these days, they got so many options, they got so

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 2>much social media, they got so much, so many podcasts

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and so much How do you stand out? How do

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 2>you speak or I'm going to be myself I am

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 2>going to do. Look, there's another way I saw her

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 2>as someone like, nobody's going to tell me what to do.

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I make my own rules. She's comfortable in this setting,

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and she just started. She reverted to who she probably

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 2>truly is.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel, as a black man to hear

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this girl say that?

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the way she said it.

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't care.

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think she should. I don't get worked up

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>about people saying the N word. As soon as it

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 2>comes out of your mouth, we are done, because it

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 2>means you're just moronic. I mean, I can't have a

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 2>conversation with you. I don't get upset or worked up.

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I've been yelled and called the N word plenty times

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 2>in my life, barely flinched. Just it doesn't work me

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 2>up like that. And there's a lot of black folks

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't like you. Just really, that's all you got

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 2>after two hundred and fifty years, this is the best

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 2>you could come up with.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Still, But is it surprising to you that that people

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>who aren't black still need to be reminded that that

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is a forbidden word.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Nobody needs to be reminded if they're using it. They're

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 2>using it intentionally, and you know it shouldn't be used.

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 2>This is silly, This is this is a non issue,

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 2>and if there's anybody out there arguing what black people

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 2>say it, I should be able to say it. Then

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>you ask yourself, why do you want to say the

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>N words so much? Why do you want permission? Why

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 2>is it so important to you? Now?

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Almost like they're trying to be black, like to be

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a part of the community. They think they are a

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>part of the community, and that's highly offensive.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because you can always go back to the safety

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 2>of your other community. I can't leave this black skin

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 2>at home. But yeah, you don't want to do the quote.

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'll have to read the quote. Yes, please,

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 2>we will tell you what exactly what she said to

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 2>wrap it up here, just so you know what we're

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 2>talking about. The second reference, I'll do the second one.

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Here she's talking about relationships, talking about some dudes U

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>was dating, and she quotes, are you efing my inward? Perfect?

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 2>That's it, But now I'm efing my in word. He's

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 2>my in word? Is what she said. Didn't miss a beat,

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 2>so she just reeled it off and it's not like

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 2>a slip and oh, I can't believe I.

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Said that, also talking about her boyfriend like he was

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a piece of property to be owned. So I feel

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>like that was an extra dig and reference to things

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we should not be.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Talking, you know what. The other thing, there's no reference

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to it on the show, and there might never be

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 2>one for this reason. They all have been in that

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 2>villa for a little while doing some pre production stuff,

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 2>so they've been off the grid. All their phones have

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 2>been taken.

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they don't have access to.

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 2>The producers aren't telling them and they have no idea.

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Because they're in Fiji right now shooting it. Because if

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a week two weeks show, so basically, if

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you're a fan of the show, you can call in

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and you can vote on who your favorite couple is.

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>You can actually contribute to who gets voted off or not.

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is in real time.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 2>It's possible they have no idea what's going on. It's

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 2>possible she had no idea until she came out, because

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 2>there were reports of like friends of hers have been

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 2>online frantically responding on social media trying to defend her.

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not working and it's not going away.

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 2>I wait to hear from her, but let's end with

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 2>one other future this week. Okay, people you know by

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 2>now Trump and Elon broke up. There's a bunch of

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 2>billionaire bickering. But they went back and forth on social media,

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>with Trump saying he was wearing thin. I'm very disappointed

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 2>he was not in favor of my bill. And now

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Elon has gone pretty much nuclear, accused Trump of being

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 2>in the Epstein files and said that's why we haven't

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 2>seen them, and a whole bunch of other jaw dropping stuff.

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 2>But it got us to thinking. Roll this stuff got

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 2>nasty and personal and quick.

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Man, it heated up fast.

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 2>It was a matter of hours this was over.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>They were back and forth, just eviscerating each other on

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>social media for all to see. It's one thing if

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you're texting someone back and forth, but man, this was

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>a public display of it was so this is the

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>biggest feud, the biggest battle I have ever seen between

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>two people that I can recall.

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 2>We got to be missing in history.

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Well it got us thinking. You actually asked, like, what

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>other feuds can you think of? What other public breakups, divorces,

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>just battles have escalated. And I looked it up these

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>celebrity battle and it's actually quite funny. But truthfully, I

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>don't think any of these rise to the level of

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>what we saw yesterday. The number one that you see

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>pop up is Kanye weston Taylor Swift.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I don't really because she never got into a

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>nasty back and forth with him.

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>They had some lyrics back and forth referencing one another,

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>or was it mostly Kanye references? It was Taylor. She

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>was actually already like, yeah, I'm good. I'm pretty much

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>good with my swifties and my like mega hits and

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>my platinum albums and I'm fine.

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 2>But the moment on stage is pretty awful when he

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 2>jumped up there and took her, so I guess maybe

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 2>they were.

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of jumping up on stage. Another one referenced Will

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Smith and Chris Rock, but Chris Rock was was was

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the hero in that, but.

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 2>He came a public view when he did his stand

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 2>up and he took some shots back. But okay, I

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have put that one up there, But okay.

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>That's up there. They have. There's some fun got violent

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that one that one. Actually guess that one turned physical,

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 1>so there is that they go back. They have Britney

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Spears and Christina Aguilera. That was so long ago. I

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>don't really remember that.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:56.719
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was kind of a musical.

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>It was, it was, and like there's a lot of

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the musical things. So they have Biggie Smalls and Tupac.

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>We also know recently we had Drake and Kendrick Lamar.

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Obviously that one turned Grammy's Super Bowl. Yes, yes, all

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>sorts of all ships rose on that one. Like Drake's

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>killing it right now. Obviously Kendrick Lamar is killing it

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>But a rat that's what a rap beef is supposed

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 2>to be, not a public feud between the president and

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 2>the richest man on earth.

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's they talk about Gwyneth Paltrow and Martha Stewart.

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even oh, Lady Gaga and Madonna, but that again,

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it was about like who's imitating whom? Like Madonna thought

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that Lady Gaga was stealing her stuff and so that

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>she was basically riding on her coat tails and she

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>was getting none of the credit.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Did you Gaga go back at her?

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>It's let's see.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I can say, I just don't remember that one at all.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>They see Born this Way was the one that Madonna

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>was upset about. She's so it was mostly Madonna being

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>upset with gagat who else? Donald Trump and Rosie O'Donnell.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 2>That was that was that one was ugly. That was ugly.

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you know, they don't even have on here because

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>we were trying to think of really ugly divorces like

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Brad Pitt and Angelina or Brad Pitt and Jennifer. Both

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of those were bad. Jennifer Aniston public neither one went

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>well trying to there's they go back to, like Joan

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Crawford and Betty Davis. But this is a lot about

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a lot about artists competing with one another.

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan. There's just all these little feuds.

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 2>What you're saying is we're seeing something like we've never seen.

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Before one percent, because like Mariah Carey versus eminem what

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>was that? I don't even know what that. But these

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are all the ones that are listed and you can

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>go through them, and it's true they pale in comparison

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to what we saw yesterday. So it does bolster our

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>belief that, yes, this is the most brazen, insane public

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>feud that we have ever seen in our lifetime.

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the most expensive divorce as well, because it calls

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 2>elon thirty four billion personal value because stock went down.

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And who's going to back off, Who's going to back down,

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:08.199
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to say uncle, who's going to wave the

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>white flag?

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 2>Nope? No, I have not. Have you seen either one

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 2>of them do so in any circumstance, and now a

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 2>public one against a guy with as much money, for

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 2>the most part as you have and as much power

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 2>as you have. To tell the president in a tweet,

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 2>he wouldn't have won the election.

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Without me, He was ungrateful that where's the gratitude.

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Gratitude? Oh, Donald Trump should be grateful to me?

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>WHOA, Oh my goodness. Yes, we will see how that

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>all unfolds. But I have a feeling in that battle

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>everyone's going to lose, not just Musk and his thirty

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars. We're all going to pay the price

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>for this. So let's hope that maybe maybe one of

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 1>them could show some humility at some point.

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>That is hilarious, and so we'll end on that comedic note.

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Amy Buck praying for peace and humility.

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Folks, We appreciate you running with us as always, and

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 2>enjoy the rest of your Saturday.