Speaker 1: Morning Run with Amy and TJ and iHeartRadio Podcast.
Speaker 2: Hey theo folks, it is Saturday, June seventh. Thank you
Speaker 2: so much for continuing to run with us. We'll taken
Speaker 2: a weekend morning run right now. Rose. During the week,
Speaker 2: there are a lot of stories on our morning run
Speaker 2: that get us going, get us worked up, even get
Speaker 2: us arguing, and we don't get to get into it.
Speaker 2: So this is where we've been doing that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So we are bringing the stories to you this
Speaker 1: weekend from the week that kept us talking or got
Speaker 1: us going. And we'll begin with the news. California, the
Speaker 1: state of California, was trying to find a compromise. President
Speaker 1: Trump signed an executive order saying, hey, We're going to
Speaker 1: cut all federal funding from any sort of athletic organization
Speaker 1: that allows transgender athletes to compete in girls' sporting events.
Speaker 1: California had a major high school championship track and field,
Speaker 1: and they had a transgender athlete competing and guess what,
Speaker 1: the transgender athlete one and one big first place in
Speaker 1: two events, second place in the third event. And so
Speaker 1: in order to compromise and to not have federal funds restricted,
Speaker 1: they decided to add a girl to the podium, so
Speaker 1: someone who would have won that the transgender athlete took
Speaker 1: their place of got to meddle too. It's a very
Speaker 1: confusing compromise that actually pissed off a lot of folks.
Speaker 2: You made it crystal clear, though in your explanation it
Speaker 2: is confusing. As I'll get out. I'll give it to
Speaker 2: your bottom line as a trans girl who won, who
Speaker 2: is a state champion in two categories out there in California. Yeah,
Speaker 2: Trump warned against this, he would take money. We'll see
Speaker 2: what happens. The problem rose, we got back and forth.
Speaker 2: That was so unsettling. So unsettling about the story is
Speaker 2: it feels like nobody won with this rule change. It
Speaker 2: felt almost humiliating to all sides to do it this way.
Speaker 2: So you're essentially just saying, yes, the trans girl got first,
Speaker 2: so the person she beat who got second gets to
Speaker 2: move up to first. Person, the guy third gets to
Speaker 2: move up to second. Person who got fourth gets to
Speaker 2: move up the third. But who's the actual champion? Who
Speaker 2: does that help that? Who? The trans girl is standing
Speaker 2: there with another girl at the top of the podium
Speaker 2: who won, I beat you, but you get to come
Speaker 2: up here with me, and.
Speaker 1: The records reflect that it wasn't the trans girl, it
Speaker 1: was the other girl. And so yeah, no one gets
Speaker 1: to feel good about the metal they got because it
Speaker 1: kind of feels like, did I earn this? Did I
Speaker 1: not earn this? Who is the best? And what's the
Speaker 1: right way to go? And I think for most people,
Speaker 1: we don't ever want to discriminate against or discourage people
Speaker 1: from participating in athletic competitions. It's part of what makes
Speaker 1: being a kid and growing up exciting and fun. Just
Speaker 1: feels awful and icky, because yes, if you're one of
Speaker 1: the girls, or you're a parent one of the girls,
Speaker 1: you might be frustrated at the unfairness of the competition
Speaker 1: because of the what most people would point to the
Speaker 1: biological advantages that the trans girl has over a girl
Speaker 1: who was born a girl. And so that is a
Speaker 1: very controversial and difficult conversation to have. And is there
Speaker 1: a good answer? Is there a right way forward? How
Speaker 1: else can trans athletes compete? There's so few of them,
Speaker 1: as we know in our population, they couldn't actually have
Speaker 1: their own competition because that would be great, except for
Speaker 1: who would they be competing against.
Speaker 2: It's tough we haven't figured it out yet. We have
Speaker 2: to figure it out, but this just felt like a
Speaker 2: mess of a way to try to deal with it.
Speaker 2: And sure enough she qualified and went out there and
Speaker 2: won two state championships. She came in third place in
Speaker 2: one event.
Speaker 1: The law thought it was the second place. She came
Speaker 1: in second place, game and second.
Speaker 2: So one cisgender girl beat her out, but beat her
Speaker 2: out by just a little bit. They were approaching state
Speaker 2: records that Marion Jones broke when she was in high school.
Speaker 2: So what I'm saying is this transathlete, yes, got second,
Speaker 2: but still did so well that almost competing with one
Speaker 2: of the greatest track athletes we've ever known in this country.
Speaker 1: So I started thinking when you told me that tidbit
Speaker 1: that what if a trans girl beats an Olympic athlete
Speaker 1: or someone who is a storied female competitor like Marion Jones?
Speaker 1: Will Will that be okay to have a trans girl
Speaker 1: beat someone like Marion Jones record? Is that fair to compare?
Speaker 1: Is that fair for then that trans girl to have
Speaker 1: that record over a biological female or a female who
Speaker 1: was born I don't even know how to say it
Speaker 1: not to offend anyone, but this is a tough cist gender.
Speaker 2: I think this is what we're supposed to go with. Now,
Speaker 2: what is it cis to person? That's what you're born
Speaker 2: sis gender girls, this gender girl and born.
Speaker 1: But I think that is another huge issue. And then
Speaker 1: you start taking Okay, we're doing it state by state,
Speaker 1: but in international competitions, the Olympics, et cetera. You say,
Speaker 1: there's actually a system in place where you have to
Speaker 1: take some sort of a blood test and if you
Speaker 1: have enough estrogen or enough hormones of a female, you
Speaker 1: can be considered a female.
Speaker 2: You have to show how long you've gone through this process.
Speaker 2: You have to show some say you have to have
Speaker 2: gone through for a year or two years. But the
Speaker 2: rules aren't uniform all over the world, so we just
Speaker 2: haven't figured out.
Speaker 1: But the reality is this, would you not say that
Speaker 1: most people would agree and it would be hard to
Speaker 1: argue against that a trans girl who was not born
Speaker 1: a female has a physical advantage in almost every case.
Speaker 1: I mean, certainly there are exceptions to the rule, but
Speaker 1: generally speaking, there's a reason why men don't compete against
Speaker 1: women because women do not have a physical advantage. Period.
Speaker 2: It is happening incount for you where that governor has
Speaker 2: come out recently and said that he believes it's unfair.
Speaker 2: He's breaking with some in his own party and some
Speaker 2: progressives in his own party by saying that. But he
Speaker 2: said it is unfair for trans girls to be competing
Speaker 2: in girls' sports.
Speaker 1: And I think it's okay to say this because I
Speaker 1: know you know. Look, I'm a parent of girls, you're
Speaker 1: a parent of girls. We have friends who we love
Speaker 1: and know who have trans children. So this isn't something
Speaker 1: that is foreign or unusual to us in any way,
Speaker 1: and in fact, even in an intimate way. But I
Speaker 1: think that you can be supportive of trans rights and
Speaker 1: supportive of some of the and and at and angered
Speaker 1: about some of the rights that are being taken away
Speaker 1: from them, and still believe that there is a physical
Speaker 1: advantage and it is unfair to other girls to have
Speaker 1: them competing against people who were born with a physical advantage.
Speaker 1: I think that you can have both thoughts and still
Speaker 1: be supportive of trans rights. It's just a sticky, tough
Speaker 1: situation because no one wants to alienate anyone or make
Speaker 1: anyone feel left out. Everyone wants to belong, and yet
Speaker 1: you still have to have a system in place for fairness.
Speaker 2: Right. Another story that got us going this week and
Speaker 2: really got us going. The military has renamed a ship.
Speaker 2: Shouldn't be a big deal, I suppose, But it was
Speaker 2: what name they took off the ship and when they
Speaker 2: did it that was a big deal. It was the
Speaker 2: us NS the US naval ship Harvey Milk, named after
Speaker 2: the civil rights gay rights leader. They took the name
Speaker 2: off the ship. Robes, that's one thing they said. It
Speaker 2: was part of kind of a let's whole dei anti
Speaker 2: dei afying of the military since Trump got back into office.
Speaker 2: This is a part of that. But Robe, it was
Speaker 2: the timing of when they did it, and then it
Speaker 2: was coming back and saying we did that on purpose. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Defense official absolutely said this timing was intentional. When Defense
Speaker 1: Secretary Pete Hegzeff announced that they were removing Harvey Milk's
Speaker 1: name from that ship right at the beginning of Pride month.
Speaker 1: June is Pride month, and it was just an extra
Speaker 1: gut punch, I think to folks who have been fighting
Speaker 1: so hard for inclusiveness. It was mean. It was mean spirited.
Speaker 1: It was almost like ha ha ha ha ha, and
Speaker 1: this you know, Harvey milk. If you're not familiar, he
Speaker 1: is one of the most yes and if you ever
Speaker 1: Sean Penn portrayed him in the movie. This is a
Speaker 1: man who was of service, was in the Navy. His
Speaker 1: parents served in the Navy, but he was threatened with
Speaker 1: the court martial because of his sexual orientation. He had
Speaker 1: to leave the military because he was gay. And once
Speaker 1: he finally got elected, one of the first openly gay
Speaker 1: men to be elected to office, he was serving on
Speaker 1: the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, he was assassinated a
Speaker 1: year later. So this is somebody who gave his life
Speaker 1: for who he was, and not willingly, but is someone
Speaker 1: who has been honored and revered and studied and we
Speaker 1: don't ever want to go back to those times and
Speaker 1: repeat that. And yet this just to take his name
Speaker 1: and to remove it from nable Ship is just unnecessary
Speaker 1: and cruel. And with everything that's going on in the world,
Speaker 1: do we really just want to continue to divide one
Speaker 1: another here and say us versus them?
Speaker 2: And I hate that cast. Let's say they wanted to
Speaker 2: do it and they did it in August, people would
Speaker 2: take issue with it. They shouldn't have done it, fine,
Speaker 2: but to do it, and you're telling an entire community that,
Speaker 2: in this month that is so important to you, we're
Speaker 2: actually going to insult you. We're actually going to punch you,
Speaker 2: We actually are trying to inflict harm on a move
Speaker 2: we already know you're not gonna like we are now
Speaker 2: intend that is unbelievable.
Speaker 1: You likened it too, and asked because they have also said, hey,
Speaker 1: there are some other ship names that are want up
Speaker 1: to be removed as well, including Thurgood Marshal, the first
Speaker 1: black Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Speaker 2: Can you stay with third Good Marshal Force second February one,
Speaker 2: tell us you're going to rename stuff like that.
Speaker 1: The beginning of Black History Month. Go ahead and say
Speaker 1: we're going to start removing names of black civil rights
Speaker 1: leaders and pioneers.
Speaker 2: So try this on February one. There's a USNS John Lewis, Okay,
Speaker 2: February one, make that announcement. Why why would you do
Speaker 2: that unless you're trying to give a big f you
Speaker 2: to the black community. I would take it as such.
Speaker 2: I wouldn't like it if you took it off in
Speaker 2: September or December. But if you do know February one,
Speaker 2: what are you trying to say to a group collectly?
Speaker 2: This blows my mind. There are a lot of things,
Speaker 2: but this to be that that obviously and embracing how
Speaker 2: mean we are trying?
Speaker 1: Yes, yes, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg same thing. Let's do
Speaker 1: it at the beginning of Women's History Month. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just you could get think about that and think
Speaker 1: about how that would make you feel with whatever community
Speaker 1: you identify with. It is an extra like it's like
Speaker 1: they're spitting in your face and it's just unkind and
Speaker 1: unfair and unnecessary.
Speaker 2: That one really got us talking. You know that, it
Speaker 2: got us worked up. If you can't tell Love Island
Speaker 2: and the inward, you might know the story by now.
Speaker 2: But yeah, Rose, the show too much much anticipation, finally
Speaker 2: launched this week and on episode two, one of the
Speaker 2: hotties in the villa was already gone and there wasn't
Speaker 2: much fanfair and we didn't know why if you were
Speaker 2: just watching the show.
Speaker 1: When you said not much fanfair, that was almost an
Speaker 1: understatement because there's a cheeky narrator with a British accent, who, look,
Speaker 1: we watched Love Island. I think if anyone listens to
Speaker 1: this podcast. You know, we're kind of obsessed with reality.
Speaker 2: For the record, she forces me to watch.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's really hard. Yeah, I should be charged with coercion. Yes, no,
Speaker 1: you are, you are okay, you're right. Sorry, I shouldn't
Speaker 1: go there. You are a willing participant. In fact, I
Speaker 1: believe it was last night that we were catching up
Speaker 1: on Love Island. But in the second episode, at the beginning,
Speaker 1: the cheeky narrator says this and only this, Ulyssa has
Speaker 1: left the villa, and then moves on there is no
Speaker 1: other commentary, and we've been watching. We actually went back
Speaker 1: watched the first episode heading into the second one now
Speaker 1: and look, this is a very diverse group. I'm curious
Speaker 1: what they even think because this all blindsided them. Were
Speaker 1: there was chatter before she got on, because people found
Speaker 1: these podcasts that this particular contestant was on. How long
Speaker 1: ago were these podcasts, you know, I don't have the years,
Speaker 1: I don't know, but fairly recently. She goes on podcasts
Speaker 1: and very casually and very comfortably starts dropping the N
Speaker 1: word when she is being recorded with the microphone for
Speaker 1: a podcast that she knows is going to be broadcast
Speaker 1: or at least disseminated and seem to have zero concern
Speaker 1: that Ulyssa herself could say this and knowing she is
Speaker 1: not black, She's Hispanic, but she is not black.
Speaker 2: But she is very comfortable using the in words incredibly comfortable. Something.
Speaker 1: Is that shocking to you.
Speaker 2: I have known folks before who have been around a
Speaker 2: lot of black people and maybe hear black folks talk
Speaker 2: to each other in this way and sometimes get comfortable
Speaker 2: enough in that environment where they get permission to use
Speaker 2: it from.
Speaker 1: Me, ken, can a black person say it sounds like
Speaker 1: she was dating a black man for a long time.
Speaker 1: She had like an eight year relationship I believe she
Speaker 1: talked about and when you hear what she said, it
Speaker 1: was seemingly referring back to him. Can a black man
Speaker 1: give permission to a white girl, a Hispanic girl, anyway,
Speaker 1: anyone who's non black, to use the word no.
Speaker 2: The answer is no. Now, permission in a clothes setting
Speaker 2: is just the two of us, the three of us
Speaker 2: a certain group is one thing. You shouldn't do that either,
Speaker 2: because if word gets out that you're permitting this, you
Speaker 2: might be in trouble with your community. But what I'm
Speaker 2: saying is there's nobody who can give any person outside
Speaker 2: of the black community permission to use the word publicly.
Speaker 2: Nobody gets that permission. You can't. You're gonna have to
Speaker 2: ask every black person in America if it's okay, and
Speaker 2: we're not gonna give that permission. So this is it
Speaker 2: was so casual in how she said it. She didn't
Speaker 2: miss a beat or think she said anything wrong, and
Speaker 2: knew this was public.
Speaker 1: She just it's remarkable to me that someone that young
Speaker 1: would feel so free to do it, because aren't those
Speaker 1: young folks also woke and they know what to say
Speaker 1: and what not to say. And you can't say this,
Speaker 1: and you can't say that. Things that we could say
Speaker 1: as kids, you can't say anymore referring to other certain
Speaker 1: time types of the population, whether whether you're whether you're gay,
Speaker 1: or whether you have you know, cognitive issues. There were
Speaker 1: things that we said as kids that you absolutely cannot say.
Speaker 1: And we know that.
Speaker 2: But you've commented now. I believe that also these kids
Speaker 2: these days, they got so many options, they got so
Speaker 2: much social media, they got so much, so many podcasts
Speaker 2: and so much How do you stand out? How do
Speaker 2: you speak or I'm going to be myself I am
Speaker 2: going to do. Look, there's another way I saw her
Speaker 2: as someone like, nobody's going to tell me what to do.
Speaker 2: I make my own rules. She's comfortable in this setting,
Speaker 2: and she just started. She reverted to who she probably
Speaker 2: truly is.
Speaker 1: How do you feel, as a black man to hear
Speaker 1: this girl say that?
Speaker 2: I don't know the way she said it.
Speaker 1: No, I don't care.
Speaker 2: I don't think she should. I don't get worked up
Speaker 2: about people saying the N word. As soon as it
Speaker 2: comes out of your mouth, we are done, because it
Speaker 2: means you're just moronic. I mean, I can't have a
Speaker 2: conversation with you. I don't get upset or worked up.
Speaker 2: I've been yelled and called the N word plenty times
Speaker 2: in my life, barely flinched. Just it doesn't work me
Speaker 2: up like that. And there's a lot of black folks
Speaker 2: it doesn't like you. Just really, that's all you got
Speaker 2: after two hundred and fifty years, this is the best
Speaker 2: you could come up with.
Speaker 1: Still, But is it surprising to you that that people
Speaker 1: who aren't black still need to be reminded that that
Speaker 1: is a forbidden word.
Speaker 2: Nobody needs to be reminded if they're using it. They're
Speaker 2: using it intentionally, and you know it shouldn't be used.
Speaker 2: This is silly, This is this is a non issue,
Speaker 2: and if there's anybody out there arguing what black people
Speaker 2: say it, I should be able to say it. Then
Speaker 2: you ask yourself, why do you want to say the
Speaker 2: N words so much? Why do you want permission? Why
Speaker 2: is it so important to you? Now?
Speaker 1: Almost like they're trying to be black, like to be
Speaker 1: a part of the community. They think they are a
Speaker 1: part of the community, and that's highly offensive.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because you can always go back to the safety
Speaker 2: of your other community. I can't leave this black skin
Speaker 2: at home. But yeah, you don't want to do the quote.
Speaker 2: I guess I'll have to read the quote. Yes, please,
Speaker 2: we will tell you what exactly what she said to
Speaker 2: wrap it up here, just so you know what we're
Speaker 2: talking about. The second reference, I'll do the second one.
Speaker 2: Here she's talking about relationships, talking about some dudes U
Speaker 2: was dating, and she quotes, are you efing my inward? Perfect?
Speaker 2: That's it, But now I'm efing my in word. He's
Speaker 2: my in word? Is what she said. Didn't miss a beat,
Speaker 2: so she just reeled it off and it's not like
Speaker 2: a slip and oh, I can't believe I.
Speaker 1: Said that, also talking about her boyfriend like he was
Speaker 1: a piece of property to be owned. So I feel
Speaker 1: like that was an extra dig and reference to things
Speaker 1: we should not be.
Speaker 2: Talking, you know what. The other thing, there's no reference
Speaker 2: to it on the show, and there might never be
Speaker 2: one for this reason. They all have been in that
Speaker 2: villa for a little while doing some pre production stuff,
Speaker 2: so they've been off the grid. All their phones have
Speaker 2: been taken.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they don't have access to.
Speaker 2: The producers aren't telling them and they have no idea.
Speaker 1: Because they're in Fiji right now shooting it. Because if
Speaker 1: this is a week two weeks show, so basically, if
Speaker 1: you're a fan of the show, you can call in
Speaker 1: and you can vote on who your favorite couple is.
Speaker 1: You can actually contribute to who gets voted off or not.
Speaker 1: So this is in real time.
Speaker 2: It's possible they have no idea what's going on. It's
Speaker 2: possible she had no idea until she came out, because
Speaker 2: there were reports of like friends of hers have been
Speaker 2: online frantically responding on social media trying to defend her.
Speaker 1: It's not working and it's not going away.
Speaker 2: I wait to hear from her, but let's end with
Speaker 2: one other future this week. Okay, people you know by
Speaker 2: now Trump and Elon broke up. There's a bunch of
Speaker 2: billionaire bickering. But they went back and forth on social media,
Speaker 2: with Trump saying he was wearing thin. I'm very disappointed
Speaker 2: he was not in favor of my bill. And now
Speaker 2: Elon has gone pretty much nuclear, accused Trump of being
Speaker 2: in the Epstein files and said that's why we haven't
Speaker 2: seen them, and a whole bunch of other jaw dropping stuff.
Speaker 2: But it got us to thinking. Roll this stuff got
Speaker 2: nasty and personal and quick.
Speaker 1: Man, it heated up fast.
Speaker 2: It was a matter of hours this was over.
Speaker 1: They were back and forth, just eviscerating each other on
Speaker 1: social media for all to see. It's one thing if
Speaker 1: you're texting someone back and forth, but man, this was
Speaker 1: a public display of it was so this is the
Speaker 1: biggest feud, the biggest battle I have ever seen between
Speaker 1: two people that I can recall.
Speaker 2: We got to be missing in history.
Speaker 1: Well it got us thinking. You actually asked, like, what
Speaker 1: other feuds can you think of? What other public breakups, divorces,
Speaker 1: just battles have escalated. And I looked it up these
Speaker 1: celebrity battle and it's actually quite funny. But truthfully, I
Speaker 1: don't think any of these rise to the level of
Speaker 1: what we saw yesterday. The number one that you see
Speaker 1: pop up is Kanye weston Taylor Swift.
Speaker 2: Okay, I don't really because she never got into a
Speaker 2: nasty back and forth with him.
Speaker 1: They had some lyrics back and forth referencing one another,
Speaker 1: or was it mostly Kanye references? It was Taylor. She
Speaker 1: was actually already like, yeah, I'm good. I'm pretty much
Speaker 1: good with my swifties and my like mega hits and
Speaker 1: my platinum albums and I'm fine.
Speaker 2: But the moment on stage is pretty awful when he
Speaker 2: jumped up there and took her, so I guess maybe
Speaker 2: they were.
Speaker 1: Speaking of jumping up on stage. Another one referenced Will
Speaker 1: Smith and Chris Rock, but Chris Rock was was was
Speaker 1: the hero in that, but.
Speaker 2: He came a public view when he did his stand
Speaker 2: up and he took some shots back. But okay, I
Speaker 2: wouldn't have put that one up there, But okay.
Speaker 1: That's up there. They have. There's some fun got violent
Speaker 1: that one that one. Actually guess that one turned physical,
Speaker 1: so there is that they go back. They have Britney
Speaker 1: Spears and Christina Aguilera. That was so long ago. I
Speaker 1: don't really remember that.
Speaker 2: I thought that was kind of a musical.
Speaker 1: It was, it was, and like there's a lot of
Speaker 1: the musical things. So they have Biggie Smalls and Tupac.
Speaker 1: We also know recently we had Drake and Kendrick Lamar.
Speaker 1: Obviously that one turned Grammy's Super Bowl. Yes, yes, all
Speaker 1: sorts of all ships rose on that one. Like Drake's
Speaker 1: killing it right now. Obviously Kendrick Lamar is killing it
Speaker 1: right now.
Speaker 2: But a rat that's what a rap beef is supposed
Speaker 2: to be, not a public feud between the president and
Speaker 2: the richest man on earth.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's they talk about Gwyneth Paltrow and Martha Stewart.
Speaker 1: I didn't even oh, Lady Gaga and Madonna, but that again,
Speaker 1: it was about like who's imitating whom? Like Madonna thought
Speaker 1: that Lady Gaga was stealing her stuff and so that
Speaker 1: she was basically riding on her coat tails and she
Speaker 1: was getting none of the credit.
Speaker 2: Did you Gaga go back at her?
Speaker 1: It's let's see.
Speaker 2: I can say, I just don't remember that one at all.
Speaker 1: They see Born this Way was the one that Madonna
Speaker 1: was upset about. She's so it was mostly Madonna being
Speaker 1: upset with gagat who else? Donald Trump and Rosie O'Donnell.
Speaker 2: That was that was that one was ugly. That was ugly.
Speaker 1: Okay, you know, they don't even have on here because
Speaker 1: we were trying to think of really ugly divorces like
Speaker 1: Brad Pitt and Angelina or Brad Pitt and Jennifer. Both
Speaker 1: of those were bad. Jennifer Aniston public neither one went
Speaker 1: well trying to there's they go back to, like Joan
Speaker 1: Crawford and Betty Davis. But this is a lot about
Speaker 1: This is a lot about artists competing with one another.
Speaker 1: Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan. There's just all these little feuds.
Speaker 2: What you're saying is we're seeing something like we've never seen.
Speaker 1: Before one percent, because like Mariah Carey versus eminem what
Speaker 1: was that? I don't even know what that. But these
Speaker 1: are all the ones that are listed and you can
Speaker 1: go through them, and it's true they pale in comparison
Speaker 1: to what we saw yesterday. So it does bolster our
Speaker 1: belief that, yes, this is the most brazen, insane public
Speaker 1: feud that we have ever seen in our lifetime.
Speaker 2: Maybe the most expensive divorce as well, because it calls
Speaker 2: elon thirty four billion personal value because stock went down.
Speaker 1: And who's going to back off, Who's going to back down,
Speaker 1: Who's going to say uncle, who's going to wave the
Speaker 1: white flag?
Speaker 2: Nope? No, I have not. Have you seen either one
Speaker 2: of them do so in any circumstance, and now a
Speaker 2: public one against a guy with as much money, for
Speaker 2: the most part as you have and as much power
Speaker 2: as you have. To tell the president in a tweet,
Speaker 2: he wouldn't have won the election.
Speaker 1: Without me, He was ungrateful that where's the gratitude.
Speaker 2: Gratitude? Oh, Donald Trump should be grateful to me?
Speaker 1: WHOA, Oh my goodness. Yes, we will see how that
Speaker 1: all unfolds. But I have a feeling in that battle
Speaker 1: everyone's going to lose, not just Musk and his thirty
Speaker 1: four billion dollars. We're all going to pay the price
Speaker 1: for this. So let's hope that maybe maybe one of
Speaker 1: them could show some humility at some point.
Speaker 2: That is hilarious, and so we'll end on that comedic note.
Speaker 1: Amy Buck praying for peace and humility.
Speaker 2: Folks, We appreciate you running with us as always, and
Speaker 2: enjoy the rest of your Saturday.