WEBVTT - How China Influences Hollywood

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. The next guest

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is definitely a timely guest. I think about the Olympics

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that are on. We see the Oscar nominations this week,

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and we see tensions between the US and China tim

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of front as they battle for influence,

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in politics, on the global stage, the global economy, military,

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>my technology. There's a battle, and that also includes the

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>movie business. Yeah, it certainly does. It's been pretty remarkable

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 1>how quickly China has been able to get to to

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>build out. It's it's version of Hollywood in China, and

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it's something that Eric Schwartzel, Hollywood reporter at the Wall

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal, dives into. He joins us right now on

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Los Angeles, Eric, how are you. I

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>am happy to be here, Thanks for having me. Congratulations

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>on the new book, Red Carpet Hollywood, China and the

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Global Battle for Cultural Supremacy. Your book opens with an

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>anecdote about a group of executives from China coming to

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States all the way back in well not

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that long ago, two thousand and eight. They were there

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to to learn from Hollywood executives, some of these executives

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>having run companies that are, you know, a hundred years old. Um,

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.839
<v Speaker 1>how quickly has China been able to build out, Uh,

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>it's movie business, it's entertainment business. Since that time, it

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>has done in about a decade and a half what

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it took Hollywood a hundred years to do. I think

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of listeners might be familiar with the concept

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of technology transfer that we see in a lot of

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>sectors when it comes to China. The the idea of

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>being that if you want to invest in China, if

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to do business in China, you might need

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to show them how it's done. You might need to

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>hand over airplane blueprints or partner with a state backed

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>company that might want to learn how to sophisticate their operations. Well,

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the same thing happened in Hollywood and the movie industry.

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>As Hollywood moved into China, China started to observe how

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood operated, sometimes in a literal classroom like you referenced,

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes just by hiring talent and bringing them over

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 1>to show them how to make commercial films. And since

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>then we've seen the Chinese film industry just take off

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and movies they're routinely grows upwards of five six hundred

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>millions dollars in China alone. And now we're trying to

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>see also this sort of final leg of the race,

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>which is exporting those movies abroad as America has done

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>for decades as well. You know, it's interesting in a

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>day when we're reporting Disney earnings, I think about the

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>role of these big global companies, including a Walt Disney,

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>their role in in terms of um helping out China.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe move forward when it comes to movie making, how

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>do you how do you think about how do you

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>write about a company like Disney and their role in

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>all of this? This needs a fascinating case study because

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it's spent the past twenty five years going deep into China.

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>At one point, Um Bob Iger, the former CEO, described

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the Shanghai Disneylands Park as the best opportunity for the

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>company since Walt Disney himself had bought land in central Florida.

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean this was a country of one point four

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>billion people, a lot of whom had children, and a

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of whom had only children. So I mean, if

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you're operating Disney's business. You know, a nation of a

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>bunch of only children is about this a dream scenario

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>as you can get. Um. However, we've seen some of

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that sex success turned into something of a liability because

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>there is a massive theme park in Shanghai, and there's

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>another one in Hong Kong, and the movies do exceptionally well. However,

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just gotten trickier to do business there overall, not

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>just because under shi jing Ping, doing business in China

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>has grown more opaque, but also because in some cases

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it has put Disney at odds with its own American government.

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Well what does Disney had to give up in order

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to operate successfully in China? Well, I mean, so let's

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>start with the theme park in Shanghai. Disney is not

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a majority owner of that park, like a lot of

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>other business ventures in China, it had to partner with

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>local firms and give them majority ownership. So that means

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that I think about forty is owned by Disney and

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest is owned by companies that are local and

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>state affiliated. And there were other issues with with disney strategy,

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the first being that you know, in the mid nineties nineties,

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>when Disney first started looking at building a theme park

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in China. Chinese officials wanted it right away, and Disney

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>had to say, whoa wa wa. You know, there's a

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>reason we only have four or five of these things

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in the whole world. We don't just build a theme

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.119
<v Speaker 1>park when someone asks for it. We have to start

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>start to seed affection with children. So they beg their

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>parents to take them to that theme park first. And

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>they initially wanted to get the Disney Channel onto Chinese

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 1>airways right. Government officials in China said no, but they

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>did have other more creative ways to introduce Chinese children

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to Disney characters, including for a time a string of

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>English language school right that would teach the airtsees and

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the Disney characters. Eric, we're going to come back continuing

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the conversation we're talking about. Eric Schwartzel, author of the

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>new book Red Carpet, will continue in just a moment.

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to get right back to Eric Schwartzel, Hollywood

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>reporter for The Wall Street Journal, also author of the

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>new book came out yesterday. It's called Red Carpet, Hollywood,

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>China and the Global Battle for cultural supremacy. Eric joins

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Los Angeles, Eric, I want

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Maverick's jacket, and I'm talking Tom Cruise

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Maverick here. This book is full of so many great anecdotes.

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea about the controversy or self censorship

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>surrounding this patch here, but explain the story and how

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>self censorship is embodied in what Paramount has done for

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the reboot of Top Gun. Right, it's one of the

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>most iconic movie star costumes of all time, right, the

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the sunglasses and the leather jacket that Tom Cruise wears

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in Top Gun from the nineteen eighties, and when crew

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>sued it up for the reboots that I think is

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>now coming out this year, if not next year. It's

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>been delayed a couple of times because of covid um.

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>People notice a key difference on that jacket, which is

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that the flag patches that were on the back had

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties included the flags of Taiwan and Japan,

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>but in this reboot they were gone. And the reason

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>why I discovered is because Chinese financiers who were helping

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>pay for the film pointed out that those could be

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a problem because a Taiwanese flag implies that Taiwan is

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>its own country, a geopolitical stance that Beijing disagrees with,

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and tensions between China and Japan have always been charged,

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and so maybe while the costume designer was at it,

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>they should take that patch off as well. And so

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>suddenly you had this movie that in thees symbolized frankly

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Reaganism on screen, you know, raw raw cinema instead bending

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to Chinese rules without China really even having to say

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a word. That is as I think one of the

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>striking things about China's relationship and influence on Hollywood is

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're at the point now that China doesn't even

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>really need to say anything for Hollywood executives to know

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>what lines not to cross. Well, you also write in

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the book audience in China are reminded every time they

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>go to the movies that what they're about to see

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>has been approved by their government. And you know, one

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of the things I think we praise or or embrace

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>big time is that when it comes to art in

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in so many different forms, including the movie industry, that

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that is an opportunity for directors, writers, producers, actors, actresses

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:06.239
<v Speaker 1>to put out lots of different points of view freely. Um,

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it's very different in China, but American companies, global companies

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have agreed to kind of play by Chinese rules. Is

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that fair? Absolutely? And and the business behind it makes

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it something of an economic no brainer for a lot

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of the studio a chiefs because the Chinese box office

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>has grown so quickly at a time when the US

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>box office has flatlined. Maintaining access to that market is

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>really about maintaining access to growth and to get into

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese movie theaters, as so many studios want to do,

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>they have to pass censorship by Chinese Communist Party officials.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So every major movie that is trying to get into

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese theaters has to be first viewed and approved by

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>these Communist Party sensors. So that means not just removing

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe something little, some little detail that or

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a line of dialogues of Chinese sensors don't approve of,

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but also just avoiding whole topics altogether, like Taiwan or

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Tibet or aspects of Chinese history that its leaders would

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>rather not see on screen. What is lost here when

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes to self censorship, when it comes to making

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that movies that are made by American studios don't

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>offend audiences globally, or I wouldn't even use the word offend,

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>but adhere to to what that government sees as its

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>own values. Well, you loud to this a little earlier,

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's I think it is a change

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>for what we've come to expect Hollywood to do. I mean,

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>since the nineteen sixties and seventies, Hollywood has been the

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>industry that is supposed to push the envelope and sort

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of stand as the American industry of free expression, and increasingly,

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>especially in a global marketplace, that has not really been possible.

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And so not only do we see certain political concerns

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>or stories taken off screen, but we also see really

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>um and undercutting a certain representation um. You know, for instance,

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in China, storylines involving gay characters are all but forbidden.

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's not going to fly in major blockbuster movies.

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>But I think in general, what we're seeing is that

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in hollywood hundred and twenty year history,

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it is not making movies with Americans first in mind,

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>but many times with Chinese censors. Wow, So how do

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you you report on this world? How do you kind

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of put it up against the increased tensions that we're

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing between China and the rest of the world, and

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly between the United States, and being in an environment

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>coming off of George floyd In and the pandemic where

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we're saying, wait, there's inequalities, there's inequities, there's a lack

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of diversity and inclusion, and there's racism out there. You know,

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>corporate leaders, you need to stand up. We all need

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to stand up to make it a better system. How

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>do you cross that with what you write about? It's

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's it's the tension that I think

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>has also enveloped entities like the n b a UM,

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:25.119
<v Speaker 1>which has also waded into Chinese politics and based similar criticism.

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's sort of like, where's this? Is there

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>an hypocrisy there that that actors or athletes who are

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>so willing to engage on social issues domestically won't engage

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on them when they are Chinese. Uh? In nature? I

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>think that I think that hypocrisy has really rubbed a

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of consumers and politicians the wrong way. And as

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>tensions between the US and China rise, and I'd also say,

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe even more importantly, as awareness of human rights abuses

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in China rise, then I think these companies and these

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>athletes are these actors are going to have more to

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>answer for. And we have yet to see what that

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>public pressure leads to, because so far, anytime there's something

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of a flare up, it fades from memory rather quickly.

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think the calculation for a lot of business

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>leaders has been the pr hit at home will fade

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>faster than any punishment I face in China. So just

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>take the pr hit as long as you can maintain

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>access in China. Well, I don't know if that dynamical ship. Well,

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just look at all the corporate sponsors that are over

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the part of the Olympics. Such a timely conversation, We

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it, and good luck with the book. Eric Schwartzel,

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood reporter at the Wall Street Journal, on the phone

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>from l A. Check out his new book, Red Carpet Hollywood, China,

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Global Battle for a Cultural Supremacy. This just

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>crosses so many different conversations and themes that we're having

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>right now.