WEBVTT - It Could Happen Here Weekly 248

0:00:00.390 --> 0:00:02.910
<v Speaker 1>Call zone media.

0:00:03.350 --> 0:00:05.700
<v Speaker 2>Hey, everybody. Robert Evans here, and I wanted to let

0:00:05.710 --> 0:00:09.420
<v Speaker 2>you know this is a compilation episode. So every episode

0:00:09.619 --> 0:00:12.700
<v Speaker 2>of the week that just happened is here in one

0:00:12.780 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 2>convenient and with somewhat less ads package for you to

0:00:16.579 --> 0:00:19.070
<v Speaker 2>listen to in a long stretch if you want. If

0:00:19.090 --> 0:00:21.049
<v Speaker 2>you've been listening to the episodes every day this week,

0:00:21.090 --> 0:00:22.850
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be nothing new here for you, but

0:00:23.190 --> 0:00:24.390
<v Speaker 2>you can make your own decisions.

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Hello everyone and welcome to It Could Happen Here. My

0:00:31.100 --> 0:00:33.460
<v Speaker 3>name is Anna Elkurd and I'm a researcher and analyst

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.639
<v Speaker 3>of Arab and Palestinian politics. Today I want to talk

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.210
<v Speaker 3>about the recent announcement that Hamas agreed to a second

0:00:40.250 --> 0:00:43.510
<v Speaker 3>phase of the Gaza ceasefire. So the Board of Peace

0:00:43.570 --> 0:00:47.650
<v Speaker 3>and mediator countries announced July 30th, last Thursday, I'm recording

0:00:47.850 --> 0:00:51.290
<v Speaker 3>on August 4th, that Hamas had agreed to a sort

0:00:51.310 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 3>of roadmap in which they would relinquish some of their weapons.

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:59.380
<v Speaker 3>So this whole scenario has hinged on Hamas disarming, even

0:00:59.420 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 3>though in other conflicts, when there have been two parties,

0:01:03.460 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 3>disarmament comes at later stages. But in this scenario, the

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Board of Peace and the Director General, Nikolai Mladenov, has

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:17.179
<v Speaker 3>basically hinged the entire process on Hamas disarming first. And

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:23.020
<v Speaker 3>so in the recent announcement, which President Donald Trump basically

0:01:23.060 --> 0:01:26.179
<v Speaker 3>celebrated on his social media, calling it a historic agreement

0:01:26.260 --> 0:01:30.220
<v Speaker 3>for the complete disarmament of Hamas. Hamas basically said that

0:01:30.300 --> 0:01:33.690
<v Speaker 3>they had been in conversation with not only the mediators

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.700
<v Speaker 3>and their proposals, but with other Palestinian factions and had

0:01:36.810 --> 0:01:41.870
<v Speaker 3>agreed to relinquish their weapons in a particular way. So

0:01:41.890 --> 0:01:45.369
<v Speaker 3>they said it was contingent and conditional on a permanent

0:01:45.450 --> 0:01:48.490
<v Speaker 3>end to Israeli attacks and a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza,

0:01:49.410 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>as well as recovery and reconstruction. And importantly, they basically

0:01:54.100 --> 0:01:56.700
<v Speaker 3>said that no weapons would be handed over to Israel

0:01:56.860 --> 0:02:00.340
<v Speaker 3>or to any non-Palestinian party. So what Hamas is saying

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 3>is we're going to give up our weapons eventually if

0:02:03.340 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 3>Israel also adheres to the guidelines of the ceasefire. And

0:02:08.660 --> 0:02:12.290
<v Speaker 3>we will relinquish our weapons to the National Committee, which

0:02:12.410 --> 0:02:18.669
<v Speaker 3>is a governance structure made up of Palestinian technocrats. So

0:02:18.730 --> 0:02:22.220
<v Speaker 3>since the National Committee is supposed to govern Gaza eventually,

0:02:22.820 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 3>or at least that's the intention of this committee, even

0:02:25.900 --> 0:02:28.700
<v Speaker 3>though they haven't actually been allowed to do that, the

0:02:28.780 --> 0:02:31.740
<v Speaker 3>idea here is Hamas is saying, you want to claim

0:02:31.780 --> 0:02:35.500
<v Speaker 3>that disarmament is the reason that the ceasefire and recovery

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.570
<v Speaker 3>and reconstruction can't proceed? Okay, so we'll disarm, but we'll

0:02:39.610 --> 0:02:43.910
<v Speaker 3>only disarm to other Palestinians. And like I said, it's

0:02:44.070 --> 0:02:50.500
<v Speaker 3>contingent on Israel also agreeing. withdrawing from Gaza, ceasing the

0:02:50.700 --> 0:02:54.340
<v Speaker 3>continued attacks. Israeli officials have basically said that they have

0:02:54.380 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 3>like severe worries about it and they're not interested. The

0:02:57.860 --> 0:03:01.370
<v Speaker 3>national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gavir, basically said that it's not

0:03:01.410 --> 0:03:04.430
<v Speaker 3>acceptable to Israel. So, you know, it's very much up

0:03:04.470 --> 0:03:09.150
<v Speaker 3>in the air, but Hamas basically threw the ball in

0:03:09.290 --> 0:03:12.829
<v Speaker 3>Israel's court with this announcement. It's also important to point

0:03:12.950 --> 0:03:15.890
<v Speaker 3>out that throughout these past couple of months since the

0:03:15.930 --> 0:03:18.870
<v Speaker 3>ceasefire was announced, Over a thousand Palestinians have been killed.

0:03:19.450 --> 0:03:23.370
<v Speaker 3>In the week that this announcement was made, Israel killed

0:03:23.389 --> 0:03:25.630
<v Speaker 3>at least six in Gaza and wounded many others.

0:03:26.210 --> 0:03:28.169
<v Speaker 4>And so all of that is going on.

0:03:28.290 --> 0:03:30.690
<v Speaker 3>And that's not even mentioning what's happening in the West Bank,

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.420
<v Speaker 3>where things have really escalated in terms of both Israeli

0:03:34.500 --> 0:03:37.540
<v Speaker 3>army and Israeli settler violence, which often, of course, goes

0:03:37.580 --> 0:03:42.490
<v Speaker 3>hand in hand. This announcement might really amount to nothing here,

0:03:42.650 --> 0:03:46.250
<v Speaker 3>especially if Israel doesn't comply. But I think it poses

0:03:46.290 --> 0:03:49.510
<v Speaker 3>a bigger question around the Board of Peace and its

0:03:49.870 --> 0:03:54.310
<v Speaker 3>design and its objectives. So that's basically what this episode

0:03:54.350 --> 0:03:56.540
<v Speaker 3>is going to be about, answering the question of whether

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 3>the board's design, who sits on it, who pays for

0:03:59.620 --> 0:04:02.580
<v Speaker 3>a seat, who answers to who, actually makes a fair

0:04:02.660 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 3>outcome for Palestinians structurally impossible, regardless of this announcement or

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.300
<v Speaker 3>any other announcements or decisions that Palestinians may make. So

0:04:11.340 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>just as a reminder to listeners, the Board of Peace

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.130
<v Speaker 3>was announced as part of President Trump's 20-point Gaza plan

0:04:18.790 --> 0:04:22.970
<v Speaker 3>back in September 2025. 20 points to get Gaza back

0:04:23.050 --> 0:04:26.690
<v Speaker 3>on track. I shouldn't make jokes here, but that's what

0:04:26.730 --> 0:04:29.180
<v Speaker 3>it was called, and it was launched in January 2026.

0:04:29.180 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Its stated purpose is to promote stability, restore dependable and

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:38.850
<v Speaker 3>lawful governance, and secure enduring peace. in conflict-affected areas. So

0:04:38.900 --> 0:04:41.849
<v Speaker 3>not only in Gaza. At the start, the Board of

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.090
<v Speaker 3>Peace was announced around what was happening in Gaza, but

0:04:45.230 --> 0:04:49.430
<v Speaker 3>eventually it grew into a bigger idea, and Gaza was

0:04:49.490 --> 0:04:52.790
<v Speaker 3>framed as a template. So this Board of Peace is

0:04:52.870 --> 0:04:55.850
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be a model for managing future conflicts globally.

0:04:56.770 --> 0:04:59.490
<v Speaker 3>But as I've argued in the past, this really is

0:04:59.910 --> 0:05:03.550
<v Speaker 3>not about conflict resolution. It's about conflict management and a

0:05:03.850 --> 0:05:08.650
<v Speaker 3>very particular type of conflict management where you subdue conflict

0:05:08.670 --> 0:05:13.690
<v Speaker 3>through repressive means rather than reconciliation or recovery or reparations

0:05:13.740 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 3>or anything kind of long-term. So I think it's important

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:20.380
<v Speaker 3>to maybe discuss at this point how the Board of

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.980
<v Speaker 3>Peace is structured. It's basically a three-tier hierarchy with Gaza

0:05:25.020 --> 0:05:28.470
<v Speaker 3>at the bottom. At the top, there's the founding executive board.

0:05:28.490 --> 0:05:31.990
<v Speaker 3>This is chaired by President Trump In fact, in the

0:05:32.150 --> 0:05:35.609
<v Speaker 3>founding documents of the Board of Peace, he is named explicitly.

0:05:35.650 --> 0:05:38.070
<v Speaker 3>It's not that the president of the United States, you know,

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 3>will continue to chair the Board of Peace. No, it's

0:05:40.620 --> 0:05:44.460
<v Speaker 3>specifically Donald Trump. So apparently he's going to be president

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.140
<v Speaker 3>for life here. That's the top decision-making body. And then

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 3>underneath that is the Gaza Executive Board. Includes a lot

0:05:51.370 --> 0:05:54.270
<v Speaker 3>of different interesting characters. I'll talk about them in a second.

0:05:54.790 --> 0:06:00.140
<v Speaker 3>The Gaza Executive Board oversees implementation of what happens in Gaza. Farther, farther,

0:06:00.180 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 3>farther underneath that is the National Committee for the Administration

0:06:02.860 --> 0:06:08.820
<v Speaker 3>of Gaza, who are 15 unelected Palestinian technocrats approved by

0:06:09.110 --> 0:06:11.870
<v Speaker 3>Palestinian factions. But, you know, they are not of any

0:06:11.930 --> 0:06:15.390
<v Speaker 3>particular party. They are civil servants and they're supposed to

0:06:15.510 --> 0:06:19.409
<v Speaker 3>actually administer Gaza day to day. Now, the National Committee

0:06:19.510 --> 0:06:22.310
<v Speaker 3>reports to the director general of the Gaza Executive Board,

0:06:22.350 --> 0:06:26.780
<v Speaker 3>who is Nikolai Mladenov, not to any Palestinian constituency at

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.930
<v Speaker 3>or to the Palestinian Authority, for example, or any Palestinian body. Now,

0:06:30.940 --> 0:06:33.990
<v Speaker 3>the six-page charter of the Board of Peace never actually

0:06:34.029 --> 0:06:36.590
<v Speaker 3>mentions Gaza or human rights. And I don't think this

0:06:36.630 --> 0:06:38.710
<v Speaker 3>is an oversight. You know, the board is designed as

0:06:38.750 --> 0:06:41.990
<v Speaker 3>a template for managing future conflicts. It's not designed to

0:06:42.430 --> 0:06:46.270
<v Speaker 3>uphold human rights. And I think even though, of course,

0:06:46.330 --> 0:06:50.060
<v Speaker 3>these are problematic positions to take, I think the European

0:06:50.100 --> 0:06:54.220
<v Speaker 3>reaction serves as a sort of legitimacy check here. When

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.710
<v Speaker 3>the Board of Peace and its mechanisms were supposed to

0:06:58.750 --> 0:07:02.529
<v Speaker 3>be applied to Gaza, the EU attended the board's first

0:07:02.589 --> 0:07:04.750
<v Speaker 3>meeting as an observer, for example, and a number of

0:07:04.830 --> 0:07:08.990
<v Speaker 3>countries kind of floated the idea of joining. But then

0:07:09.110 --> 0:07:12.550
<v Speaker 3>when the Board of Peace was expanded as an idea

0:07:12.670 --> 0:07:16.230
<v Speaker 3>to become a template for future conflicts, for example, Ukraine, then,

0:07:16.510 --> 0:07:20.830
<v Speaker 3>you know, the European Union and other European actors basically

0:07:20.890 --> 0:07:25.500
<v Speaker 3>cited serious doubts about compatibility with the UN Charter. And

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 3>then France and the UK voiced reservations when Putin, for example,

0:07:30.140 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 3>was invited to be on the board. So yeah, who

0:07:33.180 --> 0:07:37.780
<v Speaker 3>is on the top tier board here? It's got people

0:07:37.820 --> 0:07:42.090
<v Speaker 3>like Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, who holds a

0:07:42.110 --> 0:07:44.790
<v Speaker 3>seat on the Board of Peace, despite being a party

0:07:44.830 --> 0:07:47.990
<v Speaker 3>to a conflict that's literally ongoing and is the reason

0:07:48.030 --> 0:07:50.890
<v Speaker 3>why the Board of Peace supposedly came into existence. And

0:07:50.910 --> 0:07:54.590
<v Speaker 3>despite having an ICC arrest warrant for war crimes. So clearly,

0:07:54.670 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, one party to the conflict in this scenario,

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 3>in the Gaza case, is elevated while the other is administered.

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Then there are a bunch of business figures. So CEOs,

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.110
<v Speaker 3>venture capitalists, they sit alongside heads of state. So reconstruction

0:08:10.170 --> 0:08:12.330
<v Speaker 3>is really framed as a business opportunity as much as

0:08:12.410 --> 0:08:16.230
<v Speaker 3>it's framed as an issue of governance. There's not a

0:08:16.290 --> 0:08:19.490
<v Speaker 3>single Palestinian, nor does the PA actually hold a seat

0:08:19.570 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 3>anywhere in this hierarchy. Even though the Palestinian Authority did

0:08:22.780 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 3>actually want to join the Board of Peace and it

0:08:25.180 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 3>sought full membership on it, all they got was basically

0:08:28.020 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 3>a consolation prize, which was this coordination committee between the

0:08:30.980 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Palestinian Authority and the board, with the Palestinian Authority Prime

0:08:34.140 --> 0:08:39.620
<v Speaker 3>Minister Mohammad Mustafa basically representing the Palestinian Authority one-on-one to Mladenov,

0:08:40.260 --> 0:08:43.460
<v Speaker 3>which has been described as a type of compromise because

0:08:43.500 --> 0:08:47.100
<v Speaker 3>the PA doesn't actually have a seat by itself. There

0:08:47.140 --> 0:08:51.059
<v Speaker 3>was much made about a $ 1 billion price tag for

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.780
<v Speaker 3>a permanent seat on the board. So people like Viktor

0:08:54.880 --> 0:09:00.729
<v Speaker 3>Orban and Vladimir Putin and Lukashenko basically were invited to

0:09:00.809 --> 0:09:03.790
<v Speaker 3>participate in this way. And it's, you know, kind of

0:09:04.309 --> 0:09:07.930
<v Speaker 3>obviously a sham, turning participation and, you know, quote-unquote peace

0:09:07.970 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 3>governance into a commodity for heads of state. Now, Jared Kushner,

0:09:12.700 --> 0:09:16.579
<v Speaker 3>the president's son-in-law, who is inexplicably also involved in this,

0:09:17.190 --> 0:09:20.790
<v Speaker 3>at Davos in January, basically presented a master plan that

0:09:20.860 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 3>projected $ 10 billion for Gaza's GDP by 2035. And he

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.620
<v Speaker 3>talked about new towers and industrial parks and all of this,

0:09:29.660 --> 0:09:32.329
<v Speaker 3>of course, drawn up without consulting Palestinians living in Gaza.

0:09:32.970 --> 0:09:36.090
<v Speaker 3>And Trump himself has described Gaza as a, quote, beautiful

0:09:36.110 --> 0:09:38.350
<v Speaker 3>piece of property over and over. So to me, this

0:09:38.410 --> 0:09:41.390
<v Speaker 3>is a shorthand for how the plan frames the conflict.

0:09:42.020 --> 0:09:45.220
<v Speaker 3>or wants to, wants to convince people that this conflict

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:49.089
<v Speaker 3>is fundamentally about underdevelopment. Palestinians have grievances because they're poor,

0:09:49.630 --> 0:09:53.050
<v Speaker 3>rather than the occupation, rather than the genocide. So, you know,

0:09:53.090 --> 0:09:55.490
<v Speaker 3>it poses the question, what does it mean for this

0:09:55.590 --> 0:09:59.970
<v Speaker 3>peace architecture when the same people who oversee reconstruction also protest?

0:10:00.020 --> 0:10:00.690
<v Speaker 4>Profit from it?

0:10:11.420 --> 0:10:14.660
<v Speaker 3>Now, who is on the Gaza executive board, that second tier?

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.829
<v Speaker 3>You can find the full roster online It is important

0:10:17.870 --> 0:10:21.929
<v Speaker 3>to note that they actually haven't met ever as a board.

0:10:22.030 --> 0:10:23.630
<v Speaker 3>You know, some of these people have their names and

0:10:23.770 --> 0:10:26.490
<v Speaker 3>their pictures on the website. And this Gaza executive board

0:10:26.510 --> 0:10:29.450
<v Speaker 3>has really not functioned except as kind of a legitimacy

0:10:30.090 --> 0:10:33.650
<v Speaker 3>stamp on the Board of Peace's activities. But it really

0:10:33.710 --> 0:10:35.890
<v Speaker 3>is very indicative of what the Board of Peace is

0:10:35.910 --> 0:10:37.790
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be and how they want to deal with

0:10:37.809 --> 0:10:40.610
<v Speaker 3>Gaza here. When you look at who has been invited,

0:10:40.650 --> 0:10:44.130
<v Speaker 3>even if they've never met. So it's got Gulf diplomats,

0:10:44.190 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Turkish diplomats. It has an Egyptian intelligence chief. It has

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:52.300
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of Trump administration people, Kushner, Susan Wiles, Steve Witkoff.

0:10:52.860 --> 0:10:54.860
<v Speaker 3>And then finance and business interests, like I said, are

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 3>very heavily represented here. So you have the CEO of Apollo,

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:05.189
<v Speaker 3>Mark Rowan. You have venture capitalist Michael Eisenberg and a

0:11:05.210 --> 0:11:08.470
<v Speaker 3>number of other businessmen, many of them with ties to Israel.

0:11:08.490 --> 0:11:10.329
<v Speaker 3>There's only really two companies.

0:11:10.950 --> 0:11:13.570
<v Speaker 4>Let's say, peace process veterans on this board.

0:11:14.130 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 3>There's the director general, Mladenov, who I've discussed in a

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.900
<v Speaker 3>previous episode, who's very problematic. I'll talk about him in

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.380
<v Speaker 3>just a second. And then Tony Blair. Tony Blair, also

0:11:23.620 --> 0:11:27.359
<v Speaker 3>extremely problematic. He has a history of basically delivering the

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.940
<v Speaker 3>Good Friday Agreement in the Northern Ireland conflict, but he

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.670
<v Speaker 3>doesn't seem to be applying any of the lessons of

0:11:33.730 --> 0:11:35.710
<v Speaker 3>those previous conflicts to the Middle East in any way.

0:11:36.380 --> 0:11:39.700
<v Speaker 3>But the point here is that security, finance, and U.S.

0:11:39.740 --> 0:11:45.140
<v Speaker 3>political operatives clearly outweigh conflict resolution expertise on this executive board.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 3>So who's actually running this? Like I said, they've never

0:11:48.660 --> 0:11:52.020
<v Speaker 3>actually met. Maybe some of them have been promised a

0:11:52.059 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 3>bigger role in the future. I'm thinking particularly the business

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 3>people here. But let's linger on Nikolai, I don't know

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 3>how to pronounce his name, Ladinov, who is the director

0:12:02.090 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 3>general here. I've talked about him before in a previous episode,

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.339
<v Speaker 3>but he's the former Bulgarian foreign minister under a government

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:13.170
<v Speaker 3>that was toppled by anti-corruption protests. Since 2022, he was

0:12:13.250 --> 0:12:16.230
<v Speaker 3>the head of an Emirati diplomatic academy which championed the

0:12:16.309 --> 0:12:20.210
<v Speaker 3>Abraham Accords, the so-called peace agreements between Israel and the

0:12:20.290 --> 0:12:23.309
<v Speaker 3>UAE and Bahrain and a few others. And this is

0:12:23.370 --> 0:12:27.350
<v Speaker 3>a framework that was disastrous. It's seen, especially by Palestinians,

0:12:27.550 --> 0:12:30.969
<v Speaker 3>as essentially cementing their exclusion from statehood. So this is

0:12:31.010 --> 0:12:34.330
<v Speaker 3>the guy who's supposed to run the Gaza executive board

0:12:34.470 --> 0:12:37.709
<v Speaker 3>and who has turned the peace process on its head

0:12:37.830 --> 0:12:40.550
<v Speaker 3>by basically, again, like I said at the beginning of

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 3>the episode, conditioning the entire process on disarmament first. We

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.380
<v Speaker 3>have the rest of the Gaza executive board, and then

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 3>we have the Center for Civilian Military Control. So- This

0:12:52.300 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 3>is a center. It's based in the south of Israel.

0:12:56.220 --> 0:13:00.940
<v Speaker 3>It's supposed to oversee the ceasefire. But every ceasefire enforcement

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:06.210
<v Speaker 3>decision basically has no sway on Israel itself. Like there's

0:13:06.250 --> 0:13:09.290
<v Speaker 3>no mechanism to actually hold Israel accountable. It has no

0:13:09.330 --> 0:13:13.650
<v Speaker 3>independent authority. It coordinates with the White House. And in particular,

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.420
<v Speaker 3>the liaison to the White House is this man, Aryeh Lightstone.

0:13:16.940 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 3>who was a senior advisor to a former U.S. ambassador

0:13:20.179 --> 0:13:23.830
<v Speaker 3>to Israel who was extremely right-wing. And there's been recent reporting,

0:13:23.870 --> 0:13:26.850
<v Speaker 3>which I'll link in the show notes, about how intensely

0:13:26.929 --> 0:13:29.970
<v Speaker 3>hostile he is to Palestinians. So this is the guy

0:13:30.030 --> 0:13:33.050
<v Speaker 3>who's supposed to oversee the ceasefire and report to the

0:13:33.070 --> 0:13:33.410
<v Speaker 3>White House.

0:13:34.470 --> 0:13:36.229
<v Speaker 4>So what are the consequences on the ground?

0:13:36.870 --> 0:13:39.130
<v Speaker 3>As I said, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed

0:13:39.170 --> 0:13:41.910
<v Speaker 3>in Gaza since the ceasefire was announced. Over half of

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Gaza is now behind this quote-unquote yellow line, which is

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:49.380
<v Speaker 3>Israeli-controlled territory. Humanitarian and agricultural access is restricted or prohibited

0:13:49.450 --> 0:13:52.810
<v Speaker 3>in that area. So Gaza is more and more squeezed.

0:13:53.450 --> 0:13:56.429
<v Speaker 3>The aid that was supposed to reach 600 trucks a

0:13:56.470 --> 0:14:00.569
<v Speaker 3>day has never reached that promised 600 trucks. And much

0:14:00.590 --> 0:14:03.030
<v Speaker 3>of what enters is basically private sector goods that's sold

0:14:03.050 --> 0:14:06.270
<v Speaker 3>for profit, with the Israelis also getting like a coordination

0:14:06.309 --> 0:14:11.420
<v Speaker 3>fee on each truck. Now, Hamas dissolved its emergency committee

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 3>in July 2026. before they announced that they had accepted

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:19.260
<v Speaker 3>the mediator's proposals about disarmament. They dissolved this emergency committee

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 3>and said they were handing authority over to the national committee.

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 3>But the board basically was uninterested in this move. They

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:30.220
<v Speaker 3>said that they were guided by actions, not promises. And

0:14:30.300 --> 0:14:32.100
<v Speaker 3>it really points to the fact that these kind of

0:14:32.140 --> 0:14:34.739
<v Speaker 3>procedural concessions that Hamas is attempting to make don't really

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 3>fix the structural design flaws. I think it's also important

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.330
<v Speaker 3>to point out here that even though on paper Hamas

0:14:41.350 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 3>has given up its civilian government, On the ground, like

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.180
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't actually change much. It's still involved in security

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 3>and policing and bureaucracy. And what they dissolved is this

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:55.590
<v Speaker 3>like civilian cabinet body that had run Gaza since October 2023.

0:14:55.590 --> 0:14:59.430
<v Speaker 3>And it's a very like specific administrative organ. And it's

0:14:59.510 --> 0:15:03.630
<v Speaker 3>not all of Hamas's governing capacity. So it was kind of, again,

0:15:03.670 --> 0:15:05.810
<v Speaker 3>a way of like throwing the ball in Israel's court

0:15:06.290 --> 0:15:08.750
<v Speaker 3>and claiming that we are dissolving the committee.

0:15:08.810 --> 0:15:11.860
<v Speaker 4>We are making these concessions. But they're being very, you know,

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:12.700
<v Speaker 4>strategic about this.

0:15:13.380 --> 0:15:16.060
<v Speaker 3>And in the same announcement, when they dissolved the emergency committee,

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 3>they basically said that their technical and professional staff would

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 3>remain in their posts. And it hasn't, you know, relinquished

0:15:22.780 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 3>control over the civil service and security bureaucracy. So a

0:15:27.380 --> 0:15:30.180
<v Speaker 3>few months ago, much was made about Hamas's strategy and

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 3>whether there were going to be shifts in that strategy.

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Because there was an internal election in Hamas that basically

0:15:37.820 --> 0:15:41.470
<v Speaker 3>cemented the divide between a kind of more hardline camp

0:15:41.570 --> 0:15:45.070
<v Speaker 3>and a more pragmatist camp. And the more hardline camp won.

0:15:45.770 --> 0:15:51.090
<v Speaker 3>So between Khaled Mishal, who was supposedly, you know, more

0:15:51.130 --> 0:15:56.150
<v Speaker 3>pragmatist and arguing for political accommodation, and Khalil Hayya, who

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.460
<v Speaker 3>demanded kind of more confrontation, the second guy won. And

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 3>so there was a lot of speculation back in February

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:08.260
<v Speaker 3>that that meant if the hardliners won, that this is

0:16:08.700 --> 0:16:12.140
<v Speaker 3>going to impact disarmament. And that that means Hamas will

0:16:12.220 --> 0:16:15.950
<v Speaker 3>never disarm and would never actually acquiesce to what was

0:16:16.010 --> 0:16:20.100
<v Speaker 3>being demanded of them. But in the last couple of weeks, months,

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:25.450
<v Speaker 3>you can see that Hamas' strategy is much more, let's say,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 3>nuanced and attempting to kind of buy time with the

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 3>United States and with the international community while.

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.740
<v Speaker 4>Still saying, okay, we're going to make concessions.

0:16:37.590 --> 0:16:39.890
<v Speaker 3>This is not to imply that the victory of the

0:16:39.910 --> 0:16:42.230
<v Speaker 3>kind of more hardline camp isn't going to impact Hamas'

0:16:42.270 --> 0:16:46.490
<v Speaker 3>strategy in the future. They are much more Gaza-rooted and

0:16:46.510 --> 0:16:51.729
<v Speaker 3>a more pro-Iran faction. Obviously, these are internal shifts between them,

0:16:51.910 --> 0:16:55.590
<v Speaker 3>but we'll see how that plays out in the near future.

0:16:56.410 --> 0:16:58.910
<v Speaker 3>But again, I think we go back to the idea

0:16:59.150 --> 0:17:02.010
<v Speaker 3>of how the Board of Peace is designed and whether

0:17:02.750 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 3>the flaws in its design and the dangerous precedent it

0:17:06.020 --> 0:17:09.510
<v Speaker 3>sets for not only quote unquote, you know, conflict resolution

0:17:09.550 --> 0:17:12.790
<v Speaker 3>in Gaza, but conflict resolution in every other arena of

0:17:12.830 --> 0:17:17.470
<v Speaker 3>conflict here, where in this scenario, there isn't neutral mediation.

0:17:17.930 --> 0:17:21.260
<v Speaker 3>There isn't buy-in from all parties. One side is completely

0:17:21.340 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 3>missing from the board. One side is administered. It really

0:17:25.100 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 3>poses the question of whether any kind of political movement,

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.379
<v Speaker 3>any concessions, anything that can be mediated and agreed upon

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.650
<v Speaker 3>actually impacts how the board is going to function. Hamish Hedda,

0:17:38.830 --> 0:17:42.540
<v Speaker 3>who was speaking at a Carnegie Endowment roundtable back in April,

0:17:42.970 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 3>he is a Gazan journalist, I think put it really

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.619
<v Speaker 3>well when he said that, quote, Gaza is no longer

0:17:49.060 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 3>just a unique, extraordinary case of human savagery. It is

0:17:52.260 --> 0:17:54.780
<v Speaker 3>a canary in a coal mine. What starts there does

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 3>not end there. And I think I want to end

0:17:57.859 --> 0:18:00.500
<v Speaker 3>on that note of framing Gaza as a canary in

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.660
<v Speaker 3>the coal mine, because the Board of Peace is this

0:18:02.740 --> 0:18:09.290
<v Speaker 3>model that combines billionaires, profiteering, and kind of the worst

0:18:09.410 --> 0:18:11.910
<v Speaker 3>actors in the world in terms of dictators and those

0:18:11.970 --> 0:18:16.020
<v Speaker 3>who are invested in a more authoritarian world, that is

0:18:16.060 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 3>going to be the model that's going to be exported

0:18:18.540 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 3>to other weak states or contested territories.

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 4>That's all for me today. Hope that this was at

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.770
<v Speaker 4>least eye-opening. And thanks for listening.

0:18:40.100 --> 0:18:43.820
<v Speaker 5>The drums of war are beaten. Everywhere you look, people

0:18:43.940 --> 0:18:48.420
<v Speaker 5>are picking sides. Governments are demanding unity. Critics are being

0:18:48.460 --> 0:18:54.950
<v Speaker 5>denounced as naive, irresponsible, even treacherous. And a movement built

0:18:55.350 --> 0:19:00.830
<v Speaker 5>on international solidarity has been split in the kiosk. The

0:19:00.869 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 5>year is 1914, at the beginning of the First World War,

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 5>though you'll be excused if you thought I was describing today.

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.100
<v Speaker 5>Hello and welcome to It Could Happen Here. I'm Andrew Sage,

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:18.379
<v Speaker 5>also Andrewism on YouTube, joined again by Neil Wogg to

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.730
<v Speaker 5>discuss the infamous split among the anarchists over World War I,

0:19:23.150 --> 0:19:26.389
<v Speaker 5>of all things. So just to be clear, the common

0:19:26.550 --> 0:19:30.450
<v Speaker 5>anarchist stance prior to the war was fairly straightforward. It

0:19:30.470 --> 0:19:34.750
<v Speaker 5>was a stance of internationalist worker solidarity against imperialist wars,

0:19:35.210 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 5>a solidarity that transcended borders and nationalities. recognizing that ordinary

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.220
<v Speaker 5>people had more in common with one another than with

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.810
<v Speaker 5>the ruling classes of their own countries. Such wars were

0:19:45.830 --> 0:19:48.429
<v Speaker 5>never fought in the interests of workers, but in the

0:19:48.470 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 5>interests of states, empires, dynasties, and capitalists. If war came,

0:19:53.900 --> 0:19:57.699
<v Speaker 5>the task of revolutionaries was not to rally behind their

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:02.619
<v Speaker 5>own governments, but to oppose the conflict and preserve international

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 5>working-class solidarity. However, the Great War would strain the internationalist cause.

0:20:08.820 --> 0:20:12.420
<v Speaker 5>forcing splits and theoretical developments owing to the ensuing debates

0:20:12.500 --> 0:20:17.530
<v Speaker 5>personified in the disagreement between Errico Malatesta and Peter Kropotkin,

0:20:17.900 --> 0:20:21.510
<v Speaker 5>as well as many others, who clashed intellectually over the

0:20:21.570 --> 0:20:27.070
<v Speaker 5>nature of war, history, national struggle, and revolutionary change. The

0:20:27.090 --> 0:20:32.290
<v Speaker 5>First World War emerged from decades of imperial rivalry, colonial competition,

0:20:32.410 --> 0:20:36.990
<v Speaker 5>military expansion, and competing alliance systems among Europe's great powers.

0:20:37.850 --> 0:20:41.250
<v Speaker 5>The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo on the

0:20:41.290 --> 0:20:45.650
<v Speaker 5>28th of June 1914 served as the immediate catalyst, but

0:20:45.830 --> 0:20:48.969
<v Speaker 5>it merely ignited tensions that had been building for years.

0:20:49.830 --> 0:20:54.730
<v Speaker 5>Within weeks, a regional dispute between Austria-Hungary and Serbia escalated

0:20:54.770 --> 0:20:59.149
<v Speaker 5>into a continental and eventually global conflict. On one side

0:20:59.250 --> 0:21:03.550
<v Speaker 5>stood the Central Powers, led by Germany and Austria-Hungary, later

0:21:03.590 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 5>joined by the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria. and opposing them

0:21:07.430 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 5>were the Allied powers, initially consisting of France, Russia, and Britain,

0:21:11.980 --> 0:21:15.980
<v Speaker 5>with countries such as Italy, Romania, Japan, and eventually the

0:21:16.020 --> 0:21:19.179
<v Speaker 5>United States entering the war on the Allied side as

0:21:19.220 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 5>the conflict expanded. Attitudes toward the First World War across

0:21:23.740 --> 0:21:27.300
<v Speaker 5>Europe were deeply divided and often changed dramatically in the

0:21:27.380 --> 0:21:30.939
<v Speaker 5>opening weeks of the conflict. A powerful wave of patriotic

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:35.010
<v Speaker 5>enthusiasm swept through many cities, with countless people volunteering for

0:21:35.050 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 5>military service, under the belief that the war would be short, necessary,

0:21:39.820 --> 0:21:44.220
<v Speaker 5>or even glorious. Governments, newspapers, churches, and much of the

0:21:44.260 --> 0:21:48.859
<v Speaker 5>political establishment promoted national unity and portrayed the conflict as

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:54.700
<v Speaker 5>a defensive struggle against foreign aggression. For socialists, trade unionists,

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 5>religious pacifists, and most relevantly anarchists, the stance was deeply

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:03.810
<v Speaker 5>sceptical or openly oppositional to the war. as it appeared

0:22:03.830 --> 0:22:07.270
<v Speaker 5>to be a catastrophic clash between rival empires in which

0:22:07.550 --> 0:22:11.390
<v Speaker 5>ordinary people would bear the costs while elites pursued their

0:22:11.470 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 5>geopolitical ambitions. However, one of the attitudes that flared up

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 5>as a result of the war, even amongst some anarchists

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:23.719
<v Speaker 5>and socialists, was anti-German sentiment, manifest in Kropotkin's open letter

0:22:23.850 --> 0:22:27.570
<v Speaker 5>in the anarchist newspaper Freedom. This open letter would spark

0:22:27.609 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 5>the ensuing debate between Kropotkin and Malatesta. As documented by

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 5>historian Matthew S. Adam in Anarchism and the First World War,

0:22:35.940 --> 0:22:39.699
<v Speaker 5>Kapotkin wrote, quote, I consider that the duty of everyone

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.030
<v Speaker 5>who cherishes the idea of human progress is to crush

0:22:43.109 --> 0:22:46.070
<v Speaker 5>the invasion of the Germans into Western Europe. Since 1871,

0:22:46.070 --> 0:22:50.830
<v Speaker 5>Germany has become a standing menace to European progress. All

0:22:50.869 --> 0:22:53.870
<v Speaker 5>were living under the menace of sudden invasion. More than that,

0:22:54.310 --> 0:22:57.630
<v Speaker 5>Germany was the chief support and protection of reaction, end quote.

0:22:58.330 --> 0:23:02.619
<v Speaker 5>For many anarchists, and even Leon Trotsky, this seemed a

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.619
<v Speaker 5>clear break from Kropotkin's anarchism, which would be in opposition

0:23:06.780 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 5>to alignment with nation-state-based struggles. However, as noted by historian

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.460
<v Speaker 5>George Woodcock in Peter Kropotkin, From Prince to Rebel, quote,

0:23:15.830 --> 0:23:20.109
<v Speaker 5>anti-German sentiment was probably an influence on Kropotkin long before

0:23:20.150 --> 0:23:23.129
<v Speaker 5>this point, as it was a current in Russian revolutionary

0:23:23.170 --> 0:23:26.470
<v Speaker 5>movements due to the German rule by the Romanov dynasty.

0:23:27.070 --> 0:23:30.310
<v Speaker 5>and perhaps also because his fellow Russian anarchist Mikhail Bakunin

0:23:30.890 --> 0:23:35.220
<v Speaker 5>had an infamous rivalry with the German Karl Marx. End quote.

0:23:35.900 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 5>Though of course, you know, this is speculation. Kropotkin and

0:23:39.660 --> 0:23:42.899
<v Speaker 5>Malatesta were both in Britain when their exchange of letters

0:23:42.940 --> 0:23:47.220
<v Speaker 5>took place. Malatesta wrote in his article, Anarchists Have Forgotten

0:23:47.270 --> 0:23:50.690
<v Speaker 5>Their Principles, that the only war worth fighting was one

0:23:50.790 --> 0:23:54.450
<v Speaker 5>of liberation, and there was no siding with national agglomerations.

0:23:55.130 --> 0:24:28.209
<v Speaker 5>He said, quote, End quote. Now, Kropotkin had previously argued

0:24:28.270 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 5>that modern wars were fundamentally driven by capitalist competition for markets, resources,

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 5>and opportunities to exploit less industrialized nations. He pointed to

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.719
<v Speaker 5>the imperial conquests and colonial conflicts of his time as

0:24:41.820 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 5>evidence that financiers and economic interests, rather than ordinary people,

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 5>were the true beneficiaries of war. And while he saw

0:24:49.859 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 5>capitalism as the primary engine of modern militarism, he also

0:24:54.580 --> 0:24:58.939
<v Speaker 5>condemned the state as the political institution that organized and

0:24:59.060 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 5>carried out these conflicts. So it was odd for Kropotkin

0:25:04.340 --> 0:25:07.939
<v Speaker 5>to seemingly come out the contrary of his previous positions,

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.590
<v Speaker 5>and take one state's side over another when he had

0:25:11.650 --> 0:25:16.830
<v Speaker 5>seen through such sides before. But, of course, people and

0:25:16.850 --> 0:25:21.970
<v Speaker 5>their motivations are more complex. Kropotkin had sympathy for France

0:25:22.210 --> 0:25:26.460
<v Speaker 5>and hostility toward Germany. He saw France as the heir

0:25:26.510 --> 0:25:30.190
<v Speaker 5>to the revolutionary tradition of 1789 and the Paris Commune,

0:25:30.710 --> 0:25:34.950
<v Speaker 5>and he saw Germany as the embodiment of militarism and authoritarianism.

0:25:35.670 --> 0:25:38.149
<v Speaker 5>He believed the war was a poor moment for social

0:25:38.190 --> 0:25:41.689
<v Speaker 5>revolution and feared that a German victory would usher in

0:25:41.810 --> 0:25:46.429
<v Speaker 5>decades of political reaction, wiping out the hard-won freedoms that

0:25:46.450 --> 0:25:50.609
<v Speaker 5>had been achieved in countries like Britain and France. His

0:25:50.650 --> 0:25:53.790
<v Speaker 5>support for the Allies was rooted in his broader view

0:25:53.869 --> 0:25:57.660
<v Speaker 5>of history, that social progress was never guaranteed and could

0:25:57.810 --> 0:26:02.150
<v Speaker 5>always be reversed, that periods of freedom and cooperation could

0:26:02.190 --> 0:26:07.070
<v Speaker 5>collapse into authoritarianism. He also believed that national liberation struggles

0:26:07.109 --> 0:26:11.290
<v Speaker 5>were a space ripe for anarchist social insertion and radicalization,

0:26:11.310 --> 0:26:15.700
<v Speaker 5>and that in times of war, an anti-militarist general strike

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 5>within the targeted nation would simply gift the country to

0:26:19.500 --> 0:26:23.930
<v Speaker 5>its invaders, and that anti-militarists advocating such actions were thus

0:26:24.170 --> 0:26:28.210
<v Speaker 5>siding with the invaders and making social revolution more difficult

0:26:28.250 --> 0:26:31.300
<v Speaker 5>to carry out in the future. This is, for me,

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:37.860
<v Speaker 5>a somewhat compelling argument. I feel this way about current struggle.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 5>While the worker has no friend in the states of

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.530
<v Speaker 5>the world, and I don't think it should be framed

0:26:43.650 --> 0:26:46.790
<v Speaker 5>as a matter of campism the way we see running

0:26:46.830 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 5>rampant today, It is undeniable that there are some victories

0:26:51.060 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 5>and defeats that will be more or less preferable to

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:57.310
<v Speaker 5>the viability of the struggle long term. I am rooting

0:26:57.490 --> 0:27:01.830
<v Speaker 5>against an Israeli victory anywhere. And while I reserve my

0:27:01.890 --> 0:27:05.429
<v Speaker 5>right to criticize the politics, ideologies, and other actions of

0:27:05.470 --> 0:27:09.150
<v Speaker 5>the groups carrying out that resistance, it remains true that

0:27:09.260 --> 0:27:11.699
<v Speaker 5>the defeat of the oppressors can open up the space

0:27:11.820 --> 0:27:15.970
<v Speaker 5>for further struggles. If it was that anarchists were arguing

0:27:16.130 --> 0:27:20.180
<v Speaker 5>and acting solely for anti-militarism in the targeted countries, then

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.900
<v Speaker 5>I would be fully with Kropotkin, you know, I would

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.380
<v Speaker 5>get where he's coming from, we would indeed have a problem.

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.820
<v Speaker 5>But I think he mischaracterized the anarchist position, or perhaps

0:27:30.900 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 5>did not give them enough credit. As for the anarchists,

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:39.230
<v Speaker 5>primary responsibility for anti-militarist ends is in agitating within the

0:27:39.330 --> 0:27:43.810
<v Speaker 5>invader countries themselves. to disrupt the militarism within the threatening

0:27:43.830 --> 0:27:47.780
<v Speaker 5>nations to the bitter end. Anything less would be an

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 5>incomplete and flaccid anti-militarist struggle. Kropotkin addresses this in the

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:57.350
<v Speaker 5>Manifesto of the Sixteen, which we'll get to shortly. And yet,

0:27:57.770 --> 0:28:01.629
<v Speaker 5>with the context of hindsight, I share Malatesta's criticism of

0:28:01.670 --> 0:28:06.030
<v Speaker 5>the pitfalls of lesser evilism as he kinda predicted World

0:28:06.050 --> 0:28:10.970
<v Speaker 5>War II. Adam wrote of Malatesta's position, quote, German victory

0:28:11.250 --> 0:28:14.340
<v Speaker 5>would certainly mean the triumph of militarism, but the triumph

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 5>of the Allies would result in much the same. Both

0:28:17.100 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 5>guaranteed the victory of the state principle. With statism delivered

0:28:20.980 --> 0:28:23.940
<v Speaker 5>in both cases, and the tensions that caused the war

0:28:23.980 --> 0:28:29.770
<v Speaker 5>remaining unresolved, Malatesta perspicaciously warned that with both sides exhausted,

0:28:30.310 --> 0:28:32.770
<v Speaker 5>some kind of peace would be patched up, leaving all

0:28:32.830 --> 0:28:36.590
<v Speaker 5>questions open, thus preparing for a new war more murderous

0:28:36.650 --> 0:28:52.750
<v Speaker 5>than the present. End quote. In 1915, Malatesta, along with

0:28:52.770 --> 0:28:57.750
<v Speaker 5>Emma Goldman, Alexander Berkman, and 32 other signatories, co-signed a

0:28:57.790 --> 0:29:02.450
<v Speaker 5>manifesto titled The Anarchist International and the War, otherwise known

0:29:02.490 --> 0:29:05.650
<v Speaker 5>as the International Anarchist Manifesto on the War, Manifesto of

0:29:05.670 --> 0:29:07.729
<v Speaker 5>the 35, and Anti-War Manifesto. In this text, Malatesta, along

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.750
<v Speaker 5>with Emma Goldman, and 32 other signatories, the anarchists call

0:29:10.810 --> 0:29:13.930
<v Speaker 5>out the ridiculous notion that any side of this clash

0:29:13.970 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 5>of civilizations had claim to righteousness, freedom, or civilization. Quote,

0:29:19.300 --> 0:29:22.500
<v Speaker 5>In the current conflict, the governments in Berlin and Vienna

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 5>have justified themselves by producing documents every bit as authentic

0:29:26.660 --> 0:29:30.300
<v Speaker 5>as those produced by the governments in Paris, London, and Petrograd.

0:29:30.780 --> 0:29:33.050
<v Speaker 5>It is for whoever on each side who will produce

0:29:33.090 --> 0:29:38.190
<v Speaker 5>the most unchallengeable, most telling documentation to prove their bona fides.

0:29:38.610 --> 0:29:41.820
<v Speaker 5>and portray themselves as the unblemished defender of the right

0:29:42.180 --> 0:29:47.830
<v Speaker 5>and of freedom, the champion of civilization. Civilization? Who stands

0:29:47.870 --> 0:29:50.310
<v Speaker 5>for that at the moment? Is it the German state

0:29:50.330 --> 0:29:53.970
<v Speaker 5>with its redoubtable militarism, so powerful that it has stifled

0:29:54.070 --> 0:29:57.550
<v Speaker 5>every vestige of rebellion? Or the Russian state, whose only

0:29:57.610 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 5>methods of persuasion are the nowt, the Gibbet, and Siberia.

0:30:01.660 --> 0:30:07.530
<v Speaker 5>Or the French state, with Espiribi, its bloody conquests in Tonkin, Madagascar, Morocco,

0:30:07.850 --> 0:30:11.410
<v Speaker 5>and forcible conscription of black troops. The France whose prisons

0:30:11.430 --> 0:30:15.050
<v Speaker 5>have housed, for years past, comrades whose only crime was

0:30:15.090 --> 0:30:18.510
<v Speaker 5>to have written and spoken out against the war. Or England,

0:30:18.770 --> 0:30:22.290
<v Speaker 5>as she exploits, divides, starves, and oppresses the peoples of

0:30:22.350 --> 0:30:26.610
<v Speaker 5>her huge colonial empire. No, none of the belligerents has

0:30:26.770 --> 0:30:29.940
<v Speaker 5>any right to lay claim to civilisation. just as none

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.860
<v Speaker 5>of them is entitled to claim legitimate self-defense. The truth

0:30:33.980 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 5>is that the root of wars, of the war currently

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 5>bloody in the plains of Europe, just like all the

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.900
<v Speaker 5>ones that went before it, is located exclusively in the

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 5>existence of the state, which is the political form of privilege.

0:30:47.060 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 5>The state is born of military might, it has grown

0:30:49.740 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 5>through recourse to military might, and logically, it is upon

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:55.500
<v Speaker 5>military might that it must rely if it is to

0:30:55.540 --> 0:30:59.990
<v Speaker 5>retain its omnipotence. Whatever the form it may assume, the

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.900
<v Speaker 5>state is merely oppression organized for the benefit of a

0:31:03.940 --> 0:31:08.460
<v Speaker 5>privileged minority. The present conflict offers a striking illustration of this.

0:31:09.140 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 5>All forms of the state are embroiled in the present war.

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:17.450
<v Speaker 5>Absolutism is represented by Russia, absolutism mitigated by parliamentarism and

0:31:17.470 --> 0:31:21.430
<v Speaker 5>by Germany, a state ruling over very different peoples by Austria,

0:31:22.050 --> 0:31:27.310
<v Speaker 5>constitutional democracy by England, and the democratic republican system by France.

0:31:28.220 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 5>End quote. Malatesta rejected the idea that anarchists should support

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 5>one state over another because it was supposedly the lesser evil.

0:31:37.140 --> 0:31:40.870
<v Speaker 5>Doing so, he argued, placed the struggles of some workers

0:31:41.030 --> 0:31:45.450
<v Speaker 5>above those of others and abandoned international working class solidarity.

0:31:45.990 --> 0:31:49.410
<v Speaker 5>While he accepted that anti-colonial wars and social revolutions could

0:31:49.450 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 5>be justified, he maintained that anarchists should oppose wars between

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:57.870
<v Speaker 5>rival capitalist and imperialist states. refusing to become complicit in

0:31:57.910 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 5>their violence and exploitation. Later, in the brief manifesto, No

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 5>matter where they may find themselves, the anarchists' role in

0:32:07.380 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 5>the current tragedy is to carry on proclaiming that there

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 5>is but one war of liberation, the one waged in

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 5>every country by the oppressed against the oppressor, by the

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.010
<v Speaker 5>exploited against the exploiter. Our task is to summon the

0:32:21.050 --> 0:32:25.820
<v Speaker 5>slaves to revolt against their masters. Anarchist propaganda and anarchist

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 5>action should set about doggedly undermining and breaking up the

0:32:29.700 --> 0:32:33.660
<v Speaker 5>various states, cultivating the spirit of rebellion, and acting as

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.980
<v Speaker 5>midwife to the discontent in the peoples and in the armies.

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 5>End quote. Going on to describe how anarchists might convince

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 5>the soldiers, the factory workers, the peasants, the outcasts, the women,

0:32:45.420 --> 0:32:50.700
<v Speaker 5>and to quote, capitalize upon every stirring of rebellion, every discontent,

0:32:51.070 --> 0:32:54.380
<v Speaker 5>in order to foment insurrection. to organize the revolution to

0:32:54.420 --> 0:32:57.719
<v Speaker 5>which we look for the ending of all of society's iniquities.

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.610
<v Speaker 5>End quote. Powerful words. Yeah. And indeed in line with

0:33:02.630 --> 0:33:07.469
<v Speaker 5>what anarchists had long proclaimed. But Kropotkin, and Kropotkin was

0:33:07.530 --> 0:33:10.910
<v Speaker 5>not alone, mind you, he took a different position on

0:33:10.950 --> 0:33:15.970
<v Speaker 5>the war. He and 14 allies published in 1916 the

0:33:15.990 --> 0:33:19.380
<v Speaker 5>Manifesto of the Sixteen as a reply. It was not

0:33:19.380 --> 0:33:23.390
<v Speaker 5>16 of them who signed that manifesto, it was 15.

0:33:23.390 --> 0:33:26.140
<v Speaker 5>He just got called the Manifesto of the Sixteen because

0:33:26.220 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 5>the home address of one of the contributors was mistaken

0:33:29.580 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 5>for another contributor.

0:33:32.500 --> 0:33:34.540
<v Speaker 4>Incredible stuff.

0:33:36.350 --> 0:33:38.330
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and so that's what I was knowing today. But

0:33:39.010 --> 0:33:42.190
<v Speaker 5>it's like he was living in some town in Algeria,

0:33:42.450 --> 0:33:44.590
<v Speaker 5>I believe, and they thought the name of the town

0:33:44.630 --> 0:33:48.390
<v Speaker 5>was a person's name. Oh my God. Publishing mistakes are

0:33:48.410 --> 0:33:52.260
<v Speaker 5>tailors all this time. In the Manifesto of the Sixteen,

0:33:52.730 --> 0:33:56.530
<v Speaker 5>Kropotkin and the other signatories reaffirmed their opposition to militarism

0:33:56.710 --> 0:33:59.990
<v Speaker 5>and wars of conquest, but argued that peace could not

0:34:00.170 --> 0:34:03.990
<v Speaker 5>simply be declared while Germany continued its invasion and expansion.

0:34:04.620 --> 0:34:07.500
<v Speaker 5>They contended that German workers had failed to resist their

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:13.420
<v Speaker 5>own government's imperial ambitions, leaving no meaningful internal opposition to militarism.

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.900
<v Speaker 5>Although they maintained their commitment to internationalism and the eventual

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:22.110
<v Speaker 5>abolition of borders... they concluded that the defeat of German

0:34:22.150 --> 0:34:26.870
<v Speaker 5>militarism was a necessary precondition for a just and lasting peace,

0:34:27.650 --> 0:34:31.270
<v Speaker 5>believing it would ultimately benefit both the German people and

0:34:31.310 --> 0:34:35.739
<v Speaker 5>the cause of human liberation. So, I get where Kropotkin

0:34:35.780 --> 0:34:38.580
<v Speaker 5>is coming from too, as I see parallels to the

0:34:38.620 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 5>situation today vis-a-vis American imperialism and the flawed actors that

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:48.250
<v Speaker 5>resist it. Even though I generally share Malatesta's sentiments, and

0:34:48.489 --> 0:34:51.930
<v Speaker 5>Malatesta was ultimately correct in his assessment that maintaining a

0:34:51.989 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 5>consistent stance is necessary for the clarity of the movement,

0:34:56.540 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 5>and also that this war's outcome would be nothing but

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.300
<v Speaker 5>a precursor to a further war and would not advance

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 5>the class struggle and in fact worsen its conditions. All

0:35:04.660 --> 0:35:07.819
<v Speaker 5>that being said, I think there's room for a more

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:13.629
<v Speaker 5>sympathetic appraisal of Kropotkin's position. As for responses and just

0:35:13.670 --> 0:35:17.540
<v Speaker 5>the overall outcome of this rift, For one, the Bolshevik

0:35:17.580 --> 0:35:21.299
<v Speaker 5>party had something to say. Lenin condemned the supporters of

0:35:21.340 --> 0:35:27.870
<v Speaker 5>World War I as anarcho-chauvinists. Stalin and Trotsky dismissed Kropotkin's

0:35:27.930 --> 0:35:32.350
<v Speaker 5>pro-war stance as evidence of anarchism's failure, despite the fact

0:35:32.390 --> 0:35:35.250
<v Speaker 5>that the majority of the anarchist movement remained opposed to

0:35:35.290 --> 0:35:38.930
<v Speaker 5>the Great War. Malatesta, responding to the Manifesto of the

0:35:38.969 --> 0:35:43.770
<v Speaker 5>Sixteen with his article Pro-Government Anarchists, accused its signatories of

0:35:43.870 --> 0:35:47.710
<v Speaker 5>abandoning anarchist principles and by siding with states in wartime.

0:35:48.350 --> 0:35:50.509
<v Speaker 5>He also pointed out that in the name of defeating

0:35:50.590 --> 0:35:56.779
<v Speaker 5>German militarism, they had instead strengthened militarism, authoritarianism, and nationalism

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 5>across Europe, including in the countries they were siding with

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:05.930
<v Speaker 5>the governments of. Alexander Bultmann, echoing this criticism, argued that

0:36:05.969 --> 0:36:09.650
<v Speaker 5>Kropotkin had wrongly treated nations as if they were their governments,

0:36:10.170 --> 0:36:13.850
<v Speaker 5>when in reality the war was being driven by ruling elites,

0:36:14.230 --> 0:36:19.029
<v Speaker 5>not ordinary people. Malatesta maintained the position that anarchists should

0:36:19.090 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 5>capitalize on the imperialist war for class war by encouraging

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:27.580
<v Speaker 5>workers to resist their own governments and revive genuine international solidarity.

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:32.980
<v Speaker 5>Although wartime repression made revolutionary activity extremely difficult, he believed

0:36:33.020 --> 0:36:37.020
<v Speaker 5>the crisis created new opportunities for insurrection rather than justification

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.890
<v Speaker 5>for supporting any state. The anarchist movement emerged from the

0:36:40.930 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 5>other side of the Great War Fragmented. some of its

0:36:44.680 --> 0:37:00.910
<v Speaker 5>adherents forever stained by their inconsistency of principle. The war

0:37:01.010 --> 0:37:06.280
<v Speaker 5>forced anarchists to reconsider strategy and revolutionary tactics, and, alongside

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 5>the economic devastation and political instability it unleashed, helped create

0:37:10.739 --> 0:37:16.420
<v Speaker 5>conditions that fueled revolutionary upheavals across Europe, most notably the

0:37:16.460 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 5>Russian Revolution and the wave of labor unrest that followed

0:37:20.180 --> 0:37:23.660
<v Speaker 5>the war. Though the revolution was initially carried out by

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:27.430
<v Speaker 5>a diversity of forces, the Bolsheviks claimed it, and with

0:37:27.450 --> 0:37:30.390
<v Speaker 5>the seeming success of the Marxist model in Russia, it

0:37:31.010 --> 0:37:34.930
<v Speaker 5>appeared anarchism would be on the downturn. Though disillusionment with

0:37:34.969 --> 0:37:38.070
<v Speaker 5>that model would follow, and as many anarchists have highlighted,

0:37:38.670 --> 0:37:41.690
<v Speaker 5>the metrics of success between the respective movements were in

0:37:41.730 --> 0:37:45.230
<v Speaker 5>many ways different, it wasn't all bad news coming after

0:37:45.250 --> 0:37:50.020
<v Speaker 5>the war. The collapse of old regimes inspired experiments in workers' self-governance,

0:37:50.460 --> 0:37:53.780
<v Speaker 5>such as the German Revolution of 1918 and the Bavarian

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 5>Council Republic, where anarchists like Gustav Landauer and Eric Moussam

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 5>sought to build a federation of workers' councils rather than

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:05.989
<v Speaker 5>a new state. Similar anti-authoritarian currents appeared in the Kronstadt

0:38:06.030 --> 0:38:10.750
<v Speaker 5>Rebellion of 1921, where rebels called for free Soviets independent

0:38:10.830 --> 0:38:15.310
<v Speaker 5>of Bolshevik control. Despite the growing dominance of state socialism,

0:38:15.770 --> 0:38:19.460
<v Speaker 5>anarchist ideas continue to shape revolutionary struggles in the aftermath

0:38:19.500 --> 0:38:22.180
<v Speaker 5>of the Great War. Though the war marked a shift

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:25.940
<v Speaker 5>in the movement that some would argue anarchism has never

0:38:26.100 --> 0:38:31.819
<v Speaker 5>fully recovered from, anarchism has persisted, continues to reach people worldwide,

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.310
<v Speaker 5>and has the potential still to intercede in the diversity

0:38:35.410 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 5>of struggles and places today. What is needed is a

0:38:38.860 --> 0:38:43.859
<v Speaker 5>clarity and consistency of principles and analyses across contexts that

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:49.550
<v Speaker 5>can encourage initiative and responsibility and solidarity and revolutionary achievement.

0:38:50.410 --> 0:38:54.910
<v Speaker 5>It's easy, I think, to reduce this story to Kropotkin

0:38:54.950 --> 0:39:00.140
<v Speaker 5>standing alone, betraying anarchism. While ultimately I end up aligning

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:04.180
<v Speaker 5>more with Malatesta's position than Kropotkin's, I do think that

0:39:04.219 --> 0:39:08.300
<v Speaker 5>Kropotkin deserves a bit more credit and he has sometimes

0:39:08.340 --> 0:39:12.460
<v Speaker 5>been afforded in retrospect. While his prejudices played a role,

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:17.060
<v Speaker 5>he did seem to genuinely believe that German militarism posed

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 5>a unique threat to freedom that British, French, and Russian

0:39:20.660 --> 0:39:23.990
<v Speaker 5>powers did not. Whether he was right is another question,

0:39:24.570 --> 0:39:28.010
<v Speaker 5>but I think he was still coming from an anarchist place.

0:39:28.810 --> 0:39:32.420
<v Speaker 5>Coloured as he may have been by his anti-German prejudices.

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 5>I think the whole incident revealed the liveliness of the

0:39:36.420 --> 0:39:41.410
<v Speaker 5>anarchist movement as one that was constantly questioning and adapting

0:39:41.550 --> 0:39:45.489
<v Speaker 5>and conflicting and refining its ideas. Something that I hope

0:39:45.530 --> 0:39:48.430
<v Speaker 5>that we will be willing to carry on today. But

0:39:48.550 --> 0:39:52.300
<v Speaker 5>what were your thoughts? on this bit of early 20th

0:39:52.340 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 5>century drama alert.

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, I think in a lot of ways,

0:39:58.500 --> 0:40:01.060
<v Speaker 6>this is the anarchist version of a debate that played

0:40:01.140 --> 0:40:06.090
<v Speaker 6>out throughout the entire socialist movement and effectively ended up

0:40:06.110 --> 0:40:09.810
<v Speaker 6>destroying it in the sense that, you know, the logic

0:40:09.850 --> 0:40:14.500
<v Speaker 6>that Kropotkin is operating from to some extent makes sense,

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:16.859
<v Speaker 6>but it's also the logic that was taken by every

0:40:16.950 --> 0:40:19.510
<v Speaker 6>single individual side in the conflict where like the German

0:40:19.530 --> 0:40:22.990
<v Speaker 6>social democratic party, you know, ends up supporting the war

0:40:23.090 --> 0:40:25.710
<v Speaker 6>because they think that if they don't, they're going to

0:40:25.750 --> 0:40:29.210
<v Speaker 6>be sort of like annihilated by the reactionary forces.

0:40:28.870 --> 0:40:29.690
<v Speaker 4>Of the czar.

0:40:29.989 --> 0:40:32.410
<v Speaker 6>And, but then like the French think they're going to

0:40:32.450 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 6>be destroyed by the reactionary forces of the Germans and

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:39.660
<v Speaker 6>so on and so forth. And so everyone ends up

0:40:39.900 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 6>operating from this logic of like, It's going to be

0:40:43.260 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 6>really bad for us if the other side of this

0:40:45.540 --> 0:40:51.240
<v Speaker 6>wins this war. And it ends up squandering this moment

0:40:51.300 --> 0:40:54.550
<v Speaker 6>of possibility. And instead, everyone just gets sort of fed

0:40:54.570 --> 0:40:58.530
<v Speaker 6>into the meat grinder. And I think the struggle playing

0:40:58.690 --> 0:41:02.630
<v Speaker 6>out this way was effectively the worst possible thing that

0:41:02.670 --> 0:41:06.130
<v Speaker 6>could have happened. Because it meant that some of the

0:41:06.190 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 6>only people who were left resisting it were people who

0:41:09.700 --> 0:41:13.790
<v Speaker 6>shouldn't be running a dog kennel, much less, you know, like,

0:41:13.910 --> 0:41:16.930
<v Speaker 6>controlling the fate of the socialist movement. And also it

0:41:16.969 --> 0:41:19.850
<v Speaker 6>meant that the war was allowed to continue. And so

0:41:20.030 --> 0:41:22.770
<v Speaker 6>I think from a theoretical perspective, it's like, it makes

0:41:22.910 --> 0:41:27.750
<v Speaker 6>sense why people took the positions that they did, and also, like,

0:41:28.110 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 6>supporting this war was so catastrophically wrong that basically every

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:36.110
<v Speaker 6>subsequent war of the 20th century can be laid upon it.

0:41:37.580 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 5>But, I don't know.

0:41:39.660 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 6>The other thing I'll say about it is it's not

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:44.460
<v Speaker 6>clear to me if Kropotkin acting differently would have changed anything.

0:41:45.300 --> 0:41:50.100
<v Speaker 6>But the sort of general failure of the socialist movement

0:41:50.140 --> 0:41:53.460
<v Speaker 6>to actually grapple with this moment was a sort of

0:41:54.580 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 6>apocalyptic moment in the history of class struggle that we

0:41:58.920 --> 0:41:59.879
<v Speaker 6>have never recovered from.

0:41:59.900 --> 0:42:04.030
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I definitely don't think that the blame for World

0:42:04.090 --> 0:42:06.910
<v Speaker 5>War II and all subsequent wars in the 20th century, which...

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.470
<v Speaker 5>can in some way be connected to that World War I.

0:42:11.580 --> 0:42:13.380
<v Speaker 5>I don't think we should lay the blame on the

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:16.380
<v Speaker 5>feet of Kropotkin or on the anarchist movement or the

0:42:16.420 --> 0:42:17.260
<v Speaker 5>socialist movement.

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:20.500
<v Speaker 5>All we can really do is speculate the what if,

0:42:20.980 --> 0:42:26.270
<v Speaker 5>you know? Yeah. And what if there was a unified front,

0:42:26.290 --> 0:42:29.850
<v Speaker 5>a unified stand across all these countries, a commitment, a

0:42:29.890 --> 0:42:33.770
<v Speaker 5>solid commitment to we will not cooperate with our respective states.

0:42:34.530 --> 0:42:37.770
<v Speaker 5>How might the course of the war turned out differently

0:42:37.850 --> 0:42:40.890
<v Speaker 5>how might history have played out differently i guess we'll

0:42:40.910 --> 0:42:45.930
<v Speaker 5>never know yeah but we are in a position to

0:42:46.070 --> 0:42:49.489
<v Speaker 5>shape the course of history here and now yeah as

0:42:49.530 --> 0:42:51.970
<v Speaker 5>the title of the podcast goes you know it could

0:42:51.989 --> 0:42:56.870
<v Speaker 5>happen here it kind of is happening here by here

0:42:56.930 --> 0:42:59.219
<v Speaker 5>i mean on this planet across the world we are

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:06.009
<v Speaker 5>dealing with wars we are dealing with interstate conflicts diplomatic economic,

0:43:06.950 --> 0:43:12.690
<v Speaker 5>and military. And despite how interconnected we are through the internet,

0:43:13.630 --> 0:43:16.290
<v Speaker 5>it certainly doesn't feel like we've come any closer to

0:43:16.310 --> 0:43:20.810
<v Speaker 5>the kind of international solidarity that the Great War demanded,

0:43:21.469 --> 0:43:25.810
<v Speaker 5>let alone the many wars being raged across the world today.

0:43:25.830 --> 0:43:30.110
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, but even, you know, the bleakness of the past

0:43:30.180 --> 0:43:33.180
<v Speaker 6>and the bleakness of the present does not mean that

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:38.630
<v Speaker 6>the future As I've said before, the definitional quality of

0:43:38.710 --> 0:43:41.819
<v Speaker 6>modernity is that today is not like yesterday. And so

0:43:42.050 --> 0:43:46.500
<v Speaker 6>we don't actually have to live through yet another round

0:43:46.540 --> 0:43:49.240
<v Speaker 6>of imperialist butchery where different parts of the working class

0:43:49.260 --> 0:43:53.340
<v Speaker 6>slaughter each other. We don't have to live in a

0:43:53.700 --> 0:43:58.620
<v Speaker 6>world that's defined by endless status and capitalist war. We

0:43:58.660 --> 0:44:02.290
<v Speaker 6>can build something else. But that's something that is the

0:44:02.330 --> 0:44:06.739
<v Speaker 6>responsibility of not the state, because the state will never

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:10.380
<v Speaker 6>choose to abandon its privilege and abandon its wars. And

0:44:10.420 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 6>it's not up to, you know, capital, because capital will

0:44:14.100 --> 0:44:16.540
<v Speaker 6>also continue fighting its wars. The only people who can do.

0:44:16.500 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 7>It is us.

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:23.190
<v Speaker 5>As usual, all power to all the people. Peace.

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:37.219
<v Speaker 2>Robert Evans here, and this is It Could Happen Here,

0:44:37.300 --> 0:44:39.860
<v Speaker 2>a podcast about our crumbling world and the people making

0:44:39.910 --> 0:44:42.570
<v Speaker 2>it crumble. And a good chunk of those people happen

0:44:42.610 --> 0:44:45.310
<v Speaker 2>to be race scientists, which is why today I'm going

0:44:45.330 --> 0:44:48.109
<v Speaker 2>to be talking about the gang of race scientists who

0:44:48.290 --> 0:44:52.170
<v Speaker 2>went after Jason Arday, the former Cambridge professor who recently

0:44:52.270 --> 0:44:57.029
<v Speaker 2>died by suicide just earlier this year in August of 2026.

0:44:57.030 --> 0:45:00.430
<v Speaker 2>And I came across a very good article about what

0:45:00.530 --> 0:45:03.109
<v Speaker 2>happened to Jason and the people kind of responsible to that.

0:45:03.670 --> 0:45:07.110
<v Speaker 2>by Stephanie Lamy. Stephanie is a researcher, a feminist, and

0:45:07.130 --> 0:45:11.010
<v Speaker 2>an expert in influence operations. She's the former Secretary General

0:45:11.090 --> 0:45:17.589
<v Speaker 2>of Internet Without Borders and the co-founder of DANAIDES.org, which

0:45:17.650 --> 0:45:21.319
<v Speaker 2>develops and deploys technology for civil society organizations operating in

0:45:21.360 --> 0:45:24.940
<v Speaker 2>conflict and crisis environments. She's a PhD candidate in political

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:28.390
<v Speaker 2>sociology and And she wrote this really, really good article

0:45:28.430 --> 0:45:30.950
<v Speaker 2>that was published initially on the Club de Media part,

0:45:31.110 --> 0:45:35.259
<v Speaker 2>which is a French journalism blog, effectively. And she published

0:45:35.300 --> 0:45:38.020
<v Speaker 2>also a really good translation of it. And I enjoyed

0:45:38.060 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 2>it very much. I thought it was really valuable. So

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:42.900
<v Speaker 2>I reached out to Stephanie and asked if we could

0:45:42.940 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 2>pay to host the audio version of her investigation. And

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 2>she agreed. So I'm going to be reading it. She

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:50.819
<v Speaker 2>wanted me to do that. But I want to make

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 2>it clear, none of this is my work. And I

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 2>don't say that to, you know, defray any sort of

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:58.790
<v Speaker 2>responsibility or whatever. This is much better work than I

0:45:58.830 --> 0:46:00.770
<v Speaker 2>could have done on the same subject, and I'm really

0:46:00.810 --> 0:46:03.529
<v Speaker 2>proud to be able to host Stephanie's article. Before I

0:46:03.570 --> 0:46:05.129
<v Speaker 2>get into her article, I do want to note that

0:46:05.170 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 2>she is the author of two books, Ogura Toxica, Uncivil

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Society in the Internet Age, which is about how anti-democratic

0:46:11.300 --> 0:46:14.460
<v Speaker 2>actors use influence operations and digital platforms to mobilize and

0:46:14.500 --> 0:46:19.540
<v Speaker 2>undermine democratic societies. and La Terreur Masculiniste in 2024, an

0:46:19.580 --> 0:46:23.410
<v Speaker 2>investigation into masculinist radical milieus, their ideologies, networks, and the

0:46:23.469 --> 0:46:26.130
<v Speaker 2>use of violence as a political strategy. Both are published

0:46:26.190 --> 0:46:29.870
<v Speaker 2>by Editions du Deux Tours. I think, unfortunately, they're, I mean,

0:46:30.130 --> 0:46:32.250
<v Speaker 2>unless you speak French, then it's very fortunate, but they

0:46:32.469 --> 0:46:35.910
<v Speaker 2>are in French. Obviously, I'm going to be reading Stephanie's

0:46:35.930 --> 0:46:39.029
<v Speaker 2>article in English. And here it goes. The Hunt for

0:46:39.070 --> 0:46:44.270
<v Speaker 2>Jason Arday. Race science is a pseudoscience that feeds far-right propaganda.

0:46:44.650 --> 0:46:47.210
<v Speaker 2>Long relegated to the margins, it is gaining traction in

0:46:47.290 --> 0:46:50.850
<v Speaker 2>universities and seeks to establish its proponents as arbiters of knowledge.

0:46:51.370 --> 0:46:53.529
<v Speaker 2>The hunt that led to Jason Arday's death reveals how

0:46:53.570 --> 0:46:57.750
<v Speaker 2>this machinery of epistemic domination operates and who helps normalize it.

0:46:58.410 --> 0:47:01.490
<v Speaker 2>From day one, everything pointed to the fact that Jason Arday,

0:47:01.630 --> 0:47:04.850
<v Speaker 2>the black neurodivergent Cambridge professor who died in August of 2026,

0:47:04.850 --> 0:47:09.110
<v Speaker 2>was being subjected to racist and ableist harassment. exactly the

0:47:09.130 --> 0:47:12.029
<v Speaker 2>kind of targeting he himself had described. Arte had been

0:47:12.090 --> 0:47:15.210
<v Speaker 2>marked as quarry long before the fatal media pile-on. An

0:47:15.330 --> 0:47:19.339
<v Speaker 2>open and immensely well-funded race science international network enabled its

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:22.500
<v Speaker 2>hunters to unleash the pack, to give the pursuit scale, reach,

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:25.280
<v Speaker 2>and political unity. But to break out of the margins

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:27.879
<v Speaker 2>of race science, the chase had to become something else.

0:47:28.219 --> 0:47:31.190
<v Speaker 2>Its extremist ideology needed to be laundered into a story

0:47:31.230 --> 0:47:35.340
<v Speaker 2>about scientific and journalistic integrity. The media had ample evidence

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:38.690
<v Speaker 2>to challenge the frame imposed on them by the eugenicists. Instead,

0:47:38.790 --> 0:47:41.649
<v Speaker 2>they adopted it, running with the hounds, and in doing so,

0:47:41.969 --> 0:47:45.690
<v Speaker 2>legitimized both the aims and the epistemic authority of race scientists.

0:47:46.650 --> 0:47:50.580
<v Speaker 2>Marking the Quarry The hunt for Professor Jason Arday began quietly,

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:53.360
<v Speaker 2>three years earlier, couched in the civilized nodes of a

0:47:53.420 --> 0:47:58.029
<v Speaker 2>scholarly society, a professor who was merely asking questions. In

0:47:58.070 --> 0:48:01.469
<v Speaker 2>May of 2023, Dave Harris, a retired white academic and

0:48:01.510 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 2>professor emeritus at Plymouth Marjon University, began examining Arday's publications.

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Arday's appointment as professor of sociology and education at Cambridge

0:48:10.300 --> 0:48:13.290
<v Speaker 2>had made national news. At 37, he was the youngest

0:48:13.350 --> 0:48:16.610
<v Speaker 2>black professor in the university's history. From the moment he

0:48:16.650 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 2>arrived at Cambridge, our day was targeted by freedom of

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 2>information requests. In the United States, Christian nationalist organizations opposed

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 2>to teaching and researching drawing on critical race theory, CRT,

0:48:27.660 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 2>which examines, among other things, how racism is reproduced through

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:34.299
<v Speaker 2>law and institutions, were already explicitly encouraging their supporters to

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:37.650
<v Speaker 2>use public records procedures to target academics and then identify

0:48:37.930 --> 0:48:41.830
<v Speaker 2>or manufacture misconduct. Such smear campaigns are now part of

0:48:41.850 --> 0:48:46.270
<v Speaker 2>the academic far-right's repertoire. aimed particularly at researchers who examine

0:48:46.310 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 2>power relations, but also at those whose very presence, whose

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:53.280
<v Speaker 2>perceived identity, appears to embody the gains of diversity, equity,

0:48:53.380 --> 0:48:57.980
<v Speaker 2>and inclusion policies. The largely covert campaign against Black scholars

0:48:58.060 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 2>also surfaced in 2023, when the work of Claudine Gay,

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:04.330
<v Speaker 2>Harvard's first Black president, came under heightened scrutiny against a

0:49:04.370 --> 0:49:08.110
<v Speaker 2>backdrop of misogynoir. Christopher Ruffo, a senior fellow at the

0:49:08.130 --> 0:49:11.370
<v Speaker 2>Manhattan Institute and former visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation,

0:49:11.650 --> 0:49:15.239
<v Speaker 2>both Christian nationalist organizations, is one of the principal architects

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:19.069
<v Speaker 2>of the American campaigns against CRT and DEI. He helped

0:49:19.170 --> 0:49:22.440
<v Speaker 2>turn the plagiarism allegations against gay into a broader political

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:27.760
<v Speaker 2>offensive against minority representation in American institutions. What connects Rufo

0:49:27.820 --> 0:49:29.859
<v Speaker 2>to what would later come for ARDE is not only

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:33.980
<v Speaker 2>the method, but also the network. Rufo has repeatedly promoted

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 2>race-science-focused online magazine, Aporia, and appeared on its podcast in 2023.

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:43.140
<v Speaker 2>Research by the anti-fascist organization Hope Not Hate identifies Emporia

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:47.100
<v Speaker 2>as the public-facing arm of the Human Diversity Foundation, or HDF,

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:51.230
<v Speaker 2>a Wyoming-registered company created as the successor to the Pioneer Fund,

0:49:51.510 --> 0:49:56.450
<v Speaker 2>the American eugenics organization established in 1937. Byline Times reports

0:49:56.469 --> 0:50:00.069
<v Speaker 2>that Rufo and HDF also shared a funder. Tech entrepreneur

0:50:00.210 --> 0:50:04.799
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Conru invested $ 1. 3 million in HDF, while his foundation

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 2>gave $ 25, 000 to Rufo's documentary foundation in 2021. Aporia repeatedly

0:50:10.620 --> 0:50:14.180
<v Speaker 2>provided a platform for Nathan Kofnes, the race science researcher

0:50:14.219 --> 0:50:16.299
<v Speaker 2>who would later propel the allegations against R &amp; A

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 2>to a mass audience. HDF co-founder Emile Kierkegaard had met

0:50:20.219 --> 0:50:24.180
<v Speaker 2>Peter Thiel in 2019. According to Kierkegaard's own account, Thiel

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:28.830
<v Speaker 2>subsequently asked him to recommend other researchers. Kierkegaard named Kofnes

0:50:28.950 --> 0:50:32.190
<v Speaker 2>and Noah Carl, Aporia's editor. Both have been run out

0:50:32.210 --> 0:50:36.009
<v Speaker 2>of Cambridge for their mediocre work and overt racism. This

0:50:36.070 --> 0:50:40.370
<v Speaker 2>network also overlaps directly with Britain's Free Speech Union, FSU,

0:50:40.710 --> 0:50:44.610
<v Speaker 2>founded by Spectator magazine associate Toby Young, who has himself

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:49.150
<v Speaker 2>advocated what he called progressive eugenics. Aporia's Noah Karl is

0:50:49.190 --> 0:50:53.649
<v Speaker 2>the co-director of Skeptics LTD, the publishing company controlled by Young,

0:50:53.969 --> 0:50:58.420
<v Speaker 2>while Aporia contributor Eric Kaufman sits on the FSU's advisory council.

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:02.299
<v Speaker 2>The funding of race science by Christian nationalist and extractive

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:06.940
<v Speaker 2>industry billionaires, including surveillance capitalism, serves a political function. As

0:51:06.980 --> 0:51:11.609
<v Speaker 2>historian of neoliberalism Quinn Slobodian shows in Hayek's Bastards, racialist

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:14.450
<v Speaker 2>theories and the obsession with IQ make it possible to

0:51:14.550 --> 0:51:18.630
<v Speaker 2>naturalize inequality. Social hierarchies are no longer presented as the

0:51:18.670 --> 0:51:21.950
<v Speaker 2>product of power relations, but as the expression of supposedly

0:51:22.010 --> 0:51:27.150
<v Speaker 2>objective biological differences that are hereditary. In largely secular societies,

0:51:27.450 --> 0:51:30.890
<v Speaker 2>race science therefore provides Christian nationalists with a substitute for

0:51:30.910 --> 0:51:35.180
<v Speaker 2>the authority religion no longer commands. It also provides intelligence-obsessed

0:51:35.360 --> 0:51:39.020
<v Speaker 2>techno-masculinists with a scientific veneer for the hierarchies they seek

0:51:39.100 --> 0:51:43.260
<v Speaker 2>to uphold or even reinforce. The day Claudine Gay resigned

0:51:43.300 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 2>as Harvard president, Rufo announced an initial $ 10, 000 fund for

0:51:47.360 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 2>plagiarism hunting at elite universities, explicitly tying the bounty hunt

0:51:51.700 --> 0:51:55.180
<v Speaker 2>to his campaign to defeat what he called racialist ideology.

0:51:55.950 --> 0:52:00.129
<v Speaker 2>Plagiarism hunting reconfigures legitimacy. Promoters of the junk science, that

0:52:00.190 --> 0:52:04.030
<v Speaker 2>is race science, reposition themselves as arbiters of scientific integrity,

0:52:04.350 --> 0:52:06.930
<v Speaker 2>from which position they can disqualify those who expose the

0:52:06.989 --> 0:52:11.469
<v Speaker 2>cultural foundations of systems of power. By June 2024, Black

0:52:11.530 --> 0:52:15.330
<v Speaker 2>academics were describing the climate in their universities as... open season.

0:52:16.969 --> 0:52:20.710
<v Speaker 2>The pursuit. So, against this backdrop of racist attacks on

0:52:20.790 --> 0:52:24.800
<v Speaker 2>scholars at elite universities, on the 4th of May, 2023,

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:28.700
<v Speaker 2>Arday received his first email from Dave Harris. Harris challenged

0:52:28.739 --> 0:52:32.240
<v Speaker 2>his public work. When Arday did not reply, Harris wrote again.

0:52:32.580 --> 0:52:35.990
<v Speaker 2>On the 11th of May, Arday eventually responded, accusing Harris

0:52:36.010 --> 0:52:39.050
<v Speaker 2>of spending hours combing through his work looking for mistakes

0:52:39.070 --> 0:52:41.790
<v Speaker 2>and He told him not to contact him again. Anything

0:52:41.870 --> 0:52:45.169
<v Speaker 2>further from you will be considered bullying and harassment, citing

0:52:45.230 --> 0:52:47.790
<v Speaker 2>a past incident of bullying in which Harris had been involved.

0:52:48.530 --> 0:52:51.970
<v Speaker 2>Harris replied anyway. Arday had explicitly asked him to stop,

0:52:52.010 --> 0:52:55.470
<v Speaker 2>but Harris, willfully oblivious of his own oppressive behavior, treated

0:52:55.510 --> 0:52:59.390
<v Speaker 2>the pursuit of academic standards as an entitlement to continue. Meanwhile,

0:52:59.530 --> 0:53:02.779
<v Speaker 2>across the Atlantic, this very posture was growing. The self-appointed

0:53:02.820 --> 0:53:05.920
<v Speaker 2>investigator of black academics could recast himself as a guardian

0:53:05.940 --> 0:53:10.009
<v Speaker 2>of merit, simply a man of learning, asking questions. With

0:53:10.050 --> 0:53:12.780
<v Speaker 2>no reply to his last email, Harris took his claims

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:17.320
<v Speaker 2>elsewhere and enlisted another retired academic, Martin Hammersley, professor emeritus

0:53:17.340 --> 0:53:20.680
<v Speaker 2>of education and social research at The Open University, who

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:24.020
<v Speaker 2>has a history of wild claims about feminist standpoint theory.

0:53:24.540 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 2>His grievance is what he regards as the influence of

0:53:26.940 --> 0:53:30.410
<v Speaker 2>activist research on the social sciences and the diversity of viewpoints.

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:34.790
<v Speaker 2>On the 19th of May, 2023, Hammersley wrote to Hillary Crimin,

0:53:35.280 --> 0:53:38.420
<v Speaker 2>head of Cambridge's Faculty of Education, and Rhys Morgan, the

0:53:38.480 --> 0:53:41.860
<v Speaker 2>university's head of research policy, governance, and integrity, setting out

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 2>allegations concerning Arday's 2018 paper in social sciences. Kremen then

0:53:46.700 --> 0:53:49.879
<v Speaker 2>met with Arday and the faculty's director of research. Arday

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:52.360
<v Speaker 2>agreed that the article could be temporarily removed from the

0:53:52.410 --> 0:53:55.470
<v Speaker 2>journal's platform while the issues raised were examined. On the

0:53:55.650 --> 0:53:59.250
<v Speaker 2>21st of June, 2023, Kremen told Hammersley that Arday retained

0:53:59.270 --> 0:54:03.020
<v Speaker 2>the faculty's full support. Morgan separately informed him that, because

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:06.380
<v Speaker 2>the work predated Arday's employment at Cambridge, the university did

0:54:06.460 --> 0:54:10.260
<v Speaker 2>not consider an investigation to fall within its remit. Hammersley

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:14.080
<v Speaker 2>escalated the pursuit, rejecting the resolution and demanding a systematic

0:54:14.140 --> 0:54:18.390
<v Speaker 2>investigation of Arday's other publications. Kremen did not respond. The

0:54:18.410 --> 0:54:22.210
<v Speaker 2>chase then spread beyond Cambridge. Harris and Hammersley contacted academic

0:54:22.230 --> 0:54:25.489
<v Speaker 2>journals and Liverpool John Moores University, which had awarded Arday

0:54:25.550 --> 0:54:30.490
<v Speaker 2>his Ph.D., Harris and Hammersley also harried Arday outside university channels.

0:54:30.950 --> 0:54:34.450
<v Speaker 2>As early as 2023, he contacted Jack Grove, a journalist

0:54:34.510 --> 0:54:37.830
<v Speaker 2>at Times Higher Education, drawing his attention to the correction

0:54:37.850 --> 0:54:42.069
<v Speaker 2>to Arday's 2018 paper. Times Higher Education, THE, did not

0:54:42.110 --> 0:54:46.070
<v Speaker 2>investigate the allegations in earnest until June 2025, when another

0:54:46.110 --> 0:54:50.069
<v Speaker 2>professor contacted the publication about Arday's work. Harris then supplied

0:54:50.110 --> 0:54:54.160
<v Speaker 2>material to Grove, whose scrutiny extended far beyond Arday's publications

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:58.150
<v Speaker 2>to his CV, sporting achievements, charitable activities, and personal biography.

0:54:58.590 --> 0:55:02.770
<v Speaker 2>By September, Grove had compiled a 63-page dossier and approached

0:55:02.830 --> 0:55:05.210
<v Speaker 2>Arday for comment not only on his work, but on

0:55:05.250 --> 0:55:09.040
<v Speaker 2>his private life. By all accounts, Arday experienced this as

0:55:09.080 --> 0:55:12.360
<v Speaker 2>a continuation of the harassment he had already identified. The

0:55:12.380 --> 0:55:14.540
<v Speaker 2>man he had asked to stop pursuing him had now

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:18.060
<v Speaker 2>enlisted journalists for the hunt. It's important at this stage

0:55:18.100 --> 0:55:20.750
<v Speaker 2>to understand what the hunt had failed to achieve. After

0:55:20.810 --> 0:55:23.990
<v Speaker 2>years of relentless scrutiny, only two of Jason Narde's 33

0:55:23.989 --> 0:55:27.810
<v Speaker 2>peer-reviewed papers had been challenged. The article in Social Sciences

0:55:27.850 --> 0:55:31.350
<v Speaker 2>was amended in December of 2023, with additional references and

0:55:31.390 --> 0:55:34.680
<v Speaker 2>clarification of its relationship to earlier work. The paper in

0:55:34.719 --> 0:55:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Educational Philosophy and Theory was corrected in May of 2024.

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:43.300
<v Speaker 2>Neither was retracted. By the time THE began its investigation

0:55:43.420 --> 0:55:46.570
<v Speaker 2>in 2025, both matters had been closed. When the allegations

0:55:46.610 --> 0:55:51.020
<v Speaker 2>eventually reached Arday's PhD, Liverpool John Moores University found citation

0:55:51.060 --> 0:55:54.200
<v Speaker 2>defects but cleared him from plagiarism, including that they resulted

0:55:54.239 --> 0:55:58.400
<v Speaker 2>from honest and reasonable error compounded by inadequate supervision related

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:01.900
<v Speaker 2>to his learning disabilities. It's also important to center the

0:56:01.940 --> 0:56:06.340
<v Speaker 2>story here. From Arday's standpoint, and from LJMU's own standards,

0:56:06.640 --> 0:56:10.080
<v Speaker 2>there was no intent to commit academic fraud. Arday, for

0:56:10.120 --> 0:56:12.839
<v Speaker 2>his part, consistently described what was happening to him as

0:56:12.960 --> 0:56:17.940
<v Speaker 2>racist and ableist harassment, not legitimate academic debate. In April

0:56:17.969 --> 0:56:22.250
<v Speaker 2>of 2026, in his British Sociological Association keynote, Wanted Dead

0:56:22.270 --> 0:56:25.489
<v Speaker 2>or Alive, the playbook, he described how black academics were

0:56:25.530 --> 0:56:29.470
<v Speaker 2>being targeted through an identifiable repertoire already deployed against prominent

0:56:29.489 --> 0:56:32.430
<v Speaker 2>scholars in the United States. He explicitly warned that the

0:56:32.469 --> 0:56:35.850
<v Speaker 2>very instruments designed to protect academic integrity were being weaponized

0:56:35.890 --> 0:56:39.080
<v Speaker 2>against them. By then, Arday had already made public the

0:56:39.100 --> 0:56:43.799
<v Speaker 2>very tangible effects of the campaign, racist abuse, threats, and intimidation.

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:47.720
<v Speaker 2>In a July 2025 letter to Jackie Smith, then Minister

0:56:47.739 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 2>for Skills at the UK Department of Education, he reported

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:53.549
<v Speaker 2>a physical assault, death, and rape threats against himself and

0:56:53.590 --> 0:56:56.549
<v Speaker 2>his family, and racist objects and threats sent both through

0:56:56.590 --> 0:56:59.390
<v Speaker 2>Cambridge and to his family home. In his memoir, he

0:56:59.450 --> 0:57:03.580
<v Speaker 2>likewise described targeted campaigns driven by racial animus. In fact,

0:57:03.680 --> 0:57:06.879
<v Speaker 2>the entire media coverage of the plagiarism affair cast Dave

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Harris in the familiar role of the reasonable, concerned academic,

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:15.380
<v Speaker 2>a variation on the concerned parent or concerned citizen routinely

0:57:15.440 --> 0:57:19.140
<v Speaker 2>mobilized to lend the appearance of spontaneous, reasonable concern to

0:57:19.200 --> 0:57:23.650
<v Speaker 2>far-right campaigns against sex education, trans rights, racial equality, and

0:57:23.730 --> 0:57:27.170
<v Speaker 2>public health measures, while Arday became the eccentric young black

0:57:27.210 --> 0:57:31.210
<v Speaker 2>professor resisting legitimate scrutiny. His attempts to protect himself were

0:57:31.230 --> 0:57:35.630
<v Speaker 2>recoded as aggression through the classic mechanism of DARVO, deny, attack,

0:57:35.730 --> 0:57:39.810
<v Speaker 2>and reverse victim and offender, first identified by psychologist Jennifer Freed.

0:57:40.470 --> 0:57:42.810
<v Speaker 2>The reversal drew on the myth of the perfect victim.

0:57:43.210 --> 0:57:47.010
<v Speaker 2>Inaccuracy in Arday's autobiographical narrative, as well as unprovable facts,

0:57:47.050 --> 0:57:49.590
<v Speaker 2>were used to discredit his testimony. If he was not

0:57:49.650 --> 0:57:52.280
<v Speaker 2>beyond reproach, perhaps he was not a victim at all,

0:57:52.530 --> 0:57:55.720
<v Speaker 2>and perhaps his place at Cambridge was itself suspect, and

0:57:55.780 --> 0:57:59.150
<v Speaker 2>maybe he even deserved to be harassed. In a historically

0:57:59.250 --> 0:58:04.010
<v Speaker 2>white and male elite institution, credibility, merit, and belonging became entangled.

0:58:04.490 --> 0:58:07.370
<v Speaker 2>The racist trope of the threatening black man did the rest.

0:58:07.910 --> 0:58:11.470
<v Speaker 2>Arday could be cast simultaneously as aggressor and fraud, while

0:58:11.510 --> 0:58:14.470
<v Speaker 2>those pursuing him became the hapless victims of an interloper

0:58:14.530 --> 0:58:17.400
<v Speaker 2>with something to hide. But for the reversal to take hold,

0:58:17.500 --> 0:58:20.400
<v Speaker 2>it had to be made public. Darvo works by manipulating

0:58:20.440 --> 0:58:23.440
<v Speaker 2>how third parties perceive victim and offender. On the 5th

0:58:23.460 --> 0:58:25.980
<v Speaker 2>of August, as Arday resigned from Cambridge and lost the

0:58:26.040 --> 0:58:29.200
<v Speaker 2>institutional protections that came with his position, the Committee for

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:34.250
<v Speaker 2>Academic Freedom, CAF, an anti-DEI organization, revealed that Arday had

0:58:34.290 --> 0:58:36.530
<v Speaker 2>reported Dave Harris to the police and that the case

0:58:36.550 --> 0:58:40.630
<v Speaker 2>had been closed without further action. CAF's Frederick Attenborough, who

0:58:40.670 --> 0:58:43.770
<v Speaker 2>had previously headed research at the Free Speech Union, FSU,

0:58:44.130 --> 0:58:46.280
<v Speaker 2>framed Arday's report to the police as a threat to

0:58:46.380 --> 0:58:49.680
<v Speaker 2>academic freedom. Also on the 5th of August, Times Higher

0:58:49.720 --> 0:58:53.380
<v Speaker 2>Education helped publicize the same reversal. Jack Grove published his

0:58:53.420 --> 0:58:56.060
<v Speaker 2>account under the headline, I was reported to police over

0:58:56.080 --> 0:58:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the Arday case. I was just doing my job. Arday's

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:01.860
<v Speaker 2>complaint to the police and his instruction of Carter Rook,

0:59:02.160 --> 0:59:05.229
<v Speaker 2>the London firm specializing in media and defamation, were framed

0:59:05.290 --> 0:59:08.710
<v Speaker 2>as attempts to obstruct legitimate journalism, while Arday's attempts to

0:59:08.750 --> 0:59:12.520
<v Speaker 2>protect himself from harassment became threats to press freedom. On

0:59:12.540 --> 0:59:15.380
<v Speaker 2>the 10th of August, the FSU fused the supposed attacks

0:59:15.440 --> 0:59:19.060
<v Speaker 2>on academic and press freedom into a single conspiratorial narrative,

0:59:19.420 --> 0:59:24.010
<v Speaker 2>casting Arday as a powerful censor determined to intimidate his critics. Quote,

0:59:24.270 --> 0:59:27.010
<v Speaker 2>in a desperate bid to avoid scrutiny, Professor Arday tried

0:59:27.030 --> 0:59:29.810
<v Speaker 2>to use the police to silence a journalist and an academic.

0:59:30.860 --> 0:59:33.880
<v Speaker 2>This threat frame survived Arday's death on the 14th of August.

0:59:34.060 --> 0:59:37.450
<v Speaker 2>That same day, THE published an opinion piece by Ian Pace,

0:59:37.670 --> 0:59:41.430
<v Speaker 2>an advisory board member of Academics for Academic Freedom, AFAF,

0:59:41.690 --> 0:59:46.450
<v Speaker 2>who campaigns on institutional neutrality and academic free speech alongside

0:59:46.490 --> 0:59:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Cambridge professor and Reform UK head of policy, James Orr.

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:53.720
<v Speaker 2>As Byline Times has documented, Orr himself is a keynote

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:57.020
<v Speaker 2>in the same network. Peter Thiel made a secret five-figure

0:59:57.060 --> 1:00:00.260
<v Speaker 2>donation to Cambridge through Orr around the time of his appointment.

1:00:00.650 --> 1:00:03.870
<v Speaker 2>while Orr later helped bring the race science publication Aporia

1:00:03.970 --> 1:00:07.990
<v Speaker 2>into organized national conservative politics. Pace argued that the Arday

1:00:08.030 --> 1:00:11.860
<v Speaker 2>affair demonstrated, quote, the danger of treating criticism as injury.

1:00:12.510 --> 1:00:15.780
<v Speaker 2>Three days after Arday's death, THE news editor Tom Williams

1:00:15.900 --> 1:00:18.460
<v Speaker 2>maintained that the journalistic inquiry into the person of Arday

1:00:18.480 --> 1:00:23.600
<v Speaker 2>by Grove was justified. And we'll continue, but first, here's

1:00:23.620 --> 1:00:39.090
<v Speaker 2>some ads. And we're back. The Code of Gentlemanly Conduct.

1:00:39.850 --> 1:00:42.830
<v Speaker 2>The chase had remained largely confined to allegations and rumors

1:00:42.930 --> 1:00:46.190
<v Speaker 2>circulated by Harris and others through academic and journalistic channels.

1:00:46.670 --> 1:00:49.330
<v Speaker 2>The public frenzy began in earnest on the far-right French

1:00:49.370 --> 1:00:52.820
<v Speaker 2>on the 21st of July, 2026, when Nathan Kofnas, the

1:00:52.880 --> 1:00:56.400
<v Speaker 2>race scientist, published allegations based on a dossier he said

1:00:56.420 --> 1:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>he had recently received from an unidentified source inside Cambridge.

1:01:00.220 --> 1:01:03.720
<v Speaker 2>That claim is unverifiable. Three days later, the Telegraph, to

1:01:03.780 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>which Free Speech Union founder and General Secretary Toby Young

1:01:06.580 --> 1:01:10.790
<v Speaker 2>regularly contributes, published an article with the title, Cambridge Diversity

1:01:10.850 --> 1:01:13.950
<v Speaker 2>Poster Boy in Plagiarism Row. The Times and the Daily

1:01:13.990 --> 1:01:16.850
<v Speaker 2>Mail followed that same day with similar articles. By the

1:01:16.990 --> 1:01:19.710
<v Speaker 2>1st of August, The Guardian published its investigation under the

1:01:19.730 --> 1:01:23.560
<v Speaker 2>sensational headline, Plagiarism, Playbooks, and a Pig's Head, the new

1:01:23.600 --> 1:01:27.280
<v Speaker 2>claim surrounding Cambridge professor Jason Arday. The story had become

1:01:27.300 --> 1:01:30.620
<v Speaker 2>a national media affair, still oriented by the race science

1:01:30.660 --> 1:01:34.500
<v Speaker 2>network's framing. Four days after the Guardian piece, Cambridge announced

1:01:34.540 --> 1:01:39.140
<v Speaker 2>a new investigation into Arday's qualifications and career, citing new information.

1:01:39.700 --> 1:01:43.940
<v Speaker 2>Arday resigned later that day, saying that the relentless accusations, speculation,

1:01:43.980 --> 1:01:46.600
<v Speaker 2>and public commentary had taken a profound toll on him

1:01:46.960 --> 1:01:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and those he loved. The scrutiny had to be of Arday,

1:01:50.420 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>not the PAC. The Guardian article subjected Arday's accounts of

1:01:53.740 --> 1:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>racist harassment to minute scrutiny, going so far as to

1:01:56.720 --> 1:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>check some of them with police and witnesses, and finding

1:01:58.980 --> 1:02:02.900
<v Speaker 2>discrepancies in but the three-year pursuit initiated by Harris, the quarry,

1:02:02.960 --> 1:02:06.120
<v Speaker 2>the chase, and the context was entirely absent from the story.

1:02:06.510 --> 1:02:09.370
<v Speaker 2>Harris briefly appears in the article as a concerned academic.

1:02:10.090 --> 1:02:12.930
<v Speaker 2>But Dave Harris's own history should have complicated his portrayal

1:02:12.970 --> 1:02:16.910
<v Speaker 2>as a neutral source. For example, it's publicly available information that,

1:02:17.050 --> 1:02:20.630
<v Speaker 2>in May of 1998, Times Higher Education reported that Harris

1:02:20.650 --> 1:02:23.410
<v Speaker 2>had been dismissed from what is now Plymouth Marion following

1:02:23.470 --> 1:02:27.350
<v Speaker 2>a complaint alleging harassment and bullying. Harris maintained that the

1:02:27.390 --> 1:02:30.250
<v Speaker 2>dispute had begun after he and a colleague raised concerns

1:02:30.270 --> 1:02:34.220
<v Speaker 2>about academic standards, and his union supported his appeal. He

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:37.240
<v Speaker 2>was reinstated the following month, although the re-hearing upheld a

1:02:37.280 --> 1:02:39.820
<v Speaker 2>finding of misconduct and issued him with a formal warning.

1:02:40.410 --> 1:02:42.890
<v Speaker 2>This history should have at least alerted the Guardian to

1:02:42.930 --> 1:02:46.430
<v Speaker 2>a possible recurring pattern of behavior. Although Arday had pitched

1:02:46.490 --> 1:02:49.690
<v Speaker 2>specifically to him, maybe sending the arts and culture editor

1:02:49.730 --> 1:02:52.170
<v Speaker 2>to cover the story was not the appropriate choice to

1:02:52.210 --> 1:02:55.730
<v Speaker 2>cover a far-right propaganda campaign. In a video published after

1:02:55.790 --> 1:03:00.190
<v Speaker 2>Arday's death, Harris lied, saying he had been cleared. Furthermore,

1:03:00.510 --> 1:03:06.550
<v Speaker 2>Times higher education accounts repeatedly confirmed Harris's correspondence was described

1:03:06.650 --> 1:03:10.390
<v Speaker 2>as notably, even excessively, polite, as though civility of tone

1:03:10.450 --> 1:03:15.460
<v Speaker 2>guaranteed disinterestedness of purpose. Times Higher Education's Jack Grove recalled

1:03:15.500 --> 1:03:18.700
<v Speaker 2>his first email in his August 5th account as softly phrased.

1:03:19.160 --> 1:03:22.160
<v Speaker 2>By then, Arda had already asked Harris to stop contacting

1:03:22.200 --> 1:03:24.830
<v Speaker 2>him and reported him to the police. When Times Higher

1:03:24.870 --> 1:03:29.230
<v Speaker 2>Education had resumed its investigation in 2025, Tom Williams similarly

1:03:29.250 --> 1:03:32.900
<v Speaker 2>described the anonymous professor who contacted him as almost apologetic

1:03:33.000 --> 1:03:36.940
<v Speaker 2>about raising his concerns. Politeness became a proxy for trustworthiness,

1:03:37.140 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 2>while the repetition and escalation of approaching THE, the very

1:03:40.360 --> 1:03:44.640
<v Speaker 2>conduct Arday had identified as harassment, disappeared from view. Two

1:03:44.680 --> 1:03:47.160
<v Speaker 2>things can be true at once. A harasser can also

1:03:47.200 --> 1:03:51.430
<v Speaker 2>be perfectly gentlemanly. As race and performance scholars Kyla Wazana-Tomkins

1:03:51.530 --> 1:03:55.350
<v Speaker 2>and Tavia Nyong'o have argued, Civility operates as a covert

1:03:55.390 --> 1:03:59.370
<v Speaker 2>political aesthetic and a rhetorical mode which guards the boundaries

1:03:59.410 --> 1:04:02.930
<v Speaker 2>of access to politicity. It helps determine whose speech and

1:04:02.990 --> 1:04:06.980
<v Speaker 2>conduct are recognized in the first place as legitimate political participation.

1:04:07.460 --> 1:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Harris's softly phrased manner helped make him legible as reasonable, measured, rational,

1:04:12.660 --> 1:04:16.460
<v Speaker 2>and therefore credible, irrespective of the cumulative effect of his conduct.

1:04:17.070 --> 1:04:20.210
<v Speaker 2>The veneer of politeness, combined with other markers of legitimacy,

1:04:20.530 --> 1:04:23.270
<v Speaker 2>a white man, a professor emeritus, a selfless defender of

1:04:23.370 --> 1:04:27.400
<v Speaker 2>academic standards, positioned Harris as an arbiter of scientific integrity

1:04:27.720 --> 1:04:31.560
<v Speaker 2>rather than an object of scrutiny himself. Retraction Watch, a

1:04:31.600 --> 1:04:36.110
<v Speaker 2>specialist publication dedicated to research integrity and misconduct, glaringly failed

1:04:36.150 --> 1:04:39.760
<v Speaker 2>to scrutinize Harris' own track record. In its lengthy investigation

1:04:39.820 --> 1:04:42.940
<v Speaker 2>published on the 27th of July, it detailed Harris' pursuit

1:04:42.980 --> 1:04:46.040
<v Speaker 2>and quoted Arday explicitly asking him to stop, yet did

1:04:46.080 --> 1:04:48.820
<v Speaker 2>not frame that conduct as harassment, nor did it mention

1:04:48.860 --> 1:04:52.200
<v Speaker 2>that Harris had himself previously been dismissed following allegations of

1:04:52.240 --> 1:04:55.100
<v Speaker 2>harassment and bullying in a dispute he said arose from

1:04:55.140 --> 1:04:58.990
<v Speaker 2>concerns about academic standards. Instead, Harris was given space to

1:04:59.030 --> 1:05:02.370
<v Speaker 2>complain that bloody awful work could get through when standards

1:05:02.390 --> 1:05:06.410
<v Speaker 2>were relaxed for special issues devoted to activist issues, like

1:05:06.550 --> 1:05:11.490
<v Speaker 2>racial inequality. Harris's own record received no comparable scrutiny, nor

1:05:11.530 --> 1:05:15.110
<v Speaker 2>was his sustained campaign against critical race theory treated as activism.

1:05:15.860 --> 1:05:19.200
<v Speaker 2>The very man denouncing other people's work as bloody awful

1:05:19.480 --> 1:05:22.120
<v Speaker 2>had himself faced questions about the quality of his research.

1:05:22.540 --> 1:05:26.740
<v Speaker 2>In April of 2025, internal Plymouth Marjan correspondents described publications

1:05:26.800 --> 1:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>produced in the Marjan name as poor quality and often controversial,

1:05:31.320 --> 1:05:35.020
<v Speaker 2>a criticism Harris himself understood to refer to his methodological

1:05:35.080 --> 1:05:38.570
<v Speaker 2>assessments of critical race theory. His resulting critique of CRT

1:05:38.630 --> 1:05:42.230
<v Speaker 2>was self-published in March 2024, rather than published by an

1:05:42.310 --> 1:05:46.250
<v Speaker 2>academic press. The pamphlet attracted just five reviews, including a

1:05:46.270 --> 1:05:50.450
<v Speaker 2>generic endorsement from Martin Hammersley. Concerns about the poor standard

1:05:50.470 --> 1:05:53.210
<v Speaker 2>of Harris' research had already been public knowledge since January

1:05:53.230 --> 1:05:56.830
<v Speaker 2>of 2026, when The Telegraph reported Plymouth Marjon's decision to

1:05:56.870 --> 1:06:00.520
<v Speaker 2>suspend his emeritus status. In that article, The Telegraph explained

1:06:00.540 --> 1:06:03.580
<v Speaker 2>the university's assessment of the publications produced in the Marjon

1:06:03.640 --> 1:06:07.770
<v Speaker 2>name were poor quality and often controversial. Although the Telegraph

1:06:07.790 --> 1:06:10.710
<v Speaker 2>framed Harris as the injured party, an academic stripped of

1:06:10.770 --> 1:06:14.260
<v Speaker 2>title after critiquing critical race theory, the information was now

1:06:14.300 --> 1:06:17.580
<v Speaker 2>in the public domain, readily available to any journalist assessing

1:06:17.600 --> 1:06:21.660
<v Speaker 2>his credibility when the Arday allegations resurfaced in July. Between

1:06:21.680 --> 1:06:24.090
<v Speaker 2>the 24th of July and Arday's death on the 14th

1:06:24.110 --> 1:06:28.790
<v Speaker 2>of August, the Telegraph published 43 articles about Jason Arday.

1:06:29.110 --> 1:06:32.190
<v Speaker 2>It even ran a box headed, How the Telegraph's Reporting

1:06:32.250 --> 1:06:35.830
<v Speaker 2>Led to Jason Arday's Resignation. After his death, the newspaper

1:06:35.890 --> 1:06:39.310
<v Speaker 2>quietly altered the headline, Jason Arday is living proof that

1:06:39.350 --> 1:06:43.510
<v Speaker 2>you reap what you sow, removing the word living. Meanwhile,

1:06:43.770 --> 1:06:47.310
<v Speaker 2>the January article about Harris briefly disappeared from the Telegraph's website,

1:06:47.590 --> 1:06:50.660
<v Speaker 2>the very article containing information that should have disqualified Harris

1:06:50.700 --> 1:06:54.620
<v Speaker 2>from being treated as an unimpeachably credible source. What felled

1:06:54.700 --> 1:06:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Arday was not the action of isolated actors, but that

1:06:57.180 --> 1:07:00.979
<v Speaker 2>of a single well-connected and well-financed PAC with a not-so-secret plan.

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:04.840
<v Speaker 2>In 2023, Nathan Kofnes laid out a roadmap to power

1:07:04.960 --> 1:07:08.220
<v Speaker 2>on his substack, How to Take Back Academia. He was

1:07:08.280 --> 1:07:11.230
<v Speaker 2>not alone in articulating such a strategy, and the prescriptions

1:07:11.290 --> 1:07:14.150
<v Speaker 2>tend to look very similar. Quote, There are two ways

1:07:14.190 --> 1:07:16.890
<v Speaker 2>to reduce the power of the wokesters on campus. Remove

1:07:16.930 --> 1:07:19.550
<v Speaker 2>them by showing that they don't satisfy minimal criteria for

1:07:19.610 --> 1:07:22.620
<v Speaker 2>contract renewal or academic promotion, or dilute their influence by

1:07:22.660 --> 1:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>bringing in some of the non-woke scholars who have been

1:07:24.660 --> 1:07:30.270
<v Speaker 2>pushed out of academia for political reasons. The two-pronged approach— eliminate

1:07:29.270 --> 1:07:32.470
<v Speaker 2>the black scholars, platform the mediocre white males— is apparent with

1:07:32.490 --> 1:07:35.170
<v Speaker 2>the support system they enjoy. When Dave Harris had his

1:07:35.230 --> 1:07:38.710
<v Speaker 2>emeritus status suspended in January of 2026, he became a

1:07:38.750 --> 1:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>cause célèbre in Britain's anti-woke ecosystem, with the Committee for

1:07:42.320 --> 1:07:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Academic Freedom, CAF, rallying to his defense. CAF's Frederick Attenborough,

1:07:47.460 --> 1:07:49.780
<v Speaker 2>during his time at the Free Speech Union, had also

1:07:49.820 --> 1:07:54.950
<v Speaker 2>defended Nathan Kofness. When Emanuel College, Cambridge, terminated Kofnes' affiliation

1:07:54.970 --> 1:07:58.270
<v Speaker 2>on the 5th of April, 2024, following his writings on race, heredity,

1:07:58.310 --> 1:08:01.770
<v Speaker 2>and intelligence, the FSU assisted him in the proceedings, with

1:08:01.850 --> 1:08:05.950
<v Speaker 2>Attenborough personally promoting his case. Kofnes later stated that FSU

1:08:06.010 --> 1:08:09.730
<v Speaker 2>Chief Legal Counsel Bryn Harris assisted his appeal. The FSU

1:08:09.770 --> 1:08:13.050
<v Speaker 2>subsequently backed his legal challenge and urged supporters to contribute

1:08:13.070 --> 1:08:15.740
<v Speaker 2>to his legal fund. The FSU itself says it has

1:08:15.780 --> 1:08:18.780
<v Speaker 2>supported Kofnes throughout and helped him bring legal action against

1:08:18.820 --> 1:08:23.450
<v Speaker 2>Emanuel College. In March of 2026, Attenborough, now at CAF,

1:08:23.570 --> 1:08:27.509
<v Speaker 2>intervened on Kofnes' behalf again, urging Ghent University to resist

1:08:27.550 --> 1:08:31.090
<v Speaker 2>demands that his appointment be rescinded. Kofnes had been recruited

1:08:31.130 --> 1:08:34.280
<v Speaker 2>to Ghent by Bouc Devry, whose own work on intelligence

1:08:34.340 --> 1:08:39.860
<v Speaker 2>and dysgenic fertility draws extensively on hereditarian researchers. In 2024,

1:08:39.860 --> 1:08:43.439
<v Speaker 2>Devry also attended the London Conference on Intelligence alongside Human

1:08:43.470 --> 1:08:48.090
<v Speaker 2>Diversity Foundation co-founder Emile Kierkegaard. De Vries had already sought

1:08:48.150 --> 1:08:50.910
<v Speaker 2>university funding to bring Kofnis to Ghent for a lecture

1:08:50.930 --> 1:08:54.630
<v Speaker 2>in February of 2024, just days after Kofnis published A

1:08:54.710 --> 1:08:58.210
<v Speaker 2>Guide for Hereditarian Revolution, before later hiring him as a

1:08:58.250 --> 1:09:03.740
<v Speaker 2>postdoctoral researcher on his Liberalism's Fertility Problem project. So when,

1:09:03.860 --> 1:09:07.160
<v Speaker 2>on the 21st of July, Nathan Kofnes published DEI Fraud

1:09:07.200 --> 1:09:10.380
<v Speaker 2>and Cover-Up at Cambridge on his substack, the architecture of

1:09:10.520 --> 1:09:14.809
<v Speaker 2>uncivil society actors to immediately scale the harassment initiated by Harris,

1:09:15.170 --> 1:09:17.469
<v Speaker 2>as well as give cover to the attackers, was already

1:09:17.510 --> 1:09:21.430
<v Speaker 2>in place. So was the framing. Kofnes heavily promoted his

1:09:21.470 --> 1:09:24.590
<v Speaker 2>blog entry on X, where the post exceeded one million views.

1:09:25.010 --> 1:09:27.850
<v Speaker 2>It was amplified by figures such as Richard Hanania, the

1:09:27.910 --> 1:09:31.340
<v Speaker 2>American race and IQ writer from the same reactionary intellectual

1:09:31.380 --> 1:09:35.500
<v Speaker 2>milieu as Curtis Yarvin. A foundational figure of the anti-democratic

1:09:35.600 --> 1:09:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Dark Enlightenment, Yarvin coined the concept of the cathedral to

1:09:39.220 --> 1:09:42.880
<v Speaker 2>describe what, in secular societies, he presented as a new church,

1:09:43.460 --> 1:09:46.500
<v Speaker 2>a decentralized system made up, in particular, of universities and

1:09:46.540 --> 1:09:51.010
<v Speaker 2>mainstream media— responsible for producing and disseminating progressive orthodoxy and

1:09:51.060 --> 1:09:54.580
<v Speaker 2>policing the boundaries between truth and heresy. The concept made

1:09:54.660 --> 1:09:58.960
<v Speaker 2>refutation almost impossible. If academic institutions rejected race science, that

1:09:59.000 --> 1:10:01.460
<v Speaker 2>rejection itself could be presented as proof of their membership

1:10:01.520 --> 1:10:05.309
<v Speaker 2>in the cathedral, discrediting academic knowledge production on race while

1:10:05.350 --> 1:10:09.510
<v Speaker 2>recasting hereditary and race science as censored truth fitted directly

1:10:09.590 --> 1:10:13.090
<v Speaker 2>into this logic. By the time the first national newspaper

1:10:13.150 --> 1:10:15.790
<v Speaker 2>articles appeared three days later in the Telegraph, the Times

1:10:15.830 --> 1:10:18.380
<v Speaker 2>and the Daily Mail reported Kofnes and those amplifying his

1:10:18.420 --> 1:10:21.520
<v Speaker 2>narrative had already transformed Arday into a symbol of the

1:10:21.640 --> 1:10:26.139
<v Speaker 2>supposed corruption of universities by DEI. A DEI star whose

1:10:26.180 --> 1:10:29.479
<v Speaker 2>alleged failings were presented as proof that Cambridge had sacrificed

1:10:29.560 --> 1:10:32.400
<v Speaker 2>academic standards to racial hiring and then sought to conceal

1:10:32.420 --> 1:10:35.519
<v Speaker 2>the consequences. Brought to bay on the 31st of July,

1:10:35.930 --> 1:10:38.270
<v Speaker 2>Arday submitted to an interview with the Times to defend

1:10:38.310 --> 1:10:41.410
<v Speaker 2>himself against the allegations. But by then, the media pack

1:10:41.450 --> 1:10:44.519
<v Speaker 2>was closing in and the kill seemed inevitable. According to

1:10:44.580 --> 1:10:48.120
<v Speaker 2>News Corp's verified corpus, 52 articles about Arday had appeared

1:10:48.160 --> 1:10:50.700
<v Speaker 2>by the time his resignation statement was published on the

1:10:50.840 --> 1:10:54.320
<v Speaker 2>5th of August. Arday's resignation did not stop the hunt,

1:10:54.700 --> 1:10:56.960
<v Speaker 2>because the actions of the victim have no bearing on

1:10:56.979 --> 1:10:59.439
<v Speaker 2>the level of harassment they receive. It stops when the

1:10:59.479 --> 1:11:02.190
<v Speaker 2>harassers stop, whether because they move on to another target

1:11:02.470 --> 1:11:06.150
<v Speaker 2>or because institutions and bystanders intervene. If the prey is isolated,

1:11:06.210 --> 1:11:10.010
<v Speaker 2>the hunt can intensify. Another 222 articles appeared between his

1:11:10.070 --> 1:11:12.030
<v Speaker 2>resignation and the moment he was found dead on the

1:11:12.050 --> 1:11:16.070
<v Speaker 2>14th of August. 214 through the 13th, and eight more

1:11:16.110 --> 1:11:19.390
<v Speaker 2>that day before his death became known. In all, News

1:11:19.430 --> 1:11:24.310
<v Speaker 2>Cord records 274 articles across 26 outlets in the 22

1:11:24.310 --> 1:11:26.960
<v Speaker 2>days between the first national coverage on the 24th of

1:11:27.000 --> 1:11:30.680
<v Speaker 2>July and his death. Of those articles, my own, Stephanie's,

1:11:30.860 --> 1:11:34.380
<v Speaker 2>mapping identifies at least 23 produced by outlets or authors

1:11:34.420 --> 1:11:38.280
<v Speaker 2>with links to the FSU, 19 of them after Arday resigned.

1:11:38.280 --> 1:11:42.100
<v Speaker 2>21 appeared in The Spectator alone, where FSU founder Toby

1:11:42.140 --> 1:11:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Young is associate editor and columnist. Another was written in

1:11:45.020 --> 1:11:48.260
<v Speaker 2>The Telegraph by FSU-linked Alison Pearson, and another in The

1:11:48.320 --> 1:11:53.660
<v Speaker 2>Times by FSU chair Nigel Bigger. And we'll continue, but first,

1:11:53.729 --> 1:12:09.360
<v Speaker 2>we've got one last ad break. And we're back. the trophy.

1:12:10.479 --> 1:12:14.010
<v Speaker 2>Rather than a media pile-on, this was predatory propaganda. Fighting

1:12:14.050 --> 1:12:17.229
<v Speaker 2>propaganda is not simply a matter of determining whether each

1:12:17.290 --> 1:12:19.809
<v Speaker 2>individual claim is true or false. It is first and

1:12:19.850 --> 1:12:23.050
<v Speaker 2>foremost a struggle over who has the power to define reality.

1:12:23.490 --> 1:12:26.310
<v Speaker 2>That is what framing does. It places certain perspectives at

1:12:26.330 --> 1:12:29.110
<v Speaker 2>the center, relegates others to the margins, and determines what

1:12:29.150 --> 1:12:33.479
<v Speaker 2>becomes visible, sayable, and relevant. That authority, that power, is

1:12:33.520 --> 1:12:36.740
<v Speaker 2>precisely what is at stake. Race science, a belief system

1:12:36.820 --> 1:12:40.379
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally untethered from reality. needs to be received as science.

1:12:40.780 --> 1:12:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Its proponents crave legitimacy because their very existence depends on it.

1:12:44.820 --> 1:12:48.219
<v Speaker 2>Without recognition from journalists, universities, and the public, they remain

1:12:48.240 --> 1:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>what they are, marginal and extremist. With it, they acquire

1:12:51.780 --> 1:12:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the authority to police the boundaries of knowledge, to decide

1:12:54.460 --> 1:12:59.389
<v Speaker 2>what counts as evidence, what constitutes merit, whose scholarship warrants investigation,

1:12:59.490 --> 1:13:02.790
<v Speaker 2>and whose testimony can be dismissed as mere grievance. And

1:13:02.870 --> 1:13:06.890
<v Speaker 2>Arde was an extraordinarily useful object around which to manufacture

1:13:06.910 --> 1:13:09.769
<v Speaker 2>that authority. A young black professor at Cambridge with a

1:13:09.810 --> 1:13:14.070
<v Speaker 2>remarkable life story, working on racism, sanism, and inequality. Make

1:13:14.090 --> 1:13:16.010
<v Speaker 2>him doubtful enough, and he can be made to carry

1:13:16.050 --> 1:13:19.770
<v Speaker 2>the weight of a much larger proposition. Perhaps inclusion policies

1:13:19.830 --> 1:13:23.189
<v Speaker 2>put him there. Perhaps standards were lowered. Perhaps research on

1:13:23.250 --> 1:13:26.689
<v Speaker 2>racism itself is suspect. Perhaps the people telling us racism

1:13:26.729 --> 1:13:29.450
<v Speaker 2>structures the academy are precisely the people who do not

1:13:29.510 --> 1:13:31.600
<v Speaker 2>belong in it. You do not have to prove the

1:13:31.640 --> 1:13:34.450
<v Speaker 2>whole proposition. You only have to keep the doubt moving.

1:13:35.229 --> 1:13:38.570
<v Speaker 2>As defense researcher Olivier Schmitt, now research director at the

1:13:38.610 --> 1:13:41.809
<v Speaker 2>Institute for Military Operations at the Royal Danish Defense College,

1:13:41.850 --> 1:13:45.729
<v Speaker 2>has shown, methodological doubt can be turned into systematic doubt.

1:13:46.290 --> 1:13:49.269
<v Speaker 2>I'm just asking questions, then becomes a posture through which

1:13:49.310 --> 1:13:52.670
<v Speaker 2>suspicion can be kept moving, alive and definitely, even in

1:13:52.710 --> 1:13:55.970
<v Speaker 2>the absence of sufficient evidence, while claiming the credibility of

1:13:56.030 --> 1:13:59.570
<v Speaker 2>critical thinking. Arde did not have to be proved a fraud.

1:13:59.870 --> 1:14:02.910
<v Speaker 2>He only had to be made permanently suspect. and with him,

1:14:03.180 --> 1:14:06.179
<v Speaker 2>everyone who looked like him. But the hunt could continue

1:14:06.340 --> 1:14:08.300
<v Speaker 2>only as long as the pact kept running and the

1:14:08.340 --> 1:14:12.980
<v Speaker 2>hounds baying. Arday's mass harassment on social media was participatory.

1:14:13.420 --> 1:14:19.250
<v Speaker 2>For some, the serialization of revelations discrediting him became collective fun, harass-tainment.

1:14:19.790 --> 1:14:22.870
<v Speaker 2>Adam Serwer, the American journalist at The Atlantic whose work

1:14:22.930 --> 1:14:26.430
<v Speaker 2>examines race in American politics, captured this political pleasure in

1:14:26.530 --> 1:14:30.130
<v Speaker 2>collective humiliation in one phrase, the cruelty is the point.

1:14:30.880 --> 1:14:34.160
<v Speaker 2>For others, the reward was informational ascendancy and a misguided

1:14:34.220 --> 1:14:38.560
<v Speaker 2>impression that their contribution would protect science somehow. Kate Starbert,

1:14:38.700 --> 1:14:42.300
<v Speaker 2>a University of Washington professor who studies collective sense-making, has

1:14:42.360 --> 1:14:44.920
<v Speaker 2>shown that online crowds do not merely consume a narrative.

1:14:45.160 --> 1:14:48.700
<v Speaker 2>They participate in investigating, producing, and circulating the material that

1:14:48.720 --> 1:14:51.890
<v Speaker 2>sustains it. The invitation to go and look for yourself,

1:14:51.990 --> 1:14:55.630
<v Speaker 2>to check another supposedly outlandish claim, to uncover another discrepancy,

1:14:55.990 --> 1:14:59.330
<v Speaker 2>was particularly enticing to those who define themselves as rationalists

1:14:59.390 --> 1:15:04.280
<v Speaker 2>or skeptics. Participation could be experienced as independent inquiry, affording

1:15:04.340 --> 1:15:07.260
<v Speaker 2>a sense of intellectual superiority over those who brought the

1:15:07.320 --> 1:15:10.780
<v Speaker 2>issue back to the reality of harassment, and thereby establish

1:15:10.850 --> 1:15:15.530
<v Speaker 2>ascendancy over them. Participation in the harassment offered epistemic domination.

1:15:15.910 --> 1:15:19.550
<v Speaker 2>That reward helps explain why, even after Arde's death, so

1:15:19.570 --> 1:15:21.650
<v Speaker 2>many of those who engaged with the ready stream of

1:15:21.689 --> 1:15:25.469
<v Speaker 2>revelations remain invested in fact-checking him to this day, unable

1:15:25.510 --> 1:15:29.580
<v Speaker 2>to let him go. Even the reasonable minds. Kate Starbert

1:15:29.600 --> 1:15:32.980
<v Speaker 2>has also argued that the answer to information disorder lies, quote,

1:15:33.320 --> 1:15:36.620
<v Speaker 2>not in better facts, but better frames. Arday was hounded

1:15:36.660 --> 1:15:40.100
<v Speaker 2>to death. But the frame that made the hunt possible survives,

1:15:40.400 --> 1:15:43.059
<v Speaker 2>a frame centered on the feelings of cisgender white men

1:15:43.090 --> 1:15:45.450
<v Speaker 2>who believe themselves to be being greatly replaced from the

1:15:45.510 --> 1:15:49.490
<v Speaker 2>institutions that produce knowledge, while pushing Arday's own perspective out

1:15:49.530 --> 1:15:52.740
<v Speaker 2>of view. On the 20th of August, six days after

1:15:52.780 --> 1:15:56.300
<v Speaker 2>the kill, Ghent University suspended Kofnes as a precautionary measure

1:15:56.340 --> 1:16:00.220
<v Speaker 2>pending a disciplinary investigation into conduct that, in part, predated

1:16:00.260 --> 1:16:04.519
<v Speaker 2>his post about Arday. The disciplinary letter describes months of complaints, reports,

1:16:04.560 --> 1:16:07.060
<v Speaker 2>and concerns about his conduct and public statements and their

1:16:07.100 --> 1:16:10.300
<v Speaker 2>impact on staff and students. It accuses him, among other things,

1:16:10.380 --> 1:16:13.720
<v Speaker 2>of using his position and Ghent affiliation to pursue and

1:16:13.800 --> 1:16:17.860
<v Speaker 2>promote his race realism and hereditarian revolution, despite having been

1:16:17.880 --> 1:16:21.400
<v Speaker 2>hired to work on the future of liberalism. The university

1:16:21.460 --> 1:16:24.040
<v Speaker 2>regarded this as a breach of his professional obligations, a

1:16:24.120 --> 1:16:27.160
<v Speaker 2>misuse of his institutional reputation, and a conflict with its

1:16:27.200 --> 1:16:30.460
<v Speaker 2>code of ethics, which prohibits, among other things, the dissemination

1:16:30.479 --> 1:16:34.140
<v Speaker 2>of ideas of racial superiority and incitement to racial segregation.

1:16:34.660 --> 1:16:37.340
<v Speaker 2>This time, fraud really was at the heart of the case.

1:16:38.100 --> 1:16:41.540
<v Speaker 2>Kofnes immediately recast his suspension of censorship, an attack on

1:16:41.580 --> 1:16:44.889
<v Speaker 2>his freedom of speech. The experiences of his racialized colleagues

1:16:44.930 --> 1:16:47.980
<v Speaker 2>disappeared from the story. His claim amplified by the very

1:16:48.090 --> 1:16:51.010
<v Speaker 2>architecture of actors implicated in the hunt but now with

1:16:51.050 --> 1:16:54.610
<v Speaker 2>an American dimension. Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal handed him

1:16:54.670 --> 1:16:58.070
<v Speaker 2>its opinion pages to consolidate the frame. How I became

1:16:58.130 --> 1:17:02.310
<v Speaker 2>the scapegoat in the Jason Arday affair. My university suspended me,

1:17:02.370 --> 1:17:05.189
<v Speaker 2>the article declared. All I did was tell the truth.

1:17:06.050 --> 1:17:06.270
<v Speaker 4>U.S.

1:17:06.330 --> 1:17:09.590
<v Speaker 2>Ambassador to Belgium Bill White then reproduced the free speech frame,

1:17:09.870 --> 1:17:13.460
<v Speaker 2>pressuring Ghent to reinstate Kofnis and warning that all options

1:17:13.520 --> 1:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>were on the table as the United States reviewed its

1:17:16.020 --> 1:17:19.850
<v Speaker 2>relationship with the university. Its rector, Petra de Sutter, a

1:17:19.890 --> 1:17:22.910
<v Speaker 2>trans woman and former Green Party deputy prime minister of Belgium,

1:17:23.260 --> 1:17:25.640
<v Speaker 2>then became the new target onto which the frame could

1:17:25.660 --> 1:17:29.179
<v Speaker 2>be transferred. Within days, an open letter opposing the punishment

1:17:29.220 --> 1:17:31.680
<v Speaker 2>of a whistleblower in the person of Cofnes attracted more

1:17:31.700 --> 1:17:36.140
<v Speaker 2>than 800 academics. Among them, actors embedded in a billionaire-funded

1:17:36.240 --> 1:17:40.990
<v Speaker 2>Christian nationalist and transphobic networks across Europe. In France and Belgium,

1:17:41.030 --> 1:17:45.590
<v Speaker 2>for example, signatories Florence Beauregard Blackner and Xavier Laurence Salvador

1:17:45.970 --> 1:17:49.750
<v Speaker 2>led back to Christian nationalist billionaire Pierre-Edward Sterin, who funds

1:17:49.810 --> 1:17:55.580
<v Speaker 2>Salvador's Observatoire du Decolonialisme, while his Pericles project funds Justitia,

1:17:55.840 --> 1:17:59.099
<v Speaker 2>created with the Institut Thomas More in Belgium. The latter

1:17:59.140 --> 1:18:02.040
<v Speaker 2>collaborates with Beauregard Blackner and is linked to a French

1:18:02.080 --> 1:18:07.490
<v Speaker 2>transphobic organization that fuels campaigns against trans right. Pierre-Edward Sterin's

1:18:07.650 --> 1:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Observatory has since expanded its remit, The organization intervenes in

1:18:12.400 --> 1:18:16.800
<v Speaker 2>academic controversies in the name of academic freedom, opposition to censorship,

1:18:16.880 --> 1:18:19.900
<v Speaker 2>and scientific integrity, a function comparable to that of the

1:18:19.939 --> 1:18:23.030
<v Speaker 2>Free Speech Union in the United Kingdom. And like the FSU,

1:18:23.110 --> 1:18:26.730
<v Speaker 2>it has relays across several media spaces. Its actors circulate

1:18:26.750 --> 1:18:32.130
<v Speaker 2>in particular through the neo-secularist cluster around Lapointe, Marianne, Franck Thirure,

1:18:32.250 --> 1:18:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and Charlie Hebdo, but also through far-right media organs such

1:18:35.520 --> 1:18:39.900
<v Speaker 2>as Le Figaro, Cossure, Belur's Actuals, and Atlantico. Added to

1:18:39.939 --> 1:18:45.190
<v Speaker 2>this is Christian nationalist Vincent Ballor's media apparatus, CNews, Europe 1, JDD,

1:18:45.310 --> 1:18:48.810
<v Speaker 2>and others. But Beauregard, Blackner, and Salvador are not the

1:18:48.890 --> 1:18:53.900
<v Speaker 2>only French signatories. Martine Benoit, Jean Fichaud, Andreas Bekfalvy, and

1:18:53.960 --> 1:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Charles Ramond have, like Beauregard, Blackner, and Salvador, signed initiatives

1:18:58.460 --> 1:19:02.900
<v Speaker 2>organized by Vigilance Universities, a collective founded in 2016 to

1:19:02.939 --> 1:19:07.620
<v Speaker 2>combat what it describes as racialism, communitarianism, and attacks on

1:19:07.720 --> 1:19:12.250
<v Speaker 2>universalism in higher education. The neo-secularist milieu thus performs both

1:19:12.310 --> 1:19:15.510
<v Speaker 2>a function of monitoring and that of ideological laundering. The

1:19:15.550 --> 1:19:19.750
<v Speaker 2>dominant group's identity anxieties and the objectives advanced by Christofascist

1:19:19.790 --> 1:19:22.770
<v Speaker 2>networks are stripped of their religious matrix and translated into

1:19:22.790 --> 1:19:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the language of universalism, secularism, science, and academic freedom. Nathan

1:19:27.640 --> 1:19:30.620
<v Speaker 2>Kofnes has since been permitted to return to his mediocre work,

1:19:30.920 --> 1:19:34.400
<v Speaker 2>albeit remotely in pending investigations. But he's only a cog

1:19:34.439 --> 1:19:36.900
<v Speaker 2>in a well-oiled machine, the one who looks the part.

1:19:37.270 --> 1:19:40.470
<v Speaker 2>Behind him, billionaire money flows through think tanks, media, and

1:19:40.490 --> 1:19:44.809
<v Speaker 2>strategic litigation and concerned academics, allowing the same politics of

1:19:44.870 --> 1:19:47.990
<v Speaker 2>white cis male supremacy to circulate under the cover of neutrality,

1:19:48.370 --> 1:19:50.969
<v Speaker 2>a very long way from the besieged dissidents they claim

1:19:51.010 --> 1:19:53.910
<v Speaker 2>to be. The hood is not what makes the racist.

1:19:54.189 --> 1:19:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it simply makes the racist easier to recognize. And

1:19:57.340 --> 1:20:00.020
<v Speaker 2>race science is a lab coat with an equally white hood.

1:20:00.700 --> 1:20:03.660
<v Speaker 2>The onslaught against Jason Arday was not inevitable. It became

1:20:03.740 --> 1:20:07.720
<v Speaker 2>possible because at every stage of the pursuit, people and institutions,

1:20:07.800 --> 1:20:11.480
<v Speaker 2>the police, universities, the media, the commentariat, chose to ignore

1:20:11.520 --> 1:20:14.910
<v Speaker 2>his warnings, legitimize the frame and amplify the reality imposed

1:20:14.950 --> 1:20:17.870
<v Speaker 2>by the proponents of race science. Collectively, we did not

1:20:17.930 --> 1:20:20.850
<v Speaker 2>simply follow the hunt. We handed them the trophy, the

1:20:20.890 --> 1:20:23.970
<v Speaker 2>power to define what is real. To overturn that frame,

1:20:24.070 --> 1:20:26.370
<v Speaker 2>to take back the power, we first have to lift

1:20:26.410 --> 1:20:29.559
<v Speaker 2>the hood, collectively name what is wearing it, That starts

1:20:29.650 --> 1:20:31.990
<v Speaker 2>with bringing the voices of those producing knowledge from the

1:20:32.030 --> 1:20:34.510
<v Speaker 2>front lines back to the center and listening when they

1:20:34.550 --> 1:20:37.870
<v Speaker 2>sound the alarm. Jason Arday was afforded no such attention.

1:20:38.430 --> 1:20:41.890
<v Speaker 2>The stakes are huge. As Jafari Sinclair Allen, professor of

1:20:41.930 --> 1:20:45.110
<v Speaker 2>black studies at Columbia University, writes in The Nation, this

1:20:45.189 --> 1:20:48.170
<v Speaker 2>is a transatlantic movement to end the independent production of

1:20:48.250 --> 1:20:51.070
<v Speaker 2>knowledge about race and power and to decide on both

1:20:51.150 --> 1:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>shores who is permitted to produce it at all. The

1:20:53.979 --> 1:20:56.280
<v Speaker 2>question now is whether we can recognize the hunt for

1:20:56.320 --> 1:20:59.280
<v Speaker 2>power when it disguises itself as free speech, academic freedom,

1:20:59.360 --> 1:21:02.550
<v Speaker 2>or scientific concern, and refuse our assigned role in the

1:21:02.630 --> 1:21:07.150
<v Speaker 2>killing of our democracies. And that's it. Again, this was

1:21:07.170 --> 1:21:09.400
<v Speaker 2>written by Stephanie Lamy. You can find more of her

1:21:09.410 --> 1:21:11.740
<v Speaker 2>work on the Club de Media part, and we'll have

1:21:11.780 --> 1:21:14.420
<v Speaker 2>that linked in the show notes. Thank you again, Stephanie.

1:21:14.780 --> 1:21:15.620
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back tomorrow.

1:21:29.729 --> 1:21:33.269
<v Speaker 5>Did you have a favorite ancient civilization that you were

1:21:33.290 --> 1:21:37.510
<v Speaker 5>learning about growing up? Oh man, so many.

1:21:37.530 --> 1:21:41.380
<v Speaker 8>I guess I enjoyed like Celtic things because that's like

1:21:41.740 --> 1:21:42.660
<v Speaker 8>part of the world I'm from.

1:21:43.160 --> 1:21:45.479
<v Speaker 5>I wasn't even that Celtic. I think she was Celtic,

1:21:45.520 --> 1:21:49.280
<v Speaker 5>like a Celtic warrior, queen, Bodicia.

1:21:49.760 --> 1:21:51.920
<v Speaker 8>Bodicia is how people used to say it, but Boudica

1:21:51.939 --> 1:21:53.500
<v Speaker 8>I think is more accurate.

1:21:53.840 --> 1:21:57.139
<v Speaker 5>That speed. Like she was someone who had resisted the

1:21:57.280 --> 1:21:58.980
<v Speaker 5>Roman invasions, right?

1:21:59.710 --> 1:22:00.450
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's right.

1:22:00.550 --> 1:22:03.970
<v Speaker 8>Where my dad lives is like where the Romans built

1:22:03.990 --> 1:22:09.139
<v Speaker 8>their border wall called Hadrian's Wall. And it's just kind

1:22:09.180 --> 1:22:11.920
<v Speaker 8>of cool to be like, you know, the Romans brought

1:22:11.960 --> 1:22:13.860
<v Speaker 8>their colonialism to all of Europe and they got here

1:22:13.880 --> 1:22:17.400
<v Speaker 8>and I can't fucking do it. It might have been

1:22:17.430 --> 1:22:18.550
<v Speaker 8>they got to that part of the world and they

1:22:18.570 --> 1:22:20.430
<v Speaker 8>were like, it's raining so fucking much I want to

1:22:20.470 --> 1:22:24.110
<v Speaker 8>go back to Italy. But yeah, it was always interesting

1:22:24.130 --> 1:22:26.979
<v Speaker 8>to me to think of like, You know, the amount

1:22:27.040 --> 1:22:30.240
<v Speaker 8>of our modern world that's still impacted by Roman colonization

1:22:30.270 --> 1:22:32.820
<v Speaker 8>and then these people who were able to resist it.

1:22:33.630 --> 1:22:36.050
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I remember as a child, I was a really

1:22:36.110 --> 1:22:40.530
<v Speaker 5>big fan of Egypt, of course, I guess, classic.

1:22:40.950 --> 1:22:41.370
<v Speaker 9>Of course.

1:22:41.830 --> 1:22:45.620
<v Speaker 5>Greece, you can't go wrong. Yeah. Babylon, big fan. I

1:22:45.979 --> 1:22:48.120
<v Speaker 5>liked the beards. Yeah. You know, very cool.

1:22:49.860 --> 1:22:50.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:22:50.760 --> 1:22:53.340
<v Speaker 5>As someone who, you know, I grew up like with

1:22:53.400 --> 1:22:58.270
<v Speaker 5>a voracious appetite for those things. living long ago, how

1:22:58.310 --> 1:23:03.570
<v Speaker 5>people lived in the past, like historical books, how people dressed,

1:23:03.610 --> 1:23:07.090
<v Speaker 5>what they ate, how they lived day to day. And

1:23:07.150 --> 1:23:10.150
<v Speaker 5>a lot of those ancient civilizations were presented to me

1:23:10.310 --> 1:23:17.100
<v Speaker 5>as humanity's great achievements. You know, the magnificent architecture, the

1:23:17.400 --> 1:23:22.140
<v Speaker 5>advances in agriculture, the remarkable works of art, and so on.

1:23:23.040 --> 1:23:25.519
<v Speaker 5>But as I got older and I started reading more

1:23:25.580 --> 1:23:29.290
<v Speaker 5>history from below rather than history through the lens of

1:23:29.930 --> 1:23:36.210
<v Speaker 5>kings and empires, I learned more about life before civilization

1:23:36.790 --> 1:23:41.840
<v Speaker 5>and outside of empire. And I really became less interested

1:23:42.080 --> 1:23:46.500
<v Speaker 5>in civilization as something to be held up as the

1:23:46.560 --> 1:23:49.990
<v Speaker 5>pinnacle of what he wants to keep full of. although

1:23:50.030 --> 1:23:52.840
<v Speaker 5>I am still very much interested in it as an

1:23:52.920 --> 1:23:55.920
<v Speaker 5>idea and how we think about and talk about it

1:23:56.400 --> 1:23:59.500
<v Speaker 5>as an idea. And so this is It Could Happen Here.

1:23:59.520 --> 1:24:05.679
<v Speaker 5>I am Andrew Sage, or Andrewism on YouTube, joined again by... James.

1:24:06.340 --> 1:24:08.780
<v Speaker 8>People have already heard me sounding off, but yeah, it's

1:24:08.820 --> 1:24:09.559
<v Speaker 8>nice to be here again.

1:24:09.880 --> 1:24:13.260
<v Speaker 5>Yes, in case you didn't recognize the voice. And I

1:24:13.840 --> 1:24:17.380
<v Speaker 5>want to talk about the meaning of civilization. If I

1:24:17.420 --> 1:24:21.390
<v Speaker 5>were to ask you if you... were civilized, how would

1:24:21.410 --> 1:24:21.969
<v Speaker 5>you respond?

1:24:23.450 --> 1:24:26.990
<v Speaker 8>I think I aspire not to be, but like I

1:24:27.850 --> 1:24:31.890
<v Speaker 8>have been raised in a society which very much proposed

1:24:31.910 --> 1:24:36.030
<v Speaker 8>this binary between like the civilized and the uncivilized, right?

1:24:36.370 --> 1:24:38.229
<v Speaker 8>I guess savage is a word you could use if

1:24:38.250 --> 1:24:40.630
<v Speaker 8>you were looking at how that society portrayed it, right?

1:24:40.689 --> 1:24:44.429
<v Speaker 8>And like, even though I think British education and stuff

1:24:44.470 --> 1:24:47.530
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't use that word anymore, it says a lot about

1:24:47.550 --> 1:24:51.200
<v Speaker 8>like the state and its desire to shape narratives in

1:24:51.240 --> 1:24:55.100
<v Speaker 8>its favor. So I think I would aspire to de-civilize myself,

1:24:55.160 --> 1:24:58.979
<v Speaker 8>I guess. I'm not like anti-civ in the big scheme

1:24:59.020 --> 1:25:00.969
<v Speaker 8>of things, but I think in the way that it's

1:25:01.010 --> 1:25:04.729
<v Speaker 8>often used to describe indigenous peoples or peoples who are

1:25:04.750 --> 1:25:05.729
<v Speaker 8>not under control of the.

1:25:05.710 --> 1:25:07.070
<v Speaker 4>State, I don't like that very much.

1:25:07.630 --> 1:25:11.769
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's interesting to me because if you ask most people,

1:25:12.189 --> 1:25:14.170
<v Speaker 5>they'll probably just be like, yes. They would say yes

1:25:14.189 --> 1:25:15.090
<v Speaker 5>without hesitation.

1:25:15.530 --> 1:25:15.769
<v Speaker 8>Sure.

1:25:16.030 --> 1:25:19.170
<v Speaker 5>You know, obviously we're not... Most people.

1:25:19.189 --> 1:25:19.269
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:25:22.229 --> 1:25:25.130
<v Speaker 5>But, you know, as you mentioned, like the alternative being,

1:25:25.450 --> 1:25:27.950
<v Speaker 5>you know, the savage, that is something that has kind

1:25:27.970 --> 1:25:32.110
<v Speaker 5>of fallen out of fashion. You know, that exact binary

1:25:32.170 --> 1:25:35.840
<v Speaker 5>of civilized and savage is not in vogue. You know,

1:25:35.880 --> 1:25:38.360
<v Speaker 5>it's not treated as something that you see. And yet

1:25:38.400 --> 1:25:43.260
<v Speaker 5>we maintain one half of the binary as something to uphold.

1:25:43.800 --> 1:25:46.660
<v Speaker 5>So we still say, you know, we are civilized and

1:25:46.680 --> 1:25:51.019
<v Speaker 5>this is civilization, but you wouldn't as much see descriptions

1:25:51.340 --> 1:25:55.960
<v Speaker 5>of the alternative, of the barbarian, the uncivilized, the savage,

1:25:56.780 --> 1:26:00.470
<v Speaker 5>the primitive. I think you can ask people, like, what

1:26:00.650 --> 1:26:04.350
<v Speaker 5>is civilization? What do you mean by being civilized? And

1:26:05.210 --> 1:26:06.850
<v Speaker 5>it's a bit shaky. You know, it's one of those

1:26:06.870 --> 1:26:10.510
<v Speaker 5>concepts that is so familiar, so used to being referenced,

1:26:10.689 --> 1:26:14.790
<v Speaker 5>that not many people stop to interrogate it. You know,

1:26:14.810 --> 1:26:17.330
<v Speaker 5>we throw the word around all the time and it

1:26:17.390 --> 1:26:21.970
<v Speaker 5>can mean cities or technology or modernity or law or

1:26:22.189 --> 1:26:28.280
<v Speaker 5>culture or the state or simply not being barbaric. Historically,

1:26:28.320 --> 1:26:32.060
<v Speaker 5>it's also been a way of dividing humanity. The Greeks,

1:26:32.140 --> 1:26:35.760
<v Speaker 5>I believe, were the ones who referred to basically anyone

1:26:35.800 --> 1:26:40.090
<v Speaker 5>who didn't speak Greek as a barbarian. You know, China

1:26:40.200 --> 1:26:46.150
<v Speaker 5>infamously treated... everything outside of china as the barbarian.

1:26:45.610 --> 1:26:50.150
<v Speaker 8>Yeah isn't it like a literally an onomatopoeia like people

1:26:50.170 --> 1:26:50.750
<v Speaker 8>are saying like.

1:26:50.670 --> 1:26:52.670
<v Speaker 4>Bar bar bar bar bar bar bar.

1:26:53.110 --> 1:26:55.190
<v Speaker 5>I think i've heard that story as well yeah i'm

1:26:55.220 --> 1:26:56.110
<v Speaker 5>not sure how true it.

1:26:56.180 --> 1:27:01.120
<v Speaker 8>Is yeah i'm not super familiar with like the little

1:27:01.160 --> 1:27:02.160
<v Speaker 8>exhausting on that one i.

1:27:02.160 --> 1:27:06.639
<v Speaker 5>Guess yeah but you know the distinction of the civilized

1:27:06.660 --> 1:27:10.919
<v Speaker 5>and barbarian is something that has been weaponized across history

1:27:10.960 --> 1:27:18.639
<v Speaker 5>to justify conquest and colonization and hierarchical taxonomies of the

1:27:18.650 --> 1:27:22.700
<v Speaker 5>human race. White man's burden, quote unquote, was to bring

1:27:22.860 --> 1:27:27.820
<v Speaker 5>civilization to the less advanced people. Yeah. Civilization being, of course,

1:27:27.860 --> 1:27:31.760
<v Speaker 5>the most advanced stage of human social and cultural development,

1:27:32.260 --> 1:27:35.520
<v Speaker 5>which to me is itself a hubris because I think

1:27:35.560 --> 1:27:38.900
<v Speaker 5>that presumption that we made it, you know, we reach

1:27:39.660 --> 1:27:41.720
<v Speaker 5>where we go and, you know, what we figured out here,

1:27:41.740 --> 1:27:42.280
<v Speaker 5>this is it.

1:27:42.939 --> 1:27:43.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:27:43.410 --> 1:27:46.430
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think that is a very damaging way

1:27:46.490 --> 1:27:47.009
<v Speaker 5>of thinking.

1:27:47.490 --> 1:27:47.929
<v Speaker 9>Definitely.

1:27:48.350 --> 1:27:52.250
<v Speaker 5>And it's something that I think is embedded into a

1:27:52.830 --> 1:27:58.720
<v Speaker 5>very popular perception of what civilization is. You know, usually, historically,

1:27:58.800 --> 1:28:05.260
<v Speaker 5>civilization has also been tied to cities, writing, large populations, agriculture,

1:28:05.840 --> 1:28:11.870
<v Speaker 5>social stratification of some kind, specialized labor, monumental architecture, and

1:28:11.890 --> 1:28:12.710
<v Speaker 5>of course, the state.

1:28:13.170 --> 1:28:13.290
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:28:13.680 --> 1:28:16.440
<v Speaker 5>Buried in many of these associations is the assumption that

1:28:16.479 --> 1:28:22.469
<v Speaker 5>hierarchy is advanced, that this way of structuring human society

1:28:23.030 --> 1:28:26.190
<v Speaker 5>is the destination we were always headed to. You know,

1:28:26.210 --> 1:28:31.189
<v Speaker 5>we have this term in anthropology, stateless. The presumption being

1:28:31.250 --> 1:28:35.550
<v Speaker 5>that lacking a state is itself, you know, something that

1:28:36.170 --> 1:28:38.710
<v Speaker 5>perhaps needs to be rectified. I'm not saying that every

1:28:38.729 --> 1:28:41.979
<v Speaker 5>anthropologist takes this perspective. but the words that we use

1:28:42.240 --> 1:28:45.530
<v Speaker 5>carry certain connotations. And I think that for some people,

1:28:45.550 --> 1:28:50.849
<v Speaker 5>particularly people raised in a civilization context, It's like, oh yeah,

1:28:50.860 --> 1:28:53.950
<v Speaker 5>they haven't reached where we have reached yet. They haven't

1:28:54.010 --> 1:28:56.590
<v Speaker 5>gotten there yet. They haven't evolved to a point where

1:28:56.630 --> 1:28:59.410
<v Speaker 5>they've developed a state yet. But that is the trajectory

1:28:59.450 --> 1:29:01.910
<v Speaker 5>that they are on or are supposed to be on.

1:29:02.790 --> 1:29:07.019
<v Speaker 5>The more bureaucracy and rule and classes and institutions your

1:29:07.060 --> 1:29:10.300
<v Speaker 5>society has, the more advanced it is presumed to be.

1:29:10.320 --> 1:29:13.559
<v Speaker 5>And then, of course, you have people like Samuel Huntington,

1:29:14.000 --> 1:29:18.420
<v Speaker 5>who used civilization in this very broad sense as cultural identities.

1:29:19.770 --> 1:29:24.650
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I have a pretty negative impression of Samuel Huntington

1:29:24.710 --> 1:29:26.490
<v Speaker 8>as a human being and as a theorist, but.

1:29:26.950 --> 1:29:27.810
<v Speaker 5>As do I, I mean.

1:29:27.830 --> 1:29:29.330
<v Speaker 4>I think we all do.

1:29:30.050 --> 1:29:33.150
<v Speaker 5>To give you the listener an indication, he treats Islam

1:29:33.600 --> 1:29:39.099
<v Speaker 5>as a civilization, Hinduism as a civilization, Orthodoxy as a civilization,

1:29:39.400 --> 1:29:42.280
<v Speaker 5>and then everything south of the Sahara in Africa is

1:29:42.740 --> 1:29:44.280
<v Speaker 5>just one civilization, Tim.

1:29:45.620 --> 1:29:50.550
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I love that, like, Islam is a civilization and also, like,

1:29:50.610 --> 1:29:54.309
<v Speaker 8>south of the Sahara is a civilization as if never

1:29:54.370 --> 1:29:58.010
<v Speaker 8>the two shall meet, right? Like, famously, there were no

1:29:58.070 --> 1:29:59.170
<v Speaker 8>Muslims in Africa. Yeah.

1:30:01.300 --> 1:30:05.580
<v Speaker 5>The maps that I've seen, he does have, like, Islam

1:30:05.900 --> 1:30:08.480
<v Speaker 5>in Africa as well. If you ever look at the map,

1:30:08.520 --> 1:30:11.460
<v Speaker 5>the map is awful. The map is just awful.

1:30:11.860 --> 1:30:15.890
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, the map, like, gives me fucking... Yeah, like, admittedly,

1:30:15.910 --> 1:30:19.439
<v Speaker 8>it's been a long time since I've engaged. Yeah, Muslim

1:30:19.520 --> 1:30:22.060
<v Speaker 8>and African. I guess, yeah, he includes a horn of

1:30:22.160 --> 1:30:23.339
<v Speaker 8>Africa in Muslim.

1:30:23.900 --> 1:30:26.839
<v Speaker 4>Fucking unbelievable. Yeah, Confucian.

1:30:27.580 --> 1:30:32.210
<v Speaker 8>Japan just exists as, like, a, like, every other culture is, like,

1:30:32.330 --> 1:30:35.650
<v Speaker 8>massively homogenized, and then Japanese is, like, completely unique in

1:30:35.670 --> 1:30:36.849
<v Speaker 8>this little bubble.

1:30:37.450 --> 1:30:41.429
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah. That's such, like, I'm sorry, like, that's so

1:30:41.490 --> 1:30:42.809
<v Speaker 5>weeb-coded to me.

1:30:45.400 --> 1:30:50.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah it's incredibly white dude who hasn't fucking really engaged

1:30:50.120 --> 1:30:51.740
<v Speaker 8>with the world coded you know.

1:30:51.740 --> 1:30:54.660
<v Speaker 5>Yeah yeah it's like oh yeah the entire continent of

1:30:54.780 --> 1:30:59.809
<v Speaker 5>africa sure fine whatever that's that's africa japan though like

1:30:59.970 --> 1:31:03.590
<v Speaker 5>this japan is distinct from korea from china from the

1:31:03.610 --> 1:31:07.339
<v Speaker 5>philippines from all of asia japan has its own thing yeah.

1:31:07.880 --> 1:31:10.820
<v Speaker 8>From these places it's had exchange with for centuries yeah

1:31:10.860 --> 1:31:16.280
<v Speaker 8>and then like The entirety of North America, Greenland, Western Europe,

1:31:16.700 --> 1:31:22.150
<v Speaker 8>and Australasia is just Western. The indigenous peoples there don't exist, right? Like,

1:31:22.229 --> 1:31:23.290
<v Speaker 8>the differences in those cultures.

1:31:23.330 --> 1:31:27.350
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, Western is code for white, so... Yeah. It's

1:31:27.390 --> 1:31:28.250
<v Speaker 5>not surprising.

1:31:28.790 --> 1:31:30.670
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's definitely what he's doing there.

1:31:31.610 --> 1:31:34.960
<v Speaker 5>His famous argument was that future conflicts would be predicated

1:31:35.280 --> 1:31:41.420
<v Speaker 5>on clashes between these civilizations. Hence, clashes of civilizations being...

1:31:41.810 --> 1:31:44.910
<v Speaker 5>The title of his book. Yeah. I don't find it

1:31:44.930 --> 1:31:47.830
<v Speaker 5>very convincing. I don't think you do either. Yeah.

1:31:48.030 --> 1:31:49.510
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm not buying it, to be honest.

1:31:50.229 --> 1:31:50.410
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:31:50.810 --> 1:31:54.910
<v Speaker 5>It treats these big cultural blobs as if they're unified

1:31:55.070 --> 1:31:59.440
<v Speaker 5>entities and discrete entities when, you know, history has been

1:31:59.450 --> 1:32:05.980
<v Speaker 5>a long story of exchange, borrowing, overlap, divergence, migration, and transformation.

1:32:06.000 --> 1:32:07.019
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. Yeah.

1:32:18.090 --> 1:32:22.230
<v Speaker 5>Finally, for another perspective, I want to share on the

1:32:22.270 --> 1:32:26.530
<v Speaker 5>subject of civilization. We have David Wengru, who many of

1:32:26.550 --> 1:32:29.250
<v Speaker 5>you may know as the co-author of The Dawn of Everything.

1:32:30.310 --> 1:32:32.840
<v Speaker 5>And for him, he argued that if we're going to

1:32:32.860 --> 1:32:35.940
<v Speaker 5>keep using the word civilization, we should think of it

1:32:36.500 --> 1:32:42.559
<v Speaker 5>as a product of interaction between societies. So through trade

1:32:42.700 --> 1:32:47.880
<v Speaker 5>and conflict and migration and imitation collaboration, Civilization is like

1:32:47.960 --> 1:32:52.320
<v Speaker 5>an emergent phenomenon of that interconnectedness. I think that is

1:32:52.590 --> 1:33:01.310
<v Speaker 5>a somewhat idiosyncratic, but still compelling and somewhat familiar approach

1:33:01.410 --> 1:33:05.290
<v Speaker 5>to the idea. Typically, people do think of civilizations as

1:33:05.350 --> 1:33:10.050
<v Speaker 5>discrete entities, though. Yeah. At least in Lehman's perspective. But

1:33:10.410 --> 1:33:13.510
<v Speaker 5>the field of anthropology and historical research I know is

1:33:13.630 --> 1:33:20.460
<v Speaker 5>rife with comparative studies. and investigations of those very exchanges

1:33:20.880 --> 1:33:25.300
<v Speaker 5>between societies. So as he is speaking from an anthropological perspective,

1:33:25.720 --> 1:33:28.960
<v Speaker 5>I see why he would want to put forward that reframing.

1:33:29.479 --> 1:33:32.280
<v Speaker 5>And the thing about definitions of words and connotations and

1:33:32.300 --> 1:33:35.180
<v Speaker 5>stuff is none of it is really objectively correct. They're

1:33:35.200 --> 1:33:38.920
<v Speaker 5>all just pointing to different things. And the way that

1:33:38.939 --> 1:33:42.219
<v Speaker 5>we use language is always going to be subject to debate.

1:33:42.810 --> 1:33:44.770
<v Speaker 5>I think the fact that we can't even agree on

1:33:44.850 --> 1:33:49.320
<v Speaker 5>what civilization exactly is should probably make us a bit

1:33:49.360 --> 1:33:53.509
<v Speaker 5>more cautious in how we make sweeping claims about it.

1:33:53.960 --> 1:33:55.620
<v Speaker 5>And really, I feel I've heard about many of the

1:33:55.660 --> 1:33:59.160
<v Speaker 5>words that we throw around so casually. But one consistency

1:33:59.280 --> 1:34:03.650
<v Speaker 5>I've seen across most definitions of civilization is this packaging with,

1:34:03.810 --> 1:34:07.450
<v Speaker 5>of course, the city, but also with ideas of advancement

1:34:07.630 --> 1:34:11.590
<v Speaker 5>and development, which of course begs the question, advanced according

1:34:11.630 --> 1:34:15.439
<v Speaker 5>to whom? measured by what standard? How do you actually

1:34:15.920 --> 1:34:20.230
<v Speaker 5>quantify how much more advanced one society is compared to another?

1:34:20.250 --> 1:34:25.630
<v Speaker 5>If the benchmark is skyscrapers and bureaucracies and standing armies

1:34:26.590 --> 1:34:30.650
<v Speaker 5>or industrial output, then yeah, sure, modern states score very

1:34:30.710 --> 1:34:33.929
<v Speaker 5>highly in terms of advancement. But then we can ask,

1:34:33.990 --> 1:34:36.630
<v Speaker 5>why should those be the specific metrics we use? Why

1:34:36.670 --> 1:34:39.070
<v Speaker 5>not measure the advancement of a society according to how

1:34:39.110 --> 1:34:43.930
<v Speaker 5>much leisure its members enjoy? or by how equal they are,

1:34:44.050 --> 1:34:48.810
<v Speaker 5>or by how sustainable they engage with the ecosystem they're

1:34:48.830 --> 1:34:52.639
<v Speaker 5>embedded in, or by how much freedom regular people have

1:34:52.720 --> 1:34:55.219
<v Speaker 5>over their own lives. You know, we can pick different

1:34:55.260 --> 1:34:58.400
<v Speaker 5>measuring sticks and get different winners and losers in this

1:34:58.680 --> 1:35:02.040
<v Speaker 5>competition of advancement. But the measuring stick we're working with

1:35:02.080 --> 1:35:05.930
<v Speaker 5>when we speak of civilization clearly isn't very helpful for

1:35:05.950 --> 1:35:09.490
<v Speaker 5>many of us. All societies are not working with the

1:35:09.510 --> 1:35:13.690
<v Speaker 5>same measuring stick. despite the efforts to impose this capitalist

1:35:13.810 --> 1:35:17.330
<v Speaker 5>neoliberal measuring stick on everybody. You know, we have countless

1:35:17.370 --> 1:35:21.070
<v Speaker 5>experiments and examples of different ways of organizing life across history,

1:35:21.630 --> 1:35:25.850
<v Speaker 5>some lasting for centuries, others millennia, some expanding into empires,

1:35:26.020 --> 1:35:32.400
<v Speaker 5>others staying small, some prioritizing equality, others prioritizing hierarchy, accumulation

1:35:32.439 --> 1:35:36.420
<v Speaker 5>versus mobility. You know, we can't assume that All of

1:35:36.460 --> 1:35:40.080
<v Speaker 5>humanity is trying to reach the same predetermined destination. So

1:35:40.120 --> 1:35:44.020
<v Speaker 5>the whole language of more and less civilized doesn't really

1:35:44.060 --> 1:35:48.380
<v Speaker 5>cut it for me. But the language of civilization does

1:35:48.860 --> 1:35:51.930
<v Speaker 5>work for the people that it serves. The people who

1:35:52.020 --> 1:35:55.210
<v Speaker 5>see their society as the highest stage of human development,

1:35:55.729 --> 1:35:59.990
<v Speaker 5>which must be imposed on others by evangelism and conquest

1:36:00.090 --> 1:36:04.900
<v Speaker 5>and so on to bring development. And same attitude which

1:36:04.920 --> 1:36:10.160
<v Speaker 5>is extended to people by European colonial powers to invade

1:36:10.180 --> 1:36:14.299
<v Speaker 5>these lands for wealth and territory, to conquer them, to

1:36:15.140 --> 1:36:18.140
<v Speaker 5>treat them as a lesser on the ladder of human development.

1:36:18.580 --> 1:36:23.510
<v Speaker 5>That very same attitude extends beyond people to nature itself

1:36:24.310 --> 1:36:29.030
<v Speaker 5>as something vile and unproductive and waiting to be mastered

1:36:29.630 --> 1:36:33.229
<v Speaker 5>by civilizations. But one thing that's really stuck with me

1:36:33.670 --> 1:36:36.790
<v Speaker 5>in reading, for instance, James E. Scott, which he talks

1:36:36.830 --> 1:36:40.019
<v Speaker 5>about this in Against the Green, is just how fragile

1:36:40.720 --> 1:36:47.939
<v Speaker 5>and not inevitable this civilizational development was. These early states

1:36:48.780 --> 1:36:53.660
<v Speaker 5>very often collapsed, very often fragmented. And for many people

1:36:54.120 --> 1:36:59.969
<v Speaker 5>in those contexts, the collapse, quote unquote, was an escape

1:37:00.010 --> 1:37:03.939
<v Speaker 5>to freedom. You know, it was something that gave them

1:37:03.960 --> 1:37:07.590
<v Speaker 5>an opportunity to disperse and to create smaller communities and

1:37:08.229 --> 1:37:13.309
<v Speaker 5>to have greater autonomy and fewer obligations to rulers. And

1:37:13.330 --> 1:37:15.990
<v Speaker 5>so with all that history in mind, I find the

1:37:16.060 --> 1:37:19.100
<v Speaker 5>concept of civilization, you know, something to think about, but

1:37:19.280 --> 1:37:20.860
<v Speaker 5>certainly not something to idealize.

1:37:21.700 --> 1:37:21.979
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

1:37:22.820 --> 1:37:24.860
<v Speaker 8>Something that just came to my mind is a speech

1:37:25.240 --> 1:37:28.190
<v Speaker 8>that Daruti gave to the cop's.

1:37:28.439 --> 1:37:33.040
<v Speaker 4>On the eve of the Catalan revolution, right? So 19th

1:37:33.060 --> 1:37:33.439
<v Speaker 4>of July.

1:37:33.460 --> 1:37:36.020
<v Speaker 8>So the cops have been sent, right? They know that

1:37:36.060 --> 1:37:38.370
<v Speaker 8>the military is going to rise up against them, right?

1:37:38.970 --> 1:37:42.990
<v Speaker 8>They know that in the coming days that they will

1:37:43.229 --> 1:37:47.030
<v Speaker 8>either have to fight their own military or accept the

1:37:47.150 --> 1:37:50.590
<v Speaker 8>end of this like liberal democracy in Spain, right? This

1:37:50.650 --> 1:37:54.230
<v Speaker 8>republic in Spain. The Catalan government has still sent the

1:37:54.270 --> 1:37:57.360
<v Speaker 8>police to seize weapons from the anarchists, right, who are

1:37:57.380 --> 1:38:00.540
<v Speaker 8>the most capable people of fighting this coup. They would

1:38:00.580 --> 1:38:03.040
<v Speaker 8>rather state than no state, I guess, right? The state's

1:38:03.080 --> 1:38:04.980
<v Speaker 8>always going to have more solidarity with the state than

1:38:05.320 --> 1:38:10.769
<v Speaker 8>its constituents. And he says to the cobs, sometimes when

1:38:10.780 --> 1:38:11.519
<v Speaker 8>we're given an order.

1:38:11.560 --> 1:38:12.630
<v Speaker 4>We have to disobey it.

1:38:12.729 --> 1:38:14.650
<v Speaker 8>And even if the order comes from a very big

1:38:14.670 --> 1:38:19.030
<v Speaker 8>and important person, to translate, obviously, and paraphrase to, we

1:38:19.130 --> 1:38:21.130
<v Speaker 8>civilize ourselves with disobedience.

1:38:22.510 --> 1:38:24.300
<v Speaker 4>It's a really interesting phrase, right?

1:38:24.340 --> 1:38:28.250
<v Speaker 8>Like to him, I guess the concept of civilization is

1:38:28.410 --> 1:38:33.400
<v Speaker 8>dignity and like, autonomy the person who is given up

1:38:33.420 --> 1:38:36.740
<v Speaker 8>their autonomy to the state is not civilized because they

1:38:36.800 --> 1:38:41.040
<v Speaker 8>have given up that autonomy and allowed the state to

1:38:41.080 --> 1:38:43.990
<v Speaker 8>be the one that makes their decisions for them right

1:38:44.030 --> 1:38:46.450
<v Speaker 8>like it's an alternative use it's like.

1:38:46.310 --> 1:38:48.670
<v Speaker 5>An inversion basically.

1:38:48.590 --> 1:38:51.530
<v Speaker 8>Exactly yeah yeah like he's taken that term and said

1:38:51.570 --> 1:38:55.980
<v Speaker 8>like it's it's fundamentally uncivilized of you to uh to

1:38:56.030 --> 1:38:57.700
<v Speaker 8>allow the state to be the one that makes the

1:38:57.720 --> 1:39:01.600
<v Speaker 8>choices for you it's just a really interesting yeah inversion

1:39:01.620 --> 1:39:03.259
<v Speaker 8>of the terminology.

1:39:03.560 --> 1:39:07.260
<v Speaker 5>Yeah yeah i think it's it's curious because when i

1:39:07.280 --> 1:39:12.099
<v Speaker 5>look at for instance there's this book civilized death by

1:39:12.180 --> 1:39:18.880
<v Speaker 5>Christopher Ryan, and he uses this concept of human domestication. Okay.

1:39:19.479 --> 1:39:22.760
<v Speaker 5>And he argues that, you know, just as humans selectively

1:39:23.420 --> 1:39:26.510
<v Speaker 5>bred and conditioned animals to fit into environments that we

1:39:26.520 --> 1:39:32.330
<v Speaker 5>designed for our own purposes, civilization shaped us to fit

1:39:32.370 --> 1:39:35.769
<v Speaker 5>the needs of these large hierarchical systems. Okay. You know,

1:39:35.790 --> 1:39:39.590
<v Speaker 5>with sort of routines and obedience and punctuality for activity,

1:39:40.030 --> 1:39:43.519
<v Speaker 5>dependence on these institutions. And so it's kind of interesting

1:39:43.540 --> 1:39:49.460
<v Speaker 5>to me that, you know, by Dorotes Freeman, the domestication

1:39:49.700 --> 1:39:53.100
<v Speaker 5>of civilisation is precisely what makes us uncivilised.

1:39:53.580 --> 1:39:56.370
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, like the forced pacifism, I don't know how to

1:39:56.390 --> 1:40:00.710
<v Speaker 8>say it, is what makes us uncivilised, it makes us undignified.

1:40:00.729 --> 1:40:05.470
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and I guess that is another use or connotation

1:40:05.530 --> 1:40:09.670
<v Speaker 5>associated with civilisation that he's utilising there, which is, Civilization

1:40:09.720 --> 1:40:10.309
<v Speaker 5>as dignity.

1:40:10.490 --> 1:40:10.729
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:40:11.120 --> 1:40:15.019
<v Speaker 5>As being upright or dignified as a person. To be

1:40:15.080 --> 1:40:19.220
<v Speaker 5>civilized is to be, you know, a certain standard or

1:40:19.320 --> 1:40:20.979
<v Speaker 5>caliber of person.

1:40:21.380 --> 1:40:22.910
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly that.

1:40:22.950 --> 1:40:23.250
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:40:23.530 --> 1:40:27.450
<v Speaker 5>And so he's kind of pointing to civilization as corrupting

1:40:27.490 --> 1:40:34.300
<v Speaker 5>that caliber by making us slavishly dependent on the institutions

1:40:34.380 --> 1:40:36.580
<v Speaker 5>over which we have very little control over.

1:40:37.150 --> 1:40:39.930
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's like an interesting inversion. I'm not sure how

1:40:40.110 --> 1:40:41.830
<v Speaker 8>useful it is. I'm not sure if it's a term

1:40:41.870 --> 1:40:45.110
<v Speaker 8>anyone needs to recapture, but it's interesting.

1:40:45.470 --> 1:40:48.010
<v Speaker 5>First thing, even if I find that an invasion is

1:40:48.050 --> 1:40:54.180
<v Speaker 5>not necessarily practical in terms of day-to-day communication, I think

1:40:55.180 --> 1:40:59.840
<v Speaker 5>playing with concepts, tinkering with concepts, invoking them, I think

1:40:59.860 --> 1:41:04.200
<v Speaker 5>it's still useful in better grasping them. Yes. In better

1:41:04.900 --> 1:41:07.270
<v Speaker 5>formulating our sense of what they are And what they

1:41:07.310 --> 1:41:07.630
<v Speaker 5>are not.

1:41:08.510 --> 1:41:09.530
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, definitely.

1:41:10.050 --> 1:41:13.510
<v Speaker 8>The meaning of a word is something we co-create over time, right?

1:41:13.590 --> 1:41:17.420
<v Speaker 8>It's not like a fixed thing. And obviously we have

1:41:17.439 --> 1:41:19.720
<v Speaker 8>these dictionaries and they have the meanings of words, but

1:41:19.960 --> 1:41:24.679
<v Speaker 8>language is just a way of communicating concepts. And so

1:41:24.700 --> 1:41:28.080
<v Speaker 8>we co-create that meaning as we redefine those concepts.

1:41:28.280 --> 1:41:45.210
<v Speaker 5>Exactly. Exactly. So much of modern civilized life clearly isn't

1:41:45.350 --> 1:41:50.480
<v Speaker 5>good for us. I say that after stretching my back with,

1:41:50.770 --> 1:41:54.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, great futility as I spent most of my

1:41:54.600 --> 1:41:56.120
<v Speaker 5>day sitting.

1:41:56.560 --> 1:41:56.780
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:41:57.600 --> 1:42:00.519
<v Speaker 5>Working at a desk. You know, a lot of people

1:42:00.560 --> 1:42:04.060
<v Speaker 5>are working jobs they find meaningless simply because they need

1:42:04.080 --> 1:42:06.599
<v Speaker 5>the income to survive. You know, they are spending most

1:42:06.640 --> 1:42:11.500
<v Speaker 5>of their waking hours indoors, unexposed to fresh air. If

1:42:11.520 --> 1:42:15.020
<v Speaker 5>they even have fresh air outdoors because many of us

1:42:15.080 --> 1:42:20.320
<v Speaker 5>live in urban environments where the standards of air quality

1:42:20.350 --> 1:42:23.090
<v Speaker 5>are not the best. You could also speak of the

1:42:23.130 --> 1:42:26.430
<v Speaker 5>rates of stress and loneliness and anxiety and depression and

1:42:26.470 --> 1:42:30.150
<v Speaker 5>burnout that have continued to rise even as our material

1:42:30.510 --> 1:42:35.150
<v Speaker 5>wealth as societies, not necessarily as individuals, but as societies

1:42:35.800 --> 1:42:40.519
<v Speaker 5>and our technological capabilities have both increased. I don't think

1:42:40.540 --> 1:42:43.660
<v Speaker 5>you have to be a primitivist and advocate for some

1:42:43.700 --> 1:42:48.700
<v Speaker 5>return to prehistory to recognize the negatives, the real same.

1:42:49.939 --> 1:42:53.889
<v Speaker 5>And while I think many technological developments associated with civilization

1:42:53.930 --> 1:42:59.689
<v Speaker 5>have genuinely improved people's lives, you know, antibiotics, dentistry, planes,

1:42:59.930 --> 1:43:03.630
<v Speaker 5>the internet, especially for disabled people and those medical conditions

1:43:03.670 --> 1:43:07.160
<v Speaker 5>that would otherwise be untreatable. You know, these are very

1:43:07.200 --> 1:43:12.090
<v Speaker 5>beneficial innovations. Yeah. I just don't think that civilization as

1:43:12.150 --> 1:43:14.689
<v Speaker 5>we have structured it and conceived of it has a

1:43:14.729 --> 1:43:20.950
<v Speaker 5>monopoly on innovation. In his book, Wild Thoughts, Claude Lévi-Strauss

1:43:20.990 --> 1:43:24.769
<v Speaker 5>had made the point that many of humanity's greatest technological

1:43:24.830 --> 1:43:31.140
<v Speaker 5>breakthroughs in agriculture, weaving, pottery, animal domestication, they were developed

1:43:31.229 --> 1:43:36.120
<v Speaker 5>long before we conventionally think of as civilization. Human beings

1:43:36.280 --> 1:43:40.960
<v Speaker 5>have always been creative. We've always experimented. We've always invented

1:43:41.060 --> 1:43:43.720
<v Speaker 5>and we always will. I don't think we can or

1:43:43.780 --> 1:43:46.760
<v Speaker 5>should go back because, I mean, there are billions of

1:43:46.840 --> 1:43:50.580
<v Speaker 5>us now, mostly in cities that are far from ecologically sustainable.

1:43:51.300 --> 1:43:53.900
<v Speaker 5>But I think if we keep the history of our

1:43:53.920 --> 1:43:58.520
<v Speaker 5>diverse social forms in mind, then as we go forward,

1:43:58.740 --> 1:44:02.090
<v Speaker 5>we can try to preserve what genuinely enriches human life

1:44:02.870 --> 1:44:08.010
<v Speaker 5>while leaving behind the institutions and assumptions that no longer do.

1:44:08.910 --> 1:44:12.390
<v Speaker 5>By the way, do you by chance have a blueprint

1:44:12.990 --> 1:44:15.030
<v Speaker 5>for the future of our species?

1:44:17.610 --> 1:44:21.590
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't think I do other than working it

1:44:21.650 --> 1:44:22.210
<v Speaker 4>out together.

1:44:22.229 --> 1:44:24.630
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, me neither. Hoping someone might. I guess we'd have

1:44:24.650 --> 1:44:27.530
<v Speaker 5>to figure that out together. Exactly. Yeah.

1:44:28.670 --> 1:44:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Maybe that is a blueprint.

1:44:30.180 --> 1:44:33.140
<v Speaker 5>Exactly. I'm really not interested in seeing that there's like

1:44:33.439 --> 1:44:36.600
<v Speaker 5>one correct society that everybody has to adopt.

1:44:36.640 --> 1:44:36.780
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:44:37.570 --> 1:44:40.410
<v Speaker 5>I think we can learn something from the incredible diversity

1:44:40.830 --> 1:44:44.450
<v Speaker 5>of human societies that have existed. And we can use

1:44:44.490 --> 1:44:48.460
<v Speaker 5>that not for mimicry, but for inspiration, you know, to

1:44:49.060 --> 1:44:54.520
<v Speaker 5>realize that we too can pursue these uncharted territories and

1:44:55.240 --> 1:44:58.340
<v Speaker 5>develop something new or to take old concepts and stretch

1:44:58.360 --> 1:44:59.400
<v Speaker 5>them into new forms.

1:45:00.220 --> 1:45:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, definitely.

1:45:01.620 --> 1:45:05.430
<v Speaker 5>The author Daniel Quinn in his book Ishmael had made

1:45:05.470 --> 1:45:09.900
<v Speaker 5>a point that Tribes can be defined not by hunting

1:45:09.960 --> 1:45:14.200
<v Speaker 5>and gathering or ethnicity, but as a social organization that

1:45:14.240 --> 1:45:17.479
<v Speaker 5>allows people to make a living together. And so by

1:45:17.620 --> 1:45:22.020
<v Speaker 5>this definition, people still today create tribal forms of organization

1:45:22.180 --> 1:45:25.390
<v Speaker 5>all the time, whether it be mutual aid networks, affinity groups,

1:45:25.470 --> 1:45:31.050
<v Speaker 5>intentional communities, wherever people freely organize themselves around shared needs

1:45:31.150 --> 1:45:34.660
<v Speaker 5>and shared purposes. One thing Quinn emphasizes is that these

1:45:34.680 --> 1:45:38.010
<v Speaker 5>kinds of societies can be very flexible. You know, when

1:45:38.250 --> 1:45:41.170
<v Speaker 5>these arrangements are no longer working for us, we can

1:45:41.210 --> 1:45:44.030
<v Speaker 5>change them. We can walk away from them. We're not

1:45:44.130 --> 1:45:46.309
<v Speaker 5>tied to them in the way that we are basically

1:45:46.390 --> 1:45:50.750
<v Speaker 5>bound by an enormous bureaucracy that we're supposedly in social

1:45:50.810 --> 1:45:53.910
<v Speaker 5>contract with today. And so really, for me, that's what

1:45:54.010 --> 1:45:56.689
<v Speaker 5>I want to focus on, a world where people have

1:45:57.020 --> 1:46:02.590
<v Speaker 5>greater control over their lives, more decentralized, more cooperation, a

1:46:02.610 --> 1:46:06.130
<v Speaker 5>world where organizations are things that people can freely join

1:46:06.250 --> 1:46:10.560
<v Speaker 5>and reshape and split and leave, and they're no longer

1:46:10.600 --> 1:46:15.059
<v Speaker 5>serving their needs. I really care about GDP metrics and,

1:46:16.100 --> 1:46:21.189
<v Speaker 5>you know, megacity concentrations. I just want to know, you know,

1:46:21.330 --> 1:46:27.330
<v Speaker 5>how we get from here to there together. And to me,

1:46:27.370 --> 1:46:30.950
<v Speaker 5>that is something that requires... as I've said many times

1:46:30.990 --> 1:46:34.639
<v Speaker 5>before on this podcast and on my YouTube channel, it

1:46:34.689 --> 1:46:40.620
<v Speaker 5>requires opposition to systems of domination, you know, through confrontation

1:46:40.680 --> 1:46:44.940
<v Speaker 5>and non-cooperation, through things like strikes and boycotts and other

1:46:44.979 --> 1:46:48.429
<v Speaker 5>forms of resistance. And it also requires, on the other

1:46:48.510 --> 1:46:51.850
<v Speaker 5>end of that equation, that we prefigure the world we

1:46:51.890 --> 1:46:55.650
<v Speaker 5>want to live in by promoting certain ideas and philosophies.

1:46:55.750 --> 1:47:00.190
<v Speaker 5>But more so by building the actual relationships and institutions

1:47:00.229 --> 1:47:03.370
<v Speaker 5>we want to live in and be a part of.

1:47:04.050 --> 1:47:05.930
<v Speaker 5>And I think that these are two processes that will

1:47:05.970 --> 1:47:09.650
<v Speaker 5>reinforce each other. You know, people will see and experience

1:47:09.689 --> 1:47:14.550
<v Speaker 5>different ways of organizing their lives and that informs their ideology.

1:47:15.010 --> 1:47:18.550
<v Speaker 5>They become more confident that these alternatives are possible and

1:47:18.570 --> 1:47:22.519
<v Speaker 5>it drives them to push them in new directions. So

1:47:22.530 --> 1:47:25.720
<v Speaker 5>I say all that to say that The idea of

1:47:25.780 --> 1:47:30.950
<v Speaker 5>civilization had its place and has had its time. But

1:47:30.990 --> 1:47:35.970
<v Speaker 5>I think that we can let go of that old idea.

1:47:35.990 --> 1:47:41.330
<v Speaker 5>You know, that we don't have to assume that there

1:47:41.390 --> 1:47:45.760
<v Speaker 5>is no other alternative. And I think that requires not

1:47:45.800 --> 1:47:49.880
<v Speaker 5>just a rejection, but an act of replacement. To make

1:47:49.920 --> 1:47:55.460
<v Speaker 5>the cracks of the old order apparent... And to make

1:47:56.260 --> 1:48:03.160
<v Speaker 5>the idea, the omni idea of liberalism, capitalism, and civilization

1:48:03.840 --> 1:48:09.439
<v Speaker 5>unconvincing by the presentation of this other alternative. I know

1:48:09.510 --> 1:48:13.190
<v Speaker 5>some people might call that next thing a better civilization,

1:48:13.870 --> 1:48:16.410
<v Speaker 5>but I would prefer to be, you know, didn't bind

1:48:16.450 --> 1:48:20.720
<v Speaker 5>ourselves to that old terminology. I least that's how i

1:48:20.880 --> 1:48:23.240
<v Speaker 5>try to approach it and what about.

1:48:23.100 --> 1:48:26.260
<v Speaker 8>You yeah i don't think we should be beholden to

1:48:26.979 --> 1:48:29.100
<v Speaker 8>these things that they can hold us back right and

1:48:29.120 --> 1:48:30.920
<v Speaker 8>as you say we should be more focused in like

1:48:31.540 --> 1:48:34.040
<v Speaker 8>building the world that we want to live in and

1:48:34.100 --> 1:48:36.040
<v Speaker 8>not so much building the world we've been told we

1:48:36.080 --> 1:48:38.729
<v Speaker 8>should want to live in language can turn into a

1:48:38.770 --> 1:48:42.290
<v Speaker 8>way of seeing the world and i think we need

1:48:42.310 --> 1:48:45.090
<v Speaker 8>to be careful of letting language determine how we see

1:48:45.130 --> 1:48:48.970
<v Speaker 8>the world in a way that inherently like limits our

1:48:48.990 --> 1:48:51.309
<v Speaker 8>ability to create a better one and i think this

1:48:51.380 --> 1:48:54.259
<v Speaker 8>is a concept that we need to be very careful

1:48:54.300 --> 1:48:57.120
<v Speaker 8>of like when it comes to that and just like

1:48:57.160 --> 1:49:00.019
<v Speaker 8>the inherent bigotry that came came with a lot of

1:49:00.360 --> 1:49:03.900
<v Speaker 8>civilization narratives right Sometimes I do like the idea, and

1:49:03.950 --> 1:49:05.580
<v Speaker 8>Scott talks about this a little bit, right? But like,

1:49:05.860 --> 1:49:09.179
<v Speaker 8>in fact, it is people in states who are domesticated

1:49:09.200 --> 1:49:12.820
<v Speaker 8>and they were domesticated by grain crops. Grain crops brought

1:49:12.840 --> 1:49:14.960
<v Speaker 8>those people in, forced them to live in a certain place,

1:49:15.000 --> 1:49:16.660
<v Speaker 8>forced them to live in a certain way, all this

1:49:16.680 --> 1:49:19.559
<v Speaker 8>so they could tend and care for grain crops, right?

1:49:19.689 --> 1:49:19.990
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:49:20.250 --> 1:49:23.830
<v Speaker 8>Like, I think maybe flipping that around might help people

1:49:23.870 --> 1:49:25.010
<v Speaker 8>understand a little bit.

1:49:25.750 --> 1:49:28.030
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think there's a, I forget the name of

1:49:28.070 --> 1:49:30.750
<v Speaker 5>the book. Is it Botany of Desire?

1:49:30.770 --> 1:49:30.850
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:49:32.260 --> 1:49:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I haven't read that. I've been recommended that book before.

1:49:35.020 --> 1:49:38.740
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I read that a couple years ago. And I

1:49:38.880 --> 1:49:42.320
<v Speaker 5>think it was on that very subject. The idea that

1:49:43.140 --> 1:49:47.400
<v Speaker 5>the plans that we've raised have in some ways domesticated us.

1:49:47.939 --> 1:49:48.200
<v Speaker 9>Right.

1:49:48.900 --> 1:49:52.200
<v Speaker 5>Just as we have domesticated them. It's been a reciprocal process.

1:49:52.689 --> 1:49:53.620
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I like that idea.

1:49:54.050 --> 1:49:56.269
<v Speaker 5>That, I think, was like a theme or an element

1:49:56.390 --> 1:49:57.849
<v Speaker 5>of that book, if I remember correctly.

1:49:57.870 --> 1:49:58.550
<v Speaker 4>Okay, nice.

1:49:58.630 --> 1:50:01.830
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Or maybe it's a theme that I read into it.

1:50:02.280 --> 1:50:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Right, either way, I think it's sometimes a useful way

1:50:04.680 --> 1:50:05.360
<v Speaker 4>of seeing the world.

1:50:06.020 --> 1:50:07.980
<v Speaker 5>And yeah, I guess that's one of my takeaways as well.

1:50:08.860 --> 1:50:13.099
<v Speaker 5>Play around with concepts, think with them, flip them upside down.

1:50:14.020 --> 1:50:17.349
<v Speaker 5>And I think that is also how we innovate, how

1:50:17.390 --> 1:50:21.809
<v Speaker 5>we create new things, new meaning. You know, there is this,

1:50:22.370 --> 1:50:25.689
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a proverb, or it might be an Ecclesiastes,

1:50:26.350 --> 1:50:28.350
<v Speaker 5>but it's like, there's nothing new under the sun.

1:50:28.810 --> 1:50:28.950
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:50:29.700 --> 1:50:32.660
<v Speaker 5>So it's like creativity is just the ways that we

1:50:32.700 --> 1:50:37.500
<v Speaker 5>repurpose what already exists. We build upon everything that came before.

1:50:38.420 --> 1:50:40.889
<v Speaker 5>And we have to be willing to play around with

1:50:40.970 --> 1:50:43.929
<v Speaker 5>it if we want to get to that point of innovator.

1:50:44.570 --> 1:50:44.750
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:50:45.710 --> 1:50:49.950
<v Speaker 5>That's pretty much all I have for today. All power

1:50:49.990 --> 1:50:52.450
<v Speaker 5>to all the people. Peace.

1:51:08.200 --> 1:51:11.620
<v Speaker 4>This is It Could Happen Here, Executive Disorder, our weekly

1:51:11.660 --> 1:51:14.630
<v Speaker 4>newscast covering what's happening in the White House, the crumbling world,

1:51:14.689 --> 1:51:18.110
<v Speaker 4>and what this means for you. I'm Garrison Davis. This episode,

1:51:18.150 --> 1:51:22.570
<v Speaker 4>we are covering the week of August 26th to September 2nd. Today,

1:51:22.590 --> 1:51:26.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm joined by James Stout, Robert Evans, and special correspondent

1:51:26.939 --> 1:51:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Prop from our show Hood Politics. Welcome.

1:51:30.300 --> 1:51:32.679
<v Speaker 9>Hey, long-time listener, first-time caller, you know.

1:51:33.280 --> 1:51:33.940
<v Speaker 5>Glad to be here.

1:51:34.240 --> 1:51:36.380
<v Speaker 4>First time on ED. You've been on It Could Happen

1:51:36.400 --> 1:51:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Here a few times.

1:51:37.590 --> 1:51:38.550
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure.

1:51:38.630 --> 1:51:38.830
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:51:39.370 --> 1:51:40.430
<v Speaker 9>Your favorite cousin, you know.

1:51:41.229 --> 1:51:43.170
<v Speaker 4>James, do you want to start with your little short

1:51:43.250 --> 1:51:43.870
<v Speaker 4>news items?

1:51:44.110 --> 1:51:46.530
<v Speaker 8>This is a barrage of bad news. Prop if you're

1:51:46.560 --> 1:51:51.080
<v Speaker 8>not familiar with this. Last week, I guess, barrage was

1:51:51.100 --> 1:51:54.220
<v Speaker 8>an unfortunate choice of words. Right when we were releasing this,

1:51:54.540 --> 1:51:57.640
<v Speaker 8>a flood in Nepal caused catastrophic damage.

1:51:58.080 --> 1:51:58.380
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:51:59.660 --> 1:52:02.090
<v Speaker 4>If you're on the internet, you've seen the videos, right? Yeah.

1:52:02.090 --> 1:52:07.090
<v Speaker 8>1,000... People have been reported dead so far with nearly

1:52:07.090 --> 1:52:11.469
<v Speaker 8>4,000 missing. The current hypothesis is that a glacial collapse

1:52:11.689 --> 1:52:14.769
<v Speaker 8>so large and fast that it caused a seismic event,

1:52:15.430 --> 1:52:18.980
<v Speaker 8>caused a detached portion of the glacier to melt due

1:52:19.020 --> 1:52:21.080
<v Speaker 8>to friction as it fell. So there was like a

1:52:21.100 --> 1:52:21.840
<v Speaker 8>seismic event.

1:52:22.000 --> 1:52:22.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:52:22.300 --> 1:52:24.599
<v Speaker 8>And there was some question of the timeline, right? Did

1:52:24.620 --> 1:52:27.180
<v Speaker 8>the seismic event precipitate the collapse or did the collapse?

1:52:27.780 --> 1:52:28.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:52:29.280 --> 1:52:32.349
<v Speaker 8>From what I've seen, the current hypothesis is that so

1:52:32.400 --> 1:52:36.120
<v Speaker 8>much of the glacier fell that it created the seismic event.

1:52:36.520 --> 1:52:38.139
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that's what I remember hearing.

1:52:38.860 --> 1:52:40.420
<v Speaker 9>Me too. And the most logical.

1:52:41.060 --> 1:52:43.820
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, yeah, it does seem like it wasn't a

1:52:43.860 --> 1:52:45.809
<v Speaker 8>tectonic situation here.

1:52:45.820 --> 1:52:49.050
<v Speaker 2>No, it was purely as a result of the glacier degrading.

1:52:49.439 --> 1:52:53.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've seen a glacier carve before.

1:52:53.979 --> 1:52:56.080
<v Speaker 8>It's an incredible thing. But this is on a scale

1:52:56.140 --> 1:52:59.929
<v Speaker 8>that is almost unfathomable. There are early warning systems for

1:52:59.970 --> 1:53:02.269
<v Speaker 8>flooding on that river, but the flooding moved so fast

1:53:02.290 --> 1:53:06.809
<v Speaker 8>that it swamped and destroyed those facilities before they could trigger.

1:53:06.930 --> 1:53:08.050
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:53:08.070 --> 1:53:09.410
<v Speaker 4>We're talking seconds here.

1:53:09.590 --> 1:53:09.910
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:53:10.850 --> 1:53:14.710
<v Speaker 8>Secondly, I'm going to talk about the SDF, the Syrian

1:53:14.750 --> 1:53:19.400
<v Speaker 8>Democratic Forces, which was officially dissolved on August 25th. had

1:53:19.439 --> 1:53:24.219
<v Speaker 8>its forces absorbed into the new Syrian army, Masloum Ebdi.

1:53:24.460 --> 1:53:27.740
<v Speaker 2>The SDF being, of course, the armed forces of Rojava,

1:53:27.939 --> 1:53:33.349
<v Speaker 2>the self-administration, the ANAS, you know, in northeast Syria. James

1:53:33.370 --> 1:53:34.490
<v Speaker 2>and I both reported from there.

1:53:34.850 --> 1:53:37.710
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and I know it's been really an important place,

1:53:37.770 --> 1:53:40.139
<v Speaker 8>an important thing for both of us. We will, like,

1:53:40.700 --> 1:53:43.560
<v Speaker 8>break this down in more detail in another episode, but

1:53:44.130 --> 1:53:46.729
<v Speaker 8>I wanted to say really briefly, Mazlou Mebdi made the

1:53:46.790 --> 1:53:51.550
<v Speaker 8>announcement and he said that approximately 10,000 SDF fighters have

1:53:51.570 --> 1:53:56.340
<v Speaker 8>been integrated into a new Syrian army. The integration that

1:53:56.460 --> 1:53:59.440
<v Speaker 8>matters is the Women's Protection Forces, the YPJ.

1:53:59.800 --> 1:54:02.299
<v Speaker 2>And some of the ethnic minority militias.

1:54:02.560 --> 1:54:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Sure, yeah, yeah. The non-Kurdish ethnic minorities.

1:54:05.580 --> 1:54:08.860
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Armenians and the Assyrians and the like.

1:54:08.880 --> 1:54:10.840
<v Speaker 4>The Assyrians, yeah, yeah.

1:54:12.340 --> 1:54:15.600
<v Speaker 8>As it seems right now, the offer is for the

1:54:15.720 --> 1:54:20.620
<v Speaker 8>YPGA to integrate as individuals into the Ministry of the Interior.

1:54:20.880 --> 1:54:23.880
<v Speaker 8>So doing stuff like tourism police, border police. And it

1:54:23.939 --> 1:54:27.020
<v Speaker 8>does not seem that the new Syrian government is interested

1:54:27.060 --> 1:54:29.540
<v Speaker 8>in having women in its armed forces, right? Despite these

1:54:29.600 --> 1:54:32.500
<v Speaker 8>particular women being some of the most capable fighters in

1:54:32.540 --> 1:54:35.720
<v Speaker 8>the world who have been trained by the US and

1:54:35.740 --> 1:54:38.470
<v Speaker 8>by other militaries and have been fighting for more than

1:54:38.480 --> 1:54:41.400
<v Speaker 8>a decade in some cases. Yeah. Right now, what they

1:54:41.460 --> 1:54:43.970
<v Speaker 8>want is to remain as a distinct entity with their

1:54:44.050 --> 1:54:47.450
<v Speaker 8>own structures and not to be broken up as a

1:54:47.510 --> 1:54:51.510
<v Speaker 8>group of disparate individuals. In related news, I guess, there

1:54:51.530 --> 1:54:53.950
<v Speaker 8>have been protests in Kamishlo this week after the government

1:54:54.010 --> 1:54:56.450
<v Speaker 8>failed to follow through on its promise in the constitution

1:54:56.590 --> 1:55:00.280
<v Speaker 8>to have Kurdish be a language of instruction. Instead, lessons

1:55:00.340 --> 1:55:03.360
<v Speaker 8>are optional and three hours a week.

1:55:04.100 --> 1:55:05.840
<v Speaker 4>This would be a disaster for people.

1:55:06.100 --> 1:55:09.310
<v Speaker 8>There are generations who have grown up in Rojava Where

1:55:09.370 --> 1:55:11.470
<v Speaker 8>Kurdish was the language they spoke at home, Kurdish was

1:55:11.490 --> 1:55:14.910
<v Speaker 8>the language they spoke at school. Of course, Comanji Kurdish

1:55:14.930 --> 1:55:18.130
<v Speaker 8>has a different alphabet to Arabic. There are older generations

1:55:18.190 --> 1:55:21.670
<v Speaker 8>who were educated in Arabic, right? And they're very aware

1:55:21.710 --> 1:55:25.330
<v Speaker 8>of this difference. But the right to education in your

1:55:25.350 --> 1:55:28.850
<v Speaker 8>mother tongue, when we look at autonomous movements across the world,

1:55:28.870 --> 1:55:31.650
<v Speaker 8>I wrote about this in my PhD dissertation actually, this

1:55:31.710 --> 1:55:34.530
<v Speaker 8>is one of the things that is considered sufficient autonomy

1:55:35.150 --> 1:55:39.260
<v Speaker 8>for these sub-state national groups and taking it away. It's

1:55:39.270 --> 1:55:40.400
<v Speaker 8>a very serious thing.

1:55:40.960 --> 1:55:43.140
<v Speaker 2>No, especially since, I mean, a lot of these people,

1:55:43.180 --> 1:55:45.800
<v Speaker 2>like in Turkey, it's been criminalized and there have been

1:55:46.280 --> 1:55:48.920
<v Speaker 2>degrees of this in Syria under different regimes. But in Turkey,

1:55:48.940 --> 1:55:50.840
<v Speaker 2>it's been criminalized for a long time to speak the

1:55:50.860 --> 1:55:51.540
<v Speaker 2>Kurdish language.

1:55:51.900 --> 1:55:52.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:55:52.300 --> 1:55:57.690
<v Speaker 8>And the school textbooks have explicitly in Turkey, like, I mean,

1:55:57.710 --> 1:56:00.800
<v Speaker 8>they've written Kurds out of history, right? Let's move to Myanmar,

1:56:00.860 --> 1:56:04.100
<v Speaker 8>where a Burmese junta resupply convoy to Bamu has been

1:56:04.140 --> 1:56:07.240
<v Speaker 8>targeted by numerous FPV drones and attacks on its way

1:56:07.300 --> 1:56:11.010
<v Speaker 8>up the Urawadi River to resupply the town. The KIA,

1:56:11.070 --> 1:56:14.910
<v Speaker 8>Kachin Independence Army, is attacking government forces there. It seems

1:56:14.930 --> 1:56:18.629
<v Speaker 8>like this morning, two boats seem.

1:56:18.450 --> 1:56:19.430
<v Speaker 4>To have surrendered.

1:56:19.770 --> 1:56:22.400
<v Speaker 8>And there are videos of what look like hundreds of

1:56:23.020 --> 1:56:26.440
<v Speaker 8>what are probably conscript soldiers being captured by the KIA.

1:56:26.100 --> 1:56:27.360
<v Speaker 4>And associated PDFs.

1:56:28.180 --> 1:56:28.780
<v Speaker 2>They're relying.

1:56:29.560 --> 1:56:32.490
<v Speaker 8>incredibly heavily on conscripts right now. Someone sent me some

1:56:32.550 --> 1:56:35.610
<v Speaker 8>documents from a junta officer who they captured showing that

1:56:36.070 --> 1:56:38.890
<v Speaker 8>something like a single digit percentage of the troops under

1:56:38.950 --> 1:56:43.430
<v Speaker 8>his command had been in the military before the conscription began.

1:56:44.350 --> 1:56:47.020
<v Speaker 8>So they're like taking people with very little training and

1:56:47.040 --> 1:56:50.240
<v Speaker 8>sent into the front line very quickly, which relates to

1:56:50.260 --> 1:56:52.300
<v Speaker 8>my next point, which is that Malaysia is planning to

1:56:52.360 --> 1:56:56.580
<v Speaker 8>forcibly return Myanmar nationals on Myanmar Navy ships at the

1:56:56.600 --> 1:56:59.290
<v Speaker 8>end of this month. We can pretty safely assume that

1:56:59.330 --> 1:57:03.050
<v Speaker 8>these will be Rohingya or other Muslim peoples from Myanmar, right?

1:57:03.170 --> 1:57:04.850
<v Speaker 8>Malaysia has been one of the places where people have

1:57:04.870 --> 1:57:07.850
<v Speaker 8>tended to go, especially with conditions being what they are

1:57:07.910 --> 1:57:11.780
<v Speaker 8>in Cox's Bazaar. This would lead to those people most

1:57:11.820 --> 1:57:14.280
<v Speaker 8>likely immediately being conscripted if they were sent back.

1:57:15.040 --> 1:57:16.960
<v Speaker 4>That's all I've got. Gary, I know you have some

1:57:17.000 --> 1:57:20.400
<v Speaker 4>stuff too. Yes, I do have some stuff because it

1:57:20.440 --> 1:57:25.320
<v Speaker 4>was a big news week for White House extended universe

1:57:25.340 --> 1:57:26.120
<v Speaker 4>related news.

1:57:26.440 --> 1:57:27.200
<v Speaker 5>Okay. On.

1:57:27.900 --> 1:57:30.560
<v Speaker 4>August 28th, Trump signed an executive order to create the

1:57:30.600 --> 1:57:34.450
<v Speaker 4>country's first US Space Academy. The order starts by saying, quote,

1:57:34.930 --> 1:57:38.950
<v Speaker 4>space is a critical domain for American national security, economic growth,

1:57:39.030 --> 1:57:43.450
<v Speaker 4>scientific discovery, and technological innovation. More details on this will

1:57:43.490 --> 1:57:44.900
<v Speaker 4>come out in the next 120 days.

1:57:45.270 --> 1:57:47.560
<v Speaker 8>I'm really excited to see how they're going to work

1:57:47.640 --> 1:57:50.140
<v Speaker 8>in the Confederate flag into that, because you know they're

1:57:50.160 --> 1:57:50.540
<v Speaker 8>going to.

1:57:51.520 --> 1:57:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Military academies love that shit. Yeah. Trump starts evil Star Trek.

1:57:58.480 --> 1:58:02.810
<v Speaker 4>Amid trade disputes with Canada, on August 27th, President Trump

1:58:02.830 --> 1:58:07.290
<v Speaker 4>signed an executive order to rename Lake Ontario to Lake America.

1:58:07.310 --> 1:58:11.660
<v Speaker 4>And as of recording, both Google and Apple Maps have

1:58:11.740 --> 1:58:17.010
<v Speaker 4>complied with Trump's order. This move has not received universal praise,

1:58:17.990 --> 1:58:22.600
<v Speaker 4>even among Trump's followers on the right. Matt Walsh came

1:58:22.640 --> 1:58:26.760
<v Speaker 4>out against this, saying, quote, This will be an unpopular

1:58:26.780 --> 1:58:28.680
<v Speaker 4>opinion on the right, but I think this is kind

1:58:28.700 --> 1:58:31.180
<v Speaker 4>of dumb, even as a troll. Lake Ontario was given

1:58:31.200 --> 1:58:35.440
<v Speaker 4>that name on maps by European explorers long before the

1:58:35.480 --> 1:58:39.970
<v Speaker 4>Canadian province of Ontario was named. There are several cities

1:58:40.010 --> 1:58:42.860
<v Speaker 4>in America called Ontario, at least one of them, predating

1:58:42.900 --> 1:58:45.910
<v Speaker 4>the Canadian province by like a hundred years, because the

1:58:45.930 --> 1:58:49.190
<v Speaker 4>word originates with native tribes in North America. Yeah. It

1:58:49.250 --> 1:58:52.090
<v Speaker 4>is not a Canadian invention. Canadians never uniquely owned the

1:58:52.130 --> 1:58:54.960
<v Speaker 4>lake or the name, so in effect... All you're doing

1:58:54.980 --> 1:58:56.880
<v Speaker 4>here is actually giving them credit for a thing that

1:58:56.920 --> 1:59:00.650
<v Speaker 4>wasn't theirs to begin with. Yeah, it's funny when Canadians

1:59:00.710 --> 1:59:04.030
<v Speaker 4>are upset, I guess, or whatever, but Lake Ontario name

1:59:04.070 --> 1:59:09.030
<v Speaker 4>itself is American history dating back many centuries. Not sure

1:59:09.070 --> 1:59:12.230
<v Speaker 4>how you own Canada by deleting your own history, unquote.

1:59:13.010 --> 1:59:18.330
<v Speaker 4>So that's Matt Walsh's long, long take on this, if

1:59:18.370 --> 1:59:19.420
<v Speaker 4>you are interested in.

1:59:20.010 --> 1:59:22.630
<v Speaker 2>Man, of all the things I would think he'd break

1:59:22.670 --> 1:59:23.910
<v Speaker 2>with the administration on.

1:59:24.590 --> 1:59:25.310
<v Speaker 4>Right. Yeah.

1:59:25.450 --> 1:59:25.810
<v Speaker 9>Okay.

1:59:26.110 --> 1:59:26.610
<v Speaker 5>All right, Matt.

1:59:27.290 --> 1:59:27.490
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1:59:27.670 --> 1:59:30.690
<v Speaker 4>Well, because European explorers did that.

1:59:30.930 --> 1:59:31.290
<v Speaker 7>I know.

1:59:31.310 --> 1:59:31.890
<v Speaker 9>I know.

1:59:32.410 --> 1:59:33.570
<v Speaker 2>It's just also stupid.

1:59:33.590 --> 1:59:34.170
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:59:34.810 --> 1:59:39.070
<v Speaker 9>And also, okay, it's stupid. It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter.

1:59:39.790 --> 1:59:44.970
<v Speaker 7>But America's the name of the continent. It shouldn't bother

1:59:44.990 --> 1:59:48.370
<v Speaker 7>me as much as it does. But like- Canada's a

1:59:48.390 --> 1:59:50.470
<v Speaker 7>part of America. Like, you understand it.

1:59:50.770 --> 1:59:51.560
<v Speaker 9>The Americas.

1:59:51.690 --> 1:59:51.990
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:59:52.700 --> 1:59:54.230
<v Speaker 9>Even if it is a troll. It's not even a...

1:59:55.480 --> 1:59:57.300
<v Speaker 9>I shouldn't care that your troll sucks.

1:59:57.840 --> 1:59:59.400
<v Speaker 4>It's deeply frustrating.

1:59:59.900 --> 2:00:00.320
<v Speaker 9>Yes.

2:00:00.800 --> 2:00:01.660
<v Speaker 4>It's so stupid.

2:00:02.600 --> 2:00:06.630
<v Speaker 7>And even calling the Gulf of Mexico, calling the Gulf

2:00:06.650 --> 2:00:07.210
<v Speaker 7>of America.

2:00:07.250 --> 2:00:08.950
<v Speaker 9>You know Mexico's a part of America.

2:00:09.090 --> 2:00:09.410
<v Speaker 4>It's still.

2:00:10.030 --> 2:00:13.320
<v Speaker 9>It's not a... It's just not a... This doesn't matter.

2:00:13.940 --> 2:00:14.500
<v Speaker 9>It doesn't matter.

2:00:14.620 --> 2:00:17.060
<v Speaker 4>It's one of the most annoying things that he has

2:00:17.100 --> 2:00:19.200
<v Speaker 4>done and continues to do as president. Yeah. And the

2:00:19.240 --> 2:00:21.940
<v Speaker 4>fact that Apple and Google Maps is like the key

2:00:21.960 --> 2:00:26.040
<v Speaker 4>towing to this is just completely embarrassing. A pundit on

2:00:26.160 --> 2:00:30.890
<v Speaker 4>Fox News' The Five also did not like this, but

2:00:30.940 --> 2:00:33.630
<v Speaker 4>because he was concerned that the new acronym that would

2:00:33.670 --> 2:00:35.850
<v Speaker 4>be given to kids to memorize the Great Lakes, right?

2:00:35.870 --> 2:00:40.090
<v Speaker 4>Because the acronym used to be HOMES. To go over

2:00:40.250 --> 2:00:43.710
<v Speaker 4>all of the Great Lakes. That's the first letter of

2:00:43.890 --> 2:00:48.950
<v Speaker 4>each said lake. Huron, Ontario, Michigan, Erie, and Superior. Work

2:00:48.990 --> 2:00:53.100
<v Speaker 4>well for you. This Fox News prudent is concerned that

2:00:53.280 --> 2:00:57.600
<v Speaker 4>now the acronym will be too close to Hamas. Because

2:00:57.680 --> 2:00:59.730
<v Speaker 4>you have to trade the O for the A.

2:00:59.810 --> 2:01:00.870
<v Speaker 2>Yep, yep, yep, yep.

2:01:01.950 --> 2:01:02.330
<v Speaker 9>All right.

2:01:03.590 --> 2:01:07.210
<v Speaker 8>If we could get a merry-go-vespoochie in there, if.

2:01:06.730 --> 2:01:07.950
<v Speaker 4>Lake Erie, we'd be there.

2:01:08.310 --> 2:01:10.710
<v Speaker 2>Right. I think we could make it to Homo. We

2:01:10.730 --> 2:01:12.650
<v Speaker 2>could probably get to Homo pretty easily. We could get

2:01:12.670 --> 2:01:14.430
<v Speaker 2>to Homo. If we're close to Hamas, we've got to

2:01:14.470 --> 2:01:15.250
<v Speaker 2>be close to Homo.

2:01:15.550 --> 2:01:18.250
<v Speaker 4>The next liberal president has to replace the name of

2:01:18.310 --> 2:01:21.720
<v Speaker 4>Lake Erie with another O word and have homos.

2:01:22.980 --> 2:01:26.840
<v Speaker 9>Lake Obama. There we go. Lake Obama.

2:01:26.860 --> 2:01:32.710
<v Speaker 4>Lake Obama. Yeah, that's good. Trump has also, since renaming,

2:01:32.930 --> 2:01:35.530
<v Speaker 4>quote unquote, renaming the lake, he has also suggested changing

2:01:35.560 --> 2:01:38.540
<v Speaker 4>the name of either the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean to

2:01:38.740 --> 2:01:39.580
<v Speaker 4>the American Ocean.

2:01:39.600 --> 2:01:40.400
<v Speaker 2>The American Ocean, absolutely.

2:01:40.480 --> 2:01:43.860
<v Speaker 4>And has also talked repeatedly about changing the name of

2:01:43.880 --> 2:01:46.120
<v Speaker 4>the Strait of Hormuz to the Strait of America.

2:01:46.140 --> 2:01:46.860
<v Speaker 5>Oh my gosh.

2:01:46.880 --> 2:01:50.300
<v Speaker 4>So we'll see how that works out for him. How's

2:01:50.320 --> 2:01:54.110
<v Speaker 4>that going for him? We'll check in later. how's that

2:01:54.150 --> 2:01:55.630
<v Speaker 4>going yeah.

2:01:55.230 --> 2:01:58.280
<v Speaker 9>About to go to your backyard and change the name

2:01:58.320 --> 2:01:58.560
<v Speaker 9>of it.

2:01:59.180 --> 2:02:02.260
<v Speaker 2>This is just for clout right like this is just

2:02:02.300 --> 2:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>a fucking like he's found out that he gets a

2:02:04.380 --> 2:02:06.750
<v Speaker 2>lot of attention and owns the libs and yeah yeah

2:02:06.770 --> 2:02:09.210
<v Speaker 2>yeah creates like a news cycle whenever he does this

2:02:09.270 --> 2:02:11.730
<v Speaker 2>bullshit that's the reason this is happening right.

2:02:11.690 --> 2:02:13.770
<v Speaker 4>Yeah that's why i don't want to speak any more

2:02:13.830 --> 2:02:16.720
<v Speaker 4>about it but right it's it's it's it's worth a

2:02:16.760 --> 2:02:20.740
<v Speaker 4>little mention there and for sure Homes to Hamas is

2:02:21.040 --> 2:02:21.940
<v Speaker 4>undeniably funny.

2:02:22.100 --> 2:02:27.080
<v Speaker 8>Homes for Hamas is an amazing, like a fictional NGO

2:02:27.120 --> 2:02:29.020
<v Speaker 8>that would come out of like a Matt Walsh tweet.

2:02:29.680 --> 2:02:32.560
<v Speaker 4>That is true. And then maybe the new Daily Wire

2:02:32.640 --> 2:02:33.680
<v Speaker 4>Plus film.

2:02:34.100 --> 2:02:38.160
<v Speaker 8>The next film, yeah. It's Habitat for Humanity, but it's

2:02:38.230 --> 2:02:39.690
<v Speaker 8>Habitat for Hamas instead.

2:02:40.970 --> 2:02:43.170
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of something that could come out of a Daily

2:02:43.210 --> 2:02:47.770
<v Speaker 4>Wire exclusive film, A former staffer for Mike Collins, a

2:02:47.810 --> 2:02:50.650
<v Speaker 4>Republican congressman from Georgia who's currently running for Senate against

2:02:50.690 --> 2:02:54.070
<v Speaker 4>John Ossoff, has been linked to a Nazi account on

2:02:54.270 --> 2:02:57.950
<v Speaker 4>X the Everything app. This ex-staffer is a 24-year-old who

2:02:58.150 --> 2:03:01.360
<v Speaker 4>interned for Collins in 2024 and then the next year

2:03:01.420 --> 2:03:05.860
<v Speaker 4>worked as a contractor at a pro-Collins PAC. On X,

2:03:06.080 --> 2:03:10.360
<v Speaker 4>this staffer described himself as a quote-unquote twink fascist.

2:03:10.640 --> 2:03:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Okay, yeah.

2:03:12.450 --> 2:03:15.490
<v Speaker 4>And in one post from July of this year, he

2:03:17.130 --> 2:03:20.530
<v Speaker 4>used the word twink to type out the shape of

2:03:20.570 --> 2:03:21.390
<v Speaker 4>a swastika.

2:03:21.710 --> 2:03:23.630
<v Speaker 2>Okay. All right.

2:03:23.710 --> 2:03:25.350
<v Speaker 4>I have it in the doc here if you guys

2:03:25.370 --> 2:03:27.110
<v Speaker 4>want to see.

2:03:27.490 --> 2:03:28.590
<v Speaker 9>What is happening?

2:03:28.890 --> 2:03:30.600
<v Speaker 4>How does he think that's going to end for him?

2:03:31.340 --> 2:03:32.230
<v Speaker 4>I don't think he cares.

2:03:32.720 --> 2:03:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:03:34.060 --> 2:03:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a chunk of people for whom all

2:03:36.180 --> 2:03:38.200
<v Speaker 2>that matters is the lulz, right?

2:03:38.640 --> 2:03:39.860
<v Speaker 4>So it would seem, yeah.

2:03:40.190 --> 2:03:40.430
<v Speaker 7>Wow.

2:03:40.470 --> 2:03:42.810
<v Speaker 4>He also posted thirst traps of himself.

2:03:43.070 --> 2:03:43.290
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

2:03:43.330 --> 2:03:44.589
<v Speaker 4>Captioned racist.

2:03:44.650 --> 2:03:45.570
<v Speaker 2>That's not desperate.

2:03:45.910 --> 2:03:49.250
<v Speaker 4>And also shared a grok generated photo of himself in

2:03:49.270 --> 2:03:50.870
<v Speaker 4>a Klan robe. Fascinating.

2:03:50.910 --> 2:03:54.990
<v Speaker 7>I never thought I'd see the day of like bored Nazis.

2:03:55.350 --> 2:03:57.310
<v Speaker 4>With too much time on their hands online.

2:03:57.610 --> 2:03:57.950
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:03:57.970 --> 2:03:58.430
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:03:58.510 --> 2:03:59.950
<v Speaker 9>I was like, y'all just bored now.

2:04:00.090 --> 2:04:02.610
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's where these Nazis started.

2:04:02.810 --> 2:04:03.100
<v Speaker 9>Okay.

2:04:03.220 --> 2:04:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Right.

2:04:03.560 --> 2:04:06.460
<v Speaker 2>It began in boredom. And I guess to some extent,

2:04:06.780 --> 2:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, it should end there.

2:04:08.540 --> 2:04:08.620
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:04:10.750 --> 2:04:11.170
<v Speaker 5>Touche.

2:04:11.650 --> 2:04:14.330
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's downstream of being on the internet too much.

2:04:14.570 --> 2:04:14.870
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:04:16.690 --> 2:04:19.970
<v Speaker 4>On Monday, Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy announced an emergency

2:04:20.010 --> 2:04:25.100
<v Speaker 4>shutdown of 110 commercial driver's license schools, which, according to

2:04:25.140 --> 2:04:28.680
<v Speaker 4>the White House, accounted for, quote, more than 5,000 of

2:04:28.740 --> 2:04:34.060
<v Speaker 4>the drivers who have failed English proficiency tests, unquote. So

2:04:34.140 --> 2:04:37.000
<v Speaker 4>this will make it harder for people to work as

2:04:37.080 --> 2:04:37.700
<v Speaker 4>commercial drivers.

2:04:38.400 --> 2:04:38.620
<v Speaker 6>Hmm.

2:04:39.350 --> 2:04:40.990
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've got too many of those as it is,

2:04:41.030 --> 2:04:42.030
<v Speaker 2>so that's good.

2:04:42.630 --> 2:04:43.010
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, yeah.

2:04:43.610 --> 2:04:47.290
<v Speaker 4>Things are going great. A federal appeals court ruled three

2:04:47.310 --> 2:04:50.630
<v Speaker 4>to one, and that's Trump appointees on that court, that

2:04:50.830 --> 2:04:56.430
<v Speaker 4>states can regulate prediction market platforms like Cauchy as gambling.

2:04:57.410 --> 2:05:00.710
<v Speaker 4>This case originated from regulators in Nevada with support from

2:05:00.730 --> 2:05:03.570
<v Speaker 4>their Republican governor. Obviously, the state of Nevada has an

2:05:03.610 --> 2:05:07.070
<v Speaker 4>interest in keeping these platforms regulated as gambling or kicking

2:05:07.090 --> 2:05:10.670
<v Speaker 4>the platforms out of their state entirely. because it's Nevada.

2:05:10.890 --> 2:05:15.030
<v Speaker 4>It's Las Vegas. The judges in this case wrote, quote,

2:05:15.670 --> 2:05:20.130
<v Speaker 4>The substance of the sports event contracts offered on Kalshi's

2:05:20.170 --> 2:05:25.270
<v Speaker 4>exchange is sports gambling, regardless of whether Kalshi calls them swaps.

2:05:25.750 --> 2:05:30.330
<v Speaker 4>Kalshi's attempts to distinguish its sports event contracts from sportsbooks

2:05:30.390 --> 2:05:37.200
<v Speaker 4>betting are unpersuasive, unquote. The judges also highlighted how in court,

2:05:37.520 --> 2:05:41.990
<v Speaker 4>Kalshi argued that Its platform wasn't actually sports betting, but

2:05:42.030 --> 2:05:45.530
<v Speaker 4>Kalshi had previously used that term to market its platform

2:05:45.650 --> 2:05:46.380
<v Speaker 4>to users.

2:05:47.720 --> 2:05:51.400
<v Speaker 7>I didn't go too deep into this, but yesterday, the

2:05:51.460 --> 2:05:54.260
<v Speaker 7>first person to get a lifetime ban from Kalshi, did

2:05:54.280 --> 2:05:56.060
<v Speaker 7>y'all see this? No.

2:05:56.080 --> 2:05:56.140
<v Speaker 5>No.

2:05:57.280 --> 2:05:59.560
<v Speaker 4>Is it Trump's teleprompter guy?

2:05:59.580 --> 2:05:59.640
<v Speaker 5>No.

2:06:00.180 --> 2:06:00.360
<v Speaker 7>No.

2:06:01.550 --> 2:06:05.570
<v Speaker 9>It's even funnier. It's George Santos. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.

2:06:05.930 --> 2:06:06.550
<v Speaker 9>He's back.

2:06:07.310 --> 2:06:09.290
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:06:09.590 --> 2:06:12.810
<v Speaker 4>No way. 4-1 out for Santos.

2:06:13.510 --> 2:06:14.930
<v Speaker 9>For insider trading.

2:06:15.010 --> 2:06:18.870
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah. Did he bet on himself getting booed

2:06:18.950 --> 2:06:19.510
<v Speaker 4>out of Congress?

2:06:19.530 --> 2:06:22.290
<v Speaker 9>I can only imagine him being like, oh, me, right? Oh,

2:06:22.370 --> 2:06:24.110
<v Speaker 9>fuck me, right? Fuck me.

2:06:26.030 --> 2:06:26.850
<v Speaker 4>That's good.

2:06:27.310 --> 2:06:27.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:06:28.220 --> 2:06:28.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:06:29.150 --> 2:06:32.490
<v Speaker 4>This case here will most likely escalate to the Supreme Court.

2:06:32.930 --> 2:06:34.610
<v Speaker 4>Another case which might end up going to the Supreme

2:06:34.670 --> 2:06:38.590
<v Speaker 4>Court relates to this next short story. A district court

2:06:38.650 --> 2:06:41.970
<v Speaker 4>judge in California ruled that Rubio's use of the NIA

2:06:42.270 --> 2:06:45.750
<v Speaker 4>to deport non-citizens based on their political speech violates the

2:06:45.810 --> 2:06:50.290
<v Speaker 4>First and Fifth Amendments. Stephen Miller reacted to this ruling

2:06:50.380 --> 2:06:54.040
<v Speaker 4>by writing, quote, a district court judge says America must

2:06:54.160 --> 2:06:58.090
<v Speaker 4>admit and keep foreigners who hate America and hate Americans out.

2:06:58.610 --> 2:07:07.270
<v Speaker 4>Court-ordered civilizational suicide. It will not stand, unquote. Yeah. Very

2:07:07.290 --> 2:07:10.470
<v Speaker 4>much in line with Stephen Miller's stance on restricting free

2:07:10.510 --> 2:07:12.850
<v Speaker 4>speech in order to save our civilization.

2:07:12.870 --> 2:07:13.390
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:07:14.850 --> 2:07:17.030
<v Speaker 4>Second to last here, I'm going to talk about a

2:07:17.050 --> 2:07:19.890
<v Speaker 4>story in The Guardian, which everyone should just read the

2:07:19.950 --> 2:07:22.610
<v Speaker 4>full story. It'll be at the top of our show notes,

2:07:22.810 --> 2:07:24.470
<v Speaker 4>so you can check it out. Usually I keep the

2:07:24.530 --> 2:07:26.530
<v Speaker 4>small things show notes at the top. And this one

2:07:26.550 --> 2:07:27.810
<v Speaker 4>will be at the top of the top because you

2:07:27.830 --> 2:07:30.750
<v Speaker 4>should just read the story. Last Saturday, The Guardian reported

2:07:30.790 --> 2:07:33.640
<v Speaker 4>that the Trump admin has been using a, quote, obscure

2:07:33.770 --> 2:07:37.080
<v Speaker 4>legal maneuver to try to obtain private information on journalists,

2:07:37.180 --> 2:07:43.540
<v Speaker 4>nonprofits and unions, unquote, all without judicial oversight. How The

2:07:43.560 --> 2:07:46.500
<v Speaker 4>Guardian learned about this is that feds tried to get

2:07:46.560 --> 2:07:49.510
<v Speaker 4>a search warrant for digital information from a Minneapolis journalist

2:07:49.590 --> 2:07:54.330
<v Speaker 4>named Georgia Fort and Don Lennon. The judge denied this request,

2:07:54.860 --> 2:07:57.620
<v Speaker 4>citing a lack of probable cause, and the government then

2:07:57.720 --> 2:08:01.830
<v Speaker 4>withdrew its request. But weeks later... DHS requested the information

2:08:02.010 --> 2:08:05.340
<v Speaker 4>from Google anyway. They went straight to Google. And per

2:08:05.450 --> 2:08:09.300
<v Speaker 4>The Guardian, they used a, quote, administrative summons citing an

2:08:09.540 --> 2:08:15.640
<v Speaker 4>arcane provision of federal law, 19 U.S.C. 1509, dealing with

2:08:15.800 --> 2:08:20.320
<v Speaker 4>customs imports, unquote. All that was needed to send the

2:08:20.360 --> 2:08:23.740
<v Speaker 4>summons was a sign-off from a DHS official. There was

2:08:23.780 --> 2:08:28.710
<v Speaker 4>no judge involved. Google denied the requests for information on Fort,

2:08:29.130 --> 2:08:34.050
<v Speaker 4>but DHS did secretly obtain her phone records from T-Mobile,

2:08:34.670 --> 2:08:37.620
<v Speaker 4>with no opportunity for her to challenge the summons.

2:08:37.920 --> 2:08:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Hmm.

2:08:38.670 --> 2:08:41.190
<v Speaker 4>For more information, people should read this full article on

2:08:41.210 --> 2:08:45.590
<v Speaker 4>The Guardian. It has other instances of DHS using this

2:08:45.650 --> 2:08:48.839
<v Speaker 4>little piece of customs law. Basically, DHS is arguing that

2:08:48.910 --> 2:08:53.900
<v Speaker 4>because this involves people interfering with ICE agents, it is

2:08:54.160 --> 2:08:58.860
<v Speaker 4>subject to this customs, duties, and taxes import law, which is,

2:08:59.220 --> 2:09:01.100
<v Speaker 4>in cases where this has been actually argued in court,

2:09:01.140 --> 2:09:03.840
<v Speaker 4>has not succeeded. But they have been able to successfully

2:09:03.880 --> 2:09:06.900
<v Speaker 4>get information on a number of people and have also

2:09:07.080 --> 2:09:13.170
<v Speaker 4>requested information on outlets like Democracy Now!, independent journalists, and nonprofits.

2:09:13.950 --> 2:09:15.490
<v Speaker 4>And this follows, you know, a few weeks ago, we

2:09:15.590 --> 2:09:21.930
<v Speaker 4>reported DHS obtaining financial information on unions in Minneapolis as well.

2:09:22.050 --> 2:09:24.030
<v Speaker 4>This is all kind of part of this same time

2:09:24.070 --> 2:09:29.270
<v Speaker 4>zone in terms of the response to Operation Metro Surge. Lastly,

2:09:29.390 --> 2:09:32.770
<v Speaker 4>for small things, and this will be a future episode

2:09:32.810 --> 2:09:38.800
<v Speaker 4>probably next week, Far-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos was deported last week.

2:09:39.280 --> 2:09:40.580
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he sure was.

2:09:41.100 --> 2:09:41.780
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, buddy.

2:09:42.000 --> 2:09:47.820
<v Speaker 4>After promoting ICE and deportations pretty gloriously for years and years.

2:09:47.840 --> 2:09:51.580
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, talking about wanting to masturbate while ICE tore people

2:09:51.620 --> 2:09:57.170
<v Speaker 2>away from their families. Like, he specifically and directly stated, like, that, yeah, yeah,

2:09:57.250 --> 2:09:59.170
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I got no sympathy for the man.

2:10:00.130 --> 2:10:00.690
<v Speaker 4>Certainly not.

2:10:00.810 --> 2:10:02.710
<v Speaker 2>Like, fuck ICE, but, yeah.

2:10:03.220 --> 2:10:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, this is Milo suffering the consequences of

2:10:06.500 --> 2:10:09.000
<v Speaker 4>the world that he helped bring into existence and has

2:10:09.100 --> 2:10:11.660
<v Speaker 4>cheered on for years and years and years. This, you know,

2:10:11.680 --> 2:10:12.860
<v Speaker 4>this should not be a thing that we have in

2:10:12.900 --> 2:10:15.320
<v Speaker 4>our country. This process should not be something that exists,

2:10:15.440 --> 2:10:17.830
<v Speaker 4>but it's one that Milo wants to exist and he

2:10:17.930 --> 2:10:20.450
<v Speaker 4>still wants it to exist. In his interview with Piers

2:10:20.470 --> 2:10:23.810
<v Speaker 4>Morgan after his deportation, he said that the problem is

2:10:23.910 --> 2:10:26.550
<v Speaker 4>not deportations, but that they're just deporting the wrong people.

2:10:26.690 --> 2:10:29.190
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, after saying no one deserves this kind of treatment,

2:10:29.850 --> 2:10:31.600
<v Speaker 2>he then went on to say like, but obviously some

2:10:31.640 --> 2:10:32.120
<v Speaker 2>people do.

2:10:32.320 --> 2:10:32.500
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

2:10:33.980 --> 2:10:37.680
<v Speaker 7>But even that, like, this man's treatment, he still got the, like,

2:10:38.360 --> 2:10:39.540
<v Speaker 7>white glove treatment.

2:10:39.560 --> 2:10:39.880
<v Speaker 9>He's fine.

2:10:39.920 --> 2:10:40.580
<v Speaker 2>He's fine.

2:10:40.640 --> 2:10:44.430
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. Did you miss a meal, bro? Like, was they

2:10:44.470 --> 2:10:45.210
<v Speaker 9>handing you stuff?

2:10:45.270 --> 2:10:45.490
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:10:45.610 --> 2:10:46.210
<v Speaker 9>Maggots in it?

2:10:46.290 --> 2:10:48.790
<v Speaker 4>No. He spent less than a day in detention.

2:10:48.830 --> 2:10:48.990
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

2:10:49.010 --> 2:10:52.390
<v Speaker 4>And now he is free to go back in Britain

2:10:52.470 --> 2:10:55.210
<v Speaker 4>with all of the money and resources that he has.

2:10:55.310 --> 2:10:57.850
<v Speaker 4>He is not suffering the way thousands and thousands of

2:10:57.890 --> 2:10:58.850
<v Speaker 4>other people have suffered.

2:10:59.030 --> 2:10:59.230
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:10:59.860 --> 2:11:00.140
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

2:11:00.460 --> 2:11:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Now, DHS claims that he overstayed a visa.

2:11:02.860 --> 2:11:03.020
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:11:03.950 --> 2:11:07.290
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, Milo himself claims that his green card was quote-unquote

2:11:07.330 --> 2:11:12.730
<v Speaker 4>canceled without him knowing and that summons to immigration court

2:11:12.750 --> 2:11:14.270
<v Speaker 4>were sent to an address that he no longer lives

2:11:14.390 --> 2:11:16.690
<v Speaker 4>at and he never learned about the summons. That's what

2:11:16.720 --> 2:11:19.140
<v Speaker 4>he's claiming. We will go over all of these in

2:11:19.520 --> 2:11:23.660
<v Speaker 4>much more detail next week. Unless anyone has anything to

2:11:24.540 --> 2:11:25.240
<v Speaker 4>add on that.

2:11:25.600 --> 2:11:25.760
<v Speaker 9>Nope.

2:11:25.960 --> 2:11:28.320
<v Speaker 4>I think we can... Yeah, whatever.

2:11:28.340 --> 2:11:29.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, whatever.

2:11:29.660 --> 2:11:33.100
<v Speaker 4>It's funny, I think last time me and Prop talked

2:11:33.230 --> 2:11:36.110
<v Speaker 4>at length, it was about Kanye West, who Milo was

2:11:36.170 --> 2:11:37.330
<v Speaker 4>working for at the time.

2:11:37.350 --> 2:11:38.630
<v Speaker 9>He was working for him, yep.

2:11:39.630 --> 2:11:42.070
<v Speaker 4>And is actually working for Kanye again.

2:11:42.130 --> 2:11:42.390
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

2:11:42.430 --> 2:11:44.850
<v Speaker 4>He started working with him again earlier this year.

2:11:44.870 --> 2:11:45.610
<v Speaker 9>Oh, good.

2:11:45.650 --> 2:11:49.000
<v Speaker 2>That's what he was in Louisiana for, it looked like.

2:11:49.120 --> 2:11:49.820
<v Speaker 4>Quite possibly.

2:11:49.840 --> 2:11:54.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. Okay, obviously there's exceptions to everything, right?

2:11:55.440 --> 2:12:02.850
<v Speaker 7>But within sort of like black American culture. It's, we're

2:12:02.890 --> 2:12:04.730
<v Speaker 7>done talking about you. We're done dragging. We won't even

2:12:04.770 --> 2:12:08.020
<v Speaker 7>check for you. I'm like, Kanye dropped an album. And

2:12:08.030 --> 2:12:14.300
<v Speaker 7>I'm like, wait, what? Like, I don't know anyone who

2:12:14.340 --> 2:12:14.960
<v Speaker 7>heard this record.

2:12:15.980 --> 2:12:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Just like dropped it into a void.

2:12:18.140 --> 2:12:21.780
<v Speaker 7>I was just like, this is how you know how

2:12:22.060 --> 2:12:26.440
<v Speaker 7>thoroughly you burnt your brand. Like, honestly, as a person

2:12:26.460 --> 2:12:32.550
<v Speaker 7>who bleeds hip hop, is arguably a generational talent when

2:12:32.590 --> 2:12:37.680
<v Speaker 7>it comes to production, soundscaping, like creating music, but is

2:12:38.640 --> 2:12:40.940
<v Speaker 7>so completely insufferable.

2:12:42.000 --> 2:12:45.000
<v Speaker 9>And just so, we're just.

2:12:44.760 --> 2:12:50.890
<v Speaker 7>So done with you. And your boy Milo gone, as

2:12:50.930 --> 2:12:51.380
<v Speaker 7>he should be.

2:12:52.670 --> 2:12:52.850
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

2:12:53.960 --> 2:12:56.900
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's what happens when you hire the man who

2:12:56.940 --> 2:12:58.740
<v Speaker 4>perfected the art of the fall off.

2:12:59.020 --> 2:12:59.900
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

2:13:00.120 --> 2:13:01.740
<v Speaker 4>To work for your company.

2:13:01.960 --> 2:13:06.890
<v Speaker 9>To help you in your fall off, sir. And you

2:13:06.900 --> 2:13:07.590
<v Speaker 9>can argue.

2:13:07.610 --> 2:13:11.630
<v Speaker 7>He's like he sold out five days at crypto. Okay,

2:13:11.650 --> 2:13:16.070
<v Speaker 7>but that's not five days in every city in America,

2:13:16.510 --> 2:13:18.530
<v Speaker 7>which is what he was doing.

2:13:18.870 --> 2:13:20.130
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Anyway.

2:13:21.650 --> 2:13:23.830
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'll talk a little bit more about what Milo's

2:13:23.850 --> 2:13:27.630
<v Speaker 4>been up to and other issues regarding his ongoing separation

2:13:27.650 --> 2:13:31.270
<v Speaker 4>from his husband and questions about his legal status next

2:13:31.370 --> 2:13:34.680
<v Speaker 4>week in a special episode. But for now, let's go

2:13:34.740 --> 2:13:36.680
<v Speaker 4>to a quick ad break and then return for some

2:13:36.720 --> 2:13:37.400
<v Speaker 4>more news.

2:13:48.820 --> 2:13:50.180
<v Speaker 9>Okay, so.

2:13:50.180 --> 2:13:54.230
<v Speaker 7>27 years ago, one of the greatest rappers of all

2:13:54.330 --> 2:13:56.770
<v Speaker 7>time was murdered in front of everybody.

2:13:56.850 --> 2:14:01.450
<v Speaker 9>This is Tupac. And the killer just now got sentenced.

2:14:02.070 --> 2:14:04.440
<v Speaker 7>One would wonder, first of all, why this is so

2:14:04.480 --> 2:14:06.980
<v Speaker 7>important to put it on executive order. And I have

2:14:07.020 --> 2:14:10.120
<v Speaker 7>a theory as to why. But also, why did it

2:14:10.160 --> 2:14:13.820
<v Speaker 7>take 27 years to solve this? And everybody involved except

2:14:13.850 --> 2:14:17.230
<v Speaker 7>for one dude has been dead. So what is we

2:14:17.290 --> 2:14:20.830
<v Speaker 7>talking about? So to understand his importance to this, I

2:14:20.870 --> 2:14:23.870
<v Speaker 7>think we have to understand really just how singular Tupac

2:14:24.370 --> 2:14:28.470
<v Speaker 7>was as a person. And I think anybody born post

2:14:28.510 --> 2:14:31.060
<v Speaker 7>his birth, it's like you weren't a part of the

2:14:31.560 --> 2:14:34.280
<v Speaker 7>monoculture that we had all existed in, in the sense

2:14:34.320 --> 2:14:36.440
<v Speaker 7>that at some point in our lives, we used to

2:14:36.520 --> 2:14:39.920
<v Speaker 7>all sit down at eight o'clock Thursday night to watch

2:14:39.980 --> 2:14:44.290
<v Speaker 7>the same television show like across the world. You know, like, yeah,

2:14:44.390 --> 2:14:46.850
<v Speaker 7>that just doesn't exist. So to be a star in

2:14:46.900 --> 2:14:50.580
<v Speaker 7>that era means the planet is watching you. And I

2:14:51.540 --> 2:14:54.960
<v Speaker 7>think that Pac was such an enigma. We're talking about

2:14:54.980 --> 2:14:57.730
<v Speaker 7>a guy's life who's like his life would be a

2:14:57.830 --> 2:15:00.630
<v Speaker 7>bad script. Like if this was somebody was writing like

2:15:00.670 --> 2:15:02.430
<v Speaker 7>what he actually lived in a script, you'd be like,

2:15:02.450 --> 2:15:02.950
<v Speaker 7>come on, guys.

2:15:03.320 --> 2:15:06.380
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. His last words as he was bleeding out and

2:15:06.420 --> 2:15:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the police asked him who did it were something along

2:15:08.310 --> 2:15:09.430
<v Speaker 2>the lines of fuck you, pig.

2:15:09.510 --> 2:15:09.740
<v Speaker 9>Right.

2:15:09.780 --> 2:15:10.890
<v Speaker 2>Like it was something like that.

2:15:10.900 --> 2:15:11.850
<v Speaker 9>Fuck you, pig.

2:15:12.070 --> 2:15:16.350
<v Speaker 7>Like you're talking about a guy whose godfather was Geronimo Pratt,

2:15:16.790 --> 2:15:22.010
<v Speaker 7>the legendary Black Panther. His mama and auntie, Fanny and

2:15:22.150 --> 2:15:26.930
<v Speaker 7>Assata Shakur, defended themselves in federal court while she was

2:15:27.050 --> 2:15:31.350
<v Speaker 7>pregnant with him. The man was clearly Jada Pinkett's first love,

2:15:31.430 --> 2:15:36.590
<v Speaker 7>which means that Will Smith is the consolation prize to Tupac. Like,

2:15:36.650 --> 2:15:39.760
<v Speaker 7>that's what I'm trying to say. Like, the man dated Madonna.

2:15:40.030 --> 2:15:45.540
<v Speaker 7>He dated Quincy Jones's daughter. Like, there was just genre-defining films.

2:15:45.600 --> 2:15:48.920
<v Speaker 7>The guy lived four lives. Like, he literally lived four

2:15:48.980 --> 2:15:52.860
<v Speaker 7>lives inside of the five years that he was a

2:15:52.920 --> 2:15:58.730
<v Speaker 7>public figure. Rapper, gangster, sex symbol, revolutionary. All before he

2:15:58.780 --> 2:16:02.610
<v Speaker 7>was 26. So backstory before we get this court case.

2:16:03.250 --> 2:16:07.870
<v Speaker 7>So 1996, honestly, the biggest star in the world, him

2:16:08.190 --> 2:16:12.730
<v Speaker 7>and Notorious B.I.G., two biggest rappers that rap has ever seen, right?

2:16:13.250 --> 2:16:16.670
<v Speaker 7>Pac and his friends, part of Defro Records, Suge Knight,

2:16:16.750 --> 2:16:19.390
<v Speaker 7>who was the leader of Defro, went to Vegas to

2:16:19.410 --> 2:16:20.290
<v Speaker 7>a Mike Tyson fight.

2:16:20.850 --> 2:16:23.990
<v Speaker 9>At the Mike Tyson fight, they see a man named Orlando.

2:16:24.130 --> 2:16:29.520
<v Speaker 7>Now, Orlando was a crip important to the story, Shug

2:16:29.720 --> 2:16:33.760
<v Speaker 7>being a notorious Compton Piru blood in charge of death

2:16:33.780 --> 2:16:37.580
<v Speaker 7>row records at this fight for Mike Tyson, which only

2:16:37.620 --> 2:16:39.660
<v Speaker 7>lasted 15 seconds, which was why they were.

2:16:39.620 --> 2:16:41.620
<v Speaker 9>So bored because the fight was done immediately.

2:16:42.040 --> 2:16:45.420
<v Speaker 7>So while they were out trying to party, still kind

2:16:45.470 --> 2:16:47.830
<v Speaker 7>of bored because the fight they came to see didn't happen,

2:16:47.840 --> 2:16:51.990
<v Speaker 7>they run into this guy named Orlando. Now, Orlando's important because, again,

2:16:52.330 --> 2:16:55.900
<v Speaker 7>he's a crip. And a few months earlier, he snatched

2:16:55.980 --> 2:17:00.140
<v Speaker 7>a chain, a Death Row Records gold chain from another

2:17:00.180 --> 2:17:03.600
<v Speaker 7>person at the Lakewood Mall, no less, which is very

2:17:03.680 --> 2:17:07.360
<v Speaker 7>funny because Lakewood is a suburb of Long Beach. It's

2:17:07.420 --> 2:17:10.950
<v Speaker 7>not even like a city. It's literally just a mall.

2:17:11.490 --> 2:17:17.110
<v Speaker 7>So these murderous Crips steal this chain from this guy.

2:17:17.930 --> 2:17:20.390
<v Speaker 7>They see him and they're like, hey, that's the dude

2:17:20.410 --> 2:17:23.539
<v Speaker 7>that snatched the homie's chain. So him and Suge go

2:17:23.980 --> 2:17:26.220
<v Speaker 7>stomp the guy out. It's all, you could see it all.

2:17:26.280 --> 2:17:29.660
<v Speaker 7>It's all on, you know, surveillance footage, camera footage. They

2:17:29.700 --> 2:17:31.260
<v Speaker 7>see him stomp him out. They're still on a high.

2:17:31.620 --> 2:17:33.400
<v Speaker 7>They're about to go party. They want to go do

2:17:33.440 --> 2:17:36.320
<v Speaker 7>their thing. The problem is the guy that they stomped out,

2:17:36.700 --> 2:17:39.570
<v Speaker 7>his uncle is this man named Keefie D. Keep Keefie

2:17:39.590 --> 2:17:41.690
<v Speaker 7>D's name in mind because Keefie D had a friend

2:17:41.730 --> 2:17:42.869
<v Speaker 7>named Zip, I know.

2:17:43.330 --> 2:17:45.410
<v Speaker 9>But Zip worked for P.

2:17:45.450 --> 2:17:49.850
<v Speaker 7>Diddy, as in Sean Puffy Combs, as in the worst

2:17:49.870 --> 2:17:52.200
<v Speaker 7>human we've ever met you know what I'm saying so

2:17:52.260 --> 2:17:55.720
<v Speaker 7>he works for him Puffy is the leader of Bad

2:17:55.760 --> 2:17:58.660
<v Speaker 7>Boy Records who's got Biggie they're in this amazing like

2:17:59.200 --> 2:18:01.150
<v Speaker 7>struggle for power to be the king of hip hop

2:18:01.940 --> 2:18:05.870
<v Speaker 7>it was pretty well known worst kept secret Puffy wanted

2:18:06.510 --> 2:18:11.060
<v Speaker 7>Suge and Pac dead right So Zip works for Diddy.

2:18:11.640 --> 2:18:14.900
<v Speaker 7>Keefy D gets a gun from Zip and says, you

2:18:14.920 --> 2:18:17.480
<v Speaker 7>finna let that man, you know, stomp you out like

2:18:17.520 --> 2:18:18.860
<v Speaker 7>that in front of the homies. We got to go

2:18:18.879 --> 2:18:21.430
<v Speaker 7>get your gift back. They get in the car, find

2:18:21.470 --> 2:18:23.250
<v Speaker 7>out where he's going to be at the club. He's

2:18:23.290 --> 2:18:26.310
<v Speaker 7>not there. They were going to give up. And then

2:18:26.350 --> 2:18:27.730
<v Speaker 7>some girls on the side of the road at the

2:18:27.770 --> 2:18:30.789
<v Speaker 7>gas station realized that that's Tupac in the car because, again,

2:18:30.870 --> 2:18:32.590
<v Speaker 7>he's the biggest star on the planet at the time.

2:18:32.870 --> 2:18:34.590
<v Speaker 9>They're screaming, oh, my God, oh, my God, it's Pac.

2:18:34.830 --> 2:18:36.400
<v Speaker 9>They go, oh, dude, it's him. He's there.

2:18:36.840 --> 2:18:40.840
<v Speaker 7>Flip a U-turn. roll the window down, shoot through the car,

2:18:41.140 --> 2:18:45.380
<v Speaker 7>kill Tupac, right? Now, all kinds of conspiracy theories as

2:18:45.420 --> 2:18:48.040
<v Speaker 7>to how this happened because the case went unsolved, but

2:18:48.200 --> 2:18:51.040
<v Speaker 7>of course it was solved. He's the biggest artist on

2:18:51.080 --> 2:18:54.250
<v Speaker 7>the planet. They absolutely knew who killed this guy. It's just,

2:18:54.270 --> 2:18:57.930
<v Speaker 7>you didn't have enough to convict him, right? Because it's

2:18:57.950 --> 2:19:01.030
<v Speaker 7>still all hearsay. It's still all this, the word of

2:19:01.390 --> 2:19:03.930
<v Speaker 7>a bunch of crips who all tell war stories all

2:19:03.970 --> 2:19:07.410
<v Speaker 7>the time. You can't prove it, right? Anyway, They're waiting

2:19:07.450 --> 2:19:10.230
<v Speaker 7>for a chance to actually solve this. Six months later,

2:19:10.290 --> 2:19:13.300
<v Speaker 7>Biggie gets killed, right? So now you got two of

2:19:13.340 --> 2:19:16.220
<v Speaker 7>the biggest stars in the world in hip hop murdered.

2:19:16.620 --> 2:19:20.480
<v Speaker 7>Biggie's mom sues NYPD for not solving the case, right?

2:19:20.740 --> 2:19:23.599
<v Speaker 7>Which means that, damn, we better solve this shit. Well,

2:19:23.620 --> 2:19:25.210
<v Speaker 7>we kind of know who did it, but we can't

2:19:25.270 --> 2:19:28.910
<v Speaker 7>prove it yet. 2008, Keefie D gets picked up on

2:19:29.070 --> 2:19:32.119
<v Speaker 7>a drug charge, right? It's a federal case because he's

2:19:32.140 --> 2:19:34.420
<v Speaker 7>doing a whole lot of drugs. Right. So now the

2:19:34.459 --> 2:19:36.619
<v Speaker 7>man's going to get put up under the jail. The

2:19:36.670 --> 2:19:38.910
<v Speaker 7>cops say to him, hey, listen, we know you got

2:19:38.970 --> 2:19:40.450
<v Speaker 7>all them drugs, but can you tell us about what

2:19:40.490 --> 2:19:42.390
<v Speaker 7>happened in 96? He was like, what you talking about?

2:19:42.430 --> 2:19:45.310
<v Speaker 7>They was like, we don't play dumb. You know that

2:19:45.370 --> 2:19:46.190
<v Speaker 7>we know it was you.

2:19:46.650 --> 2:19:46.869
<v Speaker 5>Right.

2:19:47.450 --> 2:19:49.779
<v Speaker 7>And let me tell you something about this code that

2:19:49.800 --> 2:19:52.160
<v Speaker 7>the gangsters have. You throw enough time at somebody, they're

2:19:52.180 --> 2:19:56.390
<v Speaker 7>going to start singing, boy. And Keefie sang, right? He

2:19:56.430 --> 2:20:00.129
<v Speaker 7>told him the whole story, exactly what happened, all the names.

2:20:00.190 --> 2:20:01.650
<v Speaker 7>Let me tell you, look, this is where we were

2:20:01.690 --> 2:20:04.370
<v Speaker 7>sitting in the car. This the homie, this the one

2:20:04.390 --> 2:20:06.850
<v Speaker 7>who actually shot. I got the gun from this person

2:20:07.530 --> 2:20:09.820
<v Speaker 7>and the gun I got from Diddy's homie told the

2:20:09.840 --> 2:20:12.180
<v Speaker 7>whole thing in exchange for immunity.

2:20:13.020 --> 2:20:15.060
<v Speaker 9>It was like, all right, we got you.

2:20:15.440 --> 2:20:15.780
<v Speaker 7>Good.

2:20:16.280 --> 2:20:17.980
<v Speaker 9>Shut your mouth. Everything's fine.

2:20:19.050 --> 2:20:20.770
<v Speaker 7>They would go to trial, except they can't go to

2:20:20.810 --> 2:20:25.150
<v Speaker 7>trial because, again, it's the word of just Keefie by

2:20:25.190 --> 2:20:28.470
<v Speaker 7>himself because everybody else that was in the car is dead.

2:20:28.990 --> 2:20:31.930
<v Speaker 7>And are you going to press charges against Puffy, against Diddy?

2:20:31.990 --> 2:20:34.610
<v Speaker 7>It's absolutely, you can't do it. Anyway, it had been

2:20:34.670 --> 2:20:36.870
<v Speaker 7>fine right off to the sunset. We wouldn't have known

2:20:37.070 --> 2:20:42.900
<v Speaker 7>until this fool got on YouTube. And then, guys, listen,

2:20:44.020 --> 2:20:45.939
<v Speaker 7>it can happen here, podcast team.

2:20:47.340 --> 2:20:54.640
<v Speaker 9>My friends. My friends, he wrote a book. He wrote

2:20:54.720 --> 2:21:00.320
<v Speaker 9>a book confessing all of this, right? He wrote a book.

2:21:01.140 --> 2:21:01.580
<v Speaker 4>Perfect.

2:21:01.840 --> 2:21:05.050
<v Speaker 7>He got on every podcast he could get on telling

2:21:05.070 --> 2:21:10.400
<v Speaker 7>this story. Two years ago, Las Vegas PD say, hey, homie, uh,

2:21:11.400 --> 2:21:12.610
<v Speaker 7>we got to charge you for murder.

2:21:13.060 --> 2:21:14.500
<v Speaker 9>He was like, what are you talking about? I got

2:21:14.540 --> 2:21:14.900
<v Speaker 9>a deal.

2:21:14.959 --> 2:21:16.859
<v Speaker 7>They was like, first of all, your deal was with

2:21:16.900 --> 2:21:20.180
<v Speaker 7>the feds, not with the Las Vegas PD, number one.

2:21:20.280 --> 2:21:25.080
<v Speaker 7>And number two, the deal was for your testimony to us.

2:21:25.959 --> 2:21:30.420
<v Speaker 9>You just told the planet what you did. You got

2:21:30.480 --> 2:21:32.520
<v Speaker 9>on the internet and you told.

2:21:32.360 --> 2:21:37.920
<v Speaker 7>The planet, sir, you confessed to a murder. So he like, okay, well,

2:21:38.080 --> 2:21:41.050
<v Speaker 7>I guess we got to do. The trial started last month.

2:21:41.780 --> 2:21:44.220
<v Speaker 7>The man's defense was, I need you to look me

2:21:44.260 --> 2:21:47.879
<v Speaker 7>in my eyes. The man's defense was, I was making

2:21:47.920 --> 2:21:48.760
<v Speaker 7>that up for clout.

2:21:49.629 --> 2:21:50.990
<v Speaker 9>I was lying the whole time.

2:21:51.050 --> 2:21:53.029
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing a lot of that in court these days.

2:21:54.890 --> 2:21:58.609
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I made it up. This is not real. I

2:21:58.670 --> 2:21:59.190
<v Speaker 9>made it up.

2:21:59.270 --> 2:22:02.300
<v Speaker 7>They was like, sir, we finna put you up under

2:22:02.320 --> 2:22:05.270
<v Speaker 7>the jail. So he just got convicted for murder. He

2:22:05.300 --> 2:22:07.080
<v Speaker 7>was not the one that pulled the trigger. The one

2:22:07.110 --> 2:22:09.440
<v Speaker 7>that pulled the trigger is dead. But he was the

2:22:09.560 --> 2:22:11.939
<v Speaker 7>one that attained the gun to make sure this happened.

2:22:11.959 --> 2:22:14.200
<v Speaker 7>He's the last one left.

2:22:14.200 --> 2:22:15.980
<v Speaker 9>63 years old, about to go to jail for the

2:22:16.020 --> 2:22:16.680
<v Speaker 9>rest of his life.

2:22:17.040 --> 2:22:20.599
<v Speaker 7>Now, the reason why I bring this up for executive

2:22:20.640 --> 2:22:25.920
<v Speaker 7>disorder is I really think this is the destiny of

2:22:26.100 --> 2:22:26.879
<v Speaker 7>the Epstein case.

2:22:28.260 --> 2:22:29.600
<v Speaker 9>They're going to wait until everybody's dead.

2:22:31.000 --> 2:22:33.770
<v Speaker 7>Except for one dude, and then put him in jail.

2:22:35.490 --> 2:22:36.070
<v Speaker 9>That's my theory.

2:22:36.610 --> 2:22:39.570
<v Speaker 8>Thomas Massey was on One in Congress again today reading

2:22:39.650 --> 2:22:42.310
<v Speaker 8>off a bunch of the Epstein co-conspirators. I'm not sure

2:22:42.330 --> 2:22:44.140
<v Speaker 8>if you saw that bit.

2:22:44.660 --> 2:22:45.780
<v Speaker 9>Yes, I did. Oh, yeah.

2:22:46.379 --> 2:22:49.840
<v Speaker 7>And so what I'm trying to say is the case

2:22:49.920 --> 2:22:52.640
<v Speaker 7>was solved within a week.

2:22:53.700 --> 2:22:59.629
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. Everyone knows who's guilty. Now, I'm not a gangster.

2:22:59.980 --> 2:23:02.340
<v Speaker 7>Okay, I'm from here, but I do not at all

2:23:03.100 --> 2:23:07.090
<v Speaker 7>report to be a member of an active gang. I

2:23:07.120 --> 2:23:10.129
<v Speaker 7>don't think there's a single gang member in Los Angeles

2:23:10.150 --> 2:23:11.890
<v Speaker 7>who did not know who killed Tupac.

2:23:12.010 --> 2:23:12.410
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:23:13.990 --> 2:23:17.850
<v Speaker 7>Everyone knew who did it. But you don't talk to

2:23:17.890 --> 2:23:21.430
<v Speaker 7>the cops. It's their job to figure it out. All right,

2:23:21.470 --> 2:23:23.589
<v Speaker 7>that's your job. That's not my job. That's your job.

2:23:23.959 --> 2:23:24.800
<v Speaker 7>That's their job to.

2:23:24.720 --> 2:23:27.860
<v Speaker 9>Figure it out. But either way, now.

2:23:28.370 --> 2:23:34.709
<v Speaker 7>Officially, case closed. Tupac was murdered by Keefy D's friend.

2:23:34.430 --> 2:23:35.370
<v Speaker 9>Who shot through the thing.

2:23:35.490 --> 2:23:37.430
<v Speaker 7>And now he's going to jail for a murder that

2:23:37.470 --> 2:23:38.730
<v Speaker 7>happened 27 years ago.

2:23:39.690 --> 2:23:42.030
<v Speaker 9>But yeah, you know, keep fun in the police, right?

2:23:42.050 --> 2:23:42.949
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

2:23:42.990 --> 2:23:43.810
<v Speaker 9>They're good at their job.

2:23:44.170 --> 2:23:44.970
<v Speaker 5>They'll solve murders.

2:23:45.250 --> 2:23:47.430
<v Speaker 2>I mean, not like they can't solve like a kidnapping

2:23:47.450 --> 2:23:49.080
<v Speaker 2>of an incredibly famous person's mom.

2:23:49.800 --> 2:23:50.060
<v Speaker 5>Right.

2:23:50.560 --> 2:23:54.540
<v Speaker 2>But, you know, eventually they solve the really obvious crimes

2:23:54.820 --> 2:23:55.820
<v Speaker 2>if they're forced to.

2:23:55.840 --> 2:23:56.920
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

2:23:56.940 --> 2:23:57.020
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:23:58.500 --> 2:24:00.199
<v Speaker 8>I think that's why we should be funding millions of

2:24:00.240 --> 2:24:03.200
<v Speaker 8>dollars to big podcasts so we can continue to have

2:24:03.240 --> 2:24:05.379
<v Speaker 8>people confess to murders on podcasts.

2:24:05.459 --> 2:24:08.340
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, that's what we replace the police with. It's just

2:24:08.379 --> 2:24:09.959
<v Speaker 2>podcasts where people confess to crimes.

2:24:10.420 --> 2:24:10.940
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:24:10.959 --> 2:24:14.600
<v Speaker 7>Just promise them $ 500 and a Vlad TV interview.

2:24:15.280 --> 2:24:17.380
<v Speaker 9>They will tell you every crime they did.

2:24:17.800 --> 2:24:20.520
<v Speaker 8>That's our new take on true crime. Someone just comes

2:24:20.600 --> 2:24:21.910
<v Speaker 8>on and talks about their crimes.

2:24:22.570 --> 2:24:22.810
<v Speaker 5>Right.

2:24:23.990 --> 2:24:24.170
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

2:24:24.730 --> 2:24:27.789
<v Speaker 4>I think being forced to talk on the Joe Rogan

2:24:27.830 --> 2:24:31.060
<v Speaker 4>experience would qualify as cruel and unusual punishment. So I

2:24:31.100 --> 2:24:36.420
<v Speaker 4>don't know about that. Constitutionally prohibited. Yeah, I don't know.

2:24:36.600 --> 2:24:37.520
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the amendments.

2:24:38.240 --> 2:24:41.939
<v Speaker 9>Like, okay, guys, just give me the time. Yeah.

2:24:43.100 --> 2:24:43.390
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:24:43.920 --> 2:24:45.310
<v Speaker 9>So moral of the story, guys, yeah.

2:24:45.410 --> 2:24:47.890
<v Speaker 7>Like, hey, listen, if you were about to get away

2:24:47.930 --> 2:24:50.650
<v Speaker 7>with murder, just, like, shut the fuck up.

2:24:50.970 --> 2:24:53.030
<v Speaker 9>Like, I can't stress this enough.

2:24:55.860 --> 2:24:57.510
<v Speaker 4>If you're going to write a book, at least title

2:24:57.530 --> 2:25:00.010
<v Speaker 4>it something like If I Did It. Don't say I

2:25:00.090 --> 2:25:00.490
<v Speaker 4>did it.

2:25:00.730 --> 2:25:01.789
<v Speaker 9>Right. If I did it.

2:25:01.790 --> 2:25:02.930
<v Speaker 2>That worked great for OJ.

2:25:02.950 --> 2:25:03.590
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:25:03.810 --> 2:25:05.709
<v Speaker 4>You got to put the if in front first.

2:25:06.350 --> 2:25:09.740
<v Speaker 9>OJ got away with murder. Like, can we just? Yes.

2:25:09.940 --> 2:25:11.540
<v Speaker 9>Because he was like, well, if I was going to

2:25:11.560 --> 2:25:11.779
<v Speaker 9>do it.

2:25:13.280 --> 2:25:13.580
<v Speaker 5>All right.

2:25:14.200 --> 2:25:15.119
<v Speaker 9>Back to actual death.

2:25:15.980 --> 2:25:16.300
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

2:25:16.459 --> 2:25:19.810
<v Speaker 8>So talking of two groups of people who keep shooting

2:25:19.830 --> 2:25:23.360
<v Speaker 8>each other, let's go to Venice Wayler first. Hmm. The

2:25:23.700 --> 2:25:27.720
<v Speaker 8>United States yesterday, when we're recording this on Wednesday, September 2nd,

2:25:27.760 --> 2:25:31.100
<v Speaker 8>so that would be Tuesday, September 1st, announced an oil

2:25:31.140 --> 2:25:33.629
<v Speaker 8>deal with Venezuela. And when I say Venezuela, I mean

2:25:33.650 --> 2:25:37.050
<v Speaker 8>specifically with Delce Rodriguez. The way we found out was

2:25:37.090 --> 2:25:40.590
<v Speaker 8>that the president truthed, quote, breaking news that parts in

2:25:40.610 --> 2:25:44.100
<v Speaker 8>block capitals. The United States of America has just entered

2:25:44.140 --> 2:25:48.260
<v Speaker 8>into an agreement with the country of Venezuela, countries capitalized.

2:25:48.459 --> 2:25:52.150
<v Speaker 8>I'll just do the block caps. on the biggest oil

2:25:52.190 --> 2:25:54.470
<v Speaker 8>deal in world history. That one's in block caps. At

2:25:54.510 --> 2:25:57.269
<v Speaker 8>my direction, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of

2:25:57.310 --> 2:26:00.720
<v Speaker 8>War Pete Hegsess working closely with highly respected interim president

2:26:00.760 --> 2:26:04.600
<v Speaker 8>of Venezuela, Delcy Rodriguez, and through a partnership with private business,

2:26:05.180 --> 2:26:08.570
<v Speaker 8>have secured majority US control of more than 65 billion

2:26:08.610 --> 2:26:11.920
<v Speaker 8>barrels of proven oil reserves in Venezuela. At no cost

2:26:11.940 --> 2:26:15.080
<v Speaker 8>to the American taxpayer, this historic transaction more than doubles,

2:26:15.220 --> 2:26:18.379
<v Speaker 8>that's in block caps, American oil reserves greatly increases our

2:26:18.440 --> 2:26:21.080
<v Speaker 8>oil supply and will substantially lower gas prices for all

2:26:21.120 --> 2:26:23.830
<v Speaker 8>Americans long into the future while helping, that's not a

2:26:23.850 --> 2:26:26.730
<v Speaker 8>full stop, I'm struggling, while helping to continue to set

2:26:26.750 --> 2:26:29.970
<v Speaker 8>Venezuela on a course toward tremendous success and great prosperity.

2:26:30.470 --> 2:26:33.530
<v Speaker 8>This transaction will greatly strengthen the already growing relationship between

2:26:33.570 --> 2:26:36.460
<v Speaker 8>Venezuela and the United States. Thank you for your attention

2:26:36.500 --> 2:26:40.310
<v Speaker 8>to this groundbreaking matter. Make America great again, President Donald J.

2:26:40.320 --> 2:26:40.580
<v Speaker 9>Trump.

2:26:41.230 --> 2:26:44.030
<v Speaker 8>I wouldn't pay too much attention to the claims he's

2:26:44.090 --> 2:26:47.650
<v Speaker 8>making here. We know that the United States is planning

2:26:47.690 --> 2:26:51.209
<v Speaker 8>to partner with some kind of private business entity to

2:26:51.250 --> 2:26:54.440
<v Speaker 8>develop oil fields. It seems like from reporting, they will

2:26:54.480 --> 2:26:58.060
<v Speaker 8>take 55% of the effective output and have a right

2:26:58.100 --> 2:27:01.470
<v Speaker 8>to buy oil at cost. If you remember when they

2:27:01.530 --> 2:27:06.210
<v Speaker 8>first kidnapped Maduro, Trump summoned oil executives to the White

2:27:06.250 --> 2:27:09.070
<v Speaker 8>House and none of them were exactly chomping at the

2:27:09.090 --> 2:27:13.490
<v Speaker 8>bit to go drill baby drill in Venezuela, right? That's

2:27:13.530 --> 2:27:17.090
<v Speaker 8>because the infrastructure is damaged and the crude oil is

2:27:17.129 --> 2:27:20.560
<v Speaker 8>among the heaviest and dirtiest on the planet. They would

2:27:20.670 --> 2:27:24.630
<v Speaker 8>just rather go berserk. almost anywhere else, right? They have

2:27:24.650 --> 2:27:26.710
<v Speaker 8>to do more work to get this oil in worse conditions.

2:27:27.270 --> 2:27:29.040
<v Speaker 8>I want to recap a little bit where we're at.

2:27:29.120 --> 2:27:31.820
<v Speaker 8>The United States is effectively running Venezuela as a vassal

2:27:31.860 --> 2:27:36.570
<v Speaker 8>state now. It literally receives revenue from Venezuelan exports and

2:27:36.610 --> 2:27:39.110
<v Speaker 8>then sends it back via private banks. There was a

2:27:39.230 --> 2:27:42.600
<v Speaker 8>really good NYT article on Delcy and Rubio's relationship that

2:27:42.700 --> 2:27:44.670
<v Speaker 8>made the analogy that this is like a parent giving

2:27:44.680 --> 2:27:47.890
<v Speaker 8>a child, what do you call it, an allowance, right?

2:27:48.390 --> 2:27:49.270
<v Speaker 4>We call it pocket money.

2:27:50.180 --> 2:27:54.160
<v Speaker 8>The United States deployed hundreds of troops to Venezuela after

2:27:54.180 --> 2:27:58.580
<v Speaker 8>a devastating earthquake. Allegedly, according to this NYT report, Rubio

2:27:58.800 --> 2:28:02.620
<v Speaker 8>has an effective veto on government appointments. He decides who

2:28:02.660 --> 2:28:06.340
<v Speaker 8>gets sanctions waivers to work there. He and Delci send

2:28:06.379 --> 2:28:10.459
<v Speaker 8>each other birthday messages and selfies. Venezuela, in the meantime,

2:28:10.480 --> 2:28:14.360
<v Speaker 8>has quietly wound down its cooperation with Russia. And it coordinated,

2:28:14.400 --> 2:28:17.780
<v Speaker 8>Venezuelan intelligence coordinated with the US military when they struck

2:28:18.140 --> 2:28:22.670
<v Speaker 8>Tren de Aragua personnel. They have forced Venezuelan ministers to

2:28:22.709 --> 2:28:27.070
<v Speaker 8>delete tweets condemning the US attack on Iran. Just for reference, people,

2:28:27.090 --> 2:28:29.970
<v Speaker 8>Iran has been a longtime ally of the regime in

2:28:29.990 --> 2:28:33.529
<v Speaker 8>Venezuela in so much as we can see. There is continuity, obviously,

2:28:33.570 --> 2:28:36.190
<v Speaker 8>from Delcy, from Maduro to Delcy, but things are very

2:28:36.250 --> 2:28:40.680
<v Speaker 8>much changing. Delcy has run drafts of tweets past Marco

2:28:40.740 --> 2:28:42.100
<v Speaker 8>Rubio before posting them.

2:28:42.360 --> 2:28:42.760
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

2:28:42.860 --> 2:28:43.280
<v Speaker 9>Oh, boy.

2:28:43.600 --> 2:28:44.060
<v Speaker 8>Sheesh.

2:28:45.260 --> 2:28:45.640
<v Speaker 5>All right.

2:28:46.180 --> 2:28:49.000
<v Speaker 8>When there were reports that DOJ was building a case

2:28:49.040 --> 2:28:52.400
<v Speaker 8>against her, she approached him for assurance. And it seems

2:28:52.459 --> 2:28:56.000
<v Speaker 8>like that directly resulted in Trump truthing. Do you remember

2:28:56.020 --> 2:28:58.980
<v Speaker 8>a few months ago now, Trump truthed how great she

2:28:59.040 --> 2:29:00.220
<v Speaker 8>was and how high?

2:29:00.300 --> 2:29:00.500
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:29:00.920 --> 2:29:03.330
<v Speaker 8>It seems like that was the assurance that she was

2:29:03.450 --> 2:29:05.789
<v Speaker 8>asking for. So it came in the form of the

2:29:05.850 --> 2:29:09.590
<v Speaker 8>president posting, as he did again yesterday, about how great

2:29:09.629 --> 2:29:09.930
<v Speaker 8>she is.

2:29:10.230 --> 2:29:11.450
<v Speaker 4>The poster's republic.

2:29:12.370 --> 2:29:12.610
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

2:29:13.129 --> 2:29:16.450
<v Speaker 8>What incentive does the United States have to move towards

2:29:16.490 --> 2:29:20.450
<v Speaker 8>democracy in Venezuela, when it is getting everything it wants,

2:29:20.670 --> 2:29:22.750
<v Speaker 8>and it doesn't have to deal with the possibility of

2:29:22.810 --> 2:29:27.980
<v Speaker 8>the president changing, of the legislature changing. The US is

2:29:28.260 --> 2:29:32.119
<v Speaker 8>effectively running Venezuela as an informal colony, as it has

2:29:32.180 --> 2:29:33.800
<v Speaker 8>done in all of its colonies.

2:29:34.040 --> 2:29:36.519
<v Speaker 4>It is not inclined to give those people more rights.

2:29:37.270 --> 2:29:39.470
<v Speaker 8>I would focus less on this deal and more on

2:29:39.490 --> 2:29:42.730
<v Speaker 8>the fact that Trump is very clearly trying to lean

2:29:42.790 --> 2:29:46.550
<v Speaker 8>on gas prices. And the reason he's doing that is

2:29:46.650 --> 2:29:49.349
<v Speaker 8>what we're going to talk about next, his ongoing disastrous

2:29:49.430 --> 2:29:53.480
<v Speaker 8>war with Iran. So the US this week is once

2:29:53.530 --> 2:29:57.760
<v Speaker 8>again on a path to escalation in Iran. On the

2:29:58.040 --> 2:30:02.879
<v Speaker 8>30th of August, a new round of strikes inside Iran began.

2:30:02.900 --> 2:30:07.640
<v Speaker 8>This followed the kind of reduced bombing activity that we

2:30:07.660 --> 2:30:10.510
<v Speaker 8>spoke about last week, right? The United States says it

2:30:10.590 --> 2:30:13.970
<v Speaker 8>struck launches for rockets which were preparing to deploy mines

2:30:14.070 --> 2:30:16.990
<v Speaker 8>into the Strait of Hormuz, which Trump has claimed is

2:30:17.090 --> 2:30:20.750
<v Speaker 8>not mined. In response, Iran launched ballistic missiles at US

2:30:20.830 --> 2:30:24.110
<v Speaker 8>bases and allies in the region. And a US source

2:30:24.150 --> 2:30:28.560
<v Speaker 8>told Fox News that, quote, nearly all of them were intercepted.

2:30:28.780 --> 2:30:29.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

2:30:29.240 --> 2:30:29.620
<v Speaker 7>All right.

2:30:29.660 --> 2:30:29.940
<v Speaker 9>Great.

2:30:30.000 --> 2:30:31.780
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's good. You want to know that most of

2:30:31.800 --> 2:30:32.949
<v Speaker 4>the missiles didn't make it?

2:30:33.400 --> 2:30:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Nearly all is all the missiles you need to stop.

2:30:35.360 --> 2:30:37.140
<v Speaker 4>That's what I want out of a missile defense system.

2:30:37.580 --> 2:30:38.340
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

2:30:38.990 --> 2:30:41.190
<v Speaker 8>What it means, of course, is that United States has

2:30:41.430 --> 2:30:44.310
<v Speaker 8>used more of its interceptors, right, which are It is

2:30:44.370 --> 2:30:51.030
<v Speaker 8>already dwindling its supply. The Iranians, meanwhile, struck four vessels

2:30:51.110 --> 2:30:53.190
<v Speaker 8>in the Strait of Hormuz this week, perhaps soon to

2:30:53.209 --> 2:30:56.110
<v Speaker 8>be renamed the Strait of America. It does not seem

2:30:56.170 --> 2:30:58.580
<v Speaker 8>that America has much to say on what goes on there.

2:30:59.170 --> 2:31:02.260
<v Speaker 8>In one incident on Monday, which I saw a UK MTO,

2:31:02.540 --> 2:31:04.720
<v Speaker 8>so it's American Trade Office, right? That's kind of the

2:31:04.800 --> 2:31:09.379
<v Speaker 8>entity which puts out these safety briefings to mariners. A

2:31:09.440 --> 2:31:13.360
<v Speaker 8>tanker was hit with three projectiles. Which is the first

2:31:13.400 --> 2:31:16.679
<v Speaker 8>time I can recall in this conflict that happening, right?

2:31:16.700 --> 2:31:20.280
<v Speaker 8>Like there's a difference between like, we will strike your

2:31:20.379 --> 2:31:23.300
<v Speaker 8>vessel to show you that we can strike your vessel

2:31:23.340 --> 2:31:25.890
<v Speaker 8>and hopefully cause people to stop coming through here out

2:31:25.930 --> 2:31:28.629
<v Speaker 8>of fear and hitting it three times, which seems to

2:31:28.670 --> 2:31:30.490
<v Speaker 8>me like maybe an attempt to sink a vessel, right?

2:31:30.510 --> 2:31:31.970
<v Speaker 4>Like that's an escalation.

2:31:33.090 --> 2:31:37.230
<v Speaker 8>In response, on Tuesday, 1st September, the US began another

2:31:37.270 --> 2:31:41.030
<v Speaker 8>series of bombings with the president truthing. The United States is,

2:31:41.170 --> 2:31:43.580
<v Speaker 8>as we speak, striking Iranian targets near the Strait of Hormuz.

2:31:44.020 --> 2:31:46.120
<v Speaker 8>The strikes are large and powerful, and then retaliation for

2:31:46.140 --> 2:31:48.900
<v Speaker 8>the Iranians' failed attempt to adding sea mines to the Strait,

2:31:48.940 --> 2:31:51.880
<v Speaker 8>which currently has no mines. They have been completely removed

2:31:51.940 --> 2:31:55.580
<v Speaker 8>or detonated. And the Iranians shooting eight missiles all successfully

2:31:55.600 --> 2:31:58.390
<v Speaker 8>knocked down an armed military base in Jordan. If the

2:31:58.430 --> 2:32:01.330
<v Speaker 8>failed nation of Iran retaliates for this very justified attack,

2:32:01.370 --> 2:32:04.010
<v Speaker 8>they'll be hit again at a much harder and higher level.

2:32:04.490 --> 2:32:05.970
<v Speaker 8>but it will not be the biggest attack of them

2:32:06.090 --> 2:32:06.990
<v Speaker 8>all that.

2:32:06.910 --> 2:32:07.970
<v Speaker 4>Is waiting in the wings.

2:32:08.090 --> 2:32:09.790
<v Speaker 8>And when it is over, there will be very little

2:32:09.830 --> 2:32:12.529
<v Speaker 8>left of the Islamic Republic of Iran. And then he

2:32:12.590 --> 2:32:15.950
<v Speaker 8>signs it. He also did another one where he said,

2:32:16.730 --> 2:32:18.930
<v Speaker 8>it's a failed nation. They have no eight Navy. They

2:32:18.950 --> 2:32:21.740
<v Speaker 8>have an air force for inflation to 300%. Their leadership

2:32:21.770 --> 2:32:25.000
<v Speaker 8>is disarray. And then he's blaming fake news for giving

2:32:25.020 --> 2:32:29.019
<v Speaker 8>you other impressions. He also tweeted a shit tier AI

2:32:29.160 --> 2:32:34.380
<v Speaker 8>slop video of missiles hitting Karg Island. where the observer

2:32:34.740 --> 2:32:38.539
<v Speaker 8>was in a helicopter with the missiles flying over their head.

2:32:39.280 --> 2:32:39.890
<v Speaker 4>It was very bad.

2:32:39.920 --> 2:32:40.129
<v Speaker 5>What?

2:32:41.110 --> 2:32:41.530
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

2:32:42.150 --> 2:32:45.010
<v Speaker 4>Prop, have you not seen this? I will drop this

2:32:45.090 --> 2:32:47.170
<v Speaker 4>in the chat for you to watch. Yeah, let's get

2:32:47.209 --> 2:32:47.910
<v Speaker 4>a live react.

2:32:48.500 --> 2:32:48.900
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

2:32:49.520 --> 2:32:52.460
<v Speaker 4>The video is its own thing. The caption he used

2:32:52.560 --> 2:32:54.980
<v Speaker 4>for this, or whoever's running his account used for this,

2:32:55.550 --> 2:32:57.350
<v Speaker 4>is also, I think it's kind of incredible.

2:32:57.450 --> 2:32:58.800
<v Speaker 9>Smithereens?

2:32:59.030 --> 2:32:59.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:32:59.320 --> 2:33:01.700
<v Speaker 4>Garg Island being blown to smithereens.

2:33:01.740 --> 2:33:02.440
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

2:33:03.660 --> 2:33:04.640
<v Speaker 4>President DJT.

2:33:04.780 --> 2:33:04.980
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:33:05.430 --> 2:33:07.350
<v Speaker 8>It is interesting that that one was not signed. Thank

2:33:07.390 --> 2:33:11.050
<v Speaker 8>you for your attention on this, Matt. That's a good point.

2:33:11.240 --> 2:33:13.760
<v Speaker 2>It looks like a cut scene from like a Command

2:33:13.800 --> 2:33:14.740
<v Speaker 2>and Conquer game.

2:33:15.020 --> 2:33:17.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that is exactly what I thought of.

2:33:17.480 --> 2:33:21.640
<v Speaker 7>Why is this person lowering themselves into the explosion?

2:33:21.660 --> 2:33:23.060
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that doesn't make a lot of sense.

2:33:23.300 --> 2:33:25.300
<v Speaker 9>I don't understand why you would do this.

2:33:25.620 --> 2:33:26.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:33:26.340 --> 2:33:27.420
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I wouldn't want to be there.

2:33:28.080 --> 2:33:31.330
<v Speaker 9>Who is shooting these missiles? What is happening?

2:33:32.230 --> 2:33:34.849
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's like infinite secondaries. Every like.

2:33:35.520 --> 2:33:38.340
<v Speaker 8>Everything that explodes lands and then explodes again. The way

2:33:38.360 --> 2:33:42.600
<v Speaker 8>the AI understands explosions, it's fascinating shit.

2:33:43.200 --> 2:33:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Just on a very basic level, this is an interesting

2:33:45.720 --> 2:33:48.900
<v Speaker 4>thing for a president to do. I know this is Trump.

2:33:48.920 --> 2:33:51.140
<v Speaker 4>He posts shit from his account all the time. But

2:33:51.580 --> 2:33:55.879
<v Speaker 4>the idea of a president posting a semi-photorealistic, obviously we

2:33:55.900 --> 2:34:01.300
<v Speaker 4>can tell, but a semi-photorealistic video Another location being hit

2:34:01.440 --> 2:34:07.520
<v Speaker 4>by ostensibly our own military is interesting. I just like

2:34:08.000 --> 2:34:10.700
<v Speaker 4>a more advanced version of this could be an actual

2:34:10.760 --> 2:34:14.180
<v Speaker 4>video that's indistinguishable from real footage, at least on a

2:34:14.220 --> 2:34:19.189
<v Speaker 4>service level glance. That's like, you know, the president saying that,

2:34:19.290 --> 2:34:21.390
<v Speaker 4>you know, X location has been hit.

2:34:21.530 --> 2:34:21.830
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:34:21.900 --> 2:34:23.160
<v Speaker 4>And like, no, it hasn't. Yeah.

2:34:23.400 --> 2:34:23.619
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:34:23.980 --> 2:34:26.280
<v Speaker 4>This is the kind of sloppy and bad. It's not clear.

2:34:26.300 --> 2:34:28.959
<v Speaker 4>He's actually trying to convince people that this actually happened.

2:34:29.040 --> 2:34:29.310
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:34:29.890 --> 2:34:33.109
<v Speaker 4>But just the very basic components of this are interesting

2:34:33.170 --> 2:34:33.929
<v Speaker 4>and troubling.

2:34:34.650 --> 2:34:34.850
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:34:35.030 --> 2:34:37.580
<v Speaker 4>With the, from the commander in chief, it's not great stuff.

2:34:37.780 --> 2:34:38.060
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Yeah.

2:34:38.760 --> 2:34:41.810
<v Speaker 4>Clearly, like, he's enjoying watching little AI videos. He posted

2:34:41.830 --> 2:34:42.310
<v Speaker 4>another one.

2:34:42.230 --> 2:34:45.890
<v Speaker 8>Today of Lake America. Well, yeah, he's kicking the sign

2:34:45.930 --> 2:34:49.290
<v Speaker 8>for Lake Ontario. He walks up. He's carrying, you know,

2:34:49.350 --> 2:34:52.690
<v Speaker 8>it's a wooden sign on a couple of 4x4s. He

2:34:52.750 --> 2:34:55.230
<v Speaker 8>kicks the sign over. At that point, one of the

2:34:55.270 --> 2:34:57.330
<v Speaker 8>legs on the sign suddenly becomes shorter when it's on

2:34:57.350 --> 2:34:57.770
<v Speaker 8>the ground.

2:34:58.090 --> 2:34:58.390
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

2:34:58.870 --> 2:35:03.820
<v Speaker 8>And then YMCA starts playing, and he dances in his

2:35:04.500 --> 2:35:05.879
<v Speaker 8>characteristic fashion.

2:35:06.000 --> 2:35:06.180
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:35:06.700 --> 2:35:08.480
<v Speaker 9>It's just so embarrassing, man.

2:35:08.500 --> 2:35:11.500
<v Speaker 8>He's having a great time with the AI machine that

2:35:11.540 --> 2:35:12.140
<v Speaker 8>someone gave him.

2:35:12.640 --> 2:35:13.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:35:13.360 --> 2:35:15.480
<v Speaker 4>So let's talk about what these mean, right?

2:35:16.040 --> 2:35:18.820
<v Speaker 8>He's clearly losing patience with this war and he's worrying

2:35:18.860 --> 2:35:22.000
<v Speaker 8>about how it's going to impact the midterms. So much

2:35:22.050 --> 2:35:24.470
<v Speaker 8>of what we're seeing now is like, we're going to

2:35:24.490 --> 2:35:28.189
<v Speaker 8>talk about other stuff with voting rights later, right? DHS

2:35:28.250 --> 2:35:32.230
<v Speaker 8>is clearly winding up. for the midterms in blue states.

2:35:31.970 --> 2:35:34.310
<v Speaker 2>Yeah i'll be commenting on that a bit yeah.

2:35:34.390 --> 2:35:36.830
<v Speaker 8>We can see the work requirements for federal benefits not

2:35:36.870 --> 2:35:39.400
<v Speaker 8>hitting until january 27 like they are still worried about

2:35:39.430 --> 2:35:43.600
<v Speaker 8>these midterms right yeah meanwhile they are still fucking up

2:35:43.660 --> 2:35:46.320
<v Speaker 8>in iran i saw a video last night of an

2:35:46.620 --> 2:35:48.980
<v Speaker 8>iranian missile hitting something in jordan like this is one

2:35:49.000 --> 2:35:50.699
<v Speaker 8>of the ones that wasn't most of them i guess

2:35:51.180 --> 2:35:54.090
<v Speaker 8>uh because it clearly impacted the ground Iran claims to

2:35:54.110 --> 2:35:58.360
<v Speaker 8>have shot down a Reaper. Last night, United States missiles,

2:35:58.940 --> 2:36:00.540
<v Speaker 8>not for the first time in American history.

2:36:00.800 --> 2:36:01.519
<v Speaker 4>Hit a wedding.

2:36:01.980 --> 2:36:03.020
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've done a bit of that.

2:36:03.459 --> 2:36:03.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:36:04.600 --> 2:36:05.300
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah.

2:36:05.320 --> 2:36:09.580
<v Speaker 8>This was like a defining moment for Obama's air war, right?

2:36:09.600 --> 2:36:11.100
<v Speaker 8>For his drone campaign.

2:36:11.340 --> 2:36:11.580
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:36:12.120 --> 2:36:15.230
<v Speaker 8>When people talk about Obama and how he was a

2:36:15.280 --> 2:36:19.890
<v Speaker 8>disappointment in foreign policy terms, this is what they talk about, right?

2:36:19.910 --> 2:36:21.110
<v Speaker 4>Like, this is the moment.

2:36:21.150 --> 2:36:21.369
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:36:21.629 --> 2:36:22.490
<v Speaker 9>And he bombed a wedding, yeah.

2:36:23.170 --> 2:36:24.510
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we did that again.

2:36:25.129 --> 2:36:29.440
<v Speaker 8>This time, Weapon Fragments at the scene show, I think

2:36:29.459 --> 2:36:33.160
<v Speaker 8>it's what a slam ER or slammer. Please email me,

2:36:33.220 --> 2:36:35.020
<v Speaker 8>Navy people, tell me how you refer to the missile.

2:36:35.440 --> 2:36:39.230
<v Speaker 8>Boeing has touted it as the, quote, most accurate missile

2:36:39.260 --> 2:36:41.690
<v Speaker 8>in the Navy's arsenal. It punched straight through the roof

2:36:41.750 --> 2:36:45.170
<v Speaker 8>of this building. Balooch weddings are really big. There were

2:36:45.209 --> 2:36:48.390
<v Speaker 8>hundreds of people there. There were at least 50 people injured,

2:36:48.410 --> 2:36:50.609
<v Speaker 8>at least five of them dead, including a child missing.

2:36:50.879 --> 2:36:54.340
<v Speaker 8>I've seen videos where you can see children's shoes, little

2:36:54.379 --> 2:36:56.980
<v Speaker 8>tiny toddlers' wedding shoes among the rubble, right?

2:36:57.020 --> 2:36:57.360
<v Speaker 7>Damn.

2:36:58.200 --> 2:37:00.050
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's pretty fucked up, and the images that will

2:37:00.080 --> 2:37:02.730
<v Speaker 8>come out of it will not look good.

2:37:03.370 --> 2:37:03.630
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:37:04.550 --> 2:37:08.110
<v Speaker 8>Finally, talking of Iranian missile strikes, I want to speak

2:37:08.150 --> 2:37:11.910
<v Speaker 8>about this. Discourse about this missile. This missile is generally

2:37:11.950 --> 2:37:14.760
<v Speaker 8>referred to as a castle breaker. The Persian name is

2:37:14.860 --> 2:37:19.250
<v Speaker 8>Kaibasha Khan, I believe. Castle is referring... to a specific

2:37:19.330 --> 2:37:22.390
<v Speaker 8>castle from like Quranic history. And that's relevant only because

2:37:22.410 --> 2:37:25.400
<v Speaker 8>this missile is designed to hit Israel, right? Like that

2:37:25.440 --> 2:37:28.060
<v Speaker 8>is what this is for. It's a medium range ballistic missile,

2:37:28.080 --> 2:37:31.080
<v Speaker 8>something like a 900 mile range. Recently, though, there's been

2:37:31.120 --> 2:37:32.720
<v Speaker 8>a lot of reporting that this is some kind of

2:37:32.900 --> 2:37:36.000
<v Speaker 8>new and groundbreaking thing that Iran's been dropping in the

2:37:36.040 --> 2:37:38.839
<v Speaker 8>last few weeks. And they have had them for years.

2:37:39.379 --> 2:37:42.640
<v Speaker 8>We know this because they unveiled it on live TV.

2:37:43.180 --> 2:37:46.390
<v Speaker 8>They literally whipped a tablecloth off it and were like,

2:37:46.420 --> 2:37:47.310
<v Speaker 8>there it is.

2:37:47.850 --> 2:37:50.030
<v Speaker 4>Iran does this a lot with its weapons systems, right?

2:37:50.090 --> 2:37:50.290
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:37:50.690 --> 2:37:53.010
<v Speaker 8>But I'll include a link to a Russia Today post

2:37:53.070 --> 2:37:57.160
<v Speaker 8>about it. They do seem to be likely the missiles

2:37:57.200 --> 2:38:00.160
<v Speaker 8>that killed several US service people in Jordan in July.

2:38:00.780 --> 2:38:03.020
<v Speaker 8>But in part, the reason that they were the missiles

2:38:03.060 --> 2:38:05.650
<v Speaker 8>that snuck through because they're the missiles that Iran uses

2:38:05.700 --> 2:38:08.730
<v Speaker 8>a lot. Iranian state propaganda is making a big deal

2:38:08.770 --> 2:38:11.370
<v Speaker 8>of talking about these missiles. They do this occasionally with

2:38:11.390 --> 2:38:14.800
<v Speaker 8>their weapon systems, right? They portray it as like, oh,

2:38:14.810 --> 2:38:18.150
<v Speaker 8>the American patriot has nothing on this missile system that

2:38:18.190 --> 2:38:18.530
<v Speaker 8>we have.

2:38:19.010 --> 2:38:22.529
<v Speaker 4>But they are effective, right? They're smallish. They're maneuverable.

2:38:22.980 --> 2:38:26.950
<v Speaker 8>And in the terminal phase of their trajectory, they maneuver,

2:38:26.990 --> 2:38:31.129
<v Speaker 8>which makes them harder to intercept. If it's just doing

2:38:31.170 --> 2:38:35.090
<v Speaker 8>a ballistic arc, then it's a math problem to intercept it.

2:38:35.640 --> 2:38:38.880
<v Speaker 8>But if it's maneuvering, from what I understand, that makes

2:38:38.900 --> 2:38:43.670
<v Speaker 8>the intercept more complicated. They use these in Syria soon

2:38:43.750 --> 2:38:47.609
<v Speaker 8>after I left, actually. This isn't some secret brand new technology,

2:38:47.890 --> 2:38:50.570
<v Speaker 8>but it is a technology that is effective. And the

2:38:50.610 --> 2:38:53.920
<v Speaker 8>reason it's continuing to be effective is that despite more

2:38:53.940 --> 2:38:56.920
<v Speaker 8>than six months of war, the United States has failed

2:38:56.959 --> 2:39:00.640
<v Speaker 8>to destroy their launchers and failed to destroy their missile supplies, right?

2:39:01.240 --> 2:39:04.320
<v Speaker 8>And that is why they're still able to strike United

2:39:04.360 --> 2:39:07.270
<v Speaker 8>States bases all around the region, which they have been

2:39:07.290 --> 2:39:09.830
<v Speaker 8>doing last night and they will do again.

2:39:10.310 --> 2:39:11.210
<v Speaker 4>Tonight, I imagine.

2:39:11.940 --> 2:39:14.980
<v Speaker 8>And as the US supply of munitions continues to dwindle,

2:39:15.020 --> 2:39:16.800
<v Speaker 8>this is going to become a bigger and bigger problem

2:39:16.820 --> 2:39:17.619
<v Speaker 8>for the United States.

2:39:18.320 --> 2:39:18.959
<v Speaker 9>What an L.

2:39:19.879 --> 2:39:22.310
<v Speaker 4>Talking of big problems, we haven't done an ad break

2:39:22.340 --> 2:39:22.779
<v Speaker 4>in a while.

2:39:34.990 --> 2:39:39.279
<v Speaker 2>And we're back. So at the end of March, 2026,

2:39:39.280 --> 2:39:44.930
<v Speaker 2>which is, I think, At least it feels like that.

2:39:45.110 --> 2:39:47.700
<v Speaker 2>President Donald Trump signed an executive order to create a

2:39:47.820 --> 2:39:52.020
<v Speaker 2>national list of verified eligible voters. Mail-in voting would be

2:39:52.060 --> 2:39:54.459
<v Speaker 2>restricted to the people on this list, which would be

2:39:54.620 --> 2:39:58.459
<v Speaker 2>essentially an arbitrary list of whoever the administration thought should

2:39:58.480 --> 2:40:00.470
<v Speaker 2>be on it, right? It was going to be compiled

2:40:00.490 --> 2:40:03.890
<v Speaker 2>with help from DHS based on like citizenship roles. Voting

2:40:03.950 --> 2:40:07.030
<v Speaker 2>law experts immediately complained that this violated the Constitution for

2:40:07.050 --> 2:40:09.690
<v Speaker 2>a variety of reasons. And some people have said essentially

2:40:09.730 --> 2:40:12.160
<v Speaker 2>this is an attempt at a coup. Under the order,

2:40:12.270 --> 2:40:15.560
<v Speaker 2>DHS was supposed to work with the Social Security Administration

2:40:15.600 --> 2:40:18.460
<v Speaker 2>to create lists for each state. Ballots would be given

2:40:18.620 --> 2:40:21.700
<v Speaker 2>new envelopes with special barcodes for tracking, and federal funds

2:40:21.720 --> 2:40:23.960
<v Speaker 2>would be withheld from states that refused to comply with

2:40:23.980 --> 2:40:27.340
<v Speaker 2>this illegal order. As with many Trump executive orders, this

2:40:27.400 --> 2:40:29.740
<v Speaker 2>one was immediately met by a federal judge who issued

2:40:29.780 --> 2:40:32.820
<v Speaker 2>a temporary restraining order that blocked it from going into effect.

2:40:33.320 --> 2:40:36.780
<v Speaker 2>Trump appealed, and the whole situation remains legally unsettled to

2:40:36.820 --> 2:40:40.070
<v Speaker 2>this day. Despite the fact that the order has been halted,

2:40:40.270 --> 2:40:43.750
<v Speaker 2>earlier this week, Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, announced that

2:40:43.770 --> 2:40:46.820
<v Speaker 2>a USPS whistleblower had come forth to assert that the

2:40:46.860 --> 2:40:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Postal Service was still moving forward to comply with the

2:40:49.900 --> 2:40:53.700
<v Speaker 2>halted order anyway. According to an article by the AP, quote,

2:40:54.200 --> 2:40:57.190
<v Speaker 2>The disclosure from the unidentified whistleblower contends that the Postal

2:40:57.209 --> 2:40:59.609
<v Speaker 2>Service has been scrambling to try and build a complex

2:40:59.650 --> 2:41:01.550
<v Speaker 2>system that would normally take a year or more and

2:41:01.650 --> 2:41:04.610
<v Speaker 2>only three months, sometimes in defiance of the judge's orders

2:41:04.629 --> 2:41:06.770
<v Speaker 2>halting work. The goal is to have it ready for

2:41:06.910 --> 2:41:10.050
<v Speaker 2>use in the midterm elections. The disclosure contends that, due

2:41:10.070 --> 2:41:12.390
<v Speaker 2>to the new procedures, a single scanning error in a

2:41:12.450 --> 2:41:15.010
<v Speaker 2>batch of tens of thousands of ballot envelopes could prevent

2:41:15.110 --> 2:41:18.070
<v Speaker 2>any from reaching voters. It details a system that election

2:41:18.090 --> 2:41:20.859
<v Speaker 2>officials have already warned could not be implemented before the

2:41:20.920 --> 2:41:23.980
<v Speaker 2>first mail ballots begin going out Friday in North Carolina.

2:41:24.540 --> 2:41:27.360
<v Speaker 2>The Postal Service has designed a system to disenfranchise millions

2:41:27.379 --> 2:41:30.359
<v Speaker 2>of Americans, Blumenthal told reporters in advance of releasing the

2:41:30.379 --> 2:41:34.439
<v Speaker 2>whistleblower information. this administration seems hell-bent on changing the framework

2:41:34.500 --> 2:41:38.450
<v Speaker 2>on casting ballots in this country, clearly for political reasons. Now,

2:41:38.870 --> 2:41:41.690
<v Speaker 2>For its part, the U.S. Postal Service contends that the

2:41:41.750 --> 2:41:45.240
<v Speaker 2>judge's restraining order still gave them explicitly the right to

2:41:45.270 --> 2:41:49.120
<v Speaker 2>develop online tools for states who wanted to voluntarily abide

2:41:49.180 --> 2:41:51.820
<v Speaker 2>by the order. Even if this is true, it's a

2:41:51.940 --> 2:41:55.300
<v Speaker 2>massive issue because the changes mandated by the EO are

2:41:55.400 --> 2:41:58.820
<v Speaker 2>hideously unconstitutional and no state should be allowed to carry

2:41:58.860 --> 2:42:00.900
<v Speaker 2>them out. And to make that point, here's a quote

2:42:00.920 --> 2:42:04.370
<v Speaker 2>from the actual whistleblower complaint to Blumenthal. When ballots are

2:42:04.410 --> 2:42:07.410
<v Speaker 2>submitted to USPS in large volume batches, if any one

2:42:07.510 --> 2:42:10.590
<v Speaker 2>ballot in the batch cannot be verified against the portal,

2:42:11.030 --> 2:42:14.130
<v Speaker 2>all ballots in that batch will be rejected. For example,

2:42:14.230 --> 2:42:16.830
<v Speaker 2>if a state election official brings a batch of 10,000

2:42:16.830 --> 2:42:20.000
<v Speaker 2>ballots to USPS and USPS is unable to match just

2:42:20.220 --> 2:42:23.039
<v Speaker 2>one of those ballots against the portal because, for example,

2:42:23.120 --> 2:42:26.160
<v Speaker 2>someone had recently changed their name after marriage or they've moved,

2:42:26.480 --> 2:42:29.300
<v Speaker 2>then USPS would refuse to mail the remaining 9,999 ballots

2:42:29.320 --> 2:42:29.500
<v Speaker 2>as well.

2:42:31.930 --> 2:42:35.490
<v Speaker 4>That's what the whistleblower is contending about the new USPS

2:42:35.590 --> 2:42:39.810
<v Speaker 4>rules regarding, yes, the barcodes and the portal system.

2:42:40.230 --> 2:42:40.449
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:42:40.709 --> 2:42:44.119
<v Speaker 2>Like this is how he's describing the system as working, right?

2:42:44.140 --> 2:42:44.660
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:42:45.240 --> 2:42:48.720
<v Speaker 2>He continues, USPS expects the state to take back the

2:42:48.760 --> 2:42:51.279
<v Speaker 2>entire batch to cure the issue with a single ballot.

2:42:51.540 --> 2:42:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Should the slapdash portal mistakenly mark a ballot as unverified,

2:42:54.810 --> 2:42:57.530
<v Speaker 2>there is no clear process by which state election officials

2:42:57.570 --> 2:43:00.800
<v Speaker 2>or voters themselves can challenge the rejection. The rule simply

2:43:00.879 --> 2:43:03.959
<v Speaker 2>vaguely states that they will be informed of the escalation

2:43:04.000 --> 2:43:08.099
<v Speaker 2>procedures should they decide to challenge a rejection. Voters intending

2:43:08.150 --> 2:43:10.450
<v Speaker 2>to cast ballots by mail may not even be aware

2:43:10.490 --> 2:43:12.529
<v Speaker 2>that their ballots have been rejected or were part of

2:43:12.570 --> 2:43:14.990
<v Speaker 2>a rejected batch until it is too late to secure

2:43:15.030 --> 2:43:19.289
<v Speaker 2>an alternative ballot or vote in person. Now, I would

2:43:19.330 --> 2:43:22.039
<v Speaker 2>call this a clear attempt to steal an election or

2:43:22.080 --> 2:43:24.259
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily to steal, but at least to create doubt

2:43:24.400 --> 2:43:27.100
<v Speaker 2>around the midterm elections, right? This is something of a

2:43:27.140 --> 2:43:29.180
<v Speaker 2>desperate Hail Mary by Trump and his cronies as the

2:43:29.220 --> 2:43:32.390
<v Speaker 2>numbers of them have gotten much, much worse nationwide. And

2:43:32.690 --> 2:43:35.310
<v Speaker 2>if individual states are allowed to do this, even if

2:43:35.570 --> 2:43:37.789
<v Speaker 2>the TROs remain in place and this is halted from

2:43:37.810 --> 2:43:41.000
<v Speaker 2>going forward nationwide before the election, if individual states are

2:43:41.030 --> 2:43:44.620
<v Speaker 2>allowed to use this system, then we could see countless

2:43:44.660 --> 2:43:48.060
<v Speaker 2>Democrat votes tossed out in red states where many Dems

2:43:48.100 --> 2:43:50.519
<v Speaker 2>are doing well for the first time in several election cycles.

2:43:51.020 --> 2:43:52.650
<v Speaker 2>And I think a large part of the goal here,

2:43:52.690 --> 2:43:57.430
<v Speaker 2>beyond just blunt disenfranchisement, is creating chaos, right? Because chaos

2:43:57.470 --> 2:44:00.070
<v Speaker 2>is almost as good as outright tossing out votes. It

2:44:00.110 --> 2:44:03.390
<v Speaker 2>creates doubt and it provides opportunity, a period of time

2:44:03.690 --> 2:44:06.500
<v Speaker 2>in which the administration can set narratives about how the

2:44:06.560 --> 2:44:09.700
<v Speaker 2>election went in an uncertain election night, right? That's a

2:44:09.740 --> 2:44:11.760
<v Speaker 2>big part of, I think, why they're doing this is

2:44:11.780 --> 2:44:14.640
<v Speaker 2>to provide opportunities to where they can throw doubt on

2:44:14.660 --> 2:44:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the system. Here's another relevant quote from the complaint. According

2:44:18.320 --> 2:44:20.910
<v Speaker 2>to the whistleblower, USPS's effort to develop and deploy the

2:44:20.950 --> 2:44:24.770
<v Speaker 2>portal has been rushed, risky, and haphazard because leadership has

2:44:24.790 --> 2:44:28.320
<v Speaker 2>demanded an impossible timeframe. In an effort to meet impossible deadlines,

2:44:28.420 --> 2:44:31.900
<v Speaker 2>USPS has eliminated standard and needed testing, thereby creating a

2:44:31.940 --> 2:44:35.260
<v Speaker 2>substantial risk of a catastrophic failure of the system that

2:44:35.340 --> 2:44:37.119
<v Speaker 2>could derail the midterm elections.

2:44:37.600 --> 2:45:05.940
<v Speaker 9>Quote, Now, It's good that.

2:45:05.860 --> 2:45:08.580
<v Speaker 2>This whistleblower came forward and courage like this is one of,

2:45:08.640 --> 2:45:10.480
<v Speaker 2>if not the only ways that we're going to have

2:45:10.500 --> 2:45:12.699
<v Speaker 2>a chance to catch and stop schemes like this from

2:45:12.740 --> 2:45:15.660
<v Speaker 2>coming to fruition. It is too early to know what

2:45:15.700 --> 2:45:18.420
<v Speaker 2>the fallout from this revelation is going to be. That

2:45:18.480 --> 2:45:20.560
<v Speaker 2>is still very much ongoing. This all just came out

2:45:20.620 --> 2:45:22.980
<v Speaker 2>in the last couple of days. So we'll update you

2:45:23.160 --> 2:45:25.610
<v Speaker 2>on this in the future as this evolves. But I

2:45:25.650 --> 2:45:27.790
<v Speaker 2>wanted to talk a little bit more about some other

2:45:28.070 --> 2:45:30.610
<v Speaker 2>midterm fuckery related news, some stuff that's a little bit

2:45:30.709 --> 2:45:34.289
<v Speaker 2>less dark, right? General Dan Cain, chairman of the Joint

2:45:34.330 --> 2:45:37.670
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs of Staff, wrote in a letter to Senator Alyssa Slotkin,

2:45:37.990 --> 2:45:41.040
<v Speaker 2>a Democrat, early this week, promising her, quote, the joint

2:45:41.100 --> 2:45:43.940
<v Speaker 2>force has no plans to send federal military personnel or

2:45:44.040 --> 2:45:46.860
<v Speaker 2>federalized members of the National Guard to polling places during

2:45:46.879 --> 2:45:50.779
<v Speaker 2>the 2020 elections. Likewise, the joint force has no plans

2:45:50.990 --> 2:45:53.670
<v Speaker 2>to use such personnel to seize ballots, voting machines or

2:45:53.730 --> 2:45:56.990
<v Speaker 2>other election related material. Now, this was in response to

2:45:57.030 --> 2:46:00.170
<v Speaker 2>a request Slotkin's office sent Cain and Pete Hegseth, asking

2:46:00.190 --> 2:46:03.040
<v Speaker 2>for confirmation the Pentagon would not interfere with the election

2:46:03.080 --> 2:46:06.500
<v Speaker 2>by having soldiers at polling places or seizing ballots. I'd

2:46:06.540 --> 2:46:09.620
<v Speaker 2>call this a partial positive story, right? It's good that

2:46:09.660 --> 2:46:12.980
<v Speaker 2>he's saying that. It's not great that elected Democrats are

2:46:13.020 --> 2:46:15.269
<v Speaker 2>so worried about this that they felt the need to ask.

2:46:15.670 --> 2:46:18.310
<v Speaker 2>It's not just the military we have to contend with here,

2:46:18.370 --> 2:46:21.890
<v Speaker 2>because back in February, DHS Assistant Secretary for Election Integrity

2:46:21.930 --> 2:46:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Heather Honey said, And that sounded great, but on September

2:46:30.060 --> 2:46:33.000
<v Speaker 2>1st of 2026, just a couple of days ago, Homeland

2:46:33.020 --> 2:46:36.340
<v Speaker 2>Security Secretary Mark Wayne Mullen made some concerning statements to

2:46:36.360 --> 2:46:46.050
<v Speaker 2>reporters in New York City. Per Politico, quote, Yep. He added, however,

2:46:46.129 --> 2:46:49.450
<v Speaker 2>that reports of specific undocumented immigrants at a location could

2:46:49.470 --> 2:46:51.869
<v Speaker 2>be a reason for ICE to deploy. The only reason

2:46:51.910 --> 2:46:53.629
<v Speaker 2>why we would be at polling places is that there

2:46:53.670 --> 2:46:55.709
<v Speaker 2>is a threat to that polling place or we're serving

2:46:55.750 --> 2:46:58.610
<v Speaker 2>a warrant on someone that we have been actively tracking down,

2:46:58.709 --> 2:47:02.140
<v Speaker 2>he said. ICE's job is immigration, customs enforcement. That's their job.

2:47:02.480 --> 2:47:04.640
<v Speaker 2>If we're serving a warrant, we will be where we

2:47:04.700 --> 2:47:07.519
<v Speaker 2>need to be. And that does leave the door open

2:47:07.560 --> 2:47:10.140
<v Speaker 2>to some degree of intimidation and fuckery at polls, because

2:47:10.160 --> 2:47:11.880
<v Speaker 2>we've all seen over the last two years that ICE

2:47:11.959 --> 2:47:15.100
<v Speaker 2>regularly take being brown as a sign that someone might

2:47:15.140 --> 2:47:17.320
<v Speaker 2>be an illegal alien in need of tasing and arrest.

2:47:17.700 --> 2:47:20.190
<v Speaker 2>And when the agency was asked for more clarification, on

2:47:20.209 --> 2:47:24.210
<v Speaker 2>Mullen's statement, ICE responded, ICE is not planning operations targeting

2:47:24.250 --> 2:47:29.030
<v Speaker 2>polling locations. ICE conducts intelligence-driven targeted enforcement. And if an

2:47:29.129 --> 2:47:32.170
<v Speaker 2>active public safety threat endangered a public location, they may

2:47:32.190 --> 2:47:35.029
<v Speaker 2>be arrested as a result of that targeted enforcement action.

2:47:35.050 --> 2:47:36.590
<v Speaker 2>So again, what's going to happen?

2:47:36.610 --> 2:47:38.250
<v Speaker 9>It's hard to say.

2:47:39.070 --> 2:47:42.590
<v Speaker 2>So far, DHS and the military are saying the right things.

2:47:42.629 --> 2:47:45.189
<v Speaker 2>But certainly with ICE, there remains open the possibility of

2:47:45.230 --> 2:47:48.330
<v Speaker 2>some targeted ICE fuckery at polling locations around the country.

2:47:48.420 --> 2:47:49.850
<v Speaker 2>So something to keep an eye on as well.

2:47:50.140 --> 2:47:50.379
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:47:50.840 --> 2:47:54.900
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, no parts of me trust them in any way

2:47:55.900 --> 2:48:00.859
<v Speaker 7>that their word means anything. And it sounds like exactly

2:48:00.879 --> 2:48:05.030
<v Speaker 7>what you said. This is some sort of word judo.

2:48:05.950 --> 2:48:10.789
<v Speaker 7>We're not planning to be there for the purpose of.

2:48:10.970 --> 2:48:12.050
<v Speaker 2>Keeping the door open.

2:48:12.330 --> 2:48:15.130
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you know what I'm saying? Well, we told you

2:48:15.170 --> 2:48:17.910
<v Speaker 9>we wasn't coming for the purpose of this. We here

2:48:17.950 --> 2:48:18.330
<v Speaker 9>for that.

2:48:18.709 --> 2:48:21.090
<v Speaker 2>And again, you know, I don't expect some national rollout

2:48:21.129 --> 2:48:24.550
<v Speaker 2>of ICE, but there's some really close state elections and maybe,

2:48:24.890 --> 2:48:25.190
<v Speaker 2>you know.

2:48:25.430 --> 2:48:25.690
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:48:26.480 --> 2:48:30.340
<v Speaker 8>There were people who were attempting to do this six

2:48:30.379 --> 2:48:33.320
<v Speaker 8>years ago in 2020 in swing states, right?

2:48:33.360 --> 2:48:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. And like that.

2:48:35.400 --> 2:48:40.260
<v Speaker 8>Very narrowly avoided happening through the intervention. I think of

2:48:40.280 --> 2:48:43.280
<v Speaker 8>a couple of members of Congress, but like this is

2:48:43.379 --> 2:48:46.259
<v Speaker 8>something that has clearly been like a.

2:48:48.080 --> 2:48:49.120
<v Speaker 4>I guess a strategy, right?

2:48:49.140 --> 2:48:50.700
<v Speaker 8>It's not a hard one to come up with, but

2:48:50.900 --> 2:48:53.439
<v Speaker 8>it's a thing that we should be really fucking worried about.

2:48:53.640 --> 2:48:58.459
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Yep. To clarify one thing regarding my reporting last

2:48:58.520 --> 2:49:02.990
<v Speaker 4>week on the plans for this UPS implementation of the

2:49:03.010 --> 2:49:08.250
<v Speaker 4>executive order, there was two injunctions that were dropped last week.

2:49:08.770 --> 2:49:12.450
<v Speaker 4>And then after the USPS published the rule change, a

2:49:12.530 --> 2:49:16.609
<v Speaker 4>new lawsuit was initiated by over half a dozen states.

2:49:17.450 --> 2:49:20.450
<v Speaker 4>And then a judge granted a TRO in regards to

2:49:20.470 --> 2:49:24.510
<v Speaker 4>that new lawsuit. And there will be a hearing tomorrow,

2:49:24.770 --> 2:49:28.230
<v Speaker 4>which for us is September 3rd, that will determine if

2:49:28.250 --> 2:49:29.590
<v Speaker 4>there's going to be a permanent injunction.

2:49:29.730 --> 2:49:29.990
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:49:30.370 --> 2:49:32.820
<v Speaker 4>And then based on whatever happens at that hearing, the

2:49:32.830 --> 2:49:36.199
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration will also likely appeal to the Supreme Court.

2:49:36.260 --> 2:49:39.080
<v Speaker 4>And it's really just a matter of days in terms

2:49:39.120 --> 2:49:40.340
<v Speaker 4>of ballots being sent out.

2:49:40.560 --> 2:49:40.740
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:49:40.980 --> 2:49:43.939
<v Speaker 4>It's cutting it super close. And they're trying to make

2:49:43.959 --> 2:49:44.879
<v Speaker 4>this be very close.

2:49:44.959 --> 2:49:45.160
<v Speaker 7>Right.

2:49:45.720 --> 2:49:46.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah.

2:49:46.640 --> 2:49:48.420
<v Speaker 7>Usually I can at least follow the logic of the

2:49:48.440 --> 2:49:50.619
<v Speaker 7>Supreme Court. But this one, I just kind.

2:49:51.160 --> 2:49:54.240
<v Speaker 9>Of, whether I agree with them or not, I was like,

2:49:54.280 --> 2:49:56.190
<v Speaker 9>at least I understand how you got there. But they're

2:49:56.230 --> 2:49:59.390
<v Speaker 9>just like, I don't know. This ain't illegal yet, but

2:49:59.470 --> 2:50:00.150
<v Speaker 9>let them cook.

2:50:00.390 --> 2:50:02.150
<v Speaker 4>No, this seems like some of the one of the

2:50:02.190 --> 2:50:06.459
<v Speaker 4>more partisan or like subservient to Trump kind of type

2:50:06.540 --> 2:50:07.520
<v Speaker 4>orders that they've had.

2:50:07.920 --> 2:50:11.460
<v Speaker 7>Yeah yeah like okay a little bit of our like

2:50:11.500 --> 2:50:14.800
<v Speaker 7>personal information but basically we've been waiting for the insurance

2:50:14.860 --> 2:50:17.840
<v Speaker 7>to it happened already but my wife needed a particular

2:50:17.860 --> 2:50:21.180
<v Speaker 7>medical procedure this is to like prevent a stroke you

2:50:21.200 --> 2:50:23.870
<v Speaker 7>know i'm saying and so essentially they was like well

2:50:23.910 --> 2:50:30.490
<v Speaker 7>we can't approve this this preventative procedure unless you already

2:50:30.550 --> 2:50:35.900
<v Speaker 7>have a stroke let me get this straight fam perfect

2:50:36.120 --> 2:50:41.070
<v Speaker 7>okay just say it to yourself again yeah like so

2:50:41.090 --> 2:50:43.550
<v Speaker 7>you so they gotta so they gotta break a law

2:50:44.930 --> 2:50:48.570
<v Speaker 7>before you could say what they doing is illegal I

2:50:49.410 --> 2:50:50.090
<v Speaker 7>just yeah.

2:50:50.150 --> 2:50:53.509
<v Speaker 4>That is a fair interpretation of the Supreme Court's logic

2:50:53.690 --> 2:50:54.970
<v Speaker 4>yeah that's what the.

2:50:54.910 --> 2:50:57.270
<v Speaker 7>Supreme Court just said they gotta break a law before

2:50:57.290 --> 2:51:00.710
<v Speaker 7>we could tell you what they did is illegal okay okay.

2:51:01.090 --> 2:51:02.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah that does seem to be where we're at it's

2:51:02.610 --> 2:51:08.340
<v Speaker 8>great yeah For our final story, let's talk about Data Republican.

2:51:09.200 --> 2:51:15.539
<v Speaker 4>Data Republican is a relatively popular conservative influencer or propagandist

2:51:15.640 --> 2:51:17.760
<v Speaker 4>on X the Everything app. But this isn't just a

2:51:17.760 --> 2:51:21.640
<v Speaker 4>story about Twitter drama, trust me. Data Republican has almost

2:51:21.879 --> 2:51:24.580
<v Speaker 4>a million followers on X. Her account started to gain

2:51:24.830 --> 2:51:28.770
<v Speaker 4>traction in the early days of Musk's doge by her

2:51:28.990 --> 2:51:31.990
<v Speaker 4>posts that are kind of like data journalism. I use

2:51:32.030 --> 2:51:37.170
<v Speaker 4>that term very loosely. Yeah. using manipulated data to justify

2:51:37.230 --> 2:51:41.030
<v Speaker 4>Doge in a very questionable way. And now she produces

2:51:41.070 --> 2:51:44.470
<v Speaker 4>content which is essentially like open source, like OSINT style

2:51:44.950 --> 2:51:50.170
<v Speaker 4>data journalism for MAGA or a far right audience. Her

2:51:50.270 --> 2:51:53.370
<v Speaker 4>bio reads, I'm just a tool builder and has a

2:51:53.450 --> 2:51:56.730
<v Speaker 4>quote from Musk saying that she's worth following as well

2:51:56.750 --> 2:51:59.890
<v Speaker 4>as a quote from Charlie Kirk saying, you're a must follow.

2:51:59.910 --> 2:52:06.330
<v Speaker 4>Last week, Data Republican published a web tool mapping out

2:52:06.430 --> 2:52:11.470
<v Speaker 4>thousands of Antifa, anarchist, and left-wing websites from across the

2:52:11.490 --> 2:52:15.570
<v Speaker 4>globe hosted through NoBlogs. And as we discussed last week,

2:52:15.610 --> 2:52:20.340
<v Speaker 4>the collective that runs the infrastructure behind NoBlogs was designated

2:52:20.420 --> 2:52:25.260
<v Speaker 4>as a specially designated global terrorist. Data Republican basically scraped

2:52:25.660 --> 2:52:28.980
<v Speaker 4>every NoBlogs site that was online as of last week

2:52:29.320 --> 2:52:33.560
<v Speaker 4>and created an index of posts, if they host doxing information,

2:52:33.680 --> 2:52:37.080
<v Speaker 4>calls to violence, and if they have any financial information

2:52:37.120 --> 2:52:41.850
<v Speaker 4>or donation links, as well as quote-unquote institutional affiliations to

2:52:42.030 --> 2:52:45.690
<v Speaker 4>other organizations such as the SPLC and any connections to

2:52:45.810 --> 2:52:49.830
<v Speaker 4>other no-blogs sites. She described the tool like this, quote,

2:52:50.370 --> 2:52:54.830
<v Speaker 4>introducing an interactive map of 7,000 plus blogs across many

2:52:54.870 --> 2:53:01.130
<v Speaker 4>countries and languages, anti-fascist, anarchist, ecological, prisoner solidarity, migrant border, revolutionary,

2:53:02.020 --> 2:53:06.250
<v Speaker 4>Every one classified, geolocated, and searchable down to the verbatim quote.

2:53:06.910 --> 2:53:10.270
<v Speaker 4>Verified quotes. Every claim is a receipt. Their words, not mine.

2:53:10.270 --> 2:53:13.890
<v Speaker 4>4,000 plus blogs pinned to a live world map. Zoom

2:53:13.950 --> 2:53:18.730
<v Speaker 4>into your own city. Many blogs classified, quote-unquote, operational. Click

2:53:18.750 --> 2:53:21.910
<v Speaker 4>any blog, author, or cell, and walk the network one

2:53:21.950 --> 2:53:25.500
<v Speaker 4>tie at a time. No grant funded this. No client

2:53:25.590 --> 2:53:28.080
<v Speaker 4>asked for it. I do this for free on my

2:53:28.140 --> 2:53:32.090
<v Speaker 4>own time because someone should, unquote. I have a little

2:53:32.150 --> 2:53:36.590
<v Speaker 4>picture of the tool here below, which was titled Trump Blogs.

2:53:37.670 --> 2:53:39.490
<v Speaker 4>That's what she calls her tool to search all these

2:53:39.530 --> 2:53:42.890
<v Speaker 4>different sites. She has little nodes on this map that

2:53:42.930 --> 2:53:46.710
<v Speaker 4>are labeled mainstream authority for groups like the SPLC or

2:53:46.730 --> 2:53:51.670
<v Speaker 4>the ADL. She has another node for Antifa slash Watchdog Research,

2:53:52.060 --> 2:53:54.900
<v Speaker 4>which she calls naming shops, basically like, you know, info

2:53:54.959 --> 2:53:58.580
<v Speaker 4>sites where anti-fascist researchers will name fascists.

2:53:58.100 --> 2:53:58.740
<v Speaker 2>In their area.

2:53:58.879 --> 2:53:59.019
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:54:00.090 --> 2:54:03.449
<v Speaker 4>She's in other nodes for movement legal defense, for official

2:54:03.560 --> 2:54:10.340
<v Speaker 4>political parties, mostly international-based parties, and for movement infrastructures. Now,

2:54:10.379 --> 2:54:13.940
<v Speaker 4>a few days prior, she posted a similar network map

2:54:14.060 --> 2:54:19.040
<v Speaker 4>for the DSA, inspired largely by Marco Rubio's Cuba conspiracy document.

2:54:19.500 --> 2:54:22.880
<v Speaker 4>This quote-unquote DSA explorer allows you to navigate an alleged

2:54:22.959 --> 2:54:26.920
<v Speaker 4>web of connections between DSA members, journalists, politicians, and other

2:54:27.250 --> 2:54:33.720
<v Speaker 4>left-wing organizations. other quote-unquote anti-imperialist organizations, foreign political parties, and

2:54:33.920 --> 2:54:38.630
<v Speaker 4>Islamic terror groups. Data Republican has a few projects like

2:54:38.690 --> 2:54:42.410
<v Speaker 4>this on her website. Other projects include the National Endowment

2:54:42.430 --> 2:54:47.709
<v Speaker 4>for Democracy Explorer, quote, AI-generated summaries of NED's Journal of

2:54:47.750 --> 2:54:50.470
<v Speaker 4>Democracy articles, authors, and NGOs, unquote.

2:54:50.830 --> 2:54:51.830
<v Speaker 5>Perfect.

2:54:51.850 --> 2:54:56.130
<v Speaker 4>She also has another database of nonprofit NGOs, their employees,

2:54:56.250 --> 2:55:00.130
<v Speaker 4>and their volunteers, and whether they receive government funding. For instance,

2:55:00.470 --> 2:55:05.689
<v Speaker 4>she has pages on 92 nonprofits focused on combating hunger.

2:55:06.690 --> 2:55:09.390
<v Speaker 4>Truly the worst of the worst being documented here. Yeah.

2:55:10.330 --> 2:55:13.520
<v Speaker 4>She also has a database of grant funding, a 2024

2:55:13.520 --> 2:55:16.520
<v Speaker 4>voter turnout analysis, and a link to her book on

2:55:16.600 --> 2:55:20.880
<v Speaker 4>NGOs and USAID published under her real name, Jennica Pounds,

2:55:21.420 --> 2:55:24.550
<v Speaker 4>with a foreword by Doge's own Big Balls.

2:55:25.110 --> 2:55:25.849
<v Speaker 5>Oh my god.

2:55:25.990 --> 2:55:30.240
<v Speaker 8>Is he credited using his legal name there or Big Balls? No,

2:55:30.330 --> 2:55:32.940
<v Speaker 8>he is credited as Big Falls. Like I read it,

2:55:33.000 --> 2:55:36.120
<v Speaker 8>he is credited as Big Falls.

2:55:36.260 --> 2:55:38.900
<v Speaker 4>At the bottom of the Data Republican website is a

2:55:38.940 --> 2:55:43.490
<v Speaker 4>link to a nearly 5,000-word essay from her pastor titled

2:55:43.570 --> 2:55:50.129
<v Speaker 4>The Historical Case for Christianity. Last April, Jenica Pounce, Data Republican,

2:55:50.790 --> 2:55:55.220
<v Speaker 4>became a credentialed member of Hegseth's revamped Pentagon Press Corps.

2:55:55.740 --> 2:55:58.240
<v Speaker 4>Remember when he kicked out all those news outlets out

2:55:58.280 --> 2:56:01.040
<v Speaker 4>of the Pentagon last March and replaced them with right-wing cheerleaders?

2:56:02.060 --> 2:56:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Pound's admission into the press corps was part of this effort.

2:56:06.180 --> 2:56:10.100
<v Speaker 4>And then last month, something odd happened in the Pentagon

2:56:10.140 --> 2:56:14.770
<v Speaker 4>press corps. Jenica Pound, data Republican, accused someone from the

2:56:14.810 --> 2:56:18.790
<v Speaker 4>State Department of trying to entrap her into leaking old

2:56:19.190 --> 2:56:23.530
<v Speaker 4>Biden-era documents about Cuba by presenting the documents as an

2:56:23.730 --> 2:56:27.220
<v Speaker 4>exclusive scoop. I'm going to read a quick text exchange

2:56:27.580 --> 2:56:30.660
<v Speaker 4>that Data Republican posted on Twitter. This is her, quote,

2:56:31.040 --> 2:56:33.379
<v Speaker 4>Just to be clear, you want me to leak the

2:56:33.420 --> 2:56:34.779
<v Speaker 4>material you gave to me?

2:56:35.480 --> 2:56:36.199
<v Speaker 9>Unredacted?

2:56:37.600 --> 2:56:40.570
<v Speaker 4>Happy to help your efforts. The person that she was

2:56:40.590 --> 2:56:45.350
<v Speaker 4>texting to responded, quote, It already contains all necessary redactions.

2:56:46.070 --> 2:56:49.330
<v Speaker 4>If you'd rather report on already open source stuff, that's

2:56:49.390 --> 2:56:51.980
<v Speaker 4>fine too. But I wanted to give you the option of,

2:56:52.050 --> 2:56:56.760
<v Speaker 4>quote unquote, breaking the story as a sort of gift. Unquote. OK,

2:56:57.170 --> 2:57:01.350
<v Speaker 4>so as data Republican, Jenica Pounds posted a now deleted

2:57:01.390 --> 2:57:05.129
<v Speaker 4>tweet reading. It's not OK when the deep state sets

2:57:05.170 --> 2:57:07.369
<v Speaker 4>you up to commit a crime. I have never been

2:57:07.450 --> 2:57:12.520
<v Speaker 4>more angry in my life. Meanwhile, the Undersecretary of State,

2:57:12.580 --> 2:57:17.119
<v Speaker 4>Sarah Rogers, who oversees Voice of America, basically government-funded media,

2:57:17.780 --> 2:57:21.910
<v Speaker 4>replied to Pounds' thread about this alleged entrapment and tried

2:57:21.920 --> 2:57:25.570
<v Speaker 4>to explain that this wasn't a deep state plot trying

2:57:25.590 --> 2:57:29.280
<v Speaker 4>to trick Pounds into committing treason, but rather, a sincere

2:57:29.500 --> 2:57:34.160
<v Speaker 4>offer from her, Sarah Rogers, to just publish some exclusive documents.

2:57:34.180 --> 2:57:54.450
<v Speaker 4>And then Sarah Rogers posted a thread of those documents. Also,

2:57:54.480 --> 2:57:57.980
<v Speaker 4>it's funny that she calls just redactions FOIA redactions because

2:57:58.300 --> 2:58:00.600
<v Speaker 4>these were not FOIA documents, but she just refers to

2:58:00.640 --> 2:58:05.439
<v Speaker 4>those as FOIA redactions. Just an interesting note here. Yeah.

2:58:05.980 --> 2:58:09.000
<v Speaker 4>So essentially, Data Republican just botched a scoop because of

2:58:09.060 --> 2:58:11.400
<v Speaker 4>her weird paranoia and because she doesn't really know how

2:58:11.420 --> 2:58:17.959
<v Speaker 4>to do journalism, even like administration propaganda journalism. And in

2:58:18.000 --> 2:58:20.380
<v Speaker 4>the midst of this shit show, like this, this caused

2:58:20.400 --> 2:58:22.480
<v Speaker 4>a lot of drama, like on like, you know, MAGA Twitter.

2:58:23.230 --> 2:58:25.850
<v Speaker 4>But in the midst of this shit show, the far-right

2:58:25.910 --> 2:58:31.449
<v Speaker 4>news aggregator account America First News claimed that Pounds wasn't

2:58:31.530 --> 2:58:36.220
<v Speaker 4>just a Pentagon press corps journalist, but was actually a, quote,

2:58:36.480 --> 2:58:41.420
<v Speaker 4>Department of War employee, unquote. A big claim. And then

2:58:41.640 --> 2:58:45.880
<v Speaker 4>a few days later, the Pentagon confirmed that Pounds was

2:58:45.980 --> 2:58:49.940
<v Speaker 4>indeed an employee of the Department of War, the so-called

2:58:50.510 --> 2:58:53.780
<v Speaker 4>This is a statement from the DOD or the DOW, quote,

2:58:54.360 --> 2:58:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Miss Jenica Pounds serves at the Department of War as

2:58:56.879 --> 2:59:00.770
<v Speaker 4>a special government employee and is no longer a credentialed

2:59:00.830 --> 2:59:04.879
<v Speaker 4>journalist at the Pentagon. Her press credentials expired in June

2:59:04.879 --> 2:59:07.980
<v Speaker 4>2026 and she did not seek a renewal. She began

2:59:08.010 --> 2:59:12.400
<v Speaker 4>working for the department in July, 2026 unquote. So that's

2:59:12.440 --> 2:59:15.279
<v Speaker 4>pretty wild. And I will invite you to return back

2:59:15.620 --> 2:59:20.060
<v Speaker 4>to this map of like Antifa anarchist, no blogs, websites

2:59:20.760 --> 2:59:24.560
<v Speaker 4>that pounds created while she was a special government employee

2:59:24.720 --> 2:59:26.720
<v Speaker 4>of the department of war. You know, same thing with

2:59:26.740 --> 2:59:29.440
<v Speaker 4>this DHS list, same thing with this, you know, voter analysis,

2:59:29.459 --> 2:59:32.179
<v Speaker 4>although the voter analysis, what I think was an older piece,

2:59:32.220 --> 2:59:34.879
<v Speaker 4>but it's still on her website, but both this no

2:59:34.900 --> 2:59:39.570
<v Speaker 4>blogs list and, and this network map of DSA were

2:59:39.650 --> 2:59:43.690
<v Speaker 4>created and published as public tools while she worked and

2:59:43.720 --> 2:59:47.180
<v Speaker 4>is still working for the Department of War. And then

2:59:47.280 --> 2:59:49.660
<v Speaker 4>a few days after this was revealed, the Washington Post

2:59:49.720 --> 2:59:52.040
<v Speaker 4>published an article revealing that Pounce was not the only

2:59:52.120 --> 2:59:55.940
<v Speaker 4>right-wing influencer secretly working for Pete Haig's death. This is

2:59:55.959 --> 2:59:59.390
<v Speaker 4>a quote from the Post. Quote, The Pentagon has secretly

2:59:59.450 --> 3:00:03.390
<v Speaker 4>installed several conservative military veterans with large eyeline followings in

3:00:03.450 --> 3:00:07.220
<v Speaker 4>government roles, declining to disclose their assignments as they amplify

3:00:07.530 --> 3:00:11.379
<v Speaker 4>Defense Secretary Pete Higgs's viewpoints and attack those who scrutinize

3:00:11.400 --> 3:00:15.179
<v Speaker 4>the Trump administration, unquote. So according to the Washington Post,

3:00:16.000 --> 3:00:19.920
<v Speaker 4>at least three retired colonels, who now boast hundreds of

3:00:19.980 --> 3:00:23.300
<v Speaker 4>thousands of followers each on XTheEverything app, have been assigned

3:00:23.340 --> 3:00:27.020
<v Speaker 4>to civilian roles in the office of Anthony Tada, the

3:00:27.080 --> 3:00:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. And this office

3:00:31.280 --> 3:00:34.500
<v Speaker 4>has been focusing on how to make the military less woke, specifically.

3:00:34.780 --> 3:00:35.080
<v Speaker 5>Man.

3:00:35.440 --> 3:00:38.930
<v Speaker 4>These influencers are listed as either special government employees or, quote,

3:00:39.190 --> 3:00:43.470
<v Speaker 4>highly qualified experts, which can work on a longer-term basis

3:00:43.790 --> 3:00:45.970
<v Speaker 4>than special government employees who can only work for a

3:00:45.990 --> 3:00:46.430
<v Speaker 4>few months.

3:00:47.070 --> 3:00:47.230
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

3:00:47.709 --> 3:00:51.430
<v Speaker 4>And, like, these are influencers who are actively working on policy,

3:00:51.510 --> 3:00:54.400
<v Speaker 4>on military policy, on how to make the military less woke,

3:00:55.209 --> 3:00:58.430
<v Speaker 4>while also posting on their big accounts and in major

3:00:58.450 --> 3:01:01.230
<v Speaker 4>news publications, like the Daily Caller, as well as the

3:01:01.250 --> 3:01:04.090
<v Speaker 4>Washington Post itself. One of these influencers had a letter

3:01:04.110 --> 3:01:08.250
<v Speaker 4>to the editor published in the Post recently. And so

3:01:08.270 --> 3:01:11.270
<v Speaker 4>they're doing all this and posting about how awesome Pete

3:01:11.290 --> 3:01:15.170
<v Speaker 4>Hegseth is, while never disclosing that they also work for

3:01:15.209 --> 3:01:15.850
<v Speaker 4>Pete Hegseth.

3:01:16.170 --> 3:01:17.869
<v Speaker 9>They work for Pete Hegseth, right.

3:01:18.330 --> 3:01:22.570
<v Speaker 4>And like, again, Twitter sucks. But unfortunately, Twitter is still

3:01:22.629 --> 3:01:24.670
<v Speaker 4>very consequential to national politics.

3:01:24.690 --> 3:01:24.810
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

3:01:25.330 --> 3:01:28.480
<v Speaker 4>It's one of the primary ways the administration communicates with

3:01:28.920 --> 3:01:33.920
<v Speaker 4>people and the public digitally. And as a platform, it's important,

3:01:34.300 --> 3:01:37.379
<v Speaker 4>not just to this administration, but especially for the so-called

3:01:37.410 --> 3:01:41.470
<v Speaker 4>Department of War. We've seen pictures from live military operations

3:01:42.170 --> 3:01:45.030
<v Speaker 4>that show that Hengsteth has Twitter feeds pulled up on

3:01:45.110 --> 3:01:48.160
<v Speaker 4>screen of While special operations are underway.

3:01:48.340 --> 3:01:49.519
<v Speaker 9>The man is watching Twitter.

3:01:49.760 --> 3:01:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, like in the situation room. Yeah, they're checking hashtags.

3:01:53.140 --> 3:01:56.920
<v Speaker 4>And now they're recruiting staff from Twitter, including staff who

3:01:56.959 --> 3:02:01.660
<v Speaker 4>are building publicly accessible tools mapping out the left. From

3:02:01.680 --> 3:02:07.199
<v Speaker 4>the DSA and Palestinian solidarity organizations to Antifa info blogs

3:02:07.700 --> 3:02:12.779
<v Speaker 4>and anarchist report backs. She's building those databases while covertly

3:02:12.860 --> 3:02:15.490
<v Speaker 4>working for the Pentagon. And I want to close with

3:02:15.510 --> 3:02:19.050
<v Speaker 4>this one reply she made to her posts regarding the

3:02:19.129 --> 3:02:23.090
<v Speaker 4>NoBlogs tool. Quote, in the course of building this website,

3:02:23.610 --> 3:02:27.530
<v Speaker 4>a number of anti-fascists were identified. I disclosed them, but

3:02:27.590 --> 3:02:32.010
<v Speaker 4>not on the website directly to the USA government. Unquote.

3:02:32.530 --> 3:02:35.400
<v Speaker 4>The government that she works for, that she is working for.

3:02:35.440 --> 3:02:35.900
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, yeah.

3:02:36.060 --> 3:02:37.520
<v Speaker 4>How would you have that direct channel?

3:02:37.540 --> 3:02:41.770
<v Speaker 7>Like, When I let myself think too long about like,

3:02:42.470 --> 3:02:45.140
<v Speaker 7>follow me, what frustrates me about climate change is the

3:02:45.170 --> 3:02:48.200
<v Speaker 7>fact that we saw it coming a hundred years ago

3:02:48.459 --> 3:02:53.779
<v Speaker 7>and just watch this slow, slow moving death. And we're like, guys,

3:02:53.940 --> 3:02:56.180
<v Speaker 7>it's on its way. This is where here's evidence. Here's

3:02:56.200 --> 3:02:56.760
<v Speaker 7>what's happening.

3:02:57.270 --> 3:02:57.910
<v Speaker 9>It's coming.

3:02:58.250 --> 3:03:01.670
<v Speaker 7>If we get above two degrees Celsius, we're above two

3:03:01.690 --> 3:03:03.769
<v Speaker 7>degrees Celsius.

3:03:03.910 --> 3:03:04.970
<v Speaker 9>It's right there.

3:03:04.990 --> 3:03:09.580
<v Speaker 7>I feel like that when Pete Hexeth said, I'm finna

3:03:09.640 --> 3:03:13.780
<v Speaker 7>fire everybody from the press corps, you not allowed to come.

3:03:13.800 --> 3:03:16.480
<v Speaker 7>And you're going, he's going to hire his own press people. Guys,

3:03:16.500 --> 3:03:17.890
<v Speaker 7>they're going to put him on the... She works for him.

3:03:18.240 --> 3:03:18.580
<v Speaker 9>It's just so.

3:03:25.580 --> 3:03:28.020
<v Speaker 9>This is the slowest moving coup.

3:03:29.510 --> 3:03:33.290
<v Speaker 7>Like, it's just, it's the slowest moving coup that you

3:03:33.470 --> 3:03:33.910
<v Speaker 7>all see.

3:03:33.950 --> 3:03:36.290
<v Speaker 9>Hey, hey, hey, excuse me, excuse me.

3:03:37.250 --> 3:03:39.949
<v Speaker 7>They're going to hire their own press and put, they're

3:03:39.970 --> 3:03:43.010
<v Speaker 7>going to send all of our names to the government.

3:03:43.480 --> 3:03:43.980
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there it is.

3:03:44.840 --> 3:03:46.920
<v Speaker 9>I just, yeah.

3:03:47.080 --> 3:03:48.320
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that gets me the most about

3:03:48.340 --> 3:03:51.100
<v Speaker 4>this is how literally days ago, she was, you know,

3:03:51.200 --> 3:03:52.600
<v Speaker 4>ranting about the deep state.

3:03:53.390 --> 3:03:53.730
<v Speaker 9>You know?

3:03:54.050 --> 3:03:58.450
<v Speaker 4>Of which she is part. While she is a secret, like, covert, undisclosed,

3:03:58.550 --> 3:04:01.519
<v Speaker 4>special government employee. That's you!

3:04:02.500 --> 3:04:04.100
<v Speaker 9>She is you and you are it.

3:04:05.400 --> 3:04:08.320
<v Speaker 8>People will often talk about, like, psyops or psywar, right?

3:04:08.360 --> 3:04:11.000
<v Speaker 8>And be like, an individual person is a psyop. And

3:04:11.020 --> 3:04:13.860
<v Speaker 8>generally that's not how psychological warfare works, right? But, like,

3:04:14.750 --> 3:04:16.910
<v Speaker 8>now they're doing it. That is what.

3:04:16.830 --> 3:04:17.570
<v Speaker 4>They're doing now.

3:04:18.690 --> 3:04:20.070
<v Speaker 9>You're the thing. You're the thing.

3:04:21.790 --> 3:04:24.359
<v Speaker 4>It's great stuff. Oh, and one other thing that I

3:04:24.480 --> 3:04:26.910
<v Speaker 4>do want to briefly mention, and this could just be

3:04:26.940 --> 3:04:31.690
<v Speaker 4>a curious coincidence, but late last week, NoBlogs suffered a

3:04:31.770 --> 3:04:36.090
<v Speaker 4>hack a few days after the group that runs NoBlogs,

3:04:36.129 --> 3:04:40.970
<v Speaker 4>the IA Collective, was declared a specially designated global terrorist.

3:04:41.629 --> 3:04:44.720
<v Speaker 4>The collective published a statement saying that the hack lasted

3:04:44.860 --> 3:04:49.260
<v Speaker 4>about two hours, during which the title of NoBlogs was

3:04:49.379 --> 3:04:54.420
<v Speaker 4>changed to Trump Blogs, and the attacker, quote, may have

3:04:54.450 --> 3:04:59.300
<v Speaker 4>had access to the user's database. Now, Trump Blogs is

3:04:59.440 --> 3:05:05.879
<v Speaker 4>also what Data Republican calls her no-blogs tracking tool. Now,

3:05:05.980 --> 3:05:10.890
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying that Data Republican scraped no-blogs data by

3:05:11.150 --> 3:05:14.810
<v Speaker 4>hacking the website, but these two events did happen around

3:05:14.850 --> 3:05:18.690
<v Speaker 4>the same time, which means could just be a curious coincidence.

3:05:18.990 --> 3:05:21.890
<v Speaker 4>There is no direct evidence that Data Republican is the

3:05:22.030 --> 3:05:26.129
<v Speaker 4>one who hacked noblogs, and the use of Trumpblogs as

3:05:26.190 --> 3:05:30.660
<v Speaker 4>a term isn't very original, for one, and could just

3:05:30.720 --> 3:05:34.820
<v Speaker 4>be a sort of inside joke, troll, or reference. But

3:05:34.920 --> 3:05:39.160
<v Speaker 4>considering the fact that Data Republican secretly works for the Pentagon,

3:05:39.860 --> 3:05:43.160
<v Speaker 4>I thought this is something worth mentioning, coincidence or not.

3:05:44.020 --> 3:05:47.129
<v Speaker 4>You can draw your own conclusions. That should do it

3:05:47.410 --> 3:05:49.350
<v Speaker 4>for us here at It Could Happen Here.

3:05:50.330 --> 3:05:52.230
<v Speaker 8>If you want to email us, you can do it.

3:05:52.230 --> 3:05:57.740
<v Speaker 8>It's coolzontipsatproton.me. Prop, do you have any other podcasts that

3:05:57.800 --> 3:05:58.920
<v Speaker 8>you'd like us to listen to?

3:05:58.940 --> 3:06:00.920
<v Speaker 9>Hey, it'd be great, actually.

3:06:00.980 --> 3:06:03.820
<v Speaker 7>We have a cousin podcast called Politics with Prop where

3:06:03.860 --> 3:06:08.119
<v Speaker 7>we dive into not the breadth of topics that were

3:06:08.170 --> 3:06:11.160
<v Speaker 7>covered here, but... A couple of topics that may make

3:06:11.170 --> 3:06:13.580
<v Speaker 7>you scratch your head a little bit. Like, I feel

3:06:13.600 --> 3:06:15.620
<v Speaker 7>like what they're saying is A, B, and C, and

3:06:15.660 --> 3:06:17.460
<v Speaker 7>I get to go, yes, you're right. That's exactly what

3:06:17.500 --> 3:06:17.879
<v Speaker 7>they're saying.

3:06:18.400 --> 3:06:19.420
<v Speaker 9>So, yeah, tap in with me.

3:06:20.100 --> 3:06:22.780
<v Speaker 7>Hub Politics with Prop every Wednesday and Friday.

3:06:23.520 --> 3:06:23.700
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

3:06:24.860 --> 3:06:25.840
<v Speaker 4>We reported the news.

3:06:26.879 --> 3:06:27.680
<v Speaker 9>We reported the news.

3:06:32.020 --> 3:06:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week

3:06:35.240 --> 3:06:37.020
<v Speaker 2>from now until the heat death of the universe.

3:06:37.920 --> 3:06:40.390
<v Speaker 1>It Could Happen Here is a production of Cool Zone Media.

3:06:40.570 --> 3:06:43.570
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, visit our website,

3:06:43.770 --> 3:06:48.190
<v Speaker 1>coolzonemedia.com or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

3:06:48.550 --> 3:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can now find

3:06:51.420 --> 3:06:54.340
<v Speaker 1>sources for It Could Happen Here listed directly in episode descriptions.

3:06:54.840 --> 3:06:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening.