1 00:00:02,400 --> 00:00:06,200 Speaker 1: This is the last with your host JJ zach j 2 00:00:06,360 --> 00:00:14,239 Speaker 1: J Zacher reason. What's up everyone, It's JJ Zacharyesen in 3 00:00:14,280 --> 00:00:20,520 Speaker 1: this episode eleven two of the Late Round Fantasy Football podcast. 4 00:00:21,640 --> 00:00:24,639 Speaker 1: Thanks for tuning in. Some of you may heard about 5 00:00:24,640 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 1: it already, but Late Round Fantasy Football has a brand 6 00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:31,160 Speaker 1: new website. We're shifting off of Patreon and we've now 7 00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:34,239 Speaker 1: got a member's hub for all Late Round members where 8 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:37,560 Speaker 1: you can get rankings, data dumps, discord access and more. 9 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:41,640 Speaker 1: And the site itself has more information too. Prices aren't changing, 10 00:00:41,800 --> 00:00:43,920 Speaker 1: but if you're a patron and you want access to 11 00:00:43,920 --> 00:00:46,760 Speaker 1: the new site, you should have received some communication via 12 00:00:46,880 --> 00:00:49,960 Speaker 1: email already. If you haven't, you want to make the switch, 13 00:00:50,280 --> 00:00:53,680 Speaker 1: email David at lateround dot com and David Kitchen can 14 00:00:53,680 --> 00:00:56,360 Speaker 1: help you out. There's going to be a transition period here, 15 00:00:56,400 --> 00:00:59,040 Speaker 1: so bear with us. But the new website is seriously 16 00:00:59,120 --> 00:01:02,400 Speaker 1: awesome and on that site you can now officially pre 17 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:05,479 Speaker 1: order the Late Round Draft Guide. That guide is gonna 18 00:01:05,480 --> 00:01:07,920 Speaker 1: give you everything you need to crush your season long 19 00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:11,960 Speaker 1: drafts this year. There's game theory, discussion, player analysis, targets 20 00:01:11,959 --> 00:01:15,240 Speaker 1: and avoids, rankings and more. You can check that out 21 00:01:15,319 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 1: on the new Late round dot Com site. Right now, 22 00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:24,160 Speaker 1: that's late round dot Com. The first question this week 23 00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:26,679 Speaker 1: is from Kobe on Patreon. It says, hey, JJ, are 24 00:01:26,720 --> 00:01:29,839 Speaker 1: there any big picture dynasty strategies that you consistently live 25 00:01:29,920 --> 00:01:33,160 Speaker 1: by to keep a roster healthy and competitive long term? 26 00:01:33,600 --> 00:01:36,399 Speaker 1: For example, in a start three wide receiver PPR league, 27 00:01:36,400 --> 00:01:39,320 Speaker 1: would you generally lean toward elite wide receivers like Chase 28 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:42,720 Speaker 1: Puka and jsn over elite running backs like gibbson Bijeon 29 00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:45,000 Speaker 1: if they're in the same tier because of the longevity 30 00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:48,280 Speaker 1: and roster building advantage. And in the deep late rounds 31 00:01:48,320 --> 00:01:51,240 Speaker 1: of a startup are high upside players who may never 32 00:01:51,320 --> 00:01:54,720 Speaker 1: pan out better stashes than handcuff running backs and sacrificial 33 00:01:54,720 --> 00:01:57,160 Speaker 1: ex wide receivers that we don't expect to hold much 34 00:01:57,160 --> 00:02:01,160 Speaker 1: standalone fantasy value. So I don't have one singular answer here, 35 00:02:01,200 --> 00:02:04,880 Speaker 1: because every roster needs to be approached differently. Like if 36 00:02:04,920 --> 00:02:07,160 Speaker 1: I'm in win now mode, I might hold on to 37 00:02:07,320 --> 00:02:09,639 Speaker 1: less of those project wide receivers who need some time 38 00:02:09,639 --> 00:02:13,160 Speaker 1: to develop. I'll opt for backup third string running backs. 39 00:02:13,480 --> 00:02:15,880 Speaker 1: It all depends on where my roster's at, and I 40 00:02:15,880 --> 00:02:17,760 Speaker 1: don't think there's some clear cut answer with whether you 41 00:02:17,800 --> 00:02:20,040 Speaker 1: go with Chase or Pooker or JSN versus b Jon 42 00:02:20,120 --> 00:02:22,200 Speaker 1: and Gibbs. I can tell you that I tend to 43 00:02:22,200 --> 00:02:25,000 Speaker 1: build with wide receiver and non running backs, and usually 44 00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:29,040 Speaker 1: dress running back last. I do that for two reasons. First, 45 00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:31,040 Speaker 1: if I have a higher end rookie draft pick, I 46 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:33,400 Speaker 1: can get more of that immediate production at running back 47 00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:35,640 Speaker 1: and a lot of classes like Jeremiah Love this year, 48 00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:37,720 Speaker 1: but even last year, we had a handful of Year 49 00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:40,720 Speaker 1: one impact type players at running back. But then second, 50 00:02:40,760 --> 00:02:43,799 Speaker 1: if I'm competitive or borderline competitive, my biggest need is 51 00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:46,639 Speaker 1: at running back. It's a position that teams are typically 52 00:02:46,680 --> 00:02:50,680 Speaker 1: more willing to part with mid season non competitive teams 53 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:53,280 Speaker 1: because players like Derrick Henry they're at the tail end 54 00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:56,839 Speaker 1: of their career and managers know that if they're not competitive, 55 00:02:57,080 --> 00:02:59,680 Speaker 1: they'll want to cash in before being the ones holding 56 00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:03,200 Speaker 1: the back. From just a perception standpoint, it's not quite 57 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:07,120 Speaker 1: the same at wide receiver. The overarching approach in philosophy 58 00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:09,840 Speaker 1: that I have with Dynasty is to draft for value 59 00:03:09,880 --> 00:03:13,440 Speaker 1: and trade for need. I'm rarely jumping tiers for need 60 00:03:13,480 --> 00:03:16,359 Speaker 1: in rookie drafts. Early on in rookie drafts, unless it's 61 00:03:16,360 --> 00:03:18,880 Speaker 1: a league that doesn't have a lot of trading. But 62 00:03:18,960 --> 00:03:21,120 Speaker 1: in an active league where I know that I can 63 00:03:21,120 --> 00:03:23,600 Speaker 1: get a deal done, I won't reach for a need. 64 00:03:23,960 --> 00:03:26,560 Speaker 1: I want to first accumulate that value and then I 65 00:03:26,560 --> 00:03:28,959 Speaker 1: can address it later. And when I address it later, 66 00:03:29,160 --> 00:03:31,480 Speaker 1: I have a larger player pull to choose from, not 67 00:03:31,560 --> 00:03:34,480 Speaker 1: just rookies. It makes doing a deal easier because I 68 00:03:34,520 --> 00:03:38,320 Speaker 1: have more options. Hopefully that answers your question, though, I 69 00:03:38,320 --> 00:03:40,840 Speaker 1: think the beauty of dynasty is that every league has 70 00:03:40,840 --> 00:03:43,640 Speaker 1: different dynamics, and every league is going to force you 71 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:46,680 Speaker 1: to have somewhat of a different approach. The best players, 72 00:03:46,680 --> 00:03:48,800 Speaker 1: in my opinion, they're the ones who are able to 73 00:03:48,840 --> 00:03:54,320 Speaker 1: adapt to that specific league environment. Now, speaking of adapting 74 00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:56,840 Speaker 1: to your league's environment, the next one is an email 75 00:03:56,840 --> 00:04:01,320 Speaker 1: from Corey. It says, HI, why are quarterback generally prioritize 76 00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:05,720 Speaker 1: so heavily in superflex leagues? I draft primarily on replacement values, 77 00:04:05,840 --> 00:04:08,200 Speaker 1: and for a ten man league, so replacement starter is 78 00:04:08,240 --> 00:04:11,520 Speaker 1: the twentieth ranked quarterback. Those values say that only Josh 79 00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:15,320 Speaker 1: Allen should go in round one. Most superflex mockx and 80 00:04:15,400 --> 00:04:19,479 Speaker 1: rankings have five or more quarterbacks in round one. So 81 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:23,200 Speaker 1: if I'm being totally honest. I cannot stand super flex rankings. 82 00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:26,440 Speaker 1: I despise them because if you're not reading the draft room, 83 00:04:26,560 --> 00:04:29,440 Speaker 1: reading your individual league's draft, if you're not doing that 84 00:04:29,480 --> 00:04:31,919 Speaker 1: in a super flex league, you're doing it totally wrong, 85 00:04:32,960 --> 00:04:36,080 Speaker 1: and rankings can't account for that. In some leagues, you're 86 00:04:36,120 --> 00:04:39,680 Speaker 1: gonna get eight quarterbacks drafted in round one, and unfortunately, 87 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:43,440 Speaker 1: the position will dry up. You mentioned using a simple 88 00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:46,680 Speaker 1: VARp equation where your baseline quarterback is the QB twenty. 89 00:04:47,279 --> 00:04:50,560 Speaker 1: Some leagues, that's not the baseline quarterback because some teams 90 00:04:50,600 --> 00:04:53,280 Speaker 1: are gonna draft three quarterbacks before you're even thinking about 91 00:04:53,279 --> 00:04:56,520 Speaker 1: your second one. And obviously the league size matters here too. 92 00:04:56,880 --> 00:05:00,880 Speaker 1: League size is generally twelve, not ten. You get prioritized 93 00:05:00,920 --> 00:05:03,360 Speaker 1: so heavily in super flex lee's because obviously the supply 94 00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:07,159 Speaker 1: and demand equation just shifts. Instead of starting one, you're 95 00:05:07,200 --> 00:05:10,159 Speaker 1: generally starting two. Now, you could argue that it matters 96 00:05:10,200 --> 00:05:13,000 Speaker 1: a little bit less in full PPR formats because some 97 00:05:13,040 --> 00:05:17,400 Speaker 1: elite wide receivers can match those quarterback scores, but quarterbacks 98 00:05:17,480 --> 00:05:20,080 Speaker 1: is generally gonna score more points than the other positions, 99 00:05:20,839 --> 00:05:22,920 Speaker 1: and there are at most thirty two of them there's 100 00:05:22,920 --> 00:05:25,960 Speaker 1: thirty two starters, and at this moment, we don't even 101 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:28,560 Speaker 1: know who some of those starters even are, which means 102 00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:31,440 Speaker 1: the supply can run out quickly in leagues where teams 103 00:05:31,440 --> 00:05:33,960 Speaker 1: aren't afraid to just start their drafts with like two quarterbacks, 104 00:05:34,279 --> 00:05:36,479 Speaker 1: or where they get two in the first three rounds. 105 00:05:37,279 --> 00:05:40,720 Speaker 1: I do think that vorpass flaws just inherently. I talk 106 00:05:40,760 --> 00:05:43,040 Speaker 1: about that a lot every year in the Late Round 107 00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:46,240 Speaker 1: Draft Guide. But even if you go with VORP, you 108 00:05:46,320 --> 00:05:49,480 Speaker 1: still need to account for where that baseline player gets drafted. 109 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:52,320 Speaker 1: If he goes in round four, let's say that it's 110 00:05:52,360 --> 00:05:55,200 Speaker 1: not in apples to apples comparison if the baseline player 111 00:05:55,240 --> 00:05:58,560 Speaker 1: at a different position goes in round eight. If the 112 00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:01,880 Speaker 1: baseline player a wide receiver, let's say goes in round eight, 113 00:06:02,040 --> 00:06:04,360 Speaker 1: that's different than the baseline player going in round four 114 00:06:04,400 --> 00:06:08,560 Speaker 1: at quarterback because that point differential from that player to 115 00:06:08,600 --> 00:06:12,440 Speaker 1: the baseline player. It's stretching across fewer rounds at quarterback 116 00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:15,719 Speaker 1: in that case, which means there's a higher opportunity cost 117 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:18,680 Speaker 1: if you pass on that position. But look, I think 118 00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:21,920 Speaker 1: your overall feelings towards rankings and superflex is very valid 119 00:06:21,960 --> 00:06:25,280 Speaker 1: because even myself, as someone who does superflex rankings, I 120 00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:28,640 Speaker 1: hate them. It's different in Dynasty because there's a market 121 00:06:28,640 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 1: component that we have to worry about long term, but 122 00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:35,200 Speaker 1: in redraft, you need to read the room first and foremost. 123 00:06:37,880 --> 00:06:40,240 Speaker 1: This lass questions from Dylan. It says, who are some 124 00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:42,839 Speaker 1: of your favorite underrated tight ends in Dynasty right now? 125 00:06:42,880 --> 00:06:45,400 Speaker 1: Any interesting finds with a new tight end model? Or 126 00:06:45,560 --> 00:06:49,880 Speaker 1: was that just for prospects? Well, that model is for prospects, yes, 127 00:06:50,160 --> 00:06:52,080 Speaker 1: And if you go past, like even the twenty twenty 128 00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:54,680 Speaker 1: five class, you're getting into tight ends where we now 129 00:06:54,720 --> 00:06:58,040 Speaker 1: have multiple NFL seasons from them, so a prospect scorer 130 00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:00,760 Speaker 1: is just not as relevant. But if we look at 131 00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:04,279 Speaker 1: last year's class, the model reinforces the idea that Colson 132 00:07:04,320 --> 00:07:07,559 Speaker 1: Lovelin and Tyler Warren and Harold Fannin are all really good. 133 00:07:08,200 --> 00:07:11,040 Speaker 1: And I'm still holding out hope for Terrence Ferguson. I 134 00:07:11,080 --> 00:07:13,280 Speaker 1: had him as a buy this offseason, and even though 135 00:07:13,280 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 1: they drafted Max Claire, Ferguson is an athletic tight end 136 00:07:16,520 --> 00:07:19,080 Speaker 1: who scored well in both the old model and this 137 00:07:19,240 --> 00:07:21,680 Speaker 1: new model. And we know the Rams are going to 138 00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:24,640 Speaker 1: run heavy personnel, and I'm expecting Ferguson to take a 139 00:07:24,680 --> 00:07:27,760 Speaker 1: step forward. According to Keep Trade Cut, he's at a 140 00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:31,480 Speaker 1: very reasonable price tag of tight end twenty two. Another 141 00:07:31,520 --> 00:07:33,720 Speaker 1: tight end you might want to look at is Greg Dolsic. 142 00:07:34,280 --> 00:07:36,560 Speaker 1: He's tight end forty two on Keep Trade Cut. He's 143 00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:38,360 Speaker 1: probably on the waiver wire in a lot of your 144 00:07:38,440 --> 00:07:41,400 Speaker 1: dynasty leagues. One of the things to always look for 145 00:07:41,440 --> 00:07:44,160 Speaker 1: in a breakout tight end is an obvious lack of 146 00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:48,080 Speaker 1: pass catchers on that team, and Miami clearly has that. 147 00:07:48,920 --> 00:07:51,160 Speaker 1: Dulsig is also coming off a season where he was 148 00:07:51,200 --> 00:07:53,520 Speaker 1: targeted on almost twenty three percent of his routes run, 149 00:07:53,600 --> 00:07:55,680 Speaker 1: and he had a crazy good two point three to 150 00:07:55,720 --> 00:07:57,800 Speaker 1: one yards per rou run rate on one hundred and 151 00:07:57,840 --> 00:08:01,480 Speaker 1: forty five routes run. That's according to PA. Now, look, 152 00:08:01,520 --> 00:08:03,720 Speaker 1: that's not a ton of routes run, so these numbers 153 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:06,880 Speaker 1: aren't amazingly predictive. But when we're talking about a totally 154 00:08:06,920 --> 00:08:10,880 Speaker 1: free player in a situation without pass catching alternatives, I 155 00:08:10,880 --> 00:08:12,600 Speaker 1: do think that we can use some of those numbers 156 00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:14,600 Speaker 1: just say hey, let's throw a dart at this player. 157 00:08:15,240 --> 00:08:18,080 Speaker 1: I've also taken him plenty in Best Ball drafts so far. 158 00:08:19,280 --> 00:08:21,080 Speaker 1: Some other players who I think are were dart throwser 159 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:23,760 Speaker 1: Juan Johnson, who's coming off his most efficient season by 160 00:08:23,840 --> 00:08:27,040 Speaker 1: most metrics. Pat Fryermuse still isn't twenty eight years old. 161 00:08:27,120 --> 00:08:29,040 Speaker 1: He could have a larger role in this new offense. 162 00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:31,960 Speaker 1: And Michael Meyer the Raiders are probably gonna run a 163 00:08:31,960 --> 00:08:34,480 Speaker 1: lot more twelve personnel. I've talked about that this offseason. 164 00:08:35,040 --> 00:08:38,320 Speaker 1: And Mayer has injury upside if something happens to Brock Bauers. 165 00:08:39,000 --> 00:08:40,920 Speaker 1: So those are some random names that make sense to 166 00:08:40,960 --> 00:08:45,839 Speaker 1: me right now. This last question is an email from Robert. 167 00:08:45,880 --> 00:08:48,400 Speaker 1: It says, hey, JJ, love all the work you do. Thanks, 168 00:08:48,480 --> 00:08:52,800 Speaker 1: thank you. Are we ignoring Lequent Allen and Jacksonville. Everybody's 169 00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:55,640 Speaker 1: talking about bashall Tuton's breakout, but isn't getting on the 170 00:08:55,640 --> 00:08:58,720 Speaker 1: field the first goal of a successful running back. Allen 171 00:08:58,800 --> 00:09:01,280 Speaker 1: has already proven his past protection and work in the 172 00:09:01,320 --> 00:09:04,480 Speaker 1: passing game. What are the chances he gets the lion's 173 00:09:04,480 --> 00:09:08,600 Speaker 1: share of work? Thanks, Bob, I mean to be fair, 174 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:11,040 Speaker 1: they played almost an identical number of snaps per game 175 00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:14,000 Speaker 1: last year, bay Shall Tuton and Laquinn Allen. They just 176 00:09:14,040 --> 00:09:17,360 Speaker 1: did very very different things. Allan would run a few 177 00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:19,760 Speaker 1: more routes per game touton would see a handful of 178 00:09:19,760 --> 00:09:22,880 Speaker 1: more rushes. Alan only had a little over one rush 179 00:09:22,920 --> 00:09:25,439 Speaker 1: attempt per game last year. He played their third down role. 180 00:09:25,559 --> 00:09:28,199 Speaker 1: According to Fantasy Life data, seventy nine percent of their 181 00:09:28,240 --> 00:09:30,800 Speaker 1: long down in distant snaps last year went to Laquinn Allen, 182 00:09:31,320 --> 00:09:34,000 Speaker 1: Travis Etn, and Beasehall Tutin combined for the final twenty 183 00:09:34,040 --> 00:09:37,160 Speaker 1: one percent. Now, Allen was a great pass catcher in 184 00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:39,440 Speaker 1: college and that translated to a role right away in 185 00:09:39,440 --> 00:09:42,680 Speaker 1: the NFL. The problem is that he likely isn't the 186 00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:45,199 Speaker 1: player that they're gonna want to use on early downs. 187 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:48,520 Speaker 1: I mean, last season, Allen had six total first half 188 00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:51,760 Speaker 1: rush attempts. He had seventeen in the second half, and 189 00:09:51,840 --> 00:09:54,760 Speaker 1: about half of his attempts came on third and fourth down. 190 00:09:55,720 --> 00:09:58,800 Speaker 1: The reason Tuton's getting loved right now or even Chris Rodriguez, 191 00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:01,800 Speaker 1: is because Travis et who is the most valuable asset 192 00:10:01,800 --> 00:10:04,959 Speaker 1: in the backfield last year, He's gone, and the idea 193 00:10:05,240 --> 00:10:07,720 Speaker 1: is that someone's gonna be taking that work. And since 194 00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:10,560 Speaker 1: Alan played a very specific role last season and this 195 00:10:10,640 --> 00:10:13,320 Speaker 1: is the same coaching staff, there's more upside for that 196 00:10:13,400 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 1: role to be absorbed by Tutin than Laquinn Allen. Now 197 00:10:16,600 --> 00:10:18,880 Speaker 1: that being said, I've thrown plenty of final round dart 198 00:10:18,880 --> 00:10:21,960 Speaker 1: throws and Best Ball at Laquinn Allen. He'll likely have 199 00:10:22,040 --> 00:10:24,400 Speaker 1: a role in that team. It's just that when we 200 00:10:24,440 --> 00:10:27,280 Speaker 1: aim for pass catchers in fantasy, we don't only want 201 00:10:27,320 --> 00:10:29,600 Speaker 1: guys who are mostly playing on third down and who 202 00:10:29,600 --> 00:10:32,720 Speaker 1: probably won't be seeing much goalline work, if any. The 203 00:10:32,920 --> 00:10:35,880 Speaker 1: likely outcome is that Alan more so caps the ceiling 204 00:10:35,880 --> 00:10:38,240 Speaker 1: of a player like base Shall Tuten or Chris Rodriguez 205 00:10:38,360 --> 00:10:42,120 Speaker 1: as opposed to having crazy standalone value himself. But in 206 00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:44,760 Speaker 1: best Ball, I think, given then he has some role, 207 00:10:45,000 --> 00:10:47,640 Speaker 1: and he's so cheap, and there's at least some chance 208 00:10:47,679 --> 00:10:50,120 Speaker 1: for a little bit more work, he could give us 209 00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:52,480 Speaker 1: some usable weeks here and there on a full PPR 210 00:10:52,559 --> 00:10:57,520 Speaker 1: platform like DraftKings. This last question is from Twitter. Is 211 00:10:57,520 --> 00:11:02,840 Speaker 1: from at bnl BRGHD one. I'm sure that spells something, 212 00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:05,760 Speaker 1: but I have no idea what it spells. What's your 213 00:11:05,800 --> 00:11:08,560 Speaker 1: outlook on Matthew Stafford this year seems like a clear 214 00:11:08,600 --> 00:11:11,960 Speaker 1: regression candidate based on touchdown rate, but Rams throw at 215 00:11:11,960 --> 00:11:15,000 Speaker 1: a much higher rate close to the goal line. I mean, look, 216 00:11:15,000 --> 00:11:17,120 Speaker 1: to be fair, the Rams are still just eleventh last 217 00:11:17,200 --> 00:11:19,280 Speaker 1: year in pass rate within the ten yard line, and 218 00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:21,880 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four, the year before Devonte Adams, they 219 00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:25,360 Speaker 1: were seventeenth and Matthew Stafford had a three point nine 220 00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:27,840 Speaker 1: percent touchdown rate one year and then a seven point 221 00:11:27,880 --> 00:11:31,000 Speaker 1: seven percent touchdown rate the next year. Well, look, Stafford 222 00:11:31,080 --> 00:11:34,559 Speaker 1: undoubtedly had a crazy high expected touchdowns number because they 223 00:11:34,600 --> 00:11:36,360 Speaker 1: also threw it a lot at the goal line. At 224 00:11:36,400 --> 00:11:40,240 Speaker 1: the actual goal line, his expected touchdowns last year were 225 00:11:40,280 --> 00:11:44,160 Speaker 1: closer to forty two or forty three. That's insanity. He 226 00:11:44,240 --> 00:11:47,320 Speaker 1: threw forty six, so we outperformed that mark, But it's 227 00:11:47,320 --> 00:11:51,640 Speaker 1: not like he outperformed it by such a crazy, crazy number. Now. 228 00:11:51,640 --> 00:11:54,480 Speaker 1: I've seen this a lot in fantasy analysis. People often 229 00:11:54,480 --> 00:11:57,040 Speaker 1: think that if a player didn't far outperform as expected 230 00:11:57,080 --> 00:12:00,600 Speaker 1: numbers from the previous season, whether it be yards, touchdown, whatever, 231 00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:04,760 Speaker 1: that automatically means that he's not a regression candidate. But 232 00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:07,719 Speaker 1: that's not exactly how this works. Like, we can't just 233 00:12:07,760 --> 00:12:10,439 Speaker 1: assume that Stafford is going to have forty two expected 234 00:12:10,480 --> 00:12:14,000 Speaker 1: touchdown passes again the year prior he was at twenty eight. 235 00:12:14,920 --> 00:12:18,800 Speaker 1: That number fluctuates and it changes. It's just helpful when 236 00:12:18,800 --> 00:12:21,040 Speaker 1: we're looking at a player and we're saying, if he 237 00:12:21,120 --> 00:12:24,240 Speaker 1: maintains this type of workload, will things get better or 238 00:12:24,280 --> 00:12:27,280 Speaker 1: will things get worse. That's what the expected numbers can 239 00:12:27,320 --> 00:12:30,080 Speaker 1: help us do and find out. And for Stafford, it 240 00:12:30,080 --> 00:12:32,040 Speaker 1: would be a little bit worse probably, But we also 241 00:12:32,120 --> 00:12:35,400 Speaker 1: shouldn't expect him to maintain that kind of workload because 242 00:12:35,400 --> 00:12:37,800 Speaker 1: it's not a common numbered hit at all. It's a 243 00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:41,320 Speaker 1: very very high expected touchdowns mark, and we also know 244 00:12:41,360 --> 00:12:43,600 Speaker 1: that touchdown rate is a number that regresses to the mean. 245 00:12:44,080 --> 00:12:46,760 Speaker 1: I'd likely have another rewind episode in this topic coming up, 246 00:12:46,760 --> 00:12:49,880 Speaker 1: but touchdown rate has a negative relationship to current season 247 00:12:49,920 --> 00:12:53,400 Speaker 1: production among quarterbacks and fantasy football, as in, when you're 248 00:12:53,440 --> 00:12:56,319 Speaker 1: looking at a draft worthy quarterback, the ones with higher 249 00:12:56,360 --> 00:12:59,880 Speaker 1: touchdown rates in the previous season actually underperformed versus expect 250 00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:02,240 Speaker 1: at a higher rate than the players who have lower 251 00:13:02,280 --> 00:13:05,440 Speaker 1: touchdown rates. And that's because fantasy managers they look at 252 00:13:05,440 --> 00:13:07,400 Speaker 1: the previous season and they look at those numbers and 253 00:13:07,400 --> 00:13:10,160 Speaker 1: they say, oh, yeah, I'll draft Matthew Stafford really high 254 00:13:10,200 --> 00:13:13,560 Speaker 1: because he had forty six touchdowns last year. That raises 255 00:13:13,600 --> 00:13:16,000 Speaker 1: the player's cost and it makes it harder for those 256 00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:21,520 Speaker 1: guys to really exceed expectation because touchdown rate regresses, So 257 00:13:21,559 --> 00:13:24,840 Speaker 1: we'll see where Stafford ends up landing ADP wise, I 258 00:13:24,880 --> 00:13:27,560 Speaker 1: don't usually have strong quarterback takes in Best Ball because 259 00:13:27,559 --> 00:13:30,520 Speaker 1: I'm usually just stacking. But I don't have a serious 260 00:13:30,559 --> 00:13:34,800 Speaker 1: problem with this QB fifteen to ADP over on Fantasy pros. Now, 261 00:13:34,800 --> 00:13:37,040 Speaker 1: it might sound crazy, but I think someone like Tyler Shuck, 262 00:13:37,080 --> 00:13:40,520 Speaker 1: Kyler Murray they might have more intriguing upside because they're rushing, 263 00:13:40,840 --> 00:13:43,640 Speaker 1: and Malik willis even because if you draft them in 264 00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:46,000 Speaker 1: season long and they don't pan out, you can just 265 00:13:46,040 --> 00:13:49,600 Speaker 1: start streaming and still be Okay. It's crazy. I understand 266 00:13:49,600 --> 00:13:51,640 Speaker 1: that it's crazy to say that because Stafford is just 267 00:13:51,679 --> 00:13:54,120 Speaker 1: so good, but we have to play this game of 268 00:13:54,160 --> 00:13:58,120 Speaker 1: fantasy football. That's what the game is, whether fortunately or 269 00:13:58,160 --> 00:14:00,959 Speaker 1: unfortunately however you want to view it. Mobility at the 270 00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:05,440 Speaker 1: quarterback position matters so much. I do expect regression from 271 00:14:05,480 --> 00:14:08,520 Speaker 1: Stafford this year, though we can't project anyone to hit 272 00:14:08,559 --> 00:14:15,080 Speaker 1: forty passing touchdowns, let alone repeating forty six. The last 273 00:14:15,120 --> 00:14:17,520 Speaker 1: question this week is from at Brainy Balders. It says 274 00:14:17,520 --> 00:14:19,720 Speaker 1: it would be awesome hearing about your early years in 275 00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:21,920 Speaker 1: the industry and what helps shape the legend we all 276 00:14:21,920 --> 00:14:24,160 Speaker 1: know today. I've heard you talk about your background a 277 00:14:24,160 --> 00:14:26,240 Speaker 1: couple of times in your podcast, but I'd love to 278 00:14:26,280 --> 00:14:29,160 Speaker 1: hear more about your inspirations and what helps shape Late 279 00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:32,840 Speaker 1: Round QB in its early years. So, first off, I'm 280 00:14:32,840 --> 00:14:34,600 Speaker 1: far from a legend. I'm just a guy in mom's 281 00:14:34,600 --> 00:14:37,560 Speaker 1: basement doing fantasy content. But this type of question has 282 00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:39,600 Speaker 1: now been asked multiple times over the last couple of 283 00:14:39,600 --> 00:14:42,360 Speaker 1: mailbag cycles, and it's the off season. Less stuff is 284 00:14:42,400 --> 00:14:44,840 Speaker 1: going on. So I'll talk about it, and I'll bookmark 285 00:14:44,880 --> 00:14:47,200 Speaker 1: this for any future questions like it, because I know 286 00:14:47,440 --> 00:14:50,160 Speaker 1: that I tell this story periodically, but I'll just do 287 00:14:50,200 --> 00:14:52,280 Speaker 1: it one more time. And if this kind of thing 288 00:14:52,320 --> 00:14:55,240 Speaker 1: does not interest you, Thanks for listening. I appreciate you. 289 00:14:55,400 --> 00:14:58,480 Speaker 1: Have a great weekend. I'll catch you next week. Anyway, 290 00:14:58,640 --> 00:15:01,800 Speaker 1: where this all started. Graduated college in twenty ten. I 291 00:15:01,800 --> 00:15:03,920 Speaker 1: got my degree in marketing and I had a background 292 00:15:03,920 --> 00:15:07,560 Speaker 1: in graphic and web design. Back then, you couldn't vibe code. 293 00:15:07,640 --> 00:15:09,960 Speaker 1: I just learned front end development and design while I 294 00:15:09,960 --> 00:15:12,280 Speaker 1: was in high school. I started building websites when I 295 00:15:12,360 --> 00:15:14,320 Speaker 1: was like in eighth or ninth grade. I actually thought 296 00:15:14,320 --> 00:15:15,680 Speaker 1: I was going to go to school for design at 297 00:15:15,680 --> 00:15:18,600 Speaker 1: one point, so out of college, my now wife got 298 00:15:18,640 --> 00:15:21,240 Speaker 1: a job in Cincinnati, Ohio, and that's where I moved. 299 00:15:22,120 --> 00:15:24,160 Speaker 1: And I got a job at an ad agency, and 300 00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:27,400 Speaker 1: I hated it. I loved the people, I love the atmosphere, 301 00:15:27,600 --> 00:15:29,840 Speaker 1: but I just didn't like the job. I was a 302 00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:31,880 Speaker 1: project manager. I thought I was gonna bring all my 303 00:15:31,960 --> 00:15:34,320 Speaker 1: skill sets together and be really good at that job. 304 00:15:34,360 --> 00:15:35,760 Speaker 1: And I think I was good at that job for 305 00:15:35,800 --> 00:15:37,920 Speaker 1: what it's worth, but it just felt like admin work. 306 00:15:38,480 --> 00:15:40,880 Speaker 1: I took one other job at a different agency where 307 00:15:40,920 --> 00:15:43,320 Speaker 1: it was smaller, and I did some more hands on design, 308 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:46,920 Speaker 1: some more hands on website development work. But while I 309 00:15:47,000 --> 00:15:49,440 Speaker 1: was at my first job, I knew I couldn't do 310 00:15:49,520 --> 00:15:52,320 Speaker 1: that for the next forty plus years. I knew I 311 00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:54,840 Speaker 1: needed to do something about it. So I sat down 312 00:15:54,880 --> 00:15:57,840 Speaker 1: one day, I wrote my passions down in a word document, 313 00:15:58,240 --> 00:16:01,720 Speaker 1: and I couldn't get off the fantasy football idea. At 314 00:16:01,720 --> 00:16:04,160 Speaker 1: the time, there wasn't nearly as much content as what 315 00:16:04,200 --> 00:16:06,880 Speaker 1: we see today. It was the big players, the big 316 00:16:06,920 --> 00:16:10,080 Speaker 1: media sites mostly, and at that time, which was late 317 00:16:10,120 --> 00:16:12,920 Speaker 1: in the twenty eleven season, I couldn't help but notice 318 00:16:12,920 --> 00:16:16,280 Speaker 1: how every analyst was essentially telling people to draft quarterbacks 319 00:16:16,280 --> 00:16:19,160 Speaker 1: early next year, or that you needed a good quarterback 320 00:16:19,400 --> 00:16:22,040 Speaker 1: to win in fantasy. But I knew through playing for 321 00:16:22,080 --> 00:16:23,880 Speaker 1: a decade at that point, because I started playing in 322 00:16:23,880 --> 00:16:26,400 Speaker 1: like two thousand and one, two and two, I knew 323 00:16:26,440 --> 00:16:29,680 Speaker 1: that the logic didn't make sense. Yes, quarterback numbers were 324 00:16:29,680 --> 00:16:32,400 Speaker 1: really good in twenty eleven, but it wasn't like we 325 00:16:32,440 --> 00:16:36,360 Speaker 1: predictably knew exactly which quarterbacks would be good. And we 326 00:16:36,400 --> 00:16:38,760 Speaker 1: also knew supply and demand was a big part of 327 00:16:38,800 --> 00:16:41,880 Speaker 1: this game, and that position just didn't matter that much 328 00:16:41,920 --> 00:16:45,600 Speaker 1: from a supplying demand perspective. So I decided to blend 329 00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:49,280 Speaker 1: all of my passions together on a project outside of work. 330 00:16:49,920 --> 00:16:52,880 Speaker 1: At that time, ebooks really weren't that easy to produce, 331 00:16:52,920 --> 00:16:55,720 Speaker 1: and they weren't that popular. But I knew how to design. 332 00:16:55,960 --> 00:16:58,600 Speaker 1: I knew how to code, so I could write the ebook. 333 00:16:58,760 --> 00:17:01,040 Speaker 1: I could design the charts, can make it look decent, 334 00:17:01,360 --> 00:17:03,600 Speaker 1: and then I could code it so it was responsive 335 00:17:03,640 --> 00:17:07,080 Speaker 1: on different devices. So that's what I did. Each day. 336 00:17:07,119 --> 00:17:10,119 Speaker 1: I'd go to work, i'd go home, and then I'd write. 337 00:17:10,200 --> 00:17:12,440 Speaker 1: I had very little responsibilities at the time, because I 338 00:17:12,520 --> 00:17:14,879 Speaker 1: was twenty three years old. I then did that for 339 00:17:14,920 --> 00:17:17,560 Speaker 1: about six months, and I published the Late Round Quarterback 340 00:17:17,560 --> 00:17:20,840 Speaker 1: Ebook in June of twenty twelve. And then in twenty 341 00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:23,080 Speaker 1: twelve a lot of stuff that I wrote about ended 342 00:17:23,160 --> 00:17:26,240 Speaker 1: up coming. True quarterbacks regressed, we had more chaos at 343 00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:30,240 Speaker 1: the position, and Late Round Quarterback dominated. That got me 344 00:17:30,280 --> 00:17:32,280 Speaker 1: a guest series on rote A World after having a 345 00:17:32,280 --> 00:17:34,520 Speaker 1: call with Evan Silva, who funny enough as a friend 346 00:17:34,520 --> 00:17:36,520 Speaker 1: of mine now and then I actually wrote a few 347 00:17:36,560 --> 00:17:39,480 Speaker 1: articles on PFF when Mike Clay was running things there. 348 00:17:40,440 --> 00:17:43,440 Speaker 1: Almost exactly a year after my book launched, I got 349 00:17:43,440 --> 00:17:46,280 Speaker 1: a full time job offer from Nick Bonadio at Number Fire. 350 00:17:46,800 --> 00:17:48,920 Speaker 1: I was asked to create content for them, which turned 351 00:17:48,960 --> 00:17:51,640 Speaker 1: into me essentially building out the media business for Number Fire. 352 00:17:52,240 --> 00:17:55,680 Speaker 1: I would recruit writers, they'd write content, I'd edit the content. 353 00:17:55,880 --> 00:17:58,280 Speaker 1: I'd critique things for the writers. We were a well 354 00:17:58,280 --> 00:18:01,080 Speaker 1: oiled machine. We were doing up to thirty articles per 355 00:18:01,160 --> 00:18:04,239 Speaker 1: day at one point. Some really awesome analysts actually got 356 00:18:04,280 --> 00:18:06,359 Speaker 1: their start under me at Number Fire. Scott Barrett and 357 00:18:06,359 --> 00:18:09,399 Speaker 1: Graham Barfield over at Fantasy Points, Jacob Gibbs at CBS Sports, 358 00:18:09,440 --> 00:18:13,159 Speaker 1: Chris Raybon and Action Network. There are tons more apologies 359 00:18:13,160 --> 00:18:15,199 Speaker 1: if I didn't name you, but I'm proud of what 360 00:18:15,240 --> 00:18:18,000 Speaker 1: we built without a doubt. We then were bought by 361 00:18:18,040 --> 00:18:21,920 Speaker 1: Fandel in twenty fifteen. I became a Fandel employee. The 362 00:18:21,960 --> 00:18:23,840 Speaker 1: first couple of years they were actually kind of rough, 363 00:18:23,920 --> 00:18:25,880 Speaker 1: just from the perspective that Fandle didn't know what they 364 00:18:25,880 --> 00:18:28,760 Speaker 1: wanted to do with us. But my team, alongside my 365 00:18:28,800 --> 00:18:30,800 Speaker 1: boss Adam Kaplan, who was there with me back at 366 00:18:30,880 --> 00:18:33,520 Speaker 1: number five, we all just started kind of taking over 367 00:18:33,560 --> 00:18:37,200 Speaker 1: as thought leaders within that organization and with digital content. 368 00:18:38,040 --> 00:18:40,399 Speaker 1: So I was at Fandle for almost seven years, and 369 00:18:40,440 --> 00:18:42,359 Speaker 1: I did some cool stuff there. I got to do 370 00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:44,800 Speaker 1: TV spots, I got to have a real budget to 371 00:18:44,800 --> 00:18:47,720 Speaker 1: work with. I really did enjoy my time at Fandel. 372 00:18:48,400 --> 00:18:50,240 Speaker 1: I have nothing but good things to say about that 373 00:18:50,320 --> 00:18:53,719 Speaker 1: company and the people that I worked with. It just 374 00:18:53,760 --> 00:18:55,840 Speaker 1: got to a point where I always had this goal 375 00:18:55,880 --> 00:18:58,960 Speaker 1: in mind to run my own company. Just going back 376 00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:00,720 Speaker 1: to the start, I taught my self had to design 377 00:19:00,760 --> 00:19:03,280 Speaker 1: and build websites. That was what I did in high 378 00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:06,159 Speaker 1: school to make money. I didn't have the traditional jobs. 379 00:19:07,080 --> 00:19:10,359 Speaker 1: That's what got me decent internships in college. I've just 380 00:19:10,440 --> 00:19:14,280 Speaker 1: always had this desire to create and the only way 381 00:19:14,320 --> 00:19:17,040 Speaker 1: that I could really do that completely freely was to 382 00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:19,199 Speaker 1: go out on my own and start a business. So 383 00:19:19,280 --> 00:19:21,720 Speaker 1: in January twenty twenty two, that's what I did. I 384 00:19:21,800 --> 00:19:25,639 Speaker 1: left FanDuel and I started Late Round Fantasy Football. My 385 00:19:25,720 --> 00:19:27,800 Speaker 1: plan was to actually never hire anyone and just do 386 00:19:27,880 --> 00:19:30,720 Speaker 1: my own thing, but then David Kitchen became available, and 387 00:19:30,760 --> 00:19:32,399 Speaker 1: he was something I actually had thought of when I 388 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:34,680 Speaker 1: started the business, as someone who could help manage sort 389 00:19:34,720 --> 00:19:37,200 Speaker 1: of like the business side of things. So I hired 390 00:19:37,280 --> 00:19:39,600 Speaker 1: him last year January twenty twenty five, and then I 391 00:19:39,640 --> 00:19:42,240 Speaker 1: was able to add Brandon Godolah in January of this year. 392 00:19:43,040 --> 00:19:45,639 Speaker 1: And look, right now, I really don't have plans to 393 00:19:45,720 --> 00:19:48,440 Speaker 1: be much bigger. From a human resource standpoint, I would 394 00:19:48,480 --> 00:19:51,600 Speaker 1: be totally content and fine if it's just us three forever, 395 00:19:52,160 --> 00:19:53,879 Speaker 1: because I want to be able to stay true to 396 00:19:53,920 --> 00:19:56,320 Speaker 1: what I really want to do, which is create content 397 00:19:56,440 --> 00:19:59,480 Speaker 1: and analyze this game. The bigger you get, the more 398 00:19:59,520 --> 00:20:02,639 Speaker 1: managing you have to do. And if that's the case, 399 00:20:02,880 --> 00:20:05,240 Speaker 1: then I would have less time focusing on the content. 400 00:20:06,000 --> 00:20:07,280 Speaker 1: But look, in the end, if you want to talk 401 00:20:07,280 --> 00:20:10,439 Speaker 1: about inspiration and what pushed me to do this, I 402 00:20:10,520 --> 00:20:13,199 Speaker 1: just couldn't do the typical nine to five thing. I 403 00:20:13,240 --> 00:20:15,560 Speaker 1: didn't like it. I knew I didn't like it. I 404 00:20:15,640 --> 00:20:18,600 Speaker 1: knew I needed out. I was determined to do whatever 405 00:20:18,640 --> 00:20:21,520 Speaker 1: I could to not do that, because I know myself. 406 00:20:22,040 --> 00:20:24,480 Speaker 1: I know that if I had that standard job that 407 00:20:24,520 --> 00:20:27,439 Speaker 1: I just didn't like doing, it would affect my mental health, 408 00:20:27,520 --> 00:20:30,160 Speaker 1: it would affect my relationships, and that's not a good 409 00:20:30,160 --> 00:20:33,639 Speaker 1: thing at all. And I am fully aware of how 410 00:20:33,720 --> 00:20:36,320 Speaker 1: lucky I am. Look. I know that I worked hard. 411 00:20:36,560 --> 00:20:38,159 Speaker 1: I know I was able to think about things in 412 00:20:38,160 --> 00:20:40,400 Speaker 1: the way that other people weren't thinking. I was able 413 00:20:40,400 --> 00:20:42,800 Speaker 1: to market an idea in a way that was unique, 414 00:20:43,280 --> 00:20:45,280 Speaker 1: and that's something I'm very proud of. Don't get me wrong. 415 00:20:45,920 --> 00:20:48,720 Speaker 1: But anytime you're able to find success doing something, you 416 00:20:48,840 --> 00:20:50,679 Speaker 1: have to take a step back and you have to 417 00:20:50,720 --> 00:20:54,000 Speaker 1: try to be objective. You know. For me, I was 418 00:20:54,080 --> 00:20:56,480 Speaker 1: lucky to have an interest in an industry that was 419 00:20:56,640 --> 00:20:59,000 Speaker 1: just starting to boom. I was lucky to have a 420 00:20:59,040 --> 00:21:01,920 Speaker 1: loose connection to even have an interview at Number Fire. 421 00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:05,040 Speaker 1: I was lucky that my content ended up getting seen 422 00:21:05,119 --> 00:21:07,520 Speaker 1: by the right people at the right time. And there 423 00:21:07,520 --> 00:21:09,560 Speaker 1: have been ups and downs through all of this. Trust me, 424 00:21:10,240 --> 00:21:12,960 Speaker 1: Most of the really tough stuff happened pretty early on, 425 00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:15,120 Speaker 1: where I was working like fourteen fifteen hours a day 426 00:21:15,119 --> 00:21:18,320 Speaker 1: pretty consistently. There were definitely times in that like twenty 427 00:21:18,359 --> 00:21:21,480 Speaker 1: thirteen to twenty sixteen timeframe where I let my work 428 00:21:21,520 --> 00:21:23,960 Speaker 1: like get in the way of health. Fortunately, though, I've 429 00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:26,560 Speaker 1: always had a great support system with my wife, my family, 430 00:21:26,680 --> 00:21:29,040 Speaker 1: my friends, and I've always been able to bounce back. 431 00:21:29,600 --> 00:21:31,600 Speaker 1: I think that's key with anything that you set out 432 00:21:31,600 --> 00:21:34,880 Speaker 1: to do. Don't do it alone. Lean on people, ask 433 00:21:34,960 --> 00:21:37,439 Speaker 1: for advice, be willing to feel what you need to feel, 434 00:21:37,880 --> 00:21:40,760 Speaker 1: don't let it just sit there. But really, what inspired 435 00:21:40,800 --> 00:21:42,520 Speaker 1: me to do all this was just this desire to 436 00:21:42,560 --> 00:21:45,919 Speaker 1: create something, to create something that could connect people and 437 00:21:45,960 --> 00:21:47,719 Speaker 1: get them to think differently about a game that I 438 00:21:47,760 --> 00:21:51,360 Speaker 1: really do deeply love. As I've gotten older, I've realized 439 00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:54,440 Speaker 1: that critical thinking is something to just not take for granted. 440 00:21:54,840 --> 00:21:58,080 Speaker 1: It's important to always work your mind, and this game 441 00:21:58,480 --> 00:22:00,720 Speaker 1: is a way for us to do that. That's one 442 00:22:00,720 --> 00:22:03,080 Speaker 1: of the many reasons I love doing what I do. 443 00:22:03,880 --> 00:22:05,639 Speaker 1: I get to go in the lab, I get to 444 00:22:05,680 --> 00:22:09,160 Speaker 1: completely fry my brain researching things, and then I emerge 445 00:22:09,160 --> 00:22:11,399 Speaker 1: with some new idea that you guys can judge me 446 00:22:11,440 --> 00:22:15,320 Speaker 1: on it's legitimately really really fun and it's one of 447 00:22:15,359 --> 00:22:17,920 Speaker 1: the things that drives me to keep innovating and coming 448 00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:20,520 Speaker 1: up with new ideas. Now, look, there are plenty of 449 00:22:20,600 --> 00:22:22,439 Speaker 1: details in there that I could have gotten to. I 450 00:22:22,440 --> 00:22:24,640 Speaker 1: could have talked about this for hours, and if any 451 00:22:24,680 --> 00:22:26,040 Speaker 1: of you want to learn more or you just want 452 00:22:26,080 --> 00:22:28,119 Speaker 1: to bounce an idea off of me, you can always 453 00:22:28,160 --> 00:22:31,280 Speaker 1: email me. But that's really the story. From a lazy 454 00:22:31,320 --> 00:22:33,879 Speaker 1: high school student who just built websites, hung out with friends, 455 00:22:33,920 --> 00:22:37,280 Speaker 1: played some sports, to an advertising project manager, to an 456 00:22:37,400 --> 00:22:40,800 Speaker 1: editor in chief to an entrepreneur. That's how Late Round 457 00:22:40,800 --> 00:22:44,240 Speaker 1: Fantasy Football came to be. That's it for today's show, though, 458 00:22:44,240 --> 00:22:46,280 Speaker 1: Thanks all of you for listening. If you had subscribed 459 00:22:46,320 --> 00:22:48,719 Speaker 1: to the Late Round Fantasy Football podcast, make sure you 460 00:22:48,760 --> 00:22:51,000 Speaker 1: are by starching for it pretty much anywhere podcasts can 461 00:22:51,040 --> 00:22:53,320 Speaker 1: be found, and effort to follow me on Twitter and 462 00:22:53,359 --> 00:22:56,840 Speaker 1: on Blue Sky at Late Round QB. Thanks for listening 463 00:22:56,920 --> 00:22:59,000 Speaker 1: this week everyone, I greatly appreciate it. Make sure you 464 00:22:59,080 --> 00:23:01,639 Speaker 1: check out Late Round sign up for whatever you can 465 00:23:01,640 --> 00:23:03,720 Speaker 1: sign up for, or whatever you want to sign up for. 466 00:23:04,080 --> 00:23:07,480 Speaker 1: I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks for the continued support. Enjoy 467 00:23:07,520 --> 00:23:09,359 Speaker 1: your weekend. I'll catch you next week.