1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,720
Speaker 1: Hello, Hello, Welcome back to Movie Mike's Movie Podcast. I

2
00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:04,520
Speaker 1: am your host, Movie Mike, joined by my wife and

3
00:00:04,559 --> 00:00:07,000
Speaker 1: cost Kelsey. How are you? Oh your Mike's not on?

4
00:00:07,160 --> 00:00:07,840
Speaker 1: How are you again?

5
00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:08,600
Speaker 2: I'm tired.

6
00:00:08,680 --> 00:00:11,040
Speaker 1: Sorry Mike wasn't on. It's on now. We have a

7
00:00:11,080 --> 00:00:14,640
Speaker 1: lot to get to. We're gonna talk about the OSCAR nominations.

8
00:00:14,680 --> 00:00:18,360
Speaker 1: I'll give my prediction movie review. We're talked about The Brutalist,

9
00:00:18,400 --> 00:00:20,759
Speaker 1: and in the trailer park a new horror kind of

10
00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:23,200
Speaker 1: comedy movie called The Monkey. Like I said, a lot

11
00:00:23,239 --> 00:00:25,880
Speaker 1: to get to. Oh you're here, all right? Ready to go?

12
00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:26,440
Speaker 1: Ready to go.

13
00:00:26,560 --> 00:00:28,639
Speaker 2: We should not be recording this in the evening. I

14
00:00:28,680 --> 00:00:29,840
Speaker 2: do not have that kind of energy.

15
00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:32,720
Speaker 1: We'll explain that in a second. Thank you for being subscribed.

16
00:00:32,760 --> 00:00:35,640
Speaker 1: Chaut to the Monday Morning Movie Crew. And now let's

17
00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:40,680
Speaker 1: talk movies from the Diastrolle podcast network. In cases Movie

18
00:00:40,760 --> 00:00:43,760
Speaker 1: Mike Movie Podcast. I'm a little hyped up. It is

19
00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:47,879
Speaker 1: the ninety seventh Oscar Academy Awards. So far, the only

20
00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:50,680
Speaker 1: thing that's been delayed is the nominations. They came out

21
00:00:50,720 --> 00:00:52,879
Speaker 1: a little bit later because of the LA wildfires, but

22
00:00:52,920 --> 00:00:55,720
Speaker 1: they're still set to go down Sunday, March second, Conan

23
00:00:55,760 --> 00:00:59,600
Speaker 1: O'Brien is hosting their host before No, okay, they're on

24
00:00:59,720 --> 00:01:02,600
Speaker 1: AB see. I always love the Oscars no matter what

25
00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:05,320
Speaker 1: movies are nominated, it just feels like a special event.

26
00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:05,520
Speaker 1: To me.

27
00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:07,040
Speaker 2: It's your super Bowl.

28
00:01:07,319 --> 00:01:08,800
Speaker 1: The super Bowl is also my super Bowl.

29
00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:10,240
Speaker 2: But realized that as I said it.

30
00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:12,959
Speaker 1: But yes, it also it feels like that level of

31
00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:14,960
Speaker 1: event to me. To most people, they say, I haven't

32
00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:17,240
Speaker 1: seen a lot of these movies nominated, why would I care?

33
00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:20,520
Speaker 1: And those are the same people who say that everything's

34
00:01:20,520 --> 00:01:23,919
Speaker 1: a rebate rebate You remember get having ascend in rebates,

35
00:01:24,600 --> 00:01:26,000
Speaker 1: everything is a reboot.

36
00:01:26,080 --> 00:01:27,960
Speaker 2: I would love a rebate right now.

37
00:01:27,840 --> 00:01:30,440
Speaker 1: Or everything is a sequel, so you can't say both things.

38
00:01:30,600 --> 00:01:32,800
Speaker 2: What's harder now is that like they don't come out

39
00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:35,000
Speaker 2: just in theaters, like some of them are only indie theaters.

40
00:01:35,080 --> 00:01:37,520
Speaker 2: I would agree with that, Like it's very hard to

41
00:01:37,600 --> 00:01:40,120
Speaker 2: keep track of where to watch all of the Best

42
00:01:40,120 --> 00:01:41,360
Speaker 2: Picture nominees.

43
00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:43,119
Speaker 1: And sometimes you can only watch them at home. Yet

44
00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:44,840
Speaker 1: the renom and it's the twenty bucks price. That is

45
00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:46,479
Speaker 1: the thing I wish would happen, and I know it's

46
00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:48,680
Speaker 1: all they try to get it into a certain window.

47
00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:51,560
Speaker 1: Some of these are from smaller studios, so they don't

48
00:01:51,600 --> 00:01:53,680
Speaker 1: have wide releases. But I wish by the time the

49
00:01:53,720 --> 00:01:57,040
Speaker 1: nominations came out they were available to watch either on

50
00:01:57,080 --> 00:01:59,640
Speaker 1: the streaming service or you could rent them for the

51
00:01:59,680 --> 00:02:01,440
Speaker 1: normal four to six bucks.

52
00:02:01,640 --> 00:02:03,440
Speaker 2: I'm not renting a movie for twenty dollars.

53
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:05,760
Speaker 1: Yeah, that just feels like I need to go experience

54
00:02:05,760 --> 00:02:08,560
Speaker 1: it for twenty bucks. But for some people they'll do that.

55
00:02:08,600 --> 00:02:11,799
Speaker 1: But let's get right into it. You'll read the nominees.

56
00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:14,440
Speaker 1: I'll give you to crack your neck.

57
00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:15,799
Speaker 2: Did that come through on those Oh?

58
00:02:15,800 --> 00:02:16,440
Speaker 1: It came through.

59
00:02:16,800 --> 00:02:19,600
Speaker 2: I realized that as I did it. I boxed tonight

60
00:02:19,680 --> 00:02:22,040
Speaker 2: and my shoulders are sore because it was upper body

61
00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:25,959
Speaker 2: day and my neck and my shoulders are really tight.

62
00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:28,119
Speaker 2: So apologies a little asmr there.

63
00:02:28,240 --> 00:02:32,000
Speaker 1: But you'll go read the category, read the nominees, and

64
00:02:32,040 --> 00:02:34,880
Speaker 1: I'll predict who is gonna win. We'll talk about surprises

65
00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:37,000
Speaker 1: and snubs. Kick it off with the first category.

66
00:02:37,080 --> 00:02:38,000
Speaker 2: We have best Picture.

67
00:02:38,040 --> 00:02:39,200
Speaker 1: Oh, the big Daddy.

68
00:02:39,600 --> 00:02:40,880
Speaker 2: Please never say that again.

69
00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:42,240
Speaker 1: It's the big Daddy category.

70
00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:43,080
Speaker 2: I don't like that.

71
00:02:43,120 --> 00:02:44,440
Speaker 1: Okay, the big one.

72
00:02:44,919 --> 00:02:45,480
Speaker 2: Are you done?

73
00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:47,120
Speaker 1: Yes, I've done? Now go ahead.

74
00:02:47,880 --> 00:02:53,200
Speaker 2: We have a Noor, Wicked Conclave, Amelia Perez, Dune Part two,

75
00:02:53,919 --> 00:02:57,799
Speaker 2: The Brutalist, The Substance, A complete unknown. I'm still here

76
00:02:57,840 --> 00:02:58,640
Speaker 2: in Nickel Boys.

77
00:02:58,960 --> 00:03:02,720
Speaker 1: The surprise here, I think is Amelia Perez, just because

78
00:03:02,760 --> 00:03:05,600
Speaker 1: I feel overall it has the most nominations. And I

79
00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:07,920
Speaker 1: watched that movie and I just didn't quite see what

80
00:03:08,200 --> 00:03:09,919
Speaker 1: made that movie Best Picture worthy.

81
00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:12,639
Speaker 2: And I seeing clips on TikTok and that was I've

82
00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:13,359
Speaker 2: seen what I need to do.

83
00:03:13,520 --> 00:03:15,240
Speaker 1: I will say the clips make it seem worse than

84
00:03:15,280 --> 00:03:17,799
Speaker 1: it is. The way I was exposed to it first

85
00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:20,600
Speaker 1: was everybody calling out Selena Gomez for her Spanish. It

86
00:03:20,639 --> 00:03:23,640
Speaker 1: was Henny Dibez, who is a great Mexican actor, one

87
00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:26,520
Speaker 1: of my mom's favorite actors, and he was basically saying

88
00:03:26,560 --> 00:03:29,040
Speaker 1: that they should have had somebody who had more authentic

89
00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:32,960
Speaker 1: Spanish speaking. I didn't think it was that distracting. The

90
00:03:33,040 --> 00:03:36,280
Speaker 1: problem was that she speaks such good English that the

91
00:03:36,360 --> 00:03:39,280
Speaker 1: going back and forth between English and Spanish is very jarring.

92
00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:41,280
Speaker 1: I feel like to do that role you almost have

93
00:03:41,360 --> 00:03:43,360
Speaker 1: to play it a little bit closer because the character

94
00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:46,120
Speaker 1: is supposed to be fluent in Spanish from Mexico and

95
00:03:46,160 --> 00:03:49,480
Speaker 1: then also knows English but her English is way too perfect,

96
00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:54,080
Speaker 1: almost like California English that I mean Selena Gomez speaks. Now. Yeah,

97
00:03:54,640 --> 00:03:56,760
Speaker 1: it was also hard for me to root for her,

98
00:03:57,160 --> 00:04:00,880
Speaker 1: the main character who was a bad person, because what

99
00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:05,320
Speaker 1: that movie is about, it's a drug lord, cartel leader

100
00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:11,320
Speaker 1: who wants to change their entire life, change their gender,

101
00:04:12,400 --> 00:04:14,880
Speaker 1: and then kind of it's like, can you change who

102
00:04:14,920 --> 00:04:17,000
Speaker 1: you are with? It was hard for me to see

103
00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:20,040
Speaker 1: past the awful things that they did. And I think

104
00:04:20,040 --> 00:04:22,400
Speaker 1: it's because my parents are from Mexico. Every time they

105
00:04:22,440 --> 00:04:25,359
Speaker 1: go down there, their biggest fear is running into the cartel,

106
00:04:25,440 --> 00:04:28,039
Speaker 1: and I know how much that traumatizes people. It was

107
00:04:28,080 --> 00:04:30,120
Speaker 1: hard for me to have any sympathy towards that kind

108
00:04:30,160 --> 00:04:32,160
Speaker 1: of character. And I know the whole thing is supposed

109
00:04:32,160 --> 00:04:35,680
Speaker 1: to be redemption and she's doing good things later in life,

110
00:04:35,720 --> 00:04:37,680
Speaker 1: but if you look back on the things that not

111
00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:40,000
Speaker 1: just her character particular, but anybody in the cartel does,

112
00:04:40,040 --> 00:04:41,200
Speaker 1: it's like, is that forgivable?

113
00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:44,359
Speaker 2: I wouldn't say it is forgivable, but is there a

114
00:04:44,440 --> 00:04:47,280
Speaker 2: way to move forward and be grateful that they're no

115
00:04:47,360 --> 00:04:49,840
Speaker 2: longer doing those things and doing good things now? Because

116
00:04:49,880 --> 00:04:52,360
Speaker 2: the other path is just keep doing bad things true,

117
00:04:52,480 --> 00:04:53,920
Speaker 2: I'm just playing devil's advocate here.

118
00:04:54,160 --> 00:04:55,760
Speaker 1: That was hard for me. Aside from that, I thought

119
00:04:55,760 --> 00:04:59,000
Speaker 1: it was a pretty decent movie except for the singing.

120
00:04:59,279 --> 00:05:00,880
Speaker 1: That's the part that it was just like this. If

121
00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:02,760
Speaker 1: it didn't have that in there, it would be a

122
00:05:02,839 --> 00:05:04,839
Speaker 1: much stronger movie, and maybe it would have moved me

123
00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:06,320
Speaker 1: a little bit more. Maybe I would have felt a

124
00:05:06,320 --> 00:05:08,000
Speaker 1: little bit more for the character. But it was all

125
00:05:08,040 --> 00:05:10,880
Speaker 1: the musical aspects that I thought, they're only putting this

126
00:05:11,120 --> 00:05:13,520
Speaker 1: in to make it feel different, because aside from that,

127
00:05:13,560 --> 00:05:15,240
Speaker 1: I don't know if it would have stood out as much.

128
00:05:15,720 --> 00:05:17,800
Speaker 1: So that is what I feel like is the surprise here.

129
00:05:18,279 --> 00:05:21,120
Speaker 1: Even though it had the most nominations, I think the

130
00:05:21,120 --> 00:05:23,640
Speaker 1: winner here, I'm gonna go with the movie. I'm finally

131
00:05:23,680 --> 00:05:28,000
Speaker 1: gonna endorse. I'm going with The Substance. I love that movie,

132
00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:33,000
Speaker 1: and for a category that doesn't have one movie that

133
00:05:33,240 --> 00:05:34,800
Speaker 1: as soon as we watched it, I thought that was

134
00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:37,000
Speaker 1: Best Picture worthy. The only movie I even mentioned that

135
00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:39,719
Speaker 1: in the review was when I first reviewed The Substance

136
00:05:39,760 --> 00:05:42,359
Speaker 1: back opening weekend. So that is what I'm going with

137
00:05:42,400 --> 00:05:45,080
Speaker 1: the winner here. I'm going with my heart. The snubs,

138
00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:46,440
Speaker 1: no challengers.

139
00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:47,359
Speaker 2: It was pretty surprising.

140
00:05:47,520 --> 00:05:51,039
Speaker 1: I thought overall Challengers would have had at least one

141
00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:53,960
Speaker 1: or two nomination, especially in Best Picture. I thought that

142
00:05:54,040 --> 00:05:56,400
Speaker 1: was a snub. A Real Pain didn't get a nomination

143
00:05:56,520 --> 00:05:59,159
Speaker 1: for Best Picture. That was my second pick to win.

144
00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:01,400
Speaker 1: I said, I want it to be the substance, and

145
00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:03,599
Speaker 1: if the substance doesn't win, I want it to be

146
00:06:03,680 --> 00:06:05,440
Speaker 1: a real pain. But now a real pain is not

147
00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:08,560
Speaker 1: even nominated. I also thought maybe d D would get nominated.

148
00:06:08,760 --> 00:06:10,200
Speaker 2: So can I add a snub?

149
00:06:10,320 --> 00:06:10,560
Speaker 1: Yeah?

150
00:06:10,640 --> 00:06:11,120
Speaker 2: Sing Sing?

151
00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:14,000
Speaker 1: Oh, yes, Sing Sing is not Best Picture. And there

152
00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:18,360
Speaker 1: are a lot of movies on here. That's one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine,

153
00:06:18,480 --> 00:06:20,920
Speaker 1: ten movies. Yeah, I would have probably taken out a

154
00:06:20,920 --> 00:06:21,679
Speaker 1: complete unknown.

155
00:06:22,320 --> 00:06:24,680
Speaker 2: I think i'd have taken out Dune Part two, Dune

156
00:06:24,720 --> 00:06:26,839
Speaker 2: Parts I like to call it News Part two.

157
00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:30,200
Speaker 1: Timothy Shalloway again. Yeah, it's rare for also sequels to

158
00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:32,159
Speaker 1: get nominated. I would have taken down both of the

159
00:06:32,160 --> 00:06:35,080
Speaker 1: Timothy Shallowy movies. Sorry, Tommy, put Sing Sing and put

160
00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:37,080
Speaker 1: Challengers in there, just because I think those will be

161
00:06:37,120 --> 00:06:41,280
Speaker 1: more definitive For twenty twenty four, next category.

162
00:06:40,839 --> 00:06:43,960
Speaker 2: Best Actor in a Leading Role. If Adrian Brody, the

163
00:06:43,960 --> 00:06:49,480
Speaker 2: Brutalist Coleman Domingo sing Sing, Ray Fines Conklive, Timothy Chalomy

164
00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:53,760
Speaker 2: and a complete unknown and Sebastian Stan and The Apprentice going.

165
00:06:53,520 --> 00:06:56,359
Speaker 1: Through some surprises here. I'm surprised Sebastian Stan got a

166
00:06:56,360 --> 00:07:00,880
Speaker 1: nomination surprise snub. I would say Denzel for Glady, but

167
00:07:01,000 --> 00:07:04,839
Speaker 1: can you just get nominated for being Denzel? I thought

168
00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:06,839
Speaker 1: his performance was the best character in that movie.

169
00:07:06,960 --> 00:07:09,680
Speaker 2: They should just have like the Denzel a War, but

170
00:07:09,800 --> 00:07:10,560
Speaker 2: I don't think it.

171
00:07:10,520 --> 00:07:13,680
Speaker 1: Was best actor worthy. Now I'm gonna do process of

172
00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:15,960
Speaker 1: elimination here on who I think is gonna win. I

173
00:07:15,960 --> 00:07:18,960
Speaker 1: think you take out Timothy Chalamey and Sebastian Stan. Timothy

174
00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:21,720
Speaker 1: Schallamey was good as Bob Dylan, but there were times

175
00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:24,119
Speaker 1: where I felt his performance was a little bit weak,

176
00:07:24,200 --> 00:07:26,400
Speaker 1: and Timothy Shallo May kind of shined through.

177
00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:29,360
Speaker 2: It's very meta. It was like Timothy Schallamey being Timothy Shallamey,

178
00:07:29,440 --> 00:07:30,120
Speaker 2: and I.

179
00:07:30,120 --> 00:07:31,440
Speaker 1: Could see that in there, and I think in a

180
00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:33,600
Speaker 1: great bio pick, you should not see that at all.

181
00:07:33,600 --> 00:07:36,320
Speaker 1: You should only see that character. So for that reason,

182
00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:37,640
Speaker 1: I don't think he deserves it.

183
00:07:37,760 --> 00:07:39,240
Speaker 2: I didn't go full Austin Butler.

184
00:07:39,480 --> 00:07:41,760
Speaker 1: Yeah, he didn't fully embrace it, live in it for

185
00:07:41,800 --> 00:07:44,960
Speaker 1: that long. Sebastian stan I'm surprised he's even in the category.

186
00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:47,760
Speaker 1: I'm taking him off. Ray Fines was great in Conclave,

187
00:07:48,560 --> 00:07:51,600
Speaker 1: great and everything he's he has such range. I mean,

188
00:07:51,680 --> 00:07:55,160
Speaker 1: he can do Voltimore and he can do Conclave. His

189
00:07:55,320 --> 00:07:57,840
Speaker 1: performance was so powerful in this movie, and I found

190
00:07:57,840 --> 00:08:00,440
Speaker 1: myself really enjoying it. But I don't think wins.

191
00:08:00,520 --> 00:08:02,080
Speaker 2: Can I make a comparison there? He goes from the

192
00:08:02,160 --> 00:08:03,600
Speaker 2: dark lord to a man of the Lord.

193
00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:05,960
Speaker 1: That is true. I didn't even think about that.

194
00:08:06,120 --> 00:08:07,280
Speaker 2: Thank you was real singer.

195
00:08:07,760 --> 00:08:10,200
Speaker 1: And then Covid Domingo is the one I want to win.

196
00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:11,760
Speaker 1: I love.

197
00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:16,520
Speaker 2: Bad I am such a fan of his.

198
00:08:16,920 --> 00:08:20,000
Speaker 1: I can visualize him going up there and giving his speech.

199
00:08:20,120 --> 00:08:22,280
Speaker 1: I just love his voice. I could hear him just

200
00:08:22,560 --> 00:08:23,120
Speaker 1: he could read.

201
00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:24,840
Speaker 2: The phone book and I'd be like, cool, let me listen.

202
00:08:24,880 --> 00:08:26,600
Speaker 1: I would listen to his Chick fil a order. His

203
00:08:26,680 --> 00:08:30,000
Speaker 1: voice is just like But I think it's easily Adrian Brody,

204
00:08:30,440 --> 00:08:30,960
Speaker 1: probably just.

205
00:08:30,920 --> 00:08:32,439
Speaker 2: Because the movies three and a half hours long. I

206
00:08:32,480 --> 00:08:35,199
Speaker 2: feel like that guarantees you it's historical.

207
00:08:36,040 --> 00:08:38,840
Speaker 1: He's won in the past, and I feel like putting

208
00:08:38,920 --> 00:08:42,560
Speaker 1: him against all these other performances. He is going to win.

209
00:08:42,960 --> 00:08:44,800
Speaker 1: I think that is an easy call. I would put

210
00:08:44,840 --> 00:08:49,840
Speaker 1: money that gold gold. I would put money that Yeah

211
00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:51,640
Speaker 1: is going to take the gold home. That's what I'll

212
00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:52,280
Speaker 1: try to say.

213
00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:55,400
Speaker 2: Adrian Brode, I said Brody, Oh, so like you put

214
00:08:55,400 --> 00:08:57,559
Speaker 2: a little emphasis on Adrian Brode.

215
00:08:57,720 --> 00:09:00,400
Speaker 1: I do have a hard time spelling Adrian. Never want

216
00:09:00,440 --> 00:09:01,800
Speaker 1: to spell it the way he spells it.

217
00:09:02,200 --> 00:09:04,400
Speaker 2: It's kind of like gray g r A y g

218
00:09:04,559 --> 00:09:05,040
Speaker 2: r U. I.

219
00:09:05,559 --> 00:09:08,520
Speaker 1: But for Best Actor Leading Role, Adrian Brody.

220
00:09:08,679 --> 00:09:11,560
Speaker 2: Next category, Best Actress in a Leading Role, we have

221
00:09:11,640 --> 00:09:16,599
Speaker 2: Mikey Madison, Honora, Cynthia Arrivo, Wicked, Demi Moore, The Substance,

222
00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:20,960
Speaker 2: Carla Sophia gascon For, Amilia Prez and Fernando Torres.

223
00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:25,800
Speaker 1: I'm still here a couple first time nominees here. Demi Moore, I.

224
00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:26,440
Speaker 2: Think it's to me?

225
00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:27,480
Speaker 1: Is it to me?

226
00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:28,520
Speaker 2: I think it's to me?

227
00:09:28,840 --> 00:09:30,600
Speaker 1: It could be the right way to say. I've said

228
00:09:30,600 --> 00:09:32,120
Speaker 1: Demi Moore my entire life.

229
00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:33,880
Speaker 2: I swear it was one of those where it was

230
00:09:33,920 --> 00:09:35,560
Speaker 2: like we've all been saying this wrong forever.

231
00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:40,880
Speaker 1: Could be Demi miss Moore, Miss Moore. Her Golden Globe

232
00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:42,760
Speaker 1: win was the first award she'd ever won.

233
00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:44,000
Speaker 2: That was shocking.

234
00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:45,160
Speaker 1: That is wild to me.

235
00:09:45,360 --> 00:09:47,640
Speaker 2: It's one of those where you're like, you're a household name,

236
00:09:47,679 --> 00:09:49,920
Speaker 2: how have you never won her award before?

237
00:09:50,040 --> 00:09:52,439
Speaker 1: And her speech was great that a producer told her

238
00:09:52,440 --> 00:09:54,800
Speaker 1: that she was just a popcorn actress. She would never

239
00:09:54,840 --> 00:09:56,400
Speaker 1: win an award like that. She was on that stage

240
00:09:56,400 --> 00:09:57,120
Speaker 1: winning that award.

241
00:09:57,240 --> 00:09:59,640
Speaker 2: I mean, the woman shaved her head for Gi Jane.

242
00:09:59,720 --> 00:10:03,120
Speaker 1: Yeah, Fernanda Torre is also a first time nominee. My

243
00:10:03,280 --> 00:10:06,880
Speaker 1: surprises and snubs. No Zendaya for Challengers, you know know,

244
00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:08,760
Speaker 1: Nicole Kidman for Baby Girl.

245
00:10:08,880 --> 00:10:11,200
Speaker 2: Also, I want to point out that Carlo Sophia Gascon

246
00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:14,400
Speaker 2: is the first ever openly transactress to be nominated for

247
00:10:14,720 --> 00:10:15,520
Speaker 2: an acting award.

248
00:10:15,679 --> 00:10:17,320
Speaker 1: So who do I think is going to win here?

249
00:10:17,840 --> 00:10:21,920
Speaker 1: I think the fact that Cynthia Arrivo is nominated is

250
00:10:21,960 --> 00:10:24,040
Speaker 1: more of it's an honor to be nominated, even though

251
00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:26,480
Speaker 1: she did fantastic in that because if you think about

252
00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:29,319
Speaker 1: just the performance she gave compared to everybody else, the

253
00:10:29,360 --> 00:10:32,440
Speaker 1: acting and the singing both at a ten. But I

254
00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:34,520
Speaker 1: think Wicked is going to have a hard time winning

255
00:10:34,600 --> 00:10:37,200
Speaker 1: these awards just because it was so big. It was

256
00:10:37,280 --> 00:10:40,360
Speaker 1: so big, it had commercial success. It's sometimes hard for

257
00:10:40,400 --> 00:10:41,320
Speaker 1: those movies to win.

258
00:10:41,600 --> 00:10:42,720
Speaker 2: Did Barbie win anything?

259
00:10:42,960 --> 00:10:45,600
Speaker 1: I think for music, But as far when it came

260
00:10:45,640 --> 00:10:48,360
Speaker 1: to acting, yeah, and even direct Greta Gerwick should have won.

261
00:10:48,559 --> 00:10:48,760
Speaker 2: Yeah.

262
00:10:49,160 --> 00:10:52,360
Speaker 1: But when it comes to the big, bigger awards, it

263
00:10:52,440 --> 00:10:55,120
Speaker 1: is hard for those commercially successful movies to win, which

264
00:10:55,120 --> 00:10:58,040
Speaker 1: is another flaw in the system. I don't think Mikey

265
00:10:58,080 --> 00:11:01,080
Speaker 1: Madison is going to win. I'm going with Demi because

266
00:11:01,600 --> 00:11:04,679
Speaker 1: not only is she my favorite performance out of anybody here,

267
00:11:04,960 --> 00:11:07,360
Speaker 1: I think she put the most on the line in

268
00:11:07,400 --> 00:11:11,000
Speaker 1: that character was very vulnerable. It's also very much a

269
00:11:11,040 --> 00:11:14,480
Speaker 1: reflection of her career. That's what she said, Like, the

270
00:11:14,520 --> 00:11:16,840
Speaker 1: reason she took this movie is because she felt this

271
00:11:16,920 --> 00:11:20,000
Speaker 1: way that when she reached a certain age in her career,

272
00:11:20,080 --> 00:11:21,880
Speaker 1: she thought she was done and wasn't gonna work. And

273
00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:24,360
Speaker 1: that's what the substance is all about. She has her

274
00:11:24,360 --> 00:11:26,960
Speaker 1: fiftieth birthday, she gets fired from her job, and they

275
00:11:26,960 --> 00:11:29,640
Speaker 1: want to replace her with a newer, younger person. So

276
00:11:29,920 --> 00:11:32,800
Speaker 1: I'm going with Demi or Demi Moore. I think she

277
00:11:32,920 --> 00:11:34,840
Speaker 1: is gonna win for Best Actress.

278
00:11:34,880 --> 00:11:37,640
Speaker 2: Next category, all right, we have best Actor in a

279
00:11:37,679 --> 00:11:41,400
Speaker 2: supporting role. We have Kieran Colkin a Real Pain, Edward

280
00:11:41,440 --> 00:11:47,800
Speaker 2: Norton a complete unknown guy, Pierce the Brutalist, you, Rob Borisov.

281
00:11:47,400 --> 00:11:48,319
Speaker 1: Yeah right, Sarah.

282
00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:51,040
Speaker 2: Apologies if I butcher in that. I do listen to

283
00:11:51,040 --> 00:11:53,439
Speaker 2: pronunciations before we do this, but there's some that are hard,

284
00:11:53,520 --> 00:11:55,679
Speaker 2: and I try Jeremy Strong the Apprentice.

285
00:11:55,920 --> 00:11:59,600
Speaker 1: No real surprises or snubs here. I think the fact

286
00:11:59,640 --> 00:12:03,559
Speaker 1: that A Real Pain kind of has two supporting not

287
00:12:03,600 --> 00:12:06,199
Speaker 1: really one lead roles. I wouldn't know where to put

288
00:12:06,280 --> 00:12:09,840
Speaker 1: Jesse Eisenberg. Would you have been lead? I mean, because

289
00:12:09,840 --> 00:12:11,679
Speaker 1: they had like equal parts almost, but I think he

290
00:12:11,679 --> 00:12:13,839
Speaker 1: would have been lead. Okay then, so I don't even

291
00:12:13,840 --> 00:12:16,160
Speaker 1: think he's a snub here. I'm just putting all my

292
00:12:16,320 --> 00:12:18,520
Speaker 1: chips in the A Real Pain basket on this one.

293
00:12:18,559 --> 00:12:21,040
Speaker 1: I love Kieran Colkin. I said that after watching that

294
00:12:21,120 --> 00:12:23,240
Speaker 1: movie too. In my review of that I said he'll

295
00:12:23,240 --> 00:12:25,720
Speaker 1: probably win an Oscar for it. Out of anybody on

296
00:12:25,720 --> 00:12:28,120
Speaker 1: this list. He's just the most likable too, and I

297
00:12:28,200 --> 00:12:31,800
Speaker 1: love that movie so good, probably my second favorite out

298
00:12:31,800 --> 00:12:35,240
Speaker 1: of all of these nominated movies. So I'm gonna go

299
00:12:35,240 --> 00:12:37,679
Speaker 1: with Kieran Colkin. Best Actor in a supporting role.

300
00:12:37,760 --> 00:12:42,800
Speaker 2: Next category, Zoe Saldania Amelia Perez as actress right, sorry, yes,

301
00:12:42,920 --> 00:12:46,040
Speaker 2: best actress in sporting role. Sorena Grande have two last names.

302
00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:47,400
Speaker 1: That's what caught me off guard.

303
00:12:47,920 --> 00:12:52,040
Speaker 2: I was like, who is that Ariana Grande Utera for Wicked.

304
00:12:52,160 --> 00:12:55,120
Speaker 1: I never had that name attached to her ever before.

305
00:12:55,360 --> 00:12:59,559
Speaker 2: Isabella Rossellini conclive, I like, how you put the pronunciation

306
00:12:59,600 --> 00:13:05,920
Speaker 2: for us Italian and Monica Barbaro for a complete unknown,

307
00:13:06,240 --> 00:13:08,559
Speaker 2: Felicity Jones for the Brutalist. Sorry, I should have said

308
00:13:08,559 --> 00:13:10,400
Speaker 2: an Felicity Jones. She was the last one.

309
00:13:10,520 --> 00:13:14,079
Speaker 1: This is a tough one. The surprise and snub here,

310
00:13:14,200 --> 00:13:17,160
Speaker 1: I feel is no Margaret Quayley, who was also fantastic

311
00:13:17,160 --> 00:13:19,760
Speaker 1: in the substance for the Winner. I would love to

312
00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:25,880
Speaker 1: see Ariana Grande wind Uterra Tara because I found so

313
00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:28,880
Speaker 1: much joy in her character and the way she played it,

314
00:13:28,960 --> 00:13:29,520
Speaker 1: and I want.

315
00:13:29,400 --> 00:13:31,800
Speaker 2: People to take her seriously as an actress. I feel

316
00:13:31,800 --> 00:13:35,400
Speaker 2: like this was kind of the role that people were like, oh, like,

317
00:13:35,600 --> 00:13:37,760
Speaker 2: she has some acting chops and she.

318
00:13:37,800 --> 00:13:40,600
Speaker 1: Can sing really well, and to go from being on Nickelodeon,

319
00:13:40,800 --> 00:13:43,400
Speaker 1: and I just feel like that would be a cool moment.

320
00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:47,720
Speaker 1: I also think with the Oscars not really appealing to

321
00:13:47,840 --> 00:13:52,080
Speaker 1: younger people at all, ariana Grande winning an Oscar would

322
00:13:52,120 --> 00:13:55,079
Speaker 1: maybe get some people to care who don't normally care

323
00:13:55,120 --> 00:13:56,000
Speaker 1: about these awards.

324
00:13:56,120 --> 00:13:57,520
Speaker 2: Do you think there's people that are just like, what

325
00:13:57,559 --> 00:13:58,319
Speaker 2: are the Oscars?

326
00:13:58,520 --> 00:14:00,800
Speaker 1: Yeah? Oh yeah, but I think it's gonna be He's

327
00:14:00,800 --> 00:14:01,600
Speaker 1: always al Donna.

328
00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:05,080
Speaker 2: They don't remember the great Oscar selfie of like two

329
00:14:05,120 --> 00:14:06,320
Speaker 2: thousand and something.

330
00:14:06,320 --> 00:14:08,600
Speaker 1: Yeah, twenty sixteen.

331
00:14:08,400 --> 00:14:10,640
Speaker 2: Or when like Jimmy Kimmel went into the theaters and

332
00:14:10,720 --> 00:14:13,480
Speaker 2: was like delivering pizza. Oh yeah, great Oscars moments.

333
00:14:13,600 --> 00:14:15,120
Speaker 1: I'm going with its always all Donna.

334
00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:19,920
Speaker 2: All right, Next category Director, we have Jacques Oudier for

335
00:14:20,080 --> 00:14:25,440
Speaker 2: Amelia Prez, Brady Corbett the Brutalist, Sean Baker Anorra, Edward

336
00:14:25,480 --> 00:14:30,320
Speaker 2: Berga for Conclave, James Mangold a complete Unknown, and Corley

337
00:14:30,480 --> 00:14:31,880
Speaker 2: Farge for The Substance.

338
00:14:33,080 --> 00:14:37,560
Speaker 1: Surprised that Denieville Knew was not nominated for Best Director

339
00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:41,360
Speaker 1: here for Doune. He is one of those top tier

340
00:14:41,440 --> 00:14:45,360
Speaker 1: directors that just has a filmography that kind of warrants

341
00:14:45,400 --> 00:14:47,920
Speaker 1: that that whenever he puts out a movie, he's going

342
00:14:47,960 --> 00:14:50,200
Speaker 1: to get nominated. And I know you're not always a

343
00:14:50,240 --> 00:14:52,200
Speaker 1: shoe in, but he's on that same level of a

344
00:14:52,320 --> 00:14:55,880
Speaker 1: Quentin Tarantino, of a Christopher Nolan. That they make a

345
00:14:55,880 --> 00:14:57,840
Speaker 1: movie I think is nominated. That just happens. But he

346
00:14:57,920 --> 00:15:00,680
Speaker 1: wasn't nominated for Doune two. I don't think he was

347
00:15:00,680 --> 00:15:02,960
Speaker 1: nominated for Doune one either, And I saw a lot

348
00:15:03,040 --> 00:15:06,320
Speaker 1: of people who are involved in that movie, like Josh Brolin,

349
00:15:06,440 --> 00:15:09,400
Speaker 1: say like it's a travesty that he wasn't nominated. So

350
00:15:09,480 --> 00:15:11,480
Speaker 1: I was just surprised by that. Do you have any

351
00:15:11,480 --> 00:15:12,320
Speaker 1: snubs here?

352
00:15:12,760 --> 00:15:14,360
Speaker 2: Yeah, John Cheu for Wicked.

353
00:15:14,800 --> 00:15:17,240
Speaker 1: I think people forget how hard it is to make

354
00:15:17,280 --> 00:15:19,120
Speaker 1: a movie on that scale and.

355
00:15:19,120 --> 00:15:22,680
Speaker 2: The fact that they did two parts. I saw someone

356
00:15:23,240 --> 00:15:26,480
Speaker 2: I think it was Kate Kennedy on Instagram. She said,

357
00:15:26,960 --> 00:15:28,920
Speaker 2: maybe he'll get it, like when Wicked Part two comes

358
00:15:28,920 --> 00:15:31,080
Speaker 2: out and the whole thing is complete, Like maybe they're waiting.

359
00:15:31,200 --> 00:15:33,240
Speaker 2: But I do think that's a snub because I think

360
00:15:33,280 --> 00:15:36,040
Speaker 2: to direct not only a movie, but a musical of

361
00:15:36,080 --> 00:15:39,120
Speaker 2: that caliber and where your actresses are doing everything live,

362
00:15:39,720 --> 00:15:42,560
Speaker 2: I think he totally should have been nominated, And I agree.

363
00:15:42,280 --> 00:15:44,280
Speaker 1: With you, I think that is a snub. I also

364
00:15:44,280 --> 00:15:47,760
Speaker 1: think the director for Challengers should have been nominated here,

365
00:15:47,920 --> 00:15:49,920
Speaker 1: who I think is going to win and also who

366
00:15:49,920 --> 00:15:52,600
Speaker 1: I want to win. I'm going with Cora Lee Farjov

367
00:15:52,640 --> 00:15:57,720
Speaker 1: for the substance who is representing the women directors here,

368
00:15:58,200 --> 00:16:01,720
Speaker 1: which if you look at all the people nominated, is

369
00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:04,680
Speaker 1: she the only woman? Yeah, she's the only woman nominated.

370
00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:07,840
Speaker 2: Seem men are surprised by this women or not, so

371
00:16:07,880 --> 00:16:10,360
Speaker 2: I yeah, But then it's like, is it gonna be

372
00:16:10,360 --> 00:16:12,240
Speaker 2: a Greta Gerwig? And like the woman's not gonna win.

373
00:16:12,800 --> 00:16:15,320
Speaker 1: I think she has to win here just because I

374
00:16:15,480 --> 00:16:20,480
Speaker 1: really feel like watching that movie, it was all about

375
00:16:20,520 --> 00:16:24,400
Speaker 1: her vision because if you give this script to anybody else,

376
00:16:24,960 --> 00:16:27,280
Speaker 1: I don't know that they could execute it like she did.

377
00:16:27,720 --> 00:16:30,800
Speaker 1: And that of all of the styles of film in

378
00:16:30,840 --> 00:16:34,360
Speaker 1: this category, I think it is truly the most unique

379
00:16:34,800 --> 00:16:37,960
Speaker 1: and truly the most and biggest testament to the director,

380
00:16:38,000 --> 00:16:40,920
Speaker 1: and that's what this category should be. So I think

381
00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:42,840
Speaker 1: she's gonna win. I also think she would give a

382
00:16:42,840 --> 00:16:45,920
Speaker 1: fantastic award speech, and I always think about that. I

383
00:16:45,960 --> 00:16:47,800
Speaker 1: always think, like, who'd I want to see go up

384
00:16:47,800 --> 00:16:49,880
Speaker 1: there and accept the award because that's a big part

385
00:16:49,880 --> 00:16:51,920
Speaker 1: of it me because that's always my favorite thing to

386
00:16:52,000 --> 00:16:54,760
Speaker 1: go back and listen to all the all the speeches.

387
00:16:54,800 --> 00:16:57,280
Speaker 1: So that is my pick, substance director.

388
00:16:57,720 --> 00:17:00,920
Speaker 2: All right, Next we have best cinematography. We have Maria

389
00:17:01,560 --> 00:17:06,720
Speaker 2: the Brutalist, your favorite one to say, Amelia Prez and

390
00:17:06,800 --> 00:17:07,320
Speaker 2: Done two.

391
00:17:07,840 --> 00:17:12,239
Speaker 1: Dune two is probably the easy pick here because it

392
00:17:12,320 --> 00:17:17,679
Speaker 1: is very visually interesting despite it not being as exciting

393
00:17:17,760 --> 00:17:20,760
Speaker 1: as we hoped it would be. It's pretty snoozy Dune two.

394
00:17:21,200 --> 00:17:24,160
Speaker 1: Dune one was totally snoozy. Doune two had more action,

395
00:17:24,280 --> 00:17:27,439
Speaker 1: but overall, I still feel like it was very slow paced,

396
00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:28,240
Speaker 1: but turns on.

397
00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:29,320
Speaker 2: I'm just not a Duton girl.

398
00:17:29,440 --> 00:17:32,159
Speaker 1: I'm not really either, and I'm a nerd. I should

399
00:17:32,160 --> 00:17:35,280
Speaker 1: be loving Dune. Most nerds love it. But visually, I

400
00:17:35,320 --> 00:17:38,040
Speaker 1: think is where this movie really stands apart from all

401
00:17:38,040 --> 00:17:40,200
Speaker 1: these other movies. So you would say that it would

402
00:17:40,200 --> 00:17:42,920
Speaker 1: be an easy win for Best Cinematography, but I think

403
00:17:42,960 --> 00:17:48,120
Speaker 1: it's going in because it has like these very iconic

404
00:17:48,359 --> 00:17:52,600
Speaker 1: old horror movie images that I feel were more cinematic

405
00:17:52,680 --> 00:17:56,000
Speaker 1: than anything that Done two did. That they almost look

406
00:17:56,160 --> 00:17:58,920
Speaker 1: these little paintings that they did that even though it's

407
00:17:58,920 --> 00:18:01,840
Speaker 1: a horror movie, I feel it deserves to win more

408
00:18:01,880 --> 00:18:04,560
Speaker 1: than a big sci fi movie. Even though it feels

409
00:18:04,560 --> 00:18:07,520
Speaker 1: like a smaller scale, I just feel like the cinematography

410
00:18:07,600 --> 00:18:13,239
Speaker 1: is more artistic. So I'm going with al Right, next category.

411
00:18:12,800 --> 00:18:17,320
Speaker 2: You have Best International Feature Film Flow, I'm still here

412
00:18:17,880 --> 00:18:21,000
Speaker 2: Amelia Perez, The Seed of the Sacred fig and The

413
00:18:21,000 --> 00:18:21,760
Speaker 2: Girl with the Needle.

414
00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:26,240
Speaker 1: I think it goes to Amelia Perez, and with that

415
00:18:26,359 --> 00:18:30,080
Speaker 1: movie having the most nominations, I feel like it'll at

416
00:18:30,160 --> 00:18:32,560
Speaker 1: least come away with one. If it does end up

417
00:18:32,600 --> 00:18:34,760
Speaker 1: losing here, I think it's going to show you that

418
00:18:35,040 --> 00:18:37,320
Speaker 1: just because you get a lot of nominations doesn't mean

419
00:18:37,320 --> 00:18:39,560
Speaker 1: you get a lot of wins. Last year, Killers of

420
00:18:39,600 --> 00:18:42,320
Speaker 1: the Flower Moon I think had ten nominations. It was

421
00:18:42,359 --> 00:18:44,040
Speaker 1: like the third most. It won zero.

422
00:18:44,440 --> 00:18:47,640
Speaker 2: Yeah, that was a snub. Not over that one.

423
00:18:47,760 --> 00:18:48,719
Speaker 1: That was a big snub.

424
00:18:48,800 --> 00:18:52,240
Speaker 2: Lily Gladstone deserved to win, honestly, could have been Best Picture.

425
00:18:52,680 --> 00:18:55,440
Speaker 1: But I think when you see like how many nominations

426
00:18:55,480 --> 00:18:57,240
Speaker 1: a movie gets, you think, oh, that has to be

427
00:18:57,280 --> 00:19:00,320
Speaker 1: an easy win. Sometimes you just don't win any So

428
00:19:00,440 --> 00:19:03,000
Speaker 1: I think the category the movie does have the best

429
00:19:03,119 --> 00:19:05,840
Speaker 1: chance to win here is here, So I'm going with

430
00:19:05,920 --> 00:19:06,720
Speaker 1: that as the winner.

431
00:19:07,040 --> 00:19:11,560
Speaker 2: Next up, Best Animated Feature Film, Flow Inside Out too,

432
00:19:12,119 --> 00:19:14,960
Speaker 2: The Wild Robot, Memoir of a Snail, and Wallace and

433
00:19:15,000 --> 00:19:16,760
Speaker 2: Grammat Vengeance Most Foul.

434
00:19:16,960 --> 00:19:20,720
Speaker 1: Oh, I love that movie. I like the Walles and

435
00:19:20,760 --> 00:19:21,560
Speaker 1: Grammed movies.

436
00:19:23,040 --> 00:19:24,639
Speaker 2: I'm not really big into clamation oh.

437
00:19:24,680 --> 00:19:25,679
Speaker 1: I love Claymation.

438
00:19:26,040 --> 00:19:27,040
Speaker 2: I like to Chicken Run.

439
00:19:27,440 --> 00:19:30,080
Speaker 1: I love Donn and the Nugget. I think there's just

440
00:19:30,160 --> 00:19:32,919
Speaker 1: something What is Down of the Nugget is one of

441
00:19:32,920 --> 00:19:36,280
Speaker 1: the spin off same creator interesting.

442
00:19:36,920 --> 00:19:38,080
Speaker 2: I must miss that one.

443
00:19:38,240 --> 00:19:40,560
Speaker 1: I just love the style of animation, the fact that,

444
00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:43,359
Speaker 1: I mean it's truly just taking an object moving a

445
00:19:43,359 --> 00:19:46,600
Speaker 1: little bit, taking a picture moving. It just something tangible

446
00:19:46,680 --> 00:19:48,840
Speaker 1: in film. It's just still exciting to me because I'm

447
00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:51,560
Speaker 1: a big fan of like practical effects. So the fact

448
00:19:51,560 --> 00:19:53,239
Speaker 1: that they can still make movies like this and they

449
00:19:53,280 --> 00:19:56,280
Speaker 1: get nominated for awards and they still do pretty well

450
00:19:56,280 --> 00:19:59,080
Speaker 1: on Netflix, they're still making them. Wallace and Grammat the

451
00:19:59,080 --> 00:20:02,320
Speaker 1: Franchise is a six time OSCAR nominee. That's wild So

452
00:20:03,080 --> 00:20:05,199
Speaker 1: I enjoyed it, but I don't think that one is

453
00:20:05,240 --> 00:20:08,159
Speaker 1: going to win. I am really excited that The Wild

454
00:20:08,240 --> 00:20:09,480
Speaker 1: Robot got nominated.

455
00:20:09,640 --> 00:20:10,679
Speaker 2: I loved that movie.

456
00:20:11,200 --> 00:20:13,520
Speaker 1: It is my favorite. I wanted to win again. I

457
00:20:13,520 --> 00:20:16,119
Speaker 1: think it's that commercial success, which I would love it

458
00:20:16,119 --> 00:20:18,960
Speaker 1: for Chris Sanders. I would love it for Maren Morris,

459
00:20:18,960 --> 00:20:21,080
Speaker 1: who was a part of this movie. Inside Out too,

460
00:20:21,200 --> 00:20:23,840
Speaker 1: I think is kind of the we'll give this to

461
00:20:23,960 --> 00:20:27,040
Speaker 1: you nomination. It was really good. It's the highest grossing

462
00:20:27,160 --> 00:20:28,520
Speaker 1: movie of the year last year.

463
00:20:28,760 --> 00:20:32,000
Speaker 2: Yeah, but I don't know if it was Oscar level.

464
00:20:32,200 --> 00:20:37,040
Speaker 1: Yeah. And the only sequel in the Disney Pixar franchise

465
00:20:37,080 --> 00:20:40,040
Speaker 1: that I believe deserved to win was Toy Story three.

466
00:20:40,320 --> 00:20:42,320
Speaker 1: I don't think Inside Out two is on that level.

467
00:20:42,960 --> 00:20:46,240
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go with Flow here, but I would love

468
00:20:46,240 --> 00:20:47,360
Speaker 1: for the Wild Robot to win.

469
00:20:47,440 --> 00:20:50,160
Speaker 2: I would love for that to be like surprise. Yeah,

470
00:20:50,600 --> 00:20:51,880
Speaker 2: I would love to be for you to be wrong.

471
00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:53,560
Speaker 1: I would love to be wrong on this one, dude.

472
00:20:53,640 --> 00:20:57,719
Speaker 2: Next up, Best Original Song el Mal from Amelia Prez,

473
00:20:58,160 --> 00:21:01,040
Speaker 2: The Journey from the six Triple Eight, Like a Bird

474
00:21:01,080 --> 00:21:04,840
Speaker 2: from Sing Sing, Mikamino from Amelia Perez, and Never Too

475
00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:06,880
Speaker 2: Late from Elton John Never Too Late.

476
00:21:07,440 --> 00:21:11,080
Speaker 1: I always find it wild when two things from the

477
00:21:11,119 --> 00:21:13,600
Speaker 1: same movie get nominated in the same category, because I

478
00:21:13,640 --> 00:21:14,800
Speaker 1: feel it splits the vote.

479
00:21:15,080 --> 00:21:16,680
Speaker 2: I just feel like it's kind of cheating, Like that

480
00:21:16,840 --> 00:21:17,560
Speaker 2: is kind of cheating.

481
00:21:17,600 --> 00:21:19,679
Speaker 1: They did the same thing in The Golden Globes and

482
00:21:19,680 --> 00:21:22,440
Speaker 1: that song still won, and Model still won. The me Camino.

483
00:21:22,640 --> 00:21:25,600
Speaker 1: I think that's the Selina Gomez one. Yeah, the Amot

484
00:21:25,840 --> 00:21:27,680
Speaker 1: I think that's the one that you saw a clip

485
00:21:27,720 --> 00:21:29,120
Speaker 1: up and said, this is terrible.

486
00:21:29,520 --> 00:21:30,840
Speaker 2: I don't want to talk about that clip.

487
00:21:31,200 --> 00:21:35,119
Speaker 1: But I just can't pull for those songs because I

488
00:21:35,200 --> 00:21:37,320
Speaker 1: didn't like any of the music from that movie. So

489
00:21:37,359 --> 00:21:40,080
Speaker 1: even though I think it'll probably win again here, I'm

490
00:21:40,080 --> 00:21:42,200
Speaker 1: gonna go with Like a Bird from Sing Sing because

491
00:21:42,240 --> 00:21:43,680
Speaker 1: I want to see that movie win an award.

492
00:21:43,880 --> 00:21:45,840
Speaker 2: I want that movie to have success.

493
00:21:45,840 --> 00:21:49,240
Speaker 1: And that song had like that level of power to

494
00:21:49,320 --> 00:21:51,840
Speaker 1: that movie. It added that level of power where that

495
00:21:51,960 --> 00:21:56,600
Speaker 1: movie is very you think it's gonna be a little

496
00:21:56,600 --> 00:21:59,719
Speaker 1: bit more gritty because it is like a prison movie.

497
00:22:00,040 --> 00:22:02,720
Speaker 2: I thought it was gonna be totally different.

498
00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:04,399
Speaker 1: And I thought there was gonna be a lot of

499
00:22:04,760 --> 00:22:08,199
Speaker 1: tension in it. But it's a surprisingly really warm and

500
00:22:08,320 --> 00:22:12,760
Speaker 1: soft inviting story a lot about these people in prison,

501
00:22:13,200 --> 00:22:15,160
Speaker 1: and I think that Like a Bird song is kind

502
00:22:15,160 --> 00:22:19,480
Speaker 1: of representative of that of It's also like a slower, sweeter,

503
00:22:19,640 --> 00:22:22,280
Speaker 1: tender song, but has like a slight little bit of

504
00:22:22,359 --> 00:22:24,840
Speaker 1: edge to it because it is a prison movie. So

505
00:22:25,160 --> 00:22:27,119
Speaker 1: I want that movie to win more awards again. I

506
00:22:27,160 --> 00:22:29,720
Speaker 1: would love Coleman Domingo to win. I hope they at

507
00:22:29,800 --> 00:22:32,000
Speaker 1: least get this one. I'm going with like a Bird

508
00:22:32,040 --> 00:22:33,280
Speaker 1: from Sing Sing all Right.

509
00:22:33,440 --> 00:22:38,679
Speaker 2: Next, Best Original Score Conclave, Amelia Prez, The Brutalist, The

510
00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:40,040
Speaker 2: Wild Robot, and Wicked.

511
00:22:40,440 --> 00:22:44,160
Speaker 1: I think this one is easily Conclave. Whenever I first

512
00:22:44,240 --> 00:22:46,439
Speaker 1: made my notes after watching that movie, I said it

513
00:22:46,480 --> 00:22:50,520
Speaker 1: had a fantastic score because it's so driving and it

514
00:22:50,600 --> 00:22:53,679
Speaker 1: makes it feel like a horror movie. That movie, in

515
00:22:53,680 --> 00:22:56,320
Speaker 1: no way is a horror movie, but it almost adds

516
00:22:56,320 --> 00:22:59,560
Speaker 1: like this level of tension that's like driving the entire time.

517
00:23:00,080 --> 00:23:05,199
Speaker 1: Dunt very cinematic, a lot of strings, and it just

518
00:23:05,240 --> 00:23:08,240
Speaker 1: feels chilling the entire time. And that definitely took that

519
00:23:08,359 --> 00:23:09,280
Speaker 1: movie up a level.

520
00:23:09,359 --> 00:23:11,760
Speaker 2: The addition of strings does make something feel a little

521
00:23:11,840 --> 00:23:14,440
Speaker 2: It makes it more like everywhere on my arm stands up.

522
00:23:14,600 --> 00:23:16,560
Speaker 1: And there's a lot of tension in that movie. There's

523
00:23:16,560 --> 00:23:19,719
Speaker 1: a lot of confrontation, and the score adds to that.

524
00:23:20,119 --> 00:23:23,920
Speaker 1: Wild Robot has a good score, but I think the

525
00:23:23,960 --> 00:23:26,639
Speaker 1: actual song I don't really consider the songs with lyrics

526
00:23:26,680 --> 00:23:28,840
Speaker 1: a part of the score, Like, I feel like that's

527
00:23:28,880 --> 00:23:31,680
Speaker 1: part of the soundtrack. So I feel like the score

528
00:23:31,920 --> 00:23:35,119
Speaker 1: in the Wild Robot is in a strong same thing

529
00:23:35,160 --> 00:23:38,040
Speaker 1: with Wicked, Like do you consider the songs a part

530
00:23:38,040 --> 00:23:39,720
Speaker 1: of the score. I don't. I don't feel like that's

531
00:23:39,760 --> 00:23:42,080
Speaker 1: the same thing. Like the score to me is like

532
00:23:42,119 --> 00:23:45,439
Speaker 1: the instrumentation. And I think even when they play it

533
00:23:45,440 --> 00:23:47,720
Speaker 1: in the categories the nominees, I don't think they put

534
00:23:47,760 --> 00:23:50,520
Speaker 1: anything with lyrics because that would be a Best Original Song, right.

535
00:23:50,480 --> 00:23:52,399
Speaker 2: I honestly don't know that I've ever thought about.

536
00:23:52,119 --> 00:23:54,160
Speaker 1: That because when I think a score, I just think

537
00:23:54,200 --> 00:23:59,600
Speaker 1: instrumental music, and there is obviously a score behind everything

538
00:23:59,600 --> 00:24:01,920
Speaker 1: in Wick, but I don't feel like that's as prevalent

539
00:24:02,000 --> 00:24:04,160
Speaker 1: as the actual song. So I feel like in this

540
00:24:04,200 --> 00:24:07,640
Speaker 1: category I would be voting for the songs, but when

541
00:24:07,680 --> 00:24:11,400
Speaker 1: I really didn't think the score itself was that impactful. Yeah,

542
00:24:11,520 --> 00:24:15,080
Speaker 1: so I'm going easily with Conclave and we only have

543
00:24:15,119 --> 00:24:16,760
Speaker 1: a few categories left. What do we got?

544
00:24:16,920 --> 00:24:18,879
Speaker 2: But we gotta talk about the snub for the score.

545
00:24:19,240 --> 00:24:22,560
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, no, challengers, it won the Golden Globe.

546
00:24:22,680 --> 00:24:28,040
Speaker 2: I mean that score alone, that one song, Like, yeah.

547
00:24:27,880 --> 00:24:30,399
Speaker 1: You talk about adding tension to a scene.

548
00:24:30,119 --> 00:24:32,160
Speaker 2: Surprise snub both I bet.

549
00:24:31,960 --> 00:24:35,000
Speaker 1: Trent Reznor is rolling around and his millions of dollars, Like, ah,

550
00:24:35,040 --> 00:24:36,880
Speaker 1: I didn't get the Oscar nomination.

551
00:24:37,280 --> 00:24:40,199
Speaker 2: All right. Next we have best makeup and hairstyling the

552
00:24:40,240 --> 00:24:47,080
Speaker 2: substance Wicked Amelia Perez a different man and.

553
00:24:46,000 --> 00:24:50,080
Speaker 1: Did have some a lot of crazy makeup and hairstyling.

554
00:24:49,560 --> 00:24:50,200
Speaker 2: A different man.

555
00:24:50,400 --> 00:24:53,600
Speaker 1: Yeah, different mandang. They all have some pretty hardcore makeup

556
00:24:53,680 --> 00:24:57,320
Speaker 1: and hairstyling. And then you think about Wicked Cynthia Reo

557
00:24:57,440 --> 00:24:59,560
Speaker 1: having to be green for so long.

558
00:24:59,600 --> 00:25:02,080
Speaker 2: And like she would have to there's days where like

559
00:25:02,160 --> 00:25:04,240
Speaker 2: just her face would be green, her whole body just

560
00:25:04,240 --> 00:25:05,280
Speaker 2: to face in her hands.

561
00:25:06,960 --> 00:25:11,320
Speaker 1: Yeah, you do you account for how many hours the

562
00:25:11,440 --> 00:25:15,479
Speaker 1: person had to be in hair and makeup. Oh, that's

563
00:25:15,520 --> 00:25:17,280
Speaker 1: a tough one. Also the fact that they were able

564
00:25:17,320 --> 00:25:19,240
Speaker 1: to do all the same things basically all the same

565
00:25:19,240 --> 00:25:21,679
Speaker 1: things they did from the Wizard of Oz, but nobody

566
00:25:21,720 --> 00:25:24,760
Speaker 1: got sick or hurt, yeah, or health issues from the

567
00:25:24,800 --> 00:25:28,320
Speaker 1: makeup and hair. I'm going with the substance just because

568
00:25:28,480 --> 00:25:33,120
Speaker 1: Demi Moore takes on a crazy transformation in that the

569
00:25:33,280 --> 00:25:37,720
Speaker 1: entire third act of hair and makeup is wild. Also,

570
00:25:37,840 --> 00:25:41,360
Speaker 1: how much they transformed Margaret Quayley in that movie. Even

571
00:25:41,440 --> 00:25:44,080
Speaker 1: she talked about the prosthetics they used on her.

572
00:25:44,280 --> 00:25:46,159
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, she talked about in her chest.

573
00:25:46,560 --> 00:25:49,720
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think that is wild. I'm going to go

574
00:25:49,760 --> 00:25:51,080
Speaker 1: with the substance.

575
00:25:50,800 --> 00:25:55,400
Speaker 2: All right, best costume design kick us off. I also

576
00:25:55,440 --> 00:25:57,120
Speaker 2: just want people to be as annoyed as I've been

577
00:25:57,200 --> 00:26:00,840
Speaker 2: for the past month listening to you say that Wicked

578
00:26:01,040 --> 00:26:04,000
Speaker 2: Gladiator too a complete unknown in conclave.

579
00:26:03,760 --> 00:26:05,920
Speaker 1: I'm gonna give this one of the Wicked.

580
00:26:05,600 --> 00:26:06,600
Speaker 2: Cast, I think so.

581
00:26:06,840 --> 00:26:12,679
Speaker 1: I think those costumes were the most extravagant. No, Swaratu

582
00:26:12,760 --> 00:26:16,399
Speaker 1: also had some Like anytime you do a period piece,

583
00:26:16,960 --> 00:26:19,240
Speaker 1: a lot goes into that wardrobe. Sometimes when I think

584
00:26:19,320 --> 00:26:22,400
Speaker 1: best costume design, I always think anything old is gonna win,

585
00:26:22,600 --> 00:26:25,280
Speaker 1: just because it feels like they had to make every

586
00:26:25,359 --> 00:26:28,480
Speaker 1: single piece of clothing, because you're not gonna go out

587
00:26:28,520 --> 00:26:32,040
Speaker 1: and find those you have the tailor everything. Gladiator two

588
00:26:33,160 --> 00:26:35,240
Speaker 1: not really anything crazy going on there.

589
00:26:35,480 --> 00:26:37,720
Speaker 2: The shock for me is a complete unknown. I'm sorry.

590
00:26:37,880 --> 00:26:40,480
Speaker 2: Go to every vintage store in New York and you

591
00:26:40,680 --> 00:26:42,760
Speaker 2: just found Bob Dylan's wardrobe.

592
00:26:42,920 --> 00:26:45,880
Speaker 1: Bob Dylan doesn't really wear any extravagant like on stage

593
00:26:45,880 --> 00:26:48,359
Speaker 1: things like you would for like Elton John or the

594
00:26:48,400 --> 00:26:51,160
Speaker 1: Bohemian Rhap City movie. Yeah, yeah, that did Wild Why

595
00:26:51,320 --> 00:26:54,480
Speaker 1: did that sneak in there? And then Conclave, I mean, yeah,

596
00:26:54,680 --> 00:26:57,320
Speaker 1: it's it's an interesting costume, but I don't feel like

597
00:26:57,359 --> 00:27:00,639
Speaker 1: that's worthy of an Oscar. So I'm go Wicked. I

598
00:27:00,720 --> 00:27:01,840
Speaker 1: want Wicked to win here.

599
00:27:01,840 --> 00:27:05,800
Speaker 2: Yeah, all right? Best Visual Effects doing part two Kingdom

600
00:27:05,840 --> 00:27:09,400
Speaker 2: of the Planet of the Apes, Alien Romulus, Better Man

601
00:27:09,440 --> 00:27:09,960
Speaker 2: and Wicked.

602
00:27:10,440 --> 00:27:13,720
Speaker 1: This is where dude gets it. They get the Visual

603
00:27:13,720 --> 00:27:16,960
Speaker 1: Effects Award. We're doing part two next up. You're like,

604
00:27:17,560 --> 00:27:20,160
Speaker 1: like ether Win, I would have wanted and Your Mind

605
00:27:20,320 --> 00:27:22,639
Speaker 1: Dead pull Wolverine. And there was some sus CD I

606
00:27:22,680 --> 00:27:23,600
Speaker 1: in that there.

607
00:27:23,520 --> 00:27:29,600
Speaker 2: Was I all right. Best Adapted Screenplay a complete Unknown,

608
00:27:30,040 --> 00:27:33,840
Speaker 2: Conclave Amelia Perez Nickel Boys, and Sing Sing.

609
00:27:34,160 --> 00:27:36,520
Speaker 1: This is essentially they take like a book or a

610
00:27:36,560 --> 00:27:38,359
Speaker 1: story and turn it into a movie. I'm going with

611
00:27:38,400 --> 00:27:39,520
Speaker 1: Sing Sing Yeah.

612
00:27:39,760 --> 00:27:42,680
Speaker 2: I'm also kind of surprised Wicked wasn't though, Oh yeah,

613
00:27:42,680 --> 00:27:44,639
Speaker 2: because it is a book. But I mean I want

614
00:27:45,160 --> 00:27:45,840
Speaker 2: Sing Sing to win.

615
00:27:45,920 --> 00:27:47,800
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm going with Sing Sing here, all right.

616
00:27:47,840 --> 00:27:51,679
Speaker 2: And then final one is Best Original Screenplay anor the

617
00:27:51,720 --> 00:27:55,959
Speaker 2: Brutal Brutalist, a real pain. September five is September five,

618
00:27:56,080 --> 00:27:58,040
Speaker 2: September five, okay, and the substance.

619
00:27:58,720 --> 00:28:01,320
Speaker 1: I think this is where Jesse Eisenberg gets his Oscar.

620
00:28:01,520 --> 00:28:03,560
Speaker 1: I want to see him go once the agent accept this.

621
00:28:03,800 --> 00:28:06,840
Speaker 1: I think he wrote the best original screenplay, just straight up.

622
00:28:07,080 --> 00:28:07,520
Speaker 2: Yeah.

623
00:28:07,600 --> 00:28:10,960
Speaker 1: That entire movie is all based on the screenplay, Like

624
00:28:11,000 --> 00:28:14,280
Speaker 1: the writing in that the dialogue, all of the layers

625
00:28:14,320 --> 00:28:16,480
Speaker 1: of that story is all on the page, and you

626
00:28:16,520 --> 00:28:18,760
Speaker 1: can feel it while watching that movie. It's also the

627
00:28:18,800 --> 00:28:21,760
Speaker 1: execution of them as actors and him directing. But I

628
00:28:21,840 --> 00:28:24,280
Speaker 1: think the true heart of that movie is the screenplay.

629
00:28:24,680 --> 00:28:27,840
Speaker 1: So I'm going with a real pain to recap here

630
00:28:27,920 --> 00:28:31,560
Speaker 1: most nominations. Amelia Perez has thirteen, Wicked has ten, The

631
00:28:31,600 --> 00:28:35,439
Speaker 1: Brutalist has ten as well. Complete Unknown has eight. I

632
00:28:35,480 --> 00:28:38,800
Speaker 1: feel like they're gonna come home the most empty handed.

633
00:28:39,040 --> 00:28:41,560
Speaker 1: I feel like it was kind of Oscar bait Timothy

634
00:28:41,640 --> 00:28:45,560
Speaker 1: Chalomay's performance in that it just felt very Oscar baby

635
00:28:45,640 --> 00:28:48,280
Speaker 1: to me. Even the time it came out. That was

636
00:28:48,440 --> 00:28:51,160
Speaker 1: them saying we want this movie to be considered. I

637
00:28:51,240 --> 00:28:53,560
Speaker 1: enjoyed it, but I don't think it's at the level

638
00:28:53,600 --> 00:28:57,600
Speaker 1: of winning. An Oscar Conclave has eight. Ho Nora has six.

639
00:28:57,880 --> 00:28:59,800
Speaker 1: I don't think of Noora is gonna win a whole lot.

640
00:29:00,480 --> 00:29:04,280
Speaker 1: Doune Part two has five. The Substance has five, not

641
00:29:04,400 --> 00:29:06,000
Speaker 1: as many as some of the top ones, but I

642
00:29:06,040 --> 00:29:08,120
Speaker 1: think if it can win the big ones, that's all

643
00:29:08,200 --> 00:29:11,600
Speaker 1: that matters. Has four.

644
00:29:12,400 --> 00:29:15,760
Speaker 2: So overall, everyone's got time to make their scorecards.

645
00:29:15,880 --> 00:29:19,360
Speaker 1: Yeah, see what you want to win. We'll look back

646
00:29:19,400 --> 00:29:21,200
Speaker 1: and see what I got right, what I got wrong.

647
00:29:21,320 --> 00:29:23,120
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I don't agree with all of these, which

648
00:29:23,200 --> 00:29:25,320
Speaker 2: didn't have time to go through my opinions. This isn't

649
00:29:25,320 --> 00:29:26,320
Speaker 2: the Kelsey Podcast.

650
00:29:26,480 --> 00:29:27,760
Speaker 1: What do you have for Best Picture?

651
00:29:28,680 --> 00:29:30,560
Speaker 2: I mean, I almost kind of feel like the Brutalists

652
00:29:30,640 --> 00:29:32,720
Speaker 2: might take it, but I could see the Substance winning.

653
00:29:32,960 --> 00:29:34,600
Speaker 2: I mean, I'm just kind of going for what I want.

654
00:29:34,840 --> 00:29:37,720
Speaker 2: Like I'd love Coleman Domingo to win. Best Actor, I

655
00:29:37,760 --> 00:29:40,720
Speaker 2: would love I would love Demeanmoor, but I would also

656
00:29:40,800 --> 00:29:44,400
Speaker 2: love Cynthia Reville. That's a hard one. Best Actor. I

657
00:29:44,520 --> 00:29:48,880
Speaker 2: agree with you, Kieren Colkin Best Actress. I'm gonna go

658
00:29:48,920 --> 00:29:53,520
Speaker 2: Ariana Grande debut Tara Best Director. I do think I

659
00:29:53,640 --> 00:29:56,920
Speaker 2: agree with you. Brady Corbett one the Golden Globe, though

660
00:29:57,320 --> 00:29:58,920
Speaker 2: I think those are the only ones that I really

661
00:29:59,320 --> 00:30:02,320
Speaker 2: disagreed with, and it's more like wishful thinking.

662
00:30:02,720 --> 00:30:06,320
Speaker 1: All right, well, those are the nominees again. Oscars are

663
00:30:06,360 --> 00:30:09,280
Speaker 1: going down on Sunday, March second, unless they delay.

664
00:30:09,040 --> 00:30:10,080
Speaker 2: It cleary calendars.

665
00:30:10,400 --> 00:30:12,760
Speaker 1: I will be there. I'll wear my tex You will

666
00:30:12,800 --> 00:30:14,600
Speaker 1: not be there, oh man, I'll be there on my

667
00:30:14,760 --> 00:30:18,640
Speaker 1: couch watching it with my tuxedo hoodie.

668
00:30:18,800 --> 00:30:19,960
Speaker 2: We gotta hear it about, honey.

669
00:30:20,160 --> 00:30:22,120
Speaker 1: I know it's a tradition. I wear it every single year.

670
00:30:22,680 --> 00:30:23,320
Speaker 2: Better days.

671
00:30:24,640 --> 00:30:27,160
Speaker 1: We'll come back and I'll give my thoughts on the Brutalists,

672
00:30:27,160 --> 00:30:28,160
Speaker 1: which we've been talking about here.

673
00:30:28,400 --> 00:30:29,360
Speaker 2: We've talked about it a lot.

674
00:30:33,120 --> 00:30:35,560
Speaker 1: Let's get into it now. A spoiler free movie review

675
00:30:35,640 --> 00:30:39,600
Speaker 1: of The Brutalist Nominated for Best Picture, Adrian and Brody

676
00:30:39,800 --> 00:30:43,360
Speaker 1: is up for Best Actor. The director, Brady Corbet is

677
00:30:43,440 --> 00:30:46,280
Speaker 1: up for Best Director. The question I think most people

678
00:30:46,360 --> 00:30:48,760
Speaker 1: want to know is this movie worth three and a

679
00:30:48,800 --> 00:30:51,840
Speaker 1: half hours. It's a long one. I think up to

680
00:30:52,000 --> 00:30:55,400
Speaker 1: date it is the longest movie I've ever seen in theaters.

681
00:30:55,720 --> 00:30:58,280
Speaker 1: I don't mind a three hour movie if a director

682
00:30:58,880 --> 00:31:01,720
Speaker 1: and a story is big enough and warrants that runtime,

683
00:31:01,760 --> 00:31:03,280
Speaker 1: and I'm able to go and enjoy it and not

684
00:31:03,360 --> 00:31:05,880
Speaker 1: even think about it. I am all for it. I'll

685
00:31:05,960 --> 00:31:09,240
Speaker 1: kill an afternoon enjoying a great movie if it's truly

686
00:31:10,160 --> 00:31:12,280
Speaker 1: a story that required it. And I think that is

687
00:31:12,320 --> 00:31:14,280
Speaker 1: a big question. Once you get to that three hour mark.

688
00:31:14,840 --> 00:31:16,800
Speaker 1: You have to have a reason to keep people there

689
00:31:16,880 --> 00:31:20,080
Speaker 1: that long. When it comes to the brutalist, I actually

690
00:31:20,160 --> 00:31:23,000
Speaker 1: think it was worth that three and a half hour runtime.

691
00:31:23,520 --> 00:31:27,400
Speaker 1: I found myself at the end saying I want a

692
00:31:27,440 --> 00:31:30,520
Speaker 1: little bit more. I don't know exactly why I want more,

693
00:31:31,280 --> 00:31:35,200
Speaker 1: but the way the story unfolded, I found myself fully

694
00:31:35,360 --> 00:31:37,760
Speaker 1: enjoying it. I'll get into how I felt about the

695
00:31:37,840 --> 00:31:40,800
Speaker 1: intermission because I've never seen a movie this long. I've

696
00:31:40,920 --> 00:31:43,000
Speaker 1: never even seen a movie with an intermission like this.

697
00:31:43,160 --> 00:31:46,080
Speaker 1: But what the movie is about. You have Adrian Brody

698
00:31:46,160 --> 00:31:49,120
Speaker 1: who is a Holocaust survivor. Even though they don't really

699
00:31:49,200 --> 00:31:53,040
Speaker 1: get into that a whole lot, it's almost just implied.

700
00:31:53,440 --> 00:31:56,760
Speaker 1: Unless I missed it, there wasn't an explicit part where

701
00:31:56,800 --> 00:32:01,200
Speaker 1: he talked about being a Holocaust survivor, but the movie

702
00:32:01,280 --> 00:32:05,240
Speaker 1: takes place shortly after the Holocaust. His character is named Loslow.

703
00:32:05,400 --> 00:32:10,239
Speaker 1: He is this really smart, brilliant architect, smart brilliant kind

704
00:32:10,280 --> 00:32:12,720
Speaker 1: of the same thing, but he has to escape his

705
00:32:12,880 --> 00:32:16,440
Speaker 1: home country, moved to the United States, moves to Philadelphia

706
00:32:16,520 --> 00:32:18,520
Speaker 1: to go work for his cousin in a furniture store,

707
00:32:19,320 --> 00:32:22,760
Speaker 1: and he is an immigrant trying to restart his life

708
00:32:22,840 --> 00:32:26,400
Speaker 1: in a country that doesn't really want him. So he

709
00:32:26,520 --> 00:32:29,720
Speaker 1: is having to start all over, which I thought was

710
00:32:29,960 --> 00:32:32,800
Speaker 1: an entirely different immigrant story that I'm kind of used

711
00:32:32,840 --> 00:32:34,960
Speaker 1: to you. I have parents who are both from Mexico.

712
00:32:35,640 --> 00:32:39,240
Speaker 1: They came from nothing, so when they got here without anything,

713
00:32:39,480 --> 00:32:42,920
Speaker 1: it wasn't as big of a culture shock for them

714
00:32:43,000 --> 00:32:46,000
Speaker 1: because coming to the United States for them was their

715
00:32:46,040 --> 00:32:50,480
Speaker 1: ticket to a better life. They went being able to

716
00:32:50,560 --> 00:32:53,080
Speaker 1: work in fields in Mexico and not make anything, and

717
00:32:53,200 --> 00:32:56,480
Speaker 1: here the American dream, they could put in that same effort,

718
00:32:56,520 --> 00:32:58,960
Speaker 1: put in that same work, and now they could start

719
00:32:59,040 --> 00:33:01,880
Speaker 1: building towards something. When it comes to Adrian Brodie's character.

720
00:33:02,040 --> 00:33:05,560
Speaker 1: In his country, he was this really renowned architect who

721
00:33:05,720 --> 00:33:10,880
Speaker 1: was celebrated for his work, created these amazing structures that

722
00:33:11,000 --> 00:33:13,840
Speaker 1: were modern ahead of its time. But suddenly he gets

723
00:33:13,880 --> 00:33:16,560
Speaker 1: to the United States and he has to start all over.

724
00:33:16,720 --> 00:33:20,520
Speaker 1: He is living in a shelter, he is trying just

725
00:33:20,680 --> 00:33:24,400
Speaker 1: to make enough money for food, has no place to stay.

726
00:33:24,840 --> 00:33:29,200
Speaker 1: He also struggles with addiction, which was an underlying theme

727
00:33:29,360 --> 00:33:31,120
Speaker 1: of the entire movie. I thought that was kind of

728
00:33:31,160 --> 00:33:32,960
Speaker 1: going to be the focus of it, of him trying

729
00:33:33,000 --> 00:33:36,960
Speaker 1: to be an architect but dealing with drug issues. That

730
00:33:37,200 --> 00:33:40,480
Speaker 1: was kind of the thing about this movie is there's

731
00:33:40,600 --> 00:33:44,560
Speaker 1: not this one big exposition. Even after the movie, when

732
00:33:44,600 --> 00:33:48,280
Speaker 1: I did feel I wanted more, I found myself wondering why.

733
00:33:48,400 --> 00:33:51,040
Speaker 1: I found myself saying what exactly was the purpose of

734
00:33:51,080 --> 00:33:54,000
Speaker 1: this movie? What exactly were they trying to say? And

735
00:33:54,080 --> 00:33:57,760
Speaker 1: I've been spending some time now after watching it, going

736
00:33:57,920 --> 00:34:01,440
Speaker 1: back and putting the pieces together. So I will say

737
00:34:01,480 --> 00:34:03,280
Speaker 1: I think this will be a hard movie for me

738
00:34:03,400 --> 00:34:05,760
Speaker 1: to recommend to people one because of that runtime, even

739
00:34:05,800 --> 00:34:08,800
Speaker 1: though I feel it does warrant it. There's nothing crazy

740
00:34:08,960 --> 00:34:12,800
Speaker 1: that happens that you're following the entire time, like this

741
00:34:13,000 --> 00:34:14,719
Speaker 1: happens to him, and then he has to do this,

742
00:34:14,840 --> 00:34:16,400
Speaker 1: and then he has to do this, And there's not

743
00:34:16,480 --> 00:34:19,560
Speaker 1: a whole lot of crazy action. It is a very

744
00:34:20,239 --> 00:34:24,080
Speaker 1: large scale drama that unfolds very subtly, and it's a

745
00:34:24,760 --> 00:34:28,200
Speaker 1: really big, deep dive into this character learning all of

746
00:34:28,280 --> 00:34:30,560
Speaker 1: his flaws and all the things that make him great,

747
00:34:31,239 --> 00:34:35,520
Speaker 1: the reasons why he has tortured, the overall perils and

748
00:34:35,719 --> 00:34:39,680
Speaker 1: dark side of chasing that American dream and coming to

749
00:34:39,800 --> 00:34:44,120
Speaker 1: this country and realizing you can't trust everybody, which I

750
00:34:44,120 --> 00:34:47,959
Speaker 1: think is something I learned from my parents. Sometimes people

751
00:34:48,000 --> 00:34:51,000
Speaker 1: would take advantage of them. They would either go try

752
00:34:51,080 --> 00:34:52,960
Speaker 1: to find a job, or somebody would say, hey, come

753
00:34:53,000 --> 00:34:54,480
Speaker 1: work for me. They're working for him, and then they

754
00:34:54,600 --> 00:34:57,080
Speaker 1: screw them. So there's a hard thing for people who

755
00:34:57,160 --> 00:35:00,239
Speaker 1: come here of just knowing who to trust. How was

756
00:35:00,280 --> 00:35:02,280
Speaker 1: the other part of this story is you find yourself

757
00:35:02,360 --> 00:35:06,040
Speaker 1: thinking did this actually happen? Was this actually a real person?

758
00:35:06,160 --> 00:35:09,120
Speaker 1: And it's actually not. It's a fictional story, not based

759
00:35:09,200 --> 00:35:13,239
Speaker 1: on a real person. Although some historical events obviously like

760
00:35:13,320 --> 00:35:16,800
Speaker 1: the Holocaust and other elements of this story actually did happen.

761
00:35:17,120 --> 00:35:19,920
Speaker 1: I found myself even wondering what does the title mean

762
00:35:20,000 --> 00:35:23,719
Speaker 1: when it's the Brutalist. When I heard that title, I

763
00:35:23,880 --> 00:35:27,279
Speaker 1: thought it meant he was going to face I don't know,

764
00:35:27,320 --> 00:35:31,200
Speaker 1: maybe get beaten up or maybe something hardcore. The brutalist

765
00:35:31,520 --> 00:35:36,319
Speaker 1: is actually a reference to an architecture style called brutalism,

766
00:35:36,760 --> 00:35:38,600
Speaker 1: which is something that he was known for. It is

767
00:35:38,680 --> 00:35:40,799
Speaker 1: a French phrase. I'm going to butcher this, but it's

768
00:35:40,840 --> 00:35:45,359
Speaker 1: called bitone brute, which means raw concrete. He was all

769
00:35:45,480 --> 00:35:50,000
Speaker 1: about the raw concrete. I actually think the design looks fantastic.

770
00:35:50,440 --> 00:35:52,680
Speaker 1: At that time in the forties and fifties, I have

771
00:35:52,880 --> 00:35:55,880
Speaker 1: to imagine it looked way ahead of its time. I

772
00:35:55,960 --> 00:35:58,960
Speaker 1: feel even now it still looks pretty modern. And this

773
00:35:59,200 --> 00:36:03,120
Speaker 1: entire movie is him just trying to build something. So

774
00:36:03,239 --> 00:36:05,480
Speaker 1: that's why I say it's a hard movie to recommend

775
00:36:05,640 --> 00:36:09,440
Speaker 1: because I don't even think it's a slow burn, because

776
00:36:09,520 --> 00:36:13,160
Speaker 1: sometimes a slow burn indicates that eventually it ramps up

777
00:36:13,200 --> 00:36:16,520
Speaker 1: to a lot of action. It is just about the

778
00:36:16,719 --> 00:36:19,520
Speaker 1: journey of this movie. They even make a reference in

779
00:36:19,600 --> 00:36:22,160
Speaker 1: a quote in this movie that I love that sometimes

780
00:36:22,600 --> 00:36:25,080
Speaker 1: it's not about the journey, it is about the destination,

781
00:36:26,200 --> 00:36:29,560
Speaker 1: which I feel is almost the reverse of explaining this movie,

782
00:36:29,680 --> 00:36:32,440
Speaker 1: because it is kind of that journey that you go

783
00:36:32,800 --> 00:36:35,840
Speaker 1: through with this character, and it's not so much about

784
00:36:35,960 --> 00:36:39,040
Speaker 1: where you find yourself at the end. I don't even

785
00:36:39,080 --> 00:36:40,960
Speaker 1: think that is fully important, and I think to some

786
00:36:41,080 --> 00:36:43,279
Speaker 1: people that may kind of piss you off, and you

787
00:36:43,400 --> 00:36:45,479
Speaker 1: get to the end and think, what did I watch,

788
00:36:45,640 --> 00:36:51,360
Speaker 1: but I found myself enjoying the director's ability to really

789
00:36:51,480 --> 00:36:55,720
Speaker 1: flesh out and understand all the inner workings of this character.

790
00:36:56,520 --> 00:36:58,920
Speaker 1: And I think that is what makes this movie compelling,

791
00:36:59,400 --> 00:37:02,840
Speaker 1: that I felt like I was there with him, and

792
00:37:02,920 --> 00:37:06,759
Speaker 1: there are some movies you watch where they don't feel

793
00:37:06,880 --> 00:37:09,320
Speaker 1: like movies at all. I felt like I was in

794
00:37:09,440 --> 00:37:11,880
Speaker 1: this world like I was in the nineteen forties. In

795
00:37:11,920 --> 00:37:14,200
Speaker 1: the nineteen fifties. Maybe it has to do with the

796
00:37:14,280 --> 00:37:17,240
Speaker 1: way this movie was filmed, the cinematography, some of the shots.

797
00:37:17,920 --> 00:37:21,720
Speaker 1: It felt very intimate. There were moments where I felt

798
00:37:21,760 --> 00:37:24,040
Speaker 1: like I shouldn't be there watching it, and I think

799
00:37:24,200 --> 00:37:27,759
Speaker 1: with that type of storytelling, that is really what made

800
00:37:27,800 --> 00:37:30,479
Speaker 1: it feel like it was worthy of that three plus

801
00:37:30,560 --> 00:37:33,720
Speaker 1: hour runtime because you kind of just let it steep

802
00:37:33,800 --> 00:37:38,360
Speaker 1: in and enjoy it. The dialogue is really important throughout

803
00:37:38,400 --> 00:37:40,000
Speaker 1: this entire movie, so it is when you have to

804
00:37:40,080 --> 00:37:44,000
Speaker 1: pay attention to because if you miss something, then you

805
00:37:44,160 --> 00:37:46,440
Speaker 1: might miss a pretty big plot point. And I think

806
00:37:46,640 --> 00:37:48,400
Speaker 1: that is why I really enjoyed the fact that this

807
00:37:48,480 --> 00:37:52,440
Speaker 1: movie had a fifteen minute intermission, which I hadn't experienced before.

808
00:37:52,600 --> 00:37:54,520
Speaker 1: I had a little bit of hesitation going into it

809
00:37:54,560 --> 00:37:57,960
Speaker 1: because the movie is listed at three hours and thirty

810
00:37:58,000 --> 00:37:59,760
Speaker 1: five minutes. I thought it was gonna be a fifteen

811
00:37:59,760 --> 00:38:03,640
Speaker 1: minut intermission. On top of that, I'm like, that's almost

812
00:38:03,760 --> 00:38:06,880
Speaker 1: four hours right there, not including the ten to fifteen

813
00:38:06,920 --> 00:38:09,759
Speaker 1: minutes of previews. How it actually broke down is the

814
00:38:09,880 --> 00:38:14,200
Speaker 1: intermission hit around an hour and forty minutes. There's a

815
00:38:14,239 --> 00:38:17,959
Speaker 1: fifteen minute intermission, came back for another hour and twenty

816
00:38:18,040 --> 00:38:20,600
Speaker 1: eight minutes, and then after that there is a six

817
00:38:20,680 --> 00:38:23,640
Speaker 1: minute epilogue, which is really quick. I thought that was

818
00:38:23,719 --> 00:38:26,280
Speaker 1: going to be longer. So you get about three hours

819
00:38:26,320 --> 00:38:29,600
Speaker 1: and fourteen minutes of film fifteen minute intermission, so you're

820
00:38:29,640 --> 00:38:32,360
Speaker 1: there for a total about three hours and thirty minutes

821
00:38:32,440 --> 00:38:34,759
Speaker 1: unless you stay around for credits. And I really feel

822
00:38:34,840 --> 00:38:38,800
Speaker 1: like having that fifteen minute intermission really made it easier

823
00:38:38,880 --> 00:38:41,920
Speaker 1: to take in because I've gone through these long movies before,

824
00:38:42,200 --> 00:38:44,080
Speaker 1: and it was the ability to get up, go to

825
00:38:44,200 --> 00:38:46,920
Speaker 1: the lobby, grab a drink. We saw it at the

826
00:38:47,080 --> 00:38:49,360
Speaker 1: Bell Court. I got me a lemon lacroix, went to

827
00:38:49,440 --> 00:38:52,040
Speaker 1: the bathroom and came back and I had about four

828
00:38:52,120 --> 00:38:54,040
Speaker 1: minutes left until the movie started again, So it was

829
00:38:54,160 --> 00:38:56,920
Speaker 1: kind of a good reset, I thought, I wasn't going

830
00:38:57,000 --> 00:38:59,600
Speaker 1: to enjoy that because I don't really like to stop

831
00:38:59,640 --> 00:39:02,239
Speaker 1: them on mentum once I'm at a movie and I'm

832
00:39:02,280 --> 00:39:05,319
Speaker 1: fully in the story. But I think, given that there

833
00:39:05,440 --> 00:39:08,920
Speaker 1: wasn't anything high paced or crazy amount of action in

834
00:39:09,000 --> 00:39:12,600
Speaker 1: this movie, that I like the break to be able

835
00:39:12,640 --> 00:39:15,000
Speaker 1: to reset my brain, go do what I need to do,

836
00:39:15,200 --> 00:39:17,279
Speaker 1: walk around a little bit if I need to come

837
00:39:17,360 --> 00:39:19,960
Speaker 1: back and sit for the rest of the movie. I

838
00:39:20,080 --> 00:39:22,680
Speaker 1: actually found myself enjoying it. I would not be opposed

839
00:39:22,719 --> 00:39:25,560
Speaker 1: to going to see another movie with a fifteen minute intermission.

840
00:39:25,960 --> 00:39:29,839
Speaker 1: I think the other thing that has caused some controversy

841
00:39:29,920 --> 00:39:32,839
Speaker 1: with this movie, aside from the runtime, which I love,

842
00:39:32,920 --> 00:39:36,640
Speaker 1: the director defending that he was saying that theaters weren't

843
00:39:36,640 --> 00:39:38,239
Speaker 1: going to want to run it, But look at him

844
00:39:38,280 --> 00:39:40,960
Speaker 1: now with all these nominations, so I do credit him

845
00:39:40,960 --> 00:39:43,560
Speaker 1: for that. But I think some of the controversy has

846
00:39:43,680 --> 00:39:46,920
Speaker 1: come from the fact that it came out that they

847
00:39:47,040 --> 00:39:51,840
Speaker 1: use some AI to enhance Adrian Brody and Felicity Jones's

848
00:39:51,920 --> 00:39:56,000
Speaker 1: Hungarian accent. And I think when people read that headline

849
00:39:56,000 --> 00:39:59,160
Speaker 1: and hear that, you think that they used it the

850
00:39:59,360 --> 00:40:01,640
Speaker 1: entire time, and that they use it in a way.

851
00:40:01,760 --> 00:40:04,400
Speaker 1: That kind of diminishes the art because a lot of acting,

852
00:40:04,760 --> 00:40:07,920
Speaker 1: especially when you get a Best Actor nomination, is in

853
00:40:08,040 --> 00:40:11,160
Speaker 1: that performance. Can you do the accent? Can you portray

854
00:40:11,280 --> 00:40:14,520
Speaker 1: to the audience that you spend enough time understanding this

855
00:40:14,680 --> 00:40:18,120
Speaker 1: character in order to portray them on the big screen.

856
00:40:18,520 --> 00:40:21,719
Speaker 1: What they actually used was the AI voice cloning tool,

857
00:40:22,080 --> 00:40:25,160
Speaker 1: and they didn't use it the entire time. Instead, they

858
00:40:25,280 --> 00:40:27,799
Speaker 1: used it to tweak words here and there, because they

859
00:40:27,800 --> 00:40:30,560
Speaker 1: said it was a really difficult accent to do and

860
00:40:30,680 --> 00:40:32,920
Speaker 1: there were certain words they just wanted to fix. I

861
00:40:33,040 --> 00:40:34,760
Speaker 1: heard it at first, and I even had that reaction

862
00:40:34,880 --> 00:40:36,520
Speaker 1: like if you use AI like that kind of takes

863
00:40:36,560 --> 00:40:39,320
Speaker 1: away from the performance. But it sounds like they just

864
00:40:39,520 --> 00:40:42,120
Speaker 1: used it to tweak things here and there wasn't the

865
00:40:42,320 --> 00:40:45,000
Speaker 1: entire time. I actually think you so that is fine.

866
00:40:45,280 --> 00:40:48,640
Speaker 1: I've used something like that before. I've taken interviews sometimes

867
00:40:48,719 --> 00:40:52,160
Speaker 1: where you can't hear maybe somebody on zoom. They have

868
00:40:52,280 --> 00:40:55,319
Speaker 1: a response and a voice gets like that weird zoom

869
00:40:56,400 --> 00:40:59,800
Speaker 1: robotic sound. You could put it in AI transcribes it.

870
00:41:00,040 --> 00:41:02,239
Speaker 1: You can fix in one word, you can type it

871
00:41:02,320 --> 00:41:04,320
Speaker 1: out and it cloones their voice and it says it

872
00:41:04,560 --> 00:41:06,719
Speaker 1: and you can fix it, So it would be hypocritical

873
00:41:06,800 --> 00:41:09,080
Speaker 1: of me to say, like, now you can't use that

874
00:41:09,239 --> 00:41:12,080
Speaker 1: when I have used it before. I get it's different

875
00:41:12,280 --> 00:41:16,080
Speaker 1: between an interview and art, but I think especially in

876
00:41:16,160 --> 00:41:18,600
Speaker 1: movies like this, they don't have like a crazy budget

877
00:41:18,719 --> 00:41:21,759
Speaker 1: like an Avengers movie would. Sometimes you have to use

878
00:41:21,840 --> 00:41:25,360
Speaker 1: those resources, and you also think about things when it

879
00:41:25,440 --> 00:41:29,560
Speaker 1: comes to using movie magic. Nobody is saying anything about

880
00:41:30,520 --> 00:41:34,080
Speaker 1: James Gunn using CGI to make Superman fly like that

881
00:41:34,360 --> 00:41:37,680
Speaker 1: is cheating. That really doesn't take away from David krn

882
00:41:37,760 --> 00:41:41,960
Speaker 1: Sweat's performance as Superman. That is just movie magic. That's

883
00:41:42,000 --> 00:41:46,520
Speaker 1: what movies are, using special effects to make something seem

884
00:41:46,680 --> 00:41:49,640
Speaker 1: a little bit more real and realistic for us. I

885
00:41:49,800 --> 00:41:53,480
Speaker 1: ultimately think it comes down to how the audience interprets it.

886
00:41:53,880 --> 00:41:56,080
Speaker 1: If we start rejecting it in a way that it

887
00:41:56,160 --> 00:41:59,840
Speaker 1: gets so blatantly overused, they'll have to scale back. But

888
00:42:00,040 --> 00:42:02,799
Speaker 1: if they're using it to enhance things here and there,

889
00:42:03,360 --> 00:42:07,359
Speaker 1: to fix little tweaks, much like a photographer would use photoshop,

890
00:42:07,760 --> 00:42:10,920
Speaker 1: I still think that's art. Somebody takes a photo and

891
00:42:11,040 --> 00:42:13,839
Speaker 1: maybe there's some power lines in the back they want

892
00:42:13,880 --> 00:42:16,520
Speaker 1: to take out. They use an AI tool to clear

893
00:42:16,600 --> 00:42:20,480
Speaker 1: that out. Nobody says that that is less artistic because

894
00:42:20,520 --> 00:42:24,120
Speaker 1: they used AI to fix it. Right now, in this case,

895
00:42:24,840 --> 00:42:27,560
Speaker 1: I'm not against it. I don't think it takes away

896
00:42:27,640 --> 00:42:30,480
Speaker 1: from the fact that Adrian Brody was nominated and will

897
00:42:30,560 --> 00:42:34,719
Speaker 1: win for Best Actor. But will somebody eventually end up

898
00:42:34,840 --> 00:42:39,040
Speaker 1: abusing AI and making it seem less authentic. Yeah, that's

899
00:42:39,080 --> 00:42:42,239
Speaker 1: gonna happen to and I will cross that bridge when

900
00:42:42,360 --> 00:42:44,560
Speaker 1: we get there. When it comes to what I rate

901
00:42:44,680 --> 00:42:48,359
Speaker 1: the Brutal List, I give it a strong four out

902
00:42:48,400 --> 00:42:52,440
Speaker 1: of five buildings. I do think there is something to

903
00:42:52,560 --> 00:42:54,680
Speaker 1: seeing this movie in theaters. We actually saw it in

904
00:42:54,719 --> 00:42:57,960
Speaker 1: thirty five millimeter. Something I like looking for when I

905
00:42:58,120 --> 00:43:01,480
Speaker 1: watch a movie being shown on film is you can

906
00:43:01,560 --> 00:43:03,600
Speaker 1: tell when they're about to switch the reels. You see

907
00:43:03,600 --> 00:43:05,840
Speaker 1: a little flicker in the corner. It's like a white

908
00:43:05,920 --> 00:43:09,040
Speaker 1: circle that comes and goes, and then it goes into

909
00:43:09,160 --> 00:43:12,160
Speaker 1: the next reel. I assume each reel is about an

910
00:43:12,239 --> 00:43:14,800
Speaker 1: hour long because I counted about three times that it happened.

911
00:43:15,040 --> 00:43:17,880
Speaker 1: So there is something to watching it in theaters, especially

912
00:43:17,920 --> 00:43:20,040
Speaker 1: if you have a theater around you that is showing

913
00:43:20,120 --> 00:43:23,720
Speaker 1: it in thirty five millimeter. There is an added warmth

914
00:43:23,840 --> 00:43:26,400
Speaker 1: to it. It adds a little bit of grain to it.

915
00:43:27,000 --> 00:43:29,160
Speaker 1: I just kind of love that feeling. It's almost like

916
00:43:29,280 --> 00:43:34,480
Speaker 1: listening to an album on vinyl, where not a whole

917
00:43:34,560 --> 00:43:36,880
Speaker 1: lot of crazy difference, but it just adds like this

918
00:43:37,080 --> 00:43:40,160
Speaker 1: level of texture. And if you're somebody who like a

919
00:43:40,239 --> 00:43:42,200
Speaker 1: music'snob and you're like, nah, you gotta listen to it

920
00:43:42,280 --> 00:43:44,440
Speaker 1: on vinyl. It's kind of the same thing when it

921
00:43:44,520 --> 00:43:47,000
Speaker 1: comes to watching something in thirty five millimeter, but not

922
00:43:47,120 --> 00:43:49,920
Speaker 1: everybody has a theater that shows it that way. But

923
00:43:50,040 --> 00:43:52,200
Speaker 1: I think the benefit of seeing it in theaters is

924
00:43:52,280 --> 00:43:55,400
Speaker 1: you are fully engaged the entire time, You're not on

925
00:43:55,480 --> 00:43:58,440
Speaker 1: your phone, and you're able to give it your full attention.

926
00:43:58,760 --> 00:44:00,960
Speaker 1: I think if you watch this movie at home once

927
00:44:01,040 --> 00:44:03,840
Speaker 1: it is available on streaming, I would compare it to

928
00:44:04,160 --> 00:44:07,600
Speaker 1: me running outside versus me running on the treadmill. When

929
00:44:07,640 --> 00:44:10,480
Speaker 1: I go run outside, I'll run four miles one way.

930
00:44:10,680 --> 00:44:12,600
Speaker 1: I can't just stop because I have to go home.

931
00:44:12,680 --> 00:44:15,719
Speaker 1: I'm already invested in those four miles. I'm gonna come

932
00:44:15,760 --> 00:44:17,960
Speaker 1: back and run a total of eight. But if I

933
00:44:18,080 --> 00:44:20,520
Speaker 1: run four miles on the treadmill, you know how easy

934
00:44:20,560 --> 00:44:23,439
Speaker 1: it is just to hit stop. I'm tired. This is boring.

935
00:44:23,440 --> 00:44:25,680
Speaker 1: I'm gonna hit stop. I'm in a gym. I kind

936
00:44:25,719 --> 00:44:27,600
Speaker 1: of feel that way when it comes to watching a

937
00:44:27,680 --> 00:44:30,800
Speaker 1: long movie. When you go see it in theaters, you're committed.

938
00:44:30,880 --> 00:44:33,040
Speaker 1: You've paid for it, you were there, You're gonna sit

939
00:44:33,080 --> 00:44:35,879
Speaker 1: there the entire time. You get an hour into the movie,

940
00:44:35,920 --> 00:44:37,359
Speaker 1: you're like, you know what, I'll just finish it. At

941
00:44:37,360 --> 00:44:39,600
Speaker 1: this point, you get an hour into a movie at home,

942
00:44:40,239 --> 00:44:41,960
Speaker 1: you can just hit stop. You can go watch something else,

943
00:44:42,040 --> 00:44:44,200
Speaker 1: go back to watching the office. So I think that

944
00:44:44,400 --> 00:44:46,919
Speaker 1: is the benefit of seeing it in theaters. So again

945
00:44:47,000 --> 00:44:49,359
Speaker 1: for the brutalist, I give it four out of five.

946
00:44:53,560 --> 00:44:57,239
Speaker 1: It's time to head down to Movie Mikes. Trailer Paul.

947
00:44:58,120 --> 00:45:00,239
Speaker 1: The trailer for this new movie called The mon Monkey

948
00:45:00,480 --> 00:45:03,720
Speaker 1: is nuts, but in a good way. I like movies

949
00:45:03,760 --> 00:45:06,719
Speaker 1: that are nuts, but in a good way. It's a

950
00:45:06,800 --> 00:45:11,000
Speaker 1: mix of horror and comedy. It's from the studio Neon,

951
00:45:11,120 --> 00:45:14,839
Speaker 1: which I've praised a lot. In recent history. They've been

952
00:45:15,000 --> 00:45:18,000
Speaker 1: crushing it when it comes to horror. I mean, they

953
00:45:18,080 --> 00:45:21,920
Speaker 1: had immaculate, they had cuckoo, they had long Legs. This

954
00:45:22,080 --> 00:45:25,280
Speaker 1: is also from the same director of Long Legs, Oz Perkins,

955
00:45:26,239 --> 00:45:28,680
Speaker 1: who is really starting to crush it right now, but

956
00:45:28,760 --> 00:45:31,759
Speaker 1: this movie is coming out on February twenty First, it

957
00:45:31,920 --> 00:45:35,080
Speaker 1: is about two brothers named Bill and how they find

958
00:45:35,120 --> 00:45:37,680
Speaker 1: their father's old monkey in the attic and then a

959
00:45:37,840 --> 00:45:41,399
Speaker 1: series of death start. They decide to throw the toy

960
00:45:41,440 --> 00:45:43,160
Speaker 1: away because that's what you do, right when you find

961
00:45:43,200 --> 00:45:45,880
Speaker 1: a possessed dog, you throw it away. But what happens,

962
00:45:45,920 --> 00:45:49,520
Speaker 1: It always comes crawling back. They try to move on

963
00:45:49,680 --> 00:45:52,840
Speaker 1: with their lives, they grow apart over the years, but

964
00:45:53,000 --> 00:45:58,160
Speaker 1: then the monkey brings them back. A classic tale. This

965
00:45:58,320 --> 00:46:02,520
Speaker 1: movie feels like it was ripped from a Twilight Zone episode,

966
00:46:03,160 --> 00:46:06,880
Speaker 1: and of course it is an adaptation of a Stephen

967
00:46:07,000 --> 00:46:10,760
Speaker 1: King story. I think over the years, not every Stephen

968
00:46:10,880 --> 00:46:13,680
Speaker 1: King novel that has been turned into a movie has

969
00:46:13,760 --> 00:46:16,800
Speaker 1: been great, because again, just because it's a well written

970
00:46:16,880 --> 00:46:20,200
Speaker 1: story doesn't mean it's an easy plug and play. Either way,

971
00:46:20,280 --> 00:46:22,600
Speaker 1: the check clears for him, but I think he gets

972
00:46:22,600 --> 00:46:24,600
Speaker 1: a little bit more excited when you have a director

973
00:46:24,680 --> 00:46:27,439
Speaker 1: who gets what he was trying to say and really

974
00:46:27,560 --> 00:46:30,320
Speaker 1: is able to execute the story. I remember when The

975
00:46:30,400 --> 00:46:34,360
Speaker 1: Simpsons parodied a Twilight Zone episode in a classic story.

976
00:46:35,120 --> 00:46:37,719
Speaker 1: It was like the Second Treehouse of Horror. Episode back

977
00:46:37,760 --> 00:46:40,759
Speaker 1: in the nineties. But Homer gets this monkey paw that

978
00:46:41,360 --> 00:46:43,920
Speaker 1: it grants you the wishes on each of the fingers.

979
00:46:44,719 --> 00:46:48,160
Speaker 1: But anytime you make a wish, something bad happens, something

980
00:46:48,239 --> 00:46:51,360
Speaker 1: twisted happens where you get your wish, but it comes

981
00:46:51,560 --> 00:46:55,120
Speaker 1: with a little taste of misfortune. And I just kind

982
00:46:55,160 --> 00:46:58,200
Speaker 1: of had that feeling of whenever the Simpsons would pry

983
00:46:58,320 --> 00:47:00,440
Speaker 1: the Twilight Zone, because that's really how I was exposed

984
00:47:00,480 --> 00:47:02,919
Speaker 1: to it first, and they have like this classic voice

985
00:47:02,960 --> 00:47:05,800
Speaker 1: over with a really chilling voice. That is what this

986
00:47:06,160 --> 00:47:08,920
Speaker 1: movie reminds me of. The plot reminds me of. There

987
00:47:09,000 --> 00:47:12,000
Speaker 1: is also a Simpson's parenty in tree House of Horror

988
00:47:12,520 --> 00:47:15,040
Speaker 1: whenever Bart can read people's thoughts and then he'll turn

989
00:47:15,120 --> 00:47:18,120
Speaker 1: them into things. That is also the vibes I'm getting here.

990
00:47:18,320 --> 00:47:21,320
Speaker 1: So it's coming out again on February twenty First, before

991
00:47:21,360 --> 00:47:23,600
Speaker 1: I talk about it more, here's just a little bit

992
00:47:23,680 --> 00:47:24,640
Speaker 1: of the monkey trailer.

993
00:47:24,960 --> 00:47:27,680
Speaker 3: The coroner said it was an accident, but it was

994
00:47:27,800 --> 00:47:28,640
Speaker 3: no accident.

995
00:47:28,840 --> 00:47:29,520
Speaker 2: It was a monkey.

996
00:47:29,719 --> 00:47:32,080
Speaker 3: When I was a kid, my twin brother and I

997
00:47:32,239 --> 00:47:36,800
Speaker 3: found something that loved to kill. I did everything I

998
00:47:36,960 --> 00:47:47,000
Speaker 3: could to make it go away, but it had other plans. Hello, brothers.

999
00:47:48,280 --> 00:47:54,320
Speaker 3: The monkey that likes killing our family. It's back. It

1000
00:47:54,440 --> 00:47:55,200
Speaker 3: must be vanquished.

1001
00:47:55,280 --> 00:47:57,200
Speaker 1: There are a lot of crazy death in this trailer.

1002
00:47:57,719 --> 00:48:00,480
Speaker 1: It opens up with this woman dying after the monkey

1003
00:48:00,520 --> 00:48:04,520
Speaker 1: shoots a gun. And then you have our main star here,

1004
00:48:04,680 --> 00:48:09,360
Speaker 1: THEO James. He's wearing these big old retro glasses. Blood

1005
00:48:09,400 --> 00:48:11,960
Speaker 1: splatters across his face and then he takes the glasses

1006
00:48:11,960 --> 00:48:14,040
Speaker 1: off and he has like this tan line of blood.

1007
00:48:14,560 --> 00:48:16,719
Speaker 1: That is a great scene. I love horror movies that

1008
00:48:16,840 --> 00:48:19,520
Speaker 1: have that one still image that you could see it

1009
00:48:19,600 --> 00:48:21,840
Speaker 1: and associate it with this movie. That is something I

1010
00:48:21,920 --> 00:48:24,000
Speaker 1: feel that horror movies have kind of gotten away from,

1011
00:48:24,080 --> 00:48:27,040
Speaker 1: like you need that one big shot to sell the movie.

1012
00:48:27,520 --> 00:48:30,200
Speaker 1: That one is fantastic. There's another death in this trailer

1013
00:48:30,760 --> 00:48:33,560
Speaker 1: where you see this woman diving into a pool and

1014
00:48:33,760 --> 00:48:39,160
Speaker 1: right before she dives in, the monkey makes that pool electrified.

1015
00:48:39,320 --> 00:48:43,160
Speaker 1: She dives in and well gets electrocuted. So THEO James,

1016
00:48:43,239 --> 00:48:46,279
Speaker 1: you may know him from the Divergent movies, I never

1017
00:48:46,360 --> 00:48:48,400
Speaker 1: really got into those. I know him more from The

1018
00:48:48,480 --> 00:48:51,239
Speaker 1: White Lotus. By the look at this trailer and me

1019
00:48:51,480 --> 00:48:54,360
Speaker 1: doing some research on this, I believe he is playing

1020
00:48:54,520 --> 00:48:57,560
Speaker 1: both brothers. I don't know if they're ever going to

1021
00:48:58,560 --> 00:49:02,000
Speaker 1: actually meet, because for the most part in the trailer

1022
00:49:02,080 --> 00:49:04,279
Speaker 1: it looks like they just talk over the phone. I

1023
00:49:04,320 --> 00:49:06,800
Speaker 1: didn't see anybody else credited as the other brother, so

1024
00:49:06,880 --> 00:49:10,040
Speaker 1: I believe that he is playing both brothers. Well, you're

1025
00:49:10,040 --> 00:49:12,640
Speaker 1: gonna get from this movie a lot of blood that's

1026
00:49:12,840 --> 00:49:17,359
Speaker 1: very over the top and gory, which is a much

1027
00:49:17,560 --> 00:49:21,040
Speaker 1: different feeling than what Oz Perkins did when he directed

1028
00:49:21,080 --> 00:49:24,120
Speaker 1: Long Legs last year, which that was much more of

1029
00:49:24,200 --> 00:49:27,800
Speaker 1: a slow burned story. It was more sinister. It was

1030
00:49:27,880 --> 00:49:32,040
Speaker 1: a lot of anticipation, showing you little glimpses of Long

1031
00:49:32,160 --> 00:49:35,640
Speaker 1: Legs and then really ramping up towards the end. But

1032
00:49:36,239 --> 00:49:38,480
Speaker 1: throughout that movie there wasn't a whole lot of just

1033
00:49:38,640 --> 00:49:40,680
Speaker 1: blood and guts all over the thing that you would

1034
00:49:40,719 --> 00:49:43,880
Speaker 1: expect in a normal slasher movie. It didn't really has

1035
00:49:43,960 --> 00:49:46,680
Speaker 1: that feeling, even though it was based on a serial killer,

1036
00:49:47,160 --> 00:49:49,640
Speaker 1: just not that same type of horror movie, more of

1037
00:49:49,680 --> 00:49:54,759
Speaker 1: a thriller, more of a psychological horror movie. But here

1038
00:49:55,840 --> 00:49:59,520
Speaker 1: much different tone. It still has that this is gonna

1039
00:49:59,520 --> 00:50:02,000
Speaker 1: be kind of vibes, because anytime you have some kind

1040
00:50:02,040 --> 00:50:05,160
Speaker 1: of possessed doll, you're gonna get that, but it's gonna

1041
00:50:05,160 --> 00:50:08,160
Speaker 1: be a little bit more comical. And I don't think

1042
00:50:08,200 --> 00:50:11,560
Speaker 1: you're gonna have nightmares from watching The Monkey, which I

1043
00:50:11,680 --> 00:50:14,680
Speaker 1: felt very uneasy after watching Long Legs and thinking about, man,

1044
00:50:14,719 --> 00:50:17,080
Speaker 1: there's somebody out there like that. That's freaky. But I

1045
00:50:17,160 --> 00:50:20,000
Speaker 1: don't think unless you're a young kid, very impressionable, that

1046
00:50:20,040 --> 00:50:22,719
Speaker 1: you're gonna leave the Monkey and think, oh, man, is

1047
00:50:22,760 --> 00:50:25,600
Speaker 1: there gonna be a toy possession going down in my house?

1048
00:50:25,640 --> 00:50:27,680
Speaker 1: That something is going to kill me? Which was a

1049
00:50:27,760 --> 00:50:30,120
Speaker 1: big fear of mine when I was a kid. Talked

1050
00:50:30,120 --> 00:50:32,680
Speaker 1: about this a lot, but the first horror movie that

1051
00:50:32,760 --> 00:50:36,520
Speaker 1: ever gave me serious nightmares as a kid was Child's Play.

1052
00:50:37,320 --> 00:50:41,000
Speaker 1: I think when it comes to the scariest dolls in

1053
00:50:41,239 --> 00:50:44,640
Speaker 1: not just movies but TV and pop culture, Chucky is

1054
00:50:44,719 --> 00:50:47,839
Speaker 1: number one. I think Annabelle has kind of creeped up there,

1055
00:50:48,360 --> 00:50:51,440
Speaker 1: mainly from the first Conjuring movies. I don't know that

1056
00:50:51,680 --> 00:50:55,799
Speaker 1: the spinoffs and the prequels of Annabelle have really solidified

1057
00:50:55,840 --> 00:50:58,040
Speaker 1: her as me being scared of her because that first

1058
00:50:58,120 --> 00:51:03,240
Speaker 1: Conjuring movie intense because she just looks freaky Chucky depending

1059
00:51:03,280 --> 00:51:05,760
Speaker 1: on what state you see him in, he doesn't always

1060
00:51:05,800 --> 00:51:09,719
Speaker 1: look freaky, but Annabelle always looks freaky. So Chucky gave

1061
00:51:09,760 --> 00:51:12,680
Speaker 1: me nightmares. Annabelle never really gave me nightmares because I

1062
00:51:12,880 --> 00:51:15,600
Speaker 1: was older. Although the conjuring did freak me out. I

1063
00:51:15,680 --> 00:51:19,320
Speaker 1: did get nightmares from that, but it wasn't because of Annabelle.

1064
00:51:19,840 --> 00:51:22,960
Speaker 1: Number three on my list is Slappy the Ventriloquist on

1065
00:51:23,120 --> 00:51:26,239
Speaker 1: Me from Goosebumps. I could not even look at the

1066
00:51:26,360 --> 00:51:31,319
Speaker 1: book cover of that Goosebumps story and not be freaked out.

1067
00:51:31,360 --> 00:51:33,440
Speaker 1: I remember it was either my older brother or my

1068
00:51:33,560 --> 00:51:36,120
Speaker 1: older sister had a copy of it, and I would

1069
00:51:36,200 --> 00:51:38,160
Speaker 1: throw it in the shoe box because I was so

1070
00:51:38,360 --> 00:51:42,120
Speaker 1: freaked out just by the image of Slappy. But then

1071
00:51:42,160 --> 00:51:44,600
Speaker 1: you have in this movie. It's a monkey who looks

1072
00:51:44,640 --> 00:51:47,680
Speaker 1: more comical. He looks freaky. He has like these bulgy eyes.

1073
00:51:48,160 --> 00:51:51,200
Speaker 1: It doesn't talk, he doesn't really do a whole lot

1074
00:51:51,280 --> 00:51:53,279
Speaker 1: of like at least not in the trailer of like

1075
00:51:53,320 --> 00:51:56,279
Speaker 1: actually grabbing people because he's small. But it's the thing

1076
00:51:56,400 --> 00:51:59,040
Speaker 1: surrounding him and the things he's able to do that

1077
00:51:59,239 --> 00:52:02,520
Speaker 1: makes it scary. So I don't know if he's gonna

1078
00:52:02,560 --> 00:52:04,839
Speaker 1: work his way up into this list, but either way,

1079
00:52:05,120 --> 00:52:07,479
Speaker 1: this trailer did a really good job of just making

1080
00:52:07,520 --> 00:52:11,239
Speaker 1: him look absolutely insane. So I have a lot of

1081
00:52:11,320 --> 00:52:13,600
Speaker 1: hope for this movie. It looks like it's gonna be

1082
00:52:13,640 --> 00:52:17,480
Speaker 1: a movie that's fun and bloody, and I love things

1083
00:52:17,520 --> 00:52:20,080
Speaker 1: that are fun and bloody. So again, the Monkey is

1084
00:52:20,200 --> 00:52:23,319
Speaker 1: coming out on February twenty first. This will be one

1085
00:52:23,400 --> 00:52:25,600
Speaker 1: that'll get a reaction in the theater and somebody's throwing

1086
00:52:25,640 --> 00:52:26,560
Speaker 1: their popcorn in the air.

1087
00:52:27,239 --> 00:52:31,440
Speaker 2: And that was this week's edition of movie Line Tramer.

1088
00:52:31,160 --> 00:52:34,239
Speaker 1: Par And that'll do it for another episode here of

1089
00:52:34,360 --> 00:52:36,719
Speaker 1: the podcast. But before I go, I gotta give my

1090
00:52:36,840 --> 00:52:40,280
Speaker 1: listeners shout out of the week this week, I'm going

1091
00:52:40,520 --> 00:52:44,759
Speaker 1: over to Instagram to Ashley and Kennedy who commented on

1092
00:52:44,920 --> 00:52:47,920
Speaker 1: a recent reel of mind and said, catching up and

1093
00:52:48,200 --> 00:52:51,600
Speaker 1: just finished the podcast from eleven twenty five. Your ending

1094
00:52:51,719 --> 00:52:54,360
Speaker 1: comment to yourself of what kind of accent was that

1095
00:52:54,600 --> 00:52:57,600
Speaker 1: cracked me up? Thanks for not editing that out. Thank

1096
00:52:57,680 --> 00:53:00,520
Speaker 1: you Ashley for a couple of things. One that means

1097
00:53:00,560 --> 00:53:03,400
Speaker 1: you listen to the very end of the episode. I

1098
00:53:03,600 --> 00:53:07,080
Speaker 1: love people who listen to the entire episode that don't

1099
00:53:07,120 --> 00:53:09,359
Speaker 1: get tired of me going on and on about dumb

1100
00:53:09,440 --> 00:53:11,560
Speaker 1: things and make it to the very end, So I

1101
00:53:11,719 --> 00:53:14,440
Speaker 1: appreciate that. And the second thing is thank you for

1102
00:53:14,680 --> 00:53:17,800
Speaker 1: noticing some of the things I've decided to leave in recently.

1103
00:53:18,400 --> 00:53:22,320
Speaker 1: I think before I was really just like, if I

1104
00:53:22,440 --> 00:53:24,160
Speaker 1: mess up even the slightest bit, I have to take

1105
00:53:24,200 --> 00:53:26,080
Speaker 1: it off because I don't want to sound like an idiot.

1106
00:53:26,320 --> 00:53:28,120
Speaker 1: And I think it was really last year where I

1107
00:53:28,239 --> 00:53:30,400
Speaker 1: realized that I just kind of have to have a

1108
00:53:30,440 --> 00:53:33,440
Speaker 1: little bit more of a free flow, let the podcast

1109
00:53:33,600 --> 00:53:36,480
Speaker 1: live and breathe a little bit more like if you

1110
00:53:36,520 --> 00:53:38,759
Speaker 1: were right here in this studio sitting with me, right

1111
00:53:38,840 --> 00:53:42,319
Speaker 1: across from me, that version of me, and not worry

1112
00:53:42,320 --> 00:53:45,840
Speaker 1: about everything being so polished. And I'm not a polished

1113
00:53:45,840 --> 00:53:50,200
Speaker 1: speaker by any means, So I feel like leaving in

1114
00:53:50,360 --> 00:53:52,480
Speaker 1: little things like that is just like, Okay, this is

1115
00:53:52,520 --> 00:53:56,319
Speaker 1: who I really am. I'm going to say things weird. Sometimes,

1116
00:53:56,480 --> 00:53:59,920
Speaker 1: I'm going to say people's names wrong. Sometimes, even though

1117
00:54:00,000 --> 00:54:02,640
Speaker 1: well I make it such a point to research their names.

1118
00:54:03,160 --> 00:54:06,440
Speaker 1: It's not even that I don't research and look up

1119
00:54:06,600 --> 00:54:08,239
Speaker 1: an actor's name before talking about them.

1120
00:54:08,320 --> 00:54:08,560
Speaker 2: I do.

1121
00:54:09,200 --> 00:54:11,279
Speaker 1: There are other times where something just comes to my

1122
00:54:11,440 --> 00:54:13,880
Speaker 1: mind and I will say it and not think of

1123
00:54:13,960 --> 00:54:15,680
Speaker 1: it that I will think I'm saying the right thing,

1124
00:54:16,120 --> 00:54:19,239
Speaker 1: but something in my brain triggers. Here's an example. One

1125
00:54:19,320 --> 00:54:21,319
Speaker 1: thing I did edit out recently is I was talking

1126
00:54:21,400 --> 00:54:24,759
Speaker 1: about Peter Parker and I straight up said Peter Pan,

1127
00:54:25,000 --> 00:54:27,680
Speaker 1: even though there's no reason for me to say Peter Pan.

1128
00:54:27,880 --> 00:54:30,560
Speaker 1: You obviously know how big of a Spider Man fan

1129
00:54:30,719 --> 00:54:34,080
Speaker 1: that I am that I would never reference Peter Parker

1130
00:54:34,800 --> 00:54:37,320
Speaker 1: as Peter Pan. But when I listened back to the episode,

1131
00:54:37,360 --> 00:54:40,200
Speaker 1: for some reason, I said Peter Pan and Toby Maguire.

1132
00:54:40,239 --> 00:54:41,680
Speaker 1: I'm like, that makes no sense. I have to take

1133
00:54:41,719 --> 00:54:45,040
Speaker 1: that out. So sometimes my brain just like crosses these wires,

1134
00:54:45,120 --> 00:54:47,160
Speaker 1: you know, like back in the day. I don't know

1135
00:54:47,200 --> 00:54:48,680
Speaker 1: if they actually did this, but I would see it

1136
00:54:48,719 --> 00:54:52,279
Speaker 1: in movies where you would call a telephone operator and

1137
00:54:52,360 --> 00:54:55,960
Speaker 1: they would like plug in these wires and cables into

1138
00:54:56,040 --> 00:54:58,520
Speaker 1: these different holes they connect you to a different line

1139
00:54:58,600 --> 00:55:01,280
Speaker 1: or whatever. That is kind how my brain is sometimes,

1140
00:55:01,320 --> 00:55:04,399
Speaker 1: But somebody just got the wrong piece into the wrong hole.

1141
00:55:04,600 --> 00:55:07,879
Speaker 1: So those things I will edit out. Other little things

1142
00:55:07,920 --> 00:55:09,759
Speaker 1: like that that you notice, Ashley, I'm gonna try to

1143
00:55:09,800 --> 00:55:12,680
Speaker 1: leave in more so appreciate that comment. You're this week's

1144
00:55:12,719 --> 00:55:14,880
Speaker 1: listener Shout Out of the Week. Thanks to everybody for

1145
00:55:15,000 --> 00:55:19,479
Speaker 1: listening right now and until next time, go out watch

1146
00:55:19,560 --> 00:55:21,120
Speaker 1: good movies and I will talk to you