WEBVTT - How long does a neutron live?

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Katie, how do your particles feel today? I guess

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it depends on which particle you ask. All right, well,

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>let's start with your protons. How are they feeling this morning?

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>They're feeling pretty positive. And your electrons any negativity there? Well,

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say they're all charged up. And what about

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>those neutrons. We don't want to overlook them? How are

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>they doing? There? Come scums? All right, well, let's see

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>if this podcast can get them excited. Well, I'm excited

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>even if my neutrons are kind of just meth. Hello.

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Daniel. I'm a particle of physicist and a professor

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>at UC Irvine, and I contain multitudes of particles. And

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I am Katie Golden. I host the podcast Creature feature

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>about animals and my particles. Uh, I think I've got

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>at least ten of them. You know, really, your podcast

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is also about particles, since all animals are also made

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>of particles. That's right, So who's the physicist? Now? We're

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>all physicists. That's the point. Every podcast is really about particles,

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>even those true crime podcasts, even the Bigfoot podcast, even

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>those paranormal e sp podcasts that consistently outrank ours in

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the natural science category, but welcome to the podcast. Daniel

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge explain the universe in which we treat the

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>entire universe as a crazy swarm of particles. Particles that

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>are mysterious, particles that are weird, particles that follow very

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>strange quantum rules, but particles that do follow rules in

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the end, rules that we think we can understand, we

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>can digest, that we can explain to you. On this podcast,

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we hope to wrap our minds around everything in the universe,

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>break it down to its time little particles, and feed

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>them to you one by one. My co host and friend,

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Champ can't be here today, but we are very

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>lucky to have our regular co host, Katie. Katie thanks

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot for joining us. Of course, I am ready

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to learn about particles because you know, they seem important,

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>given that I need them in me to make me, me,

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to make you you. Indeed, but you know what is

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>the units of you? Diving right into the philosophical questions

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of particle physics, one thing we have

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>learned recently about particles and the universe is that we

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>all seem to be made up of the same kinds

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.519
<v Speaker 1>of particles. I'm made of protons, neutrons, and electrons. You're

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>made of protons, neutrons and electrons. What's the difference? Are

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>there Katie particles and Daniel particles? No, it turns out

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that the only different it's between Daniel and Katie fundamentally,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>or between an apple and a banana, or between kittens

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and lava, is how those particles are put together. You

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>take that same basic set of building box and you

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>can make anything. You're blowing my mind. So if we

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of melted down Katie and Daniel into just the

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>particles and then rearranged all the Katie particles into Daniel

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>particle like the Daniel blueprints, then now would just create

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a Daniel even though uh, those were originally my particles.

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. It seems like our universe follows the

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>same principles as legos, that the same basic building blox

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>can be used to make anything. Right, if your little

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>brother used your legos to make a huge dinosaur and

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>then you smashed it and used it to build a

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>pirate boat, you could reuse those dinosaur legos to make

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>your pirate hip. Now Here, of course, I have to

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>quibble with the fundamental flaw of Lego toys. The original Legos,

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>We're just the basic building blocks, and I love that

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>simplicity that I had no bias to them. You you

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>could use them to make anything. These fancy new modern Legos,

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, they come with stuff printed on the sides

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>or specific shapes, right, so the sort of like predetermine

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>what you have to build. I'm talking about the true

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>original Legos. Yeah. I usually just built the tallest tower

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I could make out of my Legos, and then usually

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>put a bunch of guys on it, so it's like

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>just this big tower of Babel. I don't know what

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that says about me, but yeah, I agree, Although I

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>do like that modern legos do have different kinds of Legos.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it started out, I think, with just the one

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Lego block unit, but now you have all sorts of

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>different types of Legos. You have like the sort of

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>o G blocks, but you also have these long, skinny ones,

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 1>you have ones that can rotate, you have like connector legos.

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>But is that at all similar to how the universe works?

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Seems to be very similar to how the universe works.

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm made of protons and neutrons and electrons

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and store are you and so is basically everything that

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you've ever eaten, everything you've ever tripped over, everything you've

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 1>ever thrown at your sibling. They're all made of the

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>same ingredients. And if you look at the periodic table,

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you can see that that's true, right, Every element on

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the periodic table is just made of protons and neutrons

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and electrons arranged in different numbers. You start with one

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>proton and electron, you have hydrogen. You added another proton,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you get helium. Keep adding protons, do you get different elements?

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>You're just adding more of the same basic building blocks,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>but you make fundamentally different elements. But those different elements

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>are not really fundamentally different. The only difference between carbon

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and neon, or between lead and gold is the number

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of protons inside those nuclei. So really you can build

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>anything with the same basic building blocks. It's so hard

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to wrap my head around that. So, you know, just

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's just seems that it's a numbers game, because

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like usually with legos, if you just have like five legos,

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't suddenly turn into from like you know, a

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>sugar into like gold or something like that. But with

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>these on the atomic levels. When you change just the

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>number of these these tiny particles, it turns from you know,

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>something that if you eat nothing would happen to you,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to something if you eat it it would be bad

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and drive you crazy, like eating lead versus drinking air.

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess we don't really drink air, but you get

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea. Yeah. Absolutely. It might seem like a small difference.

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>You're just adding a proton, what's the big deal, But

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it completely changes its emergent behavior. All these characteristics that

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>were familiar with the way metals are shiny and conduct electricity,

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the way some of these elements are float around and

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>ignore the other ones that are not very active. All

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of those properties are determined by how many protons and

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>how many electrons there are in each atom, and so like,

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that metals are metallic and conductive comes from

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that their electron shells are not filled, which

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>is determined by the number of protons inside the nucleus.

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just an relevant detail, it's a totally

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>determining fact. But it's fascinating they're all made out of

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the same bits. The other fascinating thing to me is

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're all made out of roughly the same ratios

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of bits, Like any given atom has basically a one

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to one to one proton to neutron to electron ratio.

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So lead has more protons than hydrogen, but it also

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>has more neutrons and also has more electrons. That means

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that not only are we all made out of the

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>same three basic building blocks, but we're made out of

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>them in the same proportions. It's not like Katie has

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>more electrons and Daniel has more protons, right, where the

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>same building blocks in the same proportions just rearranged differently.

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>So you you mentioned that the number of protons sort

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of changes the element. In the number of electrons, it's

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of changes the characteristic of these elements, But you

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention neutrons too much being sort of the determinant

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of what these elements are. Why are neutrons different in

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of pro tons and electrons. Yeah, it's a good point,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and neutrons are sadly often overlooked, which is why we

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>are dedicating almost our entire podcast today to talking about

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>these mysterious, funny particles. But you're right that neutrons don't

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>really determine as much the identity of the atom, and

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that's because they are electrically neutral. Like if you add

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>another proton to the atom, then in order to make

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it electrically neutral, you have to add another electron in

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>orbit around it, and that really changes the chemical properties.

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>It changes how this thing interacts, whether or not it's

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>electron orbitals are filled, or whether it's got an opening

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that very strongly affects the behavior of the atom. You

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>add another neutron, then you don't need to add another electron.

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So you can add neutrons, no big deal. You can't

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>just add neutrons anytime you like to any atom. It

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make them heavier, and it makes these other versions

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of the elements. These are called isotopes. So, for example,

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you can have hydrogen, which is just a proton, but

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you can also have deuterium, which is a proton and

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a neutron. So you put those together inside the nucleus,

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you have an electron around it. It's still called hydrogen,

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's like a heavy version of hydrogen. For example,

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>if you put that together into H two O, but

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>instead of the hydrogen, you have this heavy version of

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen with a neutron also in the nucleus. Then you

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>get what's called heavy water, which we sometimes use in

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>nuclear experiments. Right, so it does change a little bit

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of the flavor of the element to add neutron,

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>sort to take them away, but it doesn't change its

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>fundamental identity, which is determined by the charged objects of

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>proton and the electron. So that's really interesting to me.

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Why is the neutron involved at all in the atomic

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>structure if it's just kind of this It seems like

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>this neutral fluff particle just this like dead weight, But

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is that really true. No, the neutron often overlooked, but

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it does play a vital role in keeping the nucleus together.

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna dig into it a bit more on the podcast,

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>but very briefly, think about how the nucleus stays together. Right,

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 1>If you have the nucleus of an atom that has

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like twenty five protons in it, those things are all

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>positive of lee charged. Why don't they just like bust apart?

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, why don't they repel each other because they

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>all have the same positive charge. The answer is that

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the nucleus is held together by the strong force, which

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is much more powerful than electromagnetism and neutrons. Even though

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>they are neutral electromagnetically, they do involve the strong force.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Turns out, the nucleus is a bit of a delicate

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>puzzle keeping those protons from flying apart. You need the neutrons.

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a little bit of a spacer, and so it's

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>easier to make stable nuclei if you include the neutrons.

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I see, So without the neutrons, the protons would not

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to stand each other's presence. I know people

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 1>like that and like in group dynamics, that kind of

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>keep the peace. So that's that is really interesting. So

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess without neutrons we wouldn't exist, we would not

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>be held together. But it's odd to me though, that

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that neutrons have. It seems like they're fundamentally different from

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 1>like a proton or an election because they don't have

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>this charge. So you know, how did that even really happen? Yeah, well,

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>these are deep questions about the universe, like why do

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we have neutrons anyway? Right, it's just sort of how

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the universe coalesces. Remember, we go back to the very

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>early part of the universe where everything is just energy,

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and the universe then expands and cools and as it cools.

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like crystallizes into lower energy states. Things

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of like come together and form stable particles. And

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>by looking around in the universe and seeing sort of

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>what was made, we can tell sort of like what

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the options were. We don't know like why it's possible

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to build neutrons necessarily, but we see that a lot

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of them sort of emerged from the chaos of the

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>early universe. And that's another really fascinating aspect of these

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>particles is their age. Like protons, we think that protons

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>probably live forever. Like you make a proton, you can

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>just hang out forever and stick around till the end

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of time. Same with an electron. Electron is stable, right,

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you have an electron sitting in empty space, it will

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>just stay an electron for a billion years, maybe a

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>trillion years, a quadrillion years. And what that means is

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that the protons and electrons inside your body were probably

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>made during the Big Bang. So you are made of

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>ancient multitudes. I mean, you know, thank you for that,

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you for calling me old. So neutrons weren't necessarily

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 1>made during the Big Bang. You're saying, so neutrons were

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>also made during the Big bang, right as the universe cooled,

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we got protons, we've got electrons, we've got neutrons. But

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a difference between protons, electrons, and neutrons that goes

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>beyond just their electric charge. Neutrons don't seem to last

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>forever the same way that protons and electrons do. In fact,

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't last very long at all. So that makes

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>them fundamentally weird and different. And by studying the details

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of how long the neutron lives and what it turns into,

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we might get some clues to these questions about like

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:55.479
<v Speaker 1>why are there neutrons after all? What's going on inside

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the neutrons? Are they irrelevant little particles? Are they the

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>most important clue we have to the nature of the universe?

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, no, I'm really curious, like what does it

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>mean for a neutron to be alive? And then how

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>does it die? And how long does that process take?

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And so today on the podcast we'll be answering the

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>question how long does a neutron live? Alright, Katie, and

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you've already called me out, I see for using the

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:29.719
<v Speaker 1>word live in the title, because our neutrons alive after all,

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>and you know, as a particle physicist, I think about

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>these particles as sort of having a lifetime. But you're right,

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>neutrons are not alive, nor are they dead in any

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of biological sense. I mean, if you corner a

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>biologist and try to get them to answer the question

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>what is life, They're gonna start sweating and giving you

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a really complex answer. So it's not a simple question.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>But but no, I get it. So it's like a

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>neutron does not always remain a neutron in the sense

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that it does not stay the same forever, and so

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that could be seen as it, you know, essentially decaying

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>or dying. Right exactly, When we talk about particle lifetimes,

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about how long the particle exists before it

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>turns into something else. So some particles in the universe

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>are stable, like electrons and protons and the corks that

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>make up those protons and photons. For example, you can

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>create a photon with a flashlight, shoot it out into space,

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and it might fly for billions or trillions of years.

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Some of the photons received by your eyeballs when you

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>look up at night have been crawling across the universe

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>for billions of years. It's incredible how long they have survived.

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So some particles sort of live forever. And again we're

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>using to live in a sort of anthropomorphic biological analogy

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to life. Really we just mean exists, but other particles don't.

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Other particles are not stable, and the neutron is one

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of those. That's really interesting. So yeah, I didn't really

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>think of neutrons as being an impermanent thing. I think

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>about the building blocks of life. I mean I pictured

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>them as these like little permanent speares that you know,

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>make everything and just stay the same, and you know

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that is just this kind of like solid foundation to everything.

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>But now you're shaking that all up. What if I

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>told you that one of your legos a specific kind

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of lego, if you didn't use it, it would just

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like evaporate or turn into other kinds of legos. That

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds like an excuse a little brother would give when

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you're stealing all my legos. All right, but this is

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>not a family therapy podcast, at least not yet. So

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I was curious if other people had thought about the

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>lifetime of the neutron, if people were aware that neutrons

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>don't live forever, and how long they thought it might live.

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>So I went out there to our cadre of Internet

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>volunteers who are willing to answer hard physics questions without

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>any opportunity to prepare themselves. Thank you very much, and

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>if you would like to join this hearty group, then please,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll be shy right to me. Two questions at Daniel

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge dot com. So think about it for a moment.

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you know how long a neutron lives? Here's what

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>people had to say. I guess. My guess would be

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that it would live indefinitely until some other force overpowers

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the forces that hold it together. Tron lives um like

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a free nel tron shouldn't been that long, but I

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know, probably not more than a few minutes. I

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think that actually this is something that's really confused me

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>as I've started to look into and tried to understand

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>particle physics and quantum physics and everything, and I think

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that possibly it's just an instant. Yeah, neutrons, just like

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of particles, just exists for an instant.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, it could be they could last

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for by entire lifetime, so yeah, it could be a

0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>long time as well. Well. Neutrons makeup part of stomic nuclei,

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>so they live for at least as long as the

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>longest lived elements UM, so at least a few million years.

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think UH universe skills tend to be quite extreme,

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>so I guess since they don't live for only fractions

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 1>of a millisecond, I'm going to guess they live for

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>billions of years. I don't know if a neutron lives forever,

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think the answer to that question is we

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know if neutrons live forever. I know that proton

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>decay is still actively being studied and debated, and I

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think a neutron would be much different. And as

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of now, I believe we do not know how long

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>they live or if they decay away. I know that

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>protons decay inter neutrons UM because they emit a positron,

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna wonder whether neutrons can also emit an

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.239
<v Speaker 1>electron and in a sense decay into protons. But this

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>process doesn't happen, so all the proton has a lifetime

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of I don't know if the order of a few

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>seconds UM, and you'tron. I know it's a number of

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>years and I think it's the amount amount of time

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is comfortable to the age of the universe something like that.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I really like the answer, probably just an instant, or

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:21.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe my entire lifetime, because even though that seems funny,

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like how could you compare an instant to an entire lifetime?

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>How could you be so equivocal? On the universal scale,

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>those are almost the same in a certain way, right,

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Like when you look at the entire lifetime of the universe,

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:39.719
<v Speaker 1>an instant in one human lifetime or not that different exactly.

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>And that's the incredible thing about all of these numbers

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>in physics that when you're talking about how long something lives,

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it could be some crazy, tiny tiny number ten to

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the minus twenty seconds, or it could be cosmic the

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>scale of the lifetime of the universe, right, which is like,

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, six tillions of seconds, and so it's hard

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to know, like on that huge scale where to put

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>these numbers, And so if you don't have any information,

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>then you're right, his entire lifetime does feel sort of

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>like an instant. And that's one of my favorite things

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>about physics that it may think about these cosmic sweeps

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of time and recognize the fact that something that might

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>take our entire lifetime is basically meaningless on the time

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>scale of the universe. Well, way to make me feel

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>both old and small. So in terms of neutrons, like

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting, like if they live like a human lifetime,

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.479
<v Speaker 1>that makes me feel a little less alone, or if

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>they live like an instant, that almost makes me feel

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>sorry for them. It's really hard not to anthropomorphize something

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>once we're talking about how long it lasts, as if

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the neutron particularly cares. But I guess I want to know, like,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>what what is the neutron? Should I feel sorry for it? Well,

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to tell you how to feel about

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the particles, but I'm happy to tell you how they're

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>put together and what they mean. And so in the

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>case of a neutron, we've been talking about it as

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>if it was a particle in itself, like atoms. We

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>said are made out of protons and neutrons in the

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>nucleus surrounded by electrons. And that's true, but we can

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>also drill one step deeper to understand what is the

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>neutron itself made out of? Now, in the case of

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>some fundamental particles like the electron, we don't know if

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>they're actually fundamental or made out of even smaller lego

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>building blocks. So far, the electron just looks like it's

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>only made out of itself, but that might just be

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>because we haven't zoomed in far enough. We don't have

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>colliders capable of blowing up electrons and seeing what's inside them.

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>In the case of protons and neutrons, we actually have

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>been able to break them up and see what's inside.

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>For about the last fifty years or so, we have

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>had colliders capable of smashing these particles and showing us

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>what they are made out of. And fascinatingly, the proton

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and the neutron are made out of the same two

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>building blocks, up quarks and down corks, so there are

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>two funny little particles. They have weird fractional electric charges,

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 1>which allows them to get added up to make a

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>neutron or a proton. So, for example, a neutron is

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>an up cork which is charged two thirds, and then

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>two down corks, each of which are charged minus one third.

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So neutron is an up, down, down Three of these

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>corks put together, and you get zero electric charge. So physicists,

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>when you're asked what's up cork? Do you just say

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>not much what's up cork with you? Or do you

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>have an actual answer to what's an up cork? And

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess what's a down cork? I don't know what's

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>up is down, what's down is up? Sometimes in physics,

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, as I always say, I'm not going to

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>be held responsible for the names of these particles, but

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are some reasons why we called them

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>up corks and down corks. They're organized together by the

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>weak force into this pair, this up and down pair

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that get linked together by the w boson, which we're

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about in just a minute. But actually

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in the nucleus, the upcorks and down corks are not

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>held together by the weak force. They're held together by

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the strong force. So quarks have electric charges, but that's

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>not what's holding them together. Like you think about the

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>way molecules are held together, they're held together because of

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the electric charges. These electrons are like whizzing around and

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>making these ionic bonds or covalent bonds. The electric charges

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>are basically irrelevant once you get inside the proton and

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the neutron because there's a much more powerful force at play.

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>And that's the strong nuclear force, which totally overwhelms the

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic force, is able to hold all of these particles together.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And the strong nuclear force does that by using gluons.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So your mental picture of a neutron shouldn't be like

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>three little lego pieces that clicked neatly together and that's it. Instead,

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it's more like three tiny little dots surrounded by a

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>swarm of these gluons that are holding it together. So

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>it's more like a bag of gluons with three hard

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>dots in it. So, oh my gosh, so gluons. It's

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>just this sort of like swarm of these things that

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>hold together the up quarks and down corks. So like,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the more we split things apart and try to think

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 1>about like the even smaller thing that holds the smaller

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>things together, it gets really difficult for my brain not

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>to start hurting. But all right, So, so do we

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>know like how many gluons are in a neutron or

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>is it just kind of this mass of stuff that

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we know holds together of corks and down corks, But

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we can't necessarily quantify how many of these things there are. Yeah,

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that is a great question because probably you're wanting to

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>put together a model of what's going on inside the

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>neutron that has like a basic recipe, and those things

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>clicked together to make a neutron way like pieces of

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a jigsaw puzzle get clicked together to make a bigger picture. Right,

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's not really the way we think about these gluons.

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Luans in this case are force particles. They're not matter particles.

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>What that means is that they don't really exist in

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the same way that the matter particles do. They exist

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>as a representation of the force between the matter particles.

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So you have the up cork and the two down corks.

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>They're sitting there and they're pulling on each other, the

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>strong forces holding them together there. How do you think

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>about that force, Well, there's a few different ways of

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>doing it. One is to think about them exchanging particles

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>like zooming gluons back together. That's how they hold themselves together.

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And you can use that same strategy to think about

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>how other particles talk to each other, Like what happens

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>when two electrons push against each other because they have

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the same electric charge. How does that actually work microscopically, Well,

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you can think of them as shooting photons towards each

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>other because photons are the force particle for the electromagnetic force.

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So inside the neutron, these corks are holding onto each

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>other by shooting gluons at each other. That's one way

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about how the forces are working inside the neutron.

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>There's another way of thinking about it, which doesn't use

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this sort of like virtual particles, these gluons sipping back

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and forth. You just think about fields. Like if you're

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable thinking about an electron being surrounded by its

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>electric field and the way that it pushes on other

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>electrons is that it's electric field pushes on it, then

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you can think about the interior of the neutron that

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>same way as having three quarks each surrounded by a

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.959
<v Speaker 1>field from the strong force, and those fields are tugging

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>on each other. Those are gluonic fields. You can think

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>about them as either like a huge tower or virtual

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>gluons which appear and disappear very quickly, or you can

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>think about them in terms of fields. Are two equivalent

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>mental pictures for the same fundamental process that's going on.

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>But you can't really like count the number of gluons

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>because they're not particles that exist in the same way

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>as the corks. So, Okay, in my recipe that I'm

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>writing for home baked neutrons, I'm just gonna put down

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a pinch of gluons. So you said that this is

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>these are strong, uh, strong forces holding this neutron together.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>But we were just talking about how maybe these neutrons

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>break apart. So how would they break apart if you

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>have these really strong forces holding them together? Great question,

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>and it reveals something about the way I think a

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of people think about particles and their decay. What

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>happens when a particle decays? Is it breaking apart? Are

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you taking its pieces and they're reassembling them to build

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>something else? Right, Well, what's happening when a neutron decays

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is not actually that is breaking apart at all. It's

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that one piece of its internal structure, one of those corks,

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>changes its nature. So remember that a neutron is up, down,

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>down right tow down corks and an up cork. Well,

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>what happens if one of those down corks changes its

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>flavor and becomes an up cork? Then you have two

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>upcorks in a down instead of two down corks and

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>an up. Remember that up coorks are charged plus two

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>thirds and a down cork is charged minus one third,

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So now you have plus two third plus two third

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>minus one third gives you a charge of plus one.

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a proton. So what happens when a neutron decays

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>is that one of its down corks converts into an

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>upcork and the neutron becomes a proton. So it doesn't

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>break apart. It flips from being a neutron to being

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a proton. That's amazing. So it's less of a death

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of a particle in more of a tram information of

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>a particle. Do we have any idea of why a

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>down cork would become up cork? Yeah, Like you know,

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>why does it down cork decide it wants to be

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>an upcork one day? You know, like why isn't it

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just happy being an upcork. It's a great question, and

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a really deep question. It's like why does any

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>particle decay? You know, why do muance just hang out

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and be muance? Why do they decay to electrons and

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of neutrinos? Why does anything decay? And the

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>reason is that the universe is constantly getting colder and

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>spreading out. Entropy and statistical mechanics tells us that the

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>universe doesn't like to have energy localized in a little spot.

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>It likes for it to spread out. Sort of fascinating

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanical, the universe likes to occupy multiple quantum states

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>instead of like being focused on a single quantum state.

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>What that means essentially is that any particle will always

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>decay into a lower mass particle. If it's possible for

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you to take a step down the mass ladder to

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>break up into smaller particle with less mass than you,

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>always will the universe is its constant pressure. It's the

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>same as if you have like a hot object sitting

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>on a surface, it's going to spread its energy out

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to the neighboring stuff. The same way you have a

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.880
<v Speaker 1>very high mass particle. It wants to break up into

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>lower mass particles. And it turns out that the neutron

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is heavier than the proton just by a little bit,

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and so the neutron can do this. It can take

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a step down into a lower energy configuration. So the

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>neutron is a higher energy state, which means it has

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more mass. And decays down into a proton.

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>It does this by flipping one of the down corks

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>into an upcorp. So it's my freshly biked neutron. It's

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a hot soup flay. And then if

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I leave that out, it's going to cool down and

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>then collapse into a proton. I got it. Oh, speaking

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:49.959
<v Speaker 1>of su fla, I did leave one out, so we're

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna need to take a quick break while I go

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>check on that. I'm sure it's fine, uh, And then

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we hopefully will come back and I'll still have my

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>neutron soup fla attack and we'll continue talking about how

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>long do these neutrons live? How do I resuscitate my

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>neutron souflay? So we'll be right back. Okay, So bad

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>news is that my soup fla did collapse. The good

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>news is I guess it's now our proton, so all

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't lost. That's always the backup plan for your neutron souflay.

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Turns out, charge it up to a proton south lag.

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, a sou flay that collapses is still

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna taste pretty good. So a neutron that decays into

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a proton is still a particle. It'll still build things

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>like delicious soufleas exactly. And so we were talking about

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>how neutrons decay and how they turn into protons, and

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>people might be wondering, like what's going on with the

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>electric charges? Like can you just turn a down cork

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>which is charged minus a third into an upcork, which

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is charged plus two thirds? Like charge doesn't just come

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>for fruit. You can't just like create charge. How do

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you just convert a neutron into a plus one charged proton? Right?

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>The answer is that the universe does do the accounting

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>quite carefully. And when a downcourt converts into an upcork,

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it also emits a W particle. Okay, now you're just

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>making up particles. What's the W particle? So a W

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>particle is the force particle for the weak nuclear force. Right,

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we got all these different forces. We have electromagnetism, we

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>have a strong force, we have the weak force. Each

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>one we think of as carried by a particle. So

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>photons carry the electromagnetic force, gluons carry these strong force.

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>W particles carry the weak nuclear force. The weak nuclear

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>force is like the weirdest, strangest, most amazing sporce there is.

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not very powerful, but it can do all sorts

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of really strange stuff. And we have a couple of

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>podcast episodes dedicated just to under standing the weak force

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and parity violation and all that crazy stuff. But in

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>this case, the weak force is here to help balance

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the books. When a down cork becomes an upcork, that

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of costs one electric charge. You've gone from a

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>neutron to a proton. So to balance the books, you

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>also need to create something with negative charge. The amazing

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>thing about these W particles is that they do have charge,

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>so the W can have a positive or a negative charge.

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>In this case, you emit a W minus which balances

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the charges. So have you've gone from a neutron to

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a proton and a W minus. So the proton is

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>plus one, the W minus is minus one. That all

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>adds up to zero. The W minus itself doesn't live

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>for very long and it turns into an electron and

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>an anti neutrino. Okay, so an electron does have a

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>negative charge, so it still retains that negative charge. What

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is an anti neutrino? Yeah, and anti neutrino is one

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of these little ghostly particles. So you and I are

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>made of protons and neutrons and electrons, which are made

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.479
<v Speaker 1>of upcorks and down corks. But there's this other particle,

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this neutrino, which exists in the universe and can be made,

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Sun is pumping out like jillions of them

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>every second. But they're very strange little particles because they

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>don't appear normally inside matter, Like I am not made

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>out of neutrinos, and you're not made out of neutrinos

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in any way. But it's something that the universe can exist.

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like a Lego building block that's never used in

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>making anything bigger or larger. It's just sort of like

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>floating around in the universe. Yeah, I remember those Lego blocks.

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>They're usually like these like weirdly shaped, clear little ones,

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and they would just kind of not be used in anything,

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>get quickly lost or eaten exactly. And neutrinos are strange

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>because they're very very low mass, they're almost massless but

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>not entirely, and they also hardly interact. They don't have

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>any electric charge, they don't have the strong force, so

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they basically just fly through everything. So neutrino when it's produced,

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>can fly through like a star without blinking an eye

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>into a neutrino. The whole universe is transparent, and so

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that just sort of flies out. And so to summarize them,

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>when a neutron decays, it turns into a proton, an electron,

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and then an anti neutrino, and so that's what happens

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>when a neutron decase. That's spooky. So neutron does kind

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of create a ghost when it decays scientifically speaking exactly.

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And we should also be clear about what we mean

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>about neutron decay because people might be wondering, like, does

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that mean that the neutrons that are in my body

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>right now are going to like break up, like they

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>don't last for long? Like, am I dying because my

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>neutrons are decaying? Yeah, I want to know if I

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>will spontaneously turn into a pile of protons, electrons and

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>ghost particles in my best interest to know. And that's

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the really fascinating mysteries about neutron decay is

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that neutrons do decay, but only sort of like when

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>they're on their own, floating out in the universe. When

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:54.719
<v Speaker 1>a neutron is inside a nucleus when it's hanging out

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>with other protons. When it and it's proton brethren have

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>built something larger, then he can last forever. You know,

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a stable nucleus like iron, right, iron can

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>live forever. We think if you have an iron atom

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>sitting alone in the universe, it's made of protons and

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>neutrons and electrons, it can sit there, we think forever.

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>We think it's stable. If it's not perturbed, it will

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>just hang out until the end of time. That includes

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the neutrons inside the iron right there there. They're neutrons.

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>They will hang out forever. Their down corks are not

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>going to flip into up corks, turning them into protons.

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>This is like the ultimate ziplock bag techniques. So keeping

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>neutrons fresh forever. I love that technology for my strawberries.

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>They're so good, but they go bad so fast. Exactly so,

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the neutrons in your body are in atoms, and so

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>they are likely to last as long as those atoms last.

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you take a neutron out of the atom

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have it by itself hanging out in free space,

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 1>now we can talk about the lifetime of that neutron.

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>What does it do when it's left alone? Well, the

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>neutrons sitting there in empty space last till end of

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 1>time or will it decay? So if you put like

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a proton and then a neutron and electron, you have

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>them just hanging out in free space and you just wait.

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>The proton will last forever, we think, the electron will

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>last forever, we think, but the neutron will not. The

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.479
<v Speaker 1>neutron by itself will decay. One of those down corks

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>will flip. That's the actual sound it makes, and it

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>will turn into a proton electron and an anti neutrino.

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 1>So when we talked about the neutron last time, we're

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>talking about the isolated neutron, not a neutron that's inside

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the nucleus. So, when it's inside the nucleus, what is

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that zip block effect that is keeping it from decaying. Yeah,

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question, and there's a lot of mysteries

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>there because we don't really understand very well how the

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 1>strong force works. We talked about it briefly a little earlier,

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but when protons and neutrons are locked together inside a nucleus,

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you just have these particles and they're

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>stuck together like legos. They're also talking to each other

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 1>because remember a proton and a neutron, they're not just

0:35:56.560 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>linked together quarks, they're little bags of gluons. When you

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>get a proton and neutron close enough together, then their

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>gluons talk to each other. Those bags leak a little bit.

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>They're not totally separate from each other, and really they

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of like weave themselves into a larger mosaic. You

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.800
<v Speaker 1>might wonder inside a heavy hydrogen atom, where you have

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>not just a proton, but a proton or a neutron,

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>what's making the proton and neutron stick to each other? Right,

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the proton is positively charged, the neutron is negatively charged.

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Why did they stick together at all? Why don't they

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>just float apart? The answer is their gluons. When you

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>get them that close together, then the gluons inside each

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>other's bags talk to each other, and they click together

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>into sort of a larger object which is not really

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>anymore just and isolated proton, not really any more isolated neutron,

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>but this combined object that has these linkages together. So

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is that why when you keep adding neutrons to an

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>atom that it becomes maybe less stable because you start

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to weaken those gluon forces. Yeah, you can make it

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>less stable or more stable. Right, The way that you

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>organize the protons and the neutrons inside the nucleus totally

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>determined whether something is stable or not. We have a

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>fun podcast episode about the islands of stability and how

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>heavy you can make something and keep it stable. We

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answer to that because the strong force

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.919
<v Speaker 1>is very difficult to do calculations with, Like we can't

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>sit down with pencil and paper and solve the quantum

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 1>mechanics of the nucleus the way we can with the

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen atom. Folks who have done physics in college have

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>done like the shortening your equation for the hydrogen atom.

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>When we know those equations, we can solve them, we

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>can find the states of the electron. We don't know

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.439
<v Speaker 1>how to do those calculations for the strong force because

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's much more powerful and much more sensitive to tiny details,

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So we don't actually know like the answer to those

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>We can't do it with pencil and paper. We have

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:49.320
<v Speaker 1>massive computers trying to do those calculations, but it's really challenging,

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So mostly it's experimental. We try to like build heavier

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff and see if we can keep it together. People

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>shoot like neutrons at atoms and see like, oh, can

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I get one to stick in there and make something

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>which lasts longer. So it's a whole area of research.

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>How do weave protons and neutrons together into stable objects?

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 1>We think that they organize themselves in terms of these shells.

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Is this nuclear shell model that tells you how to

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>build protons and neutrons together into a stable nucleus sort

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of analogous to the way electrons organize themselves in shells

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on the outside of the atom. It's really fascinating. So

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I am feeling more and more like a physicist based

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on my childhood because I would try to just build

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing out of legos and then kind of

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>hold it up and see if it could sustain and

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:34.280
<v Speaker 1>self for if it would fall apart. And it sounds

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.839
<v Speaker 1>like that's what you guys are doing, just with more

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>expensive equipment. But yeah, so that that is interesting is

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you're saying that, like maybe they arrange themselves into shells.

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>When you're talking about shells, I'm assuming this is not

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>like a mollusk shell or something. So what is a

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>shell in terms of particle physics. Yes, when we talk

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.839
<v Speaker 1>about shells we think of like spheres and other arrangements.

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>We think of The protons and neutrons inside the nucleus

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>have somehow found stable ways to organize themselves into these

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>like little mosaics. Instead of thinking about them really as

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 1>protons and neutrons anymore, you really should think about them

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>as components of this fabric, this nuclear fabric, which likes

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to weave itself together. And the incredible thing is that

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:20.359
<v Speaker 1>it's stable, like in many configurations, even for very very

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 1>heavy elements, these things are quite stable. Again, we don't

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>really understand it. And so there's two different communities of

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>physicists here, the ones that like to make really big

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>blobs of protons and neutrons and understand like how are

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they working together? And then there's the folks who just

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>want to like dig inside one neutron and say, well,

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.720
<v Speaker 1>let's just study the neutron by itself. Let's zoom inside

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the neutron and see if we can understand what makes

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that cork flip from one to the other. How often

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>does that happen? How long does it take? And what

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>does that mean about the neutron. So you've got like

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear physicists studying like huge blobs of neutrons and

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>protons inside the nucleus, and they have us particle physicists

0:39:57.200 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>looking to break it apart and see what's inside. That's

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. So now that we have isolated the neutron,

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it's we've broken apart that atom. It's outside, it's vulnerable.

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Now what happens? So now we can see how long

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it takes to pop into a proton and electron and

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a neutrino. And so this is a really interesting question,

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>just like how long does it take? Remember, protons will

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>live for trillions of years. There's two amazing things about

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the neutron lifetime how long a neutron will survive on

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 1>its own. First is that it's very short. It's like

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes. The neutron does not last very long. The

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 1>person is that it's basically instantaneous on a cosmic timescale.

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right, you know, neutron's last for like fifteen minutes.

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's nothing. You know, cosmically, do you make a neutron?

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>You leave it there, you go to get a coffee

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and you come back it's gone. You know, that's kind

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of sad to me. I don't know why. Again, I'm

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like attributing emotions to these things in the universe that,

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know, don't feel emotions, but it does.

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It seems very um disconcerting. That's something as fundamental as

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a neutron, less about as long as it takes for

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>my soup to cool down. Yeah, So if you want

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:11.479
<v Speaker 1>to build something out of neutrons, and you make yourself

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>a big pile of neutrons, you better get to work.

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 1>No time for a coffee break, you know, before you

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 1>get started. Like you got to use them or lose them.

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 1>The other fascinating thing about the neutron lifetime is we

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 1>don't actually know what it is. We've tried to measure it,

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and we have two very different ways of measuring the

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>neutron lifetime, like two very different experimental setups, and they

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>get different results. Like one group put a bunch of

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 1>them in a bottle and wait to see how many

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they have like ten minutes later, and they get an

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 1>answer of like fourteen minutes and thirty nine seconds. And

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>other folks use a beam of neutrons and count how

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.720
<v Speaker 1>many protons come out, and they get a different answer.

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 1>They get fourteen minutes and forty eight seconds, So there's

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like a nine second difference, so we don't even actually know. Well,

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I see what the problem is. Probably one group is

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>using one Mississippis and the other group is using one

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>potato to potato. You have solved this mystery. It is

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 1>funded physicists for decades and today you have figured it out. Katie. Wow,

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much your contributions to particle physics. So

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you're welcome everyone for me solving this physics problem. And

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>when we get back, um, I'm sure Daniel will make

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:24.240
<v Speaker 1>some kind of argument that no, it's not as simple

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as one Mississippi or one potato, but you know all

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of them have a short break to work that one out,

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>because I think my argument is prettier tight. Okay, And

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>so we're back and we've got this. Two teams of

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I would assume, very smart, very professional scientists, but they're

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:57.959
<v Speaker 1>coming to slightly different answers on how long it takes

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:02.240
<v Speaker 1>for a neutron on to decay. One group fourteen minutes

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine seconds, the other group fourteen minutes and forty

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>eight seconds. So what the heck is going wrong? Is

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>one group just wrong? We don't know. It's really fascinating

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>to have watched this series of experiments over a couple

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of decades. You know, whenever you do something in physics,

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you try to do it a couple of ways because

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to make mistakes. You're doing something hard, you're

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>making assumptions, you're doing the best you can, but it's

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>very easy for mistakes to creep in, and so it's

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>great practice to have two different groups of people doing

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it two different ways, making different mistakes. In the end,

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to be measuring the same thing about the universe.

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>The neutron should just have a certain lifetime and we

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:40.320
<v Speaker 1>should be able to measure it and get the same answer.

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And if we don't, that means that one of our

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>assumptions is wrong, where somebody is making a mistake, or

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 1>there's something deeper going on. Right, something is happening in

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>one of these experiments that we don't understand, which could

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.240
<v Speaker 1>be like a clue as to how the universe works.

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So originally these two groups made these measurements and they

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the same answer, But nobody was worried because

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>their airbor were pretty large. You know, the difference was

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like eight or nine seconds, but the uncertainty was like

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. So people have thought, we'll just keep working

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and maybe the numbers will creep together as they get

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>more precise. The opposite has happened. Both groups have been

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>working hard to reduce those uncertainties, you know, figure out

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the sources of error and potential bias in their experiments,

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>shaving them off, calibrating them, cross checking them. And as

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the uncertainties have decreased, and now those uncertainties are like

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>less than a second or two, the size of the

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>difference between the two experiments has stayed the same. In fact,

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:32.799
<v Speaker 1>it's even crept up a little bit, from like eight

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to almost ten seconds. Okay, so we have Team Bottle,

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say, and then Team Beam. So what

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>are these teams doing? Because they have very different methods

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>going on here, which that may somewhat explain why they're

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 1>getting different results. So first let's go over like Team Bottle.

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 1>What is Team Bottle doing just you know, shaking up

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>some neutrons and a bottle, seeing what happens to them.

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 1>That's basically, yeah, they have a new tron source. This

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>is actually at Los Alumos, New Mexico, where I grew up.

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>I was wasn't involved in this experiment. It's a huge

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>facility there. As far as you know. Anyways, go on,

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I may have been unwittingly roped into this experiment. They

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of neutrons there and basically they put

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>them in a bottle. They get them ultra cold, so

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not moving very fast, and neutrons are a bit

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:23.120
<v Speaker 1>hard to store because they don't have electric charts, so

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>you can't use magnetic fields or electric fields to control them.

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 1>You have to use gravity to get them cold. So

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 1>they slow down and let them just like fall into

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>this container. They call it the bathtub, And basically they

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 1>just collect a bunch of neutrons. They very carefully count

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:39.760
<v Speaker 1>how many introns they start with, and then they measure

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the number of neutrons in their bottle, and then they

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 1>come back ten minutes later, measured again. And they come

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:45.840
<v Speaker 1>back ten minutes later and they measure it again. And

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the essence of the experiment, is like, if you

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>think something doesn't last very long, put a bunch of

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>them in a bottle. Count how many you have come

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 1>back later and count them again. So it's very simple

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>experiment in that way. So you've got this this ice

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>cold bottle of delicious new atron's man that makes me thirsty.

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:04.399
<v Speaker 1>And so they would measure these and they would find

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>that they are sort of disappearing at a certain rate,

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and that is how they got at fourteen minutes and

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine seconds exactly. The important thing to understand is

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that the neutron lifetime doesn't mean that every neutron has

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a clock in it and it expires exactly after fourteen

0:46:19.560 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>minutes and thirty nine seconds. It's an exponential decay. Every

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 1>neutron has a probability to decay in any moment. And

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>if some fraction of your neutrons will decay in shorter time,

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and a fraction of the neutrons will last longer, just

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>like radioactive decay, it's the same fundamental process. In fact,

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it is that process protons turning into neutrons, which drives

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 1>also radioactive decay. So you don't like watch one neutron,

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>just ask how long did it live. Have a whole

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 1>population of neutrons, and you count how many you have

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>over time, and you fit that to a function and

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>exponential decay, and you measure sort of the parameter the

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>slope of that function. So it's a bit more than

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:56.840
<v Speaker 1>just watching one neutron decay. That's why you have a

0:46:56.880 --> 0:46:59.399
<v Speaker 1>population of them. So they have these in a little

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 1>bathtub and then every once in a while they're trying

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to count all of them. They pushed them against this

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 1>counter which is covered in boron and zinc, and that

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>makes the neutrons give off a little flash of light,

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 1>and they count how many flashes of light they saw,

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and that tells them how many neutrons they have left

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I see. So these two experiments would be like two

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 1>groups of alien scientists measuring the average lifespan of a human. Like, sure,

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>our lifespans are going to differ, but they're not going

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to differ by like hundreds of years. They're going to

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>differ by a matter of a few years. And so

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you should in theory, even if these two alien scientists

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:37.800
<v Speaker 1>groups have different methods of measuring our lifespan, they should

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in theory be able to both come up with the

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 1>same average lifespan. But in this case they're not. So

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>then what is what is Team Beam doing? The Team

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Beam is taking the opposite approach, where his team Bottle

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is saying, let's count how many neutrons we still have left,

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Team Beam is asking how many neutrons disappear. So they

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 1>have a beam of neutrons that they create, and they

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>count how many protons are created within these beams, because

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:04.240
<v Speaker 1>remember a neutron decays and it decays into a proton,

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:07.839
<v Speaker 1>So to count how many neutrons have disappeared, they count

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:10.720
<v Speaker 1>how many protons are created. And so instead of counting

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:13.319
<v Speaker 1>how many neutrons they still have, like the Bottle guys

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>are doing, they're counting how many neutrons have left the room.

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So in the analogy you were talking about with human lifetime,

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.359
<v Speaker 1>instead of counting how many humans do we still have left,

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they're counting graves. I see. I mean it makes me wonder.

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 1>And again this is probably you know, me strolling in

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:34.359
<v Speaker 1>without having done the rigorous testing that Team Beam has done.

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But like, could there be like some infiltration of protons,

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>like protons coming from some other source that is messing

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:44.400
<v Speaker 1>with their results. Absolutely, that's the kind of thing that

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they've been thinking about for like the last twenty years.

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So you're right, it's something to be worried about, but

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>they're very careful. They shield their experiments that magnetic fields

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to prevent anything from creeping in, and they filter these

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:58.879
<v Speaker 1>protons out using magnetic fields and very careful to only

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>count the protons that they think come from their beam.

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So each experiment has like a long list of ways

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:06.879
<v Speaker 1>that they can get it wrong. And over the last

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>ten years they've been like going down that list and thinking,

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 1>how can we check this, How do we really know

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>this is true? Can we do this another way just

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to verify, just like as a sanity check, maybe there's

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 1>something going wrong here. And they've gone down that list

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and nobody's found any basic mistakes, and as a result,

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>they've been able to shave down their uncertainty because now

0:49:25.680 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 1>they have like multiple ways of doing every step of

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>their experiment to convinced themselves that their number is correct.

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 1>So we still have Team Bottle and Team Beam doing

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>very careful work. Nobody has an idea for what might

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:40.319
<v Speaker 1>be different where the mistake could be, but they're still

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:43.839
<v Speaker 1>getting different answers. Also, bringing it back to the aliens

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:47.919
<v Speaker 1>observing Earth analogy, I mean, I wonder if maybe there

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:51.759
<v Speaker 1>could like these teams could be doing everything perfectly and

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 1>executing the experiments perfectly, still getting the different results, but

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>not because they made an error, but because there's something

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>else going on. So, for instance, maybe if the Team

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Alien one is just counting the number of humans left

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 1>after a certain amount of time and average getting the

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:13.359
<v Speaker 1>lifespan average from that, they may not be taking into

0:50:13.400 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>account like a new births or something. And then for

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Team Alien just measuring the graves. You know, what if

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:22.879
<v Speaker 1>you have a grave that has like more than one

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:25.719
<v Speaker 1>person in it, So could there be something going on

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 1>where these these two you know, let's not blame the

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 1>groups of scientists or the intern or the janitor. Nobody's

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 1>doing anything wrong. But they are actually correct. But just

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>because their method of measurement is different, there is some

0:50:40.960 --> 0:50:45.480
<v Speaker 1>some mysterious mechanism going on that is creating that difference. Yes, absolutely,

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that is sort of the hope, right. The boring answer

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is like, oh, it turns out the cable wasn't plugged

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in right, or this temperature was set to the wrong number,

0:50:52.960 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>and like you know, from an experimental point of view,

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that would be satisfied to figure it out. More exciting

0:50:57.600 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 1>would be is if it reveals that one of the

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 1>assumptions that are made that suggests that these two experiments

0:51:02.480 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>should be getting the same answer are fundamentally wrong. So

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 1>people have been very creative about this, and there is

0:51:08.280 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>one cool idea floating out there that maybe when the

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:15.439
<v Speaker 1>neutron decays, it doesn't always decay into a proton. Maybe

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it decays into something else like dark matter. Some

0:51:19.880 --> 0:51:22.919
<v Speaker 1>tiny fraction of time, the neutron turns into dark matter,

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and that would explain this difference because remember that the

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:29.240
<v Speaker 1>beam folks, they won't see it if the neutron decays

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>into something else. They only count the number of times

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the neutron decays into a proton because they assume it

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 1>always decays into a proton. Now the bottle folks, they

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 1>will see that neutron disappear because they're counting the neutrons themselves.

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So if the neutrons sometimes decay into something which is

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not a proton, then these two groups will get different numbers.

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 1>So this is fun idea out there about how maybe

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>neutrons will sometimes decay into dark matter instead of into protons.

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:57.760
<v Speaker 1>That is really cool. I love that when in science,

0:51:57.840 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like if you get an unexpected result bolt or something

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a mistake, it could actually lead you

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to an even bigger, even more interesting discovery. And there's

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>so many times in the history of science when you

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 1>do that, When people do experiments, they think just like

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 1>wrapping up everything, tying up the loose ends. We're pretty

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>sure we understand what we're gonna see. And then there's

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a discrepancy and it's persistent and it won't go away,

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes you tug on that thread and it unravels

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:25.360
<v Speaker 1>like everything we thought we knew about the universe. You know,

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole discovery of quantum mechanics was from people like

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>m that's weird. You don't really understand what's going on

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 1>with the photoelectric effect. So these little discrepancies are very important.

0:52:34.440 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 1>They're very powerful ways to test your assumptions and to

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:40.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe get a clue that there's something new going on

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in the universe we don't know. And the dark matter

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>idea is just sort of like a category of possibilities.

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>The specific theory that was bounced around for a few

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:51.440
<v Speaker 1>years about the neutrons decay in the dark matter doesn't

0:52:51.520 --> 0:52:53.960
<v Speaker 1>look like it works. They made this very specific prediction

0:52:54.239 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that it would decay into a new state, and in

0:52:56.360 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that state, we decay into dark matter, and along the

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:00.520
<v Speaker 1>way it would make a tiny little lash, a very

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:03.200
<v Speaker 1>specific light. And so the bottle folks looked for this

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 1>flash of light, but they didn't see it. But that

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that it's wrong. There might be some other

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:10.479
<v Speaker 1>explanation in the same vein the neutrons could be turning

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>into something else. We don't expect a new kind of

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:15.879
<v Speaker 1>dark matter or even something else weirder, So, are are

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 1>they looking into new experiments that they could potentially do

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to sort of find out what's going on here exactly?

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to develop like a third way to measure

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the neutron lifetime, because that will give us a handle.

0:53:26.920 --> 0:53:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like a vote, right, we develop a third, totally

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:32.239
<v Speaker 1>independent way with different assumptions than either the first two.

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:34.440
<v Speaker 1>It will tell us which of those first two is

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:37.160
<v Speaker 1>correct and which one is not. Actually measuring the neutron

0:53:37.239 --> 0:53:39.399
<v Speaker 1>lifetime the way we thought it was. A third way

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:42.759
<v Speaker 1>to measure this is actually in space because one way

0:53:42.840 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to make neutrons is to smash protons against the Earth's atmosphere,

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:49.720
<v Speaker 1>which happens all the time out there in space because

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 1>space is filled with high energy cosmic rays. Protons from

0:53:53.239 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the center of the galaxy or from other solar systems

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:59.600
<v Speaker 1>smashing into Earth's atmosphere, creating these showers of particles, including

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:02.359
<v Speaker 1>neutron on. Now, most of these neutrons then like rain

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 1>down on the Earth's surface, and as they do, because

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 1>they're by themselves, they're not inside atomic nuclei, they turn

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:11.839
<v Speaker 1>into protons. So if you can count like the number

0:54:11.880 --> 0:54:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of neutrons created at the edge of the atmosphere with

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a number of protons you then see raining down, you

0:54:17.719 --> 0:54:19.800
<v Speaker 1>can get a sense for how many of those neutrons

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 1>have converted from neutrons into protons. And that's a way

0:54:23.320 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to measure the neutron lifetime. It's a bit tricky and

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it's more complicated, which is why it wasn't like the

0:54:27.440 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 1>first option or the second option. But now we need

0:54:30.480 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 1>a third option and we need to figure this out.

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And so people are even talking about like building probes

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that an orbit Venus, because Venus might have the perfect

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:40.960
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere to do this kind of experiment, because it's got

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 1>so much C O two in it, So it's using

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole planet as a test tube exactly. Particle physicists

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:51.760
<v Speaker 1>are not content to just do experiments in one tiny

0:54:51.840 --> 0:54:54.759
<v Speaker 1>little lab. We want to use the whole universe as

0:54:54.840 --> 0:54:57.200
<v Speaker 1>our experiment. I see you're just trying to use your

0:54:57.600 --> 0:55:02.400
<v Speaker 1>research budget for travel. I get it, exactly. What's this

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:05.560
<v Speaker 1>first class ticket to Venus? Daniel? Can you explain this charge?

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:09.719
<v Speaker 1>But this is something that's really important, you know, not

0:55:09.920 --> 0:55:12.720
<v Speaker 1>just because we want to understand what's inside the neutron

0:55:12.840 --> 0:55:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and how does it work and is the neutron turning

0:55:14.800 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 1>into something else? The neutron lifetime is a really important

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:21.160
<v Speaker 1>component of our universe. You know, in the early universe,

0:55:21.280 --> 0:55:23.480
<v Speaker 1>neutrons were made, as we talked about, but if they

0:55:23.480 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't last for long enough, they couldn't get served up

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 1>into atomic nuclei. So the length of the neutron lifetime

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:32.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of determines how many isotopes are made, how much

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:35.440
<v Speaker 1>helium is made, and so it's important to get this

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:38.560
<v Speaker 1>number right. You know. They determines like the hydrogen to

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:41.960
<v Speaker 1>helium ratio that's made during the Big Bang, but also

0:55:42.040 --> 0:55:45.520
<v Speaker 1>determines like how long stars will live, because the more

0:55:45.640 --> 0:55:49.000
<v Speaker 1>helium you get, the smaller and heavier the stars are

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that are made, which don't burn as long. So this

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:54.799
<v Speaker 1>is like a fundamental ingredient to the early universe calculations.

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 1>It's something we really need to understand. So even a

0:55:57.280 --> 0:56:01.560
<v Speaker 1>discrepancy of a few seconds is very important to determine

0:56:01.719 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what is causing that and what the answer is to

0:56:04.160 --> 0:56:06.360
<v Speaker 1>this right, and it goes to really deep questions in

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:09.200
<v Speaker 1>particle physics about the strong force. You know, this is

0:56:09.239 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 1>something that we can't sit down and predict very confidently.

0:56:12.560 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 1>It takes massive calculation to try to get a sense

0:56:15.440 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for how corks talk to each other because the forces

0:56:17.719 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 1>are so strong and so difficult to calculate with. It's

0:56:20.160 --> 0:56:23.399
<v Speaker 1>something physicists called non perturbative, which means that we can't

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:26.520
<v Speaker 1>make many of our typical assumptions and simplifications when we

0:56:26.640 --> 0:56:29.880
<v Speaker 1>do these calculations. So this is a great laboratory to

0:56:30.040 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 1>force the universe to teach us something about how the

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:35.440
<v Speaker 1>strong force actually works, to force it to like tell us,

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:38.600
<v Speaker 1>here's how this happens. Here's the result of this calculation.

0:56:38.840 --> 0:56:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's a really powerful way to try to get

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:43.640
<v Speaker 1>some inside how these little particles are talking to each other.

0:56:43.760 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And in the end, I got neutrons and you got neutrons.

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So this should be important to all of us. Yeah,

0:56:48.520 --> 0:56:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting. It's such a humble particle that you

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think of this like neutral doesn't seem to have such

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a big role to play, But really it's so important

0:56:58.320 --> 0:57:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to not only to keep us together apparently, like I

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:03.799
<v Speaker 1>don't want to fall apart into a bunch of protons

0:57:03.920 --> 0:57:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and w minuses and then which turns into ghost particles

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and electrons. I want to stay me for as long

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:12.680
<v Speaker 1>as possible, but also just it seems like it's really

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 1>important to understand them, to understand the universe. Yeah, and

0:57:16.560 --> 0:57:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it's an enduring mystery. We're gonna stay tuned to figure

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:21.640
<v Speaker 1>out what's going on with these neutrons, how long they live,

0:57:21.840 --> 0:57:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and whether Team Bottle or Team Beam got it right.

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:27.720
<v Speaker 1>This is exciting. I want to print shirts Team Bottle,

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Team Beam and see we're the dialay. Thank you everybody

0:57:31.160 --> 0:57:34.120
<v Speaker 1>for joining us on this journey, the journey inside our

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 1>atoms and your atoms and the universe's atoms, where tiny

0:57:38.040 --> 0:57:40.840
<v Speaker 1>little clocks determine the fate of neutrons and the fate

0:57:40.920 --> 0:57:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of stars. And thanks very much Katie for joining us

0:57:43.840 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 1>on this very particular podcast. Thanks for having me, and

0:57:47.160 --> 0:57:51.120
<v Speaker 1>good luck with your neutron soup. Flay tune in next time. Everybody,

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:01.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:58:01.920 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the Universe is a production of I heart Radio. For

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:07.840
<v Speaker 1>more podcast from my heart Radio, visit the i heart

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. Ye