WEBVTT - Zichen Wang's Exit Interview From America

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Allaway.

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, we're recording this June fifth. President she Shinping and

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 2>President Trump just held a phone call.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't you like to be a fly on the wall

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 3>for that conversation?

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 4>I would. I don't know what that means.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Markets moved on it. I'm always surprised how hard it

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 2>is to set up phone, just pick up the phone,

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>But I'm always at surprised that these are like bigger news.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.959
<v Speaker 2>It should be noted that this was reported first by

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the Shinwan News agency out of China, and there was

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 2>a headline that the news agency specified that the phone

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 2>call was at Trump's request. They made a point of saying.

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 3>That I still have this image of Trump sitting in

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 3>the Oval office by the phone, just like twittally his

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 3>thumbs waiting for shehian Ping to call, like hoping is

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 3>he gonna call me? Should I wait two days? Should

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 3>I wait three days before responding that kind of thing.

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 2>There was an Ultra Journal article from a few weeks

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 2>ago which made the observation which I had not realized

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 2>outside of the September eleventh terrorist attacks, there's never been

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 2>a contact between the US and China that was initiated

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 2>by China, which I hadn't realized before. I assume it's true.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 3>So Sheishan Ping is sitting in his office twiddling waiting

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 3>for the Trump.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, and then he decided, but he decides to

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 2>either take the call anyway. All of this sort of

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 2>speaks that to the fact, you know, we sort of

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 2>confused by all this, and there's still just so much

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 2>that I think Americans in particular, but I'm sure it

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>goes to both directions, like genuinely don't understand about the

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 2>other country. And given a time of increased tension obviously

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 2>the trade war heightened geopolitical concerns, it's not great. I

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 2>think it would be better even if we sort of

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 2>accept the premise of there is the very intense competition

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 2>that the two countries and the populations and the governments

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>and the people going to governments just know more about

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 2>how they work.

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Have you ever read an English translation of the way

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 3>China academics write and talk about American society and American politics?

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I should read this.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 3>It's really really interesting.

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Should send me some links?

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, I will, but I know a person who

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 3>has done this and translated it and done the work,

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 3>and he will definitely send you some links.

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 2>So I am very excited to say that we have

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>a I think it should be a special episode. We've

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 2>talked to him on the podcast before. We're going to

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>be speaking with Zishen Wog. He is the author of

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 2>the creator of the Pechnology Substack, which essentially looks at

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 2>public comments from officials, academics, leaders in China and then

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>writes about them and translates them for an American audience

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 2>and actually sort of helps an American audience understand what

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>this sort of like public discourse is. And anyway, over

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the last year, he's been getting his master's degree in

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 2>public policy at the Princeton School of Public International Affairs.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 2>So he's been in Princeton over the last year. But

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 2>he's going back to China and he's going to return

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 2>for where he was working at the think tank, the

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Center for China and Globalization.

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, So this is his exit interview from America.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Basically, when I heard that he was leaving town, I

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 2>was like, let's do an exit interview. And of course

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 2>the other added context, which I think is very relevant here,

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 2>is that this comes a time of extreme scrutiny on

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the mere existence of Chinese students at American universities, particularly

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 2>out of the Trump administration. It's an American export US universities,

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 2>and there's this major crackdown. We've seen all these concerns

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 2>about visas, et cetera. So there's a perfect time to

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.839
<v Speaker 2>do this exit interview. So Zishan, thank you so much

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 2>for coming on the podcast.

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, thank you for having me here back again.

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>You run a great newsletter and we had a great

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>episode with you. And as a student in the US,

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 2>you're sort of situated at a very interesting time. But

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 2>let's like back up, Like what prompted you to come

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 2>to the US to study in the first place. I mean,

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>you did this program at Princeton.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 5>How come before coming to the mid career Master in

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 5>Public Policy program at the Princeton School of Public International

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Affairs formerly known as the Rural Wilson School, I'd already

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 5>been working for thirteen years, so I was like at

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 5>the middle of my professional trajectory and I were thinking

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 5>about getting another advanced education, and of course the United

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 5>States is the top destination.

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 4>One other thing.

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 5>Is that, to the credit of Princeton, the Policy School

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 5>offers fully funded education, so that means they examined all

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 5>the tuition and the healthcare coverany.

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 4>No export revenue for US, yes.

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 5>Exactly in this case, yes, and also a living stipend.

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 5>And so I turned down some other offers from the UK,

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 5>from Singapore and came here. And also, as you correctly

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 5>mentioned at the very beginning, you know, China US relations

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 5>is perhaps the most consequential bilacual relations for someone whose

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 5>past career was in journalism and nonas in tank. I

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 5>couldn't think of a better place to be here in

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 5>the US. But you know, here we are, and I

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 5>feel like being overwhelmed by all these news.

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 3>So on that note, was the plan always to go

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 3>back to China after you completed your degree or is

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 3>this something new.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 5>That was like eighty or nineteen percent of my plan?

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Mainly for personal reasons, but also I think the political

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 5>atom sphere is a bit overwhelming. I did have some

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 5>kind offers from potential employers here, but I decided against them.

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 5>The State Department announced, actually, you know, they are going

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 5>to aggressively revoke Chinese students visas as well as imposed

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, further scrutiny on future Chinese students visa applications.

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 4>Let's say I stay on for one more year.

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 5>I would be on opt or CPT, which is a

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 5>post training upon graduation from a US college, but that

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 5>status would be linked to your student visa, your FM visa.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 5>So the potential consequences for Chinese students is not just

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 5>currently enrolled students, but also other you know, people who

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 5>are on o BTCBT students.

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Here out of curiosity, is Princeton providing guidance on visas

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 3>because I can only imagine being a college student and

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 3>having to deal with immigration issues on top of everything else.

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 5>In light of what happened at Harvard, let me think

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.799
<v Speaker 5>of a way of not putting Princeton in jeopardy again.

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 5>I did get I think, not just me, but everywhere else.

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 5>Did get some emails from you know, sort of guidance

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 5>from the university which says it took notice of recent

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 5>news and it is offering resources basically, I guess, you know,

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 5>counseling as well as potential legal resources for people to

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 5>not to be against the administration, but to comply with

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 5>all the laws and regulations in this country.

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 2>This was a one year program obviously, say versus ten

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 2>years ago, the sort of level of suspicion and anxiety

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 2>about the press and a lot of Chinese students at

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>American universities has grown quite a bit. What about even

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 2>in the last year, how do things feel shifted? And

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 2>when you talk to other Chinese students, you know, is

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 2>it just like noise coming out of DC or does

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 2>it change the campus environment?

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think it definitely has already had a chilly

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 5>in fact, And I mean for me personally, I feel

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 5>very welcomed and I feel all the hospitality and warmth

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 5>from my American professors, you know, school administrators, and the

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 5>prison community of neighbors and my local friends. But for

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, most of the Chinese students who are currently

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 5>in this situation perhaps too scare to speak up, and

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 5>especially after the news last week, I think they are

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 5>under a bit of stress because the announcement out of

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 5>the state partament is very broad, it doesn't use very

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 5>exact language to ascertain who will exactly be in trouble.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 5>There are currently I think two hundred and seventy thousands

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 5>Chinese students here in the United States. China is the

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 5>second largest origin of international students here in the US,

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.679
<v Speaker 5>and so was the first India. So for many years

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 5>China was the largest source of international students here in America,

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 5>but that number has come down since bilateral relations.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Worthen.

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 5>The United States has a proud history of welcoming Chinese

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 5>students who come to the United States. In the beginning

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 5>of the twentieth century, when China was still governed by

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 5>the Qing dynasty, there was this Boxer indemnities, basically the

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 5>compensations paid by dan Qing dynasty to various Western powers.

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 5>And at that time, the US was kind enough and

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 5>smart enough to turn those compensations into a scholarship program.

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 3>Which was part of their money diplomacy of the early

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 3>nineteen hundreds, right.

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 5>Well before Joseph Knight created the concept of soft power,

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 5>and the US has been practicing that. So they ceded

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 5>the top university in Beijing and sponsored to one thousand

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 5>and three hundred Chinese students to come to the United States.

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 5>And after the bilactual ties were established, you know, since

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 5>the two countries normalized the diplomatic relations, Republican and the

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 5>Democratic presidents both welcomed the Chinese students. There was this

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 5>very famous episode where Chinese top leader Don't Selping at

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 5>the time asked, you know, if he could send something

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 5>like five thousand Chinese students to the US, and President Cutter,

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 5>according to his own recollections, he responded that, well, tell him,

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 5>tell them to send one hundred thousand students to America.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 5>I also read President Ronald Reagan actually received the Chinese

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 5>students and made remarks in some sort of reception welcoming them.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 5>And let's remember that was a time when China was

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 5>much less open and dynamic than it is today. So

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 5>what is happening is really unfortunate. I think because of

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 5>this long history, many Chinese for granted the opportunities to

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 5>come here and study in America if they are good

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 5>enough to be offered the admission letters. But the larger

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 5>background is, of course, I guess globalization, because for many,

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 5>many years, people just believe, you know, everyone is going

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 5>to be more connected and we will benefit from more

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 5>people to people exchanges, from commerce, from you know, research collaborations.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 4>But unfortunately that.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 5>Era seems to be ending right now. Well, it may

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 5>have begun to be ending quite a few years Ago Joe.

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 3>Just as an aside, there's a really good book called

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Fortunate Sons about some Chinese students who were sent to

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 3>a Connecticut school in I think the late eighteen hundreds.

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to read that.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 3>It's really good. I read it when I bought that

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 3>house in Connecticut to try to bridge the gap I

0:10:50.240 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 3>guess between Hong Kong and where I was living. I

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 3>wanted to ask, what's the difference or differences from your

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 3>perspective in terms of what you would learn in a

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 3>public policy degree in China versus a public policy degree

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 3>at some place like Princeton.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's a very good question.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 5>I think there is. This key difference is, for example,

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 5>policy schools are mostly for early career and mid career

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 5>professionals in public service sector, and here I think for example,

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 5>at Harvard Kendidate's school, at the Jackson School of Global Affairs,

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 5>at the year at PRINCETON'SBIA, they are offered full time.

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 5>And that's because not just the US, but also many

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 5>governments across the world they have the flexibility to allow

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 5>their people to basically take a year or two year

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 5>off their professional career and come here. But back in China,

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 5>I think many of those programs are taught as a

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 5>part time process, although like they are labeled a full

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 5>time process because the I think sometimes the rigidity of

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 5>personnel management system means that it's very difficult for people

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 5>to basically leave work for a year or two and

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 5>get a full time education at you know, maybe Chinhuaan

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:18.359
<v Speaker 5>and Peking University.

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 4>And also here in the US, I.

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 5>Think the policy schools benefits greatly from first of all,

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 5>former policymakers like retired former sistants, Secretary of State and

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 5>so here we have like many very good practitioners who

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 5>are becoming you know, teachers. We have, for example, Princeton Speer,

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 5>some former Biden administration officials who just exited the administration. Well,

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 5>I think in Chinese universities, to be fair, I haven't

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 5>gone to those policy schools, but that would be rare.

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 5>And secondly, this place benefits from a much broader well,

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 5>I guess this is a toxic world now diversity here. Now,

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 5>for example, my class is highlighted like over half of

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 5>the classmates I international students, and also the faculty members,

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 5>some of them even come from foreign governments. I really

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 5>benefited from the global perspectives. I get from Princeton here.

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 2>What did you do for undergrade?

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, I went to a Chinese college and major lea

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 5>in finance.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I don't know much about Chinese universities. The only

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 2>thing I ever hear these days about Chinese universities is

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 2>usually in the context of tech competition in the number

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>of STEM graduates, and you hear a lot about the

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 2>number of hundreds of thousands of STEM graduates and the

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 2>advantages that sheer scale confers. You know, when I think

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 2>of American universities, there's STEM, but I also think a

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 2>lot about the heavy importance on liberal arts degrees and

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 2>literature and history, and people can go on to you know,

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 2>careers in tech and finance even from a history degree.

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Can you compare contrast that sort of like intellectual environment

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 2>at the Chinese colleges in terms of the non technical fields.

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, this is something I think that has been observed

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 5>and they talked about in the past few years when

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 5>people compare you know, Chinese and American universities, but also

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 5>between Chinese and I guess Indian universities, because based on

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 5>what I read, which may not be like very accurate,

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.719
<v Speaker 5>it's like India also trains a lot of like lawyers

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 5>and you know, social sciences majors. But the general perception

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 5>is that the Chinese colleges and universities are training many

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 5>more STEM grads and you know in semiconductor related in

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, mechanical and yeah.

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is just what everyone's talking about these

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 2>days because of this anxiety about tech competition.

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, that's correct. And almost all.

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 5>Universities in China are state run. All the IVY leagues

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 5>are privately around universities here in the US, maybe because

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 5>I think China is still to some extent a transition economy.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 5>So China initiated as a reform and opening up in

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 5>nineteen seventy eight, but before that it was a totally

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 5>planned economy where the government basically tells every one what

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 5>to do, uh, you know, in their schools and in

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:07.359
<v Speaker 5>their professional journeys, and based on those you know paradigms,

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 5>a lot of Chinese universities are set up like to

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 5>train people in a specific field. For example, there is

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 5>this Beijing Aeronautics University which basically trains people you know

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 5>in space related technology and maybe rocket science. And then

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 5>there is also you know, comprehensive universities. But for for

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 5>many years there was this maybe legacy China learned from

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 5>the Soviet Union to have specialized colleges and universities in

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 5>training STEM grads. And also, you know, China has one

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 5>point four billion people. It is now the second most

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 5>populous country on Earth, so naturally you would see, you know,

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 5>there are just many, many more Chinese students there, and

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese they put heavy emphasis on science and technology.

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Can I share with one detail with you?

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 5>Because I graduated from finance and I went down to

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 5>join a new studency in China, Yes, the same news agency.

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 5>And my mother used to tell me, why don't you

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 5>learn something real like finance and journalism? They are not

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 5>like real professional Well, I guess I didn't test very

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 5>well in Chinese college and trance examination. For many years

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 5>there was this quote in China, and I think it

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 5>still rings true, and it maybe it rings even truer today. Well,

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 5>in Chinese it's called hortually, like if you learn mathematics

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 5>and the physics and chemistry, you can go everywhere and

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 5>do and do well. And that is still on many

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 5>Chinese minds. And so for example in Ai, I think

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Jason Juan of Nvidia, he.

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Said, like a few weeks ago.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 5>I think he was citing Marco Polo I think tank

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 5>here formally affiliated with the Postle Institute, is that fifty

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 5>percent of the global AI talent is Chinese or maybe

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 5>having some sort of Chinese heritage. So that does speak

0:16:56.120 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 5>to the enormous training capacity of the Chinese education and

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 5>which also makes many people wander here. You know, AI

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 5>is going to shape everything in the future, and the

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 5>two countries seem to be lucked in a competition that

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 5>the US really want to shut out such a large

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 5>talent poll in Ai. And these students, Chinese students, you know,

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 5>after completing their undergrad degrees, they come to the United States,

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.959
<v Speaker 5>they contribute to meaningfully, to groundbreaking research. And I think

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 5>this is one thing that many people have a maybe

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 5>an inaccurate understanding of how graduate level education, especially in

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 5>stem Field's work, this is not an extractive process. It's

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 5>not that you know, Chinese, Indian. You know, students from

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 5>global thouts come to the US universities, they learned, they

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.959
<v Speaker 5>sat in classrooms, they learned from their American professors and peers,

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 5>and then they leave and brought the knowledge back with them.

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 4>That's not the case.

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 5>Yes, they benefit enormously from the education system here, which

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 5>is just spectacular, but they make meaningful contributions in conducting

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 5>research and collaborating with the American peers and professors. They

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 5>stay in labs for days and months and which would

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 5>result in papers in top American journals. They actually contribute

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 5>to the creation of knowledge and the sharing of knowledge here.

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 5>They contribute in the process. It's a symbiotic process, not

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 5>an extractive process. So by having them here, and some

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 5>of them, you know, would remain here legally, I should say,

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 5>you know, to work in the US, become entrepreneurs and

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 5>researchers and American taxpayers to pursue their American dreams, and

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 5>some of them would leave the US and go back

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 5>to China, India, and you know, everywhere on Earth, and

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 5>they would become, you know, informal ambassadors of American openings,

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 5>of American inclusiveness, of American.

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Hospitality, and they would serve as.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 5>One of the defense lines in terms of China US

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 5>relations as decreasing mutual strategic misunderstanding and the miscalculations.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 4>So this truly.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 5>Something very important in my mind, and I'm really saddened

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 5>to see you know, the crackdown on Chinese students to

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 5>come to the United States.

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 3>When you go back to China, what nice things are

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 3>you going to say about America.

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 5>Well, the first thing I'll tell them is that I

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 5>have the enormous privilege of coming to outlaws on Princeton

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 5>I Bloomberg, I'm sorry, And that's really.

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the first thing.

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what's number two?

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, number two is I think I benefit a lot

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:31.959
<v Speaker 5>from all the critical discussions on colleges. It's not just

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, pro Trump against Trump. We have very different

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 5>views on all sorts of subjects. Some professors are rightfully

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 5>worried about, for example, rule of law here, but we

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 5>have also some classmates who have faculties who are very

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 5>sympathetic to what the broader Republican agenda is doing here

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 5>in the United States. So I think this clash of

0:19:56.320 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 5>different ideas, the market of free ideas is something simulating

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 5>for me personally. And the other reason is that, for example,

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm fully founded by Princeton spar here, and so I

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 5>benefit truly from the hospitality and the generosity of the

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 5>American people here. Is the private university is the money

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 5>coming in from private donations I'm truly grateful for that,

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 5>and I don't think like any other country on the

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 5>Earth has simply has the financial capacity to do something

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 5>like that, So this is something.

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Really should be cherished. Here.

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 5>I will certainly carry, you know, all these lessons and

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 5>appreciations back to China.

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 3>We started this conversation talking about deteriorating US China relations,

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think anyone would disagree with that premise.

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 3>But the question I wanted to ask you is, as

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 3>someone who's worked in both Chinese and Western institutions, or

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 3>at least studied at a Western institution, what do you

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 3>think is the biggest understanding between the US and China.

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 3>What's the biggest sticking point?

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 5>You mentioned the subsect I did technology and all those

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 5>for example. I also have the privilege of being invited

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 5>to some of the major thing thanks here to share

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 5>my views with you know, fellow think tank analysts and

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 5>for officials. I think, if I really want to summarize,

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 5>like what I've been doing is to normalize China, because

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 5>China has a vastly different political system from the United States,

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 5>from all the major westerns and industrial the economiess I

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 5>think people fundamentally see China as a different beast, but

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 5>China also has politics. The Chinese government has many government departments, ministries.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 5>They compete with one another. There is politics between different departments,

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 5>politics between different people inside one government department. The Chinese

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 5>make five year plans and they seem to be implementing

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 5>that quite well. For example, the China twenty twenty five

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 5>come into mind. But sometimes they are also very short sighted.

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 5>The Chinese have good accomplishments, they also make stupid mistakes.

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 5>That's just human nature.

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 2>What are some examples of short sighted? Because Americans love

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 2>to go to China and then they come back and

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 2>they say they think in the centuries, I'm like us

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 2>who just think. You know, it's these very cliches, these

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 2>very cliched commentary that you just hear over and over against,

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 2>like we just think about the next quarterly estimate or

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 2>hitting the next GDP. You say, obviously, any society is

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be richer than these sort of cliche tropes

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 2>that you know when you look back at decisions, Because

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned seems like the mad and twenty twenty five

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 2>stuff worked out really well, but where do you see

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 2>it breaking down? At times?

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 5>For example, let's talk about Eve's right, you know, the

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 5>electric vehicles.

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 4>So everyone now knows.

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 5>That China is leading on EV's and people talk about

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 5>bid about you know, cell me, the former smartphonemaker turned

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 5>automobile maker, and it seems like, you know, Ford and

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 5>other US auto giants are falling behind. So many people

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 5>attribute to some sort of Chinese state subsidies and industrial strategy.

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.959
<v Speaker 5>But there also in mind that before this evy boom,

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 5>there were like a dozen Chinese automobile makers. Almost all

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 5>of them were state around automobile companies, because China implemented this.

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 5>When foreign comakers come to China, you have to form

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 5>joint ventures with Chinese planners, and in many cases the

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 5>Chinese partners have to be in control of fifty one

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 5>percent of the joint venture.

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 4>But all these Chinese.

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 5>Stay around automobile giants are actually falling behind. Now what

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 5>you are seeing in the EV boom in China, the

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 5>names coming to mind are all very new private around

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 5>Chinese automobile makers. They didn't exist, They didn't benefit from

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 5>the sort of state monopoly or preferential loans and maybe

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 5>land and all the in kind subsidies for those they

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 5>basically partnered with. BMW with all these American and the

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 5>European commakers, but look they are falling behind now.

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 2>It's on the other hand sorry, But on the other hand,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 2>I could listen to that story and say, because of

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 2>this requirement for jvs, the only possibility of actual private

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 2>automobile development in China was for domestic companies, and international

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 2>companies never had that chance to actually sort of be

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 2>truly autonomous within the Chinese domestic market. Seems like that

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 2>worked out very well in the grand scheme of things

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 2>for ensuring that the only companies with complete agility, et

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 2>cetera in the Chinese market ended up being Chinese.

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, first of all, that could be some sort of

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 5>a good policy advice for the Cormon administration, I guess,

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 5>and also maybe European governments. And secondly, I'm very down.

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 2>With please bring bid in a JV or something like that.

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I wanted uid gigafactor in Georgia or something like that.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I've said that before anyway, going.

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 5>What I was trying to say is there is this discrepancy.

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 4>With you know, all the power of our.

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 5>Industrial strategies, but at the same time it's the private

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 5>ingenuity of the innovation of the hard work of the

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 5>private Chinese companies which have somehow come out on the

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 5>top all the states around companies, they are are falling behind,

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 5>at least in the automobile sector. And that shows that

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 5>I think people tend to see China as a country

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 5>with the Communist Party of China sitting atop the state

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 5>tells everyone what to do and marshaling all the resources.

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 5>But it is also at the same time just spectacularly

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 5>competitive and the innovative place where private ingenuity and hard

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 5>work really plays a very big rule. There is this

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 5>say in China you know five six, seven, eight nine

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 5>basically says you know, over half of the GDP, of

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 5>the taxation, of the new employ ooyment are all created

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 5>by private companies. And so that's something when Americans perceive China,

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 5>they think of just one very coherent, I don't know, Bechman,

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 5>where you know, there is this larger central brain telling

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 5>everyone to do everything else. And yes, the the like

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese government, the Commanist Party of China enjoys enormous

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 5>power in telling in shaping the Chinese society compared with

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 5>Western powers. But do not discount and actually I think

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 5>much more emphasis should be put on the non state

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 5>part of the Chinese society.

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned your mom thinking that doing finance and journalism

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 3>was not very valuable, And one thing you sometimes hear

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 3>is that China places greater importance or value on people

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 3>studying stem going into tech. And I guess I'm curious

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 3>how much has that changed over the years, Like, if

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I was a high school student in China in I

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know the nineteen nineties, would be encouraged to be

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 3>a doctor or a lawyer or a teacher, or would

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 3>I be encouraged to go into tech? Like basically, how

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 3>has that culture of which subject is most valued changed

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 3>over time?

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 4>You are very sharp eyed.

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 5>I think if it was in the nineteen nineties, people

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 5>wanted to go to I don't want to name names,

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 5>like certain finance schools in China, and after graduation, like

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 5>they would want to work in Goldman Sucks and Morgan Stanley.

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 4>That's like the top jobs.

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Maybe when I graduated from college in twenty eleven, that's

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 5>still the case what the people wanted to do because

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 5>it makes huge money. It makes very big money. But

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 5>especially in the past decade, I think I'm.

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Sure you have reported this.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 5>There is a large casts to the income to the

0:27:55.920 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 5>wages of Chinese financial engineering, and even when to the

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 5>Internet sector, Facebook now known as Matter and all those

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 5>booms they contribute to consumer internet that was the thing

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 5>in China as well. Like Ali Baba and Tencent, what

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 5>they do is they popularize some technologies which makes lives

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 5>much easier for everyday consumers and also businesses. But in

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 5>a sense, I think now more value is put into

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 5>the sort of technologies that would really boost the productivity

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 5>in you know, industrial process For example, even doctors and

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 5>hospitals can identify certain diseases. It's not just you know,

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 5>I can go out and get a delivery much easier

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 5>from a from a restaurant. So the term technology I

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 5>think has taken out a new meaning. And if I

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 5>can make a recommendation. There is this Dan Wound who

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 5>who I think.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Is in.

0:28:58.640 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 2>To recommend Dan long.

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 4>Audience.

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 2>We've had about several times. I'm sure we'll do a

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 2>big thing when his book comes out. Both Tracy and

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I have copies of it on our desk. You should

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 2>go pre order it on Amazon raw.

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 5>So basically I think China is wishing to make Yeah,

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 5>basically these hot technologies more sexy than you know, just

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 5>joining a tech firm.

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting. It sort of feels this is becoming an

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 2>international phenomenon that everyone is getting very anxious about their

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 2>country's capacity to do quote hard tech. You are returning

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 2>to China and you're going to go back to the

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 2>think tank, the Center for China and Globalization. It's interesting.

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at the controversy section in the Wikipedia page

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 2>for it, and Marco Rubio, who's now the Secretary of State,

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen, he actually blasted your school. He blasted

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 2>the Woodrow Wilson School for inviting a scholar from the CCG,

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 2>and he said the retire to the Chinese Communist Party.

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 2>And CCG, according to Wikipedia, is a member of an

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 2>alliance of think tanks coordinated by the International Department of

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese Communist Party that support the Belton Road initiative,

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 2>which we've talked about.

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 4>On the show.

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Now, granted, your situation strikes me as a little bit

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 2>unique because most students coming to the US from China

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 2>are not going to a public policy school and a

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 2>one year funded thing. Why shouldn't American lawmakers, however, be

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 2>concerned about training many of the next generation of leaders

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 2>in a country that is perceived to be a major rival,

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 2>and doing work with them and training them in Ai

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 2>and all of these things that there is so much

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of almost everyone accepts that there is going to

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 2>be some degree of, you know, either geopolitical and business competition.

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 5>First of all, about the Wikipedia page you was Jess mentioned, Yeah,

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 5>I know, it's very very thorough research over here.

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I click out a Lincoln Our School of a controversy section,

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 2>but I wanted to, you know, I saw both your

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 2>think tank and the Wilson School have come under controversy

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 2>for connections.

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 5>The joke I typically make in this sort of conversation

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 5>is that, well, I came from the State Ground News agency.

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 5>I was a proper Chinese government personnel, and now people

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 5>would characterize me as some sort of you know, the

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 5>term United Front. That's like semi government. You're done grading me, like,

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 5>I was a proper Chinese government for eleven years and

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 5>I left, you know, in October tenty twenty two. And

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 5>if we have time, I'd be happy to dive into

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 5>the details of you know, the difference between a government

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 5>rund thing tank and a non governmental thing tank in China.

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 5>But to your larger point, is that there is this

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 5>term which says keep your friends close and keep your

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 5>enemy closer. I'm not sure exactly if China and US

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 5>are enemies at the moment, but just from that inside,

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 5>I think it would be very beneficial for the US,

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 5>especially policy schools, but also other you know, social sciences

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 5>and universities, to try to have Chinese contributions, to have

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 5>Chinese students' presence here, so that's you know, when push

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 5>comes to shop, they have someone to call, They know

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 5>what the Chinese are really thinking about, and that is

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 5>I think one of the tragedies from the crackdown for example. However,

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 5>than have the Chinist school.

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned that there's a difference between properly state run

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 2>think tanks and non state run think tanks. I think

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 2>in the US there is a perception, and this actually

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.959
<v Speaker 2>goes back to the talk about companies, including car companies,

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. There's a perception that there's actually no private

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 2>companies that implicitly, even the private companies, the byds, et cetera,

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 2>are at some level, you know, at the back and

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 2>call of the state, and some more literally. The other

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 2>is even those incredible book about Walkway talks, a lot

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 2>about there's a Communist party leadership within the company. It

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 2>engages in making sure itch members who are employers of

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 2>the company and engage in more moral behavior and aren't

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 2>doing things like gambling, et cetera. Why shouldn't we think

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 2>that every country within China, regardless of how it's incorporated,

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 2>answers up to political leadership invasion.

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 5>I think on macro level, I do not see a

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 5>drastic difference between for example, a US president wants.

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 4>To have like Nvadia or Apple to.

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:42.959
<v Speaker 5>Become the dominant forces in the world, and from the

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 5>Chaps Actor, from the Inflation Reduction Act to offering you know,

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 5>generous subsidies to American companies. In China, there is this

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 5>support for Chinese companies, but in many cases not from.

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 4>The very start.

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 5>It's like, you know how we studied very little, and

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 5>it was competing with UH with European telecom vendors at

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 5>the very beginning, and for many years, you know, China Mobile,

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 5>China Unicom, all the state telecomation firms, they just wanted

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 5>the equipment from the European suppliers and yeah, and probably

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:21.280
<v Speaker 5>had to go to the European markets to increase its customers.

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 5>Numbers and revenue and after a few years and especially

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 5>when the industry became more strategic and uh, and then

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese comment, would you know, take a look at

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:37.720
<v Speaker 5>of the potential players and believe, oh, this is perhaps

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 5>an industry that's going to be of strategical value in

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 5>the future, and would provide some sort of assistance to them.

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 5>But I wouldn't think that there is a CCP committee

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 5>overseeing Huawei on a daily basis telling them, you know,

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 5>this is something you should do in the Southeast Asia

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 5>and this is something you should work on in Africa.

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 5>And if that were the case, Huawei wouldn't be where

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 5>it is today, Which is also why I sincerely believe

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 5>the US persecution of Quawei and other properly private Chinese

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 5>companies is a strategic mistake, because these companies were on

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 5>their way to making China more dynamic, more private, having

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 5>more private elements in the Chinese society, to have more

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 5>international exposure, to allow people to have a career path

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.720
<v Speaker 5>a meaningful one, a financially rewarding one.

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Outside the apparatus.

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 5>These companies are helping China to become more open, more

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 5>aligned with international standards. So these are positive forces from

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 5>a market perspective that to help align China with the

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 5>globalization process, with the so called rule based international order.

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 4>And this is also the reasons.

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 5>For example, the US has imposed many export controls and

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 5>has for example, sanctioned Russia and other states and companies

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 5>that are deemed hostile to US national interests, and many

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 5>of the Chinese private companies are well silently just abide

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 5>by all these sanctions because they want to globalize. They

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 5>want to have markets and the partners and supplies across

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 5>the world.

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 4>But I guess this.

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 5>Is the year ten twenty five. There is no way

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 5>to turn around this phenomena. I guess.

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, on this note, this actually leads into a question

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to ask, and I think this will be

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the last question for me.

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 4>But one of my.

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Pet theories right now is that the US is starting

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 3>to look a lot more like China, and China is

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 3>starting to look a lot more like the US. So

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 3>just recently, for instance, you've seen Chinese policy makers try

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 3>to boost consumer spending, which is a page out of

0:36:56.080 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 3>the US playbook. After financial crises, they've been enhancing their

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 3>social safety net, which again kind of looks American, although

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:09.240
<v Speaker 3>you can debate how strong the American social net is. America, meanwhile,

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 3>has been making more strategic investments in certain industries. Industrial

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 3>policy has become a thing again. China's liberalizing part of

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 3>its market. The US says it's going to keep Chinese

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 3>investors out of its market, like it feels like they're

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 3>taking on each other's characteristics to some degree. I guess

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 3>my question is would you agree with that? And I

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 3>have to say Michael Pettis did not agree with me,

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 3>but a couple others Victor Schwetz over at McCrory agreed

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 3>with me. And then right after I wrote my piece

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 3>about this, there was a big foreign policy article basically

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 3>saying the same thing. So I would love to get

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 3>your opinion.

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:50.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think I've heard the term called beating China

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 5>by becoming China. And I do think that the United

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 5>States has its legitimate interests in strengthening its supply chain,

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 5>in safeguarding the resilience of its industries. Like I totally

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 5>understand that the US doesn't want to rely one hundred

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 5>percent on ppees during COVID. It wants to ensure a

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 5>certain level of self reliance when it comes to manufacturing capacity.

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 5>Maybe i'mshore or maybe friendly shoring like in allies, you know,

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Transatlantic allies. I get that, and I think when it

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 5>comes to China, what you were mentioning, and I guess

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 5>maybe Michael Pattis doesn't fully agree, is that many people

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 5>believe the process in China of you know, showing up

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 5>the consumer spending and strengthening the social safety that that

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:46.399
<v Speaker 5>should be accelerated, that should go much faster than it

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 5>is happening today, because you know, the Chinese government they

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 5>have officially, according to their policy papers, recognizes that. In

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese minds, it's not about basically learning from American

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 5>way of establishing a social safety nets, maybe from the Europeans,

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:06.839
<v Speaker 5>I guess, but because it is fundamentally helpful and beneficial

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 5>for the Chinese society, for the Chinese people to have

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 5>a relatively robust healthcare coverage insurance so that they could

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 5>spend money on more iPhones and other consumer electronics. This

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 5>is fundamentally good something good. It's not about learning from

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the world, but a phenomena. You just

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 5>mentioned that there is some sort of convergence. I do

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 5>hope they converge. I'm being more open. I'm being more humane.

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm being more humanitarian, being more.

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 4>Hospitable to people to persons.

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 5>And if I may have some sort of last word

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 5>on this, I'm really saddened and sometimes I'm angry that

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 5>it's the students. They are at their early twenties or

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 5>maybe like nineteen years ago, they are being made points

0:39:56.360 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 5>in this game. Come on, they are innocent, these strategical right. Yes,

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 5>take all your measures against the military industrial complex and

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 5>even maybe huaweis, but leave the people alone from this

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 5>and let's you know, people to people experience and student

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 5>experience happen, and they will try to safeguard the long

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 5>term stability of the two countries because I mean, as

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 5>competitive as hawkish as the US Trump administration hopes to

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 5>be in China. Although I haven't read the latest read

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 5>out of the phone call, but nobody wants the two

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:33.839
<v Speaker 5>countries to go to war, and to just prevent something catastrophic.

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 5>Against that, we need people to people, you know, dialogues,

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 5>and the Chinese leaders have been receiving US guests. For example,

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 5>the Vice President of China recently, just I think yesterday

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 5>or today, received the US nonamental players in China. The

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 5>Chinese leaders met for example, John L. Thornton, the former

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 5>CEO of gold Man SAX. They met Graham Allison, the

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 5>founding dam of the Harvard the Kennedy School. So you

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 5>have many news in China from Chinese leaders receiving non

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 5>governmental guests from the US officially reported in China legitimizing

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 5>the non governmental visits from the US to China, but

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 5>the other way around. I don't see any news, even

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 5>under Biden administration, that the US government openly receives you know,

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 5>non governmental visitors, scholars, entrepreneurs, and the Chinese. You know,

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 5>for example, she didn't be met with you know, dozens

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 5>of US companies and the Western and the European company CEOs.

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 5>So in that thing, the Chinese legitimizing the Western interactions

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 5>coming into China. But unfortunately, I'm not seeing any of

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.919
<v Speaker 5>that here here. What we have is like delegitimizing any

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 5>Chinese government and the non governmental people coming here. And

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 5>I think I've heard that, you know, the US government

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:52.359
<v Speaker 5>is also meeting with non governmental Chinese actors, scholars well,

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 5>working in state around universities and think tanks, but they're

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 5>not saying anything about that. And uh, and that's not

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 5>something very I think one.

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for coming on odd Laws. Thank

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 2>you for doing your aid interview with us. This is

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 2>really fascinating. Really glad we got to chat before you

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 2>left town. And I hope we continue reading your work.

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I hope you're going to keep doing pechronology. Yes, definitely,

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 2>that's fantastic because I think for a lot of us

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:23.359
<v Speaker 2>here it's a very useful resource, those of us who

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 2>don't speak Chinese or those of us who don't know

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 2>who the names that we should actually be paying attention to,

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 2>so really appreciate it. And safe travels home.

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 5>Thank you. I'm truly grateful for the opportunity. Thank you

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 5>to Tracy and John. And I hope maybe not just

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:41.320
<v Speaker 5>for me, but for Chinese students it's odious not goodbye

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 5>real quickly.

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Has there been a change in perception the desirability of

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 2>coming here.

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 5>If the Chinese students don't face the restrictions, they certainly still.

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Want to come here.

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:54.240
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much, Thank you, my planer.

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 2>First of all, really enjoyed that conversation. It is hard

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 2>for me, you know, this sort of really aggressive attempt

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 2>to no longer have American universities be a sort of

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 2>destination for many of the world's most you know, talented individuals.

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 2>It's hard for me to imagine that not being sort

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:27.479
<v Speaker 2>of like a pretty big hit to both the US

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 2>economy and it's just sort of like standing.

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:30.240
<v Speaker 1>In the world.

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Zician's point about, well, you know, Chinese students

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:39.399
<v Speaker 3>who come to America for their education, they largely go

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 3>back to China with fond memories of America. I think

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 3>the idea that America wouldn't value that is really indicative

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:50.840
<v Speaker 3>of how much less we seem to be valuing soft

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:55.759
<v Speaker 3>power nowadays. It seems like that kind of diplomacy just

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 3>isn't as popular as it once was, And so you're

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 3>seeing people like the Trump administrations say like, well, why

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 3>should we be doing this, You don't get anything out

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 3>of it. But then people like Zishen will say, well,

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 3>you actually do get something out of it. You get

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:14.280
<v Speaker 3>better relations, and you get that sort of cultural understanding

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:15.879
<v Speaker 3>and that soft diplomacy.

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder the degree to which the American public

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:24.359
<v Speaker 2>has been sold on the benefits of so called soft power. Right, So,

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of people are saying American influence abroad,

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 2>American ideals, what America stands for for freedom and almost

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 2>in so many other countries, or maybe did up until recently.

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I know, global perceptions have changed, et cetera. But then

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, maybe there's another argument. It's like, oh,

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 2>that's great that all these countries see as a beacon

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 2>of freedom or whatever.

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:45.279
<v Speaker 4>What do I get out of that?

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 2>How does that benefit me? And I think when you

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 2>look at some of the political turns, perhaps the case

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been made to the US public in a very

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 2>compelling way from the people who believe in sort of

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 2>liberal internationalism that the average citizen in the US actually

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 2>should care at all about how the rest of the

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 2>world views us.

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Look, everyone needs to travel more if they can.

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 5>That's what I say.

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 3>You need to go to a place that loves America,

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:10.840
<v Speaker 3>and then you need to go, I don't know, to

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East or something and talk to someone that

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 3>hates America and see what the difference is. There's a

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:16.880
<v Speaker 3>big difference.

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 2>This is a really good perspective and take Okay, shall

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:22.399
<v Speaker 2>we leave it there. Let's leave it there.

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the Oddlots podcast. I'm

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:28.879
<v Speaker 3>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and.

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Follow our guest Zishan Wong. He's at Zishanwong here and

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 2>check out his Pecknology substack. I do hope he sustains

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:43.320
<v Speaker 2>it upon return to China. Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez,

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Ed Carman Arman, dash Ol Bennett at Dashbot at Kilbrooks

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:49.839
<v Speaker 2>at Kelbrooks. From Oddlots content, go to Bloomberg dot com

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 2>slash odd Lots. We have a daily newsletter and all

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 2>of our episodes, and you can chat about all of

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:57.320
<v Speaker 2>these topics twenty four to seven in our discord Discord

0:45:57.360 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 2>dot gg slash odd Lots.

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 3>when we conduct exit interviews with Chinese students studying at Princeton,

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 3>then please leave us a positive review at your favorite

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 3>podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber,

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:15.320
<v Speaker 3>you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free.

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 3>All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 3>on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.