1 00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:02,680 Speaker 1: The Action Network Podcast. 2 00:00:02,960 --> 00:00:06,480 Speaker 2: It was time for the long awaited, overdue celebration to 3 00:00:06,800 --> 00:00:11,640 Speaker 2: comments back, get back, go back, get back, goes to win, 4 00:00:11,800 --> 00:00:13,640 Speaker 2: not just to go. 5 00:00:13,720 --> 00:00:16,560 Speaker 3: All right, here we go from the test throwing a 6 00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 3: show spect we're saying it's to cats touchdown. We'll see 7 00:00:22,680 --> 00:00:25,439 Speaker 3: most gamblers when they go to gamble, they go to swin. 8 00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:30,159 Speaker 1: Oh god, that's incredible. Big bank, small banks. I like 9 00:00:30,200 --> 00:00:33,400 Speaker 1: to make money. All right, this is the ultimate Kaban 10 00:00:33,960 --> 00:00:34,600 Speaker 1: want to pull. 11 00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:38,839 Speaker 3: And we are under way. 12 00:00:39,920 --> 00:00:43,040 Speaker 2: What's up everyone, Welcome to the Action Network Podcast, presented 13 00:00:43,080 --> 00:00:46,879 Speaker 2: by Bett MGM, the King of sportsbooks. Today we've got 14 00:00:46,880 --> 00:00:50,920 Speaker 2: our early player props for the Super Bowl Super Bowl 15 00:00:51,040 --> 00:00:54,120 Speaker 2: fifty eight. I am your host, Chris Raybaugh of the 16 00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:58,320 Speaker 2: Action Networking on today's show, we're going to dive into 17 00:00:58,760 --> 00:01:02,160 Speaker 2: our betting approach for the Super Bowl and we'll each 18 00:01:02,160 --> 00:01:05,400 Speaker 2: give out three picks that we're looking at early on 19 00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:11,560 Speaker 2: in this week. So we're going to discuss where we see, 20 00:01:11,600 --> 00:01:13,880 Speaker 2: you know, value, if there's anything to jump on now. 21 00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:16,280 Speaker 2: And of course we're still a week and a half 22 00:01:16,319 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 2: out for the big Game, so be sure to keep 23 00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:21,319 Speaker 2: an eye out for our full propap Losa episode. We'll 24 00:01:21,319 --> 00:01:23,960 Speaker 2: have that next week with an even deeper look at 25 00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:27,480 Speaker 2: Super Bowl prop bets, but we wanted to have a 26 00:01:27,480 --> 00:01:30,560 Speaker 2: shorter episode this week, you know, with some initial props, 27 00:01:30,640 --> 00:01:33,160 Speaker 2: and of course joining me one of the most accurate 28 00:01:33,200 --> 00:01:35,319 Speaker 2: rankers in the game, the most accurate ranker this year, 29 00:01:35,360 --> 00:01:38,200 Speaker 2: of course, the odds maker Sean Kerner. 30 00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:39,880 Speaker 1: What's going on, Sean up. 31 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:43,039 Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm just excited to finally lock in some official 32 00:01:43,080 --> 00:01:46,600 Speaker 3: Super Bowl you know, props and bets here, So super 33 00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:47,160 Speaker 3: excited for this. 34 00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, let's get right into it. We'll go back and forth. 35 00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:52,560 Speaker 2: You can start us off with give three each where 36 00:01:52,560 --> 00:01:56,280 Speaker 2: you're going for your first Super Bowl fifty eight prop. 37 00:01:56,720 --> 00:01:58,760 Speaker 3: Well, you know, as I always say, this is the 38 00:01:58,800 --> 00:02:01,960 Speaker 3: only game where we can really on some fun punter props, 39 00:02:02,040 --> 00:02:05,720 Speaker 3: So I'm going straight to the punter props. Kicking it 40 00:02:05,760 --> 00:02:10,200 Speaker 3: off with Mitch Wishnowski longest punt to go over fifty 41 00:02:10,280 --> 00:02:14,280 Speaker 3: five and a half yards. It's at minus one fifteen 42 00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 3: right now. But he's had a punt longer than this 43 00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:20,960 Speaker 3: in fourteen of nineteen games this year, so that's a 44 00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:24,560 Speaker 3: seventy three percent hit rate. Now, five of those times 45 00:02:24,600 --> 00:02:27,640 Speaker 3: his longest punt was exactly fifty six yards, so it's 46 00:02:27,680 --> 00:02:30,880 Speaker 3: absolutely critical to get the over here at fifty five 47 00:02:30,880 --> 00:02:32,960 Speaker 3: and a half, just because he's been hitting fifty six 48 00:02:33,520 --> 00:02:36,640 Speaker 3: so frequently. It also means that, you know, he's probably 49 00:02:36,680 --> 00:02:38,720 Speaker 3: unlikely to clear it at such a high rate since 50 00:02:38,720 --> 00:02:41,720 Speaker 3: he's just barely going over so many times. But I 51 00:02:41,760 --> 00:02:43,960 Speaker 3: think there are you know, a few reasons to like 52 00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:47,720 Speaker 3: his upside here regardless. The first is this game's at 53 00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:51,120 Speaker 3: Legion Stadium, and I went back and I looked at 54 00:02:51,120 --> 00:02:54,000 Speaker 3: like the last three seasons how punters fared there, and 55 00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:56,600 Speaker 3: typically you see an average right around like a three 56 00:02:56,639 --> 00:03:00,959 Speaker 3: percent increase in their punt yards. You know, it's indoors, 57 00:03:00,960 --> 00:03:03,880 Speaker 3: so that that's gonna help. It's also you know, Paradise, 58 00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:06,799 Speaker 3: Nevada is around two thousand feet above sea level, so 59 00:03:06,840 --> 00:03:10,640 Speaker 3: that probably doesn't hurt. So either way, just punters typically average, 60 00:03:10,639 --> 00:03:13,720 Speaker 3: you know, an extra yard yard and a half at 61 00:03:13,720 --> 00:03:17,720 Speaker 3: this stadium, so it's a great place to punt. And 62 00:03:17,919 --> 00:03:20,960 Speaker 3: you know, he's only played two games indoors this year, 63 00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:23,760 Speaker 3: and both those games he had a punt go longer 64 00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:26,919 Speaker 3: than sixty yards, so he's been really good punting indoors 65 00:03:26,919 --> 00:03:30,760 Speaker 3: this year. He's also averaged just three punts a game. 66 00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:32,440 Speaker 3: I mean, the Niners don't really have to punt, so 67 00:03:32,520 --> 00:03:34,359 Speaker 3: this is going to be a really tough matchup for them. 68 00:03:34,720 --> 00:03:37,600 Speaker 3: The market has them punting around four times here, so 69 00:03:38,160 --> 00:03:42,160 Speaker 3: he's gonna probably have on average an extra punt here, 70 00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:45,800 Speaker 3: which is massive for a prop like this. So thirty 71 00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:47,600 Speaker 3: two percent of his punts have cleared this so I 72 00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:50,040 Speaker 3: think if he has three to four punt attempts should 73 00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:53,080 Speaker 3: be enough for him to get one over this number. 74 00:03:53,560 --> 00:03:55,480 Speaker 3: I have his medium closer to fifty eight and a 75 00:03:55,480 --> 00:03:59,560 Speaker 3: half yards with him run a sixty two percent chance 76 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:02,040 Speaker 3: of clearing again, like I said, probably won't be seventy 77 00:04:02,080 --> 00:04:04,840 Speaker 3: three percent going forward, but I still think it's above 78 00:04:04,920 --> 00:04:07,600 Speaker 3: sixty percent. So love the value we're getting here. And 79 00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:10,080 Speaker 3: I'd probably still bet this at fifty six and a half, 80 00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:12,600 Speaker 3: but it's really key to get it here at fifty 81 00:04:12,640 --> 00:04:13,160 Speaker 3: five and a half. 82 00:04:13,960 --> 00:04:18,239 Speaker 2: Yeah, And I think also when you look at Kyle 83 00:04:18,279 --> 00:04:21,400 Speaker 2: Shanahan in just his style of coaching, he's not going 84 00:04:21,480 --> 00:04:24,120 Speaker 2: to be super aggressive on fourth down. 85 00:04:24,480 --> 00:04:25,640 Speaker 1: I don't think he tends. 86 00:04:25,400 --> 00:04:27,520 Speaker 2: To play fairly conservative, is not going to do anything 87 00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:30,160 Speaker 2: crazy fake punts things like that. I think he made 88 00:04:30,160 --> 00:04:32,520 Speaker 2: a whole diet tribe about how he doesn't really care 89 00:04:32,600 --> 00:04:35,679 Speaker 2: for fake punts and things like that, so you should 90 00:04:35,760 --> 00:04:40,040 Speaker 2: at least maximize your chances of punts here facing the 91 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:43,560 Speaker 2: tough Kansas City matchup. All right, for my first prop, 92 00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:46,200 Speaker 2: I'm going with Isaiah Pitcheko to have the most rushing 93 00:04:46,279 --> 00:04:49,760 Speaker 2: yards in the game at plus one seventy. I think, 94 00:04:49,839 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 2: you know, Christian McCaffrey obviously should be the favorite, but 95 00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:56,680 Speaker 2: his odds are minus two fifty, and I think they're 96 00:04:56,680 --> 00:04:59,760 Speaker 2: creating a value on the only other player I think 97 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:03,159 Speaker 2: a pretty realistic shot at this in this game, and 98 00:05:03,200 --> 00:05:06,080 Speaker 2: that's Pacheco. You know, he led each of the three 99 00:05:06,520 --> 00:05:10,400 Speaker 2: Kansas City playoff games in rushing, and McCaffrey didn't lead 100 00:05:10,480 --> 00:05:13,320 Speaker 2: either of the Niner playoff games in rushing. So this 101 00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:16,000 Speaker 2: is something that you know, it's not as far fetched 102 00:05:16,040 --> 00:05:17,320 Speaker 2: as it may seem. 103 00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:18,440 Speaker 1: And then you look. 104 00:05:18,320 --> 00:05:20,839 Speaker 2: At defenses, and we know Kansas City's had the worst 105 00:05:20,920 --> 00:05:24,599 Speaker 2: run defense for the year, but in the playoffs, Kansas 106 00:05:24,640 --> 00:05:29,359 Speaker 2: City allowing four point six yards per carry along of 107 00:05:29,920 --> 00:05:32,720 Speaker 2: twenty one, and they allowed about one hundred and thirteen 108 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:38,359 Speaker 2: yards per game, whereas the Niners are allowing one hundred 109 00:05:38,360 --> 00:05:40,440 Speaker 2: and fifty six yards per game. On the ground and 110 00:05:41,000 --> 00:05:43,240 Speaker 2: five point six yards to carry with a log of 111 00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:45,200 Speaker 2: fifty three. They've given up at least a forty two 112 00:05:45,279 --> 00:05:48,919 Speaker 2: yarder in each of their two playoff games. So the 113 00:05:49,000 --> 00:05:52,640 Speaker 2: Diner run defense trending downward a little. Playing Patrick Mahomes, 114 00:05:53,120 --> 00:05:56,560 Speaker 2: I don't think that you're going to all of a sudden, 115 00:05:56,600 --> 00:05:58,600 Speaker 2: you know, pay more attention and try to show up 116 00:05:58,760 --> 00:06:00,800 Speaker 2: some of those things anymore than you know you can 117 00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:03,159 Speaker 2: without you know, giving up more against the pass. So 118 00:06:03,200 --> 00:06:06,320 Speaker 2: you should still see some vulnerabilities for San Francisco on 119 00:06:06,360 --> 00:06:09,520 Speaker 2: the ground. And then you know Patrick Mahomes, we know 120 00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:12,120 Speaker 2: what he could do as an underdog and all those 121 00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:12,640 Speaker 2: kind of things. 122 00:06:12,720 --> 00:06:14,480 Speaker 1: And San Francisco is favored. 123 00:06:14,760 --> 00:06:19,680 Speaker 2: But if the Kansas City Chiefs were to have the 124 00:06:19,760 --> 00:06:21,760 Speaker 2: edge or win the game or whatever not, you know, 125 00:06:21,800 --> 00:06:24,880 Speaker 2: you would project those carries to tick down for Pachecko, 126 00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:28,680 Speaker 2: for McCaffrey, and tick up for Pachecko. Right now, McCaffrey 127 00:06:28,720 --> 00:06:31,240 Speaker 2: projected for about two more carries than Pachecko. His carry 128 00:06:31,240 --> 00:06:33,360 Speaker 2: props eighteen and a half Patchecko's sixteen and a half. 129 00:06:33,400 --> 00:06:37,280 Speaker 2: But like if you flip the the spread, for example, 130 00:06:37,279 --> 00:06:39,560 Speaker 2: you say, let's say Kansas City were to win by 131 00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:41,839 Speaker 2: two or something like that, maybe a lot closer to 132 00:06:41,880 --> 00:06:45,000 Speaker 2: even in terms of projected carries in this game. So 133 00:06:45,440 --> 00:06:48,880 Speaker 2: I think Pachecko's ODG should be closer to plus one thirty, 134 00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:51,480 Speaker 2: so it's still plus one seventy. I love it at 135 00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:53,640 Speaker 2: that number, and I think there is a little bit 136 00:06:53,680 --> 00:06:54,320 Speaker 2: of value there. 137 00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:56,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, No, I like that one. 138 00:06:56,240 --> 00:06:58,480 Speaker 3: And I think when it comes to McCaffrey's probably gonna 139 00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:01,680 Speaker 3: see like every running back carry for the Niners, but 140 00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:03,960 Speaker 3: in these spots, you know they're gonna want to get 141 00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:07,479 Speaker 3: Debo some more design rush attempts. So like, I think 142 00:07:07,520 --> 00:07:12,000 Speaker 3: he specifically could eat in the CMC's workload and hurt 143 00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:14,520 Speaker 3: his ceiling, which is what this market's all about. 144 00:07:15,280 --> 00:07:16,760 Speaker 1: All right, we're going for your next one. 145 00:07:17,280 --> 00:07:21,920 Speaker 3: I'm going with another punter prop Tommy Townsend. His shortest 146 00:07:21,960 --> 00:07:25,440 Speaker 3: punt to be over thirty six and a half yards, 147 00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:28,160 Speaker 3: so I don't think he's gonna have any punts under 148 00:07:28,320 --> 00:07:31,760 Speaker 3: thirty six and a half yards here. Only nine of 149 00:07:31,800 --> 00:07:34,200 Speaker 3: his sixty nine punts this year have stayed under this, 150 00:07:34,360 --> 00:07:37,160 Speaker 3: So eighty seven percent of the time he's punting it 151 00:07:38,240 --> 00:07:42,040 Speaker 3: thirty seven yards or longer. You know, he's averaged more 152 00:07:42,080 --> 00:07:44,400 Speaker 3: punts the game than Wishnowski. He's averaged three and a 153 00:07:44,440 --> 00:07:47,840 Speaker 3: half punts per game. They're both projected to see right 154 00:07:47,880 --> 00:07:51,000 Speaker 3: around four punts, so well, you know he should see 155 00:07:51,080 --> 00:07:53,280 Speaker 3: you know, more punts in this matchup. It is a 156 00:07:53,320 --> 00:07:56,960 Speaker 3: tougher matchup than the Chiefs usually face. Just an extra 157 00:07:57,000 --> 00:07:59,520 Speaker 3: half punt isn't a big of a deal. But you know, 158 00:07:59,640 --> 00:08:02,280 Speaker 3: pro this, we don't want him punting the ball like 159 00:08:02,320 --> 00:08:04,320 Speaker 3: six times or something like that, because it's more likely 160 00:08:04,360 --> 00:08:07,520 Speaker 3: to have a short one. But he's also going to 161 00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:10,800 Speaker 3: benefit from punting at Allegiance in Vegas. Like I said, 162 00:08:11,600 --> 00:08:14,200 Speaker 3: typically we see punters average one to one and a 163 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:18,760 Speaker 3: half more yards on average. And Town said, you know, 164 00:08:18,840 --> 00:08:23,160 Speaker 3: he's benefited from punting indoors this year. Outdoors he's averaging 165 00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:27,200 Speaker 3: forty six yards of punt indoors it's fifty yards. And 166 00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:31,760 Speaker 3: in fact, you know, only or twelve of his thirteen 167 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:35,120 Speaker 3: punts indoors have cleared this number. So he's punting higher 168 00:08:35,160 --> 00:08:37,360 Speaker 3: than this at a ninety two percent rate, which is 169 00:08:37,440 --> 00:08:41,120 Speaker 3: higher than his overall season number. So I'm showing his 170 00:08:41,240 --> 00:08:42,880 Speaker 3: meet in you know, coloser a thirty eight and a 171 00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:45,120 Speaker 3: half I think would make sense for this prop with 172 00:08:45,200 --> 00:08:48,000 Speaker 3: a fifty nine percent chance he doesn't have a punt 173 00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:50,000 Speaker 3: going or this. But I think when you factor in 174 00:08:50,160 --> 00:08:52,360 Speaker 3: you know that this game is indoors, I think that 175 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:55,720 Speaker 3: helps a bit. So I would say probably a sixty 176 00:08:55,920 --> 00:08:59,079 Speaker 3: sixty three percent chance somewhere in that range that this 177 00:08:59,160 --> 00:09:00,640 Speaker 3: one can as well. 178 00:09:01,280 --> 00:09:05,520 Speaker 2: Uh, just a quick question for shortest punt props if 179 00:09:05,559 --> 00:09:08,440 Speaker 2: there is no if there are no punts, does that 180 00:09:08,480 --> 00:09:09,040 Speaker 2: count as action? 181 00:09:09,240 --> 00:09:13,280 Speaker 3: Still I'm under so I'm always taking worst case scenario, 182 00:09:13,679 --> 00:09:18,319 Speaker 3: so I'm assuming that so if if if he doesn't 183 00:09:18,320 --> 00:09:21,480 Speaker 3: have a punt, I'm guessing it would be a push. 184 00:09:21,559 --> 00:09:26,080 Speaker 3: I think you know, books might have different rules for that. Okay, 185 00:09:26,600 --> 00:09:29,880 Speaker 3: I'm having you know, it's about a two percent chance 186 00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:31,760 Speaker 3: he doesn't have a punt, so it probably won't be 187 00:09:32,280 --> 00:09:35,320 Speaker 3: you know, common occurrence. But I'm already under the se 188 00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:38,560 Speaker 3: So again I'm doing worst care scenario where if he 189 00:09:38,600 --> 00:09:41,920 Speaker 3: doesn't have a punt, I'm grading as a loss, and 190 00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:44,920 Speaker 3: I'm still showing a fifty nine percent chance. So if 191 00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:48,720 Speaker 3: the book does say like, if there's no punt, this 192 00:09:48,840 --> 00:09:51,559 Speaker 3: is a void, I would actually say this is closer 193 00:09:51,600 --> 00:09:54,200 Speaker 3: to a you know, sixty three sixty four percent chance 194 00:09:54,200 --> 00:09:57,280 Speaker 3: of clearing it. So, yeah, that's a great question. I 195 00:09:57,280 --> 00:09:59,160 Speaker 3: didn't find anything out there. I think in the past 196 00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:02,800 Speaker 3: I have found that it's like if there's no punt, 197 00:10:02,800 --> 00:10:03,559 Speaker 3: it's just no action. 198 00:10:04,120 --> 00:10:04,480 Speaker 1: Okay. 199 00:10:05,040 --> 00:10:08,800 Speaker 3: So but again for the worst case, I'm assuming worst 200 00:10:08,800 --> 00:10:11,559 Speaker 3: case scenario that that is action and we're still showing 201 00:10:11,600 --> 00:10:12,160 Speaker 3: some value on this. 202 00:10:12,600 --> 00:10:13,120 Speaker 1: I like it. 203 00:10:13,600 --> 00:10:16,560 Speaker 2: My second prop is going to be the Chiefs first 204 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:19,559 Speaker 2: team to use a challenge at minus one fifteen. I 205 00:10:19,559 --> 00:10:21,440 Speaker 2: think this should be closer to minus one forty. Now, 206 00:10:21,480 --> 00:10:23,320 Speaker 2: there is always a chance you just don't get action 207 00:10:23,400 --> 00:10:26,360 Speaker 2: on this if neither team uses a challenge. But for 208 00:10:26,520 --> 00:10:31,320 Speaker 2: their careers or you know, reading, Shanahan aren't too far 209 00:10:31,400 --> 00:10:34,240 Speaker 2: off in their use of challenges. But the last three 210 00:10:34,320 --> 00:10:39,240 Speaker 2: years in particular, it's been trending toward Shanahan using less 211 00:10:39,320 --> 00:10:42,360 Speaker 2: challenges and Andy Reid kind of stay in pat So 212 00:10:42,760 --> 00:10:46,439 Speaker 2: over the last three seasons, Andy Reid has used seventeen 213 00:10:46,679 --> 00:10:50,680 Speaker 2: challenges in sixty regular season or playoff games, so averaging 214 00:10:50,720 --> 00:10:55,600 Speaker 2: about point to eight challenges per game, whereas Shanahan last 215 00:10:55,600 --> 00:10:58,480 Speaker 2: three years just twelve challenges in fifty nine regular and 216 00:10:58,559 --> 00:10:59,280 Speaker 2: postseason games. 217 00:10:59,280 --> 00:11:01,120 Speaker 1: So that's just point two zero. 218 00:11:01,320 --> 00:11:04,360 Speaker 2: So if you kind of factor those together, you get 219 00:11:04,360 --> 00:11:07,000 Speaker 2: about a fifty eight percent chance of you know, if 220 00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:10,880 Speaker 2: there's a challenge read more likely to be using the 221 00:11:10,920 --> 00:11:13,840 Speaker 2: first one. So books are pricing it's kind of even. 222 00:11:14,320 --> 00:11:18,599 Speaker 2: I'm seeing, you know, one fifteen for the Chiefs of 223 00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:22,199 Speaker 2: one ten for the Niners, or vice versa. But I 224 00:11:22,240 --> 00:11:24,560 Speaker 2: think there should be a little bit more skewed in 225 00:11:24,640 --> 00:11:28,240 Speaker 2: favor of Andy Reid to use his first to use 226 00:11:28,240 --> 00:11:30,679 Speaker 2: the challenge first. So give me the Chiefs to use 227 00:11:30,679 --> 00:11:32,240 Speaker 2: the first at minus one fifteen. 228 00:11:32,559 --> 00:11:34,400 Speaker 3: Love it, I love, I love these ones. I love 229 00:11:34,440 --> 00:11:37,200 Speaker 3: the first time out. Unfortunately I did a deep dive 230 00:11:37,280 --> 00:11:39,760 Speaker 3: on that and it's literally a coin flip. Both coaches 231 00:11:39,800 --> 00:11:42,559 Speaker 3: just fly through timeouts there, you know, they waste them 232 00:11:42,920 --> 00:11:45,240 Speaker 3: at the same exact rate, so I couldn't find any 233 00:11:45,320 --> 00:11:47,800 Speaker 3: value there. This is interesting. I'll probably be joining you 234 00:11:47,920 --> 00:11:50,559 Speaker 3: on this. Love it well, this could be. 235 00:11:50,640 --> 00:11:53,520 Speaker 2: Also a tiebreaker in that market, because if you lose 236 00:11:53,520 --> 00:11:55,959 Speaker 2: a challenge, Yeah, if you're the first, like if the 237 00:11:56,000 --> 00:11:59,439 Speaker 2: Chiefs are more likely to use the talent a challenge 238 00:12:00,280 --> 00:12:02,760 Speaker 2: just by, you're also more likely to lose a challenge first, 239 00:12:02,760 --> 00:12:04,120 Speaker 2: which would then be a timeout. 240 00:12:04,160 --> 00:12:06,720 Speaker 3: So yeah, no, last year, just I love the Eagles. 241 00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:11,000 Speaker 3: Unfortunately it didn't hit, but Reid Reid is good. They 242 00:12:11,160 --> 00:12:15,880 Speaker 3: just uses timeouts like they're cheeseburgers. He uses challenges so 243 00:12:16,040 --> 00:12:18,000 Speaker 3: that I want something like this to sweat. So I'm 244 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:19,239 Speaker 3: going to join you on this. 245 00:12:19,240 --> 00:12:23,439 Speaker 2: This podcast is proudly presented by bet MGM. Used bonus 246 00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:27,520 Speaker 2: code action act ion when signing up to get up 247 00:12:27,520 --> 00:12:30,520 Speaker 2: to one hundred and fifty eight dollars and bonus bets 248 00:12:30,679 --> 00:12:43,240 Speaker 2: when you bet five dollars for new users in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, 249 00:12:43,280 --> 00:12:44,840 Speaker 2: West Virginia, and Wyoming. 250 00:12:45,120 --> 00:12:47,840 Speaker 1: Terms and conditions apply. Must be twenty one year older. 251 00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:52,439 Speaker 2: You know we problem call one eight hundred gambler, All right, 252 00:12:52,520 --> 00:12:53,439 Speaker 2: third one, Where are you going? 253 00:12:54,000 --> 00:12:57,000 Speaker 3: I've got a defensive player, prop. I'm going with Sharvarius 254 00:12:57,040 --> 00:13:00,320 Speaker 3: Ward under four and a half tackles and a sis. 255 00:13:01,240 --> 00:13:03,680 Speaker 3: You can get that minus one twenty right now. He's 256 00:13:03,679 --> 00:13:07,040 Speaker 3: been held under this in ten of seventeen full games. 257 00:13:07,040 --> 00:13:10,160 Speaker 3: So there was a game he left early, and then 258 00:13:10,640 --> 00:13:13,560 Speaker 3: week eighteen he barely played. So I omitted those, so 259 00:13:13,640 --> 00:13:15,920 Speaker 3: he stayed under this in fifty nine percent of his 260 00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:19,320 Speaker 3: full games. However, this is a matchup where he might 261 00:13:19,400 --> 00:13:24,280 Speaker 3: not have as many tackle opportunities as usual. You know, 262 00:13:24,360 --> 00:13:27,360 Speaker 3: he's typically going to be covering whichever Chiefs wide receivers 263 00:13:27,400 --> 00:13:30,640 Speaker 3: lined up on the far right, which is where Ward's 264 00:13:30,679 --> 00:13:32,440 Speaker 3: going to be over ninety percent of the time. And 265 00:13:32,840 --> 00:13:35,360 Speaker 3: for Shee Rice, obviously he's the danger in this. You know, 266 00:13:35,400 --> 00:13:38,120 Speaker 3: he's going to rack up the receptions, but he lines 267 00:13:38,240 --> 00:13:41,040 Speaker 3: up on the right side the least just around twenty 268 00:13:41,040 --> 00:13:44,520 Speaker 3: percent of the time, so it's likely Ward will beyond 269 00:13:44,960 --> 00:13:48,319 Speaker 3: you know MBS and or Justin Watson for most of 270 00:13:48,400 --> 00:13:50,880 Speaker 3: the game. And you know he's in the nine Ers' 271 00:13:50,880 --> 00:13:53,080 Speaker 3: best corner, so it would make sense for the Chiefs 272 00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:55,880 Speaker 3: to kind of scheme that up. And you know, let 273 00:13:56,280 --> 00:13:59,040 Speaker 3: you know, Rice and Kelsey have you know, the weaker 274 00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:02,960 Speaker 3: matchups inside or on the left side. So you know, 275 00:14:03,080 --> 00:14:07,040 Speaker 3: both NBS and Watson are low target wide receivers and 276 00:14:07,080 --> 00:14:09,920 Speaker 3: they tend to run routes downfield, so that could take 277 00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:12,679 Speaker 3: Ward out of the play a lot of the time 278 00:14:12,720 --> 00:14:15,360 Speaker 3: where he might be involved in like a Pacheco screen 279 00:14:15,440 --> 00:14:18,880 Speaker 3: pass or Kelsey target over the middle, but if if 280 00:14:18,880 --> 00:14:20,880 Speaker 3: they're going deep, it's kind of take him out of 281 00:14:20,920 --> 00:14:23,800 Speaker 3: the play more often than not. So having said that, 282 00:14:23,840 --> 00:14:26,960 Speaker 3: you know, I have him projected around one and a 283 00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:28,960 Speaker 3: half tackles in the run game and about two and 284 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:31,920 Speaker 3: a half in the passing game, but so four tackles. 285 00:14:31,960 --> 00:14:33,960 Speaker 3: But again, I think like he's more likely to have 286 00:14:34,000 --> 00:14:36,560 Speaker 3: a four game in this market, So I have him 287 00:14:36,840 --> 00:14:39,240 Speaker 3: run a sixty one percent chance he stays under four 288 00:14:39,280 --> 00:14:40,640 Speaker 3: and a half tackles in the sis here. 289 00:14:41,680 --> 00:14:46,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, And that's that's really interesting because you know, I 290 00:14:46,120 --> 00:14:48,960 Speaker 2: would have thought, you know, looking at okay, how are 291 00:14:49,000 --> 00:14:53,200 Speaker 2: teams attack in San Francisco on defense, you know, running outside, 292 00:14:53,200 --> 00:14:55,840 Speaker 2: which is what teams have been really successful with, I 293 00:14:55,840 --> 00:14:59,160 Speaker 2: would have thought that would have kind of negatively impacted Ward. 294 00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:02,320 Speaker 2: But I just that he is, you know, his game 295 00:15:02,360 --> 00:15:05,080 Speaker 2: against Detroit where you know, they were really kind of 296 00:15:05,120 --> 00:15:09,800 Speaker 2: exploiting that and he only had a one combined tackle 297 00:15:09,840 --> 00:15:10,840 Speaker 2: and assist in that game. 298 00:15:11,000 --> 00:15:13,320 Speaker 1: And I mean that's probably because you know, they didn't 299 00:15:13,480 --> 00:15:16,280 Speaker 1: fare too well on those runs to the outside. 300 00:15:16,400 --> 00:15:18,920 Speaker 2: But you know that kind of speaks to you know, 301 00:15:18,920 --> 00:15:21,280 Speaker 2: that's probably your biggest danger here, and it's another way 302 00:15:21,320 --> 00:15:23,640 Speaker 2: to fade Justin Watson, which I feel like you've been 303 00:15:23,640 --> 00:15:25,320 Speaker 2: doing all playoff lunch. 304 00:15:26,920 --> 00:15:29,520 Speaker 3: One of my hobbies is fading Justin Watson in the 305 00:15:29,600 --> 00:15:30,600 Speaker 3: right spots. 306 00:15:30,880 --> 00:15:34,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, he's uh, well, fun fact Justin Watson. I believe 307 00:15:34,200 --> 00:15:35,720 Speaker 2: he was on that Tampa Bay team that won the 308 00:15:35,720 --> 00:15:39,760 Speaker 2: Super Bowl against the Chiefs. Uh yeah, and then he 309 00:15:39,800 --> 00:15:43,040 Speaker 2: was on the Chiefs last year. Right, So like he's uh, 310 00:15:43,080 --> 00:15:45,280 Speaker 2: he's got quite a little like quite a little uh 311 00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:47,640 Speaker 2: what three I will be three and four years if 312 00:15:47,640 --> 00:15:48,960 Speaker 2: you can, if you get this one. 313 00:15:49,400 --> 00:15:51,520 Speaker 3: So I'm still fading him, but that is impressive. 314 00:15:52,120 --> 00:15:53,760 Speaker 1: He's a winner. He's not a guy yet, He's not 315 00:15:53,760 --> 00:15:54,720 Speaker 1: gonna put up the numbers. 316 00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:59,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, I'll close it out with a kickoff return. 317 00:16:00,360 --> 00:16:02,400 Speaker 2: And this kind of speaks to what you were talking 318 00:16:02,440 --> 00:16:05,160 Speaker 2: about with you know, the indoor stadium and whatnot. I'm 319 00:16:05,160 --> 00:16:08,960 Speaker 2: going longest kickoff return under twenty seven and a half 320 00:16:09,440 --> 00:16:12,560 Speaker 2: for you know, both teams, and the reason being, I 321 00:16:12,600 --> 00:16:14,840 Speaker 2: think you don't see many kicks returned in this game 322 00:16:15,120 --> 00:16:19,360 Speaker 2: Harrison Butker for the season is seventh best out of 323 00:16:19,400 --> 00:16:23,440 Speaker 2: thirty three qualifiers according to Pro Football Focus in percentage 324 00:16:23,480 --> 00:16:26,800 Speaker 2: of kickoffs return just fifteen point eight percent of his 325 00:16:26,880 --> 00:16:30,280 Speaker 2: kickoffs have been returned. And then Moody for the Niners 326 00:16:30,680 --> 00:16:32,520 Speaker 2: earlier in the year, they were trying to you know, 327 00:16:32,640 --> 00:16:36,200 Speaker 2: pin opponents deep and have them, you know, return kicks 328 00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:38,080 Speaker 2: from you know, like the one or two yard line. 329 00:16:38,200 --> 00:16:42,040 Speaker 2: So his first sixty eight kicks, thirty one or forty 330 00:16:42,080 --> 00:16:44,680 Speaker 2: six percent of them were returned. But they's gotta switch 331 00:16:44,720 --> 00:16:47,280 Speaker 2: strategy up. I remember reading something in uh, you know, 332 00:16:47,320 --> 00:16:49,440 Speaker 2: from a beat writer about that, uh, you know, kind 333 00:16:49,440 --> 00:16:52,120 Speaker 2: of late in the year. So that's kind of played out, 334 00:16:52,160 --> 00:16:54,480 Speaker 2: and we've seen just four of his last thirty four 335 00:16:54,560 --> 00:16:57,520 Speaker 2: kicks return just twelve percent. Now you're going to be 336 00:16:57,520 --> 00:17:02,480 Speaker 2: playing indoors and for the year, uh, Moody outdoors, thirty 337 00:17:02,480 --> 00:17:04,680 Speaker 2: three percent of his kicks have been returned, but indoors 338 00:17:04,720 --> 00:17:07,479 Speaker 2: that cuts in half to just sixteen point seven percent. 339 00:17:07,560 --> 00:17:10,240 Speaker 2: So I think you have a lot of things working 340 00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:12,720 Speaker 2: in favor for Moody to kind of be similar to 341 00:17:12,720 --> 00:17:15,240 Speaker 2: Bucker and that he's not really gonna let many kicks 342 00:17:15,280 --> 00:17:16,639 Speaker 2: get returned. And then if you just look at the 343 00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:19,719 Speaker 2: prior stats for both of these teams, San Francisco had 344 00:17:19,720 --> 00:17:22,160 Speaker 2: a kick return of twenty eight or more in seven 345 00:17:22,160 --> 00:17:25,840 Speaker 2: of nineteen or thirty seven percent, Kansas City only three 346 00:17:25,880 --> 00:17:27,679 Speaker 2: of their twenty games of fifteen percent. 347 00:17:27,760 --> 00:17:28,840 Speaker 1: And I think if they if. 348 00:17:28,800 --> 00:17:31,200 Speaker 2: San Francisco puts Debo back because he's obviously a better 349 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:34,280 Speaker 2: kick returner, then you know the cloud. But if they 350 00:17:34,280 --> 00:17:36,480 Speaker 2: put him back there, it's just gonna give even more 351 00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:39,000 Speaker 2: incentive for Bucker to just boom it out of the 352 00:17:39,080 --> 00:17:42,200 Speaker 2: end zone. And it's the game is indoors. So I 353 00:17:42,240 --> 00:17:44,720 Speaker 2: think there's a really good chance you only see you know, 354 00:17:44,800 --> 00:17:47,600 Speaker 2: one or two kickoffs total for the whole game. Uh, 355 00:17:47,720 --> 00:17:50,439 Speaker 2: and so that gives a really good chance for this number. 356 00:17:50,960 --> 00:17:51,639 Speaker 1: So I bet it. 357 00:17:51,720 --> 00:17:53,680 Speaker 2: You know, it's hard to kind of calculate this because 358 00:17:53,680 --> 00:17:57,000 Speaker 2: it's such an obscure market, but yeah, I think at 359 00:17:57,080 --> 00:17:58,560 Speaker 2: twenty seven and a half, I think you have some 360 00:17:58,640 --> 00:18:02,800 Speaker 2: clear value you know, up into like minus one twenty five. 361 00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:05,399 Speaker 2: And then you know, if it was like a yard lower, 362 00:18:05,440 --> 00:18:07,200 Speaker 2: I would still bet it at like, you know, even 363 00:18:07,280 --> 00:18:09,480 Speaker 2: juice like minus one ten at most pot, Like I 364 00:18:09,520 --> 00:18:12,560 Speaker 2: wouldn't go crazy. But it's really it's just really tough 365 00:18:12,560 --> 00:18:15,040 Speaker 2: to kind of calculate the true the true value. But 366 00:18:15,080 --> 00:18:18,000 Speaker 2: I do show some decent value here just because I 367 00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:21,080 Speaker 2: don't think many kicks will be returned as as typical, 368 00:18:21,160 --> 00:18:23,720 Speaker 2: especially with the Niners trending down in terms of even 369 00:18:23,840 --> 00:18:25,240 Speaker 2: like kind of planning for that. 370 00:18:25,720 --> 00:18:28,280 Speaker 3: Yeah, no, I'll have to look into this. I trust 371 00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:30,600 Speaker 3: you on the under here. And Richie James has been, 372 00:18:30,800 --> 00:18:33,639 Speaker 3: you know, one of the worst kickoff returners in the league, 373 00:18:33,680 --> 00:18:36,119 Speaker 3: so that'll help. Even if Moody yeah doesn't take a 374 00:18:36,160 --> 00:18:39,199 Speaker 3: touch back. It looks like Richarde James has been pretty poor. 375 00:18:39,280 --> 00:18:42,520 Speaker 3: So yeah, he Yeah, this is a fun one. 376 00:18:42,560 --> 00:18:42,840 Speaker 1: Again. 377 00:18:42,880 --> 00:18:45,080 Speaker 3: I think Allegiant Stadium is just a really good place 378 00:18:45,119 --> 00:18:48,520 Speaker 3: for kickers because right indoors obviously in the elevation is 379 00:18:48,560 --> 00:18:51,400 Speaker 3: probably somewhat of a factor. So yeah, that would play 380 00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:52,400 Speaker 3: in here as well. 381 00:18:52,440 --> 00:18:55,240 Speaker 1: All right, let me recap each of our three props. 382 00:18:56,000 --> 00:18:58,600 Speaker 2: Sean, you have Mitch witch Shnowski, the punter for the 383 00:18:58,720 --> 00:19:02,120 Speaker 2: Niners longest punt over fifty five and a half yards. 384 00:19:03,280 --> 00:19:06,680 Speaker 2: Your second is Tommy Townsend, the punter for the Chiefs 385 00:19:06,880 --> 00:19:09,639 Speaker 2: shortest punt over thirty six and a half yards. And 386 00:19:09,680 --> 00:19:14,440 Speaker 2: then Shivarius Ward, the corner for San Francisco under four 387 00:19:14,800 --> 00:19:20,040 Speaker 2: and a half tackles plus assists. I have Isaiah Piciceco 388 00:19:20,240 --> 00:19:22,640 Speaker 2: most rushing yards in the game at plus one seventy, 389 00:19:23,400 --> 00:19:26,080 Speaker 2: the Chiefs as the first team to use a challenge 390 00:19:26,560 --> 00:19:30,840 Speaker 2: at minus one fifteen, and the longest kickoff return by 391 00:19:30,840 --> 00:19:35,280 Speaker 2: either team in this game under twenty seven and a half. 392 00:19:35,640 --> 00:19:36,520 Speaker 1: So that's gonna do it. 393 00:19:36,520 --> 00:19:39,760 Speaker 2: For our Super Bowl fifty eight Early Props episode of 394 00:19:39,840 --> 00:19:43,280 Speaker 2: the Action Network Podcast presented by Bett MGM. For more 395 00:19:43,440 --> 00:19:45,560 Speaker 2: fantasy content from Shawn and I, be sure to check 396 00:19:45,560 --> 00:19:49,200 Speaker 2: out the Fantasy Flex. We'll have our full fantasy preview 397 00:19:49,520 --> 00:19:52,199 Speaker 2: episode looking at how to play the Super Bowl matchup 398 00:19:52,200 --> 00:19:56,160 Speaker 2: in DFS next week. If you're into betting, my weekly 399 00:19:56,320 --> 00:19:58,680 Speaker 2: betting episode with Stucky and the six Pack will be 400 00:19:58,760 --> 00:20:01,480 Speaker 2: right here. That'll be out early next week as well, 401 00:20:01,520 --> 00:20:05,200 Speaker 2: instead of midweek on Thursday morning like we usually do, 402 00:20:05,280 --> 00:20:07,160 Speaker 2: so look out for that a little bit later. 403 00:20:07,240 --> 00:20:09,400 Speaker 1: But we'll have our usual six pack and everything for that. 404 00:20:09,560 --> 00:20:11,800 Speaker 2: Action Network dot Com for all of our NFL betting 405 00:20:11,800 --> 00:20:15,160 Speaker 2: and fantasy content, fantasyab dot Com for our DFS tools 406 00:20:15,160 --> 00:20:15,600 Speaker 2: and models. 407 00:20:15,640 --> 00:20:16,560 Speaker 1: Don't forget the. 408 00:20:16,560 --> 00:20:20,360 Speaker 2: Action Network discord server. Wink will be an episode description 409 00:20:20,600 --> 00:20:23,160 Speaker 2: for that. Sean is on X at the Underscarage Maker, 410 00:20:23,359 --> 00:20:25,560 Speaker 2: I'm at Chris Raybond, We're at those Saint handles on 411 00:20:25,680 --> 00:20:26,240 Speaker 2: the free. 412 00:20:26,000 --> 00:20:28,520 Speaker 1: Award winning Action Network app. 413 00:20:28,920 --> 00:20:47,400 Speaker 2: Until next time, Let's get this money. Action Network reminds 414 00:20:47,440 --> 00:20:51,280 Speaker 2: you please gamble responsibly. If you or someone you care 415 00:20:51,320 --> 00:20:54,439 Speaker 2: about has a gambling problem, help is available twenty four 416 00:20:54,480 --> 00:20:56,480 Speaker 2: to seven at one eight hundred gambler