WEBVTT - Chiefs Doink in a Win, Josh Allen Amazes & Public Defender

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jirel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in What driven Nick Great?

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>Episode two eighty four Ton to do today. We are

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 3>really in the stretch run of the NFL season. We

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 3>will get to all of that. We have one of

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 3>our favorite games of play, Public Defender, pretty damn good

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 3>money N'D football game last night, with one of the

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 3>NFL rule oddities coming into play in a way that

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 3>I think at first blush confuses people.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>When you really look at.

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 3>It, it does technically make sense, but probably should be adjusted.

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 3>We'll do all of that first, what missed the cut?

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Shanahan says, there's not gonna be any trades of

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 3>me to the Chicago Bears bummer for the Bears Taylor

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Swift's Eras Tour ends. I know the Swifties are gonna

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 3>get mad at me for this. I gotta be totally

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 3>honest with you. I did not know that was still going.

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 3>I was very like up on the Eras Tours news

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 3>in the offseason. I felt like that was maybe served

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 3>more to my Twitter algorithm in August. In early September,

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 3>I thought it had already ended. Turns out I was

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 3>wrong and also missing the cut my NBA Cup prediction

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 3>because much like Lebron on if the Lakers aren't.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Involved in it, I'm not that interested.

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 3>And I you know what I thought it was when

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Lebron got to add to the resume first ever NBA.

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Cup champ title, It's like, okay, just.

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Another thing Jordan doesn't have. Now that the Lakers aren't

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 3>even in the elimination round, like the knockout round, I'm like, eh.

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>In season, tournament, James that really matter demand looking great,

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 2>nice sweatshirt.

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 3>I like that a lot. Good to see you, all right,

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's get right to the news of the week, which

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 3>is the Champs stay.

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 2>The Champs go ahead.

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So the Kansas City Chiefs found another way to win.

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 4>No matter what, They're just gonna keep playing in these

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 4>nitty gritty games. Chris Jones actually came out and said

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 4>that they played these games because it holds the ratings.

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Do you think there's a possibility that the way that

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 4>they're playing in these close games could come back to

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 4>bite them in the offseason or the playoffs the postseason?

0:02:58.520 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Should I say?

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Well? Listen, playoff games typically are quite close.

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Like even the Chiefs in this dynastic run have not

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 3>had many postseason blowouts like the Super Bowl obviously went

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 3>down to overtime. The Ravens game was one of the

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 3>more lopsided playoff games the Chiefs have had, and because

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 3>they were up ten for almost the entirety of the

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 3>second half, but that's still they were up seven third

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 3>and ten, had to hit the pass to NBS.

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 2>That was a one score game.

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Obviously. The Bills game, Bills have the ball down three,

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, driving at the end of the game. That

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 3>comes down to the very end. Now, the Dolphins game

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 3>was a blowout, but then go on the previous year

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Eagles game comes down to the very end. Bengals game

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 3>comes down to the very end. The Jags game it

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 3>was they won by seven. It didn't feel quite as close,

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 3>but that was the game that Mahomes got hurt. And

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>the previous year when they didn't win. Bengals game goes

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 3>to overtime. Bill's game goes to overtime. They blow out

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers, but over their last what is this nine

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 3>playoff games, only one has been decided by more than

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 3>one score. That was the Dolphins game when the Dolphins

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 3>decided they didn't want to play in the cold. You

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 3>had one, two, three, four, four literally decided on the

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 3>last or second to last play of the game. And

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 3>so I do think there is real situational football experience

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs gain from this. I also think that folks

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 3>are so lost in wanting the Chiefs to fail that

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>we have now we haven't stopped and kind of acknowledged

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 3>some of the things this team is accomplishing and Patrick

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 3>is accomplishing. This was in Patrick's seventh season as hold on,

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe onna be this wrong. Eighteen Yeah, is

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>seven seasons as a starter, because he has three Super

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Bowl wins, of Super BWL loss TWOFC Championship losses seven

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:27.239
<v Speaker 3>seasons as a starter, he has won seven divisional championships

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 3>and he has lost five divisional games, So Mahomes has

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 3>two more divisional titles. Then he has divisional game losses.

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 3>That's incomprehensible, thirty five and five against the AFC West

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 3>with seven divisional titles. Also in games that Mahomes trails

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 3>in the fourth quarter, which means every single one of

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 3>his losses have to be included. This because not to

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 3>start the fourth quarter. It's at any point he has

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 3>trailed in fifty two fourth quarters. He is now twenty

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 3>six and twenty six so a hunt so like, I

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 3>don't even know the context for that is no other

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 3>quarterback is better than thirty four percent for their career

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 3>in those spots.

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes is dead five hundred.

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 3>And then there is the like, I do understand the

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 3>frustration if you're an AFC West team or a team

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 3>of another contender, which is demonse. What have we talked

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 3>about all through this year's gambling show, how tough divisional

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 3>games are, How no matter how good you are and

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 3>how seemingly bad the opponent is, divisional games are just

0:06:53.080 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 3>a different animal that the Chiefs last three divisional games.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Broncos trying to kick a field goal to beat them,

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 3>The Chiefs block it to win by two. The Raiders

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 3>trying to get ready to kick a field goal to

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 3>beat him, The Chiefs block it. I'm sorry. The Raiders

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 3>fumble the snap and the Chiefs recover the fumble to

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 3>win by two the Chargers.

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs need a.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Field goal to beat them, they doink it off the

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 3>upright now, I will say the doink by the Chiefs

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 3>third kicker of the year makes it feel luckier if

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 3>you will, than that actually was. What that was was

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 3>once again a perfectly executed game winning drive by Patrick Mahomes.

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 3>You pick up a third and ten early, you pick

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 3>up a third and seven, ostensibly to ice the game.

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Kelsey caught it, stayed on his knee, and so that

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 3>wasn't a lucky field goal. It was almost a horrific miss.

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 3>But when you're on your third string kicker, sometimes you

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 3>get the horrific misses.

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 2>So here's why.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 3>There are two major reasons I'm not concerned about this

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 3>at all. Listen, the offensive line needs to be better,

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 3>and I'm still waiting for DJ Humphreys' news because he

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 3>was an upgrade over Wanya Morris, but he left the

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 3>game with an injury. He had been out of football

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 3>for a year after a torn acl so they you know,

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 3>that might have been grand opening, grand closing.

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll see.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 3>And obviously the secondary has him in the same since

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Watson got hurt. All that's true, So that's legitimate.

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 3>But securing the one seed is so disproportionately valuable under

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 3>the new playoff format that that's right now all that matters,

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 3>and the Bills losing this weekend plus the Chiefs escaping

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 3>with a win makes it. So here's the situation for

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City demonsay, if they beat BA I'm sorry, beat

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland and then win their home game a week from

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Saturday against Houston, okay, and so they have to go

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 3>to or Zo, beat Cleveland, beat Houston to get to

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 3>fourteen and one. If Buffalo loses either of its next two,

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 3>they play at Detroit and then they play the Patriots.

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 3>So it really is Buffalo loses to Detroit and Pittsburgh

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 3>loses either of its next two, and they play at

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Philly and then at Baltimore. If either if those things happen,

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs lock up the one seed going in into

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the Christmas game against the Steelers. An all year long,

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 3>that has been my focus because schedule and rest wise,

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs are in a very odd spot. So I

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 3>want to take a moment here to discuss why I've

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 3>so for the Chiefs chances to win the Super Bowl

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 3>they go up so dramatically if they have the one

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 3>seed locked before that Christmas game, because they the NFL

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 3>is asking those four teams that play on Christmas to

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 3>play as condensed of a three game stretch as any

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 3>teams have ever played. Where you play Saturday, I'm sorry, Sunday, Saturday, Wednesday. Now,

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 3>that's been done before on a Monday, Sunday Thursday schedule,

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 3>but when the time's that short, it does warrant mentioning.

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 3>This is a one o'clock kickoff, so you don't even

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 3>get those extra seven hours of recovery time into your

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 3>typical Thursday night game. And it's right before the playoffs start,

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 3>and it's when the Chiefs had an early season by

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of things there that are very disadvantageous.

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 3>So now I want to get to the tricky thing

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 3>for Kansas City. If they don't clinch until.

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 2>After the Steelers game, okay.

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Because another way they can clinch is even if Buffalo

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 3>wins all of their remaining games, if the Chiefs beat Cleveland,

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 3>beat Houston, and then beat Pittsburgh, they clinch. So typical

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 3>rest between football games is six days Sunday to Sunday.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So I'm gonna reverse engineer this calendar to.

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Really try to lay this out for you guys, because

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 3>it's an unprecedented spot Kansas City could find itself in.

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 3>So the playoffs start January thirteenth, fourteenth, Okay, that's no,

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, let me. I have to get your dates

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 3>right on this. January eleventh, twelfth is when the playoffs start,

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 3>all right, So we're just gonna use Sundays as the

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 3>assumed day January twelfth.

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 3>If the Chiefs have a bye, their playoffs start January nineteenth.

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 3>So if you rest no one ever, you play January fifth,

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 3>and then instead of having six days between games, you

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 3>have thirteen days between games.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, if you have the bye. If the Chiefs though,

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 2>decide to do what a lot of teams do and not.

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 3>Play, guys in week eighteen, well, now, typically what you

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 3>would average days between games, but that's not the case

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 3>for Kansas City because their Week seventeen game is not

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 3>on a Sunday, It's on a Wednesday, December twenty fifth.

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>So if Kansas City were to say.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 3>We don't have it locked, we've got to play everyone

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 3>through the Steelers game and then you want to rest

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 3>people in Week eighteen, you are then looking at playing

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 3>a game on December twenty fifth and then having twenty

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 3>six days until your next game, which is a divisional

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 3>round playoff game. That's unprecedented and unheard of, and it

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 3>would be, in my opinion, insane to do.

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 2>The flip side is this.

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 3>And I have circled this all year and I don't

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 3>care how mad netflix would be. It would be such

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 3>a huge opportunity for Kansas City if they earn it

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 3>by having the one locked up, and all they need

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 3>is to win their next two and have Buffalo and

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh both lose once and Buffalo and Pittsburgh are both

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 3>underdogs this weekend, they have an opportunity to do this.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Play the Rave or play the Texans this coming in

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 3>two weeks, which is the date of that game for

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 3>the Texans game is on Saturday, December twenty first. Okay,

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 3>sit people, for the Steelers game. Have that be the

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 3>week of rest. Two weeks later, play the Broncos like

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 3>your final preseason game or your third preseason game. Play

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 3>your starters for a full half, get everyone up and running,

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 3>sit them in the second half, and then have two

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 3>weeks until your next game, the divisional round game. So

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 3>you get to skip the Steelers on a short week.

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 3>You give yourself an end of season by. You then

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 3>play the Broncos game to stay fresh for the first half,

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 3>get another by, and be in a position where you

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 3>have twenty six days where your team really only has

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 3>to play gosh or a thirty days pardon me, from

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the Texans game to the first playoff game, where you

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 3>really don't have to play a half of football, but

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 3>you can stay sharp. And for a team this old,

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and for a team that has played eight years of

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 3>football in the last seven years of football since Mahomes

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>has been there, it would be such an edge.

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 2>And so.

0:15:56.040 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 3>If Buffalo loses again this weekend, and I think Pittsburgh's

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 3>going to lose one of their last two and Kansas

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 3>City wins the next two games, they will have from

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 3>a rest perspective, the greatest opportunity in modern NFL history

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 3>from how they can finagle the schedule by earning it

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 3>by going fourteen to one, and if they do that,

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm here to tell you I don't know how close

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 3>those playoff games will be if every other team is

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 3>coming off a gauntlet and having to have won whoever

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 3>they play in the divisional round, travel to Arrowea after

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 3>having won a playoff game, and then in round three

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 3>that team has just won back to back playoff games

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 3>and has busted their ass down the stretch and Kansas

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 3>City is their chilling And then, by the way, another

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 3>bye week before the Super Bowl, you are going to

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 3>see a fresher, tougher, sharper Chiefs team. Now the flip

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 3>side to that coin is this, if they slip up

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 3>against the Browns or the Texans and then you have

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 3>to play a hard hitting, well coached, desperate Steelers team

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 3>on Wednesday, Christmas afternoon. That's the type of game where

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 3>you could see what happened to the Lions on Thanksgiving

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 3>happened to the Chiefs. Where it's player after player getting

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 3>banged up. That's a worst case scenario, so stakes couldn't

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 3>be higher. The next two weeks for Kansas City but

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 3>the the double up of Buffalo losing a heartbreaker and

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs winning the way they did has put him

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 3>in a brilliant position. All right, let's get to the

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 3>next weekend. Yeah, let's get to the next game, Demonse.

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, that Rams Bills game Bills came came up

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 4>short forty four to forty two. But a lot of

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 4>people probably say that's the game of the year. Out

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 4>of that game, who would you say that you're more

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 4>impressed by, between the Rams or Josh Allen?

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Listen, Josh Allen was excellent, excellent, And even though I

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 3>don't care so much about push push touchdowns and I

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 3>think some of these, Josh Allen the last two weeks

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 3>has done things no quarterbacks ever done. I don't look

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 3>at two weeks ago that he has a receiving touchdown.

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 3>A receiving touchdown is catching a touchdown. Josh Allen threw

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 3>a pass, it got lateral back to him, and because

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 3>of an odd statistical anomaly, he finishes that game with

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 3>one touchdown, seven receiving yards, zero catches. So it's just

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 3>like even the box score doesn't make sense. And I

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 3>don't value tush push touchdowns the way other people do

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 3>with that said, he was their entire offense. So I

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 3>was wildly impressed by him. My concern for the Bills,

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 3>as much as I have liked the Bills all year,

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 3>this was my concern early in the season, and I

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 3>said it, I think teams with elite passing attacks, I

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 3>don't think the Bills back end can hold up. And

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 3>the Rams, when they are healthy and Stafford is rolling,

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 3>that is an elite passing attack. There is no denying it,

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 3>there is no getting around it. And you saw it

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.719
<v Speaker 3>again this weekend. Now, the Rams have a lot of

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 3>work to do to make the playoffs, but because of

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 3>this hot streak, they now sneaky have two paths to

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs. Demonse, they control their own destiny for the

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 3>division if they went out and they obviously if Seattle stumbles,

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 3>can win the division.

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 2>But they also quietly.

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Have another path that no one's really talking about, which

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 3>is what but if they get the seventh seed because

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the Commanders fall apart. Now, we saw the Commanders trending

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 3>down and then they got the gift of the Tennessee Titans,

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 3>and so everyone's like, Okay, the Commanders are fine, maybe,

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 3>and they're coming off a bye, so maybe they're okay.

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 3>But they're at the Saints this weekend, then home for Philly,

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 3>home for the Falcons, out the Cowboys. So I just

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 3>I think the Rams their best path is winning the division,

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 3>but the seventh seed door isn't shut to them.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 2>If they win the division, though, demanse.

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 3>They are not going to object to that potential super

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Bowl road. They would start with a home game, ostensibly

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 3>against Minnesota. Minnesota's really good, but they played Minnesota this

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 3>year and beat them thirty to twenty. They then, if

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 3>the bracket holds, would be going to Detroit. They played

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Detroit in the playoffs last year, lost by one. They

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 3>played Detroit Week one of this season went to overtime.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 3>So Detroit's better than the Rams, there's no denying it.

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 3>But they play Stafford plays them tough, and I just

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 3>when you have, in my opinion, the best coach in

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 3>the conference and the best quarterback in the conference.

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 2>If you win your.

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Division and you get at least one home game, you're

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 3>a live playoffs both.

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, previous experience over the Lions and yeah.

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 3>And the last one coach quarterback combo to win a

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl not named Reied Mahomes was McVeigh Stafford.

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 2>So I just I the.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 3>The Rams win their rolling offensively are just they look unstoppable.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 3>And as I will say this, as bullish as I

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 3>am on the Chiefs, and as I have been all year,

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 3>the type of team that worries me the most are

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 3>teams with two elite receivers and an elite quarterback to

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 3>go along with it. Now, there's only two teams in

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 3>the league that fit that bill, the Rams and the Bengals.

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 2>The Eagles have.

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 3>Two elite receivers, but I don't think, well, I just

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 3>don't think Jalen is an elite quarterback. And I don't know,

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 3>if you saw the latest drum out of Philly, they

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 3>seem to be trying to light themselves on fire again.

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Jalen, I don't put this on Jailen, but

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 3>you've got a bad.

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Game by No.

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 3>But the postgame comments from AJ Brown saying what's the problem?

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 3>He says, a passing game? And then what do you

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 3>guys need to work on passing? And then Brandon Graham

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 3>comes out yesterday and says, Brandon Graham, the leader of

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 3>that team, arguably who tore his triceps, so he's out

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 3>for the year. But still, the veteran leader said on

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 3>the radio yesterday. He has since apologized, Yeah, I don't

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 3>know what happened between jail and and aj They used

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 3>to be friends. Oh so yeah, And now today he's like, oh,

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 3>I shouldn't have said that. But like, you can't put

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 3>that genie back in the bottle, man. But back to

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 3>the point, I was thinking about teams that can give

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs the most trouble. Two elite receivers, an elite

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 3>quarterback since Jalen Watson went down. That's the type of

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 3>team the Chiefs don't have, don't have an answer for.

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 2>All Right, so let's.

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Go to sounds like you. I mean, he was gonna

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 4>ask if you regret picking the Eagles over the Rams.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it sounds like you do.

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I mean.

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 3>I think the Eagles. It's not a full blown spiral yet.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 3>I think this weekend's game against Pittsburgh is gonna be

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 3>incredibly instructive. You win this game, you get to twelve

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 3>and two to great win, you can quiet a lot

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 3>of the noise. You lose this game, and immediately the

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 3>narrative is going to be is it last year all

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 3>over again? Even if that's unfair, and you know, people

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 3>did not like their win over Carolina. Carolina has been

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 3>frisky for the last month, not really winning games, but

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 3>playing good teams tough, and this was the closest win

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 3>they had. I mean, Xavier Lagett, you know, had the touchdown. Now,

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 3>to be fair, that would not have won the game.

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 3>That would have put Carolina up one, but there was

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 3>forty five seconds left. Philly would have had plenty of

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 3>time to go back and get in field goal range.

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm also going to double down on the MVP thing

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 3>that I do not think it's over, and right now,

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen is minus four point fifty or something minus

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 3>five hundred. Saquon's a distant second, and in third places

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Jared Goff. Jared Goff plays Josh Allen and the Bills

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 3>on National.

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 2>TV this weekend.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:41.719
<v Speaker 3>Golf right now has more touchdown passes than Allen, a

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 3>better passer rating than Allen, more passing yards than Allen,

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 3>all those things.

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 2>If golf betters in that game.

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 3>Right on a better team, If golf cooks in that

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 3>game and they win, there is going to be so

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm real, why isn't Jared Goff the MVP momentum and

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 3>if the Bills lose two in a row and fall

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 3>to ten and four at like there and maybe the

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 3>three seed in the AFC. It's just I don't right

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 3>now Allen is the favorite. Saquon right now would have

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 3>my vote, But right now Allen is the favorite. But

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 3>it is too early to say that debate is over.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think those odds are not giving golf enough credit.

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 4>All Right, Next, so the Bengals destroyed, not destroy. I

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.640
<v Speaker 4>guess they'd beat the Cowboys last night by a touchdown,

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 4>but coming into this year, you probably would have thought

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 4>that was gonna be a great game. But Dallas is

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 4>without Dak obviously, in Cincinnati's defense is sucked all year.

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Which one of these teams do you think returns to

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 4>relevance the fastest?

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, the answer is to me obviously Cincinnati, because they

0:26:54.920 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>have the great quarterback. Now they have some structural problems.

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 3>After the game, they talked about keeping Higgins, Chase and

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Joe together. That's just not happening there. Like they can

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 3>keep Chase there, but they're not gonna be able to

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 3>keep T. Higgins there. And I think everyone at this

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.479
<v Speaker 3>point knows that like T. Higgins is going to be

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they're franchise tagging him again, and he's

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 3>going to be a free agent and they're you know

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 3>what I mean, They're gonna go out and they're gonna

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 3>have to pay Jamar Chase absolute top of market money.

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 3>And so that's like, that's what's gonna happen. I don't

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 3>I I to me, it's not that surprising that this

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 3>is the position they have found themselves in. I shouldn't

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 3>say it's not that surprising. It's the Bengals made a

0:27:54.960 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 3>decision that I disagreed with before the year in that

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 3>they didn't take care of their business with t Higgins

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 3>early enough and decide to trade him or extend him.

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 3>And then they doubled down on that mistake by not

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 3>giving Jamar an obvious extension last year when he was eligible,

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 3>and that set the to me season off on the

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 3>wrong foot. Now, the offense has been great despite all

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 3>of that. It's been mostly defensive issues. But I think

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals have some retooling to do. The Cowboys just

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 3>seem stuck and they'll be relevant because they're the Cowboys.

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 3>And that was actually a hell of a performance last night.

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 3>And Micah is a such a massive difference maker just

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 3>when he's out there. Defensively, they're a different team. But

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 3>they are flirting with the idea of bringing my McCarthy back. Obviously,

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 3>either three best players are coming back, Micah cd and

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Dak So I just don't see what major change is

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 3>going to come for the Cowboys for them to all

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden be a contender. And the Bengals defense

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 3>can vary a ton year to year. The Bengals just

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 3>need an average defense, and they right now would be

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 3>ten and three with an average defense instead of their

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 3>position of five and eight.

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 4>Are you still on the boat off? They have like

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 4>a real playoff chance this year?

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Like do you think, well, so I was doing some

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 3>it's funny you asked that. So the Bengals would have

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 3>to win out, which if you look at their schedule,

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 3>you say, well, that's possible. What they have the rest

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 3>of the way is the Titans, who are terrible, the Browns,

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 3>the the Broncos in a huge game, and then at

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers in Week eighteen, which maybe is a super

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 3>meaningful game to Pittsburgh or maybe Pittsburgh's resting people. So

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 3>it's possible they went out and get to nine and eight.

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 3>It's not likely, but it's possible. The problem for Cincinnati

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 3>that I came across today when I was doing it is,

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 3>even if they win out, they are what they have

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 3>a very very narrow path, which is they would need

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 3>to win out and have the Broncos lose out, including

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 3>the game to them, then they would get in theoretically,

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 3>But the problem with that is, again we're going in

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 3>the weeds a bit. Is the Broncos if they lose out,

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos play the Cults this week, and the Cults

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 3>are one of the teams ahead of Cincinnati in the standings. Again,

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 3>this is probably a better article than podcasts, but just

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 3>stick with me for a minute. The Bengals max out

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 3>at nine wins, and the only team they could win

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 3>the tiebreaker with that also maxes out at nine wins

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 3>is the Broncos because they play them head to head.

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 3>But the if the bronc for the Broncos to only

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 3>get to nine wins or fewer, they need to lose out, right,

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 3>so follow me along this path, one of those.

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Losses would come to the Colts. Well, the Colts.

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Would win every tiebreaker with Cincy, and if the Colts

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 3>beat the Broncos. They're at seven wins with the following

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 3>games left Titans, Giants, Jags. So what the Bengals need

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 3>to get into the playoffs is they win all their games,

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the Colts to beat Denver, or it with the Colts

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 3>to beat Denver and then the Colts after beating Denver

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 3>to go one and two against Titans, Giants, Jags. That's

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 3>a really tough putt. Or the other way is for

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos to beat the Colts and then the Broncos

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 3>to promptly lose every game left on their schedule. So

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 3>I do think that the Bengals oddly are a dangerous

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 3>adjacent team, but they have a two to six conference record,

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 3>which means they're gonna lose every tiebreaker, and they max

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 3>out at nine wins, so they would have to hit

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the following exactas essentially.

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 2>They need to in all four of their games.

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 3>They then need the either the following things to happen,

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos to beat the Colts and then promptly lose

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 3>all three of their.

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Games, or.

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 3>The Colts to beat the Broncos and the Broncos to

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 3>lose two of their last three and the Colts to

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 3>lose two of their last three. You're just not gonna

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 3>get that, you know what. I mean, all of those

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 3>things to happen.

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 4>If the Bengals lose their next game, you sit Burrow.

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 4>You sit them right.

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 2>That's an interesting one.

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 3>If they loose the moment they get eliminated, do you

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 3>sit Joe Burrow?

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe?

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean I think that. So here's a different one.

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 3>That's let's assume Burrow hasn't set Let me ask you

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 3>this question, de Monsey, who are your three AFC Pro

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Bowl QUARTERBACKSFC.

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Pro Bowl quarterbacks?

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 2>That seems like a why are we asking this? But

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 2>here's why.

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen's in the AFC, Lamar Jackson's in the AFC,

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes in the AFC, Joe Burrow's in the AFC.

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Which of those four guys is not getting a Pro

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Bowl seat this year? Do you have, like, what's your

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 3>gut reaction answer.

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 4>If Joe Burrow You're saying this is if Joe Burrow.

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Sits No, I'm saying, how about this as now?

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 3>If you had to vote today as it is right now,

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 3>if you had to vote today, who's not getting a

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Pro Bowl spot in the AFC of those four quarterbacks.

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 4>Unfortunately, I don't know. They go back and look, I

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 4>mean Burrow's obviously you've been carrying that tea. Mahomes go ahead,

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 4>So I mean, has Lamar not had a better season

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 4>like statistic wise, then I don't.

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 3>I think I think it would come down to Burrow

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 3>or Mahomes. I think Lamar is kind of locked because

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 3>his numbers are insane. Josh feels locked because he might

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 3>win the damn League MVP.

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 2>So then you have Burrow or Mahomes.

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Burrow who has the best numbers of any quarterback in football,

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 3>but his team is five and eight. Mahomes whose numbers

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 3>are mediocre. But every single person who's watched the NFL

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 3>this year, if they were being honest and you ask

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 3>them this question, Hey, the Chiefs who are twelve and

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 3>one and have the second best Super Bowl odds, but

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 3>really they're the favorites to win the Super Bowl? What

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 3>would their record with any other quarterback? What do we

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 3>think seven and six like this Chiefs team that has

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 3>the best.

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 2>So it's a it's.

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 3>A really weird spot of and one of those guys

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 3>is not going to be a Pro bowler. Now, if

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals were to do what you're not suggesting but

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 3>you know asking, which is if they sit Burrow, then

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 3>it becomes an easier discussion. But I don't know who

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 3>gets left out. Honest to God, it can't be Lamar.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 3>You can't put in Burrow over Lamar.

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 2>You just can't.

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 3>Like you can put them both in, but Lamar. They've

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 3>played twice, they both played great in both games. Lamar's

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.439
<v Speaker 3>won both his team's better, their numbers are equivalent. He's

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 3>got to be there. Josh Allen is the overwhelming favorite

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.399
<v Speaker 3>win League MVP, so he's in there.

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 2>And then you have a Borrow Mahomes discussion, which is

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 2>an interesting one. I am here to tell you.

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm here to tell you that I want nothing more

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 3>than for the second straight year, the Chiefs to be

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 3>shut out from all of the NFL awards, even like

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 3>honors like the you know, they announce the NFL honors

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 3>ceremony like Super Bowl week or the week before, and

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 3>they announced the finalists and last year Coach of the Year,

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 3>no GM of the Year, no Defensive Player of the Year,

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 3>no MVP, no like they got shut out for everything.

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna happen again, by the way, Mahomes obviously is

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 3>not gonna be MVP finalists. They're gonna screw Chris Jones

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 3>on being a Defensive Player of the Year finalist. Andy

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Reid's not even top seven or eight and Coach of

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 3>the year odds. If all that happens and they announce

0:37:57.640 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 3>the Pro Bowl rosters, a Pro Bowl and for the

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 3>first time in his career, Patrick Mahomes is not a

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Pro bowler, oh my god. They might beat everyone by

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 3>thirty in the playoffs. I really hope it happens. All right,

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 3>let's talk a bit about quarterback development after the break,

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Take quick break, come back?

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 2>What's right? All right?

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back in What's right? With nick right demands. Let's

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 3>get to our last top before we go to public defender.

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 4>So we got the Lions, Seahawks, Bucks, Vikings, and Steelers.

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 4>All those teams right now are currently playoff playoffs teams,

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 4>but they all got quarterbacks that are previously scrapped from

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 4>their last teams. Do you think that we're witnessing a

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 4>shift in the NFL? Is not less or is it

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 4>less detrimental to have a franchise quarterback than a great coach?

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Well? What I here's what I think. I think that

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:07.839
<v Speaker 2>in the NFC.

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 3>You can survive make a Super Bowl even without a

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 3>great quarterback. We see it happen all the time. The

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Niners made a Super Bowl with Brock Purdy, the Eagles

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 3>made one with Jalen Hurts. The Eagles made one with

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Nick Foles, the Niners made one with Jimmy Garoppolo. The

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 3>only great quarterback who'd made a Super Bowl in the

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 3>NFC the last few years is Stafford and Brady obviously,

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 3>and Stafford, by the way, wasn't really held in this

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 3>high of a regard until the Rams tenure in the

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 3>eight So, like people are like, do you take the

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 3>Vikings seriously? My answer to that question is yes, because

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 3>they're in the NFC. And listen, Darnold's played great. I

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 3>don't think he's great, but he has played great. I

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 3>give him credit. But all of your historically great or

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 3>unicorn quarterbacks are in the other conference. Mahomes, Alan, Lamar, Burrow,

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 3>They're all there, and so you just feel like in

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 3>the AFC, you've got to have one of those guys.

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 3>In the NFC when it's like you're gonna have to

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 3>go through Golf or Jailing or Donald, We'll see if

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Love can become that guy he hasn't yet, or

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Baker or Geno. There's just a clearer path now those

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 3>teams might be more well rounded. So that is like

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 3>I listen, Obviously, great coaches are undervalued. But the other

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 3>piece of it is what those teams have been able

0:40:54.719 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 3>to do is pay B B plus A minus players

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 3>all over their team because their quarterback instead of making

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 3>sixty millions, making thirty or on the rookie scale, whatever it.

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Is, that's a huge edge.

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Nothing is as big of an edge as the edge

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 3>you get from having one.

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Of those truly truly great quarterbacks.

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 3>The where you get screwed is if you find yourself

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 3>in the position the Cowboys or at this point the

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals or those teams have, which is you have a

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 3>fine quarterback who you pay like he's one of those guys.

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 3>And so I this is not, you know, a unique

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.720
<v Speaker 3>opinion or new ground. This is just a different version

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 3>of the best way to win a championship as a

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 3>quarterback on the rookie pay scale. But the kind of

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 3>middle ground now is the veteran quarterback that makes more

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 3>than a rookie but way less than a superstar who

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 3>has a lot of experience who found a system that

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 3>fits him, like Gino, like Baker, like it looks like

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 3>we found with Donald And so that's the the Lions,

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess with golf would fall into that as well.

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 3>But golf, you know, has been paid top of market twice.

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Now golf got paid top of market by the Rams

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 3>and then the Lions just paid them top of market again.

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go to the game. Let's go to

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 2>public defender.

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh yes, First off, a council. It seems to exclusively

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 4>represent teams that can only be bright Shawn by less

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 4>than a touchdown. A counselor defend your client, the Eagles

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 4>and their Super Bowl chances.

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, listen, the Eagles super Bowl hopes are.

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 2>It's very straightforward.

0:42:55.840 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 3>One is, despite all of the drama surrounding the team,

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 3>it is also totally on the board that they end

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:11.319
<v Speaker 3>up as the number one seed in the NFC and

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 3>that the Super Bowl goes through the link in January,

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 3>which is a brutal spot for the rest of the conference.

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 3>All that they need is for the Lions to trip

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 3>up against Buffalo and then they're tied in the lost

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 3>column with Philly and it's a race to the end.

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Even if that does not happen. The Eagles path right

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 2>now would be the two seed hosting a Washington team

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 2>that you know they can beat, as they have already

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 2>beaten earlier this year, and they're gonna get another bite

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 2>at them later. And then.

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 3>If they get to that place, you feel like so

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 3>many of the potential bad vibes that are percolating right

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 3>now go away. They have arguably the best defense in

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 3>the whole conference, inarguably the best running back in the

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:11.360
<v Speaker 3>whole conference. They are incredibly live to win the super

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 3>Bowl or to get to the super Bowl, to win

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:18.720
<v Speaker 3>the conference. But there is no denying that. Right now,

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:23.360
<v Speaker 3>I put the problems on I'm gonna take off my

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.239
<v Speaker 3>public defender at for a moment and now just talk

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:29.320
<v Speaker 3>about the Eagles. I put the problems on AJ Brown,

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:34.320
<v Speaker 3>And listen, Jalen Hurts has not played well. AJ Brown's

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 3>a great player. But when you're a great player who

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:45.240
<v Speaker 3>not only has been paid, but has been paid twice,

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 3>if your team's winning, your job is to not cause

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:49.280
<v Speaker 3>a problem.

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 2>And AJ Brown was a first round pick, got that money.

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 3>The Eagles paid him a ton of money when they

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 3>traded for him. And this off season preemptively gave him

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 3>another extension. So AJ Brown is on his third big contract,

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that and they're winning, and the fact

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 3>that he has decided now is the time to after

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 3>a win cause a problem I think is really abhorrent

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:30.319
<v Speaker 3>behavior by your captain. Like there's just I I hate it.

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 3>And I understand we let wide receivers get away with

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 3>a lot more because the diva wide receiver thing. But

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 3>this is bad, man, Like you're eleven and two, Saquon,

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Like the whole narrative from within the locker room is man.

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:51.280
<v Speaker 3>You guys disrespected our defense. Look at him now, Saquon

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 3>is gonna break the rushing record. It should be nothing

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 3>but good vibes. And AJ Brown started a fire that

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 3>then Brandon Graham, you know, added Kerosene too, So that's

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:05.759
<v Speaker 3>not good. And so I do think the Eagles can

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 3>still make the super Bowl. But I don't trust Siriani

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:13.280
<v Speaker 3>to fix this, and I don't know why AJ Brown

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 3>started this problem.

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 4>All right, next, All right, amidst another giant's loss, a

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.840
<v Speaker 4>plane floor of MetLife Stadium with a vander reading, mister

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 4>mahra enough, please fix this dumpster fire. After the game,

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 4>the Elak Neighbors was asked about it and said, I

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 4>ain't paid for the plane. That was exactly what you

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 4>would say if you paid for the plane. Counselor defend

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:37.760
<v Speaker 4>your client, the number one suspect, Malik Neighbors.

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Listen, Obviously Milik Neighbors didn't pay for the plane.

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't even think he needs a lot of defense there.

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Nobody thinks he actually paid for the plane. I'm going

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to once again take off my public defender hat for

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:59.360
<v Speaker 3>a moment and talk about another devil wide receiver, Mylik Neighbors.

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 3>You're too young and have not accomplished enough to be

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 3>this much of.

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:04.919
<v Speaker 2>A pain in the ass.

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 3>And there's been multiple times this season where you have

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 3>made it clear it ain't my fault.

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Buddy.

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 3>We all know it's not your fault. We all know

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 3>you're one of the best players on the team.

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 2>But I do not I do not think that.

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Malik Neighbors has earned the sweat equity to do the

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 3>post game malcontent stuff the way he's already doing it.

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 3>And maybe it's because I turned forty, maybe I'm becoming

0:47:56.440 --> 0:48:06.239
<v Speaker 3>more curmudgeonly, But the the amount of young receivers that

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:12.879
<v Speaker 3>are just an instant pain in the ass. I think

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 3>is not ideal and is not does not necessarily foster winning.

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 3>And again, I imagine Malik is incredibly frustrated, and he

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 3>is an awesome player. He's been the best of the

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 3>rookie wide receivers. He's been better than Marvin Harrison, He's

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 3>been better than Rome, and that's despite being in the

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 3>worst quarterbacking situation. Try to make it through your first

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:43.839
<v Speaker 3>season before you're like, I don't know why I didn't

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 3>get the ball to we were down thirty nothing, I

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 3>ain't paid for the plane. Like, try, if you're gonna

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 3>be the best player on a team, try.

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 2>To exhibit some.

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:58.399
<v Speaker 3>Leadership qualities. I don't think that's unfair. I think that's

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 3>part of being a professional. Demant'sy, I hear I got

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 3>a new client.

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, your client League Neighbors is going to jail. Now

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 4>you just got another client to defend Divo wide receivers

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 4>as a whole.

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is actually despite everything I just said, this

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 3>is actually very easy. Which is wide receiver is the

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:30.359
<v Speaker 3>only position in all of sports where, even if you

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 3>play perfectly, you're a one hundred out of one hundred

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 3>in every category. Your success is thoroughly dependent on other people.

0:49:44.560 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 3>There is and I said, all of sports, but I

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:51.720
<v Speaker 3>can just keep it to football. There is not another

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 3>position on the football field that doesn't have the opportunity

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:05.839
<v Speaker 3>to just singular dominate in individually, independent of everyone else.

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Every spot on.

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 3>Defense can do it. If safety can come down, make

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 3>a big hit. Corners can take away side of the

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:17.359
<v Speaker 3>field or make a pick. Pats rushers run stoppers can

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 3>beat their block and go do it. Offensive linemen you

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 3>can pancake a guy again and again and again. Obviously,

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:29.640
<v Speaker 3>running back can go make somebody miss. Quarterback as the

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:32.799
<v Speaker 3>whole game in his hands. Wide receiver can do exactly

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 3>what you've asked, run his route exactly seven yards, lose

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 3>the corner, be wide open, and never get the ball

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:46.400
<v Speaker 3>or get missed. And when you play that position for

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:53.879
<v Speaker 3>your whole life growing up, when that happens, then what

0:50:54.080 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 3>that can engender or create is some selfishness and some

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:05.239
<v Speaker 3>frustration that then once you get to the top of

0:51:05.280 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the mountain, the NFL can really blossom. So it is

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 3>not a coincidence that the position that has the most

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 3>divas is the dependent position, and so that is it's

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 3>it is nurture more than nature in this regard. These

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:35.839
<v Speaker 3>these receivers are not born divas. They are developed into

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 3>them by football and what it does to them. And

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 3>so it's society's fault, your honor. Now we'll take off

0:51:45.080 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 3>my public defender. With all that said, that's what the

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:52.000
<v Speaker 3>money's for, grow up kids like they. I mean, that's

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:53.720
<v Speaker 3>what the money's for. All right, last one.

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 4>Very well said. Arguably the greatest coach of all time,

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:00.800
<v Speaker 4>or so we thought, Bill Belichick's and able to find

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 4>work this past year. Now he's reportedly considering coaching historic

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 4>basketball school. You and see a counselor to fit the

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 4>legacy of your client, Bill Belichick.

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:17.719
<v Speaker 3>Uh, your honor, I recuse myself from this case because

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I find it so outrageous and embarrassing that my client

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:28.000
<v Speaker 3>is publicly dating a woman forty five years younger than him.

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 2>And I can't believe.

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:37.759
<v Speaker 3>That the media, the mainstream media, feels like this is

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 3>out of bounds to discuss. It's not, and it's weird.

0:52:45.640 --> 0:52:49.319
<v Speaker 3>It's not out of bounds. They've gone Instagram public. He's

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 3>out there on Halloween dressing up like a fisherman. She's

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:56.319
<v Speaker 3>dressing up like a Mermaid. Listen, if someone who is

0:52:56.360 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 3>a public figure gets caught by the media at dinner

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:07.560
<v Speaker 3>with someone pictures through the you know, restaurant window, and

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 3>they and and they never do anything public about it,

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 3>then I would say that's their private life.

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Leave them alone.

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:23.400
<v Speaker 3>When you decide as a public person to publicly be

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:31.319
<v Speaker 3>in a relationship with someone I think born in the

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 3>two thousands, or if not in the two thousands, orn

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:39.879
<v Speaker 3>you know, in the what what'd you.

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:43.320
<v Speaker 4>Say you're getting.

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm not getting supposed to.

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:50.400
<v Speaker 3>It's not personal life. It's not as personally I'm telling

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:55.279
<v Speaker 3>you right now. If I ran an NFL team and

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, hey, I'm figuring out who is going to

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 3>be the head coach of my team, and it's like, oh,

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:09.960
<v Speaker 3>there's Mike Vrabel, married kids, everyone things in line. Oh

0:54:10.040 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 3>there's coordinator X single, you know, don't really know his situation.

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh here's this person divorced, don't really know his situation.

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Here's a man who's seventy two years old dating a

0:54:27.880 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 3>college student grad student. I'm going to say, I'm worried

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:40.280
<v Speaker 3>he might be going through some things that's in bounds.

0:54:40.840 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry.

0:54:42.040 --> 0:54:45.839
<v Speaker 3>That's not an unfairer and I think Belichick's greatest coach ever,

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 3>that's not unfair, and.

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Him doing it publicly.

0:54:53.040 --> 0:54:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Is weird. It's just weird. And I don't think it's

0:54:57.120 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 3>helping his coaching prospects.

0:54:59.040 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 4>What Yeah, I do think it's a It is a

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 4>little bit of a weird time to spent, like if

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:07.360
<v Speaker 4>you're going for an NFL team, but to then also

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 4>trying to go back and coach at a college when

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:10.839
<v Speaker 4>you're currently doing that.

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the whole little old to mom'sday.

0:55:15.400 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 3>This is weird because you're my son and I'm married

0:55:18.440 --> 0:55:20.759
<v Speaker 3>to your mom, so you have to put your.

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Own in a different position.

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:25.120
<v Speaker 3>So don't even pick me. Let's not even do mean,

0:55:25.480 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 3>And I don't want to do what any of my

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:30.800
<v Speaker 3>colleagues because they're married as well. I'll just do myself.

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm forty. I'm forty. If I was dating a twenty

0:55:38.600 --> 0:55:46.800
<v Speaker 3>four year old, people would roll their eyes. If if

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Belichick is my you know, almost almost to the year,

0:55:54.120 --> 0:55:59.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, who's almost the exact same age as Belichick, Papa,

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:06.120
<v Speaker 3>my dad. If my dad was dating someone your age, we'd.

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Be like.

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:13.160
<v Speaker 3>We we'd have we'd have concerns. Yeah, and I'm just

0:56:13.239 --> 0:56:17.840
<v Speaker 3>saying Belichick, I don't think it's helping his coaching career,

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:21.560
<v Speaker 3>like his ability to land one of these jobs. And

0:56:21.640 --> 0:56:25.959
<v Speaker 3>I do think it's odd, and I don't I try

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 3>to be very fair to people that private life is private.

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 2>This is not private.

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:36.960
<v Speaker 3>This has been super public to the point to where

0:56:37.280 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 3>we know how they met. I don't know how Andy

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:44.359
<v Speaker 3>Reid met his wife. I know Belichick and her were

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:46.200
<v Speaker 3>sitting next to each other on a plane and he

0:56:46.200 --> 0:56:48.920
<v Speaker 3>helped her with her homework or something like. I know

0:56:49.080 --> 0:56:53.399
<v Speaker 3>that like that that, and I know that they took

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Instagram pictures where he was a fisherman and she was

0:56:56.520 --> 0:57:00.960
<v Speaker 3>a mermaid for Halloween. I know that happened, and so

0:57:02.480 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that is what it is. And maybe people

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:07.279
<v Speaker 3>will get mad at me for this. Maybe this will

0:57:07.320 --> 0:57:08.160
<v Speaker 3>get aggregated.

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I stand by all of it. It would.

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:15.040
<v Speaker 4>It's nobody's talking about.

0:57:15.960 --> 0:57:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Nobody is talking about and why if it's so weird

0:57:18.880 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 3>that people are afraid to talk about it.

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Like he's seventy two.

0:57:24.320 --> 0:57:30.520
<v Speaker 3>If his girlfriend was forty two, it'd be noteworthy. That'd

0:57:30.560 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 3>be noteworthy.

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 2>I just wouldn't forty two, all right?

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Forty two is different like the twenty four it would

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 4>be noteworthy.

0:57:39.520 --> 0:57:43.600
<v Speaker 3>If you're dating someone thirty years younger than you, it's noteworthy.

0:57:44.320 --> 0:57:49.920
<v Speaker 3>It's not bad, but it's noteworthy. It's certainly if I

0:57:49.960 --> 0:57:52.479
<v Speaker 3>were to, if you were to, if I were to be, like, hey,

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:55.400
<v Speaker 3>let's play a game.

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:58.840
<v Speaker 2>If none of this had happened. Let's play a game.

0:58:00.480 --> 0:58:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Guess the age within a five year band of such

0:58:06.400 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 3>and such seventy two year old's girlfriend. How many guesses

0:58:11.480 --> 0:58:16.200
<v Speaker 3>does it take before you get to early forties, much

0:58:16.320 --> 0:58:21.800
<v Speaker 3>less mid twenties. Like, I think ninety is more likely

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:26.040
<v Speaker 3>than twenty five. So I just I think, like, I

0:58:26.040 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 3>don't know, it's just weird. Quick break, right back, What's right?

0:58:36.560 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back in What's right?

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 2>With Nick? Right?

0:58:39.080 --> 0:58:41.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, Demante, Let's get some listener questions Summer from

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:44.040
<v Speaker 3>last week because we didn't have time for him on

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Thursday because Danny Parkins wouldn't stop talking. By the way,

0:58:46.640 --> 0:58:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Danny Parkins one and two on his picks this week,

0:58:49.600 --> 0:58:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm officially just one pick behind him. We had another

0:58:52.080 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 3>winning week on this show three and two on this

0:58:54.120 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 3>show two and one on TV. The teaser gotcha, Sorry, pal, oh.

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:01.720
<v Speaker 4>But that's how we'll touch I've got some thoughts on that, right,

0:59:01.800 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 4>go ahead? So simpley, hey, Nick, which first round matchup

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:07.840
<v Speaker 4>would be better than a buy this year?

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, there isn't one. There is no super soft first

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:18.960
<v Speaker 3>round matchup. Theoretically, if the Colts and Anthony Richardson get in,

0:59:19.440 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 3>that would be you know, that's a pretty decent seventh spot.

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:28.200
<v Speaker 3>But the Broncos with Sean Payton, even with rookie bo Nicks,

0:59:28.480 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 3>is not a super soft spot. And obviously the Chargers

0:59:32.160 --> 0:59:34.000
<v Speaker 3>are not, and the Ravens or not or the Steelers

0:59:34.040 --> 0:59:35.760
<v Speaker 3>if they fall. So I don't think there is one.

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Whoever is the two? Go ahead?

0:59:37.720 --> 0:59:40.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, I guess like come that time, they're gonna

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:43.040
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of rest if that that dream scenario happens.

0:59:43.040 --> 0:59:46.040
<v Speaker 4>But with the way that they're playing teams, what situation

0:59:46.320 --> 0:59:47.160
<v Speaker 4>is better than a buy?

0:59:48.000 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Like what do you mean?

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:55.959
<v Speaker 4>Oh? So? Like basically like so like with how close

0:59:56.000 --> 0:59:59.440
<v Speaker 4>that they're playing teams like in the playoffs, like I

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 4>just think they you know, given that they.

1:00:04.320 --> 1:00:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah exactly, oh yeah yeah, no, no, no, no, they there there.

1:00:08.800 --> 1:00:12.720
<v Speaker 4>Is They're gonna play everybody tight. But with that rest

1:00:12.720 --> 1:00:14.400
<v Speaker 4>situation different.

1:00:14.680 --> 1:00:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Listen, And I wasn't even looking at that as the

1:00:16.640 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs question, because I don't think the Chiefs are gonna

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 3>be the.

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Two seed like they are.

1:00:20.360 --> 1:00:23.800
<v Speaker 3>They're two games clear of Buffalo, you know the and

1:00:23.960 --> 1:00:27.280
<v Speaker 3>so I'm just saying, whoever is the two seed, that

1:00:27.520 --> 1:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Round one in both conferences is not going to be easy.

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:36.960
<v Speaker 3>In the NFC, It'll either be probably Washington, theoretically Green

1:00:37.040 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Bay or the Rams like none of those are easy spots,

1:00:41.280 --> 1:00:42.240
<v Speaker 3>or maybe the Seahawks.

1:00:42.280 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Those aren't easy games, all right.

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:48.560
<v Speaker 4>Next Marcus Nick, Nick, you do think limiting sacks should

1:00:48.600 --> 1:00:51.160
<v Speaker 4>be brought up more in the quarterback convos And do

1:00:51.160 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 4>you agree if sacks are more of a QB stat

1:00:53.800 --> 1:00:56.360
<v Speaker 4>than an old line stat like who gets more credit

1:00:56.400 --> 1:00:58.440
<v Speaker 4>in Buffalo, Alan or the line?

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Well asn't I think the Bills offensive line has been

1:01:01.600 --> 1:01:03.640
<v Speaker 3>one of the more underrated units in the league this year,

1:01:03.680 --> 1:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>but Alan does get credit. I think this is I

1:01:07.720 --> 1:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>do think limiting sacks should be brought up in the

1:01:11.680 --> 1:01:16.280
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacking conversation, and I do think it's a skill. I

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 3>also think that situationally, you've got it. This is one

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:22.480
<v Speaker 3>of those things you really got to watch the games,

1:01:23.000 --> 1:01:27.120
<v Speaker 3>like how many of the sacks are instant pressure? Nothing

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:29.880
<v Speaker 3>you could do and how many of it is the

1:01:30.000 --> 1:01:31.800
<v Speaker 3>quarterback running himself into sacks.

1:01:31.800 --> 1:01:33.520
<v Speaker 2>So I'll use the most sacked quarterback in the league

1:01:33.560 --> 1:01:34.240
<v Speaker 2>this year, Caleb.

1:01:35.200 --> 1:01:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Caleb's offensive line has been brutal and a lot of

1:01:38.400 --> 1:01:42.800
<v Speaker 3>those sacks are not on him, but feels like about

1:01:42.840 --> 1:01:45.560
<v Speaker 3>a third of them are maybe a quarter of him

1:01:45.720 --> 1:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>that he has held onto the ball too long, that

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:50.880
<v Speaker 3>he has tried and so right, so I do think

1:01:50.920 --> 1:01:54.680
<v Speaker 3>it's a rich tapestry, if you will. But yes, Alan,

1:01:54.840 --> 1:01:59.400
<v Speaker 3>not turning the ball over and not taking sacks. Sacks

1:01:59.440 --> 1:02:03.200
<v Speaker 3>from a win percentage perspective are like a third is

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:06.919
<v Speaker 3>damaging as a turnover depending on the spot you take them,

1:02:06.960 --> 1:02:09.760
<v Speaker 3>so like they're really bad to take and so that

1:02:09.840 --> 1:02:10.440
<v Speaker 3>is noteworthy.

1:02:10.440 --> 1:02:10.760
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1:02:10.800 --> 1:02:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Next, only, Nick, you mentioned you listen to sports podcasts

1:02:15.520 --> 1:02:18.000
<v Speaker 4>to keep up with the news and analysis. Can you

1:02:18.080 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 4>tell us your favorites?

1:02:20.640 --> 1:02:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Uh? Yeah, I mean I think during the NFL season,

1:02:24.280 --> 1:02:29.480
<v Speaker 3>NFL Daily with Greg Rosenthal and that crew is a

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:31.920
<v Speaker 3>nop pun intended a daily listen for me.

1:02:33.080 --> 1:02:34.640
<v Speaker 2>I love it. I think it is.

1:02:34.760 --> 1:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>I think it is as good of a source NFL.

1:02:38.000 --> 1:02:41.880
<v Speaker 3>NFL Daily is what it's called, just called in NFL Daily,

1:02:42.200 --> 1:02:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Greg Rosenthal is the host. I think that's outstanding. I

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:49.760
<v Speaker 3>like the and in fact, there's a long list that

1:02:49.840 --> 1:02:52.240
<v Speaker 3>I could give. But if I give a long list

1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:55.560
<v Speaker 3>and I don't include people, then it's like I forgot

1:02:55.680 --> 1:02:57.680
<v Speaker 3>or I snubbed him, whatever. So instead of that, I'm

1:02:57.680 --> 1:03:00.000
<v Speaker 3>just gonna give one. I think NFL Daily with Greg

1:03:00.080 --> 1:03:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Rosenthal this time of the year is a must listen.

1:03:03.960 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go to Lewis's question.

1:03:06.160 --> 1:03:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Demant Lewis, who is your favorite player in the NBA

1:03:09.640 --> 1:03:14.880
<v Speaker 4>and NFL? Behind Lebron and any player on the Chiefs?

1:03:14.920 --> 1:03:20.720
<v Speaker 3>My favorite player in the NBA and NFL. No Chief

1:03:20.720 --> 1:03:26.600
<v Speaker 3>and not Lebron. It's a really good question.

1:03:27.840 --> 1:03:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Who Lamar?

1:03:31.560 --> 1:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>No that it wouldn't be Lamar for me. I don't

1:03:36.400 --> 1:03:37.520
<v Speaker 2>hate Lamar, but it wouldn't.

1:03:38.920 --> 1:03:43.720
<v Speaker 3>I like Joe Burrow a lot, uh, and I have

1:03:43.880 --> 1:03:48.720
<v Speaker 3>massive respect for Burrow. I love Luca. Obviously, the answer

1:03:48.720 --> 1:03:54.360
<v Speaker 3>is probably Luca. Uh. I'm trying to think if there's

1:03:54.400 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 3>one an obvious person that I'm forgetting, but I do

1:03:59.720 --> 1:04:03.919
<v Speaker 3>love Baker. Baker's up there as well. All right, let's

1:04:03.920 --> 1:04:04.960
<v Speaker 3>go to Grayson.

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:09.680
<v Speaker 4>Grayson if Bills, If Bills lose this week and Ravens

1:04:09.720 --> 1:04:12.760
<v Speaker 4>went out, why isn't Lamar MVP? He's better in every

1:04:12.760 --> 1:04:15.520
<v Speaker 4>single stat than Allen and would have one more loss

1:04:15.520 --> 1:04:17.120
<v Speaker 4>with a significantly harder schedule.

1:04:18.160 --> 1:04:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, and they whooped him, right, they beat him thirty

1:04:20.720 --> 1:04:21.400
<v Speaker 3>five to ten.

1:04:21.480 --> 1:04:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Would be the other piece of that.

1:04:24.400 --> 1:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I think the answer is, this award is kind of

1:04:27.520 --> 1:04:31.000
<v Speaker 3>like the narratives can get away from you, and Lamar's

1:04:31.080 --> 1:04:34.680
<v Speaker 3>MVP narrative ended and right or wrong, I don't think

1:04:34.680 --> 1:04:37.360
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna recapture it. Like I think they would have

1:04:37.400 --> 1:04:40.040
<v Speaker 3>to win out, win the division, the Bills stumble, like

1:04:40.120 --> 1:04:42.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of things would have to happen. What I

1:04:42.120 --> 1:04:45.600
<v Speaker 3>do think is the other piece that is fair is

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:48.240
<v Speaker 3>I do think people look at Lamar having Derrick Henry

1:04:48.920 --> 1:04:52.520
<v Speaker 3>as far more significant than anything Josh Allen has. But

1:04:53.040 --> 1:04:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Lamar should be in the conversation for regular season MVP.

1:04:58.120 --> 1:05:00.320
<v Speaker 3>There's no there's no question, Like, he.

1:05:00.320 --> 1:05:01.680
<v Speaker 4>Just had a buye. He's about the played in New

1:05:01.760 --> 1:05:03.440
<v Speaker 4>York coming up, right, So it's a little bit of

1:05:04.040 --> 1:05:04.840
<v Speaker 4>the lack of game.

1:05:07.520 --> 1:05:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, they had lost and he had a bye, and

1:05:09.760 --> 1:05:11.640
<v Speaker 3>so they had lost anything two of their last three,

1:05:11.760 --> 1:05:15.000
<v Speaker 3>so that hurt him a lot obviously, Right now, if

1:05:15.080 --> 1:05:20.919
<v Speaker 3>I if I had a ballot, because I don't want

1:05:20.960 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>it to just be a quarterback award. I think my

1:05:24.480 --> 1:05:32.600
<v Speaker 3>ballot right now would be Sakwan one, Josh Towo, TJ

1:05:32.800 --> 1:05:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Watt three, Lamar four and because it'd be super fun,

1:05:37.800 --> 1:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Penay Seul five because I think he's the best player

1:05:40.840 --> 1:05:42.880
<v Speaker 3>on the Lions and kind of encapsulates who they are

1:05:42.880 --> 1:05:44.840
<v Speaker 3>and they're having such a great year. That would be

1:05:44.920 --> 1:05:46.720
<v Speaker 3>my ballot at the moment.

1:05:46.760 --> 1:05:49.280
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I gotta go do Colin. Great job today

1:05:49.280 --> 1:05:49.880
<v Speaker 2>to Monday.

1:05:50.200 --> 1:05:53.480
<v Speaker 3>I'll see you guys on the Herd in about ninety minutes.

1:05:53.680 --> 1:05:55.200
<v Speaker 2>See you on First Things First and three and a

1:05:55.200 --> 1:05:59.400
<v Speaker 2>half hours. What's right? Hey, thanks for watching. If you're

1:05:59.480 --> 1:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>still here, do me a favor.

1:06:01.200 --> 1:06:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Hit the subscribe button, then hit the bell so you

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:06.200
<v Speaker 3>can be notified when we have new episodes.

1:06:06.680 --> 1:06:07.680
<v Speaker 2>After you've done.

1:06:07.520 --> 1:06:10.400
<v Speaker 3>That, one more favor, go to your favorite audio platform

1:06:10.440 --> 1:06:14.240
<v Speaker 3>of choice and subscribe there as well. Don't forget we're

1:06:14.320 --> 1:06:18.720
<v Speaker 3>live every Tuesday and Thursday ten thirty am Eastern Ish

1:06:18.920 --> 1:06:22.000
<v Speaker 3>ten thirty five, ten forty. It sometimes changes, but that's

1:06:22.040 --> 1:06:24.160
<v Speaker 3>why you hit the bell. You hit the bell so

1:06:24.200 --> 1:06:27.400
<v Speaker 3>you're notified. You subscribe, so we can get to two

1:06:27.520 --> 1:06:30.680
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand followers. We're right around one hundred and fifty thousand.

1:06:30.920 --> 1:06:33.120
<v Speaker 3>We'd love to get to two hundred thousand. Get to Monday,

1:06:33.120 --> 1:06:36.960
<v Speaker 3>another plaque, so like subscribe rate, send a rating to

1:06:37.200 --> 1:06:38.160
<v Speaker 3>do all that cool stuff.

1:06:38.200 --> 1:06:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Thanks guys,