WEBVTT - S&P 500 Hits Record High as Dollar Selloff Deepens

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business, finance

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 3>With more on the currency trade and declines in the

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 3>US dollar. Bloomberg News FX and Rates reporter Carter Johnson

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.959
<v Speaker 3>is here in the Bloomberg Business Week Studio. The declines

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 3>that we continue to see in the US dollars, the

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 3>flows behind it, what's the story that's telling you?

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, Thanks Jim, Thanks Carol. And I think what's really

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 4>interesting is we can look at this on a pretty

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 4>long timeline. So I'm starting to hear comparisons late last week, today,

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 4>yesterday to this feels like early twenty twenty five and

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 4>Liberation Day all over. And that's just because yes, we're

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 4>seeing some action at stocks and treasury and treasuries, but

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 4>really this is a real sort of dollar focused impulse

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 4>to sell, and of course on a shorter timeline as well,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 4>we can think about that in the context of what

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 4>we saw last week, which was some pretty concerted movement

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 4>in dollar yen specifically, and that was, as we reported,

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 4>likely because some folks here in the US, the New

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 4>York Fed, acting at the best of the Treasury, were

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 4>reported to us to be checking rates and sort of

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 4>calling into some banks and seeing where exchange rates were trading,

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 4>so on a couple different levels, sort of in the

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 4>near term and in the big picture, as you mentioned, Carol,

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 4>questions about the US physical position policy and certainty those

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 4>are all combining right now.

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Carter reading in this morning, you know, Bloomberg reporting app

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the positioning is heavily one sided. They said since Thursday,

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>roughly two thirds of options trades in the year and

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the Australian dollar have been bets on further greenback weakness.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So is this largely about dollar decline and not about

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>bets on other currency strength backed by fundamentals.

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 4>It's a great question. I think the answer honestly is both.

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 4>And a lot of that impulse, as we just talked about,

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 4>is because of a declining dollar in questions about US policy,

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 4>but we are seeing relatively solid growth expectations in the

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 4>rest of the world, whether that's Europe, maybe that's in Asia,

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 4>and that really underpins the impulse to sell dollars as well.

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 4>If the rest of the world, if growth in the

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 4>rest of the world was creatoring at the moment, we

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't be seeing this sort of action we're seeing in

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 4>terms of dollar sales. So it's absolutely the other side

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 4>of the coin as well.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 3>We've got stock investors watching and listening to this program.

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 3>What is the relationship between weakness in the dollar and

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 3>what happens in the equity market. I mean, you made

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 3>the comparison minutes ago. It to kind of feels like

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 3>April twenty twenty five, and we all remember what happened

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 3>to the equity markets during that time.

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, and I think that's the big question is will

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 4>we see that again. Where typically you'd expect to see

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 4>the dollar weaker as stocks strengthen, they have a negative correlation,

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 4>particularly the dollar as a traditionally have an asset, we

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 4>didn't see that late last year. The stock's, the dollar, treasuries,

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 4>they were all falling together. So I think that's the

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 4>big question right now is will we see that again.

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we are yet, but in sort of

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 4>a different picture as well. A week er dollars should

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 4>theoretically support domestic manufacturers, it should support exporters here in

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 4>the US. That's typically what we'd see on a lag

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 4>but we also know that that's something that Trump administration

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 4>has been vocal about as well. A week er dollar theoretically,

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 4>again doesn't work instantaneously, but theoretically supports domestic manufacturing and

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 4>exporters who are looking to sell to the rest of

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 4>the world.

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, one other thing I want to ask you, though,

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>but is it about global investors and we've talked about

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>flows into European equities. Is it another sign perhaps that

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>global investors are less interested in dollar denominated investments.

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 4>It is possible, although I think it's too early for

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.839
<v Speaker 4>us to say at this point. As we knew last year,

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 4>we don't have that data yet necessarily, and again, if

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 4>we look at just the relative performance of US stocks,

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 4>they're they're doing all right, they're certainly holding up. I

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 4>think what it could definitely be indicative of, and this

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 4>is something we've covered a bit here at Boomberg in

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 4>the past, is hedging behavior. And what that means is

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 4>you're a global investor here in the invested here in

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 4>the US. You might still want your exposure to US

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 4>stocks in US tech, but you're gonna hedge that dollar

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 4>component of that much more than maybe you used to mention.

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 3>J Powell tomorrow the press conference. What are you watching

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 3>for from from your purchase somebody who watches FX.

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I think, just as we are in the rates

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 4>in the treasuries world as well.

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 5>Any sort of.

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Forward guidance that we can get from from Chair Powell

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 4>that'll be a tall order given the spotlight he's under

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 4>at the moment, But any sort of future guidance about

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 4>the outlook for rates this year, that'll be particular impactful

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 4>for the dollars as well as rates.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Right if for any indications that there's higher rates coming

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about that could put some a floor under

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the dollar correct, that could definitely help.

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you know it's funny, Yeah, No, for sure,

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 4>JP Morgan when they came out with their big currency

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 4>forecast late last year, they're barish on the dollar. But

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 4>the big risk to their barish dollar view is the

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Fed has to turn around and hike again. We might

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 4>not see that, but that's that's the risk.

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Although there is it feels like a growing conversation about

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>inflationary concerns, which would certainly lead the Fed possibly certainly

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep rates as is or possibly hike them out

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to see Cord, thank you so much laying out the

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>currency trade for us as we continue to watch the

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>US dollar. He's Bloomberg News FX and Rates Reporder Carter Johnson.

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 3>More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 2>If you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast, catch

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 2>us live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Listen on it, Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 2>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>The group of airlines stocks as a whole off about

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>two percent today. Here to talk about that. We're also

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about Boeing, which also reported today, is

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Sheila Kayalu. She is managing director in equity research at Jeffrey.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>She joins us here, it's studio, nice to have you here.

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Happy New Year. You know January is over, but elm us,

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>let's just start with the airlines and then we want

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to move into defense because you cover that really closely

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. It does feel like they're all finding their

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>way back after the storm. We're trying to see if

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>there's another storm. In terms of the impact, is it's

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>still a case of they're still trying to assess. How

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>do you, as someone who covers some of these names,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of factor that in.

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 7>In terms of airlines, we're looking for revenue growth. We've

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 7>seen the same trend across American that we saw at

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 7>United and Delta. Corporate was up twelve percent. Corporate momentum continues.

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 7>I'm taking a very long flight this weekend and then

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 7>main cabin weakness, but it's getting a little bit better,

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 7>and it's all about cost control. That's why I think

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 7>you United one up the most on earnings is they

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 7>really beat out on costs when American Airlines margins came

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 7>in one hundred BIPs below our estimate. So I think

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 7>the most polarizing stock is going to be Southwest. I'm

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 7>really excited for their report on Thursday because they have

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 7>some lofty targets.

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 8>The stock's at forty dollars today.

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 7>Some people think it's going to thirty, some people think

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 7>it's going to eighty. It's all about they're adding extra

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 7>lug room seats and it is the strategy going to work.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 3>But that's a huge shift for Southwest. I mean, they're

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 3>essentially moving away from their DNA, what they're known for

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 3>and the culture that they're known for, and that's alienated

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 3>some people already.

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it depends.

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 7>So the average Southwest fair is about one hundred and

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.119
<v Speaker 7>nine dollars. So if you add an option for extra

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 7>lug room or refundable or seating, if you add fifty

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 7>dollars to that cost of that airfare, so one hundred

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 7>and fifty nine, it's a fifty percent increase.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 8>Almost does the passenger back away?

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 7>I'm not sure, but then again, it's only one hundred

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 7>and fifty nine dollars, So how do we think about

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 7>that and what adoption do we assume we're at about

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 7>five percent adoption in twenty six. They have a bunch

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 7>of other benefits as well, baggage fees and cost optimization.

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 7>So that's driving their EPs to three dollars, essentially ebit

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 7>tripling off of a very low twenty five base. So

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 7>we'll see how much of that they get. You know,

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 7>some people think they could godd to four dollars or

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 7>even five dollars as more of that extra lug room

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 7>adoption comes in but it's their first go at it,

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 7>and we'll see how it takes off.

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>You have a forty five dollars price target, so you're

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>not at the eighty and you're not at the thirty.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So maybe a little bit higher from where we are.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 7>You know, I would prefer United where they've If you

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 7>think about United, they're going to be accounting for forty

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 7>four percent of the why of the new premium seats

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 7>through twenty twenty eight, so they're going to be accounting

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 7>for more than any other airline in the US Americans

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 7>after that in Southwest because of their extra lug room.

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 7>I prefer to bet on that corporate customer paying one

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 7>thousand plus one hundred dollars to achieve that additional corporate

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 7>fare and that higher margin where United is adding its

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 7>seats than Southwest adding on the You know, I think

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 7>both are given the multiples that.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 8>They're currently trading at. United is more appealing to me.

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk some defense and then we'll talk some Boeing too.

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 3>I want to look at shares of RTX. They're higher

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 3>right now by about three point four percent. Profit topp

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 3>to Wall Street estimates assign the momentum that the company

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 3>awaits a potentially huge jump in US military spending.

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 5>That's kind of where I want to start.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 3>What we've heard from President Trump in the last few weeks,

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 3>not just with the idea of a one point five

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollar defense package, but also calling on some of

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 3>these companies to do a better job, pay their executives less,

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 3>and also build stuff for the US government more quickly.

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 5>What are these CEOs to do.

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 7>There's a lot going on in defense, and that's what

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 7>I was saying. It's an exciting sector to cover because

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 7>this is the first time that the five Primes might

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 7>no longer exist as five primes by the end of

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 7>the Trump administration, which is our view. We think that

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 7>there's going to be similar to what LHX announced days ago,

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 7>there's going to be more deconsolidation happening among the primes.

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 7>Their budget is going up by five hundred billion from

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 7>a trillion dollars. We don't know the time period of

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 7>that spending. We don't know how much will be added

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 7>to actual equipment and R and D versus military operations,

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 7>but they're seeing an increase, whether it's to fun defense

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 7>techniques like firefly voyage or the recent IPOs we've seen

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 7>in the space or the traditional primes or suppliers like

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 7>aero environment crados are up one hundred percent on the

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 7>year already and we're twenty seven days in. So it's

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 7>really interesting to see what happens in defense. But there's

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 7>a lot of shakeups that are I think are going

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 7>to play out. So it's about seeing who has the

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 7>best position positioned portfolio and who to play from here.

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised, like I know, when you walked in

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we started talking, and I mean aerospace defense. Just the

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>S and P broad Index up about nine percent year

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to date, up about forty six percent last year. Is

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it just because defense spending all around the globe is

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 1>just happening and everybody's amping it up.

0:10:58.120 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 8>It's yeah, it's as simple as that.

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 7>Unders growth internationally twenty percent plus NATO budgets, Japan, Korea.

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 7>We're seeing countries like Serbia put in orders that never

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 7>used to, put in billion dollar orders for equipment to

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 7>companies like Elbett in Israel. Coupled with the defense budget

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 7>going from a trillion to one point five trillion makes

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 7>defense very interesting and the administration has been very supportive

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 7>of defense tech. Emergent technology companies, companies that had stagnant

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 7>revenues for the last decade are seeing thirty forty percent growth.

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, as to mention, you know, when the

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>president talks about an industry, it can be good or bad.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>So is it good that they're on his radar?

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:38.119
<v Speaker 5>But when he's the world five million.

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Dollars we're talking about he.

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:40.599
<v Speaker 8>Did back off of that.

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 7>He didn't quantify in the executive order the pay and I.

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 5>But he mentioned it, and he mentioned it.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Really, Yes, that's a headline that caught our attention.

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 5>And five million dollars.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like a lot of money, but not for

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 3>a CEO who's paid over twenty million dollars.

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 7>Right the executive executive pay, the average executive pay I

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 7>would assume in any sectors over twenty million. So the

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 7>caliber of folks you would get into the defense would

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 7>be the opposite of what the administration is trying to achieve.

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>So what do you hear from defense companies about getting

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>some attention like that from the president? Do they do

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>They kind of brush it off a little bit, like

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we're talking with them.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 7>Like I think one interesting trend we've seen from the reports,

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 7>whether it was Northrop or raitheon today is the lack

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 7>of buybacks, because that's what the administration asked for, a

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 7>focus on additional cap X. Raith Yon mentioned that Northrop

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 7>mentioned dot Boeing mentioned that, so across the board, everyone's like, sure,

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 7>we're investing. We're going to get you supplies on time.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 7>That's our job and it helps funnel the growth.

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>The Norther CEO saying northp rebalancing the need for performance

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 1>with affordability and speed to market to meet the US

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>defense departments focus on speedy development.

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 7>Yes, and I think Kathy Ward and the CEO of

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 7>Northup said this was the best spending environment she's ever

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 7>seen in her career. So most of these executives are

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 7>very bullish.

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Do the off starts in defense tech pose a threat

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 3>to the incumbents? And I'm thinking of you know, an

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 3>Anderill that is not yet And I say not yet

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 3>because obviously this company, well IPO at some point soon.

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Do they compete with these incumbents.

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 7>Yes, clearly they're competing and they're collaborating. They're working together

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 7>both internationally and domestically. The primes are trying to work

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 7>with you know, Northropez a partnership with Kratos on CCA.

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 7>It's the autonomous vehicle essentially, so we're seeing a lot

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 7>more collaboration, but they're also trying to take share.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 8>But the budget is growing.

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 7>Overall, and that's the bottom line, although we're not really

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 7>seeing it. In twenty six Northrops Guidance's five percent growth,

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 7>they talk about an acceleration from there. In twenty seven

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 7>twenty eight, same thing with Raytheon it was modest growth

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 7>in defense.

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 8>It didn't really pop.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 7>Yes, it grew in the second half versus the first half,

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 7>and we'll see how those trends continue.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I feel like with all of the geopolitical tensions and

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the wars that we've seen around the world, that everybody

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>comes back to the US military might and the defense

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>companies here in the United States. What is the global picture?

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Where's the competition? Is there not much global competition shila

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the US defense companies, So.

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 7>I think it's focused on maybe a few things first

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 7>as missiles and munitions readiness. We need to have that

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 7>available and that's why we're seeing companies like Lockheed increase

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 7>Pack three production from six hundred missiles a year, which

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 7>package it's a missile Packtory is the name of the missile.

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 7>Going from six hundred units a year to two thousand,

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 7>that is significant to say at least that's eight billion

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 7>of additional revenues to Lockheed over seven years. If they

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 7>could ramp to those levels. The backlogs twenty.

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 8>Years for a missile like that. We're seeing that across

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 8>the board.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 7>LHX ten days ago or two weeks ago now announced

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 7>that they are seeing a government investment within their solid

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 7>rocket motor business that powers missiles. They're going to open

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 7>up sixty factories next year. LHX currently has two one

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 7>hundred and fifty factories, so that's a magnitude of investment

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing from the government. So focus on missiles, ammunitions,

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 7>and second, I think it goes back to old school warfare.

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 7>Everybody thinks helicopters are we and F thirty five is

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 7>a bad program. But we think about Venezuela, if we

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 7>think about Iran, what's the.

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 8>Kind of equipment we're using.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 7>So you know, it's not necessarily rebuilding an entire fleet

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 7>for the Navy, but it's doing things that we could

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 7>use pretty quickly.

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Just in last ninety seconds, I want to hit Boeing

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 3>with you, shares are down today by about one point

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 3>eight percent. The company did report this morning a second

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 3>straight quarter of generating cash fifty seven percent, bumping sales

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 3>during the final three months of the year. Shares down though,

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Is it because of accounting charges for the CAC forty

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 3>six tanker program?

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Is that it?

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 8>No, everybody just assumes that's going to happen every quarter.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 5>So we're all going shares down after So the.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 7>Share shares opened down, the call at ten thirty, got

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 7>it up to write. It reversed about four points and

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 7>then they're down again. We're a believer in Boeing. They're

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 7>underwriting their free cash flow was a loss of two

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 7>billion in twenty five. They're talking about positive two billion

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 7>at the midpoint in twenty six, normalized for one time items.

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 7>They're saying their free cash flow is high single just

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 7>so say eight billion. They're reaffirming their ten billion target,

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 7>and then they're saying they could go above that, so

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, ten fifteen. It's giving long only as a

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 7>reason not to dismiss the stock. If this company could

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 7>actually earn ten billion of free cash low, then it's

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 7>quite compelling at its current valuation. So we're seeing a

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 7>lot of fluctuations. Are they talking back twenty seven to

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 7>twenty eight? No, I think that you're going to see

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 7>two billion in twenty six and an improvement in twenty

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 7>seven and twenty eight.

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So Boeing, let me just say, you've got a two

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety price target, it's at two forty four. You feel

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>good about that?

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 7>You want to know is it? We are supportive of Boeing.

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 7>We think there's a few positive catalysts. I think President

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 7>Trump might be headed to China in April. We'll see

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 7>if Boeing heads there. We haven't seen a China order

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 7>since I can't even recall. Maybe it was twenty nineteen,

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 7>maybe earlier. So I think Boeing works from here. You know,

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 7>depressed prices for Max's maybe fifty percent below what they

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 7>historically sell at today.

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>This was fun. Come back soon, all right. Sheila Kayalu,

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>she's managing director of equity research at Jeffrey's, joining us

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>here in studio.

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar playing

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 2>York station, just say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>We do head back to the White House and Bloomberg

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>New Senior reporter Jen DLOWI, Jen, good to have you

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>here with us. We know President Trump on his way.

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's landed yet, but we know there

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is a crowd in Iowa waiting for him. He did

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>say en route to Iowa talking to reporters, he's meeting

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Tom Homan, the borders are, he said,

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>he's meeting with the governor in Minnesota. He's meeting with

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the mayor. I think later and I hear that's all

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>going very well. What are we hearing? Is it all

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>going so well?

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 9>You know early report out. You know, we don't have

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 9>a great deal of intelligence out of those early meetings,

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 9>but what we can what we are seeing, of course,

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 9>is this effort by the President. It appears to dial

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 9>down the temperature to do really two things, to express

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 9>support for Homeland Security Secretary Nome and at the same time,

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 9>who's obviously been criticized for her handling of these incidents

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 9>and her characterization of them, and then at the same

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 9>time also try to find a way forward with local leaders.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 9>The President repeated that comment to us several times before

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 9>he headed out to Iowa, you know, saying that he

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 9>believes the conversations with the governor of Minnesota are going

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 9>very nicely. And of course he was previewing that later

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 9>conversation today with Mayor Jacob Fray.

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, I was surprised to hear, just based on

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 3>the reporting that we've seen in the last twenty four

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:56.199
<v Speaker 3>hours that Tom Homan was headed to Minneapolis. Some of

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 3>the reporting from other outlets indicated that Christy Nome had

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 3>been sidelined in some way. She was at a meeting

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 3>at the White House yesterday, reportedly went a couple of

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 3>hours according to other outlets. How are you reading into

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 3>that reporting? Has she been sidelined? The President earlier expressing

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 3>his support for her, saying she will not she will

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 3>stay on at the agency. How are you reading into that?

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's important to appreciate that departures aren't always

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 9>telegraphed well in advance, but for now President is very clearly,

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 9>you know, insisting that she has a support That meeting

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 9>first reported by The New York Times last night and

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 9>stretching over two hours, included her top aid Corey Lewandowski,

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 9>you know, the first campaign manager from Trump's twenty sixteen

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 9>presidential bid.

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 7>And also.

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 9>It's notable that they came out of that meeting with

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 9>the President's messaging today about not backing down from her,

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 9>and in fact, when asked about GNOME's performance, he immediately

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 9>pivoted to talk about, you know, how she's done a

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 9>great job on the traditional deportation, you know, focused comments

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 9>from the president there, notably today on the way to

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 9>Iowa on the plane on Air Force one, Trump is

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 9>joined by his senior advisor, Stephen Miller, who had also

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 9>drawn a lot of criticism, just like Nome, for his

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 9>initial characterizations of the shooting over the weekend. Stephen Miller

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 9>had intimated on social media that the man shot on

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 9>Saturday was an assassin and domestic terrorist, even though video

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 9>evidence suggests he had been disarmed and hadn't brandished a weapon.

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you know, Jen, in terms of I was going

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about who's the architect of all of this?

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's been a lot of reporting, but

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>does it really matter because the buck really stops with

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the president.

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 9>To be fair, you know, the president, this president in

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 9>particular takes ownership of his policies and it has been

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 9>quite happy to tout his deportation agenda. You know, it's

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 9>something he campaigned on so vigorously and and in office

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 9>has really claimed as a source of pride that he's

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 9>accomplishing his goal of deporting illegal immigrants.

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>What is and not the only president to do it, right,

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>We can go back to the Obama administration to be fair,

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's important to kind of point that out.

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 9>But you know, Stephen Miller is seen internally is of

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 9>course a big, big factor in this push, obviously someone

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 9>who's been critical of of the you know, amount of

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 9>immigration and illegal immigration into the US. But but to

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 9>your point, you know, Trump has taken ownership of this.

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 9>This is as much his issue as it is that

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 9>of a key ally and aid and and it's one

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 9>where he's We've heard him talk very openly about being

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 9>frustrated with the messaging on this last week. He lamented that,

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 9>you know, the focus hadn't been on the you know,

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 9>the rapist and murderers, as he characterized them, that were

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 9>being deported. He even you know, took to the White

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 9>House briefing room last week to show pictures of some

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 9>of the deport so that, you know, kind of speaks

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 9>to his frustration that the messaging has shifted away from

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 9>where he wants it to be. And of course you

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 9>know that he's lost some control over the narrative here.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 9>Polls show that even among folks who care, who support

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 9>his broader immigration crackdown, there's support is waning for the

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 9>overall effort in the wake of these two deaths.

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 3>So then where does where do deportations go from here?

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 3>If Minneapolis Minneapolis Marrior Jacob Frye and the Governor Tim

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Walls of Minnesota are successful in de escalating this, does

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 3>that provide some sort of roadmap to other governors to

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 3>then go ahead and say, Hey, your federal agents are

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 3>not welcome here. You are going to have to find

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.959
<v Speaker 3>a different way to accomplish what you want to when

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 3>it comes to deportations.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 9>You know, it'll be interesting to see how this gets resolved.

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 9>I think that will be key to the extent to

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 9>which it is a roadmap for other states. You know,

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 9>clearly the govern and mayor have been very forceful in

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 9>their eagerness to see these folks leave their area. At

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 9>the same time, you know, Waltz has in the last

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 9>day indicated he wants to turn down the temperature. We're

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 9>gonna want to watch what happens with Tom Homan that

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 9>the borders are that Trump dispatched to Minnesota. You know,

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 9>he has focused much more on traditional deportation efforts rather

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 9>than kind of this broader dragnet or you know, these

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 9>broader operations that Christy Noman has favored. And so you know,

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 9>if we see that kind of refocusing back on more

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 9>conventional deportation efforts, that could be a de escalation and

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 9>a roadmap for other states and cities concerned about immigration

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 9>enforcement in their backyards.

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, super appreciate it, Jen, Thank you so much.

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg New senior reporter Jenda Lowie joining us there.

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us.

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 3>More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 2>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Karen Perry is with US, head of us I shares

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>fixed income strategy over at Black Rock and she joins

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>us from San Francisco. Karen, how are you?

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 6>I'm doing great, Carrol, Tim, how are you guys doing?

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Doing okay? On twenty twenty six, definitely off and running.

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>It's fed Eve right, we'll get that decision tomorrow. Tell

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about when it comes to fixed income.

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I always like to start with you guys. You're massive

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of asset manager and the asset management business.

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Where are you seeing flows in and out when it

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>comes to the fixed income world?

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 6>Already this year's already been off to a pretty strong start,

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 6>so I think last year investors who took on any

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 6>sort of duration risk were rewarded. We saw the EAG

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 6>up seven percent last year, and this year, I'd say

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 6>some of those trends are continuing. We're seeing people being

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 6>more selective about where they did their income, so positive

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 6>flows into flexible income funds like bi inc. We're also

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 6>seeing people still wanting to invest internationally, so with the

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 6>dollar being off this year, we're continuing to see more

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 6>interest and flows coming back to international fixed income. So

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 6>I think emerging market bonds with emb or even European

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 6>high yield people are looking at and then of course,

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 6>I think one of the biggest trends you can't ignore

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 6>is just the rise of actively managed bondingtfs. They were

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 6>actually responsible for about forty percent of the flows last

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 6>year and we saw over one hundred and thirty seven launches.

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 6>So people can now access a lot of their favorite

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 6>bond managers to the ETF.

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just want to read some headlines that are

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned. President Trump is set to make a speech

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 3>in Clive, Iowa. He's right now taking questions at a

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 3>small business in Urbandale, Iowa. The President Carol is saying

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 3>that China and Japan always wanted to devalue currency. He said,

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 3>the dollar is doing great. If you're watching us on

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 3>YouTube or Bloomberg Originals, you can see the President live

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 3>right there answering some questions from reporters.

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I don't know exactly what he means by

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the dollar doing great.

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 5>Maybe he was asked about weakness.

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess so. I mean we're down. I'm looking

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>at the Dollar index down another nine tenths of a

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>percentage point. But we've seen certainly a pullback when it

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>comes to the US currency. You take a look at

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the major industry developed in the developed world, if you will,

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and really the dollar at the bottom of the pack,

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>so we definitely have seen some pressure. How does that, Karen,

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if at all, play into the fixed income world?

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 6>I think for a lot of US investors, most bonds

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 6>are denominated dollars, so it doesn't impact us very directly.

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 6>But we've seen a big trend where people are looking

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.959
<v Speaker 6>at going global, grabbing those international bonds. One of our

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 6>atfs I go, which is just international bonds and those

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 6>foreign currencies. So I think the euro in is actually

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 6>off to a really strong start this year, up almost

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 6>two percent. So we've seen more people saying, you know what,

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 6>maybe I want to take advantage of some of a

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 6>dollar dropping and then one of the easiest way to

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 6>do that is with international based fixed income ETFs, and

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 6>so I think that's going to continue. More interests here.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, how do you look at this idea of Europe

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 3>moving away from US treasuries. Our Bloomberg Economics team with

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 3>a note that says, no, Europe is not about to

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 3>sell three point five trillion dollars in treasuries a sell

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 3>America's strategy, our team rights is not in Europe's interest.

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 3>The financial repercussions would be severe given the regions heavy

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 3>reliance on US dollar funding. Do you do you agree

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 3>with that?

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.239
<v Speaker 6>I think we see a few countries who made some

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 6>noise last week about potentially selling off dollar assets. I

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 6>think it's going to continue to be a major source

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 6>of liquidity, a major source of stability for a lot

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 6>of countries. We've seen more volatility, i'd say in the

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 6>long end because of its investors anticipating that. So I'd

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 6>say one of the easiest strategies to just move away

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 6>from super long duration bonds, long duration treasuries in particular.

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 6>So we've seen a lot of people reallocating back to

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 6>that belly of the curve three to seven years and

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 6>avoiding some of the long end, which I think is

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 6>going to get hit most if there's negative international sentiment, Karen.

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Any signs that you are seeing global investors think that

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the US is increasingly uninvestable.

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 6>We haven't seen that trend yet. I think, if anything,

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 6>our interest rates are still higher than other countries, and

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 6>we've even seen interest from international investor into maybe Muni's

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 6>as a way to get access to high quality bonds

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 6>that aren't treasuries. Investment grade credit is also of a

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 6>lot of interest to investors, so you know you're moving

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 6>away from if the government is going to get more levered.

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 6>Companies actually have very strong balance sheets and have lower

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 6>levels of leverage. So we've seen if anything, people are

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 6>looking towards US corporate bonds is one of the ways

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 6>to add diversification.

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 3>What are the trends that you're already seeing in the

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 3>first few weeks of this year. You mentioned what we

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 3>saw last year, but where are you seeing flows just

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 3>in the last three weeks.

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we've seen IG credit, so we have seen over

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 6>nine hundred million come into USIG, which is just the

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 6>whole corporate credit curve. A lot of interest picking up

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 6>on long duration municipal bond. Those are actually on a

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 6>tax equivalent basis, yielding over six and a half percent,

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 6>so you can get some of the same yields you

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 6>find in high yield but in unis so people are

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 6>looking at adding duration there and we've just seen more

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 6>people adding to very short ultra short exposures, putting that

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 6>cash to work, trying to squeeze a little bit more

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 6>out of the front end. And then finally, bomb ladders

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 6>are really popular. For example, our ibonds et apps We've

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 6>seen over a billion dollars come into those this year.

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 6>Our most popular one is our twenty twenty nine IBDU

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 6>yielding over four percent with only a three year duration.

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 6>So we're seeing people just stepping out of the front

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 6>end go into more that intermediate exposure.

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything that you are kind of watching out

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>from that FED decision tomorrow, Karen? Obviously it's the decision

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:46.959
<v Speaker 1>and what you hear from the FED and the statement,

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>but it really is the press conference too with j

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Powell to give a lot more context and color around

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>all of that. He's very careful. It's often we've seen

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in the last few meetings he tends to say very

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>similar things. But I'm just curious in the last thirty

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>seconds that we've got with you, what you will be

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>watching out for and you think is important to fixed

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and coome investors.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 6>So of course we're watching the main decision. We think

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:09.959
<v Speaker 6>the FED will continue to be on hold. I think

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 6>they're going to be data dependent. We've seen FED speak

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 6>this week, filter and through that they're still waiting for

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 6>the previous cuts to come through the economy. I think

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 6>I'm really going to be watching the number of dissenters

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 6>or we're going to get a nine to three or

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 6>some kind of even more divided decision.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, always interesting, right as they play it out and

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they vote basically and see where they it kind of lands,

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>because we certainly have seen a lot more dissension as

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of late. Karen, Thank you so much. Karen Verry Perry,

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>she's head of us I Shares Fixed Income strategy over

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>at Blackrock.

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal