WEBVTT - The Options Explosion

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Strap on your parachute. It's time for What Goes Up

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>with Sarah Ponzick and Mike Reagan. Hello and welcome to

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>What goes Up, a Bloomberg Weekly Markets podcast. I'm Sarah

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>pons a reporter on the Cross Asset team, and Mike Reagan,

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.319
<v Speaker 1>a senior editor at Bloomberg. This week on the show.

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Over the last couple of weeks, a real spotline has

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>shown on the options market, but questions still remain. How

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>much can options actually wag the stock market dog? Who's

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to blame retail traders or soft bank who's now been

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>deemed the Nazac whale? And of course what does this

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>mean for investor as well? Not to build any pressure

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>on our guest or anything, but he has all the answers.

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, Sarah, all all the answers. You're

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>really uh, you're really putting this guy on the spot here.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Not to hype it up too much, but I really,

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I really believe he does all the answers. I'm gonna

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>ask him where where do babies come from? Let's see

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>start with the most pressing of them. But as always,

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>will close out the episode with our tradition the craziest

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>thing I saw in markets this week. And please if

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you saw something crazy, give us a call on the

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Podcast hotline at six four or six three to

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 1>four three four nine, oh, and leave us a voicemail.

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we'll play it on the show. And of course

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you can always tweet us at podcasts Now. Sarah, before

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I actually introduced this guest, you have to indulge me

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>with a little bit of an old man nostalgia story

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>here always always you like it when I wind up

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>with the old the Old Guys series. Yeah. So, as

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you probably know, I grew up outside of Philadelphia, suburban Philadelphia,

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>but my parents are from a little town called Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania,

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>which is further north in Pennsylvania, up in the mountains.

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a river town. When we would go back to

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>visit my grandmother, my dad would always kind of revert

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>back to a twelve year old boy, I think, and

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>he'd take me and we'd go on little adventures around town.

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the things we did one time was we

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>used to go throw rocks in the river um and

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.639
<v Speaker 1>one time we were up on a cliff throwing rocks

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 1>out in the river right and all of a sudden,

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>there must have been guys down on the bank fishing

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>that we couldn't see. So they started winging the rocks

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>back at us, and we had to high tail it

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 1>back to my grandmother's house. We were all sweaty, and

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, she was like, what the what is what happened?

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And but I was like, nothing, nothing not, nothing's here?

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>How this is relevant? Okay, you're ready? Yeah, I'm waiting

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>for it. Could you name I bet you can't, but

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>can you name that river I was throwing rocks into me?

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Named that river in Pennsylvania? Named that river? Uh, Susquehanna.

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Say it again? Try say to it again. Am I right?

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>If we'll allow mispronunciations, you're you're correct, Susquehanna. Susquehanna. That

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>was pretty good. Right, that's better. And that's Ralevant because

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously one of the biggest, most important firms in the

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>options market is Susquehanna International Group, and we are lucky

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to have their co head of derivative Strategy on the

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>show this week. His name is Chris Murphy. Chris, welcome

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to the show. It's great to be here. Thank you. Um.

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm also from the suburbs of Philadelphia. So I might

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not have I might have to not have all the answers,

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but I definitely have answers. So let's let's do this.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>You might have the answers to what happened to the

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Eagles last week? I don't know. I was watching the

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>kids soccer. Luckily I missed it. Yeah you didn't, You

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't miss You didn't miss that. But Mike claim to fame.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>When I first got to Bloomberg a million years ago,

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>was the the options guy reporter realized I could I

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>could spell Susquehanna, And every time he was writing a story,

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>how do you spell Susquehanna again? And I'd tell him

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and then he'd say, how do you spell balakin Wid

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>which is where Susquehanna is located? And I think everyone

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>else on the team thought I knew everything. It's like

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.839
<v Speaker 1>this guy knows everything. Yeah, he quickly became the most

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>resourceful guy at Bloomberg. That's right, That's right. So so Chris,

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>first question is how long did it take you to

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>learn how to spell Susquehanna without looking twice? Well, I've

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>been here sixteen years, so I was I figured out

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>both of those before my headway point. So that's a

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good that's about a good learning curve, I would say,

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say, they didn't make you try to spell

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it in your start off interview. You know, they did not.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>They did not. Luckily, Luckily I might not be here.

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Who knows what I do? I can spell all the

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>tough filly area many on contrack and quiz me anytime.

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>But but anyway, Chris, let's get to the heart of

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the matter here. As Sarah pointed out in the introductions,

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>everybody is talking about the options market again, trying to

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>suss out what role options trading may or may not

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>have played in this ferocious rally in the equity market

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and now a little bit of a correction since the

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>beginning of September. You know, from your seat, what was

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it look like watching the options market this year? I'm

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>guessing it was a very unusual environment. Was this almost

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>like nothing you've ever seen before? This much sort of

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>retail interest and now we're learning about even bigger institutional

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>interest from the likes of Soft Bank. I mean, what

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>was it like watching all this flow go by? Yeah?

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you hit the nail on the

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>head the most notable change that we've seen this year

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is just the explosion in the retail trading flow concentrated

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in the front two weeks. We did some analysis recently

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>where we looked at what percentage of overall option trading

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>volume was in the front two weeks before coronavirus and

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>before all the brokerage houses we're starting to give out

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>no fee option trading. It was you know around UH.

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Now it's closer to that's a huge difference, just UH

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>concentrated in the front two weeks. That trading is unique,

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, when you're reading about it

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and looking at it, you see these giant volume numbers.

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>But what not a lot of people are are pointing

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>out is that the volume numbers at the end of

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the day, when you compare them to the change in

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>open interest the next day, the change in open interest

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is a fraction. For a lot of these what we

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>call message board trading stocks that we've been tracking here

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is a fraction of the volume number. So what that

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>means is over the course of the day, these options

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>were as we are assuming um for your number of

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>ways that we track it are being bought early on,

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but then a lot of them are closed by the

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the day UM, So their long term impact,

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, when they're open and closed the same day,

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>is not huge. But over time that open interest does

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>build up UM and by the time we get to expiration,

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that's when you see a lot of a larger moves.

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>For example, we were looking at Apple and we looked

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>at the inter day trading range for Monday through Thursday,

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>UM pretty consistent across the board, and back in two

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen the Friday was moving at a similar range.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But recently the moves on Fridays have been around wider UM,

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and we think that's, you know, really due to a

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>build up in open interests from a lot of this

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>retail trading, so this message board trading. You mentioned that

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>if if a lot of this is being open and

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>closed in the same day, you said, the long term

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>impact isn't that large. However, I think it's come to

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>been well understood that options did play a role in

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>this run up, this massive run up that we had

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in August, particularly in some of these stocks like Apple,

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>like Tesla. Can you walk us through the dynamics of that,

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>though I know a lot of Greek letters get thrown

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>out and about. But how is that actually possible that

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you can almost have this army of small day traders

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>trading options in and out very quickly UM in small lots,

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and that actually can somehow move prices, especially of large companies.

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, even though a lot of it is open

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and closed the same day, over time that open interest

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>builds up. So let's just stick with Apple for example,

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>UM and September expiration is on Friday, UH and last

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I check, Apple was around a hundred and twelve and

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a half bucks somewhere around there, maybe a little bit

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>lower UM and the strike with the most open interest

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>because of this, a lot of it due to the

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>retail trading adding up over the course of weeks and

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>weeks and weeks, UM had around seventy five thousand open

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>interest call contracts. So you know, let's say you're a

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>market maker and Apple is add ten dollars, so it's

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>below the strike. You have to buy some stock to

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>hedge your short call position, but not a lot, let's

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>say worth of how much UM culture short The next morning,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>if Apples up at one fift, you have to go

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>back out there and buy some more stock. Now, there's

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of forces at play. But because these option

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>positions are getting so big, and because the market makers

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>being forced to go out and buy stock, that does

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on the stock um and would move

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the stock higher if they are out there buying another

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>day later stocks a hundred and twenty, the market maker

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>has to go out there and buy more. And this

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>works in both directions. Apple at twenty, these calls are

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>way in the money. All the market makers are hedged

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the equivalent amount of stock to the calls

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're short. And then we start selling off like

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we did in in September, and all of a sudden,

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>those calls are out of the money. Well, they don't

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>need that long stock as a hedge anymore, so they

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>need to sell it as well. They're just looking to

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>stay flat. So this is gonna exacerbate moves in either direction. Um.

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, as we saw this week, you know, the

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>FED things like that, that's still you know, the major

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>catalyst that is moving markets. But the increased trading and

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>open interest in the options is just going to work

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to exacerbate moves in either direction. Um, if we are

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>working under the assumption, which I think is a good one,

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that that retail is um, mostly net long a lot

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of these options. Chris, did you notice any sort of

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>change in the complexion of the option markets right there

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of September when the market sort of

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>peaked and rolled over? You know, the jokes, I've got

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a piece in Business Week to sort of plug my

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>own book here, you know, people joking about, well, the

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood traders had to go back to high school,

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the the NFL Week one lines came

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>out and there was more interesting stuff to to bet on.

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder there is there a little bit of

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>element of truth to that type of sort of humorous

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>summation of what happened. Does the changing of the calendar

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to September the end of summer cause a different tone

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in trading um? And is there anything in the in

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the options data that you saw that to sort of

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>back up that idea? So now you know, in these

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>times two thousand twenty, I would not take anything off

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the table. And you know, I'm sure there's a million

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>different parts to this story. To me, it seems like

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 1>these message board traders are just very reactive to market moves,

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and to a great degree they're focused on the call options.

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>You can see that in UH, in the volume numbers,

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 1>in the put call ratios, you can see it in

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different places. We have started to see

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>selective spots where we are seeing um of this similar

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>flow on the put side, but to a large degree,

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>these investors seem to be following momentum, and we have

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly noticed when the market has had down days, we

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>see significantly less of the same trading flow. What was

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the chicken, what was the egg? You know, not sure,

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but it certainly is true from what we're seeing, we're

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>seeing less of this flow on the down days which

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the beginning of September. You know, and

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>correct me if I'm wrong. That strikes me as a

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>different sort of paradigm than the way UH professional traders

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>use options. You know, they might use a call and

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a put some sort of you know, complex multi legged

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>trade where the retail seems to have just been all

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in on calls, you know, trying to use them to

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>hit home runs, whereas you're, you're more sophisticated hedge fund

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>trader might be looking at some you know, kind of

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>multi legged trades to to hit singles and doubles. Is

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that a fair sort of analogy there, do you think, um, absolutely,

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and I, you know, I do necessarily always think that

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the most complicated trades are always the best ones. And

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at the retail traders that are just

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>buying calls, it's all about sizing it correctly. There's a

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of value in a market like this where you

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>see such dramatic moves to going out there and buying

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a call, where you know that max you can lose

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is the amount that you paid, and you're getting exposure

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to a stock that you want to get exposure to.

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And in terms of you know, how much risk are

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they taking? You know, if you're buying a stock at

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the same size, you have a lot more downside risk

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>than a call, which has the embedded UH protection, you know.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>And you know also you know, selling the pot, which

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>can definitely be a great strategy, but there's just more

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>risk in those other types of strategies when you're just

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>buying a call. You know, maybe that's related to the

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>amount of margin or what not you're able to get

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>from your brokerage. You know, maybe it's harder for um,

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, retail traders to do those more sophisticated strategies

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>because maybe they have to put more to put more

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>money up. But I guess my my main point on

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that is these calls it makes sense. There's a lot

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of reasons that they do. Makes sense, you know, if

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you're just looking to get exposure and you don't want

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to open up a lot of downside. Alright, So Mike

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioned quote unquote professional investors and the big name and

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>all of this that's really come out over the past

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>month after the Financial Times reported about soft Bank being

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the Nasdaq whale that has evolved. So you had in

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a recent report you spoke about these large so called

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>risk reversals that were being unwound. And I remember I

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>was speaking to you on a on a recent day, Um,

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that stops her trading lower, and some of these big

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>trades look to be closing out. Is it at all

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>possible to really know, um being an outsider that yeah,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>these were the trades that were being placed by soft

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Bank potentially, And even if you can't know that for sure,

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it usual or is it posible that

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>if such trades like these are closed out that they

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>could have ripple effects through the market. Trades of those size,

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the risk reversals certainly can impact the market. Uh, and

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>mostly those specific stocks, I think because of the speculation,

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>because of the timing of everything. You know, Um, that

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was all has all been reported. Cash on the sidelines

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>deployed buying big tech stocks, swap out of those tech

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>stocks into call spreads, which is actually a risk reduction

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>type of a move. UM. And then after all that,

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>these bullish risk reversals, which are buying an upside call

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and selling and downside put. And what the investor may

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>be trying to um look for there is these stocks

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>have made a big run. I'm not necessarily sure I

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>want to buy them right here, but if stock continues higher,

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to get back involved. And if they sell off,

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna look to buy them on a tip.

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>That all makes sense. Um, they were big trades, and

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>they certainly had an impact. I think because of the reporting,

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the psychological aspect, the fact that people were looking for

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>reasons um for market moves, I think that they probably

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>had a bigger impact, and maybe they normally would have

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>been if it was an unknown trade that was just large. Yeah,

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the way we were looking at it. Chris All,

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>this is fascinating, but it's time for the really important question.

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>When it's time for a cheese steak. Are you a

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Geno's guy or a Pat's guy. I've always been going

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to Genos, so I'm gonna stick with Genos. I like

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>them both, though, I like them both all right. I'm

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the shortest line guy myself. That's true though, that's Sarah.

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to We'll have to get you there. I'm

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have Yeah, I'm gonna have to make a trip

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>out there. That's the most important reason for cheesecake. Chris,

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>what one thing I wanted to ask it? I'm gonna

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>warn you this might be one of my famous twelve

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>part questions. You know, Sarah's as a derivatives guy, you know,

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>who knows a lot about multi leg trades. I think

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>he can handle a twelve part or what do you

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? Bring it on, Mike, I think

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>he can handle it. I'm getting used to answering multiple

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>questions at once with four young daughters. Oh wow, for

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a little girls, Chris, you you have your hands fall.

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>How many of them are fixed? My WiFi? Now? Dad?

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm ye, that's definitely an issue with virtual schooling. But Chris,

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you know uh. Warren Buffett famously years ago how a

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>crack about derivatives being the weapons of financial mass destruction.

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, the reaction from most people

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street was like settled down war. And that's

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a little ridiculous. I mean, maybe, okay, find maybe

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the credit derivatives, but when it comes to you know,

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>your your equity puts and calls, uh, no need for panic.

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>But every now and then we do see an episode

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>like this where you know whether it be you know,

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you remember when the t vix um e t F

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>blew up, when the the inverse x I V volatility

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>e t F blew up. I feel like the closer

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you get derivatives, equity derivatives, even the closer you get

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>them to the the retail investor um, the more likelihood

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>there is for some drama um. And I wonder if

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this episode that we saw this summer, is there any

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>concern And I realized again this might be a little

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>bit out of your wheelhouse about what you think about

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>every day. But I wonder is there a concern about

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of some some scrutiny of the trading of options

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>this summer from especially the mom and pop type of

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>retail investors. UM, is that something that could be coming

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and UM, if you got dragged in front of Congress,

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess what would be your explanation on on what

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>retail investors need to know about put some calls? Do

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>they need some further regulatory scrutiny when it comes to

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>to sort of small fry individual traders or was just

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>this just a random anomaly that we can sort of

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>not worry about. Going back to talking about the UM

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the risks of these trades. When you're buying calls, the

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>most you can lose is the amount you paid, So

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that's so that's one thing. Sizing it is is critically important.

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you don't want to take all your all

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>your investment in Google stock, sell out of that and

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>buy an upside Google call because you know the odds

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of it, you know, being if it's out of the

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>money less than fifty even hit, you could lose all

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of your money. So you need to have the correct education.

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>You need to size everything correctly to protect yourself. Now,

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of this market, you know there's been statistics

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>out there. Option volume compared to even UM equity volume

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>has risen so much. These weekly options are typically all

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a penny why they're incredibly tight, they're incredibly liquid. They're

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>not OTC products. They're not you know, murky things that

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't really understand what you're getting into. They are

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>are really tracked well. So I actually really think that,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, so long as the education is there, so

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>long as investors understand, um, the bet that they're making

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>or the investment that they're making when they're getting evolved

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in these options. UM, I don't think it's it's necessarily

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>something where you know, where it's eighteen pages long and

0:18:58.200 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you're signing on something and you don't know what you

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>know what what you're getting yourself into. Uh, these are,

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I said, the most liquid products probably

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>out there, UM, that investors are getting involved in. I

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>believe it was Goldmen Sacks who had a recent report

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>pointing out the fact that we actually saw more volume

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in the options market than in the cash equity trading

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>UH market for the first time ever this year, which

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>is pretty just crazy to think about. The guys at

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Susquehanna were popping champagne quirks. I think so so, Chris,

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to put you on the spot. I mean,

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious what you think then comes next. Obviously,

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>there are so many other fundamental factors filtering into the

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>stock market, whether it is fed policy, the fiscal cliff,

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>because right now it still doesn't look like we have

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>an agreement in Congress right now for another stimulus spill um,

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we're heading to the election, high valuations, whatever it might be.

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But this entire month, we have seen such volatility in

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the NASDAC. I mean, at least of the day that

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>we're recording, there's only been a single day a that

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the Nasdaq hasn't moved more than one percent. It just

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>feels like every single day is all or nothing almost

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>With this continued, I guess I can call it froth

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in the options market or just extreme activity in the

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>options market. Is this just the new normal as long

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>as that continues. It's a combination of two things. Technology

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>has just improved dramatically. You know, you used to have

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to call on a call a broker and wait online

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and pay a twenty five cent wide bid ask spread

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>to to get involved in um in the options market.

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Now you can do it for free on your phone

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>from anywhere, and and everything is so incredibly tight now

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.719
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the NASDAC volatility all through August, all

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>through the summer. Even a lot of people are saying, Wow,

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>this is crazy. This keep the NASDA keeps grinding higher.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't make any sense, This doesn't This is going

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to have to sell off at some point. It's too frothy, etcetera, etcetera.

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Now we're seeing that, we're basically seeing what's happening now

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is what we're expecting to happen and talking about happening

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>for much of the summer um now looking for it

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>along the calendar, we're getting pretty close to a giant

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>event in the US election, and so I don't think

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>volatility is going to be slowing down anytime soon. We

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>have looked at this election, the the amount of alatility

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>price into this election compared to other elections, you know,

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>by looking at non election volatility month of the VIX

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>compared to the election volatility month, and it's price again

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>more for this election than it hasn't in a number

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of years. Um. And then another interesting phenomenon that's just

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>been happening very recently, so for the entire year. If

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at we're talking about the VIX now, the

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>VIX October futures. They look at the implied volatility a

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>month out from October expiration that includes the election. Those

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>have been the highest option on the board, and higher

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>than the November which comes the following month for the

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>entire year. Just recently now, uh, the November futures have

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>moved above the October futures. You know, I have really

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>no opinion on the odds of a contested election and

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>try to stay out of politics in general. But that

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is the thing that people are pointing at most as why,

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, after a full year of this

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not happening, are we expecting um more volatility in the

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>month after the election than the actual election. So with

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that overhang, um, with all, with the nasdak um moving

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>around so much, I don't expect volatility to be coming

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>in anytime soon. You know. It's it's kind of chilling

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it away when if you know, if you believe that

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of the hive mind of of the markets has

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sort of you know, the intelligence of crowds,

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the wisdom of crowds. That's that's kind of an alarming

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>prospect to think about what the election coming up. You know,

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris that for a while there. To me, it looked

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like it would have been really tempting to play that

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>tink in the vix curve that you mentioned, you know,

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe sell October and by November. I guess that doesn't

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>really make as much sense anymore, if if it ever

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>really did. You know, what what would you you know,

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>if I'm coming to you as a client saying I

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>wanna I want to do something with this vixed curve

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of year, What's what's looking good to you?

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>What what type of trade would you want to get into? Well, yeah,

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we looked at the exact trade that you are talking about,

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>um a few months back, and when October was way

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>higher than November, and we said November might be a

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit under under priced here. Uh, now that that

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>has flipped, it is really hard to have a strong

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>opinion on on what's going to happen with the election

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and a contested election. I mean, I will say two

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty, the year that it has been, you know,

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>a contested election seems to be pretty fit for everything

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>else that that's been going on. You know, I don't,

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I don't really have a strong opinion

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>on how I would take advantage of that right here.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I was looking to hedge the election

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>in general, um, you know, like I said, I think

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>volatility is gonna stay relatively high heading into the election. Uh.

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And you have a lot of tech earnings in October UM,

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So if I were to try to um position for

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the election, I think that with the tech earnings, and

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you're probably gonna see less correlation in those earnings. So

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe the stoction moving in different directions. Maybe the market

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually move quite as much UM as it does

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>now without those different catalysts pulling it in different directions.

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I would look to sell some some October volatility,

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of some lower correlation activity in October, and

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>just position for the November election. And and like I said,

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be a real hard one to handicapped,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 1>and not really one that I have a strong opinion on.

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, it does seem very widely believed that

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have increased volatility heading into the election.

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Something I noticed, Chris that I don't really understand. This week,

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at the v vix so volatility of volatility,

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and noticed that it fell to the lowest levels since February,

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>so before all of this really began. How was that

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>possible when expectations for volatility going forwards are high. That's

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a that's a great observation, you know. The only thing

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that I can think of, because I really haven't looked

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>at that this week, is the election event is such

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a sticky event that's going to keep because volatility works

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 1>in both ways, volatility of the VIX, whether it's going

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to go lower or whether it's going to go higher.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>You have this election event that has pretty consistently been

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>around thirty one thirty two for those October VIX futures.

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>If you were to look at a lot of different

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>time frames, it's kind of been around there. So if

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you think it's gonna hold around there for the next

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 1>month and a half, maybe it makes sense that the

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>actual VIX is not going to be moving around quite

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>as much because that's the volatility of the VIX. And

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>if you have a sticky maturity out there for the election,

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe that could actually work to suppress the VIX. The

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>VIX volatility, all right, sir, that's not bad for a

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Genos guy. I gotta say, I'll give it him. I'll

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>give it to him. Yeah, although I'm more of I'm

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm a local. I'm a local pizza place. Cheese steak guy,

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a good balanquin would was it just ballat pizzas

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or what it's called. That's a pretty good, pretty good

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to tell you what. I think. Guys are gonna kill

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>me for not remembering. It's in the tip of my

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>tongue and I just can't. I just can't. It's gonna

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>come to me right when it's open the podcast. You know,

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm so embarrassed now because I just realized you said

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>cheese steak, which I should have understood with Philly and

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 1>rather than cheesecake. She's really missing you through the zoom cheesecake. Okay,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, Sarah. I was like, I didn't know cheesecake

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 1>was a Philly thing, but I'll go with it. Maybe

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it is. I don't know. I'll you'll, I'll have a cheesecake.

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's any good Philly cheesecake places,

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, I think that's good assign as any that

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it's that time. Charlie Pellett will tell us what time

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it is. Stand clear of the craziest things we saw

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>in markets this week Sarah Um, I don't know how

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.199
<v Speaker 1>well prepared you are for for this particular episode of

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Craziest Things we Saw on Markets. I'm gonna warn

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you though, I came. I came packing some heat. See

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 1>him coming big. I don't know if you did, though,

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because I heard from our Crazy Things correspondent that you

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>may have asked for some help. So I did. I did.

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>I asked Phil Donna. She totally let me down. Nothing

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 1>worth it. And then I found my own. And Uh,

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll let Chris go, and I'll let you go. I'm

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>not going to predict that I won just yet. Okay,

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll wait, I'll wait. Go ahead. First, I'll say, well,

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I expect Chris Is to be strong too, because I

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>know he's a listener of the podcast, so he knows

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what we expect every week from our guests. You've already

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>put enough pressure on him. Uh. With all the answers,

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's start with you, Chris. What's the craziest

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 1>thing you saw in markets this week? So I was

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>waiting all week for Tesla to do something crazy, because

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you don't have too many of those, and

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>nothing ever happened. It's been pretty boring. In Tesla this

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>week we talked about the vix Um contested election future situation.

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>So I still have a couple more. I had a

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>serious one and a not serious one. Um First, on Wednesday,

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Kim Kardashian mentioned that she was going to shut down

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>her Facebook for twenty four hours. Stock immediately dropped four

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars on the news down to round two and seventy

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>bucks on the announcement, which equates almost a ten billion

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar drop in market cap. You know, stock was down

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.239
<v Speaker 1>almost twenty billion over twenty four hours after that. You know,

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a rotation at a large cap tech. There

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>was an FTC probe announcement, the FED announcement, but I

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have to imagine a lot of it was due to Kim. Sir,

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>this guy is pretty good. I I I thought I

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>had it in the bag this week, but that that

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>is a good one. I remember you in the chat

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>saying this can't really be happening. Kind of Well, I

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't believe it because not only it did, I mean

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebooks a very large company with a very big waiting

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in all the benchmarks, but I mean you saw the

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>SMP saw that AzaC. I'll take a hit too, and

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it was just Kim Kardashian. That's just Kim being Kim,

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>just Kim being Kim. Yeah, Chris, bravo, that was well done.

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Well done. That is I forgot about that too. I

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>can't believe I forgot about that one. Alright, sir, that's

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the tough fact to follow. But what do you got? So?

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Kim Kardashian being able to move the

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>stock market in is just very so. I also have

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a statistic that is quintessential um kind of in the

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>realm of the saying that stocks only go up. So

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Golden Sacks has an index that tracks the most heavily

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>shorted stocks, and in the middle of this week, uh,

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that index hit a record So um one some pretty

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>bad shorts. I may feel bad for anyone who has

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>tried to short those names this year. I mean the

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that you have an index of the most shorted

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>stocks and it's trading out a record high. I mean,

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>come on out, Maybe we need we need an e

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>t F that goes long all the most shorted stocks.

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>That that uh, then you can just short the whole

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>thing if you want to, If you want to be

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>short the most contrarian trade. That's pretty good. That's a

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty good one. All right. Well I'll give you mine. Um, Sarah,

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>did you ever have a birthday party at Chuck E Cheese?

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I did. It may have been one of

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>my siblings, but I remember it as if it was

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.239
<v Speaker 1>my own. Chris, something tells me you've you've had a

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>few birthday You've at least spend a few birthday parties

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>at Chuck E Cheese. Is all right? I've probably been

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to about six and a half a year for the

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>past ninety but not this year. All right, Well, nope,

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>tell your kids about this story and watch their eyes

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>go go googly. So Chuck E Cheese is in bankruptcy

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>court right now, and they had to go to the

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>court to get approval to destroy seven billion with a

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>B seven billion of those prize tickets that they give

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>out that you can get, you know, stuffed animal or

0:30:55.440 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>pencil eraser or whatever, with seven billion prize tickets. And

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they told the judge that it's enough tickets to a

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>fill approximately six cargo shipping containers. And the cost to

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>destroy all these is like two point three million dollars

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>just to destroy these tickets. I can't be recycled I'm dumbfounded. Yeah,

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. The story doesn't get into that. I

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you destroy well, how do you recycle.

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess you recycle the paper, but I don't know.

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>You'd have some kids, you know, picking the trash, showing

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>up at your Chucky Cheese with seven billion tickets wanting

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>give me everything, give me the whole company. It's gonna

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be one lucky guy, lucky, one lucky eight year old Chris.

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>If you got any of those tickets, you better cash

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>mean while you can, might get you the robot at

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the top right, get you. That's right, you can have

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the guy in the Chucky Cheese costume come and cut

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>your lawn or something. Every prize in the store. I

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>remember when I was younger, I I always only found

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>enough prize tickets to get one of those. I don't

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>know how to explain it. It's one of those half

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>moon looking rubber things where you turn them inside out

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and they pop. When you're younger, they're really exciting. That

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>was about the most exciting thing I could ever win

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>with my tickets. They're still pretty exciting, all right. I

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>gotta give it to Chris. The the Kardashian market mover

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>story is pretty darn good, Chris, well done, thank you,

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>very well done, Very well done. A serious one. Yeah,

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>so you said you had to a serious one and

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:34.239
<v Speaker 1>a not serious one. So before we let you go,

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to share your not serious one, because as

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Mike and I are big fans of not

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:43.479
<v Speaker 1>serious things. Oh no, that So my other one was

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the Apple into day move this month has been around

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>five percent a day. Uh, that's about nine billion dollar

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>change in market cap each day. So staying in that,

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in another way, Apple has been changed in value each

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>day by basically the value of the entire company of Starbucks.

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's actually my series one. That's a that's a

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>good one. That reminds me actually pretty crazy that none

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of us brought up snow either. Snowflake the company that

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I p oed uh at the end of its I

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>p O seventy billion dollar company about the value of

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Goldman sachs Um and so many people hadn't heard of

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Snowflake before. I know I hadn't. I know I hadn't.

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But we talked about great timing to be a cloud

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>company come market now. But all right, Chris put it

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>on the resume was winner of the Craziest Thing for

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the third week of September. Put that at the top,

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>top of the awards and uh, what is it on

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>your resume? Awards and other distinctions or something like the certificates.

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Put it on there. Congratulator, I will, I will take anything,

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'll and I'll also say, Chris um, you had

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>all the answers, so we're so so happy that we

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>could have you on the show this week. Again, that

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>was Chris Murphy with Susquehanna. Thanks for joining the show.

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks guys, What Goes Up? We'll be back next week.

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Until then, you can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>website and app or wherever you get your podcasts. We'd

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>love it if you took the time to rate and

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>review the show on Apple Podcasts so more listeners can

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>find us. And you can find us on Twitter, follow

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>me at at Sarah Pontzack, Mike is that Reaganonymous, and

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:32.399
<v Speaker 1>you can also follow Bloomberg Podcasts at podcasts. Also, thank

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you to Charlie Pellett of Bloomberg Radio and the voice

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of the New York City Subway System. What Goes Up

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>as produced by Jordan Gospore. The head of Bloomberg podcast

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is Francesco Levie. Thanks for listening, See you next time.