WEBVTT - Trump’s Lawlessness + Showdown With SCOTUS Looming?

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Happy Monday, and welcome to another week of the Trump administration.

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>We are getting awfully close to the one hundred day mark.

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And just just to put this in perspective, think about

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>how tumultuous this first ninety plus days has been on

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the American economy, on the American judicial system, on the

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>American democracy, on foreign affairs. Just think about the things

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that have happened that we have not had follow up on.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I think about here as a DC person who uses

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.639
<v Speaker 1>National Airport a lot. I'll be honest with you, I'm

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>still I would like to know what happened the night

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>that we had that deadly plane crash where a military

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>helicopter was essentially got in the way of the landing

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of a commercial airliner. We've not gotten the after action report.

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>There's not been the congressional investment mitigations that you would expect.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Yet we really haven't had anything. And you know, and

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>part of this you can maybe chalk up to the

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>news cycle. Part of it is the whole Trump administrations

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>throw a thousand things at the wall, and things get lost,

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and you sit there and it appears as if we

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>only have the band that generically the media only has

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the bandwidth to do one story at a time. So

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>when we were in the middle of the rescue operation,

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we got a lot of details on everything we could

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>figure out in the seventy two hours in and around

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that plane crash. But we haven't had any good reporting since.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Congress as usual has been sitting on its hands. I mean, look,

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we have an issue here where we have a very

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>tumultuous period in American government and in American history. It's

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a busy executive branch and a busy judicial branch. The

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>legislative branch is sitting on its hands. Doesn't appear to

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>be doing anything other than figuring out how to not

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>at least the Republican majorities, not to alien Donald Trump

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>or Donald Trump's megabase. Beyond that, it doesn't look like

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Congress is doing much. There's some rhetoric and about things

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that they could be doing or should be doing. I

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>think we're all waiting for the oversight earing on signal

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Gate and exactly what did Peak hag seth declassify to

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>put on vulnerable private communications systems. We think we have

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the backstory is how the National Security Advisor put a

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>reporter on that group, but we still don't know why

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>there was so much ease with which the Secretary of

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Defense shared what was classified information on that. We're still

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>waiting for those hearings. We're still waiting for that investigation.

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>We know that Donald Trump fired so many inspector generals

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that it is slowing down investigations that would really be

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of routine. I mean, the fact of the matter

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is there's always issues that the government has to figure

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>out what went wrong. Bob Gates, the former Secretary of

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Defense for George W. Bush and Barack Obama, once said,

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.119
<v Speaker 1>once said that he tells President said, on any given day,

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody is fucking up, and pardon my French, there in

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>your name, mister president. And he has said that to

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>President Bush, and he has said that to President Obama.

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I meaning, the federal government is so big that no

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.119
<v Speaker 1>matter how well it is run, how efficient things are,

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 1>there's somebody making a mistake in your name, causing you,

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>at a minimum a political problem and a maximum a

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>policy problem that impacts the public. And yet we seem

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to be almost paralyzed in our ability to deal in

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>totality everything that's going on. In many ways, I would

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>argue the first ninety days of Donald Trump have been

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>my demolition man. He is just trying to demolish norms

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. He is trying to he is

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>forcing the judiciary branch and trying to see how much

0:03:55.000 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>executive power he can get the judiciary to essentially approve

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of or not stop. And the way any administration works,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>this is why this is such a dangerous period in

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the history of this country because if this judiciary essentially

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>allows some of these things to go, they become precedent,

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and what happens is future presidents take whatever minimum they

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have and then push even further. So you know, this

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is why we're sitting here with essentially vulnerable to one

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>individual's belief on how the economy should work, rather than

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>having Congress make these decisions on tariffs. We're sitting here

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>because the congressional branch handed all this power to the

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>executive branch. It went back to not arguably this started

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>with nine to eleven. Actually it started before then, when

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>more trade authority was being handed to the Clinton administration.

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Then nine to eleven, more national security authority got handed

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch. With Barack Obama, he had an all

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 1>his party had full control of the trifecta he got

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>handed more executive power. Donald Trump grabbed more executive power

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 1>the first term. Joe Biden grabbed more and pushed the

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>envelope with what he tried to do with student loans,

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>which was another essentially executive branch power grab. And now,

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of course, this one, which is really doesn't have any

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>precedent arguably unless you go back to FDR and Lincoln,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>who did grab extra executive power under the guys of war,

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and those were actual wars. Right now, we have these

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>various emergencies that the president has declared in order to

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>try to fast track deportations in this country, try to

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>fast track trade authority in this country, try to fast

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>track a few things here. So the point is he

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>has done you know, the Steve Bannon had taken Steve

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Bannon's advice, which is just essentially just flood the zone

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and try to knock your political opponents and make them

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>woozy and own sort of pick one. And this is

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the cynical aspect of what the Trump administration is doing. Ironically,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>if a democratic administration we're doing, I'm sure Stephen Miller

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>would be filing all sorts of legal briefs to claim

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that this is an abusive executive power. All he's doing

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is essentially testing the electric fence of executive power and

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>pushing the envelope, pushing the envelope at the border, pushing

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the envelope when it comes to what say so a

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>government should have over a private organization like a university

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Ala Harvard, pushing the envelope on trade and terrorf authority.

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>And you have a democratic party that is divided in

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>how to respond, right, you have some that are nervous

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>about drawing a full line in the sand, for instance,

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to due process having to do with

0:06:54.480 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Killmark Garcia, the accidentally deported Else Salvadoran migrant who is

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:07.679
<v Speaker 1>now sitting in a prison cell in El Salvador. Over

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>on Friday, Chris van Holland, Democratic senator from Maryland did

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>meet with them. We saw that the El Salvador president

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>try to create a create some propaganda claiming they were

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>sipping margaritas, and sort of the absurdity of our information,

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of our misinformation ecosystem that we all now have to

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>navigate these days. The fact that Chris van Holland had

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to spend five minutes explaining, hey, look, if you notice

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>nobody took any SIPs out of this. This was essentially

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the El Salvadoran government trying to create a warped picture

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of the situation. The most important piece of news though,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>out of that meeting is the fact that Garcia is

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>not in the more notorious prison that is nicknamed Seacott.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>The fact that they put him in another prison, I

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>think tells you the El Salvadoran government is a bit

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>nervous and the Trump administration is a bit nervous. Want

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to make sure nothing happens to him physically, so if

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, the attention has probably kept him alive, or

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>at least kept him physically more safe than he would

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>be if he were in that more notorious prison. But

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the question I keep coming back to is there is

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a legal way to do this, but the Trump administration

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to do it. They don't want to abide

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>by a court order, they don't want to even get

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>caught trying. They don't even want to fake it. They

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have the ambassador, you know, getting a meeting with

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the President of Al Salvador and the president saying sorry,

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not releasing it. At least that could they could

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>claim they were following the court order that said that

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the government had to facilitate and essentially make an effort

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>give it the Old College try guys to try to

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>get him out. And they're not even doing that. They're

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>not trying at all. And that's what you got to

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>ask yourself. Why aren't they doing that? Do they just

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>think this is good politics for them? Well? I do

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>think that they believe that everything they've done so far

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that individually, if Democrats try to push back on any

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>one thing individually, they can somehow win an argument at

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>least have their base come up and help them own

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the Libs right. Just notice the sort of demagogic rhetoric

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that the White House has been using having to do

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>with kill Mark Garcia. That the fact that anybody questioning

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>whether they followed the law in deporting him and giving

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>him due process, which I promise you they did not,

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>by my count. You'll hear this in the interview with

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Ben Wittis. I think he's violated the first, the fourth,

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the fifth, the sixth, the seventh, the eighth, and the

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>ninth amendments. Okay, And on Garcia alone, I think they

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have violated the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth Amendments, okay,

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>all of them. The first Amendment has been violated in

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>other ways, including with their dealings with the Associated Press.

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't see any evidence yet that they

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 1>have violated the second or the third, and we can

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>have a debate about whether they violated the tenth yet.

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 1>But again we're not even at day one hundred, so

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>give them time. There's always a chance. But the cynical

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>view of this administration is that they believe if they

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>have the Democrats all are all sort of standing up

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>for Garcia because of the lack of due process, that

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>instead they can say, hey, look, Democrats are willing to

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>fight harder for non citizens than they are for you.

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>They weren't fighting for you when they were letting these

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>folks in. And so it's a mindset where they believe

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the ends justifies the means as long as they have

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>shut the border down, and they have used some very

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>aggressive means to shut the border down. But frankly, there

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 1>means that the Biden administration only started using in the

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>last six months of that administration. The fact is the

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden administrations in the first two years refuse to let

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>DHS do its job. Secretary Orcus when he was deputy

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>with Jay Johnson and the second Obama administration, they knew

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>how to control the border, and he was trying to

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>implement the exact same policies that they did the first time.

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And the fact of the matter is that first White

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>House would not do it. There was absolutely an ideological

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>brick wall that Mayorcis ran into during the ron Klaan

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>era of the White House, and then when that went

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>from Clain designs, the thing that changed the most if

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you actually look at border policy, that was the biggest

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>dramatic change. So I don't want to sit here and

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>say that the Democrats didn't help create the mess at

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the border and certainly didn't do enough that could be done.

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump left them a legal quagmire when he left

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>office during the COVID era at the border, But it's

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>not as if the Biden administration managed it very well

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in the first two years. They did get their arms

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>around it eventually, but it was after there was a

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>new chief of staff and after frankly, it had already

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>become a political problem. So the Trump folks just believe

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that if they can just make this an immigration issue.

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>First of all, Notice what we're not talking about tariffs.

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking about the economic disaster that is coming. Now.

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a bit of a lagging indicator, right. All

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of the current economic figures that have been coming out

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>are of what's happened in the previous thirty days, or

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the previous sixty days, or the previous ninety days. The

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>fact is we're going to start to see arise in

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>prices probably in the next sixty to ninety days. You're

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not seeing them right in the moment, right, because plenty

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of American companies have inventory that they got in before

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs hit, so prices are only just now starting

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to creep up, and that, of course will then start

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this spiral that could get really ugly for a while.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Rising prices, inflation, stagnant wages, layoffs. You can see where

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this is headed. But in the short term, as all

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the folks, because it has been on the one issue,

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>because apparently only one issue can be done at a time,

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>there's been this debate in the Democratic Party about whether

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>how hard they should go. You have had Gavin Newsom

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>who sees the Kilmore Garcia story as a distraction. You

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>have others that say, if you don't draw a line

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 1>in the stands somewhere. Then what's the point of being

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a political party you're in the opposition. The fact of

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the matter is, I do think the party needs to

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to have one message, and I think

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the chaos message which worked in the first administration, right,

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>The fact is the public doesn't like the chaos. Individual

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>goals that Donald Trump has outlined are things the public

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>would like to see a safe and secure border, more

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing jobs in America. But how he's gone about doing it,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>upending the world economy, upending due process and the rule

0:13:55.200 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>of law. That isn't what the public wants. They don't

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like how this is being done, and the political opposition

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think has done a good enough job sort

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of framing this as that as incompetency, because ultimately that's

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>what this has been, complete and utter incompetence. On the tariffs,

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to do this, there was a more

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>systematic way to do this. On the border, if you

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do this, there was a more systematic way

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to do this. But ultimately, the only conclusion one can

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>come to is it looks like the conclusion that our

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>friends at National Review came to over the weekend when

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems as if the administration wants to test the

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>limits of executive power, so they don't care if they

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>knowingly essentially violate the law. And see how hard is

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the judiciary going to push back? How hard is the

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court going to push back? And I promise you

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, I keep using this metaphor, but

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>if you give a if you give this administration a cookie,

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they're going to come back and take more, and take more,

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and take more and take more. So it is a

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>very cynical view of the executive that this administration has taken.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And you have people around the president that are looking

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to essentially turn this country into a It's not a

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>republic if this is if the executive gets as strong,

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a borderline monarchy. And in fact, I do find

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it interesting that the governor of Massachusetts on April nineteenth,

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the anniversary of the shot heard around the world, had

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this to say at a rally. She said the following,

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this is more healing democratic Governor of Massachusetts. She was

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in conquered Massachusetts again, home conquered in Lexington, right home

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of the shot heard around the world. We live in

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a moment when our freedoms are once again under attack

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>from the highest office in the land. We see things

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that would be familiar to our revolutionary predecessors, the silencing

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of critics, the disappearing of people from our streets, demands

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>for unquestioning fealty. So that was an attempt by at

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>least one Democrat to try to take everything President Trump

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>has done and try to put it in a larger context.

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think that what the Trump administration is counting

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>on is to be able to isolate each of these

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>criticisms into one and turn it into oh, so you

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>want terrorists to be roaming free around the country type

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of type of you know, have you stopped? You know?

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>In one of the metaphors we like to use in media,

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>when did you stop beating your wife? Right? What's an

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>example of the worst kind of leading question what I

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>just said, when did you stop beating your wife?

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:43.119
<v Speaker 1>When did you stop supporting terrorists? Is essentially the conversation

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump administration wants to have every time a

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Democrat says, hey, how you did this? How you are

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>deporting these people is unconstitutional and against the law. What's

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that there's plenty of Republicans that believe this,

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>most of them don't want to say a word. By

0:16:58.000 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, have you noticed you may need to put

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>an a out for Lindsey Graham. One of the patterns

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to Lindsey Graham in particular, if you want to know,

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>when he can't defend what Donald Trump is doing, he

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>goes radio silent, completely radio silent. He has sort of

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>two versions of it. Sometimes what he does is he

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.959
<v Speaker 1>doesn't defend the actions, but he defends the goals. But

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy who was in the Jaguar in

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the military. I think actually does care about the rule

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of law, and I think is probably I would like

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to think. I don't know if he's personally outraged by

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>how this administration is dealing with the rule of law,

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 1>but it's clear he's not supportive of it because it

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is crickets. You don't see him anywhere. You don't see him.

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>This is a guy who knows his state has benefited

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>from a open and free market economy with a company

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>like BMW and Mercedes both I believe, with plants in

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. And here's a guy who actually seems to

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>care about the rule of law, and clearly this administration

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>right now doesn't care if it's following the rule of law.

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So you can see sometimes by the lack of positive

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>affirmation from some of these folks that they if they

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>can't defend it, they're staying silent because, as at Lisa

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Markowski's admitted last week, speaking out comes with a threat

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of retaliation, and that is something that many Republicans are

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>very very nervous about. All Right, I'm going to sneak

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in a break when we come back. My conversation with

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Ben Whittis says, we try to understand exactly if there

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is any actual legal strategy behind what the executive branch

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>is up to, or if this is all lawsuits that

0:18:47.680 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are designed for maximum political advantage and or pain. And

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>joining me now is the editor in chief of law Fair,

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>which is a publication that's devoted to legal issues having

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to do with with national security. But these days, the

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 1>definition at least what the White House uses for national

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>security keeps broadening, which means in many ways, I'm going

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>to be counting on Ben Whittiss here to be our

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>tour guide in understanding, frankly, all of the legal fights

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump administration has decided to take on, whether

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it's we'll concentrate for first and foremost on the immigration case,

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>but I'm hoping to tap into Ben's nimble legal mind

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>on all sorts of things, including what's going on with

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Harvard and those form Ben. What is good to see you, sir,

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Great to see you.

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 2>It's been a while.

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.239
<v Speaker 1>It has been a while back when both you and

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I took financial rewards from NBC. It might be one

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>way to put it, but one thing you can't be

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:04.239
<v Speaker 1>upset is that Donald Trump is giving Lawfair plenty of

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>material to I mean, I guess he's made people paying

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>attention to the law great again.

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Not to mention that he keeps using our name. You know,

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 2>when we named the site lawfair, which was back in

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty ten, this was a very specialized term. And now

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump tweets about lawfair. He you know, he.

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Completely decided the word means yes. Is that what it is? Yeah?

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, litigation against him, or it's any litigation he doesn't like,

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 2>is lawfair, And so he keeps you know, it's like

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 2>somebody tweets out Ben Wittis all the time, and it's

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 2>it's it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, congratulations, that's nice. Thank you, that's nice.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>We look at the bright side.

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>You have to. So I was preparing for this, and

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at, you know, this handy dandy list

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>of rules that I thought we all abided by. It

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>was called the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, this crazy thing.

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And I have him violating the first, the fourth, the fifth,

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the sixth, the seventh, the eighth, and the ninth amendments.

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't find evidence as violated the second and third,

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see on the state front right now.

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what about the tenth.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what I mean. I'm not going to sit

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>here and say I don't I don't have a good

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't have an easy case to say he's violated

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the tenth yet, although I think what he's doing with

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Education arguably might be doing that. But

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>well that that might be a stretch. But when you

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>just look at this one case, I am I crazy

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to say that he's that in some ways the Trump

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department and what the immigrant I mean, we may

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>say a violation of the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth,

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and ninth. I mean these are the amendments that are

0:21:55.240 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>there too, essentially put some boundaries on what the state

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>can do to somebody that they think might be a criminal.

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, you would think that if the notion of

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 2>human liberty and rule in a society of ordered freedom

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 2>had any meaning at all, it would be that when

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 2>you have been you're living here, your deportation case has

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 2>been adjudicated six years ago, and the immigration courts have

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>said you can't be deported to El Salvador. You would

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 2>think that if the notion had any meaning at all,

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 2>it would mean that the government can't arrest you apropos

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 2>of nothing, with no criminal allegation that you did anything wrong,

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 2>stick you on a plane, and send you to a

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of suit max prison in the one country that

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 2>they are not allowed to deport you to, without anybody,

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 2>without a judge ever hearing about it. And your wife

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 2>only finds out about it because the head of DHF

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>DHS goeses and poses in front of your jail cell

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 2>for a picture. You would think that that's what it

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 2>would mean, But apparently not so it is.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the Supreme Court ruling here and the

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>word they chose to use. The administration does not believe

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court has ordered them to have him returned

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>they believe that the Supreme Court simply says said, and

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>this is I'm sort of interpreting based on what you wrote.

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>You seem to think that their interpretation is, if El

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Salvador chooses to send him back, the United States has

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to accept him.

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Correct, that is their interpretation. So the word that the

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 2>district judge used was facilitate. And the genuine complexity here is,

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 2>let's say, and how.

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you interpret the Supreme Court order.

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, so the Supreme Court says, the district court said

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 2>facilitate and effectuate. Yeah, And the Supreme Court says, be

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 2>careful with the word effectuate because that implies that the

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 2>court can order the government of El Salvador around. It

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 2>implies that the court can order the outcome of a

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 2>US foreign policy thing, and the president kind of runs

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 2>foreign policy. So be careful with the word effectuate. But

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 2>you but you're certainly within your rights district court to

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 2>order that the government facilitate his return. So the district

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 2>court turns around and says, okay, you have to facilitate

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 2>his return. And the government interprets the word facilitate as

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 2>in exactly as you said that if the government of

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 2>El Salvador wanted to send him back. We wouldn't erect

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 2>domestic obstacles to that, and Christy nom actually or Pambondi

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 2>even said we would send a plane. That is not

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 2>if you read the Supreme Court's ruling. I think what

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court had in mind, which is they were saying, basically,

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 2>we want to be careful of ordering around a sovereign

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 2>foreign government and ordering the mechanics of the way the

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 2>president interacts with that government. But the government clearly screwed

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 2>up here, and it's totally reasonable for the Court to

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 2>try to get it to correct its error.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>So do you believe the Supreme Court watered their order down?

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 2>No? I think this is very much the order I

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 2>would have expected from this Supreme Court, which.

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me stop this Supreme Court, would you That's

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, Like, this is what you expected from

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this version of the Roberts Court, not what you would

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have expected from a generic Supreme Court on this issue.

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 2>So to be fair, I think there is the Supreme

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Court the conservative justices here do have a quite legitimate

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 2>in my view, care about getting interfering in the way

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 2>the president conducts foreign policy.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>And it is for the most part this Court's been

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>consistent on that stage. Yeah, very They're very light on

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch in general.

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Correct, and particularly in foreign policy and national security matters.

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So I don't have a problem with that, actually, And

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I think if John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett want

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 2>to say, you know, the District Court is wholly with

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 2>its right to demand a remedy here, it's got to

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit careful about how it does that.

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't bother me a bit, actually, and it cheered

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 2>me in fact, that nine justices of the Supreme Court

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 2>agreed on the premise which is a, this is not

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 2>okay for this to have happened, and B that the

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 2>district Court has some real latitude to require a remedy.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Now we're because the district judge, whose name is Paula Sinis,

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 2>has been pretty aggressive about doing that. The Justice Department

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 2>is now appealing the matter again, and you'll see, we'll

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 2>see this time around whether the Supreme Court means something

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 2>as narrow as what the government interprets it as having said,

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 2>and I don't believe that will happen, or whether it's

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 2>going to give her some latitude to say, hey, when

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 2>I said facilitate his return. I mean, you kind of

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 2>do some stuff to get him back.

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's come up with some things that might fulfill facilitate.

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean the ambassador formally petitions the Salvadorian government?

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that? I mean, what what do you think will

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>generally fall under that umbrella actions?

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 2>So I think the first thing is something, right, So

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>what's happened so far is nothing except that the President

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 2>met with the Salvadoran president in the White House and

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the two of them made fun of the court's order. Right,

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 2>So that's what's happened so far. So I think if

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>you were going to satisfy the Supreme Court that you

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 2>were facilitating, you would probably have to do more than

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 2>zero and then mock the court and, by the way,

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 2>baldfacedly lie about what the Supreme Court did. So look,

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 2>if you were dealing with a normal administration, what you

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 2>would expect would be for a official to either come

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 2>into court or file a declaration that listed all the

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 2>steps that they had taken and said, I mean, you've

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 2>read a hundred of these executive branch declarations. Here are

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the steps we've taken to comply with the Court's order.

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Here is the results that we've gotten. We're planning to

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 2>do the following things. And this is what the judge

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 2>has asked for. And I think if you did all

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 2>those things. First of all, if the president asked President

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Bukele to send him back, they would. The Salvadorans don't

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 2>have a particular interest in detaining this guy. But the

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 2>hard place would be. You know, if you did all

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 2>those things, you pro went through that pro forma exercise,

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 2>but then you also had a wink and a nod

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 2>understanding with Bouquele that he would say no, and that

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 2>would put the court in a very difficult position because

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 2>all of its formal boxes would be checked and yet

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the guy. But short of articulating something that you've done,

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you can actually go back to the

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 2>district court and claim to be in compliance with the

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 2>order and expect the Supreme Court to accept that.

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And now she's asking for daily update and the updates

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are no for we have no updates from yesterday.

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 2>The updates are the first day, first update is he's

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 2>alive and in this Salvador in Supermax, and the subsequent

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 2>updates are we have nothing further for you.

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I look at this case, and I look

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>at the AP case just those two specifically, and you

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and I both know that if the White House wanted

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to pretend it was following the law, they could. I

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>am just shocked that they're choosing to brazenly essentially not

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>even try, not even fake it. Like with AP they

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>used an unconstitutional rationale to bar them, like it was

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>blatantly obvious, which is why it was easy court case

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to win. Now they're you know, they the irony is

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>how they've responded since as actually why they they could

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have done that the first time and never had an

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>AP doesn't have a leg to stand on. They seem

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to almost want the confrontation with these judges, like they're

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>almost going out of their way to say I don't

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>care and it you know, to me, you just sit

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>there and like, I don't know why you to accumulate

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>more political You're just daring more members of the judiciary

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know what, these guys aren't even pretending

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to respect what we do. So I you know, I'm

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>not asking you to figure that out. I mean that,

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think.

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 2>You but the problem is worse than you say yeah, okay, good,

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 2>because they're also doing the same things with the law firms.

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 2>And so the law firm issue is and they're they're extorting,

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, hundreds of millions of dollars in legal work

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:26.959
<v Speaker 2>from from these firms.

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So this another Justice Department could actually charge extortion here.

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 2>They chose to might think about it, but the you know.

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>If we're going to commit, if we're going to commit

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>law their and like.

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 2>The AP, these court the the firms that have gone

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 2>into court have won in a matter of hours. Right,

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 2>so you know, no, no firm has gone into court

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 2>and challenged one of these executive orders and not got

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 2>in a temporary restraining order in a matter of hours.

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 2>The Justice Department has not appealed to these, meaning that

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 2>they actually know they can't win. And yet law firms

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 2>keep capitulating and making these extravagant promises to the executive branch.

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 2>And why are they capitulating for exactly the reason that

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 2>you just described, which is that the president can screw

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 2>them and there's nothing they can do about it, just

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 2>like he's doing to the AP. Now, you can freeze

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 2>it out with a freeze them out with a wink.

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 2>And if you're one of the firms that challenges this,

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, good luck getting a meeting on behalf of

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 2>your client with the senior levels of the Justice Department,

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 2>say before an indictment.

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>This is my frustration that one the law firms haven't

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>banded together. Two that the press, the traditional press, I mean,

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've just I'm absolutely appalled by the folks

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that are running traditional media companies not standing by ap

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>because about the only the only option you have is

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>collective action to at least make a point. I'm not

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.919
<v Speaker 1>saying it might might not work, but if you can't

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:24.240
<v Speaker 1>stand up for your basic constitutional rights the First Amendment,

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're a member of the press, frankly, the fourth Amendment,

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:29.359
<v Speaker 1>if you're a law firm you know or you know,

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>just the then what are you in this? What are

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you even doing here? That? I mean that that's my

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm so angry about the press aspect of

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this because I was one of the people who stood

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>up who we stood up to Obama and said you

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 1>can't do that to Fox and we refuse to participate

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>in their pool unless they included Fox. And the inability

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of collective action because we know what's happening. The media

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 1>executives who are not journalists have chosen to a buy

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>by their bosses who have said, please, don't pick a

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>fight right now. And I understand that from a fiduciary standpoint,

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>right from a business standpoint, but this is the slippery slope,

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and we're now watching it in real time.

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, and you can say with respect to

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 2>the press, the press is in a relatively weak position administration.

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Law firms are not, you know, law firm.

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But why are they behaving as if they are?

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Because they are wisses. And you know, because hundreds of

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 2>millions of dollars in law firm revenue is on the line.

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 2>And it is one thing when you are playing with

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.879
<v Speaker 2>other people's money to take risks. But you know, law

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:58.720
<v Speaker 2>firms are organized as partnerships, and that means that every

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 2>dollar that the law firm of X, Y and Z

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 2>doesn't bring in is you know, thirty three cents from X,

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 2>thirty three cents from Y, and thirty three cents from Z,

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.439
<v Speaker 2>and so they are really looking at their own pockets here,

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and you know, the only thing to do about it

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 2>is to shame them. But they're in a much stronger

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 2>position than the than journalists who represent actually an industry

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 2>in a somewhat precarious position. A lot of them are

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 2>not healthy organizations. These are, you know, the powerful acting

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 2>like the weakest of the week.

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Arguably. I guess Harvard decided they were going to fight.

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that? And it was interesting to me

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the day after Harvard essentially said no, Columbia said oh yeah, no.

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>They were like, oh yeah, we're going. We're right behind you.

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>How Harvard, you know on that front? Do you expect

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Harvard's decision to UH to have any effects on these

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 1>law firms?

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 2>No. I think the law firms are making different calculations

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:25.280
<v Speaker 2>than the universities. Look, I think it's great that Harvard

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.399
<v Speaker 2>did what it did. I think they're going to pay

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 2>a price for it.

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:32.359
<v Speaker 1>They will, and I think they're just banking that it's

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a two or three year price.

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, two or three year price and one that they're

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 2>going to have to litigate over because they're going to know,

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 2>because they're going to have to litigate over.

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 1>They're going to win the suit, but it's gonna cost

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>them a lot of money. I mean, it doesn't seem

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know how they lose.

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Here, but well, but they lose again. There is that similarity,

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 2>they lose even if they win. If you're you know,

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the government is going to really tighten the screws on

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of federal grants, research grants to universities. They're

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 2>going to dry up entirely in certain areas, and you're

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 2>going to find that, you know, Liberty University is a

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 2>very attractive location to do all kinds of research that

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 2>you would have once done at Harvard.

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, And so that brings me back though to my

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 1>other question. It's funny you brought up Liberty like that

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>because I thought the same thing. You know, he's going

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 1>out of his way, he and Stephen Miller, and Stephen

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Miller is obviously the guy seems to be executing all

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of this because I think we all know Donald Trump's

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>too lazy to actually do some of the work that

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it would take.

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 2>To n Miller didn't get into Harvard.

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Right there you go, I don't. I don't either. Look,

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 1>he's a smart guy. I mean, I wouldn't, you know,

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want I wouldn't want to know he was

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>working on a case against me, right Like he's he

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>is willing to push the envelope. He's willing to you

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>know he's he's willing to do things that most ethical

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:58.320
<v Speaker 1>people wouldn't do. He's willing to cross certain ethical lines.

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 1>But uh, why not just simply reward friendly university? And

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, they keep their going out of their way

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to force these fights, which I guess they just see

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it as political distractions that feed the base something to

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>eat while they destroy the global economy. And hope they're

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 1>not paying attention.

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's just that, all right, So, remember

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 2>when he's coming in and we are all worried about

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 2>them going after their political enemies, using the FBI, using

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the Justice Department right to to attack his political enemies,

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 2>And there actually hasn't been very much of that in the.

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Criminal I was just going to say, Chris Krebs might

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have I didn't.

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I didn't say that there's been none. I said there

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been a lot. Right, most of what's happened on

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 2>the criminal side has been all about creating impunity for friends.

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 2>So this started with the January sixth pardons, and then

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 2>it proceeds to things like Eric Adams and shutting down

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the entire you know, sort of public integrity apparatus of

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the Justice Department firing a whole lot of prosecutors who

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 2>worked on January sixth cases. Right, It's all about creating

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 2>the impression that if you're on Trump's side, he will

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 2>protect you. But then you have this problem on the

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 2>criminal side on using it for offensive purposes, which is okay.

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 2>You can say we're going to have an investigation of

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Chris Krebs, but you can't actually indict Chris Krebs because

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 2>you don't have shit right, right, And so what do

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 2>you do to go after your political enemies to make

0:40:56.320 --> 0:41:00.359
<v Speaker 2>them hurt if you can't really sick the FBI on them?

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 2>And the answer is that's where all these civil remedies

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 2>civil attacks come from. You can go after democratic law firms.

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 2>You can go and ruin their businesses. You can actually

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 2>put Chris Krebs out of business. He's a cybersecurity consultant.

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 2>He just had to resign from his job. You can

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:25.760
<v Speaker 2>really make universities hurt. Universities employ some conservatives, but really

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 2>they're a power base of the left. And you can

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 2>go after the press, but not after the press who

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 2>were sympathetic. And so I think the way to understand

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 2>these attacks is these are the things that he would

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the people he does want to put in jail, but

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 2>that's hard, and so this is the repressive apparatus that's

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 2>actually available to him.

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So you just view this as because he can't put

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 1>the bidens in jail or get them harassed or all

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of that business.

0:41:58.360 --> 0:41:59.879
<v Speaker 2>This stuff is so much easy.

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>He can so mess around with government contract And yet

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>here's been an assumption that I've made about DOGE in general,

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 1>but AID specifically, and frankly even many of these, many

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of these weaponizations that the Trump administration has done on

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 1>various things, is that there are the government is eventually

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>going to lose all these cases, and in some cases

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they're going to lose and have to pay damages. Right,

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I assume there's small businesses are going to

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially have breach of contracts with the federal government, and

0:42:36.040 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be able to prove that what was

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>done was illegal, their owed restitution and et cetera. But

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>although this is going to take years, but I assume

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that the government ends up paying more money in damages

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:56.919
<v Speaker 1>over the next decade for the last ninety days than

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they have in money saved by DOGE.

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it'll be.

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:01.280
<v Speaker 1>By a lot.

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 2>So you know, what they're arguing in court in these

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:12.359
<v Speaker 2>cases in which they've fired people, for example, is that

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 2>all of these cases belong have to go through the

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Merit Systems Protection Board, right, And that doesn't mean and

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 2>those are you know, that doesn't mean that they win.

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 2>That means that they can't be stopped. Now. Now, if

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 2>you go through the Merit Systems Protection Board and then

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 2>you file suit later, well you know you're gonna get.

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna win because they actually just aren't allowed to

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 2>fire civil servants like that. And so you're going to

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 2>get back pay, you're going to get reinstated, but you'll

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 2>have already had another job, so you're going to be reinstated,

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:51.360
<v Speaker 2>and then they'll owe you all the pay that you

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 2>should have done. And by the way, you won't have

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 2>to have done the work, so they're not merely gonna

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 2>lose and have to pay a lot of restitution. By

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 2>the way, this is true for a bunch of contractors too.

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Is in the contractors, and it's going to be again,

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's going to be small businesses these you know,

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 1>some of these contractors are small businesses that facilitate some

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>of these aid contracts. Correct, and the business really is

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>ninety percent of the business is the federal contract. So

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the cancelation bankshrup the company, and then.

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 2>There are damages and so get you get all of

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 2>the back stuff, you get damages. And by the way,

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 2>the government doesn't get the work done. And so if

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 2>you do the accounting for it later, it's going to

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 2>be hugely expensive.

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And describe figure.

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 2>But what you won't have had is any moment where

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 2>a court says, no, you can't do that. And so

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:49.800
<v Speaker 2>they get to say all along the way, we're saving

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 2>the taxpayer x amount of money we're cutting. And by

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the way, when they lose, it'll be the fault of.

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Some judge, right, those pesky judges.

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 2>A pesky judges.

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of those pesky judges, it's pretty clear to me

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that John Roberts is petrified that Donald Trump's going to

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 1>ignore an order he should be, so he's desperate to

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>find ways to create rulings that give him something but

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 1>not everything. Am I being a little cynical about this?

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:33.680
<v Speaker 2>You're being cynical? But the cynicism isn't. First of all,

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 2>courts behave that way a lot, right, They look for

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 2>ways to avoid confrontations to make it possible for litigants

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 2>to comply, and when you're dealing, when you're litigant is

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the most powerful nity in the world, and you have

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:53.839
<v Speaker 2>no independent ability to enforce your judgments. Being careful with

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 2>what you order is not the worst thing in the world. Now,

0:45:56.719 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to countenance being uh, cowardly, but being

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 2>But he's not wrong to want to be careful here Trump.

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately for him and for the other justices who feel

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:16.280
<v Speaker 2>this way, which certainly include Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately for them, Trump isn't giving them the space like

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 2>he's not saying. You know, so he in the Oval

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Office just lied about the Supreme Court's decision in Abrago Garcia.

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:37.879
<v Speaker 2>And you know, the justices aren't morons. They hear this right,

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 2>and so they they see, we gave you a face

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 2>saving out. We didn't say a word in criticism of you.

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 2>We didn't use words like illegal or you know, authoritarian

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 2>or terrifying. We didn't do any of that. And you

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 2>turned around and described a nine to zero Supreme Court

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 2>opinion that said, we're not even ordering you to get

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:07.240
<v Speaker 2>this guy back, but just facilitate it. And you spat

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 2>in our faces. This is going back up to them,

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and so he is sort of systematically taking away from

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Roberts and others the ability to not have a confrontation.

0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Now that does two things. One is it it? You know,

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 2>it takes away the face saving solution from the justices.

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 2>It also takes away the face saving solution from Trump.

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:40.880
<v Speaker 2>And once you force that confrontation, eventually the Supreme Court

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:45.840
<v Speaker 2>has to say, Okay, the district Court ordered you to

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 2>facilitate that's what we said she could do. You know,

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:55.840
<v Speaker 2>we affirm. And that's going to be a bad moment,

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and not just a bad moment for the Court, but

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a bad moment for true because it's one thing to

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:07.719
<v Speaker 2>defy a district court order, which he's now really done twice.

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 2>It's another thing to defy a unanimous Supreme Court opinion, say,

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:21.399
<v Speaker 2>written by Clarence Thomas or Sam Alito. And I don't

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 2>know how he responds to that moment, And I honestly

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know either, how members of Congress respond to a

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:36.799
<v Speaker 2>moment in which the Supreme Court has unambiguously said, you know,

0:48:36.880 --> 0:48:39.839
<v Speaker 2>a district court has ordered you to do X, and

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 2>we affirm. And he turns around and says, the Supreme Court,

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 2>can you know, put it where the moon don't shine.

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, he's you know, it's interesting here, you're right, and

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 1>he's putting so much stress on his own party right now.

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Right the tariffs are putting stress in the farm state

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>senators who are just uncomfortable with it, and a lot

0:49:00.520 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of the free market to your guys who are just

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:04.919
<v Speaker 1>like I knew he was for this, but I always

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.399
<v Speaker 1>believed he wasn't that serious. And now they're freaking out.

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Now there's this idea of raising taxes on millionaires, right,

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>which is like freaking out the Grover nor Quist crowd

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and that, and they're they're desperately trying. I saw Steve,

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:19.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of amusing to me to watch these

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:25.440
<v Speaker 1>mega converts be shocked when you know, they start behaving

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>unpredictably and a little more responsive to what they believe

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:32.880
<v Speaker 1>their populace base won't just accept but actually wants. Here

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>But going back on the court, do you think these

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this is oddly bringing the justices together a little bit,

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:48.319
<v Speaker 1>just even because it's pretty clear that there's a lot

0:49:48.320 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of discomfort, right, you know, your Sony Sodomayra and you're say, Alito,

0:49:51.239 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing maybe they say hi in the halls, you know,

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:57.920
<v Speaker 1>if they if there's other people watching. But I don't

0:49:57.960 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 1>know if they do if nobody's watching, right, I'm saying that,

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm you know, it's so hard to read the

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>tea leies with these, with these nine folks. But I

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a normal environment, right when you've had

0:50:11.320 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 1>these are the type of things that could actually bring

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 1>an institution together. Do you have any sense of that?

0:50:18.640 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I know you have some insights sometimes with clerics and

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>all that.

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:23.959
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, Look, I mean, I think from

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the opinions themselves, you can tell that they have been

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 2>brought together on certain matters and that they're very divided

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 2>on closely related matters. So if you look at the

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 2>two Venezuela cases or the two uh sorry, El Salvador cases.

0:50:40.239 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 2>In the first one, they all agree that you can't

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:49.400
<v Speaker 2>just declare someone in an alien enemy, put them on

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 2>a plane and fly them out of the right.

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>You have to you have to make your case, you

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have to do process again. And they all those all

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the most of the Bill of Rights is about moments

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like this exactly.

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 2>And they all that's unanimous, and they dispense with that

0:51:01.160 --> 0:51:05.440
<v Speaker 2>in the first couple of sentences, and then they go

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 2>on to have a very bitter division about whether you

0:51:12.320 --> 0:51:18.360
<v Speaker 2>can whether this very technical question of whether that do

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:22.400
<v Speaker 2>process has to occur through a habeas process or whether

0:51:22.440 --> 0:51:25.840
<v Speaker 2>it can occur through a different process, and therefore whether

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 2>this judge had jurisdiction over this case properly or not.

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:34.240
<v Speaker 2>And you know, on the one hand, they're all together

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:37.759
<v Speaker 2>on the biggest question there right, which is is this

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:41.480
<v Speaker 2>lawful to do? There's no daylight on that between Sonya

0:51:41.520 --> 0:51:45.000
<v Speaker 2>so To Mayora and Clarence Thomas. But so they're all

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:47.240
<v Speaker 2>brought together and they deal with that in a sentence

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 2>and a half and then they have a real fight

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 2>about the other thing.

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Just over jurisdiction. But it almost feels like it's like

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they're all looking around here, all right, we got to

0:51:56.920 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have some escape hatch here, so we don't rule fully

0:51:59.600 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 1>against well. And then they.

0:52:02.320 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 2>Do it again two days later or three days later,

0:52:05.440 --> 0:52:08.879
<v Speaker 2>right where with Abrago Garcia, all nine of them look

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 2>at it and say, yeah, I'm sorry, you can't do that,

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:17.319
<v Speaker 2>and then six of them are like, but be careful,

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:21.759
<v Speaker 2>District judge with that word effectuate. We're comfortable with facilitate,

0:52:21.840 --> 0:52:24.879
<v Speaker 2>but be careful with effactuation. And three of them are

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:29.359
<v Speaker 2>screaming yes, uh, you know, come on, you're gonna fight

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:35.479
<v Speaker 2>about you know, somebody's being essentially a press release. Look.

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I thought that, honestly, that was this is the division

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:45.719
<v Speaker 2>that I want to see the Supreme Court have. If

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 2>if you had told me, if you had described to

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 2>me in the abstract the facts of this case and said,

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:55.480
<v Speaker 2>based on you know, don't just don't don't, don't be

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 2>cynical about it, don't read tee leaves, don't do anything,

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:02.520
<v Speaker 2>just based on people's stated judicial philosophies, how would you

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:06.360
<v Speaker 2>expect them to handle it? I would say, wow, you know,

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the liberals on the court would be full throated behind

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the district court, and the conservatives would get a little

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 2>bit uncomfortable when you start using words like effectuate. But

0:53:18.400 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and that's exactly what happened. So this felt to me

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 2>like like if there were no politics, if there were

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:30.840
<v Speaker 2>no how a court that actually had these ideological divisions

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 2>and these philosophical divisions in a platonic ideal, how what

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:37.400
<v Speaker 2>a disposition of this case would look like? And so

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I found it very cheering actually, and that they divided

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:45.800
<v Speaker 2>exactly that way on that issue, because it's like you

0:53:46.080 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 2>you look at people who you know, have certain stated

0:53:50.280 --> 0:53:54.480
<v Speaker 2>judicial philosophies and they believe in certain things, and then

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 2>you get disappointed when they don't behave the way they

0:53:57.280 --> 0:54:00.560
<v Speaker 2>say they believe what they And this one was one

0:54:00.600 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 2>where like you really could have predicted it based on

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:07.480
<v Speaker 2>who they purport to be, and I thought they were

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:11.280
<v Speaker 2>all being their real selves, and so I liked it actually.

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:17.879
<v Speaker 2>But the point is the dispute was pretty bitter, and

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:19.920
<v Speaker 2>even though they all are but over.

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:23.040
<v Speaker 1>A technicality over me, that's right, right, It's like having

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a knockdown, drag out fight over a semicolon.

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:28.879
<v Speaker 2>And so I do think in some big sense they're

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:32.360
<v Speaker 2>being brought together in these two cases on the biggest issues.

0:54:32.360 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 2>They're nine to nothing, and yet they are really angry

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:41.600
<v Speaker 2>at each other, and they really they treat every one

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 2>of these cases as though, you know, like the fate

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:50.759
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of things depends on it, and that's

0:54:50.800 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 2>not bad. A fate of a lot of things does

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:53.879
<v Speaker 2>depend on it.

0:54:53.960 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I can't help but assume that the three

0:54:57.080 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>liberals are reacting to probably private conversations they've had with

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the other with many members of the other six who

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 1>all probably privately express alarm and and all that stuff,

0:55:09.239 --> 0:55:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and then like, come on, can't you say it publicly?

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Like that's how I kind of read it for it.

0:55:14.440 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 2>So I don't disagree with that. And I also think that,

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:23.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, being a being a member of a permanent

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:27.279
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court minority is a very hard thing. You know.

0:55:27.800 --> 0:55:30.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not like being a member of the minority in

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the House of Representatives, where there's always two years from

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:37.400
<v Speaker 2>now right, you have your eye on the next mid terms,

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:40.840
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, you can feel it when things

0:55:40.840 --> 0:55:43.959
<v Speaker 2>are going your way because fundraising picks up right, there's

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 2>always you know, for those three to become the majority

0:55:49.280 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 2>requires people to die. It requires the right person to

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:57.279
<v Speaker 2>be the president when that those people die. These are

0:55:57.480 --> 0:56:00.560
<v Speaker 2>very long way of things, and until then, on the

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 2>issues that they care most about, they're going to lose

0:56:04.600 --> 0:56:09.480
<v Speaker 2>almost every time, and that is a hard life.

0:56:10.239 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Two other cases I want to ask you about. One

0:56:12.840 --> 0:56:17.279
<v Speaker 1>is California's the State of California's lawsuit against the administration

0:56:17.400 --> 0:56:24.000
<v Speaker 1>on tariffs. I assume the administration is going to say

0:56:24.040 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that a state can't get involved in national security issues, right,

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:30.719
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that when Texas was trying to

0:56:30.719 --> 0:56:33.760
<v Speaker 1>get involved with immigration issue, you can't make immigration policy.

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I assume the federal government's going to say, hey, a

0:56:37.800 --> 0:56:42.880
<v Speaker 1>state can't decide trade policy, though they can make their

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:46.760
<v Speaker 1>own sometimes agreements. Sometimes has to do with state taxes

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. But what's your sense of that

0:56:49.080 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit and what and whether it's going to go anywhere?

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:56.000
<v Speaker 2>So I, first of all, I'm not an expert on tariffs.

0:56:57.560 --> 0:57:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I do have the impression that the administrations, to the

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 2>extent that the administration is making tariff policy under the

0:57:07.640 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 2>statute known as AEPA, which is the International Economic Emergencies.

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, it's in a national emergency, which I assume becomes

0:57:16.080 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 1>national security exactly.

0:57:17.840 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 2>So, to the extent that they're making tariff policy based

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:24.520
<v Speaker 2>on AIPA, I think that there may be serious legal

0:57:24.560 --> 0:57:28.920
<v Speaker 2>defects with the tariff policy. Whether California is in a

0:57:28.920 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 2>position to successfully challenge it, I'm not sure. Honestly. I

0:57:33.240 --> 0:57:37.000
<v Speaker 2>suspect the better plaintiffs will be private plaintiffs that are

0:57:37.040 --> 0:57:41.080
<v Speaker 2>affected by the tariffs and don't want to follow And.

0:57:40.960 --> 0:57:43.560
<v Speaker 1>What are those law what are those lawsuits against the

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:48.120
<v Speaker 1>tariffs themselves, or do they become essentially the same type

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of lawsuits we were describing with with aid contractors. No, no, no,

0:57:53.040 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they're your tariff policy bankrupted me.

0:57:55.560 --> 0:57:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, no, I think not. I think the I

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 2>think these would be prospective. You have no authority to

0:58:02.440 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 2>issue these tariffs the the UH. And I believe that A.

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:09.840
<v Speaker 1>You're over you're over reading your power in the Emergency

0:58:09.880 --> 0:58:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Acts exactly.

0:58:11.000 --> 0:58:15.440
<v Speaker 2>And and you can't declare a worldwide emergency that covers

0:58:15.480 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 2>all trade under AYEPA. And by the way, even if

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:24.520
<v Speaker 2>you could, tariffs are not one of the authorities that conveys.

0:58:24.640 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And however, the discovery of of life on another planet,

0:58:29.760 --> 0:58:33.320
<v Speaker 1>now he could worry, that's an emergency for the entire globe. Right, Sorry, I'm.

0:58:33.200 --> 0:58:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Just I would think so right, like this could be,

0:58:36.280 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 2>you know. And so I I think that there's a

0:58:38.680 --> 0:58:42.680
<v Speaker 2>there's I think that there are some substantial arguments that

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the tariffs are overreach of his power. I'm not sure

0:58:47.800 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 2>whether California is in the best position to litigate that,

0:58:51.480 --> 0:58:54.800
<v Speaker 2>but I but I wouldn't you know, they have some

0:58:55.200 --> 0:58:57.800
<v Speaker 2>They have a serious Attorney General's office that has a

0:58:57.880 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of capacity there, so I wouldn't rule it out either.

0:59:02.400 --> 0:59:04.320
<v Speaker 1>The other one I have for you is about Chris

0:59:04.400 --> 0:59:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Krebs and I and it's about a lawsuit. I don't

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>think he's filed, but I wonder if he could. And

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that is and I know that there are some protections

0:59:13.160 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that when a sitting president. When you're a sitting president,

0:59:16.480 --> 0:59:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you basically can't be sued in civil court, right, or when.

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:24.920
<v Speaker 2>You're a past president you can't be sued.

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 1>He can defame anybody he wants that. He has blanket

0:59:29.760 --> 0:59:33.840
<v Speaker 1>authority to defame people as long because this is blatant

0:59:33.840 --> 0:59:37.160
<v Speaker 1>defamation a character, Yes, blatant defamation.

0:59:36.880 --> 0:59:39.560
<v Speaker 2>As long as he does it as an official act

0:59:39.600 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of the presidency rather than outside in his personal capacity. Order.

0:59:47.520 --> 0:59:49.080
<v Speaker 2>This is clearly to.

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Pay nearly a billion dollars. Essentially it's a settlement, So

0:59:54.600 --> 1:00:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess there technically wasn't an adjudication of defamation, but

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>but essentially that's what they're paying. If Fox could have

1:00:05.760 --> 1:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>somehow declared themselves a public official to get out of this, no, it's.

1:00:09.880 --> 1:00:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Not public official. It's the president. So the relevant cases

1:00:14.280 --> 1:00:17.920
<v Speaker 2>case called Nixon v. Fitzgerald, and it held that the

1:00:17.920 --> 1:00:23.400
<v Speaker 2>president is absolutely immune for civil liability for all matters

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:28.480
<v Speaker 2>within for all official acts, within the four corners of

1:00:28.520 --> 1:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the outer reaches of his presidential authority. It's a sweeping

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:36.160
<v Speaker 2>opinion from nineteen eighty or seventy nine.

1:00:36.920 --> 1:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because I mean he is the blatant defamation

1:00:39.480 --> 1:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on individuals. I mean it is shocking. I mean, well,

1:00:45.880 --> 1:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>then why Didniejine Carroll's why did she succeed? She exceeded

1:00:50.160 --> 1:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>because it happened before he was president, correct.

1:00:53.400 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>So it happened he repeated the defamation during the period

1:01:01.080 --> 1:01:03.360
<v Speaker 2>in which he was not president.

1:01:03.400 --> 1:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>But he also did it while he was president.

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Correct, But in the interregnum he did it again.

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, he also defamed Chris Krebs in between his president.

1:01:14.240 --> 1:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>So he's not immune from that that Chris could sue

1:01:17.960 --> 1:01:24.960
<v Speaker 2>him for that. Look, this is one of the most

1:01:25.520 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 2>egregious abuses of his second term so far, both with

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>respect to Chris Krebs and with respect to Miles Taylor

1:01:34.320 --> 1:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and the idea you know this is it's so outrageous

1:01:38.400 --> 1:01:42.720
<v Speaker 2>that there's actually a specific provision in the Constitution designed

1:01:42.720 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 2>to prevent things like this, And it's called the Bill

1:01:45.160 --> 1:01:48.240
<v Speaker 2>of a Tainder Clause, right, and a bill of attainder

1:01:48.480 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 2>was what the British Parliament used to do, which was

1:01:52.240 --> 1:01:55.160
<v Speaker 2>to name to have like the Chuck todd As an

1:01:55.200 --> 1:01:58.920
<v Speaker 2>asshole statute where they would declare you a criminal and

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:02.320
<v Speaker 2>then prescribe a for you, like getting your head cut off.

1:02:03.280 --> 1:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>And the idea was they could just name you and

1:02:08.080 --> 1:02:11.480
<v Speaker 2>accuse and pass a bill convicting you of a crime.

1:02:12.160 --> 1:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>And the US Constitution specifically forbids bills of attainer only,

1:02:19.040 --> 1:02:22.400
<v Speaker 2>this isn't a bill of attainder, right, it's an executive

1:02:22.520 --> 1:02:25.480
<v Speaker 2>order of attainer, which is even worse right because there's

1:02:25.520 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 2>no legislative process behind it. There's no doubt it's unconstitutional.

1:02:31.480 --> 1:02:39.760
<v Speaker 2>There's no doubt that you know that it's a horrific abuse.

1:02:40.360 --> 1:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>The only question is whether it's worth Chris's time to

1:02:47.480 --> 1:02:52.360
<v Speaker 2>sue because it doesn't actually do very much right, it's

1:02:52.480 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>it's it's an executive order that primarily defames him.

1:02:58.040 --> 1:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>And of course, yeah, I mean, I just I get

1:03:01.120 --> 1:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>really frush because this guy has been essentially defaming our profession.

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>He's been all sorts of and you know, he's he's

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>he he deserves to be under a wave of constant

1:03:15.000 --> 1:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits that he has to like that drown over based

1:03:19.040 --> 1:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>on you know, his inability to keep his mouth shut.

1:03:22.040 --> 1:03:25.080
<v Speaker 2>But but with with Chris and I like, you know,

1:03:25.120 --> 1:03:28.680
<v Speaker 2>he and I aren't aren't close, and I know him

1:03:28.680 --> 1:03:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a little bit.

1:03:29.560 --> 1:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>But not about I think I have about the same relationship.

1:03:32.680 --> 1:03:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, It's not you know, he's somebody who professional just

1:03:35.560 --> 1:03:40.320
<v Speaker 2>a professional, professional acquaintance. And I admired his work in

1:03:40.600 --> 1:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>government very much. We do a lot of cybersecurity work

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:46.560
<v Speaker 2>at law Fair, and so our worlds have overlapped a

1:03:46.640 --> 1:03:50.360
<v Speaker 2>fair bit. But this is somebody when when when when

1:03:50.360 --> 1:03:52.760
<v Speaker 2>you sign up as a journalist, you're signing up to

1:03:52.800 --> 1:03:55.000
<v Speaker 2>play in a public space, and.

1:03:54.920 --> 1:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>To you know, know, I accept it.

1:03:59.280 --> 1:04:03.480
<v Speaker 2>We take upon ourselves the obligation not to engage in

1:04:03.600 --> 1:04:08.160
<v Speaker 2>frivolous attacks, but not an immunity from them. But when

1:04:08.160 --> 1:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>you sign up to be a government official, one thing

1:04:12.440 --> 1:04:16.680
<v Speaker 2>you are not supposed to is not supposed to happen,

1:04:17.280 --> 1:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>is that you get savagely attacked by the government for

1:04:22.360 --> 1:04:26.960
<v Speaker 2>telling the truth. And what people hate in the Trump

1:04:27.000 --> 1:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>world hate Chris Krebs for is two things. One is

1:04:30.800 --> 1:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>that he protected our elections from foreign attacks that they wanted,

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:41.480
<v Speaker 2>and the second is that having done that he told

1:04:41.520 --> 1:04:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the truth, that the election in twenty twenty was secure.

1:04:45.600 --> 1:04:48.320
<v Speaker 2>And the idea that the head of government, head of

1:04:49.640 --> 1:04:53.200
<v Speaker 2>head of state of this country would issue a formal

1:04:53.520 --> 1:04:57.400
<v Speaker 2>order attacking you for those things and accusing you of

1:04:57.880 --> 1:05:00.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, treason, is my boggling.

1:05:01.840 --> 1:05:06.479
<v Speaker 1>I look, it's it's I had a friend of mine say,

1:05:07.040 --> 1:05:09.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, the mistake we made in Trump one point

1:05:09.960 --> 1:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>oh was failure of imagination and that you know, sometimes

1:05:13.720 --> 1:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>we well, he wouldn't do that, right. You know, markets

1:05:18.360 --> 1:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>completely didn't believe he would go as far as he

1:05:21.000 --> 1:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>did on tariffs. Right, They didn't price it in. They

1:05:23.240 --> 1:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>messed up, They didn't do that. And I think the

1:05:26.680 --> 1:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>biggest mistake, probably some swing voters made was assuming that

1:05:31.320 --> 1:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>he'd be more like Trump one point oh, right. And

1:05:34.240 --> 1:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest, the most important thing people have

1:05:37.640 --> 1:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to understand is that this is an entirely different presidency,

1:05:41.720 --> 1:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>an entirely different administration. And the first one had real

1:05:45.840 --> 1:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>guardrails because there were real serious people who were not

1:05:50.720 --> 1:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>mag and this time this is a government of true

1:05:55.320 --> 1:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>believers who well, some are true believers and some are

1:05:58.600 --> 1:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on the livers. You know, there's true believers, and then

1:06:01.080 --> 1:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>there's the ones who just want to be reactionaries. If

1:06:04.120 --> 1:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the left upset, then we must be winning, even if

1:06:06.280 --> 1:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm losing money in the stock market. Do right. But

1:06:09.840 --> 1:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this is an entirely different proposition we're facing with Trump

1:06:13.640 --> 1:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>two point zero.

1:06:15.440 --> 1:06:19.480
<v Speaker 2>That is clearly right. And it is also the case

1:06:19.600 --> 1:06:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that his personality is not in the same place as

1:06:23.200 --> 1:06:23.720
<v Speaker 2>it was.

1:06:24.480 --> 1:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>No, he's a changed man.

1:06:26.840 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 2>He's Yeah, he was.

1:06:28.720 --> 1:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Always manic as he was. He's more manic now.

1:06:31.480 --> 1:06:37.400
<v Speaker 2>More manic now, and more obsessed with vindictive retribution more

1:06:37.440 --> 1:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>of the time. And not that he was free of

1:06:40.040 --> 1:06:42.959
<v Speaker 2>those things right four years ago or eight years ago,

1:06:43.080 --> 1:06:48.919
<v Speaker 2>but he was. He was less obsessed with it all

1:06:49.000 --> 1:06:51.120
<v Speaker 2>the time than he appears to be now.

1:06:52.120 --> 1:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>When when people ask you your level of concern about

1:06:56.280 --> 1:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the future of the democracy and I get this question,

1:06:59.000 --> 1:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm of the we're not a turkey. Maybe you

1:07:04.880 --> 1:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>can make some early stage hungry comparisons. I think that's

1:07:09.560 --> 1:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>where I go. Where do you go when you when

1:07:11.720 --> 1:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you get asked that question, which I know you get

1:07:13.680 --> 1:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>asked a lot.

1:07:14.440 --> 1:07:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I get asked it a lot. I mean I

1:07:17.200 --> 1:07:19.360
<v Speaker 2>almost as much as I get asked the what if

1:07:19.400 --> 1:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>he defies a court order question? Look, anybody who's not

1:07:24.600 --> 1:07:31.880
<v Speaker 2>concerned is not paying attention, and anybody who but it

1:07:32.000 --> 1:07:36.440
<v Speaker 2>is also wrong to catastrophize it. I went out the day.

1:07:36.360 --> 1:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Where I try to go. I just like, don't I

1:07:38.800 --> 1:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>trust our I trust the public to eventually figure this out.

1:07:42.480 --> 1:07:46.560
<v Speaker 2>The day after the Trump Zelensky White House meeting, so

1:07:47.320 --> 1:07:51.040
<v Speaker 2>I went, I took my laser projector and I went

1:07:51.080 --> 1:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>to the base of the Washington Monument and I projected

1:07:54.960 --> 1:07:57.960
<v Speaker 2>on in giant letters on the base of the Washington

1:07:58.040 --> 1:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Monument Trump advance betrayed it America in the Oval Office,

1:08:02.320 --> 1:08:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and this was visible from the White House and I

1:08:06.800 --> 1:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>was there doing this. By the way, the video of this,

1:08:09.680 --> 1:08:12.760
<v Speaker 2>which is available on Instagram, has been seen by two

1:08:12.800 --> 1:08:17.840
<v Speaker 2>million people now. And I was there for more than

1:08:17.840 --> 1:08:24.240
<v Speaker 2>an hour and no police showed up. I've had no

1:08:24.479 --> 1:08:30.760
<v Speaker 2>harassment of any kind as a result of having on

1:08:30.840 --> 1:08:33.759
<v Speaker 2>the base of the Washington Monument that Trump had betrayed

1:08:33.760 --> 1:08:37.800
<v Speaker 2>the country. And by the way, I'm going to do

1:08:37.880 --> 1:08:41.599
<v Speaker 2>it again. You know, the next time he drives really

1:08:41.640 --> 1:08:43.559
<v Speaker 2>really pisses me off, I'm going to do it again.

1:08:43.840 --> 1:08:47.000
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not afraid of being arrested because in fact,

1:08:47.040 --> 1:08:47.240
<v Speaker 2>by the.

1:08:47.240 --> 1:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Way, projecting images though. I mean this is I learned

1:08:50.920 --> 1:08:54.479
<v Speaker 1>this with GW when we were dealing GW was dealing

1:08:54.520 --> 1:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>with the with the the gods of protesters, and there

1:08:58.040 --> 1:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>was nothing they could do. They couldn't claim the thing

1:09:00.320 --> 1:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>was being defined because it was a projection.

1:09:03.360 --> 1:09:06.320
<v Speaker 2>This is why I use projectors, and I do it

1:09:06.360 --> 1:09:09.360
<v Speaker 2>on the Russian embassy, you know, project Ukrainian flags on

1:09:09.360 --> 1:09:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the Russian embassy. And so it's a it's a technique

1:09:12.240 --> 1:09:15.840
<v Speaker 2>of protests that I've used a lot. But here's the

1:09:15.880 --> 1:09:19.400
<v Speaker 2>thing is, in police states, you don't get to project

1:09:19.479 --> 1:09:23.400
<v Speaker 2>that the president betrayed the country within sight of the president,

1:09:24.640 --> 1:09:27.040
<v Speaker 2>and you don't get to put your name on it

1:09:27.120 --> 1:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and expect to be left alone.

1:09:29.360 --> 1:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Right you haven't. You haven't been audited yet from the

1:09:31.360 --> 1:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I R S. We'll see what well, well, I'll ask

1:09:33.720 --> 1:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you again in September.

1:09:34.760 --> 1:09:39.639
<v Speaker 2>So am I concerned? Yes? Do I think people are

1:09:40.640 --> 1:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>being a bit too hasty to catastrophize the concern? Yeah?

1:09:45.960 --> 1:09:50.600
<v Speaker 2>And look, when I get arrested for uh for this

1:09:50.760 --> 1:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of activity or get you know, I'll announce it

1:09:53.400 --> 1:09:55.320
<v Speaker 2>when I have an I R S audit, you know.

1:09:56.800 --> 1:10:00.439
<v Speaker 2>And so I I do think there's still a lot

1:10:00.479 --> 1:10:03.639
<v Speaker 2>of room to do political organizing in the United States.

1:10:03.640 --> 1:10:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And I do think by the way, that Donald Trump

1:10:06.000 --> 1:10:09.320
<v Speaker 2>is likely to get shull ACKed in the next midterms.

1:10:09.560 --> 1:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I do too, which.

1:10:11.120 --> 1:10:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Again dictators don't really let themselves do. So I don't wanna.

1:10:17.920 --> 1:10:21.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to confuse the concern for a sense

1:10:21.760 --> 1:10:24.840
<v Speaker 2>that we don't have anything left to fight over.

1:10:25.600 --> 1:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>That's essentially an answer, a form of an answer I

1:10:30.439 --> 1:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>heard from Condi Rice who basically said, you know, our

1:10:34.760 --> 1:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>democracy is pretty ingrained in the people itself, and how

1:10:38.400 --> 1:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>these things that it's going to be. One person can

1:10:41.000 --> 1:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of harm there, but it's really hard

1:10:46.240 --> 1:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>for one person to rip out the entire fabric of

1:10:48.640 --> 1:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the nation in one turn.

1:10:51.200 --> 1:10:54.439
<v Speaker 2>I agree with that, but I also don't think we

1:10:54.479 --> 1:10:59.800
<v Speaker 2>should be complacent about it. And you know, and I

1:10:59.800 --> 1:11:04.080
<v Speaker 2>think the erosion itself is awful. And look and your

1:11:04.240 --> 1:11:07.200
<v Speaker 2>if your answer, if your question had been focused on

1:11:07.960 --> 1:11:12.840
<v Speaker 2>are we still a place where uh, you know, people

1:11:12.840 --> 1:11:15.120
<v Speaker 2>who are not citizens of the United States, or.

1:11:15.080 --> 1:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>We're not a beacon anymore, I would have given you

1:11:18.800 --> 1:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a very different answer. No, no, no, no. The you know,

1:11:21.160 --> 1:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we're a beacon of freedom and a

1:11:23.040 --> 1:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>beacon of new the beacon got turned off. We are

1:11:26.920 --> 1:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>not you know, nobody is saying come here, we're a

1:11:28.960 --> 1:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>safe haven. I mean, you know. And by the way,

1:11:31.760 --> 1:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I always constantly have to remind people the Constitution constitutional

1:11:36.479 --> 1:11:40.519
<v Speaker 1>rights are for anybody in the on the in the

1:11:41.680 --> 1:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>United States, whoever's in the United States, you get some

1:11:45.280 --> 1:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>constitutional protection, not all of it, but a lot of it.

1:11:49.160 --> 1:11:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, although you know less than you did four

1:11:53.840 --> 1:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>months ago.

1:11:55.560 --> 1:11:58.519
<v Speaker 1>And well, you know, just counting on the courts not

1:11:58.720 --> 1:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to erode that away, right.

1:12:00.280 --> 1:12:02.839
<v Speaker 2>And well, but you know those are if you're a

1:12:02.920 --> 1:12:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Palestinian sympathetic student on a student visa or you're on

1:12:07.720 --> 1:12:11.080
<v Speaker 2>a green card, you have less rights than you may

1:12:11.120 --> 1:12:13.960
<v Speaker 2>have thought you did four months ago. And so I

1:12:14.080 --> 1:12:17.240
<v Speaker 2>want to be I want to be careful to acknowledge

1:12:17.280 --> 1:12:20.639
<v Speaker 2>the degree of erosion and not say it's all fine,

1:12:21.040 --> 1:12:23.760
<v Speaker 2>but also not to say things like we're not a

1:12:23.800 --> 1:12:30.639
<v Speaker 2>democracy anymore, or you know, we're we've slid into authoritarianism. Yeah,

1:12:30.640 --> 1:12:33.360
<v Speaker 2>we may be sliding, but we're still pretty high up

1:12:33.400 --> 1:12:33.880
<v Speaker 2>on the hill.

1:12:34.479 --> 1:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>So I got a lot of you know, I'm new

1:12:36.400 --> 1:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to this. I've had my podcast has been audio only

1:12:39.160 --> 1:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>up until the last couple of weeks. So I'm new

1:12:40.800 --> 1:12:43.519
<v Speaker 1>to this world of YouTube. So I'm going to make

1:12:43.560 --> 1:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you answer a question that I know some viewers are

1:12:45.840 --> 1:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>going to say, what are you sitting in? Tell us

1:12:48.479 --> 1:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>about your tell us about your backdrop? What do you say?

1:12:50.920 --> 1:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>So I do all my my zoom meetings from what

1:12:55.200 --> 1:12:59.519
<v Speaker 2>I call the Hammock Studio, and uh if I I mean.

1:12:59.479 --> 1:13:03.799
<v Speaker 1>You should name your production company that EMI Studios.

1:13:03.160 --> 1:13:05.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, so something hang on, let me let me

1:13:05.280 --> 1:13:10.559
<v Speaker 2>pull up my I can I can zoom out so

1:13:10.640 --> 1:13:14.280
<v Speaker 2>you can see the whole thing. And uh, it's.

1:13:14.120 --> 1:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>A special treat for check podcast viewers.

1:13:16.160 --> 1:13:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. I don't do this for just anybody. I

1:13:20.439 --> 1:13:24.439
<v Speaker 2>built this studio in the in the pandemic, and I

1:13:24.600 --> 1:13:29.400
<v Speaker 2>just said, you know, if I'm gonna uh uh it

1:13:29.439 --> 1:13:29.920
<v Speaker 2>wants to.

1:13:29.960 --> 1:13:32.519
<v Speaker 1>Upload, it's not zooming.

1:13:32.600 --> 1:13:35.599
<v Speaker 2>Huh yeah, I guess it's not. It's not working.

1:13:35.760 --> 1:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So basically you're sitting in a hammock. Not necessarily in

1:13:39.920 --> 1:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a hammock.

1:13:40.479 --> 1:13:43.320
<v Speaker 2>You can see, Yeah, it's a it's a it's a

1:13:43.360 --> 1:13:48.160
<v Speaker 2>handmade hammock with a Ukrainian flag hanging on it, made

1:13:48.400 --> 1:13:53.519
<v Speaker 2>in in Latvia and I bought it on on Etsy

1:13:53.600 --> 1:13:55.760
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning of the pandemic, because I said, if

1:13:55.800 --> 1:13:57.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be stuck in this little room for

1:13:57.840 --> 1:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the next I thought it was three months. It turns

1:14:00.080 --> 1:14:02.920
<v Speaker 2>that to be tweens. I'm going to be in a hammock.

1:14:03.840 --> 1:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, look a hammock. Hopefully that's all you're going to

1:14:07.960 --> 1:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>be in. The government's not going to.

1:14:10.280 --> 1:14:12.919
<v Speaker 2>Try to create hanging from something else.

1:14:12.840 --> 1:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Not going to be trying to create a different type

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of of incarceration for us. Mister Whittis. I appreciate you

1:14:21.080 --> 1:14:26.479
<v Speaker 1>going through this. It's I do think my biggest concern

1:14:26.479 --> 1:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>about all these lawsuits is that the public isn't paying

1:14:28.800 --> 1:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention right and that in some ways

1:14:32.120 --> 1:14:36.519
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration is counting on counting on the idea

1:14:36.560 --> 1:14:43.519
<v Speaker 1>that that unpopular people, unpopular people are going to get

1:14:43.520 --> 1:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>defended by the left because like they're comfortable violating the

1:14:48.120 --> 1:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>constitutional rights of unpopular people and think they can get

1:14:52.360 --> 1:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>away with it. And it's a really it's a disturbing pattern.

1:14:56.600 --> 1:15:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and especially so because they are doing it by

1:15:03.320 --> 1:15:05.759
<v Speaker 2>It would be one thing if they were taking people

1:15:05.800 --> 1:15:12.439
<v Speaker 2>who were had genuinely done things that were objectionable and

1:15:12.640 --> 1:15:18.200
<v Speaker 2>demonizing them. But some of the people that they're going after,

1:15:18.439 --> 1:15:22.080
<v Speaker 2>they've gone after so randomly that they then have to

1:15:22.320 --> 1:15:26.280
<v Speaker 2>concoct these kind of legends about them, that they were

1:15:26.360 --> 1:15:29.920
<v Speaker 2>gang members or that they're terrorists or whatever. And they

1:15:30.200 --> 1:15:33.720
<v Speaker 2>often have very little basis for saying these things. And

1:15:33.760 --> 1:15:37.880
<v Speaker 2>so the gay makeup artist with a tattoo becomes a

1:15:38.120 --> 1:15:41.840
<v Speaker 2>scary gang member and the and there's a fair bit,

1:15:41.960 --> 1:15:44.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, speaking of defamation, there's a fair bit of

1:15:44.760 --> 1:15:50.440
<v Speaker 2>simple defamation going on there. And you know, you compound

1:15:51.160 --> 1:15:54.479
<v Speaker 2>locking people up in a salvador in gulag with lying

1:15:54.520 --> 1:15:55.080
<v Speaker 2>about them.

1:15:55.680 --> 1:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it's a put it this way, I understand

1:16:00.080 --> 1:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and why some people feel that this is a catastrophic

1:16:04.760 --> 1:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>moment because in individual cases it's absolutely appalling and alarming.

1:16:09.920 --> 1:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think what you're trying to preach, and what

1:16:11.920 --> 1:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to preach is sort of, look, this is bad.

1:16:16.800 --> 1:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>It could be worse, and the goal should be to

1:16:20.760 --> 1:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>stop this so that it doesn't get worse.

1:16:23.360 --> 1:16:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and also to not confuse this. Look Kilmar Abrego

1:16:30.120 --> 1:16:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Garcia was not deported to a salvator in prison because

1:16:34.880 --> 1:16:39.240
<v Speaker 2>he was doing political organizing or expressing his opinions or

1:16:40.720 --> 1:16:45.559
<v Speaker 2>denouncing the treatment of others. He was deported as best

1:16:45.560 --> 1:16:48.439
<v Speaker 2>as I can tell, because he was looking for work

1:16:48.479 --> 1:16:51.840
<v Speaker 2>in a home depot parking lot with some people who

1:16:51.880 --> 1:16:55.240
<v Speaker 2>turned out to be members of a gang and he

1:16:55.280 --> 1:17:00.360
<v Speaker 2>got scooped up. So if it's randomly coming for you, uh,

1:17:01.840 --> 1:17:04.559
<v Speaker 2>there's not that much you can do about that. And

1:17:05.400 --> 1:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>it's not coming for you because you're giving to political

1:17:08.920 --> 1:17:12.760
<v Speaker 2>candidates or because you're raising your voice and objection. And

1:17:12.800 --> 1:17:16.719
<v Speaker 2>so you know what I'm saying is, don't confuse the two.

1:17:17.000 --> 1:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>We can all still do our parts. And the purpose

1:17:20.120 --> 1:17:22.320
<v Speaker 2>of all of this is to scare you, so don't

1:17:22.400 --> 1:17:22.720
<v Speaker 2>let it.

1:17:23.920 --> 1:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, people are going to be looking for you and

1:17:25.880 --> 1:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>your projector around Washington, DC, so it'll be fun to

1:17:28.400 --> 1:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>look for you. It's where's Waldo. We'll be looking for

1:17:31.320 --> 1:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the projector.

1:17:32.200 --> 1:17:34.680
<v Speaker 2>You can always find me in front of the Russian Embassy.

1:17:34.760 --> 1:17:39.080
<v Speaker 2>And these days, just below the south lawn of the

1:17:39.120 --> 1:17:42.839
<v Speaker 2>White House, that mound that they put the Washington Monument

1:17:42.960 --> 1:17:46.080
<v Speaker 2>on makes a great, great spot to project.

1:17:46.520 --> 1:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Weather's great today too.

1:17:49.280 --> 1:17:50.479
<v Speaker 2>Look for me Sunday evening.

1:17:50.840 --> 1:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Well there you go, all right, that's an interesting Uh.

1:17:54.560 --> 1:17:57.759
<v Speaker 1>This is actually going to drop right after Sunday evening.

1:17:57.880 --> 1:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So if that does happen. I will let let my

1:18:01.360 --> 1:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>listeners know, mister wet it's a pleasure, Thank you, sir,

1:18:04.840 --> 1:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you. So look, we're gonna wait to see what

1:18:13.000 --> 1:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>does the Supreme When does the Supreme Court go a

1:18:15.920 --> 1:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit harder? Right, they didn't order the return of Garcia,

1:18:20.520 --> 1:18:23.559
<v Speaker 1>they ordered the government to make an effort to bring

1:18:23.640 --> 1:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>him back. So we are still the Roberts Court still

1:18:27.439 --> 1:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>seems to be tiptoeing to the moment that there is

1:18:31.760 --> 1:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be a there's certainly going to be some

1:18:34.720 --> 1:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>constitutional confrontation. Perhaps it's over the FED Chair. I mean

1:18:38.720 --> 1:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear Donald Trump go after the FED Chair for

1:18:42.200 --> 1:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially trying to do his job and trying to If

1:18:44.720 --> 1:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>he tries to upend the independence of the FED Chair,

1:18:49.560 --> 1:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>not only could he creator the economy quicker and faster

1:18:53.280 --> 1:18:56.599
<v Speaker 1>and certainly cause all sorts of disruption there, but that

1:18:57.080 --> 1:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>probably and if I were to if the Roberts Court,

1:19:01.080 --> 1:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>knowing Roberts, I think he would be willing to draw

1:19:03.040 --> 1:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a line in the sand over the FED before he

1:19:06.080 --> 1:19:07.599
<v Speaker 1>might be willing to draw a line in the sand

1:19:07.640 --> 1:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>over immigration policy. I know that sounds very cynical of me,

1:19:11.200 --> 1:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think when it comes to the economy. I

1:19:15.200 --> 1:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>think he would see potentially more cover in that. Maybe

1:19:18.080 --> 1:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>there'd be more Republicans willing to stand by a Supreme

1:19:22.680 --> 1:19:26.599
<v Speaker 1>Court decision that pushed back on any effort to other

1:19:26.640 --> 1:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>president to try to fire fire pals simply because Powell's

1:19:30.080 --> 1:19:34.759
<v Speaker 1>not not bowing down to him and following the policy

1:19:34.760 --> 1:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that he wants at the FED rather than what the

1:19:38.240 --> 1:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Fed governors believe is in the best interest.

1:19:40.280 --> 1:19:40.879
<v Speaker 2>In the country.

1:19:42.439 --> 1:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>With that, I do want to just do one quick

1:19:46.360 --> 1:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>sports wine if I could, and my sports wine is

1:19:49.200 --> 1:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the NATS bullpen. Why why why can't this? There seems

1:19:56.200 --> 1:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a systemic problem in the NATS organization when

1:19:59.720 --> 1:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to pitching coaching. For whatever reason, we can't

1:20:03.280 --> 1:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>develop good relievers. We have a half decent time at development,

1:20:07.479 --> 1:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps we're just scouting. I don't know if it's

1:20:09.760 --> 1:20:12.479
<v Speaker 1>one of two things. Either we only care about finding

1:20:12.520 --> 1:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers. The experience of the twenty nineteen World Series

1:20:17.520 --> 1:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>led our front office to believe relief pittures don't matter

1:20:22.040 --> 1:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>because you just use your best pictures once you get

1:20:23.960 --> 1:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to the playoffs. But guess what, you need to get

1:20:25.840 --> 1:20:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to the playoffs, and you need to have functional bullpen

1:20:28.400 --> 1:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to do that, or maybe we have owners that are

1:20:30.760 --> 1:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>just too cheap and are not giving them whatever it is,

1:20:33.400 --> 1:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it's an embarrassment. This is a young team. They deserve

1:20:35.960 --> 1:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance to win. When you have a bullpen where

1:20:39.160 --> 1:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you're not even trying, and you may not even have

1:20:41.320 --> 1:20:45.519
<v Speaker 1>professional baseball players in that bullpen, then you do. You're

1:20:45.560 --> 1:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>not forget the fans, You're not supporting those young teammates.

1:20:48.920 --> 1:20:52.839
<v Speaker 1>You're only messing with their confidence. So get it together

1:20:53.040 --> 1:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>front office, Mike Rizzo and the learners and figure out

1:20:56.920 --> 1:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>either is it coaching and you just need to improved coaching.

1:21:00.080 --> 1:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I certainly wish we had Mike Maddocks back as our

1:21:01.960 --> 1:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>pitching coach. Or are we just being cheap? Either way,

1:21:06.600 --> 1:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you're being unfair to this organization that is still only

1:21:10.120 --> 1:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>six years removed from a world championship. All right. See,

1:21:13.080 --> 1:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the joy of having your own of having

1:21:18.280 --> 1:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>your own podcast. You can ran about pretty much anything

1:21:21.240 --> 1:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you want, as long as it doesn't, you know, totally

1:21:26.320 --> 1:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>set the entire enterprise off the rails. So there's my

1:21:29.360 --> 1:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>little Nats rant for the weekend. Because I love James Wood.

1:21:34.479 --> 1:21:37.559
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see this guy get a chance to win,

1:21:37.760 --> 1:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'd like to see the franchise put a winner

1:21:40.040 --> 1:21:42.519
<v Speaker 1>around it. All right, So with that, I wish I

1:21:42.720 --> 1:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>could have enjoyed the Nats winning this weekend, but I

1:21:45.680 --> 1:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>couldn't because of this awful bullpen. We had a nice

1:21:48.439 --> 1:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>holiday weekend, beautiful weather, and I had to watch that.

1:21:52.600 --> 1:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Come on, people, all right, joy the NBA playoffs. Those

1:21:57.000 --> 1:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to be a lot of fun until we

1:21:58.840 --> 1:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>uploaded them. Hey,