1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:04,040 Speaker 1: We've been talking a lot about this this January sixth Committee. 2 00:00:04,120 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: You know, we've basically been out there alone playing the 3 00:00:07,600 --> 00:00:11,639 Speaker 1: words of President Trump and Mark meadows In, Cash Patel, 4 00:00:12,360 --> 00:00:17,800 Speaker 1: and the acting Defense Secretary at the time, Chris Miller, 5 00:00:18,600 --> 00:00:22,239 Speaker 1: all of them corroborating, all of them confirming the Donald 6 00:00:22,239 --> 00:00:29,240 Speaker 1: Trump on January fourth, twenty one, actively, as required by law, 7 00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:34,360 Speaker 1: authorized the calling up of up to twenty thousand National 8 00:00:34,400 --> 00:00:39,240 Speaker 1: Guard troops to protect the capital, knowing large crowds were coming, 9 00:00:39,320 --> 00:00:42,000 Speaker 1: knowing there's always bad apples and crowds, knowing we came 10 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:44,280 Speaker 1: off a summer of what five hundred and seventy four 11 00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:49,080 Speaker 1: riots and thousands of cops injured, dozens of Americans dead, 12 00:00:49,080 --> 00:00:52,600 Speaker 1: and billions of property damage. Anyway, so here you have 13 00:00:52,640 --> 00:00:57,320 Speaker 1: a hearsay witness Cassidy Hutchinson relaying, you know, a story 14 00:00:57,520 --> 00:01:00,800 Speaker 1: told to her now denied by a Secret Service agent, 15 00:01:01,160 --> 00:01:05,800 Speaker 1: that in fact, Donald Trump tried to commandeer the Beast 16 00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:08,319 Speaker 1: or with the SUV or whatever vehicle he happened to 17 00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:11,360 Speaker 1: be in when he was driving back to the West 18 00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:14,160 Speaker 1: Wing because he wanted the Secret Service to take him 19 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:17,679 Speaker 1: to the Capitol. This is part of the testimony from 20 00:01:17,760 --> 00:01:21,399 Speaker 1: Cassidy Hutchinson. She claimed that this note written on January 21 00:01:21,440 --> 00:01:24,600 Speaker 1: six is her handwriting, and as we've been saying, the 22 00:01:24,640 --> 00:01:28,320 Speaker 1: president's attorney at the time, Hershman says, no, that's my handwriting. 23 00:01:28,880 --> 00:01:31,120 Speaker 1: Miss Hutchinson. Could you look at the exhibit that we're 24 00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:35,360 Speaker 1: showing on the screen now, have you seen this note before? 25 00:01:36,040 --> 00:01:38,280 Speaker 1: That's a note that I wrote at the direction of 26 00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:41,920 Speaker 1: the Chief of Staff on January six, likely around three o'clock, 27 00:01:42,520 --> 00:01:44,959 Speaker 1: and it's written on a Chief of Staff note card. 28 00:01:44,959 --> 00:01:49,400 Speaker 1: But that's your handwriting, Miss Hutchinson, that's my handwriting. Hirshman 29 00:01:49,800 --> 00:01:53,560 Speaker 1: is accusing her of lying, saying the note was actually 30 00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:57,680 Speaker 1: written by him. And by the way, others looked at 31 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:01,400 Speaker 1: the handwriting and said it is Hershman. Now you would 32 00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:03,280 Speaker 1: think that the committee wants to get to the bottom 33 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:05,480 Speaker 1: of it. They just said, no, we have confidence in 34 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:08,600 Speaker 1: her recollection. Well, we can find out whatever happened to 35 00:02:08,600 --> 00:02:13,359 Speaker 1: follow the science. There is a science to handwriting analysis. 36 00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:17,520 Speaker 1: There is an NBC News story that Biden plans to 37 00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:20,600 Speaker 1: use the January sixth Committee hearing to make the case 38 00:02:20,639 --> 00:02:25,000 Speaker 1: against Trump. Liz Cheney on Foxnews dot Com won't commit 39 00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:29,360 Speaker 1: to having the Secret Service agents who contradicted this woman, 40 00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:35,440 Speaker 1: Cassidy Hutchinson testify publicly. She dismissed the Secret Service claims 41 00:02:35,440 --> 00:02:39,640 Speaker 1: out on the other hand, that Cassidy Hutchinson's Trump assault 42 00:02:39,800 --> 00:02:42,760 Speaker 1: allegation is false. Well, it's nice of her to say, 43 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:45,080 Speaker 1: but why don't we hear from the agents themselves. They 44 00:02:45,120 --> 00:02:48,920 Speaker 1: can clear things up pretty quickly and anyway, so she 45 00:02:49,320 --> 00:02:52,480 Speaker 1: had no interests apparently to get to the truth in this. 46 00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:57,560 Speaker 1: Both Mark Meadows and Rudy Giuliani have denied Cassidy Hutchinson's pardon, 47 00:02:57,680 --> 00:02:59,960 Speaker 1: claims that they want it or were seeking a part 48 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:03,200 Speaker 1: in some way. Louie Gomert has done the same thing 49 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:07,119 Speaker 1: as have others, and Democrats now are out there attacking 50 00:03:07,200 --> 00:03:15,560 Speaker 1: the Secret Service and their bid to salvage Cassidy Hutchinson's credibility. It's, 51 00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:18,079 Speaker 1: you know, the only fault that would be why why 52 00:03:18,120 --> 00:03:22,240 Speaker 1: didn't the January sixth Committee do simple due diligence and 53 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:25,560 Speaker 1: contact the Secret Service? Did this happen? Is this true? 54 00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:29,600 Speaker 1: Did Donald Trump try to commandeer you know, the car 55 00:03:29,720 --> 00:03:31,639 Speaker 1: that he was in at the time. Did that happen? 56 00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:34,800 Speaker 1: Did he assault one of the Secret Service agents? Not 57 00:03:34,920 --> 00:03:39,200 Speaker 1: difficult to ascertain. Bring in handwriting experts. That's not difficult 58 00:03:39,200 --> 00:03:42,560 Speaker 1: to ascertain and get to the truth of the matter. Anyway, 59 00:03:42,640 --> 00:03:45,800 Speaker 1: joining us now, Greg Jared, Fox News contributor, best selling 60 00:03:45,840 --> 00:03:50,120 Speaker 1: author his podcast as the Brief, Alan Dershowitz, attorney, Harvard 61 00:03:50,400 --> 00:03:54,800 Speaker 1: professor and anyway, welcome back both of you, back to 62 00:03:54,840 --> 00:03:59,320 Speaker 1: the program. Professor Dershwitz, let me start with you. You know, 63 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,360 Speaker 1: I'm just the person that believes in the presumption of 64 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:07,360 Speaker 1: innocence and the testimony of one person, be it under 65 00:04:07,400 --> 00:04:11,280 Speaker 1: oath or not, is not all that convincing to me, 66 00:04:11,520 --> 00:04:15,320 Speaker 1: especially when you have people almost immediately contradicting what was that. 67 00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:19,119 Speaker 1: I think it's worse than that. In my sixty years 68 00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:21,919 Speaker 1: of being a lawyer, I have never seen a case 69 00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:27,800 Speaker 1: where a lawyer puts on a hearstay witness without first checking, 70 00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:32,760 Speaker 1: first checking with the eyewitnesses and the earwitnesses before they 71 00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:36,719 Speaker 1: put on the hearstay witness. Here, there's no evidence at all. 72 00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:40,200 Speaker 1: That's a committee checked with the people in the car 73 00:04:41,279 --> 00:04:44,440 Speaker 1: before they put on this hearsay witness and then they 74 00:04:44,480 --> 00:04:51,039 Speaker 1: miss lazy American public by not producing the eyewitnesses and 75 00:04:51,120 --> 00:04:54,920 Speaker 1: the earwitnesses. They suppressed evidence. You know, if this were 76 00:04:54,960 --> 00:04:58,240 Speaker 1: a criminal case. These lawyers on the committee, including my 77 00:04:58,360 --> 00:05:04,599 Speaker 1: former student Jamie Raskin, would be disciplined for putting on 78 00:05:04,839 --> 00:05:09,240 Speaker 1: a hearsay witness without first checking with the eyewitnesses to 79 00:05:09,279 --> 00:05:11,880 Speaker 1: see whether this corroboration and if it's not, They had 80 00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:13,800 Speaker 1: an obligation to say to the public, we have this 81 00:05:13,920 --> 00:05:16,800 Speaker 1: hearsay witness. She says she heard this from the driver, 82 00:05:16,960 --> 00:05:20,000 Speaker 1: but the other people in the car disagree, and they 83 00:05:20,440 --> 00:05:22,680 Speaker 1: were there and they say it didn't happen. Now, you 84 00:05:22,839 --> 00:05:25,919 Speaker 1: the American public, judge. But to have this spectacle of 85 00:05:25,960 --> 00:05:29,320 Speaker 1: putting on this hearsay witness stating this thing, which the 86 00:05:29,360 --> 00:05:32,760 Speaker 1: Boston Globe says is the most dramatic moment in modern 87 00:05:32,839 --> 00:05:37,040 Speaker 1: presidential history. The grabbing of the wheel without even checking 88 00:05:37,400 --> 00:05:41,279 Speaker 1: in advance to see whether it's corroborated, is something unprofessional, 89 00:05:41,520 --> 00:05:43,760 Speaker 1: something I've never seen in my sixty years of experience. 90 00:05:43,880 --> 00:05:46,680 Speaker 1: But isn't it the same with many things, Professor, We 91 00:05:46,839 --> 00:05:49,960 Speaker 1: never saw three years worth of lying. Now it's been 92 00:05:50,000 --> 00:05:55,200 Speaker 1: totally debunked. This whole narrative about Trump Russia collusion, the 93 00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:59,599 Speaker 1: Alpha banks, Trump servers, and Trump power story debunked. The 94 00:05:59,680 --> 00:06:05,080 Speaker 1: dirty dossier completely debunked, that was the basis the foundation. 95 00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:09,720 Speaker 1: As FBI Deputy Director McCabe said, if there was no 96 00:06:09,880 --> 00:06:12,560 Speaker 1: dirty dossier that we know Hillary paid for, there would 97 00:06:12,600 --> 00:06:16,800 Speaker 1: be no faisal warrants. Nothing happened, Nobody was held accountable 98 00:06:16,839 --> 00:06:20,760 Speaker 1: for these things. The same people that without any evidence, 99 00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:23,640 Speaker 1: just dismissed in the weeks before the twenty twenty election 100 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:27,040 Speaker 1: hunter Biden's laptop. The people that claimed to care about 101 00:06:27,200 --> 00:06:30,159 Speaker 1: quid pro quos didn't care about Joe Biden bragging on 102 00:06:30,240 --> 00:06:34,480 Speaker 1: tape that he withheld a billion taxpayer dollars until Ukraine 103 00:06:34,480 --> 00:06:38,080 Speaker 1: fired a prosecutor that we know was investigating his son 104 00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:41,680 Speaker 1: who's paid millions that had no experience at all in 105 00:06:41,720 --> 00:06:46,000 Speaker 1: his own words, and oil gas, our energy at all 106 00:06:46,120 --> 00:06:49,159 Speaker 1: or Ukraine. So it seems to me that this double 107 00:06:49,200 --> 00:06:52,800 Speaker 1: standard exists quite often. Oh, there's no question about that. 108 00:06:53,000 --> 00:06:55,560 Speaker 1: And my favorite statement it was by my former student 109 00:06:55,640 --> 00:06:58,560 Speaker 1: jamie're asking who probably didn't come to class the day 110 00:06:58,640 --> 00:07:01,240 Speaker 1: we taught about crop ration, and they asked him, is 111 00:07:01,279 --> 00:07:04,960 Speaker 1: there any corroboration to this story? And his answer was sure, 112 00:07:05,680 --> 00:07:10,040 Speaker 1: she corroborated. She's the corroboration. Who's ever heard of it? 113 00:07:10,120 --> 00:07:14,760 Speaker 1: He's saying, witness corroborating herself when there is eyewitnesses. This 114 00:07:14,880 --> 00:07:17,600 Speaker 1: is what's called the best evidence rule. You present the 115 00:07:17,720 --> 00:07:20,760 Speaker 1: best evidence. You don't present the evidence that supports your 116 00:07:20,880 --> 00:07:24,520 Speaker 1: narrative if it's not the best evidence, and you corroborate 117 00:07:24,560 --> 00:07:27,280 Speaker 1: it first with the real evidence, and then if you 118 00:07:27,320 --> 00:07:30,040 Speaker 1: want to put on hearsay, if the judge allows you 119 00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:33,680 Speaker 1: to do it, to corroborate the actual evidence, that would 120 00:07:33,720 --> 00:07:35,840 Speaker 1: be a difference. But to use the hearsay as the 121 00:07:35,880 --> 00:07:39,760 Speaker 1: primary evidence without even checking, without even checking with the 122 00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:44,520 Speaker 1: eyewitnesses near witnesses, is utterly unprofessional. Well, I mean, that's 123 00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:46,559 Speaker 1: the point. And by the way, there are other people 124 00:07:46,600 --> 00:07:49,480 Speaker 1: that have come forward corroborating saying no, that's not that's 125 00:07:49,560 --> 00:07:53,640 Speaker 1: Hershman's handwriting, not hers. Greg, Jared, let's get your take 126 00:07:53,840 --> 00:07:57,200 Speaker 1: overall on this whole spectacle. I agree with every word 127 00:07:57,280 --> 00:07:59,120 Speaker 1: that Professor durs Who had said, and I know you 128 00:07:59,160 --> 00:08:01,240 Speaker 1: have a lot to add to it. Well, I agree 129 00:08:01,280 --> 00:08:04,960 Speaker 1: with the professor absolutely. You know, I watched this testimony 130 00:08:05,120 --> 00:08:10,200 Speaker 1: unfold live and I laughed. It was such a preposterous 131 00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:15,000 Speaker 1: story of what allegedly happened in the SUV and in 132 00:08:15,080 --> 00:08:19,560 Speaker 1: my experience, you know, story stunt sounds too fantastic or 133 00:08:19,600 --> 00:08:23,960 Speaker 1: outlandish to be true. It's usually not true. And here, 134 00:08:24,600 --> 00:08:30,559 Speaker 1: you know, Cassie Hutchinson in her testimony pretended in many ways, 135 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:33,560 Speaker 1: the tone and tenor and the way she told those stories, 136 00:08:33,559 --> 00:08:36,640 Speaker 1: she was sort of pretending she was inside that suv 137 00:08:36,720 --> 00:08:41,400 Speaker 1: and she wasn't. She was wandering a story that had 138 00:08:41,400 --> 00:08:48,200 Speaker 1: gone through multiple individuals. A guy told a guy, Tony Hornado, 139 00:08:49,679 --> 00:08:53,120 Speaker 1: who told her, and she repeats it in front of 140 00:08:53,120 --> 00:08:57,160 Speaker 1: this in front of national television. You know, at minimum 141 00:08:57,200 --> 00:09:00,920 Speaker 1: it's a triple hearsay, which is a horse and it's 142 00:09:00,960 --> 00:09:05,720 Speaker 1: probably quadruple hearsay because we're not actually sure of Ornado's 143 00:09:05,880 --> 00:09:11,360 Speaker 1: original original source because he wasn't in the suv. And 144 00:09:11,520 --> 00:09:14,199 Speaker 1: in a court of law, as you've pointed out, Sean, 145 00:09:14,480 --> 00:09:19,560 Speaker 1: this would never be allowed. It's absurdly unreliable, and it's 146 00:09:19,600 --> 00:09:25,160 Speaker 1: irresponsible and blatantly reckless for Liz Chaney and the other 147 00:09:25,200 --> 00:09:29,280 Speaker 1: members of the committee to peddle this story which is 148 00:09:29,440 --> 00:09:33,600 Speaker 1: multiple hearsay, without, as the professor points out, first checking 149 00:09:33,600 --> 00:09:37,559 Speaker 1: with those who were inside the suv. But this is 150 00:09:37,600 --> 00:09:41,559 Speaker 1: what you get with a highly partisan Trump painting committee 151 00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:46,439 Speaker 1: making no effort to be fair or even honest, and 152 00:09:46,840 --> 00:09:50,000 Speaker 1: Pelosi undermined the credibility of her own committee when she 153 00:09:50,080 --> 00:09:54,400 Speaker 1: refused to seat members picked by Republicans who might have 154 00:09:54,679 --> 00:10:02,000 Speaker 1: actually engaged in challenging cross examination. That scores exactly what 155 00:10:02,040 --> 00:10:05,679 Speaker 1: I just said. You know, I mentioned Professor Trump Prussia 156 00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:07,880 Speaker 1: collusion that went on for three years. I mentioned the 157 00:10:07,920 --> 00:10:12,120 Speaker 1: dirty Dossie. I mentioned the Thaiso Warrens. I mentioned Hunter 158 00:10:12,200 --> 00:10:16,280 Speaker 1: Biden's laptop. I mean, the list is pretty long, and 159 00:10:16,679 --> 00:10:19,720 Speaker 1: I think Greg just nailed it is this is a 160 00:10:19,760 --> 00:10:22,520 Speaker 1: committee that has had a predetermined outcome from the beginning. 161 00:10:23,400 --> 00:10:25,480 Speaker 1: I'm not sure if you're aware of it, but on 162 00:10:25,559 --> 00:10:28,480 Speaker 1: January fourth, I've interviewed four of the five people in 163 00:10:28,520 --> 00:10:31,920 Speaker 1: the Oval Office with Donald Trump, Donald Trump, Mark Meadows, 164 00:10:32,800 --> 00:10:35,000 Speaker 1: Cash Patel, who was the chief of staff of the 165 00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:38,080 Speaker 1: Acting Secretary of Defense, Chris Miller. All four of them 166 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:43,400 Speaker 1: have told me on tape on video that in fact 167 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:46,160 Speaker 1: that they were there when Donald Trump authorized up to 168 00:10:46,160 --> 00:10:49,959 Speaker 1: twenty thousand troops. I wasn't able to interview General Milly, 169 00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:52,040 Speaker 1: the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, but I got in 170 00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:55,920 Speaker 1: contact with somebody close to him who did confirm that 171 00:10:56,120 --> 00:11:00,760 Speaker 1: General Milly had conversations about capital security before January sixth, 172 00:11:01,679 --> 00:11:04,200 Speaker 1: that he's abroad, he's been traveling. Isn't that time to 173 00:11:04,200 --> 00:11:07,679 Speaker 1: do an interview? So that's almost five out of five, 174 00:11:07,720 --> 00:11:09,880 Speaker 1: we'll say four and a half out of five. My 175 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:12,640 Speaker 1: question is, why isn't the committee brought that up? And 176 00:11:12,880 --> 00:11:15,760 Speaker 1: when they selectively edit the tapes that they're playing, how 177 00:11:15,800 --> 00:11:18,240 Speaker 1: come they keep out the line of President Trump that said, 178 00:11:18,280 --> 00:11:21,040 Speaker 1: many of you will peacefully and patriotically march to the 179 00:11:21,080 --> 00:11:24,200 Speaker 1: Capitol so your voices will be heard. You know, this 180 00:11:24,280 --> 00:11:26,559 Speaker 1: is a bigger issue. It goes beyond this committee. It's 181 00:11:26,559 --> 00:11:29,960 Speaker 1: the whole woke, radical left. That's the way they approach 182 00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:33,520 Speaker 1: cases on college campuses. Somebody's accused of something, we don't 183 00:11:33,520 --> 00:11:37,280 Speaker 1: need we don't need evidence, we don't need corroboration. We 184 00:11:37,360 --> 00:11:39,679 Speaker 1: don't need proof, or we need it as an allegation. 185 00:11:39,760 --> 00:11:43,839 Speaker 1: The allegation confirms itself. It's the way of the new left, 186 00:11:44,040 --> 00:11:48,800 Speaker 1: woke McCarthyism. They know the truth. Do process be damned, 187 00:11:49,320 --> 00:11:54,040 Speaker 1: free speech be damn, confrontation be damn. It's the whole approach. 188 00:11:54,440 --> 00:11:57,520 Speaker 1: I hear it today on college campuses all over the country. 189 00:11:57,640 --> 00:12:00,720 Speaker 1: I see it in the media. CNN does it all 190 00:12:00,760 --> 00:12:04,800 Speaker 1: all the time. They put on one side, they don't 191 00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:08,880 Speaker 1: have any hard questions of their side. And so what 192 00:12:08,880 --> 00:12:12,840 Speaker 1: we're seeing in the januarys Committee is the culmination of 193 00:12:12,880 --> 00:12:16,040 Speaker 1: a several year process. You mentioned one part of the process, 194 00:12:16,080 --> 00:12:18,240 Speaker 1: but the other part of the process is doing a 195 00:12:18,320 --> 00:12:20,559 Speaker 1: way with due process. Because if you if you know 196 00:12:20,720 --> 00:12:23,720 Speaker 1: capital the truth, if you know the truth, if you 197 00:12:24,200 --> 00:12:27,480 Speaker 1: believe in your narrative, why do you need dissenting views? 198 00:12:27,640 --> 00:12:30,680 Speaker 1: What do you need due process? Why do you need confrontation? 199 00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:33,839 Speaker 1: Just listen to the witnesses you put forward and don't 200 00:12:34,000 --> 00:12:37,160 Speaker 1: question them. That's the way of the new Left, and 201 00:12:37,240 --> 00:12:40,040 Speaker 1: that has to be attacked, that has to be contructed. 202 00:12:40,720 --> 00:12:43,640 Speaker 1: Click break Moore with Greg Jarrett. Moore with Professor Dershwitz 203 00:12:43,720 --> 00:12:45,440 Speaker 1: on the other side. The eight hundred nine four one 204 00:12:45,480 --> 00:12:46,840 Speaker 1: shun is a number if you want to be a 205 00:12:46,840 --> 00:13:04,480 Speaker 1: part of the program. Would continue with Professor Alan Dershowitz 206 00:13:04,720 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: and Box News League anelists Greg Jarrett. So what's the 207 00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:11,200 Speaker 1: answer to this, Greg Jarrett, I think the Professor's onto 208 00:13:11,240 --> 00:13:14,160 Speaker 1: something that has spiral way out of control and getting 209 00:13:14,160 --> 00:13:18,360 Speaker 1: worse every day. Well, I you know the only answer, 210 00:13:18,440 --> 00:13:22,199 Speaker 1: there's no stopping this committee, Jean, and the only answer 211 00:13:22,440 --> 00:13:26,679 Speaker 1: is for Americans to express their outrage over it at 212 00:13:26,679 --> 00:13:30,000 Speaker 1: the ballot box in the upcoming in November elections. I mean, 213 00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:34,199 Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy has made it abundantly clear that he is 214 00:13:34,600 --> 00:13:38,080 Speaker 1: has already sent out a bunch of letters preserving demanding 215 00:13:38,120 --> 00:13:41,520 Speaker 1: they preserve evidence. He'll send out more, and I think 216 00:13:41,559 --> 00:13:45,160 Speaker 1: he will look squarely at what this committee has done. 217 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:49,240 Speaker 1: You know, what goes around comes around, and you know 218 00:13:49,320 --> 00:13:54,199 Speaker 1: this is a but McCarthy will make sure that whatever 219 00:13:54,360 --> 00:13:58,240 Speaker 1: investigative committee looks into this will be fair and will 220 00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:04,439 Speaker 1: be balanced with Democrat appointed members of that committee. That's 221 00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:07,520 Speaker 1: how it should be, you know. And as for the 222 00:14:07,559 --> 00:14:12,400 Speaker 1: rest of Hutchinson's testimony, it is not a presidential conspiracy 223 00:14:12,760 --> 00:14:16,439 Speaker 1: to incite violence or seditious conspiracy to want to get 224 00:14:16,520 --> 00:14:20,040 Speaker 1: rid of magnetometers at the rally, or demanding to go 225 00:14:20,160 --> 00:14:22,920 Speaker 1: down to the Capitol building, or even throwing a fit. 226 00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:28,080 Speaker 1: For God's sakes. Presidential tantrums maybe unseemly, they're not uncommon. 227 00:14:28,160 --> 00:14:33,200 Speaker 1: Bill Clinton was famous for his epic temper tantrums. Lyndon Johnson, 228 00:14:33,480 --> 00:14:38,440 Speaker 1: even George Washington and Abraham Lincoln through famously angry fits. 229 00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:43,480 Speaker 1: So let's get over this self righteous indignation. I can't 230 00:14:43,520 --> 00:14:46,040 Speaker 1: think of a president that there haven't been reports of 231 00:14:47,200 --> 00:14:50,360 Speaker 1: anger of a president, can you, Professor, they're shorts. We 232 00:14:50,400 --> 00:14:53,200 Speaker 1: have about thirty five seconds. No, when I spoke on 233 00:14:53,240 --> 00:14:55,560 Speaker 1: the floor of the Senate, I said, every single president 234 00:14:55,560 --> 00:14:58,880 Speaker 1: of the United States has been accused of abusive power, 235 00:14:58,920 --> 00:15:02,640 Speaker 1: obstruction of co risk, all of these things. That the 236 00:15:02,800 --> 00:15:07,920 Speaker 1: double standard is now being applied to one particularly controversial president. 237 00:15:08,000 --> 00:15:10,000 Speaker 1: It's not about him. It's about the future of the 238 00:15:10,040 --> 00:15:12,640 Speaker 1: country and the future of the constitution. No matter what's 239 00:15:12,680 --> 00:15:15,440 Speaker 1: are you're on politically, if you believe in civil liberties, 240 00:15:15,520 --> 00:15:17,720 Speaker 1: you have to be opposed to this committee and what 241 00:15:17,880 --> 00:15:21,360 Speaker 1: the hard left is doing to do process in our constitution. Well, 242 00:15:21,400 --> 00:15:23,120 Speaker 1: if you listen to the rest of the media, they've 243 00:15:23,160 --> 00:15:29,880 Speaker 1: taken everything that every even hearsay witnesses the gospel truth. Anyway, 244 00:15:29,920 --> 00:15:32,840 Speaker 1: Thank you both, Professor Dershwitz, Thank you, Greg Jared, Thank you. 245 00:15:32,920 --> 00:15:34,880 Speaker 1: Eight hundred nine four one. Sean, if you want to 246 00:15:34,920 --> 00:15:37,360 Speaker 1: be a part of the program, quick break right back. 247 00:15:49,320 --> 00:15:51,960 Speaker 1: You are listening to the best of the Sean Hannity shop, 248 00:15:54,680 --> 00:15:59,640 Speaker 1: holding them accountable. Sean gets the answers no one else 249 00:16:00,800 --> 00:16:06,480 Speaker 1: America desserts and know the truth about Congress twenty five 250 00:16:06,560 --> 00:16:08,440 Speaker 1: to the top of the hour. Eight hundred nine one 251 00:16:08,440 --> 00:16:10,000 Speaker 1: seawn is our number. You want to be a part 252 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:12,800 Speaker 1: of the program. So we just went over everything that 253 00:16:12,960 --> 00:16:17,040 Speaker 1: Cassidy Hutchinson claimed. You know, she claims the note written 254 00:16:17,040 --> 00:16:21,680 Speaker 1: on January sixth is her handwriting. Former Trump attorney attorney 255 00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:26,280 Speaker 1: at the time, Eric Kirshman claims, No, that's my writing, 256 00:16:26,480 --> 00:16:28,920 Speaker 1: and he's had other people confirmed, Yeah, that looks like 257 00:16:28,960 --> 00:16:31,400 Speaker 1: his handwriting. Now, if the committee wanted to get to 258 00:16:31,400 --> 00:16:33,520 Speaker 1: the truth of it, and they've shown no indication they do, 259 00:16:33,600 --> 00:16:37,240 Speaker 1: they could easily bring in handwriting experts that would probably 260 00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:40,000 Speaker 1: very quickly ascertain whether or not it was her handwriting 261 00:16:40,080 --> 00:16:43,080 Speaker 1: or Hershman's handwriting. Not that hard to do. We know 262 00:16:43,200 --> 00:16:46,800 Speaker 1: she made the claim, Donald Trump, you assaulted the Secret 263 00:16:46,800 --> 00:16:49,200 Speaker 1: Service agents because they wouldn't take him to the Capitol 264 00:16:49,240 --> 00:16:51,360 Speaker 1: because they told him it was not safe after he 265 00:16:51,400 --> 00:16:54,680 Speaker 1: gave his speech on January sixth. Well, he according to 266 00:16:54,920 --> 00:16:58,480 Speaker 1: NBC and ABC and pretty much every news service out there, 267 00:16:59,400 --> 00:17:04,600 Speaker 1: we now know the two Secret Service workers officers are 268 00:17:04,640 --> 00:17:08,480 Speaker 1: denying what was said, denying that testimony. Now, as Channey 269 00:17:08,520 --> 00:17:12,080 Speaker 1: won't commit public testimony of these two secret service agents. 270 00:17:12,119 --> 00:17:14,439 Speaker 1: Why not. I'm sure they'll say, well, we don't want to, 271 00:17:14,720 --> 00:17:16,679 Speaker 1: we don't want to ruin their career. They'll come up 272 00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:21,480 Speaker 1: with some answer. But to me, the biggest, the most 273 00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:27,719 Speaker 1: exculpatory evidence that debunks and shatters the entire narrative of 274 00:17:27,760 --> 00:17:31,800 Speaker 1: this committee with their predetermined outcome, is what happened on 275 00:17:31,880 --> 00:17:35,119 Speaker 1: January fourth in the Oval Office. There were five people 276 00:17:35,160 --> 00:17:38,400 Speaker 1: in the Oval Office, President Trump, his chief of Staff 277 00:17:38,520 --> 00:17:43,879 Speaker 1: Mark Meadows, the Acting Secretary of Defense Chris Miller, and 278 00:17:44,000 --> 00:17:46,960 Speaker 1: his chief of staff, Cash Patel, and the Chairman of 279 00:17:46,960 --> 00:17:49,920 Speaker 1: the Joint Chiefs, and that would be General Milly. Now, 280 00:17:50,240 --> 00:17:52,760 Speaker 1: out of that group of five, the only one I 281 00:17:52,800 --> 00:17:55,960 Speaker 1: have not interviewed on this is General Millie. I did 282 00:17:56,000 --> 00:17:58,959 Speaker 1: get in contact with people close to the General and 283 00:17:59,000 --> 00:18:00,960 Speaker 1: they were able to confirm and for me that, in fact, 284 00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:05,480 Speaker 1: the General recalls conversations with the President then President Trump, 285 00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:11,120 Speaker 1: prior to January sixth about safety issues involving the capital. 286 00:18:11,200 --> 00:18:14,600 Speaker 1: They confirmed that to me. Now the other four have 287 00:18:14,960 --> 00:18:19,160 Speaker 1: said no, they were there, and Donald Trump authorized as 288 00:18:19,160 --> 00:18:21,800 Speaker 1: many as twenty thousand troops to be called up to 289 00:18:21,840 --> 00:18:24,440 Speaker 1: protect the Capitol. I'll land one thing before I play it, 290 00:18:24,680 --> 00:18:27,280 Speaker 1: and that is that there was a full investigation by 291 00:18:27,280 --> 00:18:31,920 Speaker 1: the Inspector General about the Department of Defenses handling of 292 00:18:32,000 --> 00:18:36,119 Speaker 1: things on January sixth, and they were cleared of any 293 00:18:36,160 --> 00:18:41,000 Speaker 1: wrongdoing whatsoever. And of course, remember Muriel Bowser is on 294 00:18:41,119 --> 00:18:44,960 Speaker 1: record rejecting the National Guard to be called up. After 295 00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:48,679 Speaker 1: the President, as required by law, authorizes the troops to 296 00:18:48,720 --> 00:18:51,760 Speaker 1: be called up, the jurisdiction to actually call them up 297 00:18:51,880 --> 00:18:54,359 Speaker 1: is not his. That would go to Nancy Pelosi, who's 298 00:18:54,359 --> 00:18:57,280 Speaker 1: in charge of security at the House of Representatives at 299 00:18:57,280 --> 00:19:00,520 Speaker 1: the Capitol, and that would be the jurisdiction of DC 300 00:19:00,720 --> 00:19:04,080 Speaker 1: mayor Muriel Bowser. And none of these people have been 301 00:19:04,080 --> 00:19:06,679 Speaker 1: called in. No testimony has been given. Why didn't you 302 00:19:06,720 --> 00:19:08,720 Speaker 1: call up the troops? Did you know that the president 303 00:19:08,760 --> 00:19:11,639 Speaker 1: had authorized the troops? And it gets even deeper, but 304 00:19:12,040 --> 00:19:15,399 Speaker 1: to me, this totally blows out of the water this narrative. 305 00:19:15,440 --> 00:19:19,560 Speaker 1: Donald Trump wanted an insurrection. Donald Trump pushed for an insurrection. 306 00:19:19,800 --> 00:19:22,080 Speaker 1: Donald Trump also said, many of you will peacefully and 307 00:19:22,119 --> 00:19:25,119 Speaker 1: patriotically march to the capital so your voices will be heard. 308 00:19:25,440 --> 00:19:28,959 Speaker 1: And all they're editing, and they're dicing and slicing of 309 00:19:29,000 --> 00:19:32,239 Speaker 1: their predetermined narrative. I don't see that they played that 310 00:19:32,320 --> 00:19:36,160 Speaker 1: part once, nor are they paying any attention to these 311 00:19:36,200 --> 00:19:39,359 Speaker 1: four people that are corroborating Donald Trump authorized the Guard. 312 00:19:39,640 --> 00:19:42,760 Speaker 1: It'd be pretty interesting that he wanted an uprising to 313 00:19:42,800 --> 00:19:47,080 Speaker 1: take place at a time when he himself is trying 314 00:19:47,119 --> 00:19:51,000 Speaker 1: to protect the capital. Doesn't seem particularly consistent with that 315 00:19:51,160 --> 00:19:53,520 Speaker 1: narrative that they had from day one. Here's what they 316 00:19:53,560 --> 00:19:57,040 Speaker 1: said to me, did you authorize calling up the Guard? 317 00:19:57,560 --> 00:20:01,320 Speaker 1: And then it became chain of command went to Nancy 318 00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:05,239 Speaker 1: Pelosi and to the Mayor of DC, Muriel Bowser, did you, 319 00:20:05,640 --> 00:20:12,840 Speaker 1: as required by law, authorize that one? And attested to 320 00:20:13,000 --> 00:20:16,800 Speaker 1: by many people, and they turned it down. Nancy Pelosi 321 00:20:16,840 --> 00:20:21,080 Speaker 1: turned it down. Mayor Bowser's written refusal the communications between 322 00:20:21,119 --> 00:20:24,320 Speaker 1: the leader of the Capitol Police and their chain of 323 00:20:24,359 --> 00:20:28,679 Speaker 1: command to the DoD refusing our request to allow National 324 00:20:28,720 --> 00:20:31,640 Speaker 1: guardsmen and women to stage on January four and five 325 00:20:31,720 --> 00:20:35,000 Speaker 1: before January six? Did you both asked for the National 326 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:38,320 Speaker 1: Guard to be called up? Without a doubt? Sean, We've 327 00:20:38,320 --> 00:20:41,960 Speaker 1: made that very clear, not just once, but on numerous occasions. 328 00:20:42,320 --> 00:20:44,560 Speaker 1: We wanted to make sure that there was plenty of 329 00:20:45,000 --> 00:20:48,200 Speaker 1: National Guard on the ready in case there was some 330 00:20:48,280 --> 00:20:51,400 Speaker 1: kind of violence. I had a meeting with President Trump 331 00:20:51,440 --> 00:20:55,960 Speaker 1: on the third of January concerning some international threats, and 332 00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:58,600 Speaker 1: at the very end he asked if there were any 333 00:20:58,920 --> 00:21:02,320 Speaker 1: requests for national guards supported. What was the President's response 334 00:21:02,359 --> 00:21:05,320 Speaker 1: to you with regards to the request made by Mayor 335 00:21:05,359 --> 00:21:08,960 Speaker 1: Bowser phill It and do whatever was necessary to protect 336 00:21:09,119 --> 00:21:13,199 Speaker 1: the demonstrators. One of the people in that room was 337 00:21:13,280 --> 00:21:16,399 Speaker 1: Kash Patel. He's the former Pentagon Chief of Staff. By 338 00:21:16,440 --> 00:21:19,240 Speaker 1: the way, he's also the author of a number one 339 00:21:19,359 --> 00:21:24,120 Speaker 1: New York Times bestselling children's book, The Plot Against the King, which, 340 00:21:24,119 --> 00:21:27,720 Speaker 1: by the way, does talk about January sixth, and it 341 00:21:27,800 --> 00:21:32,679 Speaker 1: says his inspiration to writing fairy tales for kids based 342 00:21:32,680 --> 00:21:36,320 Speaker 1: on reality working the Trump administration. Not only is it 343 00:21:36,320 --> 00:21:39,200 Speaker 1: funny for parents, but it's true and it also gives 344 00:21:39,280 --> 00:21:41,359 Speaker 1: life lessons for kids. So it's a great book and 345 00:21:41,440 --> 00:21:43,280 Speaker 1: you can get it at Amazon dot com. We'll put 346 00:21:43,320 --> 00:21:46,320 Speaker 1: a link on Hannity dot com and in bookstores everywhere. 347 00:21:46,880 --> 00:21:49,520 Speaker 1: Cash welcome back to the program. Hey Sean, thanks so 348 00:21:49,640 --> 00:21:52,400 Speaker 1: much for having me. So is it a true statement 349 00:21:52,480 --> 00:21:56,960 Speaker 1: that both you and then acting Secretary of Defense Chris 350 00:21:57,000 --> 00:22:01,040 Speaker 1: Miller told the January sixth Committee under oath that in fact, 351 00:22:01,040 --> 00:22:03,760 Speaker 1: you were in the room when Donald Trump authorized calling 352 00:22:03,840 --> 00:22:07,920 Speaker 1: up up to twenty thousand troops or whatever is necessary 353 00:22:07,920 --> 00:22:11,240 Speaker 1: to use Chris Miller's words to protect the capital two 354 00:22:11,280 --> 00:22:14,960 Speaker 1: days before January sixth. It's percent true. And if you're 355 00:22:15,040 --> 00:22:17,320 Speaker 1: if you're any of the audience or listeners doesn't want 356 00:22:17,320 --> 00:22:19,760 Speaker 1: to believe in the precrety of Chris Miller, twenty six 357 00:22:19,880 --> 00:22:22,880 Speaker 1: year Army veteran career official, or myself with sixteen years 358 00:22:22,880 --> 00:22:26,200 Speaker 1: in government working for Democrats and Republicans alike, how about 359 00:22:26,200 --> 00:22:30,200 Speaker 1: you believe the deafening silence from General Billy, who has 360 00:22:30,200 --> 00:22:33,719 Speaker 1: sought in his career to leak investigations and sensitive materials 361 00:22:33,760 --> 00:22:36,080 Speaker 1: to the media and give book interviews and tell the 362 00:22:36,160 --> 00:22:38,320 Speaker 1: Chinese counterparts that he would give him a heads up 363 00:22:38,520 --> 00:22:41,880 Speaker 1: during the Trump administration should we decide to attack them, 364 00:22:42,119 --> 00:22:45,080 Speaker 1: he would have Is there any paper trail that confirms 365 00:22:45,119 --> 00:22:49,399 Speaker 1: this that may have General Milly's signature, Honor, There's a 366 00:22:49,440 --> 00:22:52,720 Speaker 1: massive amount of documentation that I requested the January sixth 367 00:22:52,720 --> 00:22:55,240 Speaker 1: community to go get. Not only is there emails between 368 00:22:55,240 --> 00:22:57,679 Speaker 1: myself and him and the Office Secretary of event and 369 00:22:57,760 --> 00:23:00,840 Speaker 1: the chairman talking about the troop deployment in there, because 370 00:23:00,880 --> 00:23:03,159 Speaker 1: that's what it takes to mobilize them at the DoD. 371 00:23:03,560 --> 00:23:06,000 Speaker 1: But there's a delegation memo at the Department of Defense, 372 00:23:06,000 --> 00:23:09,720 Speaker 1: which specifically General Millie signed, stating that the Secretary of 373 00:23:09,720 --> 00:23:12,760 Speaker 1: the Army, who the National Guard reports too, is given 374 00:23:12,800 --> 00:23:15,879 Speaker 1: the delegation authority from the Secretary of Defense to deploy 375 00:23:15,920 --> 00:23:19,080 Speaker 1: the National Guard troops as seemed to fit. Because President 376 00:23:19,080 --> 00:23:22,639 Speaker 1: Trump already gave that authorization, that memo is somehow lost 377 00:23:22,640 --> 00:23:24,960 Speaker 1: in the ether, and of course it's not being put out, 378 00:23:24,960 --> 00:23:27,160 Speaker 1: it's not being disputed. What I was saying by Millie. 379 00:23:27,600 --> 00:23:29,840 Speaker 1: I've not seen in these hearings that have been airing 380 00:23:29,880 --> 00:23:34,200 Speaker 1: publicly any mention of any of you, no mention whatsoever 381 00:23:34,600 --> 00:23:38,840 Speaker 1: of the President's authorization. And more importantly, I think the 382 00:23:38,840 --> 00:23:43,000 Speaker 1: fact that you four all remember the same thing would 383 00:23:43,000 --> 00:23:45,959 Speaker 1: compel the committee, especially if they didn't want something like 384 00:23:46,000 --> 00:23:47,960 Speaker 1: this to ever happen again. I certainly don't want it 385 00:23:48,000 --> 00:23:49,680 Speaker 1: to ever happen again. I don't want five hundred and 386 00:23:49,760 --> 00:23:51,879 Speaker 1: seventy four riots over the summer of twenty twenty to 387 00:23:51,920 --> 00:23:53,840 Speaker 1: ever happen again. Either. We need a committee for that. 388 00:23:54,400 --> 00:23:58,000 Speaker 1: But the reality is, you testified under oath before this committee, 389 00:23:58,080 --> 00:24:01,520 Speaker 1: under the threat of perjury, and they have never one 390 00:24:01,560 --> 00:24:04,840 Speaker 1: time mentioned nor have they gone to Nancy Pelosi, nor 391 00:24:04,880 --> 00:24:09,040 Speaker 1: have they gone to Muriel Bowser or the Sergeant at arms. Also, 392 00:24:09,160 --> 00:24:12,359 Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer's office received a note is my understanding on 393 00:24:12,440 --> 00:24:17,320 Speaker 1: January fifth with a very real specific threat picked up 394 00:24:17,359 --> 00:24:19,720 Speaker 1: by our intel community. I think he should be put 395 00:24:19,760 --> 00:24:21,760 Speaker 1: under oath. I think all of them should hand over 396 00:24:21,800 --> 00:24:25,040 Speaker 1: their text messages, their phone records, and their emails to 397 00:24:25,080 --> 00:24:28,200 Speaker 1: the committee. But that hasn't happened, has it. No. And remember, Sean, 398 00:24:28,240 --> 00:24:30,280 Speaker 1: I've been asking for my transcript, which I took in 399 00:24:30,359 --> 00:24:33,719 Speaker 1: December of last year, my deposition transcript, for its entirety 400 00:24:33,760 --> 00:24:35,399 Speaker 1: to be put out for the American public, and I 401 00:24:35,480 --> 00:24:37,879 Speaker 1: just went finally three weeks ago they let me review 402 00:24:37,920 --> 00:24:40,320 Speaker 1: my transfer with my attorney in the hopes that they 403 00:24:40,359 --> 00:24:42,520 Speaker 1: would be getting ready to release it. And the exhibits 404 00:24:42,520 --> 00:24:45,960 Speaker 1: that I just talked to you about them from the 405 00:24:45,960 --> 00:24:48,359 Speaker 1: Department of Defense, and the exhibits that I had to 406 00:24:48,480 --> 00:24:51,000 Speaker 1: enter for the January sixth committee because they failed in 407 00:24:51,040 --> 00:24:54,320 Speaker 1: getting this documentation. Those exhibits were somehow to left out 408 00:24:54,320 --> 00:24:56,800 Speaker 1: of my transcript, even though we formally under oath entered 409 00:24:56,840 --> 00:24:59,160 Speaker 1: them into the record for the American public to see 410 00:24:59,200 --> 00:25:02,360 Speaker 1: in the ASP the command why these documents were excluded 411 00:25:02,760 --> 00:25:05,080 Speaker 1: from the transcript and they said, oh, whoops, we forgot 412 00:25:05,280 --> 00:25:07,199 Speaker 1: So will you have an opportunity to go back and 413 00:25:07,240 --> 00:25:09,560 Speaker 1: review them? We did, and that's what we said. We said, 414 00:25:09,600 --> 00:25:11,600 Speaker 1: we are not signing off on this transcript until you 415 00:25:11,600 --> 00:25:14,120 Speaker 1: put these documents and these exhibits, and my lawyers put 416 00:25:14,160 --> 00:25:16,959 Speaker 1: in writing to the committee that they were committed, and 417 00:25:17,000 --> 00:25:19,560 Speaker 1: they did, and they did eventually give them to you. Well, 418 00:25:19,600 --> 00:25:21,720 Speaker 1: we don't know because they still won't put out my transcript. 419 00:25:21,840 --> 00:25:24,000 Speaker 1: We'll know once the transcript to that if the exhibits, 420 00:25:24,040 --> 00:25:25,840 Speaker 1: the documents that you and I are talking about are 421 00:25:25,840 --> 00:25:28,760 Speaker 1: in there because I entered them under oath before the committee, 422 00:25:28,760 --> 00:25:31,400 Speaker 1: before the staff, before the members of Congress to see 423 00:25:31,440 --> 00:25:34,399 Speaker 1: on a videotape deposition. So it's there, and if they 424 00:25:34,400 --> 00:25:36,920 Speaker 1: want to exclude it, we'll know they've been selectively excluding 425 00:25:37,000 --> 00:25:40,640 Speaker 1: material that you say, well, that's exculpatory evidence that this 426 00:25:40,680 --> 00:25:44,280 Speaker 1: is why, for example, with Cassidy Hutchinson, you don't allow 427 00:25:44,359 --> 00:25:47,760 Speaker 1: hearsay witnesses in a real court of law. If it 428 00:25:47,840 --> 00:25:51,480 Speaker 1: wasn't a sham committee with a predetermined outcome, there would 429 00:25:51,480 --> 00:25:54,640 Speaker 1: be some type of cross examination, people asking tough questions. 430 00:25:55,000 --> 00:25:57,720 Speaker 1: What was the level of interest you were in being 431 00:25:57,760 --> 00:26:00,359 Speaker 1: interviewed by this committee? What was the level of trust 432 00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:04,040 Speaker 1: in this aspect of things that Donald Trump authorized these 433 00:26:04,160 --> 00:26:07,399 Speaker 1: National Guard troops? Almost none. I spent six hours getting 434 00:26:07,400 --> 00:26:10,080 Speaker 1: interrogated by the January sixth committee. Less than an hour 435 00:26:10,240 --> 00:26:12,439 Speaker 1: was spent on January sixth. Less than a quarter of 436 00:26:12,480 --> 00:26:14,800 Speaker 1: that was spent on this conversation that you and I 437 00:26:14,840 --> 00:26:16,840 Speaker 1: are having in less than a fifth of that was 438 00:26:16,880 --> 00:26:20,320 Speaker 1: directly related to the hard evidence that shows the president 439 00:26:20,440 --> 00:26:23,440 Speaker 1: authorized National guardsmen and women two days before. They could 440 00:26:23,480 --> 00:26:26,359 Speaker 1: not have cared about that fact. They didn't want to 441 00:26:26,400 --> 00:26:28,600 Speaker 1: investigate it, and they didn't want it out there, and 442 00:26:28,640 --> 00:26:31,280 Speaker 1: so they just motored past it with talks of Afghanistan 443 00:26:31,720 --> 00:26:35,240 Speaker 1: and other talks about cheap political theater. So I don't 444 00:26:35,240 --> 00:26:37,760 Speaker 1: think this committee is focused on being the bringing the truth, 445 00:26:37,880 --> 00:26:41,600 Speaker 1: as was witnessed by the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson, who 446 00:26:41,680 --> 00:26:44,480 Speaker 1: was not anywhere near any of the people on or 447 00:26:44,600 --> 00:26:47,920 Speaker 1: around their events of January sixth, and her testimony as 448 00:26:47,920 --> 00:26:50,439 Speaker 1: you said, was never cross examined, so it was not 449 00:26:50,560 --> 00:26:53,360 Speaker 1: born out that she had no idea what was going 450 00:26:53,359 --> 00:26:55,720 Speaker 1: on in the president. They never even took the time 451 00:26:55,720 --> 00:26:59,359 Speaker 1: to ask the Secret Service about it. Foxnews dot Com 452 00:26:59,440 --> 00:27:01,960 Speaker 1: was reporting that Liz Cheney declined to comment on the 453 00:27:02,000 --> 00:27:06,359 Speaker 1: possibility of these Secret Service members testifying in front of 454 00:27:06,359 --> 00:27:10,640 Speaker 1: the January sixth committee after they disputed claims made by 455 00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:15,439 Speaker 1: Cassidy Hutchinson about form of President Trump's behavior in the 456 00:27:15,480 --> 00:27:19,800 Speaker 1: car that day, which apparently they've publicly disputed, not only publicly, Sean, 457 00:27:19,880 --> 00:27:21,840 Speaker 1: it goes one step further. I know Tony Ronado and 458 00:27:21,880 --> 00:27:24,560 Speaker 1: Bobby Agle. I served with them their career service members 459 00:27:24,560 --> 00:27:27,920 Speaker 1: of the Secret Service the military before that. They actually 460 00:27:28,000 --> 00:27:32,160 Speaker 1: testified months ago to the January sixth Committee, and that 461 00:27:32,240 --> 00:27:34,520 Speaker 1: was hidden from the entire public. No one has heard 462 00:27:34,560 --> 00:27:36,560 Speaker 1: about what they testified to and whether or not the 463 00:27:36,640 --> 00:27:39,680 Speaker 1: January six Committee bother to ask them about this revelation 464 00:27:39,760 --> 00:27:42,160 Speaker 1: from Kathody Hutchinson. They didn't even go to the Secret 465 00:27:42,240 --> 00:27:45,200 Speaker 1: Service knowing Kathy Hutchiston would come put out this fairy tale, 466 00:27:45,320 --> 00:27:47,000 Speaker 1: because they knew it would have been shut down by 467 00:27:47,040 --> 00:27:49,480 Speaker 1: the testimony they already have. And that's why they don't 468 00:27:49,480 --> 00:27:52,800 Speaker 1: want to entertain the thought of allowing two excellent Secret 469 00:27:52,800 --> 00:27:54,919 Speaker 1: Service agents to come and tell their world the truth. Oh, 470 00:27:55,000 --> 00:27:58,080 Speaker 1: We've got one other contradiction, and that is that the 471 00:27:58,119 --> 00:28:01,399 Speaker 1: President's attorney at the time, Hirshman, claims that it was 472 00:28:01,480 --> 00:28:05,320 Speaker 1: his handwriting that Cassidy Hutchinson claims as her handwriting. Now, 473 00:28:05,680 --> 00:28:08,840 Speaker 1: I think that's easily ascertained cash and that would be 474 00:28:09,040 --> 00:28:12,639 Speaker 1: follow the science. There are people that are phenomenal and 475 00:28:12,760 --> 00:28:16,920 Speaker 1: forensics handwriting experts. Wouldn't they be able to probably very 476 00:28:17,000 --> 00:28:20,480 Speaker 1: quickly determine whether or not it was her handwriting or Hirshman's. Well, 477 00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:22,200 Speaker 1: even if they don't want to believe the science behind 478 00:28:22,280 --> 00:28:24,920 Speaker 1: handwriting experts, let me just do this. Cassidy Hutchinson's was 479 00:28:24,960 --> 00:28:27,879 Speaker 1: his junior staff work. There is no documentation that she 480 00:28:27,920 --> 00:28:29,560 Speaker 1: would have been writing that would been forwarding to the 481 00:28:29,560 --> 00:28:32,560 Speaker 1: President speaking to any events on January sixth, because she 482 00:28:32,640 --> 00:28:36,080 Speaker 1: had no operational authority to do so. The President's attorney, 483 00:28:36,080 --> 00:28:38,280 Speaker 1: on the other hand, Pershman, who I worked as, would 484 00:28:38,280 --> 00:28:41,960 Speaker 1: be directly involved with engaging and creating documents to that effect. 485 00:28:42,000 --> 00:28:46,080 Speaker 1: So that's how the Whitehouse works, not by being reported 486 00:28:46,120 --> 00:28:49,600 Speaker 1: on by tales of fantasy from a junior staff work 487 00:28:49,680 --> 00:28:52,720 Speaker 1: quick break. We'll come back more with the former Pentagon 488 00:28:52,800 --> 00:28:55,800 Speaker 1: Chief of Staff. Cash Patel is also the author of 489 00:28:55,800 --> 00:28:58,160 Speaker 1: a new children's book, The Plot Against the King, number 490 00:28:58,160 --> 00:29:00,920 Speaker 1: one New York Times bestseller for kids, and you can 491 00:29:00,920 --> 00:29:04,040 Speaker 1: get it on Amazon dot com, Hannity dot com, bookstores, everywhere. 492 00:29:22,000 --> 00:29:24,760 Speaker 1: I would considue Cash Patello's with us former chief of 493 00:29:24,800 --> 00:29:28,960 Speaker 1: staff of the Department of Defense and the Secretary Chris Miller, 494 00:29:29,000 --> 00:29:32,160 Speaker 1: who was acting d D Secretary at the time. I 495 00:29:32,240 --> 00:29:34,080 Speaker 1: want to focus on two more things, and I've less 496 00:29:34,080 --> 00:29:37,800 Speaker 1: than two minutes. One is their documentation with General Milly 497 00:29:37,880 --> 00:29:41,120 Speaker 1: corroborating the story of the other four people in that 498 00:29:41,200 --> 00:29:43,920 Speaker 1: room on January fourth. There's a slew of emails and 499 00:29:44,000 --> 00:29:46,760 Speaker 1: memorandums in the Department of Defense which we demanded that 500 00:29:46,880 --> 00:29:50,040 Speaker 1: the January sixth Committee produced, and they failed that. Both 501 00:29:50,080 --> 00:29:52,680 Speaker 1: my name, Christopher Miller's name of Secretary of Defense, Chairman 502 00:29:52,720 --> 00:29:55,360 Speaker 1: Millie's name, and Secretary of the Army who the National 503 00:29:55,360 --> 00:29:57,440 Speaker 1: Guard report to do. All of our names are on 504 00:29:57,520 --> 00:30:02,880 Speaker 1: these delegation memos accompanying president authorization. Those memos would be unconstitutional, 505 00:30:03,040 --> 00:30:06,400 Speaker 1: unlawful if the president never authorized the National Guard, So 506 00:30:06,440 --> 00:30:08,560 Speaker 1: either everybody in the chain of command for the National 507 00:30:08,560 --> 00:30:11,440 Speaker 1: Command authority lied and broke the law, or we actually 508 00:30:11,520 --> 00:30:15,400 Speaker 1: followed a presidential authorization and the Inspector General of the 509 00:30:15,520 --> 00:30:19,120 Speaker 1: DoD under Joe Biden, didn't they do a full evaluation 510 00:30:19,440 --> 00:30:24,920 Speaker 1: and of the events of January sixth about the Department 511 00:30:24,920 --> 00:30:27,520 Speaker 1: of Defense is handling of events that day in the 512 00:30:27,600 --> 00:30:30,400 Speaker 1: lead up to that day, and didn't they give you 513 00:30:30,480 --> 00:30:32,720 Speaker 1: a clean bill of health that you did everything perfectly. 514 00:30:32,880 --> 00:30:34,960 Speaker 1: Not only that, they said the Department of Defense in 515 00:30:35,000 --> 00:30:37,320 Speaker 1: the lead up to and on January six acted without 516 00:30:38,080 --> 00:30:41,800 Speaker 1: undue delay, acted appropriately, acted swiftly, and abided by the 517 00:30:41,880 --> 00:30:44,760 Speaker 1: chain of command. That to me is the one thing 518 00:30:44,760 --> 00:30:46,720 Speaker 1: the January six commande should be focused on, because it 519 00:30:46,800 --> 00:30:49,840 Speaker 1: was Biden's Inspector General that confirmed that we were telling 520 00:30:49,840 --> 00:30:52,080 Speaker 1: the truth the entire time. But of course they don't 521 00:30:52,080 --> 00:30:54,320 Speaker 1: want to talk about that either. We supplemented the record 522 00:30:54,320 --> 00:30:57,040 Speaker 1: with the Biden DoD Inspector General report. By the way, 523 00:30:57,080 --> 00:30:59,320 Speaker 1: the January sixth Committee wouldn't even put it in to 524 00:30:59,440 --> 00:31:02,640 Speaker 1: the record. Yeah, they won't put these relevant things in, 525 00:31:02,760 --> 00:31:05,280 Speaker 1: but they'll put a Hannity text in there. Five hundred 526 00:31:05,360 --> 00:31:09,600 Speaker 1: thousand times, Cash Patel, thank you for sharing the story 527 00:31:09,640 --> 00:31:13,120 Speaker 1: with us. We deserve to see all those documents, every 528 00:31:13,120 --> 00:31:15,720 Speaker 1: one of them that you talked about, and I hope 529 00:31:15,720 --> 00:31:19,120 Speaker 1: in time, when Republicans hopefully win, there'll still be in existence. 530 00:31:19,480 --> 00:31:23,280 Speaker 1: They won't magically disappear with some sort of paper equivalent 531 00:31:23,360 --> 00:31:26,760 Speaker 1: to bleach pit. Anyway, Cash, thanks for being with us. 532 00:31:26,800 --> 00:31:29,600 Speaker 1: We appreciate it. Eight hundred Oh. By the way, don't 533 00:31:29,600 --> 00:31:32,120 Speaker 1: forget Cash's book, a new children's booked to Plot Against 534 00:31:32,160 --> 00:31:35,080 Speaker 1: the King. Amazon dot com, Hannity dot com, bookstores everywhere, 535 00:31:35,240 --> 00:31:38,000 Speaker 1: quick break right back. You are listening to the best 536 00:31:38,040 --> 00:31:41,640 Speaker 1: of the Sean Hannity Show, and stay tuned. More memorable moments, 537 00:31:41,720 --> 00:31:44,360 Speaker 1: interesting guests, and a lot of fun coming up next