WEBVTT - Private Market Investing Goes Mainstream

0:00:01.600 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>In his annual letter this year, Larry Fink, CEO of Blackrock,

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>said that investors should allocate up to twenty percent of

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>their savings into private assets. That advice from the world's

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>largest asset manager is quite a departure from the traditional

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty to forty stocks and bond portfolio. That kind of

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>advice may not have even been possible a decade ago, and.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 2>It highlights an interesting shift underway in investing where alternative

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 2>assets are slowly becoming more available to the average investor.

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>For a long time, these opportunities think infrastructure, private credit

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 2>where the exclusive domain of the super rich and big

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>institutions like pension funds and insurance companies. But new products

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 2>and technologies have been opening up this world for the

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 2>average person. This is what some people are calling the

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 2>democratization of investing.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>What's the state of play for this democratization. What are

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the new areas of private investment that individuals

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>should be aware of, and what are the risks such

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>as potentially low returns. You're listening to Asia Centric from

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence, and today we're speaking with someone who can

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>give us a view into how this landscape is evolving.

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>We're joined by Stephanie Un, head of Hong Kong for Endows,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it's an investment platform and advisor to more than two

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand individuals, family officers and institutions across Asia.

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>They connect investors to fund managers and they've got more

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>than seven billion dollars in client assets under management, including

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>four hundred million from private assets. Stephanie, welcome to the show.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me.

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie. For listeners, can you give us an idea of

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>how endows helps average investors connect with private asset opportunities?

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Sure? So, Endowser's name actually stands for endowment and the

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 3>best sting for all of us. We wanted to help

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 3>individual investors to be able to invest like an institution,

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 3>and we got our inspiration really from the Yale Endowment.

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 3>So for those of you guys know about Yale Endowment,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 3>probably know their founding CIO David Swinson, one of the

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 3>legendary investors of our times who passed away a few

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>years ago, but he was really the pioneer of sort

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 3>of advocating for as allocation and particularly including private assets

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 3>into investors portfolio. He famously talks about how a lot

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>of investors overpay for liquidity. So at the founding of Endawas,

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 3>we talked about how there is now kind of this

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>increasing interest to help individuals to demoketize into private markets.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>But it's actually at the very core the beginning of Endawas,

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 3>we actually really wanted to help clients to allocate like

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 3>an endowment fund, like a Yale endowment, because we believe

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 3>this is the sort of as allocation framework. Actually it's

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot more scientific for investors than just speculating and

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 3>punting on stocks. So in Dallas, this is the core

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 3>of our work. How do we help our clients to

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 3>allocate like an endowment fund, and it could be a

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>combination of public markets, private markets, alternatives and as sort

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>of we mentioned that the intro is really exciting that

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 3>previously a few years when we first started in Dallas,

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 3>we started until I was seventeen. At that time, we

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>actually couldn't really offer this yet. But in the past

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.839
<v Speaker 3>kind of eighteen months we've really been able to work

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 3>with a lot of fund managers to enable this to

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 3>really be able to realize this vision that we have

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 3>that helping individual investors to invest like an endowment fund.

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 2>So can you tell us a bit about the private

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 2>asset side. As John mentioned, you have about four hundred million.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 2>That's you know, a chunk of the seven billion, but

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>it's your fastest or one of the fastest growing areas.

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 2>So can you tell us about why that's such a

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>fast growing area and sort of why you're seeing a

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>lot more investors coming to you for that.

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so right now in Dallas, we offer our service

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 3>to Hong Kong and Singapore, and as you've rightly mentioned,

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 3>we see alternatives, including private markets and hedge funds the

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 3>fastest growing asset class on our platform. It has tripled

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>year on year to close to four hundred million in

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 3>terms of client assets. And I'd say for a lot

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>of clients there are a lot of reasons to why

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 3>they consider including private markets and alternatives into their portfolios.

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 3>But I would summarize three big reasons. The first and

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 3>it's also why we advocate our clients to consider most

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 3>important thing, I think it's helping clients to further diversify

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 3>their portfolios. I think all of us have experiences in

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 3>the past couple of years, especially twenty twenty two was

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 3>really something that a lot of people had soul searching

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>of the public markets, the correlation of different asset classes.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 3>The correlation really went up. You have public equities, public

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 3>bonds all went down double digits, so there was quote

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 3>unquote no place to hide. So clients are thinking, Okay,

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 3>how can I further diversify my portfolios to really strengthen

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the resilience. So private markets is a very broad term.

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 3>There are many sub asset classes. You have private equity,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 3>you have private credit, you have private real estate, and

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 3>increasingly there are different sub asset classes. We see new

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 3>innovations that you can invest in, like intellectual property royalties

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 3>from IP rights. Those are all very interesting asset classes

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 3>that were previously not available for individual investors. These kind

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 3>of sub asset classes do have less correlation to public markets,

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 3>so it really helps and make sense for investors as

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 3>they look to build a more diversified portfolio. And I

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 3>guess the second point I briefly touched upon, it's increasing

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 3>your investment universe. You can invest in things that are

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of out of touch if you just dip your

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 3>toes into public markets. Right, the largest private companies we've

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 3>all heard of, the SpaceX, the open AIP. You can

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>invest in these companies through the public markets in this

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 3>part of the world. There are also many familiar names,

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 3>the likes of Byedance, the parent of tektok. These are

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 3>all private companies and in fact, if you look at

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 3>the statistics, just look at the US right supposed to

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 3>be the most liquid market in the world already if

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>you look at the number of total companies with one

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 3>hundred million US revenue above, actually there are seven times

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 3>more private companies than public markets for clients to invest into.

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 3>And we've also seen this trend. Interestingly, since two thousand,

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the number of public companies has really start to decline

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 3>by almost half. So actually the investable universe for individual

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 3>investors if you just invest in public markets is shrinking.

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 3>And thirdly, obviously very important if you look at historical data,

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 3>no matter how you cut it, and for those of

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 3>us who study finance understand this concept of this illiquid

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 3>premium what Swinson said, a lot of people overpay for

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 3>liquidity by investing into private markets. Historically you've seen in

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 3>every of these subasset classes it does offer investors higher

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>risk adjusted returns. So, on top of those two reasons

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 3>that I mentioned about sort of potentially harnessing higher potential,

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 3>higher adjusted returns. Obviously it's also something very attractive to investors.

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 3>So I'd say many, many reasons, but those three reasons

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 3>are most compelling for a lot of investors to consider.

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>In private asset space. I mean, how much money do

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I need to have as a retail investor to invest

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>in something? And are we talking about things like you know,

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 2>toll roads in Brazil that pension funds invest in, or

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>are these different assets? Like who is actually able to

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 2>invest in this?

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 3>So we talked about democratization of private assets, but in

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 3>our industry is still very highly regulated industry. For a

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 3>lot of these private markets funds, even though we've quote

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>unquote democratized, there's still privy to what we call professional

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 3>investors or credit investors, so people with a certain net worth.

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 3>And even though we've worked very hard, for example, in Dallas,

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 3>we work very hard without for manager partners to lower

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 3>the investment minimum. Generally the investment minimum for these assets

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 3>are at one hundred thousand US dollars or above. But

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 3>the saving grace is.

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Not quite democratization yet.

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>It's still not main street, it's literally.

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 3>But everything is on a relative level. So historically even

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 3>the lowest, lowest if you go to a private bank.

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's say you're quote unquote ultra high networth individual. The

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 3>lowest probably it's two to three million US. So on

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 3>a relative basis, from two to three million US to

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 3>one hundred thousand, it's gone down quite a bit if

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 3>you do the math. But what's more interesting is historically

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 3>that two three million, it's just into one single product

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 3>in Dallas, and a lot of our clients, our core

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 3>client base, are fluent clients, early high network clients. What

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 3>would realize what they want? It's that beta exposure into

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 3>private markets. So I've never had access to private credit.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 3>I've never get access to private equity, not necessarily like

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 3>a professional institutional investor looking for alpha, like I am

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 3>looking at manager a vintage twenty and twenty that's the

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 3>best performing. But for a lot of clients it's their

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 3>first double into the asset class. They're okay with just

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 3>getting the beta, higher potential of res adjustice return. So

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 3>we were actually launching a lot of these what we

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 3>call funnel funds. So one hundred k US dollars, you

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 3>get a portfolio of private equity managers the likes of

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 3>your black Row, your ares, your KHR, and all into

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 3>one portfolio with your one hundred K check. So yes,

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 3>i'd agree it's not yet sort of average investor yet,

0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 3>but at least to a certain lower tier. Now you

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 3>can get a diversified exposure to these blue chip names

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 3>which I started out my career investment banking. These are

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 3>gps that I used to cover. I would really never

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 3>imagine that I could become an investor in these funds.

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think as a step.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Towards this, Asia Centric is produced by Bloomberg Intelligence. We're

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>more than five hundred experienced analysts and strategists work around

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the clock to bring you timely, world class research. Our

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>coverage spans two hundred market industries, currencies, commodities, and industries,

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>as well as over two thousand equities and credits. To

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>learn more about Bloomberg Intelligence, visit BI go on the

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal. If you like what you're hear, don't forget

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe and shair. What type of returns do you

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>think investors should be expecting in the private space?

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because in recent years the returns haven't necessarily been

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 2>as high as you know five six years ago.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'd say, going back to what I mentioned when

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 3>we advise clients to consider private markets. The number one

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 3>reason I always share with clients it's diversification, not necessarily

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 3>the returns, because no one can really guarantee the returns. Yes,

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 3>we look at historical numbers, the likes of private equity,

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>the likes of private credit. Historically the numbers have been

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 3>higher than public markets. But you never know at what

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 3>cycle you invest, And for example, in private equity, I'm

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 3>sure a lot of us are familiar with the term

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 3>different vintages, right, different vintages could also at different times

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 3>where you invest could also have a big impact on

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 3>your ultimate returns. So no matter how you cut the data,

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 3>there's definitely higher resuggested returns. And going back to what

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 3>John you mentioned earlier, I also find it super interesting

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 3>for Larry Think to have mentioned that fifty to thirty

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty allocation. And we've ran some numbers, including us including

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot of platforms for individual investors. I'm not talking about, okay,

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 3>making one specific bet on one private equity fund or

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 3>private credit fund. If you're looking at diversification and you

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 3>include a more kind of diversified private markets, you have

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 3>a bit of private equity, a bit of private realist

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 3>at a bit of prior credit into your portfolio and

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of include it in your sixty to forty portfolio.

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 3>If we're not looking at okay, you just happen to

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 3>invest in the top tier managers. But if you get

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 3>the general average returns overall, it improves against a sixty

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 3>to forty by one hundred to one hundred fifty basis point,

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 3>and it helps kind of lower the volatility also by

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty to thirty percent. So I think that's really interesting

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 3>and for Larry think right for him about fifteen twenty

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 3>years ago to make that big bet on ice shares

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 3>and really revolutionized and popularized index investing, for him to

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 3>really say, okay, the next thing is private markets. I

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 3>think it's it's quite powerful, and we are seeing a

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of these trends that he mentioned coming together.

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>And for the benefit of the listeners, Alarry thinks suggested

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that you should invest fifty percent in stocks, thirty percent

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in fixed income or bonds, and twenty percent in private assets.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 2>And I just got to ask, I mean, not to

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 2>put you up against Larry, I think, but do you

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 2>think that that twenty percent or that mix that John

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 2>just mentioned with twenty percent to private assets. Do you

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>think that's the right one?

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 3>So Eden, Dallas, we never give out any like sort

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 3>of okay, everyone should follow the same rule, because we

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 3>do think personal investing is something very personal to your

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 3>own circumstances. So for us, we definitely remind our clients

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 3>that there are reasons to why private markets historically has

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 3>only been sort of investable by institution investors or had

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 3>now worth individuals because it is indeed illiquid. So we

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 3>definitely would not advise our clients to invest their liquid

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 3>pocket or their sort of raining day money into private markets.

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 3>That's really not right. So it really depends on you

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 3>look at your needs, You look at your current wealth,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 3>how much of that wealth you can park away that's

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 3>for long term investing, And it most importantly has to

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>be matched against your risk appetite. Because finance one oh

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 3>one higher returns, you have to take higher risks, so

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 3>it is slightly more risky, particularly less liquidity in terms

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 3>of these investments. So I'd say for each individual investor,

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>it really depends. It could be as low as new

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I cannot afford to take any illiquid risk, or to

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 3>five percent, or to ten percent or to twenty percent.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 3>But I'd say probably unlikely one hundred percent. There must

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 3>there has to be a bit of your wealth that

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 3>you need to keep it liquid, So I'd say twenty

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 3>percent ballpark generically sounds right, but obviously each individual you

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 3>should do your own whole work.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Why now, like private equity has been around for a while,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>saying with infrastructure, private credit is a little bit new,

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>but hedge fund's investing has been around for a long time.

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>What's open the market to retail investors.

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 3>There's definitely that pull and push factor. So, as I mentioned,

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 3>in the past couple of years, we have had a

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 3>bit of volatility in the markets, and very famously, I

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 3>think in the industry people would know there's this denominator effect.

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 3>So historically these private markets and alternative investments have only

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 3>been accessible to institutional investors. And in the past couple

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 3>of years, for example, during COVID, the public markets really

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 3>dropped a lot. And because of that denominator. In fact,

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of large institutions how they invest. They have

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 3>a mandate and I target let's say thirty into private markets,

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 3>forty percent into public equities, and then the rest in

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 3>public bonds. And because when the public market bit dropped.

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 3>The private market bit is overexposed. It's really out of

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 3>wack of their target as allocation, so they have to sell.

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 3>And a lot of them fund managers, when they realize

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 3>their historical target clients need to all suddenly have to

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 3>sell all facing this problem, they need to find other

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 3>pockets of capital to take this demand. And this is

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of the push factor. The pull factor is what

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned. For a lot of individual investors, they're also

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 3>realizing there is this meriage for them to double their

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 3>tolls into as allocating into private markets. Of the three

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 3>reasons that I mentioned, and sort of these two factors

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 3>coming together, the industry realized, oh, there is that business

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 3>case that need to help enable individual investors to be

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 3>able to get access to that. So I'd say there

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 3>are two very important things that really help enabled individual

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 3>investors to gain access. One is the or the proliferation

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 3>of what we call evergreen semi liquid funds green semi

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 3>liquid funds. So historically for private markets, the only way

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 3>you can invest is what we called a close ended fund.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 3>So what big institutions, the softeign, well funds, the insurance company,

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 3>what they had to commit to a manager. It's Okay,

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll give you money and it gets locked up by

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 3>five to seven years, and you invest in market companies.

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 3>In the next five to seven years, I cannot redeem

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.479
<v Speaker 3>the capital, and in five to seven years you promise

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 3>to help return the capital. And there's also a nuance

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 3>that you commit a capital and then depends on when

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 3>the investment opportunity arise, then they would do capital calls.

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's kind of the traditional what we call locked

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 3>up structure close ended fund that you're completely locked up

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 3>for five seven years. I think for institutions, you have

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 3>professional teams to manage your cash flows, and it's accepted

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 3>that approach for a lot of individual investors. So our

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 3>circumstances changed, we might change jobs, we might be out

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 3>of jobs, we might enter into a different life stage.

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Five to seven years is a really long time. It's

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 3>quite difficult for individuals to be able to commit to

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 3>a close ended vehicle for five to seven years and

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 3>to manage that what we call quote unquote capital calls.

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 3>So when you get a capital call kind of email

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 3>from your fund manager, they'll be like, you committed to

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 3>write a check of X dollars and now I've identified

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 3>an investment opportunity. You need to wire the money to

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 3>meet in two weeks. If you have an investment team

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 3>or treasury team, yes you can do that. For individual investors,

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 3>you might be on holiday, you might be busy on

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 3>something is very difficult. So the industry realized that the

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 3>closed ended funds quite difficult for individuals to quote unquote

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 3>use as a vehicle. A fund manager that's very prominent

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 3>in kind of an innovator in the space, it's Partners Group,

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 3>Swisserland based private equity manager who first started this what

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 3>we call semi liquid open ended vehicle. When was that

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 3>it should be about more than ten years ago, but

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 3>it really only proliferated in the past couple of years.

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 3>Very interesting evergreen vehicle, meaning so usually for private closed

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.719
<v Speaker 3>ended funds it only has like a fun life of

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 3>five to seven years. Once it's done investing, it's wine down.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 3>But for evergreen, you don't have that. It's it's evergreen,

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 3>it's always there, it's always okay to take client moneies.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 3>And when I say semi liquid, it's not fully liquid.

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Usually the managers understand individuals they need some sleeves of

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 3>pocket of liquidity. So all these semi liquid vehicles. They

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 3>usually allow individuals to have some redemption kind of liquidity

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 3>on an intermittent basis, maybe on a quarterly basis, but

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 3>they do have gates because the underlying you're investing in

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 3>liquid assets. But they would then make sure that a

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 3>pocket of the underlying fund invests in some more liquid

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 3>assets to be able to honor these redemptions. So semi

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 3>liquid evergreen vehicles have really been proliferated and it's much

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 3>better investment vehicle for a lot of investors. And a

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of these evergreen vehicles are also very diversified mixed

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 3>vintages instead of previously for closed ended funds, you have

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 3>to pick. You might have very professional teams for professional

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 3>investors to pick the right vintage. So semil the quid funds,

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 3>it's definitely one and then the second bid. It's technology,

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 3>So thanks John for the introduction. For example, for in Dallas,

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 3>we are a hybrid platform where a lot of clients

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 3>can use our platform online and we serve over two

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty thousand clients and for us, we can

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 3>act as a aggregator for a lot of these fund managers.

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 3>So the managers we work with the likes of black Raw, KKR, CARLA.

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 3>Historically they serve the largest institution investors and they don't

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 3>want to have to build out an army to do

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 3>KYC on individual investors checking AML. So working with tech

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 3>platforms like ourselves to be able to connect with us

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 3>and we act as an aggregator and also personalizing that

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 3>advice for clients to make sure their funds are properly distributed.

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 3>It's also the reason. Yeah, so when we talk.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 2>About technology, we're literally talking about a platform.

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 3>Like in Dallas, including yes, definitely including in Dallas.

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 3>So I think for a lot of fund managers historically

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 3>they don't want to touch individuals because it's difficult to

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 3>have to educate all your average show one by one

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 3>in terms of what is private equity, what is private credit.

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 3>But through platforms like in Dallas, we help become the aggregator.

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 3>We use technology, use AI to help personalize that advice

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that the right allocation, the right advice

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.239
<v Speaker 3>gives to the right kind of end client. So that

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 3>gives confidence to these managers that oh, as she don't

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 3>have to worry that I have to deal with the

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and fifty thousand clients I have I just

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 3>have to deal with in daoas and they can help

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 3>me connect me to these individual pools of capital.

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 2>How do you use AI? You just mentioned that, I

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 2>think it's interesting.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean AI is something that's been around for

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 3>a really long time, and I think what recently been

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 3>exploded it's jen ai. But for us at En Dallas,

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 3>AI is really two things to what we call the

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 3>two E'SE one is efficiency and then the other one

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 3>is experienced And in this circumstance, I think most interesting

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 3>it's personalizing that advice to individuals because going back to

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 3>John's question, right, we don't think every client should get

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent as an allocation to power markets is really

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 3>different for everyone's circumstance. So how do I use AI

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 3>to ask the right questions to understand what exactly is

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 3>the right as allocation to our clients. We're constantly embedding

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 3>these elements onto our platform through interactions with clients to

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 3>help them come up to the right allocation.

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, so it would be like a chatbot or.

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, including a chatbot as well as for our human

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 3>client advisors, we also have AI bots that help very

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 3>quickly go through all the alternatives and product information to

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 3>be able to generate, let's say, answers comparisons for our

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 3>clients because a lot of these alternatives it's actually much

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 3>more complicated than say a money market fund and equity fund.

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 3>We don't have a standardized fact sheet. So actually a

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of these AI tools actually really helps us to

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 3>break down these very sophisticated documents. And it's really difficult

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 3>for our clients to read these documents. So how do

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 3>we leverage technology to help break down the knowledge barrier

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 3>to help clients to be able to understand and absorbed

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 3>and to find the right information to answer the questions.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 3>It's also something we find very very interesting.

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie, you mentioned that in endows is named after the

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>endowment investment philosophy, and you mentioned Yale University as well. Recently,

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>there's been some negative news like in particular, US university endowments,

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>who are heavily exposed to alternative investments, are looking to

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sell some of their private equity stakes. How should we

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>interpret these now? I know there's a bit of a

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>political element because the President Trump is threatening to reduce

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>some funding to US universities, But what's your take and

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>how should retail investors view this?

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. So I think this really goes back to how

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 3>much you allocate really depends on your circumstance, and the

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 3>circumstance these endowment funds have really changed. I think it

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 3>really makes sense. I mean, if their funding is getting

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 3>cut and all these endowments have a yearly expensive daily expenses,

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 3>they need to pay their staff, they need the liquidity,

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 3>then it makes sense for them to cut down on

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 3>their over exposure if now they need more liquidity, if

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 3>federal funding is not coming in retail investors, I'd say

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 3>is on the other spectrum. So we've seen some institutional investors,

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 3>including Yelle endowmen historically allocate close to fifty percent or

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 3>over fifty percent to part markets. But for individual investors

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 3>on a global scale, including high networth individuals, that average

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 3>exposure is about five percent, and I think in this

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 3>part of the world it's way lower than five percent.

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 3>It's probably zero points something. So we're under exposed. So

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a very very different situation. Those institutions

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 3>are overexposed, and they now probably need to think about

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 3>having well liquidity. Given John, you mentioned circumstances that they

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 3>are facing.

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie, I wanted to ask you a broader question, not

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>just limited to private assets, but there's been this big

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>push for investors to sell US assets. At the beginning

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of this year, everyone's talking about US exceptionalism. Everyone was

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>heavily exposed to US assets. Then we had this present

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump's tariff's potential trade war, and then you had this

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>like sell America trade. Did you see this in your data?

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 3>I think definitely we've seen client interests. Historically they have

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.239
<v Speaker 3>not asked about, oh, for this portfolio data invested in

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 3>how much what's the proportion that's geographical exposures to the US.

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 3>But obviously US is still the largest, most liquid market globally.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 3>We think it still has a role in clients investment portfolios.

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 3>And we also remind clients when you're investing for five years,

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 3>ten years, twenty years, you shouldn't act upon on overnight news.

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 3>You're not the professional trader. And I think the events

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 3>in the past couple of weeks, in the past months

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 3>also demonstrated sometimes newsflow can act very fast, but it

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 3>does make sense to have a diversified portfolio. Once again,

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 3>and in the past couple of years, there has just

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 3>been so many incidents to continuously remind clients of this point,

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 3>and since this is an Asia centric podcast, I think

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 3>and this happens with investors around the globe, but particularly

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 3>in Asia. We've seen Hong Kong and Singapore clients both

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 3>do have this home bias kind of. We see this

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot that their jobs already levered to the home market,

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 3>their properties levered to home market, and their investment portfolios

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 3>also over levered to their home market. And when the

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 3>home market goes south, it's double triple whammy impact, right,

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 3>So interestingly that it reminds clients that they should stay

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:06.360
<v Speaker 3>diver and interestingly for priate markets, because Asia, the prime

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 3>markets segment is still kind of in this nation state,

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the private markets opportunities and investment opportunities

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 3>tend to be in US and Europe. It's also part

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 3>of the reason why we see Asian investors interested in

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 3>getting exposure to private markets. So in this part of

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 3>the world, a lot of including us including parents, like

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 3>to buy property. Right, if a client has just sold

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 3>a few properties in this part of the world and

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 3>they've never invested in developed market property, maybe it makes

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 3>sense to invest in a private real estate fund ran

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 3>by a professional fund manager to diversify that real estate exposure.

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 3>So it's very interesting, particularly from an Asian centric perspective.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:54.239
<v Speaker 3>We've seen private markets also has its appealed to some

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Asian investors in terms of diversifying their underlying exposure.

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for joining us today, Stephanie.

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 2>You've been listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence. I'm

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Kaye Teedmitrieva in Hong Kong and.

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Lee, also in Hong Kong. You can find

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>all our episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen.

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And this podcast was also produced and edited by Clara

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Chen And thanks for listening.

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 2>See you next time.