WEBVTT - BrainStuff Classics: Can You Really Catch Up on Sleep?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff production of I Heart Radio. Hey

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>brain Stuff, Lauren bog Obam here with a classic episode

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>from the brain Stuff archives. This one was certainly a

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>relief to me. It's about a study that revealed that,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>although good sleep is always important, you can indeed catch

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>up on sleep by sleeping in on your days off.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll let previous Lauren explain. Hey brain Stuff, Lauren bog

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Obam here, good news for people who use their days

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>off as they are intended to rest up after a

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>busy week. It turns out those compensatory z s are

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>far more beneficial than previously thought, according to a Swedish

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>study published in in April issue of the Journal of

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Sleep Research. The study looked at more than forty three

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand people who participated in the Swedish National March cohort,

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>which began follow up for every subject continued until they died,

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>moved away, or to number when the study officially closed.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>The researchers for the sleep study pulled relevant data from

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the cohort questionnaire about basic sleep habits like how many

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hours approximately participants sleep on a workday night, as well

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>as how many hours they snooze per night on days

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>off of work response increments ranged from less than five

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>hours to greater than nine hours. Previous studies have shown

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that people who consistently sleep too little short sleep is

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>defined as five hours or less a night, or too

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>much long sleep is nine or more hours per night,

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>have higher mortality rates than people who fall into the

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Goldilocks zone in between getting just the right amount of

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 1>sleep every night. However, the authors of the study point

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>out that few, if any, of those studies have asked

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>participants to differentiate between week day and weekend sleep, which

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>makes a big difference, they wrote, in the current study,

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>because there are five week days and two weekend days,

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it is likely that self reports of typical sleep duration

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>more strongly reflect weekday sleep. Thus, it is of interest

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to investigate the relationship between weekend sleep duration and mortality,

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>as well as the different patterns of sleep duration between

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>week day and weekend sleep. When the researchers looked at

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>all of the data, findings were consistent with previous conclusions

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of increased mortality if both week day and weekend sleep

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are short or when both are long. However, they wrote,

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>when weekend sleep is extended after short weekday sleep, no

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>association with mortality is seen. We suggest that this may

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>reflect positive effects of compensatory sleep. Experts have long advised

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>people to get up at the same time each day,

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>even on weekends, as a long term strategy for getting

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>better sleep each night. The theory is that yo yoing

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>sleep habits disturb your circadian rhythms. Dr David Ding's was

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>not involved in this sleep study, but he's the chief

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Division of Sleep and Chronobiology at the University

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>of Pennsylvania Pearlman School of Medicine. He told Time Magazine,

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the real question is whether there is in fact a

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>build up of deficit or biological changes that are gradual

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>over time, even though you get recovery sleep. So while

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this study is great news for those of us who

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>like to sleep in on days off, many sleep experts

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>say more studies need to be done on this subject.

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is based on the article Yes you can

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>catch up on your sleep exclamation point on how stuff

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com, written by Leah Hoyt. Brain Stuff is

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio in partnership with how stuff

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com, and it is produced by Tyler Clang.

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Perform more podcasts from my Heart Radio. Visit the I

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>heart radio, app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.