WEBVTT - Barbara Kahn Discusses the Retail Revolution (Podcast)

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have a special guest.

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Professor Barbara Con and she teaches retail

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and marketing at the Wharton School of Business. If you

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>are at all intrigued by the impact of not only

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazon on the worlds of retail, but how overbuilt retail is,

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and why it's inevitable that B and C class malls

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>would would go out, why so many retailers are failing

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep up, failing to compete, why it's inevitable that

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see a lot of these retailers go down,

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and how all these really interesting applications of data, analytics

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and technology is completely changing how retailers operate. Uh the

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>experiential aspect of it, the ability need to capture data

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in stores that previously only existed online is a very

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>very significant change, and the ramifications from that are going

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to be felt for quite a long while. With no

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>further ado, here is my conversation with Professor Barbara Con.

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ritolts. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is Professor Barbara Con.

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>She is a professor of marketing and a director of

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the J. H. Baker Retailing Center at Wharton, part of

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 1>the University of Pennsylvania. Previously to that, she was dean

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Miami Business School. She is the

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>author of The Shopping Revolution, How successful retailers can win

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>customers in an Era of Endless Disruption. Barbara Con Welcome

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg. Well, thank you very much. It's fun to

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be here. Uh, it is, and and this is such

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a fun topic. I really enjoy uh the subject. And

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>let's just jump right into it. It's a chapter in

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>your book. I have to start with how disruptive is Amazon.

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>It seems like every announcement they make royal is an

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>entire sector of the stock market. Yeah, it's really amazing.

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Every day something new from Amazon, and every day there's

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>massive reaction and a lot you do see stocks move

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>up and down as Amazon says something or other threatens

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to go into health industry, into financial services. People are afraid. Um.

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting because what Amazon does is a disruptor.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about it. Um, and they disrupt. One

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of the most famous Jeff Bezos quotes, which I have

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>never seen actually written down, but everyone on the internet swears.

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>He said, this is your margin is my opportunity, and

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that idea of taking out margin, in other words, taking

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>out profit is pretty scary and when they can do

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in a sustainable way, that's disruption. So let me broaden

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. Online retailing isn't even double digit yet, it's

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>not ten, of which Amazon is just under half. Are

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>we getting a little all worked up for five of

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the market, or is the overall trend what's scaring the

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Jesus out of everybody? You know, I don't think it's

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 1>that online per se. I think it's changing the whole

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>shopping experience. People talk about as omni channel, but right

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>now it's just retail. Retail is now become a seamless

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>integration between online and offline. The the original online retailers

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>are opening up stores. Even on Amazon is opening up stores,

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of mind boggling that they're opening up bookstores.

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, well, it's been so successful for Apple. Are

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the other technology companies trying to imitate that?

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>You see that? Also Microsoft, and you know, I mean Sony,

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>which is electronic they're opening up a direct store for them.

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But when they open up these new stores, they're different

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>from old stores. They're not the same thing at all.

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>They're much more concentrated on customer experience. Some of the

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>new stores that open up a showrooms, they don't even

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>carry inventory per se. And that's part of the point.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.119
<v Speaker 1>You really can't say what's the percentage of shopping online

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>anymore because some people will shop online pick up in

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the store. Then where do you where do you code

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know what what is that is that online

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>shopping or offline shopping? So I've experienced that with both

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Home Depot and Lows. You want something specific, they may

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>not have this particular snowblower, but you can buy it online.

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>They're shipping stuff to the store anyway you pick it

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>up there. There's no additional shipping cost. Yet you feel

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>like you're actually making it as friction free as the

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>usual online shopping. Is that what's meant by omni channel

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is everything to everybody. Omni channel is thinking about not

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>dividing up whether it's online or offline. It's all one

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>big channel, and that's going to become not a real

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>word anymore, and we're just going to think of this

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>as retail you know, when you buy retail, you can

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>go online, you can go in the store, you can

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>pick up there, you can buy there, whatever, shop it

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on your phone. So I've noticed at stores like my

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>wife calls is a retail therapy, but it's stores like

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Macy's or Lord and Taylor. If you're looking at something

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in a salesperson, some of these stores still have sales assistance.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking at something and they don't have it

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in the color, size, whatever you like, they're very quick

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to say, we can order it now and have it

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>shipped to your home for free. Would you like to

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>do that? And if it's something you're familiar with the size,

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like, yeah, sure, it's one less package I have.

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to let any transaction slip away without

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.799
<v Speaker 1>converting it to an actual sale. Has that been your experience,

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh for sure that's the case. So there's not all

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the traditional retailers are doing that now. So this is

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>a purposeful approach, not just one savvy sales person. Yeah,

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:56.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, but I wonder when you tell that story,

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's interesting to me about is

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>whether that salesperson's on commits or not, because and that's

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>what I think is interesting about say, what I consider

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a very creative retailer like Sephora, where the salespeople are

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 1>not on commission. And the reason I bring up this

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>point here is when you say I'll send it to

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>your store, send it to your home, is she really

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to she or he the sales associate, really trying

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to give something of value to you, which is the

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>way you told the story, or were they trying to

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>upsell so they make a commission. And that's a subtle difference,

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's an important difference. Well, if you

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>walk in to a store and you find something you

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>like and I'm looking at three Let's say we're looking

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:40.119
<v Speaker 1>at shirts and there are three different colors and extra

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>small up to double XL and I want this color

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and the size and they don't have it. It's not

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so much an upsell as a lost opportunity, right, And

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that that's how I took it. Okay, in that case,

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it's positive. But but I want to make that point

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>because I think this idea retailer that retailers had in

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the past of doing whatever they can to make the

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 1>next sale backfired when Amazon came in, Because I think

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>what Amazon is trying to do is really make the

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>customer experience easier, you know, and they make you so

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you can get in and out of the website very quickly.

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>When Amazon famous for is they patented in one click

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>shopping at the and I when I found out that

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that was patented, that was shocking to me. It's like,

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>why would that be patentable? And then you have to

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>go back to think what was the way retailers thought

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and what they used to think when you're online is

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>keep people online as long as possible. They would talk

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about web strategies where you have a landing page and

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's designed right, you go further and further into

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the website with the idea the longer people are on

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the website, the more they're likely to buy a store. Right.

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I was saying with the salesperson too,

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>if it's a function of just trying to make sure

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you make a sale, like you said, anything I can

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>do to make a sale, that's not what Amazon does.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Amazon said, let's make it as easy as possible for you.

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And that was the first time people really tried to

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>do that, and that's why they could patent one click

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>shopping so going back to your example, the way you

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>told the story, it was easier, it was better. But

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you could also imagine an alternative scenario where people are saying,

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want you to walk out of the store

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>without making a purchase, and they start doing a harder

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and harder sell. That's not really customer focused anymore. That's,

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, sales focused. Quite fascinating. Let's talk a little

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>bit about retail and specifically, I have to discuss the

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:36.479
<v Speaker 1>con retailing success matrix. Tell us about those four quadrants

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and what they mean. Yeah, well, I mean I did

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>name it that, but I think it's interesting. That's what

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that name is. Something I could think of nothing else.

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, the idea behind the success matrix is when

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>when I um I recently stepped down as director of

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the J. H. Baker Retailing Center. I had been there.

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I had been the director for the last six and

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a half seven years, and during that time I ran

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>into a lot of changes in the retail industry and

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>being an academic, when I stepped down, I wanted to

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>take a deep breath and try to organize everything into

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>some kind of framework, and so I went back and

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>looked at traditional retailing matrices, and they focused on the product,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and they focused on operations or logistics if you want.

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And that was it. And if you want to talk

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>with this about someone is a great retailer, let's say

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Mickey Drexler. He was called the merchant prince. But that

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>meant he knew how to merchandise, he knew how to

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>assort product, he had a good eye. And nowhere in

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>any of these traditional retail matrices was the customer. As

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 1>a marketing professor, the first principle of marketing is the

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>principle of customer value. And what does customer value mean

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in retailing? Give them a product they value from a

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>retailer that they trust, that idea of retailer that they trust.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>That was missing. The second principle of marketing, which was

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>not in any of these traditional retailing matrices, was the

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.080
<v Speaker 1>principle of competitive advantage. If you're in a very a

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>competitive market, you've got to be better than the competition.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>That means either increased pleasure or take away pain. So

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>those two ideas form the underlying theory of the matrix.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>The columns are the principle of customer value, product benefits,

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>or customer experience the rows are the principle of differential advantage.

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Do it better by increasing pleasure or do it better

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>by removing pain? And that gives me the two by

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>two matrix that I call my so I I broke

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it down in your book, which let me um, is

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>called the shopping revolution. Brands, experiential friction, lists, and low costs.

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>So each of those things either make it more fun

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>or less painful, or what's the sect or focused on

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>making the product more fun or less painful, or focusing

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>on making the customer experience more fun or less painful.

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>And what's really new in the matrix is that second

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>column of customer experience and what Amazon redesigned, in my opinion,

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is making the customer experience frictionless easy. That's interesting. How

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>much of this is driven by this millennial generation? And

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess I was going to ask a dumb question,

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>which is how much of it is technology? But how

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>do you really peel apart millennials and technology and second

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>nature to them? So the let me rephrase that question.

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 1>The combination of millennial preferences and the very use of technology.

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that what's driving a lot of this? Yeah, I

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>think it is, actually because when Amazon started, they started online,

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they started with books. And you have

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to think back, why did they start with books? And

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I would argue they started with books because the product

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and the shopping experience could be completely digitized. Once it

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>can be completely digitized, then what they did is have

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>an endless assortment. So they had more assortment than any

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>physical store, and they reduced prices by ten to That

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>was a dominance Lucien and attracted customers. But you're right,

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it started with technology, but the basic idea of removing

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>pain from a customer experience does not have to be technology.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Because think of what Walmart's doing now curbside pick up.

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>They could have done that a long time ago and

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>made shopping easier, but they didn't. They made you come

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>into the store, walk up and down the aisles, stay

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in the store as much as possible, impulse shop, you know,

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>all the ideas, put the milk in the back, All

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of that was to keep you in the store as

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>long as possible. This new idea of you're a very

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>busy person and you don't want to spend your whole time,

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole day in a Walmart, so you should be

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>able to pick it up as you drive home. That's

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a new idea, but that's not technology. Coincidentally, we're having

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 1>this conversation the day after a New York Times column

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>front page New York Times column came out discussing some

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of your work, amongst other things, how Amazon has affected

0:12:55.240 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>retail and how retailers have finally began to learn from

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>their experiences with Amazon. How far along in that process

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>are we that retailers are finally waking up and saying, hey,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we better do this and this, or Amazon is gonna

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>eat our launch. Yeah, I mean, I think they're seeing

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the retail apocalypse. People are talking about that. If you

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 1>don't understand these two basic principles, the principle of customer

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>value and the principle of differential advantage, you're not going

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to succeed radio shack, circuit city borders. You know, it's

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>soon Sears and Khmard who knows. But these retailers that

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>are not really up to snoff on customer experience, they

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>just can't make it in a world that has an

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazon in it. Sears, I think that has to be

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>inevitable going that way. The local Sears and New where

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I grew up has been there forever and finally it's

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>succumb And yet how are shops like best Buy and

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Target seemingly thriving. Target just announced their best quarter. I

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>think in something like there was a game. What is

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the drivers of the successful companies like best Buy, Target,

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and Home Deeple and Lows for that matter, versus the

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>sears and the circuit city targets are very interesting example

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>because it shows the importance of stores and this quote

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>unquote omni channel experience. So one of the things they've

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>done that's very successful is opened up the small urban stores.

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So they used to have these big boxes in suburbia

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and rural markets, right, but now they have these small

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>urban stores where singles are, young people are living in

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the city's more. They also opened them close to campuses,

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're getting a lot of people who like to

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>have the physical store experience. They've been They've been tinkering

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>with their product assortment. They've come up with a lot

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>new store brands. They're trying to get the cachet of

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>tar J back, you know, that design kind of idea

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of fun shopping, and it seems to be working. They've

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>been doing a lot of things. The biggest thing is

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>changing that store having a different assortment and it requires

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>rethinking your assortment when the store gets smaller. And then

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>these ideas of curbside pick up and making shopping easier

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and making shopping fun. So how do firms differentiate on brands? Well,

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the luxury brands are still doing very well.

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So you're looking at Louis Vatan air Mas, those those

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>are really doing very well. They're staying off of Amazon,

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>but they understand the importance of online. Also, they're partnering

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>with things like far Fetched or Netta Porte, which are

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>some kinds of online marketplaces that are dealing. But they

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>understand if they're going to charge those premium prices, they've

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>got to give superior product, pleasurable product, and a really

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>good customer experience. You have to feel pampered when you

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>buy luxury, so that's another piece of it. So what's

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the flips? Are the everyday low prices the e d

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>LP How important is that is at a totally different

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>market segment or is there any overlap? Well, you know,

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting thing because I think somebody might have a

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Louis Vatan purse and then a Target T shirt. You

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>know that that's possible, but there's always going to be

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a price sensitive segments. So Everyday low Price, the Walmart strategy,

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Costco strategy, TJ Max, they're all doing very well, even

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>though the luxury brands are doing well too, because they're

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>going after being the best at something. So luxury is

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the best at product, and everyday low price is the

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>lowest price. And it seems that it's a bit of

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a barbell the middle where the middle class used to shop,

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that's become a bit of a void. It's either high

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>end or lower right, Yeah, it's yeah, something special, And

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what I mean by differential advantage. You've got to

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>be better. You can't just be good enough. You've got

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to be better at something. Let's talk a little bit

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>about your academic career. What motivated you to write a

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>book on on the Shopping Revolution? Well, I mean for

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the last seven years or six and a half years,

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I was the director of the Baker Retailing Center at Wharton,

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and the goal of that retailing center was actually to

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>convince Wharton students to go into retailing. Typically, the Wharton

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>students didn't go into retailing. They went into vestment banking

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>or hedge funds or consulting. But Jay Baker, who had

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>retired as the president of Coles, thought this was a

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>missed opportunity, and so he developed the center to encourage

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>people to think about retailing. And I was the director

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of it, and so my goal was to really learn

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>as much as I could about retail and what the

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>excitement was, to try to convince our students to go

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>into the industry. At the time I was doing this,

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>retailing was changing radically. You know. We had all sorts,

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>not only Amazon, but these digitally native vertical brands started.

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Those are the digitally native vertical brands of brands that

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>start online and they go direct to the end user.

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Warby Parker was started for Wharton students, so that was

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>particularly sense, you know, something we were very proud of.

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's also Casper that did it. More recent Mattress Company, Yeah,

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the mattress company Bnobos which was subsequently bought by Walmart.

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Um All Birds is a new one that's getting a

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of your wearing over. But these are digitally native

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>vertical brands that are going out and this Nate this

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>We were trying to make retail sexy, but retail was

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>becoming sexy, you know. It was really the technology referenced

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>before really did change the way people think about retailing.

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So so when a student graduates Wharton and goes into retail,

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>what aspect of this are they doing? There's it seems

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a universe of things that makes sense and are

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>applicable in a modern technology world. Where do you see

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>them going into? Well, you know, Amazon right now, it's

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>big a hire of Warton students, as Goldman was really,

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we're not talking warehouse workers. These are

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 1>people who knows what they're I think they're working for

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 1>AWS or whatever else. I don't know what they're were.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But Amazon is a huge company, right right, they'll eclipse

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Walmart as the biggest employer if things continue, if you

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 1>extrapolate that to infinitely, which is never a good you know,

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>even some of our students are going to Walmart now,

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>which was you know, it was in the past. They

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>weren't so intrigued with going to Arkansas, you know, and

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>working in like you said, and operate actionally efficient company.

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>But now Walmart dot com is in San Francisco. Jet

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>dot Com isn't there, yea, So now it's a sexy, interesting,

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>fun place to work. So do you recall there was,

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, a New York Times story. You

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>just made me think of this um where someone came

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>into Target to complain that their daughter was getting pregnancy

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.439
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the mail. She's in high school? How dare you?

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And then subsequently he had to go back and apologize

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Targets Big data analytics figured out that if you buy this,

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>this and this, hey, you're probably pregnant and you're gonna

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>want this. Is that the sort of stuff that that

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>NBA students are doing. Yeah, that's one thing for sure.

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>The Wharton School, Ardine is advocating over and over and

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 1>over again data analytics, data analytics. You really can't go

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>into marketing anymore if you didn't understand customer analytics and

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>data analytics. You know in that story I remember when

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 1>it came out maybe five years ago. Was surprising, but

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you really didn't need data analytics to do that.

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>A smart salesperson could have watched this girl come into

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the store via pregnancy test and by you know, vitamins

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>and prenatal vitamins or all these other things and what

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it really wasn't rocket science to figure that out. So

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>given your vantage point, how has the curriculum for NBA

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>students changed relative to to this industry. Yeah, we've definitely

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 1>included more analytics in our marketing in everything um Adam

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Grant is another professor at the Wharton School. He started

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>people analytics generals, yeah, or givers and takers and planed

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>B and M. He but he's really you know, all

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff. It's even management, which maybe used to

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>think of management and marketing is quote unquote softer sciences,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>were all using data analytics. Of course, finance has always

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>been dated heavily data driven. You'd be surprised that's a

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>relatively recent phenomenal. By relatively recent, it's a couple of decades.

0:20:55.240 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>It was not as endemic as you would suppose any

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>forty six years ago. That's interesting, quite fascinating stuff. Let's

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about some of the older brands

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>who may not be quite as hip as um the

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Warby Parker's or the old birds of the world. How

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>would you advise companies like Kellogg's or Coca Cola to

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>appeal to the next generation. You know, it's really interesting

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to watch because I've been teaching marketing for a long time,

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and we would teach branding, and we would talk about

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what are the biggest brands forever the same biggest brands Coke, IBM, whatever, Toyota.

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, the last five years, we all

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>know who the biggest brands are, right I mean, And

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a change that happened very very quickly in the

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>last five years. And if you look at their stock prices, Kellogg's, Gillette,

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>they're hurting. The CpG companies are hurting, and they do

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>have to do something to wake up and smell the roses,

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>just like the retailers. So Gillette, for example, has you know,

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>started subscription services to compete with Dollar Shave Club and Harry's.

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Coca Cola just bought a coffee company. Look what Nike

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is doing. That's pretty interesting. So let's let's discuss that

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>because I was just reaching from my phone to grab

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a data point that I wanted to ask you you're here.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>The day after it was announced that Colin Kaepernick is

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be UH, he received an extension of his

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>contract with Nike, and on the thirty year anniversary of

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>their launch of the Just Do It campaign, they made

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>um they made him part of that. And there seems

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to be quite an interesting backlash. However, and and this

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is what's so fascinating. A data point I read I

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>might have been the Journal of the Times specifically said

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>something like two thirds of Nike's customers are under thirty five.

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So there, you know, Nike is not marketing to old, fat,

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>white conservative dudes. That's not their target demographic. Is it?

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>The people who are burning Nike socks and shoes? They

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>really don't care about that, do that? No? I mean,

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the calculated decision they made. And they

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>had to do some things because they also had been

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot of negative publicity on the women issue.

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they support Serena and she's a fantastic role model,

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>but that's not that's not where the news is about

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Nike and women. That the lawsuits and all these other things,

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's been a news and Nike has to face that. Um.

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think you asked me before about the difference

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>in millennials and baby boomers. One of the things I

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>see that's different is that millennial millennials seemed to hold

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>brands accountable, and so it's not just enough to brand

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>a product. You kind of have to take some positions.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>You have to be responsible, and I think Nike, you know,

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>is taking that position. Now. They're standing up to social

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>issues that do concern their core market, and they took

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>a stand on it. Look what happened at Starbucks, you know,

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>one incidents in one Starbucks restaurant in Philadelphia caused an

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>incredible reaction around the world. That was something I was

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>talking to someone in You're a bit better than I said.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't suppose you heard about what happened in Philadelphia

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>with Starbucks and they had it was you know, it's

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>always amazing when you have such a diffuse company with

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of stores, how hard that is to

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>um really get a consistent message in a consistent behavior

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>across tens of thousands of employees. It's uh, it's really

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>quite astonishing, all right. So here's the Times article. It's

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.479
<v Speaker 1>not the journal. Nike returns to a familiar strategy with

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the Kaepernack ad campaign. The Time suggested that Nike as

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a brand has courted controversy. Charles Barkley, I'm not a

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>role model, Tiger Wood saying, Hey, some of these uh

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>golf courses wouldn't let me play because I'm an African

0:24:55.960 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>American years ago. So coming back to Colin Kaepernack, is

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this just tacking into that controversy. Here's the data point

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to find. Nearly two thirds of individuals who

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>wear Nike in the United States are under thirty five

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>years old. So so this wasn't a coincidence. This was

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a very conscious Oh, they had to know that they

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>get I mean, Trump made it clear they were going

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to get some backlash on this, and he, true to form,

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>responded um yesterday, though not as extremely as one might

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>have thought, but he did respond um. And and that

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>then the boycott Nike kind of hashtag boycott Nike, and

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the crazy videos that are coming up with people burning

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>their expensive shoes, which is kind of silly because a,

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you already gave them your money and be really shouldn't

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>if you really think it's a veterans issue, then donated

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to Veterans group. By the way, yesterday, I'm doing this

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>from my memory, so I'm going to get the numbers wrong.

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>But it was something like Nike stock fell two point

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>seven percent, but Adiita stock felt two point It was

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>almost no difference that if their biggest rival felt the

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.479
<v Speaker 1>same amount, it might have just been uh, you know,

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole segment is going to suffer backlash for a

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.479
<v Speaker 1>couple of days and then back to back to usual.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But when you take some of these positions, you're gonna

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>get polarization. And they must have calculated, um, you know,

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll lose some but will gain loyalty in other markets,

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and they thought it was worth it. So let's talk

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the paradox of luxury. You you

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>referenced it earlier. People have to either have some very

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>positive affiliation with the products, or the brands or the experience.

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>What is the paradox of luxury. Well, you know, usually

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>in economics, which I'm sure you know very well, supply

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and demand says you lower price, make things more accessible

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>than your market share is going to go up. In luxury,

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the paradox. If you lower brands too much, like

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael Core's a lower price too much like Michael Cores

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and Coach did inadvertently by having a lot of discounting

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and selling a lot of their products and out, that

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>diminishes the value of the brand. So if the and

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>if you make it too accessible, it diminishes the value

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of a luxury brand. Luxury is for elite luxury. Special

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>luxury is inaccessible. So when you make it a little

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>bit more affordable, of the notion of affordable luxuries almost

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>an oxymoron. That's the paradox of luxury doesn't follow the

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>regular rules of supply and so this goes back to

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the old days of general motors when they would sell

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>essentially the same car. The high end was a Cadillac,

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the middle was a Buick, and the cheap car was

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a Chevy. They were all essentially rebadged and and up

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>um scaled versions of each other. Is that the concept? Yeah,

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so maybe the guts of the car was similar,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but the trappings or that we're really different. And the

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>dealerships were dealing right, and the service was different, the

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>brand was different, that materials in the car might have

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>been different higher value. So there was I'm not saying

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>it was silly. I think there was value to what

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>going on. But that's the paradox of luxury, and part

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>of what makes it special. It is not everybody has it,

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's the scarcity creates creates a specific value that

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of that's kind of interesting. So within the

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>existing world of brands that are being disrupted. How can

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 1>they jiu jitsu this? How can the disrupted become the disruptive? Well,

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.719
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting to think of. You know, you're seeing a

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure on these digitally native vertical brands. They're

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>they're considered some of the disruptors. A lot of what

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>they have done by going direct without all these intermediary channels,

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>they've been able to lower the price. And so a

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Warby Parker is a very high designed glass, but it's glasses,

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's sold at nine rather than a five hundred dollars.

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's part of what the disruption is. It goes

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>back to that notion of your margin is my opportunity.

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.239
<v Speaker 1>So I'm giving you what you really want, but I'm

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>charging a lower price. So that's one way that they've

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>been disrupting. And the other way the disruptions have been

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is making it more convenient. Um. I suppose there's something

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>lurking out there that we haven't seen yet, but right

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>now that's what people are doing. Um. I can't imagine

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>what it will be. But maybe there's another dimension in

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>my matrix I haven't thought about yet. So so you

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you said you can't imagine what what they'll do next.

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>How challenging is it to predict trends or even just

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>extrapolate trends. It seems that there's a new meme and

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a hot new flavor every other day. Are these things

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>just passing fancies or is there really a bigger shift

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>taking place in a lack of consistency and brands over time?

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean what I think what you're talking about is

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the way retail changed over time and got people to

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>buy more, which was changed style, change trends. So in

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the old days, heym's went up and down or colors arc,

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it? That was what a long arc of time.

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It didn't change see from day to day, would change

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>season and season to season, but it gave you a

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>reason to buy more. Same thing with electronics or innovations

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or cars. The technology just got better and better, and

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>so you needed so that you do need to see

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>something new in order to get people to buy because

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>products just don't wear out that fast. You know, if

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they wore out that then you'd have to replace. But

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things don't, so you need fashion style,

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>new technology. What Amazon did and the digitally native vertical

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>brands did was I do think significant disruption which is

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>different than this changing in styles and trends. And they

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>realized that the whole model of retail had gotten stale um.

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's when I went back to that salesforce commission

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of idea, the idea that if you would go

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>into a department store and try to run away from

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the perfume women, you know that we're going to surray you. Like,

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.719
<v Speaker 1>what were they thinking, You know, they were thinking that

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>these are commissioned people who are going to do anything

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to So let's talk about that. We we've been other

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>folks have been discussing the death of the mall for

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>years and years and years. Is that overblown or has

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that sort of post war suburban shopping experience. Is that

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>also circling the draink Yeah? No, I think that that's

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>what's happened, Like it got stale. So we have way

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>too many stores in the US. We're over called, overstored, overbuilt,

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like a substantial amount versus Japan and the UK even Yeah, right, substantial.

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So even if you didn't see all this change, those

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>stores were gonna have to go out of business. We

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>had too many, and if you look at the malls

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that are going out of business, they're called the B

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and C malls. They were terrible malls. You know when

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the Macy closed down is that as the destination. All

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>those stores in the middle had to go out. There

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was no traffic. So that's what's going down. But just

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>as those stores malls are going down, some exciting, beautiful

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>new flagship malls are being built. Look what's happening in

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>New York City. There's some beautiful stores being built that

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>should attract a lot of traffic. Can you stick around

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit? I have a ton more questions. Okay,

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>we have been speaking to professor Barbara on she teaches

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>marketing at Wharton. If you enjoy this conversation, be sure

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and come back for the podcast extras, where we keep

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the tape rolling and continue discussing all things retail. You

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>can find that at iTunes, Overcast, SoundCloud, Stitcher, and Bloomberg

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>or wherever final podcasts are sold. We love your comments,

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>feedback and suggestions right to us at m IB podcast

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. Check out my daily column on

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. You could follow me on Twitter at

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>rid Holts. I'm Barry Riholts. You're listening to Masters in

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Business on Bloomberg Radio. Welcome to the podcast, Barbara, Thank

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you so much for doing this. I find this subject

0:32:56.000 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fascinating. And I have a bunch of of sans

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>too that we didn't get to. Um. But I have

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to come back to the luxury as a scarce good um.

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'll share a quick funny story with you. My

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>wife teaches fashion illustration and design, so when I get

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>dragged around to various stores, it's not so much retail

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>therapy as it is research and and where I am

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the reckless, Oh that's nice, get one of those. Um.

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>She is the much more fiscally prudent of the two

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of us. And one day we're I forgot where we were,

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>but she sees this product bag and it's ungodly expensive.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>It's this leather fringe bag. I want to say, it

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>was like twelve or fourteen thousand, some insane insane number

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that I gasped. I'm like, you know, you could buy

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a small car for the cost of that that bay

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and um, And speaking of cars, I troll around eBay

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:00.239
<v Speaker 1>all the time looking at old cars to occasionally, um

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>tickle my fancy. And on a lark, I started searching

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>for that bag and one day there it is. It's

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>less than a thousand dollars. It's which to me is

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>still a ridiculous price for bags, but you walk into

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the store and hundred is pretty typical. So for her birthday,

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I surprised her with an eBay purchased product, ungodly expensive bag.

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>What does the used market due to luxury? And what

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>do things like you mentioned Netta Porta and some of

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the Cpretta Porta, what is Netta Porte? And far fetch? Okay?

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>So they sell rents repurpose, well, they do both, some

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of them on marketplaces. Some of them have their own inventories.

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Some of them concatenate a lot of little stores on

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>their platform. They're different models there. But luxury is a

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>really interesting business. There's catches on it. One of them

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is this whole counterfeit market. Oh for sure. That was

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the concern with eBay. I actually had to write the

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 1>person and say, listen, I'm interested in this bag, how

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>do I know it's real? And they sent me a

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 1>thing back here. I've sold ten thousand items. I've been

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on eBay for whatever a decade. I have all the

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>paperwork with this, and and so my wife's I I

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>When I gave it to her, I said, and make

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>sure this is real. And she looked at and she goes,

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>if this is fake, it's a fantastic alright. Was she happy?

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Thrilled to death? Can I tell you? She at we

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.439
<v Speaker 1>The reason I even remembered this is she just said

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to me, well, falls coming up, and I'm excited about that.

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, why Jean sweater. She's like, no, I

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>get to take the product bag out of the closet.

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a leather fringe bag, so it's her fall bag.

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Very she's very excited about it. But that's a real

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>big problem. Like it's a big problem, particularly in China

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of these things are manufactured, and some

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.359
<v Speaker 1>of the luxury products would be the branded products would

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>be done during the day and after hours on the

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>same manufacturing, some of the counterfeits would be dead. So

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.479
<v Speaker 1>what is the difference between counterfeits? So in that case,

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the counterfeit and the real product was actually the product

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>was the same. The branch wasn't authorized, it wasn't didn't

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>have the paperwork, the certificates and things, so they were

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>bringing in they were using the same materials in some

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>now those counterfeits are expensive. There's different levels of counterfeits.

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Want a good, counterfeits want cheap. The very best counterfeits

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>are actually quite good. Um. But you have to know

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing. You have to have the eye to

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 1>see the difference. Is some of the counterfeits are terrible.

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's a real There's been pressure now on Ali Baba,

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>on and on Amazon because they hadn't been policing whether

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>resellers and third parties sellers were selling real products or

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>counterfeits are all of that, and so luxury products never

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>wanted to go on those platforms unless they could be

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>assured that there were no counterfeits. So if you if

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you go down to Chinatown, you could buy a nice

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Rolex watch for about fifty bucks. The problem is it's

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Rolex with two ls other Other than that, it's hard

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to tell the difference. That some of the fakes are

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty spectac Yeah. I mean in Rolex, I doubt it's

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>real gold if it's for sure, um. So, so that's

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>the issue with with um luxury. I it's really fascinating.

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>I know in China they've had fake Apple stores and

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of stuff. What was has there been a

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>resolution with eBay or Amazon or is this still an

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on way is ongoing, but I think that they are.

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has now acknowledged that they're going to have to

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>control their counterfeit issue or they're not going to get

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the luxury brands to come on. But you know, we're

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>talking about luxury. Was interesting this notion that accessibility makes

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>luxury less desirable because, as you said, scarcity or exclusivity

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is what luxury is, and yet people still want to

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>buy online. Now online makes it more accessible, So that's

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>another paradox. Luxury had to figure out, how can I

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have the luxury experience and still have the convenience of online.

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>And they've been doing all sorts of experimenting with how

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to keep the convenience of online but keep the exclusivity

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of luxury. So for example, they'll have specialized buyers or

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>personalized buyers where you can talk to them online and

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>do the business online, but it's still a one to

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 1>one luxury experience like a personal shop, personal shop or

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 1>something like that. And so they've been trying to do

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 1>things and then when they ship you the product, the

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>packaging is beautiful. You know, some of the luxury comes

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in the packaging that goes around the product. Have you

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:31.320
<v Speaker 1>been reading about these unboxing videos on YouTube? So I

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>just saw this this weekend. Apparently there's a little bit

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of a dopamine hit if you watch a video of

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 1>someone unwrapping a delivery, whether it's an Amazon box or

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>something else, they unwrapid the unpacking and it's like right

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>now and off the shop. I've gone through that experience.

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much I really buy into that UM,

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's fascinating. But what what I do recall reading

0:38:55.320 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>about UM earlier. Uh, to your point about the experience,

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>if you go into Tiffany's and for whatever reason, they

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think you're a high roller type shopper, you get brought

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>up into the special, secret private room that the public

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get to see, and it's apparently a very different

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and much more expensive experience. Tiffany's is an interesting example.

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>They're coming back up. Tiffany some people say is the

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>only true American luxury brand. It started and I think

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the same year Airmez started, so it's been around for

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 1>long enough. Luxury really has to have history, it has

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to have legacy to be a real luxury brand, and

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Tiffany's really the only American brand that can claim that credit.

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.839
<v Speaker 1>But they kind of lost their way maybe thirty years

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>ago when they had too much silver in their store

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and they had all these young adolescent teenage girls coming

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>into the store right next to these very rich people

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>buying diamonds in private rooms, and that was not a

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>good juxtamosition. Yeah, that's what should have been online, the silver. Yeah, right,

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>so now they have they still sell some silver, but

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a a small part of it. And they've really

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>tried to re up the luxury vision of Tiffany's. Make it.

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>You know what Audrey Hepburn saw in it. Nothing can

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>go bad in the Tiffany's store, you know. So that's

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>an interesting point that Tiffany's might be the only luxury store.

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of things like Ralph Lauren. But they make

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>everything from the low end to the Purple label, which

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is crazy expensive, um and whatever you can find a

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 1>name and Marcus. But I assume half that stuff is

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:33.280
<v Speaker 1>coming from Europe. So the traditional luxury brands are French

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and Italian. You know, that's where you made in Italy.

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, Gucci's off the charts right now. Gucci is

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>crazy doing crazy well, Louis buiton MS. Those are French brands,

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of those um But Ralph Lauren had

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 1>this what I call a branded house strategy, which is

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>what you described under the same brand name from Purple

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Label or Collection all the way down to outlet. You

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 1>could tell it was all Ralph or Paolo. Whereas the

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 1>luxury houses in Europe a house of brands, and each

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>house is a special brand. They don't have one brand

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>name over all of their different offerings. So when you

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>look at Coach, which I recall back in the day,

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 1>at one point Coach was pretty high end. I don't

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>know if that's the case. We were talking about Professor

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Scott Galloway, an n y U Stern. He's made the

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>claim that Apple is the first technology luxury brands. I

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>agree that you do. It's kind of when you look

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>at their prices, they're certainly premium, and they're counterfeited also,

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>just the way luxury is, which almost a badge of

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>honor to be counterfeited. You know, nobody is counterfeiting Android,

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>so so, but you know Coach that you mentioned that

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>was an American brand, but they're now starting to copy

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the European strategy. So they changed their name to the

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:51.240
<v Speaker 1>holding company Tapestry, and now they have a house of brands,

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 1>So they have Coach, they have Stuart white Smith, they

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>have Kate Spade, all under the house Tapestry, and so

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>they're moving and they're trying to take back the too

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:04.320
<v Speaker 1>much outlet selling and trying to resurrect the grandeur that

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Coach used to have. And they're doing well. Their stock

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:09.359
<v Speaker 1>prices went up, their their sales are going up. They're

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>doing very well with that strategy. My wife taught me

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a shocking data point way back when the stuff you've

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.760
<v Speaker 1>seen in the outlet centers, that's not the same stuff

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 1>that you can get in the stores, although occasionally there

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>are um leftovers and end runs and they do get

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>dumped there, but a lot of stores specifically manufacturer for

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the outlet right, which that was what Coach did wrong. See,

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>but your wife said, is the right strategy. You want

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to you have to keep it separate because why would

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>anybody pay full price if you get the same product

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in an outlet. But Coach had some of the same

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>product in their outlets, and what that did was under

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>undermine the value of the brand. If you're paying a

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>high price, and someone else got the same product, the

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 1>exact same product, at an outlet price. Why would you

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>want to pay the higher price? And and and Coach

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 1>was hurt by that, so let me push back on that.

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I notice I'm wearing Brooks Brothers. Is probably the wrong example.

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a Brooks brother shirt. But I noticed that

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of products, the same exact products are sold

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>at multiple times at different prices. So I could walk

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 1>into a Lord and Taylor. So we're recording this in September.

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>All the new full stuff has already been out for

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a month. If I want shopping last month for full stuff,

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's full price, it's not discount that, it's not coupons,

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not on sale. And then by the time I

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know, November rolls around, the coupons start, and then

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>as we get closer to Christmas, the big discount start,

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and then by the time we hit January, the same

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>product you could pay buy a shirt for a hundred

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and twenty five dollars sixty dollars. Now, you may not

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 1>get the right color, you may not get the right size,

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you may not get exactly what you want. But if

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>your price sensitive, there seems to be a range. You

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>can buy the same product across six months at all

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>these crazy different price points. That is that a purposeful strategy.

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:02.359
<v Speaker 1>When started, it made sense, you know, because you would

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 1>target people at different willingness to pay, and so you

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>get the people are willing to pay at the beginning

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 1>of season to pay high. People who couldn't afford it

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>or didn't want to would wait till the end of

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 1>season and pay low. Unfortunately, people got addicted to those

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 1>price promotions. They could predict those pressure promotions, and consequently

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>they were very reluctant to pay full price, and it

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:24.360
<v Speaker 1>got really bad around holiday seasons where it's big, you know,

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the big bonanza for retail, where it said if

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you waited long enough, you know you're going to get

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the discount or Black Friday and all these other things.

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:35.719
<v Speaker 1>People got addicted to the discounts and that was very bad.

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Undermine the value of the branded It is what hurt

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cores for a while. Michael course has pulled back

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on that so they can be seen as more luxury

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>now um And part of the reason for it was

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the price sensitivity or price discrimination. Another reason was if

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they didn't forecast demand correctly. And it's hard to forecast

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:55.239
<v Speaker 1>demand for a fashion product because you don't know what

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the consumers are gonna like or not like, So you

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:00.920
<v Speaker 1>over order certain things and then you've got extra inventory

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that you've got a discount at the end of the season.

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And you're doing that years in advance. It's not like

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>thirteen months in advance typically crazy. So that's now that's changed.

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 1>And this is another thing that's not just Amazon has

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 1>done that. Zarah has changed this a lot. Zarah has changed.

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>They do like not a lot of turnovers in the store.

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 1>They don't have this eighteen month lead time or anything

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 1>like that, and there's all this pressure. The part of

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the disruption is to give customers a better experience, so

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they have to be better at forecasting demand. They have

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to get the right product in the store so they

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have leftover inventory at the end. Because what the

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.839
<v Speaker 1>process you described, you could see, you know, long term,

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna work. People understand it that, you know,

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows that happens. Why wouldn't they wait for the

0:45:44.640 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 1>discount price, especially given I would make an argument that

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been a whole lot of wage growth in

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the real wage growth after inflation from the middle class

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:57.360
<v Speaker 1>over the past twenty or thirty years. That has to

0:45:57.440 --> 0:46:00.479
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on the selling strategies of retailers. Yeah,

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I agree, but that's what you're saying, Like with all

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>with Macy's and stuff, when you talk about whether their

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>new strategy they're announcing, one of them is much more

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>meticulous forecasting a product assortment, having a better idea before

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you put you know, excess inventory in the store. And

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is that just big data? I mean, I would imagine

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 1>that if they they don't just get to turn a

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 1>dial and say, okay, now we're better forecasters. Couldn't they

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:26.919
<v Speaker 1>have been a better forecaster five or ten years ago.

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Computer technology has improved, but not so much over a decade.

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 1>That is it the algorithms? Is it just? It's also

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the changing the system so you can see what sells

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and reproducing faster, you know that business intelligence that well,

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the data, but also the operations like don't order things,

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:49.399
<v Speaker 1>see what's selling and then order it um rather than

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and the other thing that Zara did. They also were

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 1>customer focused, where the design luxury houses a product focus.

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So the luxury housers say, I'm the designer, this is

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:01.759
<v Speaker 1>what you like, Zara says, is I'm gonna look and

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 1>see what the customers like, and then I'm gonna put

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>what the fashionista is like in my store. So they

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>have their sales associates at the end of every single

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:14.360
<v Speaker 1>day report back to headquarters what they've observed, their customers

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:17.759
<v Speaker 1>are coming and wearing, what they've observed their customers asked for,

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and they use that customer data in addition to what

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the fashion houses are doing to try to better predict

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 1>what customers are gonna like or what they're not gonna like.

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>How unique is that what Zara is, Well, Zara was

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the first ones to do it, and then

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>they do a very good job and they're doing very

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 1>very well. But again this gets back to like this

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have been rocket science, that you should that you

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 1>should ask the customers what they actually like before you

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:45.000
<v Speaker 1>just load up on inventory in your store, you know,

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But that just didn't happen until recently. But what about

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm no, I'm gonna mangle this term. What about the

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>knockoffs and the fast fashion? How significant is that too? Well,

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Zara sometimes called called fast fashion, but it's

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 1>a higher, a little bit higher price point fashion. But

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that is the idea instead of, like you said, waiting

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen months for luxury to come in, let's get

0:48:06.920 --> 0:48:08.920
<v Speaker 1>people now want to buy in season. That's a very

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 1>big difference in season. Yeah, so like if it's fall,

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to buy fall now? Where they the luxury

0:48:14.239 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 1>houses were treating teaching you to buy fall? You know

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>before it was right? Who wants to go shopping in

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:22.959
<v Speaker 1>July and August for a winter coat? It makes no sense?

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Can see what I mean? It's like that should have

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 1>been obvious to people, but they looked at it from

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the product and operations side. I mean, obviously there was

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a logic to doing it. Getting You have to manufacturer,

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to get the supply, you have to do

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:38.319
<v Speaker 1>all these things. It took a long time to get

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the product to the store. But guess what, Zara figured

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 1>out how to do it in a way that took

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot less time. I will admit to once so

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I had this disan ski coat for years and I

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 1>made the mistake of buying a light colored coat, which

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is a terrible idea in New York City, it just

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>gets filthy. And I tried on this black and sort

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of neon yellow one and Dessaunt is an exorbitant French

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>luxury brand or wherever it comes from, and I couldn't

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 1>pull the trigger on it was too expensive. That September,

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I just happened to stop into a ski shop that

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:15.799
<v Speaker 1>at a giant preseason sale and literally found the same

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 1>exact code for thirty off for a third of what

0:49:19.640 --> 0:49:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I would have paid last year. And I couldn't couldn't

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:26.800
<v Speaker 1>resist that. But that said, really, how how did we

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 1>ever get trained to buy winter clothes in August? It

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense now, and that now that customers

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.879
<v Speaker 1>pushing back, that's again what the millennials are doing. One

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of our young designers, Rebecca Minkoff, which is she's considered

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a millennial designer. She was one of the ones on

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that New York Fashion Week saying, you know, I'm going

0:49:44.560 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to start showing during fashion week what people want to

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 1>buy now? Um, and that was considered revolution right, It

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:55.279
<v Speaker 1>makes it makes so much sense. What else is you

0:49:55.480 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>have a bird's eye view of what's going on in

0:49:57.440 --> 0:50:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in retail and fashion and related areas. What do you

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:04.160
<v Speaker 1>think is really interesting? What is something that you're kind

0:50:04.200 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of intrigued about these days. Well, one of the things

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I think is interesting is how important in store tech is.

0:50:09.080 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that, yeah, you know, like the beacons in there,

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:17.040
<v Speaker 1>or the smart boards and the magic mirrors mirror mentioned

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Minkoff, she does that in her own stores. If

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:21.799
<v Speaker 1>you go to the Soho store, you'll see it, which

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is where all the items in the store are coated

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 1>with r F I D code And when you walk

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:29.279
<v Speaker 1>into the dressing room, on the mirror in front of you,

0:50:29.680 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they show the items you're bringing into the kids in

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the dressing room. It's right there on the mirror. And

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:36.879
<v Speaker 1>then if you want a different size, you can push

0:50:36.960 --> 0:50:40.399
<v Speaker 1>on the mirror and the sales different size. They'll also

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>give you suggestions. If you bring in a you know,

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a pencil black skirt, they'll say this blousse will go

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 1>with it, this person go with it. All of that

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 1>makes me perfect sense. How has no one ever thought about? Now?

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 1>The thing about that that's interesting is it makes perfect

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 1>sense and apparently has increased sales. You know, it is expensive,

0:50:56.760 --> 0:51:00.319
<v Speaker 1>but apparently the upsale up cell has worked very well

0:51:00.400 --> 0:51:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on that. But more importantly is collecting the data online.

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>If you go online and you put something into your

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 1>car and you don't buy it, you know, you get

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:12.240
<v Speaker 1>all these ads for the next two months, right, because

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they figure if you went all the way through what's

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:17.080
<v Speaker 1>called the purchase funnel to put something in your car,

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you must have really liked it and maybe we can

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>get the price tweaked right, or maybe and we'll get

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you to buy. So they'd spent a lot of time

0:51:24.560 --> 0:51:28.560
<v Speaker 1>on that last miles. So to speak up the car. Well,

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in the physical store, if you went to the trouble

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of bringing something into the dressing room, you must have

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:37.879
<v Speaker 1>liked it. And then if you didn't buy it, why

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:40.280
<v Speaker 1>did you not buy it? What was wrong with those items?

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:43.879
<v Speaker 1>That data was never collected in a physical store. Now

0:51:44.080 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're taking this into the dressing room, I can

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:49.520
<v Speaker 1>see what you bring into the dressing room and what

0:51:49.680 --> 0:51:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you purchase or what you don't purchase, and that's very

0:51:52.760 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>useful information. So now you're capturing all the data that

0:51:55.880 --> 0:52:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you previously were to disadvantage versus online retailers. Right. How

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you can do that in this and what are they

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 1>actually using that data for? Is it productive for them? Yeah?

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You can figure out like why is this item not selling?

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's not sized right, maybe it's too much money

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for this. You know, you can figure out reasons why

0:52:12.520 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>people are choosing not to sell. I mean, so one

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that things aren't making it into the

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 1>dressing room. Maybe they don't look good on the rack,

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're in the wrong place in the store. All

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, you can fine tune your merchandise to

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:29.040
<v Speaker 1>be what customers want. You're getting customer input right there

0:52:29.120 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 1>at the store, which they didn't used to get that.

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That's quite fascinating. So I know I only have you

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:38.400
<v Speaker 1>for a finite amount of time. Let's jump to my

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite questions that I ask all of my guests. Tell

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>us the most important thing that your students don't know

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about you. Well, I don't know if my students, but

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:52.279
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's happened recently to me is

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that I can't drive over bridges anymore. Really, I'm scared

0:52:57.040 --> 0:52:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of driving over bridges. This is what happened in Italy,

0:52:59.680 --> 0:53:02.439
<v Speaker 1>or just it seems crazy to me to drive over

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a bridge. I don't know. I can walk over bridges,

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but I don't like to drive over bridges, and as

0:53:07.560 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a result, it's limited how much i'd drive. Now. Really,

0:53:10.840 --> 0:53:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not you're okay with tunnels, I'm okay with you.

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you that as a kid driving over

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the Williamsburg Bridge in the outer roadway, where it was

0:53:25.239 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 1>just this sort of metal um framework, like a mesh framework,

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 1>where you can look down through the road at the water,

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and I made this horrible humming sound on the tires.

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I was never thrilled with that particular bridge. It's funny.

0:53:38.880 --> 0:53:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I can be a passenger in a car driving over bridge.

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want to drive it myself. I don't

0:53:43.600 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 1>trust myself, even though I don't know what I could do.

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm afraid i'd freak out. But you know, if you

0:53:48.520 --> 0:53:50.040
<v Speaker 1>have to have that fear now, I didn't have it

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>when I was younger, I haven't now. If you have

0:53:51.760 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to have it now in the land of uber and driving, okay,

0:53:56.760 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not as as it could be. Who who are

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:02.440
<v Speaker 1>your early mentors, who guarded your career in academia and

0:54:02.560 --> 0:54:05.280
<v Speaker 1>who led you into the world of marketing and retail.

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Well you know, um, if you're a doctoral student and

0:54:07.880 --> 0:54:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you get a PhD, which I did a lot of times,

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 1>your your dissertation advisor is a big mentor, and my

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:17.000
<v Speaker 1>dissertation I got my PhD at Columbia and my dissertation

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>advisor was Don Morrison, who just recently retired UM. And

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:24.000
<v Speaker 1>he was he called himself a full service advisor. He

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:27.640
<v Speaker 1>advised everything in my academic life and my personal life,

0:54:27.680 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>so he made a really big difference. More recently, I

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:33.040
<v Speaker 1>UM left Wharton for a few years to go down

0:54:33.080 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to University of Miami to be the dean of the

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Business school there. And when I was there, Donna Leela

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:41.680
<v Speaker 1>was the president of Miami. Um Clinton administration. Yeah, she

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:44.600
<v Speaker 1>was the Secretary of Health and Human Services under Clinton

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:47.839
<v Speaker 1>for the longest serving Health and Human Services, and then

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:49.920
<v Speaker 1>she was also had a big career in academia. She

0:54:50.040 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was president of Hunter College and she was president University

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of Miami. More recently, she headed the Clinton Foundation when

0:54:57.160 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Hillary was running, which was kind of an interesting least

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:03.319
<v Speaker 1>to be I would imagine. And now she went back

0:55:03.400 --> 0:55:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to Miami and she just won the Democratic seat for

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a congress for you know, the counsel. Yeah, so she

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:13.480
<v Speaker 1>was very ray. Very recently, she won the Democratic primary

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:15.840
<v Speaker 1>for that seat, which I think was held by a

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican but so hopefully she can still win it. And

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:21.760
<v Speaker 1>she's seventy seven, and I gotta say she's an amazing

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:23.960
<v Speaker 1>role model. She really taught me what it was like

0:55:24.080 --> 0:55:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a leader. Taught me, you know, how to

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:29.400
<v Speaker 1>face adversary, adversity, you know, to figure out what you

0:55:29.400 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 1>should do. She taught me the importance of low hanging fruit,

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:36.480
<v Speaker 1>visible signs, and long term strategy. She was really amazing.

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea she had she was running or

0:55:39.080 --> 0:55:41.279
<v Speaker 1>had won that. And just last night I think it

0:55:41.360 --> 0:55:45.920
<v Speaker 1>was Massachusetts. Um there was a woman challenger to the

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 1>sitting Democrat uh in the House, and she beat him.

0:55:52.760 --> 0:55:56.319
<v Speaker 1>And there's no Republican running against them. This year very

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 1>much looks like the year of the woman, a giant,

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>giant shift. It's quite fascinating, Donna La, that's really interesting.

0:56:04.360 --> 0:56:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Um So tell us about the retailers who influence the

0:56:07.560 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>way you look at the world of retail. Well, you know,

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the things I tried to do

0:56:12.640 --> 0:56:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in my book, also to look at who's winning, and

0:56:15.880 --> 0:56:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I focused on. Who's losing I wasn't

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:20.680
<v Speaker 1>as interested in. And so the retailers I think are

0:56:20.719 --> 0:56:22.799
<v Speaker 1>doing a great job. Of course, at Amazon, I'm really

0:56:22.840 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>impressed with Walmart, Costco is a very interesting reach. They've

0:56:26.640 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 1>been a them and BJS have both been doing really well.

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And there's a data point I saw that said of

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Costco members are Amazon Prime, which means they're holding two memberships. Um.

0:56:38.719 --> 0:56:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And that means and Amazon sells the same things Costco sells.

0:56:42.200 --> 0:56:45.799
<v Speaker 1>So Costco is doing something right. Get the Giant if

0:56:45.880 --> 0:56:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you have like five kids and you want those giant

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:52.000
<v Speaker 1>like I personally don't need two gallons of salsa, But

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 1>if you walk into a Costco when you want those

0:56:54.960 --> 0:56:59.279
<v Speaker 1>giant packages, I love the idea. Yeah, business is like it,

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:01.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's all so. You know, they sell gas, so

0:57:01.760 --> 0:57:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to drive there anyway. They have the in

0:57:04.040 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 1>store sampling. There's a bit of a treasure hunt feeling

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in Costco. So the point is that there's something they're

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:13.320
<v Speaker 1>doing right in the physical store to make people have

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:16.520
<v Speaker 1>two memberships. That's I'm really impressed with them. I visited

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Costco in Seattle and I just loved that. I love

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:21.960
<v Speaker 1>their philosophy, I love the way they think. You mentioned

0:57:22.040 --> 0:57:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Mickey Drexler and the Gap previously. Um, any of the retailers, Starbucks,

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:31.520
<v Speaker 1>anybody else come to mind. As as doing anything innovative. Well,

0:57:31.800 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously Starbucks invented customer experience, you know, they the third

0:57:35.800 --> 0:57:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Place and all of that stuff. I can't tell you

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>how many Harvard cases are written a bad start, really,

0:57:40.320 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, so that whole idea when they described

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 1>experience is different than than the way Amazon I'm described it,

0:57:46.960 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 1>but they understood that also, so that I also like

0:57:49.840 --> 0:57:52.840
<v Speaker 1>t J Max and Burlington give the notion of the

0:57:53.120 --> 0:57:56.080
<v Speaker 1>treasure hunt in those stores, um, and how they keep

0:57:56.160 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the prices way down and still understand scarcity and exclusive civity.

0:58:00.480 --> 0:58:02.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's kind of interesting. You don't want to

0:58:02.800 --> 0:58:04.919
<v Speaker 1>go into a store and see twenty different of these

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:07.520
<v Speaker 1>A dresses on a special price. You want to find

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>one that's just for you. You know, that's an interesting idea.

0:58:11.480 --> 0:58:14.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about books. This is everybody's favorite question.

0:58:14.520 --> 0:58:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about some of your favorite books, be they fiction, nonfiction,

0:58:18.840 --> 0:58:21.280
<v Speaker 1>retail related, or not. You know, I was an English

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:24.240
<v Speaker 1>lit major, so I read lots of fiction for a

0:58:24.320 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>really long time, and my best my favorite books would

0:58:27.240 --> 0:58:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be the classics or some of the best selling fiction.

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 1>But most recently I have been reading more nonfiction, so

0:58:33.720 --> 0:58:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I really like, um, you know, Malcolm Gladwell, Michael Lewis.

0:58:37.040 --> 0:58:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I also like to read female comedians. So I like

0:58:40.680 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Silverman and I like Tina Facebook. I like. I

0:58:43.760 --> 0:58:46.480
<v Speaker 1>read both of those and they're both very amusing. Yeah,

0:58:46.520 --> 0:58:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they're very amusing and I like their take. So the

0:58:49.120 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Silverman's book was The Bed or something like that

0:58:53.400 --> 0:58:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and ums Pants. Yeah, yeah, they were both um absolutely.

0:58:59.160 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh any other female comedian books you would recommend, because

0:59:03.360 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 1>those are the only two I have. Those are the

0:59:04.920 --> 0:59:06.720
<v Speaker 1>two ones I read. I don't. I have to read

0:59:06.800 --> 0:59:09.840
<v Speaker 1>so much academic stuff that it's sometimes hard to read books.

0:59:10.000 --> 0:59:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So what what has you excited about retail today? What

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:16.600
<v Speaker 1>do you really jazzed about. Well, one of the things

0:59:16.680 --> 0:59:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to do, I'm thinking of developing, working with

0:59:19.240 --> 0:59:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a partner to develop a new course on visual marketing

0:59:22.680 --> 0:59:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and visual markets. So what we can learn by eye

0:59:25.360 --> 0:59:28.560
<v Speaker 1>tracking and what people are attracted to the website or

0:59:28.600 --> 0:59:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in a physical stuff. You can wear goggles and see

0:59:31.000 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 1>what people look at the store, you can see what

0:59:32.960 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 1>they look at online. We start to see what's automatic

0:59:36.640 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 1>reaction to visual You know, you said your wife as

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a designer, it's kind of interesting to see what people

0:59:42.080 --> 0:59:45.200
<v Speaker 1>are struck by how they scan a product. So this

0:59:45.400 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 1>new neural marketing idea, the idea of new ways to

0:59:48.320 --> 0:59:50.880
<v Speaker 1>collect data, new ways to get in people's heads or

0:59:50.960 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to see what they automatically and can't tell you they appreciate.

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:57.320
<v Speaker 1>When you start to care about what customers want in retail,

0:59:57.720 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 1>these different ways of measuring it is pretty exciting. Uh

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that that that's quite interesting. Um, what do you think

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is the most significant change we're going to see in

1:00:06.720 --> 1:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>retail over the next couple of years. I think we're

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to see retailers that just don't cut

1:00:12.320 --> 1:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it go out of business. And I think that's okay,

1:00:15.040 --> 1:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, And I think Amazon is gonna keep pushing.

1:00:18.400 --> 1:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna They're gonna go into other businesses that I'm

1:00:21.480 --> 1:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>really interested to see what happens. They're talking about the

1:00:23.720 --> 1:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>retailization of healthcare, talk about the situation that is so

1:00:27.520 --> 1:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>non customer focused healthcare. I mean, you can't get worse

1:00:31.120 --> 1:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>service than in healthcare, you know, cable is probably so.

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna see changes in all of that.

1:00:39.280 --> 1:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And the idea that this retail model has legs that

1:00:42.960 --> 1:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it should appuied to lots of different ways of thinking.

1:00:45.760 --> 1:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're going to see big changes there.

1:00:48.960 --> 1:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, as I mentioned earlier, I am a car guy.

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>The car shopping experience is horrific. Any chance we're ever

1:00:57.520 --> 1:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>going to see that improved tesla see SEMs to be

1:01:00.600 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>making some headway. Yeah, he's an interesting guy, Wharton grad.

1:01:04.560 --> 1:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh is he under to say the least? He's an

1:01:07.560 --> 1:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting guy. Of all the retail experiences there is, there

1:01:12.200 --> 1:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is none more entrenched in the past than going out

1:01:15.360 --> 1:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and trying to shop for a call. Oh my god,

1:01:16.880 --> 1:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't stand it. I just so, why has nobody

1:01:19.560 --> 1:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>disrupted that yet? Well, some people have tried to do it.

1:01:21.880 --> 1:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess some people like the game of that. I

1:01:24.520 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know very you know, it's it should be disrupted

1:01:28.640 --> 1:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>them that That's what you're looking for, Things that are

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>not pleasant, that people don't want to do. Somebody's going

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to come in and do it, right you You Wharton

1:01:36.120 --> 1:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>students get busy on that. Um, so, tell us about

1:01:39.600 --> 1:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a time you failed and what you learned from the experience. Well, uh,

1:01:44.600 --> 1:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a couple of times. They're difficult to

1:01:46.400 --> 1:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about. So, but what characterized the times and several

1:01:50.760 --> 1:01:53.919
<v Speaker 1>points during my life that I failed where something came

1:01:53.920 --> 1:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>as a surprise to me. That's what I would say.

1:01:56.640 --> 1:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a function of mine not being a very

1:01:59.040 --> 1:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>good self monitor And what I mean by that is

1:02:02.360 --> 1:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I have a lot of empathy, and I

1:02:04.400 --> 1:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>can see what's going on and I look around. I

1:02:06.320 --> 1:02:09.439
<v Speaker 1>see a lot. I can feel people's emotional reactions and think.

1:02:09.760 --> 1:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>But what I am not good at is understanding how

1:02:13.160 --> 1:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I come off to other people. So that's called self monitoring.

1:02:16.640 --> 1:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't anticipate maybe if I get angry, how people

1:02:20.240 --> 1:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>will what people will feel about that, or if i'm

1:02:24.120 --> 1:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, short, tempt you know, or say something very

1:02:26.400 --> 1:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in a quick way. I don't appreciate that, and that's

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>gotten me into trouble to not like understand. It's not

1:02:32.760 --> 1:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>just what I see, but it's how people see me

1:02:37.040 --> 1:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that that that's intriguing. I will plead guilty to that

1:02:40.680 --> 1:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. Um, what do you do for fun when

1:02:43.760 --> 1:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not in the classroom? What what do you do

1:02:45.640 --> 1:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to to kick back and relax? You know? The more

1:02:49.320 --> 1:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the older I get, it's interesting for this, The more

1:02:51.880 --> 1:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>important I find running, working out, being outdoors walking. I

1:02:56.640 --> 1:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>could spend when I was younger, long times at a desk. Now,

1:02:59.560 --> 1:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>if I do that crazy, I just can't stand it.

1:03:03.440 --> 1:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm glad I teach, because you walk around

1:03:05.600 --> 1:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the classroom. But I really like the outdoors. I like running.

1:03:09.040 --> 1:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I like working out. So you have a fitbit and

1:03:12.720 --> 1:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>an Apple Watch on the same hand, at least I

1:03:15.080 --> 1:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>have things on two different hands. Why bo I like

1:03:18.560 --> 1:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I like when I'm working out to monitor, you know,

1:03:20.560 --> 1:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>self quantify, so they measure different things. So I have

1:03:23.960 --> 1:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>social networks that are connected in different ways. I compete

1:03:27.160 --> 1:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>on all of this stuff. I love it. I love

1:03:29.200 --> 1:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to see how my heart rate was today, how well

1:03:31.600 --> 1:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I slept. All of that stuff. My wife wears it

1:03:34.560 --> 1:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>when she sleeps. I hate having something on my wrist

1:03:37.600 --> 1:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>while I'm sleeping. It's a distraction. Um So is it

1:03:41.560 --> 1:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>an accurate monitor of your sleep? Pause? Oh? Apparently you know.

1:03:45.440 --> 1:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess I take it. It works for me. So

1:03:47.840 --> 1:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you work with millennials and young people. If someone were

1:03:51.120 --> 1:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to come to you and say they were interested in

1:03:52.960 --> 1:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>exploring career in marketing or digital brands or retail, what

1:03:57.520 --> 1:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of advice would you give them. Well, one of

1:03:59.800 --> 1:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing, you know, when I was the dean of Miami,

1:04:02.280 --> 1:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I talked to a lot of successful deans, always talked

1:04:04.640 --> 1:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the successful alums, and I asked around, like what advice

1:04:07.680 --> 1:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>would you give students? And from talking to all those people,

1:04:10.920 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I came up with three things that they said really

1:04:13.360 --> 1:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>made a difference. The first one and they seem obvious,

1:04:15.760 --> 1:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes people don't know this. The first thing is

1:04:18.800 --> 1:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>work hard. You know, don't take it for granted. You're

1:04:22.760 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>given a job, a job that maybe you like, work

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>hard at it. The second one is be nice to people.

1:04:28.400 --> 1:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Be nice to everyone. You know, from the receptionist all

1:04:31.600 --> 1:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the way down up to the CEO. Pay attention because

1:04:35.080 --> 1:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>people watch that behavior, and you know, going back to

1:04:38.000 --> 1:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>this notion of self monitoring, understand how you come off

1:04:41.400 --> 1:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to all these other people, and that matters. And the

1:04:44.120 --> 1:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>third piece of advice that people said over and over

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>was don't just learn what you do. Learn what your

1:04:49.840 --> 1:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>people on both sides of you do also, so learn

1:04:52.640 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>other skills. And then when you do that, you're in

1:04:54.880 --> 1:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the right place at the right time for potential promotion.

1:04:58.080 --> 1:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Because a lot of movement and firms are not so systematic.

1:05:01.760 --> 1:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It really is an accident or somebody got hurt and

1:05:04.400 --> 1:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>someone needs to step in and do something. These things,

1:05:07.120 --> 1:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>these opportunities come up, and you know, they say luck

1:05:10.160 --> 1:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is you know, hard work or however they say that

1:05:12.400 --> 1:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you know something, someone's lucky, was working hard for that

1:05:15.160 --> 1:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>lucky opportunity, opportunity or something like that. Yeah, yeah, I'm

1:05:19.640 --> 1:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>angling it too, but it's that's the idea interesting and

1:05:23.280 --> 1:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>our final question, what is it that you know about

1:05:26.200 --> 1:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the world of retail and marketing today that you wish

1:05:30.040 --> 1:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you knew twenty plus years ago when you first started

1:05:33.200 --> 1:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>your career. You know, like I said, when I was

1:05:35.120 --> 1:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>writing this book, it was shocking to me that I

1:05:37.920 --> 1:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>have been teaching marketing for a hundred million years and

1:05:41.320 --> 1:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we always achieved these principles of customer value, differential advantage,

1:05:45.200 --> 1:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and the third one is selectivity and concentration, which has

1:05:48.000 --> 1:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to do its segmentation. And that I did not realize

1:05:51.600 --> 1:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>until I sat down and wrote this book and thought

1:05:53.680 --> 1:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>about what Amazon did, that retail was not customer focused.

1:05:57.280 --> 1:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>That's like so amazing to me, because that retails about

1:06:01.480 --> 1:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>selling to the consumer. How could they not understand that

1:06:05.200 --> 1:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the consumer input is important and it shouldn't just be

1:06:08.440 --> 1:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a push strategy. It's amazing to me. Well, for how

1:06:12.520 --> 1:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>long did that strategy work before it's suddenly stop working.

1:06:17.040 --> 1:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, if the market gets competitive enough, if you

1:06:19.280 --> 1:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have enough competition. And that's why whenever I give

1:06:22.080 --> 1:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a talk on any of this stuff, I asked the room,

1:06:24.320 --> 1:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is Amazon a good guy or a bad guy? And

1:06:26.560 --> 1:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it's always fifty if you're a customer. If you're a customer,

1:06:29.920 --> 1:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you say Amazon is a good guy. If you're a competitor,

1:06:32.600 --> 1:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you your face gets you read and you just hate

1:06:34.880 --> 1:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Amazon because competing against Amazon is so difficult. But most

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>people will agree what Amazon has done is raised the

1:06:41.640 --> 1:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>bar for everybody, frost the board across lots of different industries. Huh.

1:06:45.960 --> 1:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Quite fascinating. We have been speaking with Professor Barbara con

1:06:50.160 --> 1:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Wharton School of Business. If you enjoy this conversation,

1:06:54.240 --> 1:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll be sure and look up an inch or down

1:06:55.920 --> 1:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>an inch on Apple iTunes and you can see any

1:06:58.680 --> 1:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of the past two hundred plus conversations we've had previously.

1:07:03.520 --> 1:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>We love your comments, feedback and suggestions right to us

1:07:07.640 --> 1:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. I would

1:07:12.320 --> 1:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>be remiss if I did not thank the crack staff

1:07:15.040 --> 1:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that helps me put together these conversations each week. Attica

1:07:19.120 --> 1:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>val bron is our project manager. Medina Parwana is my

1:07:23.160 --> 1:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>producer slash audio engineer par Excellence. Taylor Riggs is our

1:07:27.720 --> 1:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>booker slash producer. Michael Batnick is our head of research.

1:07:31.920 --> 1:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ritults. You've been listening to Masters in Business

1:07:35.640 --> 1:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio