WEBVTT - SEC Preview - Part 2: Does Georgia have a schedule problem? + Texas, Ole Miss, Missouri, Florida & more team previews! - 2024 College Football

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. Pull that for me. I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm for.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 2>I've heard so many players say, well I want to

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 2>be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to be happy for a day? Edo State

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is that? Whoo whoom? And Dan and Tie SEC Preview

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>part say it? Tie, Yeah, I got a request out

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>on discord that I never stopped doing that. Oh good,

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it's been a big hit.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's the power of signing up to be a

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 2>verballer at verballers dot com. You get to control what

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Tye says. You get to pull the puppet strings.

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Not exactly, but not opposed to that either, Okay, not

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>opposed to that. We appreciate everybody's support out there. I

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>am ty he is Dan. This is the solid verbal.

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>This is part two of our ongoing SEC preview series,

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>really of our ongoing college football twenty twenty four preview series.

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we've got both the ACC and the Big

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Twelve in the books. We've got part one of the

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>SEC where we talked through our contender tiers. Also in

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the books, you can go back and listen to that episode.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>It's the last one out there on the feed today

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're actually going to start talking about specific SEC teams,

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to do so with a focus on

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>these eight Remember there are sixteen teams now in the SEC.

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk today about Georgia and Texas, about

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Ole miss and MISSOO, about Texas, A and M and Florida,

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and about Mississippi State and Vanderbilt to close things out. Yes,

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>so for for you that you focused on, for for

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>me that I focused on a little bit more intently

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. So excited to get into the nitty gritty

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>about these teams and much much more. Hit follow hit

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>subscribes that you don't miss any of our episodes on

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever platform you enjoy listening to podcasts on DAN. That's

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the rule. You know how it works by now, Yes,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely do so. On the last episode we talked

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>through our tiers, you and I both had Georgia and

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Texas pretty high. I don't think that is unique as

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>compared to other college football people out there, folks who

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>study this sort of thing. Most people kind of in

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>an agreement that both Georgia and Texas deserve to be

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>at the top. But where it gets interesting is when

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we start talking about the teams like the old Misses

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and the miszoos and certainly the texts A and MS

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>where there's change to discuss in some cases, and influx

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of talent via the transfer portal. Florida, of course, is

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a very very interesting topic for discussion on a number

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of different fronts. And then you got teams like Mississippi

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>State and Vanderbilt that notably are at the bottom here

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>but are both starting over in some respect trying to

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>reboot something within their program to see if they can

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>get to greater heights. Where do you think you'd like

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to start with this discussion?

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 2>I think we should start with Texas because they sort

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 2>of encompass a lot of what's new and interesting about

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 2>this conference, and we're not doing Alabama this episode, so

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 2>we're not starting with the defending champ. I'm sure we'll

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 2>get to Georgia next, but I don't know, let's start

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 2>with the new. And the new with Texas is they're here.

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 2>The new with Texas is that they've joined the SEC.

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>They have an SEC schedule, And with Texas and Oklahoma,

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 2>of course comes the end of divisions, so everybody's schedule

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 2>looks sort of different. Right, there's protected matchups, but I

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know, divisionless football is a new thing, and Texas

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 2>is one of those teams. So Texas brings back a

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 2>ton As, a Big twelve playoff team for a second.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Please you you're doing this again to me? Ah, sod?

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Where should we start? That's danger the SEC. We need

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to work on our communication here. I was waiting give

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>me a runway so that I could shoehorn that sound in.

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 2>But it's okay, Okay, Sorry, I apologize. So I'm very

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>excited to talk SEC foot.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, I know, I appreciate that. Okay.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Can I get back to what I was saying?

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Please do I apologize, sir? Okay? Can you?

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm very excited about Texas football, and the things that

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.839
<v Speaker 2>make me excited are the experience that Sark has been there,

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 2>that there's continuity on the staff. Look, it's not to

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>echo the laziest talking point of all, but it all

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>starts up front. And Texas is entering into this conference

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>with if not the best offensive line. A conversation that

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 2>they have the best offensive line in this country, especially

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 2>or in the conference, at least anchored by Calvin Banks,

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 2>left tackle, All American and he's probably going to be

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 2>top five to seven pick or whatever. In the twenty

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty five NFL Draft. They should be able to run,

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>they should be able to throw, and they should be

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 2>able to throw, replacing a lot both at receiver and

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>tight end. But when you add in Isaiah Bond from Alabama,

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 2>John Tay Cook, you know, former five star Silas Bolden

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 2>from Oregon State, Ryan Wingo a five star coming in, Like,

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 2>there are too many options for this passing game not

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 2>to work really really well. Considering it Sarks, bread and Butter,

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 2>considering the talent here, considering the experience, considering the line

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 2>protecting Quinn Eewers, and maybe arch manning of Quinn Eewers

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 2>goes down. There's just there's very little way, even with

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 2>Texas's schedule, and I know George's on this schedule, that

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to have a top ten to twelve

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>offense in America, if not higher.

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh, they're going to score thirty eight points a game

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>with this offense.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 2>They're in a great starting place there. What I really

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>like about where Texas is at is we knew what

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 2>was the weak point of Texas. We knew that danger

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 2>to Texas last year. By the end of last year

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 2>and seeing certain quarterbacks have success was they weren't getting

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 2>home off of the edge, and their DB's were losing

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:43.799
<v Speaker 2>one on one battles deep. They were giving up big

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 2>pass plays. And it wasn't just on the secondary. Wasn't

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 2>just on the pass rush. But if you have a

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 2>pass rush, it's easier on the dbs, If you have

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 2>sticky Will Johnson type corners, it becomes easier for everybody

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 2>to get to the quarterback and to get the defense

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 2>off the field. Texas has developed youth really well at

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 2>all three levels, and guys who are rotation guys step

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 2>in along the line at the linebacker spot, at both

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 2>linebacker spots really and in the secondary. They also went

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 2>into the portal once again to build up depth in

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the secondary, to build up depth at edge rusher. Trey

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Moore is that big name from UTSA they were after.

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is sort of a common theme in

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the league right now, is building up beefy depth, you

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 2>know a defensive tackle, which Texas did its best to do,

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, whiffed on a couple of transfer targets, but

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 2>brought in guys and by and large, Texas should be

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 2>in a very good spot now. The schedule is not

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 2>the easiest in terms of what they have in a row,

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think there are trappy moments. You know, they

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 2>have Oklahoma and Georgia. I think in consecutive weeks they

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 2>do so Oklahoma of course in Dallas, and Georgia is

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 2>in Auxton.

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in Texas it's in Austin.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 2>Still, that's a horrific back to back for most teams.

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 2>We'll see if it is for Texas. But there's a

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 2>reason they're a contender. There's a reason that, like Okay,

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 2>so their defensive tackles aren't quite where they were last

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 2>year with Biro Murphy and Devandre Sweat. Very few teams

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, can say that they are. So I think

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Texas in a great spot. I really really do. We'll

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 2>see like linebacker depth, will see defensive tackle depth, and

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>that's when you start getting into the end of the year.

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Their run is looks like what Florida at Arkansas, Kentucky

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 2>at A and M. You know, getting that Kentucky defense

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 2>a week before traveling to College Station. It's just I

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 2>don't know if it's going to be trickier as a

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 2>look ahead spot playing against Kentucky or against A and M.

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 2>After in a body blow spot. I mean, the emotion

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 2>will be there, the motivation will be there as they

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 2>reignite that rivalry with.

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>A and M.

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>But you really can't look at Texas and say like, oh,

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 2>here's a major, major question and so yes, it's a

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 2>transition to a new conference. You know, Sark doesn't have,

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, the experience game planning against all of these

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 2>defensive coordinators and going to all of these stadiums. But look,

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 2>they go to Alabama and beat them on the road.

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Well he kind of does, though he was in the

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>SEC before he was at Texas.

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes he was. But I'm saying, with this roster, with

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>this place whatever. Yeah, but that's me nitpicking, that's me.

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 2>That's a half truth at best.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just think it says an awful lot

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>about the job that Sark's done that they lost their

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>top running back, their top five wide receivers both Sweat

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and Murphy off the line who you mentioned earlier.

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 2>And they lost their running back like two thirds of

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the way into the year last year.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but still the point stands, there's a lot walking

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>out the door and they're over under is still ten

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half going into what amounts to a much

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 1>TOFTFER Conference. Now the over under is ten and a half.

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I would not bet on Texas going over ten and

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a half. And it's not because I don't like the team.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>It's because so much is changing. I like their talent.

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But to your point of, Okay, they've got Oklahoma and

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Georgia on back to back weeks. Okay, they've got Kentucky

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in that defense a week before squaring off against Texas

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>A and M. We don't know yet what the bumps

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 1>in the road are going to be for this team

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>going into this conference.

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 2>No, and look, if we're talking about Texas as a

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty three playoff team last year, that path is different.

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 2>It is they beat Alabama on the road, but the

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 2>week to week path in getting And this is no

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 2>disrespect intended, because these are a lot of quality teams

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 2>on this listing of teams, but going through Kansas State

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 2>getting Oklahoma State, Texas Tech, a lot of teams that

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>just don't have the tech, don't have don't recruit on

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the level of a lot of the teams on Texas's

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 2>new schedule. It's a different animal. And the other concern

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I would have with Texas, that's nothing they can control.

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 2>They can't Texas can't control how Kansas recruits, they can't

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 2>control how TC recruits and whatever. But the other animal

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 2>here is something that I think we've we put in

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 2>the past a little bit, where so two years ago

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 2>they struggle in the second halves of games and we're

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 2>just like, man, why are they losing this? Why are

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 2>they not scoring this? Why are they swing three points

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 2>in this second half loss to an inferior roster. Last

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 2>year against Washington specifically, they're like, well, the running backs

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 2>are fumbling a little, but they're running for seven yards

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 2>of carry and they've abandoned the run in the second

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 2>half and they're putting it all on Quinn yours. Now

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Washington has this ability to sort of pin their ears

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 2>back and look at a more predictable second half Texas offense.

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 2>The question then is, like sark toe to toe as

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 2>an offensive coordinator in a big game and proved against

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Alabama on the road for sure last year. Is it

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>going to be an every week thing that Texas either

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 2>survives in spite of itself or loses something that they

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 2>might not have had to because of you know, three

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 2>weird three and outs in the second half against Georgia

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 2>against Kentucky against A and M or something like that.

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 2>That would be the concern as things become more difficult.

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and look, I also think playing this type of

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>schedule brings into focus the fact that quinn Ewers has

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>had some health concerns in the past. Now they've got

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>arch Manning behind him, yep, who hasn't played meaningful snaps.

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they feel good about their quarterback depth for

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>obvious reasons. But one of those other points that I

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>think worth is worth mentioning at this early juncture, and

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>more to my point of we don't fully know what

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that transition into the SEC will look like. We assume

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it will go rather smoothly in that Texas's position well

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it. Yeah, but who knows?

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Who knows it's It's also I haven't been in a

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 2>few years, but I've been to a few Texas games.

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not always an SEC the best of SEC, even

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 2>though we consider Texas in this grouping. The environment at

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 2>DKR it's a little quieter, it's a little less rowdy,

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 2>it's a little less electric, it's a little bit less

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 2>of a frenzy. Maybe it's changed the last few years

0:11:55.960 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 2>as they've gotten better, but it's it's not exactly the

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 2>hornet's nest that is multi sport field tie. Let's go

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 2>to Georgia then, I mean, when we did our last episode,

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>it seems the two teams that we felt best about

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>were Texas and obviously Georgia. Thirteen and one last season

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 2>lost to Alabama in the SEC title game. We'll talk

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 2>about Bama on the next episode. Then went to the

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Orange Bowl and smoked Florida State by sixty points, just

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>killed him. Obviously there were reasons for that, okay, but

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Georgia is a very good team, and Georgia was kind

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 2>of at full strength going into that game. So now

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 2>going into this new season, they're at a dynasty level

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 2>with this program. Kirby Smartest done a really good job,

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 2>and there's no reason to think that they won't get

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 2>there again.

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>This is probably one of those times where I'm supposed

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a hot take. I've got the volcano behind me,

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>take a toa I've got other takes that will throw

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>in that volcano, and I'll play my sound as we

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>go through the course of this episode in the one

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>after it. But I don't have a take. I don't

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have anything spicy that's going to rack up downloads of

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>use or whatever like Georgia is take proof at this

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>point from my standpoint.

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 2>At least for on field stuff.

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>For on field stuff, yes, of course for onfield So

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>not going down that rabbit hole.

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you said not going down that road, because

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>that would have been an appropriate continue not going down

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that road.

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Beautiful.

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>The best way I can describe this team on the

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>field is that they are painfully yet scary. Boring. Okay,

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it's boring. It's boring. We already kind of know what

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get. And that's despite the loss of

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Brock Bowers, the lad McConkie and two guys in the

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>backfield and many others. They're twenty ninth nationally in returning production,

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>so they lost a lot but still rank very highly

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what they have coming back, which is

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>something of a rarity, if I'm being honest with you.

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Here an elite team from a year ago that has

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>this much back. Part of the reason why I like

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Michigan last season, it's popular pick to win the National Championship.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't alone in that they have so much back

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>from their team in twenty twenty two, obviously there was

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot to like. In twenty twenty three, they end

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>up winning the National Championship. Not to be cliche, but

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the same is true for Georgia as it was for Texas.

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Where does it start, Dan, It starts up front, and

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be maybe the four straight year

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>where they've got an offensive line that's a finalist for

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the Joe Moore Award, which they give out to the

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>best offensive line in the country. Yep, you can just

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>sort yeah, you can just sort of work backwards from there. Man,

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not that complicated. You got a Heisman caliber quarterback

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in Carson Beck. They bring over Trevor Etn from Florida,

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>going to run the rock. They've got a stable of

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>running backs. If it's not Trevor Etn, plenty of guys

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>they could count on their receiver room. Maybe a bit

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>weaker now with the dismissal of ra Ra Thomas due

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to his legal issues, but still dominic love it and

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Bell and Colby Young who comes up from Miami, London.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Humphreys who was a big play guy from Vandy. He

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>comes in oh an oscar dealt by the way, all right,

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk a lot about Rock Bowers is leaving.

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>He was maybe one of the better tight ends in

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the history of the game. Oscar delp is pretty good.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>He was good in relief effort when he had a

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>step in for Brock Bowers on a full time basis

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>here and there last season. Now he's going to be

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the duke.

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Ro Roh Thomas suspended indefinitely. He was the last thing

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 2>I saw.

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Off the team. He's gone, He's off the team. Yeah,

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, I'm just listed off names here. That's not

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the point of this, but it kind of is the

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>point of it, right Like if you have been following

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>this team, or this show or this damn sport for

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the last handful of years, you know, most of the

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>names have just rattled off, not a whole lot of

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>unknown quantities. And it's kind of the same deal on

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>defense too. Loaded up front with Michel Williams, who might

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>be a first round draft pick, will be a first

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>round draft pick, na Zerr Stackhouse, There's a ton of

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>experience in the linebacking corps, high level talent behind them.

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>On the depth chart. If anything's weak, I guess it's

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the secondary. But I'm really reaching here. I'm really splitting Harris.

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>They got a lot of do it's back there. Yeah,

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Georgia's week spots would be many other team's strengths. Again,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had something spicier for you, but I don't.

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's the schedule. I think it's it's not a

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 2>week spot per se, because everybody that they play is

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 2>more terrified of Georgia than Georgia is of it. But

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 2>I think again, if you have the schedule in front

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 2>of you, it's like maybe the most difficult first five

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 2>weeks of defense that a team might play in the country. Again,

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 2>if you're like an average you know, your replacement level team,

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 2>there's no team that I think has a more difficult

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>is it? For the first five weeks it's Clemson, Kentucky?

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Who else is on there?

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>In Kentucky? Alabama, Auburn are the Biggins. And then as

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you get into this week six, Week seven on the

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>road at Texas that's on October the nineteenth, that's obviously

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be the marque matchup of the weekend. So defense, yeah,

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>not really in short supply through the first half of

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the Georgia schedule, and it is a more difficult schedule

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>than we saw last year, than we saw the year prior.

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>It certainly is. I think many of these teams that

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>are on this thing have up their game. But I

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>still really like Georgia chances just because, again, so many

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>known quantities. There's a reason that even with the schedule

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half ste over under, I don't think

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>i'd take the bet. Honestly, I don't think I would.

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I love Georgia, I think George's winning the SEC, but

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm not taking that bet. It's not because I think

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>they're overrated. It's because there are some tough runs here.

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>That neutral Cider against Clemson in Week one. Weird things

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>happen in Week one. Yeah, at Bamba at Bama. You

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>could talk more about Bama on the next episode. Still

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talent there. At Texas at Old Miss.

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Anytime you go on the road in this conference, strange

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>things can happen. By the way, that Old Miss game

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is a week after the Florida rivalry and a week

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>before a home game against Tennessee. Talk about more beef

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on the schedule. They've got Auburn at home a week

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>after the Bamba game.

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Auburn gave him a lot of trouble last year.

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think despite the fact that I really

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>like Georgia to win this conference to get back to

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that SEC title game, I think there's a good chance

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>George drops one of these and they end up eleven

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to one, they still could hit that over. I don't

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>know if they're losing two games, who's.

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Doing like the SEC on ABC, who is the main

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 2>voice of that, like the big game of the week.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it Joe Test I'm assuming it's going to be

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Joe Tess. I don't know.

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 2>My question is this, is there a chance, like come

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 2>week four, Week five, whatever, that whoever is calling Georgia

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 2>a few weeks into the year is going to mention

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 2>that you can tell the Georgia offense for the first

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 2>time in quite some time, really does miss brock Bauers

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 2>and lad mconkey because of the safety valve and almost

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 2>like how not underrated because they've gotten a ton of attention,

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 2>and that we just assume that because Georgia recruits this well,

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 2>because they've hit the portal as well as they have,

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 2>that they'll figure it out, which I think is a

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 2>totally fair assumption. You don't get to be this good

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 2>this often without figuring it out. But that was like,

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that was the main stay over two different quarterbacks, three

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 2>different seasons in which they were excellent consecutively. That even

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 2>with brock Bauer's injury last year, it was one of

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 2>your favorite kinds of injuries. What did they call it,

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the procedure, the tyrope. Yeah, yeah, and lad McConkie was

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 2>injured as well, and they had like ninety something catches

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 2>between them last year. It was like one hundred and

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 2>twenty the year before that. The successful Georgia offense, as

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 2>much as they leaned on power rushing and bruising teams up,

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 2>that so much of the explosivity of this offense ran

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 2>through brock Bowers.

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>In Lad McConkie.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 2>And that they're underrated, but that we're perhaps underrating their departures.

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, look, and they were mainstays. They were a

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 1>big part of that offense. But to the point they

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>were both hurt. Yeah, no, they were both dealing with

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch. They needed to figure out how to win

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>without those guys, and they did more often than not.

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>They they absolutely did. I think the guys that they're

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>backfilling with are fine. I don't know if anyone's brought Bowers,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>but Oscar delp was really good in a relief effort.

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Some of these guys that Georgia wentn and got in

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the transfer portal at the receiver position. It's clear that

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they knew they wanted to beef up that side of things.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>They knew that they were going to have some folks

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>walking out the door. So I think they'll be just fine.

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>My expectation is it will be something you hear the

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>announcing crews talk about early, but maybe not so much late. Okay,

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. And by the way, we haven't even mentioned

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Carson Beck. We mentioned him once, mentioned him once. He

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>might win the damn Heisman Trophy.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's ridiculous and his moves crazy well, is accurate,

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 2>is poised, and with whatever he had early on last

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 2>season in terms of new quarterback adjustment period, he became

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 2>exponentially more comfortable week over week last year and it showed.

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>It absolutely showed. One of the things that our friend

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill Connolly talked about in his preview of Georgia was

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>just how effective Georgia is at working the middle of

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the field in between the hashes. And we could talk

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>about that a little bit maybe when we get to

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the Jalen mill Roe part of our conversation here in

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>part three. But the throw over the middle is extremely difficult.

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>There's just more that can go wrong. There are more

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>guys in the middle of the field, and Carson Beck

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>completed something like seventy four seventy five percent of his

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>passes across the middle of the field. That's on top

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>of what they were able to do in the running game,

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>where they run between the tackles. That can beat you

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>up over the middle. So there's just so many different

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>ways this team can beat you. Carson Beck was very

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>responsible with the football last season. We had a couple

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>instances a year ago where we were curious what Beck

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>would look like when they turned more of the offense

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>over to him. I remember, I want to say it

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>was either the Kentucky or the a Zuri game, especially

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>last season, or we talked about what is Carson Beck

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna look like if they take away the running game.

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>He was superb more often than not. I have no

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>reason to expect otherwise this season. So for me, from

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>where I sit, Georgia is the most proven quantity in

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>this entire conference. Yes, the schedule is more difficult. No,

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised to see them drop a game,

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>but they are still unequivocally my conference favorite and the

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>team that I've gotten coming out of the SEC.

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they did play more competitive games last year

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>than they did did it the couple of years prior,

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 2>and it was what Georgia Tech. They were a little

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 2>bit careless late and that was somewhat of a game

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 2>Miszoo went toe to toe with them for a good

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 2>chunk of that game. They lose Tobama in the SEC

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>championship game, so slightly more human. If there's anything that

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 2>was a danger last year is you could run on

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 2>them a little bit and Auburn was creative with it,

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 2>like you could. You could get some plays moving the

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 2>ball on the ground against this Georgia team, and definitely

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 2>wasn't the case those couple of years prior. And no

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 2>more coach boom Ti, no must champ, no longer defensive coordinator.

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>All right, so you had Old Miss in your SEC

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>title game. Yes, Ole Miss has an over under of

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half this year. They were eleven and two.

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>A year ago beat Penn State and the peach Ball

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>lost to Baman Georgia. And that was sort of my

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 1>hang up when we talked about ole Miss on the

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.479
<v Speaker 1>last episode, that in those games in particular, they weren't

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>especially close. Is this the year for Old Miss because

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>they've got a ton back a huge hole in the

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>portal lane Kiffin, as I said last episode, not just

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 1>using the portal plug holes. He did do it for

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>those reasons, but he also did it to stack depth.

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Got a lot of depth in some positions. That's more

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of the case than others. But in this new era

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 1>of the sport now or I end up playing more games,

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>depth is kind of its own currency. I think Old

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Miss is set up really really well there. Stansterresian could

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>get a boost from year number two under Pete Golding

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 1>running the defense. The schedule kind of beautiful. It seems

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>set up for at least nine wins in all likelihood,

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe ten or more. I understand the optimism around Ole Miss,

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but again I come back to is this the year

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and what will change if so to make it that year?

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, I think the offensive line is going to

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 2>get better, which was a weak point last year. I

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 2>think Jackson Dart, I mean, he's dealt with some offseason procedures,

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I believe, or treatment, whatever the word you want to

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 2>look for. He was beat up last year and maybe

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 2>that played a role, which, by the way, quick little

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 2>apology if you want to play the sounds the boot

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 2>boop ba doo. I feel like I was a little

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 2>bit unfair to Baron Morton, given that I didn't bring

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 2>up his ac joint injury last year, and as somebody

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.479
<v Speaker 2>currently suffering from a much better injury than what I'm

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 2>sure Baron or was suffering from my sympathies and hopefully

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 2>he's back. And I was more aware of it looking

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 2>at Jackson Dart, who was beat up all of last

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 2>year and gutted through a bunch of these games, but

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 2>ole miss in their wins. They weren't running away from

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of teams. And when I'm looking for like

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 2>that next step, I'm looking for more comfortable wins against

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 2>quality teams. And I think it is a skill to

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 2>win and win those close games, beat against Auburn or Texas,

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 2>a and ever or whatever. But these are, you know,

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 2>the final year of Jimbo and an interim situation. It's

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 2>year one of Hugh Freeze, and like I don't know,

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.719
<v Speaker 2>I feel like ole Miss should be further along if

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 2>we're going to consider them a true contender. And you're

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 2>absolutely right to bring up not being competitive at all

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 2>against Alabama those final three quarters, and certainly the whole

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 2>game against Georgia, but ole Miss being as proactive as

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 2>they have been in the portal stacking receiving talent, which

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 2>I think will only make them more dangerous. And I

0:25:58.440 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 2>still think they're going to be dangerous on the ground.

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 2>With out Quinn Shawn Judkins, we'll see along the offensive

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 2>line they went. I think they got two of Washington's

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 2>offensive linemen from last year inside, so hopefully that helps

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 2>that that was the line that won the Joe More Award.

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think Jackson Dart is the big question to

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 2>me if he is clearly better and I thought he

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 2>was good, I thought it was really good last year,

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 2>but if he has taken that next step to where

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 2>he given these receivers given what the position this defense

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 2>should put them in, given their schedule, like Jackson Dart

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 2>should be at least I don't fringe all SEC quarterback

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 2>fringe Heisman, you know, given Lane Kiffin's success on offense,

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's a crazy thing to say given

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 2>his experience, you know, on this roster in college football

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 2>and coming back. So I like ole Miss a lot,

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 2>I really really do. I think the firepowers there. I

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 2>think they're gonna get after the quarterback better. I like

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the portal moves they made on defense. Walter Nolan is

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 2>that big, big move in the middle where he should

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 2>be a lot more disruptive against the run, which ole

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Miss can definitely stand to be more disruptive against the run.

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's great. I think the big danger they

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 2>pose is just like so much speed everywhere on this offense,

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 2>and the danger to themselves is protecting Jackson Dart and

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 2>perhaps playing down to teams at times. Because I think

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:20.959
<v Speaker 2>the defense is going to still get better. I think

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 2>there's still a ton of room to improve, and I

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 2>think they've addressed enough there that they will. It's to

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 2>me and what, Princely, I want to hear you say it?

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Can you try and say it? Uman Lian Uman Mealen,

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Uman Mealen There, Princely Uman Mealen, Uman Mealen.

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>What's really cool about the Florida or his entry on

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the Florida team website And they're starting to do more

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of this, which I think is a good thing, especially

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for idiots like me. You can actually play a voice file,

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a sound file of that player. Oh, I appreciate that.

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>That's really pronouncing their own name. You know, it's legit.

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I haven't even mentioned Juice Wells, by the way,

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the embarrassment of riches on offense transferring in from South Carolina.

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 2>So schedule wise, look, Ole Miss has Georgia and then

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 2>a bye and then they're at Florida. That's a if

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 2>you're going to play both of those teams, and you know,

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 2>playing the Swamp is always difficult in its own way,

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 2>that's a good way to do it. H Kentucky at

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina, which again I'm not looking past at LSU

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 2>certainly not looking past with some of Ole Miss's recent

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 2>defensive issues. And then they get a buye before Oklahoma.

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not an amazing schedule, but all things considered, missing

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the teams that they miss, I think it's pretty great.

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Considering their experience, consider considering their depth at this moment,

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I think they're in a great position.

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you think if Jackson Dark gets drafted into the NFL,

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>he'll still do the Anakin Skywalker I black things. I

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>should hope. So yeah, I feel like that's kind of

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>his brand at this point. Yeah, Look, if the defense improves,

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the defense takes a jump forward. In year two, hunderd

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>peak colding.

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, weren't bad. This was like a top forty

0:28:58.680 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 2>hours defense.

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, they weren't bad at all. But it

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is still the thing that I think comes up most

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>frequently and you talk to people about old miss and

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>how they feel or don't feel. Yeah, if the defense

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>takes a step four under peak Golding in year two,

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>watch out, the.

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.959
<v Speaker 2>Pass rush was pretty good. They weren't terrible at anything.

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 2>If they can get excellent at something right, stuffing everybody

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 2>on the ground, getting after the quarterback, erasing things, and

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 2>getting back to like a land shark look which look,

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 2>they're very active. I mentioned offensive line, very active in

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 2>the portal at dB as well. Then that's when they

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 2>become truly a dangerous program. If they can do something

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 2>excellently on defense, which is I think what's been holding

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 2>them back. They haven't had that thing.

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So we'll say you mentioned the Florida Gators. Yeah, I

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>spent two and a half hours studying the Florida Gators.

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sorry. Four and a half is the over

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>under five and seven. Last season missed a Bowl for

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the first time since twenty seventeen. It's no wonder Billy

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Napiers on the hot seat coming into this this year,

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and man, that four and a half line, it's just

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>shockingly low for a successful, a historically successful program like

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this to see that number, even for people like you

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and me who do this all the time and we're

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>always on the lookout for news and we understand trajectories

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of programs and what it at number knocked me back.

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 2>It really maybe it's just a sucker bet type number,

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 2>right that you're just trying to.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Loll coople in. It could be we know that over

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>unders are greatly influenced by schedules. Oklahoma, who we're going

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk about next episodes another really good example of that.

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>A team that might be better, but who's win loss

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>record could be worse. That's why they're a seven and

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a half. Florida is projected to have the toughest schedule

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in America, and for that reason alone, it looks pretty

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>beak for Billy Napier making it through this season. The irony, though,

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is that when you look at Florida in a vacuum

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>separate from the schedule. They've got the hall of a

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:04.239
<v Speaker 1>team that take a step forward almost everywhere. Okay, just

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a question of whether or not their strides that they

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>take forward are offset by like a I don't know,

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>four and eight or five and seven records might not

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to see it because of the schedule.

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 2>That number could also be that number every year we

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 2>see it in major conferences, minor conferences, whatever, that like,

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 2>it starts out poorly, somebody gets rid of a coach,

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:28.239
<v Speaker 2>or even they don't get rid of the coach, and

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 2>just the wheels fall off.

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of wheels falling off potential because

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of the schedule. I talked about that UCF game in

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>what is it, Week four or five pretty early in

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the season. That to me could be one of those games.

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But that aside, I came out of by Florida study

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>feeling somewhat optimistic about where the team is headed, at

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>least directionally. Okay. For one, they were super young last season,

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and they got a lot from their freshmen. You know,

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the saying freshmen becomes sophomores. Another year in the system

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I think should help raise the floor for the Gators.

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I also think Flarida will be pretty dangerous on offense,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>at least more dangerous on offense. For all the eye

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>rolling that we did that I did, especially about Graham

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Mertz a year ago, he was really good. Yeah, just

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>three interceptions, completed seventy three percent of his passes and

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the Spider line that gave up a sack one

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>out of every ten dropbacks, which is crazy and was

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifteenth in the nation. So looking back,

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>say what you want about Billion Napier. Absolutely a good

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>move to bring in Graham Mertz and give him the keys.

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So now he's back. Graham Mertz is back. You add

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in DJ Lagway. They're big time recruit into the quarterback room.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we'll see him a bit this year. I would

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>expect we would. He does not have the pressure of

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>having to be the true freshman going through this gauntlet

0:32:55.440 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of a schedule, trying to resurrect the program. Try and

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>keep Billi Napier employed by the university. I think that's

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a good situation for him. Can use him in spots.

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Great Trevor etn transfers out, but Montreal Johnson, who actually

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>led the team in rushing good. He's back. The receiver

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>room is stacked. This was not an explosive offense last season.

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:20.479
<v Speaker 1>That's an obvious area where I think they need to improve.

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>They've said as much, but my sense is that barring

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>injury or any kind of unforeseen circumstances, this is the

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>top twenty top twenty five caliber offense, they should be

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, Dan, I assume so. Yeah.

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean they were right around They were between forty

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and fifty last year, returning what they returned. I don't

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 2>think that's a crazy thing to say.

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if the offensive line is better, then yeah,

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 2>they weren't great.

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>They got to get the line sorted out right. If

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they're dangerous for all the reasons I described, they're in

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>danger because the line it's just too leaky. Yeah, the

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>line stats from last season were lousy. They're very bad

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in pass protection. Better in the game, But the line,

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost is central to what Billy Napier wants

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to build. He is on the record saying as much

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>he wants to play the physical running game, wants that

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to be the main thing, and it like kind of

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>has been. You could see maybe that he's trying to

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>make it so, but the line just has not been there.

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be better this year. I think it

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>helps to be better this year. But if they're in

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>danger at least at this point as we record this

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>in late July early August, that's why. That's the main

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>reason all that being said. Okay, I am burying the

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>lead a big time way. Florida is in danger if

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it cannot figure out this damn defense. It's been the

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 1>running joke for how many years? Two years now? Yep.

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>This was a bad defense headed into last season, those

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>bad defense. Coming out of last season, Billy Napier went

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 1>with like a near full line change on the coaching staff.

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Kept Austin Armstrong, but added Ron Roberts, who I think

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>previously was Armstrong's mentor. So there are two guys to

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 1>know the same system right along the line. We've already

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about losing guys like Prince Lee Uman Mile said

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it the wrong way, Umane Uman Mealen, excuse me Aleen, Yeah,

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>lose him in the portal to olbyss. But they also

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>did some good work in the portal. They plugged some holes.

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Cormani MacLean, former five star, comes down from Colorado we'll see,

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, We'll see. Joey Slackman, my token transfer from

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a small Ivy League school. I'm overly excited to see

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 1>comes in from Penn. L. J. McCrae, big time get

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in the recruiting. Gable on the defensive line was like

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.439
<v Speaker 1>the top rated defensive lineman in the country. Jamar Jane

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is still back at linebacker. It does not feel like

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>a talent thing, Dan Rubinstein. The talent is there, talent's there.

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>If they can't get the talent organized enough to get

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:08.479
<v Speaker 1>better on defense, that's on them.

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I think the talent's there to like compete for the ACC.

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 2>I just think you look at their opponents and how

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 2>their opponents recruit, and how their opponents are stacking depth

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 2>on defense and finding more than just you know, a

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 2>game changing receiver like That's the difference to me is

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 2>that there are pieces, but not a grouping, not a palette.

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about winning the conference, no, I know,

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about getting a damn bowl game game.

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I know, I hear you. Even talent is there for that.

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a brutal schedule anyway you want to measure this.

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>It is a brutal schedule, but the talent is on

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>this team to go to a bowl, and if they don't,

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and if it collapses, this is on the coaching staff.

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>It would be the right move to get billion Apier.

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 1>It probably would have been the right move last year

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of billion Apier. But the game of

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>another bite at the apple here and the talent there.

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>So if it does not come to fruition, if they

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>do not take some stride forward, it's on him. Even

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>against the brutals kin, I agree. The schedule, by the way,

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 1>is a joke. I mean, walk me through it. First

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>three games are home against Miami, against Samford, against Texas

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 1>A and m Next week on the road at Mississippi State.

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>That should be a win. I hope that's a win

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>before a bye week. Then comes that home game against UCF,

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a week before the Tennessee matchup. And I

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>could see that UCF game being very consequentially.

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 2>kJ Jefferson beat him last year, right.

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>KJ Jefferson beat him last year. It's a UCF team

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that could be dangerous for many of the reasons we

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>described in our Big twelve preview episodes. I would not

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>look past that game and I would not count that

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>as a gimme. But then you're like, you know, at

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee home against Kentucky, neutral site against Georgia, at Texas

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>home against LSU, these are all in a row by

0:37:55.640 --> 0:38:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the way home versus All miss and then they go

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>out the year at Florida State. You got to be

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>kidding me. They've got Georgia and Texas on back to

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>back weeks. Their November is a car crash. This schedule

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is brutal.

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, can I ask you this if I'm going to

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 2>tell you that I am a time traveler, I've come

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 2>back from December, which is when you always say that

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 2>we'll know more by and I tell you know what,

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to tell you what Florida's record is.

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to tell you how they did in

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 2>these games, but I'm going to tell you this, they

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 2>were legit pretty good this year.

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>What is to you?

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean? Record wise? Like, if Florida is

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 2>legit pretty good, they could start out the season five

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and zero. Right, these are beautifully blue and orange colored

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Florida Gator glasses. I'm now putting on sure, right, if

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 2>they're legit pretty good, that they're not careless with the ball,

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 2>that Trey Wilson has big games, that the defense comes

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:53.240
<v Speaker 2>together a little bit more, and they're fine, They're not amazing.

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:55.800
<v Speaker 2>They can beat Miami at home, Samford, Texas A and

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 2>m at home. They can go on the road and

0:38:57.120 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 2>beat a New Mississippi State, and they can beat UCF

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.919
<v Speaker 2>at home. No, it gets trickier from there. So let's

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:05.760
<v Speaker 2>say they lose to Tennessee, they lose at home to Kentucky,

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 2>and they lose to Georgia. They're five and three. They

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 2>lose to Texas, but beat LSU, so that's six and four,

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 2>beat Ole miss seven and four, and then beat a

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 2>struggling Florida State team who has taken a step back

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:20.760
<v Speaker 2>on offense and finish.

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Eight and five. I answer your question, I think quote

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>unquote legit good Florida against this schedule relative to their

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>talent on hand, because legit good Florida still isn't going

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to go ten and two against this.

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Right, Let's I'm saying, I think they're fully captive eight

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 2>and four.

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Either're fully captid eight and four, seven and five, okay,

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and that would take a huge step forward. By that,

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd be a huge step forward. I do think you

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>have to look at this within context, because if they

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 1>go seven to five or eight and four against this,

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that represents a major strive forward, and that would be

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>a big deal for Billy Napier. I don't think they

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 1>could fire them if you win seven to five, eight

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and four against this, because that would represent so much

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of a positive step forward. I don't think they could

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>do it now. I think he should get a raise

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:09.399
<v Speaker 1>at six and six. You can make that case. Where

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you can make that case, there's a whole separate conversation

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>about whether the powers that be at Florida still feel

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>invested in Billi Napier, and so I'm curious to see

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>what happens if they encounter some headwinds through the first

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>five six weeks of this season, because that UCF game

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:26.320
<v Speaker 1>looms pretty damn large.

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we're going A and M.

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's go A and M. Actually, uh, seven to six.

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Last year they got rid of Jimbo. They lost to

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma State in the bowl game. I looked at A

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>and M. You looked at them in more and more

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>detail than me, But I looked at them and I said,

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:50.919
<v Speaker 1>is it just beer? Should they be pretty good this year?

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>You know? Like, what is the range of Texas A

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and M outcomes this season?

0:40:56.760 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 2>So I think you start with the fact that I

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I think we agree that they're getting a coaching upgrade,

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 2>an in game coaching upgrade, a vision upgrade, a coach

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.240
<v Speaker 2>who is willing to adjust, a coach who is willing

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 2>to take in more ideas. And I think there is

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 2>reason to be confident that Mikelcho, especially given his experiences

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 2>both the head coach and as a major coach at

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Texas A and M, that they will lose fewer winnable

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 2>games than the Jimbo Fisher Texas A and M.

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd agree with that.

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So it's very difficult for me to see, even

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 2>with what I think is a pretty difficult schedule, considering

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 2>they start with Notre Dame, it's very difficult for me

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:41.320
<v Speaker 2>to see this A and M team not making a Bowl,

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Like I don't think they have a loss to app

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 2>State in them, Like I just I think they're going

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:50.439
<v Speaker 2>to be a better run program and they're just going

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:53.479
<v Speaker 2>to win what they should win inside of a game,

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 2>not how we like look at a team. So floor

0:41:56.640 --> 0:42:01.879
<v Speaker 2>and ceiling I have as six and six floor, nine

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 2>and three ceiling.

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I wrote down the exact same the exact same thing.

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 2>For Yeah Buddy Digital high five for Texas A and M.

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's still a lot of talent on hand

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>even after they lost so much in the portal thirty

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>one guys. I think it speaks to the draw of

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike Elko and that vision that they were able to

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>bring a lot of talent back in to kind of backfill,

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and how the roster in a pretty good spot. It

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>does not feel like they are starting over from a

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>talent standpoint, may maybe philosophically so.

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 2>And I think depth wise they are depth.

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Wise Okay, yeah, they were hit a little bit on depth,

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 1>but generally speaking from a talent standpoint, still really talented.

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>There's obvious investment in this program. And Elko has been

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's been very very good coaching up defense,

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 1>but has proven in his short time as a head

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>coach that he knows how to get more out of less.

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So you put a guy like that in a situation

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>like A and M that over under eight and a

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:03.239
<v Speaker 1>half makes a little bit more sense. The range of outcomes, though,

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I like that won't come into more focus until we

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>have health answers about Connor Wegman until we see this

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 1>team out there.

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's the whole thing. Yeah, even like Jalen Henderson

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:16.839
<v Speaker 2>was fine last year given the weird situation he entered

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:18.879
<v Speaker 2>into with you know, Connor Wagman going down to Max

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Johnson going down, Jalen Henderson looking like a more viable weapon. Look,

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the offensive line has been an issue. They've retooled it,

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:29.879
<v Speaker 2>They've brought in transfers. They lose, you know, a couple

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 2>of gigantic literally gigantic defensive lineman Walter Nolan elt Overton.

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, they just bring back enough and enough

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 2>promise that given Mike Elko as a defensive guy again

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to Ja Bateman in a second. That talent wise,

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 2>they're in a good place. Superstars, we'll see losing Evan

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Stewart on offense. I still think there's enough dudes at

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 2>receiver that excite me. There's enough youth, you know, Muse

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Muhammad steps into a bigger role there. Ruben Owens, I

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 2>really like, is a big running back. Think that could

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:02.879
<v Speaker 2>be you know, a nice battering ram in the way

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:04.720
<v Speaker 2>that you know, Duke has had success on the ground

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:06.839
<v Speaker 2>and Kansas State has had success on the ground under

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Colin Klin, new offensive coordinator. I think it's gonna be

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 2>a balance offense. It's Connor Wegman health. I just hope

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 2>he's lucky right at a certain point, he's just been unlucky.

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he's you know, frail and made

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 2>of glass. I don't think that's the case. I think

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 2>he is just you know, some guys are just snake bitten,

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.280
<v Speaker 2>and you have to approach that as a concern given

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 2>his injury history. But if he can stay healthy, I

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 2>think so much of what A and M has been

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 2>through these last couple of years has been self inflicted.

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 2>That literally just eliminating. That is the difference between you know,

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 2>losing to Auburn and beating Auburn, losing Ole Miss and

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 2>beating Ole Miss losing to I guess it was Old

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:48.919
<v Speaker 2>Miss last year, the shootout game that they'll just win more.

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 2>And so I like too much of this team's potential

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:55.319
<v Speaker 2>to be down on the fact that they had thirty

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 2>one transfers. They bring in twenty eight transfers. You know,

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 2>des Rick's you know at corner and coming in. Cooper's gone,

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 2>but even still linebackers in a good spot like, I

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.879
<v Speaker 2>don't know. My thing that is a danger right now

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 2>is aside from you know, Connor Wegman health, I think

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 2>Jay Bateman might have a little bit of like Ted Roof,

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:16.720
<v Speaker 2>like bring him in early, let him take the lumps

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 2>when it doesn't go well on defense, you know, early

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 2>for a defensive head coach. But it's really kind of

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 2>the defensive head coach's defense. Like he wasn't good at

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 2>North Carolina, he wasn't mostly not good at Army, like

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I felt like at Texas A and M,

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:32.839
<v Speaker 2>when you have the resources to bring in a big

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 2>name coordinator or somebody from a big name defense or

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 2>something like that that was a contributing coach, like you

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 2>do it. And I'm not sure I get this. Maybe

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong about Jay Bateman, but his track record suggests

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 2>that he's either been crazy unlucky or has not. And

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 2>he was an Army by the way, when they were

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 2>running an option, and it's one of the most advantaged

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 2>places to call a defense because your defense generally gets

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 2>a ton of rest if you have a successful offense.

0:45:57.560 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that one gave me.

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, pet chair aready caused for pause there but

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 2>from a talent perspective, it's still depth. In this moment,

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I think he's going to recruit crazy well, and he's

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 2>already started recruiting.

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>He's already started recruit. Can I can I pause you

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.319
<v Speaker 1>and ask you a question? Please? Do A and M

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.320
<v Speaker 1>hosts Notre Dame in week one? Yeah, it's the marquee

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:17.759
<v Speaker 1>matchup of week one. Yeah, we haven't done a Notre

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Dame preview yet. Obviously I'm going to be a little

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>bit more plugged in on the Notre Dame side than you,

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine. I don't blame you. Who would you

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>pick in that matchup?

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 2>Is there a spread or do you want me to

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 2>just I think A.

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 1>And M's favored by about too, but for our purposes here,

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 1>just consider it.

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Even I'd probably lean in this moment A and M

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 2>because it's at home in a pretty difficult place to play,

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 2>because what they'll look like is going to be more mysterious.

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:49.879
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame has their own mystery mystery on offense, given

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 2>new coordinator, new old coordinator and Riley Leonard who is

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 2>coming off of injury, and michaelco is very familiar with

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I think I like the current A and M offensive

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 2>pop upside more than Notre Dames, and considering it's at home,

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:10.760
<v Speaker 2>considering the mysterious miss, considering Marcus Freeman in big games

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 2>against good teams, I think Mike Elcho is a better

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 2>head coach to Marcus Freeman. That's not a take, right, No,

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 2>I'll give the edge without fully diving into matchups to

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 2>A and M.

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:25.840
<v Speaker 1>In this moment. It's a fascinating matchup. Yeah, and I

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>understand why. I understand why the point spread is where

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it is. And this is not a Notre Dame preview.

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we're talking about A and M and a bunch

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of it can't be it's our show, No, But I

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>think for both teams, the significance of that game cannot

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>be overstated. Yeah, it's gonna be great. If you're A

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and M. You win that game at home against the

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 1>top ten team, Suddenly expectations are dramatically different. Suddenly that

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half over under looks very attainable. At

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 1>nine to three kind of plateau looks a little bit

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>more attainable because you're beating a team of that caliber

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:04.720
<v Speaker 1>at home. Notre Dame factors to be the playoff contender

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. Even if they lose that A and M game.

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And on the Notre Dame side, obviously, if you go

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>on the road place like College Station, that will be

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a milestone for somebody like Marcus Freeman to get the

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:16.759
<v Speaker 1>monkey off his back when a big game like that

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:19.759
<v Speaker 1>on the road against the team that we I think

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>will be we believe will be nationally ranked by the

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the season.

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, their schedule as such that there's no obvious killer

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 2>back to back on this schedule, there's difficulties. And you know,

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 2>how good is South Carolina. Well, if they're actually like,

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:36.839
<v Speaker 2>we'll get there. But if Leonora Sellers is really good,

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 2>then LSU South Carolina consecutive weeks could be very difficult.

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Right If the Auburn offense gets better, traveling to Auburn

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 2>before hosting Texas could be very difficult. But as it

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:49.360
<v Speaker 2>stands now Texas A and M has no Georgia, Tennessee,

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Ole Miss and no Oklahoma for whatever you believe in Oklahoma.

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:56.400
<v Speaker 2>But like you also kind of have to look at

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 2>it through the lens of like, well, who might be beatable

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the good teams. So schedule is pretty

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 2>good and there's a lot of I'll use the word again.

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of buttressing tie or a lot of.

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:09.960
<v Speaker 1>What's the word.

0:49:09.960 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm like buffering, not buttressing. Buffering. Right, there's a buffer

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:16.720
<v Speaker 2>zone between Florida and the rest of the SEC schedule.

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:21.360
<v Speaker 2>In Bowling Green, there's Arkansas, MISSOO Mississippi State. It's not

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 2>terrible Mississippi State before LSU, which is now no longer

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the rivalry game because Texas A and M is Texas

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 2>obviously South Carolina LSU. We'll see the new Mexico State,

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 2>which I guess beware, but this is not Jerry Kill

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Diego Pavia and Auburn Texas. We think Auburn is going

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 2>to be pretty good, but it's not Georgia Texas. It's

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 2>not Bama Texas, so.

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 2>It's Nobama too right for A and M Yeah, no,

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:50.760
<v Speaker 2>no Obama.

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know.

0:49:52.680 --> 0:49:55.400
<v Speaker 2>All things considered, it's been a pretty good off season

0:49:55.400 --> 0:49:56.000
<v Speaker 2>for Mike Elco.

0:49:57.239 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the Missouri Tigers. Let's nine and a

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:06.239
<v Speaker 1>half over under eleven and two. A year ago, they

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>beat Ohio State fourteen to three in the low scoring

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Cotton Bowl. Yes, big deal. Last year. One of the

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:19.440
<v Speaker 1>stories of the year. I am extremely high on Missouri

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:23.280
<v Speaker 1>with some qualifiers okay that I can get into here,

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>but a lot back. Seventeenth nationally returning productions the easiest

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:31.359
<v Speaker 1>schedule in the SEC. As I said on Part one,

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the thirty seventh most difficult schedule in the country is

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:38.800
<v Speaker 1>not the easiest schedule by any stretch. They should be

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>favored in ten or eleven of their games. A great

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:47.280
<v Speaker 1>my dilemma with Miszoo is whether this is a better

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>team or TV show. Okay, what do I mean by that?

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 1>All right? The Luther Burden experience, Well, they're dangerous basically

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>because the entire offense is back, with a notable exception

0:50:59.000 --> 0:51:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of Cody Schrader, the run back, and I think one

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 1>guy along the offensive line. That's it. Everybody who caught

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a pass last season is back, including Luther Burden. Brady Cook,

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:11.240
<v Speaker 1>who had a renaissance here last year. He is back.

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Either Nate Knowle or Marcus Carroll, two guys that they

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 1>got from the group of five from app State in

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Georgia State, respectively. One of those guys figures to be

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the straighter replacement. I don't have many questions about the offense.

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Dan They scored thirty two points a game last year.

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a good chance for pushing thirty five this season.

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 1>It should be one of the best ten offenses in

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the nation, full stop. My questions are about the defense.

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of turnover on defense, and I think

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it's worrying right, not the least of which is Blake Baker,

0:51:41.280 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the aforementioned prized, perhaps overpaid coordinator for how we'll see now, Yeah,

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we will see, we will see. But they lose him.

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:56.359
<v Speaker 1>They lose three solid defensive backs, their best linebacker, their

0:51:56.360 --> 0:51:59.800
<v Speaker 1>best edge rusher, and three of their four intier defensive

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:03.359
<v Speaker 1>line There is a lot of turnover here, and even

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:06.319
<v Speaker 1>though I think Eli Drinkwitz did a really good job

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 1>bringing in new talent via the portal and otherwise, I

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 1>just worry that it might be too much for them

0:52:12.760 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to absorb. Okay, you know, like best case scenario. Best

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>case scenario, it pops in MISSOO is legit top ten

0:52:20.160 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 1>team most of the year. Worst case scenario, they're a

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:27.480
<v Speaker 1>fun half team that plays in some shootouts and makes

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:31.359
<v Speaker 1>for good TV. Are they a TV show? Are they

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a team? Right? So the defense is really the only

0:52:35.960 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>reason I'm not jumping on the over here because I

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 1>like Missoo a lot, and like I said before, the schedule,

0:52:42.600 --> 0:52:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the schedule's great. The games that loom the largest are

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 1>at Texas A and M and at Alabama they're home

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 1>against Oklahoma. They play sub teams. It's not like a

0:52:53.200 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 1>cakewalk or anything, right, But if you believe that Miszoo

0:52:57.200 --> 0:53:00.480
<v Speaker 1>can win just one of those three games, then you

0:53:00.520 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>bet the over man, you bet the over. You hope

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:04.879
<v Speaker 1>there are in any other hiccups all on the way.

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think all of that is right. I also

0:53:09.800 --> 0:53:13.839
<v Speaker 2>sort of think that in this sport we've seen enough

0:53:13.880 --> 0:53:19.320
<v Speaker 2>that like success begets success that like sure there is momentum.

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:21.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, sometimes coaches are not good enough to take

0:53:21.280 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 2>advantage whatever. I think Eli Drinkwitz has proven, especially with

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 2>how he has sort of galvanized the money at Missoo, right,

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:32.800
<v Speaker 2>that they're competitive on the recruiting trail, they're competitive. They

0:53:32.880 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 2>get like the most promising Oklahoma offensive lineman, right, Caden

0:53:35.960 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Green comes in steps in to sort of bolster things,

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:44.279
<v Speaker 2>and I think he's relatively local too Miszoo. But you're

0:53:44.360 --> 0:53:47.840
<v Speaker 2>right about concerns about the defense and new coordinator losing

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:51.239
<v Speaker 2>key pieces. All of that is true. I think they're

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:54.799
<v Speaker 2>so advantaged on offense, and they're well coached enough, and

0:53:56.000 --> 0:53:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I just have this sense that Miszoo, given their schedule,

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:03.839
<v Speaker 2>given their offense, is even if they're not as good

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 2>as their final schedule indicates, their final record indicates, their

0:54:07.280 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 2>final record is gonna be really good.

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll be good. I think they'll be a

0:54:10.320 --> 0:54:12.920
<v Speaker 1>good team. And and and to the previous point of

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>what are like the range of outcomes from Zoo, the

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:19.680
<v Speaker 1>range of outcomes are pretty good. And they're they're definitely

0:54:19.719 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 1>skewing higher than they wear Texas A and m. This

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is a good team. It's a great offense. They're going

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to score like crazy. And the only reason I can't

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:35.160
<v Speaker 1>get fully into Mazoo and go even more aggressive on

0:54:35.160 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 1>my Miszoo takes is because of that defense. Okay, and

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:41.600
<v Speaker 1>even that Dan even that, depending where you look and

0:54:41.680 --> 0:54:44.839
<v Speaker 1>who you read, people have varying opinions about how much

0:54:44.880 --> 0:54:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they actually lose, how much it will affect them versus

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:51.880
<v Speaker 1>won't affect them, if anything, That's the thing that everyone's

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:55.839
<v Speaker 1>pointed at. But even still there is disagreement over how

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:57.719
<v Speaker 1>much of an issue that's going to be for this team.

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>This season, so you know, But otherwise on the schedule,

0:55:01.200 --> 0:55:04.319
<v Speaker 1>like I mentioned those three big games A and M, Alabama, Oklahoma,

0:55:04.800 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, Murray State, Buffalo, Boston College, and Vandy all

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>at home before a bye. Right also at UMass home

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:21.160
<v Speaker 1>against Auburn, at South Carolina, at Mississippi State home against Arkansas.

0:55:21.760 --> 0:55:25.080
<v Speaker 1>They drew the correct straw to try and make a

0:55:25.160 --> 0:55:29.759
<v Speaker 1>run at this thing. This is easy by comparison, still

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 1>an SEC schedule, but easy, way easier than their peers

0:55:33.520 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 1>by comparison. We just got to see on the defense.

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, my only question in this moment is I

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:42.839
<v Speaker 2>think you're absolutely right. Who are the quarterbacks that are

0:55:42.840 --> 0:55:45.279
<v Speaker 2>good enough or at least that appear to be good

0:55:45.360 --> 0:55:48.920
<v Speaker 2>enough in this moment on this schedule, Like it's at

0:55:48.920 --> 0:55:50.400
<v Speaker 2>A and M. So, it's at Connor Weigman, who I

0:55:50.400 --> 0:55:53.000
<v Speaker 2>think is pretty good. It's at Jaln Milroe in Alabama.

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a good quarterback. We'll see on Lenora Sellers,

0:55:56.160 --> 0:55:58.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll see on Jackson Arnold, We'll see on Blake Shaping

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:01.240
<v Speaker 2>and Jeff Levi's offense. We'll see Hayling Green and Bobby

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Patrino's off.

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Miss Castillanos the big guy, right, you're huge.

0:56:05.160 --> 0:56:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I seven foot four, four hundred and eighteen pound Thomas Castillanos.

0:56:08.400 --> 0:56:10.360
<v Speaker 1>He grew a foot since we did the BC preview.

0:56:10.440 --> 0:56:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like I Diego Pavia could be very challenging. And

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:17.160
<v Speaker 2>other Tim Beck offense not v Tim back, other Tim Beck.

0:56:17.280 --> 0:56:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I could talk about Van dy Nex. We got

0:56:19.400 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>two teams left here that we're going to discuss.

0:56:21.120 --> 0:56:24.600
<v Speaker 2>But no Carson Beck, No, no quin Yours, no Jackson

0:56:24.640 --> 0:56:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Dart no, whatever you think of Garrett nus meyern LSU's

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:30.759
<v Speaker 2>what should be a really good offense, Like good place, man,

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:31.399
<v Speaker 2>it's a good place.

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's a great place. It's a great place. And

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I almost felt guilty not being all in on Miszoo

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 1>because we did that episode. No Nico right, No, Now,

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we did that episode a couple months ago, and we

0:56:43.920 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 1>said Maszoo's projected as a top ten team and I

0:56:46.080 --> 0:56:48.680
<v Speaker 1>could see them finishing as a top five team because

0:56:48.719 --> 0:56:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of the schedule. I love this hype. I like him.

0:56:51.920 --> 0:56:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm just very conflicted and that's why I had them

0:56:53.920 --> 0:56:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in my So what's your number? Right?

0:56:55.560 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 2>What is with this schedule? What is there over under?

0:56:58.280 --> 0:56:58.759
<v Speaker 2>Would you say?

0:56:58.760 --> 0:57:01.800
<v Speaker 1>No? Runners nine and a half over unders nine and

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:04.279
<v Speaker 1>a half. I'd still be inclined to go over. I'm

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:07.360
<v Speaker 1>not putting it in the volcano. I'm putting in the volcano.

0:57:07.520 --> 0:57:11.640
<v Speaker 1>You want it in the volcano? Missoo ten wins? Yeah, oh,

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:15.640
<v Speaker 1>bartis why births.

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't even think it's that hot. I think it's

0:57:17.720 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 2>it's a gentle warmth.

0:57:21.160 --> 0:57:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Close things out. We got two teams left, yeah, two

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 1>teams starting over in different respects Mississippi State and Vandy.

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:29.320
<v Speaker 1>But you mentioned Vandy, so let me do Vandy please?

0:57:31.200 --> 0:57:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Two and ten. Last season, they only beat Hawaii and

0:57:35.080 --> 0:57:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Alabama A and M. Then they lost ten straight. Not

0:57:38.280 --> 0:57:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a great finish to the season for clark Lee. The

0:57:41.240 --> 0:57:45.360
<v Speaker 1>issue at Vandy is talent. It is not any is

0:57:45.400 --> 0:57:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a talent thing. And it's been tougher to recruit there

0:57:49.440 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 1>because of the academics you layer in the portal. For example,

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:56.560
<v Speaker 1>they lose their top four receivers, just makes a job harder.

0:57:57.080 --> 0:58:00.320
<v Speaker 1>The lines have struggled. The pass defense a specially, has

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:04.680
<v Speaker 1>struggled the last few seasons. Clark Lee now has two

0:58:04.800 --> 0:58:07.840
<v Speaker 1>two to ten seasons to his name. It was time

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 1>at Vandy. Overall, he's won just nine games and three.

0:58:10.160 --> 0:58:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Years with the five and seven in there, Ty with

0:58:12.360 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and five and seven.

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:16.920
<v Speaker 1>The five and seven. So Vandy's obviously in danger for

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:19.960
<v Speaker 1>all of these reasons and many more that I won't describe.

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I am not here to grave dance or spike the

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:25.000
<v Speaker 1>football on the doors. If you root for him, you

0:58:25.120 --> 0:58:29.720
<v Speaker 1>already know. Here are the two reasons why they could

0:58:29.720 --> 0:58:32.440
<v Speaker 1>be dangerous. They could at least be interesting this season.

0:58:33.160 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>The first is something that you mentioned. Changes on offense.

0:58:37.960 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Tim Beck, the one from New Mexico State, Yep, not

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the other one. He comes over. He brought Diego Pavia

0:58:44.800 --> 0:58:47.760
<v Speaker 1>with him at quarterback. He also brought Jerry Kill with

0:58:47.800 --> 0:58:49.000
<v Speaker 1>them to be an analyst.

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:58:51.160 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 1>They also landed Date Johnson, the quarterback from Utah in

0:58:53.920 --> 0:58:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the portal. It's going to be more of an option attack,

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think think is the worst idea in

0:59:01.360 --> 0:59:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the world, do I, And I'm not an option guy.

0:59:06.040 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's not to say they're gonna be Navy or

0:59:07.640 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Army overnight, but it's more of that. I don't think

0:59:11.160 --> 0:59:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a horrible idea. At a place like Vandy, you

0:59:14.320 --> 0:59:17.439
<v Speaker 1>need the line play in order to make it work,

0:59:17.480 --> 0:59:20.880
<v Speaker 1>which they have not had. But I like thinking out

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of the box here, Okay, and if nothing more, it

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 1>makes it interesting, right, Diego Pinet makes it. He had

0:59:26.800 --> 0:59:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the helmet twisted around, he runs hot. What's not to

0:59:29.640 --> 0:59:31.640
<v Speaker 1>love about Diego Pavia? I think I'm with you. I

0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:34.800
<v Speaker 1>think that that whole offense and some of the changes

0:59:34.800 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that Clarklee is trying to make there make this team interesting.

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And the second is that clark Lee has now taken

0:59:41.120 --> 0:59:43.960
<v Speaker 1>over the rings on defense where he's got a good

0:59:43.960 --> 0:59:47.280
<v Speaker 1>track record for being a coordinator. We are probably nearing

0:59:47.320 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the end of his run at Vandy. I hope not,

0:59:49.880 --> 0:59:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I hope not either. I'm a rooting for it.

0:59:51.920 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 1>But if and when that happens, he can kind of

0:59:53.880 --> 0:59:56.120
<v Speaker 1>pick the spot as a coordinator, right, like somebody would

0:59:56.160 --> 1:00:00.040
<v Speaker 1>hire him with a moment's notice. Sure, so maybe he

1:00:00.120 --> 1:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>makes that defense more interesting. Again, it's just a talent

1:00:03.440 --> 1:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>thing for Vandy. Do they got the horses to contend

1:00:07.040 --> 1:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in this now sixteen team conference where they don't have

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the easiest schedule where they lost ten straight a year ago,

1:00:13.240 --> 1:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>where they're over under is three this season, they have

1:00:16.200 --> 1:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the lowest over under in the SEC. Again, I'm not

1:00:20.800 --> 1:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>here to spite the football, Yeah, those are at least are

1:00:24.000 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>two reasons why they could be somewhat dangerous or at

1:00:26.720 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a minimum interesting.

1:00:28.520 --> 1:00:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're going to be overlooked. There are teams on

1:00:32.640 --> 1:00:34.880
<v Speaker 2>their schedule as I pull it up, but as I

1:00:34.920 --> 1:00:38.200
<v Speaker 2>remember it, like, there are teams who could fall apart.

1:00:38.440 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>There are teams who you could see having a very

1:00:41.160 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>definitive weakness that they can't figure out.

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And if Vandy is.

1:00:44.600 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Better coached because of Jerry Kill, because Clark Lee has

1:00:48.840 --> 1:00:51.680
<v Speaker 2>his fingerprints on the defense more than he's had, I

1:00:51.760 --> 1:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>think he's like they've recruited pretty well, They've lost a

1:00:55.240 --> 1:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of those good recruits to other schools. I think

1:00:58.240 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the eye for talent is good. And there is something

1:01:02.080 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>about merely being overlooked and feeling like you have nothing

1:01:06.520 --> 1:01:09.080
<v Speaker 2>to lose that could make Vandy a little bit dangerous.

1:01:09.160 --> 1:01:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I thought they were going to be more dangerous than

1:01:10.480 --> 1:01:12.560
<v Speaker 2>they were last year, and there was you know, aj Swan,

1:01:12.600 --> 1:01:14.320
<v Speaker 2>and they were trying to be a little more direct

1:01:14.320 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>with things and they didn't really match up and they

1:01:15.840 --> 1:01:19.680
<v Speaker 2>couldn't get it done. So obviously there was some sort

1:01:19.680 --> 1:01:23.400
<v Speaker 2>of behind the scenes messaging that said, we need to

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:25.000
<v Speaker 2>bring in more players, and I know we don't always

1:01:25.040 --> 1:01:27.240
<v Speaker 2>do this, and we need to bring in somebody who

1:01:27.320 --> 1:01:31.480
<v Speaker 2>can help. And I know as things fell apart at

1:01:31.520 --> 1:01:35.960
<v Speaker 2>New Mexico State that it became an attractive place. I

1:01:35.960 --> 1:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>think Jerry Kill didn't even go in with the idea

1:01:38.880 --> 1:01:40.840
<v Speaker 2>of like trying to get hired as like an offensive

1:01:40.840 --> 1:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>coordinator something like that. He was just like, what about

1:01:44.120 --> 1:01:45.800
<v Speaker 2>you know these guys, what about these guys? What about

1:01:45.880 --> 1:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>hiring me? I got nothing to do. Let's win some

1:01:49.080 --> 1:01:51.720
<v Speaker 2>football games, and so I hope it works. So I

1:01:51.840 --> 1:01:52.760
<v Speaker 2>hope it's a good marriage.

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I do. I hope it works. But Van Vandy's got

1:01:55.640 --> 1:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>an uphill climb, just as they always have.

1:01:58.200 --> 1:01:59.640
<v Speaker 2>It'd be cool if they went to a bowl game,

1:01:59.760 --> 1:02:02.160
<v Speaker 2>but it's real difficult to see with the schedule and

1:02:02.240 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 2>where the conference is right.

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, from an over under of three to an over

1:02:06.800 --> 1:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>under of four with Mississippi State Dan bring us Home

1:02:10.520 --> 1:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi State five and seven. Last year they fired Zach Arnett,

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>who our friends over at Athlon mistakenly referred to in

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>their magazine as Will Arnette different Arnett. Gmc all signs

1:02:23.520 --> 1:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>point to this being a rebuilding gear for the Bulldogs.

1:02:29.120 --> 1:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>What does the immediate future look like? What does it

1:02:33.040 --> 1:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>look like in the medium in longer terms, based on

1:02:36.440 --> 1:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever indications we have now through just a couple months

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:40.439
<v Speaker 1>of the Levee regime.

1:02:40.520 --> 1:02:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, we know what this offense is going to be obviously,

1:02:44.840 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>given his time at UCF, given his time at Oklahoma.

1:02:48.840 --> 1:02:50.640
<v Speaker 2>We know that they're going to play pretty quickly. We

1:02:50.680 --> 1:02:52.080
<v Speaker 2>know that they're going to try to get the ball

1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:56.840
<v Speaker 2>to receivers quickly and you know, play with with a

1:02:56.880 --> 1:02:59.800
<v Speaker 2>good kind of reckless abandon as Jeff Levy offenses have.

1:03:01.760 --> 1:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>If receivers that they've brought in from the portal and

1:03:05.000 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 2>that they've recruited recently work out and they're somewhat explosive,

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:10.640
<v Speaker 2>then there's a little bit of danger to them. Right,

1:03:11.240 --> 1:03:13.960
<v Speaker 2>there's danger in a good way for Mississippi State. They

1:03:14.000 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 2>already playing a difficult place to play. There are pieces

1:03:17.640 --> 1:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>along this defense that are interesting. They lost a couple

1:03:20.800 --> 1:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>big linebackers, of course, highlight by Bookie Wattson last year,

1:03:24.000 --> 1:03:27.440
<v Speaker 2>but there are enough pieces up front on defense to

1:03:27.480 --> 1:03:29.360
<v Speaker 2>make them interesting. If they can stay healthy, they're gonna

1:03:29.360 --> 1:03:31.479
<v Speaker 2>be running a three four, so they're switching away from

1:03:31.720 --> 1:03:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Zach Arnett's three three five, So a new base, but

1:03:34.520 --> 1:03:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you know most teams play Nickel anyway, it's Coleman Hutzler

1:03:38.280 --> 1:03:41.120
<v Speaker 2>who comes in who's actually has a really impressive special

1:03:41.160 --> 1:03:43.960
<v Speaker 2>teams background as well, but he comes in from Alabama

1:03:44.000 --> 1:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>most recently where he's coached I believe linebackers. So new system.

1:03:49.560 --> 1:03:52.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a year zero situation. It's been a weird situation

1:03:53.000 --> 1:03:56.120
<v Speaker 2>all together because of Mike Leech's passing and how that

1:03:56.240 --> 1:04:01.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of changed the schedule and coaching apparatus in Starkville.

1:04:01.400 --> 1:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know, I think they're being very smart

1:04:04.560 --> 1:04:07.240
<v Speaker 2>about how they're approaching things. You know, Blake Shapin is

1:04:07.240 --> 1:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>not looked at as like a high ceiling guy, but

1:04:09.800 --> 1:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>he's a guy with experience and was in a pretty

1:04:12.160 --> 1:04:15.160
<v Speaker 2>bad situation at Baylor offensively last year. So we know

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:18.400
<v Speaker 2>the best of Blake Shapin is decently good. And so

1:04:18.480 --> 1:04:20.960
<v Speaker 2>you pair that with a very quarterback friendly system. You know,

1:04:20.960 --> 1:04:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the big question for Mississippi State is, you know, what

1:04:22.720 --> 1:04:25.360
<v Speaker 2>do they look like in week in, year two, year three?

1:04:25.640 --> 1:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Right this year is kind of a wash. We'll see

1:04:29.280 --> 1:04:31.960
<v Speaker 2>you get what they're going for with Jeff Levy that

1:04:32.360 --> 1:04:34.320
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to, you know, higher from the lane. Kiff

1:04:34.360 --> 1:04:37.720
<v Speaker 2>and Tree and you know, a younger guy, fun offense,

1:04:37.920 --> 1:04:41.440
<v Speaker 2>and hopefully that resonates in state. Hopefully he'll continue to

1:04:41.440 --> 1:04:44.920
<v Speaker 2>recruit pretty well, which I think he will. So the

1:04:45.000 --> 1:04:47.040
<v Speaker 2>danger is just that they don't have the pieces, they

1:04:47.040 --> 1:04:49.440
<v Speaker 2>don't have the star power, and it's going to take

1:04:49.480 --> 1:04:52.000
<v Speaker 2>a minute to rebuild this roster because last year clearly

1:04:52.000 --> 1:04:56.120
<v Speaker 2>didn't work out, and they should be able to find

1:04:56.120 --> 1:04:57.840
<v Speaker 2>it on both sides of the ball. We've seen the

1:04:57.840 --> 1:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>best of Mississippi State this past you know, Deck fifteen

1:05:00.640 --> 1:05:03.840
<v Speaker 2>years or whatever. You can find top level offensive skill.

1:05:04.040 --> 1:05:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes they're name Fred, which I always appreciate. You find

1:05:07.880 --> 1:05:12.760
<v Speaker 2>all American caliber defensive linemen, linebackers, whatever, corners like. You

1:05:12.800 --> 1:05:16.600
<v Speaker 2>can absolutely find an eight and four team in Starkville.

1:05:16.640 --> 1:05:19.720
<v Speaker 2>And so if they're smart about how they build the offense,

1:05:19.880 --> 1:05:23.320
<v Speaker 2>if the hires continue to be sound, Jeff Lebry hiring

1:05:23.400 --> 1:05:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Leby's offensive coordinator is a good first step, I

1:05:28.680 --> 1:05:31.600
<v Speaker 2>think they'll they're they're ceiling this year. Their danger is

1:05:31.640 --> 1:05:34.440
<v Speaker 2>that they're fun and nobody figures out how to stop

1:05:34.480 --> 1:05:37.800
<v Speaker 2>them quickly enough in a game and they lose. But

1:05:39.040 --> 1:05:41.120
<v Speaker 2>making a bowl game is a big ask this year.

1:05:41.680 --> 1:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>But you know, if they're in that like five and seven,

1:05:44.080 --> 1:05:46.800
<v Speaker 2>six and six range and playing for something late that's

1:05:46.880 --> 1:05:49.160
<v Speaker 2>interesting to me. Sure, absolutely.

1:05:50.680 --> 1:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Right in solidverbod gmail dot com. Let us know what

1:05:53.120 --> 1:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we got right, what we got wrong. If you are

1:05:55.720 --> 1:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>on any of the platforms that allow you to comment,

1:05:59.120 --> 1:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear your and be nice, but generally

1:06:02.640 --> 1:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we'd love to hear what you have to say about

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>what we got right, what we got wrong.

1:06:06.520 --> 1:06:09.520
<v Speaker 2>At least if you're going to criticize Tye, I just

1:06:09.600 --> 1:06:12.600
<v Speaker 2>need the preamble of Look, we can all agree Tye

1:06:12.680 --> 1:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>is handsome and charming.

1:06:13.760 --> 1:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Com up, but I could deal with that, all right, Yeah,

1:06:16.080 --> 1:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>if you give me that, If you give me that,

1:06:18.360 --> 1:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that we can seems like a great guy. But I

1:06:21.720 --> 1:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Let's take on Miszoo is such that it's

1:06:25.080 --> 1:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>all I know. We're gonna get a lot of you

1:06:26.960 --> 1:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't do your homework on socio. So that's okay, part

1:06:29.840 --> 1:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of that, part of the part of the game here

1:06:33.160 --> 1:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we all got to play. At this time of year,

1:06:35.400 --> 1:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we're excited to play it. Look, we're halfway through all

1:06:38.400 --> 1:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>teams in the SEC. On our next episode, on part three,

1:06:43.800 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do Alabama and LSU, Tennessee and Oklahoma, Kentucky

1:06:48.400 --> 1:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and Auburn, and then close things out with South Carolina

1:06:51.280 --> 1:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and Arkansas. Hope you'll be here with us. Make sure

1:06:53.960 --> 1:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you hit follow or subscribe if you have yet to

1:06:55.760 --> 1:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>do so. Going out to verbowlers dot com if you

1:06:58.520 --> 1:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>want to find out more about our Patreon community. To

1:07:01.160 --> 1:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>our exclusive community of hardcore for bawlers who get to

1:07:05.000 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>listen to bonus episodes and add free content. Get access

1:07:08.400 --> 1:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to our Discord server. We've got college football twenty five

1:07:12.240 --> 1:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>dynasties spinning up. Dan, I need to talk to you

1:07:14.600 --> 1:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>about our recruiting strategy by the way, at my Okay,

1:07:18.080 --> 1:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about that offline a little bit, all right.

1:07:20.560 --> 1:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Got got some news to share with you on that front,

1:07:22.680 --> 1:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, And of course, yeah, follow us on social

1:07:25.840 --> 1:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>media and send us those emails at seliverball atmail dot com.

1:07:30.640 --> 1:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So I have ty part two officially in the books

1:07:35.040 --> 1:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>for the sec one more to go here where it

1:07:38.840 --> 1:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>just means more for that guy, Dan Rubinstein, for myself.

1:07:41.440 --> 1:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Tie old man, talk y'all in a few days. Stay solid, Peace,