Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom much. We have a list
Speaker 1: of Obama Gate on maskers, a big lockdown protest expected
Speaker 1: in Michigan. Thirty six point five billion without jobs, three
Speaker 1: million more than just the last week update on the
Speaker 1: Flint case, and Judge Sullivan Shenanigans Parkland coward gets his
Speaker 1: job back, and never Trump is officially never Republican. Coming up,
Speaker 1: Buck Sextons coding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake American Great, You're a great American again.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show, pumas CIA analysts. I
Speaker 1: can speak to three hours without a phone call. Try
Speaker 1: doing that sometime. No, Well, come everybody to the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. We had some interesting news breaking late in
Speaker 1: the evening last night. I'm excited to break it all
Speaker 1: down for you today. You know, you have the two
Speaker 1: main stories that are going on in the country right now.
Speaker 1: You have still the overwhelming majority of our attention. You know,
Speaker 1: most hours spent on the TV, radio, etc. It's all
Speaker 1: focused on COVID nineteen and we've entered now the phase
Speaker 1: where it's a fight against the wrong response to the disease.
Speaker 1: As much as it is now a fight against the disease.
Speaker 1: So there's that, and then you also have these big
Speaker 1: bombshells that have fallen as a result largely of the
Speaker 1: Acting Director of National Intelligence, Richard Grinnell, who is going
Speaker 1: in there and like he's like the why and Earth
Speaker 1: of the intelligence community right now. He's just saying, you
Speaker 1: know what, We're going to just declassify that thing that
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff really doesn't want people to know about. We're
Speaker 1: going to expose what a bunch of liars, the Democrats
Speaker 1: and all their little student is in the media, running
Speaker 1: off to CNN and MSNBC to get contracts and push
Speaker 1: books full of lies where they promote themselves as heroes
Speaker 1: of the republic, you know, James Comey, among others. We're
Speaker 1: gonna we're gonna dive into that for a little bit.
Speaker 1: First today, I've got some stuff for you on the
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen response, and by that I mean the the
Speaker 1: fight for freedom. We are now in a fight for
Speaker 1: our freedom against a mentality and against a government overreach
Speaker 1: that is threatening to not just destroy our economy, but
Speaker 1: to destroy our way of life. And I know that
Speaker 1: sounds extreme, but think about where we are now. We're
Speaker 1: two months into this, and they keep lying to us
Speaker 1: and changing the story, and ultimately it's you no longer
Speaker 1: have any freedom because you're a threat. You're breathing is
Speaker 1: a threat to other human beings. You must do what
Speaker 1: we say, everything that we say. We'll return to that.
Speaker 1: Let me start though with, oh my, this list of
Speaker 1: those who are doing the unmasking and those of you
Speaker 1: have been listening to me for a while now. One
Speaker 1: of the one of the advantages that I've had, it
Speaker 1: was a huge advantage early on in my career and media,
Speaker 1: is that I spent five years as a CIA officer,
Speaker 1: and so I had some idea about national security. I
Speaker 1: knew a lot about a Rock and Afghanistan from working
Speaker 1: those issues. I wasn't just a CIA guy who learned
Speaker 1: about that stuff on the side. Those were the issues.
Speaker 1: I was on the Iraq desk and then was sent
Speaker 1: to the was essentially loaned to the Afghanistan desk. So
Speaker 1: I worked those issues, mostly counter terrorism and counterinsurgency. But
Speaker 1: I also got quite a dose of the federal bureaucracy,
Speaker 1: and so I understand what the nature of a bureaucracy is.
Speaker 1: This is where I get phrases like the giant self
Speaker 1: looking ice cream cone, which we know is true of
Speaker 1: the bureaucracy. I also know what will motivate the bureaucrats
Speaker 1: to move fast, what their ultimate aims are. That process
Speaker 1: is the product. That mediocrity is the expectation, and excellence
Speaker 1: is suspect. These are all things you learn when you're
Speaker 1: in the federal bureaucracy because it's government. And ultimately, if
Speaker 1: you're not making decisions in government, you're usually just shuffling
Speaker 1: paper around. You know, if it's not very clear what
Speaker 1: your job is every day, you know, there's some there's
Speaker 1: some components of government where it's a really straightforward, really
Speaker 1: straightforward ask, right, what's the what's the purpose of a cop?
Speaker 1: Why do you have a sheriff in your county? Oh,
Speaker 1: so someone to enforce the law. So someone with a gun,
Speaker 1: to make sure the laws are enforced and to protect
Speaker 1: people and to hold criminals accountable, to arrest them. Okay, right, fireman,
Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. You go through that. That's what
Speaker 1: is the purpose of somebody who's you know, an assistant
Speaker 1: representative or rather an assistant you know, deputy secretary to
Speaker 1: the trade representative for the blahbity blah. What do you
Speaker 1: really do all day? I don't know, you kind of
Speaker 1: just send emails, go to meetings. Anybody really care that
Speaker 1: you're there or not? Now, I was always I found
Speaker 1: it remarkable that when I was in the CIA, there
Speaker 1: was always the meeting and the onlookers. And this is
Speaker 1: a concept that I'm sure many you're familiar with just
Speaker 1: from corporate America as well, but in the government it's
Speaker 1: particularly clear. And you would know, you know, we go
Speaker 1: into these pretty large conference from sometimes and you'd have
Speaker 1: a meeting with you know, dozens and dozens of people
Speaker 1: in it, and there would be all these folks. There
Speaker 1: would be the people that are at the focal point
Speaker 1: of the table, and then there will be the people
Speaker 1: who are who know no one has to tell them
Speaker 1: that they should be sitting at the actual table where
Speaker 1: the discussion, you know, the long conference from table where
Speaker 1: discussions happening. And then you'll have near them the people
Speaker 1: who are the important seconds, if you will, the aids,
Speaker 1: the assistance whatever, and then you have like rows of
Speaker 1: chairs and stuff for people that were supposed to be
Speaker 1: at the meeting but didn't really do anything. And if
Speaker 1: they weren't there No one cares and the last there's
Speaker 1: anybody who have anything to add And if you're in
Speaker 1: that outer row, the answer is no, I tell you
Speaker 1: right now, nobody. Who's nobody who's sitting at that head
Speaker 1: of the government, you know, the federal bureaucrats table, They
Speaker 1: don't care what you The little you know GS nine
Speaker 1: sitting in the back row who are taking notes on something,
Speaker 1: they don't care what you think. So I understand how
Speaker 1: government functions in a way that you only can when
Speaker 1: you've spent time working in it and been there. And
Speaker 1: that's why I also know that there's a panic right
Speaker 1: now because a lot of what you're seeing, and this
Speaker 1: is true for some elected officials, but it's also true
Speaker 1: for many, many very powerful, very senior bureaucrats, particularly the
Speaker 1: intelligence and the intelligence agencies and in the FBI and
Speaker 1: the upper echelons of federal law enforcement. There their dirty
Speaker 1: laundry is being exposed when we're seeing stuff that they
Speaker 1: didn't think we would get to see. And this is
Speaker 1: where we have the unmasker situation. Now. I think we've
Speaker 1: discussed on masking on the show before. It's pretty straightforward.
Speaker 1: You're not supposed to collect on US persons when you
Speaker 1: are doing surveillance using intelligence methods. So in order to
Speaker 1: protect people from this really unconstitutional. But they would say incidental.
Speaker 1: Incidental is not the same thing as accidental. Remember that
Speaker 1: they're they're going they're trying to target, they're trying to
Speaker 1: catch your conversation. They just are doing it because they
Speaker 1: want to hear what the foreign person is saying. That's
Speaker 1: that's what they will tell you. But this is effectively
Speaker 1: a warrantless surveillance. This is intelligence surveillance as opposed to
Speaker 1: law enforcement. There's no you know, there's there's really no
Speaker 1: court protections. We've talked about FISA for example. And so
Speaker 1: in unmasking your way rather in masking they decide that
Speaker 1: the American persons, their names are blocked out. And so
Speaker 1: you'll be reading a report and we'll say, you know,
Speaker 1: American person one, or you know US person one or whatever.
Speaker 1: They'll give it some some designation. Talk to Osama bin Laden,
Speaker 1: you know, and this is what we said. Now, that's
Speaker 1: obviously a very clear conversation that you would want to
Speaker 1: you would want to collect. But this, this also is
Speaker 1: the result of a lot of much lower level conversations
Speaker 1: nobody really cares about. So unmasking is when you're reading
Speaker 1: this report and you say, okay, I need to know
Speaker 1: and you have to go to the originator. So whoever
Speaker 1: collected it, whichever agency, you go to the originator and
Speaker 1: you say, I need to know who this person is
Speaker 1: and you have to give some explanation of it, and
Speaker 1: then you can find out who that person is. Now,
Speaker 1: you know, is it something that happens. Yet, absolutely happens,
Speaker 1: but it's usually something that you would expect to occur
Speaker 1: from people who are involved in intelligence gathering an analysis,
Speaker 1: not say, the US Ambassador to the United Nations a
Speaker 1: few weeks before she's about to lose her job. You
Speaker 1: wouldn't think that that would be somebody that would be
Speaker 1: doing this. And now we get to the general Flynn
Speaker 1: component of all of this. And look, I know there's
Speaker 1: a lot of a lot of layers here, and I
Speaker 1: know that people. You know, after a while, you sort
Speaker 1: of get you get tired of some of this stuff.
Speaker 1: You get tired of hearing about these cases and about
Speaker 1: how all this went. But we're getting the truth now.
Speaker 1: So this is why it's important. Just this is the
Speaker 1: last couple of lapse of a very long race, a
Speaker 1: race that ultimately I can't say that there will be justice,
Speaker 1: but at least they'll be clarity, there will be truth
Speaker 1: at the end of this. I don't think that there
Speaker 1: will be justice, though, because I don't believe that the
Speaker 1: wrong doors will be punished. Your only hope for that
Speaker 1: is Durham, the Durham investigation, and I would not put
Speaker 1: a lot of stock. I would not put a lot
Speaker 1: of faith behind that, not because I think Durham is
Speaker 1: a dishonest guy. I don't think that's the case. I
Speaker 1: just believe that they won't They'll always be able to hide.
Speaker 1: And this is really what we've seen. This is the
Speaker 1: way the abuse by these Obama Gate conspirators, and it
Speaker 1: was a conspiracy, the way that they were able to
Speaker 1: get they will get away with it. It's just to
Speaker 1: say they believed in good faith things that turned out
Speaker 1: not to be true, and that the incorrect belief at
Speaker 1: the time was politically useful to them. That's just incidental,
Speaker 1: you know. I just happened to believe this very fraudulent
Speaker 1: report about Russia collusion because I'm that foolish and that
Speaker 1: naive can't get mad at me for that, and then
Speaker 1: I took action based on my own stupid belief that
Speaker 1: this is what happened, and that it was going after
Speaker 1: a political enemy. That's a coincidence. That's really their justification.
Speaker 1: That's really their justification. So the Senate, it was not
Speaker 1: D and I Grinnell. D and I Grinnell was involved
Speaker 1: in the process of giving the DOJ information that it
Speaker 1: wanted here because of the unmasking stuff around Flynn, because
Speaker 1: really what we know now what's been proven is that
Speaker 1: they're what's been proven is that there was a conspiracy
Speaker 1: to frame I mean, they framed General Flynn. That's what
Speaker 1: they did. It was a frame job. And so we
Speaker 1: want to know and the DJ and Attorney General bar
Speaker 1: want to know more about how this happened and what
Speaker 1: the different components were that were involved. So the Senate,
Speaker 1: Senator Rampaul is making a lot of noise about this.
Speaker 1: Yesterday released the list, the unmasking list. It was properly declassified,
Speaker 1: and here's what you have on it. Below is a
Speaker 1: list of recipients who may have received Lieutenant General Flynn's
Speaker 1: identity in response to a request process between eighth of
Speaker 1: November twenty sixteen and the thirty first of January twenty
Speaker 1: seventeen to unmask an identity that had been generically referred
Speaker 1: to in an NSA foreign intelligence report. Each individual was
Speaker 1: an authorized recipient of the original report, and the unmasking
Speaker 1: was approved through the NSA standard process, which reviewed which
Speaker 1: includes a review of the justification for the request. Only
Speaker 1: certain person are authorized to submit unmasking requests in the
Speaker 1: NSA system. The principles are identified, we cannot confirm they
Speaker 1: saw the unmasked information. Now, this would usually be some
Speaker 1: pretty boring stuff. There's a lot of you know, if
Speaker 1: you're working on a specific country account or issue account,
Speaker 1: and if you're working on a non proliferation office, let's
Speaker 1: say in the intelligence community or our terrorism office, the
Speaker 1: intelligence community, and you know there's a US person who's
Speaker 1: captured in a surveillance report of someone you think as
Speaker 1: a known terrorist financier. You might want to unmask that guy.
Speaker 1: You might want to know what's going on here, and
Speaker 1: that could also possibly be something that you know you
Speaker 1: you would well, now you get into how does law
Speaker 1: enforcement get to use this information? It's not a it's
Speaker 1: not a it's not a duly predicated law enforcement search.
Speaker 1: But does this ever? Does Sometimes this information managed to
Speaker 1: find its way. Sometimes it finds its way to a
Speaker 1: Washington Post reporter. That's what we found out when it
Speaker 1: involves General Flint's yes, of course, these rules and regulations
Speaker 1: are not perfect, and they are not they're not always respected.
Speaker 1: But who asked for remember this is specific to General
Speaker 1: Flynn's identity. Who asked about this right around the time?
Speaker 1: I mean it was the conversation between Flynn and Kiseljak
Speaker 1: was on the twenty eighth of December twenty sixteen. My birthday,
Speaker 1: Oh Buck, it's your birthday. You're gonna yeah, it was
Speaker 1: my birthday. And General Flynn, as we know, was framed
Speaker 1: up by the FBI, and a big part of that
Speaker 1: was the leak of classify phone intercept information to the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. And all these are Mama people. They're all upset,
Speaker 1: you know, they're all sore losers. You gotta remember this.
Speaker 1: All they all thought that the Hillary administration and all
Speaker 1: their friends were gonna be running DC and they were
Speaker 1: going to be in power even if they're even if
Speaker 1: Obama had to leave, Hillary was going to come in
Speaker 1: and all this stuff. It was gonna be great, right,
Speaker 1: It was gonna be fine, fantastic. Oh no, Trump comes
Speaker 1: in and he beat her and they couldn't handle it.
Speaker 1: So that's why in the unmasking request list you have
Speaker 1: here US Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, thirtieth
Speaker 1: of November twenty sixteen, the second of December, seventh of December,
Speaker 1: fourteenth of December, the twenty third of December, and the
Speaker 1: eleventh of January. Unmasking Flynn, unmasking Flyinn. Now, even if
Speaker 1: this was all completely legitimate, are we supposed to believe
Speaker 1: that these people didn't realize they're keep reading classify intercepts
Speaker 1: of conversations involving the incoming National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.
Speaker 1: They didn't think that this was a little bit dude,
Speaker 1: that this is just probably put aside. The legality is
Speaker 1: this ethical? You're reading about your political opponents using the
Speaker 1: US intelligence process to do it. This is a backdoor
Speaker 1: on constitutional protection, That's what this is. Just like FISA.
Speaker 1: And remember what we saw with FISA. Oh, it's sacred,
Speaker 1: nobody would abuse FISA. Yeah, FIZ is a joke. Nobody
Speaker 1: was paying attention. You could put false. You basically read something.
Speaker 1: If you're an FBI agent. You could read something in
Speaker 1: a news article and say, yeah, I saw this thing,
Speaker 1: or have some confidential informant write up some report on
Speaker 1: a word doc and just you know, pass that along. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's some of my confidential informant told me. The FIS
Speaker 1: that they got open on Carter Page was appallingly flimsy
Speaker 1: and false. I remember what they were telling us. Oh,
Speaker 1: nobody would ever abuse FISA works like a Swiss watch.
Speaker 1: And now we look at unmasking. Oh one, masking happens
Speaker 1: all the time. Nothing to see here, nobody deal. If
Speaker 1: there's nothing to see here, Why are they so upset
Speaker 1: at the release of these names? Why? For example, is
Speaker 1: you know, are the Democrats and people like Shifty Shift
Speaker 1: so angry? Oh? I have some theories about that, But
Speaker 1: it's pretty clear, isn't it. As I go through these names,
Speaker 1: you'll see Obama Gate is real, folks. The Obama administration
Speaker 1: in its departing weeks, Okay, think about that, they're leaving power.
Speaker 1: They tried to sabotage the incoming administration, and they use
Speaker 1: the law enforcement agencies, the press, and the deep state
Speaker 1: actors to do so. You're in the freedom hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Oh, who are the names?
Speaker 1: I'm sorry? I got so excited to tell you about
Speaker 1: all the lies and how upset the libs are here
Speaker 1: about the unmasking? Who are the names on the lists
Speaker 1: of the people requesting? What just happened? Just happened to
Speaker 1: be the identity of Lieutenant General Flynn? Who? Oh? Cement
Speaker 1: the powers? I told you that one. James Clapper, second
Speaker 1: of December twenty eighth of December, seventh of January. Hmm.
Speaker 1: John Brennan, Director of the CIA, fourteenth of December, fifteenth
Speaker 1: of December. You go down this list, It's pretty scary, folks.
Speaker 1: You also have who else is on here? You have
Speaker 1: James Comey, director of the Federal Beer of Investigation, and
Speaker 1: this is my and there's a whole bunch of other Oh.
Speaker 1: I am trying to remember and make sure I get
Speaker 1: all them in here. You have the McDonough the White
Speaker 1: House Chief of Staff, Obama's chief of staff. He wanted
Speaker 1: to know, wasn't that interesting? And then you have finally,
Speaker 1: and this is probably the best one, Yeah, Dennis Mithella. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And then you finally have Joseph R. Biden on the
Speaker 1: twelfth of January, twenty seventeen. Biden can barely remember what
Speaker 1: planet he's on. But we are to believe that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden had an urgent need to know to expose the
Speaker 1: identity of a US person that just happened to be
Speaker 1: luten In General Flynn. About what ten days before Trump's inauguration?
Speaker 1: It was really it was that important to know what
Speaker 1: General Flynn was talking to? Or was this just about
Speaker 1: curiosity and the ability to exploit something that we had
Speaker 1: hoped wouldn't happen. We were acting on the premise that
Speaker 1: there was a certain level of government in which people
Speaker 1: would conduct themselves in good faith when it came to
Speaker 1: things like unmasking that was proven wrong. The authoritarian powermad
Speaker 1: socialist libs use this to spy on political opponents on
Speaker 1: their way out the door. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Busson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, at
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. These
Speaker 1: rumors have been going around for years that the President
Speaker 1: Obama's administration was abusing this power of unmasked, and this
Speaker 1: sounds like they were abusing it to go after a
Speaker 1: political opponent, which I think is a very serious offense
Speaker 1: and should be investigated. And the fact that president Vice
Speaker 1: President Biden is directly involved with unmasking a political opponent.
Speaker 1: Think about it. You remember we went through this thing
Speaker 1: called impeachment. They said the president Trump was using the
Speaker 1: government to go after a political opponent. This is Vice
Speaker 1: President Biden using the spying powers of the United States
Speaker 1: to go after a political opponent. He's caught red handed here.
Speaker 1: Vice President Biden's called red handed eavesdropping on a political
Speaker 1: opponent's phone calls. That to me is alarming. Let's also
Speaker 1: remember that General Flynn, in a sense he is part
Speaker 1: of the was part of the Trump campaign, right, So
Speaker 1: this this was occurring, I mean, and this was only
Speaker 1: the window they looked at. I would want to know,
Speaker 1: how about the window of the three months before it?
Speaker 1: Who else from the Trump campaign? If it's so routine,
Speaker 1: if it's so normal that there's all these unmasking requests
Speaker 1: that just happened to be of the incoming National security advisor, Folks,
Speaker 1: this isn't just you know, some random person who was
Speaker 1: talking to some strange people overseas. And no, if this
Speaker 1: is so normal, how many of these conversations were intercepted
Speaker 1: in the months before involving Flynn. This is what I
Speaker 1: really want to know. Where their conversations intercepted with Donald
Speaker 1: Trump himself was the presidential candidate for the opposition party.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but they're telling us this is no
Speaker 1: big deal. This just happens, man, totally just happens. Was
Speaker 1: Trump intercepted? Was Pennce intercepted? We know that the vice
Speaker 1: president and the President's chief of staff, which means the
Speaker 1: president himself saw it, by the way, that means Obama. Well,
Speaker 1: we know that they were looking at conversations, that Flynn's
Speaker 1: having intercepts of conversations and there, and they're now telling
Speaker 1: us all this happens all the time, totally normal, nothing
Speaker 1: to see here. We're supposed to believe this is normal. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: let's extend that theory out a little bit. How many
Speaker 1: Trump campaign officials during the campaign we're caught in unmasking
Speaker 1: by US surveillance? And do we really even have a
Speaker 1: Fourth Amendment? Do we really even have any reasonable expectation
Speaker 1: of privacy? Do we think that there has to be
Speaker 1: a warrant or not for these kinds of government intrusions.
Speaker 1: It seems like we keep coming across answers that say
Speaker 1: no the government. If the government wants to hear your stuff,
Speaker 1: they can, and they'll make some justification up for it.
Speaker 1: Just like right now, as we're seeing with the COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen pandemic, the government now has just claimed for itself
Speaker 1: total control over you, and if you disagree, you're putting
Speaker 1: people's lives at risk if you want to live a
Speaker 1: normal human life. Right now, there are government officials all
Speaker 1: across the country, including in the federal Public Health apparatus,
Speaker 1: who will tell you're putting other people at risk, and
Speaker 1: therefore you are not allowed to have those freedoms. What's
Speaker 1: it going to be like during flu season? You're gonna
Speaker 1: tell me to stay home? Then too, I can tell
Speaker 1: me you have to wear a mask. Then too, you're
Speaker 1: gonna tell me that I have no I mean, I
Speaker 1: have no basic autonomy and lock me house arrests for
Speaker 1: what there they look the government has taken all this
Speaker 1: power in to its hands. The government's also playing with
Speaker 1: fire here, and there's if this thing gets out of control,
Speaker 1: it gets out of control fast and it gets ugly,
Speaker 1: so they need to back off. This stuff is nuts.
Speaker 1: That's going on in some of these blue States. But
Speaker 1: really maybe in a way, you know, let me lemmy,
Speaker 1: I see, it gets me, gets me fired up. And
Speaker 1: I don't want to lose the train of thought right
Speaker 1: now in the unmasking. But I do want you to
Speaker 1: have that thought exercise with me. If this is so normal,
Speaker 1: if this is so legitimate, who else were they unmasking
Speaker 1: in the Trump campaign? How many? How many Trump convert
Speaker 1: if if they're going to tell me that it's oh,
Speaker 1: we would never read Trump's conversations, never read a Trump transcript.
Speaker 1: Why they've told us that this is fine, that this happens,
Speaker 1: that there's no problem with it, it's incidental. They didn't
Speaker 1: know who it was. Oh really, you don't know who's
Speaker 1: called a senior US official blacked out name speaking to
Speaker 1: the Russian ambassador. Hey, we're going to be in charge soon.
Speaker 1: So when we're in charge, just know that we'll have
Speaker 1: a good relationship. And just wait a couple of weeks. Buddy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they have no idea who that is. This is what there?
Speaker 1: This was an argument I was seeing yesterday. You morons
Speaker 1: making this argument out there don't know a damned thing.
Speaker 1: The text is already in the report. I used to
Speaker 1: read these reports all day long. It is my job.
Speaker 1: I was a little cubicle nerd in the Intel community
Speaker 1: reading these reports all day, all day, all day. We
Speaker 1: know who it is. But if you're going to make
Speaker 1: the claim, and if you're going to leak it, and
Speaker 1: if you're going to use long when, you better be
Speaker 1: darned sure, right, you better be very sure that you
Speaker 1: know exactly who is it. You know, you can't go
Speaker 1: to the FBI and say, oh, I think there's a
Speaker 1: violation of the Logan Act here unless you're sure that
Speaker 1: you know you know the name is. I mean, theoretically
Speaker 1: you think it's General Flynn, but maybe it's some other incoming.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe it's General Flynn's you know, number two,
Speaker 1: or it's you know, maybe it's you know, it's it's
Speaker 1: Michael Anton coming into being National Security Council spokesperson, or
Speaker 1: you know somebody who knows, right Kat McFarlane, the Deputy
Speaker 1: National Security Advisor, Right, So you got to be sure.
Speaker 1: But I mean you kind of know, you kind of know,
Speaker 1: And that's the whole point. Shifty Shift doesn't like any
Speaker 1: of this. Oh no, another place where their logic all
Speaker 1: falls apart. Shifty Shift is upset why if this is
Speaker 1: so normal, if this is so routine, why is does
Speaker 1: the exposure this information looks about? Also the fact that
Speaker 1: Biden two weeks before he's leaving off it just happens
Speaker 1: to want to know about a general Flynn conversation. And
Speaker 1: also I would like to know can we do a
Speaker 1: we should do a similar search. They would have it
Speaker 1: a similar search of when Obama took over. Who wants
Speaker 1: to guess if there was a series of unmasking requests
Speaker 1: like this involving Obama or one of his you know,
Speaker 1: top three national security personnelity and a vice president, national
Speaker 1: security advisor, you know incoming you name it, White House
Speaker 1: in a White House chief of staff. Who wants to
Speaker 1: bet that there wasn't this series of unmasked totally normal
Speaker 1: unmasking requests. These people are liars. They're liars their clowns.
Speaker 1: Although it's very unfunny, it's actually really disturbing what they did.
Speaker 1: And the president knows this, He understands this. This is
Speaker 1: what he has to say about a Playliff twenty four.
Speaker 1: Unasking is a mask. It's a massive things. I just
Speaker 1: got a list. It's who can believe a thing like this?
Speaker 1: And I watched Biden yesterday on Good Morning America being
Speaker 1: interviewed by one of your colleagues, George Stephanopolis, and he
Speaker 1: said he know nothing about anything. He has no idea,
Speaker 1: he knows nothing about anything, nothing at all. And then
Speaker 1: it gets released today that he was a big unmasker.
Speaker 1: So how do you know nothing if you're one of
Speaker 1: the unmaskers. It's one of the very big stories. And
Speaker 1: I suspect you'll have, if it's possible, even bigger stories
Speaker 1: coming out. I think that may be true. I hope
Speaker 1: that's true. We do deserve answers here. Let's also recall
Speaker 1: that in the last week or so, we've seen the
Speaker 1: behind closed door transcripts from the House investigation of Russia collusion,
Speaker 1: which showed us that Clapper and Brennan and all these
Speaker 1: oh my gosh liars liars on TV. Oh there's oh,
Speaker 1: there's definitely collusion. They were lying about it. Shift was
Speaker 1: lying about it because he knew he had heard the
Speaker 1: witness to say, oh, I don't know really about I
Speaker 1: don't know. I didn't see any actual evidence. I mean,
Speaker 1: come on, we're under Earth now. Shift is a disgrace,
Speaker 1: but he's a hatchetman for his party. So they don't care.
Speaker 1: They just they just view Schiff as a as a
Speaker 1: weapon of disrepute. You know. They view Shift as a
Speaker 1: guy who cannot be trusted, and that's great because he'll
Speaker 1: just do their dirty work for them. Try they can
Speaker 1: trust him, but the country can't trust him. Right. But
Speaker 1: he's he's he is uh olyaginous, great word for him.
Speaker 1: Play twenty one. Well, what's going on is this is
Speaker 1: the president's effort to distract from the fact that under
Speaker 1: his watch, we've now lost eighty thousand American lives and
Speaker 1: our economy is in the worst shape it's been since
Speaker 1: the Great Depression. This is what this is about. They
Speaker 1: want to distract attention. I want to create some kind
Speaker 1: of a counter narrative that Noah was actually Obama committing crimes,
Speaker 1: not Donald Trump. It was all the Obama administration of figures,
Speaker 1: it was an Adam shift. Don't pay attention to Americans
Speaker 1: dying right now, don't pay attention to Americans unemployed right now.
Speaker 1: But instead let's focus on this counter narrative that it
Speaker 1: was Hillary that must have colluded, it was Obama that
Speaker 1: must have been committing unethical acts instead of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: But in the American people see through this. They are
Speaker 1: focused right now enough that they can see can't take
Speaker 1: it anymore. Sorry. Just notice how Shift is saying, oh,
Speaker 1: Trump is trying to distract you. No, we're learning very
Speaker 1: important stuff about an investigation that consumed the country for years,
Speaker 1: and Shift tries to distract everybody by saying, well, look
Speaker 1: at what's going on in the rest. Okay, yeah, we know,
Speaker 1: you jerk, what's going on the rest of the country.
Speaker 1: You don't have to tell us about that. What's his
Speaker 1: answer here? He's a disgusting liar. He always has been,
Speaker 1: always will be. The Democratic Party claims that trumps you
Speaker 1: have Trump has some issues with facts and figure. Sometimes
Speaker 1: he exaggerates, he he bs is, I know, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: a delusional But he doesn't stare the country in the
Speaker 1: face and just intentionally mislead and lie about stuff that matters.
Speaker 1: Pelosi does that, Shift does that, Schumer does that. They
Speaker 1: don't care. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. So what to make of Obama Gate.
Speaker 1: We are joined by my friend David Reeboy. He is
Speaker 1: a Republican strategist and national security analyst. He's down in Florida.
Speaker 1: Mister Reeboy, good to have you, sir, Great to be here.
Speaker 1: What do you think about this list yesterday and all
Speaker 1: the explanations we're hearing for Why I say Joe Biden
Speaker 1: wanted to know about a flint phone call two weeks
Speaker 1: before he had to figure where he was going to
Speaker 1: be resting his head because it wasn't going to be
Speaker 1: as vice president anymore. Well, in Joe Biden's case, it's
Speaker 1: it's more plausible than for the others that he had
Speaker 1: no idea what he was doing or why he was
Speaker 1: asking for the name to be unmasked. But I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean, let's let's let's let's be real.
Speaker 1: The first thought that came to my mind when I
Speaker 1: saw this, this kind of weird, massive collection of folks
Speaker 1: who are doing the unmasking, most of whom have no
Speaker 1: real legitimate reason to be asking for this kind of
Speaker 1: intelligence in the first place, is maybe they all sat down.
Speaker 1: It's possible that that that that they all sat down
Speaker 1: and they said, Okay, if we all unmask then the
Speaker 1: if we ever get caught, the weight of this will
Speaker 1: not We'll fall on all of us and not just
Speaker 1: some of us. That's Uh, that's what I was thinking
Speaker 1: immediately us as to why so many people were really
Speaker 1: doing this, And we know too that there was an
Speaker 1: i'm A directive that allowed the easier transit of this
Speaker 1: kind of information from one government agency to another. What's
Speaker 1: also getting lost in this debate is the fact that,
Speaker 1: I mean, what makes this really criminal is the leak.
Speaker 1: The original leak too. I think it was too ignacious
Speaker 1: at the at the post about about Flynn's call, right,
Speaker 1: which was completely illegal, and we still haven't had any
Speaker 1: kind of legal accountability, law enforcement accountability on that as
Speaker 1: far as I know, there's never been an investigation. We'll
Speaker 1: see about what Durham is digging up, but this whole
Speaker 1: thing has taken so much time that I'm just afraid that.
Speaker 1: I mean, we know the media is going to try
Speaker 1: to pass this off as old news, Oh absolutely, And
Speaker 1: you know, I say, I think last night, at least
Speaker 1: MSNBC and CNN, I don't believe either of them were
Speaker 1: really covering the unmat asking. Now I'd have to update that,
Speaker 1: but as of last night, there was basically no coverage
Speaker 1: of it. And now we're seeing that the pandemic is
Speaker 1: going to be the go to for when they don't
Speaker 1: want to talk about something that's not the pandemic, which
Speaker 1: is a whole, a whole conversation. We can get into
Speaker 1: it with you a little bit. All they have to
Speaker 1: do is just say, how could you focus on anything
Speaker 1: else right now? You know, how could anything else be
Speaker 1: of any importance? That's what Adam Schiff was doing before,
Speaker 1: which is troubling. I also want to ask you, since
Speaker 1: we got you're you're down in Florida and you're of
Speaker 1: sound mind about these things. Somehow your governor has been
Speaker 1: the target of and your state, but particularly because it's
Speaker 1: a Republican governor and it's a swing state that we own,
Speaker 1: is really important. Oh, Florida is heading for disaster. Florida
Speaker 1: actually hasn't hit disaster at all. It's done pretty well
Speaker 1: given what the numbers, the population size and others would suggest. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: Governor Cuomo is a hero and New York is a disaster.
Speaker 1: I tell it, you know, how do you see that
Speaker 1: as a Floridian Look, I really like the santas I
Speaker 1: think he's great throughout all of this. I live in
Speaker 1: an area that is we've got three counties on the
Speaker 1: southeastern part of the state, which is which is Miami
Speaker 1: Dade and Broward and Palm Beach, and these three counties
Speaker 1: comprised most of the democratic part of the state, and
Speaker 1: as you would imagine, for that reason, they've been eager
Speaker 1: to close down, lockdown and slow to want to open
Speaker 1: back up. And we see already West Palm is starting
Speaker 1: to West Palm is open. I believe already they've already
Speaker 1: got restaurants open, their social distancing. But but Broward and
Speaker 1: UH and Dade are are not so so within the state.
Speaker 1: It's interesting people who know. So within the state, the
Speaker 1: blue areas are more lockdown than the red areas are,
Speaker 1: at least such as you're seeing right now. That right,
Speaker 1: that's that's correct. If I were to jump in the
Speaker 1: car and drive over to Naples on the west coast
Speaker 1: right now, I could go to a restaurant and UH
Speaker 1: and uh and and have dinner. But um, but but
Speaker 1: I can't, so I I sort of I understand the
Speaker 1: situation that DeSantis is in with these kind of local
Speaker 1: blue areas that are determined to shut down, local blue
Speaker 1: very high population areas that that are are determined to
Speaker 1: to I guess be the last ones to open back up.
Speaker 1: But I think they will. I think I think this area,
Speaker 1: especially Broward in Miami Dade now are gonna are gonna
Speaker 1: be open um shortly shortly after, shortly after West Palm
Speaker 1: and then and then all Florida will be open um.
Speaker 1: You know, DeSantis has been reamed out in the press.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, the first thing I think was
Speaker 1: was with the um the big Florida defensive against him
Speaker 1: was was against opening some of the beaches in Jacksonville,
Speaker 1: and they predicted, you know, the the media went into
Speaker 1: absolutely meltdown hysteria mode, and I mean, I guess it was.
Speaker 1: It was nothing compared to what they did when Georgia
Speaker 1: opened up, which is they said there's gonna be like
Speaker 1: mass murder. I mean, George has been open for three
Speaker 1: weeks now and they've been predicting mass murder every day.
Speaker 1: And George's fine. I mean, it's not perfect, but it's
Speaker 1: doing fine. Atlanta and the mayor of Atlanta to the Atlantic,
Speaker 1: I think org or some other outlet to say, you know,
Speaker 1: how how we irresponsible and terrible it is, and yet
Speaker 1: and yet they seem to be doing fine. Um. I've
Speaker 1: always been of the opinion that we're we as as
Speaker 1: a country, as a as a as a as a
Speaker 1: as a human race are going to have to just
Speaker 1: walk through the fire here when it comes to this
Speaker 1: virus because there's no uh, there's no um uh vaccine
Speaker 1: around the corner, and at some point you're gonna have
Speaker 1: to open up. I think it's it's I mean, and
Speaker 1: there's gonna be risks agree that it's well passed time
Speaker 1: that we do so. Yeah, and it's not gonna be perfect,
Speaker 1: but it's time, it's time we do so well. I'm
Speaker 1: glad at least Florida there's some pockets of sanity down there.
Speaker 1: Dave reeboy, everybody political strategist. Check him out on Twitter.
Speaker 1: Follow him there, David, thanks so much for making the
Speaker 1: time for us man get some sun. Thanks Buddy thay Care,
Speaker 1: thank here. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. When you were Director of
Speaker 1: National Intelligence, did you see any direct evidence of collusion
Speaker 1: between General Flynn or any Trump campaign official with the Russians? Oh? No,
Speaker 1: I did not. Of course, collusion is not a formally
Speaker 1: defined term, certainly in a legal sense, but if you
Speaker 1: if you were read the Intelligence Community assessment, particularly the
Speaker 1: highly classified version and as well as the young classified version,
Speaker 1: you won't find the C word anywhere in that report.
Speaker 1: Does the absence of evidence of collusion indicate to you
Speaker 1: that no requests for unmasking should have happened? If you
Speaker 1: had seen no evidence of collusion there, why ask for
Speaker 1: names like this in the intelligence reports? Well, there could
Speaker 1: have been, as I say, other reasons why you would
Speaker 1: unmask um. Again, when you read the ball read of
Speaker 1: the report may not tell you what exactly is going on,
Speaker 1: So what it was collusion or what you're what you're
Speaker 1: trying to determine? Does this suppose a threat to a
Speaker 1: national security or you know er your DNI clapper er
Speaker 1: who er go jan cnn uh or that's right. This
Speaker 1: is the guy that was at the top of the
Speaker 1: intelligence community. And I remember interacting with this guy when
Speaker 1: I was just a just a young buck and it
Speaker 1: was the same thing then, or reave the folder there
Speaker 1: er er and they've elevated him to being some kind
Speaker 1: of intel wizard. No, the guy's just been around forever.
Speaker 1: This is not somebody that you want to go to
Speaker 1: for a student analysis of anything. And notice how even
Speaker 1: at this stage you'll you'll steal get the same thing.
Speaker 1: Even at this stage, you'll have people who will will say, well,
Speaker 1: there could have been, or maybe we would have found
Speaker 1: or no, there was nothing. They were all wrong. How
Speaker 1: are they all so wrong on this? How do we
Speaker 1: end up talking about Russia collusion that didn't happen For
Speaker 1: three years? This was the biggest story of the Trump
Speaker 1: administration until a global pandemic came along. Now, of course
Speaker 1: they want to pretend like no one should even think
Speaker 1: about it, no one shold even talk about it, But
Speaker 1: that's absurd. Look, I don't want to get too more,
Speaker 1: too much more into the unmasking situation. I would just
Speaker 1: say this for right now. If it's no big deal,
Speaker 1: why do they not want us to know? And now
Speaker 1: that we know, what are we supposed to do with
Speaker 1: this knowledge? How are we supposed to act? Given that
Speaker 1: it's clear there was political targeting of the people around Trump,
Speaker 1: but notably General Flynn. But who knows what other political
Speaker 1: targeting was going on with this kind of process too.
Speaker 1: I think there should be even more declassification. I think
Speaker 1: we should see I want to see what these reports
Speaker 1: were that they were You know, they can, they can
Speaker 1: redact them as necessary, but we should see what's the
Speaker 1: content here that they were unmasking. Now, they'll never do
Speaker 1: this because of the sensitivities, but that would really let
Speaker 1: us know. Then then you'd really get the answers if
Speaker 1: you could see, Oh yeah, they really needed to know
Speaker 1: who this was. They first of all, they couldn't basically
Speaker 1: figure it out in second of all, why do you
Speaker 1: not have Do you not have any expectation of privacy?
Speaker 1: If you speak to somebody who happens to be a foreigner?
Speaker 1: Can they just listen in on phone calls and you
Speaker 1: no longer have any Sorry, the national security impetus, the
Speaker 1: national security desire overrides whatever constitutional protection you have. Apparently
Speaker 1: the answers, yes, it's not folks not okay, you can't
Speaker 1: trust these status lives. That's the problem. They don't operate
Speaker 1: in good faith. A lot of our law is set
Speaker 1: up in a way, and in a sense, I think
Speaker 1: this is a very it's actually a very important reminder
Speaker 1: for all of us, and I wanted to take just
Speaker 1: a pause to say this much about it. The Flint
Speaker 1: case is the reminder that all of our laws and
Speaker 1: our system. You know. Look, they require faithful execution and
Speaker 1: basic decency or else nobody's safe and no right is secure.
Speaker 1: Anyone can be investigated or prosecuted if officials make decisions,
Speaker 1: and those officials are stupid, vicious, and motivated by left
Speaker 1: wing ideology. Anyone could be subjected to this. And if
Speaker 1: you think, then here's my brilliant transition. If you think
Speaker 1: that the judges the courts will save you, you're wrong.
Speaker 1: There are deep staters wherein rows, just like there are
Speaker 1: deep staters at the top of the intelligence community, the
Speaker 1: top of the FBI bureaucracy. Here I bring you the
Speaker 1: latest in the judge. Remember this is all now related
Speaker 1: to Michael Flynn, the Judge Sullivan prosecution, or what they're
Speaker 1: doing with the prosecution of Michael Flynn, which really now
Speaker 1: is completely in the hands of this judge, Judge Emmett Sullivan,
Speaker 1: who had an outburst that he ended up apologizing for
Speaker 1: him and he lost it in court and started talking
Speaker 1: about Flynn betraying his country. Some of them never even
Speaker 1: stopped to think who Flynn was betraying the country on
Speaker 1: behalf of Is it Turkey, is it Russia? Is it
Speaker 1: someone else? Didn't matter, just it was just too enticing
Speaker 1: a storyline that Flynn was somehow a trader, so that
Speaker 1: the people that bought into this never stopped to dig
Speaker 1: into the details. But here you have General Flynn no
Speaker 1: longer facing the DOJ actively prosecuting him. And this was
Speaker 1: the big news last week. And I was saying to you,
Speaker 1: and you know this, I'll say, well, we gotta see
Speaker 1: with the judge does though I was a little worried
Speaker 1: about this. I was concerned about this, you know. It
Speaker 1: was it. It's not over to the It's not over
Speaker 1: till the zoftic female vocalist engages in singing. You know.
Speaker 1: That's that's where we are. And there's no singing right
Speaker 1: now because Judge Sullivan has requested an amicist brief from
Speaker 1: a retired Clinton appointee named John Gleeson, a retired federal judge,
Speaker 1: to provide the court with the reasoning with the with
Speaker 1: reasons why the Flynn prosecution should continue effectively, why Flynn
Speaker 1: should be sentenced and continue to be found guilty even
Speaker 1: though the DJ has said this case never what the
Speaker 1: DOJ has said is that this case now never should
Speaker 1: have been brought. This never should have happened. Can you
Speaker 1: imagine how is this any different from say, if there
Speaker 1: was you know, DNA evidence that exonerates that truly exonerates somebody,
Speaker 1: not that they make believe it does. Which does there
Speaker 1: there's there's some DNA stuff that we could talk about
Speaker 1: another time where Okay, I mean they think that this anyway,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I haven't seen making a murderer. I
Speaker 1: want to check that one out for sure. I think
Speaker 1: those guys are guilty. But that's just my gud my
Speaker 1: gut instect. I've seen a few of the episodes, haven't
Speaker 1: seen all of it. Um, That's what I was thinking.
Speaker 1: With the DNA stuff, I was like, Oh, it's not
Speaker 1: always is it. But imagine that there was clear cut
Speaker 1: and this does happen. There's clear cut evidence of DNA
Speaker 1: that exonerates somebody. And the judge was just like, nah,
Speaker 1: now we're still going to hold you in prison. You're
Speaker 1: not you're not getting out. And even the prosecute, even
Speaker 1: the prosecutors that that's really the way along this side,
Speaker 1: even the prosecutors like, look, we're really sorry this guy
Speaker 1: was exonerated. We never should have brought this. That that
Speaker 1: is what has happened here. The Department of Justice has
Speaker 1: said we're dropping this. This never should have gone down,
Speaker 1: And the judge is like, yeah, I don't know about that.
Speaker 1: I think I think I'm going to carry this thing through.
Speaker 1: So he brings on this Clinton Judge John Gleeson to
Speaker 1: file an amicus brief to outline why the charges should
Speaker 1: not be dropped and also to put forward an argument
Speaker 1: for how to prosecute Flynn for perjury. Here's the Here's
Speaker 1: what the judge's order says. The court exercises it's an
Speaker 1: inherent authority to appoint the Honorable John Gleeson as Amicus
Speaker 1: curier to present arguments in opposition to the government's motion
Speaker 1: to dismiss. It is so ordered that Amicus Curier shall
Speaker 1: address whether the Court should issue an order to show
Speaker 1: cause why Flynn should not be held in criminal contempt
Speaker 1: for perjury. What the heck is this? It's this judge's call,
Speaker 1: and yes, the judge does have a right to do this.
Speaker 1: This is also a reminder of my friends. Judges have
Speaker 1: a Judges are supposed to be referees. They have a
Speaker 1: ton of authority in that court room. You know that
Speaker 1: a judge can they don't usually do this. Very few
Speaker 1: people generally know this. A judge can set aside a
Speaker 1: jury verdict. It is within a judge's power. When a
Speaker 1: jury says guilty, a judge can say, yeah, thanks, Matt,
Speaker 1: gonna let this person go' gonna set aside that verdict.
Speaker 1: You're free to leave. Judge can do that. Their power
Speaker 1: is tremendous. It's also why, you know, it's really the
Speaker 1: concentration of state power in that courtroom. Whi's why even
Speaker 1: if you mouth off to a judge, you know, not
Speaker 1: a lot of people you can mouth off to who
Speaker 1: can say, you know what, you're gonna go spend a
Speaker 1: few days in prison for that one. Judges can do that.
Speaker 1: They have a lot of authority in that courtroom. And
Speaker 1: you know, the reality here is that I think they're
Speaker 1: going to force Trump to pardon Flynn. That's the way
Speaker 1: that the deep state is going to get back at
Speaker 1: this guy. He didn't even do anything. I mean, now
Speaker 1: it's clear the guy didn't do anything. He didn't lie,
Speaker 1: he didn't do anything. He's like having conversations people all
Speaker 1: the time, and you know, misremembered what he said to
Speaker 1: the ambassador about something, or like misremembered if he talked
Speaker 1: him about it doesn't even matter if you said, oh, buck,
Speaker 1: he lied. The FBI agents interviewing him, who had the transcripts,
Speaker 1: they didn't think he lied at first, So how clear
Speaker 1: was the lie? But oh no, oh no, they and
Speaker 1: Andy McCabe lied twice, FBI director. But they're not going
Speaker 1: to prosecute him. Why just because because because the bureaucrat
Speaker 1: establishment likes him, because he's one of these little government
Speaker 1: stooges who was always first and foremost about the permanent
Speaker 1: governing class. Wasn't really it wasn't really about what was ethical,
Speaker 1: what was right. It was about making sure the machine
Speaker 1: continues to be in charge. This should be troubling for
Speaker 1: all of us now as we see across the country
Speaker 1: how badly the government machine wants to continue to be
Speaker 1: in charge. They do not want to give this up.
Speaker 1: They do not want to relinquish any of the power
Speaker 1: that they have taken into their hands. And we should
Speaker 1: have seen this coming, warning about it. I've been warning
Speaker 1: about it for a long time. You can just go
Speaker 1: back in my Twitter feed if you want to see
Speaker 1: I said what six weeks ago. Now we'll go from
Speaker 1: panic demanding government action to the recognition that the government
Speaker 1: is inept and stupid, which is where we pretty much
Speaker 1: are to the government wielding even more power to tell
Speaker 1: us to shut up and do as we're told once
Speaker 1: we've realized they're stupid and they've taken too much power
Speaker 1: into their hands. That's where we are. And this was
Speaker 1: the expected trajectory of what would happened in responsible but anyway,
Speaker 1: with with Judge Sullivan here, they're going to force Trump
Speaker 1: to pardon Flynn, and then they're going to say this
Speaker 1: was all political. So this is just all about sullying
Speaker 1: his reputation at this point and giving the left wing
Speaker 1: loon Democrats one last chance to frame this issue against
Speaker 1: Flynn in a way where he looks, you know, looks
Speaker 1: like a bad guy. He looks like he did something wrong,
Speaker 1: even though we know he did nothing wrong. I feel
Speaker 1: badly even that that Flynn has been dragged through so
Speaker 1: much at this point must be horrible. Can you imagine
Speaker 1: your life savings drained fired from your wife. The guy
Speaker 1: got to be National security Advisor's supposed to be the
Speaker 1: pinnacle of his career. He's fired before he even starts
Speaker 1: the job over this over nothing. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: he's got an ego and he you know he's got
Speaker 1: he's a human being with feelings too, and aspirations and goals.
Speaker 1: They did this to this guy over what a semant
Speaker 1: the power on Obama and biding these people. They're all
Speaker 1: so in love with themselves and they're just disgraceful. They
Speaker 1: lack decency and think that they're superior. That's what's really troubling.
Speaker 1: You see this with oh all, all the Obama administration officials.
Speaker 1: That's the constant, right, they're vicious, petty little tyrants. Whenever
Speaker 1: you give them any power, whenever they can have the media,
Speaker 1: they can sick the media on somebody or attack somebody
Speaker 1: or destroy them. And never any grace, never any forgiveness,
Speaker 1: never any sense whatsoever that they're going to rise above
Speaker 1: and treat people that disagree with them or that see
Speaker 1: things differently than them with any respect. They don't do that.
Speaker 1: That was really a defining characteristic of the people in
Speaker 1: the Obama White House around him. I mean that was
Speaker 1: and Obama himself always view the other side with disdain always,
Speaker 1: So why is it surprising and all that they would
Speaker 1: have used the powers they had in this way, it's
Speaker 1: not surprising. If anything, it's just a shame that it
Speaker 1: took us so long to get this proof. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's the opinion of politicians that these protesters are
Speaker 1: just violent racists. But the Michigan State Legislature has actually
Speaker 1: filed a lawsuit against you, claiming that your state of
Speaker 1: emergency extension to May twenty eighth is unlawful since they
Speaker 1: did not approve it. Are you acting beyond your authority here?
Speaker 1: And do you understand why there are so many concerned
Speaker 1: citizens about government overreach at this point of course? And
Speaker 1: you know what, I think that that is a robust
Speaker 1: debate that we should absolutely have. The fact that the
Speaker 1: matter is every decision that I've made has been on
Speaker 1: the right side of the Constitution and always centered by epidemiology,
Speaker 1: facts and science and to save lives. Do you believe her?
Speaker 1: I don't. I would love to hear from some more
Speaker 1: of a team Buck Michigan. Let me know what you
Speaker 1: think about what's going on in your home state here.
Speaker 1: But that's Governor Whitmer who there's a very fundamental point
Speaker 1: here about a temporary state of emergency versus an open
Speaker 1: ended state of emergency. Right, and we all understand this,
Speaker 1: and there's there's some there's some gray area here in
Speaker 1: the law, but everyone's under everyone also in principle recognizes that.
Speaker 1: You know, it's one thing. Here's the perfect example. Cops
Speaker 1: run up to your front door, banging on your front door,
Speaker 1: say hey, look, we you know, we think there's a
Speaker 1: ghastly down the street. We're gonna we need every we
Speaker 1: need everybody out for a few hours while we check
Speaker 1: it out. Are you gonna say no, you don't have
Speaker 1: a warrant? I probably not right. You're gonna say, oh
Speaker 1: whoa wha, okay, yeah, thank you officer, and you're gonna
Speaker 1: take your family out. You know, that's a that's a
Speaker 1: that's a state of emergency situation. Cops runder your door
Speaker 1: a different situation. Bang bang bang, I mean with not
Speaker 1: guns obviously, with their hand on the that was a
Speaker 1: bad you know, bang bang bang is not what you
Speaker 1: want to hear from cops. Um knock, knock knock, Thank you.
Speaker 1: That's knock knock knock was the onomatopeia that I was
Speaker 1: looking for. Fun word to say, Producer Mark, that's the
Speaker 1: word of the day to day on a matapia. I
Speaker 1: used to know how to smell it. Yeah, but uh,
Speaker 1: you hear that. You hear that knock of the door,
Speaker 1: and you go to it and they say, hey, hey,
Speaker 1: we're really worried about a gas leak in the area.
Speaker 1: So we're gonna need you to clear out of your
Speaker 1: house for a month or so, and we'll call you
Speaker 1: and we'll let you know maybe when you can go back.
Speaker 1: It might be a few months. We're not sure. But
Speaker 1: you have to get out now. Okay, you might say,
Speaker 1: you might say, Buck, you know what, I'm gonna leave
Speaker 1: that house for a little bit. But all right, what
Speaker 1: happens when you call the let's say you go stay
Speaker 1: at your aunt. Ethel's the famous Buck sex and show
Speaker 1: an Ethel. I don't have one, but that's the ant
Speaker 1: we always talk about. And and you call the city,
Speaker 1: you know, you call the city health department or the
Speaker 1: police department. What you'd call. He said, Okay, can I
Speaker 1: go back to my house? No? No, sorry, No, that
Speaker 1: emergency about the gas league. We're gonna keep We're gonna
Speaker 1: keep extending that one. We're gonna push that one a
Speaker 1: little bit more. And then you do it for more weeks,
Speaker 1: and then for more weeks. At what point have they
Speaker 1: exceeded their legal authority? Right? At what point is there
Speaker 1: no longer a state ability to tell you, you know, sorry,
Speaker 1: your home is not your home, your stuff is not
Speaker 1: your stuff, and you have no rights. That's what we're
Speaker 1: up against. I mean, I know, maybe I got a
Speaker 1: little too deep into the the analogy here, but that's
Speaker 1: where we are. That's what's happening in these different states
Speaker 1: a state of emergency. And this is also the whole mentality,
Speaker 1: the whole problem now is that we were told fifteen
Speaker 1: days just to flatten the curve, slow the spread too,
Speaker 1: flatten the curve. Right, these are really related concepts. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: we we went along with this in good faith, and
Speaker 1: I think that I think that that's still under the circumstances.
Speaker 1: Was a decision that that's defensible, right, that we all
Speaker 1: had to just sort of get ready and understand what's
Speaker 1: going to We all needed to see what's going on
Speaker 1: and to prep and get facilities in place and have
Speaker 1: a national focus on it. But it was a little
Speaker 1: bit like a storm is coming. Everybody has to clear
Speaker 1: out of this area. Once the storm hits. You know,
Speaker 1: we'll come back and we'll rebuild, but never knows that
Speaker 1: there's a that it's limited in time and scope, limited
Speaker 1: in duration and clear limitations. Well, what is this? Can
Speaker 1: leave your house, can't go see people, gotta where? I
Speaker 1: don't even give it. We're gonna talk more about the
Speaker 1: mask thing. There's a protest happening. Look, I I understand
Speaker 1: why people are doing open carry at some of these
Speaker 1: Michigan protests, but you know it does for the national
Speaker 1: level messaging. It results in all that gets focused on
Speaker 1: by the Lib media. And I'm just talking about what's
Speaker 1: more effective messaging, folks. Okay, I'm not saying that I
Speaker 1: don't understand why people want to enjoy their Second Amendment
Speaker 1: rights and want to remind the tyrants that they will
Speaker 1: not be able to just endlessly do whatever they want
Speaker 1: to people. I get that. I just hope that these
Speaker 1: protests don't that. You know, the only the best thing
Speaker 1: for the for the Lib authoritarians. If something ugly happens
Speaker 1: at one of these protests, that's what the authoritarians want.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the bus seton show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts. The iHeartRadio app or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Oh, Tim, I just saw this,
Speaker 1: So you know, we have this whistle blower, they're calling him,
Speaker 1: a whistle blower named doctor Bright, who is testifying today,
Speaker 1: and he is telling us we have the world's greatest scientists,
Speaker 1: let us lead, let us speak without fear of retribution.
Speaker 1: Oh boy, you know the part of the problem I
Speaker 1: have here. And there's a lot of stuff that's going
Speaker 1: on with with the scientific community. Somehow the people that
Speaker 1: speak out on behalf of science are all like leftists.
Speaker 1: Why not all scientists are leftists, but the people that
Speaker 1: are always listening to the scientists, they're all lives. This
Speaker 1: was congressional testimony from this guy, doctor Rick Bright, the
Speaker 1: ousted vaccine chief, that's what they're calling him. And he's
Speaker 1: now getting his moment of trash Trump fame. Right, Trump
Speaker 1: is doing a bad job and all this other stuff.
Speaker 1: The donal that's already responded to him. I don't know
Speaker 1: the so called whistleblower Rick Bright, never met him or
Speaker 1: even heard of him. But to me, he's a disgruntled employee,
Speaker 1: not liked or respected by people I spoke to, and
Speaker 1: who with his attitude should no longer be working for
Speaker 1: our government. Yeah, that sounds about right. Here's what the
Speaker 1: Here is what the Department of Health and Human Services,
Speaker 1: where he used to work. They released a statement. HHS
Speaker 1: put out a press release on this guy. This guy's
Speaker 1: being treated as a hero today. Oh he's amazing. Here's
Speaker 1: what they're saying about him, Rick Bright. This is from
Speaker 1: the Department of Health and Human Surfaces Publicly, Rick Bright
Speaker 1: was transferred from his role as BARDA director to lead
Speaker 1: a bold, new one billion dollars testing program at NAA
Speaker 1: NIH critical to saving lives and reopening America. Mister Bright
Speaker 1: has not yet shown up for work, but continues to
Speaker 1: collect his two hundred and eighty five thousand dollars salary
Speaker 1: while using his taxpayer funded medical leave to work with
Speaker 1: partisan attorneys who are politicizing their response to COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: His whistleblower complaint is filled with one sided arguments and misinformation.
Speaker 1: HHS is reviewing the complaint and strongly disagrees with the
Speaker 1: allegations and characterizations made by Rick Bright. HHS is having
Speaker 1: none of it from this guy. Now. I would like
Speaker 1: to I would like to just come out right now
Speaker 1: and say, you know, there's going to be no matter
Speaker 1: no matter what Trump does. We've all known all along
Speaker 1: that they're going to blame him for everything, and they're
Speaker 1: going to be doing this. It doesn't matter if Trump said,
Speaker 1: I now give up my position as leader of this response.
Speaker 1: King Fauci will make all of our choices about how
Speaker 1: to deal with the virus. King Fauci now has my proxy.
Speaker 1: They would still they would still find ways to blame
Speaker 1: him for everything that's going on. And one of the
Speaker 1: things that came up today during this testimony is that
Speaker 1: they're saying that there are thousands and thousands of people
Speaker 1: who have died because of Trump. You know what's you
Speaker 1: know what? And oh and because he won't listen to
Speaker 1: the scientist. That's the other thing that I want to say,
Speaker 1: because he won't listen to scientists. Play clip ten here, Mark. Yeah.
Speaker 1: First of all, I want to say, we need more
Speaker 1: of a national strategy. Where I live Toledo, Ohio's border
Speaker 1: is half an hour away. We don't have it. The
Speaker 1: virus doesn't know oops these rules here and these rules there,
Speaker 1: or a person doesn't. We need to have a more
Speaker 1: national regional strategy. And I wish you would stop denouncing
Speaker 1: scientists for giving us facts and work with us to
Speaker 1: have a plan to take sciences takes these facts into account,
Speaker 1: and how do we do things safely? That's what we
Speaker 1: need do. Science in Fitts keep a line she's Ohio.
Speaker 1: She's not a uper from Michigan's Ohio. You're science in fits.
Speaker 1: People that know nothing about forget about no nothing about science. Actually,
Speaker 1: there are so many who have no intellectual curiosity, no
Speaker 1: reservoir nor thirst for knowledge, who just love to lecture
Speaker 1: everybody about listening to the scientists. Well that's because then
Speaker 1: the next line is always what we hear here from
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren, for example, who's just saying listen to science.
Speaker 1: So that's why everyone's dying. Here's Elizabeth Warren doing what
Speaker 1: knew you would do. Play for The President needs to
Speaker 1: stop pretending that if he just Endorspan News it will
Speaker 1: go away. It won't. The time for magical thinking is
Speaker 1: over here. President Trump must acknowledge that the federal response
Speaker 1: has been suspicient and that more people are dying as
Speaker 1: a result. We are running out of time to save lives,
Speaker 1: and we need to do now. So thank you, doctor
Speaker 1: Faucie for all you're doing. You appreciate it, but the
Speaker 1: urgency of the moment could not be there. You notice
Speaker 1: there's so much incoherence with all of this running out
Speaker 1: of time to save lives. We've been told now that
Speaker 1: we've lost eighty thousand lives already, so and we're doing
Speaker 1: the lockdown. We're doing what they we have done, what
Speaker 1: the science is, what the experts told us to do.
Speaker 1: For two months, we've lost eighty people, and now when
Speaker 1: we want to try to do something else, is you
Speaker 1: want people to die. We don't blame the lockdown people
Speaker 1: for the eighty thousand debts that have happened from COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: although you could start to make a case about in
Speaker 1: certain areas, was that was that the most effective for
Speaker 1: your most affective strategy? Did people die because of the
Speaker 1: stupidity of the across the board lockdown? You can ask
Speaker 1: that question. It's a real question worth asking, Meaning instead
Speaker 1: of focusing on protecting people in nursing homes, acting like
Speaker 1: everybody's an equal risk from this thing, was that intelligent?
Speaker 1: Was that the smartest thing to do? Or did people
Speaker 1: die because of that decision? In New York It almost
Speaker 1: looks like people certainly died because of the Governor Cuomo
Speaker 1: order given that even if they think somebody coming out
Speaker 1: of a nursing home has COVID nineteen, I'm sorry, coming
Speaker 1: out of a hospital has COVID nineteen, they should be
Speaker 1: taken in by the nursing home. Oh and also there's
Speaker 1: there's a rule that the people that figured out now
Speaker 1: that nursing homes have no liability for this now, so
Speaker 1: nursing homes were told take people, but don't worry. You
Speaker 1: can't get sued if everybody gets COVID nineteen. And you know,
Speaker 1: fifty one hundred people die because you took somebody in
Speaker 1: from a hospital that you knew had COVID nineteen in
Speaker 1: the highest risk population you could possibly find of older people.
Speaker 1: So we need to have these discussions right now about
Speaker 1: how right have the scientists been, how correct have their
Speaker 1: prognostications been up to this point. And this is where
Speaker 1: I just have to say, you know they keep telling this,
Speaker 1: to listen to them. You have this whole the bay
Speaker 1: now over masked. LA sent out a note to its
Speaker 1: residence Los Angeles is not telling everybody you have to
Speaker 1: wear a mask if you leave your house. Period. That's
Speaker 1: their guy. If you leave your house wear a mask.
Speaker 1: This is nuts. If you leave your house wear a mask,
Speaker 1: the risk of getting this virus or giving this virus
Speaker 1: to somebody in open air is almost zero. And if
Speaker 1: we're going to start change, if we're going to destroy
Speaker 1: people's freedom because of minute risk, if we're going to
Speaker 1: eradicate reason, rational thought, sanity in how we approach risk
Speaker 1: in our day to day lives, we have been transformed,
Speaker 1: inherently been transformed into a turnkey totalitarian society. There is nothing.
Speaker 1: This is why the Libs love climate change so much,
Speaker 1: because climate change is existential for the world. Everyone's life
Speaker 1: is at stake, So you better recycle and take that
Speaker 1: bicycle to work instead of the car, and drive a
Speaker 1: Prius instead of a car that doesn't look like you know,
Speaker 1: somebody fell asleep at the design table. You know, that's
Speaker 1: that's what it is. They can control every aspect of
Speaker 1: your life. Well now with COVID, now they really can
Speaker 1: control every aspect of your life, because it's not saving
Speaker 1: lives one hundred years from now, it's saving lives right now. Yeah,
Speaker 1: these people are scary. And I'm gonna ask you this
Speaker 1: because I've started to see some analyzes popping around about
Speaker 1: was was the lockdown effective? You know, we we were
Speaker 1: told lockdown's effective. I've read through histories of the Spanish
Speaker 1: influence of nineteen eighteen. They did a whole bunch of lockdowns,
Speaker 1: did nothing. They were locked Some places lockdown and got decimated,
Speaker 1: some places didn't lockdown and get decimated, and some places
Speaker 1: we're fine with a lockdown or without a lockdown. I mean, really,
Speaker 1: you know, you look at this, I want to say fine.
Speaker 1: I mean they were hit far less badly. And this
Speaker 1: is true about countries right now. Japan didn't have a lockdown.
Speaker 1: Why does Japan have basically no problem with this? They
Speaker 1: didn't shut down all their businesses. They were early on
Speaker 1: this and identifying it and trying to prepare for it
Speaker 1: in some ways. But they you know, there are so
Speaker 1: many factors here, climate, average health of the citizens, population density,
Speaker 1: There are all these things that we know affect the
Speaker 1: spread of this, the severity of it, age, average age
Speaker 1: of the population. Why have countries that have been exposed
Speaker 1: to this. You know, here's a question I haven't seen
Speaker 1: anybody able to really answer yet. Why hasn't Africa been
Speaker 1: hit really badly by this disease? They have cases of it.
Speaker 1: You want to say, oh, buck, they don't have population density. Really,
Speaker 1: go hang out in Lagos or a Buja, Nigeria for
Speaker 1: a while and tell me about population density. They have
Speaker 1: incredibly dense environments with very poor public health systems. Why
Speaker 1: haven't now I'm I am posing questions that I don't
Speaker 1: have answers to amount an expert. But for people to
Speaker 1: pretend that the experts who are saying lockdown, lockdown, lockdown
Speaker 1: know what they're talking about. If they knew, if they
Speaker 1: weren't just theorizing, if they knew, they would be able
Speaker 1: to explain this in a way that you would sit
Speaker 1: there and say, or I would sit there and say, Okay,
Speaker 1: that makes sense. They can't. They can. There are some
Speaker 1: countries that have been hit very, very very badly by this.
Speaker 1: In other countries that seem to be just about okay.
Speaker 1: Climate certainly plays a role, not climate change climate, but
Speaker 1: actual like hot, cold, day to day certainly plays a
Speaker 1: role in this. Everyone who's been pointing to Australia, Yeah,
Speaker 1: this they outbreak started during Australia summer, so that makes
Speaker 1: things a whole lot better for them. Started during our
Speaker 1: flu season, our winter. One of the reasons we got
Speaker 1: we got hit so badly, I'd be very curious to see,
Speaker 1: you know. I know they have all these stringent measures
Speaker 1: in place now, but we'll see if if Australia has
Speaker 1: Hopefully it doesn't, but we'll see if Australia has a
Speaker 1: more difficult outbreak now that the weather turns in the
Speaker 1: southern hemisphere. But they can't answer these questions for you.
Speaker 1: They don't know why it is so bad in some
Speaker 1: places and not No, Brazil has not been hit that
Speaker 1: badly with this. So someone explained to me, if why
Speaker 1: we must take it on faith that the lockdowns that
Speaker 1: are destroying the economy and ruining lives are even a
Speaker 1: good idea, Never put aside necessary that these are even
Speaker 1: intelligent things to do. Handwashing, I'm down masks in certain circumstances. Sure,
Speaker 1: it's not that big an imposition mask all the time. No,
Speaker 1: protect vulnerable populations, yes, try to be in less super
Speaker 1: dense environments. Sure, can't go and operate your business. Can't
Speaker 1: cut hair, why you know, can't sell flowers, can't sell clothing,
Speaker 1: You can't engage in what you know? Doctors have to
Speaker 1: shut down their offices if they're not dealing with COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen patients. Whose idea was this? Again, this is what
Speaker 1: our public health community comes up with. You know, ask
Speaker 1: this question too. Notice how we look at this and
Speaker 1: we're supposed to be able to be present with data,
Speaker 1: because these are sciences. We're supposed to be able to say,
Speaker 1: show me why this was a good idea, and they're
Speaker 1: just they turned around the yellow you and say, you know,
Speaker 1: be quiet, peasant you. You don't have the same background
Speaker 1: that we do on this issue. Oh, the old appeal
Speaker 1: to authority routine. Huh, I don't think that's going to
Speaker 1: work all that much longer. And now, of course there's
Speaker 1: the they want to politicize this, and maybe they want
Speaker 1: to stay locked down until November if they can, or
Speaker 1: at least as close to it as possible. They want
Speaker 1: to make sure that people are you know, people are fed,
Speaker 1: and that there's money flowing through this system because it
Speaker 1: creates a dependency on government that they know they'll be
Speaker 1: able to exploit for generations to come. And then be
Speaker 1: on that once Biden comes and look at what happened
Speaker 1: with Obama. Obama takes over and all he has to
Speaker 1: do is essentially be president and the cyclical recession. The
Speaker 1: Bush administration did the bailouts. The Bush administration saved the
Speaker 1: banks from failing. Obama just had his be there, and
Speaker 1: he came in at the worst possible time, and over
Speaker 1: time it was low, it was a week, it was
Speaker 1: a poor recovery, but yeah, the the upswing was going
Speaker 1: to happen. So he was always able to say, well,
Speaker 1: when I came in, things were terrible, right, which meant, yeah,
Speaker 1: things are going to get a little bit better than
Speaker 1: where they are. So when Biden comes in, what they
Speaker 1: want is the same effect. We'll say, this guy's a moron,
Speaker 1: and as policies are terrible, and they say, aren't things
Speaker 1: getting better now? And we'll say, but hold on, but
Speaker 1: the economy. You kept the economy shut down for months
Speaker 1: and months, and that'll just be add that that that
Speaker 1: that doesn't matter. It's getting better. Look at the numbers now.
Speaker 1: Biden's improving things. It's not just narrative creation. Narrative creation
Speaker 1: leads to reality creation. When you're talking about government, media perception,
Speaker 1: this is power. This isn't just what people say. This
Speaker 1: is what people think, and what people think leads to
Speaker 1: what they do and how they can be controlled. Those
Speaker 1: are the stakes right now is we're trying to figure
Speaker 1: out how to reopen this country, and the people that
Speaker 1: are trying to shut this thing down are playing hardball.
Speaker 1: I mean, keep it shut down. You're in the freedom hid.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. There's a statute.
Speaker 1: There's a nineteen forty seven statute that says Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: would yield all of the powers of the presidency if
Speaker 1: the president and vice president could not consistent with the law,
Speaker 1: she can issue whatever executive orders she wanted, fire disfavored
Speaker 1: political appointees, and in general direct the executive branch as
Speaker 1: she pleased. She's third in line. It's never going to happen.
Speaker 1: We'll keep our vice president very healthy and I'll stay healthy.
Speaker 1: Never going to happen. She would be a disaster. So
Speaker 1: it looks Nancy Pelosi is a disaster. Okay, even doing
Speaker 1: a thing like that with her crazy. But what she
Speaker 1: wants to do is get involved with a voting. She
Speaker 1: just got back to Washington. Everyone said, what was so long?
Speaker 1: She just got back here. So let's just see how
Speaker 1: it all works out. So I think we're going to
Speaker 1: have a great election. I'm getting really good pauled numbers.
Speaker 1: For the most part, they're not being shown. And I
Speaker 1: saw Joe Biden on television yesterday and if you watch
Speaker 1: aminos nothing he knows absolutely nothing. That's pretty much. That's
Speaker 1: all Trump's line really has to be about Biden. I mean,
Speaker 1: this guy really isn't know nothing. I mean, he's he
Speaker 1: is in the ultimate MPT suit. Just a lot of bluster,
Speaker 1: a lot of you know, the first two lines of
Speaker 1: the executive summary, that's what this guy gives you all
Speaker 1: the time. You know, soon, you know, we need to
Speaker 1: do things and come together and America and the people
Speaker 1: and the rubbery blown. It's just all silliness. But MSNBC
Speaker 1: thinks that Biden's just great. Play sixteen the president is.
Speaker 1: People sit around saying Joe Biden's in his basement. I'll
Speaker 1: tell you, I don't recommend you to do this, but
Speaker 1: if you watch Trump TV, you know their YouTube channel,
Speaker 1: He's on to have an hour every night on Trump
Speaker 1: TV right now. It's reaching a lot of people. Go
Speaker 1: spend some time and watch it. McConnell was on there
Speaker 1: the other night with Laura Trump. That's where he made
Speaker 1: this news where he attacked Obama. If you watch that
Speaker 1: channel and see what they're the messages are driving about
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. It's he's in his basement. He's old, he's infirmed,
Speaker 1: he's sleepy, Joe, he might be senile. It's over and
Speaker 1: over and over again. They're hammering the stuff. And you
Speaker 1: think about that message, and then you look at what's
Speaker 1: happening in the polls. Joe Biden set in his basement,
Speaker 1: according to Donald Trump, and still beating him on almost
Speaker 1: every mentoring that counts in terms of the data. Right now, Now,
Speaker 1: that does not mean that Donald Trump can't win this election.
Speaker 1: He can win this election. Okay, we get it right.
Speaker 1: And this is what I think is fascinating. We all
Speaker 1: know that the Democrats and Republicans, you could put any
Speaker 1: candidate forward and it would be a close race. I mean,
Speaker 1: you could actually put forward a candidate who all we
Speaker 1: knew about him. His name is Bob, and he's a guy,
Speaker 1: and he's running for president as a Democrat, and you
Speaker 1: get forty nine percent of the country to vote for
Speaker 1: this random imbascile. So Joe Biden just happens to be
Speaker 1: the random imbassil here. Thanks for listening to the Bus
Speaker 1: Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Collectively,
Speaker 1: we already spent about in the process of spending about
Speaker 1: two point eight trillion dollars, we now have a debt
Speaker 1: the size of our economy. So I have said, and
Speaker 1: the President has said as well, that we need to
Speaker 1: take a pause here and take a looking what we've done,
Speaker 1: see what's working, see what isn't, and also begin to
Speaker 1: encourage the governors around the country who have the decision
Speaker 1: making ability to begin to open up the economy. But
Speaker 1: they don't want to have to do that because they
Speaker 1: think that if they can keep their states fed via
Speaker 1: the federal trough, if they can keep New York and
Speaker 1: California going at a subdued level, even if you remember,
Speaker 1: they don't have to keep it locked down all the
Speaker 1: way to November to affect November even another another month,
Speaker 1: another six weeks. Is that a price? You don't think
Speaker 1: they've already done this to us for two months. You
Speaker 1: don't think they're willing to drag this out for another
Speaker 1: six weeks if it means that the chance of Trump
Speaker 1: winning is traumatically reduced, winning re election, and I know
Speaker 1: I don't want to sit here and have to have
Speaker 1: to look at this in those terms. It's absurd, but
Speaker 1: that's what's going on, so we might as well accept
Speaker 1: We might as well recognize the truth about what the
Speaker 1: other side is planning here and try to meet them,
Speaker 1: you know, on the battlefield where they're actually fighting. This
Speaker 1: is political, as I've already said to you, they can't
Speaker 1: even explain why why they shutdowns work in some countries
Speaker 1: and not in others, or why because some countries that
Speaker 1: didn't shut down seem to be fine. And I'm not saying,
Speaker 1: you know, maybe maybe they do have ants. I just
Speaker 1: haven't heard them yet, and i'd like to hear them.
Speaker 1: You know. Barstool president Dave Portnoy has a fantastic rant
Speaker 1: on this. I shared it on Twitter. We don't we
Speaker 1: didn't play here on the show, but you know, because
Speaker 1: there's a lot of a lot of salty language, mister
Speaker 1: mister Portnoy uses some of the salty language, a lot
Speaker 1: of it, but it's a great random He's basically it's like, look,
Speaker 1: you know, we were told laden the curve and now
Speaker 1: we've extended into this never never land of we'll just
Speaker 1: keep doing this until we have a cure of vaccine,
Speaker 1: and he says, well, we don't even have a cure
Speaker 1: for cures for other things that are really bad that
Speaker 1: are out there, that have been that have been in
Speaker 1: existence for decades. There's no certainty at all that there
Speaker 1: will be a vaccine for this in a year or
Speaker 1: in ten years. So what are we really doing to ourselves?
Speaker 1: And then he says, look, if you're telling me this
Speaker 1: is speaking as mister Portnoy here, but if you're telling
Speaker 1: me that my business, you know, barstool sports, would he says,
Speaker 1: he's fine, But he says, if it was going to
Speaker 1: go away or I have to take my chances with
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen, I'm taking my chances that that's his. And
Speaker 1: he says a lot of people I think feel the
Speaker 1: same way, and they do. Right, if you're if you're
Speaker 1: telling me that, I can watch the dissolution of the
Speaker 1: American economy mass poverty, never mind the poverty around the world.
Speaker 1: The La Times has a piece It says that there
Speaker 1: are one hundred million people plus who are risk of starvation, starvation,
Speaker 1: dying from hunger, a horrible way to go because of
Speaker 1: the economic catastrophe. That is a self inflicted one. This
Speaker 1: is a self inflicted economic catastrophe. The virus is one thing. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the virus would have hurt economies, no question. But the shutdowns,
Speaker 1: the shutdowns have crushed economies and forced incalculable economic damage
Speaker 1: onto all of us. Do you think that they're ever
Speaker 1: going to admit that this was a bad idea? What
Speaker 1: do you think we would do to the political class
Speaker 1: in this country if they had to come out and
Speaker 1: say to us, you know what, Yeah, that was that
Speaker 1: was our bad shouldn't have done it. And I've said
Speaker 1: it to you and you I don't think that there's
Speaker 1: a counter argument to this. The extension of the shutdown
Speaker 1: was the first time that I ever saw Trump because
Speaker 1: of public pressure, because of pressure from people that hate
Speaker 1: him and don't have not just his interests, don't have
Speaker 1: the interests of the country at heart, that he said, Okay, fine,
Speaker 1: I give well, we'll extend this out. Now there would
Speaker 1: have been a fight with the States. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: it was in his hands to make the shutdowns go
Speaker 1: away entirely, because it wasn't, but he gave them so
Speaker 1: much more cover to extend and extend and extend, and
Speaker 1: Dave Portnoy is just telling everybody this is nuts, and
Speaker 1: it is nuts, and the people that are pushing this
Speaker 1: are wrong. And this formulation they have for you will
Speaker 1: do what we say. You will not open your business,
Speaker 1: you will not go outside without a protective covering on
Speaker 1: your face, go outside at all. That's what they're saying.
Speaker 1: In Los Angeles and in New York. If you go
Speaker 1: outside without a mask on, people look at you kind
Speaker 1: of funny. Trust me, I know I'm here. But you
Speaker 1: must do these things because it's not about your risk,
Speaker 1: gets about risk that we're assessing for other people. So
Speaker 1: we're making the determination for you that you're not allowed
Speaker 1: to live your life in any freedom whatsoever because you
Speaker 1: just breathing is a risk to other human beings. That's
Speaker 1: what they're telling you. That is ultimately what's going on here,
Speaker 1: and that's how we get to a point where we
Speaker 1: have an economic free fall that, as it is calculated today,
Speaker 1: is at thirty six point five million people without jobs,
Speaker 1: almost three million more than last week. And it's just
Speaker 1: the official number. I mean, this is is hard to
Speaker 1: imagine what this is going to do, and I don't know.
Speaker 1: I hate to get ahead of where things are right
Speaker 1: now with how bad things are going to get. But
Speaker 1: the virus will the virus we will get through. A
Speaker 1: society can I'm one hundred percent sure survive a disease
Speaker 1: that nine percent plus of people who are infected with
Speaker 1: it survive. A society can survive that, then that's just
Speaker 1: in mathematical certainty, right, you know that you can serve
Speaker 1: can a society into your if it's political class is
Speaker 1: shown to be a bunch of reckless and stupid authoritarians
Speaker 1: who sees endless power in their hands at the first opportunity,
Speaker 1: and who destroy the economy that they inherited from the
Speaker 1: generations and the people that came before them. They destroy that,
Speaker 1: and we have an end to the dominance of the
Speaker 1: US dollar as the global reserve currency. We have an
Speaker 1: end to the I mean, it's hard to even wargame
Speaker 1: what will happen to the economy if they keep doing this,
Speaker 1: they keep dragging us through this. Look. Ultimately, I think
Speaker 1: the if it saves just one life, crowd will have
Speaker 1: to just shut up because people will get tired of this.
Speaker 1: They'll figure it out. But people are figuring this out
Speaker 1: too slowly. That's my problem. They're learning the lessons here
Speaker 1: too slowly, and for Democrats this is I really believe it.
Speaker 1: There's another fear, not just of the economy of COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen that's motivating a lot of this, and it's the
Speaker 1: fear of them having to psychologically bear the burden of
Speaker 1: four more years of a Trump administration. I think there
Speaker 1: are people, and I mean this, there are adults who
Speaker 1: are in a clinical sense terrified of that. In a
Speaker 1: clinical sense, it keeps them up at night, and they
Speaker 1: have physical anxiety symptoms from the idea of Trump being
Speaker 1: president for four more years. And so you know, if
Speaker 1: they can ride it out in their house somewhere, if
Speaker 1: they've got enough savings in the bank and whatever, they're like, Hey,
Speaker 1: we only got to do this for another month or
Speaker 1: two and Donald Trump doesn't get to be president again.
Speaker 1: That seems like a fair trade. I think there are
Speaker 1: millions of people who believe that, and that is part
Speaker 1: of their thought process right now, that is directing their
Speaker 1: thought process on this issue. Meanwhile, they're pretending to care
Speaker 1: about the folks who are economically getting crushed by this
Speaker 1: because they know who is really being hurt, if not
Speaker 1: celebrities in fifteen thousand square foot second homes. They're not
Speaker 1: the ones that are suffering. It's people that have no
Speaker 1: savings and no job security and lost their jobs and
Speaker 1: now have nothing and can't go outside and don't have
Speaker 1: comfortable living situations that they're staying in. You know, But
Speaker 1: here's Joe Biden letting you know that. Oh yeah, blue
Speaker 1: collar Joe really cares about the working class. Play three. Look,
Speaker 1: the people are getting hurt are Democrats. Hard working people,
Speaker 1: the people who can't afford to stay home. The people
Speaker 1: are getting clobbered, the people are making hourly ways. The
Speaker 1: people who are out there saving our lives, carrying the
Speaker 1: country on their back and losing lives and the process
Speaker 1: of doing it, they're the people who are in trouble.
Speaker 1: A lot of millionaires aren't in trouble. People making tens
Speaker 1: of millions of dollars or hundreds of thousands out they're
Speaker 1: not in trouble. But the people are in trouble are
Speaker 1: the very people that are our constituency number one Democrat constituencies. Really,
Speaker 1: I think some of them may change that calculation. We
Speaker 1: just had these we had these this Republican congressional special election,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, this congressional special election, a Republican one didn't
Speaker 1: see any media coverage of it. Of course, I think
Speaker 1: people are gonna you know, this is the hope that
Speaker 1: I have, is that enough the left wing ideologues, people
Speaker 1: that are you know, just not my president and hashtag
Speaker 1: science and all this stuff. They're never going to be
Speaker 1: able to convince them that, you know, Donald Trump wasn't
Speaker 1: out there, you know, injecting people with COVID nineteen on purpose. Basically,
Speaker 1: I mean, they're completely out of their minds. It doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: But for those who will be the difference makers in
Speaker 1: Ohio and Florida, in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and Michigan, for
Speaker 1: those folks, I truly hope that they understand who's really
Speaker 1: pushing for maximum suffering, economic suffering for those who have
Speaker 1: lost their jobs right now by extending all of this,
Speaker 1: it is the Democrats. This has become a part as
Speaker 1: an issue. Now you have the reopened Republicans and the
Speaker 1: lockdown left that is that is going on across the country.
Speaker 1: And the more we learn about this disease, the more
Speaker 1: we realize they can't protect you from it. It's going
Speaker 1: to be out there anyway. There's no vaccine in the
Speaker 1: near term. There may never be a vaccine. Our therapeutics
Speaker 1: are basically garbage. That's where we are. So what do
Speaker 1: we do. You're gonna gonna hide in you. You're gonna
Speaker 1: hide you in your home and your in your bedroom
Speaker 1: for another three months. People are gonna lose their minds.
Speaker 1: So I'm happy that we're seeing this pushback. I'm happy
Speaker 1: that there's this lockdown rebellion that is growing across the country.
Speaker 1: And I've been thinking to myself too, what what happens
Speaker 1: if they start finding or even arresting people who won't
Speaker 1: wear masks walk around in public? Am I going to be?
Speaker 1: Am I going to engage in civil disobedience? Maybe? I
Speaker 1: mean my business doesn't My business is this, It's you.
Speaker 1: It's talking to all of you, so that that won't
Speaker 1: be affected and that's not affected by the lockdown. Obviously.
Speaker 1: That's why I'm fortunate enough to be able to continue.
Speaker 1: Although they look revenue across the board for media is
Speaker 1: way down, even though ratings are up, revenue is way
Speaker 1: down because media is just a marketing platform. You always
Speaker 1: have to remember this. Media is a marketing platform for
Speaker 1: companies that actually make stuff. You know, media as we
Speaker 1: consume it unless you're talking about direct subscription, which is
Speaker 1: also part of it. But anything that's advertiser based, it
Speaker 1: means that the media products you're watching are really marketing
Speaker 1: platforms for other products, actual products that you buy. And
Speaker 1: so when that's all down, because the economy is in
Speaker 1: such bad shape, it affects the ability of media platforms
Speaker 1: to make money too. But the unemployment and we have
Speaker 1: put ourselves into a depression and Democrats want us to
Speaker 1: crawl out of it as slowly as possible because of
Speaker 1: the electoral timing of all this. That's just the truth.
Speaker 1: And they figure that the federal government will. Oh, I
Speaker 1: want to make sure that the blue states and blue
Speaker 1: cities that are going to drag this out as long
Speaker 1: as they can. You, wherever you are across the country,
Speaker 1: you're going to be paying for this with your tax dollars.
Speaker 1: Here's the mayor of New York telling everybody that there
Speaker 1: better be a huge federal bailout for New York or else.
Speaker 1: Though there's not going to be a recovery play eight.
Speaker 1: We cannot recover without the stimulus period. Right now, what
Speaker 1: I have lost in this city the human loss. First,
Speaker 1: the families, the people are suffering first, But then think
Speaker 1: about what it means for our future that we've already
Speaker 1: lost seven point four billion dollars already in terms of
Speaker 1: our city revenue that pays for cops and firefighters and
Speaker 1: healthcare workers and teachers. That's just after ten weeks. We'll
Speaker 1: think where this is going. So if our federal government
Speaker 1: doesn't step in and fill that gap and help cities
Speaker 1: and states back on their feet, there won't be a recovery.
Speaker 1: There won't be a recovery. People will suffer much longer.
Speaker 1: Why is there even that word stimulus. It is the
Speaker 1: idea of putting people back on their feet, recreating the
Speaker 1: energy of our economy, getting people back to work. That's
Speaker 1: why the concept of stimulus was invented to begin with.
Speaker 1: And it will only happen if the President says that
Speaker 1: it needs to happen. We know the Senate will act
Speaker 1: if the President says to. But without that stimulus, there
Speaker 1: is no recovery. It's as simple as that, more federal dollars,
Speaker 1: more money going in. It's not even really your taxes.
Speaker 1: It's your children, your children's children and their You know,
Speaker 1: their ability to provide for themselves and make a living.
Speaker 1: That that's what's really an issue here. But their plan
Speaker 1: is to just keep on you using relying on the
Speaker 1: federal government money lifeline, that the Treasury money tree is
Speaker 1: going to just keep getting shook until well as laid
Speaker 1: the process as they can and the rounds they see,
Speaker 1: look at how many people died, how bad the economy is.
Speaker 1: Trump is terrible. Vote Biden. That's the whole plan. We
Speaker 1: see it. That is the whole plan. You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. We
Speaker 1: all remember the horrible shooting at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School,
Speaker 1: and we also remember that there were people on site
Speaker 1: who had firearms and whose job it was to protect
Speaker 1: those kids, and they did nothing. I mean some of
Speaker 1: them just did nothing. Well, one of them who was
Speaker 1: fired just got his job reinstated thanks to the union.
Speaker 1: This is from the Miami Herald. The Broward Sheriff's Office
Speaker 1: sergeant who was the first supervisor to respond to the
Speaker 1: Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School shooting and lost his job
Speaker 1: after it was found he hid behind his car as
Speaker 1: the first shots rang out, will be reinstated, awarded full
Speaker 1: back pay, and get back his Seniority Sergeant Brian Miller
Speaker 1: was one of the four deputies who were terminated because
Speaker 1: of a neglect of duty in the February fourteenth, twenty
Speaker 1: eighteen Parkland shooting, which killed seventeen students and faculty members
Speaker 1: and injured another seventeen. Miller was paid one hundred and
Speaker 1: thirty eight thousand, four hundred and ten dollars in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: Man producer Mark I got to become a Broward sergeant. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'll hide behind my car for half that yeah, wow.
Speaker 1: And arbitration ruling union stuff of course found that the
Speaker 1: Broward Sheriff's office violated Brian's constitutional due process rights and
Speaker 1: improperly terminated him. This is just stunning. So here you
Speaker 1: go the this takes us back into the situation here.
Speaker 1: Then Sheriff Scott Israel faced backlash from Broward Deputies Association
Speaker 1: President Jeff Bell, who said at the time that Israel
Speaker 1: was going after deputies and sergeants by suspending them, but
Speaker 1: allowed Captain Jan Jordan to resign. Jordan took charge of
Speaker 1: the scene. She arrived within seven minutes of the first
Speaker 1: shots being fired and did not urge deputies to go
Speaker 1: into the school deputies Edward Easton, Joshua Stanboss, Scott Peterson,
Speaker 1: and Miller were all fired months after the shootings. The
Speaker 1: Sheriff's office internal investigation found they all failed in their duties.
Speaker 1: According to report by the Marjorie Stoneman Douglas Public Safety Commission,
Speaker 1: which investigated the shootings, Miller was the first supervisor respond.
Speaker 1: He arrived as shots were being fired. He hid behind
Speaker 1: his police cruiser and did not radio in for ten minutes.
Speaker 1: Pretty amazing, isn't it. Broward police union look unions, public
Speaker 1: sector unions are a problem, folks, Broward police unions. Making
Speaker 1: sure that you know you can't be fired for cowardice
Speaker 1: as a police officer. That's what they're saying, because this
Speaker 1: was This was cowardice. It absolutely was. And I've had
Speaker 1: one or two test the exchanges here when you stay
Speaker 1: callers in the radio shows, someone's oh, you know, rudo, No,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, you've got a gun, your law enforcement officer
Speaker 1: and their kids being shot up in a school and
Speaker 1: you're not gonna do anything about it. That's that's if
Speaker 1: that's not calarie. There's no such thing as calarice. But yeah,
Speaker 1: here we are, here we are. I'm I'm I mean,
Speaker 1: this is just unbelievable, unbelievable. And look, it's a it's
Speaker 1: a real it's a real dark spot here. It's a
Speaker 1: real bad moment for law enforcement community. This was really bad.
Speaker 1: The Pulse nightclub shooting was also really bad. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's some stuff here, folks. It's look, I know it's
Speaker 1: easy in a Monday morning quarterback, but if we're not
Speaker 1: going to expect sheriff's deputies at a school shooting who
Speaker 1: have guns when they arrive to at least try, I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm not if you're out gunned or you know you're
Speaker 1: taking fire and you gotta cover, I get that. You're
Speaker 1: not even gonna go and investing here. You're just gonna
Speaker 1: sit there. You're gonna tell people, you know, citizens, they
Speaker 1: don't want to carry guns all around of them. Flooria
Speaker 1: is better than at least New York is. But you're
Speaker 1: not gonna go in there and do anything. Unbelievable, unbelievable.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember
Speaker 1: just some scribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, team Buck, it's time
Speaker 1: for roll call, alright, teen, Remember to go to Bucksexton
Speaker 1: dot com. We post stories there and also you can
Speaker 1: listen to the podcasts there. Podcast numbers up pretty big
Speaker 1: last month. We appreciate that. Please continue to spread the word,
Speaker 1: tell people about the show and what we do here.
Speaker 1: It's the best way that people learn about this. It's
Speaker 1: why we keep growing, It's why producer Mark and I
Speaker 1: still have jobs. So with that, Facebook dot com, slash
Speaker 1: buck Sexton if you want to send messages to us,
Speaker 1: or Teambuck at iHeartMedia dot com. If you wish to email,
Speaker 1: let's get to it. John Rights, Hey, Buck, I am
Speaker 1: listening to the segment from Tuesday on the Aubury shooting.
Speaker 1: The part that I have a hard time with, and
Speaker 1: I'm sure many others have as well, is that Aubrey
Speaker 1: ran up to a truck with obviously armed men in it,
Speaker 1: then chose to punch the son in the face as
Speaker 1: he got to the front of the truck and fought
Speaker 1: with him over the gun as that same gun went off.
Speaker 1: It could have went off from the physical altercation unless
Speaker 1: the father and son were verbally threatening Aubrey with physical harm.
Speaker 1: I don't see how open carrying a weapon in self
Speaker 1: defense while questioning someone is a pass for Aubury to
Speaker 1: assault the father and son. Once Aubrey chose to attack them,
Speaker 1: I don't see the logical outcome other than the father
Speaker 1: and son defending themselves on the flip side, if Aubrey,
Speaker 1: they would have won the altercation and killed the father
Speaker 1: and son. I don't see how Aubrey would be charged
Speaker 1: with murder himself. Thoughts, Well, John, this this goes to
Speaker 1: you know. First of all, you know, the video is
Speaker 1: not a perfect I've watched it a few times. It
Speaker 1: doesn't show, at least from what I could see, exactly
Speaker 1: what went down there. But you don't. I don't. There's
Speaker 1: no right to pull over on the high on a
Speaker 1: road and brandish two shotguns and demand to speak to
Speaker 1: somebody that that does not exist. This guy was on
Speaker 1: public property. He was not. He was not on there.
Speaker 1: Maybe one thing. If someone's you know, on your front lawn,
Speaker 1: or if they're you know, that's a different thing. This
Speaker 1: guy's on a public road, he's jogging, and they are demanding,
Speaker 1: and they're the big question that I would want to
Speaker 1: know is are they brandishing? Right? You know? I mean,
Speaker 1: if you if you want to know what brandishing is
Speaker 1: someone sits down, they say, hey, you know, you're making
Speaker 1: a lot of noise last night. You know, I'm your neighbor.
Speaker 1: You're making a lot of noise last night. I need
Speaker 1: you to stop. That's one thing. Someone sits down and says, hey,
Speaker 1: you're making a lot of noise last night, and they
Speaker 1: take out, you know, a three to fifty seven and
Speaker 1: they put it on the table in front of you
Speaker 1: and they say, you might want to quiet down a
Speaker 1: little bit, right, I mean, that's and they're pointing the
Speaker 1: gun of you. That's brandishing. That's not okay. You know,
Speaker 1: you can't point a weapon at somebody's Hey, I need
Speaker 1: to talk to you. That's that's not how this goes.
Speaker 1: And you know that's what this is where the every
Speaker 1: little bit of this is going to be deconstructed and
Speaker 1: looked at very closely. But also why why are they there?
Speaker 1: Weren't burglaries in the neighborhood that's already been established. There
Speaker 1: weren't recent burglaries at least looking at an open construction site.
Speaker 1: Is I mean, I've done it. This is not something
Speaker 1: that is so strange or weird at all. That's certainly
Speaker 1: not some terrible crime that anybody would get You wouldn't
Speaker 1: think anybody to get in trouble this. They didn't do anything.
Speaker 1: There's no crime. Really, you could try to say there's trespassing,
Speaker 1: but I mean, if you want to be annoying about that,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of trespassing goes on all the time
Speaker 1: that no one you know, it's a no Usually trespassing
Speaker 1: is considered a no harm, no foul situation. But yeah,
Speaker 1: I think that if you instigate, if you on false pretenses,
Speaker 1: instigate an incident that that involves lethal use of force,
Speaker 1: I think you should be held accountable for that. You know,
Speaker 1: you can't just draw it down on people if you're
Speaker 1: if you know, it's it's a everyone who knows everyone
Speaker 1: who's an open carry or who's a firearms owner listening
Speaker 1: to nose. It's a big responsibility to carry a firearm,
Speaker 1: to be somebody who's going to exercise their Second Amendment rights.
Speaker 1: And if you're a concealed carry holder, there's a responsibility
Speaker 1: that comes with that. And you don't get to say, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, I know I was concealed carry and I
Speaker 1: got a little drunk and I just you know, popped
Speaker 1: off a couple of rounds in the sky. I mean, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's how people to go to prison for a long time.
Speaker 1: And I know you all know that, but there's a
Speaker 1: responsibility that goes along with it, and you do not
Speaker 1: I know, these guys had shotguns, but you don't. You
Speaker 1: don't get to wave shotguns and people's faces when you're
Speaker 1: you know, if you're not defending yourself. M m. Look
Speaker 1: they from what I see, these guys started it and
Speaker 1: it was unnecessary and it looks very bad and there's
Speaker 1: a reason. You know, this video shows obviously that this
Speaker 1: looks really bad. And also the whole thing. The guy's
Speaker 1: standing in the back of the truck, I mean, that's
Speaker 1: a threatening Well what is he doing? You know what?
Speaker 1: Why and why are they bothering this guy in the
Speaker 1: first they want to talk to them? I'm sorry, it's
Speaker 1: not okay. I think they they thought they were putting
Speaker 1: on their little fake cop hats. It's a very dangerous
Speaker 1: thing to do, very dangerous thing to do, and a
Speaker 1: man lost his life in it, and it's a tragedy
Speaker 1: and it shouldn't have happened. There was no need for this.
Speaker 1: There was no need for it, and I think people
Speaker 1: need to be held accountable. If there is new evidence,
Speaker 1: new information, or a new theory of the case, of
Speaker 1: course I want to hear that and I'll return to it.
Speaker 1: But for right now, I think I think this is
Speaker 1: proceeding with the charges. I think this is proceeding as
Speaker 1: it should. I gotta tell you. And if you guys
Speaker 1: think I'm wrong, please let me know why. Don't just
Speaker 1: tell me I'm wrong. Let me know why I'm wrong.
Speaker 1: Let me know what, because I can tell you this.
Speaker 1: If I'm jogging down the road and someone has a
Speaker 1: shotgun and they're insisting on talking to me, I think
Speaker 1: I'm under threat right away. That's that is threatening. This
Speaker 1: is a stranger. You're in a public space. You know
Speaker 1: they don't You don't know who they are, you don't
Speaker 1: know what their intent is. You clearly don't have a
Speaker 1: firearm you're jogging. I mean, I mean, maybe you could
Speaker 1: have a you know, something strapped in somewhere. It's very unlikely.
Speaker 1: So what's going on here? I would be under I
Speaker 1: would be nervous about that. I'm never nervous about people
Speaker 1: carrying firearms or I mean, like I carried firearms. I've
Speaker 1: carried some pretty interesting stuff in my day. But I
Speaker 1: never carried anything like I never would do anything like this.
Speaker 1: This is absurd anyway. I'm I mean, I I just
Speaker 1: been stopping somebody when I have a gun and say, hey,
Speaker 1: I need to talk to you. Jeff Buck. I've been
Speaker 1: listening to your radio show for a few years now,
Speaker 1: first on kf AB and Omaha Who Love Love KFA
Speaker 1: by Omaha. That's one of our first stations where we
Speaker 1: really showed great traction of the Buck sexon show, you know,
Speaker 1: four years ago now. So thank you to everybody in
Speaker 1: the KFAB family, one for keeping us on the air
Speaker 1: there and also just for making this a really successful
Speaker 1: show in Omaha, Braska. I gotta get it to Omaha
Speaker 1: producer Mark, you ever been out there? I have not.
Speaker 1: You know that three eleven, the band from the nineties,
Speaker 1: is from Omaha. Really, yes, that's very interesting. You know,
Speaker 1: they actually have a pretty fantastic music scene out there
Speaker 1: from what I understand, you know, like it's like the
Speaker 1: Nashville of Nebraska. You know, people think that Nebraska is
Speaker 1: kind of nothing there, so I guess, oh, hey, hey,
Speaker 1: oh hey, pretty spar but we love, hey, we love
Speaker 1: I'm not saying I don't love what I'm saying is
Speaker 1: people think that it's nothing, but there actually are things there.
Speaker 1: That's what I'm saying. Yeah, yeah, no, there's dude, Omaha
Speaker 1: is a cool town. I want to go out there
Speaker 1: and check it out for sure. So anyway, he writes, Oh,
Speaker 1: and of course Freedom ninety three seven in Denver. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: number one on a time slot. Thank you, Denver. We
Speaker 1: love you, We love you. I'm a musician, a part
Speaker 1: time college professor with current situation. Of course, all my
Speaker 1: teaching has done online and my performances have been canceled.
Speaker 1: So I picked up another job delivering packages for Amazon.
Speaker 1: I deliver all over northern Colorado, Greeley, Loveland, Longmont, et cetera,
Speaker 1: and a lot of rural deliveries in between those smaller cities.
Speaker 1: While I'm grateful for the extra work and income, I
Speaker 1: have to say that it seems that Amazon cares much
Speaker 1: more about virtue signaling to its customers than they do
Speaker 1: about the safety of delivery drivers. We're now required to
Speaker 1: wear masks at all time when working for Amazon, never
Speaker 1: mind that there's absolutely no benefit for wearing a mask
Speaker 1: when you're alone and outside. No consideration has been taken
Speaker 1: for those of us that wear glasses and have to
Speaker 1: deal with fogged up glasses obviously when driving, that is
Speaker 1: a real safety issue. I learned that Amazon is actively
Speaker 1: encouraging its customers to tattle on delivery drivers that are
Speaker 1: not wearing masks. I think it's really sad that a
Speaker 1: portion of our culture has become so fearful and petty.
Speaker 1: Being a tattletale is something that is being actively encouraged. However,
Speaker 1: I'm encouraged that majority of the people I see across
Speaker 1: northern Colorado are not this way. At least some people
Speaker 1: still value common sense and personal responsibility shields high. Well, Jeff,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for that perspective. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: really useful for us to hear what people are going
Speaker 1: through in different parts of the country with this. And yeah,
Speaker 1: wearing a mask in a car by yourself is absurd.
Speaker 1: You're protecting nobody, and it is dangerous, especially if you well,
Speaker 1: if you wear glasses. It's dangerous because I try to
Speaker 1: wear sunglasses with my mask recently because I was social
Speaker 1: distance walking along somebody one of my parents who wants
Speaker 1: to be very cautious about their health. And it's really
Speaker 1: a producer Mark. Have you had sunglasses on. Yet when
Speaker 1: you had the mask on, you fogged them up within
Speaker 1: three breaths. You can't see anything. Oh yeah, And I
Speaker 1: usually only work sunglasses when I'm driving, so I'm like,
Speaker 1: I can't even bother to put the mask on while
Speaker 1: I'm driving. Yeah. No, it's it's not a safe thing
Speaker 1: at all. So how are we going to deal with that?
Speaker 1: I ask you? You're in the hut. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, So there's a news
Speaker 1: story that I did not see and I'm having a
Speaker 1: hard a hard time believing it. But producer Mark has
Speaker 1: brought to my attention, Oh my god, it's real. There
Speaker 1: is a Chicago area woman was mauled to death by
Speaker 1: her French bulldog. Mark. This is like being eaten by
Speaker 1: a chihuahua. How could this happen? I mean, apparently it
Speaker 1: was a fifty five pound French bulldog, if that helps. Urso,
Speaker 1: who weighed one hundred and twenty pounds, was found with
Speaker 1: a very large percent of her body covered in injuries.
Speaker 1: Urso had two French bulldogs and one Border Collie mix.
Speaker 1: Cooper said. This is from People magazine. Cooper said both
Speaker 1: of Urso's French bulldogs were found with blood on them.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, we know one is an aggressive dog
Speaker 1: who had bitten someone before. The larger French bulldog Blue
Speaker 1: is two years old and the ways fifty five pounds.
Speaker 1: Oh here we go. There are reports that Blue was
Speaker 1: rescued from a dog fighting ring. Folks, oh, I mean
Speaker 1: still folks. Once dogs. I hate to say this. I
Speaker 1: was near a dog that was a rescue once upstate
Speaker 1: and these people had built this huge fence, enclosure and
Speaker 1: stuff for it, and that thing leaped at me because
Speaker 1: I moved. I just moved my leg, like my knee
Speaker 1: a little bit in a way that it didn't like,
Speaker 1: and it went and went right for my throat. I
Speaker 1: will never forget it. And the dog had been abused.
Speaker 1: Dogs that have been abused are yeah, you got to
Speaker 1: be super I mean they're animals and you have to
Speaker 1: be super careful around them. It's very hard to on
Speaker 1: to deprogram that. So that's not First of all, this
Speaker 1: dog is twice the size of a normal French bull.
Speaker 1: French bulldogs are like this is like someone getting you know,
Speaker 1: eat eaten by the by their beloved cats. I mean,
Speaker 1: this doesn't happen. But if if an animal has been
Speaker 1: abused and has been bred for fighting, as this dog
Speaker 1: apparently was at fifty five pounds. Look, bulldogs, we think
Speaker 1: of them as just being so cute and everything else,
Speaker 1: you know, Producer Mark bulldogs. Originally they were larger and
Speaker 1: heavier and their jaw they were bred to have this
Speaker 1: dwarf jane, which is what bracky cephalic is. And they
Speaker 1: would actually do something called they would bull bait, where
Speaker 1: they would have a bull and they would attack it
Speaker 1: with bulldogs. They would latch onto it and grab it
Speaker 1: and try to bring the bull down and kill it,
Speaker 1: and the bull would fight. And this is what people,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is what they would watch. Obviously it's
Speaker 1: messed up and that's where the bulldog gets its name.
Speaker 1: But what's up? Not a big fan of bulldogs in general? Whoa, Hey, whoa,
Speaker 1: I'm Mark. You you sleep on the couch? Is nice?
Speaker 1: But you know, I meant like a regular bulldogs a friend. Hey,
Speaker 1: direct all the bulldog owners out there, direct your eye
Speaker 1: or a Producer Mark. I mean you have to bit that.
Speaker 1: Of all dog breeds, they're on the uglier side. They're ugly.
Speaker 1: They're so ugly. They're cute though exactly don't. I don't
Speaker 1: even if you have to choose, you to choose a
Speaker 1: golden retriever. I love bulldogs for the teeth. So just
Speaker 1: so you all know, I love bulldogs. I don't know
Speaker 1: what producer mark is it thought all there's opinion on
Speaker 1: this one, but I'm just saying, like them, I said,
Speaker 1: they're just luglier. Do you remember when years ago, I'm like,
Speaker 1: when people have these animals sometimes and things go bad,
Speaker 1: and it's really they're they're so surprised and you sit there,
Speaker 1: you go, is this really that surprising? Though? The woman
Speaker 1: who had the chimpanzee in Connecticut, who how was a
Speaker 1: rough story that chimpanzee was one hundred and eighty pounds.
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, when you take a wild animal, like
Speaker 1: if you decided to have a pet cheetah, what do
Speaker 1: you expect? Yeah, cheetahs are actually not that big, but
Speaker 1: still could I mean it was just an example of
Speaker 1: a while. I don't know, I'm just I'm just saying.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying. I'm gonna tell you I actually watched
Speaker 1: the h The Jungle Book with snow Princess recently. Jungle
Speaker 1: Book based on the Rudyard Kipling stories that the original
Speaker 1: Disney version of it. You know, it's good. It's not
Speaker 1: one of the best disneys, but it's it's pretty good
Speaker 1: for what it is. But I was always so concause
Speaker 1: because Blue the Bear looks to me like look looks
Speaker 1: kind of like a grizzly bear or a black bear,
Speaker 1: and I was like, well, well, what what was He
Speaker 1: turns out that actually he is because and this is
Speaker 1: the tell, the giveaway, he eats ants. He is a
Speaker 1: m a sloth or sun bear, which they have in India,
Speaker 1: which also makes sense because a grizzly bear against cher Khan,
Speaker 1: a tiger grizzly bear, I might come out the winner
Speaker 1: of that, you know, solo. I mean I actually probably
Speaker 1: I don't know. I think I'd probably put my money
Speaker 1: on a large grizzlies just a large brown bear, A
Speaker 1: large brown bear against the tiger. I don't know. I'd
Speaker 1: that'd be. This is like a little of the discussion
Speaker 1: little kids always have, you know, who would win in
Speaker 1: a fight. I think grizzly bear probably beats tiger. But
Speaker 1: sun bear in India they're kind of little, so that's
Speaker 1: why they're so scared of sheer cons. So it all
Speaker 1: makes sense. I'm taking the bear in that fight. By
Speaker 1: the way, yeah, I think that, I mean the bear.
Speaker 1: I mean, brown bears are huge. I mean you look
Speaker 1: Siberian tiger can I think be up upwards of eight
Speaker 1: or nine hundred pounds. But I mean a big grizzly
Speaker 1: bear is way bigger than that. And uh yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: just saying. I'm just saying, all right, let's get back
Speaker 1: to the actual radio show. What am I doing, Mike Buck?
Speaker 1: I listened every night here in the twilight Zone of LA.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having that doctor on tonight. He's dead on
Speaker 1: and I wish he was on more media outlets. By
Speaker 1: the way, how does someone from Queens say water? Water?
Speaker 1: That's how my ex says it, and it's really annoying,
Speaker 1: not to mention she denies she pronounces it that way.
Speaker 1: Bruce and Mark, how do you say w A te r?
Speaker 1: How do I say it water? How did I used
Speaker 1: to say it? Like? Water? Yeah? Water, something like that.
Speaker 1: That's how we say that's a That's how we say
Speaker 1: it in this strong island. I'm from Queens. Always remember
Speaker 1: that when we drive around in the Dodge Neon listening
Speaker 1: to the Venga Boys outcome and we get the like
Speaker 1: the neon lights underneath the car. I almost did buy
Speaker 1: adult neon. That was almost my first car, but it
Speaker 1: ended up not being there. We go the Strong Island
Speaker 1: and remember when they used to see it for a while,
Speaker 1: people used to have like neon lights under the car.
Speaker 1: You know what I'm talking about, like in the undercarriage.
Speaker 1: It was just like a thing people trick out their cars.
Speaker 1: And I don't understand. Spend the money on your home,
Speaker 1: how long do you spend in your car? Really? I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you. One of my brothers is he loves
Speaker 1: cars and he has he has a gorgeous car, and
Speaker 1: he cares so much about it. And he's a real
Speaker 1: car guy and he's done like race car driver training
Speaker 1: and he loves cars. I view cars as a conveyance.
Speaker 1: I just wanted to be comfortable and work. I don't
Speaker 1: really care. I don't know. I'm just not I'm not
Speaker 1: a car guy, and I know a lot of people
Speaker 1: listening probably are. It's just something that I don't I
Speaker 1: never had. I don't really care. I sent to my
Speaker 1: wife the other day like if I why would I
Speaker 1: buy like a Beamer or something like that. I'd just
Speaker 1: be so worried I'm gonna crash it, or that something
Speaker 1: would happen to it, somebody would steal it. What am
Speaker 1: I get to? What that kind of What is the Mark?
Speaker 1: What is the Markmobile? Right now? I don't have a
Speaker 1: car because I moved to Jersey so I could say Manhattan,
Speaker 1: so I could have Yeah that worked out well, yeah,
Speaker 1: I I mean things have changed up. But if you,
Speaker 1: if you and missus Mark we're to get a car tomorrow,
Speaker 1: what would have been? She drives a Chevy Okay, I
Speaker 1: guess we kind of share it now, but she mostly
Speaker 1: drives it. Is it a a sedan suv? What is
Speaker 1: an suv? Yeah? We both prefer SUVs, but like fine
Speaker 1: with Chevy Honda, you know, normal cars. I don't need
Speaker 1: a BMW or Alexis or something. Dude. My first car
Speaker 1: was a wood paneled Roadmaster station wagon, dubbed the shaggin
Speaker 1: Wagon because there was no shagging in that wagon. And uh,
Speaker 1: it was amazing. It was hard to steer it. You're driving,
Speaker 1: you know, on the wheel. It was really like I
Speaker 1: can't really explain it. And you got to drive one
Speaker 1: of those cars. I think it's become kind of a
Speaker 1: collector's item now. But it looks like you're in a boat,
Speaker 1: like a wooden boat on the highway. That's how I
Speaker 1: would describe it. Roadmap. I think it was a nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety three pale blue Buick Roadmaster station Wagon. That was
Speaker 1: my first car, the shagg and wagon. Yep, those were
Speaker 1: the days. When you're in college. You're the one person
Speaker 1: that can move around all the furniture in the back
Speaker 1: of your car. Everyone loves you, that's true. Alright, alright, team,
Speaker 1: that's gonna be the show for today. We'll be back tomorrow,
Speaker 1: same time, end place. God bless you all. We'll talk soon.
Speaker 1: Hill's High