WEBVTT - Cleaning Up: Rafael Devers Trade Breakdown + Chat Q&A (Ep. 1051)

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>What's up, friends, and welcome into Fantasy Pros MLB. This

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is the Discord live show Cleaning Up. I'm Chris Welsh,

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>joined by Joe Rico. As always, well, we're live on

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Pro's Discord, hanging with audience members and letting

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys dictate what we talk about on the show

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to, because you guys can post questions

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>which we'll get to. You can raise your hand. You

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>can be a part of the podcast. Boy, what a

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>freaking time for it to be this week after an

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely berserko insane Father's Day weekend that is kind of

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>shattered and kind of shaken the baseball world. We'll be

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>covering that and a whole bunch more. We got a

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of topics we might be hitting, like Spencer Strider

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and more So, raise your hands. If you're in here,

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and if you have not joined, go and check it

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>out Fantasypros dot com slash chat. You can join the

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>discord for free and you can get in here. We're

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>here Monday a five pm Eastern. You can be a

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>part of the show. We'd love to have you. Let's

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>do it. Joe Rico, my friend, how are.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 2>You I'm good man.

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 3>This was an exciting weekend, you know, driving back for

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 3>my grandparents yesterday, just getting that notification, and it was

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of similar to the Luka Doncic's trade a few

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>months ago, where you're just like, this isn't real. There's

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 3>got to be some kind of hack going on or

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>something like that. I just feel bad for folks out

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 3>in Boston who may have bought their dad at Raphael

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Devers Red Sox jersey for Father's Day. But two weeks

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 3>in a row, we got some big Red Sox news

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 3>to break down, so it'll be a lot of fun.

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 1>There's this video, it's probably my favorite, and it's this daughter.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>They're all sitting it's like the whole family. They're sitting

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>on a deck and she's like, she's like, they just

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>trade Red Sox, just trade to Rafael Devers. But the

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>titling of it is that my dad thinks this is

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a TikTok trend. So she says it and the dad

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of laughs it off. And then there's like, I

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's a brother or whatever sitting in

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the corner and they're like whatever, whatever, And then these

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>two it's daughter and another younger brother. They're sitting with

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>their phones. They're like, nobody believes us. And then finally,

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>after you know, ten or fifteen seconds, they all look

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>at their phones and then the depression sits in. I

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>can only imagine what it must be like to not

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>only trade away like a face or like the theoretical

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>face of your organization, but like an incredible hitter like

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that and get nothing. I mean, because that is what like,

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>we can chalk it up somebody, you know, and I

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>did our pre show stuff and we'll talk about it,

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>but I think it was game over, said rather talk

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>about Tibbs today. Yeah, I imagine you kind of want

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to know what you got, but we can. We can

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>dress some of this stuff up if you'd like. But

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, they decided to get

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>rid of their dudes. They decided to get rid of

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Raphaeldt Evers because he was a problem, and they did

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it because they had somebody eat all of the money

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that there's a math equation that went on, Joe. It's like,

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>how much of a problem are we willing to deal

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>with while dealing with this money? It's money versus problem,

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>And they were in an unfortunate situation where they were

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>owed all the money and they had all the problems. Well,

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>then they got to a spot where someone was willing

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to take on all the money, and then they had

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to determine talent versus this, and far surpassed giving up all.

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Freeing up that money and getting rid of the financial

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>burden was well worth getting rid of the talent that

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>was Raphael Devers. And they just didn't get back what

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't have got back, and multiple there's some rumors

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that other teams were floating out there. It just looks

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like a bad trade that I think, at the end

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of the day won't be fully answered until they can

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>spend some of this money by resending Bragman and maybe

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>getting somebody else. But there's just no other way to

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>cope this that it looks pretty trashy.

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was trying to wrap my head around it

0:03:58.400 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 3>and try and think of a way where it may

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 3>sense for Boston to do this.

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 2>And the only way that it.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Makes sense is if it just became so untenable within

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 3>the clubhouse that they just had to get him out

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 3>of there, that it had become like a cancer situation.

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>But moving him right now when you just got through

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 3>a weekend sweep is bizarre. You just took out your

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 3>probably your biggest rival. You've won eight of the last

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 3>ten games, you're kind of making a little bit of

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 3>noise your half game out of the wild card spot.

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 2>To do this now doesn't make.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 3>A lot of sense unless there was just truly no

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 3>coming back from this. But if you're going to make

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.159
<v Speaker 3>this trade, why not do it in the offseason and

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 3>still kind of you know, see this year out.

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't understand the timing of it.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think there's a very very very easy answer

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to that, and it is that you I think the

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>timeline of what they felt that they could how much

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>let me say this better, They most likely felt that A,

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>what you said, the bridge is so burned, but b

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>this might be one of their only chances to get

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>out out of all of the money. Because there's there's

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>two different There was a rumor out there that the

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Braves had had a conversation with them, but there was

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>money involved that Boston had to send back, and then

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the Braves kind of didn't want to do the trade

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>either way. And then Jeff Ponce on Foul Territory Today

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>had said that he heard that there was a trade,

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't know who and all the exacts, but that trade

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>also involved them sending money back. So I think everything

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox were presented with was they're going to

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 1>have to eat some of this two hundred and eighty

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>million whatever was left with it. But then they were presented,

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>at the peak of all the problems, a team that

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>was willing to take on every dollar of the financials,

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's it, Like it's really simple, like

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in a business term that makes sense. Does makes I

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>guess it makes some sense. But for us we look

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>at it and we're like, the hell's going on here?

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Like this is horrible. You didn't get any you got

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>something in return, and we're being over dramatic about it.

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Harrison can be a part of this rotation at

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of this year. James Tibbs is a solid bat.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean that average really stinks. He's got some big power.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>He could be like a fourth or third outfield type,

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's not what you get for superstars. So it

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>was only about money, and that's why you didn't wait

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 1>on it, because the more you wait, the more that

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a problem could arise. If becomes more and more of

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a problem, leverage maybe goes away, and you can't get

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>rid of all that money. So I think that the

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>only reason is because the giants said we'll take on

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>all the money, and it's as simple as that.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 3>It just doesn't feel like a good enough reason, because

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, the money thing has been talked about a

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 3>lot and how they got out from under this bad contract,

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 3>and I don't really agree that it's such a bad contract.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 3>It's thirty one million dollars annual value until twenty thirty four.

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a bad contract. It's a it's a

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>bad personality of a player. The contract was never like

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a discussion. It's, oh, this guy, he is not a

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>team player, he doesn't want to be here, he doesn't

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to anybody. He's disrespecting the owner, at least according

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to the stuff allegedly, and there's just a bunch of

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>money attached to him. If he was a good team

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>player who cares about the money. But he wasn't, and

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. So it was like, we have a

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that doesn't want to be here, we don't want

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.679
<v Speaker 1>him here now, and he's owed a truckload of money.

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And they were able to offload that. So I think

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that if I made it seem like it was they

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>thought they had this bad contract. No is that they

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>had a bad contract tied to a player that clearly

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>was not going to help them win in the future.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 2>See.

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I just find a hard time saying that Raphael Devers

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 3>can't help them win.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Already win on the field.

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying he can win. His bat can win. But

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he didn't. He wasn't willing to do what the team needed.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>They needed him to play first base. He said no,

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>he defied that.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 3>That's what I mean by that, And I've said that myself,

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Like I think that he should have just picked up

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 3>a glove and played the field when they asked him to.

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 3>You're making all this money, you need to be malleable.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 3>You need to do things that will help the team win.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>But he is such an elite hitter, Like this season

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 3>has been statistically the best year of his career. He's

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 3>walking got a crazy rate, the barrel rates and hard

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 3>hit rates are career highs WRC plus is the best

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 3>it's ever been for him. I just think that the

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 3>timing of it is really stupid for the Red Sox.

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't I guess, yeah, it's an untenable situation. Whatever,

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Sure you need to do better on the trade, then

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 3>if you have, if you're dead set that you are

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 3>going to move him whatever. I don't care about the money.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 3>The Red Sox were the most profitable team in Major

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 3>League Baseball in twenty twenty four, according to Forbes. There

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 3>is no reason that they needed to make this trade

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 3>for the money side of things and make sure that Okay,

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco's gonna take every penny whatever, but we need

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 3>to get Kyle Harrison and Jordan Hicks. Like, it's just

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 3>a bad trade. I'm sorry, it's just a bad trade.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 3>If you're gonna get it, if you're gonna trade him,

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 3>if you're gonna be dead set on doing that, fine,

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 3>then shop.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Him around and get a better offer.

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Because this, if this was the best they could do,

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 3>I would have said, you know what, RAFFI can be

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 3>unhappy for a few more weeks until we try and

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 3>figure out something better. Well, I feel like they could

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 3>have probably done better.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>The rumors had been going on for a couple of weeks.

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the thing, Like we again, at the

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, all of whatever, we're going to

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>say like it is just a bad trade, Like that's

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the nuts and bolts of it. It's just not a

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>good trade, but the inner workings of it where you're

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to pick apart, like the rumor was, they had

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>actually been talking for a couple of weeks. They had

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>been talking Buster Posey and the Giants had been talking

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>with them for a couple of weeks. They talked to

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the Braves that had been talking to it.

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Jops. It wasn't like shopped around from what I heard

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>that this was.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they didn't make a call to all thirty teams

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and say who wants Ralphael Devers. They talked to the

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>teams that you know, had probably the most interesting team

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and they say three or four and every single team

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>outside of the Giants that expressed that money needs to

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>be taken. I get what you're saying. I'm not really

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>not trying to refute it or anything like that. It's

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>just like this became like a super business baseball move

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and it kind of stinks and it sucks. Now let

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>me turn it because this is what I really wanted

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to This was actually the number one on the three

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>topics we like to talk about here when we do

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>cleaning up while talking to everybody was I wanted to

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>get your take on Dever's fantasy value now, because I

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>do think it's something interesting to talk about. There's a

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>couple elements to it. William Thomas, you know famously now

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, great season, blah blah blah. We most of

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>us kind of thought like, well, you know, the ballpark

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Giants might kind of mitigate some of the

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy value. Boy has it. He's really come back down.

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Devers is leaving what according to Baseball Savant's ballpark Factors

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>over a three year window for left handed hitters, number

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>two ballpark in all of baseball, overall ballpark factor, home

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>run ballpark factor was like pretty low, it was like

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in the twenties. But overall ballpark factor for left handed

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>hitters over a three year window, Boston's number two, the

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Giants third worst in baseball, third worst overall ballpark factor

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and like the second worst home run ballpark factor for

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>left handed hitters and all of baseball three year window.

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna give you one little side caveat which

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting one, Devers. If you look at

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the expect did home run totals says he should have

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>two more on Baseball Savigne, but if he played all

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.959
<v Speaker 1>of his games with Boston, he would be two less.

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>He would have two more in the expected home run

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>with San Francisco. There's another weird oddity, weird crappy ballpark

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>factor for homers and everything. Yet he has projected two

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>more homers with the Giants and would be projected too

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>less than he has with the Red Sox had you

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>played the full season across. So I'm kind of pushing

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>against that ballpark factor. So I'm rambling on here, kind

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of setting up the positive and negatives. What do you

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>think Rafield divers fantasy value becomes as a San Francisco Giant.

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that he is elite enough as a header

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 3>that it won't impact him too much, But it's probably

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 3>a slight down tick if anything.

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, the.

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Ballpark is worse, and also the lineup around him is worse.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 3>Boston for the season as a whole, is the tenth

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 3>best lineup in baseball. Dever's probably doing some of the

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 3>heavy lifting there with a one zero six WRC plus

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco is twentieth with a ninety six, So that

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 3>is kind of a drastic change as well as the

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 3>ballpark factor, so it's it's probably going to hurt him

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 3>a little bit, but I think the Devers is a

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 3>lead enough where it's not a situation where he is now,

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, somebody you have to be selling off or

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 3>anything like that. I think he's still going to be fine.

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Like the rest of season projections, fifteen to seventeen more homers,

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 3>probably fifty more runs, fifty more ribbies, the batting average

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 3>will remain probably about the same. This is not a

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 3>situation where I think it changes greatly. Maybe a slight downtick,

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 3>but nothing, nothing drastic.

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 2>For me.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's a little bit. I think it's

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like a I'd put a percentage, like a five percent,

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>five to ten percent reduction overall. But you know, like

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the home run factors are really interesting with you know,

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>with San Francisco as well, that maybe there's still some

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>homers and maybe they're manufacturing some runs. I don't know,

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's five to ten percent maximum, So I'm not

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>really looking too far into it, but I think it's

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>something to pay attention to. And the final, you know,

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the final tip of the cap here is that Buster

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Posey said that Devers might be playing some third base

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>or first base, and that's the biggest like middle finger

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that Devers continued to give with Boston is just like

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>he was just so upset about whatever, you know, like, oh,

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>you didn't talk to me, or you make me move

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a position, like who cares?

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 2>Man?

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Three hundred million dollar man do whatever. He'll now do

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>it with San Francisco And that's a little bit of

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the slap of the face. But then he might regain

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>some of that position eligibility for next year by doing so.

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's I guess, yeah, a pseudo positive.

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Chapman's supposed to be out for too

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 3>too long.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>No, it's a sprained it's a.

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Sprained hand, so he's not usurping Matt Chapman. But maybe

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>he does end up playing regular first base. Reps that

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 3>that's a possibility. But I think it would be very

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.719
<v Speaker 3>funny to see him just first game in San Francisco

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 3>pick up a glove.

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 2>And play the field.

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 3>And they're actually playing the Red Sox this weekend, so

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 3>that's gonna be kind of fun. And I think some

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 3>home run bets should probably be put on Devers this weekend.

0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Hunt of percent he's gonna play third base. And by

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>the way, they didn't say he's gonna supplant him. They

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>just said wild Chapmans, he might pick up a third

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>base club first base would make a ton of sense.

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>They can dh and you know whatever. But it's the

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>willingness to now do it is what's really just It's

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>just kind of gross across the board. And yeah, I mean,

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he changed positional fantasy value. I wouldn't

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>be looking to sell him off or anything like that.

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>But just know, you know, there definitely was a reduction

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy production out of Willia Damas. If he can

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>pick it back up, maybe Devers will provide him some

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, some lineup protection or help him work

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>with the swing. I really don't know. But Rafaeld Evers

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco is such a ridiculously crazy wild move

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that we did not expect for this Father's Day weekend whatsoever? Whatsoever?

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Do you think he gets remembered as a Red Sox

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 3>or as a Giant and all of a sudden done giant?

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the I think this is like a burn

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bridge type of situation. There's a possibility if he

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>just becomes so good and the Red Sox continue to

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>just make bad moves that the fan base kind of

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>turns on ownership and they look back fondly. But I

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>just think with how he I think the approach here.

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm wrong by the way I won a championship,

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't say that, but like the burning of the

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>not being like he dug his own grave because he

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>was unwilling to be a team player is what got

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>him traded, you know. I mean we're all speculating too,

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, but for all intentsive purposes, it seems

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>like with how dismissive he was with the management in

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>front of him, managers, and then being dismissive with ownership,

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>not willing to listen, not willing to go and play,

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>not willing to make the team better when you're just

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>desperately trying, when you're struggling. You lost a player unwillingness

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>across the board, and there was stuff out there that

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>he was unwilling to And again these are just rumors,

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>but he was unwilling to be a part of team events,

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>sponsorship type of stuff. Like all of that, he just

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>dug his own grave, and he is the reason that

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>he's traded. I don't think that's an argument here, Like

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>he is the reason he is traded. Obviously, say like, well,

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever John Henry got in his fields and

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, but at the end of the day,

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's raw field. Devers is the reason that he's traded.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So if there's a possibility, it could be a giant

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>because he's still got a long career ahead of him.

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, he did win a championship, so Red

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Sox will always.

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Love waiting for that. But it does remind me of

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit as a Toronto guy. Not to make

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 3>another basketball reference, but Vince Carter leaving Toronto and he

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 3>was kind of vilified in Toronto for a long time.

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 3>The city eventually kind of forgave him, and that might

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 3>be what happens with Devers. Maybe it takes a little

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 3>bit of time and eventually they'll they'll come around and

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 3>remember everything he did for the team because he was

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 3>he's one of the best players in franchise history, even

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>though he only played until he was twenty eight.

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Here, yeah, well, we'll see how I mean, that's a

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>really good question, but it's too early to tell to

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>see what he does with the Giants, and you know,

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>if he decides to keep talking to keep saying some

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>more stuff and bash the Red Sox, we'll see how

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it ultimately goes. You guys, want to be a part

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of the action, Like I said, Fantasypros dot com slash Chat,

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>join up on the discord five pm Eastern on Mondays.

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>We've got other discord chats that are going on on

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the other sports as well. Make sure you

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>check it out. We got an awesome community of people,

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>tons and tons of rooms. You can be a part

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of the home run contest and there's a bunch more

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>so check it out today. You can do it free

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's a premium side. Fantasypros dot Com slash Chat.

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's check out what the speaking of chat the audience

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>has in the queue here take out. So sorry to

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>bug about this question again, but haven't found a trade

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>partner for one of my three shortstops. Ellie Abrams netto

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>shortstop is so deep, and wanted to know who to

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>target with one of those three players for outfield or

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>pitching help. So this one had come to us before,

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think it was about like, if I remember

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>correctly that I feel like the question was like, should

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I trade Ellie and Dota?

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Do?

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I still not trading Ellie? After four straight home run games,

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>He's sixteen to twenty homers, of stolen bases, batting averages

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>up over two seventy three. I think I had originally

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>brought up that interesting Ellie versus Corbyn, Carol One, and

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Y know what Ellie looks is way more valuable right now,

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>points higher batting average, only four less homers, but ten

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>more stolen bases. Ellie's going off. So if you had

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to pick one of these guys, understanding the relative like

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>outfield that you're going to get back, are you trading

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the super high of Ellie? Are you trading the medium

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of Abrams or the little bit lower of Neto?

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 3>I kind of think that Neto has surpassed Abrams at

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 3>this point. I just think that he's probably a little

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 3>bit of a higher floor. The lineup is bad, but

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of bad for both. But I would probably

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 3>try and sell off of Abrams first of the three.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Ellie is far and away the number one shortstop this year,

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 3>and I think he'll probably.

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Continue at that pace.

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Neto, I mean, Neto is looking like he'll probably finish

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 3>as a top eight or ten guy, and I think

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Abrams is probably just a little bit farther behind there.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 3>But he was also the guy who was drafted as

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 3>a top fifty player and to this point of the

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 3>season just looking at like a twelve team player raider,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 3>he is a thirteen dollars player. So trying to find

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 3>a pairing in the outfield would leave you somewhere in

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 3>like the Jung Hu Lee, Brandon Nemo, Jared Duran type

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 3>of range in terms of season to date value. So

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 3>if you were able to trade C. J. Abrams for

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Jared Duran Welsh, would you do that?

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I think that's a good for trade for trade,

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure you can get that done. I think

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you probably have to live a like can you give

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>me a Are you looking at the dollar raider right now?

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah?

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Are there any other like maybe higher dollar lower named

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>players or lower dollar higher name guys like just go

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:35.959
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like go to like fifteen and go

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to ten.

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 3>So there's Elliott Ramos who is a little bit higher

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 3>than that range, but that could potentially work. Elliott Ramos

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 3>for CJ.

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Abrams. I could see somebody.

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't hate that Dever's more lineup protection in there.

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Helio has been doing some business. I don't hate that.

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Goodman, but he's kind of catcher outfield, so it's

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 3>a little bit tricky with him.

0:19:58.280 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 2>TJ.

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 3>Friedel has been low he fantastic this season. You probably

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 3>would want to aim for higher with Abrams, so you

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 3>maybe want to get a second piece back. But Friedel

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 3>has been terrific so far.

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Now give me a couple of those, like like

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit lower dollar, bigger name players that maybe

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>are underperforming, like in the nine to ten range.

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 3>So we have Luis Robert don't have the interest there.

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think a trade is looming.

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Michael Harris the second probably you could do a little

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 3>bit better than that, I would imagine.

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I think a Harris for I think a Harris for

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Abrams is relatively okay.

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 3>I'd probably Abras, but yeah, it's it's it's it's pretty close.

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Ian Happ Ian Happ is still somebody I like a lot.

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Those are generally kind of the names Loutis, Guriel Junior

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 3>as well as in that same range.

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we can kill it there. I think I

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>think those are some good not Lortis, but like Halp

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Harris in that Abrams range, or if you want

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to have more like I'm performing now, you can go

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in like the HELLI O Ramos, TJ. Friedel. I think

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that's the general space that you could look at for

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>like an Abrams or even a netto probably pushed towards Abrams.

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>But don't move Ellie is the key. That's where we're

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 1>going at our boy, GAMEOVA. It wants to come up,

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>so GAMEOVA. On the podcast What's Up, Dude, you gotta

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>unmute though he's got the funny picture with Johnoe speakon

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what's up?

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Man?

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you guys doing We're doing good, dude, what do

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you got good?

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Brother?

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Oh man? I know, well, if you're the prospect guy,

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 4>and I know you probably watched Gage Wood, so that

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 4>no hit or nineteen strikeouts, Yeah, people don't know.

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it is for next year. But Gage would just

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>through the third College World Series no hitter today, striking

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>out nineteen and he hit a batter which could have

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>made it a perfect game. It's the first College World

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Series no hitter I believe since nineteen sixty. Was absolute

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>gas and he was already in the realm of a

0:21:54.880 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>projected first round pick an absolutely insane performance of are

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>just going crazy? Gauge would with the a's and then

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>our eight gauge jump, and then Gauge would today with

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 1>an insane performance.

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well that was my day. I was like, he's

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 4>probably be a top fifteen pick. But back to you know,

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 4>major leagues. I have a Christian Moore, an Auto Camp,

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 4>and I got Ozzie Alvi's. I'm looking to ship up

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 4>ship off Ozzy. What is like his value? Because I

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 4>like Christian Moore and I like Auto Kimp.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Is there a positional like need anywhere.

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 4>I need safe holds and stolen bases? It's like a

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 4>roto ten team?

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Cool? All right?

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So if we're targeting saves and holds and we're trading

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Ozzie Alb's, is there anybody that jumps to mind in

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>either category that you're potentially looking at. Ozzy is just

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>underperformed all year. Let me pull up his stats. We'll

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>give you a chance to take a peek there, Joey,

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>but Ozzy two twenty two six homers, two stolen bases,

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately it really hurts the trade value. His name

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>will still hold some of it.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Up.

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, in the closer market, I think it's

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be tough, and I think in the stolen

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:08.239
<v Speaker 1>base market, you're probably going to have to really just

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>buy low, specifically on like a player's name that doesn't

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable. Like I would tell you Chandler Simpson would

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have been a prime player I would look at if

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>he was up in the majors right now, that'd be phenomenal.

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 1>But does anybody jump out to you on the saves

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>or the stolen bases if you're moving off of Albi's.

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the thing with trading Albi's right now is

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 3>it might be the lowest value that he's had in

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 3>his entire career arguably. So I would prefer to not

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 3>do this. But if you are dead set on doing it,

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe you could try for like maybe a Pete Fairbanks

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 3>or I don't know, Melo Doval. Potentially, it's not that's

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 3>the thing with Albey's. The value is probably so low

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 3>that you might get laughed out of these negotiations asking

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 3>for some of these guys.

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, you.

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Could try for Jeff Hoffman because that era is up there,

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 3>but he's still probably pretty secure in Toronto. That's that's

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Those are kind of the names that I would look

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 3>at for for relievers, but it's it will be really

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 3>really tricky in terms of stolen bases.

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Mentioned TJ.

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.479
<v Speaker 3>Friedel earlier, and he's a good stolen based guy.

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>To my mind. When that popped up, I was like,

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that might be a guy that you could maybe get

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that done with.

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 3>It could be for sure, Luis Robert. If you're trying

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 3>to just do my bad asset for your bad asset,

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe that does work out as well. Could go for

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 3>a Victor Scott and then maybe you get a second

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 3>piece back in there.

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.959
<v Speaker 1>How about this this situe, what if you went and

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>got like a really cheap saves guy with a Caballero.

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Caballero is tied for the lead and stolen bases on

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the league his name value. I mean to be honest

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>with you, they might bock it all be's in general,

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but like getting like a I know Will Vess is

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>banged up, but just follow me like a Will Vest

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and a Hosa Cabiro for Ozzi Alby's. That's kind of

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>what like fantasy trades are built around like that mold.

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean?

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You out on cabro.

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 3>No, no, I like Jose Cabiro, but I think that's

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 3>probably fair value. But looking at that, and even just

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 3>looking at where we would have been a couple months

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 3>ago with Albi's, I feel like the smarter move is

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 3>it just hope that he turns things around and maybe

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 3>next year you can sell him for a much higher price.

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 3>This is a guy who has a couple of seasons

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 3>already with thirty homers, hundred runs, hundred ribbies. You know,

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 3>he's in a lineup that I think will probably eventually

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 3>be a lot better. So I think that's a good

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 3>pairing Caballero in vest. But my preference here would be

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 3>to just hold tight.

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I know what you're getting at. Another guy

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>would throw out maybe Exavier Edwards if you're looking for

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases, but there's some empty stats, and but that's

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what you're going to have to do. That's kind of

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe the main point here is you're going to have

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to go a little bit lower in the market if

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to sell off Ozzi Albi's. Unfortunately, that's kind

0:25:58.119 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of the toughness here. All right, Let's burn through a

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>couple more of these questions that are in here, so

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we had the gauge would thoughts on this trade twelve

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 1>team head to head roto Dynasty League. He gets Corbyn

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Burns and Lance McCullers gave up Devin Williams and Camille Devall.

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I hesitated because I was like, could this be Chase Burns.

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not competing this year, so I'm thinking for next

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>year and on. So I mean, yeah, you're definitely two

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>years on. So essentially two of these closers for Corbyn

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Burns and Lance McCullers, you're betting two years from now.

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a tough tra This is not a trade

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>I would probably do. Corbyn Burns is going to be

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>like thirty two or thirty three when he's finally healthy again.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Lance mcculler's is back on the il. Devin Williams he's

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>been shaky, but he has the potential to get back

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>into being like a top three closer in baseball, and

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Deval's pretty good. I gotta be honest with you, so Kyle,

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think I would have done that,

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for That's not what I would do. When I'm trading

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Devin Williams in Deval is trying to buy on Corbyn Burns,

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>who's going to be out till twenty twenty seven, So

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I would have probably went a different But what say you, I'm.

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 2>In the same boat there.

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean mccullars is already kind of snuck up

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 3>on us because he's missed a couple of seasons, but

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be thirty two later on this time.

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I do like mc colors. I do like mccollers, but

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>still I like them.

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I like them. Okay.

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 3>The command has really not been there in his return,

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 3>and we've seen the whip be crazy high because of it.

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he's able to eventually figure things out. And I

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 3>mean trading relievers. I don't have a huge problem with it,

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 3>just because they are pretty volatile assets to begin with.

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>But I personally agree with Walsh.

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 3>I would have wanted to do a little bit better

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 3>than Burns and mccollors.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, Dexter feeling very weak at shortstop with the

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.959
<v Speaker 1>damis could the devonstrate potentially boost him? Waiver Wire consists

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of the likes of Trevor's story right out, Willy or

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>do you have any trade targets at shortstop? Shortstop is deep?

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say my initial reaction is to wait out

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Willy here definitely, like, let's get like a week and

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>see what Devers does to the lineup, if anything, maybe

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>if it changes approaches, it changes momentum. I would love

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for Adamis to pick back up, but he has struggled,

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone like Prodomo Perdomo's getting chance is hitting

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>three's people still don't love him. Like that would be

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>someone I would target in type of a trade, but

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to target Trevor story. Prodomo came to mind,

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately I think I want to kind of see

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>if a Damas gets picked up by the Dever's acquisition.

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is there a shortstop you would

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>rather pick up then wait out a Damas?

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean you listening Trevor's story there makes me think

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 3>that he is the best option on the wire. And

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 3>if that's the case, then yeah, you're just holding strong

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 3>with a Damas for now. There are, like you said,

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 3>so many shortstops, and there are guys who are pretty valuable,

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 3>even just like thinking my own neck of the woods,

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Ernie Clement in Toronto has been really valuable but doesn't

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 3>really give you a ton of juice in terms of

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 3>the counting stats. It's more just like a decent batting

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 3>average you're getting out of him. You know, we mentioned

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Xavier Edwards earlier. He's probably somebody you can get for

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 3>not too expensive right now.

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean his earned dollar value.

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 3>To the season is in negatives at the moment, so

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe somebody is willing to move off of him good

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 3>batting average. The speed should return, but I think at

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day, you're probably just holding out

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 3>a damis and hoping for the best, considering what's on

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 3>the wire.

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah bad, says head to head points need two of

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the three Spencer Strider versus Miami, Logan Web versus Cleveland,

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Ryan versus Milwaukee says I don't think it's lost

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that they did it before a West coast trip. The

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>casual fan won't watch the games for ten days while

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they're late, and they probably hope it will be less

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>noticed locally. I don't know what that means, but.

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Streider webs probably in reference to the Devors trade. I

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 3>think he was probably throwing that in when we're.

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Talking Oh okay, yeah, yeah, sorry, because it showed like

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>together yeah, and I thought it was Yeah. Those are

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.479
<v Speaker 1>two different messages, so my bad. All right, So Strider

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Web Ryan kick one to the curb.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'm sit. I guess it's Joe Ryan, but

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and damn, these are all guys that you

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 3>should be starting. I feel like there's got to be

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 3>a worse option for the week.

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if these are your worst options, your staff

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 3>is and like absolutely loaded.

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Ten team league. That's not unheard of or anything like that.

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>This is good because, like with the questions, we're probably

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to get to what we were going to do.

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>But one of the questions was do you believe Spencer

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Strider is back? Thirteen strikeout game, the Braves demolished the Rockies.

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>There were a combined weekend whiff rate of forty nine

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>whiffs from just starting pitchers between Grant Holmes and Spencer Strider.

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Stryder's villa was up his slider just clearly the Rockies

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>cannot hit sliders. So I guess the question in this is, like,

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.479
<v Speaker 1>if Striider is you didn't even think twice about it.

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Striider is back or do you think

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that was more of the Rockies lifting him up.

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it's probably a little bit of both, but

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.959
<v Speaker 3>the fact that he gets the mar this week. I mean,

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 3>you have to you pretty much have to start him

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 3>There's it's such a feeble offense.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you got to start Logan Web too.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's why Joe Ryan does need to get kicked.

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I love Joe Ryan. I think Joe Ryan

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 3>is perennially perennially underrated, and he's one of the best

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 3>pitchers in baseball. But I think that just given how

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 3>well Web is pitched, and given the matchup for Strider

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 3>coming off of that game we saw, he's probably the

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 3>guy that has to go in there. Is Strider fully back,

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I think it's we're probably most of the way there,

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 3>but I still worry a little bit about how he's

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to maintain the velocity. If we're

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 3>able to see it maintained over three, four or five

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 3>starts and we start to mix in some slightly better

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 3>opponents as well, that will be a bit more of

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 3>a test for him. I just I don't know how

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 3>much to read into these offenses because we're talking about

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 3>some some pretty pretty terrible offenses in Colorado and Miami.

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 3>So even if he blows through Miami, I don't know

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 3>that I would necessarily say, yeah, he's back, so I

0:31:57.640 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of want to give it a little more time.

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So the well, the question kind of arises from, let's

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>assume because he's Spencer Strider and he struck out all

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>those rockies, his value just kind of went back to

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Strider value, which is roughly like top ten sp Do

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you think you're better set in a redraft? Would you

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like to sell him at an let's say, a top

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>ten starting pitcher, or do you want to hold on

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to him thinking there's more upside or he maintains and

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>he can't get no caveat to like, give me a

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>couple more starts like you got to choose today.

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 3>If that's the option, then I'd probably sell him. But

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I actually have another piece of information that's going to

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 3>make this initial question a lot easier is that he

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 3>has been moved and he's now starting against the Mets.

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 3>It's not the mar it's not the Marlins anymore. So

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 3>does that meant to make it easier for you for

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 3>the weekly decision?

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 2>That would make him a set for me?

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Just given how strong the other two options are with

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 3>their respective matchups, the Mets have been arguably the best

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 3>offense in baseball. I think that for this week that

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 3>makes Striders in a lot of cases. But going forward,

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm still okay with him. I think he'll

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 3>be better, but if I can get a OP ten

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 3>SP value for him today, then I'd probably sell him.

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think I might be, like, I'm very

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>open and encouraged that the Strider could be back, but

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in that same vein of like if someone was willing

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to give you know, if they it's like hardcore SP

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>ten and they give me like an SP let's say

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like eighteen or nineteen, and then like another decent hitter,

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I might do it because I still have some general worries.

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>But this also exists from having to make that decision

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>now if the peak value is back and I'm getting

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>one for one, one hundred percent value on Strider because

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I actually agree with what you're saying here too.

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>That moving that to the Mets, I think I might

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>be open to benching him as well, just because like,

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we just don't know what that quite is. And Ryan

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>against Milwaukee's a solid matchup. Web is a solid matchup.

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Strider could be old Strider, but he also would get

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>blown up, you know, it's all fastball slider. He's got

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to get those whiffs on the slider to be good.

0:33:57.520 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think the Mets are going to eat

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>slider like the Rockies did, so I think I might

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>sit him as well. And bed confirmed to ten team league.

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>He had Schwellenbach, Crochet, d Gram Bubchen RP. So like

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, ten team sp problem that he was

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>dealing with.

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Hell of a rotation man, that is incredible.

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one hundred percent. So that's a really good question.

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's see other stuff in here. Our big Dance asked

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>are you starting Misrawski versus the Cubs in his next

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>start after no hitting through five.

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 3>No, I am not. The Cubs are one of the

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 3>best lineups in baseball. He walked four guys and that started.

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:38.839
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't a perfect outing. I wouldn't risk it unless

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 3>it's a pretty deep league.

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think if from hugging ratios and stuff like that,

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I want I want to. He needs

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more before you're starting him against like

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the big teams. So that's where I would stick with that. That,

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>my friends, I think is going to do it for us.

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 1>If you guys have more questions. Don't worry, we got

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you covered. Wednesday on the YouTube YouTube dot com slash

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros m LB. Piece of p on Myself will

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>be live at four pm Eastern. Rico was with us

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>last week doing it was the Joe and Joe Show

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Pizza Pa and Me four pm Eastern Wednesday. Go on

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube, make sure you're subscribed, and you guys can

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>just rattle off your questions. We're there for a full hour,

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 1>taken all of it. So make sure that you come

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>and check us out on the YouTube Fantasypros dot or

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>YouTube dot com slash Fantasy Pros m l B, and

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>make sure you come and check us out here. Come

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 1>in the discord and hear the show before it airs

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast, because you can listen to this show

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast always, but it is live on discord

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>with an audience. Fantasypros dot com slash chat that is

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>our discord and you don't need to read. They don't

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>need this to be the reason to come and do it.

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>But there's a bunch of free stuff. But you can

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>come and hang out with us, and that is it.

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Rico, any what are you more excited about? Otani

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>pitching or seeing Devers at bat for the first time

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>as a Giant.

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I don't really care about Devers as a jot

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 3>I know you grew up a Giants fan, so I

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 3>know that that might be something that's kind of I

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 3>know you're a Diamondbacks guy.

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how you feel about it, honestly, but

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm more excited about Otani for sure.

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Barry Bonds was my favorite, but I grew up

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Bay Area. My whole family were A's fans.

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I was a Giants fan, but I moved to Arizona

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 1>before the Diamondbacks were a team, So I am a

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>literal lifelong Diamondbacks fan since they've been a team. But

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty indifferent about it.

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Though.

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>They have not had a great left handed hitter since

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you know who, so it'll be pretty fun. But it

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is clearly Otani. It is clearly Otani getting his first

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>first for I'm shocked that this is happening, by the

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 1>way that he is out here doing this. I expect

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do a lot of these little openers

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of weeks, probably through the All Star Game,

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>i'd expect, and then it looks like they're going to

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>unleash him, which is good, do you think. Okay, last thing,

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>will we see a six inning game from sho heyo

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Tani this season?

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe maybe, but it won't come until you know, September

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 3>October that include playoffs you're saying, or.

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Just now regular season where we see him go six

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>innings in a game, like six innings eight plus strikeouts.

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Will we see that this year?

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 3>I could see it, but I think it'll be a

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 3>little while. They're gonna slow play him like crazy. We're

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 3>gonna see very very minimal pitch counts until probably post

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 3>All Star break like you said, and then maybe they

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 3>take the reins off. I could see, like last couple

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 3>weeks of September, he just ever so slightly gets over

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 3>six innings, But I don't think we're gonna see it

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 3>a lot.

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say no, I'm gonna I think I'm gonna

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like you said, I think it's gonna be very very

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>baby this process, and I think it might be slower

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>than we think. But sho hal Tani is back, Devers

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>is a giant. Everything is crazy, But glad you guys

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>are here to get through all of it with us.

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>For Joe Rico. I'm Chris Welsh. We'll talk to you

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:46.839
<v Speaker 1>next time right here on Fantasy Pros MLB. For cleaning up,

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>We're out for now.

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Peace.

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 5>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 5>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 5>or Spotify. Follow us on x and TikTok at Fantasy Pros,

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.720
<v Speaker 5>and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:06.320
<v Speaker 5>slash Fantasy Pros MLB