WEBVTT - Draft Show: A Battle For No. 3 Overall?

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>He's the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, your war

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>room for incenter news and draft analysis from deep within

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the confines of Cowboys Headquarters at the Star in Frisco,

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys like DDE Lamb and now your hosts Dane Brugler,

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner and Kyle Yeomans. Well. I hope

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody has their morning coffee, has an opportunity to get

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 1>their draft notebook out, and is back on top of

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the Draft show here on a Friday morning. It's an

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>early morning edition of the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show.

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>As we are one hundred and thirty nine days out

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>from this moment from the twenty twenty one NFL Draft.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in to the SWBC Mortgage studios at the Star

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in Frisco. Kyle Yeomans with you alongside our fantastic group

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of panelists this year, the athletics Dane Brugler, We've got

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Kevin kt Turner and then Jeff cabinall from one oh

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>five three the fan and guys. It's a it's an

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>important week, to say the least, whenever it comes to

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty one NFL Draft, especially when it comes

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>to the Dallas Cowboys. Jeff, I just want to know

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>what you're calling this week between the Cowboys and the Bengals.

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a specific name for it. I guess

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the language we're allowed to use on

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>this platform. Okay, I mean you can do tank. It

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>could be tank Bold twenty twenty. It could be the

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the Suck for Sewel Battle. It's a big but it's

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 1>a big game. Clearly, it's a big game for both teams,

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati and Dallas both looking to to get the desired result.

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll say, looking to get the proper result in this game,

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>because man, a lot hangs in the balance this week. Kyle,

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about more ammunition for captain trade down here.

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're really talking about. I don't care about

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Penney Steel. I'm looking for more ammunition. Let's go. You

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>just want more rumble in the jungle? Is oh? I

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>like that, Katie, say that one more time, good old

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>fashioned the rumble in the jungle till out the record books.

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>When the Cowboys and the Bengals get together one team,

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>he's got a head coach on the line the Bengals,

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>he's trying not to get fired. That's the Bengals. I

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>think our coach is fine for now. Um, so yeah,

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a lot on the line in this game.

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm looking forward to the Cowboys going out

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>there and doing their best. And I feel like Dane,

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you you probably won't kind of participate in the Tank

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Bowl twenty twenty, but do you think this is legitimately

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a battle for the number three overall pick? Depending on

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>who loses this game, it's gonna end up getting it. Yeah,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a great shot that's what it ends up being.

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the Jets and Jaguars probably gonna be

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the first two picks, and then after that, that's where

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it gets really interesting. And you know, we on the

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Athletic we did an oracle this week on we did

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a million simulations. The rest of the season. The Cowboys

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have a fifty six point three percent chance of picking

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>top five, so not even as high as I thought.

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>It'd be a little higher than that, to be honest

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>with you. But if they do win this game against

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, then all of a sudden, you know, then yeah,

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about pick seven, pick eight, and things get

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a little more interesting with how they're going to navigate

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>this draft, so you know it's it's gonna be an

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting the results gonna make. It's gonna have a ripple

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>effect of how we look at this draft, how the

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>top seven eight picks play out. So you know my

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>eyes will be glued on this one, no doubt. Well,

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you actually brought that up, because I think

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that is a worry for a lot of Dallas Cowboys

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Nation right now, is the fact that you could have

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the number three overall pick, but to win this week

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>really puts you back in terms of draft position. Sure,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it might get you right back in the hunt to

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.119
<v Speaker 1>be a game out of the NFC East with three

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to play, but with that being said, I mean it's

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>more likely to end up in a top five pick

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>than I'm sure it is to win the NFC East

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>at this moment after the loss last week to the Ravens.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But Dane kind of address what one of the biggest

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>problems is at hand this year, and that's the fact

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>that there's a big difference between pick number three and

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>let's says pick number five, six, seven, And how big

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of a gap is that that we're looking at heading

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>into twenty twenty one. Well, yeah, and I think it's twofold.

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, first of all, you have to talk about

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks likely go one two, So you would have your

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>choice of the best non quarterback in this draft if

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you're picking three, and you have to feel great about that,

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>whether that is Penna Sul or whether that is the

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>highest ranked defensive player on your board, you feel really

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>good about getting that guy. The second part of that

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is the trade implications. You know, if quarterbacks go one two, Jets, Jaguars,

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you've got a few teams lurking with Panthers

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know a few of these other teams that

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>could possibly trade up, and so if you have that

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>third pick, your phone's gonna be blown up about okay,

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>well what's it going to cost to move to move up?

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And so having that third pick put you in a

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>position of power, and in the draft, that's what you want.

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>You want options. You want to be able to have.

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>The more options is going to give you a chance

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to find value. And again, that could be the best

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>player available there, or it could be a deal that

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>knocks you off your feet and you say, okay, yeah,

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>well we'll take an extra one next year. You know,

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a couple of twos, a couple of Day

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>two picks, and we'll revamp this roster. So when you

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>look at what's best for this organization moving forward, having

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that number three pick would be a pretty big power move.

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's just music to Jeff Kavanaugh's ears

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, I really do. I think what I think

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that's just music to your ears. Yeah, I think, and

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it bears it. Actually, I think it bears

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>repeating that this is a weird draft here, at least

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>based on what I watched so far, in that you know,

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>when you've earned, through your blood, sweat and tears and injuries,

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the right to pick in the top five and potentially

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>take the best defensive player on the board. They're supposed

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to be like Chase Young or Miles Garrett or Jalen Ramsey,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>like they're supposed to be these corners and these edge rushers,

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and there's not this year. So for like, so for

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>all the fun that I'm having talking about team tank

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and Captain trade down, the traddown aspect I think is

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>very important because odds are because in most drafts there

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>are there's Pro Bowlers and there's all pros somewhere. But

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>this year, my confidence level in telling you who's going

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to end up being the best corner or the best

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>pass rusher is not what it would normally be. So

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's it is, it's it's I'm really cheering

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for a potential scenario that may not even happen, but

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of fun. You know, Captain Traddown needs

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to ride. This is a it's a really weird year.

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>You need to. You need to get all the value

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you can out of that pick and just not get

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>stuck with it. Well, real quick question for both Jeff

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and Kat who's the best defensive player in this draft

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that you have watched so far? You know, not and

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>not and not just talking specifically about the Cowboys, just too,

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>just a flat out broad question. Who is the best

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>defensive player you have watched up to this point? I

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>may go, I mean it's gonna be between Lee um

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Ohli the Georgia edge maybe and like that and that's

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and and I think that's a guy that most years

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>goes in the late teens, So like, you know, um

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it is Patrick Surtan the Alabama corner, but

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like his tape also normally goes in the

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>late teens. So that's that's that's where I'm at. I

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have a guy that that I absolutely love, Um, Katie,

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>give me the other names. Farley, Oh, the guy I've

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>got like most excited about, like watching and may have

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>like potential to it as Micah Parsons. But I don't

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>have a ton of interest and watch and drafting an

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>off bowl linebacker in the top ten only top fifteen

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>for being Honestum, I have a ton of interest in

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>doing that. Farley would be next. He's my top ranked

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>corner right now, but I'm still kind of scrapping for

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>for twenty nineteen Virginia tech film or more film. Hit

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>me up after the show. Oh all right, nice, good news, Um,

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>But that's probably where I would stand. Yack Rousseau from

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Miami is very interesting. Yeah, I don't trust it at all, um,

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and god, I mean that you have to see more

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and you can't. You can't see more, like it's not there.

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You nupped it out. So like he's very interesting. That's

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>where I'm at, and that's where I keep leaning going

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>back towards you know what if you're stuck there and

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>can't move back that's where I end up on Pina

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Seul And I'm okay doing that because up there, I'm

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>going to take the best player on my board. I

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>would love to go defense. But what's up there in

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the draft that's out of my control. So I can

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>sit here and gripe and moan about, well, there's nothing

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm picking third but the defensive players or debt caliber. Well,

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's out of your control, dude. So like, but I

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>think another thing about this, like is wherever you're drafting at,

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>there could be action when it comes to trading down

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're picking at thirty six as well in round two, Yeah,

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like there could be teams calling up you could get

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>some extra picks there as well. So I mean, I

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>think there is a ton of value to picking. You know, well,

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.199
<v Speaker 1>if we all know it, it's it's it's not rocket science.

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>The better pick you have, the better chance you have

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it at success. If you're doing things you're right. That

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>being said, I totally think the Cowboys are gonna beat

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals on Sunday. I do believe that. So, you know,

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the third pick is very realistic.

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I truly mean that. Well, and to what Dane is

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>t well. I guess Dame's asked my defensive players, but

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 1>we always end up settling back on offensive players have

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the way this thing feels. And I just want to

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>point out for all to talk about Sewell, if he's

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the best non quarterback, the second best non quarterback might

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>be Rashaan Slater, the Northwestern offensive tackle. So you might

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>be looking at something where because I mean, his tape

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is awesome, Chase Young knows who he is. I promise

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>he had played against Chase Young and he played really well.

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's the weird world we live in where

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of cowboy fans are going to

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>look at it and say, I don't want to use

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>another high pick on the offensive line. And I'm going

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to tell you, if you get stuck, your two best

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and safest picks might be on the offensive line's outfits.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's go. Is that kind of the thing that we're

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>looking for in the Lord draft, though, because if you're

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at a top five pick right now that that

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>talent is offensive side of the football, it really is. Dane,

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and I know you've you mocked a corner and Caleb

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Farley in your first mock draft, But is it just

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>really at least at this point in the draft process.

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Things of course can change between now in April it's

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty nine days. But is it reaching

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 1>on pretty much every defensive player that we've said? Is

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that one of the reasons why you asked that question.

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not reaching in the context of this draft class

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and what has to offer. You know, it's like Jeff

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was saying, ideally the caliber of playing the caliber of

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 1>player you're getting a little bit later in other drafts.

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 1>In this draft, you can't help that these are the

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>players that are available for you. So in this draft,

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Caleb Farley is the fourth player drafted. It's

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.239
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a reach because in this draft you absolutely

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>can justify it. So yeah, and I agree with what

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Jeff was saying about the tackles, you know, with Penney

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Sewell and Rashawn Slater. I mean those have been tackle

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>one and two for me since the summer. I mean

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty clear cut in my mind. Slater, I think

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be as universally loved because he

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>has thirty two and a half inch arms and you know,

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 1>he just he's gonna get dinged up a little bit

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>throughout the draft process. But the guy can play. He's

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>an outstanding player. Body coordination, the aggressiveness, the technique. You know,

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>sign me up. I think he's got a position versatility,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>even more so than maybe Penna Suel does. So huge

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Slater fan, and I think Katsy made a good point

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>as well about that third pick you know had. It's

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>not just for the first round, but in the second

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>round too. If you have an early pick, what if J. C.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Horne were to fall a little bit, maybe you make

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a move up, Maybe you get Penny Suel at three,

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and then you trade back up into the first round

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to get JC Horn. You know, I think he just

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>gives you more options. So I agree with Kats that

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the Cowboys win this weekend. But at the

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>same time, be awfully nice to have that third pick.

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Kats tell me about Penny. So what have you seen

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>from the Oregon offensive tackle? I mean, this is another

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>guy that was an opt out. And we mentioned the

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>opt out with Brian, Bucky and Dave in the first show.

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 1>But does it scare you to say that, hey, one,

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take an offensive player and not address the

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>countless holes on this defense. But two, we're not just

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>doing that. We're taking a player that hasn't played since

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. But what makes him special enough to actually

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>make that pick? Yeah? No, it does make you a

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>little a little an I don't if nervous as the word,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>because they if you like the guy and you've scattered him,

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you like him, you draft him and you feel fine

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>about it. But you start looking at like asset allocation

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. You know. I gotta be honest,

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>going into that Tuesday night game against Baltimore, I thought

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton was gonna get sacked like ten times, ended

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>up giving them up one sack. I justs a Baltimore

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>team that blitz is more than any team in the league.

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I thought that. I thought that night was a

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>night that showed the offensive line depth is pretty good. Now,

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't want all these guys arty and you hope

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that you get tiring and Lyle back, and that's ideally

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>what you have. But you know, the first thing that

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>jumps out if you have any type of roster situation

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>with Tyring Lyle's hip going forward is I feel very

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with Pinney Soool playing guard if he needed to

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>do that for one year or two years, not like

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>moving guys around a lot, but feel very comfortable he

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>could do that. I mean, his power is very evident.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean you see him crashing down on the on

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the down block and just creating a lot of space.

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And I mean this not really not in a disrespectful manner,

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>but we have a running back will be on this

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>roster that quite frankly needs a lot of space. Um,

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's something that that he could do. And I

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>think his ability to work in space is there as well.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean for a three hundred and thirty pound guy,

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>he just moves better than most guys do it that size.

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's got really good hands. We hardly

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>ever see him go to the ground. I mean, I

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>think he is a really really strong prospect. I don't

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. This is where the scouting part gets weird,

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>because I gotta have people who are almost in a

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>private investigator like style knowing what he's been doing in

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. Because if you're not playing, it's very hard

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to you know, stay in game shape. So I think

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you got to keep your eyes on those guys, especially

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the guys you're three hundred and thirty pounds, Jeff, if

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you were to be taken by the Cowboys and the

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys elected to go offensive line, what would the jumble

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of that offensive line look like? Because you're not gonna

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>get rid of Tyrants Man, Tyrant Smith's gonna be here,

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Lyle Collins is going to be here. What would you

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>do in order to fit pen a soul into a system?

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Would you move him to guard? Would you move Tyrant

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Smith to write tackle Collins to guard? Where where would

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we go? If it were the Cowboys standpoint? I guess

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you'd have options if you wanted to. You could always

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>play Lyle Collins at guard. But I think for me,

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>initially you would be using a top five pick and

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you would be putting your guy at left guard, and

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's where Pinna Sewel would line up. And I think

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>he could do it because you know, the Cowboys ask

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of their guards in terms of the combo

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>blocks and getting to the next level and all those

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>different things, and I think Piney Seul is actually really

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>good at those things. The athleticism. What I really like

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>about him is that he plays with a level of

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>what I calls pissed off adness. He wants. He wants

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you to end up on the ground. He wants to

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>help people. So in my opinion, you would you'd be

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>putting him at left guard, assuming everybody else is good

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to go, and if he needed to transition a tackle

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>at some point that he would. But I think I

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>think he could play guard, and I think that he

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>would be good at it. I think he's absolutely fine

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in a phone booth. But to Dane's point, you know,

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>he also has he's a house, he's a monster, and

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the arms are probably going to be a Dane guest

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty five and a half inches like he's he's an

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>absolute house. So he'll end up as a tackle. But

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>if he's got to be a guard for a while,

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>then so be it. And I like the way that

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Kat said that he can move a little bit, and

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you're calling him a house, so he's a mobile home.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>It's mobile home Pina over on the West Coast, I

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>guess whenever it comes to that left tackle spot. But

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because, like we said at the top of

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the show, the loser of this game most likely will

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>have the number three overall pick, or at least a

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>really really good shot of it entering the final three

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>weeks of the year. If not, the Cowboys could be

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>picking right around six, seven, eight nine, depending on how

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>they fare against the rest of the NFC East in

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.239
<v Speaker 1>the last couple weeks of the season. But when we

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>come back, let's start answering some of these fan questions.

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>We have some Twitter on the twenty coming up. It's

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily twenty on the hour, but we'll do it

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>about fifty on the hour when we come back. You're

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. There's nothing

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>as unique as our eyes, which is why SLOR pioneers

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>ways to make lenses as unique as you vera lux

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>for super sharp vision, Essential Blue for protection, I'm Krisol

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>for freedom from glam, three cutting at solutions, and a

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>single unique lens. So whatever your needs, insist on selor

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>visit your local SLOR experts and find a perfect lens

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>for you. Seymour Domore Slord. Since eighteen sixty five, Stetson

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>hats are American maid with pride right here in Texas,

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and Stetson is proud to be on the field with

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>America's team. Want to show your Texas and team pride too,

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>You can by purchasing your own Stetson. You can look

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>just like how the flag guys do on field at

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>every home game. Stetson hats the official crown of all

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>self respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team. Get yours

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>today at shop dot Dallas Cowboys dot com or at

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Stetson dot com. I'm Jay Novachek, former tight end for

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day. I was the

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>guy who always got the tough yards, and that's why

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 1>I run with John Deer today. In fact, I have

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a John Dear three zero twenty five E tractor that

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 1>can handle any yardwork I need to do, even the

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>tough yards way out back. So if you have one

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>acre or a thousand, John Deer has the equipment that's

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>just right for you. Visit a John Dear dealer today

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and run with us. We are the official tractor provider

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of your Dallas Cowboys. Dear, it's nineteen oh eight. Don't

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you think we should get electricity and stop using candles

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>to see it night? It's just electricity lights up the

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>room fast. It's more reliable than candles blowing out, and

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>people seem to love it nationwide. Well candles, Dear, did

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you just run into the wall. I have a new candle. Please. Historically,

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>switching to new technology is a no brainer. Today it's

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>AT and T five G, fast, reliable, secure, and nationwide.

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Switch to AT and T five G. It's not complicated.

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Five G requires compatible plant may not be in your area.

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>See att dot com slash five G for you for details.

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show Back. You're

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show from the

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Star in Frisco. Glad you're with us, Episode two of

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty one edition of the show. Dane Brugler,

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin kat Turner. I'm Kyle Yeomans and Dane.

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You brought up an interesting point in the middle of

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the break, and I wanted to hit it really quickly

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>before we get into Twitter on the twenty But where

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>would Pinney Sewell sit if this were the twenty nineteen

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.679
<v Speaker 1>or excuse me, twenty twenty draft, last year's draft, in

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of the tackles that were available, Yeah, and we

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have to preface that with reminding people how great that

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>tackle class was last year. I mean, we had five

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in the top twenty picks, and so far they've they've

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>lived up to it, and you know, even Andrew Thomas

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>is coming around, and I think it's fair to say that.

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, there were different orders for different teams. The

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Giants thought Andrew Thomas was the best of the group.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Other teams had different orders. But for me personally, I

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>know Sewell would have he'd be probably the fourth best

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>tackle among last year's class. He'd be Jedrick Wills was

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 1>by far. It was a clear cut one for me,

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and then Trip Worse was the clear cut two. Beckton

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>was right there behind him at three, and I think

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Sewell would be He'd be right there duking out with

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Beckton for that third spot. So I think, more than

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>anything else, that kind of sums up the non quarterback

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>group of prospects we have this year. There's definitely talent,

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of the elite, high end talent, it's

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 1>just not the same as we've had in past years

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and which you would expect for a top five pick.

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that kind of sums it up. And Jeff,

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you had him at three last year, or you would

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>have had him at three behind Worse. Yeah, I think

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>for me he would have been. It would mine would

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>have been Will's Worse's Sewell actually had Thomas ahead of Beckton.

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I was too low on McKay Beckton. So yeah, I

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>think Piney Sewell would have been my third offensive tackle.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>And you know, what are you gonna do about it?

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.959
<v Speaker 1>The players available or the players available? But still, if

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have that off yere where you're destroyed by injury,

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>why can't I have Asa? What can I have? Miles

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Character younger Jalen Ramsey? Why don't I get to have

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>nice things? I don't know. It's it's probably one of

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the more depressing storylines of this twenty twenty one NFL

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>draft is like the one chance you get a chance

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>at a top five pick, and it's like, oh, well,

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>so much for that. That's kind of how I know.

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why can't I have a T J. Watt?

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Why can't I have a T J? Watt? Kyle? Can

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I Can I have one of those? Yeah? I can't

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>have one of those? No, I mean he was See,

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. We can get these guys wherever we're

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna find him, We're gonna draft him up. We're gonna

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>get it right this year. I like that. Cowboys fans

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>like that. I like that let's turn things around, and

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>by turning things around, that gives us a chance to

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>go to Twitter on the twenty. I don't know if

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we have the sounder in the back? Do we have

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the sounder? Chris beam t Wow, that was kind of

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>actually great. Uh. Jeff kind of led into the sounder,

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>so it ended up working out well, so that that works.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So there's Twitter on the twenty for the first time.

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Here in the twenty twenty one edition of the Dallas

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Draft Show, And this first one comes from Johnny

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, and he says, if the Cowboys don't pick

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>our man pin a soul in the top five, what's

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood that they go all defense in this draft?

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll start with kat on this one. I wouldn't say

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's out of the question. I hate they'll probably

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>draft some form of an offensive lineman because they do

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>like doing that and they've proven to be pretty good

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>at it quite frankly. But yeah, no, I if you're

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>putting some like Vegas odds on there, I don't think

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a terrible longshot to think that they go all defense. Look,

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's evident the number of players on this roster

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>who are on their defensive stuff now that you would

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>even want back next year. It's hard to even make

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a list of all the guys that you would even

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>want back on the team. So yeah, they're gonna attack

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the defensive side of the ball if possible. So yeah,

0:23:55.720 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty likely. Man, I think it's pretty

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>unorthodox to go all defense. But I hate this little

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a little more unusual than other years. They needed so

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>much help, Jeff, they need it, like, yeah, they need

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a ton. But I would just guessing here with I

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>believe they'd be projected right now to have nine draft picks.

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine at least one of them in one

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.239
<v Speaker 1>of those rounds ends up being a wide receiver, tight end,

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>or an offensive lineman. I think most of their valuable

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>picks in this draft will be defense because that makes

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>all the sense in the world, because they needs so

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>much help. They could use corner help, safety help, I

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>would say, linebacker help, defensive tackle help, and I'm always

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>here to draft pass rushers, so literally every position on

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>defense could use some attention from the Cowboys. But I'm

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just I'm playing odds with what would could be nine picks.

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they trained down, maybe they have more than nine picks,

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>at least one of I'll end up being some kind

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of receiver or offensive lineman or tight end. Yeah, it

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen often, but we saw the Panthers do it

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>last year. They went all defense with their uh, with

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>their lottery of picks. So you know, I think last

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>year we saw after the CD Lamp pick, they went

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>defensive heavy, and it's that's probably gonna be what we

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>see this year. Whether they might go offense early if

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>if they feel like an offensive lineman is the pick

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.479
<v Speaker 1>in the first round, but then it's gonna be defense, defense, defense, Uh,

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:30.479
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna it's gonna be and they need it. They

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>need depth at every level, at every position, and they

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>need to find more impact players, uh you know, someone

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to pair with Digs, maybe another safety. They need help

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>at linebacker to stop the run. Then of course depth upfront.

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's gonna be a very very defensive heavy draft. Well,

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, real quick on off I'm sorry, Kyle, real

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>quick though. On off it's some of the names that

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>you would be seeing as free agents. It's like the

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Nolah Browns of the world, do Cedric Wilson's of the world,

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>The Bells of the world. Maybe that's the area what

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to replace, or guys who're way further down

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>on the depth chart. We're on defense, you're looking for starters,

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>immediate backups, guys who are going to give you a

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of snaps, so they that kind of changes things

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and what they would even be looking

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>for on offense. Jeff, I know you guys talked about

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this on your show on gbag Nation the other day,

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, you're looking at this is what Katja said,

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's multiple starters. I mean, it's the Xavier Woods,

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the Cheetah Owoozier's, it's the I mean, the pretty

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>much the entire secondary is gonna have to take an overhaul,

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of Anthony Brown, Treyvon Diggs, and Donovan Wilson.

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what you're having to draft. And you're

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna have, to your point earlier, one, two, three, maybe

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>four comp picks to go along with your six picks

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that you have Byron Jones is most likely going to

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>net you a third Robert Quinna, fourth, Randall Cobb, maybe

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a fifth. That's kind of a borderline thing. And then

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Heath probably a six or a seven. So I

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>mean there's comp picks coming, there's darts for the dark board,

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as you always like to say it, But you're still

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>having to find starters with these pigs. Yeah, and that's

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the challenge. I think you have to be realistic when

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you talk about an NFL draft. If you, let's say

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you use your first round pick, second round pick, third

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>round pick, in your third round cop pick, so four

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>picks in the top one hundred and thirty ish picks,

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and you use them all on defense. The odds of

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>getting four rookie starters out of that are very slim.

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>But the Cowboys do have to find a way, at

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>least if they don't bring back any of the guys

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that are pending free agents. You have to replace at

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>least one starting corner, at least one starting safety. You

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have to replace your defensive tackles. But I think

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>people would be interested in an upgrading if you could

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>find an opportunity there Alden Smith one edge there, so

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>they Yeah, there's a lot. If you look at the

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>last week's game and you look at that Cowboys defense,

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 1>I would contend that only three or four of the

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>eleven starters on defense are going to be Cowboys starters

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on defense next year. That's a Chadam Field. So there's

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a ton to do that and I think that all

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>plays into why I have fun with it. And people

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>might think it's a bit, it's not a bit. I

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>want this team to trade down. I want this team

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to end up with four or five top sixty picks

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>if they can find a way to that. I want

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you to find a way to think, hey, I can

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>find a starting safety, a starting corner, and a starting

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>d tackle pick whatever position groups or however, whatever are

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you going to do in this But I think it's

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>really important for this team to be able to find

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>something like that out of this draft class. It's gonna

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.239
<v Speaker 1>be I mean, they found plenty of starters in the

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty draft. I mean Tyler Beatat, Ceedee Lamb. I

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>mean Nevill Gallimore is starting right now. He's probably not

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a starter next year, if you if we're being honest

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>with ourselves, Trayvon Diggs though, So there's three at least

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>right there that the Cowboys could have maybe four moving forward.

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>But drafting starters is the key to the whole bus

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's something that the Cowboys just haven't

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>necessarily had lately, and they hit well in twenty twenty.

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Got to do it a second year in a row. Okay,

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>So the second question comes from mister Vallejos on Twitter,

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and he says, what is a reasonable trade down spot

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>for Micah Parsons to feel comfortable about the Cowboys drafting him? Dane,

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>what you got on this one? Well, to realistically get

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael Parsons, you can't move down too far. You know,

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we can have the the off ball linebacker conversation and

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you know where where the value is for that position,

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but if you could find an impact guy at that

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it was a couple of years ago

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw you know, Devin Waito five, Devin Bush go

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>ten overall. So it's not like it's unheard of to

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>see these off ball linebackers go in the top ten.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're talking somewhere in the eight to twelve range.

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you look at Miami, They've got Houston's pick

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's at number nine, and I think Brian

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Flores would love to add Michael Parsons to that group.

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>The Lions at twelve, they could really use an impact

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>player at linebacker. So you know, you can't move back

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>too far. But what Michael Parsons that I one hundred

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>percent understand the conversation about the off ball linebacker and

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the value, but Michael Parsons he brings a little bit

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>more than that, I think because of his rush value,

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>just all the different ways you can utilize a talent

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>like that. Yeah, it does he need to grow and

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>develop and coverage. Sure, he's still a player who's piecing

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>things together and learning how to play the position, but

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, six three, two forty five, and you know

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he's he's going to put up measurables and testing numbers

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that are comparable to Bobby Wagner. So you know, you're

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about a pretty encouraging player right there. And you know,

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we can we can quibble about the value all day,

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but if you can get someone like that in the

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>top eight to ten or eight to twelve picks, you

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 1>feel good about that, especially for this team with the

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>way the linebacker position looks right now. Yeah, you know,

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and I love Michael Parsons and feel like you've got

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that that feeling that he's just going to continue to

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>get better and better and better, and some of the

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>inconsistencies that you might see on tape or just things

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that he'll grow out of. And the thing that I

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>would say is, and I'm not, you know, three hundred

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>players deep, right, so I need to I need to.

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot of work to do here. But

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like you look around the league and you're seeing a

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of linebackers really standing out that have been you know,

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>late Day two, guys, you're guys you've seen you know,

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>early day three. I think of, you know, Fred Warner

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco is the best, you know, one of,

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>if not the best linebacker in the league right now.

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think we all liked him a

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit when we scattered him, but I don't know

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>if we were thought, oh wow, he's going to turn

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>into a star. And I know that's just like one example,

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like the linebacker position I've treated a

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>lot like maybe maybe unfairly so, I treated a lot

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:17.959
<v Speaker 1>like the running back position. I just feel like that

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is something that you can wait on a little bit.

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And I understand you start talking about depth of draft, Well,

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>when you use that for wide receivers, you can use

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that for we're talking even about offensive tackles in this class.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>There may be some pretty good offensive tackles which you

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>get down to their second and third tier. I don't personally,

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see how you feel about this, JEF.

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I just personally, and I know, like Roquan Smith's, you know,

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>making place for the Bears and he was picked eighth

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and all that stuff, I don't have a ton of

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>interest in taking linebacker in the first round again, or

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>at least early in the first round. I think, generally speaking,

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, But I also because I've kind

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of been going back and forth on this over the

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>last couple of days, because it's not like a great

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>linebacker doesn't significantly impact your team. I think what's happened

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is the guys that teams have taken super high haven't

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>necessarily ended up being the best or most impactful linebackers

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in the league. And so I think we got to

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>be careful not to hold that against the players who

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>were picked higher, just because somebody either made a mistake

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in picking or we were wrong about who is going

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to develop how fast. If the Cowboys aren't to believe

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>at whatever pick they have that Michael Parsons is going

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to make the biggest impact on their team over the

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>next two, three, four or five years out of everybody available,

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and they make that pick. Yeah, for the most part,

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>most of my brain tells me that position I would

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>rather not be picking that high. But we've gone over

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and over they do I feel better about picking QUITTI pay?

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Do I feel better about picking JC Horne? Because sure,

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I would much rather pick a great pass rusher or

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a great cornerback then I would a linebacker. But you

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>also got to deal with what's in this draft. So yeah,

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm for the most part, I don't want an off

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>ball linebacker and the definitely not in the top five,

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>not in the top ten. But you also you got

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 1>to deal with what you got, and what you have

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>in this draft class is not a corner or pass

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>rusher that I feel great about in the top ten.

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So you do what you think is best. And we're

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about some of those top ten corners and

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 1>edge rushers coming up here in just a little bit.

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But I really, really, really quickly want to get to

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>one more Twitter on the twenty question. This comes from

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>our guy Matt, who always says fantastic questions, but he says,

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys keep their pick in the top ten.

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's say and they take Certan out of Alabama the corner.

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Is he already better than Treyvon Diggs, a former teammate

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of his at the collegiate level, at Katie, what do

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you think about that? Do you think that Certan is

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>better than Diggs right now? I mean, I think I

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 1>think you still need that, like your experience in the

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL and things like that. But I think Trevan digs

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>some more al players probably gonna come away with more

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>turnovers and things like that, or more ball skills. With Certain,

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he is. I think I think he's solid.

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Now he's not again, I'm not fist pumping really uh

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>watching his tape and wanting to take him in the

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>top five or or top six, seven or eight or whatever.

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I think you've got a solid player. I worry a

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how how flexible he is. I worry

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I mean, he seems a little tight

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to me. Um, but six two two h five, you

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.359
<v Speaker 1>know that he uh does have the speed that can

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they can match up. I just I'm pretty nervous about Certain,

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, like, and I don't want to like

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 1>be a generic and go in but the bloodlines and like,

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>well yeah, but like his dad's like not like his

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>dad played a long time ago. Like I hope he's

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>as good as his dad. But I mean so I

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>get I get kind of nervous with watching curtain too.

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I like Farley quite a bit more than than certain Wow, um,

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I see, I see clearly. I see the athleticism and

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a little more flexibility uh in the hips with Farley

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and and I feel like the plays on the ball

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>with with Farley a little more more range when he's

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>dropping into his zone and things like that. But you know,

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>I look, it's real close. I'm not I'm like, I'm

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.919
<v Speaker 1>not like pounding the table for Farley cornerback one. I'm

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm very nervous. I would say that, Jeff, what do

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you think I think Curtan? I'll say I think Curtan

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is a better I think he probably would be a

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>better player than Diggs. Immediately, I trust Patrick Curtan a lot.

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:53.280
<v Speaker 1>My issue, well not even an issue with him, Uh,

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:55.919
<v Speaker 1>I like him. I think My thing is I think

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>he's a better player than Caleb Farley. And it's not

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>close with Farley. My thing is that you see him

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.879
<v Speaker 1>physically moving around, and when he's at his best, you

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>see a guy that you're like, oh yeah, that's like

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>when Katie's talking about flexibility, Like there's there's an element

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of wiry, of twitched up athlete, there's an element of

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you could see Caleb Farley as the guy with the

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>best chance to turn into that team's number one receiver.

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Follow him everywhere he goes. You can see the opportunity

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>for that. So I like Certain the player better than Farley,

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but I may end up with Farley the prospect ahead

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of Curtan. That's kind of the debate for me on

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>those two. Yeah, I think that that's basically is how

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I look at it. Too Farley. Now, I like Certain

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I have Farley just above Certain in my

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>cornerback rankings one and two, and for the reasons that

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, just the overall ceiling the athlete that he is.

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But look, Patrick, Curtan and I do agree he would

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>be better than Digs from day one, and really it

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>comes down to his knowledge of the position. When you're

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about Farley, you're talking about Digs. You're talking about

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:05.919
<v Speaker 1>guys that transitioned from the offensive side of the ball

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.919
<v Speaker 1>to the defensive side of the ball with Curtan. He's

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 1>been groomed since he was a toddler to play on

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>defense and play the corner position. Son of a pro bowler.

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I love what I love the most about Curtan. He

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:22.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't panic down the field. He stays balanced, he stays

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in phase. He will get his head turned to find

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the football. He's not an elite play strength guy. He

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have elite twitch, but he's smooth, he's instinctive, and

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like when I watched Curtan, the game slows

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>down for him more than most corners. And that's why

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to me, he's a top ten player in this draft.

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 1>And if you're the Cowboys and you come away with

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Curtan in the first round, you're feeling really good

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that you have a starting level corner for the foreseeable future.

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think these are two guys that are going

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to go back and forth pretty much throughout the draft process,

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.240
<v Speaker 1>because once you get a chance to see Curtan test

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see Farley kind of get back on the

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>field a little bit and after his opt out season,

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 1>these guys are gonna flip flop back and forth between

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the number one, number two corners Right now, I have

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>certain above Farley. I just like the soundness of his

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 1>game a little bit more so than what I've seen

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>from Farley in twenty nineteen. I would have loved to

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:15.919
<v Speaker 1>see twenty twenty Farley tape. I'll say that right now.

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of a sleeper though at the cornerback position.

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Derrion Kindrick out of Clemson. I think this guy needs

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to be higher on a lot of draft boards from

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>what I saw earlier last week. But we can get

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>into that later on as well. We're gonna step aside

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>because we're running along here on the second segment. Thanks

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for all your Twitter questions for Twitter on the twenty

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>this week. We'll bring it back on Tuesday in our

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>next show. But when we come back, we'll wrap things

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>up and give you some stand out edge rushers. When

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we return here on the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show,

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>We're back in a tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves and

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>taste buds. It's new Doctor Pepper and cream Soda. Let's

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 1>take a listen, Doctor pet cream Soda. Is he a

0:39:56.440 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Newcombone's music to my ears? Okay, Doctor time already music

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.919
<v Speaker 1>to my ears and mouths new doctor pepper and cream

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 1>soda a delicious. There's nothing as unique as our eyes,

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>which is why SLOR pioneers ways to make lenses as

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>unique as you. Varilux for super sharp vision, Essential Blue

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 1>for protection, and Crisol for freedom from glare. Three cutting

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>edge solutions in a single unique lens. So whatever your needs,

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 1>insist on Selor, visit your local SLOR experts and find

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a perfect lens for you to see more, Do more, Selor.

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys Way, where sixteen Hall of Famers and five

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>championships shows us what success looks like. Where Turkey is

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>always the second best part of Thanksgiving Day, Where we

0:40:56.719 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>are all defined by one single thing, the Star, where

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>we as fans know it's our job to keep the

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>tradition going. Bank of America is proud to be the

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>official bank of the Dallas Cowboys and to support the

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>quest of living life. The Cowboys Way. Copyright twenty twenty

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Corporation. Dear, it's nineteen oh eight. Don't

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you think we should get electricity and stop using candles

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to see it night? It's just electricity lights up the

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>room fast. It's more reliable than candles blowing out and

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 1>people seem to love it nationwide. Well, candles, dear, did

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you just run into the wall? I have a new

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:33.760
<v Speaker 1>candle please. Historically, switching to new technology is a no brainer.

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Today it's AT and T five G fast, reliable, secure

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and nationwide. Switch to AT and T five G. It's

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 1>not complicated. Five G requires compatible plant may not be

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in your area. See att dot com slash five G

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for you for details. Is the Dallas Cowboys dot com

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Draft show dot com Draft show always fun here in

0:41:56.040 --> 0:42:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the early morning hours talking some NFL draft Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner,

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Dane Brugler. I'm Kyle Yeomans and we don't have a

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:05.919
<v Speaker 1>ton of time here, guys, so I want to talk

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>edge rushers for a split second. And of course that

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>was one of the big potential pieces, potential draft picks

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:14.959
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys last year. Well, of course they didn't

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>go that direction. Ceedee Lamb fell where Ceedee Lamb fell

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in history was made. But I want to know who's

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 1>potentially a top edge rusher in this year's class if

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys should be in a position to take one.

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>So I want two from each of you, guys. Will

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>start with Jeff here who you got as your top

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>two edge rushers At the moment, my top edge rusher

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 1>is a Z's Ojilari, and I'm sure Dane will correct

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>me if I'm pronouncing anything wrong, but he's number thirteen

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>at Georgia, and I wasn't all that familiar with him

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>other than of course Dane Burglar, who is the best

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Checking his rankings is kind of how

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I end up going through and watching these guys. But

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Ojelari seems like he was kind of a riser this year,

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 1>so I was watching him is Alabama twenty twenty game

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 1>and going against Alex Leatherwood and able to beat him

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>as a pass rusher, and he's like six two two

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>forty one, I believe is what we got him listed at,

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 1>but plays stronger than that, has the athleticism you won

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 1>as a pass rusher. So Aziz Ojulari is my number

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>one at the moment, and then Quitty pay Michigan would

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be my second one at the moment. I want to

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:31.959
<v Speaker 1>see if he tests physically the way that they say

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>he will, because I've never seen a pass rusher run

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:40.239
<v Speaker 1>a six three three cone, so I want to see

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 1>if he gets anywhere near that, And I'm going to

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 1>cheat here and throw in that Joseph Osai not far

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>off Texas. Hey, cheater, No, No, I like both of

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>those guys that Jeff mentioned. I have quitty pay a

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>little higher than Ojulari right now, but still, you know,

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>sifting through some things. I'll go ahead and throw out

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Gregory Russo from Miami had fifteen Hey Hey, hey, he said, hey, hey, hey, sorry,

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he said each he said, each of us, throw out two.

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>You're right, I apologize. You took some of my guys.

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Now you're right, you can't play them. Actually, I wasn't

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna say either of your guys. Gregory Russo of Miami

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and a half sacks in twenty nineteen. To me,

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the way they moved him around all over, all over

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the defensive line was very interesting, the way they use him.

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And he's also young. I mean he's opted out of

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this year. UM, so you don't have a ton on

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 1>him because he got hurt his freshman year. So his

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>sophomore year, um, he Playton had a great year, almost

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:54.840
<v Speaker 1>had twenty tackles for a loss. Um he's six seven

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 1>two fifty three, although he could be six eight he's

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 1>still growing boy, right, so he could be six eight,

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>six eight and a half six foot nine. I mean, like,

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>this guy's gonna have to stay lower. That said, the

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 1>times you see him lose, he's playing too high, but

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.879
<v Speaker 1>that's not every time. That's not every time. So like

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>there's a interesting way if you want to have him

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>as an I don't think he's a standard Hey man,

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you're my right defensive end all the time. I think

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:27.360
<v Speaker 1>he's more of a defensive chess piece. But there's that

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 1>can be fun and you can see him win with

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 1>his quickness, and I think he's got good awareness for

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>his lack of time as a pass rusher. There was

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a play in the Pittsburgh game of twenty nineteen or

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>he's rushing, trying to go around the offensive tackle and

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback steps up in the pocket and he redirects

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the offensive tackle with his left arm, is able to

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:49.440
<v Speaker 1>step up in the pocket and get the quarterbacks the

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback kind will opening up in the pocket, and that

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>quickness is that that's just winning as an athlete, and

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I love to see that. So I'm a I'm a

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 1>fan of Ruce, but I'm not in love with Rousseau.

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to be like hyper clear because you said

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot to figure out about him. How is his

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 1>pre draft process gonna be with him having very limited time,

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you know on that defensive line in Miami. I mean

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeff took three. Jeff cheated, so I mean I was no. No,

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say anything about Osai though. I didn't say

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>anything about anyways. So we gotta we gotta hurry this up. Okay,

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:29.240
<v Speaker 1>go Dane. People are here for Dane anyways, Go Dane.

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Uh real quick on Roussou. He's like a Chandler Jones

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>starter pack. I think that there's a lot to like

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>about what he could be down the road. But I

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>agree with dear, you know, the lack of optimism about

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>what he is right now. M Jason Oway from Penn

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 1>State six five, two hundred and fifty five pounds former

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>basketball player. The freakiness that he offers as a pass

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 1>rusher gets you excited bringing juice off the edge. And

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>then if I have to name one more, how about

0:46:58.680 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Phillips out of Miami, who he was the literally

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the number one recruit four years ago, not in a

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 1>not at his position, at any position in the country.

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Was banged up at Ucla concussions, had a really bad

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>wrist injury, transfers to Miami this year, and you see

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>him started to put things together. I see a guy

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that reminds me a lot of like a Ryan Carrigan type.

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Knows how to use his hands, He's a good athlete.

0:47:24.320 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>He's very smooth. So you know, if the medicals are good,

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's a big if. You know, we're talking

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 1>about another top fifty player. So this is a really

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>good edge rusher class. And that's why we pay Dame

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Brugler the big bucks whenever it comes to the Dallas

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. That's gonna do it for

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>us here on this weekend in this early morning edition. Now,

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:48.319
<v Speaker 1>these guys will be back to tuesdays from now on

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the twenty seconds, so you guys get a nice little

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>early Christmas gift of getting to listen to these guys

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:56.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about the NFL Draft. But we'll be back on

0:47:56.640 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe Tuesday to talk with Brian Ucky and David

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Hellman for the next edition of the Dallas Cowboys Draft Show.

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But for now, for Kevin kat Turner, for Dame Bugler

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff Cavanaugh, I'm Kyle Yoma saying so long from

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the Star in Frisco. We'll see you next time on

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the Draft Show. This has been a production of Dallas

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.