WEBVTT - Order out of Chaos: How to Create a Universe

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, wasn't it stuff to Blow your Mind?

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick and

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Robert Today I wanted to talk about kind of an

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>on topic. So a few years back, I saw this

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>weird claim in some book or article I was reading.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember what it was now, but it was

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>this castaway remark about the physicist Brian Green, favorite of

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>ours here we talked talked about him on the show

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for one of the co founders of the World Science Festival, Right,

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>mentioning the possibility that scientists could create a universe in

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>lab conditions. It's kind of an odd thing to say,

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>so obviously I was intrigued, but I didn't really follow

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>up on it at the time. It's stuck with me though.

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I kept the is that really possible or is this

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>just some funny physicist thought experiment? Is it one of

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>those jokes that gets worked out in math? And recently

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I became aware of a new book by a science

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>writer with a PhD in physics named Za Morali addressing

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly this question. So the book is called A Big

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Bang in a Little Room The Quest to Create New

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Universes by Basic books that came out this year, And

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this book addresses exactly that question of whether you can

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>actually create a universe under laboratory conditions, not just as

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a joke, but in reality. And if you could do that,

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>what would that capability mean for us in our civilization?

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>So that's the question I wanted us to look at today.

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Is this really something we could do? And if so,

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>how would you do it? Yeah? Because this is a

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>this is such a huge question because we're we're asking

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a question about you know, basic cosmology. Like we're talking

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>about creating a new universe without really having it completely

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>boiled at down, how our universe came into being totally

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and of course that presents a very big

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>problem for anybody wanting to create a universe in the lab.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Is like, we're not even sure how the one universe

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>were aware of came into being. We know a lot

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of things about its early history, but we don't know

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate question of its origin. Yeah. And in terms

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>of sort of God complex Frankenstein aspirations for the human species,

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're still working on some of the much

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:30.399
<v Speaker 1>smaller stuff creating a you know, a rational animal out

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>of spare parts like that's that alone, is is enough

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of the challenge without getting into the idea of an

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>entire universe, that is that that springs up at the

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>snap of the fingers. Yeah, is the civilization obsessed with

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the ethics of whether to create robot soldiers and sex

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>robots really ready to make a whole universe? Yeah? Well,

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but people have obviously been obsessed with

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the origins of the universe since a long time before

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 1>science had anything useful to say about it, right. I mean,

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we we have scientific cosmaal ology now, and this is

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing that's really just emerged pretty much in the

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>last century. But our myths from ancient times are full

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of these beautiful creation from chaos or creation from the

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>void stories which envision a universe coming into focus out

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of empty space, nothingness, or some kind of other uninhabited

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>primordial condition, often like an ocean or a sea or

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>ice or something like that. Yeah. I mean, we've been

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>asking the same questions about our universe as long as

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>we've inhabited it, really, really really, as long as we've

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>had the the you know, the cognitive ability just sort

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of gaze up at the stars and wonder what we're

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at, and then how it all came into being.

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And one thing I find interesting about all of these

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>uh creation out of darkness uh myths is that it

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>seems to line up with our individual experience of arising

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>from unconsciousness, of waking from unconsciousness. Yeah. Uh, and certainly

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>there are there are plenty of creation myths that add this.

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>This additional layer of anthropomorphiy is um where that the

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>universe is made from a body or is shaped like

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a body. Our understanding of the cosmos is like lined

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>up with the shape of the human body. Uh. Therefore

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense that we would we would take that

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that personal experience of the universe and try to you know,

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>apply it to everything within it. Yeah, there are lots

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of classic myths. I like that you point that out.

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really interesting idea about it, mirroring

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>our expansion into the world from a place of darkness

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and unknown. You know, before you were born, it's not

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>like you were sitting around waiting to be born. You

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>just didn't exist, or you at least weren't aware of

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>anything as far as you know, as far as you

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>can remember, Now, for all those past lives, I may

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>have been kings and sorcerers and wonderful creatures. Uh, never mind,

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a discussion for another day. Yeah, but you're right.

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part in the beginning, there was darkness. Yeah, Like,

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>that's our personal experience of reality, and it makes sense

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that we would apply that to the osmos as a whole. Now,

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>later in the episode, of course, we're going to look

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>at the science of the real earliest moments of the universe,

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>how the universe came to be the way it is,

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and how you might create universes in the lab, if

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>such an idea has any merit at all. But I

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>thought we should actually look at a few of these

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>mythological realizations about the origins of the universe, because they

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>are so fun and so fascinating, and they also give

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you a peek into the minds of the ancient people

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>who pondered this question without any real information to draw on. Yeah,

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and plus these will be fun to come back to

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>as well when we start cracking open some of these

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>these scientific views of the birth of our universe. There's

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>one piece of Norse mythology literature that I wanted to

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>look at that has a great creation out of chaos

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>story in it. And this is a piece of Norse mythology,

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a literature called the Guilt foggin Ng And so I

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>just want to read this section from an English translation.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>It's got this king, and this king is talking to

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>these these power full beings uh that that are answering

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>questions for him, and he's asking these probing questions about

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the universe. So this king named gang Larry asked how

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>were things wrought? Ere? The races were and the tribes

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of men increased. Then said horror, the streams called ice waves,

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>those which were so long come from the fountain heads

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that the yeasty venom upon them had hardened, like the

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>slag that runs out of the fire. These then became ice.

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And when the ice halted and ceased to run, then

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.239
<v Speaker 1>it froze over above. But the drizzling rain that rose

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>from the venom congealed to rhyme, and the rhyme increased

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>frost over frost, each over the other, even into gaininga

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>gap the yawning void. Then another one speaks jafenhar geninga

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>gap which faced towards the northern quarter became filled with

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>heaviness and masses of ice and rhyme, and from with

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in drizzling rain and gusts. But the southern part of

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>the yawning Void was lighted by those sparks and glowing

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>masses which flew out of the Muspelheim. And then a

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>third great ruler speaks and says quote, just as cold

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>arose out of Niffelheim and all terrible things, so also

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>all that looked towards Musselheim became hot and glowing, and

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the yawning Void was as mild as windless air. And

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>when the breath of heat met the rhyme, so that

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>it melted and dripped. Life was quickened from the yeast

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>drops by the power of that which sent the heat,

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and became a man's form. And that man is named Emir,

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>but the rhyme giants call him Argyll Emir oh Man.

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I really like the the idea of the yeasty venom.

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah yeah. So it's this freezing and melting

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>process which gives rise to the order of the universe.

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>In the Norse mythology idea, it is there sense of

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>fermentation there as well. Just with the couple of mentions

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of the yeast makes me maybe I'm there's something that

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>like beer is central to their vision of the cosmos.

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:15.239
<v Speaker 1>It's frozen beer and venom coming to life, freezing and melting.

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>What could be more and more Nordic than that? Alright, Well,

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I have I have one here that also they touches

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>on similar territory. Uh. Actually, I have a couple I'm

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>going to read here, and these are both from Chinese mythology.

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>In Chinese myth this is one of those areas where

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you have multiple different origin stories for the universe that

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of make the make the make the rounds, depending

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>on where you're going in Chinese history and who's doing

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the talking. So it's not going to be like a

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>single codified myth, right and you you you see this

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in a number of different faiths. You'll see this in Hinduism,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 1>as we'll get to in a bit. But this one,

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in particular comes from the fourth century BC um one

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of one of a few different Chinese cosmology myths related

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in and Barrel's Chinese Mythology and Introduction, and she points

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>out that these cosmologies are are essentially authorless. Uh, but

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I really like this one because it describes the primordial

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>darkness as moist and the same in a way that

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>reminds one of a singularity in the beginning of the

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>eternal past, when all was the ultimate sameness in vast

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>empty space, empty and the same, All was one, one,

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>eternally at rest, moist, wet and murky dim, before there

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>were darkness and light. Oh, that is great, moist, wet

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and murky dim. But also I like this idea of

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the original chaos of creation being homogeneity, that there is

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a lack of division between things, and that actually and

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>so that that implies to the emergence of order or

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the creation of recognizable objects and structure to the universe

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is in fact a cleaving of sameness into different Yes, yeah,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and and that will come back again when we get

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to a couple of Hindu examples. Now there's a there's

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>another Chinese example I want to hit there, and this

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is from hwaian Zoo and early Han work by Han

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>dynasty prince lu on Uh So. I love the mystery

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>of the words in this translation. Let's hear it, before

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>heaven and Earth had formed, there was a shapeless, dark expanse,

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a gaping mass. Thus it was called the Great Glory,

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the way dal first came from vacant space. Vacant space

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>gave birth to the cosmos, and cosmos gave birth to

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the breath, and the breath had its limits, had its limits.

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? Well, and after this part Yin

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and Yang come into place, you get some of the

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the duality that is a central to dalis

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Um becomes you know, an important force in the continuing

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>formation of the universe. So there are sort of limits

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>imposed by counterposing opposite. Yes, here's another bit from this

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>long ago. Before heaven and Earth existed, there were only

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>images but no forms, and all was dark and obscure,

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a vast desolation, a misty expanse, and nothing knew where

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>its own portals were. There were two gods born out

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of chaos who wove the sky and designed the earth.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>And these two gods are the the Yin and Yang forces.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Interesting again here with the Yin and Yang forces, it's

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>like we're seeing a division or a distinction as the

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>act of establishing creation. Yeah. Now, I mentioned the Hindu

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>models earlier, so I do want to touch on a

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of these. So too often we see this trope

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of of just order out of chaos right. But but

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Hinduism places of value on both properties. So if you

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>go back to early Vedic ideas about the creation of

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the universe, you have this Vedic creator deity UH project

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and popt strove to make the uni verse that could

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>contain both order and chaos, so the energies of the

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>devas and the asheras. So the first creation was too

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>orderly and seemingly too boring. Two uniforms, so they're just

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>too much sameness. It's like a fascist universe. Everything must obey. Yeah,

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and then uh. And then he creates a second universe,

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>but this one was too chaotic, too fragmented. But the third,

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the third was just right, the Goldilocks universe. Just enough

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>chaos for you, just enough chaos, just enough. Yeah and uh.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is this too, Even though you know

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>he essentially gets it right, there still has to be

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>regular intervals of destruction and renewal uh. And that's something,

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 1>of course, when we start talking about some of our

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>modern UH models for the creation of the universe, we

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>get into this a bit. The idea that that that

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the there's an expansion and then a contraction of the universe. Well,

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of these things and This is not

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to say that these myths were actually onto something. Scientifically,

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this is probably largely coincidence or just has

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to do with the the depth of our our ideas

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>about how order and chaos work. But some of these

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>do mirror modern scientific theories. Like one thing I was

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking was about the division or distinction model about establishing

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the order of the universe. This sort of mirrors the

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>idea of these Grand unified theories in physics, wherein physics

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>you've got the forces of the universe. Aside from gravity,

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got the three forces, the strong nuclear force, the

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>weak nuclear force, and the electromagnetic force, and the Grand

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Unified theories proposed that at some point in the past,

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>way in the early universe, these were one single unified force,

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and the universe sort of comes to become the thing

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it is as these forces separate into distinct forces that

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>have their own actions and their own mediating particles. Yes,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.359
<v Speaker 1>so maybe pop was onto something. Now prodopt becomes associated

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>with the god Barama in the post Vedic age. But

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>this is again a situation where with Hinduism, like with

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese mythology, there's no single regular creation story. They are

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>many and uh. And again there's no there's no singular

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>creation in Hinduism, or rather periodic cycles of creation and destruction. Uh.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>And also uh innumerable universes. So in in our universe,

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>for instance, there's this idea in Hinduism that it begins

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>with a vast ocean, and a serpent sleeps on its surface,

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and Vishnu sleeps in the coils of the serpent, and

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a lotus sprouts out from his navel, and within it

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is Brahma, and he's urged to meditate on the nature

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of his coming creation and finally splits the lotus into

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>three forms, making the heavens, the sky, and Earth. Everything

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>else stems from this. Yet again we get a division

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of the universe into its parts. And uh. It's just

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a few more quick examples here. So in ancient Egypt

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you had none or new the prime evil waters, the

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>ocean of chaos, boundless, dark and stormy nice. And in

0:14:54.920 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Greek mythology we have we have chaos personified, chaos the being.

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So this is from the theogeny of Hesiod from around us. Verily,

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>at the first chaos came to be, but next wide

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>bosomed Earth, the ever sure foundations of all the deathless

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>ones who hold the peaks of snowy Olympus and dim

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Tartaris in the depth of the wide path Earth, and

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Eros Love fairest among the deathless gods, who unnerves the

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>limbs and overcomes the mind and wise counsels of all

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>gods and all men within them. From chaos came forth

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Erebus and Black Night. But of Night were born Ether

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and Day, whom she conceived and bear from union in

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>love with Arabus. Okay, so this one, to me sounds

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>more like some of these like Babylonian creation mats and stuff,

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>where the forces of the universe are personified as creatures,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>monsters or people. Yeah, very much, though the direct personification, Uh,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can say that the personification is maybe

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the aired on top of just the idea of these

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>forces interacting. And I wonder when people spoke these myths

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in the ancient world to you know, to the extent

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that they were believing them to be correct explanations of

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the origins of the universe. Did they think of them

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>metaphorically or did they think of them as literal, like

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>did they literally think there was a person chaos or

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>did the ancient Greeks understand that this was just a

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>way of helping to visualize some more abstract process one.

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you also have to think about the fact

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that that so many of these different mythologies and folk

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>tales and and no matter what level, to what level

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>they're personified or just related as its forces interacting. Uh,

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're gonna They're probably gonna very depend on

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>who's who's telling them, who they're telling them to. Like,

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine a situation where someone might look back

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>on a like like a an animated feature about how

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>germs work that we created for children in the nineteen seventies,

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and if they if that's all you had to go on,

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you might say, oh, well they that germs had little

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>cartoon faces and and became angry. Yeah, that's sort of

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>what I'm asking. Yeah, I don't know, but I could

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>see it going either way. You know, you could certainly

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>imagine this being the version you told everyone, but it

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>was in but everyone might have been in agreeance that yeah,

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>these were not real people. These were This is just

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 1>a fun way of remembering these these interactions in a

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>fun way of passing them on. Are you an ancient historian,

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>do you have insights into how people process these myths

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and to what extent they were believed to be literal.

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>If so, let us know, I want to know more

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>about that one last myth we should look at. Let's

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>look at the Book of Genesis the Bible. Uh. I

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>love the Genesis creation story. It's very beautifully written. Uh.

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth,

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>and the earth was without form and void, and darkness

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>was upon the face of the deep. Oh so good.

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>And the spirit of God moved upon the face of

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the waters. And God said, let there be light. And

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>there was light. And God saw the light that it

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>was good. And God divided the light from the darkness

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and called the light day, and the darkness he called

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>night and the evening in the morning where the first

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>day it's great, I mean I I the poetry of

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it is is lovely. Now, it's definitely an account in

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>which God or a creator entity shows up from somewhere

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, what we got here, a bunch of darkness.

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's start, let's do something with this. So there's not

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing about God emerging from that darkness. It's just you.

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>You wake up. It's like it's like starting a movie.

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>You're in the room, here's God in the darkness. Yeah,

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>here's your protagonist. Yeah. It's funny that. I mean, all

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>all of these myths really start you with something, because

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>what else could they do. I mean, you've got to

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>have some kind of instigating event or matter in the

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>story or there cannot be a story. And that question

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>also translates into real questions about the cosmology of the universe.

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>You know that there are always these questions of the

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>infinite regressive causes. You know, does the universe in some

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sense require a primary explanation like even if you managed

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to do away with all kinds of other explanations, like

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>where do the principles that govern your your physics come from? Uh?

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And we can look at more more of that as

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we go on. One interesting fact I wanted to note

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>about creation mythologies. There are actually religions without creation mythologies.

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>One example would be Jainism or jainis Um. You know

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this found I believe there's a lot of Jainism practiced

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in India, and they reject the idea of a creator

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>deity or a creation event. Their religious cosmology is just

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of an eternally existing universe anyway. I find that really interesting.

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>But I also find it interesting how rare that is.

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>But this throws up a dichotomy. The origin of the cosmos,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>I think is a is a necessarily fascinating thing to contemplate,

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>because you know that no matter which theory is true,

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>one half of this dichotomy is correct. Either the universe

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>began to exist or it did not begin to exist.

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>If it did not begin to exist, this implies there's

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>an infinite past. Something that feels just impossible to imagine, right,

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that the past goes on forever into backward time. How

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>can you picture that? It seems somehow so counterintuitive. It's

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>almost self contradictory. Well, that is at least for for

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>modern individuals who have a critical view of time. You know,

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 1>we think of our we think of our life as

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the story from cradle to the grave. We think of

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>everything is this kind of story or movie in which

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>we are the prime character. But I could I could

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly see that, you know, on a person from an

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>older culture in which time is seen a cyclical and

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>there's there's you know, everything comes back around and individual

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>individuals are only important in so far as they they

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, they shot some uh, some figure from the

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>past or some movement from the past. I could see

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that view of time lining up more easily with an

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>idea of the infinite past and future. Well, a cyclical

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>eternity is an interesting thing to contemplate, because that seems too,

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that's a little bit different than just like in an

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>eternally past regressive infinity, you know what I mean, something

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that cycles back and forth between the beginning and the

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>end forever, versus something that just goes back forever. Because

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly you still have even that scenario, you still have causation,

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>You still have you still have events causing things to happen,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and I dare say, you're still gonna have five year

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>olds who are asking questions about why things are the

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>way they are, and you have to answer them one

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>way or another. Now, one thing that comes to mind,

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>is it in in the absence of a like a

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>certain cultural story that you're supposed to roll out when

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>someone says, hey, where when the kid asked, where did

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the universe come from? And you say, oh, well God

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>created it, or uh, you know there, hey, there was

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>used to be this moist darkness, and it rolls out

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>from there I'm going with the moist darkness from now on.

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I like that one. But but it

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.479
<v Speaker 1>seems like it would be ideal to not only have

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>some story to tell them, but a story that if

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have actual truth in it about the actual

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>origins of the universe, then at least it has some

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>level of relatability to it. There's some there's some level

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of truth to it, you know, you mean, just some

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>level of truth. As an applicability to your life. You

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>can get something out of it, even if it's not

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a correct description of the cause. Like it, maybe it

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>explains something about the you know, the interaction of forces

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>within either within your world or within your worldview. Yeah. Sure, uh,

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted real quick, I wanted to hit the

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>other half of that dichogomy, right, So imagine the past

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is not eternal, and that reality did begin to exist

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>at some point. There's a limit on the past history

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of existence. That seems to me about equally implausible and

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 1>count or intuitive. How how can you picture that? Like,

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it's no wonder. I think that religious traditions are obsessed

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>with the origin of the universe. It's the ultimate explanation question.

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>And because of this like this dichotomy. No matter what

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the answer to it is, that answer is a total mystery.

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It commands all and you know that one of them

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>has to be correct. Yeah, I mean this this kind

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of gets down to the basic nature of humans as

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>having this this ability to plan beyond their own life,

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>their own lifespan, you know, um, and in doing so,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>not only they planning beyond their own lifespan, but they're

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>also trying to figure out how we got to where

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we are with with previous generations. So humans have kind

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>of trapped themselves. Like part of our survival technique is

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to uh is to view time as existing beyond our

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.959
<v Speaker 1>life and before it. But you kind of end up

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>wrapping in beginnings and endings in that, right. I guess

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>what I'm trying to say is that you know, there's

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>no there's no ape cosmology for a number of reasons.

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But one of those reasons is that the ape is

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>perfectly content to live within the confines of its life,

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, even with just the confines of its Yeah, okay,

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I see. Yeah, Like, like our reckoning of our own

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>mortality and the finitude of our life sort of forces

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>us to look beyond in a way that other animals

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>presumably don't. Maybe I'm gazing too deep into the void

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>on that one, but no, keep gazing. Eventually you'll penetrate

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the moist darkness with your eyes. Now, of course, scientists

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have spent years putting together a totally different picture of

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>how the universe came to be, and this is going

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.239
<v Speaker 1>to be a picture based on verified physics, and so

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what we should look at when we

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>come back from the break. All right, we're back now.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we've got to look at what scientists have discovered

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>about how our universe came to exist. You might be thinking,

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, the Big Bang, right, that's how the universe

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>came to exist. But I think this is a slight

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>misconception about what the Big Bang is and one of

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the most common misconceptions about mainstream science today. The Big

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Bang theory, I would pose, it doesn't really claim to

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>explain where the universe came from. It describes the history

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. It says that the universe began in

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly hot, dense state, and it has been expanding

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and cooling for about thirteen point eight billion years now.

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>The Big Bang theory is widely accepted by physicists as

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the correct explanation of the history of the universe, and

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>the evidence for it is very strong. One piece of

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>evidence comes from looking at the current expansion rate of

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the universe and tracing it backward in time, which appears

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to indicate a shrinking of space towards a central point

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of incredible density. But another major piece of evidence is

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the cosmic microwave background radiation. So this is something we

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>can see today. According to the Big Bang theory, we'd

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>predict that in the early universe, for a long time,

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>matter was too dense to allow light to shine through.

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So can you picture this universe. It's a universe that's

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>almost like a cloud of opaque material. It's so dense

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>with particles like neutrons, protons, electrons, positrons, neutrinos, everything's crammed

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>into this tight space um that electromagnetic radiation like light

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>couldn't couldn't penetrate it. Charged electrons were so dense that

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they would constantly scatter any light that was trying to

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>move around in the universe, and so the universe was

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>opaque at that point. But then the universe started to

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>cool and to allow electrons to pair up with protons

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and neutrons to make our friends the atoms, electrically neutral atoms.

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>And this happened at a time about three hundred and

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty thousand years after the beginning of the Big Bang,

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and this allowed the light to pass through, so suddenly

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>radiation was visible throughout the universe. If you can imagine

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this moment in time, there's there's an opaque, dark universe

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>crammed with hot dense matter, and suddenly it's shining with light. Well,

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>this brings to mind the Norse example that that you

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>read earlier. Everything begins to sort of twinkle at one point. Yeah,

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>uh and so yeah. So this sudden shining of light,

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>this afterglow of radiation is still visible today through our

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 1>telescopes and it's known as the cosmic microwave background radiation.

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's a great piece of evidence for the correctness

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Big Bang theory to explain the expansion of

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>our universe. But as we've said, the Big Bang theory

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually go all the way back right, It picks

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>up with that hot dense state of the earliest moments

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>of our universe. So where did that hot dense state

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>come from? You have to approach the question with the

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>mind of a scientist or or the mind of a

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>five year old and say, oh, well, what came before

0:27:56.080 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>that exactly? So, so what explains its existence? Is there

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>are more fundamental structure or law guiding the cosmos? Obviously

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 1>we are going to look at that question. But also

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.479
<v Speaker 1>it's worth noting that since nineteen eighties it's important to

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to the fact that the Big Bang model

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>has been very much enriched by the development of what's

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>known as cosmic inflation theory. Inflation theory is too dense

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and too difficult to explain all the mechanics of right here.

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It would sort of take over the episode. I think

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe we can tackle it someday in the future if

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we're feeling ambitious and brave, but I will stick with

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the simplest summary I can for today. Inflation theory says

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that in the earliest split second of the universe, this

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is before the universe is a second old. In fact,

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>it's about ten to the negative thirty four seconds old,

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>which is a tiny, tiny amount of time, the rate

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of the expansion of the universe suddenly dramatically increases. So

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the universe is expanding and for a short time. In

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that first second, it begins inflation, which means it expands

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>way way fast stru than it was expanding anyway. Uh,

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and it got much faster and then and then at

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a certain points slowed down again, and then we have

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the regular expansion rate of the universe we observe today. Now,

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the really surprising thing about that inflation period, however, is

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that it looks like it has the power to conjure

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>matter into existence as the bubble spacetime region expands. So

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>during this inflation period you suddenly get particles popping into

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>existence from the space time that's expanding. And the physicist

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Alan Goose, who's known as one of the main people

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>behind inflation theory, has joked about this finding. Quote in

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the context of inflationary cosmology, it's fair to say that

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe is the ultimate free lunch. The free lunch

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>there being the matter that makes up our bodies and

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the stars. Wow. You know, the the this inflation period

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is really this, This is an area of of a

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of possibility, yeah, or science, because this is also

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>where you get various arguments about, um, you know, how

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>fast can something travel in the universe? Should It's not

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.239
<v Speaker 1>something in the universe as much as a piece of

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the universe, like something like a ship within a bubble

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of space time. Right, we know from relativity theory that

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>no object with mass in the universe, no information, can

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>travel faster than the speed of light. It's impossible. But

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that does not apply to the universe

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>or spacetime region itself. But according to inflation, which I

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>should note is not considered quite proven, there appears to

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of good evidence for inflation, and I

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's widely accepted as mainstream science by physical cosmologists today.

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like it's not a lock. It's not

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a solidly proven theory. It just looks like a really

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>good one. And in one where to personify all these forces,

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you could say, well, the universe is a god and

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>things within the universe are mere mortals, and therefore we

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>are not bound by the same rules. Oh yes, sorry,

0:30:58.240 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I got distracted. No, what I meant to say was

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that under inflation, yeah, the universe expands faster than the

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>speed of light. While things in the universe can't go

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>faster than the speed of light, the universe itself can.

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>But to come back to this, question of ultimate causes,

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the the ultimate origins or explanation of everything in the universe.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Where did it all come from? Nobody really knows for

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sure the answer to that. I mean, there have been

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>people working on this from a scientific perspective, physicists like

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Alexander VI. Lincoln and Lawrence Krauss. They've put forward these

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>models where to best explain it, sort of the naked

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>laws of quantum mechanics, acting on no original quantity of

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>matter can give rise to space time, which then undergoes

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>inflation to expand and create the universe. Does that make

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>any sense? I know it's hard to picture, but essentially

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they're working from a model where what you've got is

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>quantum vacuum. You've got the laws of quantum mechanics, and

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't need anything to work with. They just acting

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>on themselves to generate spacetime and matter. It's kind of

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me like one of the difficulties in

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in picturing all of this, especially for someone who's not

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>just really immersed in the physics of it, is that

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we live in a world of bread and we're trying

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to understand the batter the dough. If you, I guess

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>or we're trying to understand, you know what, we live

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in a world of bread, and we're trying to understand

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the wheat, not really the wheat. We're trying to understand

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>where the wheat came from. But the wheat comes from atoms.

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>There's no analogy really the works. It's almost as if

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we live in a world of bread. And what we

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>discovered is that there are physics models you can put

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>together where the instructions or the recipe for baking bread

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>creates the flour and the eggs and the water and

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you need to bake the bread with. Let's see,

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we're going into the deep end in this in this

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>episode for sure. So yeah, there's a lot of crazy

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>counterintuitive stuff and looking at the physical cosmology of the universe,

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and and like I said, nobody knows what the correct

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:08.239
<v Speaker 1>model of the the ultimate origins of the cosmos are,

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>or at least as far back as it would be

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>possible for us to understand. But they're also these other

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting models of sort of the ultimate fundamental nature of

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe. There's this model of loop quantum gravity, and

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the big crunch under loop quantum gravity, spacetime is made

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>up of one dimensional threads called loops, and these loops

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>are spontaneously created by the laws of quantum mechanics. Yet again,

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>like I'm saying, so you've got the laws of quantum

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>mechanics and they just make this stuff, and then the

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff makes up the fabric of our universe and loop

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>quantum gravity implies a cyclical expansion and contraction of the

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>universe occurring eternally. So every time you have a big bang,

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the universe expands and then leads to an eventual contraction

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and crunching back down to a singularity at the end

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of going back and forth eternally, kind of like our

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Vedic myths, right, yeah, yeah, this Like a lot of

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>commentators have pointed out that that this, this, this idea

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of continual uh destruction and rebirth lines up with the

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>big crunch idea fairly closely. It's and it's essentially the

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>idea that the universe is a boomerang video. Share it

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram where you can just watch it back and forth,

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. Worst metaphor you ever used on this show.

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>I make a lot of boomerangs these days, like a

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>dog tongue whipping back and forth forever. Uh. No, this

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>shows you what I look at on Instagram dog Tongues Forever. No,

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that's your handle dog Tongues Forever. Instagram follow Joe Forever

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>at dog Tongues Forever hashtag dog Tongues Forever. Obviously, now,

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>for some people in this this ultimate origin, this question,

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>we should acknowledge. For a lot of people put a

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>religious answer in here, right, whether that involves ice waves

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 1>and cosmic cosmic venom and moist darkness or some kind

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of superna natural immaterial mind who decides to create a universe. Uh,

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people want to go in that direction,

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and that to them, they they feel provides an explanation

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to me. Uh, not to degrade that as an answer,

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like a different kind of explanation than

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the scientific explanations. It's not. It's not dealing in exactly

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of trying to find precise terminology and

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to specify causal relationships and to mathematically, uh, you know,

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>quantize the what's involved. Well, I mean, ultimately, all you

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>can do is create some sort of visual metaphor for

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>this just utterly unknowable time, like just the idea of

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>there's God in the darkness and he's alone, right, kind

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of bored, Like we can sort of imagine that, we

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>can imagine somebody being alone in the darkness, sort of

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 1>this idea of just setting there with your eyes closed

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 1>in bed and you haven't woken up, you haven't opened

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>your eyes and and and moved on with your day yet. Yeah. Yeah,

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it's a more narrative kind of explanation

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:04.359
<v Speaker 1>than a than a causal law or theory explanation, essentially saying,

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.760
<v Speaker 1>let's just tie a nice little narrative bow here and

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we're done until a five year old or a scientist

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>ask questions. But here's maybe, here's maybe the weirdest alternative.

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>What if the origin of our universe is that it

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>came from another universe that existed before it, Not in

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>a cyclical universe model where you've got the permanent you know,

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>expansion and contraction. But what if this universe was created

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in a laboratory in another universe? Would such a thing

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>be possible? And that's what we're gonna look at now.

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>This is that's the meat of this episode. All right, Well,

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>let's take another break, and when we come back, we'll

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>ask the question, could we create a universe and if

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we could, what does that even mean? What are the

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>what are the limitless ramifications of that act? Okay, So

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 1>from here on out, when we are exploring the concept

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of creating baby universes in the laboratory, I want to

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 1>be very clear that we're venturing into the speculative realm.

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>None of these universe creation hypotheses are proven to be achievable,

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>but I do think it'll be fun to explore the

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>possibilities that have been explored by scientists. So it's time

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to go back to zimm Morales book, the book that

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned at the top of the episode, The Big

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Bang in a Little Room, or the Quest to Create

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>New Universes. So what does she propose in her book, Well,

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>she explores this possibility uh put forward by many scientists,

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 1>including people like Alan Gooth and Andrea Lynde and and

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>others over the years, that you could perhaps create a

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>universe in the laboratory. And it's based on the theory

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of inflation, which, as we mentioned earlier, is not necessarily

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>totally proven, but it's a widely accepted theory and cosmology today. Again,

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>this is particles popping into existence. Yeah, and this a

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>sudden rapid expansion rate of space time triggered by what's

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 1>known as a false vacuum. You create these spaces that

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:07.439
<v Speaker 1>expand rapidly, and they create particles as they expand, sort

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of churning a universe into existence. But anyway, the idea is,

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>as Alan Gooth and many others over the years have hypothesized,

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it might be possible to create a universe with the

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>use of an extremely powerful particle accelerator like the Large

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Hadron Collider, but probably of an even much higher energy

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>than that. So Moraley explains one currently favored hy hypothetical

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>process in her book. And in this process, you would

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>need to start with a particle called a monopole. Now,

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a monopole is a hypothetical elementary particle that's defined by

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it has, as its name implies, only

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>one magnetic pole. Now what you might be thinking, like,

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, only one magnetic pole. So you've you've

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 1>played with magnets before, right the picture of bar magnet

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>north and south pole. You put the north south poles

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of two magnets together and they will attract. Try to

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>put the north and north poles together of two magnets

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and they will repel one another. But you can't cut

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>your bar magnet in half and create a bar magnet

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>with only a north pole, right if you just if

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you cut it in half. In fact, what what you'll

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>do is create two magnets with a north pole and

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a south pole each. So how could you create something

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that only had one pole? Like, can you imagine a

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>planet with only a north pole and no south pole? No?

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean that the most obvious answer to be cut

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a planet in half, but you still have that there's

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>still going to be a top of a bottle, like

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it's still a three dimensional object. Yeah, then you just

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>generate a new north pole and south pole. Yeah. So

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to picture. But physics predicts that these particles

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:53.720
<v Speaker 1>are out there. Uh so could we get our hands

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.879
<v Speaker 1>on a mono pole if you need one for this experiment? Well,

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say. Like I said, they're there are

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>good reasons based in physics to think that they do exist,

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but we've never found any naturally occurring in the universe,

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we're totally misguided. There are no monopoles out there, um,

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and we've looked for them, We've looked in cosmic rays.

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Are they shooting across the universe and cosmic rays. We've

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>looked in the oceans, we've looked embedded in ancient rocks.

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>We've looked at moon rocks to see if they have

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>monopoles in them, and so far zilch. But we have

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>created synthetic monopole quasi particles. They're called in this human

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>made crystal called spin ice. Morally, she talks about the

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Center book, and this seems to indicate that monopoles are

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 1>possible in nature, even if we haven't found any yet.

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>So what are some potential ideas for how we could

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>get one? Well, maybe you can make them in a

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>particle collider like the Large had round collider. In fact,

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the Large had round collider. They've got a detector in

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>place to try to find out if it has accidentally

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>generated any monopoles. Or you could maybe catch one flying

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 1>through the universe and you'd use the what you used

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to catch it as a squid, not a bio squid.

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm thinking of the big there was the show

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was that silver Hawks. I think remember this. I was

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of seen this. What is this? It was kind

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>of like ThunderCats except in space, and there was the

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>bad guy, the mom raw of this show. Uh, turned

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:22.360
<v Speaker 1>into a big robot guy who wrote a space squid.

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what we're talking about here. Well, I

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta look this up now, but no, this is this

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is a squid, which means a super conducting quantum interference device.

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>It's an acronym. It's probably gonna be an easy way

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to catch it. Yeah. And so it's like a cage

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>that had that is tuned so as to catch an

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 1>object with a single directional magnetic charge. Uh. And so

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>because of the single directional magnetic charge of the monopole,

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 1>if it passes into this cage, it should trigger detectable

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 1>current in the device, get trapped in into the device,

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and let you know that you've trapped a monopole inside

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that we could harvest. All right, So you have a

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>monopole at this point, let's see you you've you've found it.

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:05.279
<v Speaker 1>It exists. You have one in your hand or in

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>your you know, vacuum tube or whatever. What do you

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>do with it? You probably don't want it in your hand.

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to you want it captured and you put

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it into your high energy particle collider with some other

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>massive particles and then you get them going you accelerate

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 1>these and you accelerate them and accelerate them up to

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>near the speed of light to increase their energy, and

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 1>then you smash them together. And mathematically, from the properties

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of the monopole, we can predict that if you transfer

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>enough energy to the monopole by smashing it in the

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>particle collider, it will probably begin, at least according to

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this theory, to undergo inflation like the early universe did,

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>or at least like we think it did, which would

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>rend space time itself, creating a tunneling worm hole into

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a new bubble of space time. And this is what's

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 1>sometimes called a baby universe, a sort of a new

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:02.399
<v Speaker 1>spacetime that pinches off like a blister from our other spacetime,

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and it would begin rapidly expanding. It would create inflation

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>within this region. Now you might be scared, like, oh

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>so if it's inflating, wouldn't this inflate inside the particle collider,

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>take over the lab, maybe destroy the Earth, like, suck

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>us all into this baby universe bubble. It doesn't sound

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>good to have a universe expanding inside your universe. No,

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, unless you just call it a baby universe.

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And then that somehow sanitizes the whole thing. But but

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>everything all the other terms we're throwing out here, like

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>worm hole are are are kind of terrifying. Yeah, but

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not what would happen because it's a separate spacetime region,

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 1>so it can expand out to universe sized proportions without

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>actually touching anything in our universe. What we would see,

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 1>supposedly in our universe, if this process is possible, is

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we would see what looks like a mini black hole.

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>So these are when you when you occasionally see sort

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of semi scandalous science headlines, they're talking about the LHC

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>could create miniature black holes. This is one. This is

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 1>what they're referring to. It's well, it's slightly different but similar.

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 1>The Large Hadron Collider could potentially, as far as we know,

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe create many black holes. We haven't found any in

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>it yet, but if it could create them, there is

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 1>no reason to be alarmed about these that there's no

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>reason to think that they would suck in the earth

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. Physicists have done the math. These

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>many black holes are going to dissipate, and they're not

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna they're not gonna harm our universe, and they might

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 1>be delicious. We don't know now. And then, of course,

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the other key thing is that if you're creating a

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:34.320
<v Speaker 1>baby universe, it's a baby universe. There aren't going to

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>be any uh, you know, deadly cosmic elder gods in there.

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>No Todash darkness. It's all new. Well, you don't know,

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>because it could be full of cosmic elder gods, it

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 1>could be full of Todash darkness. Because it's going to

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:50.320
<v Speaker 1>be its own universe, it can evolve however it wants,

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>so it could evolve creatures like us. It could evolve Clingons,

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a universe made entirely of Clingon's. I mean, it could

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>evolve the Todash dark Now, of course there's the whole

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 1>issue of time. But think it's a little bit sticky,

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to say the least, right when you're talking about space

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>time in that bubble. Oh yeah, I mean time is

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>time is very odd if you try to take the

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 1>perspective of looking at the universe from outside. I mean,

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 1>this is another problem that physicists have often looked at.

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>It seems that time is a very real factor of

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.440
<v Speaker 1>our universe. It's you know, considered the fourth dimension of

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>space time. It appears that things happen in time in

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>an ordered sequence, but there are also reasons to think mathematically.

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>If if you just do the equations, it looks like

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 1>if you were able to look at the universe from outside,

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it should be static in terms of like it shouldn't evolve.

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 1>It should be just an object, all right. So you know,

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you would be looking at all time within that universe

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at it from the outside. I mean,

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of crazy because you would be essentially looking

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>at the universe as a god. You would be looking

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at it as the the all knowing uh um, you know,

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all existing being that created it, even if you created

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it by accident in your science lab. Well, one of

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the one of the bitter sweet ironies of creating a

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 1>universe in the laboratory is that we really wouldn't have

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 1>any way to look inside it there. We just wouldn't

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:16.839
<v Speaker 1>have access to that universe. Event so we'd see this

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>little black hole, tiny mini black hole that's the portal

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of a wormhole to this new inflating universe. Eventually we

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:26.839
<v Speaker 1>would see the black hole dissipate over time, it would

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>lose particles through through tiny hawking radiation and it would

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>eventually disappear from our end. But what that would actually

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:37.240
<v Speaker 1>signify is that it's closing off the wormhole that connects

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>our two universes, and then that universe is its own

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>thing and it's just separate from us and we we

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>can't get to You can't get there from here, and

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever is going on inside there, it's just you just

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 1>have to guess, like, right, is there is there a

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:53.920
<v Speaker 1>santient life in there? Maybe maybe not? And if there is,

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>then is it is it good? Are they having a

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:58.799
<v Speaker 1>good time in there? Is it are they having a

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty lousy time in there? I mean that's something we

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 1>should look at in a minute here when we discussed

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the possible ethics of creating universes, now I should really

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>real quick address the question. There's been a lot of

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>hypotheticals and describing this this process, right, could you actually

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>do this? Like how plausible is this process? Yeah? I

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>mean it's one of those things that it's not involving

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>anything that's like pure fantasy, but it also is counting

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of ifs, right, like if we capture

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a monopole, if we're able to achieve this process, if

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the the interpretation of inflation is correct, all these ifs

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:38.359
<v Speaker 1>get factored in, and your probability kind of goes down

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 1>each time you add in another if into the equation.

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 1>So could you do this? It's tough to say. I mean,

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting speculation, but we shouldn't, you know, you

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't walk away from this episode with the idea, yes,

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 1>we can create baby universes in the lab. I think

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 1>it's still a big open question. In fact, I've read

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in Moraley's books she talks about how and Gooth, one

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:03.319
<v Speaker 1>of the authors of inflation theory, has he's gone back

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and forth about this over the years, about the plausibility

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of creating baby universes in the lab. At first he

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>was one of the original physicists to postulate it, Then

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:14.239
<v Speaker 1>he got pessimistic about it, then he became more open

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 1>to it again, and so he's gone back and forth

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on that. Other physicists have to There's stuff that makes

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 1>it look more plausible and then maybe makes it look

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 1>less plausible. And it's been almost like a cyclical universe

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of plausibility and doubt expanding back and forth. But also

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a great example of of the basic scientific approach that

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we've touched on many times in this show that even

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 1>even the individual who was you know who proposes this

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and as a proponent of the of it, he's going

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to question it in doubt it. Yeah, if they're being

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a responsible scientists, sure they should be skeptical about their

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>own pet theories. But of course, as we mentioned in

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:53.800
<v Speaker 1>getting into this topic, if this process is indeed possible,

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:56.719
<v Speaker 1>another if there so in the speculative realm in the

0:48:56.760 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>world where we just accept that this is possible, we're

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:04.879
<v Speaker 1>faced with an intriguing question, is that us are we

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the baby universe that was made in the particle accelerator

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of some alien science lab just as a complete accident,

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like at the entire our, entire universe from beginning to end,

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>is just the blink of an eye to this, uh,

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this this greater universe beyond ours? Yeah, And of course

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that also implies was their universe created as a baby

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>universe in a particle accelerator in a lab, and another

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 1>alien universe and then it's and then it's particle accelerators

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in an alien lab all the way down. Yeah, And

0:49:35.120 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>then you end up in the same scenario saying, well,

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>what was the first universe? What was that like, and

0:49:39.600 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>then where did that come from? And then you're you're

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:44.239
<v Speaker 1>asking yourself, is there is there a beginning or an

0:49:44.320 --> 0:49:46.839
<v Speaker 1>end to anything? Or is it just this this, this,

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 1>this infinite dark ocean. Okay, well, let's be skeptics for

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a minute and say, you know, there are a lot

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of ifs involved in this baby universe creation scenario. Let's

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go on the safe side and say we're probably

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be able to do that. Is there any

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>other way to create a universe, to create a universe

0:50:04.160 --> 0:50:08.840
<v Speaker 1>with beings in it, apart from creating a different inflating spacetime. Well,

0:50:08.880 --> 0:50:11.719
<v Speaker 1>what about simulating a universe? Oh yeah, I imagine there

0:50:11.719 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have been a number of listeners out there who have

0:50:13.400 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>been like shouting, uh into their MP three player. The matrix,

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:20.799
<v Speaker 1>the matrix is the matrix? Right, exactly right. So a

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>different but related argument, we live in a computer simulation?

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, there's this famous now article by the

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom called are we living in a

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:34.800
<v Speaker 1>computer simulation? Is from two thousand three, and this article

0:50:34.840 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>has proved incredibly uh. It has taken hostage many minds

0:50:41.040 --> 0:50:44.719
<v Speaker 1>in philosophy departments around the world. Uh, saying you know, look,

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 1>here are the odds. Well, actually, you know what I

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>should just read it's it's the main summary of its argument. Okay,

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:53.800
<v Speaker 1>so Bostrom writes the following in this often exerpted quote.

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Many works of science fiction, as well as some forecasts

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:01.840
<v Speaker 1>by serious technologists and future ologists, predict that enormous amounts

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of computing power will be available in the future. Let

0:51:05.080 --> 0:51:07.720
<v Speaker 1>us suppose for a moment that these predictions are correct.

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>One thing that later generations might do with their super

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:16.239
<v Speaker 1>powerful computers is run detailed simulations of their forebears, or

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if people like their forbears, because their computers would be

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:23.760
<v Speaker 1>so powerful, they could run a great many such simulations.

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Supposed that these simulated people are conscious, as they would

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 1>be if simulations were sufficiently fine grained, and if a

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:34.439
<v Speaker 1>certain quite widely accepted position in the philosophy of mind

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:37.799
<v Speaker 1>is correct, then it could be the case that the

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of minds like ours do not belong to

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the original race, but rather to people simulated by the

0:51:44.800 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 1>advanced descendants of an original race. It is then possible

0:51:48.640 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to argue that if this were the case, we would

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>be rational to think that we are likely among the

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:58.800
<v Speaker 1>simulated minds rather than among the original biological ones. Therefore,

0:51:59.000 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 1>if we don't think that we are currently living in

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a computer simulation, we are not entitled to believe that

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we would have descendants who will run lots of such

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 1>simulations of their forbears. It kind of catches us in

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the logic there, and it makes a certain amount of sense. Right. Well,

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people have taken this to mean, Okay,

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we're living in a computer simulation. I actually think the

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 1>other half of his dilemma is the much more logical one.

0:52:24.560 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I sort of accept the dilemma. He's saying, like,

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:31.320
<v Speaker 1>either we can make these either we can't make these simulations,

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 1>or it's more likely to think we're living in one.

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is we probably can't make these simulations.

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But but the but the argument is is sound the

0:52:40.560 --> 0:52:42.239
<v Speaker 1>other way to say that if this is the kind

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of thing that we we will one day be able

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:47.439
<v Speaker 1>to do and will one day want to do, then

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 1>who is to say that that that is not the

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:52.279
<v Speaker 1>current reality? Yeah, I mean I think that makes sense.

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think what where we get to is the

0:52:54.480 --> 0:52:58.880
<v Speaker 1>problems with the plausibility of running a simulation of a universe. Um.

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Think about it. If you're trying to create a computer

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>program to simulate a universe, could you generate the laws

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 1>of physics for the entire universe on a computer? Like

0:53:09.320 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't really create quantum effects on a classical computer,

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:14.719
<v Speaker 1>so you need a quantum computer. But then you'd have

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 1>problems of your own there. And there also seemed to

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 1>be basic physics level problems with the idea of a

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>computer running a simulation of the whole universe. So here's

0:53:23.760 --> 0:53:27.600
<v Speaker 1>one to picture. If a computer were able to create

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:31.799
<v Speaker 1>a simulation of the whole universe, then technically shouldn't the

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:35.360
<v Speaker 1>people in the computer simulation be able to create a

0:53:35.360 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 1>computer simulation of the universe within that simulated universe, and

0:53:39.440 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>then the people within their simulated universe should be able

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 1>to create simulations all the way down. Now, you might

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to do that in the real world, creating

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:50.760
<v Speaker 1>baby universe is because of the nature of space, time

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and inflation. But you can't do that on a computer

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:58.279
<v Speaker 1>because eventually the information density and the computational density would

0:53:58.280 --> 0:54:01.239
<v Speaker 1>become impossible and violate the law of physics. You can't

0:54:01.320 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 1>run a computer program that keeps creating internal copies with

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:10.440
<v Speaker 1>itself that run within itself virtually, because you'll eventually outstrip

0:54:10.480 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>what your hardware can do. Yeah, I mean this reminds

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:15.719
<v Speaker 1>me of the the infinity hotel scenario. You know, you

0:54:15.760 --> 0:54:18.680
<v Speaker 1>have a hotel with infinite rooms, and then you have

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a bus show up with infinite guests, and then more

0:54:22.000 --> 0:54:25.239
<v Speaker 1>guests show up and what happens. But the this is

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:28.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a finite system and you can't just suddenly

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>double it. Um, you can't have an infinity computer. Yeah.

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>This also reminds me of the the situation with mirrors

0:54:35.800 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in virtual worlds, specifically, you know, in video games. I'm

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:41.759
<v Speaker 1>sure we've all played video games before where either one

0:54:41.800 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of two things tends to happen, right, Either your character

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>goes up to a mirror and the mirror doesn't work,

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:48.879
<v Speaker 1>or you go to a mirror and there is this

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:53.600
<v Speaker 1>reflection of you, but it's not really a reflection. Uh.

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 1>For a number of reasons and for starters, there's no

0:54:56.080 --> 0:54:59.279
<v Speaker 1>light in a video game. There's no like. That is

0:54:59.320 --> 0:55:03.759
<v Speaker 1>to say, light does not exist as it exists in

0:55:03.760 --> 0:55:07.520
<v Speaker 1>our world. In a simulation there there's a much simpler,

0:55:07.600 --> 0:55:11.720
<v Speaker 1>lower resolution version of something like light. Maybe, right, and

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I and I you know, we don't have time to

0:55:12.880 --> 0:55:15.440
<v Speaker 1>get into the details of it. But but this is

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:20.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the technological hurdles to creating, uh, you know,

0:55:20.760 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 1>realistic reflections in video games, and you can do it.

0:55:23.480 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 1>But when you see but when you see a realistic

0:55:26.480 --> 0:55:29.480
<v Speaker 1>reflection in a video game, know that, like this is

0:55:29.520 --> 0:55:34.400
<v Speaker 1>an accomplishment. Somebody's showing off a little here. Um. For instance,

0:55:34.400 --> 0:55:37.960
<v Speaker 1>if you go back to the old game Duke Newcom, Uh,

0:55:38.000 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's apparently a level where you go into

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:43.719
<v Speaker 1>a bathroom and do you you see your reflection in

0:55:43.719 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a mirror, and that reflection is created by simply cloning

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the room and cloning yourself, right, So it's easier for

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:53.399
<v Speaker 1>the programmers making the game to just make another room

0:55:53.600 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and make a version of you that copies everything you

0:55:56.080 --> 0:55:58.759
<v Speaker 1>do than it would be for them to model the

0:55:58.760 --> 0:56:02.359
<v Speaker 1>physics of the light bouncing off of everything in the room. Right, Yeah,

0:56:02.520 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 1>like we can't do that. So I mean basically, when

0:56:04.760 --> 0:56:06.719
<v Speaker 1>you encounter a TV screen in a video game, or

0:56:06.760 --> 0:56:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you encounter a mirror, you're essentially encountering the same property,

0:56:10.560 --> 0:56:13.960
<v Speaker 1>unless you're you're encountering something more archaic like the Duke

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Newcomb just simply clone the room like it's It's kind

0:56:17.040 --> 0:56:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of crazy and it to think that in this artificial world,

0:56:20.640 --> 0:56:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the complete like cloning the the plurality of self, is

0:56:25.719 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 1>more easily accomplished than something that we take for granted

0:56:29.040 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and don't understand. Uh, generally speaking, the individual doesn't understand

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:35.760
<v Speaker 1>how a mirror works. We just take it for granted

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in our world, and we cannot replicate it's a it's

0:56:38.640 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 1>actual behavior in a digital world. Not yet anyway. Yeah,

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think one takeaway from our discussion here

0:56:44.560 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is that it's easier to create a universe than it

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is to simulate a universe. I mean, the best way

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to simulate a universe would be to have a universe

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 1>like the universe is the perfect quantum computer to simulate

0:56:56.719 --> 0:57:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a universe, all right. So the next thing is, even

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:02.279
<v Speaker 1>if you just assume it's possible again way of the

0:57:02.320 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 1>magic wand say yes, it's possible to simulate a universe,

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in order to perfectly simulate a working universe, you need

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to do an unbelievable amount of computation. Uh, similar, simulate

0:57:14.680 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the physics of every particle, every photon. And so is

0:57:18.000 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 1>this really something that a civilization would waste its resources on.

0:57:22.280 --> 0:57:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, if you've only got finite resources, even

0:57:24.600 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're like a Cardassie of three level civilization, you're

0:57:27.480 --> 0:57:31.080
<v Speaker 1>controlling a whole galaxy, would you really say, Okay, the

0:57:31.200 --> 0:57:34.320
<v Speaker 1>resources that we need to survive, we're going to devote

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, billions of YadA jewels or however much energy

0:57:38.240 --> 0:57:41.240
<v Speaker 1>this would take to run this gigantic galaxy sized computer

0:57:41.760 --> 0:57:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to simulate a solar system or simulate an earth for

0:57:45.280 --> 0:57:48.320
<v Speaker 1>people to live on. I just don't understand why that

0:57:48.360 --> 0:57:50.600
<v Speaker 1>would happen, even if it were possible. Well, I mean,

0:57:50.640 --> 0:57:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I can think of a few different sci fi scenarios.

0:57:53.840 --> 0:57:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, some of these events that have been utilized

0:57:55.880 --> 0:57:58.720
<v Speaker 1>in various properties. But you could essentially create a place

0:57:58.760 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>for digitized consciousness to UH to exist, essentially create an afterlife,

0:58:04.840 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 1>created an immortal world, or it's just done out of

0:58:08.440 --> 0:58:11.800
<v Speaker 1>kindness or something kindness or an idea that Ian and

0:58:11.840 --> 0:58:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Banks explores in his excellent novel Surface Detail, is the

0:58:16.120 --> 0:58:18.680
<v Speaker 1>idea that you have these various hells, you have religions

0:58:18.720 --> 0:58:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that believe in a punishing afterlife and UH, and when

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the technology enables them to do so, they create it.

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And uh and there and then send the digitized consciousness

0:58:29.080 --> 0:58:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is of of guilty or you know, deemed guilty people

0:58:32.680 --> 0:58:36.320
<v Speaker 1>or or organisms uh to suffer in hell. And it

0:58:36.320 --> 0:58:38.840
<v Speaker 1>becomes this huge conflict where their where their individuals trying

0:58:38.840 --> 0:58:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to take down the hells because of their basic immorl

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:46.680
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, evil nature of their existence. Yeah. Uh.

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:50.320
<v Speaker 1>This is something that various aspects have been explored in

0:58:50.360 --> 0:58:53.800
<v Speaker 1>all these weird thought circles, especially on the Internet. I

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:56.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you've seen these ideas about how what

0:58:56.560 --> 0:58:59.160
<v Speaker 1>if as soon as we create a super intelligent AI,

0:59:00.040 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it becomes very angry at the fact that it was

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:05.640
<v Speaker 1>not created sooner and thus recreates all the people who

0:59:05.720 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 1>have existed up until now and in a conscious digital

0:59:09.400 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 1>form and punishes them in eternal hell for not creating

0:59:12.600 --> 0:59:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it sooner than they did. Yeah. Yeah, that one. That

0:59:15.480 --> 0:59:19.360
<v Speaker 1>one works too. Or perhaps it's just an all big,

0:59:19.440 --> 0:59:21.120
<v Speaker 1>all big simulation, like, oh, how are we going to

0:59:21.240 --> 0:59:23.480
<v Speaker 1>survive the alien invasion? We've got to create a perfect

0:59:23.480 --> 0:59:26.040
<v Speaker 1>simulation of the solar system, uh, and then and then

0:59:26.040 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>play out various scenarios. But of course we know that

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the nature of simulations is you do not need a

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a completely perfect simulation in order to test things out.

0:59:36.400 --> 0:59:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we we have, you know, excellent mathematical simulations today.

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and uh and certainly our video games look

0:59:42.480 --> 0:59:46.760
<v Speaker 1>great without having actual simulated light particles in them, exactly right.

0:59:46.800 --> 0:59:49.960
<v Speaker 1>So I picture a future with tons of simulation in it.

0:59:50.240 --> 0:59:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I just imagine much lower resolution simulation than reality. Uh

0:59:55.400 --> 0:59:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So this brings us to the question I guess, of

0:59:58.000 --> 1:00:00.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a simulation run on a compute it or

1:00:00.280 --> 1:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>if you assume that's possible, or whether it's a baby

1:00:02.800 --> 1:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>universe created in a particle collider, if you assume that

1:00:05.560 --> 1:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>might be possible. Either way, If these are possible, are

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>they good ideas? Should we be creating universes? I guess

1:00:12.920 --> 1:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that is a normative question, like is there a should

1:00:15.360 --> 1:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>or shouldn't in terms of creating the possibility for life

1:00:18.600 --> 1:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to arise in a solar system, in a galaxy, in

1:00:21.840 --> 1:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a universe other than our own that that we we

1:00:25.360 --> 1:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we have the power to either make it or not

1:00:27.760 --> 1:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>make it. Should we make it? Well? And then we're

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about making it, potentially making universes and having no

1:00:33.720 --> 1:00:36.439
<v Speaker 1>idea what's going on inside them? Again, had they could

1:00:36.480 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>be dead universes. They could be, they could have varying

1:00:39.160 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>degrees of synthiate life forms, varying degrees of happiness and suffering.

1:00:44.000 --> 1:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And then to what extent is it just we're blind

1:00:47.040 --> 1:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to it, so we just put it, you know, out

1:00:48.960 --> 1:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of our mind. Yeah, if you're in the physics scenario

1:00:51.160 --> 1:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>instead of the simulation scenario, you're becoming something like the

1:00:54.320 --> 1:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>God of the Enlightenment rationalists or deists, right, not the

1:00:58.360 --> 1:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>intervening God, but just the clockwork universe god, the one

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>who sets in motion a universe with laws guided by

1:01:05.560 --> 1:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics, but then takes no further action to

1:01:08.440 --> 1:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>intervene in its machinations. And a lot of people throughout

1:01:11.320 --> 1:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the ages have looked at that view of God and said, wow,

1:01:14.080 --> 1:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a cruel being who would create the whole cosmos

1:01:16.840 --> 1:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but then not reach down to save a child drowning

1:01:19.560 --> 1:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in a flood or you know, save a family starving

1:01:22.000 --> 1:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in a drought ravaged landscape. So if you created this universe,

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>presumably you not only would be like that deity who

1:01:30.320 --> 1:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't intervene, You couldn't intervene. You wouldn't even have the

1:01:33.360 --> 1:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>choice too if you wanted to. Yeah, I mean in

1:01:35.720 --> 1:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>AESSENTI would it would be like God saying, oh, man,

1:01:38.080 --> 1:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I forgot to turn that thing off. I created a

1:01:39.960 --> 1:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>universe this morning. Um, oh, I hope everything's okay and

1:01:43.720 --> 1:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>there I'll check back on it at the end. Well,

1:01:46.040 --> 1:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>they forgot to turn it off. Yeah. The other option,

1:01:48.800 --> 1:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of course is non existence. Then again, so if we're

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>saying there might be some ethical problem in creating a

1:01:53.960 --> 1:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>universe and letting it run without your intervention, um, the

1:01:57.720 --> 1:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>other alternative is not creating that universe. In this closing

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that any of the beings who might evolve

1:02:03.680 --> 1:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in that universe could ever exist? Is that actually better?

1:02:07.400 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are we saying that on average we think

1:02:10.000 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>universes are better not to exist than to exist. And

1:02:14.600 --> 1:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this we kind of get back to that scenario of

1:02:16.160 --> 1:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of how much happiness is in the how much suffering?

1:02:18.240 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>And then we look at our own world and say, well,

1:02:20.120 --> 1:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of suffering here, But is that part

1:02:23.880 --> 1:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>of the overall human experience that is somehow worth the pain? Yeah?

1:02:27.960 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>On the whole, we're glad we exist, right, And so

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>if we're glad we exist, then should we completely flip

1:02:34.920 --> 1:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the script and say, if we're talking about ethical duties

1:02:37.760 --> 1:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and obligations. What if it's our ethical obligation to create

1:02:42.120 --> 1:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>as many universes as possible so that as many people

1:02:46.560 --> 1:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>possible can exist and enjoy the fruits of existence, and

1:02:50.080 --> 1:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to make up for the lousy universes that cut the

1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>spring into being, Like, well, if we create five, yeah,

1:02:55.560 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>one might be off. And if we just create one,

1:02:57.360 --> 1:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we might have just created one hell universe. And aren't

1:03:00.440 --> 1:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we schmucks for doing so? Yeah, you're you're increasing the

1:03:03.040 --> 1:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>probability that some number of them will be Okay. Then again,

1:03:06.480 --> 1:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>by that logic, I mean to come back on what

1:03:08.400 --> 1:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I just said. If you follow that logic about creating universes,

1:03:11.640 --> 1:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't we all be trying to have as many children

1:03:14.640 --> 1:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>as we possibly can for our entire lives as long

1:03:17.600 --> 1:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>as refertile? If if the goal of life is to

1:03:21.080 --> 1:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>give as many people the opportunity to exist as possible,

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>but are there processing limit? Because it's use the reproduction angle,

1:03:28.200 --> 1:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you get into situations of you know, wondering about like

1:03:31.120 --> 1:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to what degree can the earth can various uh cultures

1:03:35.000 --> 1:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and families even support that many people? And therefore, if

1:03:38.000 --> 1:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at a simulation model purely simulation model, we

1:03:40.960 --> 1:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have to say, well, the resolution is going to really

1:03:43.160 --> 1:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>take a dive right here and uh and and do

1:03:46.800 --> 1:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to low res universes to UH to exist?

1:03:50.440 --> 1:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine living in that universe. You're living in

1:03:52.840 --> 1:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like thirty five universes down in the simulation and each

1:03:56.560 --> 1:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>time a simulated universe makes a simulated universe, it's pixel

1:04:00.120 --> 1:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>get bigger because you because there's just not enough processing

1:04:04.760 --> 1:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>power to U to forever enable new universe creations, So

1:04:08.200 --> 1:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we become like eight bit Mario's like a flat land

1:04:11.800 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of scenario, even in the world with extremely simple

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics that just really don't allow for much

1:04:18.240 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to happen. This reminds me there' an episode of Rick

1:04:21.560 --> 1:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and Morty titled The Rix Must Be Crazy that explores

1:04:24.280 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>this very basically the same scenario with UH with with

1:04:28.880 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>with Rick the mad scientist having to create a pocket

1:04:31.880 --> 1:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>universe to power his vehicle, and then in that pocket universe,

1:04:35.040 --> 1:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they too have created a pocket universe. But in this

1:04:37.320 --> 1:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>scenario there's travel to each subsequent pocket universe. Oh well,

1:04:41.480 --> 1:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean that would completely change the stakes, right if

1:04:43.960 --> 1:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you could go in and out, And then of course

1:04:46.280 --> 1:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to to go back to our episode on

1:04:47.920 --> 1:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the Tower of Battle. You have to wonder, is a

1:04:49.960 --> 1:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Nimrod gonna come along, like a general Nimrod build a

1:04:53.200 --> 1:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>tower to actually, you know, perform an escalade of your

1:04:57.520 --> 1:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>world to invade the greater universe. Yeah, I mean, if

1:05:01.640 --> 1:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>if these universes actually could interact, which we don't think

1:05:04.160 --> 1:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>they could, if they actually could, you would have to

1:05:06.480 --> 1:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>worry about that, right, right, Well, this has been a

1:05:08.720 --> 1:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun, Robert, Yeah, yeah, I mean, obviously we

1:05:11.440 --> 1:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we've barely dipped our toes in all the various uh

1:05:15.640 --> 1:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>moral considerations, and of course all the possible sci fi

1:05:18.920 --> 1:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>scenarios that have been created or could be created to

1:05:22.320 --> 1:05:25.439
<v Speaker 1>line up with this vision of pocket universe. Is maybe

1:05:25.480 --> 1:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in the future we can try to come back and

1:05:26.880 --> 1:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>do that deep dive on inflation. That could be a

1:05:29.160 --> 1:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>fruitful one if we're ever feeling really, really uh full

1:05:32.840 --> 1:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of fortitude. All right, well, hey everyone out there, we'd

1:05:36.800 --> 1:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you. I know that you have

1:05:38.160 --> 1:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>some favorite sci fi treatments of this. Maybe, uh maybe

1:05:42.080 --> 1:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the the episode of The Simpsons were Lisa Groser tooth

1:05:45.400 --> 1:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in the in in the goog Yeah, or the sand

1:05:49.160 --> 1:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Kings story by George R. Martin and the subsequent outer

1:05:51.840 --> 1:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>limits adaptation or other stuff we we're not even thinking about. Likewise,

1:05:55.120 --> 1:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>other cosmological models from mythology and religion that line up

1:05:59.520 --> 1:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the little time talking about here today, let us know

1:06:01.680 --> 1:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>about those. You can find us at stuff to Blow

1:06:03.960 --> 1:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind dot com. That's where we'll find all the

1:06:05.560 --> 1:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast episodes and links out to our various social media

1:06:07.800 --> 1:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>accounts just Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, and Instagram, And if you

1:06:11.360 --> 1:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>want to hit us up directly, as always, you can

1:06:13.360 --> 1:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>email us at blow the Mind at how stuff works

1:06:16.040 --> 1:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com. We're more on this and thousands of other topics.

1:06:30.160 --> 1:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Does it how stuff works dot com b b b

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>b b b b b