WEBVTT - Olaf Scholz Talks European Security

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Chancellor, thank you very much for joining us. I'm going

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to ask you about the things that you would expect

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 2>me to ask about European security and some of the

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 2>announcements around Tariff's But I wanted to start by making

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 2>an observation about the last few weeks in Washington that

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 2>we have watched this whirlwind of the new administration and

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 2>the impact it's had, not just in the world, but

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>in Washington and Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency DOGE

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>has turned the federal government upside down in the time

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 2>it takes to read Marrio Druggies report on European Competitiveness,

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 2>let alone start to implement it. So I just wondered,

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the state of the European economy

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 2>and you look at the pace of change now in Washington,

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>does Europe need a DOGE of its own.

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 3>No, we need a lot of changes when everyone needs them.

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 3>So we have to work against red tape, against bureaucracy,

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 3>all this, and there is a strong willingness to succeed

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 3>with attempts about working against planning restrictions that make it

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 3>too difficult to invest, and things like that, and it

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 3>was my initiative, together with the French President, to ask

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 3>the Commission to make proposals about a better European Union

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 3>and to get written of red tape and bureaucracy, and

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>they do so. I'm really confident that we will do

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 3>our task and hopefully sensible things.

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 2>But lots of sensible things have been said for years,

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>and most of the things that were in the Mario

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Dragon Report have been said many times before. But the

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 2>pace of change is so slow. And meanwhile, you have

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 2>an economy that has been has not grown in the

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>time that you've been Chancellor, while the US economy has

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>grown seven percent. So don't you sometimes think that a

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of radical throwing up of things, a radical change,

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 2>might be needed rather than same old statements.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 3>As you know, I'm a progressive, I'm a social democrat,

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 3>so I'm in favor of change. But all the time,

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 3>the question is what sort of change it is about.

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 3>And yes, it is necessary that we work hard to

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 3>make it easy to invest in Europe and to get

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 3>rid of some of the regulations that are hindering investments

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 3>to be done very fast. But on the other side,

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 3>I think we have good chances for Europe to grow

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 3>and we have the best in Germany. Yes, it is

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 3>true that we faced a really heavy storm after the

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Russian aggression against Ukraine and all the consequences has had

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 3>for the energy supply to Germany, for prices and many

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>other things.

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>But we are now behind all the biggest difficulties.

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.559
<v Speaker 3>Inflation is down again and this will also help investments,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 3>especially when it comes to housing. So I'm quite confident

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>that with some extra activities we will have a chance

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 3>to speed up growth. One of the proposs I make

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 3>will be very similar to things you are used to

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 3>in the United States. So it is about the text

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 3>credit which you get for investments in Germany easily to

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 3>be handled and something that will boost investment.

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 2>But if you're a German voter, how can you expect

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 2>change to come out of this election? If you think

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 2>of the possible range of outcomes, when you look at

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the scale of the problems and the stagnation in Europe,

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>do you understand the people who think we need radical

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 2>change and we're not going to get it from any

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 2>coalition that comes out of this election.

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 3>I think there will be a good chance for better

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 3>growth when you vote for a social democratic party in Germany.

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 3>So this is I propose others will do a different one,

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 3>but there is.

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Always hasn't been any since you became chancellor.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:06.839
<v Speaker 1>We had a crisis, there is a war.

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I was not the one that started the aggression against

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine at Putin, and we worked against him and his aggression.

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 3>We supported Ukraine, we increased our spending for defense, and

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 3>we organized our economy in a way that it was

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 3>able to live with all these radical changes that.

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Came to us. So now we are at a good

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>starting point.

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Coming back to the Union, I'd say the biggest thing

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 3>we have to achieve is to develop the Capital Markets Union,

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>which has to come from a question of finance ministers

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 3>to a question of leaders because it is obvious also

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 3>when you look at the Dragon report, that this is

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the main question for better growth in Europe, and so

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 3>we have to do it and not to speak just

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 3>about it and.

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Will there be meaningful progress on that in the next

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>few months.

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 3>I've spoken to many and also that this is a

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 3>leadership question, and this means that many have to.

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Be ready to accept that not all these small.

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.799
<v Speaker 3>Advantages of the one country and the other one country

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 3>could continue. It is better to have a capital market

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 3>in Europe that is ready to find the growth of

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 3>companies from the equity market. And that's what we are

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 3>having to do. And that's the big difference between the

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 3>United States and Europe. Though we have even more money

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 3>for investment in Europe.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump does seem to be President Trump seems to

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 2>be in a hurry to put tariffs on European cars.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Should the European Union might happen as soon as April.

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Should the European Union be cutting their tariffs in advance

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>of that? To avoid that?

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 3>First, I have to admit that I'm in favor of

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 3>free trade. I think this is a big advantage we

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.679
<v Speaker 3>have in the world, and that many of the wealth

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and the growth we have in the world is because

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.559
<v Speaker 3>of free trade. So it must be fair free trade. Trade, yes,

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 3>but free trade is better than tariffs and protectionism.

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that this.

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Will work when it comes to the European Union. I

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 3>think everyone knows that we are a big economic area

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 3>with a lot of strength, where policy about tariffs is

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 3>something that is our common policy. So we are strong

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 3>enough to react to everything that is harming European economy.

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 3>But we should and we should react always, but in

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 3>a way that is always offering the chance for an

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 3>agreement because it's better for all parties involved, especially on

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 3>the both sides of the Atlantic.

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 2>But it is the Opini Union considering cutting tariffs before

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 2>any announcement on cars.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 3>We invite the United States to discuss with the responsible

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 3>authorities about what we can do for a better progress

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 3>that serves all of us.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>There is a willingness, and.

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 3>So I'm sure it's better if we agree to something

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 3>that helps all of us. And it is good to

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 3>know that Europe is strong enough to act and to react.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.119
<v Speaker 2>You talk about it being a common project, but Donald

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.239
<v Speaker 2>Trump has made clear that he wants to do reciprocal tariffs.

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't want a wto approach where all the rules

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>are on the same countries, And even with the European Union,

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>he might want to have a different tariff regime for

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 2>France and Italy and Germany. What would you do? Then?

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 3>The European Union is a unified economy and has there's

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 3>nothing to stop the US doing that, but it has

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 3>common tariffs and we act together and we will stick together,

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 3>which I think is also important. And so I'm quite

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 3>confident that a good solution is feasible and everyone should

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 3>work or make it happen.

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>You spoke this morning very clearly about what you need

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 2>to do to increase defense spending above two percent of

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 2>GDP and suspending the debt break just for that additional

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 2>defense spending, but for many countries it will want to

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 2>also have joint debt issuance for Europe as a whole

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 2>to be able to invest enough in defense. Would you

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 2>consider that given everything that's happened in the last few.

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Weeks, I think there are three things we can do

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 3>in this very moment. The first is that we agree

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 3>in Germany that supporting Ukraine is something of an extra effort,

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:48.239
<v Speaker 3>so we should have extra room for maneuver also financing

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 3>this support to Ukraine, which when it comes to the figures,

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Germany is doing the most. We are the biggest support

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 3>of Ukraine in Europe, the second biggest in the world,

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 3>and this has to continue. We cannot pay for it

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 3>with cuttings in pension schemes or in the health sector,

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 3>or in cuttings in the investment into streets and railways

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 3>and so on. So I think it's clear that we

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 3>have to do this. And the second is that we

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 3>have to agree how we will continue with the spending

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 3>of more than two percent of our GDP for defense,

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 3>which we achieved because of an extra fund which I

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 3>managed to get through the parliament. But for the future

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 3>we need a new decision about this and this is

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 3>for continuing with this two percent plus already thirty billion

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 3>a year. So also this will not work with tax

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 3>increases or cuttings and spending in the different areas of

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 3>the German budget. When it comes to do more, which

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 3>will be obviously necessary when we look at what NATO

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 3>is discussing, then it especially means that we do something

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 3>for this activities which gives us in Germany the opportunity

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 3>to spend even more.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 1>And this has also to do with.

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 3>The reform of the debt regulation in Germany. When it

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 3>comes to Europe, I think we should help every country

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 3>if it spends more than two percent, to be not

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 3>hindered by the European regulation on treating.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Changing the stability.

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 3>We have to change these agreements so that this is

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 3>feasible for a country to do.

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 2>But for many countries, I mean, for Germany has very

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 2>low debt relative to other countries.

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>As we might say that we are going down to

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent.

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Other countries will find it very difficult to keep issuing

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 2>more and more debt because, as you pointed out, they're

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 2>over one hundred percent, maybe over one hundred and forty

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 2>percent of GDP. You don't think this is a time

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 2>for joint debt issuance. All of the things that have happened.

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 3>It's a very difficult question to go into it.

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And I was the.

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Designer of the Recovery Fund, which we had after the

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Corona crisis, or during the Corona crisis to go through

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 3>this very difficult times, and the idea was that we

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 3>have something which is giving direct support to countries and

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 3>other aspects, which is just another way of taking money

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 3>from the market. So my view is that the first

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 3>thing to do is now to give room for acting

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 3>to the different member states, and.

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like that could be a model for expanding

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 2>defense spending in the future for Europe. I think this

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 2>is the Recovery Fund.

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, this is not the model.

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 3>I was really precise this morning saying that what I

0:11:56.080 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 3>propose is to give the countries the room for extra spending.

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 2>In this debates about Ukraine, I they we're running out

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 2>of time. But did you know that US and Russian

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 2>officials will be meeting in Saudi Arabia next week? Were

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 2>you informed of that before the news broke that they

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 2>were meeting to discuss Ukraine.

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 3>It's absolutely clear that there will be debates between Russia

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 3>and the United States about this question. I spoke to

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 3>President Trump very early about how to support Ukraine.

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>My plea is that there.

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Should be first the message to put in that Europe

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 3>and the United States will continue with their support to Ukraine,

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 3>because he has to understand that he cannot hope that

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 3>we stop our support.

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 2>But the US officials at this meeting have made clear

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 2>that Europe's not going to be at the table in

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 2>any of the important conversations. How can you you're not.

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure that there will be no solution possible over

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 3>the heads of the Ukrainians. And obviously, if someone wants

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Europe to be involved in the structures of peace in

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 3>the future, it is necessary and to discuss with Europe

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 3>and to implement the European leaders into this decision making processes.

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 2>President Trump only seems to want to talk to one person.

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't want to talk to Europe. So who should

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 2>be that one person shouldn't be nominated person to talk

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>to Donald Trump y as how he likes to do business.

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that the European Union has its own bodies

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 3>for acting. And on the other hand, I will be

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 3>very clear it is Europe that spends even more as

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the United States in the support of Ukraine. And this

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 3>is the basis for saying that everyone should count with us.

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 2>When we spoke a few years ago, we were talking

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 2>about this before we started that when it was seemed

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 2>very unlikely in an election campaign where it seemed very

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 2>unlikely that you would end up as chancellor, and then

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 2>you were proved right and the doubters were wrong. Do

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 2>you have a rabbit your sleeve for the next week

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 2>because the polls you started off far behind and they

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 2>have not got any better.

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure that that will happen again. What we are rabbit,

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 3>It will happen again that the Social Democratic Party and

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 3>myself will get the vote from the people to continue

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 3>with leading the government.

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>As it was the case.

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 2>What evidence for that, Chancellor?

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 3>The people are wondering who is the right one to

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 3>do this, and they are not decided yet. If we

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 3>look at the many that have not made up their

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 3>mind and many things are happening, so it is obvious

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>that in this time the real decision will really happen

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 3>in the places where the people give up their vote.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>What do you think they would need to be deciding

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>on thinking about most in order to change their minds

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 2>of vote for you?

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 3>One important question is One important question is defense and

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 3>security and peace in Europe. I think they can trust

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 3>the Antler when it comes to the handling of problems dealing.

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>With peace and security. It's about growth. I have a

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>very

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Concrete proposal how we can increase growth in Germany and

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 3>it's about social cohesion.