WEBVTT - Economic Animals

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Katie some sort of take your children to Bloomberg Television day.

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I feel like that's evidenced by all the children

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 3>that are well, there are a lot of children walking

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 3>at where are your kids?

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I have never once been informed in advance or frankly

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 2>in real time about it take your child to workday.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I just show up and all the kids are here,

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and they're like, oh, yeah, take your child the workday,

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 2>And like I.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Hear, I hear there's a lottery. Not everyone's allowed to

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 3>bring their children, is my understanding.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I wasn't informed with the lottery. It's fine, my

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>kids have school. It's fine, it's fine.

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 3>It's fun. I mean you're not getting anything done that day, right.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Someone at Bloomber Opinion had.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 3>His kids here and a kid.

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 2>I was like, a bad influence. I was like my

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>daughter like first tried root beer here. But I saw

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 2>two kids recording like on the camera in the lobby

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 2>that's waking behind them, and I could see the prompter

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>and it was like at Bloomberg News for kids, Yeah,

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 2>It's like are they is that going to be aired?

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 3>It's cute that they do that. Certainly not on my show.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 2>No, we're killing it.

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Man, You're a competitive I don't know why I want

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 3>to go tackle those children. Get away from my prompt

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>looking for.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Your job In approximately twenty years.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 3>I thought I was having to worry about AI.

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Welcome to The Money Stuff Podcast, your weekly podcast

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 2>where we talk about stuff related to money. I'm Matt

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Levine and I heard the Money Stuff Colm from Bloomberg Opinion.

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Katie Greyfeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 3>an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Should we talked about the weather? I feel like we

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>talked about the weather last week and now we're talking

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 2>about the weather again. There's a very economically important local

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>climatic zone, which is that apparently somewhere within Charligall Airport

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 2>in Paris, there's a censor that tells you the temperature

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 2>for like Paris. Yeah, and so polymarket takes quite a

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of bets on the weather in Paris. And at

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 2>two points this month it's been reported the temperature in Paris,

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 2>by which I mean the temperature at this one sensor

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 2>in the airport spiked by like four or five degrees

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>celsius in the space of a few minutes, causing very

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 2>long shot bets on this temperature to pay off to

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 2>the tune of tens of thousands of dollars. And so

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the French like meteorological service is investigating, and you know

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 2>their tweets about someone took a hair dryer to Sharyl

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>the Gahala and made thousands of dollars treating these weather

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 2>derivatives so good.

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I have to imagine there's going to be so

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 3>many more cases like this.

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 2>Right, I tried to write about it.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 3>I feel like you did successfully.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I wrote words about it, Like there's market

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 2>manipulation in the world. Right, there's some stuff tapping right now,

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 2>lying stuff, and there are derivatives on the underlying stuff,

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and people can manipulate the stuff to cause the derivatives

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>to go up. And I've written about dozens of cases

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 2>over the years. But like, what prediction markets have done

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 2>is they've created a sort of infinite surface for market manipulation.

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Like anything you can think of, there can be a

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 2>prediction market on and the outcome of anything you can

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 2>think of might be manipulable. And so if you are

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 2>buying like grain futures, the weather in the Midwestern United

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>States is an input to the price of those grain futures,

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 2>but like a leader of air in the Midwestern United

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 2>States is not is not a material input. But if

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>you're buying the polymarket, like bet on the weather in Paris, contract,

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 2>one tiny little spot causes the vets to pay off

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>or not. There's always gonna be market manipulation. But like

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the prediction markets have just created this vast new possibility

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 2>of things to manipulate.

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 3>It's exciting, right, it.

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Kind of is.

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know, I feel stupid every time

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 2>I write about it, but keep writing about it.

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's clever, and some of them are clever

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>and fun.

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I want to see photos or a

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 3>diagram of like where this temperature sensor is. Yeah, I

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>feel like they could fix this by just placing it

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 3>higher rights drinking.

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 2>Fountain like in the at the gate, you know, but

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 2>it's probably not. It's probably like on a runway, yeah, right,

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 2>because like you know, the weather in the actual airport

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 2>is climate control.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's I think.

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't actually eight degrees again, it would be in.

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Europe is less committitary conditioning. Then it's a good still.

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Still, that's yeah, still Yeah.

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 2>I also wrote this week about bespoke parametric insurance. Yeah,

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 2>so basically there's a good Bloomberg article about bad Bunny.

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I think it's bad Bunny.

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 2>He had a concert scheduled in like Columbia, and he

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>worried about it being canceled for torrential rain. And he

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 2>went to insurance companies to get cancelation insurance and they're like, wow,

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 2>we can and sell your policy that pays off if

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 2>it rains. But like the rain sensor is a mile

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 2>away and it's like a very different microclimate where you are.

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 2>And he was like, what if we built a weather

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 2>station and it's not him, This is like insurance adjuster.

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 2>They built a weather station inside the venue so that

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 2>they could get paid out if it rained in the venue.

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 2>The story was great because one of the things like

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 2>it was like they could have built just like a

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 2>rain collector.

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but then you could manipulate.

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Then you could you could just get a watering can

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 2>and pour water on it. It's like they had to

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 2>build out a whole weather station because that you have

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 2>all the confirmatory readings and if they just pour water

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 2>into the weather to the rain sensor. Then they'll know

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 2>appurrently the French Meteorological Service has this problem.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, bad bunny. Should have just created a market on

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 3>polymarket or kelcill.

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing, right. I wrote about this and I

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 2>was like, oh, bespoke parametric insurance, and someone was like,

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>is bespoke parametric insurance the same thing as a prediction market?

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 2>And it's like kind of yeah, I'm glad the weather sensor.

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be all we talk about. Famously boring topic

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 2>of conversation, but coming up more and more often.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 3>It'll come up again talking about Avis. Yeah, do you

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 3>know anything about as No.

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Davis budget is what it's called.

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>That's too two or more different more have often used hurts.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know much about AUS. I do know

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 3>that the stock has been going insane ripped, and the

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 3>consensus is that it's a short squeeze.

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is this stog who was like one hundred

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 2>dollars about a month ago, one hundred dollars a share

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 2>and it is a It got to seven hundred and

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 2>thirteen on Tuesday.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Wow, it must have been a great earnings report.

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, say, the consensus is that it's not earnings DRIPPN.

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 2>But it's not a fundamental.

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:45.799
<v Speaker 3>Their report on the twenty ninth of April.

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, maybe people have an inside you on the but

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. The phrase that is normally thrown

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 2>out a short squeeze and a couple of good reasons

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 2>for it, when is that is a heavily shortened stock.

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 2>He's like, short interest is like a somewhat mysterious thing

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 2>to report, and you often get it onto ala. But

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>something like sixty percent of the shares have been shorter.

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 2>It's a little lot. But the other reason that people

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 2>talk about a short squeeze, and I wrote about this

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 2>last week, is that two hedge funds own one hundred

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and eight percent of the stock, which if you do

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 2>some simple math, like if you want one hundred and

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 2>eight percent of the stock and you call in all

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 2>of your borrow, then there's no borrow to be found. Now,

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 2>it's not that's not exactly what happened here. One thing

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 2>that has happened is I've gotten several emails from people

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 2>being like, is there actually a short squeze? Because like

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>there's no reports of hedge funds being like carried out

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 2>like you know, like in gamestat where like, you know,

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 2>a big hedge fund closed because of the game stop

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 2>short squeeze. Yeah, there's not really any reports that here.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg has been reporting that people were adding short positions

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 2>as the stock was going up and have now made

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars more than all of setting the billions

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 2>of dollars they lost on the way up. Yeah, it's interesting.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 2>So these two hedgehunds own one hundred eight percent of

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>the stock, but they don't really They own like sixty

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 2>nine percent of the stock, right, and then they have

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>big swap positions where like you know, traditionally, the way

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 2>a swap works is like a bank writes the hedge

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 2>fund of contract time, we'll give you the upside in

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the stock and you'll lose the downside, and the bank

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 2>hedges it by buying stock. But it doesn't have to

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 2>hedge it by buying stock. One thing I was thinking

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 2>about is that if short sellers want to be short

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the stock, and if like these two

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 2>hedge funds are called SRS and Pentwater want to be

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 2>long a lot of the stock, they can just do

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 2>a bet with each other. The hedge fund says if

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the stock goes up, I'll pay you, and if the

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 2>stock goes down, you'll pay me. Right, that's a swap.

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 2>And what might be happening here is that that might

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>be happening. What might be happening is that the short

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 2>sellers are short the stock on swap, SRS and Pentwater

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 2>are along the stock on swap. The bank is sitting between

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 2>them and basically brokering a bat between the short hedge

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 2>funds and the long hedge funds. And then there's no

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 2>short screeze. Everything's easy, you know. I mean, there's a

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 2>little bit of short squeze youet, like collateral calls, but

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 2>basically you can just sit there until the world returns

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 2>to reality.

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I do also like the psychological maybe theory that if

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 3>enough people think there's a short squeeze happening, yeah, more

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 3>people are going to pile in, right, regardless of whether

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 3>it's truly happening at scale.

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because like a short squeeze is almost like a

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>magical incantation for a meme stock. Right, You're gonna have

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 2>a stock go up seven x without a short squeeze

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 2>just because retail investors thinks there's a short squaze, right,

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's you know, that's game stop. Yeah, well

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 2>there there was one probably, but right, and like the

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>setup here with the huge amount shorted and the huge

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 2>amount long really encourages someone to think, ooh a short

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 2>squeeze and then pile into it. So curse to me

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 2>that my writing about it last week.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Is this your fault.

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Not a lot of meme stops are born in money stuff.

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 2>But who knows?

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 3>There was an interesting jp we're going to down.

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.479
<v Speaker 2>No other fundamentals, don't justify.

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>This, Yeah, exactly.

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 3>It downgraded them to underweight from neutrals, saying it has

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 3>an unsustainable valuation not supported by them.

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Raise their price target, yes, because their pricever is like

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 2>one hundred bucks or whatever. And then it goes to

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>seven hundred and they're like, okay, well now it's a

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 2>sell at two hundred.

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Well they boosted the price target to account for capital

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 3>markets opportunity. And this is what I wanted to bring

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 3>to your attention that they wrote we view the recent

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary quote short squeeze driven rally and avis budget shares

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 3>as a potentially significant opportunity for management to create lasting

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 3>value via opportunistic capital market transactions.

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about that when you're a meme stock

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 2>and you say, okay, we're going to rip off an ATM.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Like that works, right, That's become like a standard piece

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 2>of the playbook. Now you to at the market stock

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>offering to take advantage of your memestock status. It's tougher

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 2>when you are like nominally purely a short squeeze, because

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 2>the thing about a stock offering is that like alleviates

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the short squeeze problem. Right, you can sell the shares

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 2>to the shorts or whatever. Right. Yeah, So when people

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 2>are like really amped for short squeezes, they get mad

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 2>if the company talks about issuing stock because that like

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 2>somehow dew flights to the short squeeze. But sure, right,

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean if your stack's at seven hundred, sew some stock. Yeah,

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 2>And I was wondering if they if they would do

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>some sort of at the market offering. And it's it's trickier.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, has the moment passed?

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 2>The stock was down Tuesday was the peak, and it's

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're recording this on Thursday, it's up two

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty dollars or something, which is you know, yeah,

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 2>like has the moment passed? It's doubled in the last

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 2>month for no reason. It's still a good deal, but

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 2>it's not seven hundred.

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, at least JP Morgan thinks that what's the price

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 3>start now? Their price target is one hundred and sixty

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 3>five dollars. It was one hundred and twenty three dollars.

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 3>We'll see earnings are next week.

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 2>You can be a Bye at one twenty three and

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the stocks at one hundred, and then you're a cell

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>at one sixty five when the stock is at seven hundred.

0:11:50.520 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>There you go, speaking of stocks.

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Should I about SpaceX?

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Probably public. I can't wait.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 2>You'll have to wait. It's supposedly going public in June.

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 3>I know there's no real guarantee of that, that's true,

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 3>especially if they want to do some interesting M and A.

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>I love it so much. Decided to buy Cursor, Yeah,

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 2>for like reasons, like they're.

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 3>A fundamental reasons.

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Then Thomson stra Techery has a nice piece about

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 2>why this makes sense, right, I mean, like SpaceX has

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX is a rocket company, but it's also an AI company,

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 2>And as an AI company, it's like quite good at

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>getting chips and building data centers and just sort of

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 2>like infrastructure. Yes, but you know it's a hot mess

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 2>in terms of building a model, and so it seems

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit like they're importing a AI lab into that,

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, use their AI infrastructure, which makes sense, right.

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 2>It turns out like the big use case for AI

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 2>right now is coding tools and XAI fell behind in

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 2>the coding tools race and Cursor had a lead in

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 2>the coding tools race, and you know, maybe even the

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 2>MOS of chips will help with that. So it makes sense.

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 2>But the problem with it is that theoretically SpaceX is

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 2>going public in June, yeah, and it's.

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.479
<v Speaker 3>April and not for much longer either.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>No, And traditionally, when you go public, you like, you know,

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>disclose information about your business, and like SpaceX's business is

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 2>changing from week to week, as you can tell from

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the fact that it's called SpaceX and we're talking about

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 2>its AI business.

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, data centers in.

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Space, Data centers in space.

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, it's real, Matt, it's.

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Something, it's it's it's really going to be a part

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 2>of the pitch. But the point is you can't like

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 2>acquire Cursor, generate pro form of financials, put the pro

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 2>form of financials into the prospectus, run it by the

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 2>SEC get the auditors to seign off, educate the research

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 2>analysts about it, and go public in June. If you're

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 2>signing that deal in April. So they're not doing that.

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 2>They're like, we're gonna buy Cursor, but we gotta do

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 2>it after the IPI, So just put a pin in that,

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 2>telling everyone we're planning it now, but no promises, no

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 2>promises that are certain enough to require us to realize

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the IPI perspectives.

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if in the meantime you see another bitter emerge.

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 2>It's an interesting question. I was thinking the opposite, which is,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 2>like Elon Musk has some track record of changing his

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 2>mind about m and a mm hmm, particularly here, Like

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 2>it seems apparent that this is not like they're signing

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a deal and then meeting once a week on a

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 2>conference room to negotiate into CREATIONIA. It's pretty clear that

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 2>like those guys are going to work at SpaceX tomorrow,

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, so, like they have a lot of time

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 2>to fall out of love with Elon Musk, or for

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 2>him to fall out of love with them, and if

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 2>he changes his mind, he has to pay a ten

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar breakup fee. Break up He's like traditionally are like,

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, on the order of two percent of deal,

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and this one is seventeen percent of deal value.

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say, I mean even compared to

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 3>like the Warner Brothers Discovery breakup like this.

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 2>It's an enormous breakup fee.

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 2>And here's why. One because it's not like a signed deal.

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit weirder, so it's like buying an

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 2>option rather than like really signing a deal with a

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 2>breakup fee. And two, he has a track record, you.

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Know, Twitter, which is part of XAI.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Which is part of When Musk was like trying to

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 2>get out of the Twitter deal, I had so many

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 2>people email me and I kept thinking about it, like,

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 2>is this going to affect his ability to do m

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 2>and A in the future. Will people be hesitant to

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 2>sign MNA deals with Elon Musk in the future after

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>he flaked on this one? And he's the answer, Yeah,

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 2>you gotta pay a lot of money.

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Because it is interesting that Musk's ambitions here are bumping

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 3>up against like real human timelines. If he did want

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 3>to really buy Cursor, he can't do it before the IPO.

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 3>It just physically can't happen.

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 2>You say, physically, Like the jerker is always that Elon

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Musk is constrained only by the laws physics about the

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 2>laws of friends at the SEC, and you could imagine,

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, him yelling at the lawyers who like, please

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 2>don't close another deal between now and the IPO. You

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>can imagine being like, ad, it's just doing physically impossible.

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 2>For whatever reason they didn't do it, they decided to

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>hold off.

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 3>It pours cold water also on some of the speculation

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 3>of SpaceX combining with Tesla, because it kind of I

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 3>don't think for the IPO it does.

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 2>It's not going to come out before the IPO.

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 2>So the other thing that I wrote about SpaceX this

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 2>week is that SpaceX is going public with dual class stock,

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>so I don't know the perspectives is not public and

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 2>like it's you know, they're blanks anyway. But I don't

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 2>know how much Elon Musk owns, but like he will

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 2>have ten times voting stock he shares with ten votes

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 2>per share, so he will control SpaceX probably, which makes

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 2>sense because one, if you're investing in SpaceX, you are

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 2>clearly buying into the Elon Musk machine. And two, from

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 2>his perspective, you know, like he said about Tesla, I

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 2>don't want to build a robot army at Tesla if

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't control it. And all the more so when

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 2>he's building like an intergalactic robot army to colonize Mars

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>and data center, you know, all this stuff, like he

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 2>needs to control it. So I get it. He's going

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 2>to control SpaceX. It's going to go public with du

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 2>a class stock. Tesla did not go public with du

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 2>a class stock. And you can't really add it afterwards,

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 2>like even if you get the shaoulders to vote to

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 2>approve it, like the stock exchange rules like they don't.

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 2>They don't like it. So he can't really add du

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a class stock in Tesla. And so there's these weird things.

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Every few years he gets a trillion dollar payback that

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 2>then we talk about, you know, whether that's legal. It

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be a trillion dollar pay package if they're just

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 2>like you get ten times as many votes. Anyway, there

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 2>is an obvious solution to all of these problems, which

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 2>is you take SpaceX public with dual class stock. Elon

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Musk controls the votes and then two weeks later, maybe

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 2>two weeks is optimistic. Two months later and then the

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 2>combined company has doll class stock and Elon Musk controls

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 2>both of them forever, and like they both you know,

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 2>there's some overlap in like they're both building robot armies.

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Yes, like you know you only need one company building

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 3>robot robot army.

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, you wouldn't want the robot armies to fight.

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean I would like.

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 4>To see that.

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, actually that would be probably probably like give them

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 2>good for humanity. Elon Musk's root armies fight and annihilate

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 2>each other, like somewhere off the shoulders of Oryon, you know, like.

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Just a theory.

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 3>I want to get your take on. Is you know

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Tesla reported earnings on Wednesday, broke those on live TV.

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 3>But right now Tesla is the only public option to

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 3>get into the Elon Musk machine, as you call it.

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I do wonder if SpaceX going public takes the shine

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 3>off of Tesla and sort of collapses the Elon Musk

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 3>premium there.

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's very possible. I think it's so interesting

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 2>to me that Tesla spends so much time talking about

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 2>AI and robots, and it's like you got to sprinkle

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 2>a little of the AI dust on both of them.

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, you can't just do all the AI stuff

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 2>in the AI company, because then you don't have the

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 2>AI stuff in the other company. It's possible that the

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 2>only public musk company, Premium, goes away, but then the

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 2>possible merger with SpaceX Premium comes in and so nothing.

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a passing of the baton there.

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Tessa's trading. It's something like one hundred and eighty

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 3>three times forward earnings.

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Yeah, SpaceX is allegedly going public at

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 2>one hundred times forwards revenue.

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be so fun. I keep thinking about

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 3>what I need to do between now and the time

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 3>I give birth, Like the events I have to live through.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I have to live through Milkin, and I have to

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 3>live through the SpaceX Ipo. I have to see them, right,

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 3>and then I can have a child.

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 2>Right, So please go publican dream life highlights in the

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 2>coming year SpaceX Ipo.

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Birth of I'm to tell my child about this.

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 2>Mommy, Where were you space Ex went public?

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Let me tell you.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 3>I hate the word zumping.

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I was talking to my group chat about

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 2>how much we all hate the work.

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, this is America, right.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I did not realize it's like a British real estate term,

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 2>and so I'm less offended by it now because it

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 2>likes sure fair, But no, it's a it's the term

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 2>for like when you have a deal to buy a

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 2>house and then someone else offer the higher price and

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>you lose your deal to why house. And so there's

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg story this week about that happened dads fund

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>portfolio managers. Yes, because the market for portfolio managers that

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 2>multi strategy hedge funds is so tight that people who

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 2>have quit their jobs and accepted new offers to go

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 2>to other hedgephnes or while on gardening move getting poached

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 2>at still higher offers to go to still other hedgephones

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 2>are often to go back to their original hedge one.

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 2>And what I read about is like there's a time

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 2>value of hedgehod portfolio managers, where like ordinarily if you

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>hire a hedge fund manager, if you hire a portfolio manager,

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 2>you should expect to have to wait about a year

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 2>for them to serve out their gardening leave. And that's

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 2>a long time to wait, and you've got big plans.

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 2>And so if you can find someone who's already served

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 2>out eleven months of their gardening leave, they can start

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 2>next month. Yeah, and so the hedge fund managers who

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 2>are currently sitting out on gardening leave are in some

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 2>sense the most desirable candidates, and so of course people

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 2>bid them up.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. A different term which I like is interception trade,

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 3>which is good American football term that you just say

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 3>you have to get the timing just right, which is

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 3>called that hard. Well, yeah, but it's made easier if

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 3>you are a recruiter and you have list yea of

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 3>who you've placed in.

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>You get someone a nice deal at a new hedge fund,

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 2>and you set a calendar reminder for like eleven and

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 2>a half months to check in with them so you

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 2>can get them a higher offer. It is pretty evil.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 2>The thing that I most endorsed is like people get

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 2>in that bag by negotiating up their offers, Like I'm

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 2>all for it.

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, I love this quote. It's from Mark Greenberg, who

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 3>is a former managing director at Point seventy two who

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 3>now trained traders. You're talking about a group of people

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 3>who are economic animals. They'll pay lip service to quality

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 3>of life and where they live and the type of

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 3>people that they're working for. But at the end of

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 3>the day. One of the reasons the large firms have

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 3>been so successful is because they can pay more they can.

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, this is also pure like it's just like you're

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 2>good at profiting from optionality and spotting opportunities, Like it

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 2>would be disappointing if you weren't doing this.

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it does seem like a vicious price spirral, though,

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, what does it end?

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't end, you know, it ends if the strategy

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 2>is not working. I don't know. I should mention there's

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 2>as a lawsuit. Yeah, Schoenfeld suit a guy who worked

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 2>at Millennium. Schoenfeld did like long, painful, vigorous negotiations to

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 2>hire him. They signed an employment agreement with him, They

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>signed a confidentiality agreement, and of course, of course, once

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 2>he has that, he goes to his bosses at Millennium

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 2>and is like, so, and Millennium.

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 3>What do you think matched?

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 2>And stay Yeah, which like you know, more powered to him.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Schonfeld suit him Yeah, million dollars.

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 3>His name is Adam Grunfeld, which is sort of like Graefeld.

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, apparently he held himself out during negotiations as

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 3>a long term addition to Schoenfeld, capable not only of

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 3>generating returns through his own trading strategies, but also contributing

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 3>to the firm's intellectual capital. Of course, that's something it

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 3>doesn't see. It doesn't seem that different of a playbook

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 3>than any other industry, you know, sort of interview and

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 3>chop yourself around and then you bring it back.

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 2>The unusual thing is getting sued.

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Also, eleven million dollars is quite enough. But to

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 3>that point, apparently Schoenfeld said that it had contemplated the

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 3>possibility that Grunfeld might reneg on.

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 2>The Yeah, every job in the world.

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I guess we're talking about a lot more

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 3>dollar signs and like you said, lawsuits.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's very striking. One thing I was thinking

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 2>about when I first read about the interception trade was

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the reason the interception trade works is that someone who

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 2>is eleven months into their twelve month gardening leave is

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 2>more valuable than someone who's just you know, who's got

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 2>their current job and has twelve months of gardening leave

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 2>to serve. And like, one way to prevent that would

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 2>be if your new job gave you a non compete

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 2>before starting at your new job. But I don't think

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 2>you can do it. I don't think you can sign

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 2>a new non compete while you're still in the non

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 2>compete from your old.

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Job, right, Yeah, but maybe that kind of.

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Happened here, Yeah, right where he signed the employment agreement.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 2>And so they're like, no, no, no, you can't leave to

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 2>your original job because you already signed our employment agreement.

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like he has a non compete with his

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 2>original job.

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Damn not.

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 3>Really, couldn't Millennium foot to eleven million dollars?

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 2>If you're leaving a job that has restricted stock, it's

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 2>fairly traditional for your new employer to make you whole. Right,

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 2>couldn't Millennium foot the eleven million dollar belt sure of it?

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Rather than if no one has to? I don't know.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like, the argument is that he signed a

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 2>binding employment agreement with an eleven million dollars liquid liquidated damages,

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 2>Claus saying, if you don't show up for any reason,

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 2>you have to pay US eleven million dollars to compensate

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 2>for our lost opportunity here, which is not crazy, Like,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 2>it's just, you know, it's not how It's not how

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the world works in most employment situations, but apparently maybe

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 2>it works in punch ups and that was The Money

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Stuff Podcast.

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm Matt Levine and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:25:57.720 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 2>You can find my work by subscribing to the money

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot.

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV every

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 3>day on the Clothes between three and five pm Eastern.

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 2>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us a

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 2>question and we might answer it on the air.

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 3>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 3>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 3>people find the show.

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 2>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anamasarakus Moses Onam

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 2>and Alexis.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 3>HoTT Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Amy Keen is our executive producer. Thanks for listening to

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 2>The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be back next week with

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 2>more stuff.