WEBVTT - MTA Homing In On Near-Term $33 Billion Upgrade Plan (Podcast)

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P and L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Joining

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>us now to tell us about municipal finance and green

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>finance is Pat McCoy, Finance director for the New York

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Metropolitan Transportation Authority. He directs the issuance of over three

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in municipal bonds annually. Pat McCoy, thank you

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us. Thanks for having me. Now.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>You're responsible for the m t a's thirty four billion

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar debt portfolio. How much of that would you like

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to see go into green on the initiatives? Sure well.

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Our our dead outstanding is actually closer to forty billion now,

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>so UM, look, we everything we do to move people

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>around this city on electrified rail, be it the subways

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>or commuter rails, is inherently green, and we've worked with

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the Climate Bonds Initiative to UM to issue bonds that

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>labeled green, and as we continue to roll out our

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>funding of our capital program through the issuance of bonds,

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.559
<v Speaker 1>I would expect that all of our transportation revenue bond

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>or dedicated tax fund bond issues will be green. Pat

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>do you ride the subway? I do? I do. I

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I commute from Terrytown in Westchester, so I take Metro

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>north to Grand Central and then I take the lex

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>line down here to our office at too Broadway. What

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>project would you most like to see done next? Well,

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have such a wide variety of projects

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're looking to fund. Clearly the most critical our

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, signalization and our subways to improve service there

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and to enable us to put more trains on the

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>rails and move people around faster. That's a big project.

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not funded, and we're aggressively looking to put that

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>program together and find funding. How much it cost. The

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 1>estimates are in the in the many billions. We don't

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>have a firm estimate at this point, but it will

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>be a very expensive project. Now, you have a lot

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of experience dealing with the financing of a variety of projects,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>not only in your role is at the m T. A.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>But also in previous roles, what can you tell people

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>who might be skeptical about green bond initiatives why you

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 1>believe they work, and maybe explain a little bit about

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the attractiveness to the marketplace. Sure, you know, the green

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>bond space, in our view is a natural fit to

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>what the m t A is all about. As I said,

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but according to the Climate Bonds Initiative Low Low Carbon

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Transport criteria, everything we do to move people on rails

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is green. That's that in and of itself is important.

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think the MTA needs to get recognition in

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the market for doing, for undertaking activity that is inherently green.

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But what does that mean when you say green? Good

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>good good question. So we estimate that um, every trip

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>on public transportation saves or avoids about ten pounds of

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>greenhouse gases going into the atmosphere. No, on an annualized basis,

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that's about a nineteen million metric ton number, because the

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>alternative is taking some kind of fossil fuel based transport exactly.

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So the alternative of people riding around in cars typically

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>one person, one car, UM, so we avoid nineteen million

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>metric tons going into the atmosphere every year, we spend

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>about two million metric tons to provide the service that

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we do, so the net benefit of seventeen million metric

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>tons avoided is inherently good for our region, for our state,

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and for the for the economy. When you said that

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the total debt load right now is forty billion dollars, UH,

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I imagine it would climb considerably if all the projects

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you would like to see done actually get okayed. In

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the sign off, we had Richard Ravage, the former Lieutenant

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Governor of New York, on our program a couple of

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>months ago, and he said, you know, the MTA hasn't

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>conducted a thorough study of even what would be required

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>to fix the subways and exactly what the costs would be.

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that accurate? Well, you know, like, I have a

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of respect for Dick. He's a friend, and I

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>think he is a wonderful UM UH spokesperson for infrastructure generally. UM.

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>What I'll say is that we're in the throes of

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>working on what we call our twenty year Needs Assessment,

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>which essentially UH mandates that all of our agencies, Transit Authority,

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the railroads, bridges and tunnels undertake a really thorough top

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>to bottom review of all of our infrastructure needs. That

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>will inform how we put together our next capital program,

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 1>and that will be the capital program will be a

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>five year capital program. Our current program the fifteen to

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen period is thirty three point five billion. So, you know,

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say Dick's off base on this.

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>What I would say is that, you know, we're we're

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>coming up with a new twenty year needs assessment that's

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>going to really lay out what those critical priorities are

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>for the coming capital investment cycle. How much of that

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars or so would be financed through the

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>bond market versus through state or city funding. Sure, so,

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>bonds are an important funding uh component to the capital programs,

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>but not the only thing. We rely on. The cornerstone

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of our capital investment cycle is the federal government through

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>participation in the fifty three oh seven and the fifty

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>three oh nine, the formula programs, the new starts programs,

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, for example for Second Avenue subway, and then

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>of course the state and the city kick in. So

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>bonds have typically been in that um what about a third.

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It varies, you know, it varies by program, by by

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>revenue sources the state can identify for us to lever.

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>But it will be an important piece of the picture,

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>all right. Which which train line is going to get

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>renovated next? That hasn't been announced. I wish I could

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>tell you. I don't know what you're looking at it

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixteen Station of the Sea. I think that

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that's next. I'm very excited about that. Fat mcoy, Fat

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>McCoy find insurrector for the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I sent a plaque. Yeah, that was you know, in

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of public venues, you know, like benches in

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Central Park, you know, you can get someone to sponsor

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>train station. It's true, It's true. I've I've spent a

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of my life in train stations. Pat McCoy, thank

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you again for joining us. Pleasure to be here. Thank you.

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>We are here. We are very lucky to say with

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive and the chairman of Build America Mutual,

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>Sean McCarthy and Bob cochrane um. And you know, it's interesting.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a number of stories about unprecedented outflows from

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a few municipal bond funds. We've seen rates rise just

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>across the board is as benchmarks rise, and certainly that's

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the same story for municipal bonds. And I want to

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>start with Sean, what does this mean for municipalities that

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>are hoping to finance infrastructure projects or anything else three

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>music bi bond market? How are they dealing with or

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>planning around the increasing rates we've seen. So it's interesting

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to UM two points. The first is that interest rates

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>are rising because the economy is strong UM. And one

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>thing to look at is what is the revenue strength

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>or stream that state and local governments have right now?

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>And if we look at that over the past year,

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it's increased by six point seven So the capacity for

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>municipalities to actually issue debt for new money UM has

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>increased the last year. Because it's really interesting that you

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>say that, I'm just thinking to myself, is it even

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>across the board or there's certain areas that have actually

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in their tax revenues increased dramatically. Well, other places have

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>seen them DECLIMBA. Generally, it's increased in some places quite

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit more UM so that as the economy has increased,

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>interest rates have gone up, and generally that capacity for

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>state and local governments has increased. So if you look

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>at it this year. Actually, UM, there's been a fourteen

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>percent increase in a spending by state and local governments

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>on infrastructure. So that's a total of two hundred and

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>ninety three billion dollars in construction, and that would be

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>an increase of thirty six billion dollars, so it's not insignificant.

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Bob Cochrane, I'm wondering if you could just step back

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>for a second and describe why you and Sean decided

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to start this firm. You both worked at f S

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>A that was acquired by Assured. What makes Build America

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>BAM different not only in its ownership structure, but in

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of municipal debt that it underwrites that it

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>guarantees rather right, So Sean and I got together. We

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>had we've been together as business partners for over thirty

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>years UM, even prior to f s A right build

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in three days and builds up at for a while.

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh So we had a lot of experience in the industry,

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>have a love of the industry and a lot of

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the people that work in it. UM. We took a

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of years off and as you know, through the

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, most of the companies didn't make it. We

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>tried to assess what we thought were the causes and

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>results of that, and UH, could we build a better company,

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a better business model that would address what we thought

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>were the problems that led to UH, some of the

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>failures in two thousand and eight nine and Build American

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Mutual was a result of that collaboration. We spent almost

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>two years um sort of working through that plan and

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>raising the capital to start the company, and UH, it's

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a BAM as a mutual insurance company, I think probably

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the first one created in New York and at least

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>forty ye fifty years. And the reason we did that

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>so that the issuers, the public entities that use insurance

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>would essentially be our shareholders are members. And the reason

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for that is we're not driven by high returns on equity.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Were driven by high accumulation of capital and the safety

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of the bonds that we ensure for investors. So Sean,

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>given that, and given that it's been a really benevolent

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>backdrop to issue debt over the past eight years ten years,

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>why is there this impression that a lot of local

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and state municipalities have declined to issue debt to pay

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for big infrastructure projects. Why are we hearing this push

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>about the need for a cold rebuilding of American infrastructure. Well,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a good question. UM. First and foremost, remember that

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>state and local governments represent nine of the financing for

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure in the nation. So when people think has the

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>federal government passed to bill that's going to UH finance

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>state and local governments infrastructure in the country, it's really

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>state local governments that are doing that. They are the

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>really the engine behind infrastructure finance. UH. The thing I

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>mentioned before is directly related to that, and that is

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that UM municipalities, their revenue UH strength has

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>been increasing since the recession. That happens gradually as tax

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:29.479
<v Speaker 1>bases grow, real estate values increase, and that enables municipalities

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to then commit to new projects when when things are

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in a recession, they actually are trying to claw back

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that they keep themselves in in a

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>fiscally sound position. So it's interesting for UM for for

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>BAM because as a mutual insurance company, we do a

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>number of things that are unique. One is that we

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>provide credit profiles, a financial description of each credit that

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we do. We updated every year. It's available for free

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on our website, and part of the logical outgrowth of

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that is our green Star program. So the speaker before

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>us UH, Andrew Wyley, was talking about um UH green bonds.

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>What we have recently launched is an examination within the

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>credit analysis we already do on each credit about the

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>credits that we analyze will qualify as green bonds into

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the market. So we think that over UM the near

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and long term will be help the market understand and

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>expand the green bond initiative, which really comes down to

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>environmental and climate appropriate bonds, water treatment, water purification, UH,

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy exactly, and all those things I think pair

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>up very well with what UM BAM does you know

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>right now, we've been in writing business for six years. UH.

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>That's UH comprises fifty three billion dollars worth of municipal

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>bonds for six thousand, five hundred different issuers. So when

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you said what's different about what we do, one of

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the things that different is we are looking at sort

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of core municipal finance, so general obligation bonds, revenue bonds

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>from taxes. It's really straight down the middle of the

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>fairway in terms of what is classically municipal finance. And

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>for the investing market that's important because they can look

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>at us as ultimate transparency, look at every credit on

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>our website, look at the financial strength of our double

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>A from Standard and pores, and look at our commitment

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>as being the only muni only municipal guaranteur. So if

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you think about it in those terms, what happened in

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, There wasn't municipal bonds that defaulted in mass

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>there was other things that happened. And BAM's committed to

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we only do municipal finance and the

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>core of that business is state and local governments. There

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the engine behind the growth and rehabilitation of infrastructure in

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the market. And finally, if you just think about what's

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>the demand. You know, the American Society of Civil Engineers

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>has projected a two hundred billion dollar need for additional

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>financing over the next ten years in infrastructure. And just

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>real quickly, in thirty seconds, do you think that that's

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be difficult to finance given the fact that

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>rates are rising up more and potentially the credit cycle

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>could could turn. Well. First of all, Sean, that's two

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion a year. More so two trillion over the

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>next ten years that we have to increase UM. Interest

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>rates are definitely a factor, because if we're gonna achieve

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that kind of funding rate over and above what the

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>municipal market is already achieving, which is about two d

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and fifty billion a year in new money financing, UM,

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that's those bonds. I've got to It's got to be

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>financed with some sort of long term debt, municipal bonds

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or and it's got to be paid back over time

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>with the revenue stream. Thanks very much, gentleman. Bob cochrane, Chairman,

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Build America Mutual, Sean McCarthy, chief executive Officer, Build America Mutual.

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>We are focusing today on Caterpillar, which has been a

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>bell weather of global growth, and today that bell weather

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is not signaling something positive joining us now as Brooks

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Sutherland Bloombroock Opinion industrials columnists and brook I'm just wondering.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Caterpillar didn't boost its outlook for the year,

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>which analysts had expected, but was it really so bad

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>this report or our investors simply looking for the negative

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>right now because they're feeling a skittish and are looking

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to take profits right now. I think it's a little

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of both. I mean, I think what's really key

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind here is that nobody's saying that

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>growth is all of a sudden going to stop and

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start to see sales decline at these

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>industrial companies. It's all about where the momentum is heading.

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think what Caterpillars report indicated is that the

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>sales momentum is slowing, so you're not You're still going

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to see growth, but you're probably not going to see

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it at the rates that we I've been seeing. A

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>part of that is just lapping tougher comparisons, but there's

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>also questions about how demand is going to hold up

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in some of these markets. And as Caterpillar pushes through

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>price increases to offset some of these rising raw material

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>costs amid the trade war, you know, could that ultimately

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>affect demand and sort of accelerate the grows slowdown that

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we're already seeing naturally as we get later in the

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>economic cycle. Brooke, if you happen to be a company

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that is buying or leasing a Caterpillar, let's say, off

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>highway truck, you know, in the mining industry, or construction business.

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Those items, they're like three and a half million dollars

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>just for the one time purchase. If you're financing it,

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>things are going to get more expensive. If you're buying

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it raw material inputs are making it more expensive. What

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>has happened in three months? How come we didn't hear

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this three months ago in the last earnings report? You know,

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we did. I think this price cost headwind

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>has been a matter of debate for the bulk of

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. Is you know, people sort of digest the tariffs,

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and especially as the tariff actions have escalated, I think

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the big question is how companies are going to be

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>handling this. And you make a good point that you know,

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>if Caterpillar raises its prices, those customers are also seeing

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>rising costs on their end, so their ability to absorb

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>those price increases as really gets to the heart of

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>what the issue is here is are they willing to

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>tolerate that and continue buying equipment or do they just

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, decide to hold off on some of these

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>replacement purchases or especially new equipment purchases. Do we get

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a sense of which industries were the most positive for

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Caterpillar and which were the most negative. In other words,

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>are there sectors of their business that are doing better

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>or worse? Uh? Yeah. And so they also reported their

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>September sales on Monday night, and that's on a three

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>month rolling average basis. And what you saw there was

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a slight slowdown in construction equipment sales growth um, and

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that was offset by you know, pretty strong momentum in

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>its mining segment, which makes sense because mining is coming

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>back from a pretty severe downturn. But you are seeing

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that weakness and construction and sort

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of you couple that with a lot of the negative

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>sentiment that we've been hearing for home builder stocks and

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>for you know, construction in general. And I think that

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is definitely something that investors are picking up on today.

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's actually a really interesting point I was going

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to go to that. I mean, does this signal something

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>broader about the slowdown in the in the home building

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>sector and just sort of in general about some of

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the the industries that have reported the recovery so far

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 1>really slowing down and perhaps an even more meaningful way

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>than people have realized. I think, you know, a lot

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>of what you're seeing is sort of coming up on

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the peak in the cycle, and that affects companies in

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>different ways. So three M also reported today and its

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>stock is getting crushed, and a lot of the slowdown

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that it saw is in these shorter cycle markets, so automotive, electronics,

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>UM healthcare as well, and some of those have had

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>stronger momentum for a longer stretch of time. And I

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>would also put UM residential construction, home building in that

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they've they've been on this recovery track for a longer period,

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and so it makes sense that we might be nearing

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the peak of that versus some of these longer cycle businesses,

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>like I think of United Technologies, which is also about

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>today and it's aerospace business. I mean, it takes those

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>orders very far in advance. You don't just show up

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at United Technologies and buy a jet engine. So those backlogs,

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>those order rates should help United Technologies and companies in

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>those later cycle businesses maintain momentum through twenty nineteen. But

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>as you sort of look at these dynamics, I think

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you can read into some of the trends we're seeing

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>at the shorter cycle companies that that we might be

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>nearer a turning point than Uh, than not. I want

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to thank you very much for being with us. A

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>brook Southerland, of course expert in all things having to

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>do with mergers, acquisitions and just general corporate go ahead.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Something really strange because s Brooke is talking about home

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>builders and how there has been this slowdown. Told Brothers,

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest home builders. Their shares are up

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>today nearly two per sense, so go figure. There actually

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is some strength today and home builders, even though there

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is a generally negative sentiment and frankly homebuilder stocks, as

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Dave Wilson has pointed out in his chart of the day,

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>actually a editor bear markets. So perhaps some people are

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing some opportunities. President Donald Trump is set to meet

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Chinese President Jijing Ping at the Group of

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Twenty Nations summit in Buenosaurus. The topic, of course, is

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>going to be trade disputes and the uh. The information

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.959
<v Speaker 1>comes from the White House Economic Advisor Larry Cudlow, and

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 1>here to tell us more about the dispute and whether

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it presents some opportunities is John Authors of Bloomberg Opinion.

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>John welcome as always and as the senior markets editor

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg. I wonder if you could just describe emerging markets.

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Does China still count as an emerging market? Yes, I

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>mean to something extent. There's still an argument about whether

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's even as far as emerging, given that it still

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't open its markets as freely to to the outside

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>world as it should. That's why we've had the annual

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>excitement over whether ms c I is going to, you know,

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the the index group that largely controls the description of

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, whether MSc AND is going to be including

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese A shares in its index. But it doesn't

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.719
<v Speaker 1>really matter terribly which measure of China you take at

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>the moment there, they're all down quite badly over the

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>last six months. Yeah. John. First of all, I want

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to just welcome you to Bloomberg because you spend nearly

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>three years at the financial time a variety of positions,

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and it is a coup for us that you joined us.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So I just want to say congratulations. Um John, I

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 1>want to just take a step back and look at

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>the broader cell off today in markets, and on a

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>certain level it's almost comforting, and I'll tell you why,

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>because you're not seeing bonds and stocks all off in tandem.

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm wondering from your perspective, do you think that

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.479
<v Speaker 1>this is actually um somewhat more predictable, that basically this

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>is the market more broadly saying to the photo reserve,

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>slow down. Growth is going to slow going forward. Higher

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>input costs are going to weigh on companies, and things

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>are just going to take a breather for a minute.

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that the interpretation here, that's one interpretation

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of it, certainly, you know, not not necessarily an unreasonable one.

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Another way of looking at it, which would be relatively healthy,

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>although it would suggest that the President might have been

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a little unwise to make the stock market such a

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>measure of his success is that we might finally be

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>getting to the long awaited point when Main Streets gains

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>somewhat at the expense of Wall Street that you're seeing, uh,

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, a number of the companies that have disappointed

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and endings have cited the problems of rising costs, including

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>labor costs. Obviously, that's good news for the very many,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>very frustrated people here in the US who have suffered

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>sluggish wage growth for a long time. Similarly, as the

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>economy strengthens and and rates go up, that makes it

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>harder harder sledding to a harder sledding to make money

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>out of the stock market. But it's it suggests that

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 1>there is more genuine robust health out here. So to

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>some extent um, this is what had been hoped for

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>for a while. You could argue, yes, that it's a

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's a healthy form of growth. The problem, there

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is a problem. The problem probably arises with, as we

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, what exactly is going on in China. We're

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in a bipolar world in many senses in the moment

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that there are two economies that count, the US and China,

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and some of the things that are happening in China

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>cannot be ascribed merely to trade tensions which are yet

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>seriously to bite, and they play in the art. Concerning John,

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you're famous for taking the long view, and you're an

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>investor that takes the long view. Where would you be

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>telling people to look for prospective assets to purchase somewhere

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>other than the US, more or less anywhere other than

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the US. Frankly, I mean in terms of in the

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:19.199
<v Speaker 1>very long term. The it's very hard to dispute the

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>notion that the single most important factor in the return

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>you'll get in the end is how much you paid

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>for it at the start. There are almost no stock

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>markets out there that look particularly expensive other than the US,

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>which I've been in various arguments with the people. Now

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that my blue and my email is starting to regularly

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>go out from from Bloomberg, and so Bloomberg readers are

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>discovering because I think US stocks are overpriced. My beloved

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>FT readers have known that for a while. If US

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>stocks are plainly overpriced, if you don't believe it, don't

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>believe it, send me in an email and I'll try

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to convince you otherwise. But but, but outside of the US,

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>most of the world has interesting characteristics to it. You

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>can certainly argue whether some of them, more apparently cheap

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>markets are value traps. The fact that the cheapest mainstream

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>stock market at the moment is Russia does tell you

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>something about why it might be cheap right there. But

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>outside the US, they're interesting opportunities. So is Italy interesting

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>or is it Italy is fascinating? I would even say

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>it's very entertaining. You have to be entertaining. No, No,

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really if you want to make it, if

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:32.199
<v Speaker 1>you if you want to try to be clever and

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>make an opportunity by opportunistic by don't do it now

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in Italy because I don't see a way in which

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>this political standoff is resolved quickly. This isn't Greece. The

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Italians really can try to call the Europeans bluff, and

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the Europeans really can't have bring the kind of leverage

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>against Italy that they used against Greece, but the bond

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>market can. So this is this is not the time

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to dive in yet unless you really feel like you

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>might like mega millions. It might work out for you,

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't recommend it my feet. It might be

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the jackpot for one point six billion

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar uh pool that's out there for the lottery that

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>nobody has won yet. John Author's senior markets editor for Bloomberg.

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>We welcome him to Bloomberg. We're thrilled that he has

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>joined us. We really appreciate you joining us right now.

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio