1 00:00:00,800 --> 00:00:03,640 Speaker 1: On the beck Doll Cast, the questions asked if movies 2 00:00:03,680 --> 00:00:07,320 Speaker 1: have women and um are all their discussions just boyfriends 3 00:00:07,320 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: and husbands or do they have individualism? The patriarchy? Zef 4 00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:16,800 Speaker 1: invest start changing it with the Bedel Cast. Hi, everybody, 5 00:00:16,960 --> 00:00:20,760 Speaker 1: welcome to the Beck del Cast. My name is Jamie Loftus, 6 00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:24,560 Speaker 1: my name is Caitlin Darante, and today we are unlocking 7 00:00:25,239 --> 00:00:29,960 Speaker 1: an episode from our patreon a k A Matreon feed. 8 00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:35,000 Speaker 1: Ever heard of it? And if you haven't, it's time 9 00:00:35,080 --> 00:00:39,360 Speaker 1: to get wise or not. We won't know. Uh. And 10 00:00:39,360 --> 00:00:41,680 Speaker 1: and maybe you're like, oh cool, they unlocked one now 11 00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:43,720 Speaker 1: I don't need to pay for it again. We won't know, 12 00:00:44,520 --> 00:00:47,680 Speaker 1: but you know, don't do that. But don't do that. Also, 13 00:00:47,800 --> 00:00:52,320 Speaker 1: there's still like dozens and dozens and dozens of episodes 14 00:00:52,360 --> 00:00:55,480 Speaker 1: that will never unlock. There's like almost a hundred at 15 00:00:55,480 --> 00:00:57,880 Speaker 1: this point. This show has been on for six hundred 16 00:00:57,960 --> 00:01:01,880 Speaker 1: years at this point. It's true, we're unlocking the Lolita 17 00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:06,240 Speaker 1: episode from our patreon ak matreon today, which we will 18 00:01:06,280 --> 00:01:09,760 Speaker 1: get to in a second. But if you're interested in 19 00:01:10,080 --> 00:01:13,160 Speaker 1: more episodes that are just Caitlin and myself kind of 20 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:16,680 Speaker 1: having a loose fun, this is not actually not a 21 00:01:16,720 --> 00:01:21,399 Speaker 1: good example of that. But but having normally though having 22 00:01:21,440 --> 00:01:24,679 Speaker 1: like a one on one discussion about a movie, you 23 00:01:24,720 --> 00:01:28,199 Speaker 1: can get two episodes on top of the regular feed 24 00:01:28,200 --> 00:01:31,440 Speaker 1: there every month for simply five bucks a month, that's all. 25 00:01:31,480 --> 00:01:34,880 Speaker 1: And there's like there's like seventy or eighty episodes in there. 26 00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:38,039 Speaker 1: If you've run out of main feed episodes, yeah, there's 27 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:39,920 Speaker 1: a lot. We should probably the like we should, I 28 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:42,000 Speaker 1: guess we should say what the Bechtel Cast is because 29 00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:45,120 Speaker 1: we are in the main feed. Yes, so if this 30 00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:50,000 Speaker 1: is your first episode tuning into Lolita, we should go 31 00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:55,800 Speaker 1: off and next we'll tell you what the show is. Yes, 32 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:59,600 Speaker 1: So the Bechtel Cast is our podcast in which we 33 00:02:00,320 --> 00:02:04,880 Speaker 1: discuss films through an intersectional feminist lens, using the Bechtel 34 00:02:04,960 --> 00:02:09,160 Speaker 1: test merely as inspiration for a jumping off point to 35 00:02:09,280 --> 00:02:14,040 Speaker 1: initiate larger, more in depth conversations. And Jamie, what on 36 00:02:14,080 --> 00:02:17,840 Speaker 1: earth is the Bechtel test? Well, the Bechtel test is 37 00:02:18,040 --> 00:02:22,840 Speaker 1: a media metric invented by queer cartoonist Alison Bechtel, sometimes 38 00:02:22,840 --> 00:02:26,920 Speaker 1: called the Bechtel Wallace test, that requires that, for our purposes, 39 00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:31,600 Speaker 1: multiple interpretations of this damn thing. Uh, but for our 40 00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:35,800 Speaker 1: purposes requires that there be two characters with names of 41 00:02:35,880 --> 00:02:40,120 Speaker 1: a marginalized gender talking to each other about something other 42 00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:44,840 Speaker 1: than a man for simply two lines of dialogue. It 43 00:02:44,880 --> 00:02:48,559 Speaker 1: doesn't happen in movies quite a bit, not enough. And furthermore, 44 00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:52,400 Speaker 1: if it does happen, it doesn't even mean that the 45 00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:55,240 Speaker 1: movie is good to women. Sometimes it just happens by 46 00:02:55,440 --> 00:03:00,079 Speaker 1: mistake accident. But it's it's aren't jumping off point for 47 00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:04,640 Speaker 1: for a larger discussion, and uh, today we are talking 48 00:03:04,680 --> 00:03:08,200 Speaker 1: about Lolita because well, first of all, I guess we 49 00:03:08,240 --> 00:03:11,720 Speaker 1: should say this. This episode was recorded about three months ago, 50 00:03:12,600 --> 00:03:15,959 Speaker 1: was recorded like towards the beginning of August. I think, yes, 51 00:03:16,040 --> 00:03:20,680 Speaker 1: it was one of your birthday month picks on the Matrion. 52 00:03:20,960 --> 00:03:23,840 Speaker 1: And normally you would choose your favorite movies for your 53 00:03:23,880 --> 00:03:26,400 Speaker 1: birthday month and the Matreon, but that is not the 54 00:03:26,400 --> 00:03:31,840 Speaker 1: case here. The reason the reason we covered Lolita is 55 00:03:31,880 --> 00:03:36,000 Speaker 1: because throughout the summer and into the fall and now 56 00:03:36,080 --> 00:03:39,600 Speaker 1: it's winter and just time keuthes continuing and things just 57 00:03:39,600 --> 00:03:43,600 Speaker 1: don't get any better. But we've I've been working on 58 00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:46,280 Speaker 1: a show that comes out. If you're listening to this 59 00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:48,920 Speaker 1: on the day of release, starting November twenty three and 60 00:03:49,080 --> 00:03:54,400 Speaker 1: working on a podcast that tracks the history of the 61 00:03:54,520 --> 00:04:00,800 Speaker 1: story of Lolita. So I say this story because the 62 00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:08,200 Speaker 1: adaptations are just out of control, bad and just misrepresenting 63 00:04:08,880 --> 00:04:12,880 Speaker 1: what the story is really about. I feel what You 64 00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:15,680 Speaker 1: can listen to the show for for for nine hours 65 00:04:15,680 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 1: of expansion on that. But uh, basically, yeah, this is 66 00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:25,479 Speaker 1: the first attempt to adapt Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov to 67 00:04:25,960 --> 00:04:31,640 Speaker 1: a um to a larger medium, and there's just it's 68 00:04:32,800 --> 00:04:37,280 Speaker 1: so okay. First of all, plug Lolita podcast comes out 69 00:04:37,520 --> 00:04:41,200 Speaker 1: on November twenty three, and then it's released every Monday. Uh, 70 00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:44,520 Speaker 1: there's gonna be ten episodes. We're we're gonna be talking 71 00:04:45,279 --> 00:04:47,919 Speaker 1: with I keep saying it's so, I keep saying we 72 00:04:48,000 --> 00:04:51,560 Speaker 1: because I'm so used to like not being alone. Yeah, 73 00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:54,200 Speaker 1: I'm not involved in this. It is just me. It's 74 00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:57,440 Speaker 1: just it's I say we. And then I'm also just 75 00:04:57,520 --> 00:05:02,239 Speaker 1: like me and just all of uh my my friends 76 00:05:02,279 --> 00:05:06,240 Speaker 1: that live inside of my brain. But uh, yeah, no, 77 00:05:06,360 --> 00:05:09,800 Speaker 1: I'm I'm talking to a lot of people about just 78 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:13,760 Speaker 1: kind of like tracking this story and analyzing the book. 79 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:17,599 Speaker 1: And then I talked to several psychologists who have worked 80 00:05:18,160 --> 00:05:22,839 Speaker 1: with victims of child abuse, Um, I talk with people 81 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:25,279 Speaker 1: who are involved in some of these adaptations. I talked 82 00:05:25,320 --> 00:05:28,320 Speaker 1: to people who really like the book, people who really 83 00:05:28,360 --> 00:05:32,200 Speaker 1: don't like the book. But as far as the movies go, 84 00:05:33,360 --> 00:05:37,520 Speaker 1: it's a pretty uncontroversial opinion to feel that they all 85 00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:45,280 Speaker 1: aggressively suck and push just really harmful messages that are 86 00:05:45,480 --> 00:05:49,400 Speaker 1: very of the time and also by of the time. 87 00:05:49,440 --> 00:05:52,760 Speaker 1: I mean still now this is like still, like you 88 00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:57,240 Speaker 1: know are our calls were Still has a gigantic issue 89 00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:02,000 Speaker 1: with sexualizing young girls specifically, but also just young people 90 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:05,159 Speaker 1: in general. So that's what the show is about. It's 91 00:06:05,240 --> 00:06:10,159 Speaker 1: it's a little heavier than the Bechdel cast, but um, 92 00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:13,440 Speaker 1: if that's something you're interested in, I try to really 93 00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:17,040 Speaker 1: examine it from all perspectives and bring in a lot 94 00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:21,920 Speaker 1: of different voices to discuss it, and I hope you'll listen. 95 00:06:22,600 --> 00:06:25,720 Speaker 1: Uh So that yeah Monday is starting November twenty three. 96 00:06:26,480 --> 00:06:28,840 Speaker 1: And Oh the reason I was saying all of that 97 00:06:29,000 --> 00:06:33,560 Speaker 1: is first of all, because I should. Second of all, 98 00:06:34,640 --> 00:06:38,280 Speaker 1: because I think that a lot of my thoughts on 99 00:06:38,320 --> 00:06:42,960 Speaker 1: this movie have like not changed entirely. I still think 100 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:48,880 Speaker 1: the movie absolutely sucks eggs, but but for like way 101 00:06:48,880 --> 00:06:53,800 Speaker 1: more specific reasons than I did four months ago. So yeah, 102 00:06:53,960 --> 00:06:56,960 Speaker 1: I I don't necessarily stand by to the word everything 103 00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:00,960 Speaker 1: I say in this episode, but uh, the movie is bad. 104 00:07:01,360 --> 00:07:07,440 Speaker 1: Well that's that's the beauty of just being alive and 105 00:07:07,520 --> 00:07:11,560 Speaker 1: being a person. Here you can learn more things and 106 00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 1: your mind can change and oh you growth. You love 107 00:07:16,640 --> 00:07:18,680 Speaker 1: to see it. And that's what the Bechtel Cast is 108 00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:24,400 Speaker 1: all about. Growing, changing, acknowledging faults from the past, and 109 00:07:24,520 --> 00:07:31,960 Speaker 1: moving forward in a healthy and productive way. Who um, 110 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:34,360 Speaker 1: so yes, I was just really listening back to the 111 00:07:34,400 --> 00:07:38,320 Speaker 1: episode and we you know, there's mentions to I Frankenstein. 112 00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:42,640 Speaker 1: Why because it's the other the other episode we did 113 00:07:42,680 --> 00:07:46,080 Speaker 1: on the Matren for your birthday month, so there will 114 00:07:46,120 --> 00:07:49,960 Speaker 1: be references to Jamie's birthday and I Frankenstein and whatnot. 115 00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:53,520 Speaker 1: So if you're just like, what, that's why my birthday 116 00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:57,920 Speaker 1: was in August. And I honestly think and this is 117 00:07:57,960 --> 00:08:01,080 Speaker 1: like not even I know that there's no way for 118 00:08:01,120 --> 00:08:03,080 Speaker 1: me to say this in a non biased way, but 119 00:08:03,240 --> 00:08:06,840 Speaker 1: the I Frankenstein episode alone is enough reason to sign 120 00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 1: up for the Matreon, in my opinion, one of our best. 121 00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:15,280 Speaker 1: It's not Jamie. This is not opinion, this is fact. 122 00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:21,640 Speaker 1: Very viable. Um so yes, if you, if you, I 123 00:08:21,680 --> 00:08:24,920 Speaker 1: mean just what this is all to say, folks, that 124 00:08:25,080 --> 00:08:28,080 Speaker 1: you should get on get on the Matreon train, you know, 125 00:08:29,160 --> 00:08:32,880 Speaker 1: for I Frankenstein alone, among many other films that again 126 00:08:32,920 --> 00:08:36,720 Speaker 1: will remain locked. We're not gonna just keep unlocking episodes 127 00:08:36,760 --> 00:08:39,600 Speaker 1: all willy nilly. Some of them are in the vault. 128 00:08:39,800 --> 00:08:44,120 Speaker 1: This is a rare occurrence. Yeah, so yeah, enjoy our 129 00:08:44,200 --> 00:08:49,160 Speaker 1: Lolita episode to the extent that you're able. Lolita podcast 130 00:08:49,440 --> 00:08:54,040 Speaker 1: I recommend, and again I'm completely unbiased. It's just, you know, 131 00:08:54,120 --> 00:08:57,880 Speaker 1: just a recommendation, and I haven't been sweating about this 132 00:08:58,040 --> 00:09:00,600 Speaker 1: for half of the year. Well it's someone who is 133 00:09:00,640 --> 00:09:04,880 Speaker 1: again not involved in Little to podcast. I also recommend. 134 00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:11,200 Speaker 1: Hell yeah, without further ado, here is our unlocked Matreon 135 00:09:11,320 --> 00:09:17,079 Speaker 1: episode about Stanley Kubrick's Lolita. Hate that run of words. 136 00:09:18,960 --> 00:09:27,720 Speaker 1: Enjoy del cast high Matre. Jamie, it's your birthday. It's 137 00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:32,520 Speaker 1: Jamie's Chaos month on the Matreon, and boy do we 138 00:09:32,640 --> 00:09:37,000 Speaker 1: have a chaotic month for you this year. We just 139 00:09:37,160 --> 00:09:40,000 Speaker 1: made a last minute adjustment to my birthday month in 140 00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:43,400 Speaker 1: a way that I really think makes the whole feed vibrate. 141 00:09:46,200 --> 00:09:50,480 Speaker 1: It's it's so today obviously we're We're doing Lolita, a 142 00:09:50,559 --> 00:09:53,160 Speaker 1: very heavy, serious movie with a lot of heavy serious 143 00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:57,280 Speaker 1: things to discuss, and then at the end of the month, 144 00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:01,440 Speaker 1: as a palate cleanser, we're going to be doing I Frankenstein, 145 00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:04,920 Speaker 1: which is a movie that you don't even need to 146 00:10:04,960 --> 00:10:07,600 Speaker 1: watch because it's more fun for us to tell you 147 00:10:07,679 --> 00:10:11,960 Speaker 1: about it than to watch it. You should still watch 148 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:17,760 Speaker 1: it because Bill and I he and I also feel like, genuinely, 149 00:10:17,800 --> 00:10:20,520 Speaker 1: if it came down to it, Aaron Eckhart would pay 150 00:10:20,600 --> 00:10:25,400 Speaker 1: you human dollars to not watch it, which is a 151 00:10:25,440 --> 00:10:31,280 Speaker 1: reason to watch it. It's a gritty Frankenstein movie. But 152 00:10:31,480 --> 00:10:34,720 Speaker 1: here's a twist. It's about do you remember I know, 153 00:10:34,800 --> 00:10:39,080 Speaker 1: I know this movie so well. I Frankenstein markets itself 154 00:10:39,120 --> 00:10:44,559 Speaker 1: as a movie about I callma Frankenstein, but it's actually 155 00:10:44,640 --> 00:10:51,240 Speaker 1: about the war of demons versus gargoyles. I vaguely remember that. 156 00:10:51,840 --> 00:10:55,960 Speaker 1: But all the gargoyles, the gargoyles are the heroes, which 157 00:10:56,000 --> 00:10:59,640 Speaker 1: I also like kept being like, wait, gargoyles are heroes. 158 00:11:00,320 --> 00:11:02,600 Speaker 1: They are in this movie, and if you've seen the 159 00:11:02,600 --> 00:11:06,680 Speaker 1: animated series Gargoyles, you know that they are. I saw that. 160 00:11:07,080 --> 00:11:10,319 Speaker 1: Everyone roasts me for not, I just didn't see it. 161 00:11:10,400 --> 00:11:12,240 Speaker 1: I was watching Powerpuff Girls. I don't know what I 162 00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:15,960 Speaker 1: was doing. But for me, I was like, wait, I 163 00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:19,000 Speaker 1: thought gargoyles were supposed to be mean to you, but 164 00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:21,000 Speaker 1: the been in this one. They're the heroes and they 165 00:11:21,200 --> 00:11:24,760 Speaker 1: are all royalty and they're dressed like they went to 166 00:11:24,960 --> 00:11:30,160 Speaker 1: ye party. So by party, I Frankenstein, I exactly, it's 167 00:11:30,240 --> 00:11:36,360 Speaker 1: all connected. Um. So we're gonna start with heavy episode 168 00:11:36,360 --> 00:11:38,079 Speaker 1: and we're gonna end with a light episode, and that's 169 00:11:38,080 --> 00:11:42,040 Speaker 1: going to be my birthday month because I contain multitudes. 170 00:11:43,640 --> 00:11:48,440 Speaker 1: But today we are talking about the nineteen sixty two 171 00:11:48,559 --> 00:11:56,520 Speaker 1: adaptation of Lolita by feminist icon Stanley Kubrick. We should 172 00:11:56,559 --> 00:11:59,280 Speaker 1: just at the very top here, since we're attempting to 173 00:11:59,320 --> 00:12:04,400 Speaker 1: be better at given content warnings for the content of episodes. 174 00:12:04,440 --> 00:12:11,320 Speaker 1: There's obviously a content warning here for statutory rape, child 175 00:12:11,640 --> 00:12:17,520 Speaker 1: sexual abuse. Yeah. There there's I mean, general predatory behavior 176 00:12:18,200 --> 00:12:22,280 Speaker 1: and also murder. Um so there there is just the 177 00:12:22,360 --> 00:12:25,720 Speaker 1: general brutalization of women and children is going to come 178 00:12:25,760 --> 00:12:28,560 Speaker 1: up in this episode. Um. And I guess if you 179 00:12:28,559 --> 00:12:34,200 Speaker 1: weren't familiar with the content of Lolita, that it's that's about. 180 00:12:35,200 --> 00:12:38,360 Speaker 1: So if you'd rather skip this one. We totally understand 181 00:12:38,880 --> 00:12:41,880 Speaker 1: if you'd like to hang around. There's so much to 182 00:12:41,920 --> 00:12:48,520 Speaker 1: talk about that I think is very revealing about our culture. UM, 183 00:12:48,559 --> 00:12:52,079 Speaker 1: so let's get started. I guess I'll contextualize this a 184 00:12:52,120 --> 00:12:54,839 Speaker 1: little bit by saying I chose this movie. I am 185 00:12:54,960 --> 00:12:58,600 Speaker 1: very curious as to what compelled you do want to 186 00:12:58,600 --> 00:13:02,199 Speaker 1: do this for your birthday? Of times, Well, I'm doing 187 00:13:02,240 --> 00:13:03,840 Speaker 1: it for I mean, I'm not doing it as a 188 00:13:03,840 --> 00:13:08,000 Speaker 1: gift to myself. This is very painful material to go through. Um, 189 00:13:08,040 --> 00:13:10,680 Speaker 1: but I'm doing it because I've been thinking about it 190 00:13:10,760 --> 00:13:16,719 Speaker 1: quite a bit lately. Because advertisement forthcoming, I am um 191 00:13:16,720 --> 00:13:19,680 Speaker 1: writing and producing an entire podcast that is about the 192 00:13:19,720 --> 00:13:24,040 Speaker 1: cultural impact of the book Lolita, because that's something that 193 00:13:24,040 --> 00:13:26,680 Speaker 1: I've always had a fixation on. I think it's very 194 00:13:26,960 --> 00:13:32,600 Speaker 1: telling and an interesting if disturbing obviously, but that it 195 00:13:32,679 --> 00:13:35,000 Speaker 1: was a book that I because I guess we should 196 00:13:35,040 --> 00:13:37,240 Speaker 1: just kind of talk about the property versus the movie, 197 00:13:37,360 --> 00:13:41,840 Speaker 1: because this is a movie that is not particularly remembered, 198 00:13:41,880 --> 00:13:43,520 Speaker 1: But that's going to be the jumping off point for 199 00:13:43,520 --> 00:13:47,560 Speaker 1: our discussion. In any case, Lolito was a book that 200 00:13:47,679 --> 00:13:54,120 Speaker 1: I came across when I was twelve because not good 201 00:13:54,760 --> 00:13:58,640 Speaker 1: because it had been recommended to me by Lemony Snicket 202 00:13:58,760 --> 00:14:05,480 Speaker 1: in a magazine and like, take a second with that. Uh. 203 00:14:05,720 --> 00:14:09,240 Speaker 1: So I came across this book really really early on 204 00:14:09,360 --> 00:14:11,800 Speaker 1: because I was obsessed with Lemony Sicket books. I thought 205 00:14:11,840 --> 00:14:14,280 Speaker 1: they were the best in the world. I still pretty 206 00:14:14,360 --> 00:14:18,200 Speaker 1: much do. Uh. The author I have some issues with, 207 00:14:19,040 --> 00:14:21,840 Speaker 1: but the But when I was twelve, I just wanted 208 00:14:21,880 --> 00:14:24,120 Speaker 1: to read what he was reading, and know what, you know, 209 00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:27,720 Speaker 1: I wanted to be like him. And so I read 210 00:14:27,800 --> 00:14:32,760 Speaker 1: in an interview in two thousand and five what his 211 00:14:33,160 --> 00:14:36,200 Speaker 1: favorite book was, and he said in a children's magazine, 212 00:14:36,480 --> 00:14:40,520 Speaker 1: Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov is my favorite book. And so 213 00:14:40,760 --> 00:14:43,200 Speaker 1: I went to the library and I got the book, 214 00:14:43,240 --> 00:14:45,400 Speaker 1: and I read the book, and I didn't understand the book, 215 00:14:45,480 --> 00:14:48,720 Speaker 1: and I took all the wrong messages away from the book. 216 00:14:49,280 --> 00:14:52,840 Speaker 1: And it's been a point of fascination for me ever since. 217 00:14:52,880 --> 00:14:57,920 Speaker 1: Because now obviously I am an adult and I have 218 00:14:58,040 --> 00:15:00,960 Speaker 1: read the book many times. I wouldn't say it is 219 00:15:01,160 --> 00:15:04,720 Speaker 1: my favorite book by any stretch, but I think it 220 00:15:04,840 --> 00:15:10,080 Speaker 1: is a very good book. And I reread it just 221 00:15:10,240 --> 00:15:12,800 Speaker 1: recently to like prepare for this podcast that I've been 222 00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:16,680 Speaker 1: working on, and what I find this interesting about Lolita 223 00:15:16,880 --> 00:15:20,360 Speaker 1: is that it seems like it's cultural legacy is just 224 00:15:20,440 --> 00:15:25,720 Speaker 1: taken completely out of context with what the story is about, 225 00:15:26,200 --> 00:15:29,920 Speaker 1: because you think, like I guess, when I was going 226 00:15:29,960 --> 00:15:33,440 Speaker 1: back to reread it, I was like, I wonder if 227 00:15:34,160 --> 00:15:36,360 Speaker 1: you know, just from because I hadn't read it since college. 228 00:15:36,400 --> 00:15:40,040 Speaker 1: I was like, is there any ambiguity about what the 229 00:15:40,160 --> 00:15:43,960 Speaker 1: nature of how Humberd Humberd is treating Lolita is? Is 230 00:15:44,000 --> 00:15:46,320 Speaker 1: there any way? Because I feel like our culture has 231 00:15:46,360 --> 00:15:50,560 Speaker 1: either framed it as a like doomed love story or 232 00:15:51,320 --> 00:15:54,880 Speaker 1: kind of just like a fashion aesthetic for young girls 233 00:15:55,240 --> 00:15:59,600 Speaker 1: that you see pop up in a lot of Japanese 234 00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:02,440 Speaker 1: fashion lines and also in Lana del Rey's music are 235 00:16:02,440 --> 00:16:05,040 Speaker 1: the two main places you will find it. But that's 236 00:16:05,080 --> 00:16:08,120 Speaker 1: like the Lolita brand now is it's clothing and it's 237 00:16:08,120 --> 00:16:11,160 Speaker 1: associated with this tragic love story, which is how I 238 00:16:11,200 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 1: think Humbritton Lolita are framed, and no small part because 239 00:16:15,040 --> 00:16:17,800 Speaker 1: of how this movie does it. But in any case, 240 00:16:17,840 --> 00:16:19,600 Speaker 1: I went back to read the book and I was like, 241 00:16:19,640 --> 00:16:23,240 Speaker 1: I wonder if the book is contributing to this problem? 242 00:16:23,280 --> 00:16:25,560 Speaker 1: And I would say pretty firmly that it is not. 243 00:16:25,960 --> 00:16:28,840 Speaker 1: The book could not be more. I mean, it is 244 00:16:29,280 --> 00:16:34,240 Speaker 1: horrifying what you're reading and it and it does. I mean, 245 00:16:34,280 --> 00:16:35,880 Speaker 1: I think that there's a lot of arguments to be 246 00:16:35,920 --> 00:16:38,320 Speaker 1: had that I'm still working through my own feelings about it, 247 00:16:38,480 --> 00:16:42,000 Speaker 1: like well what is this adding like what you know, 248 00:16:42,600 --> 00:16:44,720 Speaker 1: and there's a lot to talk about. Well, we'll talk 249 00:16:44,840 --> 00:16:50,760 Speaker 1: about it. But um, I find it kind of not 250 00:16:50,960 --> 00:16:52,840 Speaker 1: I mean, I guess it's it would be naive to 251 00:16:52,920 --> 00:16:55,480 Speaker 1: find it shocking. But given the fact that I've recently 252 00:16:55,520 --> 00:16:59,560 Speaker 1: read the book and it is very explicitly while the 253 00:16:59,680 --> 00:17:02,800 Speaker 1: narrator of his manipulative they you know, it's humbrid narrating 254 00:17:02,840 --> 00:17:05,159 Speaker 1: his own story, trying to get you to empathize with 255 00:17:05,240 --> 00:17:07,399 Speaker 1: him and trying to get you on his side because 256 00:17:07,440 --> 00:17:11,520 Speaker 1: it was, you know, in theory written in during his court, 257 00:17:12,280 --> 00:17:16,520 Speaker 1: uh like during his trial. That's what I'm saying. Um, 258 00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:18,640 Speaker 1: so it's him trying to manipulate a group of people 259 00:17:18,680 --> 00:17:21,760 Speaker 1: to get on his side. But he also is very 260 00:17:21,840 --> 00:17:25,040 Speaker 1: explicit about what is done. He refers to himself as 261 00:17:25,080 --> 00:17:28,520 Speaker 1: a predator and a number of other terms to that effect, 262 00:17:29,200 --> 00:17:33,520 Speaker 1: many many times constantly. The book, I feel like is 263 00:17:33,720 --> 00:17:36,479 Speaker 1: very clear at while it while it is a narrator 264 00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:40,040 Speaker 1: trying to manipulate you into being like, well, maybe it's okay, 265 00:17:40,119 --> 00:17:45,800 Speaker 1: but it's regardless, it's very clear. Yeah, there's no ambiguity. 266 00:17:45,960 --> 00:17:50,399 Speaker 1: I think in the movies and the other adaptations there is. 267 00:17:51,320 --> 00:17:54,240 Speaker 1: I don't even know if ambiguity is the word. It's 268 00:17:54,280 --> 00:17:59,960 Speaker 1: like just interpreted completely differently. And I feel like this movie, 269 00:18:00,040 --> 00:18:03,280 Speaker 1: this is the first major adaptation of Lolita, and it 270 00:18:03,440 --> 00:18:07,240 Speaker 1: just really gets us off to a horrible start and 271 00:18:07,560 --> 00:18:12,800 Speaker 1: it gets weirder and worse from there. So I'm very Yeah, 272 00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:14,640 Speaker 1: I've been attached to this book for a long time. 273 00:18:14,760 --> 00:18:17,960 Speaker 1: I think it is like an interesting case study, like 274 00:18:18,040 --> 00:18:22,440 Speaker 1: how American culture specifically takes a story that is very 275 00:18:22,440 --> 00:18:26,159 Speaker 1: explicit about being a story about the abuse of a 276 00:18:26,240 --> 00:18:29,880 Speaker 1: child and turning it into a sexy story that there 277 00:18:29,920 --> 00:18:34,600 Speaker 1: are fashion lessons to learn from. I find it fucking infuriating, 278 00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:39,000 Speaker 1: but it's also like, yeah, there's there's not a ton 279 00:18:39,040 --> 00:18:40,639 Speaker 1: of things where I feel like you can trace that 280 00:18:40,720 --> 00:18:45,160 Speaker 1: journey so directly. So that is why I chose it, 281 00:18:45,240 --> 00:18:48,640 Speaker 1: because I had been thinking about it NonStop. Got it? 282 00:18:49,520 --> 00:18:53,879 Speaker 1: What about you? So I believe if my memory serves 283 00:18:53,920 --> 00:18:57,119 Speaker 1: me correctly, I think I saw this movie before I 284 00:18:57,160 --> 00:18:59,920 Speaker 1: read the book. I saw the movie for the first time, 285 00:18:59,920 --> 00:19:01,920 Speaker 1: I think as a freshman in college. It was one 286 00:19:01,920 --> 00:19:04,119 Speaker 1: of those you know, like, I'm a film student, I 287 00:19:04,160 --> 00:19:10,040 Speaker 1: need to have seen right. Yeah, So I remember it 288 00:19:10,119 --> 00:19:15,240 Speaker 1: making me uncomfortable when I saw it, and uh not 289 00:19:15,359 --> 00:19:19,480 Speaker 1: ever feeling compelled to watch it again. Then a few 290 00:19:19,520 --> 00:19:23,119 Speaker 1: years later, still in college, I took an English class 291 00:19:23,200 --> 00:19:27,040 Speaker 1: my senior year, and it was like a banned books 292 00:19:27,119 --> 00:19:31,399 Speaker 1: class that taught literature that had been banned in different 293 00:19:31,440 --> 00:19:36,840 Speaker 1: capacities throughout history, and Lolita was one of the banned 294 00:19:36,880 --> 00:19:40,880 Speaker 1: books that we studied. So I read the book then, um, 295 00:19:40,920 --> 00:19:43,359 Speaker 1: And then I read the book a second time, or 296 00:19:43,359 --> 00:19:48,320 Speaker 1: at least I more skimmed it that time. During another 297 00:19:48,359 --> 00:19:51,679 Speaker 1: class I took in grad school. I would hate to 298 00:19:51,720 --> 00:19:56,639 Speaker 1: bring up that I haven't spreading from Boston University, but 299 00:19:56,720 --> 00:20:01,320 Speaker 1: we took a class specifically on adaptation. So Lolita got 300 00:20:01,359 --> 00:20:05,239 Speaker 1: taught in that class. That's exciting. And the kind of 301 00:20:05,359 --> 00:20:11,679 Speaker 1: discussion around Lolita being taught in this adaptation class was like, hey, 302 00:20:11,720 --> 00:20:17,040 Speaker 1: maybe some things shouldn't be adapted to film. Um. So 303 00:20:18,119 --> 00:20:23,160 Speaker 1: that was that many So that's kind of my history. Um. 304 00:20:23,200 --> 00:20:27,080 Speaker 1: I the whole. The property as a whole makes me 305 00:20:28,160 --> 00:20:32,440 Speaker 1: very unsettled and uncomfortable for obvious reasons. I don't remember 306 00:20:32,440 --> 00:20:35,439 Speaker 1: the book that well. I remember, like, I think the 307 00:20:35,480 --> 00:20:38,920 Speaker 1: discussion we had in like my English class around it 308 00:20:39,000 --> 00:20:41,920 Speaker 1: was everyone's like, oh, it's so well written. It's such 309 00:20:41,960 --> 00:20:44,919 Speaker 1: a well written book. And I remember being like, yeah, 310 00:20:44,920 --> 00:20:48,960 Speaker 1: but why are we reading a story from the point 311 00:20:48,960 --> 00:20:55,280 Speaker 1: of view of a predator, pedophile, child molester, Like what's 312 00:20:55,400 --> 00:20:58,520 Speaker 1: the value in that? And I that's like still where 313 00:20:58,520 --> 00:21:02,480 Speaker 1: I land on the entire higher property as a whole. 314 00:21:03,040 --> 00:21:06,760 Speaker 1: So that's where I'm coming from. Yeah, I mean, I 315 00:21:06,800 --> 00:21:08,960 Speaker 1: think that we're not going to reach a conclus I mean, 316 00:21:08,960 --> 00:21:12,440 Speaker 1: there's never going to be a conclusion reached on whether 317 00:21:12,480 --> 00:21:14,000 Speaker 1: this is the sort of thing that should be written 318 00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:16,879 Speaker 1: about at all. And everyone, I mean it is, like 319 00:21:16,960 --> 00:21:20,920 Speaker 1: I think it's everyone is going to feel a slightly 320 00:21:20,960 --> 00:21:23,880 Speaker 1: different way about it. And it depends on what your 321 00:21:23,880 --> 00:21:25,959 Speaker 1: own experiences are, it depends on what your views are 322 00:21:25,960 --> 00:21:30,280 Speaker 1: and and all this stuff. I truly don't know where 323 00:21:30,320 --> 00:21:33,159 Speaker 1: I fall. I do, like, I think that there is 324 00:21:33,720 --> 00:21:37,919 Speaker 1: in the same way that there are like Red Flag 325 00:21:38,040 --> 00:21:42,760 Speaker 1: movies for guys to be like, I mean, not necessarily 326 00:21:42,800 --> 00:21:46,080 Speaker 1: always guys, but like nine times out of ten, uh, 327 00:21:46,680 --> 00:21:49,520 Speaker 1: but but where people will be like, yeah, I know 328 00:21:49,720 --> 00:21:52,639 Speaker 1: that it's problematic, but look at it. There's good parts 329 00:21:52,680 --> 00:21:55,800 Speaker 1: of it. And I am always kind of like my 330 00:21:55,880 --> 00:21:58,720 Speaker 1: antenna goes up for that. I agree that it's a 331 00:21:58,720 --> 00:22:01,920 Speaker 1: beautifully written book. I don't. I mean, it's kind of 332 00:22:02,040 --> 00:22:05,200 Speaker 1: I guess that's like the whole discussion of every band 333 00:22:05,240 --> 00:22:09,520 Speaker 1: books class, right, like, is this uh taboo that we 334 00:22:09,600 --> 00:22:12,719 Speaker 1: know happens in real life that should be discussed and 335 00:22:12,800 --> 00:22:16,879 Speaker 1: if so, who gets to be the narrator? Um? I 336 00:22:16,920 --> 00:22:21,960 Speaker 1: think that every adaptation of Lolita, and I am now 337 00:22:22,119 --> 00:22:25,680 Speaker 1: intimately familiar with all of them. There's been well, all 338 00:22:25,720 --> 00:22:27,480 Speaker 1: but one. I'm still trying to get my hands on 339 00:22:27,520 --> 00:22:31,600 Speaker 1: the Russian opera, but I've studied four of them pretty closely. 340 00:22:31,920 --> 00:22:34,879 Speaker 1: I think that they're all failures to different degrees in 341 00:22:34,960 --> 00:22:38,920 Speaker 1: different ways. It's it's hard because it's like this to 342 00:22:39,200 --> 00:22:43,919 Speaker 1: this topic of an abusive relationship, especially towards a child, 343 00:22:44,000 --> 00:22:50,040 Speaker 1: it's never like it's never going to be a comfortable 344 00:22:50,160 --> 00:22:54,560 Speaker 1: palatable subject for for everyone. And that's just I mean, 345 00:22:54,720 --> 00:22:59,560 Speaker 1: because it shouldn't be. It's a fucking horrific thing to happen. Um. 346 00:22:59,640 --> 00:23:02,560 Speaker 1: I've seen a lot of opinions on it, obviously, I've 347 00:23:02,600 --> 00:23:07,000 Speaker 1: also seen uh survivors of this type of abuse who 348 00:23:07,640 --> 00:23:11,320 Speaker 1: have felt very seen and have found the work to 349 00:23:11,359 --> 00:23:15,720 Speaker 1: be sort of healing by and I can direct you 350 00:23:15,760 --> 00:23:18,520 Speaker 1: just some blogs that I've found. I've done a deep 351 00:23:18,640 --> 00:23:22,479 Speaker 1: dive into the Lolita blog a sphere, but there there 352 00:23:22,520 --> 00:23:24,720 Speaker 1: are some people who feel, as you do, Caitlin, that 353 00:23:24,760 --> 00:23:28,480 Speaker 1: it's like there's absolutely no value in giving the abuser 354 00:23:28,560 --> 00:23:31,320 Speaker 1: a voice, and I agree with that, But then I 355 00:23:31,359 --> 00:23:35,400 Speaker 1: also have read the perspectives of survivors of this abuse 356 00:23:35,880 --> 00:23:40,320 Speaker 1: who feel seen through the character of Lolita and appreciate 357 00:23:40,800 --> 00:23:45,080 Speaker 1: who she is, appreciate feeling like this is a topic 358 00:23:45,160 --> 00:23:49,080 Speaker 1: that's even being discussed at all, and so well, I 359 00:23:49,119 --> 00:23:53,120 Speaker 1: don't feel that it is the best approach. I think 360 00:23:53,160 --> 00:23:55,400 Speaker 1: it is a bit of a not a bit like 361 00:23:55,640 --> 00:23:58,399 Speaker 1: it's whatever the nineteen fifties version of edge lord is 362 00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:02,800 Speaker 1: that Nabokov is doing. I mean, it's a very edge 363 00:24:02,840 --> 00:24:06,399 Speaker 1: lordy thing to try to do, and fortunately he's a 364 00:24:06,440 --> 00:24:09,800 Speaker 1: great writer. Otherwise there we wouldn't even be having this discussion. 365 00:24:09,880 --> 00:24:13,399 Speaker 1: No one would have adapted it. But that said, I 366 00:24:13,280 --> 00:24:16,280 Speaker 1: I don't. I agree that certainly the predator's point of 367 00:24:16,359 --> 00:24:20,120 Speaker 1: view is not the priority, but I don't think it's 368 00:24:20,119 --> 00:24:23,919 Speaker 1: a valueless work because so many people, and especially a 369 00:24:23,960 --> 00:24:27,640 Speaker 1: lot of young women, have found value in it that 370 00:24:27,680 --> 00:24:30,760 Speaker 1: relates to their own experiences of abuse. I think that 371 00:24:30,800 --> 00:24:34,080 Speaker 1: abuse should be something that is discussed in art um 372 00:24:34,160 --> 00:24:39,480 Speaker 1: But this is a very imperfect and fucking complicated as 373 00:24:39,520 --> 00:24:42,520 Speaker 1: hell way to do it that there was clearly no 374 00:24:42,600 --> 00:24:46,760 Speaker 1: way to do in nineteen sixty two. But there's I 375 00:24:46,800 --> 00:24:50,200 Speaker 1: don't think that we've done it successfully yet. I think 376 00:24:50,240 --> 00:24:53,000 Speaker 1: that it's I feel like if this movie was ever 377 00:24:53,040 --> 00:24:54,840 Speaker 1: going to be if this book was ever going to 378 00:24:54,840 --> 00:24:57,399 Speaker 1: be adapted into film, it would have to be animated. 379 00:24:57,520 --> 00:25:01,120 Speaker 1: I don't think that there is a safe, healthy way 380 00:25:01,240 --> 00:25:05,560 Speaker 1: to adapt this work that is live action. I just 381 00:25:06,320 --> 00:25:08,640 Speaker 1: they it's been attempted so many times. I also think 382 00:25:08,680 --> 00:25:13,080 Speaker 1: it's directly related to who is adapting the work. The 383 00:25:13,119 --> 00:25:15,800 Speaker 1: people who have been chosen to adapt this work are 384 00:25:15,920 --> 00:25:20,520 Speaker 1: just it blows my fucking mind of like, Stanley Kubrick 385 00:25:20,680 --> 00:25:24,600 Speaker 1: is your first Like seriously, the guy who's notorious for 386 00:25:24,720 --> 00:25:28,919 Speaker 1: like abusing his power as a director. I mean, he 387 00:25:28,960 --> 00:25:31,520 Speaker 1: wasn't at this time quite yet, this was his early 388 00:25:31,640 --> 00:25:33,600 Speaker 1: one of his earlier movies. But but the fact that 389 00:25:33,600 --> 00:25:36,040 Speaker 1: you would hand it off to a young man or 390 00:25:36,080 --> 00:25:38,879 Speaker 1: like a man similar like not that far off from 391 00:25:38,960 --> 00:25:41,480 Speaker 1: humbert Age. It's just you repeatedly see this work put 392 00:25:41,560 --> 00:25:46,080 Speaker 1: into someone who is going to inherently prioritize Humbrid's voice 393 00:25:46,119 --> 00:25:50,800 Speaker 1: above Lolita's The first time I have seen this work 394 00:25:51,160 --> 00:25:56,200 Speaker 1: put into a woman's hand was literally last year. Like 395 00:25:56,640 --> 00:25:59,240 Speaker 1: this movie was given to Stanley Kubrick first, we'll talk 396 00:25:59,240 --> 00:26:03,480 Speaker 1: about that today. It fails, is given to Adrian Line. 397 00:26:03,640 --> 00:26:07,879 Speaker 1: It super duper fails, horrendous. It was given to Edward 398 00:26:07,920 --> 00:26:11,840 Speaker 1: Albee at one point. It fails. It was given to uh, 399 00:26:12,160 --> 00:26:14,440 Speaker 1: let me get the names right, two of the most 400 00:26:15,080 --> 00:26:20,760 Speaker 1: famous composers of all time in the nineties seventies. They 401 00:26:20,760 --> 00:26:24,760 Speaker 1: wrote a musical about it. It was by John Barry 402 00:26:24,800 --> 00:26:27,760 Speaker 1: and Alan jay Lerner. So John Barry wrote all the 403 00:26:27,760 --> 00:26:32,600 Speaker 1: theme songs to James Bond, Alan jay Lerner Broadway legend 404 00:26:33,040 --> 00:26:42,399 Speaker 1: did Gigi Camelot at an American in Paris. But like 405 00:26:42,600 --> 00:26:46,639 Speaker 1: they were given Lolita, it's just all the wrong people 406 00:26:46,720 --> 00:26:50,400 Speaker 1: have been given this property to adapt and so I 407 00:26:50,480 --> 00:26:56,400 Speaker 1: feel like my personal opinion is that this this material 408 00:26:56,440 --> 00:27:01,000 Speaker 1: has never been even given a chance to prioritize the 409 00:27:01,119 --> 00:27:05,000 Speaker 1: character who should be prioritized, because every person who has 410 00:27:05,040 --> 00:27:09,560 Speaker 1: adapted this material is going to I'm certainly not implying 411 00:27:09,600 --> 00:27:12,160 Speaker 1: that they agree with Humberd. Obviously they don't, but that 412 00:27:12,280 --> 00:27:16,280 Speaker 1: is the perspective they're able to plug into because there 413 00:27:16,280 --> 00:27:20,080 Speaker 1: are men sis head, men in their thirties or older, 414 00:27:20,480 --> 00:27:28,760 Speaker 1: and so I I let's talk about it. Yeah so 415 00:27:28,760 --> 00:27:32,000 Speaker 1: so yeah, Well, like just a backpedal a little bit 416 00:27:32,000 --> 00:27:35,840 Speaker 1: about the people who have managed to find value in it, 417 00:27:36,040 --> 00:27:41,600 Speaker 1: particularly survivors who you know, read the work and identified 418 00:27:41,600 --> 00:27:44,720 Speaker 1: with Lolita. Like that's great for them to be able 419 00:27:44,760 --> 00:27:48,800 Speaker 1: to find comfort in that or find someone to identify 420 00:27:48,880 --> 00:27:52,119 Speaker 1: with the character to identify with. But imagine like how 421 00:27:52,560 --> 00:27:56,320 Speaker 1: more effective that would be if it was a And 422 00:27:56,480 --> 00:27:58,679 Speaker 1: it's like it's not helpful to be like, well, what 423 00:27:58,720 --> 00:28:01,360 Speaker 1: if the book was this instead, But like if there 424 00:28:01,480 --> 00:28:04,159 Speaker 1: was a book out there that was written from the 425 00:28:04,280 --> 00:28:08,800 Speaker 1: perspective of the survivor and was just as well written 426 00:28:08,840 --> 00:28:12,720 Speaker 1: and was just as iconic in literature and just as 427 00:28:12,760 --> 00:28:16,080 Speaker 1: influential as a literary work, Like I think we do 428 00:28:16,200 --> 00:28:19,960 Speaker 1: have more books like that now and I agree that. 429 00:28:20,760 --> 00:28:24,280 Speaker 1: I mean, there has been fiction about survivors of assault 430 00:28:24,400 --> 00:28:28,520 Speaker 1: and of prolonged abuse that have taken you know, their place, 431 00:28:28,600 --> 00:28:31,919 Speaker 1: and I think that, Lolita, I mean, it is not 432 00:28:32,080 --> 00:28:35,880 Speaker 1: the perfect discussion of abuse. It just isn't. It's not 433 00:28:35,960 --> 00:28:41,600 Speaker 1: the only discussion of abuse that's out there, fortunately, um, 434 00:28:41,640 --> 00:28:45,840 Speaker 1: for me and for everybody. But yeah, I think I 435 00:28:45,880 --> 00:28:48,320 Speaker 1: do think that there's a lot of pressure put on 436 00:28:48,400 --> 00:28:52,400 Speaker 1: this singular work that was published seventy years ago to 437 00:28:53,360 --> 00:28:57,200 Speaker 1: be the discussion of this topic, um, because I think 438 00:28:57,240 --> 00:28:59,600 Speaker 1: it's the most and I don't mean this as a 439 00:28:59,640 --> 00:29:03,080 Speaker 1: compliment it but the most iconic one in American culture. 440 00:29:03,440 --> 00:29:07,120 Speaker 1: But I kind of fault that more to American culture 441 00:29:07,160 --> 00:29:10,560 Speaker 1: than to the book itself. You know, Nabokov didn't go 442 00:29:10,600 --> 00:29:13,560 Speaker 1: into this project thinking this is going to be the 443 00:29:13,600 --> 00:29:17,800 Speaker 1: only discussion we have of this topic for half a century, 444 00:29:17,840 --> 00:29:21,120 Speaker 1: but in a lot of ways it was. And so 445 00:29:21,200 --> 00:29:23,720 Speaker 1: it's like, I don't think you can really fault the 446 00:29:23,800 --> 00:29:26,280 Speaker 1: author of the work to anticipate how their work is 447 00:29:26,280 --> 00:29:28,440 Speaker 1: going to be taken out of context over and over 448 00:29:28,480 --> 00:29:32,920 Speaker 1: and over. I think that that is like a cultural problem. Well, 449 00:29:32,960 --> 00:29:34,520 Speaker 1: I do think that I don't think all of his 450 00:29:34,600 --> 00:29:38,560 Speaker 1: writing is you know, it's certainly not perfect and not responsible. 451 00:29:38,640 --> 00:29:41,640 Speaker 1: And if I were writing this story, I would fully 452 00:29:41,720 --> 00:29:46,440 Speaker 1: center Lolita. And I know that survivors of assault have 453 00:29:46,520 --> 00:29:49,200 Speaker 1: interpreted this book in a number of different ways, and 454 00:29:49,960 --> 00:29:54,800 Speaker 1: no interpretation of this work is invalid. It's just yeah, 455 00:29:54,880 --> 00:29:57,480 Speaker 1: it's a tricky fucking thing, and it's you know, it's 456 00:29:57,480 --> 00:30:01,160 Speaker 1: almost seventy years old now, and people are still trying 457 00:30:01,240 --> 00:30:05,200 Speaker 1: to find what I mean, I don't know. I don't 458 00:30:05,200 --> 00:30:07,840 Speaker 1: know if this could be successfully adopted. What we were 459 00:30:07,880 --> 00:30:13,920 Speaker 1: talking about today was not successfully adopted, and I think that, oh, 460 00:30:14,040 --> 00:30:17,360 Speaker 1: it's so frustrating. I think it's interesting. So to pivot 461 00:30:17,400 --> 00:30:22,280 Speaker 1: a little bit to the nine two movie adaptation of this, 462 00:30:22,600 --> 00:30:26,280 Speaker 1: I feel like the general consensus on this that was 463 00:30:26,360 --> 00:30:29,320 Speaker 1: made but that was like, well, it's not good, but 464 00:30:29,440 --> 00:30:34,440 Speaker 1: it's just because production codes. I feel like this movie 465 00:30:34,600 --> 00:30:37,480 Speaker 1: is definitely not good. It is so long, it is 466 00:30:37,560 --> 00:30:42,200 Speaker 1: really boring, so tedious. It's just because of the production code. 467 00:30:42,480 --> 00:30:46,440 Speaker 1: Nothing happens. But that is not why the movie is bad. 468 00:30:46,520 --> 00:30:48,560 Speaker 1: I think that there's a lot of reasons the production 469 00:30:48,560 --> 00:30:52,680 Speaker 1: code included, but I feel like it's letting Kuber get 470 00:30:52,720 --> 00:30:55,400 Speaker 1: off a little easy to say that it's just because 471 00:30:55,520 --> 00:30:58,240 Speaker 1: of the production code. I think that it's it also 472 00:30:59,320 --> 00:31:03,120 Speaker 1: it's bad for other reasons. Yes, And for any listeners 473 00:31:03,120 --> 00:31:06,160 Speaker 1: who aren't familiar with what the production code is UM 474 00:31:06,320 --> 00:31:09,040 Speaker 1: google it for more information. But it's basically a set 475 00:31:09,120 --> 00:31:14,520 Speaker 1: of censorship rules that applied to Hollywood studio films. It 476 00:31:14,640 --> 00:31:18,840 Speaker 1: was enforced from the mid nineteen thirties to the late sixties, 477 00:31:18,960 --> 00:31:23,080 Speaker 1: and it basically said that movies couldn't have graphic violence, 478 00:31:23,440 --> 00:31:28,080 Speaker 1: you know, sex or nudity or overt sexuality, no swearing, 479 00:31:28,920 --> 00:31:31,000 Speaker 1: things like that. The list goes on and on, but 480 00:31:31,240 --> 00:31:33,000 Speaker 1: it's worth checking out just to see like what the 481 00:31:33,040 --> 00:31:36,760 Speaker 1: limitations were, like what UM filmmakers could and couldn't do, 482 00:31:37,000 --> 00:31:39,720 Speaker 1: and what they did sort of to get around production 483 00:31:39,760 --> 00:31:43,880 Speaker 1: code stipulations. There's like we saw in certain genres like 484 00:31:43,920 --> 00:31:46,720 Speaker 1: screwball comedies that would be like all these like double 485 00:31:46,880 --> 00:31:51,040 Speaker 1: entendre innuendo type of dialogue and stuff like that. But 486 00:31:51,480 --> 00:31:54,640 Speaker 1: it's interesting. But yeah, like informs a whole generation of 487 00:31:54,680 --> 00:31:57,160 Speaker 1: movies basically, and then this movie kind of comes out 488 00:31:57,200 --> 00:32:00,360 Speaker 1: at the towards the tail land that this movie had 489 00:32:00,400 --> 00:32:02,400 Speaker 1: been made even a couple of years later, I don't. 490 00:32:02,400 --> 00:32:04,680 Speaker 1: I mean, it might have been quite different. I don't 491 00:32:04,720 --> 00:32:08,920 Speaker 1: really care to know, um what Stanley Kuper would have 492 00:32:08,920 --> 00:32:11,680 Speaker 1: done with this story at literally any point in time. 493 00:32:12,880 --> 00:32:16,760 Speaker 1: I think that truly just like among the worst working 494 00:32:16,800 --> 00:32:20,560 Speaker 1: directors you could choose for this, it's kind of astounding. Um. 495 00:32:21,320 --> 00:32:24,040 Speaker 1: But that was kind of that really informed how this 496 00:32:24,080 --> 00:32:27,880 Speaker 1: movie was marketed, which the tagline for this movie was 497 00:32:28,080 --> 00:32:30,960 Speaker 1: how did they ever make a movie of Lolita? And 498 00:32:31,320 --> 00:32:33,280 Speaker 1: the short answer, and a lot of people have said this, 499 00:32:33,320 --> 00:32:35,920 Speaker 1: but the short answer is that they didn't, uh, and 500 00:32:36,000 --> 00:32:39,480 Speaker 1: that's how they did. By not doing it, given the 501 00:32:39,520 --> 00:32:43,080 Speaker 1: production codes, it would have been virtually impossible to even 502 00:32:43,840 --> 00:32:47,760 Speaker 1: sort of tell the story, which this I mean, I 503 00:32:47,840 --> 00:32:50,200 Speaker 1: guess you could. I mean, there's scenes in this movie 504 00:32:50,240 --> 00:32:54,400 Speaker 1: that really lean on suggestion and then it's just like 505 00:32:54,640 --> 00:32:58,560 Speaker 1: Peter Sellers for forty five fucking minutes and you're just 506 00:32:58,680 --> 00:33:03,800 Speaker 1: like in very disguises like counts Off, I'm just like, 507 00:33:04,720 --> 00:33:08,720 Speaker 1: this is exhausting, no wonder lemony snack it liked it 508 00:33:08,840 --> 00:33:11,360 Speaker 1: so much. He's like, I'm gonna base count all off 509 00:33:11,480 --> 00:33:15,520 Speaker 1: on quilty. But it's interesting. I mean, I think that 510 00:33:15,560 --> 00:33:17,400 Speaker 1: he did do that in a number of ways. But 511 00:33:17,480 --> 00:33:22,320 Speaker 1: then I guess that's a separate episode. But technically, technically, 512 00:33:22,800 --> 00:33:27,760 Speaker 1: Vladimir and Abakoff wrote the screenplay to this movie. Once 513 00:33:27,800 --> 00:33:31,120 Speaker 1: again we encounter something here that is technically true but 514 00:33:31,280 --> 00:33:34,520 Speaker 1: isn't actually true, because I have read the screenplay that 515 00:33:34,600 --> 00:33:39,840 Speaker 1: Vladimir Nabokov wrote, and Vladimir and Abukov wrote a fairly 516 00:33:40,040 --> 00:33:44,320 Speaker 1: faithful while obviously working around quite a bit, but a 517 00:33:44,400 --> 00:33:49,440 Speaker 1: fairly faithful adaptation of his book that I feel frames 518 00:33:49,520 --> 00:33:55,240 Speaker 1: the story appropriately or more appropriately. And there's been a 519 00:33:55,320 --> 00:33:58,520 Speaker 1: number of interviews done with him and done with basically 520 00:33:58,600 --> 00:34:03,040 Speaker 1: everyone involved in this movie. Be that like, almost none 521 00:34:03,040 --> 00:34:05,120 Speaker 1: of his script is used in this movie, so even 522 00:34:05,160 --> 00:34:07,600 Speaker 1: though his name is on it, he thought very little 523 00:34:07,640 --> 00:34:10,359 Speaker 1: of it. And I also, I'm like, I'm not here 524 00:34:10,400 --> 00:34:14,840 Speaker 1: to stand for Vladimir Nabukov hardcore. He's got some weird 525 00:34:14,920 --> 00:34:17,920 Speaker 1: ship going on in his life. And I don't mean criminally, 526 00:34:18,040 --> 00:34:21,600 Speaker 1: I don't, I don't mean anything approaching like stuff like that, 527 00:34:21,640 --> 00:34:24,240 Speaker 1: but he's just I mean, look of Vladimir Nabukov's family. 528 00:34:24,320 --> 00:34:28,839 Speaker 1: They were famously executing other authors, so have a lot 529 00:34:28,840 --> 00:34:31,359 Speaker 1: of ship going on with that. It's a whole thing 530 00:34:31,560 --> 00:34:35,160 Speaker 1: like there so Nabukov has got his own thing going on, right, 531 00:34:35,200 --> 00:34:39,080 Speaker 1: He's just kind of a bizarre cultural figure. But he 532 00:34:39,120 --> 00:34:42,040 Speaker 1: didn't like this movie. The draft he wrote of this 533 00:34:42,320 --> 00:34:47,160 Speaker 1: movie at least resembles his book, and for me, for 534 00:34:47,239 --> 00:34:54,040 Speaker 1: the movies specifically, framing is everything, and this movie and 535 00:34:54,120 --> 00:34:59,319 Speaker 1: the movie are framed not at all, like basically not 536 00:34:59,400 --> 00:35:04,760 Speaker 1: at all. So yeah, Stanley Kubrick hacked into this script. 537 00:35:05,440 --> 00:35:07,600 Speaker 1: I'm sure he was also trying to get his movie 538 00:35:07,640 --> 00:35:09,560 Speaker 1: to pass the production code so that I could still 539 00:35:09,560 --> 00:35:14,640 Speaker 1: be made. But like, fuck Stanley Kubrick, Matt Like fuck him. 540 00:35:15,040 --> 00:35:18,640 Speaker 1: When has he ever successfully written a female character or treated, 541 00:35:19,040 --> 00:35:22,160 Speaker 1: you know, an actress with dignity? Fucking never is when? 542 00:35:22,800 --> 00:35:29,160 Speaker 1: So uh fux Stanley Kubrick particularly, And I guess let's 543 00:35:29,160 --> 00:35:32,960 Speaker 1: talk about what happens in the movie. Well, first let's 544 00:35:32,960 --> 00:35:34,879 Speaker 1: take a quick break and then we'll come right back. 545 00:35:41,040 --> 00:35:46,200 Speaker 1: All right, So here's the recap. We open on Humbert. Humbert. 546 00:35:46,560 --> 00:35:51,759 Speaker 1: He shows up to a rundown mansion belonging to this guy, 547 00:35:51,960 --> 00:35:56,640 Speaker 1: Claire Quilty, who is played by Peter Sellers. They have 548 00:35:56,800 --> 00:35:59,160 Speaker 1: some kind of history, but it's not clear at this 549 00:35:59,239 --> 00:36:04,160 Speaker 1: point what Humbert mentions a girl named Lolita, and then 550 00:36:04,239 --> 00:36:08,960 Speaker 1: he eventually shoots and kills Quilty. Then we cut to 551 00:36:09,080 --> 00:36:13,600 Speaker 1: four years earlier. Humbert is a recent European transplant to 552 00:36:13,760 --> 00:36:17,200 Speaker 1: the US. He arrives at a house in New Hampshire 553 00:36:17,239 --> 00:36:19,520 Speaker 1: where he will be spending the summer before he heads 554 00:36:19,840 --> 00:36:23,200 Speaker 1: off to Beardsley College in I think it's Ohio to 555 00:36:23,880 --> 00:36:28,520 Speaker 1: um teach French literature. Now, the owner of this house, 556 00:36:28,880 --> 00:36:34,120 Speaker 1: Charlotte Hayes, shows him around and played by Shelley Winters, 557 00:36:34,239 --> 00:36:40,040 Speaker 1: my birthday twin oh and wow, today's your birthday, so 558 00:36:40,080 --> 00:36:45,279 Speaker 1: that's amazing. So he's kind of on the fence about 559 00:36:45,280 --> 00:36:47,399 Speaker 1: whether or not he wants to live here. But then 560 00:36:47,760 --> 00:36:50,839 Speaker 1: she shows him out to the garden and out there 561 00:36:51,360 --> 00:36:57,319 Speaker 1: is Charlotte's teenage daughter, Lolita. She is sunbathing in a bikini, 562 00:36:57,520 --> 00:37:02,399 Speaker 1: and Lolita simply being really helps Humbert decide to move in. 563 00:37:02,960 --> 00:37:08,920 Speaker 1: Mrs Hayes. Charlotte becomes interested in Humbert pretty much right away, 564 00:37:09,760 --> 00:37:14,640 Speaker 1: but Humbert becomes interested in Lolita. There's a scene where 565 00:37:14,680 --> 00:37:19,560 Speaker 1: they all go to a community dance. I suppose this 566 00:37:19,640 --> 00:37:23,040 Speaker 1: is all like the scenes are so weird because there's 567 00:37:23,040 --> 00:37:27,160 Speaker 1: a lot of I mean, one thing that was done 568 00:37:27,360 --> 00:37:29,960 Speaker 1: for this movie to allow it to be made was 569 00:37:30,040 --> 00:37:33,360 Speaker 1: to age Lolita up because in the book she is twelve. 570 00:37:33,520 --> 00:37:36,200 Speaker 1: Am I read about that she is twelve? Yeah, and 571 00:37:36,239 --> 00:37:40,280 Speaker 1: in the movie she's fourteen or fifteen. Yeah, not entirely sure. 572 00:37:40,719 --> 00:37:46,560 Speaker 1: The actor who plays Lolita in this movie lyon, oh, 573 00:37:46,600 --> 00:37:50,000 Speaker 1: fourteen at the time shooting. Okay, yeah, she's sixteen when 574 00:37:50,040 --> 00:37:53,560 Speaker 1: it comes out. Got okay, yeah. Yeah. So they aged 575 00:37:53,600 --> 00:37:57,720 Speaker 1: her up slightly, and they added in like a boyfriend character, 576 00:37:58,440 --> 00:38:02,440 Speaker 1: I would guess to make her seem less innocent. I 577 00:38:02,480 --> 00:38:04,640 Speaker 1: don't know really what to think, but this whole boyfriend 578 00:38:04,680 --> 00:38:09,760 Speaker 1: think this is just like invented for the movie. Okay, Kenny, Kenny, 579 00:38:09,800 --> 00:38:14,480 Speaker 1: fake fake news, fake news, Kenny. And then here at 580 00:38:14,520 --> 00:38:18,719 Speaker 1: this dance, we learn that Charlotte has a habit of 581 00:38:18,760 --> 00:38:21,320 Speaker 1: going after men who are not interested in her because 582 00:38:21,320 --> 00:38:25,680 Speaker 1: she approaches Quilty who is there, and he doesn't really 583 00:38:25,719 --> 00:38:28,600 Speaker 1: seem to remember who she is, even though it's implied 584 00:38:28,760 --> 00:38:32,759 Speaker 1: that they have had sex before. This is also totally 585 00:38:32,800 --> 00:38:35,400 Speaker 1: made up for the move invented. Yeah, okay, good to 586 00:38:35,480 --> 00:38:40,520 Speaker 1: know he doesn't remember Charlotte, but he does remember Charlotte's daughter, Lolita. 587 00:38:41,239 --> 00:38:45,319 Speaker 1: So that comes into play later. Now Charlotte kind of 588 00:38:45,360 --> 00:38:49,760 Speaker 1: goes back to throwing herself at Humbert, who again only 589 00:38:49,880 --> 00:38:54,480 Speaker 1: has eyes for a child, and they go back to 590 00:38:54,880 --> 00:38:59,160 Speaker 1: the house. After this dance, Lolita returns and this makes 591 00:38:59,320 --> 00:39:03,040 Speaker 1: Humbert very happy. But Charlotte is starting to get the 592 00:39:03,120 --> 00:39:07,759 Speaker 1: sense that Humbert is interested in Lolita. So Charlotte kind 593 00:39:07,760 --> 00:39:09,719 Speaker 1: of lashes out and she says, go to bed, you 594 00:39:09,800 --> 00:39:12,759 Speaker 1: little pest, and then she kind of has a little outburst. 595 00:39:13,000 --> 00:39:18,880 Speaker 1: She sure does. Um. Then Humbert starts writing in a diary, 596 00:39:19,000 --> 00:39:21,400 Speaker 1: or maybe he has been already, but he basically started. 597 00:39:21,440 --> 00:39:24,960 Speaker 1: He's like writing in his diary about his affection for Lolita, 598 00:39:25,360 --> 00:39:31,120 Speaker 1: who he starts to call his nymphete and barf um. 599 00:39:31,719 --> 00:39:36,279 Speaker 1: But Charlotte reveals that she is sending Lolita away for 600 00:39:36,320 --> 00:39:39,600 Speaker 1: the summer to camp because she wants to keep sas 601 00:39:39,600 --> 00:39:43,960 Speaker 1: a free up her schedule to be hitting on Humbert 602 00:39:44,000 --> 00:39:48,800 Speaker 1: all summer, right, we are to believe, and Humbert is 603 00:39:48,880 --> 00:39:52,520 Speaker 1: very disappointed by this. There's a scene where Lolita comes 604 00:39:52,520 --> 00:39:55,800 Speaker 1: in the house and wishes him a farewell and says, 605 00:39:55,880 --> 00:39:59,799 Speaker 1: you know, don't forget me. Then Humbert gets a letter 606 00:39:59,840 --> 00:40:02,960 Speaker 1: from Charlotte professing her love for him, saying, one of 607 00:40:03,000 --> 00:40:07,120 Speaker 1: my favorite lines in fiction. I saw that you had 608 00:40:07,200 --> 00:40:10,560 Speaker 1: changed your Twitter bio to this. It is such a 609 00:40:10,680 --> 00:40:13,799 Speaker 1: fun line. I mean, in a very depressing work, it 610 00:40:13,920 --> 00:40:16,720 Speaker 1: is a fun line. I'm a passionate and lonely woman 611 00:40:16,760 --> 00:40:19,560 Speaker 1: and you are the love of my life. I'm like, okay, drama, 612 00:40:19,760 --> 00:40:25,360 Speaker 1: Like I Charlotte's letter is so over dramatic, and I 613 00:40:25,440 --> 00:40:28,319 Speaker 1: love it. Yeah. She's basically like, get out of my 614 00:40:28,440 --> 00:40:33,520 Speaker 1: house because I love you unless you also love me, 615 00:40:33,680 --> 00:40:36,640 Speaker 1: and then you have to stay and be my lover forever. 616 00:40:37,280 --> 00:40:40,520 Speaker 1: You're like a Charlotte like I just I I mean, 617 00:40:41,120 --> 00:40:45,400 Speaker 1: we'll talk about but like that letter is always fun 618 00:40:45,600 --> 00:40:48,040 Speaker 1: for me. I hate that he laughs at her. I'm like, 619 00:40:48,080 --> 00:40:49,880 Speaker 1: this is the this is the best writing in the 620 00:40:49,960 --> 00:40:55,080 Speaker 1: movie is Charlotte's letter. But I love Charlotte's letter. Yeah. So, 621 00:40:55,080 --> 00:40:58,839 Speaker 1: so he reads this letter and then he marries her, 622 00:40:59,400 --> 00:41:01,880 Speaker 1: and the implicate Asian here is that he marries her 623 00:41:02,000 --> 00:41:05,520 Speaker 1: so that he will have the opportunity to see Lolita again. 624 00:41:06,360 --> 00:41:09,640 Speaker 1: But then Charlotte says that she has decided to send 625 00:41:09,719 --> 00:41:14,120 Speaker 1: Lolita from camp straight to boarding school and then straight 626 00:41:14,160 --> 00:41:18,879 Speaker 1: to college from there, meaning that Humbert probably won't really 627 00:41:18,920 --> 00:41:22,240 Speaker 1: ever see her again, so he freaks out. He starts 628 00:41:22,280 --> 00:41:28,160 Speaker 1: to premeditate him murdering Charlotte loudly and all the time 629 00:41:28,400 --> 00:41:31,040 Speaker 1: like there I know. And it's so it like adds 630 00:41:31,080 --> 00:41:34,120 Speaker 1: to it that it's James Mason, just like the most 631 00:41:34,200 --> 00:41:37,279 Speaker 1: British person ever, being like maybe I should kill her, 632 00:41:37,520 --> 00:41:40,880 Speaker 1: Like you're just like shut up, man, like what are 633 00:41:40,920 --> 00:41:45,879 Speaker 1: you doing? This is also this is really deviated from 634 00:41:45,880 --> 00:41:49,040 Speaker 1: what happens in the book as well. But anyways, got it, Yeah, 635 00:41:49,080 --> 00:41:51,520 Speaker 1: I don't. I don't remember it well enough. But Humbert 636 00:41:51,560 --> 00:41:55,320 Speaker 1: decides against killing his wife Um, and we're supposed to 637 00:41:55,400 --> 00:42:02,080 Speaker 1: be like, wow, awesome, like hero cool. But Charlotte has 638 00:42:02,120 --> 00:42:05,839 Speaker 1: just discovered Humbert's diary, in which he has insulted her 639 00:42:06,320 --> 00:42:11,360 Speaker 1: and expressed his love for Lolita, so she is distraught, 640 00:42:11,760 --> 00:42:15,439 Speaker 1: runs out into the street, and is killed when she's 641 00:42:15,520 --> 00:42:19,759 Speaker 1: hit by a car. Humbert is mostly unfazed by this. 642 00:42:20,320 --> 00:42:24,600 Speaker 1: He then leaves to go pick Lolita up from camp Um, 643 00:42:24,640 --> 00:42:27,160 Speaker 1: telling her that her mother is sick and in the 644 00:42:27,239 --> 00:42:29,759 Speaker 1: hospital and they just kind of have to bide their 645 00:42:29,800 --> 00:42:32,600 Speaker 1: time before until she's well. So they're just going to 646 00:42:32,680 --> 00:42:35,359 Speaker 1: travel around a little bit until then. So they check 647 00:42:35,400 --> 00:42:38,680 Speaker 1: into a hotel and there's only one room left with 648 00:42:38,800 --> 00:42:43,560 Speaker 1: one bed. Quilty also happens to be there. There's a 649 00:42:43,560 --> 00:42:46,080 Speaker 1: scene where he is acting, he's like very high strung. 650 00:42:46,600 --> 00:42:49,879 Speaker 1: He and Humbert talk for a little bit about Lolita, 651 00:42:50,000 --> 00:42:53,280 Speaker 1: and then Humbert returns to the room where he tries 652 00:42:53,360 --> 00:42:56,879 Speaker 1: to get into the bed with Lolita, but then ends 653 00:42:56,960 --> 00:42:59,799 Speaker 1: up sleeping on the cot that has been brought in 654 00:43:00,200 --> 00:43:04,279 Speaker 1: right but the next morning it is implied that they 655 00:43:04,360 --> 00:43:08,400 Speaker 1: do something sexual together off screen a k a. A 656 00:43:08,600 --> 00:43:14,280 Speaker 1: statutory rape happens. Then they set off again in the car, 657 00:43:14,800 --> 00:43:18,160 Speaker 1: Humbert finally tells Lolita that her mother is dead, so 658 00:43:18,520 --> 00:43:24,680 Speaker 1: Lolita is very upset, but eventually Humbert and Lolita kind 659 00:43:24,680 --> 00:43:28,399 Speaker 1: of settle into a life together. And again by that, 660 00:43:28,520 --> 00:43:33,200 Speaker 1: I mean he's a predator and he regularly again and again. 661 00:43:33,239 --> 00:43:37,560 Speaker 1: This is like so wildly deviated from the book where 662 00:43:38,000 --> 00:43:42,360 Speaker 1: they're they're still traveling together, but she is constantly trying 663 00:43:42,440 --> 00:43:45,600 Speaker 1: to escape, and she is constantly trying to get away 664 00:43:45,680 --> 00:43:51,160 Speaker 1: and devise different ways to get away from her abuser 665 00:43:51,200 --> 00:43:54,000 Speaker 1: who's continually manipulating her. In the movie. It is kind 666 00:43:54,000 --> 00:43:59,120 Speaker 1: of portrayed as a mostly fun road trip when yeah, 667 00:43:59,200 --> 00:44:01,600 Speaker 1: I have a lot to say about the tone of 668 00:44:01,600 --> 00:44:07,239 Speaker 1: this movie, which is horrible. Um Okay. So now they're 669 00:44:07,239 --> 00:44:10,640 Speaker 1: living in Ohio and he starts his job as a 670 00:44:10,680 --> 00:44:14,760 Speaker 1: professor of Beardsley College. Lolita's seems to be getting bored 671 00:44:14,800 --> 00:44:17,759 Speaker 1: with their relationship. He doesn't like that she hangs out 672 00:44:17,800 --> 00:44:20,400 Speaker 1: with other boys at school. She wants to do the 673 00:44:20,440 --> 00:44:23,440 Speaker 1: school play, but he won't let her, so then Quilty 674 00:44:23,520 --> 00:44:27,080 Speaker 1: comes in. He has written this play. He shows up 675 00:44:27,160 --> 00:44:31,640 Speaker 1: pretending to be the school psychologist and convinces Humbert to 676 00:44:31,719 --> 00:44:34,839 Speaker 1: let Lolita be in the play. But Humbert finds out 677 00:44:34,840 --> 00:44:37,600 Speaker 1: that Lolita has been lying to him about where she's 678 00:44:37,600 --> 00:44:40,080 Speaker 1: been and who she's been hanging out with. They getting 679 00:44:40,080 --> 00:44:43,520 Speaker 1: a big fight, but eventually she's like, okay, Humbert, let's 680 00:44:43,560 --> 00:44:47,080 Speaker 1: go away again, so they set off. There's a car 681 00:44:47,200 --> 00:44:52,239 Speaker 1: that's been following them for a while, and then Lolita 682 00:44:52,480 --> 00:44:55,800 Speaker 1: gets sick and has to be hospitalized. But when Humbert 683 00:44:55,840 --> 00:44:58,440 Speaker 1: picks her up from the hospital, the staff says that 684 00:44:58,520 --> 00:45:01,800 Speaker 1: another man has already picked her up, so he freaks out. 685 00:45:01,960 --> 00:45:05,560 Speaker 1: He doesn't know where she is he loses contact with 686 00:45:05,600 --> 00:45:09,920 Speaker 1: her for I believe a few years, and then Humbert 687 00:45:10,000 --> 00:45:13,760 Speaker 1: after some time receives a letter from Lolita asking for money, 688 00:45:14,000 --> 00:45:17,200 Speaker 1: so he goes to see her. She is married to 689 00:45:17,239 --> 00:45:21,880 Speaker 1: a young man, she is regnant with his baby, and 690 00:45:21,920 --> 00:45:25,719 Speaker 1: she reveals that she had been having a relationship with 691 00:45:25,960 --> 00:45:29,720 Speaker 1: Quilty during this time that she was in the school play. 692 00:45:29,760 --> 00:45:33,880 Speaker 1: And then I think also before because basically Quilty follows 693 00:45:34,239 --> 00:45:38,600 Speaker 1: her around wherever she goes, it seems, and it was 694 00:45:38,680 --> 00:45:41,520 Speaker 1: him who had picked her up from the hospital. Lolita 695 00:45:42,280 --> 00:45:44,160 Speaker 1: says that she was always in love with him, but 696 00:45:44,200 --> 00:45:47,839 Speaker 1: she did care about Humbert. Humbert gets her to try 697 00:45:47,840 --> 00:45:50,359 Speaker 1: to run away with him, but she refuses, so then 698 00:45:50,640 --> 00:45:53,279 Speaker 1: he goes to Quiality's mansion, which is the scene we 699 00:45:53,320 --> 00:45:55,520 Speaker 1: see in the beginning, and then he murders him and 700 00:45:55,520 --> 00:45:59,719 Speaker 1: then we find out that he dies of coronary thrombosis 701 00:46:00,280 --> 00:46:03,920 Speaker 1: before the trial prison. Yeah, so that is the end 702 00:46:03,960 --> 00:46:07,759 Speaker 1: of the ninety two movie. Again, I mean we will 703 00:46:07,800 --> 00:46:12,160 Speaker 1: continue to repeat this. This is unequivocally a story of 704 00:46:12,560 --> 00:46:17,640 Speaker 1: a child being repeatedly abused by a guardian. Like there 705 00:46:17,760 --> 00:46:23,000 Speaker 1: is no if sandswer buds about it and this movie. However, 706 00:46:23,719 --> 00:46:26,319 Speaker 1: I don't know what this movie thinks is going on, 707 00:46:26,960 --> 00:46:32,840 Speaker 1: because it seems like it is mishandling everything at every turn. 708 00:46:33,080 --> 00:46:36,600 Speaker 1: And where I like to start is it's sort of 709 00:46:36,640 --> 00:46:39,319 Speaker 1: like for SNA like not fortunate, but like alluding to 710 00:46:39,360 --> 00:46:43,160 Speaker 1: this a little earlier of the way that this story 711 00:46:43,560 --> 00:46:45,960 Speaker 1: is framed. If you're going to attempt to tell it, 712 00:46:46,120 --> 00:46:50,960 Speaker 1: which I agree you don't have to, it exists as 713 00:46:51,080 --> 00:46:55,160 Speaker 1: a historical moment of this topic attempting to be discussed 714 00:46:55,160 --> 00:46:58,520 Speaker 1: in the nineteen fifties, that is very worthy of criticism, 715 00:46:58,560 --> 00:47:01,320 Speaker 1: and that's in one place if you're trying to adapt 716 00:47:01,440 --> 00:47:07,200 Speaker 1: this responsibly. I feel that the framing of the story 717 00:47:07,360 --> 00:47:11,719 Speaker 1: is very important because for you know, the book, and 718 00:47:11,760 --> 00:47:14,520 Speaker 1: I feel like I'm like the book, but it is 719 00:47:14,560 --> 00:47:18,520 Speaker 1: important for this friend. The way that the book frames Humbert. 720 00:47:18,600 --> 00:47:22,279 Speaker 1: Humbert is that he is narrating his own story. He 721 00:47:22,440 --> 00:47:27,960 Speaker 1: is doing so from prison, trying to convince a jury 722 00:47:28,080 --> 00:47:32,000 Speaker 1: to let him get off from these crimes that he's 723 00:47:32,000 --> 00:47:35,600 Speaker 1: committed a murder. But also he is admitting that he 724 00:47:36,040 --> 00:47:41,319 Speaker 1: um is a rapist of an m minor, So this 725 00:47:41,360 --> 00:47:43,640 Speaker 1: is something he's acknowledging over and over. So he is 726 00:47:43,680 --> 00:47:49,239 Speaker 1: perhaps not is he perhaps an unreliable narrator, but not 727 00:47:49,400 --> 00:47:53,799 Speaker 1: just that Kate there is. The book starts with a 728 00:47:54,120 --> 00:47:59,000 Speaker 1: um an introduction by a different fictional character who basically 729 00:47:59,040 --> 00:48:02,279 Speaker 1: tells you not to trust a word you're about to hear. 730 00:48:03,000 --> 00:48:06,880 Speaker 1: And so, just based on my own research and experience 731 00:48:06,920 --> 00:48:09,439 Speaker 1: with the like, the book is intended to be an 732 00:48:09,440 --> 00:48:13,040 Speaker 1: experiment of You're told very explicitly at the beginning of 733 00:48:13,040 --> 00:48:16,400 Speaker 1: the story, do not fall for this person ship. They're lying, 734 00:48:16,920 --> 00:48:21,879 Speaker 1: and then the book becomes well will you fall for it? Anyways? Basically, um, 735 00:48:22,000 --> 00:48:26,880 Speaker 1: this is completely absent from every movie adaptation, and it 736 00:48:27,000 --> 00:48:31,080 Speaker 1: is so important into like if you're going to adapt it, 737 00:48:31,320 --> 00:48:34,719 Speaker 1: this has to be included, Like, it absolutely needs to 738 00:48:34,719 --> 00:48:38,120 Speaker 1: be included. There's another thing that Humbert again, it's like 739 00:48:38,160 --> 00:48:41,359 Speaker 1: he's a fucking liar, so you don't know really. I 740 00:48:41,400 --> 00:48:44,080 Speaker 1: also think it's weird that it's like commonly accepted that 741 00:48:44,480 --> 00:48:47,360 Speaker 1: Charlotte just happened to walk into traffic. I always I'm like, 742 00:48:47,400 --> 00:48:50,400 Speaker 1: I think he's lying about that, but whatever, Yeah, he 743 00:48:50,520 --> 00:48:54,440 Speaker 1: probably pushed her, he probably killed her, like why but 744 00:48:54,680 --> 00:48:57,960 Speaker 1: even like literary scholars are like, wow, he really looked 745 00:48:57,960 --> 00:49:00,960 Speaker 1: out there I'm like, I'm I've like he killed he 746 00:49:01,120 --> 00:49:04,080 Speaker 1: was just premeditating her murder. I don't know if that 747 00:49:04,320 --> 00:49:07,400 Speaker 1: is in the book. Well that hasn't happened. But but like, 748 00:49:07,400 --> 00:49:11,560 Speaker 1: like on her way to report him for being a 749 00:49:11,680 --> 00:49:14,680 Speaker 1: criminal of the highest degree, she happened to get hit 750 00:49:14,680 --> 00:49:16,279 Speaker 1: by a car. I mean, give me a fucking break. 751 00:49:16,320 --> 00:49:20,120 Speaker 1: But in any case, this framing is so important and 752 00:49:20,480 --> 00:49:23,759 Speaker 1: humber this is included in the movie, but also in 753 00:49:23,960 --> 00:49:27,880 Speaker 1: the worst stupidest way possible. He also mentioned at the 754 00:49:27,960 --> 00:49:31,800 Speaker 1: beginning of the book that he had loved and lost 755 00:49:32,000 --> 00:49:36,040 Speaker 1: a young woman who was about Lolita's age when he 756 00:49:36,160 --> 00:49:38,960 Speaker 1: was that age and I and he uses that as 757 00:49:38,960 --> 00:49:42,160 Speaker 1: a manipulative narrator to get you to say, well, this 758 00:49:42,239 --> 00:49:45,120 Speaker 1: is why I did this horrible crime is because something 759 00:49:45,160 --> 00:49:47,680 Speaker 1: bad happened to me when I was that age, which 760 00:49:47,719 --> 00:49:49,840 Speaker 1: is a very manipulative tactic that is used by a 761 00:49:49,880 --> 00:49:54,359 Speaker 1: lot of abusers. Again, this is completely omitted from this. 762 00:49:54,920 --> 00:49:57,279 Speaker 1: I feel like this movie. I mean tell me if 763 00:49:57,280 --> 00:50:00,400 Speaker 1: you I feel like this movie pretty much just events 764 00:50:00,600 --> 00:50:05,160 Speaker 1: Humbert's narrative as fact as this is what happened period, Like, 765 00:50:05,200 --> 00:50:08,839 Speaker 1: there is no the movie does not question him at all. 766 00:50:09,320 --> 00:50:13,719 Speaker 1: At all. It's ridiculous. There's no implication that he might 767 00:50:13,920 --> 00:50:17,280 Speaker 1: be an unreliable narrator. They're like, these are the events 768 00:50:17,400 --> 00:50:21,960 Speaker 1: of the story. This is exactly how they played out. Explicitly, 769 00:50:22,120 --> 00:50:25,920 Speaker 1: he does voiceover like I guess he is the narrator, 770 00:50:26,040 --> 00:50:30,200 Speaker 1: but there's no I mean, like for your average viewer, 771 00:50:30,840 --> 00:50:33,960 Speaker 1: an unreliable narrator is like a concept that you need 772 00:50:34,000 --> 00:50:37,839 Speaker 1: to make pretty fucking clear. Like you can't just be like, 773 00:50:38,040 --> 00:50:41,279 Speaker 1: here's James Mason, a very established movie star who you 774 00:50:41,400 --> 00:50:45,920 Speaker 1: probably like, don't believe him, Like that is a difficult 775 00:50:46,280 --> 00:50:48,640 Speaker 1: that's a difficult concept. You have to make that super 776 00:50:48,760 --> 00:50:52,280 Speaker 1: duper clear. And I wonder, I mean, I've really tried 777 00:50:52,320 --> 00:50:54,920 Speaker 1: to follow the thread of like, well, who thwarted this 778 00:50:55,040 --> 00:50:59,520 Speaker 1: from happening? Because nabokov screenplay includes everything I just talked about. 779 00:51:00,120 --> 00:51:02,840 Speaker 1: It includes the character at the beginning that is like, 780 00:51:02,880 --> 00:51:06,359 Speaker 1: don't believe anything you're about to hear. It includes, if 781 00:51:06,360 --> 00:51:08,840 Speaker 1: you're going to try to adapt it, the necessary things 782 00:51:09,440 --> 00:51:13,319 Speaker 1: I think. But I'm like, well, who does Kuber say 783 00:51:13,480 --> 00:51:16,640 Speaker 1: don't bother? Does the production code say, like who is 784 00:51:16,680 --> 00:51:22,120 Speaker 1: the person that says no, it bothers me? It's and 785 00:51:22,160 --> 00:51:25,120 Speaker 1: it just dooms the movie too. I mean, any live 786 00:51:25,160 --> 00:51:29,479 Speaker 1: action interpretation of this that is translated faithfully I think 787 00:51:29,719 --> 00:51:34,640 Speaker 1: is not even worth trying and is just is irresponsible. 788 00:51:35,360 --> 00:51:37,080 Speaker 1: But this one in particular, I mean it's like you're 789 00:51:37,080 --> 00:51:41,520 Speaker 1: not even fucking trying. I know, I know the code, 790 00:51:41,600 --> 00:51:44,399 Speaker 1: and like, don't go in the comments about the code. 791 00:51:44,400 --> 00:51:48,480 Speaker 1: We know about the code. But in that case, what 792 00:51:49,800 --> 00:51:54,520 Speaker 1: cat fighting outside? There's no a bunch of cats that 793 00:51:54,640 --> 00:51:57,279 Speaker 1: fight in the alley next to my house. I live 794 00:51:57,360 --> 00:52:04,080 Speaker 1: in a cartoon. Uh so, I'm right. So what happens 795 00:52:04,200 --> 00:52:08,800 Speaker 1: in this adaptation in the sixty two one is the story. 796 00:52:09,040 --> 00:52:14,560 Speaker 1: Because there's no mention of like, don't believe anything this 797 00:52:14,600 --> 00:52:19,080 Speaker 1: man says, don't fall for his manipulation tactics, etcetera. The 798 00:52:19,120 --> 00:52:23,560 Speaker 1: movie gets framed as being like almost like a rom com, 799 00:52:23,600 --> 00:52:27,360 Speaker 1: like there are there's a lot of visual jokes about 800 00:52:27,400 --> 00:52:31,160 Speaker 1: like his attraction to Lolita. The inclusion of Peter Seller's 801 00:52:31,200 --> 00:52:34,680 Speaker 1: at all, like a famous comic actor of this era 802 00:52:35,280 --> 00:52:38,359 Speaker 1: takes up way too much screen time in this movie. 803 00:52:38,400 --> 00:52:43,040 Speaker 1: But like that aside, that's a that's a very specific 804 00:52:43,080 --> 00:52:46,000 Speaker 1: decision you're making by putting a famous comic actor like 805 00:52:46,400 --> 00:52:51,680 Speaker 1: second build in this movie. What are you saying, Like, Yeah, so, 806 00:52:51,719 --> 00:52:54,919 Speaker 1: like the tone that this movie takes I absolutely think 807 00:52:55,160 --> 00:52:57,960 Speaker 1: is horrendous because it frames a lot of what happens 808 00:52:58,000 --> 00:53:01,480 Speaker 1: as comedy and as jokes, like in cite some examples 809 00:53:01,520 --> 00:53:05,520 Speaker 1: at some point. But and while the movie ends tragically 810 00:53:05,680 --> 00:53:10,000 Speaker 1: for Humbert, like he kind of gets his come up 811 00:53:10,080 --> 00:53:13,520 Speaker 1: and I guess to like the not degree that he 812 00:53:14,080 --> 00:53:17,560 Speaker 1: should have, but like he does. That is how they 813 00:53:17,719 --> 00:53:22,200 Speaker 1: end his story in Nabakrov's book, but it omits. I mean, 814 00:53:22,280 --> 00:53:25,520 Speaker 1: the the one thing that this movie does that I 815 00:53:25,560 --> 00:53:29,360 Speaker 1: think is at least interesting and not just like Blanket 816 00:53:29,600 --> 00:53:34,960 Speaker 1: I hate it is that it gives Lolita a happy 817 00:53:35,320 --> 00:53:40,560 Speaker 1: ish ending, which is not how any other adaptation nor 818 00:53:40,600 --> 00:53:45,240 Speaker 1: the source material ends in the book. Canonically, she dies 819 00:53:45,280 --> 00:53:50,800 Speaker 1: in childbirth and as I mean, uh, it's just a 820 00:53:50,840 --> 00:53:54,200 Speaker 1: track like she has a tragic life and and passes 821 00:53:54,239 --> 00:53:58,640 Speaker 1: away very young, which and I was reading it at 822 00:53:58,680 --> 00:54:03,520 Speaker 1: the time, like I really loved Lolita as a kid, 823 00:54:03,600 --> 00:54:05,920 Speaker 1: and I kind of like looked up to her in 824 00:54:05,960 --> 00:54:09,279 Speaker 1: a way that was unhealthy because I was misinterpreting what 825 00:54:09,320 --> 00:54:11,880 Speaker 1: was happening. But I cared a lot about the character 826 00:54:12,000 --> 00:54:14,160 Speaker 1: and like to know that she dies at the end 827 00:54:14,960 --> 00:54:17,360 Speaker 1: at least helped me understand a little bit that she 828 00:54:17,440 --> 00:54:20,680 Speaker 1: had been done this huge disservice in her life, that 829 00:54:20,760 --> 00:54:24,680 Speaker 1: her life had literally been, you know, taken from her. 830 00:54:25,880 --> 00:54:28,520 Speaker 1: This movie does not go this way. It kind of 831 00:54:28,640 --> 00:54:33,680 Speaker 1: ends kind of optimistically for her, which I would suspect 832 00:54:33,719 --> 00:54:36,520 Speaker 1: has something to do with the code of like, well, 833 00:54:36,560 --> 00:54:41,480 Speaker 1: don't kill our titular character who never did anything wrong. 834 00:54:41,960 --> 00:54:45,480 Speaker 1: It's the only choice this movie makes that is remotely interesting, 835 00:54:45,640 --> 00:54:49,400 Speaker 1: is not. It is allowing lowly as character to live on, 836 00:54:49,600 --> 00:54:53,239 Speaker 1: which you know, I don't know. I guess I don't 837 00:54:53,239 --> 00:54:56,480 Speaker 1: feel one way or another about it. It's interesting, it's different. Um. 838 00:54:56,520 --> 00:55:00,840 Speaker 1: There are two things I do remember from the book. 839 00:55:01,320 --> 00:55:05,480 Speaker 1: It's been a while. It's been fifteen years since I've 840 00:55:05,520 --> 00:55:10,719 Speaker 1: read the book, so I don't remember it very well. 841 00:55:11,480 --> 00:55:13,719 Speaker 1: Let me know if I'm remembering this correctly, jam May, 842 00:55:13,719 --> 00:55:17,120 Speaker 1: since you've read it more recently. Is there a component 843 00:55:17,160 --> 00:55:20,759 Speaker 1: of the book where Humbert as he's like writing in 844 00:55:20,840 --> 00:55:25,240 Speaker 1: his diary and describing his relationship with Lolita. I feel 845 00:55:25,239 --> 00:55:29,960 Speaker 1: like he's often saying that like she is coming onto 846 00:55:30,120 --> 00:55:33,640 Speaker 1: him by, like she's like he's always like she's a nymphete. 847 00:55:33,680 --> 00:55:38,920 Speaker 1: She's like a nymphomaniac. She's always trying to initiate like 848 00:55:39,000 --> 00:55:42,120 Speaker 1: sexual contact with me, Like he's kind of blaming it 849 00:55:42,200 --> 00:55:44,919 Speaker 1: on her. Is that something? And I remember a lot 850 00:55:44,960 --> 00:55:47,200 Speaker 1: of the tone of and that's a lot of what 851 00:55:47,320 --> 00:55:51,759 Speaker 1: his character does in the book. I think intentionally by 852 00:55:51,800 --> 00:55:56,080 Speaker 1: the author is that he oscillates between blaming his victims 853 00:55:56,520 --> 00:56:00,360 Speaker 1: and a deep hatred of himself. So it pends on 854 00:56:00,400 --> 00:56:02,640 Speaker 1: what part in the book you were in. At certain 855 00:56:02,680 --> 00:56:05,879 Speaker 1: parts he blames her whole sale in a way that 856 00:56:06,120 --> 00:56:09,840 Speaker 1: reading it as an adult, you know is not true. 857 00:56:10,520 --> 00:56:14,520 Speaker 1: Um and is him offloading all of his own baggage 858 00:56:14,600 --> 00:56:18,640 Speaker 1: onto a child and saying, I mean the thing that 859 00:56:18,680 --> 00:56:22,080 Speaker 1: people have said about victims since the beginning of time 860 00:56:22,080 --> 00:56:24,279 Speaker 1: of like they were asking for it is basically what 861 00:56:24,360 --> 00:56:27,400 Speaker 1: he's saying by inventing this vocabulary word at all. And 862 00:56:27,400 --> 00:56:29,640 Speaker 1: then in other sections of the book, which we really 863 00:56:29,680 --> 00:56:33,640 Speaker 1: don't see in any of these adaptations, he kind of switches. 864 00:56:33,719 --> 00:56:39,760 Speaker 1: When Lolita shows extreme like an example would be when 865 00:56:39,800 --> 00:56:43,520 Speaker 1: she finds out that her mother is actually dead and 866 00:56:43,840 --> 00:56:48,919 Speaker 1: not sick. She grieves her and is really upset and 867 00:56:48,960 --> 00:56:51,600 Speaker 1: cries for days and days and at this point in 868 00:56:51,600 --> 00:56:55,600 Speaker 1: the narrative, he starts to go to like step zero 869 00:56:55,719 --> 00:56:59,160 Speaker 1: point one of introspection and starts to feel a lot 870 00:56:59,160 --> 00:57:01,439 Speaker 1: of guilt and his like, oh my god, I'm doing 871 00:57:01,480 --> 00:57:04,560 Speaker 1: this horrible thing to this child. What am I doing? 872 00:57:04,680 --> 00:57:07,520 Speaker 1: I'm I'm a monster, I'm a horrible person. He calls 873 00:57:07,560 --> 00:57:12,520 Speaker 1: himself like a pentapod monster, like he called There's sections 874 00:57:12,640 --> 00:57:16,240 Speaker 1: where he seems completely aware of what he's doing but 875 00:57:16,320 --> 00:57:19,320 Speaker 1: continues to do it anyways, which makes him even work right, 876 00:57:19,360 --> 00:57:22,360 Speaker 1: And then there's other sections where he's just blaming his victims. 877 00:57:22,400 --> 00:57:29,040 Speaker 1: So it's different headspaces of just a wholesale abuser. This this, 878 00:57:29,560 --> 00:57:32,680 Speaker 1: it's not even so it doesn't cross James Mason's mind 879 00:57:32,680 --> 00:57:35,920 Speaker 1: that he's doing anything wrong. And I think that that 880 00:57:36,000 --> 00:57:40,120 Speaker 1: has a lot to do with setting the code aside, 881 00:57:40,720 --> 00:57:44,840 Speaker 1: the view of that Hollywood has of women and girls 882 00:57:45,000 --> 00:57:48,640 Speaker 1: at this time of I think that the you know, 883 00:57:48,720 --> 00:57:50,960 Speaker 1: the way that it's like you're saying, Caitlin, it's so 884 00:57:51,000 --> 00:57:55,200 Speaker 1: often framed as a joke that this man who's almost 885 00:57:55,200 --> 00:57:58,720 Speaker 1: forty and James Mason was over forty, uh is having 886 00:57:58,760 --> 00:58:01,800 Speaker 1: a relationship with a child, a person who cannot consent 887 00:58:01,880 --> 00:58:04,760 Speaker 1: to them and kind of joking around, like you know, 888 00:58:05,520 --> 00:58:07,680 Speaker 1: which was a real culture and that was a real 889 00:58:07,800 --> 00:58:12,840 Speaker 1: thing that happened in in mid century America, and there's 890 00:58:13,120 --> 00:58:16,919 Speaker 1: countless examples of it, and certainly, I mean, we don't 891 00:58:16,920 --> 00:58:20,360 Speaker 1: have time to recap the history of how Hollywood has 892 00:58:20,400 --> 00:58:25,480 Speaker 1: treated child stars and how and the legacy that continues 893 00:58:25,520 --> 00:58:28,200 Speaker 1: to this day of abuse that happens to young people. 894 00:58:29,160 --> 00:58:30,840 Speaker 1: But it is I feel like it's treated as a 895 00:58:30,920 --> 00:58:33,840 Speaker 1: joke because in this time you could just treat it 896 00:58:33,880 --> 00:58:36,200 Speaker 1: as a joke, like it you didn't even need to 897 00:58:36,240 --> 00:58:38,880 Speaker 1: explain where you were coming from. It was just culturally 898 00:58:38,920 --> 00:58:45,200 Speaker 1: accepted as a joke. The movie frames again his attraction 899 00:58:45,240 --> 00:58:50,080 Speaker 1: to her as like, isn't it so fun and cute 900 00:58:50,240 --> 00:58:54,120 Speaker 1: that he's attracted to an underage girl? Like and she 901 00:58:54,280 --> 00:58:58,440 Speaker 1: and she's also interested in him and all this stuff 902 00:58:58,520 --> 00:59:03,400 Speaker 1: of it's so it's and it does lead I think, 903 00:59:03,440 --> 00:59:06,600 Speaker 1: I mean, I feel like, yeah, I mean, this is 904 00:59:06,640 --> 00:59:10,120 Speaker 1: not a hot take. I wish to god I had 905 00:59:10,200 --> 00:59:14,200 Speaker 1: not found out about this property when I was twelve 906 00:59:14,240 --> 00:59:19,360 Speaker 1: years old, when I was like Lolita's age, because you know, 907 00:59:19,400 --> 00:59:21,800 Speaker 1: it's it's for most twelve year olds at that time, 908 00:59:21,800 --> 00:59:24,200 Speaker 1: and for most young people, it's not You're just not 909 00:59:24,280 --> 00:59:28,000 Speaker 1: going to have the frame of reference to understand what 910 00:59:28,040 --> 00:59:30,040 Speaker 1: you're reading. I don't think it should be a book 911 00:59:30,040 --> 00:59:32,760 Speaker 1: that's banned outright, Like, if you don't want to read it, 912 00:59:33,160 --> 00:59:36,400 Speaker 1: definitely don't. And I absolutely understand why you wouldn't want to. 913 00:59:36,880 --> 00:59:40,960 Speaker 1: But when it's presented to like who is this movie for? 914 00:59:41,520 --> 00:59:45,400 Speaker 1: Is my question like, who the fuck is is even for? 915 00:59:46,440 --> 00:59:50,120 Speaker 1: This also extends to I mean, Lolita is I think, 916 00:59:50,120 --> 00:59:54,240 Speaker 1: to an extent, demonized and made to say, well, this 917 00:59:54,400 --> 00:59:58,800 Speaker 1: was a very like sexual fourteen or fifteen year old. 918 00:59:58,920 --> 01:00:01,560 Speaker 1: So I think at the movie frames that of like, well, 919 01:00:01,880 --> 01:00:06,720 Speaker 1: can you really blame him? And it's like, yeah, you can, 920 01:00:07,640 --> 01:00:12,160 Speaker 1: and you should and you should but this but but 921 01:00:12,240 --> 01:00:16,240 Speaker 1: I think that this movie has such a nothing view 922 01:00:16,520 --> 01:00:19,920 Speaker 1: of of Lolita. She's she's barely written at all. And 923 01:00:19,960 --> 01:00:22,919 Speaker 1: I'm sure that that again I mean code code code, right, 924 01:00:23,360 --> 01:00:29,240 Speaker 1: but I mean she's robbed of any element that made 925 01:00:29,280 --> 01:00:32,520 Speaker 1: her a character, because I mean a lot of what 926 01:00:32,640 --> 01:00:34,840 Speaker 1: you encounter with her in the book and to some 927 01:00:34,920 --> 01:00:38,040 Speaker 1: extent in other adaptations is it making it very clear 928 01:00:38,080 --> 01:00:40,240 Speaker 1: that she's a kid and she has the interest that 929 01:00:40,280 --> 01:00:43,520 Speaker 1: a kid does and she's like a really she's like 930 01:00:43,880 --> 01:00:47,240 Speaker 1: a twelve year old with a big personality, who likes 931 01:00:47,440 --> 01:00:50,320 Speaker 1: who's like very rebellious and has a complicated relationship with 932 01:00:50,320 --> 01:00:53,680 Speaker 1: her mom and all this stuff. Like, you know, people 933 01:00:53,720 --> 01:00:56,400 Speaker 1: didn't identify with this character. I didn't identify with her 934 01:00:56,400 --> 01:00:58,640 Speaker 1: when I was twelve for no reason. She had a 935 01:00:58,680 --> 01:01:03,000 Speaker 1: personality that you can recognize. But this is that this 936 01:01:03,080 --> 01:01:05,160 Speaker 1: is just the kind of another thing that's taken from 937 01:01:05,200 --> 01:01:07,959 Speaker 1: her in this movie. We know really nothing about her 938 01:01:08,600 --> 01:01:11,600 Speaker 1: right and the movie has no interest in getting to 939 01:01:11,800 --> 01:01:13,760 Speaker 1: know her, which is just going to make it that 940 01:01:13,840 --> 01:01:17,120 Speaker 1: much harder for a viewer to empathize with what she's 941 01:01:17,160 --> 01:01:21,120 Speaker 1: going through. Let's take another break and then we'll be 942 01:01:21,240 --> 01:01:29,640 Speaker 1: right back for a more discussion. Going back to the 943 01:01:29,720 --> 01:01:34,720 Speaker 1: kind of use of visual comedy to set the tone 944 01:01:34,760 --> 01:01:38,480 Speaker 1: of this movie. Like there's a scene where after Humbert 945 01:01:38,480 --> 01:01:40,120 Speaker 1: has moved in, they all go to a drive in 946 01:01:40,200 --> 01:01:42,600 Speaker 1: movie theater and there's like a scary moment in the 947 01:01:42,680 --> 01:01:46,640 Speaker 1: horror movie that they're watching, and both Charlotte and Lolita 948 01:01:46,760 --> 01:01:51,560 Speaker 1: each put a hand on one of Humbert's knees, and 949 01:01:51,800 --> 01:01:55,959 Speaker 1: he takes off Charlotte's hand because he's not interested in her, 950 01:01:56,440 --> 01:01:59,880 Speaker 1: and he like puts his hand on Lolita's hand, and 951 01:02:00,240 --> 01:02:05,000 Speaker 1: then like Charlotte realizes what's happening, and he realizes that 952 01:02:05,040 --> 01:02:08,240 Speaker 1: she realizes, so then everyone kind of like retreats into 953 01:02:08,240 --> 01:02:10,400 Speaker 1: themselves and like pulls their hand away, and it's like 954 01:02:10,440 --> 01:02:13,959 Speaker 1: this this like kind of oh, and then the whole 955 01:02:14,000 --> 01:02:17,840 Speaker 1: cot seeing there's like a three minute slapstick comedy scene 956 01:02:17,880 --> 01:02:20,320 Speaker 1: about like, oh shucks for him that he doesn't get 957 01:02:20,360 --> 01:02:22,280 Speaker 1: to sleep in a bed and he has to set 958 01:02:22,360 --> 01:02:25,560 Speaker 1: up a cot. It's made to want like it's the 959 01:02:25,600 --> 01:02:29,320 Speaker 1: fact that this is a predatory, statutory rapist. It's a joke. 960 01:02:29,560 --> 01:02:34,560 Speaker 1: It's a long and it's a long joke, and no 961 01:02:34,600 --> 01:02:38,840 Speaker 1: matter like how fucking like brainless you were in nineteen 962 01:02:38,880 --> 01:02:41,440 Speaker 1: sixty two, no one could laugh at this joke. It 963 01:02:41,560 --> 01:02:44,520 Speaker 1: is not It's just horrible in every single one like 964 01:02:45,680 --> 01:02:49,000 Speaker 1: it also another thing that frustrates me in these adaptations, 965 01:02:49,200 --> 01:02:51,920 Speaker 1: and this one is no different. And no disrespect to 966 01:02:51,960 --> 01:02:55,480 Speaker 1: Shelly Winters. She is not given really the tools to 967 01:02:55,520 --> 01:03:00,000 Speaker 1: succeed here, Nor was Melanie Griffith, who gives my favorite 968 01:03:00,040 --> 01:03:04,320 Speaker 1: at Charlotte performance in the un though she was really good, 969 01:03:05,000 --> 01:03:10,160 Speaker 1: having been given nothing right, But again, Charlotte is just 970 01:03:10,760 --> 01:03:15,840 Speaker 1: because these movies take Humbert's word as law. Charlotte is 971 01:03:16,080 --> 01:03:21,680 Speaker 1: portrayed as this as this very shrill, clueless, like not 972 01:03:21,840 --> 01:03:33,080 Speaker 1: particularly intelligent, hyper sexualized monster, like pathetic, desperate, hysterical, jealous, 973 01:03:33,120 --> 01:03:38,400 Speaker 1: like every negative trick her own child. And and again 974 01:03:38,440 --> 01:03:41,480 Speaker 1: this has taken his law. I and again it's like 975 01:03:41,520 --> 01:03:44,120 Speaker 1: you can't know. Also, these people don't exist. I know that, 976 01:03:44,840 --> 01:03:51,160 Speaker 1: but there's just again, even in literary analysis, this interpretation 977 01:03:51,200 --> 01:03:54,280 Speaker 1: of Charlotte is taken very wholesale of like, yeah, this 978 01:03:54,480 --> 01:03:59,240 Speaker 1: annoying woman who you know presents herself as an obstacle 979 01:03:59,280 --> 01:04:02,240 Speaker 1: in the first active of this story, but she obstacle. 980 01:04:02,520 --> 01:04:04,640 Speaker 1: But again, it's like, if you think about the fact 981 01:04:04,680 --> 01:04:07,920 Speaker 1: that you're told at the beginning, this person is going 982 01:04:07,960 --> 01:04:11,080 Speaker 1: to misrepresent everything to make himself look better. Would he 983 01:04:11,120 --> 01:04:15,520 Speaker 1: not benefit by making her look like a horrible, incompetent mother. 984 01:04:16,040 --> 01:04:19,960 Speaker 1: Would he not benefit from portraying her this way? Like, 985 01:04:20,880 --> 01:04:23,800 Speaker 1: I'm not claiming that this character would have been a 986 01:04:23,800 --> 01:04:26,720 Speaker 1: perfect person. It sounds like from the jump she and 987 01:04:26,760 --> 01:04:30,959 Speaker 1: her daughter have a very contentious relationship. Lots of twelve 988 01:04:31,040 --> 01:04:34,160 Speaker 1: year olds do with their mothers. They also, like she 989 01:04:35,000 --> 01:04:37,080 Speaker 1: in in the book, this is I don't remember if 990 01:04:37,080 --> 01:04:39,439 Speaker 1: this referenced in this movie. I've seen so many versions 991 01:04:39,480 --> 01:04:41,360 Speaker 1: of this, so I apologize if I'm getting this wrong. 992 01:04:41,920 --> 01:04:47,600 Speaker 1: But um, she you know, has lost a husband that's referenced. Um, 993 01:04:47,680 --> 01:04:50,480 Speaker 1: she has not. She's very cruel about it in this movie. 994 01:04:50,480 --> 01:04:53,840 Speaker 1: They really they're like, well, he didn't have sex with me, good, 995 01:04:53,960 --> 01:04:56,720 Speaker 1: so I hate him, And you're like, that's not really 996 01:04:57,360 --> 01:05:00,600 Speaker 1: anything that in the movie. In this movie she was 997 01:05:01,800 --> 01:05:06,680 Speaker 1: kind of obsessed with him. Yeah, in the one she 998 01:05:06,720 --> 01:05:09,000 Speaker 1: says he didn't fuck me right, and so I don't 999 01:05:09,000 --> 01:05:11,600 Speaker 1: care that he died, and you're like, that's not something 1000 01:05:11,640 --> 01:05:15,320 Speaker 1: people say either way. She She's like in Mourning, there's 1001 01:05:15,400 --> 01:05:18,240 Speaker 1: also a long tangent she goes on in the book 1002 01:05:18,280 --> 01:05:21,800 Speaker 1: of like she had lost a baby when he was 1003 01:05:21,920 --> 01:05:25,080 Speaker 1: very young, and Lolita had a brother, and that he 1004 01:05:25,120 --> 01:05:28,400 Speaker 1: passed away very young, and that she had never quite 1005 01:05:28,800 --> 01:05:31,960 Speaker 1: fully grieved that, and that that informed her relationship with 1006 01:05:32,000 --> 01:05:35,240 Speaker 1: her daughter, was mourning this other child, and that was 1007 01:05:35,600 --> 01:05:38,560 Speaker 1: one of the things that made their relationship very complicated, 1008 01:05:38,960 --> 01:05:42,480 Speaker 1: which is really interesting and not something that is often 1009 01:05:42,560 --> 01:05:46,040 Speaker 1: discussed of, Like this deep depression that she would have 1010 01:05:46,080 --> 01:05:48,160 Speaker 1: been in and how does that affect the child who 1011 01:05:48,240 --> 01:05:51,160 Speaker 1: lives on and like this is a real world problem. 1012 01:05:51,160 --> 01:05:54,040 Speaker 1: It's I'm not saying that this is the best exploration 1013 01:05:54,120 --> 01:05:57,000 Speaker 1: of it, but it's just kind of like all of 1014 01:05:57,040 --> 01:05:59,800 Speaker 1: that is pushed aside, even though I think it's in 1015 01:06:00,040 --> 01:06:01,960 Speaker 1: staying in the book that you're giving that information to 1016 01:06:02,040 --> 01:06:04,520 Speaker 1: make of what you will. And then he's like, she's 1017 01:06:04,520 --> 01:06:06,800 Speaker 1: annoying and you're supposed to take that as law, Like 1018 01:06:06,880 --> 01:06:08,760 Speaker 1: that's whatever, that's a part of what the book's trying 1019 01:06:08,800 --> 01:06:11,200 Speaker 1: to do. But the movie is just they're like, Nope, 1020 01:06:11,400 --> 01:06:14,280 Speaker 1: she's annoying, we hate her, we don't care when she dies. 1021 01:06:14,480 --> 01:06:18,480 Speaker 1: It's better that that he gets Lolita away from her, 1022 01:06:18,520 --> 01:06:21,120 Speaker 1: Like that's what the movie wants. And it's like even 1023 01:06:21,120 --> 01:06:23,360 Speaker 1: I get that, like even the viewers of the movie 1024 01:06:23,400 --> 01:06:25,800 Speaker 1: are not going to think that because they know that 1025 01:06:25,880 --> 01:06:29,600 Speaker 1: he is a bad person. But I feel like the way, yeah, 1026 01:06:29,640 --> 01:06:32,000 Speaker 1: the way he builds up her character is to make 1027 01:06:32,080 --> 01:06:37,600 Speaker 1: you not feel too bad when she mysteriously dies the 1028 01:06:37,600 --> 01:06:40,520 Speaker 1: second she's about to report him, he kills her. I'm 1029 01:06:40,560 --> 01:06:45,080 Speaker 1: just like, how all these fucking literary geniuses are like, no, 1030 01:06:45,320 --> 01:06:48,960 Speaker 1: she walked into traffic she was confused and I was 1031 01:06:49,000 --> 01:06:54,360 Speaker 1: like he killed her whatever. In this movie, also, she 1032 01:06:54,360 --> 01:06:58,160 Speaker 1: she's given like a gun, like she's given that whole thing, 1033 01:06:58,280 --> 01:07:01,320 Speaker 1: like that was a whole weird that doesn't happen. She 1034 01:07:01,480 --> 01:07:03,880 Speaker 1: she's like, the gun isn't loaded, and he's like I 1035 01:07:04,000 --> 01:07:06,320 Speaker 1: did that and he looks done and it is loaded. 1036 01:07:06,520 --> 01:07:10,800 Speaker 1: So like every right, every way she's characterized just makes 1037 01:07:10,800 --> 01:07:16,560 Speaker 1: her seem so awful, Like the movie frames that whole 1038 01:07:16,600 --> 01:07:22,040 Speaker 1: situation as like the movie wants you to root against 1039 01:07:22,080 --> 01:07:24,720 Speaker 1: Humbert being with an adult woman Charlotte because of the 1040 01:07:24,720 --> 01:07:27,920 Speaker 1: negative way that she's characterized, and the movie wants you 1041 01:07:28,040 --> 01:07:33,680 Speaker 1: to root for Humbert pursuing a child. The movie frames 1042 01:07:33,720 --> 01:07:38,320 Speaker 1: it horrifically. And yeah, again, it all goes back to 1043 01:07:38,360 --> 01:07:42,720 Speaker 1: the fact that it doesn't question Humbert's interpretation of events 1044 01:07:42,760 --> 01:07:45,400 Speaker 1: at all, and there's no context as to why he's 1045 01:07:45,400 --> 01:07:47,880 Speaker 1: presenting this information this way and what he wants you 1046 01:07:47,920 --> 01:07:52,480 Speaker 1: to take away. And again, yeah, and every adaptation Charlotte 1047 01:07:52,520 --> 01:07:54,960 Speaker 1: has done a huge disservice. I feel like people don't 1048 01:07:55,000 --> 01:07:58,560 Speaker 1: really talk about that because I mean, obviously, because Lolita 1049 01:07:58,600 --> 01:08:02,280 Speaker 1: has done the biggest disserves of all where she is 1050 01:08:03,120 --> 01:08:05,600 Speaker 1: you know, And I think most cases erased from her 1051 01:08:05,640 --> 01:08:11,360 Speaker 1: own story and her at any reference in the original 1052 01:08:11,400 --> 01:08:17,800 Speaker 1: work to her emotions and her grief and her confusion 1053 01:08:18,240 --> 01:08:21,240 Speaker 1: and her figuring out what is happening to her and 1054 01:08:21,320 --> 01:08:26,240 Speaker 1: repeated attempts to get herself out are essentially erased or 1055 01:08:26,760 --> 01:08:31,880 Speaker 1: severely condensed to make her just less important to the story, 1056 01:08:32,040 --> 01:08:36,200 Speaker 1: right to just invalidate her feelings and her experience. It 1057 01:08:36,280 --> 01:08:39,920 Speaker 1: makes me so sad for her. I really really love 1058 01:08:40,520 --> 01:08:43,840 Speaker 1: her as a character and feel like there's a real 1059 01:08:43,960 --> 01:08:50,840 Speaker 1: opportunity here to examine a victims story. Do I think 1060 01:08:50,880 --> 01:08:53,799 Speaker 1: that a you know, an older man is the person 1061 01:08:53,960 --> 01:08:56,400 Speaker 1: to do this? Of course I don't, But I've been 1062 01:08:56,960 --> 01:09:00,519 Speaker 1: being that she is this, you know, iconic character in 1063 01:09:00,560 --> 01:09:06,520 Speaker 1: American literature. She's just never been given an opportunity to 1064 01:09:06,560 --> 01:09:10,000 Speaker 1: show even what's on the page, much less explore deeper, 1065 01:09:10,400 --> 01:09:12,800 Speaker 1: which is what a lot of good film adaptations of 1066 01:09:12,840 --> 01:09:15,719 Speaker 1: books are supposed to do, is take the important character 1067 01:09:16,040 --> 01:09:18,280 Speaker 1: and then give you a deeper look at who they 1068 01:09:18,320 --> 01:09:20,799 Speaker 1: are and what their struggle is and what their grief 1069 01:09:20,920 --> 01:09:25,320 Speaker 1: is and and and all of this through the performances. 1070 01:09:25,520 --> 01:09:29,280 Speaker 1: And it's just not allowed to happen here. She brings 1071 01:09:29,280 --> 01:09:32,360 Speaker 1: me to the thing that I hate the most about 1072 01:09:32,400 --> 01:09:37,320 Speaker 1: this movie is a problem that follows through every adaptation 1073 01:09:37,320 --> 01:09:42,759 Speaker 1: of this is supersizing clear qualities role in the narrative. 1074 01:09:43,200 --> 01:09:46,639 Speaker 1: This is a creative choice that has made literally every time, 1075 01:09:47,320 --> 01:09:50,599 Speaker 1: and I hate it. He is present in the book. 1076 01:09:51,280 --> 01:09:56,040 Speaker 1: He's not wearing Count Olaf disguises in the book, but there, 1077 01:09:56,120 --> 01:09:59,760 Speaker 1: but it is implied that he and um Dolores had 1078 01:09:59,760 --> 01:10:02,559 Speaker 1: no each other like when she was very young, and 1079 01:10:02,560 --> 01:10:07,479 Speaker 1: that he had already been grooming her. And it's kind 1080 01:10:07,479 --> 01:10:10,320 Speaker 1: of left ambiguous in the book as to what actually happens, 1081 01:10:10,400 --> 01:10:13,360 Speaker 1: which I just kind of can't speak to it. But 1082 01:10:13,479 --> 01:10:16,800 Speaker 1: he was certainly grooming her in in the book from 1083 01:10:16,840 --> 01:10:20,320 Speaker 1: a very young age and does follow them as he 1084 01:10:20,360 --> 01:10:23,759 Speaker 1: does in this and is killed at the end. But 1085 01:10:24,360 --> 01:10:26,920 Speaker 1: this movie just, I mean, I think because this movie 1086 01:10:27,000 --> 01:10:30,120 Speaker 1: doesn't know what to do with its title character and 1087 01:10:30,280 --> 01:10:35,080 Speaker 1: has no interest in exploring the fact that it's protagonist 1088 01:10:35,240 --> 01:10:40,960 Speaker 1: is a fucking criminal of the highest degree. They just 1089 01:10:41,040 --> 01:10:46,240 Speaker 1: supersize another male character and try to deepen the history 1090 01:10:46,360 --> 01:10:50,360 Speaker 1: and the relationship with Humbert and quality, and I just 1091 01:10:50,640 --> 01:10:55,000 Speaker 1: couldn't think of a real like a relationship between two 1092 01:10:55,080 --> 01:10:58,800 Speaker 1: characters and this story that I care about less. I 1093 01:10:58,840 --> 01:11:03,720 Speaker 1: don't care about two predators and how their enemies like 1094 01:11:04,240 --> 01:11:08,760 Speaker 1: who gives a funk? Like it? Just I hate it. 1095 01:11:08,760 --> 01:11:12,920 Speaker 1: It's such a lazy choice. It's such a like, of course, 1096 01:11:13,040 --> 01:11:19,000 Speaker 1: you hand off this extremely difficult, problematic story to a 1097 01:11:19,040 --> 01:11:21,320 Speaker 1: male director and they just kind of are like, I 1098 01:11:21,360 --> 01:11:25,880 Speaker 1: don't know, let's let's get the other male character in it. 1099 01:11:26,000 --> 01:11:29,880 Speaker 1: More so I understand what we're talking about. Like, I 1100 01:11:29,960 --> 01:11:35,200 Speaker 1: hate it. This happens in the movie, happens in the musical, 1101 01:11:35,760 --> 01:11:40,960 Speaker 1: happens in the hoodward I'll be play, which is um, 1102 01:11:40,960 --> 01:11:44,200 Speaker 1: it happens every single time. And I think that that 1103 01:11:44,360 --> 01:11:49,679 Speaker 1: choice especially has a lot to do with not the code. 1104 01:11:49,920 --> 01:11:51,920 Speaker 1: This is the choice where I'm like, this is not 1105 01:11:52,000 --> 01:11:55,360 Speaker 1: the code. This is the filmmaker making a choice on 1106 01:11:55,400 --> 01:11:59,000 Speaker 1: how to handle the code. It's like, oh, I know 1107 01:11:59,040 --> 01:12:03,679 Speaker 1: what I'll do. I will make a like male predator 1108 01:12:03,800 --> 01:12:08,040 Speaker 1: character way bigger, even though the lead character of this 1109 01:12:08,800 --> 01:12:12,840 Speaker 1: is a male predator. Why do that? I just I 1110 01:12:12,920 --> 01:12:16,840 Speaker 1: hate this choice so much. I think it's so lazy 1111 01:12:16,960 --> 01:12:24,360 Speaker 1: and bad. I hate it, especially making it what yeah, yeah, 1112 01:12:24,400 --> 01:12:27,679 Speaker 1: he's like he's being Peter Seller's He's like, in every 1113 01:12:27,720 --> 01:12:30,840 Speaker 1: scene he's in, he's doing some kind of character, right, 1114 01:12:30,880 --> 01:12:34,000 Speaker 1: He's like in disguise, he's pretending to be other people, 1115 01:12:34,120 --> 01:12:41,400 Speaker 1: inspector cluz oing it through this horrifying, dense narrative, and 1116 01:12:41,479 --> 01:12:45,240 Speaker 1: it's just like, that is not, No, that is not 1117 01:12:45,479 --> 01:12:48,040 Speaker 1: He's do you know what movie you're in? Who do 1118 01:12:48,040 --> 01:12:51,880 Speaker 1: you think you are? Bill Nighy and I Frankenstein. You 1119 01:12:51,960 --> 01:12:54,080 Speaker 1: just didn't read the script and you showed up and 1120 01:12:54,120 --> 01:12:57,200 Speaker 1: you're like, I'm doing what? Like it Just he's like 1121 01:12:57,520 --> 01:13:00,920 Speaker 1: Dana Carvey and Master of Disguise. He's like, I can be. 1122 01:13:01,040 --> 01:13:04,360 Speaker 1: You need to just remove yourself. You just need to 1123 01:13:04,400 --> 01:13:09,400 Speaker 1: like go and read a book for one. Like just 1124 01:13:09,760 --> 01:13:14,719 Speaker 1: it's so infuriating that this character is and it's always 1125 01:13:14,720 --> 01:13:18,559 Speaker 1: done in slightly different ways. Frank Lngella plays him in 1126 01:13:20,400 --> 01:13:24,200 Speaker 1: and he plays the character very differently. Regardless, it's still 1127 01:13:24,760 --> 01:13:28,320 Speaker 1: a huge part and it is not written as a 1128 01:13:28,400 --> 01:13:30,200 Speaker 1: huge part. I think it is just a choice that 1129 01:13:30,320 --> 01:13:34,680 Speaker 1: lazy male creatives have made to handle the parts of 1130 01:13:34,680 --> 01:13:37,320 Speaker 1: the story that they are ill equipped to handle. And 1131 01:13:37,600 --> 01:13:41,320 Speaker 1: I feel like it is very clear, you know, if 1132 01:13:41,400 --> 01:13:44,160 Speaker 1: you have agreed to adapt this work and you do 1133 01:13:44,240 --> 01:13:48,880 Speaker 1: not have experience as a survivor of abuse as a 1134 01:13:48,880 --> 01:13:52,479 Speaker 1: young person yourself. The first thing you do is research 1135 01:13:52,600 --> 01:13:57,240 Speaker 1: that and speak to people and know what you're fucking 1136 01:13:57,280 --> 01:14:02,200 Speaker 1: talking about and adapting. So like it's just like logic, 1137 01:14:02,400 --> 01:14:07,439 Speaker 1: like one, yeah, like do you know what you're talking 1138 01:14:07,479 --> 01:14:10,200 Speaker 1: about in your work? Like, I just it makes me 1139 01:14:10,320 --> 01:14:16,120 Speaker 1: so mad that these mediocre fucking I don't care about 1140 01:14:16,360 --> 01:14:19,320 Speaker 1: Stanley Lee Krubrick so whatever dragged me. I don't give 1141 01:14:19,320 --> 01:14:23,719 Speaker 1: a ship. He's terrible to women, and I just I whatever. 1142 01:14:23,880 --> 01:14:26,240 Speaker 1: I know he's made good movies. I don't really care. 1143 01:14:27,080 --> 01:14:31,040 Speaker 1: I just think it's so irresponsible and so lazy. And 1144 01:14:31,160 --> 01:14:35,559 Speaker 1: just the fact that people have even attempted to say, like, oh, 1145 01:14:35,600 --> 01:14:38,679 Speaker 1: this is this movie is only bad because of reasons 1146 01:14:38,680 --> 01:14:42,040 Speaker 1: that have nothing to do with the filmmaker, who also 1147 01:14:42,080 --> 01:14:46,280 Speaker 1: wrote most of the movie. It's like you can't. I mean, 1148 01:14:47,040 --> 01:14:49,080 Speaker 1: I agree that the code is a big part of 1149 01:14:49,120 --> 01:14:51,519 Speaker 1: why this movie is never going to work, but it 1150 01:14:51,600 --> 01:14:56,320 Speaker 1: has a lot to do with Stanley Kubrick, a whole lot. 1151 01:14:57,640 --> 01:15:02,000 Speaker 1: It's just so yeah, because like because when he does 1152 01:15:02,640 --> 01:15:06,280 Speaker 1: decide to have lowly to on screen, this is okay. 1153 01:15:06,320 --> 01:15:07,960 Speaker 1: So this is something I'm kind of like figuring out 1154 01:15:07,960 --> 01:15:09,800 Speaker 1: in real time, so bear with me here. But like 1155 01:15:10,680 --> 01:15:14,919 Speaker 1: even the way that she is introduced on screen visually, 1156 01:15:15,040 --> 01:15:18,000 Speaker 1: like the first time we meet her character in the movie, 1157 01:15:18,760 --> 01:15:22,000 Speaker 1: she's lying on the lawn. She is in this kind 1158 01:15:22,040 --> 01:15:25,720 Speaker 1: of seductive pose, or what the movie would have you 1159 01:15:25,760 --> 01:15:29,200 Speaker 1: think is that she like is wearing these sunglasses. She 1160 01:15:29,320 --> 01:15:31,599 Speaker 1: like tilts them down in a very kind of like 1161 01:15:32,200 --> 01:15:36,120 Speaker 1: film fatality way. I feel like she's like licking a lollipop. 1162 01:15:36,240 --> 01:15:39,760 Speaker 1: She's like, well, the thing is, she is not actually 1163 01:15:40,160 --> 01:15:43,640 Speaker 1: doing that in the movie, right, This is fascinating, and 1164 01:15:43,680 --> 01:15:46,320 Speaker 1: I think it's like, Okay, I know I'm prepared to 1165 01:15:46,320 --> 01:15:49,639 Speaker 1: do this podcast, and so I'm like really in it. 1166 01:15:49,800 --> 01:15:53,880 Speaker 1: But she doesn't actually do that in the movie. You 1167 01:15:53,920 --> 01:15:55,960 Speaker 1: remember it that way because that is what is on 1168 01:15:56,000 --> 01:15:59,120 Speaker 1: the poster, and that is what happens in every like 1169 01:16:00,040 --> 01:16:04,680 Speaker 1: it's she is presented very sexualized and male gaze in 1170 01:16:04,720 --> 01:16:07,760 Speaker 1: her introductory scene. But this whole image that is the 1171 01:16:08,240 --> 01:16:11,439 Speaker 1: I think the most prevalent image that people have taken 1172 01:16:11,439 --> 01:16:15,479 Speaker 1: away from any version of this story is the young 1173 01:16:15,520 --> 01:16:19,479 Speaker 1: girl wearing heart shaped sunglasses and licking a lollipop. That 1174 01:16:19,560 --> 01:16:22,160 Speaker 1: exact image does not appear in the movie. At all. 1175 01:16:22,680 --> 01:16:27,760 Speaker 1: It doesn't appear anywhere. It is something that exists nowhere, 1176 01:16:28,080 --> 01:16:32,080 Speaker 1: Like it is fucking fascinating to me that it that 1177 01:16:32,840 --> 01:16:36,519 Speaker 1: that I mean, that's just marketing. That is literally just 1178 01:16:36,840 --> 01:16:41,360 Speaker 1: marketing designed to titilate a male viewer into thinking, you know, 1179 01:16:41,439 --> 01:16:44,479 Speaker 1: and she's making eye contact with the camera and that image. 1180 01:16:44,600 --> 01:16:48,679 Speaker 1: It's strictly marketing. It has nothing to do with anything. 1181 01:16:48,800 --> 01:16:51,120 Speaker 1: But it's the thing that everyone took away from it, 1182 01:16:51,320 --> 01:16:53,679 Speaker 1: including me. Apparently. The way she's introduced in the movie 1183 01:16:53,720 --> 01:16:56,000 Speaker 1: is similar. Where she is lying on the lawn, she's 1184 01:16:56,000 --> 01:16:58,439 Speaker 1: wearing a bikini. There's a lot of people who have 1185 01:16:58,520 --> 01:17:01,760 Speaker 1: including the actress Sue Lyon, who I want to talk 1186 01:17:01,760 --> 01:17:06,000 Speaker 1: about a little bit as well, Um who she She implied, 1187 01:17:06,120 --> 01:17:08,720 Speaker 1: and many people involved with this production implied that she 1188 01:17:08,960 --> 01:17:12,320 Speaker 1: was chosen because she was more developed than many girls 1189 01:17:12,320 --> 01:17:15,640 Speaker 1: her age, and she's presented that way. She's presented in 1190 01:17:15,680 --> 01:17:19,439 Speaker 1: a bikini. Um, she's you know, hanging out on the lawn, 1191 01:17:19,520 --> 01:17:24,320 Speaker 1: she's sunbathing. She looks at him very seductively and kind 1192 01:17:24,320 --> 01:17:29,200 Speaker 1: of starts teasing him right away. This is a hyper 1193 01:17:29,240 --> 01:17:33,759 Speaker 1: sexualized version of how it's presented in the book. The movie. 1194 01:17:33,800 --> 01:17:36,200 Speaker 1: You get a different hyper sexualized version in the book. 1195 01:17:37,680 --> 01:17:42,519 Speaker 1: What it is is it's a young girl laying out 1196 01:17:42,560 --> 01:17:47,040 Speaker 1: on the lawn reading a magazine, and everything else is 1197 01:17:47,800 --> 01:17:51,479 Speaker 1: like it's a very ordinary image, but the way it's 1198 01:17:51,720 --> 01:17:55,519 Speaker 1: written by a narrator that you have been told not 1199 01:17:55,560 --> 01:18:00,160 Speaker 1: to trust is hyper sexualized, and every movie kind of 1200 01:18:00,240 --> 01:18:03,960 Speaker 1: adapts it the same. It's the same problem is like 1201 01:18:04,479 --> 01:18:06,720 Speaker 1: the framing and the male gaze that comes with this 1202 01:18:07,040 --> 01:18:10,120 Speaker 1: is coming from the unreliable male gaze that it's presented 1203 01:18:10,160 --> 01:18:13,840 Speaker 1: as in the book, and just it's just these like 1204 01:18:14,200 --> 01:18:16,519 Speaker 1: I don't know, like Stanley Cooper has never read a book. 1205 01:18:16,520 --> 01:18:19,719 Speaker 1: He doesn't under he clearly hasn't been at grad school, Kalin. 1206 01:18:21,200 --> 01:18:24,080 Speaker 1: I mean, he also made a movie that I mean, 1207 01:18:24,120 --> 01:18:27,760 Speaker 1: with The Shining that Stephen King hated. He's bad at adaptations, 1208 01:18:27,800 --> 01:18:30,840 Speaker 1: as it turns out, he's bad, Like he's I just 1209 01:18:30,960 --> 01:18:32,920 Speaker 1: don't like I know that he's making us up. I 1210 01:18:32,960 --> 01:18:35,799 Speaker 1: just don't care. I just don't care. I don't have time. Sorry, 1211 01:18:36,360 --> 01:18:40,120 Speaker 1: only so like what my point is that I'm still 1212 01:18:40,120 --> 01:18:43,360 Speaker 1: trying to figure out. But like, like the movie does 1213 01:18:43,920 --> 01:18:48,000 Speaker 1: frame a lot of what she does as being seductive, 1214 01:18:48,040 --> 01:18:51,160 Speaker 1: which I think kind of goes to what happens in 1215 01:18:51,520 --> 01:18:54,679 Speaker 1: the book where he's like, oh, this, this nim fit 1216 01:18:54,960 --> 01:18:58,800 Speaker 1: is tantalizing me, and like we see we see that 1217 01:18:58,880 --> 01:19:01,479 Speaker 1: in the movie where like she's right beside him, like 1218 01:19:01,560 --> 01:19:05,160 Speaker 1: doing a hula hoop, which is just a normal activity 1219 01:19:05,200 --> 01:19:07,879 Speaker 1: that a child would do. But because he's a predator, 1220 01:19:08,360 --> 01:19:12,840 Speaker 1: he is liked is right in that shot, like he's 1221 01:19:13,120 --> 01:19:15,840 Speaker 1: staring at her. Do you see her staring You see 1222 01:19:15,920 --> 01:19:18,960 Speaker 1: him staring at her? But what we need But because 1223 01:19:19,520 --> 01:19:22,120 Speaker 1: because this movie doesn't make it clear at all that 1224 01:19:22,200 --> 01:19:26,040 Speaker 1: he is an unreliable narrator, the movie just makes it 1225 01:19:26,040 --> 01:19:32,040 Speaker 1: seem like she is deliberately tantalizing him. I think what's 1226 01:19:33,920 --> 01:19:36,360 Speaker 1: in the same way Humbert does by not framing it 1227 01:19:36,479 --> 01:19:41,280 Speaker 1: as like it's blaming her. Yeah, I think for that 1228 01:19:41,320 --> 01:19:47,360 Speaker 1: to be approached differently. You okay, remember the scene in 1229 01:19:48,240 --> 01:19:52,080 Speaker 1: Fast Times at Regimont High where Phoebe Kates's character is 1230 01:19:52,120 --> 01:19:54,479 Speaker 1: getting out of a swimming pool and then you get 1231 01:19:54,680 --> 01:20:00,040 Speaker 1: Judge Reinhold's point of view, like fantasy version of it 1232 01:20:00,439 --> 01:20:04,720 Speaker 1: looks like, yeah, he's seeing her in slow motion and 1233 01:20:04,840 --> 01:20:08,680 Speaker 1: she's being really sexy and seductive and she takes her 1234 01:20:08,720 --> 01:20:12,439 Speaker 1: top off and it's like male gaze for days. And 1235 01:20:12,479 --> 01:20:14,760 Speaker 1: then it cuts to what actually is happening, where she 1236 01:20:14,880 --> 01:20:17,439 Speaker 1: like jumps out of the pool because she's like choking 1237 01:20:17,479 --> 01:20:19,840 Speaker 1: on water and it's like she's got hair all over 1238 01:20:20,040 --> 01:20:25,200 Speaker 1: in her face, and it's just like, yes, I totally agree. 1239 01:20:25,360 --> 01:20:29,519 Speaker 1: Like it is a very simple I mean, maybe goofy 1240 01:20:29,640 --> 01:20:32,000 Speaker 1: for this thing, but like it makes it clear that 1241 01:20:32,160 --> 01:20:35,280 Speaker 1: what he's seeing and what is happening are two very different, 1242 01:20:35,479 --> 01:20:38,320 Speaker 1: very different things. That's what needs to be established here. 1243 01:20:38,680 --> 01:20:42,160 Speaker 1: And it never is. It never is in any of 1244 01:20:42,160 --> 01:20:46,960 Speaker 1: these adaptations. It never is. I Caitlin, need to send 1245 01:20:47,000 --> 01:20:53,639 Speaker 1: you a song that from this musical. I like some 1246 01:20:53,720 --> 01:20:56,360 Speaker 1: people will say that the musical is the best this 1247 01:20:56,439 --> 01:20:59,400 Speaker 1: has ever been adapted, which is just a look into 1248 01:20:59,520 --> 01:21:05,040 Speaker 1: how horrible the adaptations are there. This is just so 1249 01:21:05,200 --> 01:21:08,400 Speaker 1: over the top that I had to laugh. But it's 1250 01:21:08,520 --> 01:21:12,720 Speaker 1: very fun. This lyric in the song goes like this, 1251 01:21:12,800 --> 01:21:16,120 Speaker 1: it's a lyric about Humbert. The town's talking about Humbert. 1252 01:21:16,240 --> 01:21:18,920 Speaker 1: Something's not right with this guy. That's literally what the 1253 01:21:18,960 --> 01:21:22,160 Speaker 1: tone of the song is. And then towns person number 1254 01:21:22,200 --> 01:21:26,439 Speaker 1: five says, who is this viper that loves them post diaper? 1255 01:21:26,800 --> 01:21:29,519 Speaker 1: That's the line in the song that he sings, he 1256 01:21:29,560 --> 01:21:33,280 Speaker 1: says who loves him that? And it is this kind 1257 01:21:33,320 --> 01:21:38,600 Speaker 1: of uncritical, like bullshit, like trying to acknowledge what is 1258 01:21:38,640 --> 01:21:44,680 Speaker 1: happening without with also while being completely ill equipped to 1259 01:21:44,800 --> 01:21:48,559 Speaker 1: do so. Yeah, I just that line really like I 1260 01:21:48,600 --> 01:21:51,360 Speaker 1: had to like throw my computer into the ocean after 1261 01:21:51,400 --> 01:21:55,320 Speaker 1: I heard that that. It's the most like if you 1262 01:21:55,360 --> 01:21:58,360 Speaker 1: want the soundtrack is on YouTube. It's very bizarre. But 1263 01:21:58,720 --> 01:22:01,000 Speaker 1: for this, I think, yeah, with the Hula group seen 1264 01:22:01,040 --> 01:22:04,640 Speaker 1: as a perfect example of like the movie is blaming 1265 01:22:04,800 --> 01:22:07,880 Speaker 1: her for what eventually happens. It is setting the viewer 1266 01:22:08,000 --> 01:22:11,160 Speaker 1: up to say that she's quote unquote asking for it. 1267 01:22:11,240 --> 01:22:14,240 Speaker 1: That thing that we have you know, heard and discussed 1268 01:22:14,600 --> 01:22:17,360 Speaker 1: so many different times that is lived like that just 1269 01:22:17,439 --> 01:22:21,439 Speaker 1: a false narrative that has leveraged against victims. And this 1270 01:22:21,960 --> 01:22:27,320 Speaker 1: movie is just like yep, we agreed, which brings me too. 1271 01:22:28,040 --> 01:22:31,640 Speaker 1: I think my last major thing for for this is 1272 01:22:32,280 --> 01:22:36,919 Speaker 1: talking a little bit about Sue Lion, who played Lolita 1273 01:22:37,000 --> 01:22:40,920 Speaker 1: in this movie. She passed away last year and she's 1274 01:22:40,960 --> 01:22:46,679 Speaker 1: a very interesting figure in movie history. I've done quite 1275 01:22:46,720 --> 01:22:49,920 Speaker 1: a bit of research on her. There's not actually a 1276 01:22:50,000 --> 01:22:54,759 Speaker 1: lot because and this is a kind of continuing trend 1277 01:22:55,000 --> 01:22:59,960 Speaker 1: that young actresses who are cast as Lovelita historically don't 1278 01:23:00,120 --> 01:23:04,960 Speaker 1: tend to work for very long. And I think that again, 1279 01:23:05,120 --> 01:23:09,320 Speaker 1: it's everyone is different. I'm not trying to loop all 1280 01:23:09,360 --> 01:23:12,280 Speaker 1: of these people into the same narrative, but there are 1281 01:23:12,360 --> 01:23:16,320 Speaker 1: similarities that I think are worth mentioning, which include the 1282 01:23:16,400 --> 01:23:20,439 Speaker 1: fact and I think it really speaks to Hollywood issues, 1283 01:23:21,000 --> 01:23:24,280 Speaker 1: not even issues with the story, it's more societal issues 1284 01:23:24,439 --> 01:23:29,040 Speaker 1: of Sue Lion is cast as an unknown for this 1285 01:23:29,120 --> 01:23:33,840 Speaker 1: part when she's fourteen. She later describes what sounds like 1286 01:23:34,000 --> 01:23:36,800 Speaker 1: She she frames it is like, isn't this funny in 1287 01:23:36,840 --> 01:23:40,400 Speaker 1: the eighties? But what she described I thought it sounded 1288 01:23:40,960 --> 01:23:43,479 Speaker 1: very fucked up. She she went to this audition with 1289 01:23:43,520 --> 01:23:46,439 Speaker 1: Stanley Kubrick, and she frames us by being like, and 1290 01:23:46,479 --> 01:23:48,000 Speaker 1: you know, normally when you go to an audition and 1291 01:23:48,000 --> 01:23:50,519 Speaker 1: they're like, Okay, turned this way, I turned this way. Ah, 1292 01:23:50,680 --> 01:23:53,920 Speaker 1: here's the line, thanks for coming in, Sia whatever. But 1293 01:23:54,000 --> 01:23:57,759 Speaker 1: she said this audition, he asked her very personal questions 1294 01:23:58,080 --> 01:23:59,720 Speaker 1: right when she got there, and he said, do you 1295 01:24:00,240 --> 01:24:02,160 Speaker 1: where do you go? What do you do? What time 1296 01:24:02,160 --> 01:24:04,080 Speaker 1: do you come home? What does your mom think of you? 1297 01:24:04,280 --> 01:24:06,880 Speaker 1: Where did you get that dress? What? What size is it? Like? 1298 01:24:07,280 --> 01:24:11,160 Speaker 1: Asked her all these really personal questions in order to 1299 01:24:11,200 --> 01:24:14,519 Speaker 1: get the role right. So already we're like, okay, if 1300 01:24:14,560 --> 01:24:18,120 Speaker 1: you didn't remember why you hated Stanley Kubrick, there's a 1301 01:24:18,160 --> 01:24:22,599 Speaker 1: fun reminder. But so she she's put into this movie, 1302 01:24:22,640 --> 01:24:25,840 Speaker 1: she wins a Golden Globe for playing this part, and 1303 01:24:25,840 --> 01:24:29,719 Speaker 1: then goes on to really not have much of a career, 1304 01:24:29,760 --> 01:24:32,200 Speaker 1: and then she retires from acting pretty young. She has 1305 01:24:32,200 --> 01:24:35,320 Speaker 1: a very tumultuous personal life that is not really relevant 1306 01:24:35,320 --> 01:24:40,120 Speaker 1: to our discussion. But all that to say that I 1307 01:24:40,160 --> 01:24:44,599 Speaker 1: do believe that there is a stigma that comes with 1308 01:24:44,640 --> 01:24:48,679 Speaker 1: playing a role like Lolita, especially when it is written 1309 01:24:48,720 --> 01:24:52,639 Speaker 1: as irresponsibly as it regularly is in these adaptations, where 1310 01:24:53,120 --> 01:24:56,280 Speaker 1: I mean, it's like Peter Sellers certainly didn't have a 1311 01:24:56,400 --> 01:24:59,559 Speaker 1: fucking problem getting work after being in this movie, James 1312 01:24:59,560 --> 01:25:02,880 Speaker 1: Mason's they didn't have problems. Shelley Winters didn't have problems. 1313 01:25:02,920 --> 01:25:08,760 Speaker 1: But it is these young actresses who are sexualized, over sexualized, 1314 01:25:09,320 --> 01:25:13,240 Speaker 1: playing a character that is in its essence misrepresenting and 1315 01:25:13,320 --> 01:25:16,479 Speaker 1: blaming them for what is happening to them. And then 1316 01:25:16,479 --> 01:25:20,560 Speaker 1: you see that they don't even really get to reap 1317 01:25:20,720 --> 01:25:23,960 Speaker 1: the benefits of having started this huge movie. They're kind 1318 01:25:23,960 --> 01:25:27,559 Speaker 1: of discarded by Hollywood and by the culture at large. 1319 01:25:27,600 --> 01:25:31,720 Speaker 1: Of yeah, I mean, there's most Sue Lion movies she 1320 01:25:31,880 --> 01:25:34,760 Speaker 1: was in after this, you wouldn't really know, and a 1321 01:25:34,840 --> 01:25:38,000 Speaker 1: lot of the there's a similar line that can be 1322 01:25:38,080 --> 01:25:42,840 Speaker 1: drawn for the actress who played Lolita in it is 1323 01:25:42,880 --> 01:25:46,920 Speaker 1: like a common trend for this character and just extends 1324 01:25:47,720 --> 01:25:52,040 Speaker 1: my frustration and my problems with this of like I think, 1325 01:25:52,120 --> 01:25:54,639 Speaker 1: I mean, with what she's given. I think Sue Lyon 1326 01:25:54,720 --> 01:25:57,040 Speaker 1: does an excellent job, and I feel the same of 1327 01:25:57,080 --> 01:26:00,960 Speaker 1: dominiques plain and the fact that they would have to 1328 01:26:01,840 --> 01:26:05,280 Speaker 1: in some ways it seems bear the brunt and the 1329 01:26:05,360 --> 01:26:11,320 Speaker 1: consequences of the people around them mismanaging the story is 1330 01:26:11,360 --> 01:26:14,320 Speaker 1: so frustrating to me. I mean it just truly, no 1331 01:26:14,400 --> 01:26:18,320 Speaker 1: one else in these productions suffer except I mean, I 1332 01:26:18,360 --> 01:26:21,439 Speaker 1: don't want to say that, but like, career wise, Stanley 1333 01:26:21,520 --> 01:26:25,479 Speaker 1: Kubrick's is fucking fine. Adrian Line. I mean, at least 1334 01:26:25,520 --> 01:26:27,800 Speaker 1: you can argue that Adrian Line didn't make a movie 1335 01:26:27,800 --> 01:26:31,920 Speaker 1: for't even talking about, thank god. But by and large, 1336 01:26:32,040 --> 01:26:38,760 Speaker 1: you know, reputation wise and typecasting wise, Jeremy Irons went 1337 01:26:38,800 --> 01:26:41,559 Speaker 1: on to play a number of roles and he's fucking 1338 01:26:42,000 --> 01:26:46,679 Speaker 1: the worst person ever. Like, I just I just find 1339 01:26:46,840 --> 01:26:52,560 Speaker 1: that trend to also be frustrating because it just extends 1340 01:26:52,880 --> 01:26:58,080 Speaker 1: this blame onto the person playing the character, and that's 1341 01:26:58,120 --> 01:27:00,240 Speaker 1: just I hate that. I hate that so much. H 1342 01:27:02,040 --> 01:27:05,559 Speaker 1: It's awful. It's also very telling of just where we've 1343 01:27:05,600 --> 01:27:12,720 Speaker 1: been culturally, where you know, we just blame women for everything. Absolutely, 1344 01:27:13,160 --> 01:27:17,280 Speaker 1: I it really frustrates me. I'm sorry for bringing this movie, 1345 01:27:17,400 --> 01:27:19,400 Speaker 1: but I do. I mean, I'm very curious as to 1346 01:27:19,960 --> 01:27:24,360 Speaker 1: what our listeners think if if you, um, we're listening 1347 01:27:24,400 --> 01:27:27,479 Speaker 1: to the episode. It's such a complicated work. There's so 1348 01:27:27,560 --> 01:27:32,599 Speaker 1: much too obviously talk about, but also just the ways 1349 01:27:32,840 --> 01:27:37,040 Speaker 1: that I mean, I feel like of all the irresponsible adaptations, 1350 01:27:37,479 --> 01:27:42,600 Speaker 1: the adaptations of this book in particular have been egregiously terrible, 1351 01:27:42,720 --> 01:27:46,360 Speaker 1: to the point where I'm like, if this is how 1352 01:27:47,000 --> 01:27:49,920 Speaker 1: it's going to be remembered culturally, do you even want 1353 01:27:50,000 --> 01:27:52,080 Speaker 1: the book to have been written? If it's just going 1354 01:27:52,120 --> 01:27:54,800 Speaker 1: to be given to people that you can't get to 1355 01:27:54,880 --> 01:27:58,519 Speaker 1: step of researching it, Like, it's just so absurd to 1356 01:27:58,600 --> 01:28:03,400 Speaker 1: me because victims, I mean, I think victims deserve better 1357 01:28:03,439 --> 01:28:07,920 Speaker 1: than Lolita in general, for sure, but victims deserve better 1358 01:28:08,000 --> 01:28:12,439 Speaker 1: in these adaptations as well. Like there's yeah, yeah, so 1359 01:28:14,120 --> 01:28:19,240 Speaker 1: this movie is upsetting and frustrating, and historically, I guess 1360 01:28:19,280 --> 01:28:23,320 Speaker 1: I would say it's relevant and it marks a very 1361 01:28:23,360 --> 01:28:25,680 Speaker 1: specific point in time. But I also I'm just like, 1362 01:28:26,040 --> 01:28:28,000 Speaker 1: if you're still out here being like it was just 1363 01:28:28,080 --> 01:28:32,479 Speaker 1: the code. Uh, it wasn't. It definitely wasn't. There's a 1364 01:28:32,560 --> 01:28:36,439 Speaker 1: lot of other things at play here, none of them good. No. 1365 01:28:37,040 --> 01:28:41,599 Speaker 1: The one other thing I remember pretty distinctly from the book, 1366 01:28:41,640 --> 01:28:44,840 Speaker 1: and I only remember this because I remember bringing it 1367 01:28:44,920 --> 01:28:48,200 Speaker 1: up in the class discussion we had during the class 1368 01:28:48,240 --> 01:28:53,040 Speaker 1: I took in college, where in the book Humbert is 1369 01:28:53,120 --> 01:28:59,240 Speaker 1: like obsessed with Lolita's i Q. He's always talking about 1370 01:28:59,240 --> 01:29:03,240 Speaker 1: how she has a high i Q. So let's start, 1371 01:29:03,280 --> 01:29:05,800 Speaker 1: of course, by saying, and Jamie, I don't have to 1372 01:29:05,840 --> 01:29:07,680 Speaker 1: tell you this, but like, I'm in ment i Q. 1373 01:29:08,320 --> 01:29:13,240 Speaker 1: I Q tests are like bullshit based on pseudoscience, and 1374 01:29:13,320 --> 01:29:15,000 Speaker 1: you are in mensa. Yes, that's sorry, That's what I 1375 01:29:15,040 --> 01:29:19,600 Speaker 1: meant to say. Yeah, no, it's it's it's racist, sexist, 1376 01:29:19,680 --> 01:29:22,960 Speaker 1: you name it, pseudoscience. That yeah, he does. I mean, 1377 01:29:23,000 --> 01:29:26,240 Speaker 1: I think he intentionally in many points like tries to 1378 01:29:26,760 --> 01:29:28,280 Speaker 1: I think I think what he's trying to do there 1379 01:29:28,320 --> 01:29:30,200 Speaker 1: is just try to make it sound like she is. 1380 01:29:31,560 --> 01:29:34,679 Speaker 1: He's like, well, she's smart, so that means that she's 1381 01:29:34,720 --> 01:29:37,639 Speaker 1: older than her age, Like just exactly trying to play 1382 01:29:37,680 --> 01:29:42,759 Speaker 1: that angle. Yeah, because like i Q stands for intelligence quotient, 1383 01:29:43,439 --> 01:29:46,000 Speaker 1: which is a number that you get when you divide 1384 01:29:46,680 --> 01:29:49,760 Speaker 1: again and this is all like bullshit pseudoscience, but it's 1385 01:29:49,920 --> 01:29:53,960 Speaker 1: when you divide your mental age, which is a number 1386 01:29:54,000 --> 01:29:57,479 Speaker 1: that you get from an intelligence test, divide that by 1387 01:29:57,720 --> 01:30:02,519 Speaker 1: your actual chronological age. So if someone scores a one 1388 01:30:02,640 --> 01:30:05,120 Speaker 1: hundred and fifty on an i Q test, which is 1389 01:30:05,160 --> 01:30:07,639 Speaker 1: considered to be a high i Q, and you take 1390 01:30:07,680 --> 01:30:10,280 Speaker 1: that test when you're ten years old, it means that 1391 01:30:10,320 --> 01:30:13,799 Speaker 1: your actual your chronological age is ten, but your mental 1392 01:30:13,880 --> 01:30:17,240 Speaker 1: age is fifteen. So I feel like Humbred is so 1393 01:30:17,280 --> 01:30:19,599 Speaker 1: obsessed with her i Q because he's like, well, she 1394 01:30:19,680 --> 01:30:25,759 Speaker 1: might be twelve chronologically, but she's closer to It's literally, 1395 01:30:25,800 --> 01:30:28,839 Speaker 1: I mean, it's like it's it's so yeah, he's he's 1396 01:30:28,920 --> 01:30:34,479 Speaker 1: just a fucking bullshit liar. Where that's for like reading 1397 01:30:34,600 --> 01:30:40,640 Speaker 1: levels and Matt nothing to do ability to consent, Like 1398 01:30:40,720 --> 01:30:43,479 Speaker 1: it's just so bad faith and ridiculous, but I do 1399 01:30:43,680 --> 01:30:46,320 Speaker 1: yeah that I uh, but I feel like that is 1400 01:30:46,360 --> 01:30:51,240 Speaker 1: like like four predators who try to justify their behavior. 1401 01:30:51,400 --> 01:30:55,479 Speaker 1: They'll they'll site like, oh yeah, well she was maybe 1402 01:30:55,479 --> 01:30:59,479 Speaker 1: technically under age, but she was so mature. Yeah. I 1403 01:30:59,760 --> 01:31:04,120 Speaker 1: think I feel like that's very common tactic. Yeah, yeah, 1404 01:31:04,160 --> 01:31:08,360 Speaker 1: I mean humber humbert are certainly and embodies a lot 1405 01:31:08,400 --> 01:31:14,639 Speaker 1: of common tactics of manipulative abuser. I mean, yeah, hell, 1406 01:31:14,840 --> 01:31:16,960 Speaker 1: and that's something that could have been in the movie, 1407 01:31:17,000 --> 01:31:21,200 Speaker 1: where like if we see him trying to justify his 1408 01:31:21,360 --> 01:31:26,559 Speaker 1: behavior through you know, the mental gymnastics he's doing, and 1409 01:31:26,560 --> 01:31:29,599 Speaker 1: then we see other characters be like, well wait a minute, 1410 01:31:30,160 --> 01:31:37,080 Speaker 1: what So that's another I think opportunity again, if you're 1411 01:31:37,120 --> 01:31:40,080 Speaker 1: going to adapt this, that's an opportunity you have as 1412 01:31:40,080 --> 01:31:43,280 Speaker 1: a filmmaker to present these things that he is saying 1413 01:31:43,320 --> 01:31:47,320 Speaker 1: in this very fancy, flowery language in the book and 1414 01:31:47,360 --> 01:31:49,720 Speaker 1: then just having to have that character say it as 1415 01:31:49,840 --> 01:31:54,160 Speaker 1: dialogue when it will sound predatory and ridiculous and will 1416 01:31:54,200 --> 01:31:57,799 Speaker 1: scare people because it's like he doesn't have the luxury 1417 01:31:57,840 --> 01:32:00,120 Speaker 1: of talking his way around the topic as he is 1418 01:32:00,120 --> 01:32:03,240 Speaker 1: in the book. That's an I mean, that's something that 1419 01:32:03,840 --> 01:32:08,479 Speaker 1: you could have explored of, like how does this person 1420 01:32:08,640 --> 01:32:12,559 Speaker 1: try to justify himself in real time? And of course 1421 01:32:12,600 --> 01:32:16,040 Speaker 1: it's going to catch up with him. And also a 1422 01:32:16,080 --> 01:32:18,679 Speaker 1: lot of what the book deals with that I don't 1423 01:32:18,680 --> 01:32:22,400 Speaker 1: think that the movies are successful in is society's failure 1424 01:32:22,479 --> 01:32:26,840 Speaker 1: of Lolita. Not only are we seeing this predator succeed 1425 01:32:26,920 --> 01:32:29,760 Speaker 1: in taking her away again and again and again, we 1426 01:32:29,800 --> 01:32:33,200 Speaker 1: see her communities has failed her, her school system has 1427 01:32:33,200 --> 01:32:35,960 Speaker 1: failed her, her government has failed her, law enforcement has 1428 01:32:35,960 --> 01:32:40,479 Speaker 1: failed her. She's been failed at every level, and that 1429 01:32:41,240 --> 01:32:45,880 Speaker 1: you know, partially due to this kind of extreme passiveness 1430 01:32:46,520 --> 01:32:50,000 Speaker 1: that existed in the nineteen fifties in the US. And 1431 01:32:50,120 --> 01:32:54,519 Speaker 1: like that was a very deliberate commentary that again, it's 1432 01:32:54,560 --> 01:32:57,640 Speaker 1: just like this movie has no interest or ability, I 1433 01:32:57,640 --> 01:33:01,000 Speaker 1: don't know which, but like it has no and it 1434 01:33:01,120 --> 01:33:04,679 Speaker 1: just is like Peter Sellers is funny. You're just like, 1435 01:33:05,240 --> 01:33:08,960 Speaker 1: how is this where we are like, yeah, well, wouldn't 1436 01:33:09,000 --> 01:33:12,800 Speaker 1: it be funny if the hotel is all booked up 1437 01:33:13,040 --> 01:33:16,400 Speaker 1: and they can only have one room because there's a 1438 01:33:16,439 --> 01:33:20,960 Speaker 1: police convention there, and oh, the irony of a pedophile 1439 01:33:21,040 --> 01:33:24,160 Speaker 1: who's you know, breaking the law has to be around 1440 01:33:24,200 --> 01:33:27,200 Speaker 1: a bunch of cops. T he he what a funny obstacle. 1441 01:33:28,080 --> 01:33:33,480 Speaker 1: It's infuriating. It's so like, yeah, creating a comic situation 1442 01:33:33,520 --> 01:33:36,719 Speaker 1: out of it, all of it. It's just it's it's 1443 01:33:36,760 --> 01:33:40,280 Speaker 1: a it's a waste of everybody's time, and it's worse 1444 01:33:40,320 --> 01:33:44,120 Speaker 1: than a ways of time. It's actively detrimental to telling 1445 01:33:44,120 --> 01:33:49,080 Speaker 1: a story that could be of use to anybody, to anybody, 1446 01:33:49,800 --> 01:33:51,519 Speaker 1: And I feel like that's I mean, that's why nobody 1447 01:33:51,520 --> 01:33:55,200 Speaker 1: talks about this movie is because the book is very controversial, 1448 01:33:55,200 --> 01:33:57,280 Speaker 1: but some people have found value in it, which is 1449 01:33:57,280 --> 01:34:00,200 Speaker 1: why it's such a debate. This movie. No one ever 1450 01:34:00,200 --> 01:34:02,479 Speaker 1: found value and so no one is like, well what 1451 01:34:02,600 --> 01:34:06,360 Speaker 1: about Peter Sellers? Like, no one is like, it's a 1452 01:34:06,479 --> 01:34:10,880 Speaker 1: it's a useless it's a useless movie, and I and 1453 01:34:10,920 --> 01:34:14,640 Speaker 1: I hate that Sue Lion and Shelly Winters had to 1454 01:34:15,600 --> 01:34:20,640 Speaker 1: deal with any part of it. Um, thank you for 1455 01:34:20,880 --> 01:34:24,840 Speaker 1: being willing to discuss this, this movie with me. I 1456 01:34:24,880 --> 01:34:31,120 Speaker 1: don't worry now I have I'll be using this as collateral. 1457 01:34:31,280 --> 01:34:38,320 Speaker 1: Know what's the word something to yeah to? Because you 1458 01:34:38,400 --> 01:34:41,519 Speaker 1: know there's some some movies that I know you don't 1459 01:34:41,520 --> 01:34:46,120 Speaker 1: want to do that. I'm like, where this is about? Yeah, fine, 1460 01:34:46,320 --> 01:34:51,080 Speaker 1: I did Indiana Jones let that that's true there, But 1461 01:34:51,160 --> 01:34:54,479 Speaker 1: in any case, yes, I agree, and I yeah, I 1462 01:34:54,600 --> 01:34:58,880 Speaker 1: just my thoughts have been very consumed with this property 1463 01:34:58,960 --> 01:35:01,120 Speaker 1: recently and so wanted to bring it on the Bechtel 1464 01:35:01,200 --> 01:35:07,120 Speaker 1: Cast and talk about it with you. Yeah, it's just 1465 01:35:08,479 --> 01:35:11,639 Speaker 1: wow wow wow um. Yeah, So feel free to leave 1466 01:35:11,680 --> 01:35:15,120 Speaker 1: your thoughts in the comments. Were very as always, very 1467 01:35:15,160 --> 01:35:18,400 Speaker 1: interested in what you have to say. I did not 1468 01:35:18,560 --> 01:35:22,599 Speaker 1: honestly pay attention to if this movie passed. If this 1469 01:35:22,640 --> 01:35:26,000 Speaker 1: movie passes the Bechdel tests, I don't give any manner 1470 01:35:26,040 --> 01:35:29,439 Speaker 1: of funk about that. If it does, I don't really care. 1471 01:35:30,320 --> 01:35:34,040 Speaker 1: I think it probably does Melita and her mom, but 1472 01:35:34,360 --> 01:35:40,479 Speaker 1: at I just yeah, I don't really care. It doesn't. 1473 01:35:40,520 --> 01:35:43,120 Speaker 1: I don't think it matters for this movie. It doesn't 1474 01:35:43,120 --> 01:35:46,200 Speaker 1: super matter. No, it's not really relevant to this discussion. 1475 01:35:46,680 --> 01:35:49,080 Speaker 1: And I honestly don't know how to give this movie 1476 01:35:49,160 --> 01:35:52,280 Speaker 1: nipples either. I guess I would say zero. I'm going 1477 01:35:52,320 --> 01:35:55,479 Speaker 1: to give it negative one million nipples. Yeah, I guess 1478 01:35:55,520 --> 01:35:58,040 Speaker 1: I'll just say negative. I guess I'll say I barely 1479 01:35:58,120 --> 01:36:02,200 Speaker 1: know that this even apply. I said this discussion, it 1480 01:36:02,360 --> 01:36:05,639 Speaker 1: is like the portrayal in this movie. There, there wasn't 1481 01:36:05,640 --> 01:36:10,120 Speaker 1: even an attempt. It took a flawed attempt at portraying 1482 01:36:10,160 --> 01:36:16,320 Speaker 1: female characters and erased not just Nabokov's problems, but the 1483 01:36:16,520 --> 01:36:19,880 Speaker 1: entire character. Just turned the pencil over and y or 1484 01:36:19,960 --> 01:36:25,599 Speaker 1: e Uri like just it. Everyone deserves so much better 1485 01:36:25,680 --> 01:36:30,799 Speaker 1: than what this movie had to offer. And buck Stanley Kubrick. 1486 01:36:32,080 --> 01:36:36,479 Speaker 1: And that's why I suck the other adaptation, the other 1487 01:36:36,520 --> 01:36:40,800 Speaker 1: film one. That one is just the other adaptation. It's 1488 01:36:40,840 --> 01:36:44,439 Speaker 1: Adrian line. He shouldn't have worked for a long time 1489 01:36:44,479 --> 01:36:48,000 Speaker 1: after that. I tell you what the Adrian linement in particular. 1490 01:36:48,400 --> 01:36:52,280 Speaker 1: I just I watched it today and I feel terrible. 1491 01:36:52,400 --> 01:36:54,320 Speaker 1: You know what I need to do as a palate 1492 01:36:54,360 --> 01:36:57,439 Speaker 1: cleanser for having consumed all this little all these Lolita 1493 01:36:57,520 --> 01:37:02,679 Speaker 1: movies was watch hard Candy. Hard Candy is everything these 1494 01:37:02,760 --> 01:37:06,600 Speaker 1: movies are not. It is a revenge that was. That 1495 01:37:06,680 --> 01:37:10,160 Speaker 1: was a fun episode to record. Yes, yes, I and 1496 01:37:10,200 --> 01:37:11,960 Speaker 1: I feel like in a way you can view that 1497 01:37:12,240 --> 01:37:16,120 Speaker 1: movie as kind of a response to movies like Lolita. Yeah, 1498 01:37:16,240 --> 01:37:21,200 Speaker 1: I think someone like saw Stanley Kubrick's Lolita and they're like, well, um, 1499 01:37:21,320 --> 01:37:23,599 Speaker 1: I could adopt that better than this, and then they 1500 01:37:23,640 --> 01:37:28,040 Speaker 1: made hard candy. I just it still is so infuriating 1501 01:37:28,080 --> 01:37:30,280 Speaker 1: to me that the image that people take away from 1502 01:37:30,280 --> 01:37:33,040 Speaker 1: this movie doesn't even appear in the movie that says 1503 01:37:33,120 --> 01:37:35,400 Speaker 1: everything you need to know about this movie. It is 1504 01:37:35,479 --> 01:37:38,240 Speaker 1: just it tricked me to like I like I had 1505 01:37:38,520 --> 01:37:43,080 Speaker 1: mapped the poster onto that scene. I guess like almost 1506 01:37:43,120 --> 01:37:47,000 Speaker 1: everybody feels this way, like I thought this until I've 1507 01:37:47,439 --> 01:37:49,720 Speaker 1: built my life around it for no reason like that. 1508 01:37:51,280 --> 01:37:56,480 Speaker 1: It's so I mean manipulative, like it's it's very effective 1509 01:37:56,520 --> 01:38:03,320 Speaker 1: marketing that is doing bad things like yeah, it is, Uh, 1510 01:38:03,520 --> 01:38:06,080 Speaker 1: I don't know. It is a very interesting case study. 1511 01:38:06,280 --> 01:38:11,920 Speaker 1: It's very fucked up and uh you know, yeah, we're 1512 01:38:11,960 --> 01:38:14,720 Speaker 1: done talking about it. And now we're done talking. Check 1513 01:38:14,760 --> 01:38:22,240 Speaker 1: out the podcast. Oh wow, we'll be back soon with that. 1514 01:38:22,360 --> 01:38:25,320 Speaker 1: Thank you for listening again. We uh look forward to 1515 01:38:25,360 --> 01:38:34,559 Speaker 1: your perspectives or we'll see it I Frankenstein. Yes, well 1516 01:38:34,680 --> 01:38:39,880 Speaker 1: that was our unlocked Lolita episode and once again Jamie 1517 01:38:40,120 --> 01:38:44,320 Speaker 1: tell people where and when and how they can listen 1518 01:38:44,360 --> 01:38:50,400 Speaker 1: to Lolita Podcast. Lolita Podcast comes out on November twenty three, 1519 01:38:50,760 --> 01:38:54,439 Speaker 1: and then new episodes are released every Monday right here 1520 01:38:54,479 --> 01:38:58,480 Speaker 1: on on I Heart Radio or wherever you get your podcast, 1521 01:38:58,680 --> 01:39:03,439 Speaker 1: and that's the official like edge uh but yeah, I 1522 01:39:03,680 --> 01:39:07,080 Speaker 1: uh that So as far as like, there is one 1523 01:39:07,280 --> 01:39:12,880 Speaker 1: entire episode dedicated to like deep background on this movie 1524 01:39:13,120 --> 01:39:15,880 Speaker 1: in particular, but at a ten episode series, so we're 1525 01:39:15,920 --> 01:39:18,280 Speaker 1: taking a look at the book, We're taking a look 1526 01:39:18,320 --> 01:39:21,600 Speaker 1: at the author, We're taking a look at the other adaptations. 1527 01:39:21,920 --> 01:39:26,440 Speaker 1: There is also entire episodes dedicated to talking to professionals 1528 01:39:26,439 --> 01:39:28,720 Speaker 1: and child psychiatry and just like other and and the 1529 01:39:28,800 --> 01:39:31,639 Speaker 1: ways that people have reclaimed this text over the years, 1530 01:39:32,240 --> 01:39:36,719 Speaker 1: and um, it's an interesting ride. I hope that people 1531 01:39:36,760 --> 01:39:39,439 Speaker 1: will listen. But yeah, it's just uh, it's just a 1532 01:39:39,479 --> 01:39:44,519 Speaker 1: podcast that will come out on Mondays soon. Excellent. Well, 1533 01:39:44,560 --> 01:39:51,000 Speaker 1: speaking of plugs, because this was an unlocked Matreon episode, 1534 01:39:51,040 --> 01:39:53,720 Speaker 1: we said at the beginning of the episode, we'll repeat ourselves. 1535 01:39:54,080 --> 01:39:56,160 Speaker 1: Check out our Matreon and you can do that by 1536 01:39:56,200 --> 01:40:00,920 Speaker 1: going to patreon dot com slash pectel Cast. It gets 1537 01:40:00,920 --> 01:40:05,120 Speaker 1: you access to two brand new bonus episodes every single month, 1538 01:40:05,280 --> 01:40:09,839 Speaker 1: plus access to the entire back catalog of bonus episodes, 1539 01:40:09,880 --> 01:40:12,960 Speaker 1: and like we mentioned, there are upwards of eighty by 1540 01:40:13,000 --> 01:40:16,919 Speaker 1: now and if you're listening when this comes out in November, 1541 01:40:17,800 --> 01:40:20,839 Speaker 1: we just we're in the middle of Mary Kate Nashley 1542 01:40:20,960 --> 01:40:27,720 Speaker 1: month on an important moments in world history. You thought 1543 01:40:27,760 --> 01:40:30,599 Speaker 1: this episode was a critical discussion, wait till you get 1544 01:40:30,640 --> 01:40:36,519 Speaker 1: to two different Mary Kate Nashley movies. H too too 1545 01:40:36,560 --> 01:40:39,320 Speaker 1: much discourse for one episode. So but there there's a 1546 01:40:39,360 --> 01:40:42,479 Speaker 1: lot of fun stuff. We always cover um garbage holiday 1547 01:40:42,520 --> 01:40:45,960 Speaker 1: movies in December, and it's just it's a fun ride. 1548 01:40:46,000 --> 01:40:49,120 Speaker 1: So uh meet us over and the matron from More 1549 01:40:49,960 --> 01:40:54,160 Speaker 1: Yes indeed and um yeah all the other stuff. Follow 1550 01:40:54,200 --> 01:40:57,200 Speaker 1: us on social media at Bechtelcast on Twitter and Instagram. 1551 01:40:57,760 --> 01:41:01,559 Speaker 1: Check out our merch on uh public dot com slash 1552 01:41:01,640 --> 01:41:04,920 Speaker 1: the Bechtel Cast. The perfect time for Baby Grinch March 1553 01:41:05,720 --> 01:41:08,759 Speaker 1: or as I like car now, Green Baby Boy, Green 1554 01:41:08,880 --> 01:41:13,479 Speaker 1: Baby Boy, you need to do a whole after Lolita 1555 01:41:13,560 --> 01:41:15,880 Speaker 1: is over. You need to do a separate podcast about 1556 01:41:15,920 --> 01:41:19,080 Speaker 1: your journey with Green Baby Boy. I honestly will need 1557 01:41:19,160 --> 01:41:22,800 Speaker 1: the relief after after wean Lovelita for six months to 1558 01:41:22,880 --> 01:41:25,960 Speaker 1: be like, Okay, this this podcast is just about Baby Grinch. 1559 01:41:26,240 --> 01:41:30,599 Speaker 1: Let's just cut to the chase, um and well, if 1560 01:41:30,600 --> 01:41:34,080 Speaker 1: you'll allow me to plug something of mine. I have 1561 01:41:34,240 --> 01:41:38,160 Speaker 1: a still pretty new Instagram live show that I do 1562 01:41:38,280 --> 01:41:42,640 Speaker 1: every Thursday on my Instagram, which you can find that 1563 01:41:42,720 --> 01:41:47,200 Speaker 1: at Caitlin Darante. It's called Movie Talk with Caitlin and 1564 01:41:47,320 --> 01:41:51,400 Speaker 1: it's just me and a guest chatting about movies. It's 1565 01:41:51,439 --> 01:41:55,559 Speaker 1: not the Bechtel Cast because I do no preparation. There's 1566 01:41:55,600 --> 01:41:58,599 Speaker 1: no specific movie that gets discussed. It's just a loose 1567 01:41:58,720 --> 01:42:03,960 Speaker 1: convo to you were my first guest, what a what 1568 01:42:04,080 --> 01:42:06,840 Speaker 1: a blast? And many and and I think so far 1569 01:42:07,000 --> 01:42:09,599 Speaker 1: all friends of the cast have been on this so far, 1570 01:42:10,280 --> 01:42:13,400 Speaker 1: because it turns out the only people I know our 1571 01:42:13,640 --> 01:42:17,720 Speaker 1: former guests on our show. Well well, well, the way 1572 01:42:17,760 --> 01:42:19,640 Speaker 1: I was thinking of it is like we truly just 1573 01:42:19,760 --> 01:42:25,240 Speaker 1: bring our friends on our show, because that's true. Yeah, 1574 01:42:25,280 --> 01:42:28,320 Speaker 1: but yeah, I think I'll keep it pretty close to 1575 01:42:28,320 --> 01:42:31,720 Speaker 1: to to Bectel Cast friends on on Movie Talk. So 1576 01:42:31,840 --> 01:42:36,080 Speaker 1: check that out again every Thursday at six pm Pacific, 1577 01:42:36,680 --> 01:42:41,280 Speaker 1: nine pm Eastern. And that's again on my Instagram at 1578 01:42:41,400 --> 01:42:46,840 Speaker 1: Caitlin Darante. And I think that doesn't right, I think, 1579 01:42:46,960 --> 01:42:49,920 Speaker 1: so yeah, I have a have a great week, everybody, 1580 01:42:50,080 --> 01:42:54,560 Speaker 1: and uh, we'll see you next week with another episode. 1581 01:42:56,600 --> 01:43:00,200 Speaker 1: I don't know what I was gonna say with another episode, goodbye, 1582 01:43:00,200 --> 01:43:01,320 Speaker 1: it's true. Bye bye,