WEBVTT - Fantasy Football: Week 8 Waiver Wire, Adds, Drops, Streams

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever Show. Started listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>De din Yeah, now welcome you. Bake yours by day

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>from man right, excell your co host by dying stake,

0:00:55.200 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>preta bright step all your call at five eleven. Why,

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>ladies and gentlemen York. With that, we will have you

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>inside studio at thirty four. This is the BFFs. He

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is Frank Stafle, he is eu y Eric Young. I

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>am Greg Susman. Coming off a Barn Murner on Monday

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.199
<v Speaker 1>night football game as the Adam Gays led New York

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Jets fell to the seventh ranked overall New England Patriots

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>defense thirty three to nothing, seventh overall in fantasy football.

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Is what I was alluding to. That's how amongst all positions,

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>all positions, that's how good they doing. Patriots have been. Frankie,

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Jets aren't very good. The Jets are not very good.

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Greg and I can go off on a monologue. Everyone

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>knows how I feel about at Gaze. If you don't

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>just search Frank Standfell Adam Gates, you'll find a ton

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of rants from when they originally signed Adam Gaze. Look,

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot wrong with last night. You can't

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>even call it a game. It was one sided. There

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>was no competition whatsoever. Thirty three to zero, the New

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>England Patriots go into MetLife and completely stomp the New

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>York Jets, sending zero blitzes at Sam Donald. He has

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>no idea what's coming his way. Adam Gates not changing

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>up the productions one bit, the offensive line not knowing

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>where they should be at all. The defense did not

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 1>show up at all. Tremaine Johnson, I thought Bart Scott

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>said it best. I saw this on Twitter. He said,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>every single dollar that Tremaine Johnson makes this year, he

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>should donate to charity because right now he is stealing.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>He's stealing money from the New York Jets. And you

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>saw that on the play against Philip dors Set just

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>completely lets the guy get behind him. I don't know

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>what else you could say about this team right now, Greg,

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's so many holes. They don't have a

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.679
<v Speaker 1>pass rush, the offensive line is completely in flux. Everyone's

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>hurt on the offensive line. To brought in some veterans,

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they thought that, you know, they could signed Khalil and

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>that would work out they trade for Collectio simily. Those

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>guys are hurt. I read a good article from Connor

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Hughes earlier today on the athletic I mean, this is

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a team that needs to completely be rebuilt from the

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>ground up. And Sam Donald, as bad as he was

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>last night, I'm not gonna make excuses for him. I mean,

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>his happy feet all over the place, throwing off his

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>back foot some really really horrible interception. And I would

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>say that about any quarterback, you know, based on the

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>way that he played last night. It's not just because

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>he's a jet or whatever. And you know I'm being

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>horror on him or whatever. A man, yeah, be a man.

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But Sam Donald was dreadful last night for interceptions another

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>fumble loss is he did? He didn't look like he

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be there, Greg. They knew all the week

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that they were going up against the New England Patriots,

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed like they didn't prep at all. Did

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>they even practice? Did they even what team were they

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>getting ready for? Because they were ready for I think

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>they would have lost to a college football team last night,

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>right they were. They were all They do that ability

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to make you look awful, though, yes, and look what

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to say more than anything, and then we'll

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of go into fantasy football because I don't want

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the Jets anymore. It is what it is.

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was really distasteful by ESPN to not

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>only mike up Sam Donald, but but to air that

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the ghost thing. Come on, you know, I would say

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>that about I would say that about any young quarterback.

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>We know, we know that one thing that Bill Belichick does,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>no matter who it is, he dominates young quarterbacks. Last

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>night was the sixteenth game in Sam Donald's career. He's

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>basically still a rookie. Right, we could agree on that.

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>We knew that he was gonna struggle against Bill Belichick's defense,

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>there was no doubt about it. But airing that, I mean,

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy's confidence is shot already where he's at, So

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>now this is going to go down with you know,

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>the butt fumbles and all the other infamous things that

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the Jets are known for. Is gonna go down to history.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And like, he's got enough on his plate already. Right,

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>He's a young quarterback playing in New York. He's gonna

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>hear it all from the media. Does you really need

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this whole ghost thing going on. I would have said

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that about any quarterback, any young quarterback, whether it was

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield, Lamar Jackson, if that quarterback was miked up

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and they aired that, I would have said it no

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>matter who it was. It's not just because it's Donald,

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not just because it's the Jets. I thought it

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>was very distasteful. Not disagree more with that statement. To me,

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it was Daniel Jones, Phillis, Kyler Murray, I would say

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the same exact thing, completely, completely, completely disagree. Frank, do

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you watch Hard Knocks? Yes? Do you like Hard Knocks? Okay? You?

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Why do you like it? Because you get unfiltered, unfiltered

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>access to these players, behind the scenes, footage that we've

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>never seen before. They mike players of every week and

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>there's only so much. Ah oh, there's what do you

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>do over? Get her? Last night? Waver tomorrow, I wanna

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>playing Fortnite, and that I need to hear from jujus

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>miss uses. That's all nonsense. In BS, what you heard

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>last night from Sam Donald was real access, Like, holy crap,

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing ghosts out there because it seems like there's

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so many defenders. That was awesome and NFL Films has

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to approve anything that airs, and they thought, oh, this

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is really good access. It was awesome seeing that, but

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it was distasteful. It's not distaste, not just taste. Also,

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you know he's mind up, he knows he's Do you

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>think he's thinking about a microphone when he's getting demolished

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>out there? But the Patriot, he's not thinking about that.

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Why is it just because dude? He's here? Everything from

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the media today anyway, right, And his offensive line is terrible,

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>his coaching is terrible. Everything has been a disaster for

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>this kid since he has stepped into the NFL. And

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>some of that is by his own doing. I'm not

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it, but that is distasteful. And I would

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>say it about any quarterback in that same situation. What

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>do you say I would say about Kyler Murray? I

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>would say it about any young quarterback going up against

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a Belichick defense under the circumstance. Let me go to

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the public figure. E Y. You have been a public

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>figure for a very very long time, wrestling for over

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. You've been on TV for seemingly ever. You

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>were constantly miked up on the air, your Twitter and

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>your social media or in the public. Obviously you were

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a personal guy, but everything you say and due is

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>in public. Do you have any do you have an

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>issue with Sam Donald? I see ghost comment area on ESPN.

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh No, they look at their they don't. They didn't

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>sneak it in there. He would have had a sign

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>off on it, and he knows. And I understand what

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Frank is saying. I get, but the reality is that

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he knows um that access and the people the NFL

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>are doing backflip the fact that he was honest and

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>said something of substance, because the reality is is someone

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>like Juju Smith Schuster or someone like that, they're They're

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>just saying and doing things that they think they want

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>people to hear. I mean, that's what television is. None

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of it is real, guys, I hate to tell you,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>none of it. And the NFL is doing backflips because

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of that access. Sam Donald probably regrets it, but at

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>least it was real. It was entertaining, for sure, and

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a ton a ton of stories about it,

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a ton of headlines about it. You're right, that doesn't

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that it can't be distasteful. It wasn't distasteful man, right,

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>think the way every wires hung. Next, are you ready

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for the nations first and only, free, twenty four hour

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>network dedicated to you the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast.

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Sports Grade will provide you with a real time content,

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>statistics and gaming intelligence unlike anything you've ever seen before.

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Located both in the heart of New York City and

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>inside the FanDuel Sports book at the Metal Lends Sports Grade,

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>He's live eighteen hours a day here to serve you

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:26.559
<v Speaker 1>the fanatic. This is Sports Grade. Get on the grid.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Nothing like an argument into oak. Get us back on track,

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>back on track back, zy y, Frankie. I'm Greg having

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to hang out with you here on a waiver wire Tuesday.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>And for the first time in like three weeks, guys,

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this is an active and a legitimate waiver wire, and

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot to discuss and a lot of

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>players that we're gonna spend some cash on here this week.

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>And it all begins at the running back position, and

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>it begins with Ty Johnson. According to Adam Schefer last night,

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>carry on Johnson is going to miss well. It's good

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you be, I should say. Week to week with a

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>knee injury. Given that Matt Patricia comes from the Bill

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Belichick school, we have no idea what that means. We

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what this knee injury could be. Could

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it be a tornamentiscus, Could it be a deep bruise,

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Could it be a sprained mcl I don't know. Hopefully

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Virginia will on Thursday, but unfortunately, by the time Thursday

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>rolls around or waiver wire will already have run, which

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>means we need to make a decision now. E y,

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I go to you if you are not a carry

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>on Johnson owner, because if you're carry on Johnson owner,

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it's easy, Yeah, but you spend the bag, you drive

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.599
<v Speaker 1>it all for Ty Johnson. But if you're not a

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>carry on Johnson owner, how much fab are you spending

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>on Thy Johnson this week? I mean, in a feeling,

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>we're getting out to the nitty gritty here, you know

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, Like this is where you got to

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>decide if you think you're in the hunt or not

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>um and if Ty Johnson is worth it. I mean

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>what we saw it looks like it's going to be

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a split with mckissic anyways. So I

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he's worth dropping the bank. Like I think,

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>if you are the Johnson owner, then you do have

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to go after him. Um. But other than that, I mean,

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean I wouldn't. I wouldn't break the bank on

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a player like like Ti Johnson because I think Jad

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>because I guess going to get some use as well,

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be super frustrating. You don't want

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to spend all your fab money there. I mean, look

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>at there's a lot of football left. Other guys are

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>going to get hurt if you have some cash. Laugh.

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>That's not I'm not talking about myself. I've spent most

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 1>of mine already because I always do because I'm I'm

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a lunatic. But uh, I have no self control. But

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:39.839
<v Speaker 1>if you do have self control, you might want to

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>wait for something that's a little bit more valuable. Yeah, Greg,

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna be a little bit more aggressive

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>on this one. This strikes me as that player that

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>could be a league winner. We don't know what's going

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on with carry On Johnson right now. They say he's

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>quote week to week he's dealing with a believe it's

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a left knee injury. Last year he dealt with a

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>right and injury knee injury which only allowed him to

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>play ten games last season. And you know he's done

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with a lot in injuries going back to his days

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>at Auburn as well in college. So I am worried

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about this injury to carry On Johnson and THI Johnson's

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.599
<v Speaker 1>got some good matchups coming up as well. Again, we

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know how long he's gonna be out, but at

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>least for this week, I would expect carry On Johnson

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 1>not to be out there and going up against the

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants, Chase Edmonds just had a hundred and

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty total yards and three touchdowns as well. They clearly

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>liked TI Johnson a lock, Greg. I know you know

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about him. He went to the

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>University of Maryland. The University of Maryland a six round

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>pick in this year's NFL Draft. He ran a four

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>four or five forty a six percent tile in speed score.

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>They liked him enough to get rid of C. J. Anderson.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I know that they have Paul Perkins on the practice

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>squad as well, so they could promote him. J. D.

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>McKissick is gonna see some touches. But this past week,

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>once carry On Johnson went out THI Johnson played six

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps. He had fourteen touches. He had two

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>touches inside the ten yard line. J D. McKissick had

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>seven touches, zero touches inside the ten yard line. I

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think Ty Johnson is going to be the guy. The

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>matchups coming up, the Giants, the Raiders, the Chicago Bears,

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>who have allowed over a hundred yards and two touchdowns

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>in back to back games to opposing running backs, these

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>are pretty good matchups and I think that this could

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>be one of those league winning pickups down the stretch. Here, Greg,

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the second half of the season, we

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going on carry On Johnson, but I'm

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>willing to be aggressive here. I put out before the

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>show a pull how much FAB would you spend on

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>thy Johnson? And right now of the vote is going

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to twenty to thirty percent, and I think I agree

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>with that. I would if you play the league with FAB,

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 1>I would look at how much money the carry On

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Johnson owner has. I play in a league where he

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>only has twenty three dollars left out of a hundred,

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>so I know that I can win for four dollars

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>but I might go even a little bit higher than that. Yeah,

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>And I know that you're not saying it exactly amount

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 1>because you don't and your lead members to know. I

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>made that mistake before. Yeah for me, and I said

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>this to you this morning. We were trying to figure

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it out and prepping for the show that at some

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>point in the year, they is that league winner that

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>comes across the waiver wire. And I don't know that

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten there yet this year. Um, I Darren Waller

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>before the season started. It is probably that guy right now,

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and he's been amazing at the tight end position that's

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>been so bad this year. Well, we haven't necessarily had

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that running back that you picked up or that wide

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>receiver you picked up that is a game changer. And

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that. Chi Johnson is when I go

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 1>back to a year or two ago when together Frank,

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 1>we picked up Kennyan Drake and Damian Williams and we

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of hoped and Kenny Drake won a lot of

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>people leagues that year, two years ago. Last year that

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that player early on was Tyler Boyd. Philip Lindsay to Lindsay, absolutely, Yeah,

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't happened yet. Because we haven't had the major

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>running back injury, you know, knock a wood, which is

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>which is awesome, But carry On Johnson's injury. Maybe that

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's an offense that wants to run the football.

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>It's an offense that there's a clear backup, and it's

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>an injury that we don't necessarily oh if it's short

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>term or long term, like this is where you have

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>some people that are bidding that maybe well not enough

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>because hey, carry On John's gonna be back next week.

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Here's a lot of ambiguity right now, and that sometimes

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing when it comes to bidding for me.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>My first move, as you mentioned, he is looking at

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>how much the carry On Johnson owner has less and

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>going a dollar more than that if that, if he

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>has eighty dollars left, well that's a lot. If he has,

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in your case, what twenty three dollars left, there's no

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>question of bidding at least twenty four Like that's that's easy.

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>It's somewhere where it's in the middle, where he has

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>like fifty bucks left. You're like, all right, I'm gonna

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>have to spend most of everything I have now on

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it Is it worth? It is that a shot you take.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends where you are in the standings,

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>right if you are in desperation mode, if you are

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>two and five, if you are two and five, three

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and four may be depending on how your team is.

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Certainly one in six. I mean, that's it. You drop

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it right now. You have no choice. If you're three

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and four or four we're in three, five and two,

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe you have a bit of a luxury there. But

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I think this is your first true opportunity to take

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a stab, and you may have to do it. How

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>much FAB are you looking at here, Greg, twenty to

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent, thirty to forty I'm looking at my initial numbers.

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Probably yeah, I mean I don't know that, and I

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>think I think in high stakes leagues he's gonna go

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>for even more than that too. I think in high

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>stakes leagues he's gonna go for over, you know, forty

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of your FAB budget. And you know, if you

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>play in the NFFC or you know, the ff w

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>C or something like that, I mean, he's gonna go

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for probably four hundred plus dollars. I mean, you really

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have to weigh how much you need this player, you know,

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>how deep your league is how much you need running back?

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>All these things come into consideration, but I'm al right

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>being pretty aggressive right around thirty percent, maybe a little

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>bit even over that. Yeah, I think that number has

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to be up there. That brings us another running back

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that could be out there, waiver wires and that's Chase Edmunds.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>We saw how good he can be. David Johnson, well,

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>e y he he's banged up and uh a e

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>y at e y. David Johnson's bay dog is going

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to be someone that may be cautious, include Kingsbury's going

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to be cautious as we saw on Sunday where David

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Johnson just didn't seem right now. I don't know if

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a week will change things or not, but he knows

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that he has Chase Edmonds, who I don't say he's

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>just as good as David Johnson. We could certainly carry

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the load. Chase Emmons is out there. How much would

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you spend This is a guy that I would definitely

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>spend on. I totally disagree. I'm on the opposite side

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of the fence with you guys, with thy Johnson, Gary

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>On Johnson is a better player. I would argue that

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>with anybody his usage a bit has been pretty sordid

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>all year, and you believe that Ty Johnson is going

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to get it done and just don't see that happening,

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>especially because him and mckis pretty much I mean, it

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a fifty fifties play, but it was probably sixty

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>forty split um. And spending all your you know, thirty

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>percent of your fab money isn't going to help you.

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Ty Johnson is not gonna help you. Now, Edmonds, if

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you have money, spend it all. You know, this guy

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>showed up big time, um, and he looked good all year.

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Anytime he carried the ball, he looked just as good

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>or even better than David Johnson while caring in the ball.

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson is probably the best or in the top

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>three running backs, uh for for catching the ball out

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield, running running routes, lining up in the slot.

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>He is a do it all kind of guy. In

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>really good at receiving the ball, but hasn't looked great

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>running the ball. But every time Edmonds has has ran

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it this year, he's looked good. So that's that could

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>be that the game changer for me. Yeah, I like

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds, but for me. This one is a little

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>bit harder to figure out because David Johnson, I mean,

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>he is not weak too weak. Again, we don't really

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>know what's going on with David Johnson right now. He's

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>dealt with multiple injuries with a back earlier. Dealing with

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the Johnson either certainly makes sense. It makes sense, but

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>at least we know that he's I don't know he's

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>week to week. Whatever that means. I mean to me,

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that sounds a little bit more. He played one snap.

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>He played one snap, so I mean he could be

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>done for the year. He could be in the same

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>boat as carry On Johnson. If you're telling me, you

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>know you gotta spend all your FABI money, I'm taking

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds a thousand times out of a thousand over

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Ty Johnson. David Johnson is there. He made me back

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>next week, so could carry On Johnson don't at least

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>for one week. I don't think carry On Johnson is

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna play. I mean, based on hearing you know, week

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to week and he's dealt with knee injuries in the

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>past as well. We can talk a little bit more

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>about Tase Edmonds when we come back. I mean, I

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>think He's earned a role in the offensive regardless of

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>what's going with David Johnson, because he proved that this

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>past week. He's averaging over five yards per carry this season,

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson under four, he's earned a row. We'll take

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a break here when we come back. Some other running

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>backs and the wide receivers you gotta grab this week.

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready for the nation's first and only free,

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour network dedicated to you the betting and

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide you with a

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence unlike anything you've

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>ever seen before. Located both in the Hart of New

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>York City and inside the FanDuel Sports book at the

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Meadow Lends Sports Grade, He's live eighteen hours a day

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>here to serve you the fanatic. This is Sports Grade.

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Get all the grid. Remember follow us on YouTube, Sports

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>screen TV, Instagram, Sports screen TV, Twitter, Sports Cred. Of course,

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is you know the Fantasy sports radio network. We appreciate you,

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and of course our podcast download. You can download it

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>dress by searching Fantasy p FFS, NBA CC tips Off

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.959
<v Speaker 1>Tonight you have two games on the schedule. Frankie, your

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>pumps and you can dunk on your NBA DFS competition

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>using Daily Roder dot com. You'll leave the bros on

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Vandela DraftKings, the Daily Roder dot Com optimizer, and the

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 1>most accurate rejections in all of NBA d f s.

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Plus you get a lot of a lower's breaking news,

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>late swap support, and more same temp per cent on

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA d f S advice with the promo code

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>don't visit daily order dot com slash don't to learn more.

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>That's daily Order dot com slash don't and you get

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ten percent off right now Daily orter dot com where

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>millionaires are need franky. Um. It's funny because a lot

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of times on Thursdays and a little borrow my friends

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>watch those in the football g a few beers The's

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>wings and this Thursday giving that its Vikings Washington. My

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>friends are like, why don't you go? Wednesday watched the

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>opening night of NAY. I was like yes, Like not

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>really so I want to watch football? No, I don't.

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to go either night? Doesn't want to

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>go either night? Grandpa Greg? Yeah, this this week, yeah,

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Washington going up against Minnesota, not the not the you know,

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>most competitive match if they're huge favorites already, So we'll

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>see what happens there. Before the break, we were talking

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>about Chase Edmonds and now I mentioned, Look, he looked

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>really good this past week behind the same offensive line

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this year. You know, he's averaging five point six yards

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>per carry. David Johnson's averaging three point nine, and he's

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>fresher than David Johnson. Right now, you don't have to

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>deal with the injuries. I'm I'm alright spending some fab

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>on on Chase Edmonds as well, you know, in that

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen range, maybe even more than that, if you're really desperate.

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I just, for whatever reason, I feel more grim about

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this carry On Johnson injury than I do the David

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Johnson injury. There's no doubting that Chase Emmonds looked really

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>good this week. He's going up against the New Orleans Saints.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>They have been tough on running backs all season. But

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll see. I think he has earned a role

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>in this offense. We know that the Cardinals run for

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver sets. Is it out of the realm of

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>possibility that they start using David Johnson more as a

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver and both of these guys are on the

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>field together. No, I think that would actually be pretty

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>creative and I think it makes a lot of sense.

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>So we'll have to see how Cliff Kingsbury goes about

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the usage of Edmonds and David Johnson here. I like

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>spending fab on Chase Edmonds, but me personally like spending

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more on Ti Johnson's mother running Max

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that are out there. Let me begin with Mark Walten.

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>We talked about him yesterday or sorry last week. Kenny

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and Drake. The trade deadline is next Tuesday. I believe

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for the NFL, Ken and Drake is traded. We know

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Mark Walton's role will only increase. Darius Guys. I believe

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it's eligib will come off. I are around week ten.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Bill Callahan wants to run the ball. A. J. Peterson

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is banged up, Chris Thompson is hurt as well. They're

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>going to go to Darius Guys second half of the year.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Talk about league winners. That's a guy that could be one. Yeah,

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>you could pick up and stash him now he's not

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>eligible to return until week eleven. As you mentioned, Greg,

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>someone that I think you know they wanted to They

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to turn it over to him this year. If

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you you remember Week one, I mean Adrian Peterson wasn't

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>even active and that was actually a storyline that we

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>were paying attention to. But yeah, I think Darius guys,

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've given him enough time to heal up hopefully,

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you know he's he's good for for Week eleven and

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the stretch run here, Greg, but Mark Walton, Look, the

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins are not a good team, but this guy

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>just had season highs and carries. He had fourteen rushing yards,

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>He had sixty six offensive snaps, he played thirty eight.

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>He actually out snapped Kenyan Drake, Anie out snapped Klein

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Balage those two guys combined. So, yes, the Dolphins are

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>a bad team. But anytime we have a running back

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>who's seen close to fifteen touches, that running back should

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>be owned. Uh and when if they trade Kenyan Drake,

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Mark Walton is in the mix as a

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>flex basically where we've been ranking Kenyan Drake allseason. Greg,

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>either running actually want to mention it or should I

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we wanted a lide receiver. No, I think you pretty

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>much been on those like when small wood and deeper

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>leagues Darryl Henderson as well. Looks like he has surpassed

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.959
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Brown and they're getting him more touches. Todd Gurley,

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>while he's scoring touchdowns, just continues to not look good.

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>He's not running the ball efficiently. The offensive line is

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>not a great one. But you know, behind the same

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>offensive line the past two weeks, Daryl Henderson has you know,

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>outran in terms of efficiency both Todd Gurley and Malcolm Brown.

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>So look for Darrel Henderson and then Raheem Moster Greg.

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a sneaky name to pay attention to

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>because Matt Brita left that game with injury. He didn't return,

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and we know Kyle Sanahan continues to produce running backs

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that are viable for fantasy football. They want to run

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the football. They have one of the best run blocking

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>offensive lines in the game right now, and I don't

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>know that Tevin Coleman is a guy that they want

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>getting twenty plus carries consistently. So if anything is actually

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>wrong with Matt Brita, then I think where he most

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.479
<v Speaker 1>steps in there as their RB two absolutely reemost very

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>sneaky picko. He's not gonna caut you anything off the

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire. You grab him now, especially as a handcuffs

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to Matt Brita or Tevin Coleman, who has had his

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>own injury issues. Let me go, let me I don't

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>know to the wide receiver position he was. There's also

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of names here this week that could be

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>viable to pick up. And I start with your guy,

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis. When a nice game with Ryan Tannehill at quarterback,

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>he's only owning around Yah who leaves at this point

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>he faces off against Tampa Bay. And as I spoke

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to J. J. Zacharieson FanDuel earlier, he's not buying Corey Davis.

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>He's selling Corey Davis based on the performance. And why, well,

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you know why because we've seen this before, A really

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>good game out of c D followed by any consistent

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>three for thirty game out of Corey Davis. A. J.

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Brown wasn't bad last week, nor was Adam Humphrase. What

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think of Corey Davis and do you trust

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>enough to pick him up and put him in your

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>lat up this week? I mean the fact that we're

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in by weeks, so there's a bunch of injuries to

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to top wide receivers. I mean, I think you could

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>do worse than Corey Davis. Corey Davis has all the

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>tools I know that most people know that. I mean,

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy that that was drafted highly by

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. The reality is the quarterback play has never

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>been there for him to show who he is now.

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Ryan Tannehill is going to massively change

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the fortunes, but what we did see is confidence. Confidence

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>at the quarterback position is everything in the NFL. Uh.

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>The team seemed confident to let him throw it down

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the field. He seemed confident and letting it go. And

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis is going to thrive in that offense with

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill as his quarterback. When I say thrive, like, look,

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a running team. They want to run the ball.

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>They're going to spread it around. A. J. Brown is

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>going to get his for whatever reason. Taj Sharp is

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the field and still catch a

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>few balls. Uh, Jonry Smith and Delaney Walker are going

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to be involved. So like, in no way do I

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>think that he will be a top twenty wide receiver,

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>but he could be a top thirty wide receiver going forward.

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>He has the tools to do it, and the Titans

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>look like they believe in Tannehill. I like both guys, man.

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I like both Titans wide receivers Corey Davis and A J. Brown.

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>They just needed a quarterback that can get the ball

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in their hands. We know that they are both playmakers.

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>A J. Brown has really made the most of his

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunity so far this year, and he's starting to play

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>more as well. Two of the past three games he's

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>played six or more of the snap, so they're starting

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to turn it over to him a litt bit more.

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>They both had at least seven targets this past week.

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis six catches for eight yards and a touchdown.

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>His twenty three targets share this week greg was the

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>highest in any game so far this season. So again,

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>he just needed the targets and he needed someone that

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>can get the ball in his hands consistently. Ryan Tannehill.

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Say what you want about the guy in you know,

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>long term, I don't know that he's the guy. He's

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the answer for the Tennessee Titans. But for one week

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Tampa Bay Bucks, yes, I will be buying

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>in on Tannehill is a stream. I will be buying

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in on both of these wide receivers. This Bucks defense,

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Gregg has reverted back to where they've been the past

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. Todd Bowls has done a good job

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in stopping the run so far this year. I believe

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>their top three in run defense, but they are very

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>very bad against the past and specifically wide receivers. So

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I am buying in on both Corey Davis and A. J.

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Brown at least for one more week going up against

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Bucks. How much are you spending on

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>these guys? I'm not breaking the bank six percent. Well,

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 1>who would you rather have off the waiver wire? Corey

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Davis or another guy that's definitely worth picking up, And

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that's Kenny Stills. As I said yesterday in the program,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the inevitable will Fuller injury happened? Is he uh pulled

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a handy early in their contest during week seven. It

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is worth noting that Texans have a bye in week ten,

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>which means that for weeks eight and nine it could

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>be the Kenny Stills Show for the Houston, Texas Stills

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>this out there in most leaks, Frank, would you rather

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>have Kenny Stills Corey Davis? I think they are in

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a similar boat, and I think it comes down to

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>what you need, right It just talked about Corey Davis

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is a short term add going up against the Tampa

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Bay Bucks. I do think there is some long term upside,

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Like if Ryan Tannehill somehow continues playing well and continues

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to get the ball in their hands consistently, and you

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>know the targets are there for these guys, then I

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>do think there's some long term upside. But when it

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to Houston, I think, you know, for this week

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>as well, it's a really good matchup going up against Oakland,

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and we know that Will Fuller is probably going to

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>be back after the bye, So you have to ask

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>yourself a little bit of a more long term thing.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Probably Corey Davis in a vacuum, you just need one

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>for this week. I like both of them, but probably

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>would lean with will Fuller because the Houston Texans offense

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>is more explosive. We just saw with the Oakland Raiders

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>defense allowed to the Green Bay Packers wide receivers greg

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>it was eleven receptions, two hundred and sixty two yards

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>and three touchdowns, and Kenny Stills and Will Fuller with

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the only two wide receivers on the Houston Texans that

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>are averaging over thirteen a dot higher than thirteen so

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>far this year. So that's average depth of targets. So

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>we know that he's just going to step right into

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that Will Fuller role as someone who is going to

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>see the targets down the field in a really explosive offense.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So you need a wide receiver this week. I like

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>both of these guys a lot. I would lean with

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Stills because it's the better offense, but I do

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>think that Corey Davison A J. Brown probably have more

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>long term upside because Will Fuller is going to be

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>back at some point. Aleric, how much would you go

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>out and spend on Kenny Stills? Yeah, I think I'm

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>writing and and lockstep with what Frank was saying. I

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>think the better offense is obviously in better quarterback is

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Stills. Um, Kiki QT has been a massive disappointment.

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>UM this year. It was the guy that I I

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>have an almost every team, or had on almost every

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>team and have either dropped him or moved on since then. Um.

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, yeah, I think right around that that is

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>UH is about the right for them. I just have

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a I think I do have a good feeling about

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis going forward. Tannehill changed this offense. He changed

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>what the what the offense is capable of. I believe

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that I saw it as the flag as the flag

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>flies in my background. I saw a stat yesterday Greg

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that Ryan Tannehill for three and twelve yards this week.

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Mariota has played I believe, sixty four career games.

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>He's only done that three times in his career. So

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill steps in and a wise right. You know,

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>he was able to make plays and actually, you know,

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>throw for a decent amount of yards, something we haven't seen.

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, Marcus Mariota able to do consistently. So I

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>do like all three of these wide receivers, Kenny Stills,

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis, and A J. Brown. I think they all

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>go for around six to eight percent of your fab

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're playing a deeper league, maybe you're a little

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>bit more aggressive on these guys. But you brought up

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:05.479
<v Speaker 1>k QT and I think, you know, if you need

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>some backup bids to those guys. I do think that

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>he's a sneaky one going up against his raiders secondary

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's not a good one. No, it's a very

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>bad one, A very bad one. That's a bad one.

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Any of the wide receivers that are worth bringing up

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm potentially beening on. Yeah, I'll bring up a few

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>names here. Shout out to the Miami Dolphins, my man

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Parker for Eric Young and I said this yesterday.

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>As long as Ryan Fitzpatrick is the quarterback, Davanta Parker

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and Preston Williams are going to have value because he

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really throw the ball to anybody else. So I

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>like those two guys. I think Zach Pascal has had

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>at least seventy two yards or a touchdown in three

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of his last four games. He has a nice rapport

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>which Kobe Brissette and Alex Erickson. This guy just had

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>four teen targets. I think all three of those guys

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>are good backup bids to the wide receivers we mentioned.

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Take a break here, we'll get in the streaming quarterbacks,

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>tight ends and defenses on the other side. NFL season

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is no alpata, so you can be going the eighth

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>person to win one million dollars in a Fandueler Draft

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Kings tournament. My setting their lineups using the Daily Order

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>dot Com DFS line of optimizer. If you're playing Daily

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com, you're

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL Access

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better results

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>into Promo Code action first head percent discount. That's promo

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Code Action, first head percent discount Daily Order dot Com

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>where millionaires are made before we get to those streaming quarterbacks,

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>tight ends and defense is also players to drop. Do

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to not go further than Frank Glass? You're

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>reminded me about the trade earlier this morning in regards

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to Mohammed san You being traded to the New England Patriots.

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Patriots have been after all Rutgers players. They just want

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the scorelet Night's team, and they got another one in

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed Sanu and traded a second round pick in order

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to do it. It seems like a really smart trade

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Atlanta Falcons team that's going nowhere. You trade

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>an aging wide receiver you had under contract for another year.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you saved like ten million dollars in the

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>next two years by trading waste to New and he

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>had a second round Pagans. That's not nothing. And know

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be like the last pick of the second round,

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's still a second round pick and you want

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>as many of those as possible because the entire draft

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously is a crap shoot. So Mohamed san youw goes

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>over to the Patriots. What do you think his role

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:30.719
<v Speaker 1>is in New England. I think he'll be a reliable

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>possession receiver, much like all the receivers that are in

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>New England. But seriously, I don't know how much his

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>value is going to change if we're being honest, right,

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>he was, you know, a solid bye week replacement guy

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that we trusted while he was with the Atlanta Falcons.

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>He's a wide receiver for someone that you put in

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>during the bye weeks. And with the New England Patriots, yes,

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:54.479
<v Speaker 1>it's arguably a better offense, better quarterback with Tom Brady,

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but you know, Matt Ryan's been slinging it all around

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the field so far this season. Um ultimate Lee, there's

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of targets in New England as well, like

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Josh Gordon is gonna be back, Philip Dorseid is gonna

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>get his targets, Julian Edelman is gonna get his, James

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>White is gonna get his. So I don't know that

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be enough to go around for Mohamed Sannw

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to really make him viable for fantasy purposes. I think

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the biggest fallout here is for Calvin Ridley. If you know,

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>if Matt Ryan is healthy and he's good to go.

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I know that he's dealing with an ankle injury. Will

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>have to get some updates on that from Virginia later

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>on in the week. But if he's good to go,

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>this is huge news for Calvin Ridley because Mohammed'sannw was

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>playing of the snaps this year for the Atlanta Falcons.

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>That is most among their wide receivers. That's more than

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones, that's more than Calvin Ridley, and he was

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>getting just enough targets to be a thorn in the

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>side of Calvin Ridley. So now the targets are concentrated

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>even more on just Julio Jones, on Austin Hooper and

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley, and you know, maybe they'll work in a

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Russell gauge Justin Hardy and their three wide receiver sets.

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think this would be really, really big news

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for Calvin Ridley, assuming that Matt Ryan is healthy. Greg

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 1>really huge spot for Calvin Ridley because we can talk.

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I've talked a lot about how mohammedsan New was just there.

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>He's actually a really nice season for Atlanta and he

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 1>just takes away not necessarily snaps with cabally with certainly targets.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.280
<v Speaker 1>They they've trust him, they've trusted him. Is there anybody

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>else in Atlanta that gets a boost at all in

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football without mohammeds Knew on the team? No? I

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>mean some of those peripheral options that I mentioned. Throw

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball to Devontae Freeman and the running backs a

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. I think it's just a slight uptick

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>for everyone else that was there. But you know, how

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>much more value can someone like Julio Jones possibly get.

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Austin Hooper is the tight end one right now,

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>how much more value can he get? I think it

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.720
<v Speaker 1>just concentrates those targets a little bit more and Calvin

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Ridley is the main beneficiary or and then they go

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>to U E. Y. If you're taking it from the

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>New England side of things, how do you make um,

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>what do you make over this mess, Josh Gordon hasn't

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>really been good. Fielders has been pretty solid. Julian ANIMs

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have his role pretty good less night. Yeah, I

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>mean it, they suggest that doesn't really Um, what role

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>do you see mohammedsan New filling in New England? The

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>rich get richer. I think this makes them obviously a

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>better football team. But the reality is, I'm gonna say

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that that I've been saying all year

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is owning any of these players other than Gronkowski when

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>he played is maddening. And Tom Brady obviously, and the

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 1>defense I suppose, and now maybe Sony Michelle. But the

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>truth is is you throw a dart. I mean, they're

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>just going to exploit whatever your weakness is. Uh, last

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>night that was obviously all over the field. Um, but

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the truth is is you just don't know. I don't

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>think mohammedsan New. I feel that this is probably going

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to hurt in his fantasy value because they spread the

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>ball all over the place. There are so many other targets,

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>like Frank was saying, So I think this makes the

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots a better team somehow magically, and uh,

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>this probably is not a big boost for mohamedsan news

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>fantasy value, probably not and those are all mohamedsan New Sorry,

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>really surprised at the Patriots game of a second round

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of pick. I understand mohamedsan Neew was a good player,

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and you know they can get creative with what do

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:02.280
<v Speaker 1>with him, and you know they can run some trick

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>plays and I know you can throw the ball a

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But ultimately second round pick Craig, that's a lot, man.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought that they could have got Emmanuel Sanders for

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe a third or fourth question. Are we questioning the

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>pot right now? No? Yeah, you know what, No, we

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>probably shouldn't. But still second anything they do ever, yeah, rarely,

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it rarely is wrong. Rarely tell me the time that

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>they made a bad decision other than maybe Chad Johnson

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Firs set for field door set trade probably wasn't right,

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. Didn't didn't hurt him though, No, buts been

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>good for them too. He's been good this year. But

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Joey Ever says a story quarterback in the NFL. Was

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he really going to be the successor to Tom Brady?

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe, but don't worry. They'll probably trap someone

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and that guy will be awesome, and then we'll have

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a new Patriots stared. I don't know that Jared Stinemas.

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have to be the guy. They got more

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 1>draft picks coming up. Yeah, okay, um, let me go

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>back to tight ends. Let me talk about for more

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end um, and that is Jacob Hollis there. He

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 1>was the one e y that really stepped up and

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the absence of Will Disley, it wasn't your boy Luke

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Wilson instead, it was Hollister's there any interest of picking

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:08.439
<v Speaker 1>him up off the waiver wire, I feel like, I mean,

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>tight end is a wasteline. The reality is is Russell

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Wilson last year and this year has thrown to the

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>tight end. Will Disley was a massive part of this offense.

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And if Hollister can even be half of what Disley was,

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>then I want him because tight end is an absolute

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>nightmare again and I like him this week against the

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Falcons, who have allowed four touchdowns to tight ends

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>over their last three weeks. I mean their defense is

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 1>just abysmal. Right now, Jacob Hollister played thirty seven offensive snaps.

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>That was more than Luke Wilson, and as we predicted,

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Greg not that we predicted Jacob Hollister would have value,

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>but we thought that Luke Wilson would be more of

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>the blocking tight end, and that seems to be the case.

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 1>He also saw six targets, which you know is it's

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant when it comes to the tight end position.

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So if we get five to six targets in this

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks offense with Russell Wilson throwing the ball, arguably

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the league m VP right now, then I think there's

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>some value in that, especially this week against Atlanta Falcons. Absolutely. Okay,

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>let me continue on with some other potential tight end

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>options here this week. Whoever starts in New Orleans. If

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook plays well, start Jared Cook. If he doesn't,

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Josh Hill returns the fantasy relevance. Absolutely, And the Cardinals

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>continued there terrible defending of tight end. You can't call

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it defending because they're they're not even trying. They're just

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>letting tight end score all over the field. Unfortunately, it

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't Evan Ingram last week. Last week when like we

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>were hoping, it was Read Ellison, but last they gave

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>up another touchdown to a tight end. So I agree

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with you. If Jared Cook is out there and he

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>starts he's gonna be a top twelve tight end this

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>week and if not, then Josh Hill steps right into

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>his place. Josh Hill just scored a touchdown in this

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 1>past week as well. Do this only catch this week?

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I know, I think he had more catches than that,

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>but he did catch a touchdown. No I saw, I

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:50.280
<v Speaker 1>saw the touchdown. I was like, obviously, Josh Hill three touchdown,

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that will get it done. It's the top twelve tight

0:38:52.960 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 1>three targets for Josh Hill as well. Okay, other tight

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ends are out there. I go to you for this one.

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>E Y. Without Delady Walker in the lineup, New Smith

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 1>steps up and we've been wanting this for a while.

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.839
<v Speaker 1>And last year when Delany Walker was out for most

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>of the year, Smith, he really knew all that much.

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Is this year gonna be under different? Yeah? Well, I mean,

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean nobody in the offense did much because Mariota

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>was the quarterback. Marioda is a heartbreaker. This is an

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>absolute heartbreaker for me. Titens are my home team. This

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that was highly highly regarded coming out

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of college. Everyone wanted a piece of them. Titans got him.

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Um the guy could run, he could throw, he was accurate,

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>he could throw the ball downfield well enough, and he

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 1>just he crumbled. He just absolutely crumbled after his injuries,

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>he was never the same quarterback. And Tannehill is making

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this offense viable. John new Smith had a couple of

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of big plays this week and looked awesome. So yeah,

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if Delaney Walker is not going to play

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Smith, I'll be all over him too. All Right,

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill has rowing to the tide end yere and

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Janice Smith, well, he's the one that's gonna be the main,

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the main beneficiary a Delanny Walker being out. He's obviously talented.

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if Jane Jenue Smith can't come through for

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you all desperate tight ends, why not Janice Smith. Let

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:16.399
<v Speaker 1>me go over some of these streaming quarterbacks. This week.

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned a lot about Ryan Tannehill. We've trust in Tennessee.

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>You said you're doing it, Frank against Tampa. Yeah. I

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>do like Ryan Tannahill going up against Tampa. As I mentioned,

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>they've been funneling everything to the quarterback position, to you know,

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.879
<v Speaker 1>to their past defense as well, and they're twenty fifth

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and past defense DV away there allowing these six most

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks, and over the past month,

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay defense is allowing three hundred forty eight

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>passing yards per game to opposing quarterbacks two point five

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns per game. I think we could see a

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:51.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit of back and fourth year. It wouldn't surprise

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>me if tanne Hill throws for over three hundred and

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns once again, which likely gets him inside the

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>top twelve. So he is one of my top streaming quarterbacks. Obviously.

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Really like Matthew Stafford going up against the New York

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Giants as well if he's available, but I believe he's

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.359
<v Speaker 1>owning over fifty percent of Yahoo league, so if he's

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>already gone, then Ryan Tannehill's the next man up for me.

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Greg absolutely Ryan Tannehill. We'll see about him versus some

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of these other options. Matt more Uh in a Super

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Flex League Sunday Night Football against Green May, Mason Rudolph

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night Football against Miami, Derrek Cargans Houston, Derek Carr,

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Like you don't feel great about it, He did throw

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns this week. He followed the ball into the

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:32.879
<v Speaker 1>end zone too, so Derek Carr, please stop doing that.

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the second time that you've done that in your career.

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>But much like Tampa Bay, the Houston Texans allowed a

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>ton of fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks. We just saw

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Brissette through for three and twenty six yards and

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns. So if I'm ranking it, Stafford Tannehill Derek

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Carr for me. In terms of streaming this week, Greig, okay,

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. Now streaming defenses here this week, guys. Pittsburgh

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>has a legit good defense. They faced Miami on Monday night.

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:00.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a no brainer. Other than that, orn't even that

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>are out there, Frank, that could be worth starting. Yeah,

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I really do like the Detroit Lions going up against

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones and the New York Giants. Daniel Jones has

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>seven interceptions and four fumbles loss in five games since

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>he has taken over as the starter. He was just

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>sacked eight times against the Arizona Cardinals as well. With

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Lions as a touchdown favorite right now, that

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 1>tells me that the New York Giants are likely playing

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>from behind, which means there's gonna be dropbacks, which leads

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:29.839
<v Speaker 1>to sacks which leads to turnovers, fumbles, interceptions. I really

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like the Detroit Lions this week Detroit Lions against the

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants. It's a rough year for New York Man.

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Unless you're a Buffalo Bills fan. Nobody circles the wagons.

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 1>It was okay, we haven't had three minutes to go

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>here in the program. And if you're picking up any

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of these players tomorrow or when or Thursday, when your

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>waivers ultimately run, you gotta drop players as well. And

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the most common name that I've been asked about e

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Y has been Josh Gordon. Especially with the addition of

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>mohameds and new to this team, Gordon's banged up hasn't

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>really done that much. Do you feel comfortable jopping Josh Gordon? Oh, jeez.

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I think this just depends on on on your roster

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:12.399
<v Speaker 1>construction and what position you're in. I mean, I think

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Gordon will be back at some point. Um. I think

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Edelman is probably still the number one there and Gordon

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is definitely not. Everyone was rushing out and getting this guy.

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>What you know, late in the year, if you were

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>head and done your draft, dad, he was being drafted

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>very very high. Um. He wasn't a guy. It was

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a guy that I was after I ended up

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>on the team because people forgot they was available. I

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 1>drafted him late and traded him away. Um, but yeah,

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, if you have a reason

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep him and you need wide receiver death and

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 1>hold on, if not, then I mean you could probably

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>deal him a way. Yeah, I'm with the y on

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that one. I think this is specific to what your

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>record is, right, if you are you know, three and

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>four or worse, and you probably need someone who's going

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to help you. Now. I don't know that Josh Gordon

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to be back this week, and maybe the

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that they traded for mohamedsan New tells us that

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>there's something going on with Josh Gordon that's even worse

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 1>than they let on immediately. So you know, he hasn't

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 1>had a touchdown since Week one. He has had at

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>least seven targets in each game before the New York

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Giants game, but ultimately it really hasn't been doing much.

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think if you need to win now and

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a losing record, then it's probably time to

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 1>cut bait with Josh Gordon. But I would try my

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>best to hold onto him if possible. I don't know, man,

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you can need a spot to hell. How

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are you coming back to? Like, yeah, I feel comfortable

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 1>probably dropping him. I also be comfortable dropping the Chiefs

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:29.839
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, especially with al Patrick Mahomes. The next week

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:34.280
<v Speaker 1>or two or three, Marcus Robins seeing Nicole Hardman, um

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Sprinkle like I mean you mean Byron Prinkle, whatever

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you pop your can't stop Sprinkles, the tight end or

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:43.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever the other team the Washington Redskin exactly. So point

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>being he's Jeremy Sprinkle, Sprinkle or job Byron Pringle, all

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>these guys can go. Yeah, I do agree with that

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>outside of Tyreek Hill or Sammy Watkins. Maybe you could

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>even make the argument for dropping Sammy Watkins too, But yeah,

0:44:56.200 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 1>definitely DeMarcus Robinson, me, Coole Hardman, and Byron Pringle. I

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 1>just don't think that there's gonna be enough value to

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 1>go around with Matt Moore really gonna focus in those

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>targets on Tyreek Kill and Travis Kelsey with a little

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 1>bit of a Sammy Watkins as well. He's Eric Young,

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:12.719
<v Speaker 1>he is Frank Standfeld. I'm Greg Sausa. Thank you so

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:15.359
<v Speaker 1>much for watching and listening to the BFFs. Coming up next,

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Wag's your talk here on Sports Screen TV. Have a

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>great day, We'll see you back here tomorrow. Well, are

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you ready for the nation's first and only free, twenty

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:30.800
<v Speaker 1>four hour network dedicated to you the betting and fantasy

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide you with a real

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>time content, statistics and gaming intelligence unlike anything you've ever

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:41.399
<v Speaker 1>seen before. Located both in the heart of New York

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 1>City and inside the FanDuel Sports book at the meadow

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Lands Sports Crede, He's live eighteen hours a day here

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:51.959
<v Speaker 1>to serve you the fanatic. This is sports gride get

0:45:51.960 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>on the grid. So why did But here's what you

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:06.399
<v Speaker 1>missed on the Bfp's one thing that Bill Belichick does

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>no matter who it is, he dominates young quarterbacks. Last

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>night was the sixteenth game in Sam Donald's career. He's

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:15.400
<v Speaker 1>basically still a rookie. Right. We could agree on that.

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:18.720
<v Speaker 1>We knew that he was gonna struggle against Bill Belichick's defense,

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>there was no doubt about it. But airing that, I mean,

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the guy's confidence is shot already. Where he's at, so

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Now this is going to go down with you know,

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the butt fumbles and all the other infamous things that

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the Jets are known for. It is gonna go down

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in history. And like, he's got enough on his plate already, right,

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 1>he's a young quarterback playing in New York. He's gonna

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>hear it all from the media. Does you really need

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 1>this whole ghost thing going on? Like I would have

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>said that about any quarterback, any young quarterback, whether it

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>was Baker Mayfield, Lamar Jackson, if that quarterback was miked

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 1>up and they aired that, I would have said it

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 1>no matter who it was. It's not just because it's Donald,

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not just because it's the Jets. I thought it

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was very distasteful. Not disagree more with that statement. To me,

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it was Daniel Jones, phill Is Kyler Murray, I would

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>say the same exact thing, completely, completely, completely disagree. Rank.

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you watch Hard Knocks? Yes? Do you like Hard Knocks?

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 1>It's okay. Why do you like it? Because you've get unfiltered,

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:04.920
<v Speaker 1>unfiltered access to these players behind the scenes, butters that

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we've never seen before. They mike players of every week

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's only so much ah, oh, there's what do

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you do over get her? Last night? Wait over here tomorrow,

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I gonna playing Fortnite and that I need to hear

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>from ju misuses. That's all nonsense in BS. What you

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:20.840
<v Speaker 1>heard last night from Sam Donald was real access, Like,

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 1>holy crap, I'm seeing ghosts out there because it seems

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 1>like there's so many defenders. That was awesome, and NFL

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Films has to approve anything that airs, and they thought, oh,

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this is really good access. It was awesome seeing that,

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was distasteful. It's not this taste, not just taste. Also,

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you know he's mind up. He knows he's mine. Do

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you think he's thinking about a microphone when he's getting

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:44.239
<v Speaker 1>demolish out there? But the Patriots, he's not thinking about that.

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Why is it just because dude, he's out here. Everything

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:49.399
<v Speaker 1>from the media today anyway, right, And his offensive line

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is terrible, his coaching is terrible. Everything has been a

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 1>disaster for this kid since he has stepped into the NFL.

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>And some of that is by his own doing. I'm

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.320
<v Speaker 1>not gonna make it, but that is distasteful, and I

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:00.720
<v Speaker 1>would say it about any quarterback in the same situation.

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you say about saying I would saying about

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray, i'ld saying about any young quarterback going up

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and gets a Belichick defense under the circumstance. Let me

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>go to the public figure. E Y. You have been

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a public figure for a very very long time, wrestling

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Rover twenty years. You've been on TV for seemingly ever.

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You were constantly miked up on the air. Your Twitter

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and your social media are in the public. Obviously you

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 1>were a personal guy, but everything you say and due

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is in public. Do you have any do you have

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:26.200
<v Speaker 1>an issue with Sam Donalds? I see ghost comment area

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>on ESPN. Uh No, they look at their they don't.

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:32.839
<v Speaker 1>They didn't sneak it in there. He would have had

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:35.279
<v Speaker 1>a sign off on it, and he knows. And I

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:38.840
<v Speaker 1>understand what Frank is saying. I get, but the reality

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:41.759
<v Speaker 1>is that he knows um that access and the people

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFL are doing back flip the fact that he

0:48:43.640 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 1>was honest and said something of substance, because the reality

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is is someone like Juju Smith Schuster or someone like that,

0:48:48.920 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 1>they're they're just saying and doing things that they think

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:54.360
<v Speaker 1>they want people to hear. I mean, that's what television is.

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:55.759
<v Speaker 1>None of it is real guys. I hate to tell

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you none of it Sports grade