WEBVTT - Markets Must Support Treasuries as Fed Exits, Whalen Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>You know that you have. Treasury had issued a statement

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>yesterday saying that if the Federal Reserve ceases to reinvest

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>some or all of its maturing Treasury securities, Treasury would

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>likely need to increase the amount of borrowing from the public,

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and under the planned officials would increase both Treasury bill

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and Treasury nominal coupon auction sizes. Here to tell us

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>more about this potential process is Chris Whalen. He is

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the chairman of Whalen Global Advisors, and he is the

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>author of a new book entitled Ford Men From Inspiration

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to Enterprise. Chris Whalen, thank you for being with us.

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe just comment on what the Treasury Secretary with the

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Department rather is putting out in a statement that

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>they're just going to have to increase borrowing in order

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to make up for the runoff that or the lack

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of buying from the federals arve. Well, of course, pim M,

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me on. By the way, the

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>government has been subsidized by the FED. That's been the

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>primary you know, benefit of quantitative easing and all the

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>rest of this. It hasn't really helped the private economy.

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>It's been mostly a subsidy program for indented governments. So absolutely,

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>if the FED is no longer buying uh, treasuries, if

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they're no longer buying all of the agency issuance in

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage market, which they are today, Uh, then yeah,

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously the markets would have to support that issuance. You know, Chris,

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems like we don't hear that much about the

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>relationship or discussions between the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve,

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how much they're coordinating or not. I mean,

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>because as you were saying, the Fed's bomb buying program

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly acted as a support to valuations and suppress borrowing

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>costs for the US government. Now though not only is

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the is the FED considering allowing its balance sheet to

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>run off, but the Treasury came out today with a

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>statement saying that they are seriously considering longer dated, ultralong

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>dated treasuries, possibly selling fifty or one hundred year bonds.

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you think that there's an increasing tension

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>between these two agencies? No, no, absolutely not, because the

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Fed is the alter ego of the Treasury. This is

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>why it's not allowed to do business directly with the Treasury.

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>When they buy and sell debt, they have to go

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>through a dealer because otherwise it would be the snake

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>eating its tail. Right, Um, the FED doesn't make money.

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>They only incur expenses. So whatever they earn off their

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>portfolio in terms of interest, right, they subtract or operating

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>expenses and they remit that back to the Treasury is

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially their forgiving that debt. So Congress pretends that this

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is income, but it's really not. It's it's simply another phase,

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like a Hindu god, of of our government, one being

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury, the other being the Federal Reserve system. But

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they are back to back there one entity that the

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in economic terms, and you know who's written beautifully about

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>this is a good friend Bobby's andvice than a Cumberland advisers,

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, he worked at the Atlanta FED. He knows

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this subject cold and when people talk about the FED

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>making money, he just laughs because they clearly don't understand

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the relationship. Chris, one of the things that I know

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that my colleague Lisa has Lisa Brahmas has been following

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>has been the increase in charge in charge offs for

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>subprime automobile loans and also the increase in provisions that

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>such as Capital One have had to put aside in

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>order to well with and that has to do also

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>now with credit, with revolving credit or credit card loans.

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if you could speak to that issue. Do

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you see this as part of a largest cycle trend. Yes,

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Credit costs generally bottomed out in two thousand fourteen or

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand fifteen, So both for bondholders PIM and

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>for banks, the cost of credit is going up. We

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>had again a FED induced boom in consumer credit UH

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>and also another asset classes and so now we're going

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to see the result of that. Whenever you have a

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>period of really low rates, when the central banks are

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>out trying to make things easy for debt ors, you

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.679
<v Speaker 1>hide the cost of credit, and when you pull back

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>on that and you try to normalize the market, you

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>start to see the costs in terms of the faults,

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and certainly in autos you're going to see that. So, Chris,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>when I talk to analysts about this particul uller increase

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in consumer charge offs, uh, they all say, this does

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>not appear to be a systemic risk at this point. Um, First,

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>do you agree with that? But second, if it's not,

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>are there specific companies that you're watching that could suffer

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>disproportionately from this deterioration in consumer credit. Well, the companies

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>who are really on the front lines with autos or

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the private less source. These are companies that would buy

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>cars from the automakers and turn around at least them,

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but they own the residual risk. In other words, if

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that car is not worth dollars when it comes back

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>on the lease and they have to sell it for

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>eight team, they lose to grant. So the smaller players

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>who have done the below prime lending, they're pulling back.

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>They saw the losses go up and they're starting to

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>take less risk. This means that General Motors Forward all

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the rest of them can sell fewer cars because there's

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>less credit in the system. That support the inventory. Right.

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So the real issue to me is the banks are

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>going to get more careful. Clearly, bond holders are also

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 1>unnoticed now and they're going to demand better terms, higher

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>coupons and you know, in consideration for the losses. But

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they're the non banks, I think, the smaller players who

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have predominated in the subprime sector. They're going to pull

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>back a lot, the auto nations and the rest of

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>them because they just can't sit there and take losses

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>every quarter. They're gonna try and adjust supply it demand

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>and as you see the the retail pricing for used

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>cars is reflecting this. It's you know, there's too much

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>product out there. And as they say, you know, we

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>got back to record levels over five years thanks to uh,

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, thanks to the FED, and they it helped

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>save the automakers. If they don't run at least seventy utilization,

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not making money. You know, it's costing them cash.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So the whole system was driven by credit. And again,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are many bubbles and this is just

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>one of them. And the who's the Fed desperately trying

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to make something happen. But you know, the economy, population

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>growth is half flat. Yeah. Chris Whalen, thank you so

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Chris Whale and as chairman of

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Whale Global Advisors in New York. He is also the

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>author of a new book Ford Men, From Inspiration to Enterprise. So,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>as we keep talking about Puerto Rico is moving to

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>restructure it's seventy billion dollars of debt in a bankruptcy

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like proceeding that will happen in the US. To get

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>more details on how this may proceed, let's bring in

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Caski, who covers all things Puerto Rico for us

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>here at Bloomberg News. And Michelle, can you give us

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a sense of how expected or

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>not this pretty rapid move to a Title three restructuring happened.

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>It does seem very rapid, although um, they've been negotiating

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for a while with creditors, it wasn't getting anywhere, you know,

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>some At some moments it looked like maybe, um, something

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>would happen m or that they were actually making some progress.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But unfortunately, um, they just they didn't reach that common ground.

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>And the governor to today announced that the Federal Control

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Board would file. He requested that they would file and

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we just have UM just a few moments ago, UM,

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it was filed in court. Well, and I'm looking at

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the letter that Governor Ricardo Rossello UH filed and he

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>actually highlighted the stay, the fact that UH, Puerto Rico's

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>immunity to lawsuits was lifted earlier this week and that

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>that expiration was really what pushed them into having to

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>file for this forrastructure. Definitely, without that legal stay, UM,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>then Puerto Rico faces UM lawsuits from creditor seeking repayment

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>considering that Puerto Rico has not been paying on its

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 1>debts and UM there's also existing lawsuits out there that

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>could move forward. So in order to get additional protection

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>from UM new and existing lawsuits, Title three does offer

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico. That what does Title three offer the people

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:25.839
<v Speaker 1>of Puerto Rico, Well, like you have mentioned, it does

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>offer them a more orderly process to restructure the the

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy billion that they want to reduce and UM, and again,

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the the creditor lawsuits are suspended UM during a Title three.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the legal bills because I know

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that you reported several years ago that the bills at

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that point for Puerto Rico were already in the excess

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of sixty million dollars. That was just a beginning salvo,

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure that they have only continued to mount.

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Does it mean that Puerto Rico will have to pay

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>less in legal fees if there is a restructuring that's

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in a more orderly bankruptcy type of way, or is

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that not part of this picture? Well? I think either

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.839
<v Speaker 1>way with or without a title three, Um, Puerto Rico, UM,

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, needs to pay their lawyers, and they will

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>be they will be um needing this outside legal help.

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's going to be very costly. All right, it's

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be we know this is gonna be very very costly.

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>It already is very very costly. Will this allow the

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rican I was trying to get it with the people.

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Will this allow the Puerto Rican commonwealth to focus on

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>fixing the economy, which then will supposedly create revenue, tax

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>revenue that will be able to support the commonwealth, because

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>otherwise this is like a uh you know there, it's

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>like a double track reality. You've got one group over

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>here and then you've got the people who are actually

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>living the problems of Puerto Rico on the other side. No, definitely,

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is that that is their Their biggest

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>challenge right now is to get economic activity going again

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>on the island. They need that and hopefully the you know,

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the court will see that as well. And um, have

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.599
<v Speaker 1>they enacted anything. I mean, for example, one of the

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>reasons that Puerto Rico is in such dire straits as

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the federal government granted a triple tax free UH status

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>for municipal bond investors. Plus they gave huge tax breaks

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to the pharmaceutical industry to manufacture their products there. Sure,

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean the new governor, I mean, his plan is

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>he wants to increase tourism on the island. He wants

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.599
<v Speaker 1>to um have the private sector more involved in in

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 1>hiring and and taking over some, um, some of the

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>programs that the central government has been doing. He definitely

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.599
<v Speaker 1>wants to increase job creation in the private sector and

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to reduce the government's pay payroll. Michelle, I'm not seeing

0:11:54.200 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>much of reaction in Puerto Rico bonds. Why is that? Well, remember,

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the news just came out. The headlines first came out

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>at about ten forty and so it's only been about

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>an hour and we don't typically see as much active

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>trading in municipal bonds as you would see in for instance,

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. Um so, but we will see some

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>some trading today and um in the past couple of days, actually,

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico bonds have been trading up in price. And

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what I've been hearing from people as they believe that's

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>because of the medicaid money that the island did receive

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>from from Congress. I just want to say, just breaking

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>across the bloomberg that assured Guarantee and MBI a drop

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>their legal cases against Puerto Rico after this latest filing.

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like, uh, this is moving toward the

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>direction a lot of people thought was inevitable. Right, the

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>game of chicken maybe actually over by now. How long

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is this going to take? Michelle? Oh gosh, I mean

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>today the governor was saying that it could take years. Um,

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>you know it. It all depends on how in what

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a judge can do. Can you bring everybody together? Um?

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>And he or she can can that pon that judge

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>bring everyone together and and and strike a deal? Thank

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Michelle Casky. Yeah, I was just gonna

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>send following the news in Puerto Rico just to put

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it into perspective, the unemployment rate for Puerto Rico is

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>over eleven and a half percent. Just to get that

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>information out there a lot of problems. Yeah, Michelle Casky

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>is our Puerto Rico reporter for can be doing this

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. It's not going to be over.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But there's so much money at stake, and as you

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>keep pointing out, and rightly so, Paim, there are a

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of people at stake as well. Well. You have

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>people at universities who wonder whether they're gonna be able

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 1>to get a job when they graduate. We want to

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>take a moment to let you know about something new

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg. Starting right now, you can use our iOS

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>app or our new Google Chrome extension just can any

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>news story on any website, instantly revealing relevant news and

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>market data from Bloomberg and other sources related to companies

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and people you're reading about. So no matter where you're

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>reading the news, you can bring the power of Bloomberg's

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>news and data with you. It's pretty amazing. Download our

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>io s app or search for the Bloomberg extension on

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chrome Store to try it out. Learn more at

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. Slash lens. What do Filipino President Rodrigo

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Dutarte have in common with egypt General Abdela l c

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>C and Turkey's President Richie Urigon. Well, here to tell

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>us is Eli Lake. Eli Lake is a columnist for

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg View. He can be followed on Twitter at Eli

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Lake and Eli Go ahead, tell us what do these

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>three world leaders have in common? Well, they've all been

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>courted by President Trump. Uh. In slightly over the top

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric for an American president. Um. You know, in the

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>case of Duterte, you've got somebody who who's boasted about

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>um an absolutely vicious campaign against his nation's drug dealers. Um,

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and has basically admitted that this sort of vigilante campaign

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>its results in the extradicial, extra judicial killings of drug dealers. Um.

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, he has widely seen as a sort of

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>scoge from the world stage. And yet in the phone

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>call over the weekend, Trump invited him to the White House. UM.

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>You know. In in the case of Urdawan, the president

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of Turkey, you know, he has been driving Turkey into autocracy. Uh,

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, over a period of several years now. But

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>last month there was a referendum that consolidated his power

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and could keep him in office until, you know, for

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the next dozen years. Uh. This was widely condemned by

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>people who care about Turkey's democracy, and Trump called up

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>after the referendum results came in to congratulate him. Um,

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>so all of this sort of an example of how

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>he has buttered up these authoritarians. Yeah, Eli, you wrote

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a column. I love the title, Trump decides to make

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it springtime for despots. Uh, you know, talking about all

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of these overtures too widely feared and frankly reviled, certainly

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>by human rights organizations leaders but who have sort of

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>autocratic rule. That said, in this column, you point out

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that it does not appear that there is necessarily a

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>strategy behind these overtures by President Trump. And you know,

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>can we just chalk this up to shock value and

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, headlines that are going to get a lot

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of clicks. Well, there may be there may be strategies

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that say, um, you know, in the case of dot

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>really bad guy, very repressive for danger to the Philippines.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>But somebody who under the last year of Obama really

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>did threaten to come out of the US Alliance orbit

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and into China's embrace that would be very bad for

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>US strategically. Um, you know, you could argue that Trump

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is trying to sort of woo him back in this

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>fairly unconventional way. What I would say is that you

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>America is an accessible nation, and we don't need to

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>basically forget our values and our principles as a as

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a as a liberal democracy in order to work practically

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.959
<v Speaker 1>with countries like the Philippines when they have less than

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>ideal leaders. And it's Trump's style to sort of be

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>over the top in both directions. When he really doesn't

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>like something, he uses hyperbolic rhetoric in one direction. When

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>he decides he likes somebody, he used a hyperbolic language

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in the other direction. We're all kind of getting used

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to that, um you know, more than a hundred days

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in now. But at the same time, it is a

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>troubling trend, and I thought it was important to sort

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of highlight it. Eli, would you have any idea why

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he castigates the allies of the United States, such as Canada, Mexico, Germany,

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>even NATO. Well, you know, it's a little bit of

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a mixed bag. I have also heard that Trump does

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot with justin Trudeau. He has a lot

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of communications with Theresa May of the United Kingdom, and

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>even recently he's had, you know, a few phone calls

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>with angel Angelo Merkel, who he showed up when she

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>visited early in his presidency, wouldn't shake her hand. Um.

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think you know, this gets back to some

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of his you know, longstanding uh campaign Radican worldview. Um.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that he's been talking about for

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>like twenty thirty years, which is that he deals with

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States kits uh screwed on trade fields. And

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>so this is something that's really the top of his

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>mind in a way that we haven't seen in recent

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>modern presidents, where you know, the idea that we would

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>have these free trade deals was not debated really between

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the two major parties, with the exception of maybe Ross

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Perrot and NAFTA. But he was member an independent candidate. Well,

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump's the president now, and this is he he represents

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the world view we associate with guys like pack you

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>cat and and others. Let's say, um, you know, um,

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the global economy hurts a lot of Americans and we

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>just about that. Well, Eli, when you talk with people

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in Washington off the record, do you hear more support

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>for alliances with some of these UH countries that have

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>been otherwise shut out by virtue of their being good

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:21.719
<v Speaker 1>trade partners regardless of their humanitarian policies. It depends. I mean,

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting here is that UM a lot of Democrats

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and liberals really jumped on the decarc comments in Urdawan

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>UM from Trump. But you know, if you go back

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>ten years, the major criticism of George W. Bush was

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that he was too much of an idealistic ideologue when

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it came to the U S. Roland spreading democracies, and

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the impulses that got us into

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the Iraq War. So we've seen such a dramatic shift

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Republican Party in a decade on this that

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people do have whiplash. I

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>would say that the Trump approach where it seems like,

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't even factor in his public comments

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>at times, although I was told by my gla On,

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>the spokesman for the National Security Council, that he does

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>bring up human rights issues in private with some of

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>these leaders, like the Egyptian General l cc um. But

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>in that in that respect, I think that we're sort

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of still looking for a bit of a middle ground.

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And what we've seen is that even in the first

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred days, Trump has shown that he's willing to evolve

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>his position. Just look at what he's done on China

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and Russia. Um, he's pretty much flip flop those countries

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in his mind in some ways. Um. So there is

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a chance, I think where you could sort of see

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>some of this rhetoric maybe calm down. But I think

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the other real prospect theories that we just have to

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>adjust for the fact that we have a president who

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>pops off, says what's on his mind doesn't always go

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>here with our far with the rest of his government's

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy. But you know we're gonna have to adjust

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for that. Well, well, thanks for helping us adjust to it.

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Eli la is a Bloomberg View contributor. Remember to read

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>his most recent column, Trump decides to make it springtime

0:20:52.840 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>for Despots. That's on Bloomberg View dot com. Thanks for

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio