WEBVTT - Markets, EMEA, Real Estate, and Work-from-Home

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day, we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moven news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, today's tape basically unchanged. It kind of feels

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of like where we are overall in these markets

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>here feels range bound, as we've heard from some guests

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of to suggest, and the question is, you know,

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of what moves you out of that range. Maybe

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>our next guest has some thoughts here. Joe Mazzola, he's

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>over at Schwab. He is the managing director of Trading

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Education at Charles Schwab.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Joe, you're at Schwab.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>You guys see everybody, You see everything out there because

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you have so many clients out there. What do you

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like investors are kind of the biggest issue for

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>investors right here.

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 4>I think there's probably three things that investors that are

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 4>really kind of keying on right now, you know, interest

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 4>rates being number one, you guys just kind of let

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 4>into that, you know, back around four and a half percent,

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 4>four point five to five and the tenure. I don't

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 4>think it's it's the it's the move itself. It's the

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 4>magnitude and how quickly it moved. I think that's shaken

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 4>markets up quite a bit. I think the second thing

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 4>is the political landscape, and you know, there is more

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 4>risks around a government shutdown. We you know, I think

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 4>maybe we sit back and say, wow, you know this

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 4>this will work itself out, but there's real risk that

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 4>this could this could carry on for a while and

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 4>could have some economic impacts. I think the last thing,

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 4>and probably maybe front and center and investors' minds, is

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 4>inflation data.

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 5>It did seem like it was subdued over the summer.

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 4>It seemed like, you know, people were kind of able

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 4>to kind of get ahead of it and see the

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 4>end in sight.

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 5>But we started to see it kind of tick back up.

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 5>We get PC data.

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 4>On Friday, so it'll give us a little bit more

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 4>of an indication on where we're at. But that's absolutely

0:01:58.280 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 4>front and center for our investor's mind.

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Gabagail do little, Abigail do a little looks at the

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 2>technical analysis and she thinks we could float down below

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 2>forty two hundred on the S and P five hundred.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 2>I guess I would imagine that retail investors look at

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>these yields and find them attractive, especially versus stocks. Right now,

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>how are your clients trading it?

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 4>So we look at a couple of things, right we

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 4>look at the S ANDP earnings yield versus the tenure yield.

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Then you look at that spread, and we're back at

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 4>levels that we really haven't seen since prior to the

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Great Financial Crisis. Meaning look that whole Tina talk that

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 4>we've had for what fifteen years? I mean, that's out

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 4>the window. There is an alternative, there's an alternative. And

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 4>fixed income, there's an alternative. In money markets. A lot

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.399
<v Speaker 4>of investors are comfortable just kind of sitting in five

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 4>percent yield and waiting for the market to work itself out.

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 4>I agree one hundred percent. And looking at some of

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 4>these technical levels right now, it does seem like, you know,

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 4>we've moved into a bit of a lower range. And

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 4>the reason I say that is because you know, we

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 4>broke that forty three to fifty range. I think we

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 4>have some some room to potentially go maybe down to

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 4>about forty two to ten, where you might see a

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 4>bit of a bounce. That's kind of that intersection of

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 4>where the two hundre day moving average is sitting right

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 4>around forty two hundred. But we also have a Fibinacci

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 4>retracem the level from the one year highs right around

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 4>that level as well.

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 6>Two.

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 4>But a couple of things that I've been paying attention to,

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 4>and you know a lot of our traders and investors

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 4>been talking to us about, is this idea of the

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 4>market breadth and.

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 5>How it's really weakening.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 4>We're just not seeing a bounce, and we're not seeing

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 4>it across the whole spectrum, if anything. Really, the only

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 4>sector that's held up well is energy, with about ninety

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 4>percent of its components in the S and P five

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 4>hundred up above its fifty day moving average. But when

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 4>you look at the S and P five hundred as

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 4>a whole, we're around twenty five percent of the S

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 4>and P five hundred up above its fifty day moving average.

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 4>And that's just not it's not at a level that

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 4>supports a bounds. Now, what I'd like to see is

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 4>I'd like to see a little bit more of a washout.

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 4>I'd like to see us get down maybe around that

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 4>ten or twelve percent level to see if we get

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 4>a bounce from there. At that point, maybe you know,

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 4>some of that polishness kind of fades from the market.

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 4>You might start to see some you know, that that

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 4>washout occur where buyers might start step back in.

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Joe, you know when you when you talk to

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the bloom the shrub customers, what are some of the

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>sectors that they like right here? I mean it was

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>if you just kind of look back at this year

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to date, if you owned you know, the Magnificent seven, boy,

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>this has been a great year. What are they most

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>bullsh on at this point? Or maybe what are they

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>most concerned about?

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, as rob customers for sure are looking at really

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 4>two sectors right now, Energy and they've done well in

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 4>that over.

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 5>The last couple of months.

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, if you look at a sector

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 4>as a whole over the last month, it's over double

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 4>digits and then information technology. So it so they continue

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 4>to be buyers there. They're looking for opportunities on selloffs

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 4>to kind of step in and buy at those levels.

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 4>But those are the two right now that they're really

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 4>looking at the ones that they are really shying away

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 4>from our real estate utilities.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 5>Those are the ones that they're very pay or shoun

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 5>right now.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 7>In terms of real estate.

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it a problem, you know, with these higher rates,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 2>with higher mortgages, with refinancings coming to I mean both

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:20.679
<v Speaker 2>on the retail and sorry residential and on the commercial side,

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 2>there are some big question marks there now.

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 5>I think you hit a nail on the head.

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 4>I think when you're starting to look at a thirty

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 4>year fixed mortgage up above seven percent, you know, seven

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 4>point one, seven point one five percent at this point

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 4>right now, I mean, just look at look at what

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 4>we've seen in existing homes. I think ninety percent of

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 4>the US has a mortgage under five percent. What's the

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 4>impetus to move to a new home. I think they're

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 4>kind of sitting still, and that's cut down on supply,

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 4>which you know, to a certain extent, is held housing

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 4>prices in check. It hasn't. We haven't really seen a

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 4>big decrease in housing price. At the same time, it's

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 4>just not really providing the catalyst for people to move now,

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 4>until you start to see a real break there. I

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 4>know there is some pent of demand and supply apply

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 4>is starting to hit. We've seen that on the new

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 4>home sales exceeding existing home sales, and we've seen that

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 4>spread continue now for basically a year. But until you

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 4>start to see those mortgage rates kind of take back down,

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think you're going to see a lot of

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 4>buying momentum there.

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 1>So, Joe, the good folks at SCHWAP, are you, guys,

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>is it your base case that we're going to have

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a recession and if so, when or what do you

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>think we can skatee past one?

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, I could tell you what our investors and what

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 4>our trade is telling us about sixty nine percent of

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 4>them do believe that a recession is coming.

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 5>But they do believe that it'll last.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Less than a year and it might not be as

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 4>deep as as maybe some are predicting. I think that

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 4>the belief is that, you know, it'll happen in twenty

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty four, and they're kind of they're constantly looking at

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 4>this battle between the soft landing a scenario in a recession,

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 4>and I think they're probably skewing a little bit more

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 4>towards recession side at this point.

0:06:54.440 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 2>So do people back up into these rates do you buy, uh,

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, treasuries and even maybe go along a little

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>bit duration if you're if you're worried about a recession.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm not a fixed income guy, but I can

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 5>tell you, you know what our traders are.

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Telling us, and they have been bearish on but they,

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 4>let me rephrase that, they've been a little bit more

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 4>bearish on bonds and then than they were in Q two.

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 4>So the Q three survey, they pull back some of

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 4>that excitement towards bonds. But I think that what we're

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 4>starting to see now is maybe a little bit movement

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 4>back into that into that sector. And we're starting to

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 4>see it, of course on the money market side as

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 4>well too, as people are kind of waiting for a

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 4>correction in the market. I think the thing that's frustrating

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 4>for investors right now is it's kind of a slow

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 4>grind down, right. I mean, we're not really seeing a

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 4>big pop in the VIX. You know, we're still below twenty.

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 4>We haven't really seen a big pop in the move

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 4>index on the fixed income side, which is showing that

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, investors and traders not they're not comfortable at

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 4>this level.

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 5>But at the same time they're not panicking either. That's

0:07:58.080 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 5>why I talk about that wash out.

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Until we see that wash out, I think we just

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 4>can continue to see this grind down within this lower range.

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Joe, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate it.

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mazzola. He's a managing director and trading education at

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Charles Schwab.

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 8>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 8>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 8>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Bowie joins us.

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>She's a managing partner and head of e m EA

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>at Chatham Financial. Jackie, you know investors here and folks

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>here in the States, we kind of feel like our

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>economy's okay. You know, inflation with like inflation to come

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit more. Higher rates are hurting, like

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to go out and buy a house.

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 1>But generally things are okay.

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 5>Here.

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>People feel like I think generally things are kind of

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in a right direction, but Europe not so much. Talk

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to us about kind of the the economic backdrop that

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>European investors and investors that invest in em mea over

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in Europe and emerging markets, what are they dealing with?

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, I guess the trends are very similar around you know,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 9>higher inflation, higher interest rates, and a concern that those

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 9>interest rates are starting to impact the real economy. I

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 9>think the differences in Europe and in the UK is

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 9>that getting inflation under control has not been quite as successful,

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 9>you could say, as the Fed have managed to do.

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 9>And there's also a huge divergence within the economies. So

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 9>we think about the EU as a you know, one

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 9>geographic zone, but in fact, if you look at the

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 9>economic performance of Germany for example, in recession, very industrial

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 9>economy not doing well, versus like Spain and Ireland who

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 9>are showing decent growth. So it's hard to make a

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 9>uniform statement across the board, and certainly a lot of

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 9>divergence between the individual country performance.

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 2>How difficult are higher commodity prices? You know, last year

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 2>we were really worried about Germany and continental Europe as

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 2>gas prices rose up. They managed to avoid taking a

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 2>huge hit from that by storing enough.

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 7>But is it still a concern?

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 9>Definitely, and I think it's a real concern right down

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 9>to the consumer level in terms of perception, because as

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 9>soon as the headlines start to come through, you particularly

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 9>about the oil price, everyone realizes how much that really

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 9>impacts what they payple for energy and also the cost

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 9>of fuel at the pump here in Europe in the UK,

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 9>which is much higher than it is in the US.

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 9>So I think there's a bit of a concern that

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 9>if consumers start to see that, they will then start

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 9>to renin spending as they prepare for perhaps another win

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 9>to significantly higher energy costs in Germany.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess there's such an I guess the

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>importance of China as a trading partner, and the China

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>reopening has been disappointing relative to I guess maybe the

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year expectation. How is Germany and its

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>economy dealing.

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 9>With that, well, if you look at the headline numbers

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 9>of the GDP levels, you could say not very well.

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 9>So as you imply, Germany is obviously a big expert

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 9>economy and pretty much reliant on a lot of those

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 9>overseas markets. China is being just one of them, you know.

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 9>And if we think what happened through the pandemic where

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 9>we had supply chain issues, which was then impacting growth,

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 9>and now we have it on the demand side. So

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 9>we've gone through a full cycle with none of the

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 9>upside of the upcycle because you've had a bit of

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 9>a double whammy on either side of that. I mean,

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 9>there are other things that are specific to the German economy,

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 9>a whole other topics around the green agenda and the

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 9>cost for businesses to try and comply with what Germany

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 9>are trying to do around sort of green and sustainable policies,

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 9>which is definitely impacting the economy as well.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that not Is the green transition not going to

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 2>be a driver of growth down the road? I mean,

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>I look at expectations for the German economy and their law.

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Obviously we're looking for a contraction this year and only

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 2>zero point six percent GP growth next year. But is

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the green transition going to be a driver there? Or

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 2>is Germany going to be penalized by its reliance on

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 2>the internal combustion engine industry.

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. I think if we were to look ten years

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 9>ahead and then look retrospectively, you might be able to

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 9>say that the transition to green overall created jobs, created growth.

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 9>I think the pain comes in the transition period. If

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 9>you look at the number of people who are still

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 9>employed in industries around fossil fuels, around the automotive industry

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 9>as in you know, few powered cars, not electric cars.

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 9>It's huge and you don't just get an automatic replacement

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 9>of them, you get a displacement which impacts the economy

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 9>before call it the new green economy starts to take off.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 9>And I think there are more concerns that the short

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 9>term pain of pushing towards sustainable policies. The same in

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 9>the UK, and you know, our prime ministers now starting

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 9>to rein that in a little because they realizes that

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 9>the transition period will be painful.

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 7>By the way, how's Brexit been twenty sixteen?

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 8>Right?

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 7>Was that twenty sixteen?

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 2>So seven years on are you are you just reveling

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 2>in the benefits of independence? I mean, has it been

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 2>just an amazing weight lifted from your shoulders, the freedom

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 2>of doing it on your own, all.

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 7>The incredible trade deals that you've made. I mean, what courage,

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 7>What courage that took.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 9>So I think the idea of Brexit was had lots

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 9>of very positive components. The challenge for the UK government

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 9>was in the execution plan and circling through for prime

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 9>ministers in that time to try and execute the plan

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 9>in the middle of a global pandemic meant that getting

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 9>those big trade deals done was definitely more of a challenge.

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 2>And of course you're partying right, they shouldn't have partied

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 2>so much.

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 9>Got to let their hair down. And I think the

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 9>issue now, you know, just coming into the political cycle.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 9>I know it's the same in the US as we

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 9>come into twenty twenty four that we're starting to see,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, really big shifts in the sort of left

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 9>to right movement or wherever way you want to look

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 9>at it, in the direction of travel. Where you know,

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 9>in the UK the leading party in the polls is

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 9>making very clear signs about a much closer relationship with

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 9>the EU Again, so just as businesses have got used

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 9>to the new operating environment, you start to sort of

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 9>inject more of that uncertainty back in. So we'll see

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 9>how the politics shape up next year.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Jackie, thanks so much for joining us. I really appreciate

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it getting your views. Jackie Bowie, Managing Partner and head

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of E M e A at Chatham Financial based in London.

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the tape Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 8>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 8>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 8>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 8>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Former colleague device Callie Cox back in the studio, US

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>investment analyst with E.

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 7>Touro, So, Kelly, what do.

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>You make of this market? I mean there's people lass,

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, four or five weeks, people have gotten very

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>nervous here about this whole interest rate environment and what

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it may mean a how to risk assets perform in

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a higher for longer environment. But does that really bring

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>back onto the table recession? How do you guys think

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about that right here?

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, we see people building a wall of worry

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 10>and we think that's a good thing. And I'm not

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 10>trying to be overally optimistic here, but if you think

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 10>about this list of worries that we're going through, student

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 10>loan payments restarting, if you think about you know, higher oil,

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 10>higher yield's, potential government shut down, there's a reason why

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 10>people are nervous. But put them all together, and I

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 10>can only count a few of those as actual systemic

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 10>risks to the economy. So that's what we're telling customers.

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 10>Keep an eye on oil, keep an eye on yields,

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 10>even though yields are telling us a good thing. Still

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 10>pressure on the economy and markets, but everything else might

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 10>just be a distraction.

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I'm sorry, but you sound still pretty

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>constructive on these markets here.

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 10>We're I hate this phrase, but cautiously optimistic. We're constructive,

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 10>but we're also asking people to really tread carefully and

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 10>pick up quality risk, don't go all out here. I mean,

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 10>we are in a bull market until proven otherwise, until

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 10>we see that recession or that crisis. Right now, there

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 10>are a few signs of that, but at the same time,

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 10>we don't know what cracks could be forming underneath the surface.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 2>So how worried are you about the government shut down

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 2>which is very likely to come this weekend? The strikes,

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the UAW strikes being prong I mean, is this a

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 2>factor in your analysis?

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So we think about the strikes and the shutdown

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 10>a bit differently. Even though the strike the shutdown is

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 10>kind of like a like a four strike from government employees, right,

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 10>So the UAW strike, of course, is front and center

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 10>of our minds, especially because we have a lot of

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 10>investors who own auto stocks, and this is a big

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 10>deal for the auto industry. I mean, luckily, we're talking

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 10>about US production here, and US production is just a

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 10>small share of global car production. I mean, US consumers

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 10>use a lot of cars, but they don't exactly produce

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 10>a lot of them, so we think global production could

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 10>fill the gap there. But at the same time, I mean,

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 10>this is another worry to lop on top of an

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 10>economy that's under a lot of pressure. Government shutdown again.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 10>I mean, if you look historically, they haven't made much

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 10>of a dent in either the economy or markets. It's

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 10>usually just a distraction. But going back to systemic risk,

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we don't know what's happening underneath the surface,

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 10>and you know, we're encouraging people to not freak out

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 10>too much, but understand that this is just another you know,

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 10>piece of pressure. Sure that you know investors have to

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 10>think about.

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, why don't I just sit my two year treasury

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>at five point one percent? That's pretty good.

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 10>I mean a lot of people are doing that.

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that something you guys I mean, is

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that something you guys are seeing from your clients or

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>hearing from your clients, and what are you telling them

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>about that?

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 7>Oh?

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, we hear it all the time. We did a

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 10>webinar with clients yesterday and that was one of the

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 10>first questions that came up. And it's a very fair question.

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 10>I mean, that's the five percent is the most you've

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 10>been able to get on money in thirty years. So

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 10>we frame it like this. I mean, timeframes matter a

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 10>lot when it comes to considering whether to go into

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 10>cash or go into equities, or basically when you're determining

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 10>how much risk you're taking on here, because cash at

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 10>five percent is great for short term goals. But remember

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 10>that yields are probably not going to go much higher

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 10>from here. The economy is probably going to slow down

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 10>from this five percent annualized pace. People think we're growing

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 10>out in the third quarter. And if that's the case,

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 10>if the Fed starts cutting rates into next year, you know,

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 10>that's the rate that you're getting paid on your cash

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 10>and you know, on your bonds, unless you, of course

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 10>hold them to maturity. So you know, we have a

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 10>lot of longer term investors on the platform well.

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 2>If you get five percent, you know on a twenty

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 2>year you're getting that for the next two decades plus

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the appreciation. If yields go down, your capital is then

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 2>worth more.

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and it's tempting, but you also have to remember

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 10>the S and P has a seven percent average annual

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 10>return and that compounds as well over the years. So,

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 10>you know, with younger investors, with a lot of millennials

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 10>and Gen zs on the platform, we tell them to

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 10>think about the fact that they have time on their side,

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 10>so cash is good, but you know, you really have

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 10>to think in the gray area as.

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 3>When who is a typically TURO client customer.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 10>So we we skew towards the you know, older millennials

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 10>and the Gen x's, but we do have a younger

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 10>investor base when compared to other traditionals.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And did they invest differently, did they think differently or

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>do they just or is it just simply hey, you

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>guys are young. You need to think longer term, and

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>over the long term stocks outperform most other asset classes.

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Is that kind of the base message, Well.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 10>They're a little more complicated than that. A lot of

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 10>our customers are those long term investors, but they have

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 10>that active account on the side. They're interested in crypto,

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 10>they're interested in investing with a community.

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Because we never talk about crypto anymore. It seems like

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it was almost every day, and I used to quote

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it all the time.

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Is but now we don't talk about it.

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Why bother it's just twenty six thousand without looking let

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 2>me see, I I haven't looked today, but you're probably

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 2>pretty close. And I mean twenty six I think it's

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 2>more interesting to talk about investing with the community.

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 7>So what exactly does that mean?

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Somebody has a model portfolio, you might like it, and

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you can then clone that portfolio like like tracking an index.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 10>Yes, so we offer that for crypto, Matt. We call

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 10>that are not our smart portfolios. But you know, being

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 10>able to follow somebody and being able to invest if

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 10>you like the crypto, their crypto that they're investing in.

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 10>I mean, that's what we're trying to promote here. We're

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 10>trying to promote the transition of ideas. You know, the

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 10>ability to talk about what you're investing in and the

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 10>ability to see what other people are investing in as

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 10>a track record type thing. You know, these are my

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 10>returns this is what I have in my portfolio. You know,

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 10>if you see yourself as a similar investor, then you know.

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 7>Maybe is it only for crypto? I mean, can I not?

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Like if Paul goes on there, can he put you know,

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 2>his munis and all of that sort of baby boomer

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 2>stuff on there, and I can say I want a

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 2>boomer account, so I just clone his account and do

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the same thing.

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 10>Not in the US yet, but we're hopefully working toward that,

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 10>and Paul, if we get there, I would love to

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 10>create a baby boomer portfolio just for you.

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 3>There we go.

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 2>See he's the tail end, he's the last, he's the

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 2>last month of baby boomers.

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 3>Literally, he's set.

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>For sixty three, John Tucker, he's more firmly asconced.

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Within the you're closer, would you reach over and just smash?

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 5>All right?

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>So if I can do that, Kelly, what's kind of

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the big issues that are coming up from your clients

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you had the webinar?

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 7>What are they worried about?

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 3>What are they excited about? Your your clients?

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well they're worried about a recession. But the funny

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 10>thing is they feel really good about their financial situation

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 10>right now. They say I don't have a reason to

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 10>really change up my portfolio, but I'm frozen, you know,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 10>I'm not quite sure what to do here, especially because

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 10>things just don't feel good around me. So we're encouraging

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 10>them to again focus on their whys, understand what they're

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 10>different accounts are for. You know, if they want to

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 10>be active, there are plenty of opportunities in this environment.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 10>You just have to be careful. And on the long

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 10>term side. I mean, we're you know, we're quite optimistic

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 10>on the US economy over ten twenty years. Everybody is,

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 10>but you know, when you look over the next year,

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 10>you might have some chances to, you know, jump back

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 10>into a strong room.

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Our ETFs.

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you guys even recommend mutual funds or talk

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>about mutual funds or it's just ETFs now.

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 10>So we have ETFs on our platform, and we're actually

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 10>noticing that ETFs as a share of volume is growing.

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 10>Investors are looking toward diversifying their portfolios or looking toward

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 10>broader market and sector trends. So that's a trend that

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 10>we're watching closely. I feel like everybody is, but it's

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 10>something that the average investor is picking up on.

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't even imagine like the future of the mutual

0:22:58.520 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>fund business.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Nless it's in a retirement account, why wouldn't you just

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't really well.

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 2>But we haven't seen the continuation, not at last year's

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 2>pace of conversions to ETF right, which I don't know

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 2>why that slowed down.

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 7>In fact, that's a real conversion.

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Of a mutual fund into an ETF.

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, last year that was huge, right, and the beginning

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 2>of this year as well, it's kind of slowed down

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a bit. But I can't imagine why you would want

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 2>a mutual fund rather than an ETF, other than you know,

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 2>you're not allowed to have ETFs in certain investment cases.

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:32.719
<v Speaker 7>So you have to use mutual funds for that.

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, that's the only case I can think of too.

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 10>I mean, as an investor myself, it's I have no

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 10>reason to use mutual funds.

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, Matt.

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday was the beginning in basketball preseason practice. So my

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>question to Cali, being a proud alum of that trade

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>school in Chapel Hill, North knowing it, I knew it.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 7>She's a tar heel.

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 10>How is basketball season when you're talking to a Duke fan?

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So what's the outlook for Chapel Hill this year?

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 10>Oh man, We've had a lot of turnover on our roster.

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 10>We have bay Cod, he's a big guy. He's really good.

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 10>But quite honestly, I mean the turnover we've seen it.

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 10>I think it's going to be really hard to tell what's.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 2>Just historically in these conversations though, Kalie, don't you say, like,

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess what Jordan didn't play at Duke?

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 10>I mean, that's the thing we can hang over your head, right.

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, we always say the only person that can guard

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>or keep Michael Jordan down is Dean Smith, the coach.

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>He's the only one that could keep Jordan from doing

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>amazing things, Dean Smith by limiting, you know, the type

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of playing that.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 3>He could do.

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 10>But Jordan did amazing things. He's the greatest of all.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Time, of all time, and then he got that in

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the pros. But anyway, so I'm a you know, it'll

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>be interesting because what's the feeling about your coach Hubert?

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 10>I love Hubert now part of the family.

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Now, but does that still hold within the alumni base?

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is he still really well supported?

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 10>I think so he's on thinner ice than he was

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 10>you know, of course last year. And he's done a

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 10>really good job recruiting. But it's putting different pieces together

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 10>on a team that's not used to playing like the

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 10>three ball. Basically. Yeah, we're very big into getting into

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 10>the middle and you know, grinding in right below the basket.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Then chop Hill also has a good football team this year.

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 11>We do.

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 10>I would love to talk about football here. Yes, apparently

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 10>Duke is good, very good now a lot.

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't happen almost any time. You know, they beat

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Clemson this year at Duke. The last time they beat

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Clemson was when I was a first year business school

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>student in nineteen eighty nine, beat Clemson. I was at

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that game.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 3>It was pouring rain.

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I was the only one for my study section because

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we had a big exam on that Monday. Everybody else

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:33.959
<v Speaker 1>was doing a smart thing and studying for the exam.

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I was out in the pouring rain watching Duke beat Clemson.

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>John So that's kind of how.

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 3>I put you through.

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a long road to dig out of that

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>hole I started myself in, but you know it was

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>worth it.

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, I passed. It's all good.

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>The historic moment it is, so it's all good. Kelly Cox,

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Kelli Cox, us investment

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>analyst for e Toro and a proud graduate of the

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>University of North Carolina.

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the Team Canser Live Programloomberg Markets weekdays

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 8>at ten am Eastering on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app,

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 8>and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on demand wherever

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 8>you get your podcast.

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Bank Great dot Com. Thirty year US fixed rate mortgage

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>seven point seven eight percent. I'm not going to complain

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about my six percent mortgage anymore. And you've got the

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>three something.

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well three and a quarter.

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there you go.

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, how can I know if you look

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>back like a gajillion years, that's pretty much in line

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>with the average. But still that that hurts. But let's

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to somebody who does this stuff every day. Odetta Kushi,

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Deputy Chief Economists at First American. Adetta, what's your thirty

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand foot view of this residential real estate market? I mean,

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants to get out of their house. Nobody wants

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to sell. If I want to buy, I got to

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>pay this huge mortgage. It's kind of tough out there,

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>isn't it.

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 12>It is very tough out there, a lot of headwinds

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 12>in the housing market, but it's resulted in some really

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 12>interesting dynamics. The first of which is that we're seeing

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 12>a reacceleration in house price growth. You know, you've got

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 12>demands still surpassing supply and that's putting that's econ one

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 12>to one right for house price growth, and so we

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 12>saw the SMP case Shiller reaccelerate. We've seen it up

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 12>on a year over year basis after declining for three

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 12>months in a row. And that's pretty broad based across

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 12>most markets, of course, with some regional differences. And the

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 12>other dynamic here is because there are so few existing

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 12>homes on the market because of that rate lock and

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 12>effect that you alluded to. You know, people are going

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 12>to the new home market because builders are offering incentives,

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 12>they're buying down rates, and so the new home market

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 12>has actually fared better than the existing home market this year.

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:43.959
<v Speaker 2>So what does that mean for affordability? I mean, prices

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 2>are up, you know, rates are up. Is this a

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 2>market that is just you know, deadly for first time buyers.

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 12>It's really tough out there for first time buyers. As

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 12>you mentioned, you know, affordability is a function of home prices,

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 12>interest rates, and incomes, and home prices are up again,

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 12>interest rates are moving higher, incomes are increasing, but it's

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 12>not enough to offset the impact of higher rates and prices.

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 12>So it's tough out there as a first time home buyer.

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 12>But we are seeing them look to the new home

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 12>market because again with rates at seven percent, builders are

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 12>buying down rates to six percent, sometimes even five percent,

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 12>and oftentimes also cutting prices on homes, and so the

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 12>new home market is actually more affordable than the existing

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 12>home market, which is not traditionally the case.

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 2>How are builders able to do that? I've been hearing

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 2>this too, and I find it fascinating. And how long

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 2>will they be able to hold to keep that up?

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 10>I think it'll be tough.

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 12>I mean, we saw the new home sales number come

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 12>down in August, rates at seven percent, over seven percent,

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 12>really biting into affordability and cutting down demand. And builders

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 12>have had the margins to be able to buy down

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 12>the rates. But the higher that moreage rates go, the

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 12>more difficult that.

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 9>That will be.

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'll just you know again on that bank rate

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty or mortgage seven point seven percent. That's the highest

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>sense two thousand, just extraordinary. So I guess the question is,

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>is there a rate out there that you think is

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a clearing rate for lack of a better word, where

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it might kind of loosen things up in buyers will

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>be willing to take that mortgage sellers, we'll bring.

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 2>About the great reset a lot, as a lot of

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 2>people have called it the expected event.

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 12>Well, you know, more than ninety percent of existing homeowners

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 12>are locked into rates below six percent, So I think,

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 12>certainly if we could start approaching six percent, we'll start

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 12>to see a lot of activity. There's a lot of

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 12>buyers on the sidelines. There's a whole generation of millennials

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 12>that that are out there looking for that first home

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 12>and you know, on the sidelines waiting for that mortgage

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 12>math to work for them. So I think if we

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 12>can start to get rates heading lower, you know, approaching

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 12>that six percent, certainly that that would bring some folks

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 12>off the sidelines.

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 2>What about adjustable rate mortgage is how popular had they become?

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 12>We start to see adjustable rate mortgages, you know, the

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 12>use of those increase as rates increase, So we've seen

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.719
<v Speaker 12>them come up a little bit over the last year

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 12>as mortgage rates have increased, but there's still a smaller

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 12>share of the market.

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 3>If I want to go get a mortgage, can I

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 3>even get one here? And how is the mortgage origination market?

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 12>Mortgage standards have been tight, right, so not even just

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 12>this year, but generally speaking, and certainly compared to you know,

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 12>the early in mid two thousands, lending standards have been

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 12>significantly tighter, and so it's probably tough route there to

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 12>get a mortgage, certainly tougher to get a jumbo mortgage

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 12>if that's what you're in the market for. And so

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 12>that's that's sort of another headwind to the housing market.

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>What's the regional factor here? I mean, it just seems

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>like we just heard so many stories during the pandemic

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of everybody you know, owing to the Sun Belt going

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to Texas, Florida, Tennessee for crying out loud. I mean,

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is it I don't even know where there's where they're

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.959
<v Speaker 1>putting those people. But are those markets appreciably stronger? Are

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we seeing more activity there than maybe other parts of

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the country.

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 7>That's right.

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 12>In the latest SMPK shild report, the markets that experienced

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.479
<v Speaker 12>the strongest growth were in the rest belt, and then

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 12>you also had New York. So it was really the

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 12>Midwest the Northeast that are outperforming, and then the West

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 12>Coast traditionally more expensive markets that really have experienced the

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 12>strongest price declines. So you know, you've got your San Jose,

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 12>San Francisco, you know, have had a tougher go in

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 12>a rising mortgage rate environment.

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 2>So I imagine you know, workers there are still in

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 2>strong demand.

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 7>Construction workers.

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Are builders able to get everything they need, land, permits, labor.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 10>It's still tough.

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 12>The supply chain headwinds, the supply side headwinds for builders.

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 12>You know, some have eased, some of the material supply

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 12>side challenges have eased, but there is still a chronic

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 12>shortage of a skilled construction workers. And so you know,

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 12>the construction industry is still contending with some of these headwinds.

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>So do you guys at your shop, do you have

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a view on mortgage rates kind of where you think

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be six months from now, twelve months

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>from now.

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 12>Mortgage rates are notoriously difficult to forecast because they're tied

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 12>to you know, the ten year treasury, which can be

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 12>influenced by everything from you know, geopolitical tensions to your recession,

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 12>to of course inflation. But I will say that the

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 12>Fed has maintained its hawkish stance. They've made it very

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 12>clear that they intend to stay keep rates higher for longer,

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 12>and that means continued upward pressure on mortgage rates. I'm

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 12>certainly not seeing mortgage rates, you know, getting back to

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 12>I think one of you said you have a three

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 12>percent mortgage, and I'm not seeing that happen anytime soon.

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 7>Thank goodness, that was me.

0:32:56.160 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 2>So if you have I guess slower household formation because

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 2>affordability is off the charts, does that also mean consumers

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 2>are spending less money, you know at I don't know

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 2>where people go these days, you know, restoration, hardware, create

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 2>and barrel, you know, furnishing places, putting things together.

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 12>I mean there is a multiplier effect on the economy,

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 12>certainly from from from demand sort of subsiding for housing,

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 12>you know, and of course if construction slows further, that

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 12>will have a multiplier effect on you know, durable goods,

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 12>housing services. So certainly reduced demand for housing due to

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 12>the affordability environment can impact demand for furnishings and all

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 12>of those.

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 7>All right, Odedda.

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us at Debtakushy, Deputy Chief

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Economists for First American.

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 8>You're listening to the tape cans are live program Bloomberg

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 8>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 8>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 8>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 8>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven.

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Thirty glco go the global commodity prices. That's the function

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:21.879
<v Speaker 1>for that. I look at the medals here you're to date.

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much everything is down on a year to date basis.

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>A couple exceptions, most notable being gold that's up three percent.

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what's happening in the world of metals right now.

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>We talk commodities, we talk crypto. We talked to Everett Millen.

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:40.280
<v Speaker 1>He's a chief markets analyst at Gainesville Coins. So, Everett,

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 1>what is happening with gold here? What's the cause? Seems

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>to be bucking the trend where I've got aluminum down,

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 1>copper down, gold down on a silver down on your

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>today basis, but I've got gold higher.

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, thanks for having me on I think it's really

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 6>interesting that gold has been fairly resilient, hanging out around

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 6>that nineteen hundred mar even with so many headwinds working

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 6>against it. You have the dollar climbing to its highest

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 6>and six months rates being higher. Real rates being higher

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:13.439
<v Speaker 6>is usually negative for gold. And we've also just come

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 6>out of the summer months, which are typically they see

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 6>poor seasonality for the gold market. And in spite of

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 6>all that, you're right, gold has held up relatively well.

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 6>And I think a lot of it has to do

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 6>with the fact that central banks continue to purchase gold

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 6>and kind of place a floor beneath the price. And

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 6>in many cases, sure this is done to stave off

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 6>currency appreciation, but it's also a sign that central banks

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 6>are probably hedging against the potential for a policy error

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:44.760
<v Speaker 6>or an economic downturn in the near future.

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 2>So which central banks had the most gold and who's

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 2>doing the buying.

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 6>So as of now, the Federal Reserve still holds the

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 6>most gold in the world, but the big buyers we

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 6>see are mostly in the East, especially as we've seen

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 6>outflows from gold ETFs in North America and Europe. Typically

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:09.280
<v Speaker 6>most of that gold ends up flowing into China and India,

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 6>and so the People's Bank of China is certainly continuing

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 6>to buy gold. And what's interesting is there's been this

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 6>persistent premium on gold in Shanghai relative to London. Now

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 6>there is some speculation that that's perhaps due to policies

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 6>followed by the PBOC, but really what it says to

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 6>me is it's just a sign of robust demand for

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 6>gold in China, and that's important because China is always

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 6>the number one consumer of gold in the world.

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 7>By the way, how do you play that arbitrage?

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not like you're going to load up

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 2>a plane full of gold bars in Shanghai and fly

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 2>them into Heathrow, right, is there any way to play

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the difference?

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 11>Well, that's a great question.

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 6>There's there's been some suggestions that perhaps that could be

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:58.879
<v Speaker 6>done through Hong Kong, given that it is still under

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 6>Chinese rule but is somewhat of a separate special financial zone.

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 11>I don't think that there's any practical way to play

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:07.879
<v Speaker 11>that arbitrage.

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 6>But again, outside of the East, sentiment in the pressures

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 6>and precious metals market it's still rather pessimistic.

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 11>So even if there was a way to play that.

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 6>I don't think a lot of investors are really tuned

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 6>into that or paying attention.

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 7>To that evert how closely do you watch the dollar?

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I always have the Bloomberg Dollar Index on my screen.

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people watch just DXY. But right now

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 2>we're trading at twelve seventy. It's the highest level we've

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 2>seen in about a year, showing some real strength against

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 2>our trading partners, but also obviously strength in gold term

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 2>strength and oil terms, et cetera.

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 11>Right, it's always important to watch the dollar.

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 6>The fact that it has strengthened so much against its

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 6>pure currencies around the world shows up in the gold price.

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 6>Especially this week we've seen gold drifting lower, but when

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 6>you look outside of the US, in most other currencies,

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 6>gold is at or near all time highs. So it

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 6>sort of is just a relative, a relative comparison that

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:13.720
<v Speaker 6>the strength of the dollar in the West, it tends

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 6>to damp in interest in gold, but there's not.

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 11>Always a direct line.

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 6>So about a year ago we saw the last time

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 6>that the DXY was at these levels, we saw that

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 6>both the dollar and gold rallied in tandem. And sometimes

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 6>when there are safe haven concerns, you can see that

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 6>kind of paradoxical relationship happening.

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 2>And Paul and I were just talking about how boring

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.320
<v Speaker 2>it's been to quote bitcoin lately. It's just holding it

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty six thousand. But actually when you look at the

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 2>strength and the dollar, it's pretty interesting that bitcoin's been

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 2>able to hold this level.

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 6>That's right, it has been somewhat ranged down, and I

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:50.399
<v Speaker 6>think clearly we're going to have to get some more

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:54.240
<v Speaker 6>clarity on the regulatory end. We still have not gotten

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 6>a bitcoin ETF approval. And to kind of make a

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 6>comparison to gold, the gold market about a decade or

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 6>two ago experienced much greater liquidity and much greater demand

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 6>once a gold ETF was launched. So I believe a

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 6>lot of bitcoiners are looking at that experience and hoping

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 6>if there is a bitcoin ETF, it's going to ease

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:20.439
<v Speaker 6>access for kind of lowering that barrier of entry for

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:23.760
<v Speaker 6>people to get invested into bitcoin. And it's also important

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 6>to keep in mind that anyone who has been in

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 6>the crypto market for a few years, they've experienced these

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 6>kind of crypto winters before. So the current poor sentiment

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 6>regarding cryptos in bitcoin is not necessarily the death warrant

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 6>that I think some perceive it to be.

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So what is the future of this ETF here? I mean,

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of it feels like the crypto space Matt

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and I were just talking about it. It's no longer

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:51.879
<v Speaker 1>top of mind or what everybody wants to talk about

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>as much as it was, say, six, nine, twelve months ago,

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering, is the space just waiting on how

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>this ETF issue will be resolved?

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 11>I think so.

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 6>And along the same lines, you know, you have this

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 6>tug of war between the greater trust and legitimacy that

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 6>would come with an ETF and greater regulation.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 11>But on the other hand, pulling in the opposite direction

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 11>is the.

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 6>Fact that the crypto market has always been characterized by

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:20.320
<v Speaker 6>this kind of free wheeling behavior where it thrives without

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 6>any oversight. And I think one of the important things that,

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 6>as you point out, that the market seems to be

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 6>waiting for, is there's an IRS proposal for new tax

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 6>reporting rules on digital assets, and so far that has

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 6>not been very well received by.

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 11>The crypto industry.

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 6>And we already know with the FTX to backle what

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 6>a complete lack of regulation and oversight looks like. But

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 6>we're going to have to get some kind of clarity

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 6>in that realm. Otherwise you will see all of the

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:53.720
<v Speaker 6>activity in DeFi and Web three in the crypto space

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 6>will almost certainly move offshore and leave the US.

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, So run more quick quick question forty seconds? Silver?

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:01.919
<v Speaker 3>What's the call here?

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 6>Silver is one of those interesting disappointing things for the

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 6>precious metal foals. It has not really performed the way

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 6>that they expected. At the same time, we have to

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:15.959
<v Speaker 6>keep in mind that year on year, silver's up about

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 6>twenty three percent, and I'm looking at a lot of

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 6>supply concerns. Mexico has seen at silver output drop by

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 6>nearly twenty percent. They're the world's largest producer, so supply

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 6>concerns I think give silver some fuel to move higher

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 6>in the short run.

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, Everick, thank you so much. We appreciate that

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:33.280
<v Speaker 3>as always.

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Everett Milman joining US chief markets analysts at Gainesville Coins.

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to the tape.

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 8>Catch our live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 8>Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune it app, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 8>and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 8>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, just

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 8>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, we here in Bloomberg Radio and TV, the media

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>side of Bloomberg.

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 7>We're here every day.

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 3>We're required to be here every day.

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of people in Bloomberg Radio

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and TV that did not miss one day during the pandemic,

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that came in every day to get the shows on

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the air. But we are clearly the exception, not the rule.

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems like this hybrid work is here to stay.

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's see where the latest findings are. Eileen mulaney joins us.

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 1>She's a workforce transformation lead at Viato Partners. She joined

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>us via Zoom So Eileen is I guess hybrid work

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is that the new normal going forward?

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 13>That is the new normal, and first, thank you so

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 13>much for having me. Yes, that is the new normal.

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:40.959
<v Speaker 13>I think what we're seeing in a lot of industry sectors, though,

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 13>is this combination of really hybrid work. There really is

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 13>a big focus on return to the office. So we

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 13>definitely are seeing that. I think in the height of

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 13>the pandemic, we never thought we'd see returns office. We

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 13>thought we were folding remote forever, but there has been

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 13>a big push to get people back to the office,

0:42:58.120 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 13>and I think three two or four to one is

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 13>the most common schedules we're seeing.

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are a lot of folks. It seems

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of industries, a lot of companies. I'm

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking of the financial services industry. I'm thinking that Jamie

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Diamonds of the world that are pushing still for five

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 1>days a week, but they again, they feel like the

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>exception rather than the rule here.

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 13>I think we're not seeing as much on the five

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:24.879
<v Speaker 13>days a week though. I think there is a lot

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 13>to be said for human interaction collaboration, more than you

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 13>can do just on zoom. So I do see a

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 13>lot of focus on that, especially when it's very junior staff,

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:38.840
<v Speaker 13>young staff that perhaps have not developed their professional network,

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 13>and that really is a plus to be in the

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 13>office and just see how things get done. Also, some

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 13>of the challenges with developing relationships with new clients new

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 13>customers can often be difficult if the relationship is purely

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:55.439
<v Speaker 13>video based and not really in person. So I think

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 13>for me personally, the hybrid is kind of the best

0:43:58.080 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 13>in all worlds. But I do think that there are

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 13>some CEO some companies in particular that are really trying

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 13>for that five day week work in the office, But

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 13>we have seen employee expectations have significantly changed coming out

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:12.720
<v Speaker 13>of COVID.

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have two twenty seven year olds and a

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty five year old in the workforce, my offspring, and

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to them coming in five days a week, it's not

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 1>even something that's in their mindset. And I kind of

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:29.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like this this generation, it's just a non starter.

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of how it seems at this point.

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 13>I think it certainly feels like that sometimes. I think

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 13>a lot of them started their career in COVID, so

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 13>it's all they know. But I think and some of

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 13>them do have an expectation when they do come into

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 13>the office kind of what's happening that day? Is there

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 13>something exciting? Is there you know, a happy hour? Is

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 13>there a lunch? You know, what's happening? Why should I?

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 13>Why do I need to be in the office? And

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 13>I think it's because they haven't seen the benefits of

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 13>that kind of collaboration full time. So I think that's

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 13>the importantsage to get to all of them for sure.

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, when this whole thing started I was. I

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>just saw no way that this economy could function efficiently

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 1>with everybody working from home, like I thought, you know,

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, just the business that I'm in Wall Street,

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't imagine traders trading as efficiently and as successfully

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 1>from home as they do in the office, and they've

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:26.800
<v Speaker 1>got all this computer screens and all the technical tools.

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>But they did, and the economy did, and the global

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 1>economy did just well. I mean, it's just really shocking

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 1>how it really played out.

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 13>I was one of those that thought, oh, this will

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:38.839
<v Speaker 13>be in place for about two weeks and we'll get

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 13>back to normal. I kind of shared the same opinion

0:45:41.239 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 13>that it's going to be hard to really shift to

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 13>being productive efficient and just continue on as if this

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:51.240
<v Speaker 13>was a normal and none of us were really prepared

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 13>for it, and none of us were really trained properly

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 13>for it. It's different with the organizations now. They're doing

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:01.320
<v Speaker 13>a lot of focus training on helping manage understand how

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 13>to really manage a workforce that's not in the office,

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 13>how to kind of look at social cues on video,

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 13>all different kinds of training that we had never thought

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 13>of putting our teams through before COVID. So certainly a

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 13>lot more age and tools to help people, But I

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 13>agree with you, I don't think we all expected it

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 13>would be quite so successful without any planning or training.

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>For sure, I think one of the unintended consequences. But

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>something that people are starting to think about now is

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is this kind of creating a divide or exacerbating a

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>divide between those people will call them essential workers that

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>have to be in whether it's on a factory floor

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>or at a fast food restaurant, and those that don't

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and those that actually have the flexibility. How big of

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a problem is that now and could it evolve into

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:48.399
<v Speaker 1>it continues to be a problem.

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 13>We certainly saw it as a lot of organizations started

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 13>to design their future of work programs, And this was

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 13>during the height of COVID, when, as you said, those

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 13>essential workers had to be at work by day's a

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 13>week and everybody else was at home. And it's I

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:04.960
<v Speaker 13>think companies still really struggle with what kind of peer

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:07.360
<v Speaker 13>equity do we want to develop, what kind of culture

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 13>do we want to develop for the organization? When there's

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:12.880
<v Speaker 13>definitely in a lot of industry sectors, a lot of companies,

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 13>very distinct workforces. A part of the same organization, and

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 13>it's very challenging to come up with policies that are

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 13>viewed as equitable across the board for everyone when certain

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 13>roles and even certain locations just have a bit more

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 13>flexibility than others. So I think that tension is here

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 13>to stay for.

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Sure, and I wonder if that's kind of driving to

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:36.760
<v Speaker 1>some extent, some of the strikes that we've seen worker strikes,

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:39.799
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a UAW or the actors and writers in

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood or the ups drivers. I'm guessing a lot of

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:46.319
<v Speaker 1>those folks are saying I need to get some now.

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was an a central worker. I made

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the big commitment, I took the risk. Now I want something.

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 9>You know.

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:53.840
<v Speaker 13>It's hard for me to comment on those I'm not

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 13>part of any of those unions, but I can say

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 13>for the organizations that I work with across the board,

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 13>flexible ability is a critical design feature more than it

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:06.800
<v Speaker 13>ever was before. And it's interesting when companies think about

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 13>flexibility for their workforce, they think about it in two parts.

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 13>One employee flexibility, where the employees can work flexibly, and

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:17.759
<v Speaker 13>that doesn't always mean I get to work at home,

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:20.919
<v Speaker 13>but it could be more creativity around the shifts they

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 13>have to work or how much time off there is.

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 13>So I think that whole kind of creative approach, it's

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 13>not kind of business as usable when we're thinking about

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 13>designing policies and approaches. And then on the other hand,

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 13>there's also a flexibility for the managers to be able

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 13>to have a little bit more autonomy in the decisions

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:41.319
<v Speaker 13>they can make and the arrangements they can approve for

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:42.240
<v Speaker 13>their team members.

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Right, it's a whole new world. Everybody's adapting.

0:48:44.760 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>It seems like Aileen Malany, workforce Transformation lead at Viato Partners,

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:52.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about the new workforce is it appears to be

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>for most organizations some form of hybrid, and I guess

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks that are still trying to work

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that out. But whether it's three two or four to

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one or something different, hybrid seems to be the new normal.

0:49:06.280 --> 0:49:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm fall Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio