WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball 2020: Outfield Rankings! 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening. Tons.

0:00:38.960 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right now, as welcome your host by rights that

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>spun fine guy Brobran stand ball, ladies and gentlemen yours.

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>With that, we will get your inside of studio of

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty four. This is the b f FS. He is

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Frank stamfle I am Greg Sauceman. What's happening, Frankie? Great?

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Happy Thursday, Happy Thursday, Thirsty Thursday to you, budd. I

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>sleep about drinking a beer or oh yeah, me too? Nice?

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>How about that? How about that? Let make it happen?

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? How's your Thursday? I just sleep last night?

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>You know what. I trouble sleeping last night, but for

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>good reasons, because you were struggling with your outfield ranking. Nope,

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, I could not fall asleep last night because

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I was on a high from your Maryland terravants, Frank

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Sea come up that sewn Shan Shan come up to

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>do the first second? How about that ending? Let's talk

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>some college pass. Was that not amazing? Yeah? Fantastic, fantastyan Yes,

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>oh my god. Down sixty points at halftime, seventeen points

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.119
<v Speaker 1>with forty seconds left to go in the first half. Maryland,

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>despite horrific referees, despite horrific play. Marilyn gerffans find a

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>way to do it. Man, it was Oh my god.

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>That was a getting it done in the best conference

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in America, best conference in America. I'm excited. Uh, Sean,

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we are what we're like a week away, two weeks

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>away now from Maryland Michigan here. I know that's gonna

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>be fun. It's gonna be a good one in college.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what worries me. That's the issue for you

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>at absolutely all right, Uh, no more Maryland talking. I'm

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>just answering Frank's question because that's why couldn't I sleep

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>because I was watching Maryland. They're champions, baby, more game

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>away from me, the Big Ten champs. We'll see what happens.

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Will they rank when do we come back? The out

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>feel the rankings begin. But first, here's your update from

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Alex Pasana. I am Alex Pasana with your sports grid

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>news update here on the fantasy b f f's. In

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball, the Boston Red Sox left hander Chris

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Sale will start the season on the injured list. Manager

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Ron Rennicky said on Thursday, Sale, who reported to camp

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>with pneumonia, is behind schedule. He will be placed on

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen day injured list and will remain in Fort

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Myers for extended spring training when the team breaks camp.

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>This a quote from quote from Rennicky. With the sickness,

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it cost him two weeks time, and that two weeks

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is what we'd like to give him to make sure

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that he's right. He's worked hard on getting his arm right,

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and we didn't think four starts in spring training was

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>fair to him. Sale also ended last season on the

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>injured list. Some quick notes out of Major League Baseball,

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Outfielder Max Kepler for the Minnesota Twins is expected to

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>make his spring debut Friday against the Red Sox. Also

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in Major League Baseball, Salvador Perez, the catcher for the

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Royals, will bat third as the d H.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>He will not be catching in today's matchup. Also, Laurentzo

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Cane will be making his Cactus League debut. The outfielder

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Brewers will play center field and bat leadoff

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in today's matchup for the Brewers. Also for and in

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the NBA, Let's go to Joel and beat where he

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>has injured. Well, that's his shoulder and beat The Sixers

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>center exited the game last night against Cleveland Cavaliers in

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter and was ruled out with the shoulder

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>spring and m r I revealed today that he has

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>showed sprained his shoulder and no update yet as to

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the timetable. Here's a quote from Sixers coach Brett Brown saying,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like when you don't have Joel and you

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have Ben, it's an opportunity for others to put

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>their hand up and declare this is who we are.

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>It is who we are. He's obviously referring to the

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>All Stars guard Ben Simmons, who missed his second straight

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>game because of nerve impingement in his lower back. So

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>now they are without Ben Simmons and Joe l em beat.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>You've got a full slate of games of NBA, NHL,

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and college hoops tonight, let's look at the National Hockey League,

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>because why not? Uh? The New York Islanders visiting the St.

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Louis Blues. Blues your goal and a half point favorites.

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>The total is five and a half. Also, the Dallas

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Stars visiting the Boston Bruins. Bruins your favorite. The total

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>is five goals and really quick one not some NBA

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>scut scores for tonight. The NIXT visiting the seventy six

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>ers sixers or your seven point favorites. The total is

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>two ten and a half. Also, the Los Angeles Lakers

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>visiting the Golden State Warriors. Lakers, you're tending a half

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>point favorites. The total is twenty two. I'm Alex Posano

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and this has been your sports Grid news update. Now

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>back to Greg and Frank. I'm a Fantasy BFFs. Thanks

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>as always, Alex Passano with the news update here on

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the BFFs we mentioned we're going to get into our

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>outfield rankings Part one. This is our preview here. We're

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna go over to the top twenty outfielders in Fantasy

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>baseball in the season. But before we do any of that,

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>we are going to take a look at what drew.

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>What Ricky Sanders, rather Ricky Sanders of Daily Rodo had

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to say with Greg Sussman earlier today on the NBA

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Tip Trill, the guys at Daily Rodo Gregg had been

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>doing a phenomenal job of setting you up for success

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to NBA dfs. Here's what Ricky Sanders

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>had to say earlier on today, wherever Joel Embiad is out,

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we tell you to start out. Orford not just a bead,

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It's Simmons to words, a must play as well. Orford

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is a definition of must play tonight. Not only does

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>he have all the improvements that we've discussed and that

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>his rates are gonna go up without Joel Embiid, he's

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>priced under five thousand on vanduels. So I mean he

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is shown to be a guy that we're willing to play,

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, price tags into the mid sevens without Joel Embiid.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>So we're obviously gonna be playing this price tag for him.

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>We're projecting him on Daily Rodo for over thirty four

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes tonight, he used a rate about a rebound rate

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>over fourteen percent and assist right about without both Embid

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.559
<v Speaker 1>and Ben Simmons. So this is a strong races player

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>across the board. This is the guy who's just way,

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.239
<v Speaker 1>way way too cheap. Might be a lock button candidate

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>depending on how many lineups are playing tonight. I just

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.239
<v Speaker 1>don't see a scenario which I wouldn't play Al Horford.

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>That salary is super low when it comes to Al

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Horford forty dollars tonight over on FanDuel Greg. The Philadelphia

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy sixers are completely banged up. No Joel Embiid, no

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons. Al Horford should get more run. Tobias Harris

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>should see more work as well. I know that we

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>were trying to figure out who to pick up in

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>our fantasy basketball season long league, looking at guys like

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>fur Can Cork, maz uh and Milton. What's his first name?

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I am it's fine, Shake Milton, Shake Milton. Yeah. So

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the seventy sixers are banged up right now, and because

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of that, you could take advantage with Al Horford in

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>your sex message. I think it's shake Milton. Isn't it

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>sounds right right? It's gotta be a thing. Yeah. No,

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>but that that price tag on alp Horford is way

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>too cheap yeah, it shall. Yeah, shake Milton, let's go

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>shake Milon. We can get him, Frank, So why are

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we reading for him? It's fine, I'm using them in

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>dffest today. It's probably be super cheap. He certainly is.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Certainly all the Philly guys on the tables like an

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>have a back to back for them. We'll begin to

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>get to the outfields in a few moments, but we

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to start with Chris Sale, who has already been

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>announced gonna start on the I l h to start

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the year fifteen days. As you heard from Alex a

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>few moments ago, he is going to begin in extended

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>spring training. Frank, what month is it? It is February.

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>It is the twenty seventh of February. So baseball officially

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>starts in four weeks from today, less than a twenty

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>eight days away. And they already now that Chris Sale,

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>dude in pneumonia. Pneumonia can't get ready in twenty eight days. Yeah,

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>this isn't gonna be days, right, Like you could just

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Harry mull roster, let him start game two or three

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>or four. No no, no, no, no, no no, he's

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta be the openy days starter. Greg the screen days

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on the I L Chris sal Yeah. Or pneumonia or pneumonia? Yes?

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever had pneumonia in your elbow? Greg? I have?

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It seems like you're just smelling your arm bits. All right. Well,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know that you can smell a pneumonia, Greg,

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>but I hope you don't have one in your elbow.

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Chris Tale might have one in his elbow. Look, you

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>can buy the pneumonia, the flu. Whatever they're saying about

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sale right now, I am not. I'm allowed to

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>be skeptical of this, and that's exactly what I'm going

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to do. Greg. He met with Dr James Andrews in

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>August due to uh something going on with his elbow,

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden he's not going to be

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>ready for the start of the season because he's sick.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And especially when you look into what Ron Rennicky had

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to say now the manager of the Boston Red Sox,

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it was unfair to give him just four starts this spring, Greg,

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to be ready. Well, Matthew J. Of rotal

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>world dot Com at this a sales number of starts

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the last four springs Greig three five four two So

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in three of the last four years, four spring starts

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>or less has been ample enough time for Chris Sale.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Granted he didn't get off to a great start last year.

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>All the other years you got he got off to

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a fine start issue. So three of the last four

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>years having four starts or less in spring training was

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>enough for Chris Sale. But all of a sudden, when

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sale has pneumonia, ron Rennicky says that four starts

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is not ample time for Chris Sale. I am buying it.

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a leobo. I there's something sound, something wrong.

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday or two days ago, we revealed or starting pitching rankings.

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Ranky and I had Chris Sale rank number fifteen. Overall.

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>You had him believed ten, exactly where I have dropped

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>him to one. So we mentioned that our top twenty

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>one pictures are basically we want two of those guys,

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's really the cut off the top twenty one.

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Those are your your your your pictures that you would

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>feel right with as your SP one in your SP two.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>You want two of those top twenty one guys for

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>sale unless he falls to the fifth round, the sixth

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>round at Zach Ranky Range. I'm not getting involved, Greg,

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>because again, there are so many injuries that are gonna

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>take place throughout the course of the season. Why would

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to start off behind the eight ball already?

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if you get a Jacob Degraham or Gerrick Cole

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and you just see feel really confident and you want

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to take that shot on a Chris Sale at fifth

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>round range. Sure, anything before then, I can't see taking

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>him over some of these guys who are gonna start

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the season healthy, like Synderguard, like Darvish, like Paddock. I'm

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>not getting involved all right out Feelers coming up next,

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>You're on your BFS. I want to be the next

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this season. Compete with the pros with Daily Rodal dot

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Com optimizer and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS,

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>much more safe ten percent on winning m a DFS

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>advice with promo code Dunk. Visit dot com backslash dunk

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to learn more. Back with you here on the the FFS.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>He's frank Um Greg. These are your outfield rankings for

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty Fantasy Baseball with a end Frank that there are

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>three outfielders that are going the first three picks. Their

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>names are Ronald Cunia, Mike Shrout, and Christian Yellows. That's

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the order for me, that's the order for you. That's

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the order you should have as well. Yeah, they're pretty

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.719
<v Speaker 1>damn good, and I think you can rearrange these three

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>however you want to. I think you can make the argument.

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Christian Yellis says that he is healthy. Of course, he

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>fouled the ball off of his knee last year and

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>fractured his knee. Cap, who was a freak injury, missed

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the final month of the season and was still ridiculous.

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>He had thirty three home runs and thirty stolen bases

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and a hunt in thirty games. Something we've always said

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>about Christian Yellois greg is that if he just started

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to lift the ball a little bit, like we say

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of players who just typically hit too

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>many ground balls, if they just lift the ball a

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. He always made great contact, always hit

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>for a good batting average, that those doubles would turn

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>into home runs. And that was the case for Christian Yellich,

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>not only last year, but the year before that in

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>eighteen when he won the m v P. So if

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you had any doubt on Christian Yelloich, I don't think

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that you should. And if you think that he is healthy,

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that you you you can argue that he

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>should be the number one on this list right. But

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>for me, I have Ronald Ducuna as my number one

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>just because of the difference in stolen bases. Last year

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>forty one home runs, thirty seven steals. I mean, that's ridiculous.

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>He told Ozzi Albi's he wants to go, let's do

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>nothing wrong with trying, and he legitimately Mike seven last year,

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>on years old, was to say that he can't get better.

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>He does strike out, the batting average isn't gonna be

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 1>as high as like a Mike Trout or a Christian Yelloich.

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I realized that. But with this your city and stolen bases,

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I am taking Ronald Kuna in a Roto league with

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>my first overall pick. If you're playing the Categories league, however,

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I can see taking Mike Trout no head to head points.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I could see taking a Mike Trout or a Christian

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Yellot ahead of him. Obviously. When I did the numb

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>one pick, I would take Gary Cole over all of them.

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you want a hitter, I would go with

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Trout or Yellow. In a head to head paints, I

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>know it's at the head points. I know it's had

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to add categories that changes it from Rhodo. Ronald Cone

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is my number one pick even a head to head points. Yeah.

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>He strikes out more than those guys. Doesn't walk as

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>much either. He walks a lot, just doesn't walk as

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>much as Trout and Yellow. He's amazing. He's amazing. Matters

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>more in Rhodo than anything. All right, let's move out

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of the top of three after this is really not

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>much else that do we have to spend more time

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on them? I don't know we should spend time a

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>number four because we disagree who goes at four? Who

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>goes at five? I have a four, my number four

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>player overall, as Mookie bets, you have Cody Bellinger. Yeah,

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's just a matter of mistakes. No, it's not

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a mistake. Greg. You know what a mistake is having

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Bauer ranked. It's your twints. I can starting pitchers.

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a huge um. Look, it's Mookie Betts is

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>changing leagues and he's gonna see new pitches. He's gonna dominate. Look, Greg,

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we just have to split hairs here, and Kobe Bellinger

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't changing teams. He's been with the Dodgers for obviously

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>ever in the first three seasons of his career, he

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>has been great, and he's one of the true five

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>category players being drafted in the first round. There's a

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>reason why he's inside. You know, this group of five

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>outfielders here. Thirty forty seven home runs last year, runs

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifteen ribbies. He was great against left handed

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>pitching last year, much like he was in his rookie season.

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to make the argument for Mookie Betts, Greg,

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm really not going to argue with it. The only

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>difference is we do have to rank these players, and

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm splitting hairs. Mookie Betts is changing leagues and he

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>did see that's what we're doing, the changing league thing. Yeah,

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna see new pictures that he hasn't seen before.

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Should he likely should? Well? Well, i mean, Greg, what's

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>your reason for Mookie Betts over Cody Bellinger. I can

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>pull up fan grash my damn computtery in freezer. Someone

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>went the fan graphs, Frank, I have both TAM's open

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for Mookie Beets and Cody Bellinger and doesn't know, and

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like not loading. It's like enraging to me. But

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Mookie had a down year last year, right

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>down at nine five three six MBP year uh the

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>year before that ope, and a down year four thirty

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>eight the year before. Home runs were right where they

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>would be. I think he steals more bases this year

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for Dave Roberts and the Los Angeles Dodgers across on

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>top of that, When you set the over underrun stolen

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>basis for Mookie Betts and it's good number twenty a half,

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>sure you will have more. And you say he goes over,

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you'll have more steals and Cody Bellinger, that's fair. Cody

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Bellinger will have last year probably fifteen to twenty more

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>home runs. Okay there. I think their averages will be close.

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the O b P will be close. I

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>think more RBIs for Bellinger, more runs for Mookie. It's close.

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you want? Basically, here's the trade off. Do

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you No, No, you're right, I didn't know you watch

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a basis, Frank. You always argue about solid basis. Frank,

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>do you realize that? Last year in All Hours Drive?

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But here's what I'm saying, all I heard was you

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>need power. You need power right now, I'm sorry. Don't

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we always have power? You need steals, give me steals

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and run scored when he steals run scored, Greg, you

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>can't just bring you have power and we've shot here.

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>All the guys you like, they don't steal basis? But

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is not a zero in stolen basis? No, Mookie's better.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>What is he gonna give you five more stone basis?

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe ten? Maybe ten? Yeah, I will take the five

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>less stolen basis. I will take the five less stolen

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>basis and the fifteen to twenty more home runs and

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the ten less runs. Is he gonna have tenless from Yes?

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>How many runs with Cody balance you have? Let that's

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty damn good. And you asked me how many runs

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that you best that last year? That's fourteen more. That

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>was in the same league, on the same team that

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>he's always played for. Greg. It always comes down comes

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>back to him changing. Why don't you buy what if

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>he struggles a little bit though, No, seriously, like having

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>over to a new team, new league, he might somewhat

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>get off to a slow start. I'm not doubting him.

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just if we're doing Bellinger versus Bets, I will

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>take Blones are over Bets, Well, let me throw this

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>at you. Are you're gonna changing leave things? What have?

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Last year was the anomaly for Cody Bellinger. Here's a

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>two year prior to that he bet at two sixty

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there's sixty seven to sixty power four home runs or

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>run one year, twenty five year after that, in a

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty two games, what have last year? Everything

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of went right for him? And then listen, Cody

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Bellingers awesome. And again you could you could certainly say

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>he's twenty four years only got better. I agree with that,

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was plenty of hairs at four verses five.

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying, if you're gonna get average, potentially

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>from Mookie Bets, who has proven in a longer way

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>than Cody Bellinger has, you're gonna get runs and steals

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>that's three compared to home run in r V. I

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>give mean Mookie Bets at four. What if I told

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you Greg that Cody Bellinger hit three or five last

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>year and his expected batting average was three three amazing

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>last year. Here's unbelievable best in baseball. He was incredible.

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>He was number one and expected banting average he was

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>incredible last year. I mean number five. Flare overall? Right, Yeah,

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we're spending too much time on this. If you agree

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with Greg, take Mookie Bets. If you agree with me,

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>take Cody Baloncer. Also, you get positioned versatility with Cody

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Balancer first base. Alright, at number six, Let's put Frank's

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>rankings up here on the on the screens, because I

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>have mine in front of me. All right, says we

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>both have Won Soto seven, we both have JD. Eight,

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we both have Fresce Harper. Oh there you go, right nine,

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 1>we both have Starling Marte. It's kind of boring when

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we agree on stuff. Which out of this group do

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about most? Like a lot about

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>j D Martinez. I don't want to do that. J

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>D should not be going in the secondround. I feel

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 1>like we kind of agree on a lot too. Let's

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>get to Bryce Harper and Starling Marte. Here because Bryce Harper,

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we both feel going a little bit later than he should. Yeah,

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>and look with Bryce Harper, I think he got off

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to a really slow start. You look at the first half,

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the batting average was down, the strikeouts were up. That

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the biggest key for change league. He's just changed teams.

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>He just changed teams. But it was the first year

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.719
<v Speaker 1>of a mega contract. Both he and Manny Machado did

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not live up to expectations respectfully, and I think contract

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>here for movie bets. There you go, Greg, this keeps

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>finding a random arguments. We're gonna keep going back to

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>movie bets all so long. Bryce Harper, though, in the

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>second half, he did cut down on the strikeouts and

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>he saw the batting average spike up a little bit.

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't surprise me if he gets back into the

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>two seventy to eighty batting average range this upcoming season.

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>And the stolen bases actually bounced back last year. For

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Harper, I think if you're projecting him to seventy

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to seventy five, forty plus home runs, really good counting

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>stats over a dreies. So if you're playing a points league,

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna walk a lot. If you're playing in o

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>b P League. He's a borderline first round picking in

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>ob P league because he's gonna have an ob P

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>over four hundred. That's who Bryce Harper is. I think

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it was the first half struggles. The strikeouts were up, Greg.

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And if he can bring those strikeouts down, if he

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>can legit get the strikeouts back to where they were

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>three four years ago, you can see him hit three

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred just because of his quality of contact when he

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>puts the ball in play. His quality of contact is

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>among you know, the top five ten percentile in all

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of baseball. And I think we're gonna see that out

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of Bryce Harper again this upcoming season. So I have

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>no problem where he's going in the second round. Uh.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And this goes back to what I've said all along, Greg,

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you can take an ace in the first round because

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you can get eight Martinez in the second, Bryce Harper

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in the second. Those guys should not be second round picks.

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>They should not be around, and I understand why they

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>are because, like there's other players that do things that

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>are more scarce, right like Tevor Story and Francisco Lindor.

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna steal twenty to thirty bass and Jose Ramirez

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is gonna do the same thing. And you know, Bregman

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is someone who just continues to get better and better.

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot of really good hitters and because

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of that, that's why you should take a picture in

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the first in the first round. I totally get that logic.

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Another player that we like both at number nine inside

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>our top Tyler will higher on him than some others.

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>It's Starling Marte. We've talked about starring Marte here in

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the show, but you can see the projections right below

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you right now. Starring Marte in a new environment, on

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a better team and better hitting ballpark should be in

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>line for a really good year as long as these

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>stays healthy, as long as the stage off I mean

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the steroids, that's the biggest question mark, is stay healthy. Yeah.

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, he's already had the suspension. That's worth mentioning

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>because he had hit with another p D suspension, Greg,

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's one sixty two or is it eight?

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Didn't he miss eight games? He missed eight, right, So

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the second offense sixty two probably won't happen,

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Probably not gonna happen. But I'm just throw it out there.

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>He has been suspended before. Uh, And look, you have

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to imagine he's gonna miss at least fifteen to twenty

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>games throughout the course of the season. Last year one

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. The year before that, seventeen only played seventy

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>seven because of the suspension. Seen he played one nine.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>So you have to bake in he's gonna miss fifteen

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to twenty games at least one Aisleston throughout the course

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of the season. But Greg, all the other five true

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>five category players that we spoke about Trout, that's Cody,

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Bellinger and Yellow. Those guys are all top five picks.

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Staling Marte you get at the end of the second round,

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.959
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the third round, So the injury risk

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is already baked into his price. He's gonna hit to

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>nine plus. He's a two eighties seven career hitter. The

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>home runs have been up the past couple of years,

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty and twenty three. If I'm projecting him, I think

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty is safe. I think twenty home runs is safe,

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>especially in a better hitting ballpark. Now I understand the

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>human door is out there in Arizona. It has helped

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it become more of a neutral park even maybe even

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>uh favor starting pitching a little bit. But it's a

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>better hitter's park still than Pittsburgh is. He is in

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a better lineup now. He gave you ninety seven runs

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>last year, eighty two Ribbies, twenty five stolen bases. Of

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>course he's not gonna give you the same counting stats

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>as you know, those top five players, those five category players.

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>But he hurts you nowhere except for availability. He's gonna

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>miss about twenty games about the course of the season,

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>but that's baked into his price correct I have acstutely

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>no problem where selling Marte is going this year. Somebody

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that I'm in on juice ball ever helped him last year?

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I think help him again? Is this the game next?

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the next Daily Fantasy millionaire. Dunk

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts,

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more. Save ten

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk.

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily Rodal dot com backslash dunk to learn more

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>full time fantasy. I'm happy with this. Now. Here's why

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I might be slightly upset because Rivers has maybe a

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>two to three year window. I mean it's a small

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>window of success, right, this is you gotta get it

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>done now, dude. But if I'm the cold, do I

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>really think I can win with Jakobe for sett I

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>have him signed for one more year. I keep them

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 1>as the backup just in case Philip Rivers gets injured

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>week days two pm Eastern on the Fantasy Sports Network

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and on your popular podcast providers PFF's Rocking with You

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Outfield or addition, as we go through our rankings here, right,

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got gotten through the top nine. Nine at nine,

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:28.959
<v Speaker 1>that's bad. We're about halfway through the show, and we're

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>about halfway down on the day's program. There you go.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.239
<v Speaker 1>We're moving at a fantastic pace. That's why you are

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the one and only Greg Sussman. So if you're a wrestler,

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that's it. No, this is I think him in Creuse

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Jericho when he debuted like and he goes like this, Yeah,

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he used to come out with the it's like his

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>back like that. Yeah, breakdown the walls, break the walls down,

0:25:55.080 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>break the walls down. Any who, Let's just let's get back.

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's keep moving. Let's let's keep a movement, which is

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>where we difference. Number ten, I have Aaron Judge already.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, very nice. Why would you do this? Number ten?

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I have Aaron Judge, followed by Charlie Blackman, George Springer

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in my Man Kettle Marte two Morte's inside my Top

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>thirteen love Kettle mort this year he is fantastic. Let's

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>pull up Frank's Top twenty here I feel out how

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he differs the next few players and number ten you

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have Austin Meadows. By number fourteen, then you have Charlie

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Blackman and George Springer just like I do, uh, followed

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>by Aaron Judge. Marte is fourteen for you. So the

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>difference between you and I basically is Judge and Meadows here.

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>What are you like Austin Meadows were than Aaron Judge.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>It just comes down to availability. And I understand Austin

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Meadows has dealt with injuries in the past as well,

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean Aaron Judge is currently hurt Greg.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>To quote Eric Young, He's currently not a baseball player.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 1>He's throwing the ball right right right right right right

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>right right right right right right right right right right

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>right right right right right as he played a spring

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>training game. Greg. Now, Austin Meadows, Actually I don't know,

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I know he has played a game. No, no, he did.

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>He has played a game. And Austin Meadows comes with

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>about the same, if not more prospected pedigree than an

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge. He finally had the opportunity to play every

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>single day last year. He's gonna give you a better

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>batting average and Aaron Judge, he'll give you less home runs,

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's also gonna chip in, you know, twelve to

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen stolen bases. And again we're talking about a true

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>five category player. Greg. Austin Meadows is not going to

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>hurt you anywhere. Aaron Judge probably hit two sixty five

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to seventy, probably gonna miss some time throughout the course

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the season. He's dealt with oblique injuries. Now he

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>has the shoulder thing. He previously had surgery on his

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>other shoulders. So I'm just a little bit more worried

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>about when I am building the foundation of my team

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>early in drafts. I want guys that are healthy now.

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I want guys that are going to be reliable, guys

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially get better. And that's exactly what I

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 1>see in an Austin Meadows. And maybe Aaron Judge could

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>even get better than where he's been the past couple

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 1>of seasons, but I would need to see him on

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the field first and foremost and healthy spring training before

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>moving him back up my rankings. I think it's clothes Greig,

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>but better batting average, a few more steels out of

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Austin Meadows, and I think he's a player that's just

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>coming into his prime right now. He is coming into

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>this prime and aust Meadows is good. That's what I

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>haven't number fourteen for me. But while the average is

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be better, you are going to lose quite a

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>few home runs ideally, ideally, you're gonna lose quite a

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>few rb I you are the hard hit percentages for

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge last year it was probably around fifty, maybe

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>even over fifty. Nobody hits the ball harder than Aaron Judge.

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>If that's a category in your rod to league, then

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you should take Aaron Judge in the first round. Are

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you doing that? You're going there, We're the target's good

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>at hitting the ball hard. He's gonna hitting the ball period.

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>He's really strikes out a lot to Greg. I mean,

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>he could work on the strikeout right, You know, Greg,

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you gotta call you out if you're not gonna like

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Frand mill Rans because he strikes out too much. You know,

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>why do you like Aaron Judge so many groundballs? Fan Mills?

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>That's what kills me Aran Judge ground ball, Yes, he does.

0:28:57.680 --> 0:28:59.479
<v Speaker 1>He hits a lot of line drives as well. One

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that it will say about Judge and and he

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is true to his word. He is not a home

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>run hitter. He is just a hitter who hits home

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>runs because he's massive and he's incredibly strong. So it's

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>seven more of a line drive hitter than anything. A

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred games last year runs yeah years, If he plays

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty plus, Aaron Judge is probably gonna hit

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>forty five to FIFA the first round. Back. I understand

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>why he goes where he goes. But again I'm putting

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>an emphasis on batting average in soul and basis. But

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>now when it comes to mookie bats, Austin Meadows is

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>going to have the edge there, Greg, this is crazy.

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Cody Bellinger had a better batting average and mookie bats

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>last year. How is that anomalous? Two years prior to that,

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>He's keeps sixty. He's getting better, he's younger. Who's to

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>say that Cody Bellinger can't get better. Maybe Movie Beat

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>just passed his prime. Greg, what you're saying he passed

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is that the well you want to go down? Do

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you play in any hard hit percentage of leagues of Gregg?

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't play in any hard hit percentage leaues rank.

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>We use it all the time to judge Jogi's outfielders players.

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>How many times can you say judge in a one

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>minute spand Greg judge as well. Um, we've all had

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a Charlie Blackman next we're talking off the are yesterday,

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I was like, I kind of like

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Blackman. You're like, yeah, I get it, he's good.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>He's undervalued, but I took him in the Great Fantasy

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.479
<v Speaker 1>based plantation, so I do kind of like him as well.

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>So you were telling me, like, it's not I get

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>why you like him because he's under value because he

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't run anymore, so people don't like him, but he

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really good average. So let's Tonnel runs and plays

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>half his games of course field. The problem is, if

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the Rockies do wind up rebuilding this year and they

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>start slumping out of the gate, they could trade Charlie

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Blackman get out of that contract. I don't know who

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>would want it, but I mean, yeah, that's the next

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>piece if they If they do get out of the contract,

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he no longer plays half his games of course field.

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at his home in Rose splits um,

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you can ignore our Nolan Arnado's because Charlie Blackman's they're

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>quite stark. Yeah, looking up the splits right now here

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we go greg for Charlie Blackman in his career on

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the road, he is a seven forty three ops player.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, I mean that's not really going to get

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it done with a two sixty one batting average. So

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>there's still that possibility that they trade away a Charlie Blackman.

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>But he's on Colorado right now, and he is my

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>eleventh ranked outfielder. You look at what he's done the

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>past couple of seasons. He has has not hit lower

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>than to eighty three in any season of his career.

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean dating back to his when he was a rookie,

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>when he only played twenty seven games, but the past

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of years three, fourteen, three, thirty one, three four.

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>You want someone that's going to help you in batting

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>average and not really hurt you anywhere else. Not gonna

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>give you stolen bases anymore. Maybe he'll give you a

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>handful of steels, but not really expecting that out of

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Blackman, who he went two for seven on the

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>base pass last year. Still hit thirty three home runs,

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Still give you a hundred and twelve runs scored, eighties,

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>six rb. I Charlie Blackman, to me, Greg, as long

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>as he's in Colorado, is one of the safest outfielders.

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And now you're getting him fourth, maybe even in the

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>fifth round of a twelve teamer. I got him in

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the fourth round of the Great Fantasy Baseball Invitational, that's

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen team league. I got Charlie Blackman in the

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth round. He should not be going in the fourth round.

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>He should not be. He absolutely should not be. Like

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, people are done with Charlie black He took

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>It's they are there isn't still basic anymore. I was like, Oh,

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>he's old and sucks, but he doesn't. He's really good

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at what he's good at, which is average of power.

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>He's a four category player. I mean three four thirty

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>two homers, a hundred and twelve runs, eighty six RBI.

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Eighty six RBI is not great, but that's about what

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Starring Marte is gonna give you. And he's going at

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the two three turn, so it's really just stolen basis.

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And I get that people want stolen basis. That's fine,

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but Aaron Judge isn't gonna give you steals. George Springer

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is going in this range. He's not gonna give you

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>any more steals. I mean maybe he'll give you seven

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>or eight steals, not much more than probably Blackman is here,

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so you know he's proven he kind of is what

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>he is. The only reason why you would fade him

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is if you think he's going to be traded, which

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case, I means you're probably fading No.

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>One Arnado as well. I don't think they're not gonna

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>be traded, that's the thing. They also don't think they

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>could get out of blackness. Contracts. I don't think he's traded.

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't. That's why point, and that's why black Man

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is where he still has what three or four years left,

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>He's an amount of money. Yeah, black Men on number

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>eleven in both of our rankings. I believe next is

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>George Finger. Guy I was are on than you were

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>last year. That worked out a right even out on

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>most astros guys. Specifically we got our infield rankings, but

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bragman it out to you, but you're not super high

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>on those guys. George Springer inside of your top twelve. Yeah,

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind George Springer and I would take him

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>over Aaron Judge right now. I think they do a

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of similar things. And last year George Springer to

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>two batting average, and he's entering a contract year this

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>year as well. So look, I understand there's gonna be

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>people that say, well, I've done a study about contract

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>year players, and there's no such thing. I think when

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to these big name players who know that

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>they can earn huge, huge contracts, I think George Springer

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is one of those people that is going to show

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>up this year in a contract year. I'm not worried

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about the cheating scandal. I mean, this guy has been

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>um great for years now. Basically the past four seasons.

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>He's been, you know, a top fifty hitter in Fantasy

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Baseball for each of those seasons. Thirty nine home runs,

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>nine runs fbies last year and only add twenty two games, Greg,

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So not really gonna give you many storm basis. Maybe

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a six seven eight steals, but two

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty batting average I think is attainable. Thirty five ish

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>home runs good counting stats as well, And if you

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>play in a points league, the guy had a twelve

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 1>percent walk great, He's gotten eleven percent walk great in

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>his career, A three six one O b P and

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>his career, I think, no matter what format you play

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in points, roto O B peelee, whatever it might be,

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>George Springer is a fine pick where he's going. Much

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>like Blackman, it seems like he's undervalued. I agree, and

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's the ask yourself that's going on. So it

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>was really good when he was healthy last year, and

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>he the injuries are frustrating. We kind pays right back

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>up where he left off after the injury. I like Springer.

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a great spot to take him.

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I would take Aaron Judge higher because I think the

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>upside is higher, pending that I want to just state

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>this pending that Judges is healthy right like he is

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>batting that shoulder injury right now. If we see him

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>play a bunch of spring training games and the shoulder

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be an issue, like, I think you'll

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>move him back up. Also, if he doesn't and it lingers,

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously I drop him down, right, I'm not If he

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play much as him training or plays a week,

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I am going to drop him down. But I still

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's plenty of time Aaron Judge to be ready.

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I haven't where he is. If George

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Springers stays healthy for let's say a hundred and fifty

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>games and has a contract, it's a lot of games

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>for him, dty games under forty games contract year. He

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>winds up having a career year. What does that look like?

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Career year? Yeah, we're talking runs, George Springer, you're talking

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>l stolen bases. I'll get there. Um, I think you're

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>talking vs and run score probably right, that's a career year. Yeah. Well,

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think if everything works out, he can hit three

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 1>last year. Yeah, sure, in a career year at three times.

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're going to see that, though it

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>might be better than Aaron Judges, which we might have

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>seen his career year ready. I don't see that kind

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of a year for Springer. I like a lot. He's saying,

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>like we have happened the same if you're projecting there

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>like ninety percentile outcomes, right, George Springers might be better

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>than Aaron Judges could be. It could be I still

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>rather and Jogjah, but both are healthy. But anyways, we're

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 1>healthy right now. By the way, almost swung out of

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:06.959
<v Speaker 1>his shoes yesterday. Did you see that? Bring your number twelve?

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.879
<v Speaker 1>For both Frank and myself. When do we come back,

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get into Kettle Marte. We're both in on

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Kettle Marte this year. Who's awesome? Last year you finally

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>figured it out. Both in on him. And then we'll

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>get to the bottom half all of our top twenty there.

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>It is a whole lot to talk about there. I

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 1>want to get into Eddie Rosario. I'd like to talk

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>about Tommy Fan briefly, and Elo Jimenez as well. We'll

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>get into those four players. At least we'll come back

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. It's a fantasy BFF right year on

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the Sports Trade TV Network. Know, come in, share, want

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to be the next daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com and dominate

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>with Daily rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Lake swaps up more and much more on winning NBA

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>DFS advice with promo code Dunk. Visit daily dot Com

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>backslash Dunk to learn more. Had a lot of fun

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>on today's program. We want to keep going, so I

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want to waste any time with uh anything. Actually,

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 1>just die right back in into kettle more Tay. We're

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>both you know here, he's my number thire ten believes

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 1>number FURTEENA fielders. We're both right there. We both really

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>like him. Canny repeat what he did last year. I

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think he can, and I know that and maybe not

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:43.399
<v Speaker 1>completely right, Like if I'm projecting him, he's not going

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>over thirty home runs again, I wouldn't project something like that.

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But you look at his transformation over the years. I

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>mean when he came into camp last year and throughout

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 1>the course of the season, he looked jacked up. I mean,

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Kettle Marte looked like someone where you know, his body

0:37:57.520 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>was just getting bigger. He was like progressing as a

0:37:59.880 --> 0:38:03.800
<v Speaker 1>baseball player and someone who always made a ton of contact.

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Greg I mean fourteen percent k rate or less in

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>each of the past two seasons, and last year again

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>career year, wound up hitting three thirty thirty two home runs,

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>over ninety runs, over nine d R B I S,

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>ten stolen basis, could do a little bit of everything,

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and his stack cast numbers were all career high. They

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 1>all kind of back up what he did last year.

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Greg career high nine point three percent barrel rate, right

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>around ninety miles per hour, average exit velaci, eleven point

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:32.439
<v Speaker 1>five degree launch angle, hard contact. Those were all career

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>highs last year for Kettle Marte. And if you were

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>worried about it being a fluke and well, okay, it's

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a juice ball, he must have fallen off in the

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>second half. No ops, in the first half, Greg a

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>one thousand, eighty one o p s in the second

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>half for Kettle Marte. You want someone going in the

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>third fourth round range, was gonna hit for a good

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>average three, probably gonna hit twenty five home runs, give

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you good counting stats either adding second or third in

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that diamondback line up ten to twelve stolen basis. He

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>does a little bit of everything, and he doesn't hurt

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you anywhere. The only reason why you wouldn't take him

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is if you're skeptical of anything he did last year. Uh,

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And me personally, I think you have to protect for

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>a little bit lower in almost every category that he

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>had last year, maybe outside of stolen basis, but even

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 1>if he's nine percent of the player that he was

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>last year, he's going to return value where he's going

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:25.399
<v Speaker 1>some play levels out of here here for a moment,

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you talk about things coming down a little bit in

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>every category across the board. Last year at thirty two

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 1>home runs, the most prior in his career was fourteen

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:35.439
<v Speaker 1>year before three games. It wasn't like he didn't play

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a full season anything like that. He's from fourteen to

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty two in a single year, in less games played

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>all across the board, he ninety scored ninety two Rivis,

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you're prior to that in more games, let's runs, let's rbs,

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>stolen mass fine, his average jumped seventy points from nineteen. Yes,

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>he's an improving player. Absolutely. I understand that the hard

0:39:57.120 --> 0:40:00.399
<v Speaker 1>hit percentage yet way better last season. Totally under sstand

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that as well run a fly ball ratio, he was

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>lucky last year compared to where he has been previously

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in his career. What eleven percent all of up to

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen last year. I think there's a lot to look

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>at here of Hall Martin regressing back the mean a

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And this is this is what comes with

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 1>projecting a player who did something last season that he's

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 1>never done before. And this is the difficulty of projecting

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that is how much of last year was a fluke,

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 1>how much of it was juice ball related, and you

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>know how much of it was him actually progressing and

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>getting better. And I leaned towards that because the battle

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>ball numbers were the best numbers of his career. The

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>stack cast numbers back up what he did. He started

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>lifting the ball more last year. His fly ball rate

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>went from eighteen to thirty four point eight, so he

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.399
<v Speaker 1>was consciously trying to lift the ball. Two line drive

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>rate was the highest career that's gonna lend itself to

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a higher babbit lend itself to a higher batting average.

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 1>In general, his expected batting average, which again is lower

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>than his three I realized that, but in lower it

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>then projected for three hundred. Even if you get a

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>three hundred hitter. I think so. I think that he

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 1>just progressed as a player, and he was someone who

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 1>did have some prospect pedigree, and they gave up a

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>decent amount to get him in return at the time,

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to give up Jean Sigura, who was coming off I

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>believe a career year that as all right, Yeah they

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>got I think they traded away Jean Sigura, and I

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think it was Taiwan Walker at the time. They traded

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:29.800
<v Speaker 1>four tail traded it traded away if I remember correctly,

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Jean and Mitch Hanagher for in Taiwan Walker, which I

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 1>guess was like a fair trade for both teams at

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the time. But look, he was a highly regarded player

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and he makes a lot of contact, and I understand

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>if people are going to be skeptical, but plays at

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a thin position second base and outfield. Has that dual

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>position eligibility if you don't buy what he did last

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>year as him just progressing as a player, then I

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>understand why you would be off him. I tend to

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>lean more towards that way, and I'm not even protecting

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:58.839
<v Speaker 1>him for anything close to what he did last year again,

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>which is why he's going to where he's going. Three average,

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty five home runs, good counting stacks, and ten to

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve steals. I think that's all attainable. A little bit

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:09.879
<v Speaker 1>more nervous than Kindle Martin than I was last week. Yeah,

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you were all over him. I was over last week.

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 1>It was all over him. I understand it's tough when

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a player does something they've never done before. It's how

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>much of it is, you know, fact versus fiction? How

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>much of it is real? I don't know. Let me

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>jump around a little bit more inside our top twent

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>because I want to try to get as many act

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 1>feelers as I can. We spoke about Chris Bryant last week.

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>He's been number sixteen outfielder. We spoke up with Maryfield

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and the same in the same vein. We'll talk about him,

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>um a little bit more at the second baseman, right,

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>he's like he's eligible Marcella Zuna. I do want to

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 1>mention though, Marcella Juna. Now remember the bree is I

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 1>asked you if you're in on him? You sure he's

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>not an active target of mine. It's a it's a

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>favorite frank phrase. You say that three times, that's favorite

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Frank phrase. Jesus, that's hard. Marzilla Juna not an active

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>target of yours? Play that lineup with those players around him,

0:42:57.160 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Freeman, Ronald you have your Ossuna's and your Ozuna's

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and your Accunias, and you got all the tongue twisters

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sitting around Acuna Alb's Freeman, where's all this? You know?

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Kind of just slots into that Josh Donaldson roll. We

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 1>know what Donaldson did last year? Why can't do something

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>similar to that? The reason why I guess he's not

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 1>an active target. And I'll try to break this down

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>as best as I can. I have him as my

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty one outfield right now. I don't have is how

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>does he separate himself from someone like Eddie Rosario and

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Nick cass I think all those guys are kind of similar.

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Where they're gonna hit around two seventy eight. Yes, they're

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you good power numbers Castanos again, you might

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>be projecting him to do something he's never done before.

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, if you if you think he can

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 1>hit thirty thirty five home runs playing in the Great

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 1>American small park, it's the best part that he's ever

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 1>played in. Again with Castanos, My question, Greg is how

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>does he separate himself away from Castanos or Rosario, because

0:43:57.760 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I think they're all very similar, And if you ask me,

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I would just take the one that's going last out

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>of the three. I think that they're all kind of

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>similar skill sets. I think right now that's probably Castiano

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is going last, right, yes, okay um. I think they

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>him and o Zuna are basically like neconnect the doing around.

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends a kind of league you playing.

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I guess like and it result it wasn't walk right,

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>he walks like three percent of the time. Marcello Zuno

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>walks eleven percent at the time. That's pretty good. The

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>OVP should be higher. That's a good point for Marcello Zuna.

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>So I like him a little bit more. I say,

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:29.399
<v Speaker 1>an doesn't walk all that month, he's like seven percent,

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.839
<v Speaker 1>but hits a lot of doubles. He does and in Castianos,

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I worry about um. I'm trying to remember what like

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>about Cascianos in the past, and I always felt he

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 1>was underappreciated and undervalued. Maybe it's because so many doubles,

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:45.439
<v Speaker 1>like didn't turn it own runs, But now he's plays

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and STANDI it should theoretically. He saw in the National

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 1>League last year with the show of Chicago Cubs, where

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 1>he was fantastic seven runs a career high last season,

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 1>plays every day. His ops with the Cubs is over

0:44:56.440 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a thousand. He was amazing, he was ridiculous, and it

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>seemed like he was finally motivated too. And something that

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:04.759
<v Speaker 1>he's spoken about was when hitting in America that the

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>ball basically just died in the outfield there. So you know,

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's gonna sap anyone's power playing in America. I

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 1>think hitting in Cincinnati for a full season, we could

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 1>see thirty to thirty five home runs out of Casiano's career.

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Hard hit percentage is high Marcella's, do you know. I

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 1>think what I've learned here is that Marcella's, you know,

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Ni Castianos are very similar players like probably like your's

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>hard at the least, I think Eddie Rosario is probably

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the safest. Why because you, I mean, you play in

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 1>obi Pe League, so he's not gonna walk there. I

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:35.240
<v Speaker 1>understand that. But if you're just play in a batting

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>average like Rosario is so safe for to eight thirty

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>five home runs a hundred ribbies, that's not nothing. That's

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a great season. I think that again, I think it

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>goes back to what I said, and comparing all three

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 1>of these players is they're they're almost going too late,

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 1>because I think everyone kind of thinks the same thing.

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>They're like, oh well, these guys are all kind of

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the same, Like how do I differentiate them? And I

0:45:57.760 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I could just wait and take whoever falls out of

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>all three of them. And Ozuno might have the highest

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>upside because last year he was incredibly unlucky. We've gone

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 1>over we went over this when he signed with the Braves.

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>His babbit last year was to fifty seven. He's a

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>career three fourteen babbit. And his expected batting average was

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:16.240
<v Speaker 1>much higher than his two forty one actual batting average

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 1>last year. And we've seen it before. I mean back

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Ineen with the Marlins, of all teams, he had thirty

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>seven home runs with a hundred and twenty four Ribbys

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and last year he started running out of nowhere. Greg

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:28.839
<v Speaker 1>get twelve stolen basis. So I mean Zuna is someone

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that can legitimately hit two eighty thirty thirty five bombs,

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 1>good County stats in the middle of the Braves lineup

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and eight to ten stolen basis and if he does that,

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>he's probably a top five round player next year. Where

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:44.439
<v Speaker 1>does elm in that grouping? So I have elohimenez at

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.479
<v Speaker 1>I have I haven't met fifteen. I have him higher

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:51.760
<v Speaker 1>than all of them. It comes with more prospect. Pedigrees

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>had a monster second half Greg, and he's someone who

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:58.439
<v Speaker 1>in that lineup in that ballpark with the White Sox,

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the White Sox legit have top five line

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>up in all of baseball right now. He's one of

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 1>these guys where you could see him take that second

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>year leap almost something like an Aaron Judge did, not

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to the same extent, but like forty five plus home runs.

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know that the other guys that we're

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about have that type of upside. But remember two

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago when we were talking about him and we

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 1>were kind of projecting, Oh, what is the player that

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he can become, I said Nelson Cruz, I think he

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 1>could be a two eighty hitter, forty plus home runs

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and one Ribbies, and like one of those elite four

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>category players, he's not going to steal any basis at all.

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 1>The other guys all do that. Well, I haven't done

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it before. Zuna hasn't done it before. Rosario, I don't

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:44.320
<v Speaker 1>believe he's had forty home runs so and again, obviously

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Elo hasn't done it yet either, but he's only only

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:48.920
<v Speaker 1>going into the second year old. I mean that line

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>up again, Tim Anderson, Joan Moncada, jose A Braave Edwin

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and Carnacio, Luis Robert and Elohiman is going to be

0:47:56.360 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of that. It wouldn't really surprise

0:47:58.239 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone if he goes out and has a hundred and

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty RBI's this here, I don't think it would. I

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 1>think it's upside is the highest of all of these

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:08.399
<v Speaker 1>four category players. Maybe a Juna can tip in eight

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to ten steals. Last year was kind of the outwied

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 1>for him, the only year that we ever saw him run.

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:15.320
<v Speaker 1>But if you're just looking at four category players, you

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:17.440
<v Speaker 1>look Menez has the highest upside of all those players

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about right now, all right tomorrow on the show.

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to a similar batchel of players

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:23.919
<v Speaker 1>that do similar things, but not similar to these guys.

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:25.400
<v Speaker 1>What I mean is, you're looking at guys to give

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you the best chance twenty show last week, but you're

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Fams, your Victor Robles, your Moon Loriano. I think

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:34.400
<v Speaker 1>all those guys are all in a group together, and

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's how we need to start off tomorrow's

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 1>show discussing that group. Um, I have Tommy found the highest.

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I know he's not healthy right now either. If he

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't healthy by the time the season starts, I'll drop

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>him down with the other guys up right now, Fam

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:48.839
<v Speaker 1>is my highest, follow My Loriano and Rolls. They're back

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to back for me. We have a whole lot more

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, a lot more outfitlers to get too,

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 1>or we're gonna do it all tomorrow on the final

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 1>day of the week. Coming out next it's for out

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Coast to coast. I will join him in our number

0:48:58.200 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 1>two to look forward to that. I want to think

0:48:59.440 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Sean and Alex downstairs, Frank Staff, I am Greg Sousman,

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll do it all again tomorrow. We hope. I want

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the next Daily Fantasy millionaire. Dunk on your

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:16.800
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>on FanDuel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:23.080
<v Speaker 1>with Daily rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>late swap support, and much more safe ten percent on

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot com backslash dunk to learn more.