WEBVTT - Can Consumers Drive Markets Higher?

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Chinnings Now for an extended conversation synthesizing this economic moment

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>with the Marcus. Michael Darta joins us this morning, thrill

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 2>that he could be with us with Roth Capital. Michael,

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 2>you go all hysterical on me here. You go back

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 2>to President Hubert Heaver nineteen thirty nineteen thirty two, We

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 2>had a tariff hike and they raise the marginal tax

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 2>rate on the fancy people. Are we going to get

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 2>a REDUCS on that? Or is that bluff and bluster

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>from President Trump.

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Great to be on with you both, Tom. You know

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a cautionary tale here, I think for

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 3>the Republican Party and the Trump administration because obviously, even

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 3>with this simmering down of trade tensions, the average effective

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 3>tariff rate is going up meaningfully, you know, the highest

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 3>one hundred years. So you have to go back to

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Smoot Hawley Herbert Hoover. President Hoover signed that in June

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>of nineteen thirty and then he also signed a gigantic

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 3>tax increase, big rise in the top marginal tax rate

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 3>through the Revenue Act of nineteen thirty two. The Republicans

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 3>would not see the presidency for two decades, and obviously

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Smoot and Hally got run out of office in nineteen

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 3>thirty three, never to be heard from again.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 2>I look at this, it's a great walk to a history, folks.

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 2>And the backdrop of this, of course, is a small

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 2>mayorship election in Omaha, Nebraska where the Democrats doun. Nobody

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>saw that coming but Michael Darter within the stew that

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 2>you're looking at at roth Capitol. Now, do you perceive

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 2>that tariffs will be pulled back ever further from the

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 2>ridiculous numbers down to thirteen or seventeen percent whatever earning,

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.519
<v Speaker 2>Tedesky says, and it will bring him down even more

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 2>so in the coming weeks and months.

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think Tom, that you know the China deal

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 3>announced over the previous weekend is important because those tariff

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 3>rates were clearly in the prohibitive portion of the Laugher curve.

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 3>You essentially had a trade embargo with those rates up

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 3>at one hundred and forty five percent, so no trade,

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 3>no revenues, right, I mean, this is a good lesson

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 3>in supply side economics. So getting those down to around

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 3>thirty I think is important. So it's still a big

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 3>step up in tariff rates from where we were prior

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 3>to the administration coming into office, But that backing down

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.839
<v Speaker 3>I think is important in the sense that if you're

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 3>just doing a static forecast for how much this could

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.399
<v Speaker 3>disrupt growth this year, you know, more of a more

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>of a slow down dislocation versus you know, potential contraction.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Pauls when he wants to jump in here and Torston

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Slack publishing seconds ago, we bring that to you, and

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 2>this goes right to the Dartak conversation. Paul, you look

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 2>at imports coming in. You think all the money goes

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to China. That's what the president thinks. Wrong, Torston Slack

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 2>saying fifty six percent of the money stays in the US,

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 2>only forty four cents on the dollar goes to whomever

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 2>in China.

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Just want to bring that up absolutely so, Michael, can

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 4>we I mean just as recently as you know, two

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 4>or three weeks ago, the recession discussion was certainly front

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 4>and center for a lot of investors. Can we put

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 4>we put that on the back burner a little bit

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 4>here now that the President is walking back some of

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 4>these tariff discussions.

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 3>I think so, Paul. I mean, you know, we came

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 3>into the year obviously with Marke it's very hopeful that

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 3>most of what President Trump was talking about on trade

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 3>trade was going to be bluster. And you know, obviously

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Liberation Day was a scorched earth set of proposals that

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 3>markets did not expect, and then there was some feeling

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 3>out for where the Trump put would be. So now

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 3>I think we know, right, I mean, the administration is

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 3>ultimately sensitive to what's happening in equity and credit markets.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 3>It may have been the bond market action in that

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 3>first week of April that you know, finally finally got

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 3>the President to start to back off a bit. So

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 3>I do think we can breathe somewhat of a sigh

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 3>of relief here. If you look at the high yield

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 3>debt market, you know, those spreads shot up dramatically going

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>into the first week of April, basically a fifty plus

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 3>percent recession probability that's now receded down into the teens,

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 3>if not lower. So that's quite helpful. Now, look, markets

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 3>can be wrong, but I think in this case, the

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 3>high yield market and jobless claims watch those two really

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 3>closely because they've been on the front edge of this

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 3>soft landing and resilient economy.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 4>So, Michael, in that context, here, how does a federal

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 4>reserve kind of look at the world here? How do

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 4>you think they're going to behave this year?

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think you know, related to your previous question,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 3>if you know, the tariffs alone really shouldn't put us

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 3>into recession. I mean, where Tom and I started talking

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 3>about this mood and Hawley and tariff or Hoover tax

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 3>and tariff increases. Really, the Federal Reserve was responsible for

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 3>torpedoing the business cycle in the nineteen thirties, allowing a

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 3>money supply contraction of thirty percent and nominal GDP to

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 3>fall fifty percent. Massive monetary contraction. So that's not going

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 3>to happen this time. But there is some risk that

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 3>the interaction between tariffs and monetary policy could create some problems.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 3>And really it would be that the tariff disruption lowers

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 3>the neutral rate, and if the Fed is tardy in

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 3>lowering the policy rate, the business cycle software landing could

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 3>slip away. Now that these tariffs have been scaled back

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 3>and moderated, that risk has declined, and the risk of

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 3>the FED potentially falling behind the curve is also declined.

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty comfortable with where the FED is right now.

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 3>If you look at bond market inflation expectations, they've been

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 3>low and stable, consistent with price stability. Nominal wage growth,

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 3>which is not going to be affected on a first

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 3>order impact from the tariffs, perfect running right in line

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 3>with price stability. So the Fed has the flexibility to

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 3>move if need be. But with the tariff threat being

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 3>scaled back, then there's going to be, you know, less

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 3>need for the Fed to move. I still think they

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 3>will ultimately lower rates, but they're going to want to

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 3>see a few months of the hard data in my opinion,

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 3>before they start to move, and that could put us

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>into July perhaps, Michael.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 4>How about the consumer here? We're going to get some

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 4>retail sales here later on this morning, still looking for

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 4>some decent growth kind of mind month of the month here,

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 4>How do you view the consumer these days?

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, Paul, it's just been amazing the consumers held

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 3>in there this well. We know the low end is

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 3>under pressure, but that's been the case for a while.

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 3>The high end consumer, you know, drives a bulk of

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 3>the spending, and you know, with the stock market wobbling,

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 3>that was a threat in February, in March, but we've

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 3>had this huge bounce back in risk markets, and at

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 3>least so far so far, the labor market's been pretty steady.

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 3>So I think that is going to be the key

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 3>going forward. Watch those first time jobless claims numbers. If

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 3>they start to break out, you know, that's going to

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 3>be more of a potential issue. But you know we've

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 3>held in there so far, so fingers crossed.

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 2>We'll see that in claims today at any thirty. Also

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>retail sales here. Thank you to Commonwealth for support of

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 2>all we do in economics. Michael Darni, whether's or rot Capital,

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>We welcome all of you on your commune across the nation.

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.559
<v Speaker 2>Goodbardy ninety nine one FM, Washington ninety two nine FM,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 2>up to Milanocket. We said the Celtics won last night.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 4>I did any one pretty decided? Coming back to the

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 4>garden Bloomber.

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Eleventh, three zero of the game, coming up here of

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>basketball in the coming days. Uh Michael darted Kenrougoff with

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 2>US yesterday and he reframed he didn't get on the

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 2>disinflationary vector. He got on the stable rate or higher

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 2>rate vector. And I'm sorry, I'm seeing it ever so

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 2>slightly on the tape. I got a four ninety five

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>thirty year bond. Should we prepare for a higher nominal

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 2>interest rate regime?

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think you know that is certainly a with

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 3>fiscal policy makers not really taking the threats seriously. You know,

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 3>we've seemed to have missed an opportunity here. I mean,

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Speaker Johnson has his hands full with just a two

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 3>seat Republican majority, and he's essentially been held hostage by

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 3>coastal Republicans that really want to boost that salt tax exemption. So,

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, Tom, it goes back to basic public finance

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 3>theory that I agree brought to possible bait. Brought it

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 3>brought us possible base with the lowest rates achievable, and

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 3>if you move away from that, the code becomes less efficient.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 3>There's really been no stomach to do meaningful spending, complete

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 3>entitlement reforms. So you know, the we're not on a

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 3>sustainable fiscal path.

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Michael, let me cut to the chase. Let's do

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 2>some Wisconsin whitewater academics here. Rogue offs with us yesterday.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Stiglitz is known for the little g The growth rate

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 2>is really really important when looking at the debt and deficit.

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Are we finally at the place where in America, like

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe say in Italy, the growth rate doesn't keep up

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 2>with our fiscal expansion.

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, look, we are on a completely unsustainable

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 3>fiscal course. I don't even really think there's a debate

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 3>about that, but it's politically inconvenient to deal with it

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 3>unless markets are forcing your hand. Are we at that point?

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 3>You know? I don't think we're at that point just yet,

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 3>but nobody knows when that's going to come. And then

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 3>if you're trying to straighten things out in a rush,

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 3>in a haphazard way where you don't have time to

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 3>think about what the proper policy adjustments are, that's not

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 3>going to be an optimal outcome. I will say this

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 3>on the ten year yield, you know, the yield has

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 3>been picking up, and that is creating some hand ringing.

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 3>For sure. That looks a little more orderly to me

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 3>with risk assets rallying and the macro data being pretty

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 3>stable on the hard data side in April so far,

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 3>versus what we were seeing that first week of April,

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 3>where the yields shot up fifty basis points over five

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 3>sessions with risk assets cratering. I mean, that is not

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 3>what you want to see. So I don't think that

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, we're in the list Liz trust moment just yet.

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 3>It certainly is a risk factor.

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 4>Pub Hey, Michael, we're going to get some initial job

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 4>as claims today. You know, a number kind of like

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 4>two hundred and twenty eight thousand, a number we've been

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 4>pretty accustomed to. How do you think about this US

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 4>labor market? It seems pretty solid.

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Here, It really is. I mean, you know, we are

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 3>in an unprecedented environment through the lens of financial history,

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 3>and that is the unemployment rate moved up eight tenths

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 3>of a percentage point from the lows of the cycle

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 3>in the spring of twenty twenty three to its recent

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 3>level in the summer of twenty twenty four. That kind

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 3>of a movement has never occurred with the unemployment rate

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 3>leveling off like it has over the last ten months,

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 3>has never happened. So this is really the first time,

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe in history, that the FED has succeeded in creating

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 3>a soft landing where all these recession rules of thumb

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.599
<v Speaker 3>have completely failed. I mean everyone going down the line.

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 3>So maybe it's luck, maybe it's skill, maybe it's something else,

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 3>but it's a unique business cycle and this labor market

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 3>is held in there beautifully. Now. Hiring rates are weak.

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 3>So if firing rates pick up, the unemployment rate will

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>start rising again. And if that unfold, then I do

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 3>think the FED will be ready to start easing in

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 3>a significant way, but probably not until we have evidence

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 3>of that, and so far we do not.

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Michael Darted with Roth Capital greatly appreciate it.

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.479
<v Speaker 2>Joining us Tanned and rest at Jed Soroka. He's executive

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>director of everything we do in the LA. The Port

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 2>of Los Angeles is the muster.

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's acre anchors.

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 2>How many total.

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 5>Employees at the Port of Los Angeles A little more

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 5>than nine hundred every day on those docks, more than

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 5>one hundred thousand people go to work.

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Hundred thousand. Yeah, it's just like genormous. Forget about that.

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 2>A few years ago Roosevelt opened the Panama Canal. You

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 2>were with American President Lines in the deep port of

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati on the Ohio River. What was your first day

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 2>like in shipping on the Ohio River?

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 5>Tom, I came out of graduate school in New Orleans.

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 5>The price of oil was nine dollars a barrel. Unemployment

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 5>was going up. We just had a stock market crash

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 5>in eighty seven. I recall that unfortunately, and I got

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 5>offered an interview because my dad worked for American Airlines

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 5>and I could fly up to Cincinnati for free. There

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 5>you get my first day on the job. I was

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 5>getting coffee and dry cleaning for the sales reps. Took

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 5>a car to get it washed. That was my introduction

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 5>to the shipping industry.

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 2>This is so important right now. Every kid out there

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 2>is trying to get a job, and what you used

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 2>to serve there is when they want coffee jet, it's

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 2>others to it. What's changed now in the real world

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 2>of the Port of Los Angeles. I mean sheriffs have

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 2>been blown up. Is every ship in the nation to

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 2>want to crowd into your port?

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 5>I don't think so. But there's a lot of product

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 5>on the ground in China that was manufactured before the

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and forty five percent tariff was introduced. Every

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 5>conversation I have in business is about what's next. Business

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 5>community wants certainty. Ninety days of this reprieve tom is

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 5>not a long runway in our business.

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 4>So what are you seeing when you I just envisioned

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 4>you in your office in the port of Los Angeles

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 4>and you have this view of the Los Angeles Harbor

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 4>and the Pacific Ocean, You see all these ships coming

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 4>over the horizon from China. Are the ships coming?

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 5>Not yet?

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Not yet?

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 5>And I was on the phone last night with some

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 5>friends in Singapore and Hong Kong and bookings are picking up,

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 5>reservations for containers picking up. But here again, it's really

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 5>quiet in Los Angeles today. By the end of this month,

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 5>seventeen of eighty scheduled ship arrivals will have been canceled.

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 5>Our volume down twenty five percent. But even as this

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 5>booking or reservation system has an uptick, it's going to

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 5>take about two weeks for the liner shipping companies to

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 5>reposition their vessels, and then once they load up the

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 5>cargo that's on the ground, another two weeks to come

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 5>to LA. Then we have to distribute throughout the country.

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 4>We still have even though the I'm not even sure

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 4>where we are right now, but I just I believe

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 4>the tariffs have come down from their high levels Visa

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 4>EA China, there's still way higher than they were five

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 4>months ago. So that has to impact just what Walmart's buying,

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 4>what every retailer is across the US are buying, and

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 4>what you're seeing at your port right right.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 5>The headlines from just a couple of minutes ago. Walmart's

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 5>CFO says prices will likely rise towards the end of

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 5>this month. Now, we have one hundred and twenty five

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.239
<v Speaker 5>thousand companies that import through the Port of Los Angeles.

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 5>They're not all the big guys. I'm most concerned about

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 5>the small to medium sized retailer. Your corner hardware store

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 5>has to buy now at thirty fifty percent, and if

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 5>they try to raise the price on the hammer or

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 5>the toolkit that they're selling, they can't because they're competing.

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 2>With the big guys.

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 5>This is a really tough position.

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Can you explain how the tariffs work? So, when a

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 4>good comes off a ship in your port, how does

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 4>a tariff get done?

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, depending on the terms of sale and the nuances,

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 5>et cetera. When an importing company wants to accept the

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 5>goods take them off the port property, they're given an

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 5>invoice by customs and Border Protection based on a harmonized

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 5>code and what products are in that container. Before they

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 5>can take possession of that box, they will have had

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 5>to pay that tariff.

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay, all right, so the importer pays the tear. I

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 4>guess that just happens, right, I mean, because it seems

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 4>like it's so fluid. I'm not sure what the tariffs

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 4>are if I'm an importer, right.

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 5>And think about the customs agent who's got to assess

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 5>what's in that container, the price of those goods, et cetera.

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 5>And just to keep up with this is I'm in

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 5>this business and it's hard to keep up your.

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 2>Point of Cincinnati, What was your first day in Shangh?

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 2>I like they send you abroad. You're the ugly American Shanghai.

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 2>You're looking for a cheap suit. What was it like

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 2>your first day in Shanghai.

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 5>Tom, I was thirty four years old and you're on

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:27.479
<v Speaker 5>the bund. The bund in Shanghai. Beautiful, the lights up,

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 5>the architecture, unbelievable. I had people like Frank Chen, William Chen,

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 5>Philip Shu just holding my hand guiding me through this.

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 5>But what they said was our hope is that you

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 5>can learn a lot about what we do here and

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 5>take that back to America. And for the guys and

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 5>ladies on the ground here in the US, it was

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 5>like we have a contact over in Shanghai. I learned

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 5>a little bit about how to move all this cargo,

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 5>Who's who, what we can do?

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 2>What an opportunity. Ring it forward now from the bund

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 2>down to Ho Chi Minh City down to the booming Vietnam.

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 2>That Kiming experiment right now identify for all of our

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 2>listeners across this nation, the China to Vietnam to US

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 2>trade moment.

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, this is interesting too, because I think many of

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 5>us were surprised once that one hundred and forty five

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 5>percent tariff was put in. The American importer slammed on

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 5>the brakes and said, I'm not buying because I don't

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 5>know if the information is going to change in two hours,

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 5>two days, or two months. So what the liner shipping

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 5>companies did was say, look, I've got to profile these vessels.

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 5>I normally make a call in Shahai or jah Men

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 5>and then come to La. I'm going to make another

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.239
<v Speaker 5>call in Haifunk or Ho Chi Minh City. I'm going

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 5>to try to get cargo from Lomshabog and Sodakeep in Thailand.

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 5>Because if I don't profile this vessel, it's a cash loser. Right,

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 5>I've got to get ninety five percent utilization on the

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 5>ship or else that voyage is cash flow negative. So

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 5>you saw people just scramble it.

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 2>So right there, folks as the window, it's no different

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 2>than the true from Dallas to Amarillo. You've got to

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 2>have a full truck or it doesn't work. Paul, get

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 2>one more, one more jeens.

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 4>So are what are you seeing today? How do you

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 4>kind of envision the next one month, two months, three

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 4>months in terms of your port of Los Angeles.

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 5>I think you'll see a little bit of an upticking

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 5>cargo Again. May is down precipitously with respect to volume.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 5>Folks are going to have to bring product in because

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 5>we're at a critical point summer fashion, back to school, year,

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 5>end holidays. We're going to have to have product on

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 5>the shelf and online to buy. The question is going

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 5>to be what will be the consumer's willingness to pay.

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 5>So the retailers are trying to do all this calculation

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 5>right now, and I don't think anyone has the answer.

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.959
<v Speaker 4>Is theres going to be any empty shelves in the

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 4>next several weeks months.

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 5>I think you'll probably see lower levels of inventory and

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 5>less selection. Okay, with prices ticking up just a little bit.

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 2>We don't care. All we want to know is can

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 2>the Padres stay with the Dodgers?

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 5>That National League West is something else? These guys, Manny Machado,

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 5>these Padres, I tell you want to live there.

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 2>The bottom line is all the superstars want to.

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 5>Live and that rivalry is something else. Locally, this is

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 5>the team to watch.

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Porter Los Angeles tickets. I mean they're right by the

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Tom LOWSDA box. Yep, yep, thank you. When are you

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 2>coming back?

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 5>We're going to keep up. This information is so fluid,

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 5>but I really want to thank you guys and Lisa,

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 5>You're amplifying what the ground truth is in the supply chain,

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 5>and it really is resonating with the people we do

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 5>business with.

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're trying to thank you. On Coast to Coast

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 2>Good Morning is on gin Soroka with us her executive director,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Porter Los Angeles. Lets not forget Long Beach.

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our Flat New York station.

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Schoe Meyer was definitive at the Bank of America and

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 2>in analyzing the consumers. So much of the Bank of

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 2>America credit card analysis she invented with her team. She

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 2>was stolen. It's like, you know, a trade with the

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yankees in a red sox. Mishall Meyer at master Card

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 2>Economics Institute is their chief economists as well. That's the

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 2>curiosity is what does master Card see? What do you

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 2>actually see in the behavior of American consumers?

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 6>So when you look at the trend in spending, consumers

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 6>are still spending. And I think that the retail sales

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 6>numbers show that pretty clearly as well. When you look

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 6>through March and April, March was revised even higher, so

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 6>pretty exceptional spending, and the fact that April was essentially

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 6>flat shows that you didn't even see a payback after that,

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 6>Like typically when you have outsized month of a month

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 6>games you see a payback thereafter. So looking through the

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 6>last few month on, certainly consumers are still out there spending,

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 6>and I think they have the purchasing power to do it.

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 6>And that's what we're seeing in our data as well.

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 6>When we look at that pulse of the consumer in

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 6>terms of expenditures, we see engagement consumer spending.

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Is that when we think about retail sales consumer spending

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 4>the folks that you know were you are master Card?

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Is it really just about the job market? If I

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 4>have a job, my spending ham much are pretty consistent.

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Is that how it works?

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 7>Or I think that is the primary factor.

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 6>It's do I have a job today, do I expect

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 6>to have a job tomorrow? And what am I seeing

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 6>in terms of my income flow to therefore accommodat.

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 7>Or support my spending needs.

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 6>Now, of course they're going to be influenced by expectations

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 6>so how you feel about the future. Are you worried

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 6>about the stability of your income?

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 7>Are you worried.

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 6>About higher prices? Which is obviously something consumers are worried

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 6>about now. The wealth effect matters, particularly for higher income consumers,

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 6>and the overall balance sheet matters too in terms of

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 6>debt levels.

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 7>But yes, I think you hit it.

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 6>Exactly right, which is that it's a function of purchasing power,

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 6>which is driven by the labor market.

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, you see a lot of the survey data,

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 4>whether it's University of Michigan or others, and it indicates

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 4>that the consumers is a little uncertain as turfs and

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 4>so on, and you know, all that kind of stuff.

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 4>How does that do we see that in retail sales?

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure we saw it necessarily today.

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, look, I mean, consumers have a lot of reasons

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 6>to be uncerted in The headlines have been scary and

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 6>they've been changing rapidly. So if you're trying to plan

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 6>for the future, I do think there's some.

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 7>Concern right now.

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 6>But you need what you need when you need it,

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 6>and if you have the purchasing power to purchase it.

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>You do.

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 7>And that's what the data shows.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I get hate mail, Lisa gets the love notes, Paul

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 2>gets the love notes. I get down.

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 7>I can't imagine.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 2>And the hate mail is Tom, we're flat on our back.

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 2>And this is what you're expert at. You invent this

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 2>a few years ago. How concentrated is our buoyant consumer?

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Are we down to ten percent of the country's driving consumption?

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Is it twenty? Is it? What's that number in your head?

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah? So yes.

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 6>The upper income cohort drive spending disproportionally, of course, because

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 6>they have the most amount of income, and they have

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 6>that wealth and they.

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Have the confidence people are I look at the delinquency

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 2>rates and all that. I know you don't want to

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about it. What percentage of America is doing our consumption?

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>It's teen sweens, right, Lisa, that's a technical.

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 7>Phrase, teen sweens?

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 2>How much is it?

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean if you look at the consumer expenditure survey

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 6>from the Federal Reserve, it will give you a good

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 6>indication something along the lines of forty percent of spending

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 6>is driven by the top twenty percent of the income distribution.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 6>That and they also have more consistent spending because they

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 6>can smooth through shocks. Right, You talked about the confidence

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 6>that is part of it. They they have the ability

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 6>to navigate economic cycles a lot easier because they.

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 7>Have a cushion.

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 6>But the incremental movement in spending is very much driven

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 6>by not the upper income but the lower income consumers,

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 6>and we saw a lot of that during the post

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 6>pandemic period. We're spending largely exceeded expectations because you had

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 6>very healthy labor market conditions, stimulus had flowed through, they

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 6>had a low level of interest rates, deleveraging on household

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 6>balance sheets, and lower income consumers were much much more active.

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 4>What are the leading indicators that you look at for

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 4>the consumer here?

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 6>So I would say, I love the fact that the

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 6>data is hitting right now because you have a combination

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 6>of amazing data sets, but initial jobless claims, so just

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 6>out I think are extremely important right every Thursday morning,

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 6>eight thirt Eastern, paying attention to see if jobless claims

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 6>are moving from the trend.

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 2>They're not commercial free for this half hour with two

0:25:55.960 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 2>important conversations. Michelle Meyer with US with master Card Economics Institute,

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 2>scheduled to be with US Elizabeth Economy from Stanford in

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the Hoover Institution in the Pacific rim as well. Okay,

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I have to ask because they ruined your weekend. I

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Michelle was like, you know, working from home three days

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a week, the whole thing, and they MasterCard ruined your

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:22.239
<v Speaker 2>weekend the tariff impact that MasterCard sees, what's it going

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 2>to be.

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 7>My weekend was not ruined.

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 6>I had a lovely weekend on baseball fields for my children.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 6>But no, I think the headlines are obviously essential to follow,

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 6>and we're doing a very close job doing that in

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 6>the Economics Institute. But we're also really trying to be

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 6>careful about swinging around our views and our forecast at

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 6>the Institute too rapidly, given how quickly the situation is evolving.

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 6>So we're living in a world of scenarios like I

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 6>think many others are, and we're responding as we see

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 6>the data change if it changes. And frankly the moment,

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 6>when you look again at consumer spending, you're not significant ships.

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 4>What's the key thing here for you know, mastercro when

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 4>you think about the economic outlook here is the recession.

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 4>Is the risk of a recession less today than maybe

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 4>it was three four weeks ago? Has it changed that much?

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Or again? Are we kind of trying to look through

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 4>all that stuff.

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 6>So I think one of the differences in my seat

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 6>now at the Economics Institute is that relative to my

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 6>prior life on Wall Street and most recently a Bank

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 6>of America, is I think we has a lot more

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 6>flexibility in terms of the forecasting process, right in the

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 6>sense that we have the ability now to look longer term.

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 6>We're trying to guide our clients and our partners around

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 6>the business cycle. Right, where are we going generally in

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 6>the business, likele what are the big themes, what are

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 6>the big trends Versus When I was in my prior role,

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 6>it was it was more markets driven, So you had

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 6>to have a view at that moment is there going

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 6>to be a recession or not?

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 7>And when is that going to be?

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 6>And that's a difficult place to live in an environment

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 6>that we that we that were coming out of.

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 7>So we've been very consistent and I think pretty.

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 6>Relative to other economists in saying we're going to monitor

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 6>the risks, we're going to adapt, we're going to adjust

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 6>our forecast in our views, and we'll talk about scenarios.

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 6>But the modal forecast, frankly, it hasn't moved all that much.

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Mischell Meyer, Thank you so much, Great Brie, Chief Economists

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 2>MasterCard Economics at Institute. Can't say enough about her visceral

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 2>feel for the American consumer.

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 2>She's absolutely definitive, and not only China, but this odd

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 2>relationship of Beijing with Washington. Elizabeth Economy Hargrove, Senior Fellow,

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 2>co director of the US China and World Program at

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the Hoover Instatution at Stanford University, and any series of books,

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 2>including Books of the Summer for Me and Books of

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the Year, were thrilled that doctor Economy could join us

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 2>this morning. Liz, I'm not trying to be snarky, but

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 2>what's next for China? I think they got a victory.

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 2>We lowered terriffs, we lowered the import text into America.

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 2>What is next for Beijing?

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 8>I mean, so, let me say, I know that the

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 8>narrative has been that China won.

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure there was any real winner in this.

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 8>I think China demonstrated that yes, it could go toe

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 8>to toe with the United States, but both sides, you know,

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 8>reduce the tariffs. You know, China had called for the

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 8>United States to completely erase the tariffs before it even

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 8>sat down at the table. I think people have forgotten

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 8>that an administration didn't do that. They did come to

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 8>the table with, you know, a pretty concrete proposal on

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 8>how to you control the feedenol precursor exports that has

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 8>been so central to the Trump administration, and they took

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 8>off all of the non tariff sort of punishments that

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 8>they had put on the administration, things like the export

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 8>controls on critical minerals and rare earths. So I just

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 8>want to I want to level set a little bit

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 8>just because I think, you know, let's understand the full

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 8>sort of scope of this negotiation in terms of where

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 8>China goes next. I think what we've seen already is

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 8>that China is going to move very aggressively to diversify

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 8>their exports away from the United States. You know, in

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 8>part there was a twenty percent drop in Chinese exports

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 8>to the US. There was a twenty percent increase in

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 8>Chinese exports to Southeast Asia over the past month or so,

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 8>and even I think in the sort of low margin

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 8>you know, factories, apparel, boys, et cetera. They're all talking

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 8>about how to move how to reduce their dependence on

0:30:58.520 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 8>the US market.

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 3>So I think we've really.

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 8>Introduced a pretty significant new factor into the Chinese thinking

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 8>about the dependence of the United I mean, about the

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 8>liability of the United States. I think that's the big

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 8>next thing for China.

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 4>So, Elizabeth, if you're China, are they looking to really

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of go it alone visa VI the West or

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 4>do they feel like it's in the best long term

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 4>interest to have a stronger relationship with the West strong

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 4>broadly defined.

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 8>I think they're definitely not looking to go it alone

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.479
<v Speaker 8>and move away from the West.

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean they've made a big play.

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 8>Over the past couple of months, you know, because of

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 8>the sort of overall chaos that the Trump administration has

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 8>induced globally with these global tariffs, They've made a big

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 8>play to try to assert themselves as the global stabilizing force.

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 8>You know, They've gone to Australia and said please join hands.

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 8>They've gone to Europe. I think they would love to

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 8>revive the Comprehensive Agreement on investment that you know sunk

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 8>about eight years ago. Now they love to bring that back.

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 8>I don't think the Europeans are interested, but the Chinese

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 8>would like to do that. So I think, you know,

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 8>their strategy is to try to present themselves as a

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 8>responsible and reliable trade and investment partner where the.

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 3>US is not.

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 8>And they'll do that, you know, with the dance market

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 8>economies and with the global South.

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, as we were talking and this goes back, I can't.

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 2>This is like when she was at Michigan as a freshman.

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 2>This is ten years ago. Elizabeth Economy here on China's

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 2>rise in Southeast Asia. One of the teams we're addressing

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Elizabeth Economy is that China has other outros. It's not

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 2>a bilateral outcome or dare I say unilateral for mister Trump.

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 2>And that you can funnel China trade through Vietnam, through Malaysia,

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 2>through other nations as well. Is that just a given

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 2>for you?

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think certainly we know that we've seen that,

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 8>and frankly, in the Biden administration, we became aware of

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 8>that when I served with Secretary Mundo in the Commerce

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 8>Department in sort of some of the critical technologies, like

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 8>advanced chips. That became a real problem because this was

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 8>a good way for the you know, to avoid the

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 8>export controls. Actually was US chips going through Southeast Asia

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 8>and to China. So that corridor, which you know works

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 8>both ways, can be problematic, and I do think that's

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 8>something that the Trump administration negotiations with countries in Southeast Asia,

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 8>with Mexico, with others, They're trying to plug that hole

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 8>to prevent China from doing that sort of third party

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 8>shipping through to the US to avoid any kind of

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 8>restrictions or tariffs or other controls that the US might

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 8>be placing on Chinese products. So to their credit, I

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 8>think the Trump administration is trying to manage that process.

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 4>Elizabeth, in the world of global technology, that appears to be,

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, a cold war that has developed is developing

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 4>between China and the West. A. Do you agree with

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 4>that and be how do you think that might play

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 4>out going forward?

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think.

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 8>It's important to recognize that China began the process of

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 8>sort of technological decoupling around Made in China twenty twenty five.

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 8>Back in twenty fifteen, and we've talked about that before

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 8>on this show. Basically China's effort to ensure that its

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 8>companies dominated in the manufacturing of components and ten critical

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 8>cutting edge areas of technology like new materials and AI

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 8>and evs, and that then they become became these Louisville champions.

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 8>So they started, you know, by trying to close off

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 8>their market in many areas so that Chinese companies would dominate.

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 8>I think the US has been more concerned about the

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 8>strategic and security ramifications of some of these technologies, and

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 8>so we saw, you know, beginning with the first Trump administration,

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 8>through Biden and now Trump again, you know, a dramatic

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 8>increase in the use of our economic tools like export

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 8>controls in an outbound investment screening, trying to move supply chains,

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 8>you know, out of any sort of soul source dependency,

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 8>but particularly in a country like China where we feel

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 8>that they're not a reliable partner, where they do use

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 8>their economic leverage in coercive ways. So there's been I

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:24.919
<v Speaker 8>think this this pull in this you know, a way

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 8>between China and the advanced market democracies. Whether that continues,

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 8>I think is going to remains to be seen. I

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 8>mean President Trump, you know, has sort of thrown a

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 8>rentional plan. He talked about this massive reset in the

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 8>US China relationship as a result of these talks, you know,

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 8>in Geneva's not clear what that means, but he did

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 8>say we are going to open our market to them.

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 8>They're going to open their market to US. I don't

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 8>know what he means by that, but one possibility would

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:56.840
<v Speaker 8>be to permit some of those companies, Chinese companies like

0:35:56.920 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 8>c at L, which produce batteries, to actually manufacture.

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 2>In the US.

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 8>So we may see some rethinking about that technology balance.

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Liz thirty seconds. Should we let China evs into America?

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 8>I have to say this is an area where I

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 8>think we need to protect our market and or we

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 8>need to find a way to, I think, thoughtfully address

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 8>the subsidies that China puts in not only EVS, all

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 8>of those made in China twenty twenty five products. I

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 8>think until we do that, the tariffs are probably a

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:30.399
<v Speaker 8>good move.

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 2>See how she goes British. There she goes right back

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to infant industry theory. Elizabeth economy, thank you, thank you

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 2>so much. Out of Michigan and how it stands for

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 2>the Hoover Institution. And I can't say enough about her books.

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I'll do something out on Twitter and LinkedIn and today

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 2>with some of her brilliant books on Beijing and their politics.

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Sign for the newspaper. It's going to get right to it.

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 2>She had a choice of like fourteen really crazy stories

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 2>today she would have down to eight. What do you got, Lisa?

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 2>What do you have this?

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:17.399
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 9>I want to start with some tech news. This was

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 9>a good one from Mark German. He says Apple plants

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 9>to add this eye scrolling feature to that nearly thirty

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 9>five hundred dollars vision pro headset. Okay, So side I scroll, Okay,

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 9>not ie roll that your teenagers give you my scroll? Okay,

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:35.959
<v Speaker 9>Like if you're looking on YouTube, it's when your eyes

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 9>kind of up and down and you can change the apps. Okay,

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 9>So how it works? Yes, you scroll through the software

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:45.439
<v Speaker 9>with your eyes on the vision Pro headset. Okay, works

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 9>across all their apps. What users are doing now is

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.760
<v Speaker 9>that they're scrolling with their eyes, but then they select

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.799
<v Speaker 9>by pinching their fingers, So now you don't need the

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 9>fingers apparently you'll just do the eyes.

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 5>But it works.

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Is all this stuff remotely successful? Not only Apple, but

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 2>Facebook and the others. I just I get the whole

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 2>dream of it. I don't want to be an old

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 2>you know, fogy boring born. But the future are your

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 2>kids using it? My kids have no.

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 9>Interest in My kids have no interest in it, but

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 9>they they've tried the eck. They've tried the eye tracking

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 9>feature before with the iPhone. I mean it was for

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 9>like people with disabilities and things like that, and other

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 9>people have tried it. But they're just trying anything to

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 9>get this Vision Pro like you know, the.

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Pro starts at.

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there you go, there you go?

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 9>Enough said next, they're trying to get some spark behind it. Okay,

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 9>So what does it mean to be a reader? We're

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 9>talking about eyes right reading a book. So the Financial

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 9>Time says that gen z could be changing the definition

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 9>of what it means to be a reader because a

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 9>lot of these are early teens to late twenties. Just

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 9>to give you an idea, A lot of reports show

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 9>that they're not reading for pleasure, They're not doing this,

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 9>but what Financial Times it says they are. Readers are

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 9>just shifting in how they read. So for example, they

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 9>like audio books, they like online reading communities, they like

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 9>heading to YouTube, social media, following book influencers. So it's

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 9>changing how reading is by books less.

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 4>And I'm really just said about that. I used to

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 4>be a very good reader, not a very good okay,

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 4>but I I'm not. And I say this summer, I'm

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 4>going to be reading on the beach. That's but I

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 4>said that last summer.

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 9>Is it because you're on your phone?

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yes, okay, yeah it's Joe wasn't.

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 2>All about this. And we're both actively reading at home

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 2>just as almost as a symbol. Again it's a protest.

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I would say, yeah, and I'm going I'm failing at

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:49.439
<v Speaker 2>home every day with the kids. It's like we could

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 2>see why look at that.

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:54.879
<v Speaker 4>You know, university campuses at one of the market centerpieces

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 4>of Loemost, every campus is the library. My question is

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 4>what function does A lot I very served today, I don't.

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 2>Know, you know, to me.

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 9>Next that was terriblest Sorry, I knew you would get

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 9>under your skin.

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 2>That's why I picked these.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Come on.

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 9>Okay, So if you haven't decided on your summer vacation yet,

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 9>trip Advisor has their annual summer Summer Travel Index, so

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 9>here you go.

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:20.720
<v Speaker 7>When it comes to.

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 9>Top global sum summer travel destinations for Americans, number one

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 9>is actually Cancun, Mexico. If you want to be on

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 9>the beach, you can't coun Mexico. Apparently that's the number

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 9>one on spot Paris, France. Second, there you go, Tom Third, London.

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:35.359
<v Speaker 3>So that's the order.

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 9>Now when you talk domestic like here in the US,

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 9>lots of vacant yes, yes, yes, Number two, Hey, we

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 9>don't have to go far. It's New York City, So

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 9>there you go. And then number three is Myrtle Beach.

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 9>But they say they also want yes, I do do,

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 9>and we'll do, we'll get the drive.

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 4>You can do everything there, Yes.

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 9>And you can, and it's beautiful. But would be they're

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 9>saying too, is they want more experiences. So I don't

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 9>know if when you go on vacation, if you do

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 9>the whole excursion thing, and like they're saying more people

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 9>want that rather than just sit on the beach.

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 2>That's the whole travel thing is turned upside down. And

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 2>I noticed in the inflation report yesterday airlines actually at

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.399
<v Speaker 2>a negative statistic. Yeah, it was down.

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 4>All the airlines kind of hould their guidance, lower their guidance.

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, newspapers. Lisa Mateo, thank you so much, greatly

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 2>appreciate that.

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:47.240
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal