WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Leary, Bicameralism and Monsters

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb, and I'm Christian Saga, and

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick. And here we are again for another

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>listener mail episode where we get all of the beautiful

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>magic that you send us through the Internet. We wrap

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it up in a tight little bundle and we set

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it on fire. No, wait a minute, no, we read it. Yeah,

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Well, you know, Carnie, our mail bot goes

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>through it first and then games what is appropriate for

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>our eyes and then brings it to our eyes. And

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.279
<v Speaker 1>he deemed some really good stuff this time. There are

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>some great letters here. Well, yeah, because this is incorporating,

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, our October month, so a bunch of stuff

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>about monsters. It's gonna be incorporating all the drug stuff

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about Timothy Leary, and it's going to be incorporating all

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the responses to the Bicameral Mind episodes, of which there

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>were about ten. Building I was gonna say, people, that's

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>like a hit, Like you guys got a ton of

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>mail for that episode. There are two episodes, right, Yeah,

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a two parter back in September, and I

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>don't I feel like I've gotten more listener mail about

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>that one than any other one we've ever done. Would

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>would you agree, Robert Um? I mean, I'm hesitant to

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>compare it to everything, but we did receive a lot

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>of feedback on that way. It's as if they it's

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>as if you and I spoke to them through their minds,

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, like gods. Well, we we do get at

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>least one message today of somebody telling us where they're gods.

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>So we're doing something right there. Well, on that note,

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>let's let's begin to roll through it. If if you

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>have not listened to a listener mail episode from us before. Basically,

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.199
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna do is we're just gonna go around

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the table here and we're gonna take turns reading listener

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>mails from you, and then we're going to discuss them

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. You know. Sometimes it invites discussion. Other

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>times it's just like, well, there you go. That's the

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the listeners statement right there, and there's not much

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>additional diet. What I love about listener mail episodes though,

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>is that like it's a grab bag in that like

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we get to revisit these topics that we've already covered

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in the last few months, but then just bring them

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>all together and what we've learned from them and what

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the audience has learned from them into this like goolash. Also,

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it makes me feel great because y'all out there, you're

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>just so smart, You've got great things to say. I

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>mean it, Come on, I love reading our mail. Yeah,

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we have some some variants and very insightful listeners that

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you guys make connections that did we don't when

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we're researching this stuff. Totally alright, Well, Carney has h

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>has ventured forth. He is holding something out here to

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Christian Christian. Uh, why don't you read us our first

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>listener mail? This one is glorious. It might be one

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite letters that I've received on stuff to

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>blow your mind. It's from Rick and it is about

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>our two parter on Timothy Leary and lsd Uh. He

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>writes to us, and he says, this is a bit long,

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's worth three whole thing. Uh. He says,

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to respond to the Tim Leary podcast, so

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.839
<v Speaker 1>I will here are my credentials. In nineteen sixty six

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>or so, I hung out with Leary dropped acid with him,

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>threw him out of our TP one night when he

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>got drunk and hit up my wife. We were living

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. Then I worked as a mime

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and a fire eater at the Electric Circus on St. Mark's.

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>We answered a casting call for a film being shot

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 1>at the Hitchcock Estate in Millbrook, home of the LSD

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>League for Spiritual Discovery, which we discussed in that episode.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>We lived there for a couple of months. That's how

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we met Leary. When later the film project fell through,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>we took our pay in the form of one of

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a number of tps and sets of polls which had

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>been made for the film. We pitched the TP on

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a friends land near Poughkeepsie and spent lots of time

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>off there. That's where I threw Leary out. In the

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>years following our sojourn with LSD, I relocated to the

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sunny Southwest, went to medical school, and worked for over

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years as an e R doc. I recently

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>retired in many ways as this trajectory was the fulfillment

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of ideas and ideals born in vision during acid trips.

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>To the extent your podcast was focused specifically on Leary.

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>You got it mostly right. Leary was a deeply flawed man,

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>But so have been many important explorers, writers, and spiritual teachers,

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and cult leaders and philosophers. He's kind of a bit

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of all those things, isn't he? Uh? Leary was not,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>by any measure, the worst of these in terms of egocentrism, greed,

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and especially womanizing. Leary did have many important insights regarding

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>human spirituality, and was better able than most to explain

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>these two would be psycho knots. I first heard him

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>speak with Richard Albert in San Francisco, I think in

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty four. Elsewhere I have referred to Albert and

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Leary as the Abbott and Costello of the psychedelic scene.

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>That's that's how they sounded in our research too. But

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in any case, I and many others were galvanized by

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the possibilities they loaded before us. I bought the book

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the two of them had written, along with Ralph Metzner,

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>based on the Tibetan Book of the Dead, that's called

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>The Psychedelic Experience. It was a how to manual, and

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it worked very well. I used it in many sessions,

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>whether I tripped or guided It provided a framework for

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the cascade of images and sensations LSD brought on which

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>could otherwise be quite overwhelming. It contained verbal maps and

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>navigational aids. There was a cohort of hippies to which

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we belonged, for whom spiritual seeking was a serious goal.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Some of us had left oppressive or unsatisfying traditional religions behind.

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>This seeking was not akin to the sex, drugs and

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>rock and roll ethos of many. The old saw if

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.679
<v Speaker 1>you remember the sixties, you weren't there did not apply.

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>We thought of ourselves, perhaps a bit hyperbolically, as pathfinders.

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Many modalities were employed in this seeking, including of course

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic herbs and chemicals LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, ayahuasca, and others.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>But as happened with Leary, other techniques often came to

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>supplant the chemical aids. The legacy of this is the

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>commonplace presence in our culture of yoga, Zen, Buddhism, tai Chi,

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and other Asian martial arts, Sufism, kabbala studies, et cetera.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>But I want to stress that the chemicals provided the

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>initial push to open the somewhat sticky doors of perception

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I should note that some of these pharmaceutical aids were

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>tied to specific spiritual traditions of their own and were

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>regarded as sacred. These were best used in the respectful

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>manner taught by their respective masters. This is especially true

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.799
<v Speaker 1>for peyote, psilocybin, and ayahuasca. We I think we mentioned

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that in that episode as well, right we're talking about

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>um how I think in order to legally do ayahuasca

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to do it with a member of a

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>certain tribe present. That's my understanding, at least I've heard

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that before. The experience of ecstatic vision is extremely difficult

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to describe in words or even in visual art or music.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Some of the efforts to do so have given us

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>parts of various holy books. Pretty Much every religion on

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the planet has a mystical wing and teams of prophets

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>who attempt the articulation of their mystical experience, and many

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>have developed technologies to achieve the experience meditation systems, ecstatic

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>dance or postures, sacred psychedelic plants, and so on. Naturally,

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>these technologies are tuned to whatever the particular religion or

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>philosophy or sect imagines God to be. If you're a

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>mystical Christian, you are likely to see Jesus when in

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>an elevated state. As a Jew, I once had a

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>long visionary dream in which I was a Maccabean warrior.

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>It may sound pompous to say this, but if one

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>has not had such experience, it's pretty hard to understand

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>descriptions of it. Of course, getting glimpses of the gears

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of the universe does not automatically make one a sage.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>The visions come with the obligation to fulfill them in

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>good work, as the Buddhists say. Finally, we can agree

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that Leary was not really a scientist. He dabbled in science,

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>learned some of its lingo, but science was not his

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>native language. What he was instead was a ring master

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in the magic theater for mad men only. He was

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a showman, and yes, a charlatan like any good Cartney,

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>but he had a powerful gift of gab. I can't

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>tell you how often I saw his book The Psychedelic

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Experience rescue struggling folks from impending bad trips. In Leary's model,

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a full on acid trip always began with a symbolic

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>death experience metaphoric or realistic, and this required courage and preparation.

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Leary's tongue in cheek motto turn on, tune in,

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and drop out, as I'm sure you know, drop out

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>referred to out of the machine, out of the exploit

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of culture. Well, we had a sign in the back

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>of our VW bus named the Collective Unconscious, which said,

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>turn on, tune in, and drop by. Thanks for listening

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to this reverie. Well, that's awesome, I I it's wonderful

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>to have feedback a from someone who who who was

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>active at the time, B who knew Leary and uh

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and then and then see had had these experiences and

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>can speak to them in this bit of listener mail. Yeah,

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and I loved that Rick was able to provide and

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and he wasn't the only one. We received a couple

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>more emails that were similar to this, But this was

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>this was amazing. Like I just felt like Rick just

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>encapsulated everything we were trying to hit with those two episodes. Uh,

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>there was this general attitude I think that you and

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I had at the end of it. We were like, oh,

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of disappointing. Man. Leary just really wasn't the

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>figure that we hoped you would be. Well, I think

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the advantages that Rick had here is and

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>he knew he was. He was their first hand to

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:48.719
<v Speaker 1>see learies flaws and uh, you know, the human qualities

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>that were that sometimes put him apart from this iconic

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>vision of him, where whereas we were coming at it

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>mostly with the the icon in the forefront and then

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>reading about the real man and the real struggles behind it,

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>so it was very textual. We didn't we didn't have

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the experience of the human character of his ethos. Yeah,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and uh, And clearly Rick has had more time to

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 1>reflect on who Leary was and what what he contributed. Also,

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Rick sounds totally amazing a guy who worked in the

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>e Er for twenty five years and has all of

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>these cool experiences behind that. I want him to start

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a podcast. Yeah, I listen. Alright, let's let's move on

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to another bit. Joe, what does Carney have for you? Well,

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought before we got into Monsters in the bi

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Cameral Mind, I would do a roundup of lots of

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>different emails we got on our episode about the Game

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of Werewolf. Robert, I'm sure you're excited to hear some

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff. So we got lots of great emails.

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I decided to try to summarize them into a small space.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>So our listener, Carissa writes about playing in an online

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>werewolf group, which sounds pretty awesome, but they've got a

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of amaze sing extra rolls in the game. Now,

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the standard roles in the game of Werewolf.

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>You've got the townsfolk, You've got the werewolves who kill

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in the night, and you create the mob. You try

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to find a werewolf and you execute them and see

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>how you did. There's also the seer, which we used

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in our game, who gets to ask every night if

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a werewolf. In Carissa's game, there is the Frankenstein monster,

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>who absorbs the abilities of every town's person who dies.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>There is also the teen Wolf, who is who is

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>apparently so excited about being a werewolf that this person

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 1>has to use the word wolf at least once every

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>day cycle or that character dies. Oh wow, that's that's ingenious.

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So you gotta find a way to slip it in

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>there without people always noticing. Wow, that's that's brutal in

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of game mechanics. Yeah, there is also the cult

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>leader who adds one person to the cult every night,

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and if the only townspeople left alive are all in

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the cult, the cult leader wins. Nice. It's a nice

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>game within a game. There So multiple people, including Daniel,

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>contacted us about a very similar online game called Town

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of Salem, which sounds pretty cool. Our listener Leon on

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Town of Salem says, quote, what's really different than your

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>live game of Werewolf is the lack of emotion and

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>human interaction. The ability to watch someone's face twitch as

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they're accused of being evil, or hear the strain in

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the voice as they defend themselves is lost, which really

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>changes the dynamic of the game. It makes learning the

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>minutia of each role that much more important. And I

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of interesting. I know some of the

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>studies we looked at said that they found similar dynamics

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>about what liars tended to do verbally whether the game

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>was being played online or in real life, and verbally

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, spoken out loud. But I yeah, I do

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>have to think it would change some things. I mean,

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:52.959
<v Speaker 1>in our games we played in here in the office,

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I could I could sniff you out, man, because I

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>was just looking at your face. You were trying to say, no,

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not me, I'm not aware, but you just you

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>couldn't help but grin. And with the grin, I knew it.

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I knew you were the killer. Who in the office

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>was like the best at disguising being Awarewolf, It's a

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>good question. It all happened so fast. I would imagine

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was bowling there. Boland would be good at it. He

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>would been bowling of car stuff of ridiculous history of

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff they don't want you to know. Yeah. Well, our

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>producer Alex was there. Yeah, I felt like he did

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good job. He was a great narrator too,

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>was a great narrator. However, as one of the bearded

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>gentlemen playing the game instant suspicion, he was aware of

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>uh and Alex commented that that our colleague Tar he

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>thinks was the best. Yeah, she was pretty good. She

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>was pretty good. Now, those of you who don't know

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>where that probably means nothing, but but let it be

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>known she is Awarewolf. Yeah. Yeah, yeah, Hey, have you guys,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I got another tie into one of the house stuff

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>work shows here, Have you guys heard that Strickland over

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>on tech Stuff has been covering this Mondo game board

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>game that just came out about it's related to the thing. Yeah,

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I saw something about that. Yeah, and it's apparently very

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>similar to the mechanics of Werewolf. Yeah, well check that out. Well,

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.719
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of games that that certainly incorporate

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a similar mechanic. I think one of our our listeners

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>actually wrote in about the Battlestarkalactica board game that came

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>out several years ago, Are you a Toaster? Yeah? Are

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>are you a Cylon? And actually encountered that game before

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I ever played Werewolf and had tremendous fun accusing, just

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>often blindly accusing friends of being a sideline, to the

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>point that it's still kind of an inside joke with

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>certain friends, whether whether their cylines. It seems pretty easy.

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>It's whoever is wearing the slinky red dress, right right? Yeah? Yeah,

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's sometimes sometimes that'll that'll key and but not always.

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>The best cue for for seeing guilt in somebody else

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is just seeing a slight grind, not a big smile,

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>with the person who looks a little bit satisfied with themselves.

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You know they've done wrong. Believe it's what Lady Gaga

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>calls poker face. Well, I think one of the things

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we talked about too, is that there's often a different

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>energy in the person when they have to go from

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>being on the offense to being on the defense, you know,

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and and you can see that energy change, and sometimes

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you can feel it. I could definitely feel uh, my, my,

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>my energy shift when I was secretly had a different

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>role in the game when you had to pretend not

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to be the werewolf. Yeah, okay. A couple more are

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>our listener. Heather mentions that she used to play the

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>French language version of the game, which of course is

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>called Lugaru and uh that's French for werewolf, and included

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the chaste or the hunter. And that makes me wonder

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>if the language affects the dynamics of the game. Is

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it easier to lie or to spot liars in French

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>versus English, versus Russian or any other language. I can

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>speak to this actually because I used to play Mafia

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not Werewolf with a lot of Eastern European friends, and

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we also played this game that they talk me called

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>my Hot Check, which is very similar in the sense

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that like it's a game about lying and trying to

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>tell if somebody else is lying or not. And they

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely were able to read me way easier than I

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>was able to read them. Which language were you playing in? English? Okay? Yeah, huh,

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>so like you were at a disadvantage being a native speaker,

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I think so. Yeah, Yeah, that's interesting. Yeah, it was

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun because maybe playing the game in

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in a secondary language, there's kind of this this firewall

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>built up there, like a linguistic firewall. Yeah. Well, they

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>all spoke English fluently though, and I didn't speak a

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>lick of the They spoke variations of Polish, check uh, Slovakian,

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, I just whenever they would communicate with one

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of them in those languages, maybe that should have been

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>outside of the realm of of the rules. And well,

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this is probably a deeper linguistic question, but do you

0:16:55.920 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>think they were thinking about the game in English? Oh?

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. I think they were thinking about Mafia in

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>English for sure, because the concepts were very English to them.

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But not when we played my Hot Check though the

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>game was invented in Russia. Oh is that right? I

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't want that fascinating as Mafia, like we we celebrate

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the werewolf fluff. Really if you want to get technical

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Mafia. It was the first one. Last quick note

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>from a listener about Werewolf. Our listener Valerie said, well,

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>she shared a lot of weird and interesting stuff about

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>growing up in what she describes as a dysfunctional family.

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>She says, quote, what I generally tell people is that

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>I was raised by wolves, except that's really unfair to

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the wolves. So I am now in search of some

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>wolves who might adopt me. And it sounds like, given

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>her life experience and her dim views on the nature

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of humankind, she is excited to play. She wants to

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>get into the life space. So she says, quote, at

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the advanced stage of fifty eight, I believe you may

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>have finally introduced me to the perfect tool for explaining

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 1>human social interaction. It's quite good. It really does like

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>make you think about your friends differently after you play it.

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's it for Werewolf. All right, Well, here's

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>one Carney is handing me. This one comes to us

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>from Melanie and she's responding to one of our Monster episodes.

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>She says, Hey, I'm currently listening to your podcast on

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>cute Versus Monstrous imagery, and I hadn't really thought about

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it before, but there are so many similarities there. Both

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>types of stimuli are meant to grab your attention, and

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of factors can push people to

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>feel one way or the other. Lots of people find

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>mice adorable, including myself, but others are scared of them.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm terrified of spiders, but I have a friend who

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>thinks they're cute. I personally even find snakes cute, even

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>though no one seems to agree with me. I actually

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>think almost every type of animal is cute, and yet

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>actual human babies just seem mostly annoying and gross to me.

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So I don't really Melanie, something's probably wrong in my

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>brain on that note, l o l uh. The fact

0:18:58.040 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of creatures seem to be able to

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>go either way, like the II. The I, for anyone

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>not familiar, is as this wonderful species of lemur that

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>has these big, huge, huge eyes, and it has this

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>elongated finger that he uses to like pull grubs, in

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>sect feel grapes and stuff too. I remember hearing that,

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe so yeah, but I mean it does seem to

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be a horrible hybrid of baby is. Features like the

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>big eyes are part of the baby schema, but having

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>long tapering, you know, long limbs, is not having short,

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>stubby limbs as part of the baby schema. So it

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>almost seems like, can you imagine a baby with long,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>slender limbs that's not cute slender man baby. Yeah, and

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.479
<v Speaker 1>it also comes out at night. It's a nocturnal creature.

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's one of these where when I look at it,

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>especially a baby obviously, but an adult I I still

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>looks kind of adorable to me. But it is a

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>species that has traditionally faced, um, some hardships because of

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>superstitions regarding it, and so they'll be like superstitious violence

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>against the II. Anyway, she continues, Um, Yeah, a lot

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of these creatures. Quote made me think of your previous

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>episode where you mentioned the woman who doesn't feel fear

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and how in the absence of it, she's actually attracted

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to supposedly fearful stimuli. That's the patient s M who's

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>got the lesion on her amygdala. Right, She says, there

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be these two mechanisms working in tandem, and

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>different people may have different levels for those mechanisms. Anyway,

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if I'm really bringing up any any

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>new ideas here, but I thought i'd write in since

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I found the topic interesting. I love all of your

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Monster episodes. By the way, I'm sad that October is

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>over because I would definitely listen to Monster Podcast year round.

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>All your other stuff is great too, of course, but

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a bias for the Monsters. Thanks for all

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the great stuff you put out. I listened to you

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>guys all the time while I work. Well, here's one

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I'm hoping to see in eighteen

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>is that Dr Anton Jessoph gets his own podcast. Well,

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. We'll have to have to contact the university

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>about that. See what, see if he can get funding

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>for that study. But yeah, I think Melan he had

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>some wonderful thoughts here about that that cute to monstrous

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>spectrum that seems to exist. Well. I like how she

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>draws the connection to that the case of sm that

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>we discussed from the other Monster episode, that from the

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>first Monster, where apparently in these cases where there is

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a person who has a lesion on their brain that

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>makes them enable or unable to feel fear when they

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 1>see fearful stimuli, instead of just being unaffected by it,

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>they're very attracted to it, like they want to touch it. Yeah,

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it just gets their attention. Yeah. So it's it's more

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that instead of it being like a monster cute spectrum,

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it is like attention grabbing stimuli spectrum. Wait minute, guys,

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you just came up with an explanation for

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the scene in Prometheus where that scientist approaches the weird

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>albino snake xenomorph and he's like, hey, little buddy, and

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he wants to reach out and touch it. Everybody in

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the theater is going, what are you doing? Why would

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you do that? Yeah, well, you know he was if

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>he was a biologist, right, So it's it's very likely

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that he and Melanie would have had this same idea that, like,

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>any creature is cute and attention grabbing, and of course

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to get right up there and you know,

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>let him crawl inside your helmet and down your throat.

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>If I remember that movie correctly. Anecdotally, Melanie's comments about

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>finding things that are usually perceived as scary cute and

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>finding things that are usually cute kind of repellent. Uh,

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that does seem to be one anecdotal case against the

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>idea that our categories for what's cute and what's scary

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>are biologically inherited. That does seem to be one more

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>tick in the column of well yeah, maybe these are

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>somehow conditioned in early childhood rather than received through our

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>through our inborn instincts. Alright, well, on that note, let's

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>take a commercial break, and when we come back, we

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>will have another trio of either listener mails or partially

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>digest uh, conglomerates of listener males, depending on what Carney

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>gives us. Thank alright, we're back. Hey, So, springboarding off

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>of that last listener mail about fear and lack of

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>fear and the fear of response, I've got a great

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:11.479
<v Speaker 1>one here from Jev. That's about our episode on the

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>science of It meaning Penny Wise in the movie It

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and uh and she specifically references the fear response system

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>that you brought up in the episode. This again just

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>really touched me, she says, the three phases you mentioned

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>lady Da, freeze, and take charge was something I experienced

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and witnessed during nine eleven. Now let's refresh our audiences memory, right,

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>So the Lady Da people who the way that they

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>respond to fear stimuli that's supposedly seventy of the population

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like don't know what to do with themselves. Yeah,

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the goodness I wish I had had my

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>my name's here in front of me. But referring back

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to the movie Aliens, Yeah, you use that as the

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>metaphor what was the name of the guy who just

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>freezes and Gorman he didn't know how to respond and

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't respond, and it weren't for other people getting involved,

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>he would just be eaten by Zena Morse immediately. That's

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the freeze and the Latti does like some of the

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>other soldiers. And then to take charge is ripley. But

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>so lady da is s of the population, freezes fifteen

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>percent of the population and take charges fifteen percent of

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the population. But we all like to think we're to

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>take charge, right, but the numbers are against us. That's

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what this is not Planet Ripley. Yeah. So, as Jeb

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>says from her experience with nine eleven, my husband and

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I lived south of the World Trade Towers in Battery

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Park City during eleven we had a view of the

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Hudson River where the planes flew over towards the towers.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>After I alerted my sleeping husband in a nonchalant manner

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that a plane hit the towers. He jumped out of

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>bedfast and looked out the window and announced, we are

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>under attack. This was long before anyone realized that. He

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.239
<v Speaker 1>dressed and grabbed my hand and started to run. I

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>complacently went along. When our neighbor friend came out to

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the hall, she asked, what's going on. My husband said,

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we're under attack. Come and she froze and said no.

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>We left her behind, and I found out later that

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>she curled up into a ball and cried and prayed.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>My husband knew exactly what to do, and I accepted

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>his directions without obstruction to his commands. I always thought

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I was conditioned to listen to him without question, which

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of depressed me. But after hearing your explanation of

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>how we react in an emergency, my experience came flooding back,

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and everything that happened I see now that my husband

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.479
<v Speaker 1>was in the fifteen percent that take charge. I was

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the seventy percent to follow, and my friend, who did

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>get out safely and was not injured, was the fifteen

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>percent to freeze. We're all fine, and nine months later

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I had a baby girl. Thanks for your podcast. I

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>love listening to you in the entire stuff family, Keep

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>up the good work. So I responded to her with

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>this because I was really touched that she shared this

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>experience with us, and it really put that study into

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>perspective for me because I had heard those numbers before,

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>but I hadn't thought about them as being applicable to

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>real world relationship scenarios. Right, and explains a lot of

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>everyday behavior that I often find confusing. Right, Like, as

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>I said, like, I'd like to think I'm in the

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>pcent that would take charge, but who knows, maybe I'd

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be the one who freezes instead. This is probably, I

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>think why people describe when they survive life death situations

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>as it being something that teaches them something about themselves

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't know previously. Right, because this is the

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>only way you can discover which of these three categories

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you fall into. That's awesome. I love getting messages like this. Yeah,

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, but it is true. You can

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you can put yourself in simulated environments and simulated experiences,

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>but you ultimately don't really know how you're going to

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>react to an event like this unless you're presented with it. Yeah,

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>like a fun exercises, like, think about our office and

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like all the people we work with, and then imagine

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>like a swarm of Zeno morphs take takes over the

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 1>other end of the building and is coming towards us.

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>How do you think our various co workers would react?

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Would they fall into those categories? Who would freeze, who

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>would who would uh you know, take charge? And who

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:17.479
<v Speaker 1>would just be like, I don't know what to do? Well,

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone's survival would come down to, uh to whether our

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>office manager has has had the office flamethrower properly serve

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>that is absolutely true. Our office manager Tamika would absolutely

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>be in the fifty percent of take charge, all right,

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>so some of us would survive. Well, no, actually I

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>can see what would happen, which is that we would

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>call a three hour meeting to discuss what to do,

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and we well, actually we'd spend several hours trying to

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>schedule the three hour meeting at a time when everyone

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 1>could be there, and then we wouldn't really succeed, And

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>so fift would make it to the meeting and then

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they discuss what to do, and then they'd get eaten

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>by zenomorph's man. This is this is the next day

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 1>wean film, and really Scott's wondering how to this? Is

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>it fresh? This is the shin god Zilla of the

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>alien franchise, Alien bureaucracy It alright? Well, Joe, what is

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>What does Carney have to do next? Is it a

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>single email or is it another partially digested mass. Well,

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how to do the bicameral stuff because We've

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>got a whole bunch on that, and I've got one

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>other email about cuteness and monsters. Maybe we'll do cuteness

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and monsters and then we can split up the bicameral

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>stuff over a couple more rounds. What do you think

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>about that sounds good? Okay, So our listener Ming gets

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us to talk about the cuteness and

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>monstrosity spectrum. So she says, hey, guys, my name is

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Ming from Toronto. I love your show and have been

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>obsessively listening to it every week since I discovered it.

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>You guys do such a wonderful job in researching making

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts that I've been recommending it to anyone who's

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>got an interest in things out of the ordinary. We

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate that than spread the word. That's the best

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>thing you can do is support the show. Very nice

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of you to say, sort of mouth, really is I

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>think the best way to let people know about the show. Yeah, totally, yeah, yeah,

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So tell your friends people out there anyway, ming says,

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to write in and mention something I thought

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of while listening to your podcast regarding monstrosity and cuteness,

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>especially in the context of Japanese folklore. One of the

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>things that wasn't meant and so the context series that

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in the episode we discussed various folk monsters from from

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Japanese traditions like the One and the Kappa and the Tingu,

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and with the One and Kappa specifically some academic studies

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>charting the path by which they've gone from being disgusting

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and terrifying to being turned kind of cute in popular imagery.

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I don't think I mentioned on the

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>episode that on everyone's iPhones we have emoticons of the

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Tingu and the One. I'm not sure about the Kapa

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>off hand, but I was. I was in there the

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>other day and I noticed the tinger. Yeah, tingos like

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the crow one, right, it's the like the bird human

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>hybrid that's often presented as this long nose, red faced human. Yeah,

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but the Tingo we were saying hasn't been quite as

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>cute ified as the other two, or at least there

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't academic work on it, right, because it was more

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be a monster that is more spiritualized

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and more regal, and more the property of the the

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>either the ruling or the upper intellectual class. So part

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of what we talked about in that episode was trying

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to explain what's going on here psychologically, what's causing people

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to turn terrifying and disgusting monsters into cute versions of

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>themselves rendered harmless and cuddly. Anyway, ming continues. One of

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that wasn't mentioned that immediately came to mind

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for me was the socio economic climate in postwar Japan.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>The aggressive cutification feels like, at least in part, rooted

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in a rehabilitation of the country's image. Aside from boosting

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the economy through cute consumerism, it may also be a

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>reaction to the sudden lack of militarism and nationalism that

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>was ubiquitous in Japan during World War Two. I think

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a really interesting thought, Like, if you're a country

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>where your neighbors, you know, the Americans, Chinese and all

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>these have come to see you as the embodiment of

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>imperialist violence. I can see how that might lead in

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the culture to a widespread embracing of cuteness imagery. Yeah, exactly. Yeah,

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I think she's onto something here. This is a very

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>smart observation that makes the status of the tingu all

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the more interesting, doesn't it. Because the Tingu is a

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>warrior being. It is a it is a it is

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a creature that that you know, warriors would seek out

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in the wild so that they could learn it's martial arts. Uh.

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>The idea that this this remains largely untouched is it's

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the the untouched heart perhaps of of

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese warrior ethos. Maybe along the lines of what

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Mings saying there was like a rejection of warrior ethos

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>after the war. Yeah, but maybe you know, it's like

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things with either cultural or personal identity.

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can some things you can only push

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>off so far, you know, I mean there's a certain

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>war there is a warrior ethos in in every human culture. Uh,

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just you know, to what extent is it is

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:11.239
<v Speaker 1>it celebrated to what extent? Is it confronted? Okay, for

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>this next part, you should find this in your notes

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and look at this painting. I paste it in so

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>ming continues along the same lines, if y'all are particularly

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>interested in the arts. One Japanese artist that likes to

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>play with monstrosity versus cuteness is Takashi Murakami. His giant

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>paintings definitely ride the line of cuteness slash monstrosity, often

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>featuring the baby schema, but with sharp teeth and bright

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>cute colors that are occasionally pushed to the venomous extreme.

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Via Neon, I am only slightly familiar with Mirakami's work,

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, this is cool. Uh. Friend of the show

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>ec Steiner is big on Mirakami. Yeah, I'm going to

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>get into him now, so she continues. I believe one

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of the key points in his art has to do

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>with the above idea of post war transformation of Japan,

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and he also touches on consumerism by categorizing himself elf

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in the pop art genre, one primary idea of which

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is making art avant garde by making it low class

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and making art for the cold, hard cash instead of

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>purely for art's sake. If this episode had an art mascot,

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it would be him for sure. Thanks for taking the

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>time to read this. Keep doing what you do. Cheers, Ming,

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So Ming, I really appreciated this email. I thought it

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>was fantastic and this painting is awesome. Did you guys

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>happen to see there was a Murrakami traveling exhibit at

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the High Museum here in Atlanta a couple of years ago.

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I wish I'd known about that. No, it was super cool.

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>But so this painting she sent, I've got to try

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to explain it. It's um, it's like a Mickey mouse head,

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.959
<v Speaker 1>but through the lens of a psychedelic warfare terror drug.

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's got a white it's got all the baby schema.

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>It's got the wide face that's baby schema, large eyes,

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that's baby schema. It's got low set features and a

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>large forehead, large ears. It's all the stuff we think

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of for babies and puppies. But it just it looks awful.

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It's eyes look very very intense, which I think is interesting,

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like it seems to be peering into you with its

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>with crazy intensity. One of the hallmarks, of course, of

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a baby or a puppy or a kitten. Is that

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like it doesn't really you can't really see anything

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>all that well, you know, it's just kind of taking

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it all in, or in the case of very young children,

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>not only making out blurs and shapes. This reminds me

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>of another artist that comes up on the show a lot,

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>another Japanese artist, Jungi Edo. We've talked about him before

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>his work on Gio and Zamaki, and it's it's similar

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and that, like he has that manga style that's kind

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>of cute, but then he like evolves it into something

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that's totally horrific. But I'm wondering if there is going

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a point where, like, for instance, Cathulhu h

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that Jungi Edo's monstrous creations will like get turned into

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 1>plush stuff, toys or something like that. So it's like

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a it's like a double reversal, right, it goes cute

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to monstrous and then back to cute. Yeah, the um

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>one of his like really big comic storylines is told me,

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's how you pronounce it. It's all about

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this girl who's like this, you know, cute on Ingenue

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>High School Japanese schoolgirl, and but she's got this like

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>weird power where she makes everyone around her want to

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>kill her, and every part of her body that is

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>cut off grows into another tony. Uh so there's just

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like he's got like like twenty five or thirty stories

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>about this one character and all the iterations right. Uh,

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:36.760
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it's kind of cute to horrific. Dra Yeah,

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating. I highly recommend it. Alright, Well, it looks

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>like carn He is handing me a couple of emails.

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>They look kind of short, so I'm gonna read them together. Uh.

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>This first one comes to us from Brett. He writes

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in and says, hey, team, I was just listening to

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cambrian Monster Mash episode and at the moment you

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>couldn't think of an app comparison between arms race and evolution.

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Surely the British utilizing ADAR would be an apt comparison,

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>as it literally added a layer of sight to the military.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm oversimplifying. I've stopped a midbike ride to type

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>out this email. Anyway, cheers Brett, Brett. I hope you're

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 1>on a sidewalk. Yeah, stay safe, Brett. I think what

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Brett's saying, and because we did talk about arms races

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and evolution, but I think what he's talking about is

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of sight that we talked about in that episode,

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 1>because we couldn't quite find a technological arms race analogy

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for the first the first introduction of acute vision in

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the history of animals on Earth. Yea, because the idea

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>here is that as animals developed the ability to see,

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>suddenly things that were not an issue become an issue,

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 1>such as pigmentation. Yeah, and so that was one proposed

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>explanation for what might have caused the Cambrian explosion. If

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cambrian explosion is to be interpreted as this massive

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>explosion of of animal body plan diversity, what what made

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>all this evolution suddenly come about? One hypothesis is that, well,

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is the first time we got I that

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>could see very well. Before that, we might have just

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>had like you know, light sensitive spots or something. And

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 1>once you've got focusing eyes, these compound eyes that can

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>really make out movement and stuff like that, you completely

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 1>change the playing field of what your competition for survival is.

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>This follows along the line of stuff that we have

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:20.720
<v Speaker 1>covered in other episodes, but also on how stuff works,

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>about recent discoveries into like really basic life forms like

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>slimes and how their cells can sense light. They have

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>photo I guess sensitive cells. They can see with their cells.

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So maybe that's what we're talking about. Uh, we're evolving

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>into pre eyes yeah yeah, or from sorry yeah, yeah, totally. Uh.

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And so the introduction of eyes he compares, of course

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to radar. I think that's a pretty good comparison. I

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>think so, yeah, yeah, radar, and I mean to a

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 1>certain extent, you could throw sonar in there too and

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>just say that, yeah, here's a way of sensing other

0:37:57.320 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>things that change the way everything has to hey, at

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>least in a war scenario for the radar. All right,

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>here's this other bit though, that Kearney has handed me.

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>This one comes to us from Jonathan. Great episode, guys,

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't expect you could make an episode on monsters

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>so intellectually stimulating. That's what we do. Man. Is this

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>about the first sponsors, about the first monster? Inspired by

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe's speculation on our first ancestors ability to imagine a monster,

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to suggest that it might not have been

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a single epiphanist moment, but that it evolved gradually as

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>our ancestors were able to remember and reflect on their dreams.

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:38.879
<v Speaker 1>They certainly had dreams, and certainly they experienced all kinds

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of irrationality in them. A creature with the body of

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a man in the head of a great cat wouldn't

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>be a surprising dream image, And if there's any substance

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>at all to the bicameral mind theory, the source of

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>images like this might have seemed profound. Thanks again for

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, Jonathan. Yeah, I can see that that's not

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea. Hey, did you guys in that episode

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>did you talk about the example from Buffy the First Evil? No?

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we did. I don't know if I

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>made it that far. I'm talking about it's pretty close.

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>She's like the final Big Bat. We made it to

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the end of the fourth season? Is that there? They?

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So the first Evil shows up in a Christmas episode

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and then, uh, it's the very last season it's the

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Big Bad. Yeah, Robert's right, And essentially the idea is

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's the very first monster that humanity ever encountered,

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and that we're all aware of it from our collective unconscious.

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 1>So I forgot about the loftier aspects of that season. Oh, man,

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that would have been perfect for this episode. I wish

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I had known about that. I should have in prep

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>for the episode, should have gone and watched the entire

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 1>series of Buffy. I don't know. I don't know, man,

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe just that last season. But certainly I love Jonathan's

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 1>point here because this kind of gets to This gets

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to an area that we've discussed before when when trying

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what ancient people were thinking off like,

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to to fall into the trap of just

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 1>focusing on one area of human experience and human thought

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and to dismiss, say dreams or as we've specifically discussed

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>creativity and saying, well, no, if they encountered if they

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>thought up a dragon, they must have encountered bones of

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>something like a dragon. Yeah. This is so not to

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>impugne the work of people like Adrian Mayor, who I

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>think is doing very fascinating stuff. But you know, we've

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about her saying that ancient monsters may have been

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>inspired by people seeing fossils in the ancient world. So

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you see a dinosaur fossil, and that's where dragon legends

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>come from. It's not that I think that that's impossible.

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really interesting hypothesis to explore. But

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm always a little hesitant to undersell the role of

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>creative imagination in the origins of ideas and stories. I mean,

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a lot of things that probably

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just come from people dreaming up weird stuff. Yeah, literally

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>or or or figuratively. Um yeah, I mean, and I

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>guess with a lot of this too, you can just

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of imagine that you can have multiple mechanisms at

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>work at the same time. The people are dreaming, people

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>are encountering the stimuli in their in their lives, and uh,

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and there it's also a certain amount of creativity going

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 1>on as well. Yeah, I just don't think we have

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to assume that somebody needed to see something like something

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in order to make that thing up. You don't think

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that HP Lovecraft uncovered like the skeleton of a half

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>octopus half man giant now, But you know, a lot

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things he dreamt up would have would have

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>found a fitting home in in the Cambrian era seas.

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh totally. But I mean you can totally see somebody

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>writing that article, right, Because we like to make connections

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 1>about inspiration so you could say, oh, well, it turns out,

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, what we see from his diaries that HP

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Lovecraft visited a museum exhibit in this year in which

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>he saw these earlier preserved remains of a Cambrian era

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>organism that had these strange tentacles. And that must be

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. You can imagine somebody writing something like that.

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm almost I'm almost positive that what you're positing

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 1>is true because I remember reading that HP Lovecraft biography.

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>What is it called. I've mentioned it on the show before.

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like against the World, against Life, I

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>let you borrow. At one time it was something like

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>not not I am providence for the other one. Yeah,

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the profound miss and throw. Yeah, but it mentions exactly

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about. Yeah. But but I'm just saying,

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you can. People love to come up with theories of

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 1>explanation like that, and a lot of times they might

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 1>have something to them, but a lot of times people

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>are just being creative. All Right, We're gonna take one

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>more break and we come back a final round of

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>listener mail here before we close out the episode. Than

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 1>al right, we have returned. Okay, guys, this is the

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 1>last one that I have from our October series of

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Halloween episodes. This is from Lily and she writes to

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 1>us about our six ghost Stories episode. And you may

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 1>remember that one of those ghost stories came from Malawi.

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 1>She says, Hi, guys, greetings from Southern Africa, Zambia in particular.

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I love your podcast, and I particularly love the episode

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>on ghosts and different cultures. I was very excited that

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you covered a story from Malawi, a country that doesn't

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 1>get enough global attention and one that I used to

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 1>live in. While living in Malawi, I also noticed that

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Christian religions were frequently intermingled with traditional beliefs in spirits, prophets, possession,

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and faith healing. Like you supposed, these two belief systems

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 1>are not seen as incongruous to most Malawians. British colonialists

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>tried to quash this coexistence by rooting out Malawi's many

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:42.240
<v Speaker 1>religious secret societies, but were relatively unsuccessful. Although the societies

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 1>are much fewer now, many of their beliefs and traditions remain.

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I did have a minor correction regarding your pronunce pronunciation

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of I pronounced it muthu rika in that episode, In Chichewa,

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>which is the main language of Malawi pronounced chi che

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Wa and many of the other Bantu languages in the

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Southern African region, h is are often used to denote

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 1>emphasis and are silent in most cases. Muta Rica is

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>not pronounced Mutha Rieka as y'all were pronouncing it, but

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:18.760
<v Speaker 1>has actually pronounced Muta Rica. Also, it's important to note

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:22.919
<v Speaker 1>that former President Bingu mutar Rika's brother, Dr Professor Peter

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Peter mutar Rika, is now President of Malawi, so most

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>people now refer to the former as simply President Bingu

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and the current president as President Muta Rica. As far

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 1>as I've been able to tell, Bingo is one of

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the most widely revered presidents in Malawian history due to

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>his efforts to make Malawi independent from Western AID. Many

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Malawians refer to him by his first name with both

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>love and respect. So that I think we might have

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the episode that the they were related, and

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that the brother that we were talking about as the

0:44:57.360 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 1>one from earlier who passed away, and he was one

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of the many presidents who supposedly was afraid of ghosts

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in the presidential mansion. She adds one more thing. This

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. She says, one more thing. Attacks on people

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 1>with Albanism in Malawi are relatively new and infrequent compared

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to other countries in the region. Example is Tanzania, and

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>many Malawians will tell you that it's not a Malawian superstition,

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>but one carried down from Tanzania and East Africa. So

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting because we brought that up as well in

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:35.399
<v Speaker 1>that episode as being like one of those sort of

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>supernatural beliefs that seems to be working its way into

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the westernization of these African states. Yeah. I mean, it's

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>always important to remember that superstitions, urban legends and in

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the various related uh uh energies. I guess you could say, uh,

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>these continue to move, they continue to migrate, and they

0:45:56.040 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 1>can and to to evolve with our cultures. Yeah. So

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:03.319
<v Speaker 1>that was the enlightening because honestly, like that was one

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of those stories when we were looking for in that episode.

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't heard it, we tried to cover a

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:10.720
<v Speaker 1>ghost story from almost every continent and it was really

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>hard to find a good African ghost story that was

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>translated at least, but this one was widely covered in

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Western media. Well, and then also more to the point,

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 1>too difficult to find authentically African ghost stories that were

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 1>not stories told by a colonial power. Yeah, there's tons

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 1>of South African ghost stories, but they're all based on

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:37.399
<v Speaker 1>like Eurocentric ideas that were brought there. Yeah. That being said,

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:40.720
<v Speaker 1>if you know a great African ghost story from anywhere

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in Africa, share it with us. We would love to

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>have it in our heads as well. Definitely. Alright, Joe Carney,

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the mail bot is presenting a large lump of of

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 1>emails to you. Hear what's going on? Okay, Well, so

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to address the bicameral mind emails. And since

0:46:58.280 --> 0:46:59.919
<v Speaker 1>there were so many of these, I picked a few.

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 1>We might not be able to get to all of them,

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>but we might, if it's okay with you, guys, split

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this up over a couple of rounds. Uh, Let you

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>read a little more if you can, if you can,

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 1>if you have a couple of more here, I believe

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that have been flagged by Karnie. Okay, so we got

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 1>tons of great correspondence about Julian Janes and the origin

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness in the breakdown of the bi cameral mind.

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>If you are not familiar and you want to get

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the full story, you should go back and listen to

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>our episodes from late September, but we will do a

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 1>very brief refresher. Here is the super stripped down version

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of the hypothesis. Until about three thousand years ago, human

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:36.280
<v Speaker 1>beings were not conscious. The evolution of human consciousness, Julian

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Jane says, happened in three stages. First, human ancestors were

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:45.280
<v Speaker 1>stimulus response machines with no inner mind space. Then, sometime

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:48.760
<v Speaker 1>around the birth of a language in humans, humans developed

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a quote bicameral mind, which means any situation where you

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>couldn't deal with the new stimuli through instinct and conditioned responses,

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you would learn what to do by here ring a voice,

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:03.879
<v Speaker 1>an auditory hallucination that would tell you what to do.

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And what was actually yeah exactly, uh no, no, I

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:10.879
<v Speaker 1>mean not usually at the time, so it was a joke.

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 1>What was actually happening here was that the non dominant

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 1>hemisphere of the brain was coming up with a response

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and then delivering it to the dominant hemisphere of the

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>brain as a spoken command that people perceived as an

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:28.319
<v Speaker 1>auditory hallucination, and they called these hallucinated voices gods and

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 1>then finally, about three thousand years ago, a cultural revolution

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>caused humans to become conscious in the way that we

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>are today. They lost the divided brain, they lost the

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:43.840
<v Speaker 1>hallucinated voices, and instead experienced this internal theater or mind

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 1>space based on metaphors, where mental imagery is viewed and

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:53.279
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical scenarios are worked out in the imagination like memory palaces. No,

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's basically like your internal mind space. Whatever

0:48:56.880 --> 0:49:00.879
<v Speaker 1>you're picturing, whatever you're consciously thinking out, what over hypothetical

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>scenario you're working out in your mind. That is the

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>mind space for Julian James. So James has vestiges of

0:49:08.080 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 1>bi cameralism still exists today and you can see the

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:15.040
<v Speaker 1>most acutely in conditions like schizophrenia, is that it's hard

0:49:15.080 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to try to get it all into a very tight space.

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:19.719
<v Speaker 1>But that's the short run. Yeah, and it's also it's

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's also kind of a story for why the gods

0:49:22.640 --> 0:49:28.880
<v Speaker 1>stopped speaking, first, stop appearing, and then stop speaking to humanity. Uh,

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>not not a complete like suddenly they stopped returning our calls,

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:35.600
<v Speaker 1>but they started calling us less and less. But we're

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 1>still living in a world and living with the with

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this legacy, these religions, these tales as me, these mythologies

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of God's appearing and speaking to humans and telling them

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 1>what they should do. Well, they started calling us less

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:50.799
<v Speaker 1>and less and we're still sitting by the phone. So uh,

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:54.799
<v Speaker 1>bicameral mind not an accepted theory. I'm hearing the soul

0:49:54.840 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Asylum song. I'm waiting by the phone, wait seeing for you.

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 1>But whenever we pick it up these days, it's a

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>prank caller. That's the problem. Not an accepted theory, but

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in my view of really interesting hypothesis, very clever, very

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:14.920
<v Speaker 1>well argued, hasn't quite met the burden of proof, but

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's worth attention. You know. Somebody on Twitter reached

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 1>out to us and was They were kind of like, hey,

0:50:20.640 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>what's the deal? Why? Why why are you ashamed to

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>stand by by cameralism. I'm not ashamed. I'm just saying

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>what I think. Yeah, well, I mean my my response

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to them was like, I'm I am. I don't admit

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to anybody that I think this is a fabulous theory

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and just instantly just endlessly fascinating. UM. I love to

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:45.440
<v Speaker 1>bring out this model when contemplating various things in our

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:47.840
<v Speaker 1>present world or in the ancient world. But at the

0:50:47.880 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>same time, I don't want it to be the only

0:50:50.239 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>model that I pull off the shelf to analyze things.

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So if I am, if I have, if I'm hesitant

0:50:56.719 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 1>about anything, I am, I'm hesitant about taking it on

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is my sole worldview winds. I think what I detected

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in this uh in this tweet was that somebody was

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:09.839
<v Speaker 1>basically working on the assumption that it sounds like you

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>are convinced by the theory, but you're hedging or something

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 1>UH to to say like, no, I shouldn't publicly commit

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to this. I mean, that's not my position. My position

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is I find it fascinating, but I'm not convinced by

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the theory. So it's not like I'm like pretending to

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:27.399
<v Speaker 1>find it less convincing than I do. I think I'm

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not fully there for some reasons that we'll get to

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in some of the emails I'm about to read UM,

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:35.399
<v Speaker 1>but a couple of people wrote in wondering if they

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:39.240
<v Speaker 1>have a bicameral mind, I think if you're asking that question,

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I think you probably don't have one in the sense

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:44.319
<v Speaker 1>that Julian Jayne's envisioned. Though it's possibly you have one

0:51:44.360 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in some other related way. Uh. Some people pointed out

0:51:47.640 --> 0:51:52.799
<v Speaker 1>interesting parallels between bicameralism and occultism and like Crowleyite theology

0:51:52.800 --> 0:51:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and Thelema. I don't know what you think about that.

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you guys probably know more about that than

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I do a little. Yeah, well, we talk about Crowley

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and Thalma and our Jack Parsons episode quite a bit

0:52:03.520 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 1>because that was Jack Parsons, uh theology. I guess that's

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>how you would put it. Um, And you know, it's

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting based on like a lot of the stuff that

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we've talked around about occult in various episodes. It's primarily

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:19.720
<v Speaker 1>based on a system of symbology more so than actually

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like people thinking that they're casting spells and like sumoning

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:26.239
<v Speaker 1>lightning bolts and stuff like that. So it seems like

0:52:26.480 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>symbology would work its way pretty well into this. Yeah,

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it could, I mean, um. A couple of listeners that

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this connection said something about inherent issues with the duality,

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 1>like duality being important to occult theology and that that

0:52:43.239 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, is manifest in the division of the mind

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 1>under bicameralism. Anyway, I don't know enough to comment about it,

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:52.880
<v Speaker 1>but I thought that was interesting. A listener named Shaun's

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in a great email with a bunch of really interesting thoughts.

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>In one I want to mention was about a possible

0:52:57.680 --> 0:53:01.760
<v Speaker 1>cause for the transition from bicameral him to consciousness. Quote

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the subjunctive voice. And that's the subjunctive voices when you say, like,

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:10.000
<v Speaker 1>if Christian were to give me all the money in

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:12.239
<v Speaker 1>his wallet, I could go by lunch. You know, it's

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the mode of grammar where you're entertaining a counter

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 1>factual um. The subjunctive voice is used to imagine unreal

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:24.640
<v Speaker 1>scenarios and worlds. Could this have been a way in

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 1>which consciousness took over the bicameral mind instead of hearing

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>our ancestors voices in our heads? We can now imagine

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:35.719
<v Speaker 1>if my father were here, what would he tell me

0:53:35.760 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to do? Or what would Jesus do? I like this

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:43.600
<v Speaker 1>because it touches on chronesthesia or mental time travel. Basically,

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>basically just the hallmark of human consciousness that allows us

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:51.919
<v Speaker 1>to try and envision multiple outcomes to a given scenario. Yeah,

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And a key part of what Jane says about the

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:59.280
<v Speaker 1>nature of human consciousness modern human consciousness is the idea

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of in vision in time as a spatial dimension. Like

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that's an important part of what the mind space is

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is it concertizes time and allows you to to sort

0:54:09.000 --> 0:54:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of view it as a space. So, guys, I have

0:54:13.120 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a crossover that I want to bring to your attention.

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I did a recent brain Stuff episode that is based

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:20.680
<v Speaker 1>on an article on the house Stuff Work site that

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:24.399
<v Speaker 1>is about some recent research where they looked at how

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 1>well kids are able to focus on various tasks, and

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 1>they found that children are able to focus better on

0:54:31.800 --> 0:54:35.120
<v Speaker 1>their tasks when they think of themselves in the third person,

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and specifically, like way better when they think of themselves

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:44.239
<v Speaker 1>in the third person as an imaginary identity like Batman

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 1>or Dora the Explorers. I'm gonna have to look at

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 1>this study because my my son has been doing this

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot, where he'll suddenly talk about himself in the

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:56.239
<v Speaker 1>third person as if he were a cat. Okay, yeah, yeah,

0:54:56.280 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty fascinating and it seems like it's somewhat connected

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 1>to this. That's interesting. I mean, part of the part,

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:04.799
<v Speaker 1>part of the whole thing in Jane's case about bicameralism

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:07.279
<v Speaker 1>is like the idea of identity in the self and

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:10.600
<v Speaker 1>so like One of the things he identifies as regression

0:55:10.640 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 1>towards the bicameral mind and people with modern cases of

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 1>schizophrenia is not just hearing voices in the head, but

0:55:17.880 --> 0:55:22.760
<v Speaker 1>also the dissociation or the dissolution of the sense of self. Yeah,

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like that they sometimes lose a sense of first person. Well,

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:30.319
<v Speaker 1>in this case, I believe that the researchers theorized that

0:55:30.400 --> 0:55:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the reason why Batman and Dora the Explorer were examples

0:55:33.480 --> 0:55:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that worked so well for this was because the characters

0:55:35.840 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 1>themselves embodied hard work, whereas like if they were if

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the kids were just you know, in their own first

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:46.440
<v Speaker 1>person subjective point of view, they were more likely to

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 1>blow it off. Well, I mean, I wonder if this

0:55:48.239 --> 0:55:50.880
<v Speaker 1>could be compared to Jane's idea of what the ancient

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:53.919
<v Speaker 1>poets were like. So were the ancient poet might say,

0:55:54.080 --> 0:55:56.759
<v Speaker 1>might not say I need to work hard to compose

0:55:56.840 --> 0:55:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a poem, but say, I am about to be possessed

0:56:00.160 --> 0:56:04.120
<v Speaker 1>by this third entity, the muse, and the muse is

0:56:04.160 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 1>going to speak a poem through me. And actually what's

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 1>happening is it's coming out of their non dominant hemisphere.

0:56:10.440 --> 0:56:13.800
<v Speaker 1>They are composing a poem, but they find it much easier,

0:56:13.840 --> 0:56:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're very fluid, and it just comes right

0:56:16.280 --> 0:56:19.400
<v Speaker 1>out in meter and rhyme and all that as composed

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 1>by this god the muse. I think we're onto something here, Uh,

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:25.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody out there, you might get a dissertation out of this.

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'll try to do one more for this round.

0:56:29.200 --> 0:56:31.239
<v Speaker 1>And this is going to be from our listener, Amanda,

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:34.600
<v Speaker 1>who says, hey, guys, my name is Amanda. I'm from

0:56:34.640 --> 0:56:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Canada and religiously listen to your podcast. In regards to

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the latest two part podcast by camera by Cameralism, I

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:44.279
<v Speaker 1>have a thought and question. When James describes consciousness, it

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:47.360
<v Speaker 1>almost seemed like the ability to conjure a mental image,

0:56:47.400 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>among other things. I was wondering if he had any

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:54.440
<v Speaker 1>ideas about people with a fantasia this is the inability

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to form mental images. Yeah, going back to a recent

0:56:57.040 --> 0:56:59.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast of not that recent, sometimes in the past year

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 1>or a couple of years. Um, if they are unable

0:57:03.000 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a mental image, does that mean they still

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have a bicameral mind or where does that leave them

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in the spectrum. I thought this was a really interesting

0:57:11.200 --> 0:57:13.560
<v Speaker 1>question because at first I would say, no, I do

0:57:13.640 --> 0:57:15.720
<v Speaker 1>not think that means they have a bi cameral mind.

0:57:16.080 --> 0:57:18.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it would almost seem to me that they

0:57:18.880 --> 0:57:22.120
<v Speaker 1>would be something like the very opposite of having a

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:25.960
<v Speaker 1>bicameral mind, like because one of the things that uh,

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 1>some people report when they're they're describing their experiences with

0:57:29.400 --> 0:57:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a fantasia is they don't necessarily understand the difference between

0:57:33.240 --> 0:57:36.960
<v Speaker 1>mental imagery and hallucination. You know. Sometimes they'll say, like,

0:57:37.000 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, you're seeing something that's not there, and

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of hard to explain, right, You're like, well,

0:57:42.800 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not seeing it among all the things I'm seeing

0:57:45.600 --> 0:57:48.200
<v Speaker 1>with my eyes. I'm seeing it in another place in

0:57:48.280 --> 0:57:51.520
<v Speaker 1>my mind or something which would be according to Jane's

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 1>your mind space. But yeah, I thought this was a

0:57:54.000 --> 0:57:57.520
<v Speaker 1>really interesting question, and I think this this kind of question,

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I think does highlight some of the big holes in

0:58:01.120 --> 0:58:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the picture of bicameralism. Like as as interesting as the

0:58:06.000 --> 0:58:08.680
<v Speaker 1>theory is, there are just a lot of questions you

0:58:08.720 --> 0:58:10.720
<v Speaker 1>can ask about it. They're like, huh, I wonder how

0:58:10.800 --> 0:58:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that fits in it. It doesn't really seem to give

0:58:13.120 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>with the whole the whole theory. Huh. Okay, So well,

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 1>this this makes me wonder about about Gozer's roll and

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:24.040
<v Speaker 1>all of this because I've previously commented, at least on

0:58:24.080 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the blog and maybe on the show that if Goes

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:30.280
<v Speaker 1>are the Gazarian UH came and appeared to a bunch

0:58:30.360 --> 0:58:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of individuals with a fantasia and said, um, choose the

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 1>form of the destructor. UH, they would maybe not be

0:58:37.960 --> 0:58:39.680
<v Speaker 1>able to choose the form of the destructor because they

0:58:39.680 --> 0:58:41.360
<v Speaker 1>would move able to form a mental image of the

0:58:41.360 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 1>state puff marshmallow Man. So that aside what happened, because

0:58:46.640 --> 0:58:48.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the whole thing and Ghostbusters just goes rough.

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:52.840
<v Speaker 1>The Gozarian has appeared to ancient people, right, I mean,

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's essentially like a Babylonian, ancient Babylonian entity. So

0:58:58.200 --> 0:59:02.920
<v Speaker 1>what was Gozer's interaction with an ancient bicameral people. I

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:05.920
<v Speaker 1>always thought that the form that goes Or took when

0:59:05.920 --> 0:59:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they first encounter her was that was that. I don't

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:12.160
<v Speaker 1>know if there was that much thought put into the script,

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:14.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think I think there was. I think there

0:59:14.960 --> 0:59:16.680
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of it. When they encounter and she's

0:59:16.720 --> 0:59:19.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of got like the like makeup in the weird

0:59:19.200 --> 0:59:22.800
<v Speaker 1>like tattered mummy outfit. That's what I thought was that

0:59:22.880 --> 0:59:25.640
<v Speaker 1>was the Babylonian manifestation, and then she was like, oh,

0:59:25.760 --> 0:59:29.240
<v Speaker 1>for this present day, you need something else. Yeah, maybe

0:59:29.320 --> 0:59:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. It's like, goes are realized humans today

0:59:33.320 --> 0:59:36.439
<v Speaker 1>are a rather different organism in the way that they're

0:59:36.480 --> 0:59:39.680
<v Speaker 1>they're thinking, and like, clearly she can read their thoughts

0:59:39.680 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and she's interacting with something that seems entirely different. I

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:45.840
<v Speaker 1>must update my form to match this new form of

0:59:45.920 --> 0:59:49.240
<v Speaker 1>human cognition. Unfortunately, it didn't work out very well for No,

0:59:49.520 --> 0:59:52.040
<v Speaker 1>No did not work. She's clearly she's just not an

0:59:52.120 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 1>entity for a post bicameral world. The one interesting comparison

0:59:57.080 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of now between a fantasia and by moralism

1:00:00.760 --> 1:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is the presence of the internal monologue. You know, we're

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>reading about a lot of people talking about their experience

1:00:07.240 --> 1:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of living with a fantasia. You know, they say, well,

1:00:09.280 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I never picture things in my head or I almost

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>never do with any kind of lucidity. But instead, what

1:00:15.400 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I sort of hear when I'm thinking are words like

1:00:18.080 --> 1:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I hear an internal monologue talking through the things I'm

1:00:21.480 --> 1:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about, like a thought balloon in a comic. Right. Well,

1:00:24.120 --> 1:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>one of our listeners asked this question after the episode

1:00:27.920 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they said, what is what is the voice that you

1:00:31.840 --> 1:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>hear in your head when you're reading something? You know?

1:00:34.920 --> 1:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And that that kind of throws you for a loop

1:00:37.160 --> 1:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>because obviously, if you're reading, if you're reading, say, Hunter

1:00:39.960 --> 1:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>s Thompson book, you might be inclined to hear it

1:00:43.120 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and Hunter S Thompson's voice, or at least in Johnny

1:00:45.800 --> 1:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>depths Hunter Hunter s Thompson voice. But if you're reading

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>something else that you have no frame of reference for,

1:00:52.280 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's not the voice of a specific character, if

1:00:54.920 --> 1:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just the narrator, what is that quote unquote voice? Well,

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think Jane's might have said that a

1:01:01.800 --> 1:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>possibility is when ancient people's read before the transition away

1:01:05.760 --> 1:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>from the bicameral mind, instead of being conscious of reading,

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what was happening was they were hearing a god speak

1:01:13.720 --> 1:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the words to them as their eyes read them off

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the page. And that would certainly match up two with

1:01:20.240 --> 1:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>just the we we touched on this, and we discussed

1:01:23.560 --> 1:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this in the episode, the reverence for written languages and

1:01:27.240 --> 1:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>uh and and hard coded symbols. Yeah, all right, well,

1:01:30.600 --> 1:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it looks like Carni's handing me another male here. I'm

1:01:34.440 --> 1:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna read it here. This is from you have Guinea,

1:01:37.000 --> 1:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you have Guinea rights, and it says, writing you from

1:01:39.440 --> 1:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the cold coasts of the Baltic Sea, my name, name

1:01:42.920 --> 1:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>is you have Guinea. You have Guinea, or as I

1:01:45.480 --> 1:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>usually present myself for non Slavic speakers, Jeff, I've been

1:01:50.080 --> 1:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>occasionally binging on stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast since

1:01:53.240 --> 1:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen, but the recent episode on bicameral Mind,

1:01:56.800 --> 1:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a concept to which I introduced myself via uh echo

1:02:00.960 --> 1:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>praxia from Peter Watts, made me finally write you. In

1:02:05.280 --> 1:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you mentioned that reading literature written by the

1:02:08.320 --> 1:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>authors of the Times covered by meters of dust give

1:02:12.040 --> 1:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you an uncanny feeling that you were reading something alien,

1:02:15.240 --> 1:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>as if a person's thought process is quite different from

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>your own. So I was wondering if you could share

1:02:20.760 --> 1:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what piece of literature you were referring to specifically. I

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>know I was thinking of like ancient Babylonian and ancient

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Assyrian literature, so like calling back to some of the

1:02:30.480 --> 1:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>text that we we discussed in the Tower of Babel episodes.

1:02:34.000 --> 1:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>The Tower of Babel episode, I think I also mentioned

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple in the first Monster episode when I when

1:02:39.200 --> 1:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I read those texts. I often have this feeling of

1:02:43.320 --> 1:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's just something that's getting lost

1:02:45.720 --> 1:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in translation, or if it really is I'm genuinely detecting

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that a different kind of human mind produced these things

1:02:54.480 --> 1:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>than the minds of people living today. And I don't

1:02:57.040 --> 1:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>mean just like a different culture. I mean like like

1:03:00.560 --> 1:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>there there is no culture on earth today that feels

1:03:03.800 --> 1:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>like the mind that produced these Yeah, yeah, I know,

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I know. In the episode, we specifically mentioned the Iliad

1:03:10.920 --> 1:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>because the Illiot is an example that the Janes refers to.

1:03:14.760 --> 1:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>You know what's interesting about that as I actually, in

1:03:17.720 --> 1:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>my past life worked on a book that was analyzing

1:03:22.880 --> 1:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a translation of the oldest copy of the Iliot in existence. Yeah,

1:03:27.600 --> 1:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was I don't speak a lick of Greek,

1:03:30.160 --> 1:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but this was The people who were writing the book

1:03:32.640 --> 1:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>were all classical Greek scholars. They're translating it. My job

1:03:35.920 --> 1:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>was to like put the pages down and make it

1:03:37.840 --> 1:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>look nice and everything. And for me, I remember looking

1:03:40.640 --> 1:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>at these pages and thinking like this is no pun intended,

1:03:44.640 --> 1:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>not the whole, like it's all Greek to me, but

1:03:46.200 --> 1:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>literally like it looks alien. Yeah, you know, I should

1:03:49.920 --> 1:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>throw in real quick. In the original bi camera mind episode,

1:03:52.440 --> 1:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that there's a book titled The Rage of

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Achilles by Terence Hawkins that updates the Elliot for modern

1:03:59.120 --> 1:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>readers and incorporate the bicameral mind. Uh. I have since

1:04:02.400 --> 1:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>read that book and I highly recommend it. I have

1:04:05.920 --> 1:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of a mini review of it. Unstuff to blow

1:04:07.600 --> 1:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>your mind dot com. One thing I do want to say,

1:04:09.760 --> 1:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in addition to what I just said is that it

1:04:11.520 --> 1:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>does seem time dependent this alien things. So when you

1:04:14.320 --> 1:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>read this really really ancient Assyrian Babylonian literature and stuff,

1:04:18.320 --> 1:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't detect the same stuff from like Iron Age

1:04:21.880 --> 1:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>literature of the same region. That seems more like that

1:04:24.480 --> 1:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>seems familiar. So if Jenny says thanks and then he

1:04:27.160 --> 1:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>has by the way that he adds, would you consider

1:04:29.960 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>making an episode on Peter Watt's writing, especially the Blind

1:04:33.400 --> 1:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Site and Echo Proxy of vampire space travel aliens, all

1:04:37.760 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>packed in the hardest sci fi that our marine biologists

1:04:40.840 --> 1:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>could produce. Sounds like just the stuff to blow anyone's mind. Uh.

1:04:45.760 --> 1:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And an additional by the way, great, thanks for the

1:04:48.920 --> 1:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>things you do. You are a true inspiration. We covered

1:04:52.080 --> 1:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Blind Site in one of our summer reading episodes, but

1:04:56.400 --> 1:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>my piction fit, my piction pick, my fiction pick this year. Yeah,

1:05:01.080 --> 1:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and I read it as well. Yeah, it's a fabulous book.

1:05:03.560 --> 1:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I have not read any of the subsequent entries in

1:05:06.320 --> 1:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that series. You guys haven't done a science of it yet. No,

1:05:08.920 --> 1:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we haven't, so I've gotten I've got a copy of

1:05:11.160 --> 1:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Echo Praxia. It's sitting on my table and I was

1:05:13.400 --> 1:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>planning to start reading it next week independent of this email.

1:05:17.400 --> 1:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So uh yeah, obviously, Jet, Jeff, you have guinea. You

1:05:22.320 --> 1:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>should go back and listen to our episode, our summer

1:05:25.360 --> 1:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>reading episode this year. And yeah, yeah, we get into

1:05:27.400 --> 1:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit. We try to avoid spoilers. I

1:05:29.600 --> 1:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what to do about novels like that.

1:05:31.840 --> 1:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>We're discussing the science of it is inherently to spoil

1:05:36.240 --> 1:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the plot of the book. But uh yeah, maybe we'll

1:05:39.320 --> 1:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>have to do some kind of bonus spoiler laden discussion

1:05:42.480 --> 1:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of it for people who have read it or don't

1:05:44.120 --> 1:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>plan to read it. And uh and talk about all

1:05:46.680 --> 1:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of the weird stuff about consciousness and biology. All right, Jody,

1:05:50.200 --> 1:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have us some more bicameral feedback here to share before

1:05:53.400 --> 1:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Carney tells us our time is up. Yeah, a couple

1:05:55.760 --> 1:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of quick things if you guys don't mind. One of

1:05:58.240 --> 1:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>them is from our listener Milanie, who says some very

1:06:00.680 --> 1:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>nice things. Wanted to talk about bi cameralism, and she says,

1:06:03.480 --> 1:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I think people seem to strive for a lack of

1:06:05.920 --> 1:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>conscious thoughts sometimes, such as meditation or the much sought

1:06:09.840 --> 1:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>after flow state. I'm an illustrator, and a lot of

1:06:13.760 --> 1:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>my work inking, coloring, rendering, etcetera. Can be done somewhat

1:06:17.560 --> 1:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on autopilot without a lot of conscious thought. In fact,

1:06:21.160 --> 1:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it's often harder to create when I'm overthinking it, and

1:06:24.440 --> 1:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>without a lot of stimulation, my conscious mind gets bored

1:06:28.200 --> 1:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>rather quickly. That's actually where you come in. For the

1:06:32.000 --> 1:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>past few months, I've been listening to podcasts as I work,

1:06:34.640 --> 1:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>mostly stuff to blow your mind, which keeps the active

1:06:37.440 --> 1:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>part of my brain occupied and interested so that my

1:06:39.920 --> 1:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>hands can do the work, and in turn, working on

1:06:42.880 --> 1:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a project keeps me focused so that I pay better

1:06:45.280 --> 1:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>attention to what you're saying. Splitting my brain this way

1:06:48.200 --> 1:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>seems to make both parts work better and help me

1:06:51.320 --> 1:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>be more relaxed and productive. Within the bicameral theory, I

1:06:54.800 --> 1:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>suppose that you are the gods whose voices I choose

1:06:57.440 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to occupy my mind any I keep up the great

1:07:01.080 --> 1:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>work with the show. I always look forward to new

1:07:02.840 --> 1:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>episodes since I go through them pretty quickly. Thanks Melanie.

1:07:06.400 --> 1:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really interesting, and I think the flow

1:07:08.640 --> 1:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>state is one of the most fascinating examples of the

1:07:13.440 --> 1:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of reduction or limited consciousness that we usually experience, because

1:07:17.360 --> 1:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the flow state is like when you're at the height

1:07:19.320 --> 1:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of having fun and feeling good about what you're doing.

1:07:22.640 --> 1:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But I agree that in that flow state there does

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>appear to often be a sense of reduced consciousness. It's

1:07:28.400 --> 1:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>almost like being hypnotized. You're not really aware of yourself

1:07:32.880 --> 1:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and what you're doing, right. Yeah. We've actually heard that

1:07:36.120 --> 1:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of artists who are listeners of the

1:07:38.480 --> 1:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>show who have a similar experience to Melanie. And I'm

1:07:40.680 --> 1:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking of the ones that I've met in real life,

1:07:42.600 --> 1:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>like Meg Hutchinson and Jaime Dragoons who we we met

1:07:45.560 --> 1:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at C two E two last year. Um, But yeah,

1:07:48.880 --> 1:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems like that is a common thing that they're

1:07:51.680 --> 1:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>using podcasts to sort of shut down the part of

1:07:54.360 --> 1:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>their mind that's actively thinking about the work in front

1:07:57.800 --> 1:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of them. Yeah. So I know when I because I

1:08:00.720 --> 1:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>do illustration. I'm nowhere near as good as those people.

1:08:02.880 --> 1:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>But whenever I'm working on illustration or coloring specifically, like

1:08:07.280 --> 1:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>she was mentioning, I usually have a movie on in

1:08:10.040 --> 1:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the background, and that helps me do the same thing.

1:08:13.200 --> 1:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do wonder if it sort of helps

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you harness the muse, the old sense of that if

1:08:17.800 --> 1:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the muses the non dominant hemisphere taking over the creative process,

1:08:22.479 --> 1:08:25.519
<v Speaker 1>if you can sort of like sort of like tie

1:08:25.640 --> 1:08:29.439
<v Speaker 1>up the executive function of the dominant hemisphere doing something else,

1:08:30.280 --> 1:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you can sort of let that that that non dominant

1:08:33.160 --> 1:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>hemisphere takeover more effectively. Yeah, that sounds about right. Yeah,

1:08:37.360 --> 1:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I think further research is required here. Well. It also

1:08:40.320 --> 1:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>makes me think too of some of the various rituals

1:08:43.840 --> 1:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>that are used to or have been in you used

1:08:47.439 --> 1:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to invoke not only a meditative state, but some sort

1:08:50.120 --> 1:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>of a prayer state, some sort of communion trans We've

1:08:53.560 --> 1:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about saying the Rosary before along those lines. Finally,

1:08:57.560 --> 1:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>our listener Andrew sent us a email that is too

1:09:00.560 --> 1:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>long to read, but he does say a lot of

1:09:02.400 --> 1:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>really interesting stuff in it about the bicameral mind, and

1:09:04.920 --> 1:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the things he points out is I think

1:09:07.160 --> 1:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>perhaps my biggest objection to the theory. It's one of

1:09:11.640 --> 1:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>my biggest questions, which is about Jane's definition of consciousness.

1:09:16.360 --> 1:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>So James has this definition he establishes in the book.

1:09:18.960 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he does a really interesting job of characterizing

1:09:22.000 --> 1:09:25.519
<v Speaker 1>what he thinks consciousness is. It's this metaphor based mind

1:09:25.600 --> 1:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>space where you can entertain thoughts and ideas. Jeff says,

1:09:29.320 --> 1:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>I consider it given that to be conscious of something

1:09:31.680 --> 1:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is to experience it. I think awareness is essentially the

1:09:35.240 --> 1:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>same as consciousness, and I don't believe that there is

1:09:38.120 --> 1:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>an unconscious experience. But I do think it's obvious that

1:09:41.800 --> 1:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>our minds can unconsciously gather information and present it to consciousness.

1:09:46.320 --> 1:09:48.519
<v Speaker 1>Later we give examples of that in the book, like

1:09:48.600 --> 1:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you can unconsciously use your brain to do things. But

1:09:51.760 --> 1:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>he's saying consciousness and experience are the same thing, So

1:09:56.080 --> 1:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>he continues, I don't see how a bicameral person can

1:09:59.360 --> 1:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>hallucinate without conscious experience. Of those hallucinations, what is an

1:10:05.200 --> 1:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>unconscious hallucination? And then he goes on to say, I

1:10:09.320 --> 1:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>think Jane's definition of consciousness is ad hoc. I think

1:10:12.320 --> 1:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>he wrongly defines consciousness as being what we experience as

1:10:16.280 --> 1:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>modern humans, with the defining feature being internal dialogue. So

1:10:20.560 --> 1:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I may be completely off base here because I wasn't

1:10:23.120 --> 1:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>on this bi cameral mind episode. But when he says

1:10:27.000 --> 1:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>hallucinating unconsciously, the first thing I think of from previous

1:10:31.200 --> 1:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>episodes that we've done is experiencing the supernatural. So like,

1:10:35.680 --> 1:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>if you feel like you've seen a ghost, that could

1:10:38.880 --> 1:10:41.519
<v Speaker 1>be that, but you'd be conscious of it. So I

1:10:41.560 --> 1:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>think what what he's saying is, what does it mean

1:10:45.240 --> 1:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>for a non conscious person to hallucinate? So he's saying

1:10:50.000 --> 1:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to to hallucinate is to experience the detection of something

1:10:55.120 --> 1:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that is not physically there in reality. But if you're

1:10:58.800 --> 1:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>not conscious, how would you experience it? Now, I'm not

1:11:03.160 --> 1:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>quite sure. I'm want to. I think that's a really

1:11:04.880 --> 1:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting point, but I'm not quite sure I'm won over

1:11:07.320 --> 1:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>by it because I think of the analogy of like

1:11:09.120 --> 1:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a computer. So imagine you've got a computer that is

1:11:12.080 --> 1:11:15.599
<v Speaker 1>set up to detect things in a room, and it

1:11:15.680 --> 1:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>detects maybe it's got like a motion sensor, when a

1:11:18.160 --> 1:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>thing could walk in front of it. Now you could

1:11:20.200 --> 1:11:24.479
<v Speaker 1>implant a computer virus on that computer that could make

1:11:24.520 --> 1:11:27.479
<v Speaker 1>it sense people walking by the motion sensor, even when

1:11:27.479 --> 1:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>nobody's walking by the motion sensor and sense. In that way,

1:11:30.360 --> 1:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the computer would be hallucinating motion. But that doesn't mean

1:11:34.200 --> 1:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the computer is conscious of that motion, right, It's all

1:11:38.080 --> 1:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>just a machine. So I'm not sure I'm convinced by this,

1:11:42.040 --> 1:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think it is a really interesting objection, and

1:11:44.360 --> 1:11:48.479
<v Speaker 1>it's worth considering. What is the difference between Jane's idea

1:11:48.600 --> 1:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness and the idea of experience itself? Is there

1:11:52.880 --> 1:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>nothing that it would be like to be a bicameral

1:11:55.960 --> 1:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>person or would there be something that it was like

1:11:59.360 --> 1:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a bi cameral person just very different than

1:12:02.080 --> 1:12:05.320
<v Speaker 1>what it's like to be us. Yeah, I mean it's

1:12:05.360 --> 1:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>quite it's quite a conundrum. Um, you know, I thought

1:12:08.040 --> 1:12:11.599
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of this too, uh. In reading Terence

1:12:11.600 --> 1:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>hawkins The Rage of Achilles, where he has the he

1:12:14.600 --> 1:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>sets himself up with the challenge of of writing about

1:12:18.080 --> 1:12:21.519
<v Speaker 1>characters who have a bicameral mind, but also writing about

1:12:21.560 --> 1:12:25.519
<v Speaker 1>them in a way that you're gonna we're gonna also feel, um,

1:12:25.640 --> 1:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we were also going to be able to sympathize with

1:12:27.439 --> 1:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>an empathize with them to some extent as if they

1:12:29.920 --> 1:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>are you know, normal humans. Uh, how do you, truly

1:12:35.360 --> 1:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>how do you imagine the mindset of a of an

1:12:38.360 --> 1:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>unconscious human? I wonder if somebody could develop a derivative

1:12:42.360 --> 1:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>theory of the bicameral mind that gets rid of the

1:12:45.320 --> 1:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>idea that ancient humans were not conscious, or at least

1:12:49.320 --> 1:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>reformulates that to say their consciousness was different than ours,

1:12:54.120 --> 1:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's entirely possible that there was something

1:12:57.880 --> 1:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>going on in the brains of ancient humans that caused

1:13:01.000 --> 1:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>them to hear voices and hallucinate far more often than

1:13:03.760 --> 1:13:06.519
<v Speaker 1>we do today, and those hallucinations may have been of

1:13:06.560 --> 1:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a different sort of relevance to their lives, more useful,

1:13:09.479 --> 1:13:13.479
<v Speaker 1>more practical, more accurate than hallucinations are today. But at

1:13:13.479 --> 1:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the same time, they were conscious in some sense, they

1:13:16.200 --> 1:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>had an experience. They weren't hallucinating robots. They were people

1:13:20.680 --> 1:13:24.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of like us, just different. So it all comes

1:13:24.640 --> 1:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>back to the same conundrum, right what is consciousness? What

1:13:28.280 --> 1:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>am I experiencing right now? Ultimately, that's Andrew's big question.

1:13:31.960 --> 1:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>He says he he liked like He's got a lot

1:13:34.240 --> 1:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of thoughts about the theory, but he doesn't think it

1:13:36.040 --> 1:13:39.519
<v Speaker 1>ultimately sheds light on the hard problem of consciousness. The

1:13:39.840 --> 1:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>question you just asked. We all have this thing, but

1:13:42.520 --> 1:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>what is it? Alright? I have one final listener mail

1:13:45.960 --> 1:13:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and this comes to us from Meg and she's responding

1:13:48.520 --> 1:13:51.599
<v Speaker 1>to one of our ignoble episodes. I believe it was

1:13:52.240 --> 1:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the second one. Let's see. She says, Hi, there. Uh,

1:13:56.200 --> 1:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot to be said about this, but

1:13:58.640 --> 1:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>most concisely, as a twin, I can tell you that

1:14:01.479 --> 1:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>my experience and the experience of my identical twin in

1:14:05.040 --> 1:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>recognizing ourselves and photos was that we each always saw

1:14:08.960 --> 1:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the other. As in, if there was a photo of me,

1:14:11.520 --> 1:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>by and large, my conclusion was that it was a

1:14:14.120 --> 1:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>photo of my sister. The reverse was true for her.

1:14:16.840 --> 1:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it seems to be that we spent far

1:14:18.960 --> 1:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>more time looking at the other person than we did

1:14:21.400 --> 1:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it ourselves or at a mirror. Plus a mirror is

1:14:24.240 --> 1:14:27.759
<v Speaker 1>a reverse image. Additionally, we did have issues of self

1:14:28.000 --> 1:14:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and referred to ourselves in the plural, despite our parents

1:14:30.760 --> 1:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>best efforts to have us be individuals and not a unit. Uh.

1:14:34.200 --> 1:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>They were aware of that problem with twins, but we

1:14:37.160 --> 1:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>persisted unintentionally. Love your show, Mac, That's fascinating. Yeah. The

1:14:42.600 --> 1:14:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the study that we focused on just had to do

1:14:44.520 --> 1:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>with with self facial recognition in identical twins? Uh, you

1:14:50.720 --> 1:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>know what is different with identical twins and what that

1:14:52.920 --> 1:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>reveals about self facial recognition for the for the rest

1:14:55.720 --> 1:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of us. I saw something recently that is very tangentially

1:15:00.000 --> 1:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>nect it to this. But you remember in that episode,

1:15:03.240 --> 1:15:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I brought up the idea that the facial recognition software

1:15:05.920 --> 1:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on our phones maybe would have difficulty just telling you

1:15:09.640 --> 1:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and your twin apart, right, Apparently a drag queen tried

1:15:14.200 --> 1:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to trick the facial recognition software by like being out

1:15:17.880 --> 1:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of drag and then in drag to see if it

1:15:20.680 --> 1:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>could work or not, and and it it depended on

1:15:23.000 --> 1:15:26.479
<v Speaker 1>the phone, I believe. Yeah, yeah, but that that makes

1:15:26.520 --> 1:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>me wonder as well, like depending on what kind of

1:15:29.560 --> 1:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>costumed identities I guess that you create. Well, let me

1:15:32.160 --> 1:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you this, anyone out there who's looking to conduct

1:15:35.520 --> 1:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a study, I bet if you do a facial recognition

1:15:38.760 --> 1:15:42.719
<v Speaker 1>drag queen study, you will definitely win an ignoble prize.

1:15:43.080 --> 1:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think we've been doing as long enough and

1:15:46.000 --> 1:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that they would like that they would Yeah, that's a

1:15:48.000 --> 1:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>great idea. All right, all right, Well, thanks everybody, and

1:15:52.360 --> 1:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Carney for bringing out all this wonderful email.

1:15:56.040 --> 1:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to all of you for writing to us and

1:15:59.080 --> 1:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>sharing your thoughts, your questions, your and your insights and

1:16:02.200 --> 1:16:05.599
<v Speaker 1>your personal experiences related to these topics. And hey, if

1:16:05.680 --> 1:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you just listen to this and you're like, I want

1:16:07.800 --> 1:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to add too, I want you to read my thing

1:16:10.280 --> 1:16:13.439
<v Speaker 1>on the next Listener Mail episode. There's so many ways

1:16:13.479 --> 1:16:15.679
<v Speaker 1>that you can get in touch with us. There's Facebook,

1:16:15.720 --> 1:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>for instance, We've got our regular Facebook page. We've also

1:16:18.280 --> 1:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>got our discussion module. We're also on Twitter, Tumbler, and Instagram.

1:16:22.360 --> 1:16:24.559
<v Speaker 1>There's also stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. And

1:16:24.640 --> 1:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get in touch with us directly,

1:16:26.760 --> 1:16:29.799
<v Speaker 1>as always, you can email us at blow the Mind

1:16:29.880 --> 1:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com for more on this

1:16:42.479 --> 1:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics. Does it how stuff works

1:16:45.000 --> 1:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Twitty Proper first char