WEBVTT - Dealmaking in the Post-Peak TV Landscape

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Strictly Business, the podcast in

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>which we speak with some of the brightest minds working

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>in the media business today. I'm Andrew Wallenstein with Variety.

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>It was ten years ago that grand View Management was

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>formed to focus on a client list of high end

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>writers and producers. Since then, the biz has been through

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot, to say the least, and the current day

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>and age is no exception, as the TV business in

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>particular navigates what you might call the post peak TV era.

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>To help illuminate the road ahead for the industry, I've

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>enlisted grand View principles Matt Rosen and Jeff Silver. We'll

0:00:50.600 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>talk with them in just a moment. And we're back

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Rosen and Jeff Silver of the management team Grandview,

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and they've got a client list filled with writers and

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>producers of hit movies and TV shows like House of

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the Dragon, Ozark Loki. Thanks for being with me today, guys.

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for having us. Hey, Ed, thanks for

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 2>having us.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So set the scene for me, if you will. As

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>we speak here in late February in Los Angeles. We've

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten past the strikes. The streaming wars are a blaze,

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 1>but you've been in the business quite a while on

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the chaos to calm spectrum here in Hollywood? Where do

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>things sit right now? Matt? Why don't you start us off?

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, where do you thinks that right now?

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, coming out of the strike, I think there's

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people who are concerned looking at where

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 3>peak TV is going. There's been many indications that it

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 3>is going down, and that the many the amount of

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 3>shows that were being made in the five to six

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred rage are going to be cut almost in half.

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>And at the same time, the movie business is trying

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 3>to figure out ways to get back to a better

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 3>box office from the year's past, and so there were

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 3>people concerned out there that all said, I think from

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 3>our viewpoint, we're pretty optimistic about the opportunities for our

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 3>clients in this changing landscape and feel very fortunate to

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 3>represent some extremely talented people in writers and directors and

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 3>so on, and feel that the opportunity is ripe for

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 3>them to continue to be able to produce content at

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 3>the highest level.

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, So, you know, right off the bat, though,

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I would think the simplistic take would be, now, wait

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a second, you just did some scary math because less

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>product to be made means less opportunity for your clients.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know why, you know, Jeff, why be optimistic?

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, listen, we were both in the business in two

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 4>thousand and seven, two thousand and eight, right, Matt and

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 4>I started as assistants together at CIA. We met each

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 4>other my first day his third week. And you know,

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and six felt like a great time, and

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 4>suddenly you had a strike and then you had a

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 4>financial meltdown. And we were lucky enough at that moment

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 4>to be young in the business. Matt was on aging

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 4>track at CIA and I was working as an executive.

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 2>But we really felt it right.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 4>We felt the business screeched to a halt, and then

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 4>we felt this existential crisis in two thousand and eight

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 4>of what's going to happen. I remember going up for

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 4>a job at Paramount to be a CE in two

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 4>thousand and nine, and I was one of three hundred

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 4>qualified candidates for that job. So to your point, Andrew, right,

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 4>less opportunity is really scary. That said, we're in a

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 4>business of entrepreneurs and we're in a business of creatives,

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 4>and if you use those two together, you get storytellers

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 4>of the highest level who figure out a way to

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 4>get their stories told. So we're maybe uniquely confident in

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 4>the ability of our clients to get their stories out

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 4>there in the right way. So they're going to be

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 4>less when writing assignments. We've seen that there's going to

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 4>be less slots. But three months ago, I think people

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 4>were looking at FX and Hulu and saying are they

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 4>going to be bringing in new development? And right now,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, you've just had John Langraf, who we have

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 4>a ton of respect for in business with talk about

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 4>wanting new shows. Our friends at Hulu now want new shows,

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 4>so we're starting to see a rebound already. It's always

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 4>a scary moment when when you know supply and demand

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 4>get get a little bit screwed up. But if you're

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 4>the kind of artists who just waits for books to

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 4>come in your way or assignments to come in your way.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it's time to rethink how you do things.

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 4>But if you're the kind of artist that has a

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 4>vision and has stories to tell, then we think you're

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 4>as well suited now as you were before.

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I guess when you've got clients, like to

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>name a few of your people, you know, Ryan Condall

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>who is the showrunner on House of the Dragon. And

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got Chris Mundy who is coming off of Ozark.

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You've got some great names and they're going to get jobs.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>What about the I guess what I'm saying is for

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the marketplace. If you don't have the

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>best names, what do you do or or you know,

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>should the broader marketplace? Is this going to be a

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>troubling time? Is it only the cream of the crop

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that's going to survive?

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't Yeah, I'm happy to jump in. I mean,

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's just the cream of the crop.

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sorry, this is Jeff. Matt and I have talked

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 4>about this a lot. We don't think it's just the

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 4>cream of the crop. We think if you have an

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 4>intrepid idea and you've got a career that and you've

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 4>got a reputation and you know how to work well

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 4>with others, and you've proven yourself in people are going

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 4>to listen, want to listen to your idea and want

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 4>to say does this fit on our era? This is

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 4>something that we can do. And if you're young, coming

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 4>up in the business with nothing to lose and only

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 4>a dream, right then you're saying, great, I just graduated

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 4>from this playwrights program where I've got this one pilot.

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not that expensive. Come in and take me seriously.

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 4>Where where you always see attrition in these moments, I

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 4>think is in the middle. Right, So for those folks writers, filmmakers, actors, producers,

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 4>anybody in media who's sort of been resting on their

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 4>laurels for a bit and waiting for it to come

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 4>to them, it gets a little bit harder. But if

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 4>you're ready to play offense with your ideas, we think

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't matter what level.

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>You're at, Matt, how else would you characterize this marketplace?

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>How does it change now?

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think what you're going to start seeing I

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 3>hit it a little bit before, but you're going to

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 3>be seeing less shows, but you're going to be seeing

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 3>more eyeballs on those shows, and that is going to

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>lead to more cultural moments for us as a commun unity. Right,

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 3>everyone is going to be joining and watching the same

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 3>types of shows, similar to maybe the way it was

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 3>back in you know, in the days before there was

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 3>just so much television. Now now there's so much opportunity

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 3>to look at so many different things. You don't know

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 3>what option to pick, and it's going to bring people

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 3>together in a really cool way and being able to

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 3>watch things in a way that you get back into

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 3>the office on Monday and everyone sit around the water

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 3>cooler and be having conversations about watching the same thing.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Finally, again, I'm going to push back on that. I

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like, you know, you mentioned earlier that you think

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that we could see maybe half of the volume of shows.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think the estimates I've seen are it's going

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to come down a good amount. I don't know about half,

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and we still got a lot of streaming services out there.

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's not necessarily going to be that much

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>less fragmented a world. So do you really think we're

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>going to go back to the days where you know,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a Game of Thrones is going to have you know,

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty million viewers coming to a finale. Do you really

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be that dramatic a difference.

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's going to get back to you know,

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 3>the eighties or the nineties, you know, when it was

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 3>when it was just network TV, really, but I think

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 3>you're going to have more touch points for people because

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 3>there's going to be less options there's there's going to

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 3>be amazing shows out there.

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 2>To Jeff's point, I think I think he makes a

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 2>really good point.

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, people are going to rise to the top

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 3>with their fantastic ideas, and as long as you're playing offense,

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 3>you're going to be having really good content out there

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 3>and you're gonna be able to get your shows on

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 3>the air. I do feel that there will be some

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 3>change in the market in the amount of shows that

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing out there.

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 4>It's also Andrew, It's it's up to it's up to

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 4>all of us in the business to find and nurture

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 4>storytellers and find nurture ideas that have stories that cut through, right.

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's not thirty million a year, but you

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 4>look at shows like Yellowstone, right, they're bringing.

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 2>In big numbers.

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 4>And then shows that you know Beef, which you know

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 4>it's Sonny Lee wrote and came up with an amazing

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 4>idea from his life, and our partner Ben works with

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Sonny and we're fortunate enough a grand of you to

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 4>work with most of the writers and directors on.

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 2>Beef like that.

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 4>We don't have the exact data from Netflix on that,

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 4>but that show really cut through in a massive way

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 4>and was a big success for them critically and commercially.

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 4>So it might it might to match point, it might

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 4>not be what it was twenty years ago with thirty million,

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 4>but buyers are still going to want eyeballs, and advertisers

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 4>as we head towards this place in streaming where there's

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 4>more advertising, are going to want as many eyeballs as

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 4>they can get. That those fundamentals of the business are

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 4>not going to change.

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Jeff, you mentioned data. Let's let's go on a bit

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of a tangent there. How do you as a management

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 1>company deal in this asymmetrical.

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 3>World of.

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Data where you're got streaming services that have, you know,

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>armloads of data and sure, you know, every once in

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a while Netflix comes along and you know, throws a

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of data out there and says, see no,

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we share plenty. But by and large it feels like

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>representatives like yourselves seem to be operating at a big disadvantage.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, it depends, right again, everything goes in cycles.

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 4>So in the beginning of Netflix and making is so

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 4>much content, we had many filmmakers and showrunners who wanted

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 4>to go there because they felt that they were great

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 4>creative partners and the money was really good.

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Those deals were very very significant early on through a

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.720
<v Speaker 4>couple of years ago. Those deals were very top of market,

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 4>and the executives at Netflix were excellent saying to the.

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Creatives, we're here to make your shows. That's what we're

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 2>here for.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, there's now been a trend where people have been

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 4>asking to see more data, and as deals are coming

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 4>down a little bit in terms of financials.

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 2>And length and general comm yeah, that has become an issue.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 4>So we're glad we're getting some of the data. Ultimately,

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 4>what our role is with an artist is to help

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 4>them architect a strategy to get them what they want

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 4>in their career. Right, So for us, it's about picking

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 4>who are the people that are going to help them

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 4>put the best show on the air, Who are the

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 4>people that can help them make the best deal around

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 4>that show, who are the best collaborators, and how do

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 4>we build something really long lasting. So data matters when

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 4>you get granular on deal making, there's no question about that.

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 4>But when it comes to how do I create something

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm really proud of and go Molly's as an example,

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 4>Molly Smith Messler, who we've looked after for a long time,

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 4>had an incredible first show called May. It was the

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 4>first time she developed, and she developed with Lucky Chap

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 4>and John Wells and made that show at Netflix and

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 4>it was nominated for a bunch of awards. And Molly

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 4>now has just gotten Sirens Green Lid, which Variety broke

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 4>a few days ago. It's the second show she's ever developed,

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 4>so she's two for two on development. But for us,

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 4>it was Molly's in a deal with Netflix that is

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 4>a fantastic deal. We teamed her back up with Lucky

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 4>Chat because she felt so comfortable with them. We made

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 4>sure that the material was great, and we made sure

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 4>that she and Ginny Howe, who's a tremendous executive at Netflix,

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 4>were in sync together. And now they're going to go

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 4>tell another amazing story and I'm so excited for everyone

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 4>to be able to see that story at some point

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 4>next year. So again, the data matters, but for getting

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 4>artists where they want to be, it's not everything.

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 2>It's one thing.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, speaking of the financials, Matt, what's it like nowadays

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking to your clients about what the writers

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>or producers of Yesteryear could hope to make from being

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a runner versus today given the clout that you know,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the streaming services have given, the way you know, back

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>end deals or the lack thereof are structured. Is it

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is it just not as lucrative as it used to be.

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it can still be a very lucrative business.

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 3>The pie might have gotten a little bit smaller right

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 3>as you turned analog dollars into digital sense. But you know,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 3>as long as you are talented and as long as

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>you are able to be on the offense and go

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 3>sell products or sell your project in a competitive landscape,

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 3>which is what we really try to do with all

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 3>of our clients is to make sure that there's a

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 3>competitive situation and that is more important than ever to

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 3>help make sure that our clients can be making a good,

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 3>fair deal that is you know, going to be super

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 3>beneficial to them. And you know, to your question on

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 3>the back end, look, obviously the data has helped us

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 3>and you know, Netflix is transparency especially has helped us

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 3>in helping our clients along with their lawyers and agents,

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 3>make better deals for them. And the landscape is going

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 3>to continue to change over the next you know, as

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 3>everything gets reset over the next twelve to eighteen months,

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 3>let's say. But as long as there is a competitive

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 3>market and as long as there are stories that the

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 3>buyers want, which we feel very fortunate to represent people

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 3>that are in those positions, we're seeing we're not seeing

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 3>a major downward trend in what our clients are making.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 4>I think that's that's really well said, and you're just

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 4>a double underline what Matt said about competitive when you're

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 4>working with an artist, which really you hope for lots

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 4>of things. You hope for process wins. You hope that

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 4>they are really happy with the stories they've told. You

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 4>hope that they feel like the placement of those stories

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 4>has really worked. But in the inception of those stories,

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 4>you want multiple people getting excited about them. So we're

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 4>out with something right now that we haven't reported on

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 4>yet where we've got several studios bidding on a piece

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 4>for two clients of ours, a show runner and producer

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 4>around a company that we're building right now. And we

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 4>started this conversation and we had four different studios bidding

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 4>on it and number down to two. This was just

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 4>an article and a writer with an idea, but it's

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 4>something that really resonates and cut through and the deal

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 4>that we're making is incredibly cutting edge, is incredibly elegant,

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 4>but they're going to walk away with a chance to

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 4>do very, very very well, and if they hit it

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 4>out of the park, they potentially will make more money

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 4>on this show than they would have if they'd set

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 4>this up several years ago. So the ways that we're

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 4>making deals are evolving, but you need to have an

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 4>idea or a package that multiple buyers want so.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 2>That you can really get under the hood and make

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 2>an aggressive deal for your clients.

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 4>The one off open writing assignment at a studio or network.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 4>You're absolutely right, those those numbers are going down a bit,

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 4>so we're trying to get all of our storytellers and

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 4>artists to play offense.

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in just a moment with more with

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Rosen and Jeff Silver, and we are back with

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the principles at Grand View Management. Matt Rosen and Jeff Silver, Guys,

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm surprised to hear that we're not hearing

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the people that you are negotiating with plead poverty more often,

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>because I would assume after you know the strikes and

0:16:55.520 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>after you know the streaming services, you know, meaning more

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>into needing to demonstrate profitability, that they'd be all tapped out,

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they'd be, you know, not being able to spend top

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars anymore. But I feel like that's not what I'm hearing.

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 2>So what's going on? I mean, just to jump in

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 2>this is Matt.

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we, Jeff and I have found ourselves

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 3>in a very fortunate position.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 2>We started this company ten years ago.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, we were best friends coming up and meeting

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 3>at the agency and we were able to hone in

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 3>and just learn a lot over the years before we

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 3>started the company. And what we feel very blessed about

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 3>is that having built this company based on a culture.

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Excuse me, that culture is our strategy, and being able

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 3>to bring in artists and have them help or helping

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 3>them create ideas, pitches, and then help them create a

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 3>market out there with packaging that with our agency partners,

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 3>we've been able to stay above the fray when it

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 3>comes to you know, the the quote unquote economic downturn,

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 3>which you know people are crying poverty onto your what

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 3>you just said, Andrew, we feel very forciate to represent

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 3>people who are at the top of their game and

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 3>whether that is a showrunner on a massive hit TV show,

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 3>or you know someone that we just discovered, you know,

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 3>out of the UK, or or you know, right out

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 3>of grad school. We like to consider ourselves the best

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 3>in the game when it comes to identifying talent and

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 3>making sure that talent is ultra successful in the marketplace.

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Now are we going to see though? You know, it's

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>see I remember there was a time, maybe it was

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.479
<v Speaker 1>always this time, and I'm just forgetting, but like you know,

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>networks would seize on a talent. I think of like

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of like the Chuck Loriy model, where

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like they find the talent and then that talent

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>in a matter of years will go from one project

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to two projects to nine projects, you know where they

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>are just they become an empire onto themselves. Are we

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>going to see those type of people rise up rather quickly?

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that next generation? Do you think going to emerge

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 1>soon enough?

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 4>It's a great question. It's a great question. I mean, listen,

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 4>I think you could. One of the things that you

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 4>might be able to say about peak TV is that

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 4>there were too many shows, and in those too many

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.479
<v Speaker 4>shows that maybe were too many showrunners, and some of

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 4>those shows really buckled under the weight of expectations, financial

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 4>or otherwise because the shows weren't a certain level of quality, right,

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's that's something that people were experiencing

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 4>during peak TV, this sort of fatigue around are the

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 4>shows great?

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Will there be more? Chuck Lori's more, Ryan m more,

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Shonda's absolutely. Will it be a meritocracy? We think so,

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 4>will you just be given a show because so many

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 4>networks have so many hours that they're now needing to fill. No,

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be harder as always. The great people

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 4>with great motivation and great talent and great character and

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 4>great ambition will be that new class for sure. It's

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 4>just going to be a little bit tougher. And that's

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 4>maybe okay for a minute, so that we can find

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 4>the quality that we need to to keep cutting through

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 4>a marketplace where people are looking at things on second

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 4>screen and have lots of different opportunities to do. Like,

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 4>we're traditionalists in the sense that we want people watching

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 4>great shows, we want people going to great films. So

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 4>the answer your question, Andrew, yes, there will still be

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 4>those people. But we think that the people who get

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 4>to those lofty heights there'll be less of a chance.

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 4>But if you have that combination of skill and motivation

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 4>and character, you can get there.

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And I remember people like Bill Lawrence Scrubbs, executive producer

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great shows as well, voice and concerns

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>during the strike that the next generation of producers were

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to be trained and brought

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>up in a system that was going.

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 2>To groom them to.

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Really be ready to take on being able to show run.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we're coming out of the strike with

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a system that is going to equip them to do that?

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you worry that for your clients who might fit

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>needing that grooming, that they're going to be ready to

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>take that mantle?

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 3>That is as a great question, Andrew, The answer is yes,

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 3>we do think they're to be ready. And just to

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 3>further your point, you know, I think a lot of

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 3>the concerns coming out of some of these older showrunners

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 3>was is that you're cutting down from twenty two episodes.

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 2>Of network to ten episodes of.

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Premium, you know, streaming, and it was just giving people

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 3>less experience, and that people writers were moving too quickly

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 3>through the ranks and going from a staff writer to

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 3>a co executive producer in a matter of a couple

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 3>of years where it used to take you know, ten

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 3>plus years. What has happened is that there is now

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 3>a new subset of non writing executive producers that are

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, helping these you know, potentially younger showrunners. And

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 3>we are very instrumental with our clients in helping select

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 3>them and make sure that there is someone helping them,

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 3>especially on their first shows.

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 2>These shows are big shows.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 3>You know, you're a writer and you're coming in and

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden you're being asked to run, you know,

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 3>essentially a company for that's you know, costs tens of

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>millions of dollars and run hundreds of people and be

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 3>the CEO of that company. That's that's not something that

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 3>someone can do by themselves, and it is a team

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 3>oriented job. In the same way that what Jeff and

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 3>I do as a team oriented representation. You know, everyone

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 3>at this company helps each other's clients. We make sure

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 3>that we were helping each other and we're communicating, making

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 3>sure that there's transparency and everything so that we can

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 3>help our clients rise.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 2>And in the same.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Way with our showrunners, they need that help and they

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 3>need partners which we help them find to make sure

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 3>that they're going to be successful.

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that's so well said.

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 4>The only other thing I'd add to that, Andrew, is

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 4>going back to your previous question, Like the Shonda's, the

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 4>Chucks and the Ryans and the sort of you know,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 4>real aspirational heavyweights there got there by identifying who their

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 4>people are and by being mentors ands. So I think

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of what our job is is to figure

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 4>out Sometimes you've got an artist who.

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Just wants to tell a story.

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 4>They just want to tell a story, and they want

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 4>to tell that story to the fullest, and they don't

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 4>want to think about touching anything else while they're telling

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 4>that story and go from the ideas in my head.

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 4>So I'm accepting an Emmy on stage, and that's great.

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 4>We love those people and they're wonderful, but they also

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 4>know that they are more one project to one project,

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 4>and that's totally okay. That's part of their artictic expression.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 4>There's some who say, you know what, I want to

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 4>juggle multiple things at once. It will make all these

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 4>things better and I will feel satiated in different ways.

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 4>And if we can help those people find their people,

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 4>find their younger writers who are going to be their showrunners,

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 4>find their non writing EPs they want to partner with.

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Maybe find a non writing EP they want to start

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 4>a company with. So that you've got a tremendous showrunner

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 4>and a non writing EP together with the same mission,

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 4>which is how do we lift other people.

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Up and tell their stories?

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 4>So we always r on guard for bad mentorship. There's

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 4>nothing worse than putting a great idea with a bad producer.

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 4>It's absolutely brutal. It slows everything down and you're fighting

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.239
<v Speaker 4>up against the tide the entire way. So if you,

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 4>if you collaborate in the right way, the mentorship park

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 4>gets taken care of.

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>So now I want you to look across the negotiation

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>table and size up the field of buyers out there.

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a long list. I think it's almost

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>surprising here we are in February twenty twenty four and

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the list is that long. The speculation of cross, of course,

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is that that list is going to winnow any day.

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But we've been saying that for a long time too.

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you what do you think is going to happen?

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not even just saying, you know, is it

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>going to WINNO? Is it going to not but when

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>you when you look at the list of buyers, what

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>do you see right now in terms of the market?

0:25:56.040 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Is this a is this a discerning list? Do you

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>feel like you have a clear sense of what buyers

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>want even? Do they have distinct identities, distinct set of needs?

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, Andrew, I'm so curious to hear your thoughts on

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 4>this because you've been reporting on this and looking at

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 4>this for a long time. To your point, we've all

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 4>been sort of looking at the guillotine about to come

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 4>down on all these different networks. What have you seen

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 4>and heard in your travels? How come you don't think

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 4>that's happened yet.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, my skeptical take is that obviously all eyes are

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>on Paramount right now, and my feeling is that it's

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen anytime soon, and that there's probably

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>regulatory issues that are at play here, and that maybe

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>this is not going to be so easily done, and

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps maybe this is something like they need to

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out who's going to be in the White House

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year first, that maybe you know,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 1>there could be a whole host of reasons and that

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this isn't maybe necessarily as simple as just paramount. And

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>so again, though my question really isn't just about like, oh,

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>there'll be one less buyer out there. I'm really more

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>curious about, like, you know, there was a time where

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it just seemed like all these guys were just sort

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of like gobbling up product indiscriminately. Now it even feels

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>like everyone's just focused on sports. So I guess I'm

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>just trying to get a sense of you know, how

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>you see it.

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 4>All you can ask from your creed, all you can

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 4>ask from your strategic partners at buyers is for honesty

0:27:55.359 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 4>and transparency. Right as managers, agents, lawyer, producers, as people

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 4>in the creative process and in this arena, all we

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 4>can ask from the folks who are running these places

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 4>are tell us what you can do, tell us what

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 4>you can't do, tell us what you will do, tell

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 4>us what you won't do, and then let us help

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 4>get the right.

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 2>Ideas with the right people to you.

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 4>So, the folks who are greenlighting these shows, for the

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 4>most part, are not the ones who are making the

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 4>bigger M and A decisions. Those decisions are coming down

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 4>from a different level. Right for us, all we need

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 4>are for the people who are actually green lighting shows

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 4>or not green lighting shows, to be able to be

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 4>real and honest with us, so we can be real

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 4>and honest with the people that we work with so

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 4>that we can deliver them something. Or if they're in

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 4>a place where they can't buy anything for six weeks,

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 4>we say, great, we'll talk to you in six weeks.

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.479
<v Speaker 4>If that changes, let us know, just so we can

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 4>have an active picture of what the market is. I'd say, Matt,

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm curious to hear what you would say. I think

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 4>right now what we're getting from all the buyers is

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 4>bring us specific things in specific buckets because we're open.

0:28:58.040 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Look, this entire business, you know, is cyclical like every

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 3>other business, and we're in the middle of a down cycle.

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 3>But that does not mean that content stops being bought

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 3>and made. And to just point, as long as we

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 3>have solid partners on the buying side that are letting

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 3>us know what they're looking for, and sometimes they don't

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 3>know all the answers because you know, upstairs in whatever

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 3>C suite of corporate they're they're trying to figure out

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 3>how to you know, get the right answers and looking

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 3>at data and all this stuff. That honestly, at the

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 3>end of the day, may or may not matter. What

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 3>matters is that we represent people who come up with

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 3>unique and unique and different ideas than what is currently

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 3>in the market, and that excites the buyers and we

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 3>feel really fortunate about it, you know, we you know,

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 3>are able to kind of change the tide when when

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 3>things maybe in a downturn. Right before the strike, you know,

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 3>we went out with a pitch that was you know,

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 3>as everyone was shutting down, you know, we went out

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 3>with a pitch on a fascinating idea from this writer

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of the UK and there was a five way bidding

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 3>war on it because it was just different and unique

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 3>and it was this really cool comedy and everyone had

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 3>never no one had ever seen it before.

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 2>And that's why we feel really fortunate.

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 3>And to your point your question, or ganew, we do

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 3>feel optimistic because we're seeing the results.

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Last question. Here we are again in late February. There

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>used to be a time where there was this very

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, clear calendar, clear rhythms to the TV market.

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>What sense though, do you have now in this you

0:30:56.520 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>know world where you know, the traditional fall schedule is

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>probably gone for good. You know, as you look to March,

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, and beyond, how do you sort of get

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>your bearings and what do you expect, you know, the

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>spring to bring in terms of development and how whether

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it's linear networks or streaming, do you what do you

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:22.719
<v Speaker 1>expect lies ahead?

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 3>I think we anticipate it to be year round. We anticipate,

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, the market to be opened all the time

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 3>and for people to be wanting to purchase non stop.

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 3>And the days to your point of upfronts in May

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 3>and finding out you know, what was going to be

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 3>on the schedule for that fall, those you know, still

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 3>exists to a certain extent, but those days are over

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 3>and it is a twenty four to seven game, and

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, our clients are you know, advised and always

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 3>moving with us in the mentality that we're creating a

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 3>market every day because we're coming up with our clients

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 3>and helping them develop quality content that they're going to

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 3>be able to sell to multiple buyers.

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, some of the buyers may not

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 2>be buying.

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 3>To just point at one moment or another, but there

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 3>is always a market for content, especially if it is

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 3>new and cutting edge and different and innovative.

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 4>And there might be there might be an opportunity for

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 4>broadcast network at this moment. I mean, I think everyone

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 4>has been so focused on streamers and the growth of

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 4>streamers and spot and what's happening there, and I think

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 4>broadcast television has maybe gotten a little bit lost in

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 4>the shuffle there. So I think our eyes are on

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 4>the broadcasters to say, you know, what are you guys

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 4>going to do, and can you make content that does

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 4>cut through in a real way, and if so, maybe

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 4>we go back to that, to that calendar in some way.

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 3>I just to add on to that because it's a

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 3>really interesting point. But Jeff brought up, but you're also

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 3>seeing a lot of the streamers now trying to create

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 3>their own network plus content, if you will. And so

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 3>you're seeing you're starting to see the migration of some

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 3>of the network players that usually in the writing space

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 3>would be working, you know, at one of the big

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 3>three networks actually migrating to the streaming platforms.

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I can't think of a more hopeful note to

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>end on than hope for the broadcast networks. But thank

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you both for your time, good luck pitching for the

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of this season.

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Andrew, thanks for listening.

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to leave us a review at Apple Podcasts

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon Music. We love to hear from listeners. Please

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>go to Variety dot com to sign up for the

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>free weekly Strictly Business newsletter, and don't forget to tune

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in next week for another episode of Brickkly Business

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 4>HM