WEBVTT - China's Savings Surplus Must Find a Home, Bannister Says

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P L Podcast on iTunes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. For all of us here,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I just want to figure out how to introduce Barry Banister,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>chief equity strategist that as step Nicholas. You know, Barry,

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>when I mentioned earlier to Tom Keene that you were

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>coming on the program, he kind of lit up a

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit. A little bit, he lit up a little bit. Yeah,

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that kind of he that was that was

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>something that rang a bell with him. So I'm wondering,

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>how long have you been doing this. I've been a

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>strategist for about seven years, and then prior to that,

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for about three years, I was a analyst in the

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>equity side, sell side as well as by side. So

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you've seen the cycles come and go yeah, quite a few. Yeah,

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And I use the word cycle specifically be and I

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>think you know why. And I'm wondering if you would

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>just describe where we are in the cycles that you

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.919
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to. Yeah, one of the things that we've

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>differed on from from the earliest days is that the

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Fed really began hiking in May, when what's called the

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Fed Shadow Fed funds rate bottomed at minus three uh.

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a complex calculation based on options pricing models, but

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what it really describes is the effect of q E

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>rate suppression, forward guidance twist, and other things the Fed did.

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So we've been in a tightening cycle for several years,

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that at about a two interest

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>rate on Fed funds, we will reach a point where

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just too much, but that's not going to happen

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in the next six to nine. So I think the

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>market looks pretty good to the spring of eighteen. Well

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>until the spring of eighteen. What do you do. Just

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>stay where you are right now. We've been a big

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>positive bull on the reflation trade, more so last year

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>on energy. I was three months early on that, and

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>then un financials again I was three months early. We've

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>had a few soft months since the election, approximately mid December,

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as the Fiscal House is trying to get an order

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and it is very difficult. This is not an administration

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that thought it would win, so there was no government

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in waiting, and so things are in a bit of disarray.

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think things will get better. And with the

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>clarity on that, the FEDS clarity that they've been giving

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 1>some growth abroad, I think things look good for another

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>move up in the reflation trade and that would include energy.

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Would that include financials? It is primarily financials, obviously banks.

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It's also the capital spending side of technology, a little

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>different than the social media side. It's also that includes software,

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>semis and things like that, continuing or resuming the run

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that they've had. It also includes industrial and some basic materials.

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Although we have to be careful not to assume that

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese are going to employ a fixed investment model forever. Uh,

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>they have to reduce that as a share of GDP.

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>But generally, yes, it's a more pro cyclical, more pro

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>global growth bet and I think it looks pretty good

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>into the spring of eighteen. So for the SMP right now,

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>if you've participated and you're looking at it on an

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>annual basis, although I mean every it really makes no sense,

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but uh, you're five percent, what would you do Yeah.

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>One of the things about low interest rates is it

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>can be two things. One, you can have a low

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>rate because you're fearful of deflation. So what you have

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is a very low real rate and a very low

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation rate, and that's not necessarily good. It does help

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>your multiples, your PE multiples, because you're discounting the cash

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>flows at a low interest rate. But when you switch

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you over psychologically from fear of deflation to a little

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>more confidence in reflation, it's almost like a light goes

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>on and you get the positive benefit of a super normal,

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>very low interest rate. Uh and as a result, you

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>get a very very high PE ratio. So we do

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think that the dollar traily twelve month SMP earnings can

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>be discounted at a twenty multiple, which is a inverse

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of a five mid grade corporate B double A yield,

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and that puts you are So that's our target this year. Well,

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're gonna we could write We're going to

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>write that down and then we'll be able to see

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>how that, you know, turns out for the for the

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year. But Barry, you know, as I

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>look over your notes and also receive emails from people

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>who have followed your career in and listen to you

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>over the time. Uh. They go back to let's say

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the post nine eleven UH world, and you wrote about

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that what all the way back from two thousand and two. Mm. Yeah,

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand one and two thousand I've been writing

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>about a a rotation into hard assets, which would be

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>commodities and to an extent real estate and gold and

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>things like that, UM and away from financial assets in

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of relative strength, and the commodity cycle two thousand

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>two roughly to two thousand fifteen. Oil as you know,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>rolled over in the OPEC price war and the FED

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>somewhat premature attempt to exit and raise rates when the

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world was going to negative rates, so

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that tended to crash the price of oil, as we

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>saw in So the commodity cycle was two thousand two

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and fifteen, we played that. UM. The

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>cycle now though, is most of a post debt deflation

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>and a global rebalancing and de leveraging. It gets into

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>very complicated global, cross border macroeconomics. And so I'm spending

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>most of my time now Pam, trying to be more

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>knowledgeable of macroeconomics and uh that occupies probably my time.

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>So so from that perspective, maybe you can share some

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of your more recent uh understandings. Yeah, yeah, Well, I mean,

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's going on is the Chinese

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>savings surplus, which still exists, has to find a home.

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>It has to go someplace. If it stays domestic, it

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>inflates bubbles, drives credit growth. If it's exported, it bids

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>up housing prices in Brooklyn, and uh and Vancouver and

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere and Toronto, you name it, uh and uh. So

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing now is a push in this administration,

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>which is I wouldn't classify it as mercantilist, but I

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>would say that they're unwilling to have eat The surplus

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>is the trade surpluses of every other country in the world.

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing a change in the global monetary order.

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a very big deal. It's on the scale

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>of what happened in nineteen forties with the Breton Woods Agreement,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and the US is no longer willing to be the

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>dumping ground for the exports of all the other surplus countries,

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>from Germany to Mexico to China. And as a result,

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a political change of foot and I think that

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>will gel over the next several years and we'll see

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>more of a balancing of savings investment in each country domestically, uh,

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and that will reduce this role of trade. And we

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out what all this means. That's a

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>very powerful statement. Well, the US had, I guess, decided

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to uh, you know, to allow first it happened in

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Europe after World War two, Martial Plan and so on,

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that the US would be a source of of of

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>demand for their outputs so that they could modernize and

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>develop into capitalist democracies. Um. But then they did that

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in Asia with some of the tigers, as you recall,

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and I recall because we've been around a while, in

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the ninety nineties the tiger economies. UM. Before that, it

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>was the Japanese and and of course the Koreans and Taiwanese.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>But what's happening now is China, which is simply too big,

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>has tried to follow that model and it's been very disruptive.

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>China is no longer a currency manipulator. China was a

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>manipulator two thousand and two thousand seven when they built

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>up their reserve position. So we gotta we gotta leave

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it there, but I look forward to having you in

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the future anytime. Barry Banister, chief equity strategists stifle financial

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>based in Baltimore, Maryland, Medicare and doctors. There are many

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>surveys that have produced results indicating that doctors are foregoing

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>entry into Medicare they no longer feel that it would

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>make financial sense. Joining us now is Dr Chris Chen.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>He is the chief executive of Chen med and they

0:08:55.920 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are a physician led primary care facility and he joined

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>just now on the phone. Thanks very much for being

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>with us a Dr Chen, Maybe you could just explain

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the role that Medicare and the reimbursement practice of Medicare

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>works a little bit and so that we can understand

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>how the doctor fits in and some of the ways

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in which you are challenging conventional notions. Hi, pim yep Um.

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, our practice primarily relies on Medicare advantage UM,

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>which is a subsegment of the overall Medicare UM population.

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>And what that means is is that there's a premium

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that goes from Medicare over to a health plan um.

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>The way that we're able to work with these health

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.719
<v Speaker 1>plans is that the health plan will then give us

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a fixed amount of dollars to manage a patient, and

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that really allows us to create really flexible and unique

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and innovative models of care that can substantially improve the

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 1>outcomes of patients. What kind of pushback has there been

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>inside the doctor community if any well, you know, any

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of change, um, can be difficult. Today in the

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Medicare there's the Medicare fee for service world. Um. You know,

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>doctors are paid for you know, for volume, They're paid

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>for transactions. The more patients to see, the better you do.

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>In our model, which is primarily based in Medicare advantaged, Um,

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>we've created what is a value based care full risk

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>arrangement with health plans? What is that? What is it?

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Because I just I want to understand where this came from, right,

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>because this is all has to do, I believe, with

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the rules from the Medicare Access and the and the

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>chip re Or Authorization Act, because that really was kind

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of something that changed the way doctors got paid, right right.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know there there's something called the care

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>advantage um, which is the private which is the private system,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>as you said, would in which you the Medicare recipient

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>can have the premiums go to this private company Medicare advantage.

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>That's correct, and so there are many Medicare advantage health

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>plans out there, and essentially the premium dollar goes over

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to these health plans, and these health plans have to

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to improve the outcomes of patients and

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>ultimately reduce costs so that way they have some margin

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>left over, right, And so what a lot of these

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>health plans have done is they've gone out to physicians

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>UM and physician organizations like ours to create novel innovative

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>models that can ultimately improve that the outcomes of these

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>patients and subsequently reduce the cost so that way there

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>can be an opportunity to create margin on that patient population.

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>What is different about the way you would structure your

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>business having all of this information, Uh, if you had

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a kind of clean slate. So you know, that's exactly

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>what Chen meant. Did you know we noticed that UM

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>about five of any given population within Medicare advantage accounts

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for about fifty and seventy of costs. And so what

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>we notice is this population tends to be load of

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>moderate incomes, seniors with multiple chronic conditions. And so what

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>chen Mets sought to do was deliver you know, you

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>know these load of modernit incomes seniors, concierge level care um.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>This is the kind of care that usually is only

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>available to you know, CEOs and executives at large companies.

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>And and we are able to provide this level of

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>concierge care at no additional costs of the patient. So,

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're a chen Met patient, what we're able to

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>deliver them is instead of the average doctor taking care

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of twenty three patients, our doctors only take care of

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for it in fifty. Instead of a doctor only spending

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>about thirteen to sixteen minutes a year with a FaceTime

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>with a patient, our doctors have been about a hundred

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and sixty eight minutes. Well, the way we do give

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>us you reveal and pull back the curtain a little

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>bit absolutely, So, you know, by increasing access to care,

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>by providing this really high touch, concert level care that

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>includes transportation, medications on site, specialists on site, and this

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>high touch level of care, what we're able to do

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>is significantly reduced the hospitalization rate. Today we published that

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we can reduce hospitalizations by thirty eight percent and so

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>what happens is when you can reduce hospitalizations, you substantially

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>reduce costs. What would be an example, So give us

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>a patient example being you know and you know, paint

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the picture for us wonderful. So I have a patient

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of mine. Um, his name is, let's call him Mr F.

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Mr F came to me. He had been going to

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the hospital about five times a year because he has

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>end stage heart failure. Okay, it's heart doesn't pump well anymore. Um,

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's weak and he keeps showing up in the

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>emergency room. Now, what I know is this is a

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 1>patient that you know in general and a normal traditional

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>fee for service Medicare environment will be seen for thirteen

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to sixteen minutes a year of FaceTime. What I have

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>done is I see him and I will see him

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>every single week if necessary. And so initially when I

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>met him, he was actually in hospice. He was ready

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to call it quits. And when I and you know,

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>after seeing him every single week, after providing him door

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to doctor transportation, after giving his medications on site, after

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>having multiple conferences and coordinating his care with his other specialists,

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I took him from being admitted five times a year,

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of which each admission costs twenty tho dollars. Now he

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>has not been admitted in over four years, and he's

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>out of hospice, and so how do you but then

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>but there and not but but and you are who

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>pays you, how could you forward to do this? Right?

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is perfect. So if a patient comes to us, right,

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>if they because we are actually taking the premium dollar,

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the a Medicare advantage health plan will offload the a

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the premium. So fix the amount of money

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to us, right, And so therefore the patient ends up

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in the hospital like like Mr F five times, okay,

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's twenty knowledge every time they go to the hospital.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I pay for that. But the beautiful thing is if

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm able to significantly reduce his catastrophic hospitalization rates, then

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>well I'm going to bet for benefit from that. And

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so what we found is this is a scenario in

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>which if I can figure out a way to substantially

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>reduce the most costly admissions for our patients, patients win

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>because they're not getting sick. But also we win because

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>now we actually don't have to you know what what

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that patient would have cost it would have been you know,

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>five times at an admission hundred thousand dollars a year

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>instead of that, you know, perhaps that patient actually hasn't

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>accrued any major catastrophic costs, so we actually are able

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to make money. And what unique about chen Med is

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're not not only can we do this in

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>what we started, which was in South Florida, but we've

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>been able to replicate this exact model across multiple practices

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in nine U S geographies. So you know, what we've

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>discovered is this model of care is actually scalable and

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>we then surrounded well, we'll have to check in with

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you and find out the future of chen Med is

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive Dr. Chris chen We want to take

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a moment to let you know about something new from Bloomberg.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Starting right now, you can use our iOS app or

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>our new Google Chrome extension to scan any news story

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>on any website, instantly revealing relevant news and market data

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg and other sources related to companies and people

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>you're reading about. So no matter where you're reading the news,

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you can bring the power of Bloomberg's news and data

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>with you. It's pretty amazing. Download our io s app

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>or search for the Bloomberg extension on the Chrome Store

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to try it out. Learn more at Bloomberg dot com

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>slash lens. Let's take a look at Canada. Canada because

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>they are are neighbor to the north, but also because

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump in a speech was promising to find

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a solution to a trade dispute with Canada that well

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>has left many dairy farmers in Wisconsin and New York

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>without a market for their product. So, um, let's find

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>out more from Joe Light. He is our financial regulation reporter,

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is not necessarily a out regulation. I wanted

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to just bring in the Canada issue because, uh, when

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>we talk about home building, Uh, it's interesting how the

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>world gets connected very quickly, and I'm wondering, Joe, if

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you can just kind of describe what what is all

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>going on here and maybe just bring in current events. Yeah. Sure,

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So the um, as you mentioned, Trump talked to the

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>dairy community yesterday, and I've been doing some reporting on

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Canada's imports of softwood lumber to the United States and

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a great example of how even for

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of the most basic of commodities, like

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>would you have all sorts of different lobbying groups and

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>interest groups on both sides of the border. Um with

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>thousands of jobs at stake, uh, you know, fighting each

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>other for a share of the US market. So in

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the case of lumber, you know, this is a dispute

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that's been going on for more than three decades. Canada

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>imports about five billion dollars of lumber into the U

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>s that's in that's in US dollars, and as a

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>trade dispute that maybe not many people in the United

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>States have heard of, but it means hundreds of thousands

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of jobs in certain communities, communities in Oregon, communities in

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>British Columbia. Yeah. So so the so basically Canada subsidizes

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 1>is lumber industry. Most of the timberland and Canada is

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>owned by provincial governments. They charge a fee to timber

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>producers to cut the trees down and as a result,

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>um US companies say that Canadian producers are able to

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>sell their lumber in the United States at depress prices,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>which which they say costs American American jobs, cost lumber

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>companies profits. And so as soon as next week, the

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>US government might be imposing huge tariffs on Canadian lumber imports,

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and the threat of that has driven lumber prices up

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>by by more than twenty since since the election. And

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>part of that's because you know, Trump has talked very

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>tough on trade with Canada and UH, and you know,

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>American producers and Canadian producers, the lumber market is expecting

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>those tariffs to you know, and a new deal to

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>come in UH pretty tough. So tell us about the

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>price a lumber right now and what are the implications

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:16.959
<v Speaker 1>for businesses for the lumber companies. So the price of lumber,

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's gone up two since UH. That's as of

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the close yesterday, since the UH, since the election. And

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for UH for a typical US home, the home builders

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>say that's added about three thousand dollars to the UH

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to to the cost of a home. So so you

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of have two sides here in the US. You

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>have the people who buy the lumber and the people

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>who sell the lumber. The people who buy the lumber

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.479
<v Speaker 1>they want to keep these lumber imports cheap, so so

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>they they don't want to see the the US UH

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>impose these UH impose these tariffs. The people who sell

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>sell the lumber, you know, big timber companies like wire Houser,

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>which actually has some UH they've they've got some for

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in Canada as well as the US, but most mostly

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in the US. UH. Local lumber companies and in places

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like how wide is the gap between Canadian lumber and

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the US lumber. So, so the tariffs that they're that

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they're hoping to so the lumber market, it's a it's

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a Canadian lumber in US lumber is competing with each other. Right,

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So the you know, because it's traded right, I mean, yeah,

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>traded right, it's up three three points six today, right,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>And but I've been looking, I'm going back all the

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.239
<v Speaker 1>way to May of of last year, and you're right,

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's up. The prices up more than right, and and

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and so the Canadian Canadian US lumber is always competing,

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so they're selling for about the same price. The difference

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>here is that the cost of lumber, of producing lumber

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>in Canada, U S companies say, is much lower. So

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs that UM we're the US is inspected expected

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to impose as soon as next week or starting next week,

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>could run a run between thirty and according to some analysts,

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and the impact of that would be to make US

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>companies much more competitive, at least in their eyes, and

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to make Canadian companies much less competitive, which could result

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>in you know, mills closing in Canada, perhaps mills opening

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and the US market share of the

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>lumber market rising. So that would benefit companies obviously that

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>have these operations in the United States. That's right, Yeah,

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>it say so so that this is all This is

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>all about the US market share versus the versus the

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Canadian market share. For for the lumber producers, for the

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>home builders. You know, they're so frustrated by the UH

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>quickly rising costs of lumber that you know, they're already

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>looking for sources of supply elsewhere. They send a trade

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>delegation to Chile in September. They've been talking to governments

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>and producers in Sweden and Brazil, you know, basically anybody

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>who grows trees because they want to keep What about

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>alternatives to lumber for home builders, and you know that's uh.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>I I think we're they're going to be framing homes

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>with with soft lumber for UH for quite a while.

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're gonna try to reinvent the reinvent

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the home building process. And I mean obviously, but not

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, in other places, in other places around the world. Um,

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>they use other you know, materials to to do build

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>large scale housing. Yeah. And and you know one of

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>the points that the timber producers make is that that

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>lumber you know, they say, is it's not it's not

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of a cost of a home. You know,

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of a cost of a home comes in, uh,

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, labor costs and other materials, land costs, and

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and so they they're um, uh, the lumber lobby United

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>States says, they're you know, at least somewhat you know,

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>mystified that the home builders are fighting so hard against

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.479
<v Speaker 1>against these tariffs. But you know, all already homebuilders are

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>competing against um, against existing homes with the new homes,

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>and so it's it's difficult for them to pass the

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>costs nder buyer. So this this rise in LUMBERCASI, it's

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>directly into their profits. Thanks very much for joining us.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Joe Light. Hey Joe, what's your Twitter handle? It's at

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Joe Light. That's all you need to know. Our financial

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 1>regulation reporter joining us from Washington. Home builders could be

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>losers in an early test of Donald Trump's trade policy.

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>High yield. Well, if you're looking for high yield, what

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 1>does that mean these days? High yield was up to

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>nearly three percent as of the end of February, and

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>then it's stumbled. Well, let's find out more from Ken Monahan.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>He is the head of Global High year Yield at

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>a mundy Smith Breeden. They helped him manage ten point

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>nine billion dollars and they're based in Durham, North Carolina. Ken,

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for being with us. Why don't you

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 1>first just explain a little bit about your role there,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>what you are actively doing, and then tell us your

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>perspective on what's happening with with yields right now for

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>these specific types of bonds. Yeah, I Keim, and thanks

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for asking me to join you today. Um. I'm focused

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>on the global high yield markets. So that includes not

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>only the US high yield marketplace, which we're all familiar with,

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>but also the European high yield market as well as

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>emerging market corporate debt. So you're looking at a marketplace

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>which is approximately two point trillion dollars, of which about

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that is US high yield, about is Europe and about

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the remainder is is e M corporate. So that's that's

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>what my focus is. And I've been doing this for

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time with more gray hair than I care

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>to count. Okay, all right, well well maybe all right,

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>so so share some of your wisdom with us right now. Well,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, I said, we had we had a

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong rally coming into February. Market was up quite strong,

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and then kind of petered out in March. And I

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>think that there were a couple of head winds we

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>were experiencing. Certainly one of them was in the retail

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>side of things. Obviously, there's been a lot of headline

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>news both for investment grade companies as well as how

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you'd companies like Jake Crewe for example, and sears Um

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>regarding head winds in the retail space, and that I think,

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>what's your prognosis? Well, you know, I think that that

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>both are facing ultimate restructuring. Um. I think it's pretty

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>much in the news already on J. C. Penny and

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.479
<v Speaker 1>dialogue is taking place with creditors as it as we

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>speak with sears it's uh, it's been a longer term issue.

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>They've been uh deteriorating in quality for a long period

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of time and uh and uh the equity uh controlling

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>equity shareholders you know, has been selling the crown jewels

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>along the way, uh to keep the engine going. And uh,

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think ultimately that will doesn't solve the

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>problem that Sears of of a deteriorating business. Well just

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>give you Sears, of course we know is rutten and

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>owned by Eddie Lampert hedge fund manager. And well I'll

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>just say investor at this point because I mean I'm

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Sears holdings and it's a one and

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 1>a half billion dollar market capital right now. Yeah, well

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you know him. It's that it's like that old story

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>or the old adage, when a good business, a bad business,

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and a great management team to come together, it's usually

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>the bad business that keeps his reputation intact. So I

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's what you're seeing here right now. Interesting. Okay, So, um,

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>where do you want to go? Because you know you

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>said there's the two point two trillion and then you

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>know you can slice and dice it really either by

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>industry or by currency. What's the best way to approach

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>what is happening now? Because I mean we are late

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>in a cycle. We are late in a cycle. But

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think you know you we're not necessarily

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>expecting the cycle to blow up the way the way

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it did in a way or oh nine. I think

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we know you talked to sociologists. They also

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they always talked about the concept of recency and primacy,

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the concepts being you know, you were most impacted or

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>by our most recent experience, which in this case obviously

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>was the O eight or O nine recession as well

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>as the first one we've had exposure to. I think

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>the O eight or O nine one was a highly

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>unu to a one because it impacted the banking system

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in a major way. And obviously we've had the banks

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>recapitalized in the US in particular, there's some that are

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>still need to work in Europe, but the U S

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>banks have raised a lot of capital. So whatever headwinds

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>were expecting talking about late in the credit cycle, I

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're necessarily expecting it to be is broader

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>recession when it ultimately occurs, as we experienced in eight

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:27.239
<v Speaker 1>or oh nine. You know, if you look back at

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>previous recessions, he would typically find that they impacted you know,

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>one or two industries in particular. So if you look

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>back at the O two three oh two oh three recession, um,

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that one was much more focused on telecom. So there's

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly some sectors right now that uh that you know,

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>would cause concerns going forward, and maybe the ones that

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>will be most impacted, you know, if we have a

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>recession in a year or two. Retail is perhaps at

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the top of the list, but there's others like technology,

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>uh that some are concerned about as well. You know,

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you can argue that oil and gas and metals and

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:00.959
<v Speaker 1>mining already had a session of their own, you know,

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>secular problems, uh with the kind of period from late

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to fourteen through the early part of last year. Hm.

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just digesting all that because you know that, I mean,

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's an interesting scenario if it if it

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>plays out that way. Yeah, you know, I think, look,

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think how many how many interest rate increases

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think are on the table right now? Well,

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it looks like too for this year,

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, is what our guess is. But I recognize

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that an increase in interest rates can impact uh corporate credit.

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think the things that we get concerned about

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>typically Um, coming into a recession or laid in the

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>credit cycle, we're not seeing as much of this time

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>so typically you know, so is there anything worth buying

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>right now? Well? I think that there is. I think

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're gonna let's recognize that the benefit of

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the high yield marketplaces for US high yield is that

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you're picking up effectively one point seven basis points a

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>day of of current income. All right, so I'll give

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you a thirty seconds, go ahead. Well, I you know,

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that the the answer from our perspective is is,

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we still think that there's opportunities in the

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>steel sector for example. UM, we're ultimately looking for opportunities

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in retail. We recognize that there's going to be the

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>proverbial throwing the baby out with the bath water, and

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>there are retailers that they're going to survive. Uh. You know,

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we look at L Brands, for example, is a perfect

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>example of a very high quality credit and a double

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>B space that could be investment grade if it wished

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to be. Uh. They've done a better job at taking

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:26.959
<v Speaker 1>care of their shareholders, and they have their bondholders, and

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>those bonds are under pressure. At some point they'll be

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting to buy. Maybe not yet. Yeah, well I'm checking

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>them on the Bloomberg and uh well, if we'll have

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to see, well, we're gonna put them there and then

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we'll have you back and we'll be

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>able to sort of track the progress of those uh

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>L brands bonds. Thanks very much for joining us. Ken

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Monahan is the head of Global high Yield at a

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Mundy Smith Breeden, helping to manage ten point nine billion dollars.

0:30:53.240 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>They're based in Durham, North Carolina. Thanks for listening to

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg pien L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.