WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2021 NFL MegaPod Week 13 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man No Down Man Thursday morning, December one.

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>It is the Beating the Book podcast Megabod week number

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>thirteen in the National Football League. I cannot believe it

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is December. Cannot believe it is week thirteen. It's Kill

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Alexander as always staples of the show alongside to my

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>left here live at the d where we always do

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>our megapods. It is the vice president of Operations and

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Circus Sports, Derek Stephen's conciliary co host of odds on

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>at Visan Michael Palmiery. Good morning to you, like Palmiery

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>runs the Dairy Queen and Nagara does. He's one of

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the visas. Uh, very loyal subscribers like Palmier. Yeah, yeah,

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that's why I went Palmier instead of Palmetto like good good,

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>good morning. Yeah, we have time for this. And that's

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Todd wishing of everybody from his mom's core cadeck And

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we're told that his mom is not home and she

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't put anybody else in charge of the house. This

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is said he said I could do whatever I want.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Did she did? She did? She put a hold on

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Gazette. Uh, posts that we don't get that. Sorry,

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>she hold this is great. God wish that everybody. Dad.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you doing, man, killy? Why didn't you tell everybody

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>why we're gonna have to go fast because of your

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>beautiful Well, so here's what I did. I'm not a

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>bright individual case you were wondering. So I'm always dealing

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>with time zones, and i have seventy five shows I

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>do a week, and I sleep when I'm not doing

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a show, so I'm a little scattered. So I told

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Bob because he's in the Mountain time zone. But instead

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of just writing, hey, ten thirty like a jackass, I

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote ten thirty Pacific because I shut my brain off,

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>so he thought it was an hour from now, and

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>so now he's trying to figure out the skype and

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's all my fault. Are you happy? You might

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have too many irons in the fire, maybe maybe a few,

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>But that explained to them that we're gonna have to

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>run through quickly because we spent half an hour trying

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to fix the text. We're not gonna run through quickly.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do our normal survivor thing. When Bob joins us,

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>he joins is if he joins it so we'll start

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>with the whole show faster, because let's listen. I'll give

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>my picks and leave, and then you guys can't continue on. UM,

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:16.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it'll be that. I don't think it'll

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>be much faster. And maybe maybe if you let us start.

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>I like to get I like to listen to the

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>beginning of odds on It's Kine of the greatest shows

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 1>on radio. I don't want to miss that second best

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>PM show, Mike. Let me just say this, Mike Palm

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.679
<v Speaker 1>takes takes some Twitter pulse. Seriously, doesn't he could have

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>been the first four time MITCHI win before MITCHI. Alright,

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>so Circus Survivor is phenomenal. Twenty eight entries left out

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of four thousand and eight twenty six different people. Best

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 1>we can tell with twenty eight different entries, two people

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>have to under seventy. Couple weeks ago, we all took

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>me under at the end. Um, But okay, you weren't one.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 1>I did no listen to the video. Alright, great, I

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>will check the tap thousand dollars plus intrinsic value of

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the remaining twenty eight entries. This is phenomenal. Phenomenal, here's

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting, and you've broken it down better than I

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>ever could on your show. But let's get into this week.

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Like this week, who are the big favorites? Were the

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest favorites the Rams? Nobody hasn't left, Nobody the person

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>the two people who had Seattle who took Seattle this

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>last week with the last two people who had the RAMS,

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>now one of whom had New England didn't choose them.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Another another big favorite, Indianapolis. Only one left and remember

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>they're a Christmas game. That person has to take Indianapolis

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. I think I think so as well. Yeah,

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>um eight with Ksey, seven with Tampa Bay. Remember they

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>factor into bonus. If I don't think you can consider,

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>do you consider the bonus at this point? I couldn't,

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think you're crazy if you do. But you know,

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the two people with the two entries has

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City available, one in Tampa Bay and the other,

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>so they're the real test. Will they do that or

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they go to Philadelphia on both which could be the

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>neutron bomb this week. It could be Remember Philly was

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the biggest knockoff punch against the Giants, and Todd was

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>right about that he called that game correctly. Um, I

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>think people will use ten with Minnesota there at Detroit.

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Detroit's played like every other game horrifically and they're due

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>for this one. Yeah. Arizona seventeen people have them there

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>an eight point favorite at the Bears, but they're there

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Colts on Christmas. There's uh, there's one entry

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that has there's one person that has two entries. He

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:34.239
<v Speaker 1>has both San Francisco and Tennessee. If he gets to Christmas,

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>does he do the double option to survive at that point?

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to. But are we even getting there? Todd,

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>here's a question for you, yes or no? Will there

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>be someone go twenty and oh, yes or no? I

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>would probably go with no. Yeah. I don't think they're

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>still too far away. This one, This one is so

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>much different than last year. Last year when there was

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>plus and I got to December last year and I

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.679
<v Speaker 1>lost with a seventeen point favorite Rams at home against

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. That literally the next Raiders true that literally

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I would have the next three weeks I would have

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>won too. So it was literally the only one I

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>ended up losing this year. I would have I lost

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>on Buffalo and Jacksonville. I'd have lost three times since then, right, Like,

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the fact that these are still alive, these

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty six people is incredible. And one of them is

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is your friend Joe Peter. That's correct, Joe Peter is

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>one of them. Yes, And I would imagine and crack

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and I got into this a little bit on the

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers game. Do these folks start hedging away? Is it

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>too long of a runway still to hedge away? Did

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to Derek at all at Nightcap about chopping

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and how the chopp is impossible? Oh? So this is

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad we brought this up because what you said

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the other week might have confused summarized what he said.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's first get what I said that if people

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to share information, they could let Jeff Benson know that. Yes,

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>which is a little different than what Joe said, Jeff

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Benson reach out and give a proposition to everyone. Did

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you say that reach out? He did to have Jeff

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Benson queried the remaining entries if they were interested in

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>doing this job, not give him the other thirty nine

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>people's information, which is different. Right, But Derek then said

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to me, it can't happen. And here's why, because well, one,

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to pay out however, like a poker tournament,

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and then your deal is your deal. But here's the

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>other thing. Everybody lives in different states with different taxes,

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and then the gift tax is the big thing. You

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>know that if I give you more than fifteen thousand

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars in a given year, the giver gets taxed. Think

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>about that. So if one guy would have won it

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and said I'm gonna give everybody else one point five million,

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:33.119
<v Speaker 1>let's just say they want to do it a forty

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>weight chop, the guy gets six six million, and then

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get taxed on five point eight million. I mean,

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>so that right you guys. By the way, as long

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>as there's two people that have two entries, there's not

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a chop anyway. But I do think that

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>what you said the other week on the megapod could

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>have been misconstruction. I think so too. Maybe I wasn't clear,

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>but and I think everybody's fine with what you're saying now.

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't think anybody doesn't understand that. By

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, the Great Dr Bob is here, is that right,

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Bob stole. Are you there, Yeah, I'm here finally, Bob.

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I apologize for my time zone deficiencies, my fault for

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>writing the word pacific. My brain was shut off. We're

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>happy to have you. Oh I'm frustrated as hell, Gil,

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna I'm gonna handicap angry now maybe that hey,

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>angry handicapping coming. We're just finishing our Survivor discussion. So

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>there's twenty By by the way, Bob, there's twenty eight

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>entries left in Circus six million dollar um and Survivor.

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:40.559
<v Speaker 1>That what started with four thousand eighty entries, twenty eight left. Wow.

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And last year we started with thirteen nine and ended

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>with thirty five. Made it all the way thirty five.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I was wondered how much there's an extra week and

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>then there's the extra Christmas. Obviously, this year we have

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight now with four thousand eighty as a start,

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be awesome and Circu million um there's the leader

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is one in four and still has a game and

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a half lead because the consensus was one in four.

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you think the Vikings, they were the sixth

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>most popular pick. The top six picks were one in

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>five I know somebody went two and three. It is

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>like I picked up a game. Yeah for forty three

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen week? What are you? What is your record? Todd?

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe I'm thirty three and seven. Forty three and

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>seventeen leads it. There's two people at forty one, eighteen

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and one, and then another ten people at um forty

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>one and nineteen, and then at the bottom it's like

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and forty one is the lowest score so far

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Booby Prize for the year. There's so this

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is the final week of quarter three. There's one player

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>fourteen in one and there's twelve players I believe twelve

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>or fourteen that are thirteen and two and on the

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>bottom and it's it's the mirror. There's one player one

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in fourteen and twelve or four whatever that number is,

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>that are two in thirteen. Yeah, I might know that

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>person to really um, okay, bomb, are you did you

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 1>do any Survivor your loser pools or what did you

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>do this year? But you know, um, I started doing

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Survivor about eight years ago and the pool had about

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>three hundred people and at the time I won the

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>first year, I don't know he's a cake. Two years later,

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I won again, which is almost impossible, and the pool

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was like three hundred and fifty people then, and then

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>I've been hitting a dry spell ever since. Normally I

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>get to about week fourteen or fifteen. I have two

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>entries this week. I craped out early. But I have

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a friend that's in and he's he seeks my advice.

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And he was going between Dallas and Baltimore last week,

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and our angle was, don't do Dallas just for game

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>theory purposes, because every a lot of people are on Dallas.

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>So he said, let's do Baltimore. And so I'm like,

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>thank god Dallas lost, because if Dallas, little one in

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore were lost. After giving him that advice, I had

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>owed him a lot. But he's still alive and seeking

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>my advice again this week, so we'll see. I might

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>give it. I might we We're looking at Minnesota as

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a possibility for him, but I've been out long time.

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>This year, I did a whole thing on a numbers game.

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>They got a got I guess like seven thousand view

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is about how I did a thought exercise with Jeff

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Parl's my producer, and I was like a hundred thirty

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>three people took Dallas, and Jeff had said it. Jeff

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>was on record to saying I hate the Raiders today,

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and I said, if if you knew a hundred thirty three,

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take Dallas. By the way, the point of

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that was, you could estimate that about eighty would even

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>before the numbers came out that it was a d

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>He said, no, I still wouldn't take the Raiders. And

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, this is the problem with people playing Survivor.

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>They don't get the game theory. There was eighty two

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that could have taken Dallas, add and you could estimate it. Yeah, alright, Uh,

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 1>we are on a on a shorter time because of

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>my error, and Mike's got odds on to do with

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>them all, show them all. Will hopefully be the guest

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>next week on our regular weekly guest Frank Schwab from

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>me who sports, is actually gonna be in studio because

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>he's in Vegas. So we're sweetig show today. All right, Uh,

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>you know I'm gonna I'm gonna take my normal a

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>lot amount of time to do my full detailed analysis,

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>so just to warn us, Okay, okay, well let's start

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>real quick Todd with how we did last week. Everybody

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>went two in one. Uh so the standings stayed the same.

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>As far as games back, really half a game back

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>from myth Mike is at seventeen and nineteen, Mike's at

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>seventeen eighteen and one, and I am just a game

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.599
<v Speaker 1>and a half back at sixteen and twenty. On the

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>teaser side, there were two losers. Those two people are

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>sitting in far Canada. Gillen might hear their names. They

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>both thought Dallas was gonna win with the teaser, and

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I survived with the teaser of the Pats in Miami.

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>You guys still don't believe in the Pats. I have

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>forty one to one to win the Super Bowl. Thirty

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>one to win the Super Bowl really tells me who

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>have they beaten? They've beaten the teams that have been

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>placed in front of them, So be careful for Bill

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Belichick has it bold combined record of New England's beating

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 1>opponents thirty eight and fifty three. For those of you

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>score Buffaloff combined record of those teams they've beaten thirty

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>one and forty seven. Oh yeah, I didn't hear you.

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>The experiment about Buffalo's thinking, well, I don't know, I

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have. My only two futures are on the Titans

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and on the Colts. Those are my only two futures.

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>But you do agree that pages are going to be

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs, and if anything, it's going to be

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they'll be in the playoffs. They'll play in the playoffs. Absolutely,

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this will be a great This will be a very

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting Monday night game where I think they have the advantage,

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get into that any Thursday night thoughts. Cowboys

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and Saints. We learned this morning officially Alvin Kamara is

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>out for the Saints, as are there two linemen Um

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Armstead and Rama check is out, so they are depleted.

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we're getting a Taysom Hill start today. Amari

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Cooper is with the Cowboys off the COVID list. Bob

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Any play on this game. I got in on the

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys last night. Minus five. It's six everywhere, at least

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>six and a half now, II lean with Eileen with

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Dallas now after the injury adjustments. Um, the injury adjustments

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>ended up being close to about a point and a half.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Pretty big adjust and I think the true line should

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>be Dallas by eight or so. So I think it's

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good guy on Dallas. But I didn't bet it.

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Didn't bet it though, you guys, I'm gonna tease him

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>once again. I'm gonna tease Dallas. Um, just like last week.

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You know I can't blame Meg returns to its vomit,

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the pick returns to the buyer, and the burnt fools

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 1>bandaged finger goes wobbling back to the fire. Wow, what

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>has happened? I'm a little che I love kipling, your

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>great imterialist. My mom used to say, Rue, That's why

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I never miss a minute of odds on daily kind

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of thing, Todd. Any thoughts on tonight's game? I I

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>hate this game. I'll be betting in any game as usual.

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I just don't like it and I hate this game. Yeah,

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the Cowboys again. Minus five got that last

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>night before the move here. Hopefully that works out all right,

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So let us begin with best bets, Bob. We start

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>with you your first for week thirteam, sir. I not

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that I don't believe in New England. I just like

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo here. My numbers like Buffalo, even if even if

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you use New England improved defense since they've switched the

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>zone more zone than man demn six games ago and

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>they've won all six. Um. Uh, they've been a little fortunate. UM.

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>In this one against the Chargers, they were out gained

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>by one point seven yards for play and won that one.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>In Week nine, they only had two hundred and seventy

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>three total yards and got ten of their points on

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald's interceptions. That would have been a closer game. Uh.

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>They caught the Falcons on a short week Thursday night

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>game with a rookie head coach had never prepared for

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a Thursday game, and the Falcons were out without their

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>three three of the top four receivers, and then they

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>beat the crap out of them. So I say there's

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit of like the last week Titans

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>were out, didn't have Henry in their top two receivers,

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>so they did played better than they should have even

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>after adjusting for all that stuff. But now they take

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on Buffalo. Buffalo, they didn't have Tremaine Edmunds last week

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the linebacker, and they gave up a lot of running

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>yards as against Indianapolis. They gave up two undred sixty

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>four yards Indianapolis. But when Edmunds has been in the game.

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>He's got a really high stop right over ten percent

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>when he's played this year. Buffalo is only allowing three

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>point six yards per carry. But I think they'll be

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>able to stop what New England likes to do, which

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is run the ball and play ball control. There's gonna

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>be high winds Monday night in Buffalo. I trust Josh

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Allen's arm over mac Jones's arm um, but I think

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough match of for New England's offense. There's

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>one thing I like here in general, this is something

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you should listen to. Uh, high scoring teams are relatively

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>better at home, and good defenses are also relatively better

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>at home. When a tea maveraging twenty four points or

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>more is at home from game seven on, so they've

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>established that they're a good offensive team and they're facing

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a team that's a lot of less than eight team

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>points per game through seven through six games or more.

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>There's been four over four hundred such games like that.

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, going back in my database of the

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>time the high scoring home team covers the spread against

0:15:56.440 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the good defensive team at home. Now, if the line

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is less than minus fourts, you're talking about a competitive game.

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It's one thirty three and seventy seven against the spread,

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So there's some technical stuff that favors a good home,

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a good a good offensive team at home against a

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>good defensive team. And my ratings like Buffler, I think

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>go On should be at least four points, So I'm

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>going with the Bills. Todder Yapo. Is that one of

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>your picks on New England? No? No, I actually, if

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>if any if I had to bet this game, I

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>would take Buffalo too. I think, you know, I agree

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>with everything that Dr Bob said. I also think that

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>how many weeks in a row in the NFL you

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>just continued to put a game after game after game

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>after game with no mistakes, no problems. It's sooner or

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>later you know something happened. So I certainly don't want

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>any part of this game, and if I did, I

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>would take Muffler. What's interesting is that, is that, Bob,

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that you went with the high winds is most people,

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>when they say, oh, it's gonna be twenty three miles

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>per hour wins, they would then the next thing they

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>would say, is, oh, well, New England's running game is

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>better than that of Buffalo, so that would swing them

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>towards New England. But you're not saying that, oh, because

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo can stop the run open New England. But would

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you rather have in the game like that? Would you

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>rather have josh Alan crambling around and getting yards with

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>his feet? Yeah? Alright, no makes sense. Yeah, Mikey, give

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 1>me the Raiders two and alf short week for Washington,

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>travel across the country, no kicker. Raiders get the extra

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>rest off playing off Thanksgiving, and and look, Washington goes,

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Washington goes, Cowboys, Eagles, Cowboys Eggles, Giants. Everything else is

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in their division. It's still in front of them. If

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they lose this game, I'll later two and a half.

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>The only thing with this is the you're saying you

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>need a kicker. Is that what you're saying could be affective.

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>The only thing with this is Waller hasn't been limited

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.639
<v Speaker 1>in practice and DeShawn Jackson has not been in Pride

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>or the other way around. Waller has not been in

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and DeShawn has been limited. So you do have to

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>worry about that. And that's the problem with a lot

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of these games, like you can't do anything right until

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>right before kickoff. Bills in New England, I probably in

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the I like Buffalo early that I like New England

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and now I probably won't even play it. And the

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Raiders have gone at least three weeks without a disaster happening.

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean usually they every one week there's a disaster.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>To number one. My number one pick is I'm going

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>back to the well where I always go when I

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>really need to pick. That is the Jacksonville Jaguars under

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the forty A. Why why do you have to shake

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>your head? What's wrong with that? Why? Because it one

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>last week? This is your Tampa Bay over for this year.

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you have to just you know, key in on something.

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The Jaguars, I believe, are like I think they've only

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>gone over two times a year. And the reason is

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is it's a really difficult uh statistical analysis in teams

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>where NFL games play the game and do not score points,

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't go over and guess what, they don't score point.

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So just look at what happened every week. It's very

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult to go over if you can't score the ball.

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And against the Rams on the road. Dr Bob just

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>gave me a great thing where he said that great

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>defensive teams are even better at home. So the Rams

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>are probably the only way this game goes over, because

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>if it's like Houston game when Rams were up thirty

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>eight and nothing that decided to quit playing and gave

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>him a bunch of back. The only way this goes

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>over this game is going under the forty game the

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Jacks score, they get seven or ten, you're still gonna

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>make it because the ramball Dogs. And just to clarify,

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo is two and a half and the Raiders or

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>two and a half, and the previous two games that

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about. Okay, my first listen, there's there's

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of thought to this, but I'm just

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you my guessing lines reaction to the Minnesota

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Vikings Detroit Lions line. I don't understand why this is seven.

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>If it's because it's Dalvin cook out and Alexander Madison in,

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that shouldn't be a reason for it to stay at seven.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>The Lions are not a good football team. There's no

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift now, who is a major portion of the

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>offense of any semblance of offense that they did have.

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings have lost a total all all six of

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>their games by a total of twenty six points. I

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>know they were in a dog fight with Detroit the

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>first time around, where it took a kirk Cousin's miracle

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to win this I don't see that happening here. I

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>think this is the game where the Vikings take out

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>all of their frustrations and I will lay the seven

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>on the road. Okay, so you're going with Mikey's man

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>crush the kirk Cousins led Minnesota. But Mike you how

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>did you feel about kirk Cousins lining up behind a

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>guy who didn't have the ball to snap to him

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in a big spot the first thing once the receiver

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>being not a position confused him. Yes, if he wouldn't

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>have had to move the receiver to the other side

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of the field, he would have known where the center

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was do So it's not it's comparative negligence. Troy Aikman

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>did that once upon a time. As I recalled Bob

0:20:54.760 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>number two again, San Francis go on month on Sunday Night,

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Well fco. San Francisco's won three games in a row.

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I had them as the best bet last week against Minnesota.

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>But Dieba Samuel being out is a big deal and

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's being fully factored in Samuel's averaging

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>eleven points seven yards per target. The rest of the

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>board Niners receivers are all sub average, averaging six point

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>seven point six art per target. As a group, the

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>difference is about two points per game just in the

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>receiving part, and at another half point for Samuel's running.

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>That's about a two and a half point adjustment for

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for Samuel, He's such a big part of what that

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>offense does, and without him, I think Garoppolo is gonna struggle. Uh.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Niners have a good ground game, but Seattle's got a

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 1>good run defense. I think the Niners offense will struggle here.

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Now the big question is Russell Wilson. Has been a

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk about his finger not being quite right.

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they did bring him back a week early.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>In the first game against Green Bay. When he first

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>came back, the only average three point one yards per

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>pass play. The next week he was better at average

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>six point o yards per pass playing week eleven, last

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>week average seven point one yards per pass play. The

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>fingers getting better. I still docked them a little bit

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I want to see it first. But

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of games have been right around his

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>his season average, and as far as yards per pass

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>play go, the big problem with Seattle this year is

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're not converting on third downs, which is something

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit rare for for Wilson. He's only completed

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight percent of his passes on third down this year.

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>That would be the worst of any qualified quarterback since

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Mark Drew Nell in two thousand four. Now Wilson Wilson's

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>career completion percentage on third down, So there's a lot

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of randomness and that he's only completed thirty eight percent

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of his third downs this year, and I think that's

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that's got to be mostly random, and I don't

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to continue. On the yards per play basis,

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is a little bit better than average, but they're

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>they're bad because they're not completing third downs like they should.

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that will improve and they you know, they

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>also had without Russell Wilson for three games, then he

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>played with a bad finger against Green Bay. But I

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>think they're an average team here. And when the Niners

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>without Samuel and without Warner, who was a good a

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>good coverage linebacker and he's he's got some value without

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>those guys. I think the Niners are around an average team.

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that Seattle should be favored here. Now you've

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>got Pete Carroll coming off three straight losses, off two

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>straight losses, he's sixteen, three and one against the spread.

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Last week obviously was one of those losses. But he's

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>three and one against the spread off consecutive losses this

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>year three and oh off three or more consecutive losses.

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Covering those games might average of fifteen points. I just

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think Seattle is so undervalued right now for various reasons.

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>But the Niners I think a little overrated now because

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they've won three in a row, but they're not taking

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>full into account Samuel being out. So I I think

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Seattle should be favored here by at least the home port,

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>at least the home field advantage. So Salt play on Seattle. Bob,

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you you may have taken me off two games now

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>because I I liked New England and I liked San

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Francisco in this but the DEEPO Samuel point is a

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>great one. I even said like there was a Bizarro

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>m v P like literal m v P. Cor Daryl

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Patterson for the Falcons and Deebo Samuel for the Niners. Like,

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>what are those teams without those two guys. It's just

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>because the difference between who's replacing them is so huge.

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>D Is this three or three and a half? Officially

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>three and a half for for Dr Ball alright, Mikey two. Yeah,

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna agree um with Dr Bob's pick on Buffalo. Okay,

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I'd rather have Josh Allen. Are you taking

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it though, Yeah, I'm that's my second pick. Look, he's

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>right to this effect of Josh Allen's ability with his

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>legs is probably going to be the difference here. Also

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in wind, he played in more wind conditions. He's used

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to Orchard Park, played at Wyoming. Mac Jones is a Jacksonville,

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Florida kid that played at Alabama. Right, and he's gotten

0:24:58.320 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of New England. They really haven't had

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>bad weather in New England so far in the games

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that he's played at this time of the year. Agree

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>with Bob Buffalo minus to an aunt Dot number two,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>dott I'm gonna do something I swore I wouldn't never

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>do it again and bet on Pat Ryan Unfortunately, Uh,

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys, Uh, he's getting eleven points. I can't stand him.

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I hate him with a with a fiery hot passion.

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. The last time they played, it

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 1>was a three point game until two. Pick six is

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end, and the Buccaneers aren't exactly you know,

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>world beaters. I mean, yes, they've blown out some teams

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>like the Bears, the Giants, but there've been other games

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that they look very pedestrian. They've bought a lot of injuries.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>And I get Atlanta plus eleven at home last year.

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Even there was a game late the season where Atlanta

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>was hit by seventeen points and blew the game to

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. So their divisional game. They know who this

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>team is. They've hung around with them before. I'm gonna

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>hold my nose and Mattie Ice, I can't believe I'm

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>doing it. It's almost as bad as as betting on

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers. But I'm gonna bed on. Mattie Ice must

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>still love and I hate to do it. Todd, you

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>may hate this more, but I'm with you. Of the

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>big of the big favorites, I've said all week, I go,

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>there's two that I love. It's Minnesota in Indianapolis. But

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I actually have the audacity to think that Atlanta might

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>take Tampa Bay down to the wire. So I'm not

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna add anything and the interest of time, but I'm

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>on Atlanta. Been talking about on the numbers game this week.

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Atlanta as well as my number two. Bob

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>your third. Yeah, I'm gonna go with Indianapolis here. You

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned that I use them in a teaser that

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>earlier than the week when the line is eight and

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a half, I could tease them down to below three.

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>It's up to ten now. Well, I just think they

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>crush Houston. I mean, the Colts maps up well are

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>they have eight point one yards per play against Houston's

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>defense in Week six. Uh Texans are last in the

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>league in yards per tempt allowed on deep passes and

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz is in the top ten in past attempts

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of twenty yards more are yards are more so they

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>like to throw it deep. Houston can't stop that. Also,

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Houston's often They've got really gunshots Tyrod Taylor and three

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>inter steptions against the Dolphins a few weeks ago, and

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>since then they've been really trying to run the ball

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot more more than fifty percent of the time.

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But they can't run the ball. They ever done like

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>three point two yards per run, so they've gotten a

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>really gun shy and now they're going through their weakness,

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>which is running the ball. So I just think they're

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>completely messed up on offense. Hoults should take advantage of

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the defense. And I favor the Cults by fourteen in

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>my ratings. So, uh, Colts, mine is ten now, unfortunately,

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but you used them earlier in the parlay. But mineus

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>ten is good. Let me let me just step in.

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>That is my number three as well. I have the

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Colts earlier in the week in a teaser which we'll

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about later. Um, but the Colts, to me again

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>from guessing lines, Colts and Vikings were the ones of

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the of the big favorites. I'm like, that's not big enough,

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and so the Colts are my number three as well.

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I bet the Colts this week forty to one to

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>win the Super Bowl because I think that's the best

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>bet on the board. I'm not saying they're gonna win it,

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but I love that number. I think it's a sneaky,

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>great football team that by the way, have you have

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you watched have you watched the in season hard Knocks.

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I don't usually talk about this, but

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I talked about the numbers. I haven't talked about megapod

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>because I usually like numbers more than anything. But if

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you watch the in season Colts Hard Knocks, and if

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you've watched enough football in your lifetime, there are characteristics

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 1>of this football team where when you watch it, you

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>become a super impressed with that organization. With Frank Reich

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>just gonna finish the thought, they have a continuity that

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>football team. They hang out with each other that if

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you watch, if you if you remember great Redskins teams

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in the past, great Watchington football teams in the past,

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that was what they won Super Bowls doing it sounds

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>like a quaint bullshit notion, but there are things about

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>their elements of this football team where you immediately recognize.

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>You're like, oh, there are a lot more there. There

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>are a lot more intact than some of these other

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>teams that make stupid decisions in game in type ball games,

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the Colts will never do that. They've got super there.

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Their best players on offensive events, Jonathan Taylor, Darius Leonard

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>are super intelligent guys. Also, um I love the Colts

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>long term. I love him in this game. Is Carson Wentz,

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Doug William or Mark Riffin? He would be neither. He's

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy you worry about making a horrible mistake in

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a playoff. Yeah, but you know what,

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.959
<v Speaker 1>he has mastered the long past. Go for the passengerference. Yes,

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>he had number three. Mikey. Could I ask Dr Bob

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a question or two? I was just time to time

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bob when you do these situational cover percentages, like

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what you said in the in the game with the

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>team's high scoring against decent defense, how many games or

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>when the moon is in the seventh house and Jupiter

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a ligned? What percentage are you looking for that triggers

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a bet? Is a fifty fifties? Have you quoted like

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine on the first one? Nothing? Nothing? No situations

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>trigger a beta. The situation might eat me off of

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>something that my math model likes, or might make me

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>lower the rating on something my math model likes to

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>make it a lesser bet. But I never bet a

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>game based on a situation. And then my second question

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is based off them based on the t score. My

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>second question on my second question is based on your

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>your college wind total over unders that you did this year.

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>But but but the fact like they had already won

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>half of them by week five, What was your key

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to being so successful with those this year? Bob? If

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you could sho funny is you know? I was doing

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>these things and normally I get like five to seven

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of these that qualify, and I need historically a need

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:51.479
<v Speaker 1>a one point to wind differential between my predicted winds

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and the odds adjusted market, and this year I had

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty four of them. They it went, I'm like, well,

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that's maybe it's the maybe it's the year before, um,

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you know that the COVID year, and there were a

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of nonconference games, and maybe my maybe my algorithms

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>might not are a little off. And so I got

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>really conservative and I only released the eleven they were

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the four were twenty three and one. Oh my god.

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, but but I had every reason to

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>doubt that, you know, because normally have like I said,

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>five to seven that qualified, and I have twenty four

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the qualified. I mean, what the hell is going on here?

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But as it turns out, my my futures were better

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>than they've ever been. I started this season off gang Bus.

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I was fourteen and one to start the season.

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>How my college plays and then and all the wind

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>totals one. So but I still had reason to doubt it.

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>But I forget what your questions, but I think that

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>success had to do with my algorithms are just we're

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>just better at adjusting for last year's odd season. Thank

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you for bringing that up. Well, I followed. I followed

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a film because he went threw him on the numbers game,

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it was remarkable. They didn't just they didn't

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>just win, they crushed. They crushed by the either under

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the total or over total by two or three games,

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>uh or what you want? My third pick, I'll go

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>back to the well, like Todd says, look at I

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>think this Miami Dolphins team is better than we get.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Give him credit for no, because because the Giants, I mean, yeah,

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they'd be Philadelphia, but are they gonna have a plus

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>four turnover margin against Miami? This Miami defense is good.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Flora's didn't become a bad coach the first eight weeks

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the year, right, and you've got a little continuity

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>now with two So yeah, I'm gonna lay the four here,

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, Todd. If that's your pick, tis going from

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>one to seven to five. And it was gonna be

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>my pick, but now I don't know if I want

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to do it. And Miami has two games in front

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of them, they could get the seven and seven very easily.

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh by the way, Gilly, somebody just walked in. It's

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>um Dennis Green. Do you remember Dennis Green, the coach

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Minnesota Vikings. We are who they thought they Well,

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Green are who we thought him. Billion Dennis. This

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is people don't know this. Billion Dennis were long lost

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>twins raised by different parents, and Billy was raised here

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh. And he just walked in and he just

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>told me the Petsburg Stillars are who we thought they were.

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>At the end, stilled my whole routine here that I

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>worked up for YenS. But I'm telling you the strollers

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think about it's our great organization that taught us the

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>five thought we're just good depart stores at Todd Todd.

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Because you went crazy, we lost your audio. So you're on,

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>You're on Baltimore. In other words, No, I'm not even

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>on the game. I just wanted to tell you about

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Billy Creek. Okay, what's your pick, Todd? Todd, I have

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>five minutes. Let's don't get don't get sauceme. My pick

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be My pick was gonna be Miami. But

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna do it because I need to bake

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:04.239
<v Speaker 1>some brown up against uh Mr Michael Palm. So I'm

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to the one that I was gonna go

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>before that, and that is going to be the under

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cartet game. Going to be my nick? It was not?

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>It was I gave it out on odd Time yesterday.

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Was it really that? The under forty under forty four,

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe is the bailing number under forty four in

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bears against Arizona. And the reason I like this

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is because Arizona is really good. I just I just

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>don't see the Bears with their struggle on offense, regardless

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of who plays quarterback, I'd rather see fields. But even

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>if even if it's Andy Dalton, I don't see them

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 1>scoring a lot of points against Arizona. Uh. Kyler Murray

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>also questionable. Who knows what they're gonna be, whether they're

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to really roll out the offensive had Carpet,

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I doubt it. So I just like to see the

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, service game planned by Arizona. So like how

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they want against Seattle on the road, low scoring game

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>under forty bears Arizona. All right, there you go. What's

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the number again? Under what? Okay? Teaser of the week

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 1>two legs? Six point teaser? You have to give your third?

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You have to give your third? No, I did it?

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Was Indianapolis already? Oh Indies your third? Okay in minus

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>have Indie minus ten. Dr Bob at Dr Bob Sports,

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bob Sports on Twitter at dr bob sports dot com,

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>pioneer and using predictive modeling to predict NFL and other sports. Um,

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>what is your two leg teaser of the week, sir? Well,

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:40.879
<v Speaker 1>now that Indianapolis is more than eight and a half,

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I would go with Minnesota and Arizona. So Minnesota Vikings

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 1>down to one and what was the other one? Book

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Arizona down to one and a half. There is an

0:35:54.320 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>offense Todd Todd minus Vikings, Cowboys Minnesota to minus one

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys even let's hope that we can get

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a win from the Saints. Mine is mine was already

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>my account was Minnesota indian Apples. But as as Bob said,

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Indian Apples is no longer in teaser range here, so

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's Minnesota and Washington. Okay, Minnesota and the w f

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>T s of two eight and a half Okay. I

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>am not gonna go with what you guys have. In fact,

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how anyone could bet on Kirk Cousins,

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but I did it last week. In the end game,

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Arizona down to one and a

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>half minus wonderful, and I'm gonna go with my Pats

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:43.919
<v Speaker 1>up to eight and a half. I'm not gonna doubt.

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that Pats may have trouble winning this game,

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>but I also can't see them getting blown out. To

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>give me the pat plus eight and a half was

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>my second Yeah, I like here's better than mine now? Actually,

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>all right? Final two questions that end every megapod, And

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of choices for this one. Which

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is the big favorite most likely to lose? Outright? Dallas

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is now a choice in this I guess Dallas tonight

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>at New Orleans at six and a half, Minnesota seven

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at Detroit, Arizona seven and a half point

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>favorites at Chicago Tampa Bay eleven point favorites at Atlanta

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, nine and a half point favorites at home

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.240
<v Speaker 1>against Denver, Indianapolis ten point favorites on the road against Houston.

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 1>My goodness, Philly seven point favorites on the road at

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. Uh, please don't answer that. Everybody's gonna answer that.

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Rams thirteen point favorites at home against Jacksonville, which is

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the most likely to lose out right, Bob, I have

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:35.240
<v Speaker 1>all of them winning by seven or more, and Philly

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I have winning by seven. So I guess that would

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>be my most likely to lose. Eagles for me to Toddy, Uh, yeah,

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I could see the Vikings lose. Oh stop it, Okay,

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about? It? All right? And then finally,

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>if you lived in a bizarro world and you were

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>forced to bet aside on every single game, but you

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>were allowed one pass one game that you wanted no

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>part of whatsoever, Bob, that game would be Chargers and Bengals.

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>That's mine, same Charges and Bengals. For me, it's Ravens

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:17.439
<v Speaker 1>and Steelers. Oh interesting, DoD, I don't like this game, okay,

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys charges Bengals to me. If we asked the question

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:21.839
<v Speaker 1>on prime time last night. If you only had one,

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>if you only could only watch one game this weekend,

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>what would it be? And we came up with Chargers

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Bengals because that's really a narrative game. If the Chargers win,

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that you're thinking about them changes dramatically in terms of

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 1>their playoffs. Same thing for the Bengals. If the night show,

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to that one, you'll be there still do

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, Bob. The Chargers could be really good if

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 1>they could stop them on a third down. I mean,

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there's so much better than they played. It's ridiculous how

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>bad they've been on these and you can't sustain they're

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>disgusting on their disgusting Bob, we could that bad, Bob,

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>if you will do me, if you come on the

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>show tomorrow as you always do on Friday, I hope

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>you will. By the way, let's make it uh eight.

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's make it eight thirty Mountain if we can

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow if I have the time zones correct, eight and

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>now let's make it eighty mountain. As we say, um,

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we have to remember I want to hear your we

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>gotta for that audience. I want to hear the New

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>England Buffalo thing that you were talking about earlier, that situation.

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Mike, Mike Palm. Everybody's gotta go do odds

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 1>on with them all. Shaw Um, I want to We've

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>got to rehash that and also the thing about the

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>chargers and the third down conversions, because I think, you

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.439
<v Speaker 1>know it's the old Our eyes watched one game better

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>than analytics do, but analytics watches every game, and I

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>think those are things that are lost on better. So

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to bring those up for sure.

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Well basketball, right, yeah, I wanted to ask you a

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>question about ask go ahead, go ahead? Okay, So you

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>know how in the in the first half of college basketball,

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>game totals are always you know, four to five points

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>less than half the total amount at this second half

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that we supported five point more than that half half

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of the amount in exact the games because they're always

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>blowing them out. It's not gonna be usually the foused

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>at the end of game, which is why the second

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>half is larger. Ben getting in you to Brice stuffs.

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Either is it should be less of it shouldn't be

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>as much. It shouldn't be as much lower than half

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in blowout games. In tight games, they get free throws

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 1>at the end. Right, it's a great But what I'm saying,

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>even even if it's like twenty five, if the spread

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is twenty five and the totals won six, they still

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>make the first half seventy six and the second half

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:49.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven. Yeah. I think there's a little bit of

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>value there. I think the first half overs are good.

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And I've been watching for years now. Yes, so I've

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to see if you notice that one of

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the things. Have you noticed less fouls being old in

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>college basketball this year? Yeah? I actually I haven't noticed you.

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I haven't looked really looks at it too much. I'd

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>love to know right now. Everything I'm doing is based

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>on prior so I start to do the flending next week. Okay,

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on that, because I really think you know,

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm honestly looking at first half statistics, and seems to

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>me that there's fous are a lot less. There's a

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 1>lot less games where they're just calling tons of found Yeah,

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, Todd wouldn't be just for in the model,

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>but I'll take a look. Todd Wishness the the most

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>active in game college basketball? Better right now, Todd, do

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you stop at no, I started off slowed basketball, but

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of nights I've been crushing. There you go, Bob,

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>would you say about jury? I said, remember that one

0:41:47.600 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>year we're be turned on you in January. You still

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:52.760
<v Speaker 1>play through, right? Oh yeah, No, I still ended up winning,

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but it was the slower winding for the end of

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the year. All right, Todd, thank you, Thank you to

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm, Dr Bob, Bob stole everybody who I messed

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>up one in terms of the time zone. So I apologize, Bob.

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm sorry that it was so frustrating, but thank

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>you as always, my friend. I appreciate it. I bought

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a new computer to prepare, oh man, and I didn't

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 1>have time to set it up. That's what the problem is.

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have time to set up the volume the microphone.

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Well the problem, well, we have plenty of time before

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow on a numbers game, so at least we have

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.839
<v Speaker 1>for that. We'll do it over the phone bill fast.

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's true. You like to to look at the notes,

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, just put my just put my pretty big

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 1>talk all right, good to talk to you guys. We'll

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:35.919
<v Speaker 1>put your pretty picture up there. Indeed, Bob Stole, Todd

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Wishne for Mike Palm, Gil Alexander, thanks for listening in

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the Megapod Week thirteeth in the National Football League. Good

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>luck to one