WEBVTT - Surveillance: Coronavirus Response With Rajan

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jay Lee.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg John

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>gets on the phone on place to say, is Mike Wilson,

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Multin Stanley, chief US equity strategist, might always fantastic to

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>catch up with you. Let's just start with that first question,

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>how should invest this process? The agreement overnight in Washington,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>d C. Well, good morning to all of you. I

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>hope you're doing well in this lockdown. But you know, look,

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I think this is uh, you know, this has been

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>expected obviously for the last couple of weeks. We didn't

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>know the exact timing over to the size, but I

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>think given in the state of Washington over the last

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>few years, they got this done pretty quickly. And to

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>try and as a series number at least I mentioned

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know which you've include QUI we've got a six

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar stimulus of some you know, some form. You know,

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>our estimates are like everybody else, we think the second

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>quarter is going to be a bit of a black

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>hole on the economy. It's about a trillion dollar hit,

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe a trillion two trillion three when all of a

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>sudden done, assuming there's a recovery in the back half.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So you've got about a trillion trillion two hit to

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy and you've got a six trillion dollar stimulus.

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems it seems like that's appropriate, and

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it seems like that's gonna be good enough to uh

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of put in a low here, which is what

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>we've been sort of calling for. It doesn't mean it's

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna not be volatile, doesn't mean we're not going to

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>read test some of these levels. But stocks have discounted

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bad news, and we think, you know,

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>as we've been saying for the last few weeks, you

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>should be you know, averaging in over this period where

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the news is going to be really scary. You know.

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I look, Mike Wilson, and good morning to you and

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.279
<v Speaker 1>to all of Morgan Stanley on lockdown nationwide and indeed

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>worldwide as well. Mike Wilson. So much of this is

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>about the elasticities of malieabilities of corporations. Can they adjust

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>on the income statement to that one trillion dollar hole

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>this quarter. Yeah, that's the right question time. I mean,

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.839
<v Speaker 1>here's the way I think about it, which is maybe

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different than the consensus, which is the government,

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, because this is a such a shock. I mean,

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 1>we've never seen anything like this. Okay, let's and John

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 1>you said it right, there's a there's a human toll here.

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not just a statistic. Okay. People are going to

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>be losing their jobs and some of those jobs are

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be coming back for a while. That is whatever

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>sssion is. And so there is a human cost, there's

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>an economic cost, and that's typically you know, what happens

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>is when you have a when you have a situation,

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>as government does step in with easier monetary policy and stimulus.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think in that case, the government is on

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Now, when we think about it as equity

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>strategist and investors, you know, we try to and we

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>try to be objective about what's actually going on. And

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>here's the way I think about it. So companies are

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>basically we're going to go through a full employment cycle

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in a month, meaning typically it takes about two years

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for us to see an unemployment rate go up three

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>or four basis points, which is likely what's going to

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>happen over the next thirty days. Okay, now that's really

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>scary and bad, But at the same time, what it

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>really means is that, you know, costs, costs are gonna

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>be coming down. I mean, companies are going to be

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>getting their house in order, so to speak. And that's

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the bad news. The good news is is that protects margins,

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it protects the cash flow, and the government is really

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>stepping in here in a way where you could argue

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>they are allowing companies to take those costs off their

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>income statement and put it onto the government's balance sheet.

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's not gonna be seamless. It's not only there's

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to be damaged in that transition, but in

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>many ways you're transferring the risk of shareholders to the

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>federal government. Mike, this sort of supports the sense that

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you're giving out there a couple of weeks ago that

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to get to a place where you feel

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>comfortable buying, and in fact, uh, you're more bullish and

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you have been in a while on stocks. At the

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>same time, if you look at Targets, Chief executive officer,

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>he said this today, it's difficult to provide guidance with

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>any precision in this environment. America is largely out of business.

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>There's no playbook, and we are writing the script each

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and every day. How bullish can you be? How much

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>upside can there be at a time of incredible uncertainty

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and companies laying off workers, the psychological impact of that

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>demand and supply destruction destruction, Well, I mean, it's always

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a continuum of risk reward, right. So the way we

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>think about it is, you know, it's it's hard to

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>get bullish, you know when when all these bad things

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>are happening around you at the same time. You know,

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>if we're thinking about an investment horizon of twelve months

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>or longer, which is the way we think about our process,

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>then you know, this is the best risk reward we've

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>seen in quite a while. You know, it's ironic. I mean,

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>market like, markets top on good news and they bottom

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>on bad news. And that's where we are. We're at

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a period of you really really bad news that the

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>stock markets crashed. It's crashed in a way like we've

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>early seen maybe twice in history nine okay, and it's

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>crashing because the economy is crashing, so you know, you

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>have to put that all into context. And when we

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>step back and we say, okay, we don't think we're

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>going to go into a depression. We don't know that,

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>but we have to have a view. We think this

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a really steep procession. There's gonna be

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>tremendous policy response on the other side, and then by

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>next year we'll be recovering to some degree. And that's

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>what goes into our models and our thought process when

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we think about the twelve month view. So you know,

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the thought process, that's the math, and you

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>know we've done the work. We've pretty presented for people

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to look at, and we think it you know, this

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>is this is where it makes sense. You know. One

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>last comment on this, which I think is important. You know,

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>people don't think about risk reward much when they invest.

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean when I say people, I mean the average person.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of you know, strategic strategic as

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>allocators do for sure, and when we do that, that's

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>one of our jobs here. And if you think about

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the risk reward today, people in December felt like the

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>risk reward was more attractive than it is today, and

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that just doesn't mean that the math doesn't compute on that.

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And this is just a remainder that price matters, right,

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Price matters and the upside and price matters on the downside.

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>That is the final arbiter of when you should be

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>committing capital or removing capital from investments. It's strangely count

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of intuitive, but it's something we keep going back to

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>on this program, Mike, that risk appetite seems to be

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>positively correlated with the direction of price. Risk cappitite goes

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>up as prices arising, goes down as prices are going lower.

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>The drawdown we have seen has gone through several phases

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>over the last one month alone. The more recent phase

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>has been a really ugly one, the liquidation phase, the

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>sell everything face. Can you identify some points Mike, which

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of signal to you at the moment that we're

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>working our way through that we're working our way out

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of that ugly face. Yeah. I was saying credit is

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>one area where I mean that's to me that you know,

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the bigger issue over the last three months for markets,

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh this you know, I want to sell the wrong way.

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 1>But the bigger issue for markets was the oil price collapse.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Then it was the virus because that's when the credit

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>markets really came include. And the credit markets, you know,

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are incredit critically important for the economy and how kind

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of markets function overall. So they became completely dislocated over

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the last month, and that's when the FED really got

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>active as they should and they now have you know,

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>intervene and the funding markets in particular. Uh, they've got

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that under control. And then of course they injected capital

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>directly into the credit market the Monday, and that you know,

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed investment grade credit to start to heal. So the

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>credit you know, liquidation looks like you know that that

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>could continue in the lowest quality credits, but that's really important.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think we've seen you know, people basically selling

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>what they can sell. The other thing, I would argue,

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was a period of about a week

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>or two where it didn't matter what it was. Everything

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>was for sale gold right, Uh, you know, high quality bonds,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>low quality styles. I mean, everything was being sold to

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>raise money into that liquidation phase was quite clear. What

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I would remind listeners of is that we had the

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>reverse situation last Paul. So when everybody, you know, when

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the fed came back in and did que four right.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>We had basically systematic strategies and risk seekers basically putting

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on too much leverage. So these things work both directions,

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and I would I would continue to go back and

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>argue at the fourth quarter rally really should not have

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>happened to the magnitude that it does, and so it

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>cuts both ways, like where he can work both ways,

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and in many respects, this you know, liquidation phase we're

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>having is happening because people got two levered and the

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>fourth we're on the premise that you know, nothing bad

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>was ever going to happen again, Mike, always send my

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>best of the team, won't you? And my best of

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you and yours as well, Mike Wilson, that of Morgan Stanley,

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the chief US equity strategy. Now let's do this right now,

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>let us bring in our esteem guests. He of course

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>uh served his India is their central bank governor, and

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of course is at the Universe of Chicago. But that

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>barely describes the social contribution of Rob and Roger and

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>his book fault Lines was definitive twelve years ago in

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a financial crisis. And now the third pillar was my

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>book of the year last year. The third pillar is

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a primal scream for a return of community. Professor, thank

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you so much at this historic moment for being with us.

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Where is the community known as America. It's it's struggling,

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like every other country in the world, to

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:23.599
<v Speaker 1>find the resources to deal with this totally unexpected and

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>unanticipated disease uh pandemic. Um. I think we will emerge

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>from this stronger. I think you know, people are talking

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>about the isolation that this uh pandemic creates, but it

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>also creates a sense of togetherness. The package that was

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>put together, I guess the word cares is in it.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a way of telling people everywhere in the country

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that you belong in one big hole and that that

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>big community the nation cares about you. And of course,

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>what would be nice is if that when down to

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the local level and we've got far more local action

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>once this pandemic is defeated, Professor. In an audial world,

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:10.719
<v Speaker 1>we'd have the fiscal support package before we get the

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>shut down, to make sure that some of these companies

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>don't start folding, don't start laying off people before they

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have a chance to get the money. And that's the

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>story in the United States, the sequencing, it's just a

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit messy in your India. With one point three

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>billion people lockdown for three weeks, what are they doing

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 1>on the fiscal side, on the monty policy side to

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 1>try and cushion what will be a massive blow to

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>the economy. It's worse. I mean, governments simply happened to

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>come to terms with what is happening. I think in

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>India we've got the lockdown first and now they're contemplating

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>what they will do on the fiscal side. It's also harder.

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you get money to a worker who has

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>no formal bank account? Uh And what we're seeing right

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>now is the first phase where people are trying to

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>come to terms with not going to work. There are

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>lots of poor house holes that have absolutely no income,

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>no savings, and they also aren't necessarily better off by

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>being locked down at home because home is a slum

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>where everybody sort of really lives on top of each other.

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 1>So I think India will have to see over the

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>next few days whether this is sensible. It can't go

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the same way as the West, but will also have

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to work very quickly in getting money directly to households,

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>especially in the urban areas where you know the lockdown

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>is going to be far more problematic, and also on

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>small and medium sized firms which are already hurting because

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of previous the previous demonetization which reduced informality, as well

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>as the rollout of a goods and service tax which

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.599
<v Speaker 1>put great streams on small businesses. But now we have

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the third blow, which is coronavirus, and I don't think

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>many small and medium enterprises are prepared to handle it.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Professor Rice, a really excellent point and something I'd like

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to dig a little bit data on. Hind, every single

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>data point we receive in the next month will be

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>real economic pain and real psychological pain as well. You've

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>brought up the issue of the unbanked, the individuals in

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>society that don't have a bank account that one be

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>able to cash that check in the same way as well,

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>especially in the developed world, what can you do in

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a country like India, in an emerging market where so

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>many of societies still do not have bank accounts, Well,

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you you will have to find some way to get

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>money to them, and this is where you might have

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to use community resources. Of course, bearing in mind that

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>getting a bunch of people together as dangerous at these times.

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>But perhaps funnel money through the post office. You will

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>have to accept a fair amount of leakage money going

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to people who don't actually deserve to get that money

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>because they've manipulated the system. But that is the price

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay to keep people from starvation at

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this point. So, I mean, India has many people banked,

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the achievements over the last few years,

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>but there are still some unbanked people, and the way

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to do that might be through community institutions. Professor, India

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the developing world have really relied

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>on fast growth for their entire ecosystem. I'm just looking

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>right now at the growth in the GDP of India

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>over the past few years eight percent, eight point three percent,

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>seven percent now coming out of i n G saying

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that India's economy is plaised to shrink next quarter and

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the full year expansion is supposed to be perhaps uh

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>significantly lower than it has been in a long time.

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>How much does that challenge the financial structure right now

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of India and it's just an incredible economic engine in

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>the longer term, Well, I think it's a challenge for

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>all developing countries which don't have the kind of resources

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 1>than industrial countries. Have remembered that industrial countries are putting

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>enormous amounts of wealth to work in questioning the blows

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>from this this crisis. Emerging markets and developed in countries

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have that spare cushion, and especially when you're running

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>already a large fiscal deficit, your debt to GDPs at

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>levels which markets already start worrying about, and your inflation

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is not zero, so the printing press can't start up

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>as we see with the central banks and industrial countries.

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So e ms and developing countries have to keep in

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>mind that they have to maintain some sense of fiscal

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and monetary responsibility even while dealing with this unprecedented crisis.

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And that means that you know they many of them

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>are at this point facing capital outflows. So you have

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you can't cut interest rates to zero. You have to

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>main interest rates and maintain interest rates at the reasonable level.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't blow out your fiscal depths. That you have

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to be very careful about where you apply resources. And

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of course you really hope that you have the medical

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>resources to cope because your medical resolve, also the refraction

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of the ones in industrial countries, and everybody at this

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>point is looking for those resources ventilators that are premium

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>across the world. So what I think at this point

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets and developing countries they're looking for is certainly

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to make the best of their own situation, but

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>also more global cooperation and Professor, I mean, this is

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>such an important issue for the entire world because the

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>developing nations have been the engine of growth for years

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering what this means extrapolate out into what

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the scenario is given India's precarious situation and frankly that

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of all developing nations right now. Yeah, no, I I

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>think for for the next month and a half, countries

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>will have to try and get ahead of the of

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the virus. And this is where India's lockdown comes in,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's an attempt to prevent the surge that's happening

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in an variety of other countries and to prepare their

0:15:55.200 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>medical resources for the eventual rise in cases. So this

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is something that every developing country now understands it has

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to do. But of course it would help if there

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>were more resources available, especially for the poorest countries in Africa.

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>What we know from this virus is there's no point

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>eliminating it in the West or in East Asia. If

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it comes back from some other part of the world

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>where it's not controlled to some extent. We can't have

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>an open world again until we will eliminate this virus everywhere. Professor,

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>which we shake its hand this morning, I'm gonna have

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to leave it there. The secret sauce for Lisa Bramo,

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's John Farrell and I Paul Sweeney Francine liquid is

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we lean over the desk and we actually read the research.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>This is always problematic with Karl Weinberg of high frequency Economics,

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>because he has the audacity. At least it tore right

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>an international peace, a United States peace, and a China piece.

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:03.479
<v Speaker 1>I read every word of them on Sunday, and Karl Weinberg,

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what stunned me was, after a mere thirty two years

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of doing this, you decided you couldn't make a forecast.

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>What does that feel like? It feels like sailing on

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the ocean without a sale or a rudder. You know,

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we are in unschowed territory as far as the economy

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>is concerned. Great example of that is tomorrow's number on

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>initial claims for unemployment. Absolutely no idea how that number

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to print. It's going to be big, it's

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be a record. But more than that,

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>more detailed than that, no precedent to move on. And

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a really important number because we're coming up on

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the employment report in another ten days or so, and

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's another number we don't know anything about. We

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>really do not know the true state of any major

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>economy in the world right now. The shock of this

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is the shock, as Alan Ruskin of Deutsche Bank says,

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of depth and to ration. Is Karl Weinberg more concerned

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>about the depth or the duration of what we're living. Yes,

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned about both the depth and the duration. And

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not a lessing matter. I apologize for lessing at

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it all right. The shock itself, the lockdown is unprecedented.

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>The complications of it, you know, no historical precedents to

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>agd against them that I can think of making. You know,

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe you spoken to someone who has a precedent, but

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't. And of course the driving factory, the driver

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is the disease, the virus and nobody really has a

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 1>handle on the medicine or the science of that to

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>tell us how long this is gonna last. So we

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.360
<v Speaker 1>are very much a wrong for the ride right now

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and um trying our best just to keep up with

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the news. We're looking forward to some we we're looking

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>forward to the survey data for March, but the surveys

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing seemed to have been taken too early in

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the months to be able to give us a good

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>bead on what's happening. So, for instance, markets MR yesterday,

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>which are flawed indicators anyhow, but if you just say

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that even they couldn't use a big moves like this.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>They showed that the climb manufacturing activities for the month

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of March, said that you expect that, but February had

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>blipped up the levels of the industries. Tell us that

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.239
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing in Europe and Japan and the United States as

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we were was down and marched from federately, but no

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>worse than it was less small and last summer level.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's just ridiculous. Well, Carl, No, I mean I

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>want to break in and get a sense from you.

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're talking about how it's unprecedented and how

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>We just don't have a sense of of how long,

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>how deep. But it's it's it seems like it's really bad.

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>We know the virus will eventually be stopped, whether it's

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>by a vaccine or whether it's just by herd immunity

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>after everybody gets it. This does have an end point,

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't know when it is. And the question is

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>how quickly can people get their jobs back? Can the

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>economy get back up to steam? Is there a precedent

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with the job market destruction and then recreation? And how

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>long are short of a time that could take? Well,

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't really think of a good one to tell

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you the truth. I need to tend to elevance. You

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>want to think about the Japanese uh tsunami in twenty eleven,

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and there are all kinds of things out there that

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>are similar, but nothing on such a global scale. The

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>really big anomies say, it's not only the duration. If

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.479
<v Speaker 1>you told me the date when this was all going

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to stop, I'd be happy to know it. But what

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know is what's going to break in between. Okay,

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>if you shut the economy down for a month or

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a week or three months, and it definitely turns out

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 1>to be some firms are going to sell, and are

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they going to be big or small firms? Are they're

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>going to be systemically important? Are they're going to be

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>financial system and regularities that they're going to banks that fell?

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh is they're going to markets that fail, But we

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know what breaks. And that's what I'm going to

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>determine the question of whether they're the jobs for people

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>when this all ends. Tom, You know, I been thinking

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and talking a lot about this with people. How will

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the world look after this is over? Are you still

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>going to go to the Irish pub downstairs from you?

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Of course you will. Will you still come to the

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>one up by near me by me? Yeah, of course

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you will, you know. But I do wonder about how

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>things are going to change permanently when it comes to

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>office space, when it comes to just the landscape of

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>what people need to desire. Dr Weinberg then along that line,

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>one final question, Carl Weinberg, what does business investment do?

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's going to take quarters to get that

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>inherent confidence back, isn't it? Absolutely? Tom? I just want

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to go back to Lisa's common just now. Tom would

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>like to go back to that Irish poke downstairs if

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it were open, and that's really the question. Will be

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Irish probably open. After this will be enterprise called bankrupt.

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the key to the future. Well, I don't know

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the answering. I just saw it on Twitter somebody saying

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Department of Labor just issuing some documents to help out

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>businesses moments ago. Carl Weinberg, thank you so much and

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we value immensely your research pieces the Weinberg Global look

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>about ten pages long, and his wonderful US work as

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>well with John Sylvia helping out there, and of course

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the view of China from high frequency economics. It is

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a labor economy. It is an economy of jobless claims

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow some estimating one million, one and a half million

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is a Bloomberg survey, two million, even three million, maybe

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 1>not in one week, but spread out over fourteen days.

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>These are numbers, folks, that no one has ever perceived.

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Academics think about this public that Cherniva is it barred.

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>She's professor of economics and far more importantly an important

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>book coming out, The Case for a Job Guarantee. That's

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a controversial title professor as well. With this legislation, Are

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>we any closer to a job guarantee? Good morning, Tom

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and Paul. No, we are not close to a job guarantee.

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And I am looking at the provisions and I actually

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>don't see anything specific specifically targeted to the labor market.

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>We have some emergency measures that I think you're trying

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to stop the hemorrhage, and you know there's good measures,

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but we need we need to keep a laser sharp

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and focus on jobs. Right. We have we have atomized

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>our labor economy over X number of years. I've said

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>this on the show, Folks on Labor Day, I always

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>try to read some labor chapter in a book. I

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>read Paul Samuelson from another time in place on labor

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>in America. I mean, it's gone, isn't it? Puffly? Now?

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean there really is no labor representation? Am I

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>right on that this is true? There's no strong labor representation,

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And we are putting labor on the back burner. And

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>we will not come out of this uh moment without

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>some bold, big programs to restore jobs and incomes. And

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we just can't think in the conventional ways. You know,

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at potentially quarter to unemployment rates of thirty

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>if we listened to the St. Louis FED, that is

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>greater than what we had seen in the Great Depression.

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>And there is only one solution to a problem like this,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and that is direct employment, bold, big public investments. So

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>publicly looking at the trade the fiscal stimulus plan just

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>emerging from Congress, what are some of the key highlights

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 1>for you as it relates to getting people back to work.

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>What I am seeing is a lot of focus on

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>income support, which is the right thing to do at

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>this moment, some strength and of unemployment insurance and this

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>one time payment which probably will go for rent and

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>food for the amount of April. But that is it.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And unemployment insurance is not a pro job creation policy.

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a policy that stops sort of the floor from

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, falling from underneath us. And so what we

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>need is to start thinking about how to return jobs back. Uh.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Once unemployment developed, it has this terrible, terrible way of

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>self perpetuating. Because um, we tried this last time during

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and eight Great Financial Crisis, we strengthen

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>unemployment insurance. We could have done better, but we It

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>took us ten years to bring unemployment down to its

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>historic lows. So we cannot afford to wait this long

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>or potentially longer unless we do some direct job creation. So, Professor,

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Wall Street economers are scrambling to come

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>out with GDP forecasts, and I think, you know, many

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of them kind of I think incorporate kind of a

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>V shaped recovery, a sharp sharp decline in two q

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>GDP followed by pretty you know, solid bounce back in

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>queues three and four. How do you view how this

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>might unfold? Yeah, Paul, I think you absolutely correct. All

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of these provisions right now now are designed to patch

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>us over for a couple of months. So whether these

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>a loan guarantees, you know, various all of the various

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>policies are with the short term under the assumption that

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>people will happily return back oh work, but that that

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>ship has sailed in some sense, because even if if

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of business is reopened, we already have plenty

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of off and loss of income which will kind of

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>ripple through the economy, and folks, even if they get

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>alone to pass them over for a couple of months,

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>if the customers are not returning in big numbers, we

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>will see the problems down the line, professor, one final

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>question that it's too short a time to talk to you.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Would love to have you on again. Is the basic

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:46.239
<v Speaker 1>idea of an individualistic almost Lackey in America. And as

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody said brilliantly in essay this week, this is a

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>hobbsy in crisis. We've gone back to natural man and

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>natural law and all that of another time and place.

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>How do we recapture the collectivism of labor? I don't

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>see any evidence the mood is out there. No, you're

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you may be right, but I fear that the economic

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>pain is ahead of us, and we will be once

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>again engaged in this conversation. What we do, we would

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>do wrong? Could we have prepared better? Can we stabilize

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the foundations of the economy and the foundations of the

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>labor market? Working people? We need good jobs and good incomes.

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And I hope that we start this conversation as em

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.239
<v Speaker 1>as possible so we don't have to go through yet

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>another very very protracted downturn. Polinare pablinnatured, thank you so

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>much with Bard today with a really out of consensus

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:47.479
<v Speaker 1>view there for so many on global Wall Street right now,

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>A gentleman who is expert at labor economics, and he

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>has the ultimate accolade of a polarized Washington. He writes

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Of course,

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>has been iconic in his public support of Vice President

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Biden the last go around. UH And Jared Bernstein joins

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.959
<v Speaker 1>us right now. He is a liberal who Conservatives are

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.959
<v Speaker 1>compelled to read at each and every moment. Jared, wonderful day.

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Have you with us today? Can you explain the reticence

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of Senate Republicans to get this bill done? I mean,

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the compromise is supposed to benefit eleven

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>pages of America, two trillion dollars in all. Explain the

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Washington reticence to assist their electorate. Yeah, I think I

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>can do that. It took way too long for members

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of Congress to recognize urgency. That was clear to any

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of us who've been watching markets and other economic indicators.

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately, one of the things that happens in this

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of situation is that you have the Christmas tree problem.

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Members of Congress see a big bill coming down the

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>pipe that has to pass, and they think they have

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>leverage to put stuff on it, but doesn't belong there.

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I will say though, that for this Congress, it looks

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like they did ultimately act pretty quickly, and uh, the

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>deal should be perhaps later today. The Senate and the

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>White House are in agreement. Now it's all about the House,

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and what I'm hearing on the ground is that the

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>House is uh are going to join on pretty quickly.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So Jared, it's interesting here. Do you think this deal

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollars, obviously a huge number, really jumps out

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>at people. Is it enough? Or do you think this

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is just the first in a series of fiscal stimulus

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>plans that will be needed to keep this economy, you know,

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>from going too far south. It is the largest stimulus

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe we've ever heard of. It's of g d

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>p uh and it's uh. And yes, we will definitely

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>need more trips to the well. Uh. This is actually

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the third trip there. There's been two other stimulus bills

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>so far. The first one was a narrow one directed

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>at health crisis. The second one was a small stimulus.

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a big stimulus, but we're going to need

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>more trips to the weather. At least two things left

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>out of this bill. First of all, it has nothing

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>on state fiscal release that turns out to be critically important.

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>It was important last time in a shallower down turn.

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, uh the uh the bill um has just

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>one time payments to households. Those are going to be

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>very useful, but I think we'll have to do more

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>than one round of that. So Jared, there's you know.

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask you to look into your crystal ball,

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>your g DP crystal ball. How do you think g

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>d P is going to play out over the next

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>several quarters. I think Wall Street, many on Wall Street

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>are looking for a V type, some are looking for

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a U type of recovery, and some are just flat

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>out saying this is an L type recovery. And we'll

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>get back to you whether you know this thing turns up. Well,

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>here's how I would explain that. You think think of

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the V or the U or the is having two parts,

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>one part down in one part either upper sideways. The

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>down part. Economists can explain to you, and I will.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>The up part epidemiologists can explain to you, and they will,

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>or at least they will when they have the data.

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>The down part is baked in the cake and it's

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be double digits, and it's probably happening as

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we speak that has double a double digit GDP decline

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>with a negative handle. Uh. And then the up part,

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:28.479
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a v is a matter of when containment occurs. Uh.

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>No question. There will be lots of pent up demand,

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, air airplane trips and conferences that many will

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>be rescheduled. People will go on vacations and back to restaurants.

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So I I think Trump is correct when he says

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>there's pent up demand. The question is how intact will

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the economy be on the other side of this such

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that it can absorb and reflect that to men. I mean, Jared,

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this is all well and great, but I want you

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to explain. I want you to go all Dean Baker

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on me right now. And so there's a whole left

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>feeling that, you know, life will go and there's a

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>conservative ethos which many of our listeners and viewers share.

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>There's this conservative ethos, Oh, no, we're giving it away.

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Isn't anything we spent now paid back in ongoing g

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>d P over quarters and indeed years. I mean we're

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get the money back eventually, right, Yes. And

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the notion that you can somehow pivot from

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>where we are now to a better economy by easter

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is completely nonsense. I mean, as I've said, the second

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>quarter is a deep recession baked in the case. That's

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>not just me, that's everybody. And uh the idea that

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you can um punt on containment efforts only means a

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>much larger economic problem down the road. So yeah, I

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to have to just do what the

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>uh what the health experts are telling us and recognize

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and keep that the key to your questions, tom if

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>making sure that we have an economy that can bounce

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>back at the other side of this. That's why the

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred plus billion in this in this bill we're

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about to help preserve small and large business is

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>very important. But I remember this is really important, folks.

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>In A E. A and two thousand nine, the American

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Economic Association Olivier Blanchard, the giant of French economics, working

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>with the I m F, working out of M I T.

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Professor Blanchard got up Jared and he put up a

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>chart and he said, you know, there's been a real crash,

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but here's the run rate to get back and someday

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll get back. I mean those laws are still in place.

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>If we spend ten percent of GDP now and seven

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of g d P in eight weeks or eight months, whatever,

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get it back down the road. Right Listen, Tom, Yes, right,

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you. But here's the thing you

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have to appreciate. I'm sure you do. You think, and

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think medium and long term. Sounds like you're thinking

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>long term. Politicians think in very very short term. Uh So,

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about Trump, who feels like his and

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I think correctly, feels like his electoral prospects are very

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>much damaged by what's going on, he's thinking in terms

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, not seven eight years to make up an

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>outcoat gasp that, yes, eventually we'll make up. So, Jared,

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>I guess the one of the next issues is as

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we pass through what's coming out of Congress right now

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the two trillion dollar fiscal stimulus plan,

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>what is what does Congress need to focus on next?

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think from a from a stimulus perspective, Well,

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. A couple of things. First of all,

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>state fiscal relief is essential, and it's not in this bill.

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>American states have to balance their budgets, and given the

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 1>demands on their unemployment insurance system, UH, they're going to

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>be facing a big time. Secondly, there will need to

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>be another trip to the well to help support households

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>who are losing paychecks week by week. And also it's

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>important to note that in this bill, it is true

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that low income households are eligible for these checks, but

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>many of them don't file federal tax returns just because

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>their income isn't high enough, and that means that they

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>won't get those checks unless they file. That's the way

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing is set up, so they're going to need

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to They're gonna need to file in order to get

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>their checks. Jared Bernstein, thank you so much for the

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Center and Budget and Policy Priorities. Can't say enough about

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>his work. Really compelling reading always from Professor Bernstein. Thanks

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast.

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio