WEBVTT - This Is How Derivatives Trading Swallowed the Entire Market

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey, there are aud Loots listeners. It's Tracy Alloway.

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 2>And Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>We are very excited to announce that Audlots is going

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:09.479
<v Speaker 1>to Washington That's right.

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 2>For the first time, we are going to do a

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 2>live public odd lotch recording in our nation's capital. That's

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.479
<v Speaker 2>going to be March twelfth in Washington, DC at the

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Miracle Theater and guests will be announced in the coming days,

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 2>but in the meantime you can find a ticket link

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>at Bloomberg dot com, slash odd.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Lots, Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Audlots podcast.

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Joe, as part of my preparation for this episode, I

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>have spent the morning on TikTok and Twitter, slash x

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Instagram watching videos.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Did you find any good techniques that you are going

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 2>to employ for generating two hundred thousand dollars a year

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 2>on two hundred and fifty thousand dollars in capital by

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 2>selling short term options? You know what?

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>First of all, there are so many accounts that are

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>basically pitching trading with derivatives options. Some variation of those nowadays.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I did, to your point, find a guy a video

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of a guy saying that one thousand dollars is only

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>nine doubles away from becoming a million, and a million. True,

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a million is only ten doubles away from a billion.

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's true too. Now, I think that sounds roughly right. Yeah,

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 2>so what's the catch? You know, someone's got to do it.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>No catch, Joe, It's it's all good. We can all

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>be billionaires. No, I think. I think the thing about

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>derivatives trading nowadays is when it's started, it was very

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>much a retail phenomenon. It was, you know, the guys

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street bets Yo, lowing into some crazy derivatives trade,

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>basically buying a lottery ticket on the market. But what's

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>happened since then is derivatives have really gone mainstream in

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>various ways. So, for instance, if you look at options

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>like across the S and P five hundred right now,

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>something like sixty percent of the volume is shorter dated options.

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, zero DT or one DT, which is kind

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of crazy.

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 2>It's totally crazy, you know. I remember first, do you

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 2>remember Tracy early on when we started at Bloomberg, You

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 2>brought in. There was someone I forget who it was,

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 2>but there was someone from some sort of like actual

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>like institutional options trading research firm that came in and

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 2>did this little like mini seminar for some of the

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 2>reporters on like how to analyze options data. Do you

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 2>remember doing that you brought in anyway, But one of

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 2>his points was is that the purpose of options are

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 2>like they're largely hedging instruments. They're sort of tactically used

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 2>by institutions for very specific purposes, you know, insurance essentially,

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 2>that options sort of played this role as insurance for

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 2>specific things. And then since then I get the impression

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 2>that the world is just like totally changed. And I

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 2>think the other thing that surprised me. I would have

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>guessed that if we're sitting here in twenty twenty five,

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 2>that that craziness of twenty twenty one would have been

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 2>some sort of peak. Right, there is Robinhood here, Memestock,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>ere et cetera. I would not have guessed the durability

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>of it, especially with the FED having hiked and everything

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 2>that we've seen transpires.

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Since No, that's my point, right, Instead of like the

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Yolo crowd basically reducing their options trading. Instead, we had

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street yoloing into options trading to serve first. Okay,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So options, derivatives, they're everywhere right now, and you have

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>different groups of people, so institutional and retail using them.

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You have a bunch of different strategies, you have a

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different products that deploy them, that give again

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>new types of traders access. So we should talk about it.

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>And who do we call to talk about derivatives? The

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>perfect guest, one man, the perfect guest. We have Ben

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>i for managing partner at QVR. Back with us, Ben,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:21.679
<v Speaker 1>thanks for coming back.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 4>On Tracy Joe. It's so good to see you, guys.

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 4>I'm really excited about this. It's always so much fun

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 4>talking to you.

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>It's been a while. I have to say, maybe just

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>to start out with videos' favorite.

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 4>The one actually from a few days ago that I

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 4>just absolutely loved. I'm gonna I'm gonna forget her name

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 4>off the top of my head, but she's called the

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 4>she Wolf of Indian options trading and she has a

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 4>whole show. She was actually reacing me. She was recently

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 4>banned by the Indian government from you know, doing what

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 4>she's doing because she's sort of so controversial, but she's

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 4>very intimidating it. Like I like to kind of take

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 4>on these option influencers and sort of say, look, you know,

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 4>come on, guys, this isn't right. I don't know, man,

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 4>she's she's pound, you know, pounding the table about making

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 4>one hundred percent in ten minutes, you know, like guaranteed profits,

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 4>interdate options trading over and over again while like a

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 4>band plays in the background and fireworks go off. It's

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 4>like truly incredible stuff.

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm reading an article on livemint dot com SCBI, which

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I guess is the Indian regulator banning her from capital markets.

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 2>But one hundred percent in ten minutes sounds pretty good.

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 4>What's the kid, what's the cat? Well, it turns out

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 4>it's a lot better money for her than it is.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Usually Well what is Okay, that's a very extreme example,

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 2>but we all, you know, we've all seen these videos.

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>The modal TikTok options is influencer. What is the sort

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>of the gist of what they're telling viewers that they

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 2>can do.

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely, I mean the things that you that they say,

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 4>you guys just kind of joked a little bit about

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 4>this earlier, but you know, make twenty thousand dollars a

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 4>month in passive income, you know, easily with only a

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 4>two hundred and fifty thousand.

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 2>What's the gist of that stor we all are very

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 2>skeptical results, But what is the basic thing that they're

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 2>saying that you.

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 4>Can absolutely achieve. The typical thing these days is they

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 4>want you to sell short data, short term options, right,

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 4>And there's various formats that might take. The really popular

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 4>stuff might be just selling puts, you know, one month

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 4>puts on your favorite stocks or on the equity index,

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 4>or maybe weekly puts or maybe zero DT puts, sort

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 4>of daily puts over and over again. Could be selling

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 4>covered calls or uncovered calls. Could be selling you know,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 4>straddles or strangles or whatever it is. But the common

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 4>idea or the kind of they'll pack all of these

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 4>different handwavy justifications into why this is free money or

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 4>why this is really easy. You'll hear people say, oh,

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 4>ninety percent of options expire out of the money, so

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 4>it's just super easy. You just make money on all

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 4>these trades, you know, and then and then anything that

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 4>could go wrong they explain away as how it's not

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 4>really a problem. You know, Oh, well, if you sell

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 4>the put and the stock goes down, then you get

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 4>to buy the stock really cheap and the stock is

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 4>going to go back up and it's kind of fine.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 4>Or you know, oh, you reduce your cost basis on

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 4>the stock over and over again, and then then you

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 4>get the stock for free. For all of these things

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 4>over and over again. Where at the end of the day, Look,

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 4>if you say you can sell an option, that's fine.

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 4>It's just a trade. It has a payoff profile. You

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 4>get a little bit of premium and maybe you lose

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of money or maybe you don't, and you

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 4>can kind of analyze that trade the same way you

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 4>would analyze any trade. It's not free money, you know.

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 4>But the justifications and explanations and persuasiveness that goes into

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 4>this from these from these kind of influences is very powerful.

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Do we have any sense of what people are using

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>these four And you know, one thing I hear in

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>particular on shorter dated options from this mostly comes from

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>institutional traders, but the idea that well, these allow you

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to be more precise when you're hedging. This is a

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>tactical move versus a strategic move. But then of course

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at something on a subreddit or something like

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that and people are just basically buy lottery tickets.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's exactly right. So, you know, derivatives

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 4>have been around for a long time, and options have

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 4>been around for a long time, and they certainly enable

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 4>you to make very customized, precise bets or hedges in

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 4>intelligent ways if that's what you're trying to do, and

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, that's super. But most of what you see

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 4>being sold on YouTube or on Instagram is much more.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, you should just do this all the time.

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 4>This just makes sense. This is basically free money. It's

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 4>really easy.

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>There's no accompanying strategy.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 4>There's no accompanying strategy of when and why might something

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 4>like this make sense? At what price? How do you

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 4>know if it's a good trade. There's none of that.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 4>It's just justification that somehow this is a cheat code

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 4>in markets that just lets you unlocked the infinite money,

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 4>an infinite money cheat code that lets you unlock sort

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 4>of spectacular returns.

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 2>One day, Tracy, We're going to do an episode on

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the cheat code that I did find in markets, which

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I have I think i've hinted it.

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Wait, you found one and you're still here.

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, the short version is, I did find a cheat

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 2>code in nineteen ninety nine. I didn't know that I

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 2>had found a cheat code at the time, and so

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I was like, oh, at some point I'll pick this

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 2>back up. But in retrospect, I should have gotten all

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 2>my friends and family to go all into it for

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 2>a month. I could talk about it some other time.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I did briefly find it. Cheat coulde in the markets,

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, I was like, you know, and.

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 4>He didn't tell any of.

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.599
<v Speaker 2>Us, Yeah, I didn't. I was like, oh, this is

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of cool. I made ten thousand dollars. You know,

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>we talk about volatility, right, and so just a very

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>crudely you know, they're you know, maybe higher vall opportunities

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 2>present good times because you're getting large premium or whatever

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 2>for some of the options trading, et cetera. What are

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 2>like people who find who like walk into these extremely

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 2>naive strategies, Oh, option ninety percent of the time options

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 2>expire out of the money. What does the payoff look

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>like for them? How many days do they how many

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 2>pennies can they pick up before they get steamrollered?

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, totally. I mean, these kind of strategies again, if

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 4>you're just doing them all the time without thinking about it,

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 4>without thinking about the price, and you're just going out

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 4>like on the S ANDT for example, and selling options,

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, most of the time these days, because that's

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 4>a crowded one way trade where lots of people sell

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 4>short dated options. You'll tend to make kind of a

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 4>little bit of money at a time, sort of choppily

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 4>for a while, and then once every you know, three

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 4>years or five years, you'll kind of get wiped out

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 4>and end up down.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:09.839
<v Speaker 2>You just start getting into it the day after the

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 2>wipeout exactly.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 4>And actually that's and actually there is something to that.

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Usually usually it's like a month or two after the

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 4>wipeout because you don't know if there's going to be

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 4>another big leg down or something. But there does tend

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 4>to be some excess risk premium and options markets a

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 4>little while after a big market crash that blows out

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot of these guys and kind of causes people

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 4>to panic, that's totally true. And then that tends to

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 4>go away after another you know whatever it is year

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 4>or two years or something like that.

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So just in terms of the expansion of all different

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>types of derivatives. I don't want to focus too much

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>on shorter dated options because there are some other things

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>out there that look really interesting. One of them is

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw a headline float by about the University of

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Connecticut's endowment dropping some of its hedge fund exposure in

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>favor of buffer ETFs. What are buffer ETFs?

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Yep, So this is a a big new manifestation of

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 4>a relatively old popular idea. So buffer ETFs are usually

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 4>pitched as sort of defined outcomes in some sense over

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 4>some time period where they say, well, what you're trying,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 4>what we're trying to do is give you equity exposure,

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 4>but you have protection. You have a buffer down to

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 4>say ten or fifteen percent, where you're not going to

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 4>lose money as the market goes down, and then beyond

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 4>that point you're exposed. And in order to do that,

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 4>you're going to sell an upside call. You're going to

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 4>give up some of your upside And so what this

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 4>is it's basically just a put spread caller, which is

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 4>a very standard kind of option structure. You sell a

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 4>call to buy a put spread. That is for many

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 4>many years and decades, by far the most popular thing

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 4>that a Wall Street derivative salesperson will run around trying

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 4>to pitch to their clients. It's a very easy thing

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 4>to conceptualize, I'm giving up some upside, I'm getting some protection.

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 4>They can be structured so that there's sort of zero

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 4>premium outlay where you sell a call and use that

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 4>same amount of money to buy a put. So if

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 4>you're an aggressive salesman, you call that like a free

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 4>hedge or a zero cost hedge. Of course you're giving

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 4>up upside, so you can it can be very cool

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 4>to pay.

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.599
<v Speaker 2>For it, but only implicitly by some notional change that

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 2>you're not thinking about.

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 4>That's exactly right. And there's three legs to the trade,

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 4>so there's lots of bit offer spread and lots of commissions.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 4>So salespeople and traders really like that, and they're very,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 4>very very popular now. Buffer ETFs these days enable a

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 4>retail investor or a high net worth individual to go

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 4>and get that just by buying an ETF, you know,

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 4>with a seventy basis points management fee or whatever it is,

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 4>instead of having to, you know, be involved with Wall

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Street banks or doing trading themselves. People love that. There

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.719
<v Speaker 4>are very famous mutual funds like the JP Morgan one

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 4>that everybody talks about, and it's twenty two billion dollars

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 4>of assets or something like that. And now there's I

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 4>think something like ninety billion dollars of bufferytf's doing the

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 4>same kind of thing. And they're all doing something very

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 4>very similar, which is again they're selling call it an

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 4>eight percent or ten percent out of the money call

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 4>or seven percent of the money call. They're buying an

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 4>apt the money or slightly downside put and then selling

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 4>out another like a ten percent down or fifteen percent

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 4>down put to kind of give yourself this bus on

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 4>the way down. You're giving up upside on the way up.

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>One thing I don't get is like, why would you

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>prefer doing that versus just buying a bunch of equities

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe hedging in a more traditional way like buying

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>some bonds.

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 4>So this is exactly the right question. So the first

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 4>thing that you know, a derivatives person looks at when

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 4>you look at a trade like this is Okay, what

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 4>does this do to the delta the equity exposure of

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 4>your position? Right? So if you buy some equities that

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 4>is a one delta, A derivatives guys would say, it's

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 4>just a delta one position. Market goes up a percent,

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 4>you make a percent. If you trade a typical put

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 4>spread caller against that, you buy a put spread, you

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 4>sell a call, you're probably going to take that one.

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Sorry. What's a put spread?

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Is a posh to put? A put spread would be

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 4>you buy say the out the money put, but then

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 4>you sell a ten percent out of the money put. Okay,

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 4>So that's going to give you protection only for ten percent. Okay.

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 4>So if you do that kind of a trade, you

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 4>might take your one delta option down to like a

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 4>point six down to a sixty delta, So now you're

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 4>only participating kind of sixty percent in the movements of

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 4>the market. And if you look at how these kind

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 4>of trades perform over long periods of time, they actually

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 4>act a whole lot just like having sort of sixty

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 4>percent as much stock, right, because ultimately they're rolling these

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 4>it's not really like a buy and hold to maturity thing.

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 4>It's like they're rolling these options to kind of maintain

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 4>this kind of exposure. And if you were just to

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 4>take the counterfactual, which is why don't I just own

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 4>sixty percent as much stock? And put forty percent of

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 4>the rest in T bills. Turns out your fees are

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 4>way less and your performance is probably better. Right, So

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 4>you're doing this creative, smart sounding options thing, but actually

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 4>you're underperformed.

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Are there institutions, you know, trace you mentioned the University

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 2>of Connecticut. You know, institutions have sometimes very specific needs

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 2>they need to have, like a guarantee return very long term.

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 2>They may not be optimizing for maximum returns. They have

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>to dole out a certain amount for student aid, whatever

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 2>it is. Are there certain types of institutions where, whether

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about the buffer ETFs specifically or analogus to

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 2>that strategy, that this is, in your view, in alignment

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 2>with the institutional mandate.

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 4>So that there are cases when that's to some extent true,

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 4>at least with some kinds of derivative structures. So you

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 4>will have cases where there's like a big dispersement that

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 4>has to be made at some future date and they

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 4>want to lock in for sure the fact that they

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 4>can make that dispersement. But usually something more like an

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 4>outright put is going to be a better match for that, right,

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Because the thing about the put spread or the put

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 4>spread collor is you've only got like this, say, ten

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 4>percent buffer of protection, and what if the market crash, So.

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 2>If the stock falls, or if the market falls twenty

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 2>five percent, which does happen, you're actually not protected against

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 2>all of that.

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly right. So this stuff really doesn't like lock

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 4>in defined outcomes to the downside. It just gives you

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 4>of some buffer of protection in exchange for some upside

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 4>that you're losing.

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>You touched on this earlier, but talk to us a

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about the commissions and the execution and

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you're getting a good deal on those,

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>because my sense is these all seem to be algorithmic, right,

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>very mechanical, So I'm not entirely sure what you're paying for.

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 4>He yeah, no, So this is a really important point.

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 4>So generally these are not always, but typically these kind

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 4>of structures exist in fairly popular, fairly liquid underlyings. Right.

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 4>This isn't like microcapstocks. This is S and P or something.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 4>So the you know, the bid offer spreads don't look

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 4>that wide when you look at it. But you have

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 4>to keep in mind if you have a twenty two

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar fund that once a quarter is rolling this

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 4>giant collar and everybody knows about it and knows exactly

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 4>what you're going to do and knows exactly when you're

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 4>going to do it, then obviously the market just moves

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 4>right ahead of you, right and everybody positions first trade.

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>What happened during Vollmageddon as well, very much so.

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 4>When when you have a big tray that everybody knows

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 4>what you're going to do and when you're going to

0:16:58.080 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 4>do it, they're going to position ahead of that. In

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 4>this specially in a poor liquidity environment, you know that's

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 4>going to really hurt you. Like markets can you know,

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 4>the markets can move very significantly as market makers and

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 4>arbitrazurers and volatility people sort of position for this big

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 4>trade that's coming. And so the execution you end up

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 4>getting in these trades is really poor. And usually they're

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 4>not again they're doing something very simple, very mechanical. They're

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 4>not randomizing their trades in small batches to work into

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 4>position really efficiently. They're just outsourcing execution to some agency

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 4>only broker who doesn't care at all about how they

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 4>just have to get a filled and they put it

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 4>up way over the offer side of where the market

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 4>really should be.

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Are there funds that claim to do something more sophisticating,

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 2>because it does sound obvious, like all the rules are

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 2>out there, the prospectus, the mechanics, the timing, et cetera.

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 2>It does seem very I guess front runnable. Do they

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 2>have tactics or approaches to avoid what sounds like the

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 2>most obvious risk in the world.

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean certainly there are you know, volatility arbitrage

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 4>type of funds like ours and like others out there.

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 4>We will work with institutional clients that are trying to

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 4>do some similar kinds of things, but in an intelligent way.

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, the way we execute in the marketplace is

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 4>very different, right, So we take the same objective of

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 4>the exposure we want to get, but we're going to

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 4>work into it sort of passively and secretly and quietly

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 4>in very smart ways and try to kind of get

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 4>mid market execution and have nobody know what we're doing.

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And so the competitive advantage is really on the execution

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>side rather than the actual design of the product.

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's probably some of both. I mean, one thing

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 4>one thing you want to do is execute really efficiently

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 4>without people knowing what you're doing. Another thing you want

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 4>to do is just know what the big flows and

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 4>big crowded trades in the market are and generally be

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 4>trying to achieve the client subjectives, but ideally by buying

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 4>something that's getting sold too much as opposed to selling

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 4>something that everybody else is selling. Right, So those two components,

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 4>that's a kind of a strategy design aspect, and then

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 4>there's just an execution implementation aspect that's again really important

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 4>and people just aren't incentivized for it. Like when you

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 4>think about these the buffer ETFs derivatives using ETFs, it's

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 4>really kind of a Wild West type of boomtown scenario

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 4>right now, right, And I would say, you know, generally

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 4>the first to market has an advantage, and it's all

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.959
<v Speaker 4>about distribution and very and you know, implementation details are

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.239
<v Speaker 4>very secondary. Right. The people have been really successful are

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 4>marketers and distributors hitting the street hard. They're not you know,

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 4>vall traders who are designing these things.

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>All the influencers. I'm just going to throw out random

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>derivatives products. So if you could just define them, what

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>is the wheel and why does it have an E

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>t F named after it?

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Yes, this is this is fantastic. So it kind of

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 4>goes back a little bit to the mean stock options crave.

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 4>You know they're ticker. Is it? Is it w h

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 4>H E L Wheel?

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it?

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's four letter. I think it's w h

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 4>H E L.

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>If you no, I think it's it's w E E L.

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 2>O w E L. That's peerless option wheel, peerless that

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 2>they put peerless, Yes, tell us about the wheel.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So the a lot of the original mean stock

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 4>option traders who made a bunch of money in g

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 4>M and you know AMC back in the day, some

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 4>of them sort of migrated from that into getting really

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 4>interested in options selling, and in particular kind of a

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 4>strategy called the wheel, where the idea is you're going

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 4>to sell against short data options. You're gonna start out

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 4>selling cash secured puts, so you're gonna sell some puts

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 4>on the S and P or on your favorite stocks,

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 4>and then you're going to keep doing that unless the

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 4>market goes down enough that you get a sign on

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 4>that put and you take a loss. Then you long

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 4>that stock, and then you're gonna sell some calls against

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 4>it and have a covered call strategy until the stock

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 4>rallies enough that that call gets assigned, your stock gets

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 4>taken away, then you sell a put, and so it's

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 4>sort of you know, the end. The way they'll describe

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 4>this is it's almost as if it's this continuous money machine,

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 4>because all of these outcomes are good. If the stock

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 4>doesn't move, you get the premium, that's good. If the

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 4>stock goes down, you get the stock cheap, that's good.

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.360
<v Speaker 1>And you're sort of you keep moving with the market, right,

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and the one thing you know is the market's gonna move. Probably.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 2>It seems like there's some assumed mean reversion here. The

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 2>cycle of life.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's very much like a cycle of life. There's

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 4>this idea that no matter what scenaari, there's a justification

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 4>for how anything that can happen is sort of good.

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, the stock goes up, you made money. You

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 4>didn't make as much money as you would if you

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 4>hadn't sold the call, but you still made money. And

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 4>then if it goes down, the same thing like you.

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 4>And ultimately, what's not described in these pitches is how

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 4>this is a it's a short volatility trade. What you're

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 4>exposed to is the stock going down a lot and

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 4>then back up a lot, and then down a lot

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 4>and back up a lot. Right, Because what happens is

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 4>stock goes down a lot, you're going to lose money

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 4>on your short put. Now you're gonna get assigned the stock.

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 4>You're going to sell a call. What if the market

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 4>goes back up a lot. Well, now you didn't make

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 4>money on the reversion because you're short of call and

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.479
<v Speaker 4>you're just getting chopped up by this volatility. Right. So

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 4>people love to pitch options trades in ways that don't

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 4>have anything to do with volatility, when they're inherently volatility trades, right,

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 4>they like to pitch them as you know. One of

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 4>my least favorite phrases, right is people will say, these

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 4>influencers will say, selling a put is just like having

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 4>a limit order out there in the market to buy

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 4>a stock really cheap, but you get paid for it,

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 4>So it has nothing to do with the price, has

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 4>nothing to do with it. If this is like a

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 4>good risk reward for the premium that you're getting, it's

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 4>as if you can just buy a stock for really

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 4>cheap when it goes down and you get paid for it.

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Do we have any historical data on how these have

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>performed in the past, so most of them are new.

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So I imagine we have finite information about performance.

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, totally. If you look at benchmark indices for things

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 4>like call over writing or cash secured put selling, those

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 4>have been around for a very long time and they

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 4>know back tested, way way back. So there's something called

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 4>BxM index on Bloomberg that you can pull up, and

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 4>something called put put index on Bloomberg that you can

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 4>pull up for call writing and put writing. And what

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 4>you see there is it actually tells a really nice story,

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 4>which is from about nineteen ninety line going up from

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:51.360
<v Speaker 4>about the lines going up from about and you want

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 4>to compare that to just the SMP. So from nineteen

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 4>ninety to about twenty twelve they look pretty good. They

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 4>kind of keep up on average with the SMP, but

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 4>on somewhat lower volatility with a little bit lower draw downs.

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 4>And that was really the pitch that investment consultants and

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 4>pension fund consultants started making after the credit crisis to

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 4>their clients.

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Is this what made off claim to be doing some

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of like right.

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 4>He was claiming to be doing like conversions and like

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 4>diagonal spreads and stuff, so like a little bit funkier stuff.

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:23.719
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, he was out there saying, oh, we're doing

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 4>this kind of really cute option stuff. So this stuff again,

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 4>it it looked recent decent in this sort of back test,

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 4>and but the whole point is of you know, very

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 4>much like any back test in finance, option selling looked

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 4>good when nobody was doing it in size right, there

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 4>were it was not you know, option markets were backwater.

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 4>There were funny little things that some hedge a few

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 4>hedge funds did and a few kind of people, but

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 4>there were no giant pension two hundred million dollar pension

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 4>funds doing like option selling. And then those pension fund

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 4>consultants started writing white papers and they started pitching to

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 4>their clients' boards, and by like twenty eleven, twenty twelve,

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty thirteen, they started to get some traction, and you

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 4>started to have you know, giant two hundred million dollar

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.239
<v Speaker 4>pension funds saying sure, we'll put ten percent of our

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 4>assets and move it from equity into option selling. And

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 4>that grew and grew and grew and grew and grew,

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 4>and so what you ended up with then is volatility

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 4>term structures steepened, which means that short dated options that

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 4>were getting sold really heavily went down in price because

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 4>that's what everybody was selling. And what happened was you

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 4>see the performance then of in kind of the out

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 4>of sample period, if you want to think of it

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.479
<v Speaker 4>that way, from a back test for BxM and put index,

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 4>which are the benchmarks for this kind of stuff, then

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 4>really deteriorated relative to S and P, where they sort

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 4>of had very similar risk but much less return. And

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 4>that was like, how does this actually look once real

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 4>money goes into these strategies, Because at the end of

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 4>the day, derivatives' markets are big and deep in liquid,

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 4>but they're not primary markets, right, They're derivatives markets. You

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 4>can't they're not designed for like global asset allocation for

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent of the of all the money in the

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 4>world to go into selling them, right.

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>But this is the big debate, right to what extent

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is this kind of options trading or derivatives trading action

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>affecting the underlying which would be the market or you know,

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>something like the VIX and you hear different sides to

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the story. So you have some people arguing that actually

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the key reasons the VIX has been kind

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of subdued recently is because of all this short dated

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>trading then you have you know, entities like the CBOE

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>arguing for obvious reasons, perhaps that actually the gamma exposure

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>from the short dated options isn't that big, certainly not

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>big enough to move the full huge market. It sounds

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>like you land on the first one.

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the size of short dated options selling is very,

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 4>very large. It's very very one way, and there's different

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 4>flows in different parts of the option market, right, But

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 4>if you look at one month range options that are

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 4>not that far out of the money, call it like

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty five delta put wing to call wing, the overwhelming

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 4>end user of that product is selling it for income

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 4>or for you know, for a asset allocation type of strategy.

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 4>And what that means is, you know, the all of

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 4>the flows on the floor for brokers and banks are

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 4>giant trades to sell constantly, and the people that are

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 4>buying them are people like us who are buying them

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 4>because they're too cheap, not because we have any other

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 4>reason to buy them. Right, So go ahead, job, No.

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 2>This is sort of where I was going to follow

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 2>on to Tracy's question. I mean, if we were having

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 2>this conversation in twenty nineteen, what are the fingerprints that

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 2>are visible in the market. Obviously, volume is clear, I mean,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of the fingerprints of when it comes

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 2>to price, what are the fingerprints of all of this

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 2>retail and now institutional money flowing into this space? And

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 2>I presume to some extent the reason you have a

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 2>business is because there are these fingerprints.

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 4>What do they look like? Yeah? Absolutely so. Taking this

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 4>example of short data options selling, for instance, the first

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 4>thing you want to look at is the relative price.

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 4>And what is that In the world of options in volatility,

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 4>it's the term structure of volatility, which means where is

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 4>implied volatility for the S and P for example, which

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 4>is one of the biggest parts of this ecosystem for

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 4>very short term options one month, two month, three month,

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 4>six month, one year. And what does that term structure

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 4>look like if you compare it to history, And what

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 4>you'll find is really in the evolution that you've had

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 4>in that post twenty twelve regime has been the volatility

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 4>term structure getting steeper and steeper and steeper, so lower

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 4>in the front and steeper and steeper kind of all

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 4>the way out to the back. And the reason for that,

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 4>again is that the front is being sold very, very

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 4>very heavily, and people who are getting put into a

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 4>lot of the front, like market makers and like volatility arbitrazures,

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 4>then have to go further out the curve to hedge.

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 4>You see that very distinctly. Another thing you can look

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:55.239
<v Speaker 4>at is volatility risk premium, which is something you kind

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 4>of have to estimate and look at empirically. It's not

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 4>just the shape of a volatility term structure. That is

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 4>what is implied volatility relative to subsequent realized volatility. So

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 4>implied volatility is supposed to be forecasting realized volatility how

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 4>much the market actually moves, and the spread between those

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 4>two is a risk premium. If you're selling options, you

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 4>should get paid a risk premium. It's a risky, long

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 4>beta kind of thing to do, so you should get

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 4>paid some amount of money for that. In the old days,

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 4>before twenty twelve, you used to get paid a decent

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 4>amount of money for that, maybe three volatility points on average.

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 4>In the more recent years, that compresses and compresses down

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 4>to one point or half a point, and then you know,

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of to Joe's point, that will blow out a

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 4>little bit after a major market crash for a little while.

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And then you dive in exactly. Okay.

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 2>One other I think you said you die, that's actually.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Either dive in.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>One other thing I want to ask about is, of course,

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>multi strategy hedge funds. So we did a bunch of

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>episodes on these and options trading derivatives came up quite

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit, especially in things like the dispersion trade, and

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>one thing sticks with me. We spoke to a guy

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>called I think it was Krishna Kumar. Is that right,

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Krishna Kumar, and he made the point that at multistrat funds,

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not trying to maximize long term returns. You're trying

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to maximize returns per unit of time, in which case

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>options sound pretty good for doing that.

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's absolutely right. So, you know, multistrats are a

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 4>very interesting business. But I think part of what you're

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 4>getting at is one thing that they do very well

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 4>from a business standpoint is they have a very short

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 4>leash on portfolio managers and on pods. They're notorious for

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 4>firing you very quickly if you start to lose any

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 4>material amount of money, and that's a risk management thing

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 4>for them, right, And so there's this idea that gosh,

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm probably only going to be here for like a

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 4>year or two or three, So I sure better just

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 4>make a whole bunch of money as fast as I can,

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 4>and if it goes really poorly, then it goes poorly, right.

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 4>But and so you're incentivized to do negatively skewed things. Now,

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 4>the multistrats have very good risk management. They know this.

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 4>They're you know, they're not silly, So they're not going

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 4>to just let you go sell a whole bunch of options,

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, naked and a bunch of puts and see

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 4>how that goes. But you can definitely try to do

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 4>more creative things that look a little bit more like

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 4>relative value and maybe sneak through the risk systems a

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 4>little bit better, at least in some size. You know,

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 4>Dispersion can be one of those things. Depending on again

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 4>who's looking at it and how sophisticated they are. You

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 4>can have a dispersion trade where you're buying some single

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 4>name options, you're selling a lot more index options. You're saying, look,

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 4>this is really correlation, it's not volatility. But depending on

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.719
<v Speaker 4>the hedge ratio that you're using, it might just actually

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 4>be a very short ball behaving thing where you tend

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 4>to make money for a year or two or three,

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 4>but then it goes really poorly eventually, and you see

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of that. There's dispersions very popular in the multistrats.

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, a year or two ago, there were many, many,

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 4>many pods at some of the big multistrats that we

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 4>all know about. Dispersion that's shrunk very dramatically because P

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 4>and L has been relatively poor. It's very cyclical. Multi

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 4>strats are a fascinating thing in that regard that the

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 4>end result to the you know, to the buyer of

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:11.719
<v Speaker 4>the multi strat tends to be pretty good because they

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 4>cut off the tails by doing this rapid sort of yeah,

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 4>stop out of PM, but it comes with a lot

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 4>of weird incentives.

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 2>An episode that I'd love to do that will probably

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 2>that will probably never do, is talk to a multi

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 2>strat PM essentially about how they gained the risk parameters

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 2>that are imposed on them by their manager. Maybe we

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 2>could talk to a risk manager and a retired pe yeah,

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and how they sort of try to find pennies in

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 2>front of steamroller strategies that will work for a year

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 2>or two before they get fired, before they're just sort

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 2>of identified as having done that all right, here's another question.

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't get certain assets like bitcoin or micro strategy,

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 2>which is you know, an exotic wrapper of bitcoin in

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 2>some way are extremely volatile that and that's part of

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 2>the fun, I guess, like that, why is there the

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 2>appetite for even layering on more volatility? So there exists,

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 2>like you know, there's like a three x micro strategy ETF.

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Who is the like customer for like, you know what

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 2>micro strategy? Just not volatile enough for me? Not enough

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 2>daily not enough daily swings here or like what's good?

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it reminds me of remember the like multi blade

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>razor commercial and why we have three blades? We have

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>four blades?

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Why why not have a ten xm micro strategy ETF?

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Why stop at three?

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely no, that it's it's really fascinating. My best sense,

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, from watching Twitter and people asking me questions

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 4>is you know, there's this there's a community of people

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 4>and kind of a voice for Hey, look I've only

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 4>got twenty thousand dollars. Yeah, and I don't want to

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 4>work my job at Starbucks anymore. Yeah, how am I

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 4>going to really make it? And this idea that you

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 4>can really make it and you can kind of get

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 4>rich from only having twenty thousand dollars, and how are

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 4>you going to do that? You need as much leverage

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 4>as you can possibly imagine. Right, So cryptos and attractives

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 4>because of this, because some of the things in crypto

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 4>that you can do get one hundred times leverage or something. Right,

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 4>So if that's your benchmark, actually three x mstrs is

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 4>relatively boomer. Exactly, it's pretty boomer. But yeah, these ETFs exist,

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 4>and they're really fascinating because normally the way that a

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 4>leverage GTF works is that the ETF fishuer will do

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 4>a swap with a bank and get some get two

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 4>x leverage or get three x leverage, and it's a

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 4>fairly simple and clean thing. But no bank is going

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 4>to give you three x leverage on micro strategy, right

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 4>because the wipeout risk possibility is very is very real.

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 4>The collateral is not going to cover a massive move

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 4>down in micro strategy. And so what you would think

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 4>of is vanilla things is just a leverage GTF. It's

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 4>not a crazy derivatives thing. Actually it is, because they

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 4>have to buy call options in order to have a

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 4>risk profile that's acceptable, but generates the leverage that they need.

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 4>And so what that means is these things are really

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.239
<v Speaker 4>big and they actually dominate the options market on you know,

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.239
<v Speaker 4>some of these underlyings and you know, micro strategy can

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 4>go up a bunch and this huge etr this triple

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 4>levered ETF has this giant call options position that's now

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 4>deep in the money and illiquid, and it has to

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 4>go out and like roll and buy a ton more

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 4>of this of you know, call options on micro strategy

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 4>when there's very little appetite from the dealer community to

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 4>provide liquidity on that. Yeah, and it's a you know,

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:16.760
<v Speaker 4>a big.

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Mess other options on the three X micro strategy ETF.

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 4>I would actually have to check some of the leverage

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 4>some of the LeVert ETFs actually do. And yeah, we

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of a running joke, right is you've got

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 4>like the you've got like the triple levered you know

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 4>et F on the thing. You've got the covered call

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 4>selling ETF on that thing. You got people running the

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 4>wheel strategy on that just in sort of an infinite

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 4>recursion of you know, option selling abyss.

0:34:42.840 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazing just going by to options influencers. So one thing

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>that you see a law is not necessarily like here

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is an options trade that will make you a bunch

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>of money. But here's how you really make money in

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>options by selling? Yes, how do you make money in

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>options by selling? Like I get the sense that it's

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>not just it's not just you buy a put, it's

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 1>something else.

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 4>You're exactly right. So normally, the way a derivative trader

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 4>would think about it trade is what is this trade?

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 4>What is the price, what's the upside, what's the downside?

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 4>Why should I do this trade? That's not really the

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 4>approach with options influencing. It's this idea of this cheap

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 4>code in markets, right where people just don't know this

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 4>one cool trick and I'm going to show you for

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 4>only ninety nine dollars a month, right, And the typical

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 4>pitch again is you're just going to be doing some combination.

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Maybe you're selling puts, maybe you're selling calls, maybe against stock,

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 4>maybe not. And the idea is they're pitched in terms

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 4>of the premiums that you're selling are like income, and

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.240
<v Speaker 4>we just talk about how much money you're making solely

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 4>in terms of how much premium you're generating from option sales.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 4>And that's why it's like, oh, I can make two

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 4>hundred thousand dollars a year on a two hundred and

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 4>fifty thousand dollar account. But obviously that's not your profit

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.240
<v Speaker 4>from the trades. You're just doing trades and you're selling

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 4>that pinion. But you might lose money. You might lose

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 4>money on those trades. Yeah, right, you're that's not income.

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 4>And you know, I get a little bit triggered by

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 4>the use of the word income with respect to this stuff,

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 4>because like, income to me is like you own some

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 4>treasury bills, right and you're making four percent and you

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 4>don't just suddenly lose thirty percent on your income thing, right,

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 4>Like it's you know, these are trades, but this community

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 4>is not expressing what is this trade, Why is it good?

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 4>When is it good, what's the price? What's going on.

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 4>It's just saying, look, you can just sell these options

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 4>and this is income, right, which is totally crazy.

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 2>So people come to you from time to time. Your

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 2>a voice of reason. When we had you back on

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 2>a few years ago, you know, people reach out like, oh,

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I really want to learn more. I imagine that getting

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 2>into options is a little bit like converting to Judaism,

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 2>where the rabbi is supposed to send you away three

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 2>times and say no, just buy a S and P

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 2>five hundred index CTF. Don't do it. But and then finally,

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 2>if they keep knocking at their door, then like, okay,

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe we'll teach you something. Where should you start? If

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 2>you're like actually serious and like you know, I do

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 2>know most of the time you're like, just buy an

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 2>ETF and.

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 4>Live your life. That's what a perfect analogy. Thank you?

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, where would you say? We're going to get DMS?

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 4>After this?

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 2>I want to learn more about how to do it right?

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there a way to start to learn to do

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 2>it right?

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely. Usually the first thing that I do is I

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 4>send people kind of collect a thread that has a

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 4>collection a lot of people contributed to on good reading

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 4>material and stuff on how to educate yourself about options

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 4>and how to use them and what they are and

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 4>how to think about the risk and all this stuff.

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 4>So that's a really good kind of first thing to

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.399
<v Speaker 4>do to just have some kind of clue what you're doing.

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:42.919
<v Speaker 4>And then you know, the next thing that I tell

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 4>people is what do I think are kind of reasonably

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 4>safe uses of options that if you really want to

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 4>dedicate time to figuring this out, you might kind of

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 4>start with right, And so I'll say, look, if you

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 4>have some kind of fundamentally driven or tactically driven process

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 4>with for coming up with a view on STEF, and

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 4>you have a timing view, then sure could you use

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 4>a call spread or a put spread to express that view?

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 4>You say, oh, I really like earnings on this on Tesla,

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 4>like next week, could you buy a two week call

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 4>spread around the range where you think the stock could

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 4>trade to And you can obviously make money or lose money,

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 4>but you know exactly how much money are risking. Yeah,

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of a safe thing. You're not going to

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 4>just blow up one day on that. I think that's

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 4>kind of okay. If you really need a little bit

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 4>of kind of cash efficiency or leverage, again not too crazy.

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, you can do things like buy a combo

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 4>in the option market, or buy a call and sell

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 4>a put that give you a very similar profile to

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 4>buying a stock but are a little more cash efficient.

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 4>If you just really feel like you need fifty percent leverage,

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.919
<v Speaker 4>you know, or something like that. And if you want

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 4>to be really thoughtful about options selling, you know, to

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 4>try to generate yield over time, there's ways to do that. Too,

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 4>But you really have to read up to understand how

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 4>to think about the risk award of a trade that

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 4>you're doing, not just believe there's something you can do

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.720
<v Speaker 4>all the time because somebody told you it's a great idea.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Your favorite options blow up or derivatives blow up. And

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll say I'm partial to Vallmageddon in twenty eighteen because

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a lot about it, and I'm still traumatized

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>by the reaction of vol twit when I said it

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>was going to blow up when the vix was going up.

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But what's your favorite?

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 4>Well, Vallmageddon is a great one. You know, you've talked

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 4>about that. Everybody everybody else has two, So I'll give

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 4>you something else. I mean, I think possibly my favorite

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 4>was was alions Structured Alpha, which blew up in twenty

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 4>twenty in March, and the reason was, you know, the

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Allions is a huge sort of safe conservative firm that

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 4>everybody would look and say, oh, they would never be

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 4>doing something kind of crazy, right, because it's you know,

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 4>they're very buttoned up, they're very serious people. They own

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Pimco and so they but they had these French kind

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 4>of option traders and Joe laughs. It's always there. It's

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 4>always the French. There's just something in the DNA. And

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, they were doing something where they would effectively

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 4>they would usually sell downside put spreads. They'd sell a

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 4>put and then they'd buy back a lower strike. That

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 4>was the main They'd do a few other things like that.

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Didn't think of that as like the core thing they

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 4>were doing, right, and that's kind of safeish, right, you're

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 4>getting some a credit if you're earning some premium, but

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 4>like you're supposed to know how much you can lose. Yeah,

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 4>and then but their returns were pretty good. They actually

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 4>kind of kept up with equity markets, which didn't really

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 4>make a whole lot of sense. And it turned out

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 4>the way that they were doing that was that they

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.359
<v Speaker 4>were just not buying back the downside put or buying

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 4>or they were buying it back but like way way

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 4>way lower strike than they said that they were buying

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 4>it back, right, so that's obviously one way to make

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 4>more money. Kind of that sounds really bad. Yeah, that

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 4>was really bad, and they they were doing that for

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 4>years and years and they actually it's really great. There's

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 4>a whole SEC complaint about this. You can read all

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 4>the details. They had to show this to investors what

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 4>they were doing, right, because that's part of the business.

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 4>And so they had spreadsheets with all these kind of

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 4>hard coded cells and made up numbers to sort of

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 4>be able to lie to investors and say that they

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.240
<v Speaker 4>were doing what they said they were doing when they weren't.

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 4>And because that's complicated to manage to have all these

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 4>big spreadsheets faking your returns and faking your risk and everything.

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 4>Then they had a word document with an eight team

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 4>points on like how to do all of the lying

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 4>and number printing for all their analysts to be able

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 4>to follow, and you know it instructions on how to

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 4>not hover the how do you structured alpha Greg Toront

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 4>and it's like, you know, don't hover your mouse over

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 4>a formula. It's supposed to be a formula, but it

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 4>is hard coded because the investor might see the stuff

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 4>like that, right, And you know, with very detailed emails

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 4>on all this kind of how to lie kind of

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 4>kind of stuff, the fun and then what happened was,

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, obviously in March of twenty twenty, the market

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:30.839
<v Speaker 4>went down a lot, so their fund was down much

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:32.800
<v Speaker 4>more than it should have been because they weren't actually

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 4>buying back the insurance that they were supposed to be,

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 4>and so what do you do obviously in that circumstance, Well,

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 4>maybe you could hedge, or maybe you could kind of

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 4>come clean. What they actually did was they went to

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 4>the vix options market and they say, gosh, why don't

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 4>we just sell a massive amount of vix calls because

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 4>then when everything comes back, we'll just make that money

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 4>back and we won't have to tell anybody we lost money.

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 2>This SEC complaint is amazing. Defendants reduced losses under a

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 2>market crash scenario in one risk report send to investor

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:02.959
<v Speaker 2>from negative forty two point one five zero five seven

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 2>four eight nine seven five five seven four seven percent

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 2>to negative four point one zero. They just removed a number.

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 4>That's rights. They just took off a decimal took off,

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 4>that's right. It was all just hard coded. They didn't like,

0:42:14.840 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 4>they didn't have some sophisticated methodology for this. They literally

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 4>just type the numbers into the spreadsheets.

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes and it gets this gets to the I mean,

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 2>to be honest, you don't really even need to be

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 2>French to do that's right, Like any I could have

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 2>come up with I could have come up with this one.

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't need to go to strategy, I don't need

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 2>to go to air call polytechnique to come up with They.

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Just go to sell C six. So you just overwrite

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:38.240
<v Speaker 4>the number.

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Some people do screw up math, like some even sophisticated

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:44.280
<v Speaker 2>traders like sometimes math is tough.

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 4>At this level. Yeah, but no, this was not sophisticated.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 4>This was just you type over the cell. And so

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 4>what happened was they sold lots of vix calls with

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 4>the front month of exed futures at about twenty five,

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 4>and then the front month of fixed features went to

0:42:56.239 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 4>eighty five, and so they were they were liquidated middle

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 4>of March in the huge catastrophic explosion that people like

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 4>us were shown the auction and everything, and they drove

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 4>the relative price of the Vick's options and futures to

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 4>twice as high as it had ever been relative to

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 4>S and P. In this sort of spectacular implosion, you know,

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 4>they went to zero. They lost billions and billions of

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 4>dollars for you know, teachers, pensions and all this kind

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 4>of stuff in just total and utter fraud again at

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 4>a very big buttoned up place, and actually one of

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:29.959
<v Speaker 4>the one of the funny takeaways from it was in

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 4>all of the lawsuits, you know, leons stepped up and

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 4>settled lots of lawsuits and paid investors back, you know,

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 4>all this money and cost them many billions of dollars.

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 4>And so actually, in a twisted sort of way, the

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 4>logic of investing with the big safe place actually worked.

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 4>But it wasn't because they managed the risk or had

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 4>any idea what these guys were doing, and it was

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 4>just that you could sue them and they would pay you.

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Since you mentioned PIMCO, one of the interesting things about

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>PIMCO is, as you said, there is this perception that

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of like an old school just buying bond

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:04.879
<v Speaker 1>type fund burgers and bonds. That's right, But actually if

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at their portfolio and talk to people who

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>are actually doing these trades, there are a lot of

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 1>derivatives involved. There is like Euro dollar futures and swaps

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 1>things like that. Do you see the explosion of derivatives

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>trading reflected in fixed income as well? Like the type

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that we see in equities that we've been talking about,

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 1>is that happening in fixed income too?

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Very much? So? So I actually had a little poll

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 4>I put out on Twitter the other day, which was

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, who do you think is the best derivatives

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 4>trader of all time? And my choices were Bill Gross

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 4>of PIMCO, Warren Buffett, Who else was it? Oh Yaes

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 4>of Susquehanna and Jim Simon's of Renaissance. And everybody was

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:47.840
<v Speaker 4>really confused because they're like, none of these people are

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 4>derivati Well, jeff yass is a derivative trade, but all

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 4>these other guys are what are you talking about, Warren Buffett?

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, Bill Gross has traded more derivatives notional than

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 4>the GDP of the world. They're you know, massive traders

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 4>of things like futures. As you point out in fixed

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 4>income also, Bill Gross and PIMCO was by far the

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 4>biggest option seller in the fixed income complex for many,

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 4>many years, or tens of billions of dollars of piano.

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 4>People don't really think about this, right, They think, oh,

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of boring bond stuff. But no, there's massive

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 4>involvement of you know, big sophisticated institutions in you know,

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 4>all of these spaces. So like retail investors aren't involved

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 4>in fixed income volatility because they don't really have an

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 4>instrument to do that. I mean, they could trade like

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 4>treasury futures options, but that's kind of like a weird

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 4>funk thing. They don't You don't really have listed options

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:31.799
<v Speaker 4>that people can sell as easily. But you know, big

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 4>institutions have been involved in this stuff for a very

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 4>long time.

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's probably coming. If it makes people money,

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's going to be you could sickorize it. Yeah.

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely. They made a vix for fixed income called move

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 4>mov Oh.

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, Well, Ben, that was so much fun

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and we so enjoyed having you back, and you're going

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to have to come back on the show relatively soon,

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>as soon as we have a blow up.

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:54.479
<v Speaker 3>Come back.

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:54.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 2>We'll definitely be calling Ben the next time there's a

0:45:57.800 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 2>blow up.

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 4>That's actually a recurring theme in our right. I do

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 4>a talk with you guys about something, and then it

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 4>blows up, and then you bring me back to talk

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 4>about how it blew up.

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Consider this a warning.

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Can I just this one more quick question?

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 4>Of course?

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Why like you lay out these with the buffery tfs

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and all this stuff, and like how really like they

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 2>don't get you what they think? Do you have a

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:19.759
<v Speaker 2>theory for I get it for retail, the person at

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Starbucks who wants to find a way to get leverage

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:25.280
<v Speaker 2>on that much cash, Now, why is it so big elsewhere?

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 4>So a big part of it is that the kinds

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 4>of institutions involved in these type of trades are just

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 4>are very slow moving and very backward looking, and they're

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 4>not that sensitive to performance outside of like catastrophic events. Yeah. Right,

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 4>So if you think of like a typical pension fund,

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:45.839
<v Speaker 4>it took the consultants like three years to get this

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:48.720
<v Speaker 4>call overwriting stuff through the board in the first place,

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 4>and then they put on the trade that they put

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 4>it on with a couple of managers that they like,

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:54.879
<v Speaker 4>and they go out to dinner with them once a year.

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 4>It's in the it's a footnote in a long report

0:46:57.520 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 4>on performance. And as long as it's just kind of

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 4>my underperforming expectations, like, nobody cares if it blows up.

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 4>That's a different thing. But this kind of thing doesn't

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 4>really blow up, not the kind of strategies that the

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 4>institutions are doing. Yeah, that retail is different, but you know,

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 4>call overwriting, you know, call unlovered, call over writing doesn't

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.040
<v Speaker 4>blow up. It just underperforms in their performance. It's gonna

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:16.719
<v Speaker 4>take them ten years to ever decide to stop.

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, Ben Iffer until the next blow up.

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 4>I guess wonderful guys, really fun.

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe. That was fun.

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I love talking to Ben because he's a funny, fun

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 2>guy and also just explains things really well.

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, should we get the she Wolf of Indian

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>options on together with Ben to fight it out.

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's just do just a rigorous one on one

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 2>debate about whether you can really earn one hundred ten minutes.

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 2>It's really funny that they actually like as a regulator,

0:47:57.800 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 2>They're like, you have to stop this, that you have

0:47:59.880 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 2>to get out of the market.

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. But I also think it's an important episode because

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 1>if I was going to pinpoint one thing that has

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>really changed in the market recently, it would be I

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>guess a pervasive sense of short termism on the part

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of investors, and options fit perfectly into that, right, Like

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>why wait ten years to make a decent reliable return

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 1>when you can buy zero DT options and make a

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:29.359
<v Speaker 1>bunch of money in a day.

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 2>The line between investing and speculating or investing in gambling

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 2>has always been a blurry one. Right, that's just a fact.

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:42.360
<v Speaker 2>But then you see things like, you know, prediction market

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:45.759
<v Speaker 2>platforms where you can invest, you know, make bets on

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 2>where the FED is going to go right alongside, like

0:48:49.280 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 2>bets on you know, who's going to win the coin

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:53.439
<v Speaker 2>flip of the Super Bowl and stuff. Or you see

0:48:53.480 --> 0:48:56.399
<v Speaker 2>like Robin Hood selling futures on who's going to win

0:48:56.880 --> 0:49:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl football game or whatever. The line is gone,

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:03.000
<v Speaker 2>like it's still a spectrum, I guess, but the idea

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 2>that there's any sort of bright line or line at

0:49:05.760 --> 0:49:08.800
<v Speaker 2>all between the two things like there's no line anymore.

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, shall we leave it there.

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the Authots podcast. I'm

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:49:18.160 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:49:21.280 --> 0:49:24.239
<v Speaker 2>Follow our guest Ben Eiffert. He's back on Twitter after

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:28.320
<v Speaker 2>a hiatus. He's at Ben Piffert. Follow our producers Carmen

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Rodriguez at Carmen Arman, dash O Bennett at Dashbock and

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Kelbrooks at Kelbrooks. For more odd Lots content, go to

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots where we have a

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 2>newsletter and a blog, and you can check out all

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 2>of these topics twenty four to seven in our discord

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:45.399
<v Speaker 2>discord dot gg slash.

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Od Lots and if you enjoy odd Lots, if you

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 1>like it when we reminisce about volatility blow ups, then

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:54.839
<v Speaker 1>please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 1>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.