1
00:00:04,480 --> 00:00:12,640
Speaker 1: Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

2
00:00:12,680 --> 00:00:16,160
Speaker 1: and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

3
00:00:16,200 --> 00:00:18,959
Speaker 1: I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and How the

4
00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:22,760
Speaker 1: tech are you? So as twenty twenty three winds down,

5
00:00:22,840 --> 00:00:24,919
Speaker 1: we're looking back on some of the big tech stories

6
00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:28,320
Speaker 1: that happened this year. I mentioned this one a few times,

7
00:00:28,680 --> 00:00:30,320
Speaker 1: but I figured it would be better to do a

8
00:00:30,360 --> 00:00:35,640
Speaker 1: full look back on Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard, which

9
00:00:35,640 --> 00:00:38,839
Speaker 1: actually obviously stretches back more than a year. It was

10
00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:42,160
Speaker 1: never a guaranteed deal and there was a significant amount

11
00:00:42,159 --> 00:00:44,360
Speaker 1: of opposition to it all around the world. So today

12
00:00:44,880 --> 00:00:47,360
Speaker 1: we're going to look at how the story began and

13
00:00:47,400 --> 00:00:49,960
Speaker 1: how it unfolded, as well as we'll speculate a little

14
00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:52,120
Speaker 1: bit about the future now that the two companies have

15
00:00:52,240 --> 00:00:55,640
Speaker 1: put ink to paper. Now, let's start off with background

16
00:00:55,760 --> 00:01:00,040
Speaker 1: on Activision Blizzard. The company traces its history to the

17
00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:04,959
Speaker 1: earliest days of home video game markets. Activision launched out

18
00:01:04,959 --> 00:01:07,840
Speaker 1: of Atari when a group of folks decided that it

19
00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:11,240
Speaker 1: might be nice to receive credit and royalties for their work,

20
00:01:11,720 --> 00:01:14,520
Speaker 1: rather than all that sweet cash and credit going to

21
00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:19,720
Speaker 1: the company itself. So Activision made some real bangers like Pitfall,

22
00:01:19,959 --> 00:01:23,200
Speaker 1: which if you're old like I am, you might remember

23
00:01:23,400 --> 00:01:28,080
Speaker 1: fondly compared to more recent games. Of course, it's primitive,

24
00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:33,000
Speaker 1: but trust me, at the time, Pitfall was amazing. Skip

25
00:01:33,040 --> 00:01:35,639
Speaker 1: ahead to nineteen ninety one and a guy named Bobby

26
00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:40,160
Speaker 1: Kodik would, along with some financial partners, by a significant

27
00:01:40,200 --> 00:01:43,480
Speaker 1: amount of stock in Activision. He would later become the

28
00:01:43,520 --> 00:01:47,760
Speaker 1: CEO of the company. That same year, the company that

29
00:01:47,800 --> 00:01:51,040
Speaker 1: would become Blizzard would form. The original name for a

30
00:01:51,080 --> 00:01:54,160
Speaker 1: Blizzard was Silicon and Synapse when it was launched in

31
00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:57,640
Speaker 1: ninety one, but it took the name Blizzard in ninety four,

32
00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:02,200
Speaker 1: and Blizzard also published some real bangers in video and

33
00:02:02,200 --> 00:02:05,600
Speaker 1: computer games. It's the company behind Warcraft, which was a

34
00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:10,720
Speaker 1: huge hit in the real time strategy community. They produced Diablo,

35
00:02:10,919 --> 00:02:13,960
Speaker 1: which was a huge hit among the how many times

36
00:02:13,960 --> 00:02:16,880
Speaker 1: can I click my mouse button in a row? Community,

37
00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:20,720
Speaker 1: and it launched World of Warcraft, the I Will Never

38
00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:24,359
Speaker 1: see the light of day again community, among many others.

39
00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:28,960
Speaker 1: By the two thousands, Activision was creating or publishing genre

40
00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:34,840
Speaker 1: defining franchises like Call of Duty and Guitar Hero. Blizzard's

41
00:02:34,919 --> 00:02:39,800
Speaker 1: game StarCraft would become a cornerstone of esports. Blizzard also

42
00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:43,359
Speaker 1: changed hands multiple times in the early two thousands, ending

43
00:02:43,440 --> 00:02:45,920
Speaker 1: up with a company called Vivendi Games out of France.

44
00:02:46,680 --> 00:02:49,840
Speaker 1: Activision merged with Vivendi in two thousand and eight and

45
00:02:50,160 --> 00:02:53,920
Speaker 1: the new company was called Activision Blizzard and Bobby Kotik

46
00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:59,520
Speaker 1: became CEO of this newly merged company. Activision Blizzard continued

47
00:02:59,560 --> 00:03:03,000
Speaker 1: to develop, up and publish successful games and franchises. It

48
00:03:03,040 --> 00:03:07,560
Speaker 1: became one of the largest video game companies in the world. Now,

49
00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:12,320
Speaker 1: let us switch gears to talk about Microsoft. Now, obviously

50
00:03:12,400 --> 00:03:16,040
Speaker 1: Microsoft has had a really long history as well. I

51
00:03:16,040 --> 00:03:18,320
Speaker 1: think it's safe to say that the company is best

52
00:03:18,360 --> 00:03:21,760
Speaker 1: known for the Windows operating system. It's also the company

53
00:03:21,800 --> 00:03:25,960
Speaker 1: behind the Office suite of productivity software like Word and Excel.

54
00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:31,120
Speaker 1: Oh and it has a long history of Shenanigan's ranging

55
00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:34,639
Speaker 1: from misleading business deals which go all the way back

56
00:03:34,680 --> 00:03:37,200
Speaker 1: to the earliest days of the company, with Bill Gates

57
00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:40,760
Speaker 1: pulling a fast one on rivals, to a legal case

58
00:03:40,760 --> 00:03:44,520
Speaker 1: that very nearly forced Microsoft to break up into smaller companies,

59
00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:47,480
Speaker 1: but a subsequent judge in the US would overrule that

60
00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:51,760
Speaker 1: decision later on. Microsoft has been a big part of

61
00:03:51,800 --> 00:03:54,520
Speaker 1: gaming for a really long time as well. The first

62
00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:57,840
Speaker 1: edition of Microsoft Flight Simulator launched in nineteen eighty six,

63
00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:01,440
Speaker 1: but this title was actually built on an older simulator

64
00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:05,840
Speaker 1: that originally came out in nineteen seventy seven. Microsoft waded

65
00:04:05,840 --> 00:04:08,480
Speaker 1: into the video game console wars in two thousand and

66
00:04:08,480 --> 00:04:12,560
Speaker 1: one with the launch of the original Xbox console. The

67
00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:15,320
Speaker 1: Xbox three sixty would follow in two thousand and five,

68
00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:18,680
Speaker 1: and then Xbox One would come out in twenty thirteen.

69
00:04:19,520 --> 00:04:24,320
Speaker 1: In twenty fourteen, Microsoft acquired Mojang Studios, the company behind

70
00:04:24,400 --> 00:04:29,719
Speaker 1: the insanely popular title Minecraft, and in twenty twenty, Microsoft

71
00:04:29,760 --> 00:04:33,360
Speaker 1: launched the most recent version of the Xbox. The Series

72
00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:37,160
Speaker 1: X is the flagship. There's also the Series S. In

73
00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:40,760
Speaker 1: recent years, Microsoft has focused more on video games as

74
00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:44,880
Speaker 1: its business model has shifted quite a bit so in

75
00:04:45,000 --> 00:04:49,719
Speaker 1: years past, new versions of Windows and updates to the

76
00:04:49,839 --> 00:04:52,920
Speaker 1: Office Suite where the flagship products for the company. That's

77
00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:56,800
Speaker 1: mainly what they focused their sales on, but the revenue

78
00:04:56,800 --> 00:04:59,960
Speaker 1: strategy has changed a bit. It focuses more on subscrib

79
00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:04,880
Speaker 1: options than product sales, and they also have other services

80
00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:08,600
Speaker 1: that they make money from, like cloud computing. Video games

81
00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:11,440
Speaker 1: and consoles are one of the product lines that are

82
00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:14,599
Speaker 1: still going strong in Microsoft, though there are also subscription

83
00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:18,120
Speaker 1: elements to those as well, and Microsoft faces a couple

84
00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:22,640
Speaker 1: of heavy hitters in the video game industry, namely Sony

85
00:05:22,920 --> 00:05:26,800
Speaker 1: and to a lesser extent, Nintendo, but Sony is the

86
00:05:26,839 --> 00:05:30,360
Speaker 1: real rival to Microsoft's total domination of the home video

87
00:05:30,400 --> 00:05:36,200
Speaker 1: game market. In twenty twenty one, a scandal erupted at

88
00:05:36,320 --> 00:05:40,240
Speaker 1: Activision Blizzard. Now, to be clear, the problem that was

89
00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:43,400
Speaker 1: the focus of the scandal had been in place for

90
00:05:43,440 --> 00:05:46,720
Speaker 1: a really long time, but in twenty twenty one it's

91
00:05:46,720 --> 00:05:50,720
Speaker 1: when it all sort of became public dirty laundry. Multiple

92
00:05:50,760 --> 00:05:53,520
Speaker 1: parties came forward and accused the company of allowing a

93
00:05:53,680 --> 00:05:58,599
Speaker 1: toxic environment to flourish. At Activision Blizzard. There were allegations,

94
00:05:58,600 --> 00:06:03,120
Speaker 1: like serious allegations of stuff like sexual harassment cases, including

95
00:06:03,279 --> 00:06:06,080
Speaker 1: at least a couple that were really more bordering on

96
00:06:06,120 --> 00:06:10,680
Speaker 1: sexual assault cases, and a lot of the stories ended

97
00:06:10,760 --> 00:06:13,200
Speaker 1: up being the same where employees were told that they

98
00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:16,800
Speaker 1: had to settle the matter internally within the company and

99
00:06:17,160 --> 00:06:20,279
Speaker 1: that human resources was supposed to be the first and

100
00:06:20,360 --> 00:06:25,640
Speaker 1: really only resort. Meanwhile, that department was allegedly burying these matters,

101
00:06:25,720 --> 00:06:28,760
Speaker 1: so that they wouldn't go any further. There were other

102
00:06:28,880 --> 00:06:32,480
Speaker 1: serious allegations as well, claiming the company discriminated against women,

103
00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:34,880
Speaker 1: and that it violated the law in how the company

104
00:06:34,880 --> 00:06:37,960
Speaker 1: treated pregnant women, and that it was also guilty of

105
00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:42,320
Speaker 1: retaliating against employees who brought issues up, another thing that

106
00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:47,560
Speaker 1: is against the law. The accusations also said that Bobby Kotik,

107
00:06:47,640 --> 00:06:50,640
Speaker 1: the CEO of the company, was fully aware of the

108
00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:54,400
Speaker 1: situation and that he did nothing about it, or worse,

109
00:06:55,080 --> 00:06:58,000
Speaker 1: not that he did nothing, but that he also faced accusations.

110
00:06:58,040 --> 00:07:02,960
Speaker 1: They specifically withheld in from the board of directors. There

111
00:07:02,960 --> 00:07:06,360
Speaker 1: were folks calling for Kodek's resignation, a call that CODEC

112
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:12,440
Speaker 1: pointedly ignored. Not at the time, very few people knew

113
00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:14,760
Speaker 1: what was going on behind the scenes, but this was

114
00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:19,400
Speaker 1: when Microsoft was in early negotiations considering an acquisition of

115
00:07:19,400 --> 00:07:23,080
Speaker 1: the company, and it wasn't public knowledge yet. A big

116
00:07:23,080 --> 00:07:26,880
Speaker 1: move like that requires stability in both companies that are

117
00:07:26,920 --> 00:07:30,120
Speaker 1: part of a merger, and while a change in leadership

118
00:07:30,720 --> 00:07:34,080
Speaker 1: might have been appropriate considering the accusations involved over at

119
00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:38,720
Speaker 1: Activision Blizzard, it would also make the acquisition process more complicated,

120
00:07:39,200 --> 00:07:43,320
Speaker 1: and apparently business wins out over matters of toxicity and

121
00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:48,320
Speaker 1: abuse of employees. So Kdek stayed put, and various employees

122
00:07:48,360 --> 00:07:53,480
Speaker 1: in US agencies filed lawsuits against Activision Blizzard. The company

123
00:07:53,520 --> 00:07:57,080
Speaker 1: actually settled one of those lawsuits out of court in

124
00:07:57,120 --> 00:08:01,280
Speaker 1: September twenty twenty one. It agreed to settle a similar

125
00:08:01,360 --> 00:08:05,720
Speaker 1: lawsuit just this year, after Microsoft had already completed the acquisition.

126
00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:10,760
Speaker 1: There's a dark legacy of sexual discrimination that Activision Blizzard

127
00:08:10,840 --> 00:08:15,240
Speaker 1: must overcome, and there are different camps that view the

128
00:08:15,280 --> 00:08:18,960
Speaker 1: acquisition in very different ways with regard to that. There

129
00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:22,800
Speaker 1: are some who worry that with Microsoft acquiring Activision Blizzard,

130
00:08:23,760 --> 00:08:26,920
Speaker 1: the new parent company is just going to sweep everything

131
00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:30,400
Speaker 1: under the rug and walk away and make that just

132
00:08:30,440 --> 00:08:32,319
Speaker 1: a matter of the past, and no one will ever

133
00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:37,320
Speaker 1: see any justice from the various indignities and worse that

134
00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:42,480
Speaker 1: they experienced under Activision Blizzard. The other camp hopes that Microsoft,

135
00:08:42,520 --> 00:08:45,840
Speaker 1: by taking charge, will actually address these things in a

136
00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:50,600
Speaker 1: way that is accountable and will end up seeing justice

137
00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:54,679
Speaker 1: done for the people who were negatively impacted by Activision

138
00:08:54,760 --> 00:08:58,600
Speaker 1: Blizzard's environment, and that perhaps Microsoft will clean house as

139
00:08:58,640 --> 00:09:01,240
Speaker 1: part of the process. Some of that has actually come

140
00:09:01,280 --> 00:09:04,920
Speaker 1: to pass, as we have seen some changes in executive

141
00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:08,679
Speaker 1: leadership in recent days, but we'll get back to that.

142
00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:15,480
Speaker 1: So on January eighteenth, twenty twenty two, Microsoft announced its

143
00:09:15,520 --> 00:09:19,560
Speaker 1: intention to acquire Activision Blizzard. The transaction was to be

144
00:09:19,640 --> 00:09:23,600
Speaker 1: all in cash nearly sixty nine billion, with a b

145
00:09:23,840 --> 00:09:27,600
Speaker 1: dollars worth of cash, which is a whole lot of cash.

146
00:09:28,120 --> 00:09:31,280
Speaker 1: According to the press release that Microsoft was behind, this

147
00:09:31,320 --> 00:09:35,120
Speaker 1: would put Microsoft in third place among video game companies,

148
00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:38,440
Speaker 1: at least by revenue. They said that the Chinese company

149
00:09:38,480 --> 00:09:42,040
Speaker 1: Tencent was in number one and the Japanese giant Sony

150
00:09:42,520 --> 00:09:46,800
Speaker 1: was in place number two, and I suspect Microsoft listed

151
00:09:46,840 --> 00:09:51,079
Speaker 1: Sony this way, acknowledging it as a larger video game company,

152
00:09:51,880 --> 00:09:55,360
Speaker 1: because it was a strategic move. I'm pretty sure that

153
00:09:55,440 --> 00:09:59,240
Speaker 1: Microsoft and Activision Blizzard knew that this merger was going

154
00:09:59,320 --> 00:10:02,480
Speaker 1: to face scrutine all around the world, and it would

155
00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:04,839
Speaker 1: mean two very powerful companies in the video game space

156
00:10:04,880 --> 00:10:07,600
Speaker 1: would consolidate, and that could be viewed as a threat

157
00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:10,960
Speaker 1: to competition in the overall industry. So they end up

158
00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:14,000
Speaker 1: pointing out, hey, even if we're together, Sony is still

159
00:10:14,040 --> 00:10:17,400
Speaker 1: bigger than we are. It was kind of a strategic

160
00:10:17,400 --> 00:10:20,560
Speaker 1: way of saying we're not a threat to competition. Look,

161
00:10:20,960 --> 00:10:23,480
Speaker 1: we still won't be as big as Sony or Tencent.

162
00:10:24,480 --> 00:10:28,079
Speaker 1: But as it turns out, that scrutiny would exactly follow

163
00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:32,520
Speaker 1: it in the way that Microsoft anticipated, and Sony would

164
00:10:32,520 --> 00:10:36,319
Speaker 1: play a very large heart of it. I'll talk more

165
00:10:36,400 --> 00:10:38,840
Speaker 1: about this, but first let's take a quick break to

166
00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:50,080
Speaker 1: thank our sponsors. All Right, we're back. I had talked

167
00:10:50,120 --> 00:10:54,680
Speaker 1: about how Microsoft was trying to kind of pregame by saying, hey,

168
00:10:54,760 --> 00:10:57,840
Speaker 1: even when we're together, we're gonna just be in third place,

169
00:10:58,480 --> 00:11:01,040
Speaker 1: And they're positioning it in a way where they're like, hey, yay,

170
00:11:01,120 --> 00:11:03,480
Speaker 1: we're all the way moving up to third place. But

171
00:11:03,559 --> 00:11:05,320
Speaker 1: it was kind of a sly way of saying, there's

172
00:11:05,320 --> 00:11:08,160
Speaker 1: still two companies that are bigger than us, even given

173
00:11:08,280 --> 00:11:14,680
Speaker 1: this this merger. The situation also explained why Bobby Kodick

174
00:11:14,880 --> 00:11:18,120
Speaker 1: was adamant with regard to staying in charge at Activision Blizzard.

175
00:11:18,400 --> 00:11:22,000
Speaker 1: Before it looked like he was just doubling down as

176
00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:25,800
Speaker 1: a leader of a company that had a callous attitude

177
00:11:25,840 --> 00:11:31,040
Speaker 1: toward employees, specifically employees who were also women. But now

178
00:11:31,080 --> 00:11:34,480
Speaker 1: the complication of this massive business deal put things into

179
00:11:34,679 --> 00:11:38,679
Speaker 1: a new perspective, people said, Aha, this is why Bobby

180
00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:42,240
Speaker 1: Kodick refuses to step down. It's not that he really

181
00:11:42,320 --> 00:11:46,240
Speaker 1: thinks he's in the right here, but because there's this massive,

182
00:11:46,480 --> 00:11:50,040
Speaker 1: sixty nine billion dollar deal going on and he doesn't

183
00:11:50,080 --> 00:11:52,320
Speaker 1: want to mess it up by stepping down and having

184
00:11:52,360 --> 00:11:56,600
Speaker 1: someone else take charge. So it got very cynical for

185
00:11:56,679 --> 00:11:59,880
Speaker 1: good reason. It didn't take long for folks to screw

186
00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:03,239
Speaker 1: the deal and for people to start raising their concerns.

187
00:12:03,520 --> 00:12:07,160
Speaker 1: In fact, in April twenty twenty two, several US senators

188
00:12:07,160 --> 00:12:10,360
Speaker 1: wrote a letter to the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC

189
00:12:11,240 --> 00:12:15,160
Speaker 1: about this proposed merger, and they cited worries about consolidation

190
00:12:15,240 --> 00:12:18,520
Speaker 1: in the tech industry in general, which does make sense

191
00:12:18,559 --> 00:12:21,880
Speaker 1: because there is a very small collection of very large

192
00:12:21,920 --> 00:12:25,360
Speaker 1: companies that dominate the tech space here in the United States,

193
00:12:25,760 --> 00:12:29,000
Speaker 1: and Microsoft is one of them already, and their move

194
00:12:29,080 --> 00:12:32,280
Speaker 1: appeared to be in alignment with concentrating even more power

195
00:12:32,960 --> 00:12:37,360
Speaker 1: within that small group of companies. The senators also reference

196
00:12:37,440 --> 00:12:42,440
Speaker 1: the ongoing investigations and litigations surrounding Activision Blizzard. They were

197
00:12:42,679 --> 00:12:45,440
Speaker 1: among those who were worried that a merger could mean

198
00:12:45,480 --> 00:12:49,320
Speaker 1: that employees who had been affected by the activities of

199
00:12:49,320 --> 00:12:52,439
Speaker 1: Activision Blizzard might find themselves without means to have their

200
00:12:52,480 --> 00:12:56,080
Speaker 1: issues addressed in the wake of a merger, like how

201
00:12:56,080 --> 00:12:59,440
Speaker 1: can they see justice if there's a new boss in

202
00:12:59,520 --> 00:13:04,680
Speaker 1: charge in the just essentially say upslates wipe clean. But

203
00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:07,760
Speaker 1: the real opposition to the deal, I would argue came

204
00:13:07,760 --> 00:13:12,160
Speaker 1: from overseas. Specifically in the United Kingdom. The Competitions and

205
00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:17,120
Speaker 1: Markets Authority or CMA launched an investigation into the deal

206
00:13:17,240 --> 00:13:20,120
Speaker 1: out of concern that it would lead to significant decrease

207
00:13:20,240 --> 00:13:24,320
Speaker 1: in competition in video games. There were worries that Microsoft

208
00:13:24,360 --> 00:13:29,240
Speaker 1: would reserve Activision Blizzard titles to Microsoft exclusive platforms like

209
00:13:29,520 --> 00:13:34,400
Speaker 1: Xbox consoles and Windows based PCs, that Microsoft would deny

210
00:13:34,520 --> 00:13:38,720
Speaker 1: companies like Sony and Nintendo from getting access to really

211
00:13:39,400 --> 00:13:43,880
Speaker 1: hugely popular video game franchises, and that this would constitute

212
00:13:43,880 --> 00:13:49,240
Speaker 1: anti competitive practices. Essentially, they were worried about Microsoft locking

213
00:13:49,280 --> 00:13:52,839
Speaker 1: all of these popular video game titles to an exclusivity

214
00:13:52,880 --> 00:13:58,640
Speaker 1: deal with itself. Microsoft repeatedly committed to giving its competitors

215
00:13:58,720 --> 00:14:02,880
Speaker 1: access to those pop titles. Time and again, a Microsoft

216
00:14:02,920 --> 00:14:07,120
Speaker 1: representative would refute the concerns, and this got to a

217
00:14:07,160 --> 00:14:12,320
Speaker 1: point where Microsoft agreed to sign to ten year commitments

218
00:14:12,679 --> 00:14:16,640
Speaker 1: that would cement that Microsoft would not lock games like

219
00:14:16,679 --> 00:14:20,640
Speaker 1: the Call of Duty franchise behind an exclusive arrangement. It

220
00:14:20,720 --> 00:14:24,000
Speaker 1: turned out that Sony representatives had been raising concerns with

221
00:14:24,120 --> 00:14:28,120
Speaker 1: regulators about this very thing. That Sony had been arguing

222
00:14:28,760 --> 00:14:32,240
Speaker 1: Microsoft and Activision Blizzard merging together would cause direct harm

223
00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:37,200
Speaker 1: to companies like Sony and Nintendo, and ultimately, they argued consumers.

224
00:14:37,960 --> 00:14:43,400
Speaker 1: Sony reps also said that Microsoft would squeak around guarantees right. Oh, sure,

225
00:14:43,440 --> 00:14:46,280
Speaker 1: they'll release the game, but they'll make sure that the

226
00:14:46,320 --> 00:14:49,320
Speaker 1: Microsoft version of the game has more features and more

227
00:14:49,400 --> 00:14:52,640
Speaker 1: content in it, and that the version that gets released

228
00:14:52,680 --> 00:14:57,320
Speaker 1: to platforms like PlayStation or Nintendo consoles will be stripped

229
00:14:57,360 --> 00:15:01,080
Speaker 1: down and inferior. Maybe they'll have a content, maybe it'll

230
00:15:01,120 --> 00:15:03,880
Speaker 1: be lower fidelity, something along those lines, maybe it'll have

231
00:15:03,920 --> 00:15:09,160
Speaker 1: performance issues. By the way, Sony locking stuff behind exclusive

232
00:15:09,240 --> 00:15:12,520
Speaker 1: content for themselves is something that they have done a

233
00:15:12,560 --> 00:15:14,600
Speaker 1: lot of, so you could argue they knew a lot

234
00:15:14,640 --> 00:15:16,960
Speaker 1: about this kind of idea because they themselves had sort

235
00:15:17,000 --> 00:15:20,920
Speaker 1: of perfected it. But no matter, I think the concern

236
00:15:21,600 --> 00:15:25,280
Speaker 1: was a legitimate one, even if Sony itself had been

237
00:15:25,280 --> 00:15:29,360
Speaker 1: guilty of doing the same thing to other platforms. Phil Spencer,

238
00:15:29,680 --> 00:15:33,280
Speaker 1: the head of the Xbox division over at Microsoft, ultimately

239
00:15:33,400 --> 00:15:36,160
Speaker 1: made a public statement that said the company would release

240
00:15:36,240 --> 00:15:39,800
Speaker 1: Call of Duty titles to PlayStation for as long as

241
00:15:39,840 --> 00:15:43,800
Speaker 1: there's a PlayStation to release titles too. Essentially said, we're

242
00:15:43,800 --> 00:15:46,000
Speaker 1: never going to get out of the business of creating

243
00:15:46,120 --> 00:15:50,320
Speaker 1: video games for other platforms. It doesn't make sense because

244
00:15:50,360 --> 00:15:54,000
Speaker 1: while we could dominate the market and be anti competitive,

245
00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:57,560
Speaker 1: there's more money to be made by making titles for

246
00:15:57,640 --> 00:16:01,720
Speaker 1: other platforms. That's that's what we want to do, ultimately,

247
00:16:01,840 --> 00:16:05,760
Speaker 1: is make more money, not have some sort of, you know,

248
00:16:06,240 --> 00:16:11,240
Speaker 1: de facto dominance in the market. This was after more

249
00:16:11,280 --> 00:16:14,160
Speaker 1: than a year of back and forth in various regulatory arenas.

250
00:16:15,120 --> 00:16:19,440
Speaker 1: So not only did the two companies face stern opposition

251
00:16:19,560 --> 00:16:23,000
Speaker 1: in the UK, here in the United States things were

252
00:16:23,040 --> 00:16:26,920
Speaker 1: getting thorny as well. The Federal Trade Commission announced it

253
00:16:26,960 --> 00:16:30,680
Speaker 1: was opposed to the deal. In fact, the FTC sued

254
00:16:30,840 --> 00:16:35,240
Speaker 1: Microsoft to stop the deal from happening. Again. The concern

255
00:16:35,400 --> 00:16:38,080
Speaker 1: was that the deal marked a decrease in competition in

256
00:16:38,120 --> 00:16:40,360
Speaker 1: the market and that it would give Microsoft an unfair

257
00:16:40,400 --> 00:16:44,080
Speaker 1: advantage over other companies. And again this is something that

258
00:16:44,120 --> 00:16:47,320
Speaker 1: Microsoft has a well earned reputation of doing in the past,

259
00:16:47,440 --> 00:16:50,880
Speaker 1: So it's not like Microsoft is some innocent babe in

260
00:16:50,880 --> 00:16:56,360
Speaker 1: the woods. The company has been found guilty of engaging

261
00:16:56,360 --> 00:16:59,960
Speaker 1: in anti competitive practices. So in some ways you can

262
00:17:00,120 --> 00:17:02,600
Speaker 1: look at this as the FTC saying, ah, you're back

263
00:17:02,640 --> 00:17:06,720
Speaker 1: up to year old tricks again Microsoft. By early twenty

264
00:17:06,800 --> 00:17:10,960
Speaker 1: twenty three, the European Union had also jumped into this mess,

265
00:17:11,480 --> 00:17:14,320
Speaker 1: and regulators in the EU said that they too were

266
00:17:14,400 --> 00:17:17,920
Speaker 1: concerned about the deal. At this point, things were starting

267
00:17:17,920 --> 00:17:22,800
Speaker 1: to look pretty uncertain. Microsoft and Activision Blizzard were facing

268
00:17:22,840 --> 00:17:27,160
Speaker 1: critical scrutiny in the UK, the EU, and the US.

269
00:17:28,160 --> 00:17:31,280
Speaker 1: That's a lot of initials. The deal was supposed to

270
00:17:31,320 --> 00:17:34,360
Speaker 1: close in the summer of twenty twenty three, but at

271
00:17:34,359 --> 00:17:36,879
Speaker 1: this point that seemed like that was going to be

272
00:17:36,920 --> 00:17:40,280
Speaker 1: wishful thinking. In fact, the deal itself was by far

273
00:17:40,800 --> 00:17:45,800
Speaker 1: not a guarantee. There were serious doubts coming up. For

274
00:17:45,840 --> 00:17:48,760
Speaker 1: a few short weeks, things actually started to look up

275
00:17:48,800 --> 00:17:53,720
Speaker 1: for Microsoft and Activision Blizzard because the CMA, potentially the

276
00:17:53,760 --> 00:17:58,119
Speaker 1: harshest critic of all the regulators. Arguably the FTC wins

277
00:17:58,160 --> 00:18:01,360
Speaker 1: out in the end, but the CMA had serious concerns

278
00:18:01,359 --> 00:18:05,000
Speaker 1: about this deal, but in March of twenty twenty three,

279
00:18:05,520 --> 00:18:09,040
Speaker 1: CMA said, you know what, we're not as concerned about

280
00:18:09,040 --> 00:18:11,480
Speaker 1: this whole thing as we used to be. They essentially

281
00:18:11,960 --> 00:18:14,840
Speaker 1: said they were no longer concerned on March twenty fourth,

282
00:18:14,880 --> 00:18:20,640
Speaker 1: twenty twenty three. However, on April twenty sixth, twenty twenty three,

283
00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:24,080
Speaker 1: a month later, the CMA did another one to eighty

284
00:18:24,640 --> 00:18:28,120
Speaker 1: and formally moved to block the deal from happening, saying Nope,

285
00:18:28,160 --> 00:18:31,320
Speaker 1: we're not gonna let this go through. So what the

286
00:18:31,359 --> 00:18:35,480
Speaker 1: heck happened? Where did CMA go from saying Okay, our

287
00:18:35,520 --> 00:18:38,199
Speaker 1: concerns have been met to Nope, we can't allow this

288
00:18:38,240 --> 00:18:42,520
Speaker 1: to happen. Well, according to the CMA, the new issue

289
00:18:42,520 --> 00:18:45,680
Speaker 1: was a concern that the acquisition would create an unfair

290
00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:50,040
Speaker 1: market in cloud gaming. Microsoft reps said the issue appeared

291
00:18:50,040 --> 00:18:53,960
Speaker 1: to stem from a quote flawed understanding of the market

292
00:18:54,119 --> 00:18:57,719
Speaker 1: end quote which is throwing some shade at the CMA.

293
00:18:58,240 --> 00:19:00,199
Speaker 1: They also said something along the lines of it, sure

294
00:19:00,280 --> 00:19:03,040
Speaker 1: is a shame that the CMA is determined to make

295
00:19:03,680 --> 00:19:07,840
Speaker 1: the UK lag behind in technological innovation. Like it was

296
00:19:07,960 --> 00:19:10,800
Speaker 1: kind of it was kind of like a like the mafia,

297
00:19:10,880 --> 00:19:13,320
Speaker 1: making a threat in a way like the way that

298
00:19:13,600 --> 00:19:16,800
Speaker 1: you see in mob movies where someone's like, hey, it's

299
00:19:16,800 --> 00:19:18,720
Speaker 1: a nice shop you got here. Sure would be a

300
00:19:18,760 --> 00:19:23,480
Speaker 1: shame if someone would, I don't know, set fia to it.

301
00:19:23,480 --> 00:19:26,240
Speaker 1: It kind of felt like that sort of threat, like

302
00:19:26,280 --> 00:19:29,800
Speaker 1: a threat that's worded in a way to potentially raise

303
00:19:29,920 --> 00:19:34,520
Speaker 1: plausible deniability. But yeah, that's that's what Microsoft was saying.

304
00:19:34,520 --> 00:19:37,560
Speaker 1: Plus they were just saying, y'all are stupid because you

305
00:19:37,560 --> 00:19:42,720
Speaker 1: don't understand the market. Shortly after the CMA made its

306
00:19:42,840 --> 00:19:44,320
Speaker 1: change of mind and said no, we're not going to

307
00:19:44,440 --> 00:19:47,800
Speaker 1: let this go through, the EU regulators actually dropped their

308
00:19:47,880 --> 00:19:51,240
Speaker 1: concerns and they approved the deal, so they removed one

309
00:19:51,280 --> 00:19:55,320
Speaker 1: of the massive obstacles that were in the way of Activision,

310
00:19:55,320 --> 00:19:59,359
Speaker 1: Blizzard and Microsoft, but the UK and the United States

311
00:19:59,359 --> 00:20:03,159
Speaker 1: were still uncertain. Good news arrived in the US as

312
00:20:03,200 --> 00:20:06,600
Speaker 1: a judge found that Microsoft's commitments to ensuring that popular

313
00:20:06,680 --> 00:20:10,840
Speaker 1: titles would remain on competitors' platforms were sufficient enough to

314
00:20:10,920 --> 00:20:14,399
Speaker 1: allow the deal to proceed. This knocked down the FTC's

315
00:20:14,440 --> 00:20:17,520
Speaker 1: concerns on the matter. The judge said, well, Microsoft has

316
00:20:17,520 --> 00:20:22,680
Speaker 1: made a commitment to negate the problems that the FTC

317
00:20:22,800 --> 00:20:26,359
Speaker 1: has brought up, and as long as Microsoft follows that,

318
00:20:26,560 --> 00:20:29,719
Speaker 1: then there's no anti competitive issue here because the company

319
00:20:29,720 --> 00:20:33,080
Speaker 1: has committed to making sure that competitors have access to

320
00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:35,560
Speaker 1: those titles. That was one of the cornerstones of the

321
00:20:35,600 --> 00:20:39,480
Speaker 1: FTC's argument. So the judge said, FTC, your your argument

322
00:20:39,520 --> 00:20:42,680
Speaker 1: doesn't have merit to it and essentially dismissed the case.

323
00:20:43,320 --> 00:20:47,000
Speaker 1: This happened on July eleventh, and remember Microsoft hoped to

324
00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:50,520
Speaker 1: close the deal in June twenty twenty three, so this

325
00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:54,639
Speaker 1: is after when the original closing date was supposed to

326
00:20:54,680 --> 00:20:58,280
Speaker 1: have happened. All Right, we've got a bit more to

327
00:20:58,320 --> 00:21:01,720
Speaker 1: cover about this case, but before we can get to that,

328
00:21:01,800 --> 00:21:14,200
Speaker 1: let's take another quick break to thank our sponsors. Okay,

329
00:21:14,280 --> 00:21:18,199
Speaker 1: during its legal case with the FTC, Microsoft said some

330
00:21:18,240 --> 00:21:21,800
Speaker 1: stuff that everyone already knew but that the company had

331
00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:25,760
Speaker 1: never really admitted, namely, that Sony had run away with

332
00:21:25,840 --> 00:21:29,200
Speaker 1: the victory in the console wars. Right in the announcement,

333
00:21:29,280 --> 00:21:33,119
Speaker 1: Microsoft had mentioned that Sony was a larger company in

334
00:21:33,160 --> 00:21:37,000
Speaker 1: the video game space than Microsoft was, but then this

335
00:21:37,280 --> 00:21:40,679
Speaker 1: was slightly different. This was Microsoft saying that the PlayStation

336
00:21:40,840 --> 00:21:46,760
Speaker 1: consoles consistently outsold Xbox consoles. Again, this wasn't a secret,

337
00:21:47,040 --> 00:21:50,520
Speaker 1: like everyone knew this, but for Microsoft to acknowledge it

338
00:21:50,520 --> 00:21:53,600
Speaker 1: seemed like it was a pretty big deal. And Microsoft

339
00:21:53,640 --> 00:21:56,600
Speaker 1: was using it in defense right. They were saying, how

340
00:21:56,640 --> 00:22:01,040
Speaker 1: could we be decreasing competition in a market when we're

341
00:22:01,080 --> 00:22:04,640
Speaker 1: not the dominant player in the market, Sony dominates us.

342
00:22:05,160 --> 00:22:09,320
Speaker 1: So this isn't bringing down competition, It's actually helping us

343
00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:12,520
Speaker 1: improve our position in a market that is already extremely

344
00:22:12,560 --> 00:22:16,280
Speaker 1: competitive and we are losing. So it helps support the

345
00:22:16,320 --> 00:22:18,920
Speaker 1: story that Microsoft wasn't about to run away with everything.

346
00:22:19,640 --> 00:22:21,800
Speaker 1: But I bet it's stung to say it out loud.

347
00:22:22,400 --> 00:22:26,720
Speaker 1: The FTC, for its part, would appeal the ruling saying

348
00:22:26,760 --> 00:22:30,880
Speaker 1: that hey, actually, our concerns are well merited and they

349
00:22:30,920 --> 00:22:34,240
Speaker 1: we should be allowed to stop this merger. But that

350
00:22:34,320 --> 00:22:39,239
Speaker 1: appeal is still pending as I record this episode, So

351
00:22:39,640 --> 00:22:42,320
Speaker 1: that is a we'll talk about it again in a second,

352
00:22:42,320 --> 00:22:46,199
Speaker 1: but it's an unresolved matter. But with the recent win

353
00:22:46,280 --> 00:22:49,760
Speaker 1: for Microsoft and Activision Blizzard on the books, where a

354
00:22:49,840 --> 00:22:53,200
Speaker 1: judge had said that Microsoft was fine to pursue this

355
00:22:53,800 --> 00:22:57,120
Speaker 1: merger in the United States, the company's moved to convince

356
00:22:57,160 --> 00:23:01,280
Speaker 1: the CMA back in the United Kingdom to reconsider their

357
00:23:01,320 --> 00:23:06,160
Speaker 1: position of blocking the deal from happening. So they took

358
00:23:06,200 --> 00:23:08,879
Speaker 1: the concerns that the CMA raised and they proposed a

359
00:23:09,000 --> 00:23:12,879
Speaker 1: new deal in an attempt to mollify those concerns. So,

360
00:23:13,160 --> 00:23:16,960
Speaker 1: for example, one of the concessions that Microsoft made was

361
00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:20,639
Speaker 1: that it would sell the streaming rights to Activision Games

362
00:23:20,960 --> 00:23:26,159
Speaker 1: to Ubisoft Entertainment for non European markets. This was a

363
00:23:26,200 --> 00:23:30,080
Speaker 1: specific move to assuage the concerns that the deal would

364
00:23:30,080 --> 00:23:35,000
Speaker 1: somehow unfairly impact the cloud gaming market. The CMA took

365
00:23:35,080 --> 00:23:39,920
Speaker 1: this newly revised deal and they took their time reviewing it,

366
00:23:40,600 --> 00:23:44,200
Speaker 1: and then finally in October, they dropped their opposition to

367
00:23:44,280 --> 00:23:48,000
Speaker 1: the merger. The FTC was still urging US courts to

368
00:23:48,440 --> 00:23:52,320
Speaker 1: review the case that they had appealed, but because there

369
00:23:52,440 --> 00:23:56,880
Speaker 1: was no active appeal case going on, technically it meant

370
00:23:56,880 --> 00:23:59,240
Speaker 1: there were no real legal obstacles in the way of

371
00:23:59,320 --> 00:24:03,240
Speaker 1: Microsoft and Activision Blizzard, and so they finalized the merger

372
00:24:04,240 --> 00:24:08,680
Speaker 1: that happened on October thirteenth, twenty twenty three. It took

373
00:24:08,880 --> 00:24:12,680
Speaker 1: nearly a year and nine months from when Microsoft announced

374
00:24:12,760 --> 00:24:16,879
Speaker 1: its plans to acquire Activision Blizzard to win the deal

375
00:24:17,000 --> 00:24:21,720
Speaker 1: was actually finalized. Meanwhile, the FTC is still appealing that

376
00:24:21,840 --> 00:24:25,320
Speaker 1: earlier court decision that ruled in favor of Microsoft. The

377
00:24:25,400 --> 00:24:29,879
Speaker 1: FTC says it wants to unwind the merger. Now I

378
00:24:29,880 --> 00:24:32,960
Speaker 1: don't think that's likely to happen, but I do think

379
00:24:33,040 --> 00:24:36,159
Speaker 1: it may see Microsoft have to pay some sort of

380
00:24:36,400 --> 00:24:40,400
Speaker 1: settlement out of court in the process. As I record this,

381
00:24:40,960 --> 00:24:44,520
Speaker 1: the matter is still pending in US courts. Microsoft most

382
00:24:44,600 --> 00:24:48,840
Speaker 1: recently successfully requested an extension to file a response to

383
00:24:48,880 --> 00:24:52,359
Speaker 1: a motion to compel, so that is a motion that

384
00:24:52,400 --> 00:24:56,240
Speaker 1: the FTC brought against Microsoft to compel Microsoft to share

385
00:24:56,600 --> 00:25:01,040
Speaker 1: documentation relating to the case. The court has granted Microsoft's

386
00:25:01,080 --> 00:25:04,720
Speaker 1: request and has extended the time limit to compel to

387
00:25:04,800 --> 00:25:08,680
Speaker 1: that motion to January second, twenty twenty four. So while

388
00:25:08,680 --> 00:25:12,359
Speaker 1: the acquisition has already happened back in October, the matter

389
00:25:12,400 --> 00:25:17,159
Speaker 1: itself technically remains unresolved until next year, and that brings

390
00:25:17,240 --> 00:25:20,679
Speaker 1: us up to speed on the whole matter. I suspect

391
00:25:20,720 --> 00:25:24,200
Speaker 1: the merger will remain in place. The process of unwinding

392
00:25:24,200 --> 00:25:26,840
Speaker 1: the deal seems so complicated that it's very hard to

393
00:25:26,920 --> 00:25:30,800
Speaker 1: imagine a court commanding it to happen. Technically, I guess

394
00:25:30,880 --> 00:25:35,720
Speaker 1: it could, but it seems unlikely. However, if the FTC's

395
00:25:35,760 --> 00:25:39,639
Speaker 1: appeal actually works, this would send a massive message to

396
00:25:39,880 --> 00:25:43,639
Speaker 1: businesses at large and the tech industry in particular, that

397
00:25:43,840 --> 00:25:48,960
Speaker 1: there is a new focus on competition and antitrust situations.

398
00:25:49,840 --> 00:25:52,000
Speaker 1: Then again, we also have to acknowledge that here in

399
00:25:52,000 --> 00:25:55,320
Speaker 1: the United States, it's an election year in twenty twenty four,

400
00:25:55,960 --> 00:26:00,119
Speaker 1: and if there's another change in administration, we're likely to

401
00:26:00,119 --> 00:26:03,760
Speaker 1: see those changes trickle down into regulatory agencies as well,

402
00:26:03,880 --> 00:26:07,360
Speaker 1: and things that are of huge concern right now may

403
00:26:07,359 --> 00:26:11,560
Speaker 1: be dismissed later on. And by that I mean companies

404
00:26:11,600 --> 00:26:14,359
Speaker 1: that are looked at as being anti competitive may end

405
00:26:14,480 --> 00:26:18,200
Speaker 1: up getting a pass depending on how elections go, same

406
00:26:18,200 --> 00:26:20,440
Speaker 1: as it ever was. It's one of the big reasons

407
00:26:20,480 --> 00:26:26,480
Speaker 1: why regulatory change in the United States happens rarely, and

408
00:26:26,920 --> 00:26:31,679
Speaker 1: it is increasingly difficult to happen in a world a

409
00:26:31,720 --> 00:26:37,040
Speaker 1: political world where there's very little bipartisan support for anything anymore.

410
00:26:37,080 --> 00:26:41,199
Speaker 1: There's so much tribalism in the various political camps that

411
00:26:41,560 --> 00:26:45,080
Speaker 1: you typically just see people opposing one another. In my view,

412
00:26:45,400 --> 00:26:48,119
Speaker 1: it's because if one party says yes, the other party

413
00:26:48,119 --> 00:26:51,760
Speaker 1: has to say no. Doesn't matter if they actually agree

414
00:26:51,760 --> 00:26:53,600
Speaker 1: on the thing. At the end of the day. It's

415
00:26:53,680 --> 00:26:56,880
Speaker 1: just like by law, if you're in favor of it,

416
00:26:56,920 --> 00:26:58,920
Speaker 1: I have to be opposed to it. That can That's

417
00:26:58,920 --> 00:27:01,200
Speaker 1: what it seems like. Maybe I'm being far too cynical,

418
00:27:02,160 --> 00:27:06,480
Speaker 1: but that's look back on how the Microsoft Activision Blizzard

419
00:27:06,560 --> 00:27:13,040
Speaker 1: acquisition deal actually finally coalesced in twenty twenty three, with

420
00:27:13,240 --> 00:27:16,840
Speaker 1: the acknowledgment that the FTC is trying to undo the

421
00:27:16,880 --> 00:27:21,040
Speaker 1: whole thing, and who knows where that's going to go again,

422
00:27:21,080 --> 00:27:25,560
Speaker 1: I'll be surprised if it changes. Oh and one other update. Yeah,

423
00:27:25,840 --> 00:27:29,840
Speaker 1: Bobby Kodik, the CEO of Activision Blizzard, has stepped down

424
00:27:30,119 --> 00:27:33,600
Speaker 1: finally now that the deal is done, and so that

425
00:27:34,359 --> 00:27:37,119
Speaker 1: thing that people have been asking for since twenty twenty

426
00:27:37,160 --> 00:27:40,399
Speaker 1: one has finally come to pass. There's also been some

427
00:27:40,480 --> 00:27:45,120
Speaker 1: changes in executive leadership over at Microsoft's Xbox division, and

428
00:27:45,320 --> 00:27:49,720
Speaker 1: it looks like there's going to be some shuffling that

429
00:27:49,800 --> 00:27:53,679
Speaker 1: will go on as Microsoft determines whose role fills what

430
00:27:53,880 --> 00:27:57,919
Speaker 1: position within the newly merged company. So I'm sure that

431
00:27:57,960 --> 00:28:00,320
Speaker 1: the changes are just at the very beginning. We'll have

432
00:28:00,320 --> 00:28:04,040
Speaker 1: to see what happens in twenty twenty four. That's it.

433
00:28:04,840 --> 00:28:08,080
Speaker 1: I hope you are all well, and I am going

434
00:28:08,119 --> 00:28:10,600
Speaker 1: to wish you a happy new Year, and I'll be

435
00:28:10,680 --> 00:28:14,919
Speaker 1: back with predictions with what I think might happen in

436
00:28:15,000 --> 00:28:18,000
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four. We know how well those go. It's

437
00:28:18,000 --> 00:28:19,920
Speaker 1: been a few years since I've done one of those.

438
00:28:20,400 --> 00:28:24,080
Speaker 1: And until then, I'll talk to you again, really soon.

439
00:28:29,600 --> 00:28:34,240
Speaker 1: Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

440
00:28:34,560 --> 00:28:38,240
Speaker 1: visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

441
00:28:38,320 --> 00:28:43,280
Speaker 1: to your favorite shows.