WEBVTT - NFL Week 11 Waiver Wire, Adds And Drops.

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess d Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy Best

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever to Do Do Do Do, Don Do, Do

0:00:55.000 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Dinna do. Yeah, this is the Fantasy

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>Fast Friends Forever here on the Fantasy and Sports Radio

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Network alongside Braggy Snample. I am Greg Sauceman. Rag what's

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>going on on it? Three? Note it self? Not enough

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>time to use the bathroom before the show. Now when

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 1>you come up with one minute deal before the show

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>go on, let's go on. Freddy strolled back in here.

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like, we're on the air. Yeah, I didn't know.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I thought we had more time than I than we did.

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Big win for the for the g Men last night,

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Greig Big Blue rate unbelievable. This team can't even lose. Right,

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing, absolutely amazing a competent quarter No, he didn't.

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I am so sick of his take. He three touchdowns? Dude,

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>do you realize how many how terrible throws he had?

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>He did have a lot of how the Giants got

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>battled out by BS penalties in the last drive he

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>did a joke, Amen, they would have had the first

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>overall pick if it wasn't for this nonsense. At least

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback throws such sound. Yes, even the touch to

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Sterlian Shepherd was a terrible throw. But the thing that

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't really have to worry about from the Giants

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>perspective in the draft is nobody else around them needs

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback. Just one who's that? That's one. When the

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Raiders cut Derek Carr, that's an issue, you think, so

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you also of the issue of the farther down you

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>go teams that do you need a quarterback? Though? Trade off? Yeahalistically,

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>how many more games are the Giant's gonna win? Like

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bronco's gonna trade up somewhere and then get a

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterback Broncos? Yeah, what happened? Correct? The Raiders when they

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>trade away or release Derek Carror whatever, they're gonna need

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback. This is awful, but John Gruden has the

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>utmost faith in the in this quarterback. Let me be

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>so upset when this team doesn't get just nerv I

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>think we'll be so upset. Alright, So Tampa Bay in MetLife,

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that's actually a very winnable game. Yeah, I know it's

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a disaster. Everything else on the schedule, like maybe Dallas

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in week seventeen, but Billion week twelve in Philly not

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>winning that against Chicago and MetLife not winning that at Washington,

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>not winning that at home against Tennessee. Maybe, but Tennessee

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is playing good ball at Indianapolis. They're playing good ball

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're probably gonna need that win. And in Dallas

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in week seventeen, which maybe Dallas will need that win.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Like this week is like this team, this team goes

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>four and twelve, This is a disaster. What are they

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>not in seven? They're not gonna win two more games.

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that most of win one more, three and thirteen.

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>That would get you at least top three. I want,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I want one, I want. But the Raiders are not

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>winning another game. You don't think they can't put one

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>more out nope. And they played the Cardinals this week,

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk about this later on. The Cardinals are

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>probably my favorite defense stream of the week. I picked

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. Everybody told you last week, I think it's Sinnati.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I was like, you know what, I'm not gonna do anything.

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I picked the Arizona. Thank god their defensive coordinator was

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just fired, right, so I picked up Arizona. Jackson was hired. Yeah,

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>big morale boost for the Bengals. There Weaver Wire Week eleven,

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Grady gosh Man. For most people, there's really only three

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>moreular season weeks, and in the playoffs start Week fourteen.

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>That's when a lot of fantasy playoffs started. We have

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. Yeah, we're there. Six teams on a bye

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>this week too. It's tough. Waiver wire not great this

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>week either. It's not the it's not the best. It's

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely not. I don't think it's the worst either, though

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's somewhere in the middle. I know

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you've been so I know there's been like a lot

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>of injuries this year, and there's a lot of injuries

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>every year. It doesn't feel like that we've had that

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>many great waiver wire pickups this year. I think you

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you think that way because of the running back. The

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver pickups have been outside of Tyler Boyd, who

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>are the guys you know Tyler Boyd? And that was

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a week one pickup. But outside of Tyler Boyd, which

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>is literally week one, you didn't pick him up because

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>anyone was injured. He picked him up because hey he

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 1>had a good week. That's fine. Outside of Tyler Boyd.

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Like who had been the big waiver wire pick ups

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>for the first ten weeks of the season. I lock

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it might have been picked up. He was going probably sure,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>see who we got here? John Brown was a waiver red.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>He's been has been terrible. It's the top thirty wide receiver.

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>It's the weeks. Not a GameBreaker. Move on, He's not

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>a game breaker. But I mean, where's your GameBreaker running

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>back to just I agree? Is what I'm telling you.

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>There's not been a great waiver wire year. When you

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>do like awards the end of the season waiver people

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Year, it's like, all right, Tyler Boyd, fine,

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>like who else? Who else in the running? James Connor

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>was a weird situation. It was and on the flip

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>side of that, And I've heard a lot of people

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about this Levion Bell the biggest bust of all

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>time and fantasy football because it's not injury related, of absolutely,

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But I've also heard a counter argument whereas, at least

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>for the other people that have busted, like the biggest

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>bust of all time, they were in your lineup and

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>hurting you. At least let On Bill has not been

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in your life. That's fair, that's fair argument. But for

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>people who drafted Levion Bell and did not get James Conner,

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>allah me, it has not been great. Although in the

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>one league where I did that, I'm six and four,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know. I mean to manage to string

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>string a few together here by the way, I know

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>no one feels bad for um the Terps. Ever, to

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>their quarterbacks they have they have a problem with quarterbacks

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>tearing a c L is. A couple of seasons ago,

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>four different quarterbacks on their team to ra c LS.

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Um so this is the last year, uh, two quarterbacks

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they fixed their field or something. Last year two quarterbacks

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to ra c LS, and now this year they're starting

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.119
<v Speaker 1>quarterback tour his other a c L. Maybe we should

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>put you in a bubble dude. Next thing, you know,

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Greg Susman, I'm gonna come wheeling in here on a wheelchair.

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm never gonna be It's not gonna be a quarterback

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in the University of Maryland. So I'm good. Yeah, but

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you went there, so maybe like you have the juju,

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe have the bad juju. Smith Schuster, No, that's the

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>good juju Maryland, very bad juju. Not great Bob terps On.

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>They won't last night though, by the way. Oh and

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>for those wondering, you know, I brought it up yesterday,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>big frank up fifteen facing state Kwon Barkley, I was

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>texting managed to pull out the W I was texting you, man, Oh,

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that was one of my most stressful Monday night football

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>games watching because obviously se Kwan gets that that big

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>reception and brings it down into like inside the five

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>yard line, gets a couple of runs there, and I'm like,

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, this is it. Like I watched the entire

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>game thinking I have a chance he's gonna score a

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdown here in the last drive and put me in

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>my grave. Eli Manning, my man sterling Shepherd. I thought

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you were done. You were so screw one of the

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>most flukey six and four teams of all time. I'm

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>telling you I'm the Miami Dolphins of my fantasy league,

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and you don't want to be that. I'm not a

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>good I don't have a good team. I have the

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>third most fantasy point a third few is fantasy points

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in the league. I'm six and four. Rememb by the

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>way that at least I think it's longer than the

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter yesterday last night, and they just didn't throw

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it to Georgie Kittle. What are you doing? Dominated Why

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>did you stop throwing George Kittle? Yeah? What do you have?

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Eight for ninety three? Just absolutely monster game with Nick

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Mollins as the quarterback. And there wasn't the same a

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>hand and it wasn't even the Iowa connection. We've had

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>so many jub whispers in the past, Adam Gaze being

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>one of them. Yeah, he's doing a great job with

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Brock Oswelder right now. Um Shanahan is probably the QB

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>whisper Greg to be honest with, I mean, it's look,

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>he made the most out of C. J. Bethard as

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>his quarterback. Now is a third string scout teening quarterback

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacking his team in Nick Mullins, and he's at least

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>looked competent. Give me, Garoppolo looked like like all of

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Famer last year in those final five or six games.

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>How Sanahan, that's the quarterback whisper. Yeah, definitely a quarterback

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>west Bers. I think it's a known thing. Speaking of

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterback will give you jump into streams. Here have a

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>stat of the day, which will also lead us into

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>running back. I got. I got a lot of stuff

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>on the rundown. Yeah, I looked at a lot of news.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's was making the fanel rundown earlier. You're like,

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the run down, like, wow, it's very early

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the run down to be completed, and it was did

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it last night during the game we were going to

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>He's myself off the pressure of watching seake Kwon Barkley

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>nearly destroy me. Yeah, so I'm looking at the news.

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>There's not really much interesting here. I mean, Bengals bring

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>back Hugh Jackson as an assistant. That's huge. So in

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>all caps, Bucks signed Cairo Santos. Yeah, let me get

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the Hugh Jackson thing. First, Floria were like freaking fantasy chat.

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You're a freaking out And I was like, why are

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys surprised? We knew this was coming. None of

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a surprised. You knew he could back to Cincinnati.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 1>You know that him and Marvin Lewis. I told you

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>earlier on in the year that huge Jackson will end

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>up getting another job. And I believe I was doing

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that right there, and you said there's no way he

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>gets another job. No. No, I sat right here and

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you to told you to be in Cincinnati. It's

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>literally right to the tape. Please, I'm happy to I'm

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure you were like, no, he's not gonna get

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a job for a while, like he sucks. I did

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>not say that. I said he'll get another job in

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati and my best friends and I was adamintant saying

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>these guys get recycled in the NFL all the time,

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 1>even if they sucked, they get recycled around. Jackson back

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>with the Bengals not good for him, as if you

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>know they don't have enough bad things going on. And

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 1>the Browns two more times. Sweet I saw a great

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>sweet Ray Summerlin, who tweeted out that the first move

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that he Jacks will do as a special assist in

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the offensive side of the ball is Benji Andy Dalton

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>for aj mccaren and they find out that Aji mccarroen

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is not on the team anymore, he will quit exists, right,

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>He was the one who wanted to give up all

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>those draft picks to get him. Where's Ajian mccarroen now?

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Is he playing? Like? That? Might be correct? These dark

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.599
<v Speaker 1>cars back? Yeah, I know he got signed by the

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Bills and then got cut. He's somewhere now that sounds

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>right for you. Sure he's an Oakland Sure any else

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>news related here says signed Brandon Marshall. Greg, Okay, you're

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>out on that. Yeah, not not getting u. It's not

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the same amount of buzz as Dez Brian, mean,

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>while it's likely the same exact thing. Yeah, nothing, Everyone

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and everyone took time out of the day to talk

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>about des Bryant. I tried not to as forced. I

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>mean we had to talk about him a little bit,

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>but I mean he lives. I'm not talking about Brandon Marshall.

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Er have to show cord in the peat Carroll, Chris

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Carson will play on Thursday night football looks talking with

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 1>us out of the day. Then it's that end of

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the day comes via Jared Smola following on Twitter at

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>smola d s attributes to Draft Sharks has a lot

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of great stats as well. Rashad Penny first twenty NFL

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>carries two point two yards per carry is next thirty

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>four NFL carries have been six point two yards per carry.

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>This past week, we all saw him twelve carries over

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards, a touchdown, nine yards per carry in

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that game. Like I've been thinking about more and more

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>about what you said yesterday about the GM maybe you know,

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 1>tipping off, he Carollen, like, all right, come on, we

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>gotta get this guy involved now, you know, let's show

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>people why we drafted him in the first round. And

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>it just so happens that after that game he Carol

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>came out and said that Rashad Penny finally looked like

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the guy that they drafted in the first round. We

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>know that he's dealt with the injury in the preseason,

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>the broken finger, he was out of shape, still doesn't

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>look like he's in the best shape of all time,

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but he looked great in that in this past week

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>on rushing for nine yards per carry. I just wonder

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that even with Carson back, is there a chance that

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Rashot Penny is the guy moving forward, and I would

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>say that there is a chance that that is the case,

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You're just gonna get messed with, man. Yeah, I mean, look,

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why you still have to take a

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>shot and adding him here, because while it is a

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>small chance that he's the guy, and we all know

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>how much they like Chris Carson, if management is in

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>front of them here and saying, hey, we need to

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>get Shot Penny involved, and he just looked as good

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>as he did, I wouldn't manage and come back again

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and be like, well, look what he did. We gotta

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to get this guy involved. I get it, and

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>and like, how can you deny what he just did?

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Look great? He looked fantastically. The best rushing performances of

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the year out of a Seahawks. Yeah, no question about it.

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>He looked fantastic. I think we'll see again Chris workload

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and think they like Chris Carson. I think he looked

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>at Chris Carson has done when he's healthy. Chris Carson

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>has been fantastic. I mean, all these running backs when

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you give it a shot, have been fantastic. It's just

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that they're the number one rushing percentage

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>team in the NFL. I mean, maybe they can coexist

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>even Like what if what if Chris Carson and Shot

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Penny get like fifteen touches each per game? That would

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>put them both in the flexis because that means that

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>means Mike David gets none. I don't think that happens. Yeah,

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not gonna So what's the most realistic scenario,

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen for Carson, ten for Penny, five for Davis,

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>something like that. I bet you it's like last I

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>bet you it's literally like eight for Penny. And what

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 1>did you be really surprised you, Mike Davis and more carrious. No,

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't. It wouldn't at all. Like nothing moving forward

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>with the Seahawks running backs would surprise me. And I

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>said that yesterday reminds me a lot of Bill Belichick

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Patriots. I mean, they kind of want to

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>keep opposing defenses and opposing teams off balanced by not

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>knowing who they're going to use at the running back position.

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>But I think the reason you have to take a

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>stab on a Shot Penny is because there's at least

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that slight sliver of a chance that for shot Penny

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is the guy moving forward and that you know, all right,

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe he doesn't get twenty touches per game, but if

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>he is the main running back behind that offensive line

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>who's played well from a run blocking perspective, on the

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>team that's running the most rush plays in the NFL

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:15.719
<v Speaker 1>this season, you want you want a piece of that

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>running back. So I at this point, we're not going

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to really talk about FAD because I don't know how

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>much people have left. But I think what would help

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>listeners and and watchers more Greg is rather we rank

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the players at their position, and I think we're talking

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Tony is the number one running back at this week? Um,

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he's number one. Add this week, I think

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>number one running back. I agree. I agree with that

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>because he has the potential to start down the stretch

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>because he's that first round pick. He does with the pedigree,

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Yes, So I agree with you with that.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Unless Derrick Henry's out there, I don't know if you

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>would rank I don't know Dereck even number one either, Um,

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>but I agree that Petty is number one at I

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he probably is. Do you want to talk

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>abou running backs? I like and I liked him last week.

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I told you that at costume nothing last week. It

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>was last week or two weeks and I picked him up.

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Josh Adams. And you never want to get involve with

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Philly running backs. I completely understand that, Frank. But he

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>had the highest percentage of running back snaps for one plays.

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>He actually ran the ball last week. Um he is,

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>according to Peterson, needs to be and have a better

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>usage in the running game. He's averaged the most yards

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of the past couple of weeks. He looks like the

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>best running back in Philly. And I get you don't

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>want to get involved with the Philadelphia Eagles and you

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want their running backs. They're gonna play Corey Clement

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna play Windel Smallwood, and they want to

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>get everybody in bothered. It's only gonna bother you. And

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Frank wants nothing to do in the Eagles running back.

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But six teams gonna buy. If you're looking for a

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>story running back, I think you found one in Josh Adams.

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>He's starting running back right. Yeah. He hasn't add more

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>than nine carries in any single game. I will say

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>over the past three games, he's had twenty carries exactly,

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging over six yards per carry with those with

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>those touches, so he's performing when he gets the ball.

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>What I don't understand is doesn't Doug Peterson call plays

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for the Eagles. Yes, so doesn't he control how many

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>touches Josh Adams gets. So it's just confusing to me

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that he comes out after the game and he says,

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to get Josh Adams more involved. Doug Peterson,

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you control whether or not Josh Adams gets involved. So

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I just don't really understand is I will agree that

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>with six teams on a buy, if I had to

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>choose an Eagles running back that I am most excited about,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and when I say most excited, it's not very exciting

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>at all, it would be Josh Adams, just based on

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>how efficiently he's run the ball when he touches it,

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but does absolutely nothing in the past game, has one

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>reception on the season, hasn't had more than nine carries

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in a game. And I know he can have a

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>game here where he gets randomly, you know, fifteen, sixteen carries,

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but in the next game he'll seven or eight. So

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it's an it's extremely fluid situation. I will say based

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>on how he has from the ball when he does

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>get the football. I am intrigued in Josh Adams and

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>there's six teams on a by Again, Greg, I mean,

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as you reference, I'm not very high on the Eagles

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>running game. The offensive line has not performed well this

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.719
<v Speaker 1>year in terms of running the football. Arson Wentz took

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of taxes past week as well. Offensive line

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:13.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of shaky. Um too many running Max here, let

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>us his upside A lot to change your Frank, you

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>still watched nothing to do with the Eagle's branding. Max

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>day Break more from the Waiver Wire Tuesday after this,

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rhodo dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you premier advice. We play every day,

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Roado dot Com Optimizer in minutes building optimized line up

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for cash games and turneys. Learned from the game's best

0:17:48.720 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>DFS players joined Daily Rodo dot Com Fantasy best Friends

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Forever Fantasy Sports Radio network that is Frank Stanford. I

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>am Greg Susman, Thank you so much for joining us

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>here on a Tuesday waiver wire. Tuesday, Frankie, we're getting

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>into the running backs here so you can pick up

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and I want to get into places you can drop

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>as well. Just talk about running backs and Josh Adams

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>were shot, Penny and guys that you might need to

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>start this week. But the questions becomes who who can

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you dropp And with four teams on a buy, six

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>teams on six teams on by four teams the NFC

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>A f C S, can you drop Kenyan Drake. Nope,

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing it. I own him in one league.

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>I know it's been frustrating. It's not necessarily his fault.

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I think you know when he touches the ball, he's

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>still their most explosive weapon. Frank Gore is seems like

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not going away. But I'm just gonna keep holding

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>onto what he did in that second half last year,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that final stretch where Greg you know very well he

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>nearly won us a league together that we owned last year.

0:18:56.080 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Um you, me and Michael Florio together. Kenyan Drake has

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that ability if they would just open their eyes and

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's maybe it'll take the by maybe you know,

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're uh, they're they're from office needs to step

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>forward in and and say something to Adam Gaze because

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it's gonna take, but we know

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that Kenyan Drake has that ability to to win you

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks single handedly and really try and propel you to

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>win a league if they would just give him the touches.

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I can't drop him yet. I know he

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:24.959
<v Speaker 1>was like a third fourth round pick for people care

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>about that. I mean, it's not gonna be the pick

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I drop. Chris Hogan is the third round pick. He's

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>been no off my team for six weeks for a

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>third round pick. I drafted Chris Hogan in the fourth round.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>On the turn. Fine, there's literally the turn. Are you

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>dropping Kenyan Drake? I'm strongly considerate. Sure, it's frustrating, like

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we are at the mercy of Adam Gates. I get it.

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>He won us leagues, he won me a leading is

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>who are you dropping for? Gregg? Do you drop for

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a shot, penny or a job or definitely not Josh

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Adams. There's no upside there, in my opinion, no

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>upside with the Eagles running backs right now, Penny a

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit more interesting, But I mean it's a crowd No,

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a crowded situation as well. I will say this,

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>at least the Seahawks are a better offense behind a

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>team that's dedicated to the run. It seems like they

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>somewhat know what they're doing. Would you drop the offense

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>just don't. Would you drop Elijah McGuire for any of

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>these they either these two guys, Elijah McGuire, I would

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>drop him to get Penny. I would keep him over

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Josh Adams because look what we've seen is when teams

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>go into the by, especially when they're sputtering. Coming out

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of that by, things can completely change. Especially with a

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>team like the Jets. If they're quote reevaluating everything like

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they say they are, maybe they'll realize throughout the bye,

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, isaihah, well, is not what makes this offense better.

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's getting uh, getting Elijah McGuire the ball fifteen

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>plus times per game is what's gonna make this team better.

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So I would hold on to guys like that. And

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen that happen, you know, guys like David

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Johnson throughout the bye alright. Byron left which works with

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>his offense and realized all right, this is what we're

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna do coming out of the bye. So you know,

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>I uh, I get encouraged when I see stuff like that,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there's a chance that that can

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>happen even with Elijah McGuire hopefully. I mean, look, we're

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.719
<v Speaker 1>just we're holding on to a with a prayer here

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that that that that's what they do with Kenyan Drake.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>So I can't. I can't drop me just based on

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:12.479
<v Speaker 1>what I saw from him down the stretch last year.

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that's the fault of me. Maybe that's me

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>just holding on too much. I'm going down with the ship.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think when it comes to Kenyan Drake, he

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>does have that that league winning ability. What are the

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>player that is on a buy that you want to

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>pick up potentially, and that's Rex Burke hand. He obviously

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>came out last week and he was h practicing and

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>he could return early in December. Sonny Michelle has the

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>big back role. You have James White having the smaller role.

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Rex Berken was vital for New England last year. Are

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you making are you picking up Rex Brokent this week? Yes?

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So if I've already I've already picked him up in

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>my home league on Sunday because we have after fab

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>goes through, we have open waivers, and no one picked

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>him up. So I picked him up then, and I'm

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna stash and reminder they have a buy in this week.

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>In week eleven, and in week twelve, the Patriots face

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the Jets and he's still not eligible to return in

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>week thirteen. So if you're fighting for your playoff lives,

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't afford to pick up Rex Burkin and just

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>throw him into your lineup week thirteen and hope that

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he does something, because I'm telling you right now, even

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>owning him in week thirteen, I'm not going to start him.

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be a wait and see approach and just

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of see what happens with the Patriots running back situation.

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>But what I will say is Tony Michelle did not

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>look great in this game. I don't know that he's

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on and we saw last year a running back I

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>would say similar to Rex burkehead in the Patriots eyes

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and Dion Lewis take over down the stretch for the Patriots.

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Why did the Patriots love Dean Lewis so much because

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of his versatility. When he was on the field, you

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't know whether the Patriots were going to run the

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.719
<v Speaker 1>football or throw the football, because you know he can

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>He ran it effectively, and he can also catch the

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>ball out of the backfield. Rex burkehead kind of represents

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that similar type of mold of a running back, similar

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to Dion Lewis, and that he can run the football effectively,

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>he can catch the football out of the backfield, and

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>we saw him have games last year where he was

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly fantasy viable as well. So Tony Michelle first game

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>back eleven carries thirty one yards two point eight yards

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>per carry. If they figure out during the break that

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>he is not maybe there's a chance he gets shut down.

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>We're dealing with a lot of ifs here, but there

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a chance for upside. Based on what we

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>saw Dean Lewis down the stretch last do last year,

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a chance that rex Burkid could have

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that same type of value. So I am picking him up.

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But those are in leagues where I kind of I

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>think I know that I'm going to be in the playoffs,

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>because again, you likely won't be able to play this

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>guy until week fourteen at the earliest. I agree with that,

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and I picked him up in the league I expected

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>being the playoffs in and we're desperate for running backs ultimately,

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I'm stashing him with a bench of

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>stashing him and Foreman and and Deonta Foreman. The news

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>came out yesterday, Bill O'Brien saying, quote, will see, they

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if he's gonna play this yere. Yeah,

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that was a waste and we and we got excited

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>over that too, And then we got excited over the

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>two months ago, which is frustrating because look, it's it

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>was just a weird situation overall, because there was a

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>chance he could play in week one. There was a

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>chance he wasn't even going to land on the pub

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and I figured all along on lean, look, coming back

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>from a torn achilles, I don't care how young you are,

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 1>that is a devastating or should come back from. So

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think there was any chance in hell he

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>was gonna return in week one. But I thought maybe

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that they put him on the pup

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 1>and they expected him to return at some point, that

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that's also what I expected. I and you know, their offensive,

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>their their run game was not performing well. There were

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a few games where Lamar Miller did show out, they

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>were in very good matchups, but overall, the run game

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been great this year. So I thought, all right,

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll they'll give Jonson Forming a chance. But it still

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>seems like he's foreman they everybody believes, from Bill O'Brien

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>to foreman himself at the twenty one day window for him,

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the practice will begin this week, and again that doesn't

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>put him on the roster. Is no guarantee he will

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>be on the roster in three weeks from now. We're

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about Rex Broke in week fourteen. That's the earlies

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>should be able to start the foreman most likely, and

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna start with the third straight at that point.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>So these are guys that you're you're only stashing. If

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>your record is like six and four better, that's fine.

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Rather I'd rather um, I'd rather have Rex Burkhead, And

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>just ranking the running backs that we've talked about so far,

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I would put it Rashad Penny. Would you rather have

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry or Rex Burkhead. Greg. Look, yeah, I just

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think that there's much upside. I know he scored

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns in the last three games. An interesting stat

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that I saw both Derrick Henry and Dean Lewis both

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have nineteen red zone rushing attempts this season. It's completely

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>split down the middle. There's no rhyme or reason. It's

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>basically just whoever is on the field right If they're

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>running the no huddle, the hurry up offense, it's just

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Dan Lewis. They're gonna keep him on the field. If

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>they have time where they're going to the huddle and

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>they're getting set and they really want to kind of

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>barrel into the end zone, then they're gonna bring Derrick

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Henry on the field. But there's really no rhyme or

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>reason as who when, who's getting the ball inside the

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>red zone. So I mean they're split down the middle.

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Realized that. And in games where Derrick Henry doesn't score

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>touch on, he's giving you thirty forty fifty yards at most.

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't had more than twelve rushing attempts in any

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>games since we three. I will say I do agree

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>with you. I'd rather own Derrick Henry than Rex burkhead Um.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that's the order right, Rich Shod Penny Derrick,

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Henry rex Burkhead, and then we would you rather own

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Aliza McGuire than rex Burkett. I think I would. Yeah,

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he's still not owned in enough leagues. Two more morning backs.

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to you first, just THEO Ridic,

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>who's only owned in thirty pc of CBS leagues, give

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>or take, and Riddicks. Since coming back from injury, he's

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>resumed his role he's always had. I think he had

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>six receptions one game, seven the next. It's theoretic. Being theoretic,

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the lines are terrible, so they're always in comeback mode.

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>It's just dumped Ridic dump, Ridic dumps Riddick. Now carry on,

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Johnson's playing more snaps than ever. Uh, he's a goal lineback.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>You know THEO Rick is not going to carry the

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>ball at all. But are you diving in a theoretic frank, Yeah,

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the ownership percentage is too low

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>based on how many PPR formats there are, which means

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>he should be owned in all PPR leagues. Um, and

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you notice the snap percentage from this past week. Carry on,

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Johnson of the snaps, THEO Rick fifty eight percent of

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the snaps seven in post fifty eight, there's not equal

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a hundred? What does that mean? Theoretic and carry on?

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Johnson are playing on the field together at times. So

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>John Greggy just jumped a balloons just popped. If you

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>were watching the morning after, you saw that they had

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>balloons delivered, and you know they're sitting in the corner

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of the room right now and one of them just popped. Uh,

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Greggy nearly soiled his breeches as I interrupt you, Frank,

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>someone popped last night. I honestly I couldn't even watch

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it because I heard it was gruesome, and I really

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's going on, like in my older age,

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like I don't have the stomach to like watch gruesome

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>injuries anymore. So I didn't watch. He was diagnosed today

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with a subtillar dislocation of the right foot. That means

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>there is no surgery and he'll be back this season

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.959
<v Speaker 1>new for the Brooklyn Nets. Really, yeah, good news. Did

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you watch it? I still have actually watched it, not glad,

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know. So I showed it to King

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, watch this and please describe it

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>to me. And she basically said that he jumped up

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and when he came down, he basically landed full force

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>on the side of his foot and like his his

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>foot was like nine degree angle, so like basically his

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>ankle was touching the sun Man. Good news, no surgery,

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>should be back. Yeah, and he was enjoying a breakout

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>season and everything that you read about the kids says

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know he's a stand up guy, had a

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of promise coming out of Michigan, but has consistently

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>dealt with injuries. Just sucks that for those who drafted him.

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>He was he was performing quite well, but now has

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this injury. It is good good news that he'll be back,

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>but um, hopefully you can stash him on your i R.

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Just getting back to theo ridic though. I think he

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>needs to be owned in all PPR leagues six verse sixty.

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>This week he's playing on the field the same time

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>as carry On Johnson and per our guy Michael Florio.

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>The already had sixteen slot routes this week, which led

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Lions. So he's he's basically picked up that

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>role left behind from Golden Tate, which we know is

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a very, very valuable role to Matt Staffort. Okay, so

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:57.719
<v Speaker 1>there you go. So theoretic ahead of all these other

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>guys in PPR, he is I know that Shot Penny

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>still like doesn't catch passes. I would still rather have

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a shot Penny overall. THEO Riddick is number two on

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the list in PPR leagues. Um just in a vacuum,

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>like if you play in half PPR, I generally just

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>want like the best player available. I don't think that

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>he has immense upside, he has a safe floor I

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>would rather have. I'd rather have Derrick Henry, and I

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>would rather have Elijah McGuire. But um Rex Burke, it

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is firmly behind theoretic in my opinion, I might rather

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have Riddy than McGuire. I've just kind of talked myself into,

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, teams going to into the bye, the Jets,

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what are they playing for this season? They

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>might as well see what they have in Elijah McGuire,

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah krow Well, he's still pretty young. I think Rowell

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is like only twenty five years old, but it's clear

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think he's going to be part of

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the future by any means. So I think they're gonna

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>get Elijah McGuire more involved coming out of the by

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>He's already played more snaps than Crowell in both games

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that he's been back. So intrigued by by McGuire. Okay,

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>last running back, I want to hit up. That's Jalen Samuels.

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>James Conner's ingercussion protocoll called Mike Tolland says he expects

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>him to pass tomorrow the first day of practice. We'll

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>see concussions can linger, that can be setbacks or whatnot.

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Samuels is the backup to James Connor. Jaalen Samuels

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and Stephen really don't know want you to forget about him, Frank,

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>because he is there. Jim Samuel's yea who Lee's both

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>running back and tight end eligible? Just say yeah, that

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>is really random that he has tight end eligibility. And

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you who do you think is

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the handcuff because we're at that point and we continue

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it. Where down the stretch Again, there's

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>only three regular season weeks in fantasy football, you need

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to own the handcuffs for your team. We'll find out

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>today by the four PM deadline whether Levian Bell is

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna show up, But all indications say that Levian Bell

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is not going to show up, which means he's not

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>going to play this year, which also means you need

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to get the handcuff to James Conner. James Conner is

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the RB one on the Steelers, and we know that

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>if anything were to happen to him. The Steelers typically

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>lean on one running back. They don't go running back

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>by committee. They normal they have that one guy. Is

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that one guy Jalen Samuels or is it Stephen Ridley?

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Really is the veteran Jalen Samuels I believe is the

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>first year player a rookie here um, but he caught

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown last week, so I'm I'm a little bit

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>more intrigued in Jalen Samuel's something we would happen to Connor.

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Who do you think is the guy Greg Samuel's or

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Ridley? I think it's really to be honestly, it

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>could go either way. I don't think that there's any

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>wrong answer here, but you do need to own You

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>do need to own one of them for what it's worth.

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>In Week ten, James Conner played of the snatch that

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>was on Thursday Night Football obviously left the game dealing

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with the concussion. The next player up with the highest

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>percentage of snaps was Jalen Samuels, who played of this thing.

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>But that was a monstrous blowout and in the fourth quarter,

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>like Samuel's got a whole bunch of snaps, I don't

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>know that he would get I believe that when Connor

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>came out in the first running back and it was

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Ridley just saying that might be true, that might be true,

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just gonna go based on what we saw

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in this game on the season for what it's worth.

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>The next man up in terms of running back snaps,

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Ridley has eight point five percent of snaps. Janiel

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Samuel is a six point seven percent. Yeah, so it's close, um,

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but I think you need to own one of them

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>for sure. If something were to happen, just get that waiver.

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And now it's not gonna cost you all up meuch,

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>because everyone expects Connor to play. It happened a long

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>time ago, obviously on last Thursday. And if someone picks

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>up Jaleens Anuels and pick up Ridley as you want

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to them, and even it's just for a day, or

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>two even it's just for a don't I think you

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>need to own one of these guys moving? Yeah? Yeah,

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for sure? Um should we move on? You know, it's

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of quarterbacks. I'll say, the wide receivers for the

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>end quarterbacks stream this week. You don't have Tom Brady.

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't have Broadway Baker this week. You don't really

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>have the two big names I would say, I mean

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you left out Nate Peterman. Um who is not on?

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Who's also left out by Buffalo? Um mcmullins, who a

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people picked up last Yeah, you lost on Brady,

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you lost Baker Mayfield. Maybe you'll probably a backup quarterback

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>for you anyway. Um, so you're really losing Brady if

0:32:57.320 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to stream of quarterback this week. The ones

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that I like the best, Dak Prescott against Atlanta. Prescott

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>has to believe, rushed for a touchdown in three of

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>his last five games, so I like his last four year.

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>We have his last four. It was another quarterback actually

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>did three of his last five, but Prescott three of

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>his last four games he's rushed for a touchdown. Also

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>three has last five UM against Atlanta, it's a good

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>matchup We've been streaming quarterbacks against them for a while now.

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Last week it was Mayfield, This week is Prescott, so

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I like him. Another quarterback I really like is Marcus Mariota,

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>who's really turned it on as a lake. He finally

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>seems healthy and that nerve issued in his hand kind

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of subsided um. So I like that Mariota. And the

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>third one I wrote it would be fun to start

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson if he plays this week. Yeah, it would

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly be fun. I do agree with you on Dak.

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>He has the rushing production lately, has posted at least

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen fantasy points in four straight games. That's in four

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>point passing touchdown leagues. Falcons allowed the fourth fourth most

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks this season. We just saw

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield have the best game this season. He threw

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for three touchdowns. And the Cowboys are three and a

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>half point dogs in the Dome. I have a feeling

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that they'll be chasing points in this one against Atlanta.

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>It is worth noting that Dion Jones is eligible to

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>return at linebacker for the Falcon sole their defense should

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>be better, but I do expect the Cowboys to be

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:15.880
<v Speaker 1>playing from behind Mariotta. I agree with you. Seems like

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>he's playing better, seems like he's over the injury. Um.

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 1>The Titans offense is finally starting to click. I was very,

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>very critical of the Titans offense earlier on in the season.

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>They were a complete mess. Whether that was due to

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>play calling, the offensive line being banged up, Mariota being

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>banged up, it could be a combination of all of

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>those things. But it's a great match up here. The

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Colts have allowed multiple touchdown passes in five of their

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>last six games. That one game where they didn't was

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills, and that was um, that was Derek Anderson.

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't Nate Peterman. But the Bills just terrible. And

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean except for when they played the Jets, but

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, talk about Mariotta also averaging thirty rushing

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>yards per games, so even if he throws an interception,

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he kind of has that mitigated by the rushing production

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 1>he has also Just throw him out there. I don't

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like him as much as the other guys, but Blake

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Bortles going up against the Steelers. Their defense has played

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 1>much better as of late, but Blake Bortles has also

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>played better as of late, averaging thirty rushing actor game.

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>He's averaged over three passing yards over his last two

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>games he throw. He threw for two touchdowns this past

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>week against the Cold and their five point home dogs

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Steelers, so likely chasing points as well. There

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>for Blake Portals. When it comes to Lamar Jackson, look

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>he has to and super flex leagues just based on

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>his upside. I don't think that he's a very polished

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterback at all yet by any means. But have you

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>seen bad quarterbacks in the NFL give good fantasy production

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>just based on rushing alone? Allah Tim Tebow, and I'll

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>always go back to that. I think Lamar Jackson, if

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>he plays, could have that Tim Tebow back effect for fantasy.

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll see when we come back the wide receivers, you

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>need to pick up stick around more of your BFFs

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>after that. If you're someone that needs fantasy sports advice

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>every day, the Fantasy Sports Radio Network has you covered.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>When you download the NTS Watch Sports Radio Network GAP,

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 1>you get top fantasy advice every single day right through

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. Be sure to listen to our weekend Warriors

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>like College Football Today. Welcome to College Football Today Weekend

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Update. They called me the fantasy Jesus in this

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 1>league is never short of exciting at I T L

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and so much more. Download the Fantasy Sports Radio Network

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Gap in the iTunes and Google play Store now and

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>keep the best fantasy experts right in your pocket all

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>day long and all week long. Eight four four eight

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>for three six eight seven nine over those phone lines

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to help you guys on the way of a wire

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:41.919
<v Speaker 1>at four four eight four three six eight seven nine.

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>We also would remind you of you enjoy playing daily

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports, but are sick of dealing with the professionals

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>using algorithms like hundreds of the lineups and entries. Try

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the pros Fillers tool and my Boogi Daddy Jay. Forget

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>having a great multiple line ups. That's the hassle of

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>dealing with late line up scratches and a boy experts

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>when night were seven the money, Invest the players you

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.280
<v Speaker 1>want without solar gaps, and then sign up freend account

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>us in the promial code mc s Y you can

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>receive a fifty positive bonus. We're dealing with late lineup scratches,

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>no experts that compete against just you. The problem that

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you choose go to my Booky dot a G and

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>proo code f m d S. Why when you sign

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>up and use your matchup using the props builder tool,

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that's my Bookie dot age. The prolo code is f

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>n t S. Why, Freddy, what are we going on

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the day year on vnd s y

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the day here? Yeah, Uh, I don't know.

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question. We got that, We got the

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Frenzy coming up next, Corey posson Jim Day and Ventura believe.

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>We have a replay of Rotal Experts in the morning

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>after that, and Fantasy Sports Day after that and Fantasy

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Sports to day after that. Uh. If you stay tuned

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to our Fantasy Sports Network YouTube channel, you will also

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have some Vandel content come out, some NBA content for

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>getting you ready Fortunit's DFS slate, uh, and then getting

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>ready for the NFL late Actually rather that will be

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>our weaver wire Vandel. Is there anything else? Yeah? He

0:37:55.680 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>game time decisions, gave kids on the radio understand Lineup

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Block Live starts at six, and then we got Scout

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 1>with Ronus at seven. You also forgot about Ronus what

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you heard his promo during the break, guy Ronus, I

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen Ronus, our guy Ronus. Yeah, your guy Ronus.

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:18.720
<v Speaker 1>You worked with them more than I did. Like Ronus

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>me too for basketball team Ronuses league. That's so good though. Yeah,

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 1>all right, man, Jimmy Butler coming back. Vengeance can change

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Everything's gonna change everything. He's gonna play every single game

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>now moving forward, we will be all right, fair enough

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 1>eight four four eight four three six s seven nine.

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of your calls right now. As we'll get

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>into the wide receivers Frankie that people have to know

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:39.800
<v Speaker 1>about this week, I'll start with my guy, Josh Reynolds.

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I picked up and dropped three times, three times thus far. Well,

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll make it a fourth this week. Cooper cups out

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for the year. Josh Reynolds will play all the snaps,

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:50.879
<v Speaker 1>but the usage won't necessarily be there. Yeah, and we've

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>seen that in the games where Cooper Cup missed. I

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:57.879
<v Speaker 1>brought up the staff from Adam Levitt tan Adam Leaving

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>ten yesterday about how Josh Reynolds played all the snaps

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>but nine in the two games where Cooper Cup did

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 1>not play, but his targets share was a easily ten percent.

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So look, it's gonna be a lot of Brandon Cooks,

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a lot of Robert Woods. I

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>think the tight ends get a little bit more involved

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>here as well. But there's still that chance, the fact

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that he's on the field in an offense as potent

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>as the Los Angeles Rams and match up against the

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Chiefs, I think you have to be interested

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in Josh Reynolds. I think there are a few other

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers that will talk about that I like more

0:39:30.400 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>than him this week. But I'm trying to add and

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>where I'm specifically trying to add is on teams where

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I own Sammy Watkins, right because Sammy Watkins plays on

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night, they say that they expect him to play

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on Monday Night. But if he doesn't go, if you

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>also own Josh Reynolds, at least you have that plug

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in where if Watkins can't go, you have Josh Reynolds

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, you know at least that he's

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>going to play. And I like that much more than

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, handcuffing a Chiefs wide receiver behind Watkins, because

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we saw this past week the Marcus Robinson, Chris Conleeen

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:01.280
<v Speaker 1>either one of those guys has a ton of value.

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 1>So especially on teams where I own Sammy Watkins, I'm

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna make sure I get Josh Reynolds in case Watkins

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>is to go on one DA night. I think it

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense. Um listen, he plays on

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 1>the field. That replay you just need to touchdown is

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 1>what you're looking for exactly, you only you only need one.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So I like it, and it makes sense to say

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we're walking certainly as well. Ye the other wide receivers

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>who will get into I will say this though, I

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 1>do want to throw this out there. I'm sorry, there

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:26.879
<v Speaker 1>is a chance. And I was reading this this morning.

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Adam Schefter tweeted this out that the field conditions in

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Mexico City are disastrous right now, brutal and given these

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>short notice, they may have to move back to l A.

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you have all the fires unfortunately going on

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in l A and they haven't hold the events of

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the stable center and whatnot. But they might try to

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>move this to l A. They they're determined to move

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>this to Mexico City or play this in Mexico City.

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>If they can't, they might move in to l A.

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>If they can't play in l A. There is a

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>chance it could be postponed. Now, I don't know postponed

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>until when. I don't know what that would do. I

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>do know obviously the Rams by next week. I assume

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>we would know that before the game start to Yes,

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.839
<v Speaker 1>but you won't know that before waivers run. I don't

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>know how early that. Yeah, I mean this is very

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>like very preemptive, like forward thinking. But I just want

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>to stand. I just want to throw it out there

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>because they read it this morning. All right, eight four four,

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>eight four three six seven nine. Let me get to

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Julian and Miami. He has an ad job question for us.

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Julian? Okay, what's up? Guys going on? Can

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>you hear me? What's going on? All right? Um, I

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up one player for the end of

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>my bench. Would you guys think Murray, Henry Penny or

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>McGuire or theoretic? Thanks for listening to the entire show.

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Juliete talked about this for literally the last Henry Penny,

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 1>theoretic and McGuire. Yes, what format is this? GPR EPR?

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you own Dalvin Cook? No? I told Tavis Murray

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 1>is definitely out of the question, and I've already mentioned

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>regardless of format. The one that I want to add

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>most is for shot Penny greg a great in PPR.

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather have I I hear, I'm going with Anny.

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>We're agreement. There's been a big fan let me hind

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of the wide receiver. Back of the wide receivers. We

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Josh Reynolds. Next one, I want to go with

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Miller, and we talked about him off there on.

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember we we we were talking about talking

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 1>about him on the year and just how much better

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>he has been over the past couple of weeks playing

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>out of that slot. Mitjor Drobiski is trusting him only

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>just of leagues. I really like Anthony Miller going forward

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of the year. I think he

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>could be a big, big, big time player for for

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owners. Yeah, at least six targets in four straight games.

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 1>He had a career game this past week obviously, five

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for one, two and a touchdown. You have to remember

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the Bears traded up to get Anthony Miller. They gave

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 1>up their second round pick and an additional pick to

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>move up and get Anthony Miller. This year Uh. Typically,

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>whenever I see a team do that, I realized that

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to want to get this player involved. And

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes it takes time for rookie wide receivers

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to you know, get their feet underneath them. Uh, at

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the NFL level obviously, But it looks like he's coming

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>on strong and I'm gonna continue to talk about slot

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. I love slot wide receivers this year, and

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>especially for Mentell Trabinsky to lean on him. No. Greg,

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Something that we spoke about before the year as kind

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of a comp um for Anthony Miller and Mitell Trobinsky

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>was last year Jared Goff leaning on Cooper Cup out

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of the slot, and we're kind of seeing that relationship

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>developed now between Trabinsky and Anthony Miller Trobisky. Remember, still

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a young quarterback needs somebody to lean on. Yes, Allen

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Robinson look great this past week, but I really like

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the usage out of Anthony Miller, at least the six

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 1>targets in four straight games out of him. I will say, Um,

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings this week is not the greatest matchup, but

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>then gets the Lions again, the Giants, the Rams and

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:47.320
<v Speaker 1>what should be a lot of points scored the Packers

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and the forty niners, So everything outside of the Vikings

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:52.839
<v Speaker 1>this week looks like a pretty favorable schedule moving forward

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:55.320
<v Speaker 1>for Anthony Miller. All right, so there you go, Anthony Miller.

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Maybe now at the time to buy achieve even after

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 1>this game it doesn't go great, It's an opportunity. How

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>badly do you want him? So I have thirteen dollars

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 1>left in my home league. I'm gonna put it all

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on Anthony. You want him, I want him. He's the

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:10.800
<v Speaker 1>top waiver, the top wide receiver in the end of

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the week, and I would say he is the number

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:17.320
<v Speaker 1>two add overall beast behind Shot Penny. This week is

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 1>not available in my leagtas would you rather want Anthony

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Miller or Shot Penny if you can only pick up really? Yeah,

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:28.760
<v Speaker 1>other water receevers. We like QT, who is back this week. Finally,

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.919
<v Speaker 1>We spoken about him a lot recently. His first game

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:34.839
<v Speaker 1>back without Will Fuller but with d Maarous Thomas. Would

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:36.880
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see how his role has changed, if

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 1>at all, with him being back in a lot of

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. Yeah, it seems like he's had enough time

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>now to get completely healthy. I like the fact that

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the Texans left him out of that game before the

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>by and then obviously gets to buy as the extra

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>week to get right. But let's not forget what he did.

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he had a game this year against the

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Colts fifteen targets, eleven receptions over a hundred yards receiving,

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the very next game against the Cowboys seven targets, six receptions,

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty one yards and a touchdown, and a reminder that

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 1>will Fuller was on the field for both of those games.

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller was he percent Maybe not. He was also

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the hamstring injury to Marius Thomas, still finding

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:12.320
<v Speaker 1>his footing learning the offense here under Bill O'Brien and

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans so well, I do think that Marrius

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Thomas gets more involved he had the bye week to

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 1>learn the offense. I think kik qt again a common

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>theme slot wide receiver here is going to be that

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 1>safety valve for Shaun Watson when he's not just peppering

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins with targets. So I really do like him

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Don't forget about Kiki q t still only

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 1>own in thirty percent of leagues. I think a lot

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 1>of people dropped him because he was on that bye week. Right.

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>If the Texans could just get a serviceable running back,

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>this offense next year is going to be fun. I've

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:45.759
<v Speaker 1>already heard people kind of float out the idea of

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Levion Bell joining the Texans in the off season. God

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine this offense with Hopkins qt will Fuller back maybe

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 1>mid season and then is he under contract next year?

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:04.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not will be back at some point and then

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the first spend a first round picking an offensive lineman. Yeah, yeah,

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for sure, there you go. I mean, the defense has

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:11.359
<v Speaker 1>has come around, really, offensive line is what they really

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 1>really need. I did pick Houston to win this division.

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's not forget that I did as well you were.

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, something that I'm learning is that they were

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a popular pick to make it to the Super Bowl

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>on this network. I know Gabe had them, I believe

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I believe Mike Blue had had them going to the

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the championship games. So a lot of people were excited

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>about Let's not forget who picked Kansas City. That's you, Greg,

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks man, appreciate that. But the team right behind them, arguably, uh,

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the second third hottest team in the league l A

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Bowl this year? Uh, any other wide receivers that we

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't mentioned. You want to pick up, Yeah, I'll just

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>mention these guys real quick. John Ross played in the

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:57.320
<v Speaker 1>snatches pad this past week, led the team in targets

0:46:57.360 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>with six, all two of them for thirty nine yards

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in a touchdown. We know that A. J. Green is

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to play at least this week. He might

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:07.120
<v Speaker 1>be out until December. So John Ross is getting an

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:09.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunity made the most of it this past week. Dante

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Moncrief had the big play against the Colts in the

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>revenge game, but the Jaguars have been playing from behind

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in more games. I think they'll be doing the same

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:20.960
<v Speaker 1>thing against the Steelers this week. So Moncrief has played well.

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 1>And then Za Jones, and this is more so in

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.759
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues, had a great, great game against the Jets.

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:29.279
<v Speaker 1>He is also paying playing more out of the slot

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 1>this past year. And again this is you know, we're

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>very quick to write rookie players off. Last year looked terrible,

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>but I mean the Bills did not have you know,

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>great quarterback play. Tyrod Taylor was fine last year, but

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 1>he you know, he didn't light it up by any means.

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 1>If the Bills can somehow get a like maybe Josh

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Allen is at least a serviceable quarterback because A Jones

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 1>is going to have value down the Shreds playing out

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of the slot. So in deeper leagues specifically, I know

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bills are on a by. I just wanted to

0:47:57.000 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 1>mention Za Jones. He's been playing very very well as

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of late. Right, it's my like A Florio's guy. Yeah,

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:04.799
<v Speaker 1>actually wrote about him last season and then put himself

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 1>up on Twitter about it. Yeah. I was like that, look, yeah, look,

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.400
<v Speaker 1>what are you dealing Floria. Yeah. He also had a

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 1>tweet yesterday about Otani winning and how he's happy because

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it makes Yankee fans salty. I was like, this is

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a bad look, Mike, It's real bad. I was like,

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 1>b J M. I gave him the whole like, shake

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:23.920
<v Speaker 1>my hand, come on, come on, Mike, you bet in that.

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And he's like, well, I don't know what he said.

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I was like, this was the last Mets with Cookie

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that was actually relevant to send him picture of lasting spillage.

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. There you go with that stand

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:36.239
<v Speaker 1>The phone lines would get to you just a second,

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and I want to sign off on YouTube and say goodbye.

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It's all our YouTube audience, Corey Parson, Jim Day, Chris Ventra,

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantash Football Frenzy. They come your way, next to you

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 1>listening on the podcast like sub sky Ridges five stars

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and leave a comment because on the radio will go

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>another five minutes or so. Let's get back to the

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 1>phone lines. Frank A four four, four, three, six, seven nine,

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 1>and we go out to Nebraska to talk to Blake.

0:48:55.840 --> 0:49:02.759
<v Speaker 1>What's up Blake? Here? Guys? Who's going wonderful? Hey? Um

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So on eight and two in a twelve team PPR league,

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just trying to sure up my playoffs situation

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>because I'm pretty sure I'm gonna make it. Um So,

0:49:13.760 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about trading either mark Ingram, Aaron Jones

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:21.760
<v Speaker 1>or James White to pick up Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers.

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to hear what you thought. I have

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a Kirk Cousins and that fits magic. I would treat

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:33.839
<v Speaker 1>more Hingram for I'm sure for which one? Which one

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>do you like better? Though? You don't need to do.

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Who are you running? Max? My starting running backs right now?

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Are DJ? I have? Sorry? Um, I'm a d J.

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I have James Conner, Aaron Jones, James White and mark Ingram.

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So the reason I'm doing it, Frank, he can't play

0:49:56.680 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 1>all him every week, But is Tom Brady or Aaron

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Rodger is an unquestionable upgrade over Kirk Cousins at this point?

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how can you say that with a straight face.

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that, but I'm just saying, like his

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:17.439
<v Speaker 1>matchups going into like week fifteen and sixteen. I'm gonna

0:50:17.440 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>pull up the strength of schedule real quick for from

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros, which we were using last week to see

0:50:22.520 --> 0:50:25.319
<v Speaker 1>who has the best remaining schedule for quarterbacks. But we talked.

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:27.480
<v Speaker 1>We spoke about this yesterday. Greg, Aaron Rodgers, and Tom

0:50:27.520 --> 0:50:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Brady haven't been great this year, and I know we'd

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:31.840
<v Speaker 1>like to project forward, but what do we have to

0:50:31.920 --> 0:50:33.400
<v Speaker 1>go on that says that these guys are going to

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be much better than Kirk Cousins down the stretch. I

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 1>understand that you can't play all those running backs, but

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 1>having the versatility and having you know, those matchups to

0:50:42.560 --> 0:50:45.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to play I like that. I like that idea.

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So are looking at schedules here. They like Drew Brees,

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton, Ben Roethlisberger. Those are guys that all have

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:55.720
<v Speaker 1>their inside the top seven at strength of schedule remaining,

0:50:55.840 --> 0:50:58.439
<v Speaker 1>so I think I would I would rather lean towards

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>getting one of those guys even on the stretch here.

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady have

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the name value, but I haven't really done much. Tom Brady,

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>according to Fantasy pro Stranger schedule, has the twenty third

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:14.480
<v Speaker 1>best scheduled remaining and Aaron Rodgers as the six. I

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 1>will also say that Kirk Cousins has the third hardest

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 1>schedule according to this list. So all three of those

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>guys don't have great remaining schedules. If you want to

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 1>try and turn Ingram into a breeze, a Cam Newton

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:27.239
<v Speaker 1>or a Big Ben whose schedules are a little bit

0:51:27.280 --> 0:51:30.000
<v Speaker 1>more favorable, I'm more likely to do that. But Aaron

0:51:30.080 --> 0:51:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers and Tom Brady. This is one of those situations

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>where I'm taking the name off the back of the

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>jersey here. It's hard for me. It sounds really hard

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 1>for me to take the name off the back of

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the jersey at this point in the year. And I

0:51:39.600 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>get it. I was wronging about I was wrong about

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Brady last year when it came down to this, and

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Rogers already saw this out of him. There were weeks

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 1>where I I had Jared Goldfranks, That's what thought. It

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:50.399
<v Speaker 1>was crazy. That's what I'm saying. I was wrong last

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 1>year were you were doing that, And I don't want

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to make the same mistake again. So I'll just be

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:57.360
<v Speaker 1>on your side in this one. Let me before we

0:51:57.440 --> 0:52:00.319
<v Speaker 1>wrap up, Frank tight Ends to pick up for this man,

0:52:00.400 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Hireman, can you take me high? You're man? Um

0:52:08.440 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>leads to Denver Broncos and red zone targets. Yeah. So

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:12.719
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to when it comes to Hireman and

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>my my buddies listen to the program, they're they're hoping

0:52:15.480 --> 0:52:18.839
<v Speaker 1>that Jeff Hireman isn't the new rat. Oh the rat,

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:21.839
<v Speaker 1>the rat Damien Ratley. That was a flash in the pan.

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 1>If I rec hopefully Hireman is better than that. Um

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:28.240
<v Speaker 1>other tight ends Smith back to back and a touchdowns?

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything here? Um? I like the fact that

0:52:31.520 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 1>both of his touchdowns have come from within the red zone,

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 1>so they're clearly drawing up plays. And since the Landy

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Walker has gone down, he's been on the field of

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 1>ton Like he's playing a large majority of the snaps.

0:52:40.560 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 1>The thing is the Titans while we talk about targets

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>share with guys like Corey Davis, and the reason he

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>has such a high target share is because the Titans

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:49.319
<v Speaker 1>don't really throw the ball all that much. Greg. If

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at their offense at their core, they still

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:53.160
<v Speaker 1>do want to be a run first team. They want

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to pound the rock with Derrick Henry and with Dion Lewis.

0:52:56.239 --> 0:52:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'll take a stab on John Smith kind of

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 1>similar to what we sawt of Chris Herndon earlier in

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:03.839
<v Speaker 1>the year, where Herndon was a scoring touchdowns every single week.

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Jonod Smith can keep this streak going. But for

0:53:07.320 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>how long is he gonna do that? Because in the

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:10.920
<v Speaker 1>games where he doesn't score touchdown, he's not going to

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>be great. We could say that about a lot of

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:14.880
<v Speaker 1>tight ends this year. But he is training in the

0:53:15.040 --> 0:53:16.839
<v Speaker 1>right direction, He's on the field a lot, he's get

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 1>taking the red zone targets, So I am intrigued by him.

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I will say I would rather own Jeff Hireman or

0:53:22.400 --> 0:53:25.879
<v Speaker 1>even Ricky Seals Jones because Ricky Seals Jones just had

0:53:26.040 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a just had nine targets in that game against the

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Kanda City Chiefs. Yeah, Ricky, Ricky Sealers Jones out of

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:35.480
<v Speaker 1>know where? Really? Uh? Monstro's game this past week r

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:38.880
<v Speaker 1>s j out of nowhere? Like okay, i'twhere I got it.

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>You didn't like that one. I thought I thought it

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:43.279
<v Speaker 1>was pretty good. Yeah, I thought it was pretty good.

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:44.920
<v Speaker 1>We told you to take the pick up the Cardinals

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this week against the Raiders. Cardinals are trying, Raiders are

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not yes, and look just stream m of defense against

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. Moving forward, their offense has been putrid. Derek

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Carr hasn't looked good. They have our team off throw

0:53:55.200 --> 0:53:57.360
<v Speaker 1>out there. Surprised they were unknown to my league Carolina

0:53:57.400 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Panthers this week, Gregor not bad, not bad Frenzies and

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:02.239
<v Speaker 1>next for Frank Staffle. My name is Drex Susman. Good

0:54:02.320 --> 0:54:04.320
<v Speaker 1>luck in your waivers this week. Talk to again tomorrow.

0:54:04.920 --> 0:54:08.360
<v Speaker 1>We hope h