1
00:00:00,480 --> 00:00:03,960
Speaker 1: We have all talked for months and months and years

2
00:00:04,000 --> 00:00:07,800
Speaker 1: and years about the threats that big tech is posing

3
00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:11,840
Speaker 1: to free expression, to the First Amendment, to our public square,

4
00:00:12,080 --> 00:00:17,160
Speaker 1: to self government itself. Now, finally the government is taking action.

5
00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:20,919
Speaker 1: The Department of Justice is suing Google on the grounds

6
00:00:20,920 --> 00:00:24,639
Speaker 1: of antitrust. The US Senate is going to subpoena Jack

7
00:00:24,680 --> 00:00:28,640
Speaker 1: Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg, the heads of Twitter and Facebook.

8
00:00:29,160 --> 00:00:32,320
Speaker 1: Big tech is finally being called to account. This is

9
00:00:32,440 --> 00:00:41,880
Speaker 1: Verdict with Ted Cruz. Welcome back to Verdict with Ted Cruz.

10
00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:46,280
Speaker 1: I'm Michael Knowles, joined as ever by Senator Cruz. Senator

11
00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:49,640
Speaker 1: I like to think that on this show we predict

12
00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:53,000
Speaker 1: the future, and I guess sometimes actually maybe affect the future,

13
00:00:53,159 --> 00:00:55,880
Speaker 1: because as we're talking about laws that could be passed

14
00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:58,560
Speaker 1: and big moves that could be taking place in the

15
00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:01,920
Speaker 1: federal government. Last episode we talked about this crazy story

16
00:01:01,920 --> 00:01:06,040
Speaker 1: with big Tech censoring a New York Post investigation into

17
00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:10,680
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden and possible corruption involving Joe Biden. Big Tech

18
00:01:10,760 --> 00:01:12,840
Speaker 1: suppressed the story, shut it down. We also are going

19
00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:15,720
Speaker 1: on for days now it appears the federal government is

20
00:01:15,760 --> 00:01:18,399
Speaker 1: taking action. All I've seen her the headline, Senator that

21
00:01:18,480 --> 00:01:20,760
Speaker 1: the DOJ is going to try to break up Google,

22
00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:23,840
Speaker 1: and that the Senate Judiciary Committee is going to subpoena

23
00:01:24,080 --> 00:01:26,479
Speaker 1: the other heads of big tech. What can you tell

24
00:01:26,560 --> 00:01:29,640
Speaker 1: us about what is actually going on? Well, sure, this

25
00:01:29,680 --> 00:01:33,199
Speaker 1: has been a big and momentous week on multiple fronts,

26
00:01:33,200 --> 00:01:37,400
Speaker 1: as you just noted concerning big tech. Let's start with

27
00:01:37,920 --> 00:01:42,320
Speaker 1: Twitter and Facebook. And last week during the confirmation hearing

28
00:01:42,360 --> 00:01:44,880
Speaker 1: on Judge Barrett, we had one story that came out

29
00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:48,600
Speaker 1: Wednesday night that was the New York Post blockbuster story

30
00:01:48,640 --> 00:01:56,720
Speaker 1: on Ukraine based on Hunter Biden's emails and alleging on

31
00:01:56,800 --> 00:02:01,400
Speaker 1: its face corruption by Joe Biden and that he had

32
00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:04,840
Speaker 1: lied in saying that he had not not met with

33
00:02:04,960 --> 00:02:09,880
Speaker 1: these Ukrainian oligarchs. The next day, Thursday, and we recorded

34
00:02:09,919 --> 00:02:15,440
Speaker 1: a Verdict podcast with that information that night, because both

35
00:02:15,520 --> 00:02:20,880
Speaker 1: Twitter and Facebook blocked that story. If any individual user

36
00:02:20,960 --> 00:02:24,080
Speaker 1: tried to tweet out that New York Post story, you

37
00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:27,520
Speaker 1: got a warning sign that said you couldn't tweet it,

38
00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:30,280
Speaker 1: you couldn't post it on Twitter said that this was

39
00:02:30,360 --> 00:02:36,760
Speaker 1: potentially harmful. Well, the next day, Thursday morning, the story

40
00:02:36,840 --> 00:02:39,720
Speaker 1: actually it got worse because the New York Post broke

41
00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:44,680
Speaker 1: a second blockbuster story. This second one was again from

42
00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:48,520
Speaker 1: the same trove of emails on Hunter Biden's laptop, allegedly,

43
00:02:49,720 --> 00:02:54,080
Speaker 1: this one concerning Communist China and an offer from Communist

44
00:02:54,160 --> 00:02:57,200
Speaker 1: China to pay not only Hunter Biden millions of dollars,

45
00:02:57,240 --> 00:03:00,960
Speaker 1: but to pay Joe Biden himself millions of dollars. The

46
00:03:01,040 --> 00:03:04,799
Speaker 1: emails refer to Joe Biden as quote the big Guy,

47
00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:08,920
Speaker 1: and it's an offer of serious cash directly to Joe Biden.

48
00:03:09,800 --> 00:03:15,639
Speaker 1: So once again, Twitter block that, and I have to

49
00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:17,760
Speaker 1: admit I saw this. So I'm sitting on my phone

50
00:03:17,880 --> 00:03:21,640
Speaker 1: during the Judge Barrett confirmation hearing, and I'm up at

51
00:03:21,639 --> 00:03:23,239
Speaker 1: the Dias and I'm on my phone and I'm looking

52
00:03:23,280 --> 00:03:26,679
Speaker 1: at the store and I'm like, wow, this is unbelievable.

53
00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:29,520
Speaker 1: And so I put together a tweet. You know, we'll

54
00:03:29,560 --> 00:03:33,360
Speaker 1: Twitter block this one too, and I hit send and boom,

55
00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:37,960
Speaker 1: Twitter's blocked it and I can't send it, and I'm

56
00:03:38,040 --> 00:03:43,680
Speaker 1: like furious, And so I get up and called Lindsay

57
00:03:43,760 --> 00:03:46,040
Speaker 1: Graham over and he and I stepped out out back.

58
00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:49,680
Speaker 1: And so the public hearing room where we do the

59
00:03:49,720 --> 00:03:51,920
Speaker 1: hearings is in the Heart Centered office building and there's

60
00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:53,840
Speaker 1: an area back behind this like the ante room. So

61
00:03:53,880 --> 00:03:57,040
Speaker 1: I pulled Lindsay back and I was worked up. I said,

62
00:03:57,080 --> 00:04:01,200
Speaker 1: you know what, let's subpoena Twitter right now. We're we're meeting,

63
00:04:01,200 --> 00:04:03,800
Speaker 1: the Judiciary Committee is here. Let's do it right now.

64
00:04:04,600 --> 00:04:07,600
Speaker 1: Get Jack Dorsey to come right here and explain what

65
00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:10,400
Speaker 1: in the hell he is doing. So I gotta admit

66
00:04:10,520 --> 00:04:15,320
Speaker 1: Lindsay's staff was very worried about this, and look, to

67
00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:17,520
Speaker 1: be fair, that they're sitting there saying, well, let's not

68
00:04:17,560 --> 00:04:20,040
Speaker 1: do anything to screw up the Judge Barrett confirmation. And

69
00:04:20,279 --> 00:04:22,640
Speaker 1: I understand that, and I'm like, well, look obviously I

70
00:04:22,680 --> 00:04:24,040
Speaker 1: don't want to. I don't want to do anything to

71
00:04:24,080 --> 00:04:26,760
Speaker 1: screw that up. And so they were nervous. Let's just

72
00:04:26,960 --> 00:04:29,280
Speaker 1: let's not do anything else. Let's just do Judge Barrett.

73
00:04:31,080 --> 00:04:36,240
Speaker 1: But this was so so absurd. I told Lindsay we

74
00:04:36,040 --> 00:04:38,039
Speaker 1: got we got to do something. So what his staff

75
00:04:38,080 --> 00:04:40,120
Speaker 1: has said is, well, look we can we can notice

76
00:04:40,120 --> 00:04:44,600
Speaker 1: a hearing for next week and vote on subpoena's next week.

77
00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:47,560
Speaker 1: And I said great, and Lindsay said, you know, if

78
00:04:47,600 --> 00:04:49,039
Speaker 1: you want, you and I can go announce it to

79
00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:51,240
Speaker 1: the TV cameras right now. I said, great, let's go.

80
00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:54,840
Speaker 1: We both walk out as during a break in the

81
00:04:54,880 --> 00:04:56,920
Speaker 1: Judge Barrett hearing, So it's it's just there was a

82
00:04:57,480 --> 00:04:59,400
Speaker 1: kind of a five minute break. Lindsay and I walk

83
00:04:59,440 --> 00:05:02,839
Speaker 1: out to the a TV camera out there, and we

84
00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:06,240
Speaker 1: both announced together that the Judiciary Committee will be voting

85
00:05:06,279 --> 00:05:11,680
Speaker 1: on subpoenas to subpoena Jack Dorsey to testify in front

86
00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:15,320
Speaker 1: of Judiciary. And that blew up the news. That was

87
00:05:15,360 --> 00:05:18,800
Speaker 1: literally just on the fly, Lindsay and me talking in

88
00:05:18,839 --> 00:05:21,920
Speaker 1: the ante room, and we agreed, let's go announce it,

89
00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:25,120
Speaker 1: and now this week we'll be teeing it up. This

90
00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:28,880
Speaker 1: is something that I realized during impeachment, and I suppose

91
00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:31,320
Speaker 1: probably the listeners and viewers realized it too that I

92
00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:34,480
Speaker 1: didn't understand before. In my mind, the way the government

93
00:05:34,520 --> 00:05:37,839
Speaker 1: and especially the Senate works is that everything is preplanned

94
00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:40,400
Speaker 1: and nothing happens on the spur of the moment, and

95
00:05:40,480 --> 00:05:43,000
Speaker 1: you just know what's going to happen. And that's that

96
00:05:44,279 --> 00:05:46,720
Speaker 1: what I realized was that's not really what happens in

97
00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:49,159
Speaker 1: the moment. I mean, as you described, during impeachment, you'd

98
00:05:49,200 --> 00:05:51,720
Speaker 1: hear a question, you'd hear Adam Shifts say something, you'd

99
00:05:51,720 --> 00:05:53,480
Speaker 1: go into the cloak room, you'd talk to Senator so

100
00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:55,680
Speaker 1: and so, you guys would make a plan to do this,

101
00:05:55,760 --> 00:05:58,000
Speaker 1: that or the other thing. And obviously that's what's happening

102
00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:02,680
Speaker 1: here as well. Twitter's decision to censor this information, to

103
00:06:02,680 --> 00:06:06,640
Speaker 1: suppress it led directly to Jack Dorsey getting subpoenaed on

104
00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:10,360
Speaker 1: the fly in the moment. And we'll get into the

105
00:06:10,440 --> 00:06:12,720
Speaker 1: legal issue I suspect in a moment, but I think

106
00:06:12,760 --> 00:06:16,599
Speaker 1: it is important for listeners to consider just the way

107
00:06:16,600 --> 00:06:19,039
Speaker 1: that our political system is structured right now that a

108
00:06:19,240 --> 00:06:24,359
Speaker 1: US senator in a hearing trying to post new information

109
00:06:24,360 --> 00:06:26,880
Speaker 1: that has just come out from the oldest continually published

110
00:06:26,920 --> 00:06:30,000
Speaker 1: daily newspaper in the country founded by Alexander Hamilton, the

111
00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:32,280
Speaker 1: New York Post, trying to put that out there in

112
00:06:32,279 --> 00:06:36,080
Speaker 1: the public square, could be censored by a tech oligarch

113
00:06:36,360 --> 00:06:39,159
Speaker 1: in Silicon Valley. That is the regardless of the legal question.

114
00:06:39,200 --> 00:06:41,640
Speaker 1: That is the political situation that we're looking at now

115
00:06:41,680 --> 00:06:43,680
Speaker 1: as we head into these subpoenas. So, look, you and

116
00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:46,600
Speaker 1: I and on Verdict, we've been talking about tech censorship

117
00:06:46,640 --> 00:06:48,920
Speaker 1: a long time, and a lot of us have been

118
00:06:49,040 --> 00:06:53,040
Speaker 1: very concerned about tech bias and censorship for years it's

119
00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:56,839
Speaker 1: been getting steadily worse. It's been escalating, it's more and

120
00:06:56,920 --> 00:07:03,800
Speaker 1: more and more. Last week was a dramatic escalation last week.

121
00:07:03,839 --> 00:07:10,080
Speaker 1: It's one thing for big tech to silence individual Americans speaking.

122
00:07:10,120 --> 00:07:13,080
Speaker 1: They're doing far too much of it. It's wrong and

123
00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:15,720
Speaker 1: it's and I am leading the fight to stop it.

124
00:07:16,320 --> 00:07:19,280
Speaker 1: But last week represented something very very different, which is

125
00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:23,760
Speaker 1: they silenced a major media publication. The New York Post

126
00:07:23,800 --> 00:07:27,320
Speaker 1: has the fourth highest circulation of any newspaper in America.

127
00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:29,720
Speaker 1: And not only could you or I or any American

128
00:07:29,800 --> 00:07:33,320
Speaker 1: you couldn't tweet their story. Twitter actually blocked the New

129
00:07:33,400 --> 00:07:38,720
Speaker 1: York Post itself, prevented the New York Post from posting

130
00:07:38,760 --> 00:07:43,160
Speaker 1: their own story and silenced the media from speaking. And

131
00:07:43,240 --> 00:07:49,200
Speaker 1: it actually, you know, Politico certainly not a right leaning publication,

132
00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:53,360
Speaker 1: to put it mildly, a Politico journalist sent out some

133
00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:55,880
Speaker 1: tweets about the New York Post story, and the Politico

134
00:07:55,960 --> 00:08:00,960
Speaker 1: journalist got blocked. And this is big tech a the

135
00:08:01,200 --> 00:08:05,480
Speaker 1: power to censor the media. And you know, if reporters

136
00:08:05,560 --> 00:08:12,000
Speaker 1: had even the tiniest hint of integrity, they'd be losing

137
00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:16,360
Speaker 1: their minds over this, right, because this is literally Jack

138
00:08:16,400 --> 00:08:20,559
Speaker 1: Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg saying they can decide what media

139
00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:24,040
Speaker 1: outlets an American can report and what anyone in America

140
00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:25,920
Speaker 1: is allowed to see, because if they can if they

141
00:08:25,920 --> 00:08:27,600
Speaker 1: can censor the New York Post, they can sense of

142
00:08:27,640 --> 00:08:30,520
Speaker 1: the New York Times, if they can silence Politico, they

143
00:08:30,520 --> 00:08:33,440
Speaker 1: can silence the Washington Post, or they can silence Fox News.

144
00:08:33,640 --> 00:08:39,080
Speaker 1: And crossing that threshold of we're now going to silence

145
00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:49,840
Speaker 1: silence the media is incredibly dangerous two weeks out from

146
00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:54,920
Speaker 1: an election. Certain no reporter cares that they're so invested

147
00:08:55,080 --> 00:08:58,720
Speaker 1: in defeating Donald Trump that they're willing to let Jack

148
00:08:58,760 --> 00:09:02,000
Speaker 1: Dorsey sensor them and decide which of the stories can

149
00:09:02,120 --> 00:09:06,360
Speaker 1: can be published. Um, and it's it's these are these

150
00:09:06,400 --> 00:09:08,480
Speaker 1: are American oligarchs. I mean, you want to talk about

151
00:09:08,520 --> 00:09:12,400
Speaker 1: the oligarchs of Russia. These are oligarchs with money that

152
00:09:12,400 --> 00:09:16,760
Speaker 1: that believe they're drunk on their own power, right. I

153
00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:18,760
Speaker 1: think I think this is the point when when people

154
00:09:18,840 --> 00:09:21,280
Speaker 1: use the phrase fake news, I think sometimes it's a

155
00:09:21,280 --> 00:09:24,240
Speaker 1: little bit ambiguous what that means. But I think in

156
00:09:24,280 --> 00:09:27,640
Speaker 1: its most precise meaning, it's not that every single news

157
00:09:27,720 --> 00:09:30,440
Speaker 1: story is false. It's not that every single reporter is corrupt.

158
00:09:30,679 --> 00:09:34,120
Speaker 1: It's that the news itself is fake because it isn't

159
00:09:34,120 --> 00:09:37,439
Speaker 1: the news, because the focus is not on reporting the news.

160
00:09:37,520 --> 00:09:39,480
Speaker 1: The focus is not on standing up to censorship when

161
00:09:39,520 --> 00:09:42,360
Speaker 1: the outlets are censored. It's all just about advancing a

162
00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:45,800
Speaker 1: narrative that benefits one political party over another. Well, and

163
00:09:45,880 --> 00:09:49,800
Speaker 1: you know, so the most of the Democratic senators have

164
00:09:49,840 --> 00:09:52,360
Speaker 1: ignored this issue, have ignored the New York Post story,

165
00:09:52,400 --> 00:09:58,680
Speaker 1: have ignored um ignored Twitter censorship and Facebook censorship. U

166
00:10:00,120 --> 00:10:02,880
Speaker 1: by the way, the Biden campaign has ignored it. So

167
00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:05,800
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. About the only thing the Biden campaign has

168
00:10:05,840 --> 00:10:08,240
Speaker 1: said is there's no meeting with the Oligarch on his

169
00:10:08,320 --> 00:10:11,520
Speaker 1: official schedule. So they haven't denied that this was Hunter

170
00:10:11,520 --> 00:10:14,760
Speaker 1: Biden's laptop. They haven't denied that these are Hunter Biden's emails.

171
00:10:15,040 --> 00:10:18,080
Speaker 1: They haven't denied that Joe Biden met with the oligarc

172
00:10:18,160 --> 00:10:20,920
Speaker 1: even though he said said previously he did not. They

173
00:10:20,960 --> 00:10:24,840
Speaker 1: haven't denied that that communist China offered Joe Biden millions

174
00:10:24,880 --> 00:10:27,840
Speaker 1: of dollars, So no one's even asked them. You know,

175
00:10:28,040 --> 00:10:32,280
Speaker 1: Biden did an ABC town hall the day after these

176
00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:34,840
Speaker 1: stories broke, and they didn't bother to ask him. It's

177
00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:40,520
Speaker 1: simply it doesn't exist. It's been disappeared. But when it

178
00:10:40,559 --> 00:10:43,480
Speaker 1: comes to Democratic senators, to the extent they've said anything

179
00:10:43,520 --> 00:10:50,480
Speaker 1: about it, their talking point has been this is Russian disinformation. Okay, well,

180
00:10:50,720 --> 00:10:55,120
Speaker 1: I'm not aware of any evidence of that. The Director

181
00:10:55,120 --> 00:10:58,560
Speaker 1: of National Intelligence has said it's not. But if somebody

182
00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:01,920
Speaker 1: has evidence that it's Russian information, great, show us the evidence. Look,

183
00:11:02,120 --> 00:11:06,720
Speaker 1: if these emails are fake, that's highly relevant. If they're

184
00:11:06,720 --> 00:11:10,240
Speaker 1: But at this point Joe Biden didn't claiming they're fake. Right, Well,

185
00:11:10,360 --> 00:11:13,680
Speaker 1: it would seem, you know, the fact that the Biden

186
00:11:13,760 --> 00:11:16,480
Speaker 1: campaign won't deny it, and the fact that photos were

187
00:11:16,600 --> 00:11:20,840
Speaker 1: released as well, either these Russian disinformers have the greatest

188
00:11:20,840 --> 00:11:23,640
Speaker 1: photoshop skills in the world, or what we're looking at

189
00:11:24,080 --> 00:11:28,800
Speaker 1: is legitimate material from Hunter Biden's computer. If something's fake,

190
00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:33,400
Speaker 1: that's actually what journalism is for. So I'm perfectly fine

191
00:11:33,400 --> 00:11:35,400
Speaker 1: with people reporting it. If you share the New York

192
00:11:35,640 --> 00:11:37,720
Speaker 1: Post story, it turns out the story is wrong, fine,

193
00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:40,120
Speaker 1: then they put out the refutation and show that it's wrong.

194
00:11:40,720 --> 00:11:42,719
Speaker 1: But Big Tech doesn't want to do that. They just

195
00:11:42,800 --> 00:11:48,240
Speaker 1: simply want to make it disappear. And I think Big

196
00:11:48,240 --> 00:11:52,440
Speaker 1: Tech believes they are not accountable to anybody, and that's

197
00:11:52,480 --> 00:11:56,640
Speaker 1: why I think it's so important that they testify. I

198
00:11:56,640 --> 00:11:59,320
Speaker 1: think so as well. I was thrilled when I saw

199
00:11:59,360 --> 00:12:02,200
Speaker 1: that you were called for Dorsey and Zuckerberg to come

200
00:12:02,240 --> 00:12:04,840
Speaker 1: and testify. I have to ask you for a little

201
00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:07,160
Speaker 1: behind the scenes, though, a little cloakroom gossip, if you

202
00:12:07,160 --> 00:12:09,679
Speaker 1: don't mind, which is that I've seen headlines that some

203
00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:13,720
Speaker 1: Republicans on the committee are wavering, that's the term that's

204
00:12:13,720 --> 00:12:16,760
Speaker 1: been reported. Are people going soft here? Are we actually

205
00:12:16,760 --> 00:12:19,920
Speaker 1: going to hear from Zuckerberg and Dorsey or not? I

206
00:12:19,960 --> 00:12:24,600
Speaker 1: believe we will. It is true. We are having I

207
00:12:24,640 --> 00:12:30,959
Speaker 1: guess what I'll characterize as vigorous internal conversations. We were

208
00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:33,320
Speaker 1: supposed to vote today. This is Tuesday, you and I

209
00:12:33,320 --> 00:12:35,000
Speaker 1: are talking. I think the pod will probably can't come

210
00:12:35,040 --> 00:12:37,520
Speaker 1: out tomorrow. But we were supposed to vote today on

211
00:12:37,559 --> 00:12:41,480
Speaker 1: the subpoenas. We haven't voted today. There is a vote

212
00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:45,880
Speaker 1: noticed for Thursday, so two days from now on the subpoenas.

213
00:12:46,440 --> 00:12:50,160
Speaker 1: Twitter and Facebook are right now negotiating with the Judiciary

214
00:12:50,200 --> 00:12:57,560
Speaker 1: Committee about potentially appearing voluntarily, and actually next week they're

215
00:12:57,559 --> 00:13:00,600
Speaker 1: going to be appearing before the Commerce commit I also

216
00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:02,559
Speaker 1: serve on the Commerce Committee, so I'm going to be

217
00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:05,480
Speaker 1: at a hearing next week with the heads of Google, Facebook,

218
00:13:05,480 --> 00:13:10,480
Speaker 1: and Twitter. Anyway, Commerce is a very different committee than Judiciary.

219
00:13:10,520 --> 00:13:12,920
Speaker 1: I'm on both of the committee, so it's I'm I'm

220
00:13:12,920 --> 00:13:16,640
Speaker 1: fine with that, but Commerce, the issue's Commerce focuses on

221
00:13:16,679 --> 00:13:19,320
Speaker 1: Section two thirty will be part of the discussion in

222
00:13:19,360 --> 00:13:25,560
Speaker 1: the Commerce hearing. But Judiciary is on both sides, Democrat

223
00:13:25,600 --> 00:13:32,120
Speaker 1: and Republican, frankly manned by junkyard dog prosecutors who know

224
00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:34,240
Speaker 1: how to pound the hell out of a witness. It's

225
00:13:34,280 --> 00:13:37,560
Speaker 1: just a different that, ain't commerce. Commerce is lovey dovey

226
00:13:37,600 --> 00:13:41,040
Speaker 1: kumbay yah. It's It's a lot easier to testify in

227
00:13:41,040 --> 00:13:44,679
Speaker 1: front of Commerce than Judiciary. What I am pressing for,

228
00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:47,920
Speaker 1: what I want to see happen is I want to

229
00:13:47,960 --> 00:13:52,080
Speaker 1: see Dorsey and Zuckerberg testify in person. They prefer to

230
00:13:52,080 --> 00:13:55,240
Speaker 1: do it remotely. Yeah, I want to drag their asses

231
00:13:55,400 --> 00:13:58,480
Speaker 1: to Washington to sit down in that hearing and answer questions.

232
00:13:58,760 --> 00:14:00,800
Speaker 1: And I think it needs to be for the election.

233
00:14:01,960 --> 00:14:06,800
Speaker 1: I believe we'll see them testify before the election. I

234
00:14:06,800 --> 00:14:11,440
Speaker 1: hope it's in person. That's what I'm pressing for and

235
00:14:11,679 --> 00:14:16,760
Speaker 1: whether it is by subpoena or voluntary doesn't really matter.

236
00:14:16,880 --> 00:14:19,360
Speaker 1: My objective is that they testify. If they agree to

237
00:14:19,440 --> 00:14:24,080
Speaker 1: voluntarily shown up, fine, as long as it's in person

238
00:14:24,160 --> 00:14:27,760
Speaker 1: before the election. But where the votes are on Judiciary,

239
00:14:27,760 --> 00:14:30,080
Speaker 1: I don't know. We may find out on Thursday. We

240
00:14:30,120 --> 00:14:32,560
Speaker 1: may see it tied up for a vote. I think

241
00:14:32,600 --> 00:14:34,680
Speaker 1: we'll see all the Republicans come on board if it

242
00:14:34,720 --> 00:14:36,840
Speaker 1: actually gets pressed to a vote. I think there's some

243
00:14:36,880 --> 00:14:41,240
Speaker 1: folks that are nervous, But nervous is not the same

244
00:14:41,280 --> 00:14:43,840
Speaker 1: thing as voting, now, you know, Senator, I read the

245
00:14:43,880 --> 00:14:46,120
Speaker 1: mail bag to this show, and we get a lot

246
00:14:46,160 --> 00:14:50,760
Speaker 1: of emails and a huge number of people are asking

247
00:14:50,880 --> 00:14:53,160
Speaker 1: when these guys are going to be dragged in front

248
00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:55,360
Speaker 1: of Congress and in front of the Senate to answer questions.

249
00:14:55,440 --> 00:14:57,720
Speaker 1: So I hope that your colleagues on the committee get

250
00:14:57,760 --> 00:15:00,320
Speaker 1: the message. Very interesting, it actually had not a occurred

251
00:15:00,320 --> 00:15:03,240
Speaker 1: to me that testifying before different committees has a different

252
00:15:03,240 --> 00:15:05,400
Speaker 1: tenor because you have different people on those committees. And

253
00:15:06,120 --> 00:15:09,120
Speaker 1: I'm not at all surprised the Judiciary Committee has more

254
00:15:09,160 --> 00:15:11,600
Speaker 1: of a bulldog kind of style. I certainly want to

255
00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:15,080
Speaker 1: see them dragged before that committee and answer those questions.

256
00:15:15,240 --> 00:15:17,360
Speaker 1: I also have to ask you though about this separate question.

257
00:15:17,400 --> 00:15:20,880
Speaker 1: We've been focusing on Facebook and Twitter, but the big kahuna,

258
00:15:20,960 --> 00:15:25,000
Speaker 1: the real giant in this space, is actually not Twitter,

259
00:15:25,040 --> 00:15:28,600
Speaker 1: and it's not even Facebook. It's Google. The DOJ has

260
00:15:28,640 --> 00:15:31,560
Speaker 1: just announced that they are going to sue Google on

261
00:15:31,640 --> 00:15:35,480
Speaker 1: anti trust grounds. Obviously, I am not an expert in

262
00:15:35,520 --> 00:15:37,960
Speaker 1: anti trust law, and I suspect most people who are

263
00:15:37,960 --> 00:15:40,320
Speaker 1: calling for a big tech to be broken up aren't

264
00:15:40,360 --> 00:15:43,800
Speaker 1: expert in that either. What is the case here and

265
00:15:44,040 --> 00:15:45,920
Speaker 1: do you think it will be successful? And do you

266
00:15:45,920 --> 00:15:49,200
Speaker 1: think it's advisable? So I'm very glad DJ is moving

267
00:15:49,240 --> 00:15:51,920
Speaker 1: forward and filing a case. The exact details of it

268
00:15:51,960 --> 00:15:54,680
Speaker 1: will be coming out in coming days and weeks, but

269
00:15:54,760 --> 00:15:57,120
Speaker 1: as I understand it, they're bringing a case that Google

270
00:15:57,200 --> 00:16:00,600
Speaker 1: is a monopoly and it's abusing its monopoly power. And

271
00:16:00,760 --> 00:16:03,560
Speaker 1: at least some of what the case is focusing on

272
00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:08,760
Speaker 1: is that they force, for example, phone companies to preload

273
00:16:08,840 --> 00:16:11,400
Speaker 1: Google on it as your search engine when you get

274
00:16:11,400 --> 00:16:16,560
Speaker 1: a phone, and they use their market power to prevent

275
00:16:16,600 --> 00:16:21,280
Speaker 1: competitors from doing the same. And look, Google is very

276
00:16:21,360 --> 00:16:25,840
Speaker 1: good at leveraging one monopoly and too power in all

277
00:16:25,880 --> 00:16:30,120
Speaker 1: sorts of other areas, and so from the initial announcements,

278
00:16:30,160 --> 00:16:33,000
Speaker 1: that's what the case is going to focus on. I

279
00:16:33,040 --> 00:16:36,920
Speaker 1: hope one component of the case is using their monopoly

280
00:16:37,000 --> 00:16:42,080
Speaker 1: power to censor political speech that doesn't fall as traditionally

281
00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:44,880
Speaker 1: or cleanly into antitrust laws. And it's one of the

282
00:16:44,960 --> 00:16:47,760
Speaker 1: things we've talked about. In fact, when you and I

283
00:16:47,800 --> 00:16:49,600
Speaker 1: talked with Bill Barr. I mean I have in the

284
00:16:49,680 --> 00:16:54,240
Speaker 1: last four years raise this issue personally and directly with

285
00:16:54,360 --> 00:16:57,040
Speaker 1: the President multiple times, with the Vice President, with the

286
00:16:57,040 --> 00:16:59,160
Speaker 1: White House Chief of Staff, with the White House Council,

287
00:16:59,440 --> 00:17:01,920
Speaker 1: with the Attorney General, with a Deputy Attorney General, with

288
00:17:01,920 --> 00:17:04,240
Speaker 1: the Assistant Attorney General for an I trust, with the

289
00:17:04,320 --> 00:17:06,600
Speaker 1: chairman of the Federal Trade Commission. I mean, this is

290
00:17:08,359 --> 00:17:10,600
Speaker 1: I think it's the biggest threat in the country to

291
00:17:10,760 --> 00:17:15,679
Speaker 1: free speech, to a free press, and to to our democracy,

292
00:17:15,720 --> 00:17:20,520
Speaker 1: to our our elections. So I hope and Google is

293
00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:23,919
Speaker 1: by far the worst actor. So as I sort of

294
00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:29,160
Speaker 1: ranked the actors of big tech, Facebook I have problems with,

295
00:17:29,200 --> 00:17:34,159
Speaker 1: but comparatively speaking, they're the least bad of the big guys.

296
00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:38,480
Speaker 1: Then there's Twitter, which is quite brazen, and then by

297
00:17:38,560 --> 00:17:41,199
Speaker 1: far the worst I believe is Google, and Google owns YouTube,

298
00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:45,640
Speaker 1: so so I throw YouTube into it. And remember Google's

299
00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:50,000
Speaker 1: motto used used to be, uh, do no evil? Yeah,

300
00:17:50,040 --> 00:17:53,440
Speaker 1: don't be evil, don't be evil, don't be evil. Yeah,

301
00:17:53,440 --> 00:17:56,320
Speaker 1: it's and then they just scrapped it. I mean they

302
00:17:56,440 --> 00:18:00,080
Speaker 1: literally scrapped the motto and I don't know if it

303
00:18:00,160 --> 00:18:02,760
Speaker 1: was what they were twirling their mustache and like the

304
00:18:03,480 --> 00:18:06,480
Speaker 1: fires of Hades to which they were condemning the globe

305
00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:09,440
Speaker 1: and decided, oh, let's not forswear evil anymore. I mean,

306
00:18:09,440 --> 00:18:15,800
Speaker 1: it really is. And the amount of look, Google's worth

307
00:18:15,880 --> 00:18:18,560
Speaker 1: over trillion dollars they have I think one hundred and

308
00:18:18,600 --> 00:18:23,480
Speaker 1: twenty billion dollars in cash, just just like the change

309
00:18:23,520 --> 00:18:27,040
Speaker 1: apparently sitting around and the sofas and between the cushions

310
00:18:27,040 --> 00:18:30,920
Speaker 1: and their sofas, like the massive power Google has, and

311
00:18:31,320 --> 00:18:37,760
Speaker 1: they are completely brazen about using it to advance their

312
00:18:37,760 --> 00:18:39,520
Speaker 1: political lens. And I will say I have a theory.

313
00:18:39,520 --> 00:18:42,800
Speaker 1: By the way, so on these New York Post stories,

314
00:18:42,880 --> 00:18:46,480
Speaker 1: we know that Facebook and Twitter blocked it. To our knowledge,

315
00:18:46,520 --> 00:18:49,159
Speaker 1: Google hasn't blocked it. So I actually tried went to

316
00:18:49,200 --> 00:18:52,000
Speaker 1: Google and typed in and Google it comes up, and

317
00:18:52,040 --> 00:18:54,640
Speaker 1: I have a theory that actually the reason Google didn't

318
00:18:54,680 --> 00:18:57,800
Speaker 1: block it is because they knew this DJ's case was coming,

319
00:18:58,040 --> 00:19:06,280
Speaker 1: that they're on mildly better behavior because they're facing massive litigation.

320
00:19:06,600 --> 00:19:09,040
Speaker 1: I can't prove that that's just a theory. No, it's

321
00:19:09,080 --> 00:19:12,120
Speaker 1: a good suggestion, Senator, because I did wonder at the time.

322
00:19:12,119 --> 00:19:14,320
Speaker 1: I said, wait a second, how's Google not jumping on

323
00:19:14,359 --> 00:19:16,959
Speaker 1: this bandwagon? But of course Google is getting word when

324
00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:18,720
Speaker 1: when you're talking about an entity as large as the

325
00:19:18,800 --> 00:19:22,120
Speaker 1: DOJ or the federal government, obviously they know what's coming

326
00:19:22,160 --> 00:19:24,879
Speaker 1: down the pike, and what you what you focused on

327
00:19:24,920 --> 00:19:27,920
Speaker 1: there is search, which when most people think about how

328
00:19:28,000 --> 00:19:30,720
Speaker 1: YouTube is abusing its power or Google is abusing its power,

329
00:19:30,920 --> 00:19:33,600
Speaker 1: they think it's through video, or they think it's through advertising,

330
00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:36,920
Speaker 1: or they think it's But in this fifty seven page

331
00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:40,480
Speaker 1: complaint that the DOJ has just filed here, they actually

332
00:19:40,520 --> 00:19:44,880
Speaker 1: focus in on search, and search is Google's core product.

333
00:19:44,920 --> 00:19:46,320
Speaker 1: If you make it to the first page of a

334
00:19:46,359 --> 00:19:50,120
Speaker 1: Google search, that has so much power, so much more

335
00:19:50,160 --> 00:19:52,600
Speaker 1: power than if you're on page two or page two

336
00:19:52,640 --> 00:19:55,680
Speaker 1: thousand for that matter. And Google, we know manipulate search

337
00:19:56,280 --> 00:19:59,720
Speaker 1: for ideological ends. But what do you say, Senator, beyond

338
00:19:59,720 --> 00:20:03,879
Speaker 1: the logical question, beyond the free speech question. What do

339
00:20:03,920 --> 00:20:06,639
Speaker 1: you say to people, maybe they're a little more libertarian leaning,

340
00:20:06,880 --> 00:20:10,120
Speaker 1: who say, listen, it's it's a free market, and Google's

341
00:20:10,160 --> 00:20:13,600
Speaker 1: a private company sort of. And if Google, you know,

342
00:20:14,119 --> 00:20:16,639
Speaker 1: is not to your liking, well then fella just go

343
00:20:16,800 --> 00:20:18,879
Speaker 1: make your own Google. Do you do you think conservatives

344
00:20:18,880 --> 00:20:24,120
Speaker 1: are betraying our kind of free market preferences. Yeah, look,

345
00:20:24,160 --> 00:20:26,480
Speaker 1: I understand those sentiments, you know. I will say, by

346
00:20:26,520 --> 00:20:29,200
Speaker 1: the way that some of the voices, particularly in DC,

347
00:20:29,480 --> 00:20:34,320
Speaker 1: that echo them, some of the more libertarian outfits get

348
00:20:34,359 --> 00:20:37,360
Speaker 1: a whole lot of money from big tech. And one

349
00:20:37,520 --> 00:20:40,440
Speaker 1: problem we have in our own neck of the woods

350
00:20:41,840 --> 00:20:45,720
Speaker 1: in terms of the center rights conservative libertarian world, is

351
00:20:46,040 --> 00:20:48,359
Speaker 1: there are some folks who, if you write them a

352
00:20:48,359 --> 00:20:50,719
Speaker 1: big enough check, suddenly if you look at some of

353
00:20:50,760 --> 00:20:55,119
Speaker 1: the most vigorous defenders of tech from from all of

354
00:20:55,119 --> 00:20:58,840
Speaker 1: this scrutiny, for many of them, there's a money trail

355
00:20:58,920 --> 00:21:03,320
Speaker 1: to be followed. But let me take your the critique

356
00:21:04,080 --> 00:21:09,439
Speaker 1: on face value. I am a free market conservative. I

357
00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:11,879
Speaker 1: believe in free markets. That doesn't mean we don't have laws.

358
00:21:12,080 --> 00:21:14,639
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean you don't have the antitrust laws the

359
00:21:14,640 --> 00:21:17,960
Speaker 1: antitrust laws have been on the books for almost one

360
00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:22,920
Speaker 1: hundred years yea, and abusing a monopoly position, which is

361
00:21:22,960 --> 00:21:27,159
Speaker 1: what Google does, has been against the law a very

362
00:21:27,200 --> 00:21:31,440
Speaker 1: long time. Of course, it is right the government shouldn't

363
00:21:31,480 --> 00:21:35,600
Speaker 1: be regulating speech. We don't want some federal police officers

364
00:21:35,640 --> 00:21:37,639
Speaker 1: saying this speech is good, this speech is bad. That

365
00:21:37,680 --> 00:21:40,480
Speaker 1: would be a terrible outcome, and by the way, the

366
00:21:40,520 --> 00:21:42,680
Speaker 1: Democrats would love that outcome. So so we need to

367
00:21:42,720 --> 00:21:45,919
Speaker 1: be very cautious about where they want to take this.

368
00:21:47,920 --> 00:21:51,000
Speaker 1: But there's a difference between that and not letting someone

369
00:21:51,000 --> 00:21:55,040
Speaker 1: abuse their monopoly power. And there's also a difference. Section

370
00:21:55,119 --> 00:21:57,760
Speaker 1: two thirty, which we've talked about a lot on this podcast,

371
00:21:58,600 --> 00:22:02,560
Speaker 1: is a special immunity from liability that Congress gave big

372
00:22:02,600 --> 00:22:05,120
Speaker 1: Tech that nobody else gets. And it's basically a subsidy.

373
00:22:05,240 --> 00:22:07,000
Speaker 1: All right, you want to put it in free market terms,

374
00:22:07,520 --> 00:22:10,840
Speaker 1: end section two thirty because it's a damned subsidy to

375
00:22:10,960 --> 00:22:14,600
Speaker 1: the biggest, most profitable companies on Earth. It's corporate welfare,

376
00:22:15,080 --> 00:22:19,800
Speaker 1: and it immunizes them from behaving like the Ttalitarian Star Chamber.

377
00:22:20,280 --> 00:22:25,480
Speaker 1: And so that's a pure free market argument which addresses

378
00:22:25,560 --> 00:22:28,919
Speaker 1: directly what the threat is and the magnitude if you

379
00:22:29,000 --> 00:22:31,800
Speaker 1: believe in the principles of free speech, which is that

380
00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:34,960
Speaker 1: we ought to be able to speak and debate freely. Yeah,

381
00:22:35,119 --> 00:22:38,199
Speaker 1: allowing one or two billionaires to have a monopoly on

382
00:22:38,359 --> 00:22:45,440
Speaker 1: every means of communication is a really, really dangerous phenomenon. Absolutely,

383
00:22:45,480 --> 00:22:48,879
Speaker 1: I agree entirely with that, and I think there is

384
00:22:48,960 --> 00:22:53,800
Speaker 1: nothing conservative about allowing a couple of oligarchs to dominate

385
00:22:53,840 --> 00:22:56,399
Speaker 1: our public square and control the flow of information. And

386
00:22:56,440 --> 00:22:59,639
Speaker 1: of course there's nothing conservative about letting companies brazenly violate

387
00:22:59,640 --> 00:23:01,600
Speaker 1: the law, laws that have been on the books for

388
00:23:01,560 --> 00:23:03,000
Speaker 1: one hundred years or laws that have been on the

389
00:23:03,000 --> 00:23:06,159
Speaker 1: books for twenty five years. You have assuaged my fears

390
00:23:06,520 --> 00:23:09,520
Speaker 1: on this free market issue, and I think a lot

391
00:23:09,520 --> 00:23:13,240
Speaker 1: of conservatives are are recognizing that threat. We have a question,

392
00:23:13,400 --> 00:23:15,600
Speaker 1: by the way, Senator, in our remaining couple of minutes

393
00:23:15,920 --> 00:23:18,800
Speaker 1: that is just as important in my view. I was

394
00:23:18,840 --> 00:23:20,439
Speaker 1: going to I was gonna bring this up with you

395
00:23:20,520 --> 00:23:22,680
Speaker 1: personally as a matter of fact, because I was very

396
00:23:22,760 --> 00:23:26,240
Speaker 1: worried when this was mentioned on the Senate floor. This

397
00:23:26,280 --> 00:23:31,520
Speaker 1: is from Gregory. Is Senator Cruz really a vegan? Say

398
00:23:31,560 --> 00:23:34,520
Speaker 1: it ain't so, Senator This is after your colleague, Corey

399
00:23:34,600 --> 00:23:37,200
Speaker 1: Booker came out and made this wild accusation on the

400
00:23:37,240 --> 00:23:41,119
Speaker 1: Senate floor. Please clear this up for us. It was

401
00:23:41,160 --> 00:23:47,800
Speaker 1: a hurtful and scurrilous attack. It was deeply personal, and

402
00:23:47,960 --> 00:23:53,520
Speaker 1: it was lies, damn lies and statistics. I am emphatically

403
00:23:53,680 --> 00:24:00,320
Speaker 1: a Cuban Texan carnivore, but I will come see that

404
00:24:00,480 --> 00:24:06,719
Speaker 1: that all of the animals that I eat are vegetarians. Um.

405
00:24:07,160 --> 00:24:11,240
Speaker 1: And you know, so Corey Booker said that, and it

406
00:24:11,280 --> 00:24:14,920
Speaker 1: was it was a moment of levity where I popped

407
00:24:14,920 --> 00:24:17,960
Speaker 1: back at him. What would surprise people is Cory and

408
00:24:18,040 --> 00:24:22,160
Speaker 1: I actually get along quite quite well. I like Corey personally.

409
00:24:22,280 --> 00:24:25,640
Speaker 1: We've we've actually gone out to dinner, although he I

410
00:24:25,720 --> 00:24:27,800
Speaker 1: let him pick the place and he went to a

411
00:24:27,880 --> 00:24:30,760
Speaker 1: vegetarian restaurant. It was truly maddening. I was like, could

412
00:24:30,800 --> 00:24:33,080
Speaker 1: they go kill some animal and serve it for dinner? Please?

413
00:24:34,040 --> 00:24:37,680
Speaker 1: I'll be right back. But look, I actually think one

414
00:24:37,680 --> 00:24:41,040
Speaker 1: of the reasons Corey didn't do very well in the

415
00:24:41,080 --> 00:24:45,960
Speaker 1: Democratic presidential primary is because he's not a jerk. Yeah,

416
00:24:46,000 --> 00:24:50,760
Speaker 1: and I think they wanted someone to be tough and

417
00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:52,880
Speaker 1: a jerk in that primary, and so Corey was kind

418
00:24:52,920 --> 00:24:58,000
Speaker 1: of faking it, and he wasn't very good at faking it. Yeah, yeah,

419
00:24:58,080 --> 00:25:01,080
Speaker 1: I think that that came across the I Am Spartacus

420
00:25:01,160 --> 00:25:06,679
Speaker 1: moment is a good example of a less than authentic

421
00:25:06,840 --> 00:25:12,800
Speaker 1: moment than we have seen. I agree, And he usually

422
00:25:12,840 --> 00:25:15,480
Speaker 1: when he's being his authentic self, he usually plays a

423
00:25:15,480 --> 00:25:18,040
Speaker 1: little bit fairer, a little bit nicer, except for that

424
00:25:18,119 --> 00:25:20,280
Speaker 1: awful lie. I have to tell you, Senator, we have

425
00:25:20,400 --> 00:25:23,199
Speaker 1: had done many meals together, and I thought, hold on,

426
00:25:23,240 --> 00:25:25,680
Speaker 1: if Senator Cruiz is a vegan, I think I've never

427
00:25:25,720 --> 00:25:28,320
Speaker 1: seen him eat anything other than red meat at at

428
00:25:28,359 --> 00:25:30,960
Speaker 1: a meal, at lunch, dinner. So I'm glad that you've

429
00:25:30,960 --> 00:25:34,200
Speaker 1: cleared this up. Nothing has changed in the meantime. So

430
00:25:34,280 --> 00:25:36,720
Speaker 1: and you know this because you are you still a

431
00:25:36,760 --> 00:25:39,359
Speaker 1: California resident or have you gone gone to Tennessee yet?

432
00:25:39,400 --> 00:25:43,480
Speaker 1: Where just for a few more minutes in about ten

433
00:25:43,600 --> 00:25:46,879
Speaker 1: or twelve days. But I'm in La La Land for now. Well,

434
00:25:46,920 --> 00:25:51,680
Speaker 1: as you know, Heidi is a vegetarian, and she's from

435
00:25:51,680 --> 00:25:54,760
Speaker 1: California and her entire family or vegetarians. I'm married into

436
00:25:54,760 --> 00:25:57,840
Speaker 1: a family of California vegetarians. I remember one of the

437
00:25:57,880 --> 00:25:59,840
Speaker 1: first times I went in a family vacation with my

438
00:26:00,000 --> 00:26:03,600
Speaker 1: in laws. We were out on a houseboat on Lake Powell,

439
00:26:03,640 --> 00:26:07,000
Speaker 1: which is spectacular, and my father in law was like

440
00:26:07,320 --> 00:26:09,199
Speaker 1: grocery shop. He didn't know what to do with his

441
00:26:09,480 --> 00:26:12,520
Speaker 1: carnivore son in law. So at the grocery store he

442
00:26:12,600 --> 00:26:16,040
Speaker 1: brought bought a giant salami and said, here, Ted, here's

443
00:26:16,080 --> 00:26:20,000
Speaker 1: some meat for the week. And it was kind of like, uh, thanks, Peter.

444
00:26:22,800 --> 00:26:25,560
Speaker 1: That's you know. And I will say, Senator, it shows

445
00:26:25,680 --> 00:26:29,560
Speaker 1: how open minded you are. You know, you've you can

446
00:26:29,640 --> 00:26:32,280
Speaker 1: have a conversation with Corey Booker, you can share a

447
00:26:32,320 --> 00:26:35,840
Speaker 1: table with vegetarians, share a family with vegetarians. Even have

448
00:26:35,920 --> 00:26:38,399
Speaker 1: I told you my dental theory of this, by the way,

449
00:26:38,920 --> 00:26:42,240
Speaker 1: I don't think so. Now. So I have a dental theory.

450
00:26:42,280 --> 00:26:44,159
Speaker 1: So my father in law is a dentist, so I.

451
00:26:44,600 --> 00:26:47,920
Speaker 1: But my theory is, if you look at the animal kingdom,

452
00:26:47,920 --> 00:26:51,639
Speaker 1: every animal that has incisors like we do, they are

453
00:26:51,720 --> 00:26:56,040
Speaker 1: fangs and they ripped the flesh of other animals. The

454
00:26:56,200 --> 00:27:01,520
Speaker 1: animals that chew their cut or chew grass, they don't

455
00:27:01,560 --> 00:27:05,200
Speaker 1: have incisors. So my dental theory is, look, we have

456
00:27:05,400 --> 00:27:08,399
Speaker 1: we have fangs for a reason, and that is to

457
00:27:08,480 --> 00:27:13,240
Speaker 1: plunge our teeth into a RIBI and my Denis father

458
00:27:13,280 --> 00:27:15,679
Speaker 1: in law is not persuaded by that argument, Well, Senator,

459
00:27:15,720 --> 00:27:18,600
Speaker 1: I find a very persuasive. We have those incisors and

460
00:27:18,760 --> 00:27:22,119
Speaker 1: fangs for a reason, and that reason might be the

461
00:27:22,680 --> 00:27:25,160
Speaker 1: testimony of big Tech executives in front of the Senate

462
00:27:25,240 --> 00:27:28,119
Speaker 1: Judiciary Committee. I suppose there are many uses for this.

463
00:27:28,440 --> 00:27:30,360
Speaker 1: We will we will have to leave it there, though,

464
00:27:30,840 --> 00:27:35,159
Speaker 1: look forward to following the update on big Tech and

465
00:27:35,440 --> 00:27:37,520
Speaker 1: a number of other issues that we will have to

466
00:27:37,560 --> 00:27:40,280
Speaker 1: save until next time. Until then, I'm Michael Knowles. This

467
00:27:40,359 --> 00:27:52,640
Speaker 1: is Verdict with Ted Cruz. This episode of Verdict with

468
00:27:52,680 --> 00:27:55,439
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz is being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom

469
00:27:55,480 --> 00:27:59,320
Speaker 1: and Security Pack, a political action committee dedicated to supporting

470
00:27:59,359 --> 00:28:03,959
Speaker 1: conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In twenty

471
00:28:04,040 --> 00:28:07,359
Speaker 1: twenty two, Jobs Freedom and Security Pack plans to donate

472
00:28:07,400 --> 00:28:10,959
Speaker 1: to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the Republican

473
00:28:11,000 --> 00:28:12,520
Speaker 1: Party across the nation.