WEBVTT - Jeffrey Katzenberg, Meg Whitman Share Their Plan to Shake Up Mobile Media

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of the Strictly Business podcast, where

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>we talk with some of the brightest minds working in

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the media business today. On Variety co editor in chief

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Wallenstein, I'm asked what I think about a wide

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>range of ventures here in Hollywood, but none lately more

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>so than something called Quimby. That's the new mobile video

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>app in the works from two legends from media and

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>tech circles, former Disney and DreamWorks Animation chief Jeffrey Katzenberg

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and former Hewlert Packard CEO Meg Whitman. My conversation with

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>them was recorded from the stage of the Innovate Summit

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles on December five. I hope you enjoy.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>For those who have been under a rock this past

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>year or so, let's get the elevator pitch out on

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>what you guys have been working on. Uh, talk about

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the state of Quimby. Yeah. Well, first of all, thank

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.959
<v Speaker 1>you for having us this morning. We're delighted to be here. Um.

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>So we are building the first entertainment platform built mobile

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>only for quick bite meaning short form under ten minutes

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>quick bite content made by Hollywood's top creators. And uh,

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we have really been in business we raised our initial

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>funding ground which we closed on July thirty one, So

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we've been in business effectively since August one. And uh,

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we are commissioning content, we are building the tech platform.

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>We are hiring people. I think today we're at forty

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>eight people, up from five on August one, and um,

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.639
<v Speaker 1>we are super excited about the opportunity that lies ahead.

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>The name is a contraction of quick bites, which is

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what we have called this content for a long period

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of time. And so it's a contraction of quick bites.

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And people seem to like Quimby. You know, it's memorable,

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It rolls off people's tongue. It says what we do.

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And uh, so we're we're off and running and we're

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>excited about it. And what is the roadmap ahead? You

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>guys are developing stuff. You have some interesting projects that

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to announce. Uh, Jeffrey, what do you what

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>do you see the next twelve months looking like for Quimby? Well,

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a it's a lot of things, and

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think may can expand on a good

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>part of it. Um. But from a content standpoint, UM,

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to achieve two essential things for this to

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be successful one which is, as we have discussed, UM

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>raised the quality to an unprecedented level, and which is

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>make said we bring the very best quality, production, talent,

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>financial resources UM to UM. Uh. You know what has

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>been this world of UM. You know, pretty amazing work

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that's gone on on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, snapchat. UM. But

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>we're looking to do something at a pretty high level.

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And we can talk a little bit and give you

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.119
<v Speaker 1>a good and allergy about that. But at the same time,

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>we also have to achieve a phenomenal volume of content.

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>So just to put in perspective, once we go live,

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we will deliver in the first twelve months five thousand

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>quick bites. So it's a it's a high bar. So

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on the content side, it's building the team out. Remember

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't produce anything. We commission our content. We are

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a licensor of content from everybody in the production Hollywood ecosystem. UH,

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the highest ends of it. UM. But

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, UH, we have to build UM

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a user experience UM in the way in which this

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>unique content is consumed in an equally unique way. And

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>so in the world of product, which is how people

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are actually going to experience and be served up our content.

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Mega's put together a world class engineering team and product

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>development team, and that bar for us is as essential

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and as high UM. So there's there's a lot of

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>things to get on our to do list. Do you

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>guys at this point know when you're going to be

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in market, So either the last part of or the

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>first quarter probably, and it just depends on what's going

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>on in the marketplace and how ready we are. We

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>have one chance to launch, and we needed to be

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>as absolutely close to perfect as it can possibly be

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>from a content perspective and engineering perspective. So we'll see

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>from the biggest challenge and we know this right now,

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>is the volume of content to you know, to hit

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this quality that we want and the quantity UM. It's

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a tall order to deliver that in the next twelve months,

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean we're not going to try. UM

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>So we're giving ourselves a lot of flexibility where we're

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to get locked into something. As Meg said,

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>when we come we have to hit a home run.

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think what people sometimes forget is this is the

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>first UM platform that has ever been launched without a library.

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>There's no library to buy because no one has done

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>this quality content in this format, and so every bit

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of content has to be made de novo with our

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>with our partners. And it's the format question I want

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to dig into first, because you guys are are It's

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>not that short form content doesn't exist, but you're doing

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it at a level that I don't think it's existed

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>at volume. So when you're out there talking to the

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>creative community, how do you even pitch this? Are they

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>even thinking in five ten minute bites? Well, here's the

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think that's where and that's why we

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>are trying to UM move ourselves into something where we're

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>not in the short form business. It's why we sort

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of are embracing this idea of quick bites. And let

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>me try and put that into context. UM. For for us,

0:05:56.080 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a lighthouse show is um a two to three hour

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>story that you can actually consume in bites that are

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>under ten minutes. UM. This is the convergence of two

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>very try, true, tested and phenomenally successful existing forms of

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>um UH filmed media. So what does that mean? So

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>for the beginning, at the the beginning of the twentieth century, UH,

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we pioneered out on this path our industry and we

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>made movies, and they quickly migrated into storytelling that is

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>two to three hours in length, and that has worked

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and continues to this to the to today to be

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a widely accepted form of narrative film storytelling. In the

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>middle of the twentieth century, television came along, and now

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we found a new form of narrative storytelling which posibly,

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>not exclusively, but principally is in one hour chunks, and

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was formed and formatted to fit into broadcast television. And

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>so for seventy years, uh many of the greatest talents

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and showrunners creators have been delivering their stories in chapters.

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We call them act breaks. In this town. The first

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>act of this is US is eight and a half minutes.

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>There's then a break, and there are five of them,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and then they deliver a forty two minutes show. And

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not you know, forty one forty one week and

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>forty two ten the next week. In it it's to

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the second forty two minutes. And so this idea that

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we're contracting together these two tried, true, tested, you know sciences,

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>which it's a it's a proven science with a new

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>application to it. The example which I've given to you

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>before and you've actually written about before. Is what happened

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in publishing where Dan Brown just he was the one

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that just made the greatest impression on me. Is neither

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the first nor the only to do it. It's just

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the one that really, you know, landed for me. Is

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he wrote the Da Vinci Codes FO sixty four pages

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>long and the has a hundred and five chapters. The

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>average chapter is less than five minutes. So I get it.

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>By innovating in terms of the increments of content, you

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>guys are going to do something that feels more conducive

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to the mobile experience as opposed to TV or film.

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But is it possible that what mobile is about is

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>giving people the ability not to consume these new shorter increments,

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but to go through films and TVs at their own pace,

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.079
<v Speaker 1>stopping and starting at their own leisure. So I think

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things to consider is, remember Jeffrey said,

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we are not a studio, so we don't make any

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>of our own content. But the other thing people often

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>forget is this is a very different use case. This

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is on the go viewing. So you leave your house

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Dray morning with a little TV in your pocket. It's

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 1>called your smartphone. And during the day, think about it.

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You have these in between moments ten minutes here, five

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>minutes here, fifteen minutes there where you want to see

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>something great. And whether it's waiting in line at Starbucks

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>or waiting for a meeting to start, or waiting for

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>friends for lunch, or at a doctor's office. And so

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a very different use case, and people are looking

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>for things that are of a you know, something that's

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 1>really like a gem for that little moment in time.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>And again, Jeffrey said it. YouTube has done a fantastic job.

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>It is the most democratized video platform in the world.

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>But what we want to do is a little bit

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the analogy of what HBO did when they launched. HBO

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>launched at the height of advertiser supported TV. And remember

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>what their tagline was, We're not TV where Hbo and

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>so we're not short form you know, YouTube, Snapchat, Instagram,

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we're quimby and so it will be that much of

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a step up in the quality and storytelling. And think

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of the four things that HBO did. They eliminated commercials,

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>they freed the form and formats they were not behold

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in the thirty sixty all right, so so far check

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>those new boxes for us. Third is they were not

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>beholding the standards and practices, so they could make any content.

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>You could have sex in the city, you could have sopranos,

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you have the wire in this. And third they they

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>spent UH at a level of production that an AD

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>supported world simply could not compete with. So they ordered

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>ten episodes a Band of Brothers for a million dollars.

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>You translate that to today, that's like thirty million dollars

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in episode. So we check all of those four boxes

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>when we say we're not short form, we're Quimby. And

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>so to bring that kind of quality of production and

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>talent UH to this um, you know, I just think

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>it is a singularly and and and unique experience to

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>anything that's there today. But you guys are going to,

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, hopefully be the brand for the way this

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>new format is known. What I'm wondering though, is is

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it less realistic to expect people to have a Quimby

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>app on their phone for this kind of experience as

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>opposed to fishing, where the fish are having Quimby live

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>on the platforms where consumption is already taking place. Going

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Facebook Acto into snap Jacko on the Instagram.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Why go it alone via your own branded app, because

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to. First of all, we think we can

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>get the distribution and the go to market through our

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>own content. I mean, we are making content with incredible actors, actresses, directors,

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>producers and wonderful story Second, we will do distribution with

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the big tailcos, whether it's a Verizon or

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>an A T and T. But importantly we're going to

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>do something quite different with the tech platform here. And

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the things Jeffrey and are trying to do

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is to bring the best to Silicon Valley together with

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the best of Hollywood. So Jeffrey said it. But the

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>user experience, the search and fine metaphor, the recommendation engine,

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>how content looks on mobile needs to be completely upgraded

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and different today. I think you know, listen, lots of

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>people watch mobile on their video. In fact, they're watching

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>over sixty minutes. Our target audience of five year olds

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is watching about an hour a day. But it's not

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 1>an optimized experience. Here's a great analogy for you. Think

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>about what Apple and Samsung have done for photography on

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the mobile phone. It's remarkable. I mean, I take pictures,

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm a junior only any Leibowitz. I mean,

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing how good those devices have made all of

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>us look as photographers, we want to work to have

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>video look that good on the mobile, and there's all

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>kinds of challenges with that, as you can imagine, right.

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>But with the thing that strikes me then is you

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>have two massive challenges in the sense of you've got

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to ramp up this new content format format at both

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>quantity and quality, and the experience of watching that content

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is something that you just described as being quite a challenge.

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're here at the Innovade conference, we're talking

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>about machine learning, artificial intelligence. Are you bringing those kind

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of technologies to bear here? Sure. So there's a couple

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of things. One is, remember we have to have a

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>different search and find metaphor, and we have to have

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 1>different personalization that exists today. I'll just give you a

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>perfect example. As many of you know, it takes about

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>eight minutes to find what you're looking for on Netflix.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>This cannot take eight minutes because the viewing window is

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes. So we almost have to know what you

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>want to watch before you know you want to watch it.

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And so the good news is every piece of film

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that is on our platform is only there because we

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>say it's there. It's highly curated, and everything will have

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a script. So think about we can apply meta tagging

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to every single frame, which allows behavioral analytics and AI

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>to be much more accurate and predictive than it is

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>if you are retrofitting lots of you know, older movies

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or older TV shows, it's harder to actually meta tag

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to the level that we're going to do it. The

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>second is we have to instrument this site. And this

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is one of the great joys of being a technologist.

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I kept to build a tech platform with no legacy,

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>which you know, if you've been in business for more

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>than five years, you have a legacy tech platform. Maybe

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>have a legacy tech platform at variety, I don't know,

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh. And so we will be able to instrument

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>this where we have data on usage patterns, on watching,

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>on what works, what doesn't, and we will be filtering

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that into our recommendation engine, our choice of what content

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to make, and things like that. So this ought to

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>be state of the art from an AI, behavioral analytics,

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>machine learning. But then let's go back to the art

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of it all. You know, you're both out there and

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the creative community talking to people. Uh do they get it?

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Do they do you give them the vision of how

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes storytelling works? Or or has there just been

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this long suppressed out there. I've been dying to tell

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>this ten minutes story. Um, well again, I'm gonna keep

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>coming back and saying to you, we're not asking people

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to tell ten minutes stories. We're actually asking them to

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>tell two to four hour stories increments of ten. Okay, Well,

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge difference in that. Sorry, I and I

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And so the answer is is that the challenge, the excitement,

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the enthusi yasm, the opportunity to be pioneering and innovative

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is something that has gotten people enthusiastic and our industry

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in a way that I have to say, is kind

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of the wind beneath our wings right now. It's everybody

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>wants to play. And I would say when I say

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants to play, I mean you look at the

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>lineup of people we've already announced. You know, Anton Fuqua

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>was out there actually shooting tests for us right now. Um,

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>we have a new project. Katherine Hardwick, Um, you know

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>who one of our leading amazing directors female directors today.

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>She just committed to do a uh a new project

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>with us, UM and I should make sure I say

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it all right here, which is how they made her UM,

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>which was written by Jeff Leeber and Charlie McDowell McDonald UM,

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>which is a really kind of fascinating story UM around

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a AI character, a real thriller, and she is actually

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>out now shooting some tests uh for us as we speak.

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Um uh. But everyone from Anton Fuqua to uh uh,

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Giermo del Toro to um you know uh uh, you know,

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's been a there's so many names, Sam

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Rainy Uh. It's it's a good way. Lena Waite is

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>doing this. Everybody's exciting. And by the way they're all pioneering.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like we're not giving them some tight little box

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and asking them to, you know, to produce. We're actually

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>just giving them sort of guardrails and saying experiment, you know,

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>discover the path forward for us in it, and some

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>insight about how these stories can be shot. So it

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>looks better on mobile. So I don't most of you

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>probably have watched some things on your mobile and it

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>often looks quite dark, doesn't it. Well, that's because the

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>actual shows need to be shot with more contrast to

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>begin with. Right and then and when you're on mobile,

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you go from this environment which is quite dark, to

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>right outside in the lobby to outside on the sidewalk,

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're changing light environments and it becomes increasingly more

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>difficult or easier to watch the video. So there's visual

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>optimization that we need to be able to do. And

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we've been able to do.

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>We have a test of this is you know when

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>you go to if you have Apple phones, you go

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>to that brightness slider in the your settings. Well, we

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>now have moved that into the app where you can

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>just use your fingers to change the brightness while you

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>are in app, So as you move from spot to spot,

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>you're not exiting the app going to settings, changing it

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>and coming back. Which was not a problem that you

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>carried your flat screen TV from here to the lobby

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>to out on the street. No one had to worry

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>about that. We do, you know, and so making that great.

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the other thing that you talked about, uh

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and he is is um you know, why not be

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in the environment, you know, where the fish are, and

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact is where the fish are right now today. UM,

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>as Meg said, is a phenomenal, phenomen amal environment, but

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it is an ocean. And the fact is is that

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we need to find a place where it's a premium experience.

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And we have seen this occur in other businesses UM

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and other related businesses. Meg made the note, which is HBO.

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>When television was at the height of three TV over

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the air at its height, HBO came along and you know,

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>launched a premium service, UM Spotify, Spotify and Apple Music.

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Six years ago, all music was available, thirty five million titles.

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>All you had to do was type in the title

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and you could have any song that you wanted. Well,

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>what did they did? They came along and they created playlists, recommendations,

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a set of features that suddenly made music curation convenient.

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And somebody did the workforce and by the end of

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>this month, six years, two hundred million people paying ten

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month for the exact same music that they

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>had before. We need to make information convenient, which is

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a very big part of what we're doing. We talk

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>about the lighthouse all the time, but the sort of

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>second part of what we're doing is taking what is

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>right now ubiquitously available information around video and curating it

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>in a quality way and now making that convenient for

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>people every day, which is why we are a daily

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>We are a Monday through Friday, eight in the morning

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>till six o'clock or eight o'clock at night. That's our

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>use case. That's not where television. I would ask in

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>this room anybody in this room who has watched a

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>our episode of television between eight o'clock in the morning

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>and six o'clock at night, and you watched it on

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>this device, could you please raise your hand now? And

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Andy has one? I found there's one. Okay, well one.

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure your boss will be really happy with you. Um,

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>but so that but you understand, that's not where we

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>watch quality of media today. And because we don't have

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>an hour, there's not a single person in this room

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have five or seven or ten minutes in

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the course of your day, ten times a day. Particularly

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>our target audience five year old target audience is on

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 1>their mobile phone four to five hours a day. Interestingly,

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the average session length is about six and a half

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to seven minutes. So think about how many times they're

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>picking up putting down their phone for relatively short bits

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of time. We want to fill some of that time.

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're getting backing from really the who's who

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Hollywood studios, the biggest companies. I'm curious is

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there going to be much coordination with them in terms

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of the kinds of intellectual property that we can see

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>show up in Quimby, so that you're able to sort

0:20:55.240 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of leverage existing intellectual property that is on the NBC's,

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that is on the Disneys, that is on the Foxes.

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Or is this going to be just sort of a

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>world of intellectual property unto itself it is what they

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>are participating. Well, there are investors, there are partners, the

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>as you I mean, just to put this in perspective,

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the first time in the history of our

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>industry in this town in which everybody and I mean everybody,

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>every single media company has come in and been an

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>investor um and help start this business up and committed

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to make their talent and their i P available to

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>help build out this platform and for them actually get

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>paid great value for doing that. It's a two way

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>street here in this which is we're not asking for

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>charity from anybody. We're not asking for people to work

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>for less or non competitive, in fact, just the opposite.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Our deal is actually one of the most tracted deals

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.199
<v Speaker 1>that anybody could work in in television or film today.

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Describe what makes it attractive. So, um, we pay a

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of the cost of our shows plus a margin, so

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a d and if it's long form, up to six

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>million dollars an hour. So that's the top of scripted

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>television today. There are literally not ten shows out of

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and fifty that spend more than six million

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars an hour. Um, we have a license where that content,

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>for in its short form and it's quick bites, is

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>exclusive to us for seven years. At the end of

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>seven years, it reverts to the producer. Then you own

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it at the end of seven years. So one, it's

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>going back to a model that worked in the sixties

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>and seventies and eighties, where producers, production companies and creatives

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>owned their content, except we're give delivering it back to

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>them you much shorter window. Second is is that after

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>two years you can take that content in its quick

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>bites and put it together in long form. Long form

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to us is defined by over twenty one minutes, you

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 1>own that and can monetize that after two years. So

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>if somebody has made a two or three hour movie

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for us, which we've paid a d and of the

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>cost of where you can't take an episode of Game

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of Thrones and cut it up into six ten minute pieces,

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>if you actually created it in six ten minute pieces,

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you actually can put it together and it's a seamless

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>hour of content. Now after two years, you own that,

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and you can now go sell that in the marketplace,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and I believe will create one of the most powerful

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>syndication markets that we've had since existed in television at

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the height of TV syndication, which was in the eighties

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and nineties. So the value for the studios and the

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>creators is signific again. And I get those attractive terms.

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering though, whether you guys are setting yourselves up

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>for a long term hangover seven years from now when

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of your IP vanishes. We don't think so

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>at all. And and and we've made a conscious decision

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>here to partner and to make this the most attractive

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>place for creators and studios to come work today, so

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that we get the best. You get what you pay

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for in this town and everywhere else in life, and

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna pay the best talent competitively, if not competitive. Plus,

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>our bet what Meg and I are doing our investors

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>is we're betting on the success of the platform. We

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>are thrilled for the I P holders and creators to

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>get full value out of that content. And by the way,

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it worked brilliantly in the sixties and seventies and eighties.

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>You look at the alignment between broadcasters, which is before

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>financial interest and syndication rules, suns said they weren't allowed

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to have a financial interest in their content. The studios

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>never owned their content by regulation, they were prohibited from

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>doing that. Right, and yet the studios got rich, the

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>creators got rich, and the networks became blockbuster platforms in it.

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And so whether it was Happy Days or Laverne and

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Shirley or A Wife I've Oh or Star Trek are

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>on and on and on, you know, Simpsons, hundreds of

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>television shows. You know, we're tremendous, tremendous successes. We want

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to return for that and we think it will work,

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want to compete with our suppliers. And

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think what Jeffrey said is exactly right. That what

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 1>we want to do is have the best content, the

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>best artist, the best creators on the best platform with

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the best user experience and search and fine metaphor, which

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>therefore drives more subscribers and advertising, which therefore allows us

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to reinvest back in the core of what will make

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>this platform great. And we want the creators to feel

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>that this is an incredible deal. Why would they not

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>want to do this. Maybe we should be the first

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>choice of what they end. Our content, particularly our Lighthouse content,

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to get marketed by it because that's our

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>subscriber acquisition. So every one of these Lighthouse series, and

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we were at least one every every

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>other Monday, literally every other Monday, twenty six of them

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>will be a Lighthouse. Every one of them. We have

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to market the way we would come from a world

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>where we market the release of a movie, because we

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>have to make it that compelling. I grew up in

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>an industry where there are two things that move the dial,

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>fame and fortune. And here's the deal. If you have

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>fame and you don't have fortune, you're not so happy.

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>And the reverse is true, you got fortune and you

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have fame, you're not so happy. Quimby is going

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to deliver both fame and fortune to people that come

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>partner and work for us. Meg, you didn't a really

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>great tech platform. You the best. You did not grow

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>up in this industry. You grew up in the industry

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of building tech platforms. What has it been like dealing

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>with content and art and things that aren't so easily controlled?

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 1>But we think engineers are artists as well. I couldn't

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>agree more. What is it? But um, so listen there, Um,

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>there are an enormous differences between Silicon Valley and Hollywood. Um.

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I lived here before. I worked for Disney for four years,

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>so I've lived in l A before. We have a

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>number of friends here. Um, but it's an entirely different

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>um community. And I'll just give you my sort of

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>executive summary of this. In many ways is Silicon Valley

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is a community of left brain engineers who are highly linear, logical,

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>data driven people. And this town, largely in the creative community,

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>is right brain storytellers, and um, in some ways embodied

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in Jeffrey and I and uh and so you know,

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>merging those two is not for the faint of heart.

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And my view is that actually, the two of us

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have got to do something that I never been done before,

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, how do you have the most

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>incredible users variance with the most amazing content in a

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>way that the engineers and the creators don't kill each other?

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And uh and so far, and we're the first test

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>case of that, which is we've been in business for

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a year. We are complete opposites in every fashion japer.

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>We laugh about it all the time in it, right

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>we when we're a year, we haven't killed each other yet.

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>So and you know the power of opposites it's if

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>actually if they attract, it's you get one plus one

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>equals eleven. And that's what's happened for us because I

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>know what I know, and I know she knows what

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, and vice versa. I mean, we could

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>not do this without Jeffrey, right. So, but it's been

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>fascinating because I really am I'm not an engineer by training,

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>but I've been in technology for so long I think

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like an engineer. I'm highly left brain, highly analytical, and

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey is a right brain storyteller. And so often when

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we're you know, arguing or deciding what we're gonna do.

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, we come at things from completely different places,

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and when we are at our best, increasingly they one

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>plus one equals you know, ten, and it's it's quite powerful.

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Discounted me. Well, that's that's that's kind of that's a

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>left range. She discounts every it's a reality chick. I'm

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of the warrior and I'm the you know, I

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, let's think about that. So there's there, there's

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>there's the dreamer and the warrior, and that's a different

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>yin yang altogether, and the and the analyst and you know,

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's actually a very powerful partnership and quite

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a bit of fun. I mean, Jeffrey and I've known

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>each other for thirty years and we worked together at Disney.

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I was on his board at DreamWorks when he took

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>DW a public and uh then HP, where I was

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>most recently, had a long term technology deal. Our technology

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>powered the Dreamwork studio. So we've known each other a

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>long time, but you know, we had to sort of

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>work it out because like day to day, you know,

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean I talked to Jeffrey eight times a day,

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.239
<v Speaker 1>so and I will remind you and again we are.

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Partnership that we had at HP is emblematic of this.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>DreamWorks Animation was a technology and storytelling company. You know,

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we were in the state of the art creation of

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>digital imaging UM and we couldn't do what we did

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>without actually having the support in this case of HP

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and a couple of other technology partners. And that's what

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>took me to Silicon Valley. And you know, DreamWorks Animation

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>had a studio, you know, down the street from Meg

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>with eight people at it, and we called our engineers

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>artists that DreamWorks always did well. I hope the two

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of you going to keep this as much as we do,

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>keep this going. Best of luck and keep us posted

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on all things Quimby, Well, thank you very much for

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>having us. Thank you. This has been another episode of

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Strictly Business. Tune in next week for another helping of

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>scintillating conversation with media movers and shakers, and please make

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sure you subscribe to the podcast to hear future episodes.

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Also leave a review in Apple Podcast let us know

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>how we're doing.