WEBVTT - Are You Losing Control of Your Wealth?

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But that is the primary argument for well, we need

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to know everything about everybody so that if something does

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>go wrong, we can find out who did it. Like, well, okay,

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a thing called police.

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Work, do it.

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I thought that we the people, were supposed to be

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 3>private citizens and the government was supposed to be public.

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's not how it works. Now if you

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>tell the truth, you get thrown in jail. They have

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>their assets here in this state, and the Fed doesn't

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>need to know about that. There's no functional legal nexus

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>other than where you live. So if you live in

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 1>New York, new York's going to say that asset is

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in New York. If you then moved to Virginia, now

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>New York can say, well, it was in New York,

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>so we have we can control it. In Virginia to

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>say well, you're here so we can control it. That

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>gets to be a problem. And the governments of the

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>world want to have absolute visibility into the assets of

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>their citizen. Right if you look at the results, I

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>believe they're there to allow them to collect massive taxes

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>from people when the inflation does start to get out

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of control.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 3>It's not really that bitcoin's on the ballot. It's that

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 3>freedom's on the ballot. The freedom to choose how we

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 3>want to store value, how we want to transact. That's

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 3>what's really at state sovereignty is on the ballot, right,

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 3>the ability for us to remain a private citizen, as

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I said, a government trying to take away our ability

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 3>to be that private individual. Is that how you see it,

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 3>all right, Colin. So we were talking about the inner

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 3>workings and the belly of the beast and the political

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.279
<v Speaker 3>fighting that's happening. Specifically, there's a power struggle between states

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 3>rights and fed rights. I want to get into that.

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I want to talk about, you know, what's happening on

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 3>the political field in terms of those those fights, as

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 3>well as what's happening obviously with bitcoin, the right to mind, bitcoin,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 3>those types of things, Bitcoin of the balance sheet of

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the United States. A lot of stuff to talk about,

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 3>but we were talking about just before we start recording,

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I want to jump back into So you're in you

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 3>work for the Secretary of State State of Wyoming, and

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I was saying how I've registered corporations in the State

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 3>of Wyoming because of the privacy that it allows and

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 3>some of the that's been lost, and you were saying

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 3>that it's not it wasn't Wyoming's fault. It's the Feds

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 3>that are putting this in. And now it's going to

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 3>this Alabama. I think you said suing, go ahead and

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 3>fillis jump back in on that.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's a small a business coalition called I Believe

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>It's National Small Business United sued the federal government and

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary Yellen about the finn centrule called the Corporate

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Transparency Act, and based on the burden that it creates

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for small businesses, as well as the fact that it's

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>potentially or allegedly unconstitutional.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 3>The addition it's unconstitutional because well.

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole bunch of reasons why they've alleged, but

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the primary ones are the Feds are intruding on an

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>area that is traditionally regulated by the states, as well

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>as the fact that so the Feds don't have general

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>or police powers, so when they do regulate inside states,

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>they have to tack it to one of their actual powers.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>One of them, and the most broad spectrum one is

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>historically the commerce clause. Their argument is that corporations implicitly

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>impact commerce. Well, the alternate argument is interstate commerce. Specifically,

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>when a corporation is formed a it might not be

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>engaging in commerce at all, and there is no guarantee

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that it will ever engage in interstate commerce. So their

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>power to demand all of these corporations register at the

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>moment they're formed is that by that argument would be

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>unconstitutional because you're forcing them to do something that they

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that defends don't have the power to force them to

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>do yet. So those are the two primary arguments in

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that case. The District court found that the fin Sen

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>rule was unconstitutional limited it to the parties in the lawsuit,

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you were a member of this group, you

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have to comply with the fin Cen rule right now.

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else does. It immediately got appealed to the Eleventh

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Circuit and it is pending expedited review right now. Hopefully

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that decision will come down before the end of the year,

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>because there is a deadline for all existing corporations to

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>register by January one of next year, and the fines

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>are substantial, something like five thousand dollars a day. I'm

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>not one hundred percent sure that's the exact number, but

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a very large number, and the cost of

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>compliance is very high. But of course they've exempted large companies,

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's and ones that can afford.

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 2>It don't have to do it.

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>If you are a publicly traded company, if you have

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty five or fifty employees, if you're a bank,

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>if you are a CPA not a lawyer.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 2>Lawyers have to do it, but CPAs don't. It's it's

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 2>it's a bizarre set of exclusions. Even nonprofits, though, have

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 2>to do it.

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So all of these companies have to register immediate, and

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>companies that have pre existed have until the end of

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>this year to do it. If this case comes down

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in the way that I hope it does, which is

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>this law is declared not a constitutional, then it ideally would

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>go away or at least have to be refactored and fixed,

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the problems would be removed, But

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the cost of compliance are extremely high. Into the extent

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of they want to know not just who all the

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>beneficial owners are, which is anybody who has an economic

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>interest or controlling interest doesn't necessarily have to be the

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.559
<v Speaker 1>same thing. At the same time, they also apparently want

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>your succession plan so if you have, if it's a

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>husband and wife that own like a corner store, they

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>want to know all the personal information about your kids.

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Which why do they need to know that today? It's

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a ky see all the things mentality.

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, now you said this is sort of the States

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 3>rights versus FED rights, but specifically it's more not the FED.

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>It's fence and which is part of the Treasury that's

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 3>doing this. Is FinCEN one of the three and four

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 3>letter administrative state agencies? Or are they part of the FED?

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>They are I believe they are, well, it's the Financial

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Crimes Enforcement Network, Vincent. I believe they're qualsiti governmental. I'm

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>not entirely sure precisely how they fit in, but effectively

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they're granted regulatory.

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 3>The reason why I asked that is because of what

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 3>just happened with Supreme Court overturning the Chevron Chevron is

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 3>so they have just basically neutered a lot of these

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 3>three and four letter agencies, including the EPA and you know,

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 3>SEC and all these agencies. And so I'm just curious

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 3>if maybe that has them to do with fence in.

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>For the purposes of Chevron and it's removal and lower Bright,

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>I believe that that aspect would apply here. It would

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it would so I to the ex So if Fincent

0:06:54.440 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is analyzing their rules in a way that they should

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>not be granted Chevron difference. Now that the Chevron cases

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>come down, that doesn't necessarily mean that will change anything.

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>That is an argument that I don't believe was made

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in the district court. So that could be a new

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>argument that's made the problem in this case. And I

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>have not done this analysis yet, but one of the

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>problems that I see is that Congress very specifically ask

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>them to collect a lot of this information. So there

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is unlike say Lope or Bright, where the enforcement agency

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>just randomly created this rule that they could collect seven

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars from fishermen. The Finn said, the Corporate Transparency

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Actor CTA has a lot more specificity from Congress. So

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>while the removal of Chevron would apply, I don't know

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>how valuable that is in this case. That said, it

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is a definite argument that can be made if the

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Eleventh Circuit doesn't find it unconstitution under the arguments that

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>are already before it.

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 3>So we could if this fails, then potentially there's a

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 3>tried again yes, a different.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And there's a there's at least there's a couple of

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>other angles that could be tried even if the Chevron

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>one isn't brought to bear. So there's there's several avenues

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that can be brought. Still, the problem is.

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 2>The decision.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>If everything goes into effect on January one for the

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>existing businesses, and of course every business that's been formed

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>since January one of this year, they have to comply

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>within ninety days of formation. So to some extent, you know,

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the horses are out of the barn now in the

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>e In the ei A case, the judge in that

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 1>case forced the E i A to destroy all the

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>data that they had collected. I don't know or if

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that is the kind of thing that a judge would

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>demand in this case if it was found that they

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the fincent had violated some rule. It's it's on a table.

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 3>But now why that's the question I want to ask.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 3>We just saw this week the EU put out a

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 3>thing They want an asset registration list, and they want

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 3>everybody in the EU now to register. I don't know

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 3>if you saw that register every asset they own, including

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 3>watches and bank accounts and cars and the whole thing

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned. This is sort of like a KYC power grab,

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 3>so to speak. Elaborate on that.

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe that part of this is just based on

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they want to the governments of the

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>world want to have absolute visibility into the assets of

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>their citizenry. Partly they'll claim anti money laundering, they'll claim

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>all of these things. But as we as bitcoiners know,

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>these laws do not collect or solve the problems that

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they're passed to attempt to solve. They fall on normal people,

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and they fall on the costs of enforcement fall on

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>people who aren't otherwise problematic if you look at the results.

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe they're there to allow them to collect massive

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>taxes from people. When the inflation does start to get

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>out of control, they need to they need to pull

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>money out of the system that they've printed. The only

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>way to do that is taxation. So they need to

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>know where all these assets are. If you're going to

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>implement a wealth tax, you need to know where the

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>wealth is and how how much is out there. So

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>similarly to the concept of should we have a registry

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of everyone's firearms in this country, we see that A

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of us see that as a front to the

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment, because as soon as they know where they

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>all are, they can come and get them. Well, if

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>they know where all the wealth is, they can come

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and get it.

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 2>If you have to.

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Register it, don't they already know that they.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Know it in your bank account. Certainly you have to file.

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 3>You have to claim all your assets every year when

0:10:58.320 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 3>you file your taxes.

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 2>You have to claim all of your income.

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>But you don't necessarily have to claim like you don't

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>have to claim your rolex you have real estate.

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 3>If you have monetary assets that are over certain denominations.

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>But certain types of things, you don't have to But

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 1>if they're actually going and you don't, you have to

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>file a tax return on your company, you do have to.

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Report that.

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But the if your company isn't generating a ton of income,

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>if it's basically a relatively balanced company, like a lot

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of small LLCs are mom and pop things where you

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>know may be the income.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Or hold income or even holding company.

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a lot of that you know may not provide

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 1>much detail on the tax return. Now you're going to

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>get not just who owns it, but potentially all possible

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>future owners. If they're getting all of this all of

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this succession information, so they'll know now if you're going

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to inherit, so they could use that information to jack

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>up the inheritance taxes. Which that's that is a policy argument.

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, we can have that argument. But should we

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>do we need to destroy the last vestiges of whatever

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 1>we feel as privacy just to get that, and I

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think we.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Should do that.

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, do you think it puts? Do you think it

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 3>creates more harm than it does good?

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Yes, in the long run. Well, first of all, you've

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>now created a massive database. It's a honeypot honey if

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you first have to trust that the government is going

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to handle the data properly, that's an open question. I

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't necessarily want to go there. But let's

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>assume that the government itself is going to handle the

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>data in a in a totally ethical way.

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Big assumption, do you I mean, before we move on

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 3>past that point, do you think they can handle the

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 3>data in the best possible way? Oh?

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>No, not even close.

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's for the sake of let's say they can. Okay,

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.079
<v Speaker 1>the Office of Personal Management was hacked. All of the

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>personal records are huge numbers, millions of personal records of

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>government employees, including social security numbers, pensions, All of that

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>information was taken. You've just created a database now of

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>all of the business information and valuation for the entire country.

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>You think that's not going to get hacked. So, even

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>assuming the government is going to do its best job,

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>they are not necessarily going to prevent that information from

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>getting out. And while some people will argue you, you know,

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't have you shouldn't hide from the government.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't agree with that argument, but some people make

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 2>that argument.

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't necessarily mean your neighbors need to know everything

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>about you. If you have an LLC that owns a business,

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're in your neighbor can find it now

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that now they know what or it can get a

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>really good idea of what your net.

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Worth might be.

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>They don't need to know that. They don't need to

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>know that I have a house that I rent. They

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>don't need to know that, you know, somebody might own

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a rivate jet or precisely how so all of this stuff, Sure,

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>the government can get it, but now there's going to

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>be a push once the state is out there, to

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>just make it public.

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 3>I thought that we the people were supposed to be

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 3>private citizens and the government was supposed to be public.

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 3>So I thought we were supposed to know everything about

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 3>them and they don't know everything about us.

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's not how it works. Now they want

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get as we as we saw.

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 2>With Julian Osange and others. If you tell the truth,

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 2>you get thrown in jail.

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, So the KYC power grab is a honeypot.

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Who knows what they could do when they get that information.

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 3>But it's one of those things where it's like almost

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 3>like nobody should concentrate that much knowledge and power. There's

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 3>just no there's no upside. The upside almost seems nefarious

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 3>in any way that you look at that in a

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 3>sense where the upside is, well, now they know or

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 3>anybody could find out who has it, so they could

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 3>go get it. That's the upside.

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 3>And I suppose back if you're you know, super pro government,

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 3>in pro tax then you might think that's a good thing.

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 3>But it also puts everybody into this. Uh, everyone is

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 3>guilty until proven innocent.

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Ye taxing.

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh, they have it for the ability to if they

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>can seize your bank account, they can seize your real estate.

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>They clearly can do that easily. They can't necessarily easily

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>seize your rolex, especially they don't know it's there now.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>If they know it, they can you have rolex, you

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>registered it, bring us the role ax.

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, although that's not on the docket right now.

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Not here. It is an EU it's a yeah.

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>But once you once you have all of these these

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>connections on the business side, you can start to look

0:15:58.760 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>into that.

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 2>And it's just it's a one way ratchet, right.

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>We're just because of things like the First Amendment, we

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit and the way our government is

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>constructed in general, some of these stuff that Europe is

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>doing takes longer to do here and you have to

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>move more slowly. But if you don't put your foot

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>down on this, then you will get to the next step.

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, And I know Wyoming, which you work in,

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the State of Wyoming has been with Caitlin long and

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 3>has been really sort of trying to be at the

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 3>forefront of protecting asset rights, right, so like the state

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 3>has sort of tried to reinforce their right to control assets,

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 3>specifically around Bickquinen cryptocurrencies with like UCC filings and saying

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 3>wait hang on, these are assets. These are protected by

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 3>the state. So I guess that's sort of this power

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 3>struggle that you're talking about. Then, So the states are like, hey,

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 3>these are our citizens in our state and they have

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 3>their assets here in this state, and the FED doesn't

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 3>need to know about that.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's a couple of different things specifically with digital

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>assets at the moment, with the exception of Wyoming, if

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a digital asset, it exists everywhere and nowhere,

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>so there's no functional legal nexus other than where you live.

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you live in New York, New York's going

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 1>to say that asset is in New York. If you

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>then move to Virginia, now New York can say, well,

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it was in New York, so we have we can

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>control it in Virginia and say well, you're here, so

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>we can control it. That gets to be a problem,

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>like with a car once if you move and you

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>register it in Virginia, now it's in Virginia. Obviously, you

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>can't physically move real estate, so that's always under the

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>purview of whatever location it's in. With digital assets, it

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>could be anywhere. California, for instance, could say you've never

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>been to California. But since it's on the Internet and

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the Internet runs through California, it's here. What Wyoming has

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>done is said, if you want to, you can register

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the asset in Wyoming, and that will It's not been

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>tested in court, but under Wyoming law that will mean

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that because you have elected that asset to be domesticated

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in Wyoming. Now that asset is in Wyoming, which means

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you can then take advantage of the Wyoming laws, one

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of which is you cannot be compelled to release your

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>private key. So a court can issue you a charging

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>order and say you must you must give us the

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>money in the account, right, but they can't force you

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to disclose the private key under Wyoming law. And that's

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that is very important because if you disclose the private

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>key under Bitcoin, of course, if the master private key,

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>now you know every single account that's in there, not

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just the ones that they're doing a charging order for,

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and that also means that you know you've now burnt

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that account in every sub account forever, so you get

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that key is now in the public record, so you

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>can't if you ever receive anything to that out in

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the future, it's just gonna get stolen. So Wyoming does

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>have that protection. We also have some lean washing rules

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>where if you if you receive something that has a

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>lean on it and it's in good faith, the same

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>way you would say if you received a physical good

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>under the UCC. Well, we've basically read that into digital

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>assets in some ways, and of course we're pushing the

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>envelope on that as well.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, how is that going?

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 2>It's going pretty well.

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>The Digital Asset Registration went online officially first of December,

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>and we've had a few do it. If you're a

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>citizen of Wyoming, obviously you live there. There's not much necessary,

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>not a need necessarily to do it. If you have

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>an LLC in Wyoming and the asset is under the LLC,

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>well that LLC is a citizen of Wyoming. So the

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>registration is really for people who don't live in Wyoming

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and don't have a business in Woming, but want to

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>domesticate their asset into Wyoming and basically take advantage of

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Oiling's laws without necessarily going through the process of forming

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>a business or moving to Ailing.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Got it. So if you're a resident there or you

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 3>have a business there, then you're sort of already just

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 3>under that. If you're non resident or non registered business,

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 3>then you would need to register the asset.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 2>If you want to take advantage of it.

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, got it, which is then still a big registry,

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 3>a big honeypot.

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:27.479
<v Speaker 1>But and so you wouldn't necessarily register these assets if

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you want them to be private, and there's no necessarily

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 1>need to do that. But certain assets like the reason

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>why you would do this intentionally, and that's really what

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's about choice, right, you should be allowed to choose

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to disclose or not personal details. And what you own

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is a personal detail. So if you were to say,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>want to leverage an asset as collateral, then the bank

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to want to know a lot about that assets,

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>such as do you really own it?

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Where is it domesticated?

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you take that asset, let's just say it's

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:07.479
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin public key, You register that public key. Everything

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>in that public key is now registered in Wyoming. We

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>say that public key exists in Wyoming. The bank knows

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>that that public key exists, you have registered it. You

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>are on under oath or you're under penalty of perjury

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>for filing the document saying that you own this, and

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>now it's effectively a public record.

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 2>The bank has a little bit more concern that that's there.

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So I was working the news desk this morning

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 3>and here at the at the Bigcoin conference, and we're

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 3>talking about politics. Trump speaking here later this week. By

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 3>the time people see this, he'll have already spoken RFK speaking.

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 3>So it's not really partisan. We have people on both

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 3>sides dial not kamalas you do climate invitation. But you know,

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 3>one thing that I said on the news desk was

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 3>that this is you know, it's not that bitcoin became political.

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 3>It's political in a sense only because money is because weaponized,

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 3>and the dollar has been weaponized against almost everyone in

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the world, I mean countries anyway. And I said, it's

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 3>not really that bitcoin's on the ballot, it's that freedom's

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 3>on the ballot. That's that's the way that I say it, Right,

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's like the freedom to choose how we want

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 3>to store value, how we want to transact. That's what's

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 3>really at stake, not bitcoin per se, right, but really

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of when I think about these types of things

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 3>that you're we're talking about here, it's really like freedom's

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 3>on the on the ballot. Sovereignty is on the ballot, right,

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 3>The ability for us to remain a private citizen, as

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 3>I said, and the state or I really actually in

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 3>this case, like the government trying to take away our

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 3>ability to be that private individual. Is that how you

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 3>see it?

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And they.

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>To participate in the modern economy, you have to live

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with some removal of privacy. Just you have ideas, you

0:22:57.560 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>have like it, just it's just the way it is.

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>The point is you should be able to choose how

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>much you want to integrate with that if you don't,

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 1>if you don't ever leave your state, you don't want

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>why do we need to know everything about you? And

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>there are certain times of your life that you may

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>not want to be fully integrated, and other times you

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>may want to. So people should be allowed to pick

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and choose how much integration that they have at any

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>point in their life. In addition, there are certain legal

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>activities that you may not want to have widely disclosed.

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Sure you know tons of them.

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Tons of them, Like I mean, that's just straight up

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>operation choke point that kind of stuff, like why do

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>we need to know all of this stuff about you

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>when these are perfectly legal activities. One of the analogies

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that I use when people say, you know, if you

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear, like, okay, fine,

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>then you're okay if the New York Times comes into

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>your bedroom and films you with your partner because you're

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>not doing anything illegal, or I.

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Would say give me your phone, Yeah, let me go

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 3>through your phone if you're gonna want that.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And so.

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>That argument of you, if you're nothing to hide, you

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>have aything interfere is crap. But that is the primary

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>argument for Well, we need to know everything about everybody

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>so that if something does go wrong, we can find

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>out who did it. Well, okay, there's a thing called

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>police work.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Right do it?

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 3>A small business owner? Are you buried in all types

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 3>of work keeping you from the real thing that makes

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 3>you money? Well that's where just Works comes in. They're

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 3>the all in one platform that supports small business growth.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 3>You can get all their tools that help with benefits

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 3>like payroll and HR and compliance with transparent pricing. Now

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 3>they help you hire top talent internationally, internew markets, quickly

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 3>scale international operations without the workload, and for every how.

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 2>Do I do it?

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Question? You can reach out to their expert staff from

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 3>sole proprietor or a team of twenty Just Works empowers

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of small business. This is with real human support.

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 3>So visit Justworks dot com slash podcast to join the

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 3>thousands of small businesses that trust Just Works to take

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 3>care of payroll, benefits, compliance and more. Again, that's Just

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Works dot Com slash podcast. It's the whole, it's the

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 3>whole pre crime thing, and and really you know, it's

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 3>it's constantly. We see it everywhere, inconveniencing everybody for potentially

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 3>catching one or two percent of bad people.

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Right where I live down in southern California, we have

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 3>like you know, immigration checkpoints, which I don't even know

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 3>why we have them anymore. We used to have the

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 3>border open, but like, uh, you know, very often there's

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 3>massive lines on the freeway and you have to wait

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 3>because they have like a checkpoint going. It's like, I'm

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 3>gonna get inconvenience everybody for that, right or in this

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 3>KYC situation, maybe there's one or two people that will

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 3>do something bad, but let's inconvenience everybody put everybody at risk.

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about another thing that's that was happening in

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Wyoming and with Caitlyn Long as well, which was Custodia

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Bank and so we've seen the dangers of the banks.

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 3>We understand most people watching this understand that the banks

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>are in great danger, partly because they were buying government

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 3>bonds that are no longer holding their value. We saw

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 3>banks collapsing, and custodia banks try to do something different,

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 3>which would be like a full reserve banks. They wouldn't

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 3>be subject to the ups and downs of the bond

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:21.360
<v Speaker 3>market like other banks are. Seems like a pretty good idea,

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:23.719
<v Speaker 3>like the bank actually holds my money so I can

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 3>get it when I want. But yet the FED didn't

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 1>The FED has they have a lot of arguments as

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>to why they don't want to grant custodia a master account.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And of course the master account is the.

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 2>First building block to having a real bank.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>You can have a bank with what's called a correspondent

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>account and you can function, but it's a significantly more

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>expensive and I'm sure Caitlin or other bankers could get

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>into precisely how much more expensive and why that is.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>But without a master account, you're not a first classes

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and of the banking system. Similarly, if you're not running

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>a node, you're not a first class is in the

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin system that is effectively.

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Your mastercount means you have your own account with the FED.

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Exactly so that you, if your bank effectively, can clear

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>directly with a FED.

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 2>The FED doesn't.

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Want to grant Caussodia a master account for a couple

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>of different reasons. Their stated reason, I think one of

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:23.239
<v Speaker 1>the more later stated reasons was Cassodia doesn't have FDIC insurance. Well,

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we know that's not really that's a red herring because

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 1>there's several hundred banks that have master accounts that don't

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have FDSC insurance, that are not fully reserved, so they're

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>running there. There are other reasons why they've said this,

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 1>but fundamentally they don't want to give Custodia a master

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>account because Custodia is potentially a risk to them. If

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you have a fully reserved bank, you can't have a

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>run on your bank because if you if you put

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a thousand dollars in the bank, the bank has a

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars, they haven't lent it out under in Custodia's case,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a violation of state law for them to lend

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>out that money, so they have it on their balance

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>sheet and can immediately return it to you. The problem

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is like, look at Silicon Valley Bank. A whole bunch

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of businesses that never had a relationship with Silicon Valley

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Bank got into financial trouble when Silicon Valley Bank went

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>down because a lot of the FinTechs were routing their

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>payrolls through Silicon Valley Bank and so the moment they

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>went down, some of these payrolls were in flight. Well

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know little mom and pop that's running their payroll

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with a fintech company that happens to have their payroll

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in flight when the bank goes under and the payroll

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get to their employees, Well, they didn't have a

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>relationship with.

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>With SVB, so they suddenly got impacted.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, if that mezzanine bank that was handling these payrolls

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>with Custodia, and Custodia had a problem, all that money

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is still there, so it wouldn't have it couldn't have

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a run on the bank. So at that point, as

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a small business owner, what do you think do you

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>think you want to have your payroll being run through

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a bank that could fail or a bank.

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 2>That can't fail.

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I would like the can fail exactly.

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>So fundamentally, the risk that they're not going to say

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>out loud, but the risk to the system is that

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Custodia is too safe and it puts stress on the

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>rest of the system, which, of course it remains to

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>be seen if that will actually happen. Because Custodia as

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a the way they have to make money is they

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>have to charge fees. So their fees are going to be,

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, significantly higher than someone who can basically give

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you a free checking account because they're making all their

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>scratch on lending out the money.

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Of course, JP Morgan just they're getting rid of free checking.

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 3>So even so, you're saying, the FED decline Custodia's bank,

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 3>a full reserve bank that should be a lot less risky.

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 3>They declined it because it is less risky.

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I think that played a role. I'm

0:29:57.680 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>not sure if that's the entire reason.

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Obviously to the listener, they're scratching their heads. So they're saying, well,

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 3>why would they decline it because it's less.

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Risky because it damages the feds fractional reserve system.

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 3>So what you're saying is it makes all the other

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:18.479
<v Speaker 3>banks look so bad that everybody might want to come

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 3>to Custodia, which would then cause a massive run on

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 3>all the other banks exactly.

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Potentially.

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Potentially. The flip side is is that the question is,

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 3>we don't know will people accept less risk and pay

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 3>higher for it monthly?

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Yep, we don't know that.

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 3>We don't know.

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:34.479
<v Speaker 2>You can't know that.

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 3>That's what the free market would figure out exactly.

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And another reason I think that the FED is going

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>after or preventing Custodia from getting a master account is

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is the argument that a couple of individuals

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>have made in the Custodia case, including the Wyoming Secretary

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of State, which is the Federal Reserve wants to pull

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>back on the dual banking system, which is right now,

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the US has a dual banking system where there are

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>federally charted banks and state chartered banks, and these banks

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to be on a completely level playing field with.

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Respect to access to the FED. I think they don't

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 2>like this.

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they want to effectively remove this system from existence,

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and they want everything to become a federally chartered bank

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>because they they don't have full visibility, they don't have

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>full regulatory control over what some of the state banks

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>can do the state of Wyoming, the state of Virginia,

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>State of New York does have full regulatory control over

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the state chartered banks, but their bank regulators can't touch

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the federally chartered banks. So you basically are effectively having

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a battle of two regulatory visions fifty But yeah, no

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>different than what we were just talking about is a

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>state versus fed constantly.

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk the bigger political picture here. So again, here

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 3>we are at bitcoin conference. Trump and RK are speaking

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 3>little bipartisan Kamala was invited to attend. She didn't attend,

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 3>and you know, we can expect it as to why.

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 3>But I'm curious your take on this and what's on

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 3>what's at stake here? The Biden regime has been openly

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 3>hostile to bitcoin through you mentioned earlier choke point choke

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 3>point two point zero Elizabeth Warren on the Biden regime

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 3>has been openly running an anti crypto platform or campaign.

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 3>President Biden himself vetoed a bill that would have allowed

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 3>the banks to custody crypto assets. So it's like, not

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 3>just the regime, but Biden even himself supposedly he did

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 3>his office veto to Bill. I'm curious your take on

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of what's at stake for the digital asset, for

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin space. You know, on this election, the well clearly

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the the RFK, so the independent candidate, and the Republicans

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 3>have decided think of RFK as an independent candidate. Obviously

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 3>he's run independent, but he's a Democrat. Yes, Yeah, And

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I just want to reinforce that point because it's not

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 3>about Trump or Republicans or Democrats. I mean RFK is

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 3>a Democrat. He's a lifelong Democrat, his family's a long

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 3>time in a Democrat. He's running on independent only because

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 3>he has to because they wouldn't allow him.

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, so yeah, and that's a good point. But

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>those candidates, they've seen the writing on the wall. They

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>know that this is where we're going, and they don't.

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Neither one of them believe in CBDCs for probably very

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>different philosophical reasons, but it gets them to the same place.

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren is on record as saying she wants a CBDC, whether.

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 2>We want or not.

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>She literally said, I'm there, I'm ready, ready to go

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>with a CBDC. And the only way you get to

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a CBDC in this country is if you consolidate the power,

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you will eliminate the state banks, you move everything to

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the federal chartered banks, and then you slowly remove those

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>two and consolidate all the power into the federal reserve.

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's that's the that's how you end up

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>getting one. So what that what that looks like for

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>the country long term? The conflict divisions is if you

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have someone like Kamala who gets elected as president, basically

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the continuation of the of the Biden regime, you probably

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>still have Elizabeth Warren, even though the Harris campaign has

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>made a couple of half hearted overtures.

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe that.

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't think any any bitcoiner would believe

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>that that's friendship. That's you know, we see that you

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 1>all are a power broker. Now we have to play

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>lip service. But I don't think that that goes anywhere.

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So if she were to be elected, I see that

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to get more of the same, possibly

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 1>even more pedal to the metal on it, because they

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>will they will have a limited time frame to do it.

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Does this mean that the Republicans and or r f

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>K are good, No, it just means they're better. But

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>on certain on certain things. Yeah, for this for the

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>purposes a big way right for now, and you know

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that could change on the time.

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 2>They could, but they they at least understand it.

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>They they are currently philosophically opposed to what a what

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren's vision is, and that means that we are

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>aligned for now on this issue. That it's not necessarily

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:47.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna last forever. I hope it does, and I hope

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that the that the Democrats who understand that the CBDC

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is a bad thing went out and that if Kamalad

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is some how elected president, that it goes you know

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that that she's moderated on some of these issues and

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren's faction is minimized. But if that were to happen,

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>there's much I have a lot much less faith that

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's the way it will play out.

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 3>I would also think or do you think that if

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 3>Kamala were to win, that it would actually show that

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 3>their side is more desirable, that their side has won

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 3>the pro bitcoin candidates the RFK and Trump lost. So

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 3>people must want more regulation and must want a CBDC.

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I think I think that that is a uh that

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 2>is that will be used as a justification.

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, do I people spoke.

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Look, but as you know, in any federal election, there

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>are thousands of issues at play. Yes, the people spoke.

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But can you say that Harris won because of her

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and Trump lost and RFK lost because of their differential

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>support on this issue. Probably not, but it will be

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>useful as that.

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, history is written by the victors exactly.

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:17.399
<v Speaker 1>And you know there's there's there's you know, a dozen

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>or more issues that could decide the election. But that

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>just means that they're going to say we have a

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>mandate on every single one of these issues, not oh wait,

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the one that mattered.

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 3>What do you think will be the top issues that

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 3>would decide election?

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, you have, yeah, the spending in Ukraine, the the

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the inflation that that well, I mean that that Biden

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>has caused and others, but the the spending on that,

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the abortion decision at the Supreme Court, that's going to

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>be used considerably. I think there's a lot of anger

0:37:53.800 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 1>from how COVID turned out, and basically there's what was

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of exposed pretty plainly is a level of incompetence

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>at the federal level, specifically with the Secret Service, and

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 1>there and they're handling of the Trump rally a couple

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, and so things like that are I believe,

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>going to play a large role. Will that tippet toward

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>one or another, I don't know, but I think that

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats move to eliminate Biden from the ticket and

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 1>put Harris up as their dominant candidate. I think that

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it was the only move they had left at the time.

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 3>It's all speculation, we don't know. Some people are saying

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 3>that some of the inner rumblings from the DNC are

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 3>that Biden threw that out of throwing Kamala on there

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 3>and just messed up the whole program. And that's not

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 3>what Obama wanted and it was not their hope, and

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 3>now they're stuck with it, trying to figure out what

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 3>to do with that. But yeah, I would say those

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 3>are probably some of the issues. I think the inflation issue, specifically,

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 3>just the cost of living issue, which is an inflation issue,

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 3>I think is probably, I would guess, maybe most front

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 3>and center of everybody's mind. The problem is that they've

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of, you know, they changed the definition of what

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 3>inflation is. Now it's CPI consumer price inflation, and then

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.399
<v Speaker 3>we don't know what causes prices to go up and down,

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 3>so it's probably hard to pinpoint that on somebody.

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I think the.

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Public data is horribly manipulated. Everybody or most people understand

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that what people do get is I go to the store.

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 2>It's costing me two.

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Three x what it used to That video that went

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>around recently of the of the individual that had a

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>like a pre order like Walmart or Amazon or whatever

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.399
<v Speaker 1>from years ago and then just hit reorder and it

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>was four x. Wow, same items four x or three

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>x so like.

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 3>It, but a real basket of goods.

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know, the CPI is the CPI. They

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we know they manipulate. They've been manipulating it since it

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>was formed to give the answer that they want it

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to give. But you can't manipulate the you know, the

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>actual feeling of people at the grocery store. And fundamentally,

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that is the issue. In my mind,

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it's going to resolve this selection is the pain that

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>people are feeling at the grocery store when they're trying

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to feed their families.

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 2>And that a lot of the a lot of the talk.

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.359
<v Speaker 1>And education that bitcoin has done, even if you know,

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of large chunks of society aren't ready to

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:49.240
<v Speaker 1>go as far as we did.

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Mainstream.

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>They're talking about the dollar's fiat that was us. Yeah,

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about inflation. People understand that it's the printing

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 1>that's doing it. They may not understand how it works out.

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>But our education of people has been so successful that

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the MMT ers had to come out with their little movie, which,

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:15.839
<v Speaker 1>if you watched, was kind of hilariously opaque as to

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happening. But at some point in there they

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 1>did basically admit that it's video game money, so we

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>just make it up.

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you didn't mention border security.

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mention border security. I happen to live in

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>an area where we're pretty far from it. But that

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is another big issue, and I don't know how much

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of an issue that'll play because that issue was already

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>so heavily polarized between the two sides. I don't know

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>if that issue is going to be the deciding issue,

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 1>because I think that.

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Some people will change their mind.

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if that's the dominant issue that

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:55.760
<v Speaker 1>will swing the election one way or the other, because

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I think people are already pretty set on that.

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the inflation you and I.

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 3>Think even if you were a strong Democrat and you

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 3>lived in let's say, in New York, where in Manhattan

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:10.919
<v Speaker 3>and not just Manhattan, the boroughs, Bronx, et cetera, rape

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 3>for up three hundred percent, does that think even if

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 3>you're a lifelong Democrat and you see you're not safe

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 3>in your own neighborhood anymore, you probably want those borders closed.

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:20.879
<v Speaker 3>And if even if it's the other part of it's

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 3>offering to close the borders, maybe that swings you.

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I agree that you will swing people, but will that

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 1>swing the electoral college?

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to move New York from blue to red? Now?

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 2>What I what I could see happening is that.

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>That issue and other issues like it swing it so

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that if say Kamala wins, it may be the first

0:42:43.840 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>time that the Democratic candidate has won without the popular

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>vote that I see is potentially possible. And then you

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have the inconvenient truth of them saying, well, the national

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>popular vote shoul decide the president.

0:42:57.719 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 3>But which is what Hillary trying to say?

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Yep, so is that on the table? I think that

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>could be on the table for just that reason. I

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>just don't see. I don't see the border issue as

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a strong enough issue to switch a uh maybe a

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>state like North Carolina. Maybe a state uh that's that's uh,

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, fairly on the bubble, sure, but not like

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 1>in New York, not like California. The states where they're

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're they're in Texas, of course, is already

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:26.720
<v Speaker 1>quite red. So I think that the the border issue,

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's gonna if it's if it's strong, yeah, maybe,

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>well Arizona and Nevada, those those are two states that

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that could they could flip flop because of that. But

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>taken together, I think I think the Democrats have a

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>fairly tough road to.

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:47.359
<v Speaker 3>Ho yeah row to sorry, yeah, okay, okay, all right, Well,

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:48.839
<v Speaker 3>I think we covered a lot of ground. I think

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna continue to saying. I think freedom's on the

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 3>on the on the docket here, the freedom to be sovereign,

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 3>the freedom to choose, the freedom to open a bank.

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't cause any more risk. So I don't think

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 3>people should be single issue voters, because I think you

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 3>need to kind of look at the whole big picture.

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 3>But you've laid out the risk. I think pretty well,

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 3>so I think we'll wrap it up with that.

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh, thank you very much, thanks for coming on. Cheers,