WEBVTT - Chiefs SAVE SEASON, Shedeur Sanders’ HISTORIC start, Eagles CHOKE vs. Cowboys | Nick Wright NFL

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What Driving Nick Great Episode three ninety six.

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>This episode, as always, is presented to you by our

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>friends at Boost Mobile on this holiday week, So a

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a different schedule this week. Today's show

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously as normally planned. However, this will be a two

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>show week, not a three show week. Because of Thanksgiving.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>We will have our pick show that will come out Wednesday.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So Wednesday we will drop our week thirteen picks after

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a very successful Week twelve pick show that got us

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>above five hundred on the year, demands back to five hundred.

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>With the teasers, we were this close to Were we

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this close to a three and oh weekend? I think

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we were. I'm gonna double check. Uh yeah, I mean

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>this close to a three and oh weekend or a

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>five and oh weekend. Pardon me? We ended three one

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and one. We'll discuss that on the PIC show. Demonse's

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>teaser covered easily. So all that coming to you Wednesday,

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and I will be flying out on Wednesday to Los

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Angeles and to see Demanse, to see baby Mila, and

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe as early as next week, Demonse could be back

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to the pods, certainly before the stretch run of the

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>NFL season, but a ton to do today, and unlike

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>last week, the Chiefs are not coming off a devastating,

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>heart wrenching, keep me up at night loss, So we

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:36.919
<v Speaker 1>will start with the Chiefs instead of with the NBA.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that it annoyed some of you last week.

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I want to make this clear. It's totally legitimate that

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it annoyed some of you last week. It would have

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>annoyed me too. But you know what to my damn

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>show Straight to voicemail brought to you by boost Mobile.

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Luca not megging old man Kevin Love. Can somebody get

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Love out of Utah and get him on a

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>team that has a pulse? Please? Actually, Utah, to be fair,

0:01:57.960 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>has a bit of a pulse, but on a team

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that could maybe you know, at least he could have

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a little more fun on Jamis has the play of

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the year catching a touchdown pass and the Pistons shout

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>out Greg Jennings he needed to win. This week, the

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Pistons match their franchise record win streak at thirteen. A

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>remindered all of you in this holiday season, the single

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>best gift you can give us is subscribing to the show,

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>whether that be on YouTube, iTunes, Spotify. Honestly, best case

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>scenario for us subscribe on YouTube and then also whatever

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>your favorite audio platform is. We do greatly appreciate that

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just an added bonus if you like, rate, or

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>like or rate the show, but really the subscriptions do

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>help us out. So we start with the Chiefs saving

0:02:52.600 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>their season, because while they would not have been mathematically eliminated,

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and I probably would have even convinced myself, well, if

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they just go six and zero down the stretch, they'll

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs, which what is true, by the way,

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>eleven wins almost assuredly will get am Man and five

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>and six they would have still been alive. For eleven wins,

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that would have been a season ending loss. Dominating the

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>time of possession, dominating the yardage battle, and just not

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>making championship plays would have signaled that this Chiefs team

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>simply doesn't have the juice of Chiefs teams in years past. Thankfully, however,

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>they are the Chiefs. They do still have Patrick Mahomes

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Jones and Andy Reid, and despite fumbling inside

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line while trailing by eleven in the

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter, they then played perfect defensive football good but

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>not great offensive football, and it was enough to potentially

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>derail is probably too strong, but really throw a wrench

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 1>in this magical indie season and give Kansas City a

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>chance to in forty eight hours be for the first

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>time or just the second time all year two games

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>above five hundred really have their head above water and

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to have them any by. Take a deep

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>breath before a very difficult stretch run of final five games,

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>two of which are cupcakes the Titan and the Raiders,

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and three of which are teams fighting for exactly what

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are fighting for, AFC playoff spots and AFC

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>playoff seeding with games against the Texans, Chargers, and Broncos.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So how did they do it? Because right now they

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>are still the ten seed. They went into the week

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the nine seed, but they come out of the week

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>despite the win the ten seed because every because the

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Texans won, the Chargers were off, the Jags won. We'll

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>get to those games later. So how did they do it?

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>They did it because the defense absolutely shut down start

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to finish. Jonathan Taylor in one of the most impressive

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>defensive performances any team has had all year. They allowed

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty but seven of them were on a drive that

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>started at the three thanks to Patrick's interception, and so

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to essentially hold the highest scoring, highest yardage, most efficient

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>offense in the NFL to thirteen points without forcing a

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>turnover is just a remarkable job by that Chiefs defense.

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And for the Colts to have the ball up eleven

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and go run, pass pass, and then have the ball

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>up three and go pass, pass pass, and then have

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>the ball up three again and go pass pass pass

0:06:54.200 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>before you go to overtime and you go pass run,

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just it is a testament to the fact that

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs defense was able to convince the Colts by

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter of this game, you're simply not going

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to get Jonathan Taylor going. But it also and it

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>also was a testament to the fact that the Chiefs defense,

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>right or wrong, simply said Daniel Jones, go ahead and

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>beat us. We don't think you can, and he couldn't.

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And that gave the Chiefs offense and Patrick just enough

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>bites at the apple that they were able to overcome

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a really sloppy game, not just the turnovers, but the

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>red zone inefficiency, the missed open guys and the hurky

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>jerky name of the offense and Rashi Rice in the

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>second half of that game, really, for the first time,

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe since his suspension, certainly since his first game back

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>from the suspension, looked like the player that we saw

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>at the end of his rookie year and the beginning

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of last season before he got injured, which is just

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a dynamic, elite yard after catch player. Xavier Worthy made

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge play. Noah freaking Gray made a catch while unconscious,

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>which is still one of the more remarkable feats of

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>this NFL season, and the Chiefs offense did just enough

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Lounarumo Colts defense to where they're now stabilized.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>By the way that is now four consecutive wins by

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Patrick against lou Anarumo, his alleged kryptonite four wins in

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a row. After losing the first three games he faced

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>against him, he's now one four straight. But the story

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.839
<v Speaker 1>of the game is the defense. The fact that the

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>Colts had thirteen to three and outs all year going

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>into that game, which is remarkable, and I don't know

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>how many they had total in the game, but I

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>do know they had four straight to end the game.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And Chris Jones, who has been I think it's fair

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to say underwhelming this year. Picked a hell of a

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>time to make his biggest impact. And listen, I know

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I was watching the game with Danny, and Danny was

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were talking about the Chiefs and whether

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>or not, you know, I think they have another gear

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and just why I think the offense hasn't looked quite

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>as good. And I made the point and this maybe

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this is an excuse, maybe it's a justification, but there's

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>just not a lot of comparisons for it. I made

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the point of I do think the Chiefs, and this

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>can apply to the coaches and the players have to

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>play a different style and a different brand of football

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>than every other team in the league because they are

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>going on what they hope is their eighth consecutive twenty

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>game season and the ability to peek at the end

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of the year, to have your key guys healthy at

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, to have enough juice left

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>in the tank. And I bring that up with Chris

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>because it is totally fair to say Chris Jones has

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>not lived up this season to his reputation, to his contract,

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to you know, all of those things. But also, and

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I know this is not apples to oranges. But when

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you see the impact one twenty game, super high usage

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>season has on a guy like Saquon Barkley and more

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on him and a bit. And you see the Lions,

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like, man, couple really good years and now they

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>seem to be scuttling a bit. The Rams, who have

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>been unbelievable, had a you know, in the midst of

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>from when they won the Super Bowl to right now

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>where they are, you know, the Super Bowl favorites, they

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>had a year where they won what six games where

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it all came apart for a season, And so listen,

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe Chris was just not playing well, or maybe there

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is a level of Man, I'm a thirty something year

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>old d tackle that's played the equivalent of eight seasons

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in the last seven and I need to make sure

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I have a gear that I can get to come

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving time. I don't know, I just do know that

0:12:55.600 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>by year eight of the Patriots run, So the Patriots

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>initial run one through eight, they had a year in

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>there where they missed the playoffs. They had another year

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in there where they lost in round their first playoff game.

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>They had another year in there where they lost in

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Round two, and then eight they missed the playoffs entirely

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>when Tom gets hurt. Nine to ten are disappointing short

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>playoff runs, don't make a conference championship game, and then

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>from eleven to eighteen they go on their eight straight

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>conference championship appearances, five Super Bowls, three victories, which is,

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Chiefs have done the five Super Bowls

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>three victories in seven years. And by twenty eighteen that

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>team was leaking Sam oil. And by twenty nineteen they

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>were done, just done, losing to Ryan Tannehill at home

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs type of done. And so I just

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very very difficult to watch the Chiefs

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and determine are they just not as good or you know,

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>have have the games caught up to them, or are

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>they likely as they have to be fair every other

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>year of you know, as this dynasty has gotten to

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>year five, six, seven, simply have an extra gear for

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs and for the late in the season. Now

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>for Kansas City, the playoffs really have started. It's not

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>single elimination, but it's damn close to double elimination. And

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys game is gonna be really hard. I don't

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>think the Cowboys defense is quite as good as it

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>has looked the last two weeks, but it's obviously improved,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and that Cowboys offense is exceptional and really good. Pocket

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>passing quarterbacks have given Kansas City some trouble as far

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>as the inability to get off the field the inability

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to generate a pass rush, so I don't think that

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys game is anything close to a cinch. However, I

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>do think that if both the Cowboys and the Chiefs

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>are coming off season saving for the time being, stirring

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>home comebacks, and then a very short turnaround to what

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>will be the most watched regular season game in the

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>history of professional football, Cowboys Chiefs on Thanksgiving, I do

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>think the Chiefs are more likely to handle the jubilation

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of the win and the short week and the stage.

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>They're more likely to handle that game with professionalism and

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>attention that it deserves than Dallas's. And I also think

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that while the Chiefs offense has been uneasy or uneven,

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I should say when they have played bad defenses, they've

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>looked exceptional thirty seven on the Ravens, twenty eight and

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>should have been thirty eight on the Jags, thirty on

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the Lions, thirty one on the Raiders, twenty eight on

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the Command. Now you can say the Bills have a

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>bad defense, but the Bills bad defenses, it's run defense,

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Chiefs aren't really built to take advantage of that.

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>So should be a great game. Cowboys barely holding on

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to any playoff hope. The Chiefs have real reason for optimism,

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>but they gotta win Thursday. But it all would have

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>been moot had they lost to the Colts. And the Colts,

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, I called them the twenty twenty

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>four Vikings early in the year, and I'll go ahead

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and stand by that. And I think the Colts. I

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 1>think they'll be fine. But what I do know is

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>their final six, and they have my opinion. The Colts

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>started looking three weeks ago. They lost to the Steelers.

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>They got very fortunate to win against the Falcons in

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Berlin in overtime. They lost to the Chiefs, and now

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they go Texans, Jags, Seahawks, Niners, Jags, Texans. Six straight

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>games against teams playing for something, four divisional games, three

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>total road games. Colts Colts need need a win on

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Sunday against a Texans defense that's going to be extra

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>arrested and feeling the best it's felt all year, and

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>they should have CJ Stroudback. Today's show is brought to

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you by representing sponsor hard Rock Bet. There are three

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>things to be thankful for this week, family food football.

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to hard Rock Bet, you can easily sneak in

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>bets while your crazy uncle goes on his annual rant

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>about the good old days. Sign up today and you

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>could feast with one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets.

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Just place a five dollar bet. If it hits, you

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>get not only your winnings, but also one hundred fifty

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars in extra bonus bets. That's an offer you cannot

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>pass up, even on a full stomach. Not sure what

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.479
<v Speaker 1>to place your first bet, head over the hard Rock

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Bets Stats up and we'll help you out. It's load

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>with trends, streaks, and stats though guide your picks. Numbers

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>rarely lie and the data in there never does. Plus

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this week on hard Rock Bet, you get three fifty

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:45.479
<v Speaker 1>percent profit boots, one for each Thanksgiving Day game. You

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>know I'll be locked in on the Kansas City game.

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh really? All the games boost your same game parlay

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>or SGP max, so your bets pay extra winnings, new

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>promos every day. So if you're listening to this later,

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>just open the app, check out what you've got any

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>day of the week. Down unload the hard Rock Bet

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>app and make your first deposit, payble and bonus bets.

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Not a cash offer offered by the Seminole Tribe of Florida.

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>In Florida, offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC. In

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>all other states. Must be twenty one plus and physically

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>gambling in Florida, call one eight eight to eight. Admit

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it in Indiana. If you are someone you know as

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a gambling problem wants help, call one eight hundred and

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>nine with it. Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia.

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>All Right, the Eagles blew it against Dallas. There's no

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>other way to put it. And the Eagles here is

0:20:54.040 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>my takeaway honestly from that Eagles game. AJ Brown is

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>not wrong. There is something wrong with Phillies offense. Philly's

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>offense this year has eight halves. They've played twenty four. Obviously, No,

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>actually that's not obvious, and I think it's wrong because

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>they've already had a buy. So they've played twenty two

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 1>in eight of their twenty two halves, so more than

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a third they have scored seven or fewer points. They

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>have three scoreless halves of football. Only the Titans are worse,

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and there are They do not have Saquon to save

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>them this year. I know he's on the team, he

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>ain't saving them. And this was the most predictable year

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>over year decline imaginable. Literally every running back save one

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>in NFL history that has had Saquan's type of workload

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>last year saw a significant drop the following year. A

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of guys that their production dropped by half. That's

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're staring at with Saquon. And while the passing

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>game at times looks dynamic, they just can't string together

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a whole game. And right or wrong, Siriani consistently shows

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 1>us with his decision making that for some reason or

0:22:55.200 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>another he does not fully trust Jalen and the end

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of the half was bizarre. You have eighteen seconds, you

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>have the ball in the thirty and in today's NFL

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you're twenty five yards away from field goal range. We

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>know you think Jake Elliott's got a big leg because

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>later in the game you was shoot a fourth and

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>five attempt to kick a field goal, and Sirianni's explanation

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>after the game was, well, the Cowboys kicker is such

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a big leg, we don't want to leave them time.

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>There was eighteen seconds. There was no scenario at all

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>except for a turnover where the Cowboys were gonna touch

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the ball, much less kick a field goal. Even if

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you just threw four consecutive incomplete passes, that takes eighteen seconds.

0:23:56.320 --> 0:24:02.479
<v Speaker 1>So that didn't make sense. And Philly is obviously in

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>good shape because of the division they're in, so they're

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be a good seed, they're going to be

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a division champion. They still have three games left against

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the Commanders and Raiders. They're going to finish with a

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>gaudy record. I'm not worried, honestly about any of those

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>those things. But the flashing siren that's been what is

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>up with this offense continues to go off and now

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>getting Lane Johnson back. If you get him back in

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a month or so, that should help. But he's only

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 1>been gone one game. And if I'm Philly, here's the

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>other thing that I hate about this loss. My path

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to the one seed is now so much trickier. In fact,

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look the wild has got me going to

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this is my go to But and I've always kind

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of actually liked this. But I used to use Football

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Outsiders or Aaron Schatz's But the New York Times Playoff

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Predictor they have the Eagles at twenty six percent for

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the one seed, the Rams up to fifty seven percent.

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>That's a big deal. The extra playoff game plus not

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>having the huge edge of potentially a warm weather contender

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>having to come to your building. And right now, the

0:25:54.960 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, projected playoff field of the Eagles being the

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>two seed and hosting either the Lions or the Niners.

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I would love either of those spots if I were Philly.

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, speaking of the Niners, just real quick,

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I have never been proven more right more times than

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 1>every time the Niners trot out either mac Jones or

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Brock Purty or all of last season for what was

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>once such a controversial hot button. Take that Brock Party

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is not a force multiplayer and is a Kyle Shanahan

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Niners amazing skill position player creation. The last year seeing

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>him without those great players, this year seeing Mac Jones

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>outplay him, and then last night seeing him throw three picks.

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:04.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just every single time. And I know the arguments

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I've won because they start becoming less and less prominent

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:15.959
<v Speaker 1>on the TV show. I'm like, Okay, the cost of

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>being the annoying guy is when you just smoke, You're

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>too much more likable co hosts in a multi year argument,

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you just have to you have to take the win,

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>but take the win graciously, which I'm not always great at.

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 1>So Philly, I I don't know. And here's the other piece.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>It can't all be on the offensive coordinator in Philly.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying Patullo is doing a great job, but

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>if he's doing that bad of a job, then Sirianni takeover.

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But you have an offensive minded head coach, you have

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback that carries himself like Michael Jordan. Figure it out.

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You have too much talent on that offense. That's an

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>awful loss. And Dallas on the other hand, I right

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>now the Quinn Williams trade is aging great. He's been excellent.

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I was not a fan of that trade. I still

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>am not a fan of that trade, but right now

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it is looking really good. But the story for Dallas

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is Dak's been the second best quarterback in the NFL

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>this year. It's been Stafford one, Dak two. And it

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is as simple as that. He's been that good. And

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>he has a legitimate second team All Pro case. And

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in that game Sunday, he became the Cowboys all time

0:28:55.120 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>leading passer, which sounds about right. Hey, guys, you ever

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>notice how everything keeps going up? Rents going up, streaming

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>services are going up. Even your favorite Brio spot suddenly

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>thinks they need to charge extra for Salza. But with

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile, you and your phone bill don't have to

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>play though, will this go up soon? Game? Why? Because

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile has unlimited talk, text and data plan at

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a price that will never go up. In fact, it's

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the same price you will pay for life. So switch

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>now for unlimited wireless at a price that will never

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>go up. Only at boost Mobile. After thirty gigs, customers

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>may experience lower speeds. Customers will pay twenty five dollars

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>per month as long as they remain active on the

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Boost Unlimited plan. All right, Shure Sanders got the win

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and was named, at least for the time being, the starter.

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was noteworthy that they said Gabriel is

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>cleared concussion protocol, but Shoudor is still the starter. That

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:02.959
<v Speaker 1>is obviously the right call, and I don't I find

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>so much of the Shadore commentary to be disingenuous and

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>idiotic that I try not to swim in those waters,

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>even though, man oh man, if you are trying, if

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you are basing your Chadore takes off what gets engagement.

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a very hard flame to avoid. So if

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you just I mean, this is anecdotal, obviously, but yesterday's

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>uh First Thing's first clips on Twitter, if I'm just

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at it by retweets or comments, see and I'm

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>not gonna say what the topics were, but just see

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>if you can guess which one was the Shtore topic.

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Number of retweets in comments total on the First Thing's

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>First clips from yesterday's show Clip one one hundred and

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine, Clip two twenty six, Clip three forty four,

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Clip four forty nine, Clip five thirty six, Clip seven

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty five, Clip nine thirty three, Clip twelve or clip

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>ten sorry thirty two, Clip eleven one thousand, one hundred

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and fifty eight, Clip twelve sixty five, Clip thirteen thirty seven,

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Clip fourteen one hundred and seventy two. One of those

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>stick out to you, guys, get the people go it,

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I also think part of that the reason

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that that commentary has gotten so snake eating its tail

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>ish is there are a lot of folks who they're

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>only outlet is their social media feed, and so all

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>they have to go on is reaction to things they

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>put out on social media, and so because of that,

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they they're like, well, this is what people want and

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>this is what people have strong opinions on. The Chador

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>thing to me is very very simple, and I will

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>do it as efficiently as possible. Shardour the player compared

0:32:53.480 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to Gabriel, and why shoudor should be the starter. There

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely no chance, none, that Dylan Gabriel is ever

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>an above average NFL starter. It would be delightful if

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Dylan proves me wrong. If you know Dylan Gabriel's friends

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>or family, see this clip he uses it for motivation,

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>grows a few inches and gets a lot better, and

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>then you be like, Nick, you idiot, that's fine. I

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's zero percent that he's ever an above average

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>NFL starter, and I think it's close to zero percent

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that he's ever even just a full time starter. It

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that's a bad draft pick. If he can

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>just be a competent backup, stop gap quarterback, that's worth

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a third round pick. So that's Gabriel. Shador has just

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>enough traits and just enough collegiate pedigree and just enough

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, look at that play that. I give him

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a five percent chance five percent one in twenty of

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>being a plus starter and a ten to fifteen percent

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>chance of being a full time starter for somebody. The

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Browns are otherwise that and that alone is enough to say,

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's use these last half dozen games to

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>see what Shador has before we make massive decisions this

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>offseason with our multiple first round picks. So in that regard,

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I I greatly prefer Schador to Gabriel for the Browns

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, with what they're trying to do. Let's take one,

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>take two. What did I think of Shador's game? I

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 1>thought it was fine. He had one really nice chunk

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.919
<v Speaker 1>play over the middle, another potentially really nice chunk play

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 1>to Jerry Judy that was a really nice chunk play

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>until Judy started celebrating early and fumbled. He had one

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>grisly interception and then two swing passes, one of which

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>went for a sixty yard touchdown, the other of which

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 1>damn near got the Raiders back in the game. A

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of a mixed bag, and he was fine, but

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that being fine was the most important thing. What he

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be was awful or in way over his skis,

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and he wasn't, and so that's positive. And then there

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is the third point, which is Schador's disposition or personality

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>or comments before and after the game. And I don't

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:11.800
<v Speaker 1>think that Shadoor means any harm. And I do think

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>he is a very likable guy and from all accounts,

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a really good guy. And I think he is handled

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:30.760
<v Speaker 1>growing up very rich and very famous better than most

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>young people would. I believe that. I also think that

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>while I always encourage confidence, particularly in athletes, particularly and

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>guys that want to be starting quarterbacks, some of Shadour's

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>comments have butted up against what I believe to be

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you'll prove me wrong. Delusion. So Shadoor really

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>harping on, imagine what it'll look like when I have

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a full off season. Imagine what it will look like

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>when I have all the practice reps. Assumes to get

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a little litigious for a moment, some facts not in evidence,

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>most notably that at any point in the near or

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>even distant future, but certainly near future, that you're going

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a team's unquestioned starter, which the only way

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you're getting all the off season reps, all the practice

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>reps is if you are the unequivocal QB one for

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a team. And I do not think that Shadoor is

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>on the doorstep of that. And I also think if

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I had to crystal ball it and say ten years out,

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is it more likely or than not that there will

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>ever be a season where Shadoor is simply a team's incumbent,

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>un no competition involved starting quarterback. I don't think that's

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 1>going to happen chardor clearly does, and good for him

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:58.359
<v Speaker 1>for believing it. I I don't. It's not that I

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the common he made before and after the

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>game because I thought they were arrogant. I didn't like

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the comments he made because I thought he it showed

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that he hasn't come to grips with where he is

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL quarterback hierarchy. So like, unless he just

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:43.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely balls out in a way that would be truly

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented for a fifth round rookie and would be top

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>five percentile for any rookie of any round at that

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>position over the final six weeks, he is not going

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to enter next year as the clear cut starter for

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>any team. And it is going to take a some

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>really special performances over this last six weeks for the

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Browns to decide we are not spending a first round

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 1>pick on a quarterback next year, and we are not

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 1>trading for Kyler Murray or bringing in you know, this

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>year's version of Daniel Jones, whatever it is. And so

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I I, while I find Shador's biggest detractors to be

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 1>typically bad people, and I find Shudore's biggest supporters to

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 1>be typically very annoying people, I am rooting for him,

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think, I mean, we'll see all these this

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>next month goes. But I I think that he would

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>serve himself well, if at least internally and psychologically. He

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 1>reset his own personal expectations to where man next year,

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go into camp as the clear cut

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 1>number two somewhere, and then maybe by year three there

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I will be able to compete eat for a starting

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>job somewhere. That to me is a far more realistic

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and achievable path than imagine when I'm getting all the

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 1>reps as the starter, buddy, I don't know that that's

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>happening ever. And then, of course, the story of the

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:28.720
<v Speaker 1>game was the ten sacks from the Browns. I listen,

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I said that I thought Miles Garrett might break the

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>sack record against the Raiders in their effort to make

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>sure he didn't. Everyone else you know it got gino.

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>He had three. He's gonna break the record. And I

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he's only minus eight point fifty for

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Defensive Player of the Year surprises me. I think there's

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I actually think there is value in that because I

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think he could get hurt next week and still win it,

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>all right. The other news of the weekend was John

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Morant calling Klay Thompson a bum. And they're back and forth,

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and I have two takes here before we get to

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the other NFL games that we'll do in quick hit

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or fashion. Take one is this if you think John

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Morant was a better player than Klay Thompson. I don't

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>respect your basketball opinion. It's an IQ. It's a basketball

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:46.280
<v Speaker 1>IQ test. First of all, I'm not the only way

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you could have that opinion is if you're basically being like,

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>who would win a one on one game? And I'm

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not certain that peak Jaw against peak Clay that Peak

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>would win. He probably would because of the athleticism, but

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Clay's defense, shooting, and size would have him right there.

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>But there is but who gives a shit? Who would

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>win a one on one game? Klay Thompson was the

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>more complete player, obviously, the more mature player, understood how

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to play winning basketball, was the better teammate all of

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the above. So that's just about the the the children

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and fools on the internet that are like, well, Jah

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>has a point, You guys don't know what you're watching.

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>The second point is this, we are approaching Defcon one

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 1>for Jaz's career in a way, I cannot remember a

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:09.280
<v Speaker 1>player his caliber because he was a great player, great player.

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 1>That the only guys who have his caliber who have

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 1>blown it up like this, like he appears to be

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to do it was because of drugs or injury,

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Like this is a clumsy cump, but I'll stand by it.

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>He is barreling towards a poor man's version of the

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Derek Rose trajectory, except it'd be instead of blowing out

0:45:54.200 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 1>your knee. You're just an asshole like Derek Rowe, who

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:03.840
<v Speaker 1>won an MVP, by the way, who made a conference finals,

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:05.720
<v Speaker 1>who was on a sixty win team.

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 2>It it his career got derailed because he blew his

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 2>knee out, and before he blew his knee out, ran

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:19.839
<v Speaker 2>into Lebron at his apex.

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Jaws. Just being a fool, and it's a damn shame.

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:33.799
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know that I have much of a

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:42.239
<v Speaker 1>comp for it. Across sports, usually drugs or injury. This

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is neither. This is rank immaturity. All right, let me

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>quickly get to these other games and then we're gonna

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll do our pick show tomorrow. Rams beat the Bucks,

0:46:56.600 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Baker's injured, My beloved Bucks are in tro and Stafford

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>has won MVP. I mean, it's too early to say

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 1>he's one MVP. It would be shocking if he doesn't

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 1>win MVP. I don't know what those odds are, but

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>right now I would if you could do it. I'm

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not sure if our friends at hard Rock Bet allow this,

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but if you could parlay Stafford MVP plus Miles Garrett

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Defensive Player of the Year and get you know, plus

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 1>anything on it, I'd like that a lot. Patriots beat

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals in one of the Patriots least impressive games

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of the year and only scoring nineteen on that Bengals

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 1>defense not great. You might be like, well, they won

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty six to twenty. There was a May pick six

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 1>and the later there was a Flacco pick six the

0:47:55.360 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Bengals man, I'd be so Jamar Chase had a very

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 1>nice apology letter that seems sincere, but I'd be so

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>mad at Jamar Chase farvar a Bengals fan, because I

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 1>think they can win that game if he's there, and

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>then you're four and seven about to play the Ravens

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and potentially just be a game out of the playoffs.

0:48:17.200 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Packers beat the Vikings twenty three to six. JJ McCarthy

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 1>legitimately might be the single worst player in the entire NFL.

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Packers defense is unbelievable. Packers offense still a little shaky

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and Lions beat the Giants in a bad win. Great

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>job by Jamar Jamier Gibbs. Jamis probably should have been

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the Giants starter week one, not Russell Wilson, and Jamis

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>should be a starter somewhere next year. But the Vikings

0:48:50.080 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they might. You know, the last time a super high

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:59.959
<v Speaker 1>first round pick only got one year was Josh Rose

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>and his team replaced him with Kyler Murray. That's the

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:09.439
<v Speaker 1>last time this happened. It might happen again getting only

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>one year because he didn't play last year, because he

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:17.479
<v Speaker 1>might get replaced by Kyler Murray again, because he could

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Kyler could go to the Vikings the other quick hitters.

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night Football, we talked about a bit the Panthers.

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Good job, good effort on the season. You were competitive,

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:36.359
<v Speaker 1>but you're done. And the Niners are frisky. As long

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:39.440
<v Speaker 1>as Christian McCaffrey's healthy and Kyle Shanan's calling plays and

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Bob Solo is calling the defense, they're frisky. Purdy is

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 1>concerning the Oh we didn't talk about Texans bills and listen,

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I know how we all know the rules. Guys. When

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen's great, he's the most talented quarterback ever, and

0:49:56.719 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>when he's bad, it's Brandon Bean and Sean McDermott's fault

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:04.880
<v Speaker 1>bad against the Texans. That that Texans defense is also ferocious,

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's another that's a scary team down the stretch

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with the defense playing that way. Seahawks beat the Titans

0:50:11.480 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty to twenty four in a game that was not

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:17.319
<v Speaker 1>nearly that close. Cam Ward actually played well. I thought

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the better cam Ward games of

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the year. Seahawks had full control, Jackson Smith and Jigba

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe stealing the offensive Player of the Year from Jonathan Taylor. Possibly.

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Ravens beat the Jets twenty three to ten and a

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>game the Jets were in a ridiculous fourth down call

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:42.720
<v Speaker 1>by Aaron Glenn when the Ravens offense had done nothing,

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 1>combined with a Breezehall fumble, made it to where the Jets,

0:50:48.120 --> 0:50:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, squandered where what could have been a close

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:54.400
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. Something's wrong with the Ravens offense. And Lamar

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:57.399
<v Speaker 1>has him been Lamar Bears beat the Steelers. I knew

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers was idiotic for him to play. He didn't play.

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Steelers scored twenty eight twenty one on offense seven because

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:07.799
<v Speaker 1>of a terrible Caleb fumble and the Bears get to

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:10.719
<v Speaker 1>eight and three. Jags beat the Cardinals twenty seven to

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:12.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four in a game that I don't want to

0:51:12.960 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about for two reasons. One is Trevor was terrible,

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but more importantly I I don't want to get into

0:51:25.160 --> 0:51:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the full details of this, but had the Cardinals won

0:51:30.080 --> 0:51:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that game, I would have won thirty four thousand dollars,

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and watching how that game ended was difficult to deal with.

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:50.440
<v Speaker 1>God that that's still a little pit. I didn't lose all,

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I lost less than a grand, but I add I

0:51:56.680 --> 0:52:04.560
<v Speaker 1>did a very foolish multi leg moneyline parlay that when

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that game went to overtime, every other leg was already

0:52:07.920 --> 0:52:11.359
<v Speaker 1>in and you guys know, I'm on team never ever

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:16.040
<v Speaker 1>cash out under any circumstances. So we let that sucker

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:20.160
<v Speaker 1>ride and that was a painful one. Falcons beat the

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Saints twenty four to ten in a game I didn't

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:27.760
<v Speaker 1>watch one second of. So that covers Week twelve in

0:52:27.800 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. We will do our pick show that will

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:34.279
<v Speaker 1>air tomorrow, so be on the lookout for that. Like

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>rate subscribe review, make sure you get our pick show

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in your feed. A huge shout out to Volume into

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Blue Duck and of course our right sponsors hard Rock, Bet, Boost,

0:52:44.600 --> 0:52:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Wayfair and Zen. See you guys tomorrow for our Week

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:48.839
<v Speaker 1>thirteen Pick show